[Bug 655379] Review Request: tritonus - Java Sound API Implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=655379 --- Comment #3 from Hans de Goede 2010-11-24 02:54:40 EST --- (In reply to comment #2) > All done. > > Thanks. > > http://static.zapletalovi.com/fedora/rpm/tritonus/0.3.7-0.7.20101108cvs/ Hi, 2 small issues remain: 1) The: "# Packages merged into the tritonus package" obsoletes and provides still provide and obsolete the -gsm sub package which now is a separate sub package again and they do not obsolete / provide the now merged -src package 2) The Summary, Group and Requires tags / fields for the -gsm subpackage are indented with tabs, where as spaces are used everywhere else. Regards, Hans -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 592645] Review Request: mkgmap - Convert OpenStreetMap data for Garmin GPSes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592645 --- Comment #20 from Alexander Kurtakov 2010-11-24 02:18:03 EST --- Please note that you will have to open a new bugreport for the osmprotobuf as it is a different project released separately. And make the new bug report blocks this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 518546] Review Request: libva - VAAPI video playback acceleration
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518546 --- Comment #59 from Adam Williamson 2010-11-24 00:06:13 EST --- I certainly never heard anything about most things defaulting to multilib. I'll check with Jesse I think. It didn't seem neat to ship a tarball with nothing changed but the 'bad stuff' removed, because that tarball would in itself be useless; it'd completely fail to compile. It seems odd to ship a package which contains a source tarball that's useless and requires further changes from the spec to work at all. I'm not sure if there's an 'official' preferred process here, I'll see if I can find anything. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 518546] Review Request: libva - VAAPI video playback acceleration
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518546 --- Comment #60 from Adam Williamson 2010-11-24 00:07:19 EST --- chen: there's no great reason any more, there's not a lot of difference. I started with the sds builds because they were significantly better than upstream, but most of gwenole's changes have been merged now. We could probably switch to upstream, I guess. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 518546] Review Request: libva - VAAPI video playback acceleration
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518546 --- Comment #58 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-11-23 23:37:44 EST --- (In reply to comment #56) > I thought that was already done in our default optflags? 'tis not, I'm afraid. Not that it's a big deal anyway. > This isn't really Fedora policy, most things aren't multilib in Fedora and we > don't apparently split libs from binaries as a matter of course. Only things > you might actually want to install the 32-bit version of on a 64-bit system > are > explicitly marked multilib. Perhaps the process has changed; it used to involve a magic formula and the presence of a -devel package. Looking at the mash code, though, I'm pretty sure this will end up multilibbed. Unless I'm misunderstanding the mash code, of course. > I can't see any reason you'd want to do that with libva. It's not something that someone explicitly does. And even if I'm wrong and it turns out not to be multilibbed, it may later become multilibbed if some multilib package enters the distro which depends on it. So, yeah, pretty sure it's going to be multilib and you'll have a conflict with the file in /usr/bin. But if you want, sure, wait to see what the first mash does. > What do you think is missing? The comments list the entire sequence. I guess what's throwing me is the fact that usually this kind of modified tarball thing involves simply deleting the bad content, so a recursive diff would just list a few deleted files instead of giving a few thousand lines of modifications. Fixing up things to build and running autotools and such would normally be done within the spec itself. To see such a huge diff starts to look more like an internal fork than a simple deletion of a few files. > yeah, I know, I guess I'll do that. Though someone might want to pull it into > EPEL, I guess, and they're not doing much harm. Oh, there's no requirement to remove that stuff. I just remind people that it can be done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639661] Review Request: arm-none-eabi-binutils-cs - GNU Binutils for cross-compilation for ARM target
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639661 --- Comment #3 from Eric Smith 2010-11-23 22:17:23 EST --- This toolchain is for "bare-metal" cross-development, not for a Linux target. That's why it is "arm-none-eabi" rather than "arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi". The -linux-gnueabi tools are well-suited for cross-development for a Linux target, and not so well-suited for bare metal. That's why CodeSourcery has completely independent builds of the toolchain they distribute. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 518546] Review Request: libva - VAAPI video playback acceleration
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518546 --- Comment #57 from Chen Lei 2010-11-23 22:16:54 EST --- Why not to use upstream libva instead of a forked version from splitted Desktop Systems? It seems both Debian and Meego all packaged the upstream one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 517191] Review Request: php-symfony-symfony - Open-Source PHP Web Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517191 --- Comment #25 from Ruediger Landmann 2010-11-23 21:56:06 EST --- (In reply to comment #24) > It is expected that you'll have to manually install dependencies of packages > when you build with rpmbuild. mock will of course install all of the > specified > build dependencies into the chroot as part of the build process. D'oh! :) Of course; sorry, I was misled by the package name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608852] Review Request: epris - a dbus service to listen to music
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608852 --- Comment #12 from Ratnadeep Debnath 2010-11-23 21:49:15 EST --- SPEC Url: http://rtnpro.fedorapeople.org/Packages/SPECS/epris.spec SRPM Url: http://rtnpro.fedorapeople.org/Packages/SRPMS/epris-0.2-3.fc14.src.rpm Koji scratch build Url: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2620526 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 517191] Review Request: php-symfony-symfony - Open-Source PHP Web Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517191 --- Comment #24 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-11-23 21:48:41 EST --- It is expected that you'll have to manually install dependencies of packages when you build with rpmbuild. mock will of course install all of the specified build dependencies into the chroot as part of the build process. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 515164] Review Request: gnomenu - A consolidated menu for gnome that brings eye candy to the world of the Gnome menu's
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515164 --- Comment #30 from John Friar 2010-11-23 21:36:44 EST --- Agreed - it seems to be a bit more work than it's worth... The src rpm is still available on my wiki for anyone who wants it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 515164] Review Request: gnomenu - A consolidated menu for gnome that brings eye candy to the world of the Gnome menu's
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515164 --- Comment #29 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2010-11-23 21:06:25 EST --- Hi, John, I've downloaded the new 2.9 version to see what have changed since my last package (1.9!) and, despite some great improvements in this new version I'm still finding some pretty annoying bugs (like this 64 bits issue). To be honest, maybe this software is going to require a lot of basic work to be done by upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 577951] Review Request: mingw32-wine-gecko - MinGW Gecko library required for Wine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577951 --- Comment #15 from Nerijus Baliunas 2010-11-23 20:25:42 EST --- This patch does not help on F14, I still get error as in Comment 12. But there is no more error as in Comment 10 w/o applying patch in Comment 11, as it was on F13. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 518546] Review Request: libva - VAAPI video playback acceleration
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518546 --- Comment #56 from Adam Williamson 2010-11-23 20:13:05 EST --- " libva-devel.x86_64: E: useless-provides libva-devel Packages automatically provide themselves; there is no point in doing it manually." that's just another left-over from the rpmfusion libva-freeworld obsoleting my side repo libva; i'll fix it. "Those libraries are all linked against things they don't actually call. This isn't generally a big problem unless it causes additional dependencies or forces libraries to be pulled into memory that otherwise wouldn't be there. It can usually be fixed by passing --as-needed into the linker." I thought that was already done in our default optflags? "Seems better living in a libva-utils package, honestly, but perhaps I've failed to properly understand multilib." This isn't really Fedora policy, most things aren't multilib in Fedora and we don't apparently split libs from binaries as a matter of course. Only things you might actually want to install the 32-bit version of on a 64-bit system are explicitly marked multilib. I can't see any reason you'd want to do that with libva. "It would be nice to have more explicit instructions for modifying the tarball. Otherwise the next person who has to do it risks letting the prohibited bits back in." What do you think is missing? The comments list the entire sequence. The only thing you have to figure out for yourself is how to 'rediff 108_drivers_path.patch' but it's inherently difficult to explain that exactly because it may change between releases. All the other changes are consequences of the steps listed in the comments, there's nothing left out. Try it yourself and you'll see. (the 'autoreconf -i' step causes most of the changes). AIUI running autoreconf in the spec would not be optimal because it would leave some i965 references in the tarball, they aren't purged until the autoreconf step is run. "I don't know if you intend to target RHEL4 or 5 with this, but if not you can drop BuildRoot, %clean and the first line of %install." yeah, I know, I guess I'll do that. Though someone might want to pull it into EPEL, I guess, and they're not doing much harm. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 515164] Review Request: gnomenu - A consolidated menu for gnome that brings eye candy to the world of the Gnome menu's
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515164 --- Comment #28 from John Friar 2010-11-23 20:11:11 EST --- Hi Henrique - I've updated my source rpm to fix the desktop file issue, but I don't see a clean/easy way to resolve the Makefile problem (the Makefile isn't 64bit aware) without the %ifarch x86_64 statement. I also noticed that there is a new version of gnomenu (2.9), and while this new version's Makefile is easier to work with, the setup.py script that is called by the Makefile no longer seems to adjust the bonobo server file correctly for 64bit builds. https://wiki.thoughtbit.com/_media/linux:fedora:gnomenu-2.5-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639661] Review Request: arm-none-eabi-binutils-cs - GNU Binutils for cross-compilation for ARM target
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639661 --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-11-23 20:01:31 EST --- Can you comment on how this relates to the existing armv5tel-unknown-linux-gnueabi-binutils review ticket (bug 509798)? I've no idea if you're trying to package the same thing or not. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 613725] Review Request: mediawiki-SyntaxHighlight_GeSHi - This extension adds source code highlighting for mediawiki
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613725 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||DUPLICATE Last Closed||2010-11-23 19:53:03 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-11-23 19:53:03 EST --- This was previously submitted. Perhaps you could work with the original submitter to get that package reviewed? *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 537687 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 537687] Review Request: mediawiki-SyntaxHighlight_GeSHi - MediaWiki syntax highlighter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537687 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mastah...@gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-11-23 19:53:03 EST --- *** Bug 613725 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 591331] Review Request: rpy1 - Python interface to the R language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591331 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard||BuildFails --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-11-23 19:51:35 EST --- This fails to build for me in both f14 and rawhide. Is it really necessary to force such a strict version dependency on the base R package? That sounds like a recipe for broken dependencies. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 517191] Review Request: php-symfony-symfony - Open-Source PHP Web Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517191 Ruediger Landmann changed: What|Removed |Added CC||r.landm...@redhat.com --- Comment #23 from Ruediger Landmann 2010-11-23 19:20:59 EST --- Hi Christof, I tried to build this a few days ago, but could not build this locally: $ rpmbuild -ba SPECS/php-symfony-symfony.spec error: Failed build dependencies: php-channel(pear.symfony-project.com) is needed by php-symfony-symfony-1.4.4-1.fc14.noarch When I installed php-channel-symfony, the package built fine. Is this expected? I'll now have a go at the new version of the package and hopefully contribute a review unless wiser and more experienced heads beat me to it. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 656421] Review Request: gedit-collaboration - Gedit's support for collaborative editing in gedit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656421 --- Comment #1 from Matej Cepl 2010-11-23 19:12:54 EST --- Builds in koji http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2620449 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 583105] Review Request: djmount - Mount MediaServers content as a Linux file system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=583105 Jean-Francois Saucier changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Jean-Francois Saucier 2010-11-23 19:12:41 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: djmount Short Description: Mount MediaServers content as a Linux file system Owners: jfsaucier Branches: f13 f14 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 583105] Review Request: djmount - Mount MediaServers content as a Linux file system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=583105 --- Comment #2 from Jean-Francois Saucier 2010-11-23 19:09:27 EST --- Thanks a lot for the review. I will try to talk with upstream for adding a manpage to this package. For the timestamps, I will add this to the final package as per your suggestion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 543566] Review Request: tsocks - Library to allow transparent SOCKS proxying
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543566 Jean-Francois Saucier changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #15 from Jean-Francois Saucier 2010-11-23 19:04:19 EST --- Package Change Request == Package Name: tsocks New Branches: el5 el6 Owners: jfsaucier pcarrier -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 592645] Review Request: mkgmap - Convert OpenStreetMap data for Garmin GPSes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592645 --- Comment #19 from Bruce Cowan 2010-11-23 19:02:51 EST --- Sorry for the spam, but I've found (thanks to #osm on OFTC) the source for osmprotobuf.jar, which is https://github.com/scrosby/OSM-binary. However, I notice that there is no licence for this code. I will e-mail the author to ask him to add/clarify the licence. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 604331] Review Request: redshift - Adjusts the color temperature of your screen according to time of day
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=604331 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #32 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-11-23 19:01:51 EST --- It is too early to requrest f15 branches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 518546] Review Request: libva - VAAPI video playback acceleration
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518546 --- Comment #55 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-11-23 18:31:14 EST --- OK, let's take a look. Seems to build OK; rpmlint says: libva.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary vainfo It's nice to have manpages for binaries, but not essential. libva-devel.x86_64: E: useless-provides libva-devel Packages automatically provide themselves; there is no point in doing it manually. libva-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation Not a big deal. libva.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libva-tpi-0.31.1.1.so.1.0.3 /lib64/libdl.so.2 libva.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libva-compat.so.0.0.0 /usr/lib64/libva-x11-0.31.1.1.so.1 libva.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libva-compat.so.0.0.0 /usr/lib64/libva-0.31.1.1.so.1 libva.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libva-compat.so.0.0.0 /usr/lib64/libX11.so.6 libva.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libva-compat.so.0.0.0 /usr/lib64/libXext.so.6 libva.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libva-compat.so.0.0.0 /usr/lib64/libdrm.so.2 libva.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libva-compat.so.0.0.0 /usr/lib64/libXfixes.so.3 libva.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libva-glx-0.31.1.1.so.1.0.3 /usr/lib64/libXext.so.6 libva.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libva-glx-0.31.1.1.so.1.0.3 /usr/lib64/libdrm.so.2 libva.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libva-glx-0.31.1.1.so.1.0.3 /usr/lib64/libXfixes.so.3 Those libraries are all linked against things they don't actually call. This isn't generally a big problem unless it causes additional dependencies or forces libraries to be pulled into memory that otherwise wouldn't be there. It can usually be fixed by passing --as-needed into the linker. I would anticipate this library being multilib, but it seems to me that the vainfo executable will cause a conflict. Am I wrong? Seems better living in a libva-utils package, honestly, but perhaps I've failed to properly understand multilib. It would be nice to have more explicit instructions for modifying the tarball. Otherwise the next person who has to do it risks letting the prohibited bits back in. I did a diff and of course it's huge due to different autotools versions; I can't really figure out what changed. There are even several files in the new tarball that weren't in the old one. It might be simpler just to run the autotools as part of the build process. I don't know if you intend to target RHEL4 or 5 with this, but if not you can drop BuildRoot, %clean and the first line of %install. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603267] Review Request: Netperf - Benchmark tool for networking.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603267 Rafael Aquini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aqu...@linux.com --- Comment #5 from Rafael Aquini 2010-11-23 18:17:58 EST --- Hello Gowrishankar, Are you still interested in getting netperf into Fedora packages? If yes, please consider Jason observations and submit a new bumped-release .spec & srpm. Do you have a FAS account? As I couldn't find your email in Fedora Packager CVS Commit Group (packager), I have assumed you do not have an account, and you must get one before you proceed: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Get_a_Fedora_Account Also, if this is your first package review request, you gonna need a member sponsorship in order to check in and build your package, after get your work reviewed. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Get_Sponsored I'll be glad in helping you out. Best regards Aquini -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 592645] Review Request: mkgmap - Convert OpenStreetMap data for Garmin GPSes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592645 --- Comment #18 from Bruce Cowan 2010-11-23 18:02:45 EST --- Looking at the huge numbers of jars that osmosis bundles, I suspect this going to be far too difficult for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 624294] Review Request: gforth-ffl - The Forth Foundation Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624294 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard||BuildFails -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 628665] Review Request: Mars - An interactive development environment for programming in MIPS assembly language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=628665 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-11-23 17:30:53 EST --- Builds but fails to install; looks like there's a typo: Error: Package: Mars-4.0-1.fc15.x86_64 (/Mars-4.0-1.fc15.x86_64) Requires: jpackage-util -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 628665] Review Request: Mars - An interactive development environment for programming in MIPS assembly language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=628665 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||652183(FE-JAVASIG) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 588433] Review Request: rubygem-echoe - ruby gem pacaking tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588433 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|rubygem-echoe-4.3.1-2.fc13 |rubygem-echoe-4.3.1-2.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639278] Review Request: erlang-lfe - Lisp Flavoured Erlang
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639278 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2010-11-23 16:57:09 EST --- erlang-lfe-0.6.1-4.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 626004] Review Request: osm2pgsql - Imports map data from OpenStreetMap to a PostgreSQL database
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=626004 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard||StalledSubmitter -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 644335] Review Request: rubygem-mustache - Mustache is a framework-agnostic way to render logic-free views
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=644335 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|rubygem-mustache-0.11.2-4.f |rubygem-mustache-0.11.2-4.f |c13 |c14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 588433] Review Request: rubygem-echoe - ruby gem pacaking tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588433 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||rubygem-echoe-4.3.1-2.fc13 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639278] Review Request: erlang-lfe - Lisp Flavoured Erlang
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639278 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|erlang-lfe-0.6.1-4.fc13 |erlang-lfe-0.6.1-4.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639615] Review Request: rubygem-rvm - Ruby Version Manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639615 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|rubygem-rvm-1.0.19-1.fc14 |rubygem-rvm-1.0.19-1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 588433] Review Request: rubygem-echoe - ruby gem pacaking tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588433 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2010-11-23 16:55:28 EST --- rubygem-echoe-4.3.1-2.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639615] Review Request: rubygem-rvm - Ruby Version Manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639615 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2010-11-23 16:56:02 EST --- rubygem-rvm-1.0.19-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 654007] Review Request: python-simplemediawiki - Extremely low-level wrapper to the MediaWiki API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=654007 Guillermo Gómez changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Guillermo Gómez 2010-11-23 17:11:47 EST --- APPROVED :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 654443] Review Request: h2 - h2 database engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=654443 Chris Aniszczyk changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Chris Aniszczyk 2010-11-23 17:10:25 EST --- Thanks Alex! New Package SCM Request === Package Name: h2 Short Description: Java SQL database Owners: caniszczyk Branches: f14 InitialCC: caniszczyk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 646573] Review Request: rubygem-whiskey_disk - Ruby tool for embarrassingly fast deployments
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646573 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|rubygem-whiskey_disk-0.5.4- |rubygem-whiskey_disk-0.5.4- |1.fc13 |1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 646573] Review Request: rubygem-whiskey_disk - Ruby tool for embarrassingly fast deployments
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646573 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2010-11-23 17:01:50 EST --- rubygem-whiskey_disk-0.5.4-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 646573] Review Request: rubygem-whiskey_disk - Ruby tool for embarrassingly fast deployments
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646573 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2010-11-23 17:00:16 EST --- rubygem-whiskey_disk-0.5.4-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 646573] Review Request: rubygem-whiskey_disk - Ruby tool for embarrassingly fast deployments
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646573 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||rubygem-whiskey_disk-0.5.4- ||1.fc13 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 588433] Review Request: rubygem-echoe - ruby gem pacaking tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588433 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2010-11-23 17:00:45 EST --- rubygem-echoe-4.3.1-2.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 649777] Review Request: jorbis - Pure Java Ogg Vorbis Decoder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=649777 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2010-11-23 16:56:56 EST --- cortado-0.6.0-2.fc14, jorbis-0.0.17-4.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update cortado jorbis'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cortado-0.6.0-2.fc14,jorbis-0.0.17-4.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608332] Review Request: rootplot - Plots ROOT data with matplotlib
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608332 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2010-11-23 16:54:37 EST --- rootplot-2.2.1-3.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update rootplot'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rootplot-2.2.1-3.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 644335] Review Request: rubygem-mustache - Mustache is a framework-agnostic way to render logic-free views
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=644335 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2010-11-23 16:53:16 EST --- rubygem-mustache-0.11.2-4.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639615] Review Request: rubygem-rvm - Ruby Version Manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639615 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||rubygem-rvm-1.0.19-1.fc14 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2010-11-23 16:52:55 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 537983] Review Request: python-visual - 3D Programming
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537983 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|python-visual-5.32-10.fc13 |python-visual-5.32-10.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 537983] Review Request: python-visual - 3D Programming
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537983 --- Comment #40 from Fedora Update System 2010-11-23 16:54:24 EST --- python-visual-5.32-10.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 604331] Review Request: redshift - Adjusts the color temperature of your screen according to time of day
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=604331 Miloš Komarčević changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #31 from Miloš Komarčević 2010-11-23 16:50:56 EST --- Package Change Request == Package Name: redshift New Branches: f15 Owners: kmilos -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 527462] Review Request: gmpy - Python interface to GMP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527462 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #49 from Fedora Update System 2010-11-23 16:52:02 EST --- gmpy-1.14-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update gmpy'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gmpy-1.14-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 644335] Review Request: rubygem-mustache - Mustache is a framework-agnostic way to render logic-free views
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=644335 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||rubygem-mustache-0.11.2-4.f ||c13 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2010-11-23 16:51:53 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639615] Review Request: rubygem-rvm - Ruby Version Manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639615 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2010-11-23 16:52:50 EST --- rubygem-rvm-1.0.19-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 644335] Review Request: rubygem-mustache - Mustache is a framework-agnostic way to render logic-free views
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=644335 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2010-11-23 16:51:48 EST --- rubygem-mustache-0.11.2-4.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 537983] Review Request: python-visual - 3D Programming
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537983 --- Comment #39 from Fedora Update System 2010-11-23 16:49:46 EST --- python-visual-5.32-10.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639278] Review Request: erlang-lfe - Lisp Flavoured Erlang
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639278 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2010-11-23 16:51:23 EST --- erlang-lfe-0.6.1-4.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 652803] Review Request: adf-gillius-fonts - Gillius ADF sans-serif typeface family
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652803 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2010-11-23 16:51:03 EST --- adf-gillius-fonts-1.008-3.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update adf-gillius-fonts'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/adf-gillius-fonts-1.008-3.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639278] Review Request: erlang-lfe - Lisp Flavoured Erlang
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639278 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||erlang-lfe-0.6.1-4.fc13 Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 592645] Review Request: mkgmap - Convert OpenStreetMap data for Garmin GPSes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592645 --- Comment #17 from Bruce Cowan 2010-11-23 16:49:02 EST --- According to http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/2010q4/009248.html, mkgmap requires protobuf.jar (which is in protobuf-java), and also osmprotobuf.jar (which is not packaged). Apparently osmprotobuf is in Osmosis. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 537983] Review Request: python-visual - 3D Programming
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537983 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||python-visual-5.32-10.fc13 Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 614656] Review Request: rxvt-unicode - Apply 256 color patch to rxvt-unicode
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614656 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||DUPLICATE Last Closed||2010-11-23 16:36:31 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-11-23 16:36:31 EST --- Since this package is already in the distribution, there is no point in this review ticket being open. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 581373 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 518546] Review Request: libva - VAAPI video playback acceleration
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518546 Adam Williamson changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||182235(FE-Legal) --- Comment #53 from Adam Williamson 2010-11-23 16:25:09 EST --- updated to drop the pointless provides/obsoletes of itself (hangover from the rpmfusion package): http://www.happyassassin.net/extras/libva.spec http://www.happyassassin.net/extras/libva-0.31.1-3.sds4.aw_fc14.src.rpm can someone review this now? thanks! rpmlint output is clean. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 518546] Review Request: libva - VAAPI video playback acceleration
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518546 Adam Williamson changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|182235(FE-Legal)| --- Comment #54 from Adam Williamson 2010-11-23 16:25:30 EST --- -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 655527] Review Request: pyside-tools - Development tools for PySide
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=655527 Kalev Lember changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Kalev Lember 2010-11-23 16:21:05 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: pyside-tools Short Description: Development tools for PySide Owners: kalev rdieter kkofler than ltinkl Branches: f13 f14 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 655527] Review Request: pyside-tools - Development tools for PySide
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=655527 --- Comment #7 from Kalev Lember 2010-11-23 16:18:08 EST --- Thanks Steve, I'll take a look at your review request tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 654443] Review Request: h2 - h2 database engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=654443 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Alexander Kurtakov 2010-11-23 16:15:09 EST --- Thanks, This package is APPROVED. P.S. Please submit the 2 patches upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 572515] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=572515 --- Comment #32 from Aidan Delaney 2010-11-23 16:10:40 EST --- Yeah. Just a massive forward pointer to what's down the line. JoGL 1.X will be around for ages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 572515] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=572515 --- Comment #31 from Sylvestre Ledru 2010-11-23 16:04:33 EST --- Aidan: AFAIK, JoGL 2.0 is not compatible with the version 1... :/ This will require massive changes from upstream. I think both 2.0 alpha/beta and 1.X should be available at the same time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 656082] Review Request: libcprops - library of C prototyping functions, mostly searching
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656082 --- Comment #4 from Philip Prindeville 2010-11-23 15:48:40 EST --- $ rpmlint ../SRPMS/libcprops-0.1.8-0.1.fc13.src.rpm libcprops.spec libcprops.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US trie -> tire, true, tie libcprops.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US tcp -> pct, cp, tsp libcprops.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US http -> HTTP libcprops.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US api -> ai, pi, ape libcprops.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US dbms -> DBMS, dims, dams 1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings. $ (Note: the "misspellings" are from the cut&paste of the description taken from the original README file. And "trie" is not a misspelling.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 592645] Review Request: mkgmap - Convert OpenStreetMap data for Garmin GPSes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592645 --- Comment #16 from Alexander Kurtakov 2010-11-23 15:51:04 EST --- Bruce, your package really tries to use some jars from /opt and they are not there on a stock Fedora system. There is protobuf-java package please make use of it to fix the build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 656483] Review Request: mod_remoteip - Apache Module mod_remoteip
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656483 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Steffan 2010-11-23 15:47:01 EST --- As a note, this is only needed for branches with Apache 2.2.x as it's included with Apache 2.3 as a core module. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 656483] New: Review Request: mod_remoteip - Apache Module mod_remoteip
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mod_remoteip - Apache Module mod_remoteip https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656483 Summary: Review Request: mod_remoteip - Apache Module mod_remoteip Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jonathanstef...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://jsteffan.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/mod_remoteip.spec SRPM URL: http://jsteffan.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/mod_remoteip-0.1.20100929-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: This module is used to treat the remote host which initiated the request as the originating remote host as identified by httpd for the purposes of authorization and logging, even where that remote host is behind a load balancer, front end server, or proxy server. The module replaces the apparent remote (client) IP/hostname for the request with the IP address reported in the request header configured with the RemoteIPHeader directive. Once replaced as instructed, this apparent IP address is then used for mod_authz_host features and , is reported by mod_status, and is recorded by mod_log_config a and h directives. It also determines the machine probed for an inetd identity by mod_ident based on the IdentityCheck configuration. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 592645] Review Request: mkgmap - Convert OpenStreetMap data for Garmin GPSes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592645 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|akurt...@redhat.com --- Comment #15 from Alexander Kurtakov 2010-11-23 15:44:24 EST --- I'll do this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 631964] Review Request: pbs_python - PBS/Torque python module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631964 --- Comment #2 from Steve Traylen 2010-11-23 15:45:51 EST --- Update to 4.3.0: http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/pbs_python/pbs_python.spec http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/pbs_python/pbs_python-4.3.0-1.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 655527] Review Request: pyside-tools - Development tools for PySide
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=655527 Steve Traylen changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Steve Traylen 2010-11-23 15:38:53 EST --- All seems in order: APPROVED. If you have the time: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631964 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 631964] Review Request: pbs_python - PBS/Torque python module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631964 --- Comment #1 from Steve Traylen 2010-11-23 15:38:18 EST --- Update to 4.3.0: http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/pbs_python/pbs_python.spec http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/pbs_python/pbs_python-4.1.0-2.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 513320] Review Request: boxbackup - A fast, secure and automatic online backup system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513320
--- Comment #20 from Stewart Adam 2010-11-23 15:27:49 EST
---
(In reply to comment #19)
> I thought I saw on IRC that someone was going to review this last week, but
> nothing seems to have happened so I'll make some further comments.
>
> The makefile hides important data; adding 'V=1' to the make call makes it more
> useful.
Done.
>
> I'll trust the previous licensing work and assume that license tag and such
> are
> correct.
I've double checked this and to the best of my knowledge (IANAL) it is OK. The
only possible problem I see is that the GPL license has exceptions for MS VSS
and OpenSSL, so strictly speaking it isn't standard GPL nor "GPLv2+ with
exceptions" as defined in the Fedora licensing page... In the LICENSE-DUAL.TXT
it's referred to as "Box Backup GPL".
> Your scriptlets don't seem to correspond to the recommended ones from
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript#Initscripts_in_spec_file_scriptlets
Sorry about that! I must have misread the %postun for %preun and appended it to
the other scriptlets... Fixed it.
> boxbackup-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug
>/boxbackup-0.11rc8/lib/win32/getopt.h
> It's odd that the header is executable, and doubly odd that it's in the
> package
> at all. Why is the stuff in lib/win32 being built?
It looks as if that file acts as a sort of abstraction layer. If on Unix, it
maps the EMU_{F,L,}STAT structs to the system ones and stops because of this
line:
#if ! defined EMU_INCLUDE && defined WIN32
The rest of Box Backup references EMU_* and so it will automatically get the
right one depending on the platform. I believe something similar happens in
getopt_long.cpp because neither _MSC_VER or __MINGW32__ should be defined.
> Why are the files in /etc/boxbackup/ completely empty?
/etc/boxbackup/bbstored and /etc/boxbackup/bbbackupd are the locations that the
services store the account data and user/server certificates so that will vary
from machine to machine and it needs to be initialized correctly by the user (I
provide instructions on how to do so in the README.fedora files for each
package)
I suppose it would be possible to provide a sample configuration and let the
user create the certificates, but then we'd be dictating where backups are
stored on the server machine and disabling the userland raid feature. I think
it is much easier to let Box Backup handle all of it - the tools included
easily and quickly create the necessary configuration and certificates once the
user provides information about the server (or client) machine.
SPEC: http://firewing.fedorapeople.org/pub/SPECS/boxbackup.spec
SRPM:
http://firewing.fedorapeople.org/pub/SRPMS/boxbackup-0.11-0.3.rc8.fc14.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 554103] Review Request: fgrun - Graphical frontend for launching FlightGear flight simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554103 Hans de Goede changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #18 from Hans de Goede 2010-11-23 15:31:37 EST --- Looks good now, approved! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 572515] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=572515 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||652183(FE-JAVASIG) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608852] Review Request: epris - a dbus service to listen to music
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608852 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard||StalledSubmitter --- Comment #11 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-11-23 15:12:28 EST --- It has been several months and there have been several good comments since the last response from the submitter. I will close this soon if there is no further progress. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608574] Review Request: tinymce - Web based Javascript HTML WYSIWYG editor control
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608574 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-11-23 15:11:14 EST --- To be honest, I don't understand why this has a dependency on the web server at all. What generates the actual javascript files used from the *_src.js files? It seems that we should be building from the source files instead of using what are essentially the result of some compilation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608319] Review Request: memaker - An avatar creator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608319 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard||StalledSubmitter --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-11-23 15:05:43 EST --- It's been several months without response to the above commentary. I'll close this soon if there's no further progress. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 606421] Review Request: quickfix - Open Source FIX Engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=606421 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard||NotReady --- Comment #18 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-11-23 15:04:11 EST --- Marking as not being ready; please clear the whiteboard when you believe this is ready to be reviewed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 606003] Review Request: pypolicyd-spf - SPF Policy Server for Postfix
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=606003
--- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-11-23 15:00:06 EST
---
Note that you can remove the %{?fedora} > 12 conditional; F13 is the oldest
thing you can build for. There were also updated Python guidelines which you
should read over. The python3 stuff probably has no bearing on this package,
but you will at least need BuildRequires: python2-devel instead of
python-devel.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 631964] Review Request: pbs_python - PBS/Torque python module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631964 Steve Traylen changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: python_pbs |Review Request: pbs_python |- PBS/Torque python module |- PBS/Torque python module -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 606127] Review Request: colortool - useful tool for web-designers/graphic artists
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=606127 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard||StalledSubmitter --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-11-23 15:01:08 EST --- It's been several months since that commentary with no response from the submitter. I will close this soon if there is no further progress. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 572515] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=572515 --- Comment #30 from Aidan Delaney 2010-11-23 15:00:52 EST --- @Sylvestre #29 I'm happy to commit to maintaining it and improving it over time. I've been looking at JoGL 2.0 development and as soon as you guys need it, I'm happy to package and push it. One of the courses I teach uses JoGL, so I have a long-term need to support it anyway. However, I don't have the authority to upload it to Fedora at the moment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 554103] Review Request: fgrun - Graphical frontend for launching FlightGear flight simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554103 --- Comment #17 from Fabrice Bellet 2010-11-23 14:56:51 EST --- Hi Hans! Thanks a lot for the review. Here is the updated package with the requested modifications: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~bellet/fgrun.spec http://people.fedoraproject.org/~bellet/fgrun-1.5.2-5.fc15.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 655527] Review Request: pyside-tools - Development tools for PySide
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=655527
--- Comment #5 from Kalev Lember 2010-11-23 14:44:35 EST
---
CMake upstream strongly suggests to use a separate build directory if possible.
However our CMake packaging guidelines aren't particulary up to date, so I'm
following KDE packaging guidelines where it makes sense. The directory name
%{_target_platform} comes from the example spec file:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/KDE/Packaging/Guidelines#Spec_file
The rationale for using platform name for generated files (as opposed to simply
calling the directory 'build') is to avoid conflicts between multilib debuginfo
subpackages.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 652665] Review Request: erlang-luwak - Large-object storage interface for Riak
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652665 Bug 652665 depends on bug 639263, which changed state. Bug 639263 Summary: Review Request: erlang-rebar - Erlang Build Tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639263 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA Resolution||RAWHIDE Status|ON_QA |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 652648] Review Request: erlang-skerl - Skein hash function for Erlang, via NIFs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652648 Bug 652648 depends on bug 639263, which changed state. Bug 639263 Summary: Review Request: erlang-rebar - Erlang Build Tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639263 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA Resolution||RAWHIDE Status|ON_QA |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 572515] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=572515 --- Comment #29 from Sylvestre Ledru 2010-11-23 14:40:31 EST --- Great. Does this mean it is ready for an upload in Fedora ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 517191] Review Request: php-symfony-symfony - Open-Source PHP Web Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517191 --- Comment #22 from Christof Damian 2010-11-23 14:38:05 EST --- (In reply to comment #21) > (In reply to comment #20) > > > I haven't updated it because nobody seems to be interested in reviewing it > > and > > everybody who does gives up after a while. > > Well, the other side is that if people see that it's out of date perhaps they > don't want to spend time reviewing it. So it works both ways. I agree, I have updated it to the current release: Spec URL: http://rpms.damian.net/SPECS/php-symfony-symfony.spec SRPM URL: http://rpms.damian.net/SRPMS/php-symfony-symfony-1.4.8-1.fc13.src.rpm > > The symfony project itself also doesn't seem to be interested in a package. > > If they don't want their software packaged, perhaps we shouldn't be packaging > it? I don't think they are an exception. A lot of project are of the opinion that the best way to distribute software is a build directly from them, ideally with all approved versions of libraries bundled. > > yes, but this is quite common. > > I know; as a member of the packaging committee, I'm just lamenting the fact > that the guideline we wrote makes for dumb-looking package names. > > I can't promise a review in the future but I'll watch this ticket. Thanks, me too. As I mentioned above, this review request has brought some other packages into Fedora so it is a win anyway. I understand that it is a difficult beast and maybe not with a big audience. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 638909] Review Request: erlang-gproc - Extended process registry for Erlang
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638909 Bug 638909 depends on bug 639263, which changed state. Bug 639263 Summary: Review Request: erlang-rebar - Erlang Build Tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639263 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA Resolution||RAWHIDE Status|ON_QA |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 652585] Review Request: erlang-luke - Dataflow / MapReduce coordination framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652585 Bug 652585 depends on bug 639263, which changed state. Bug 639263 Summary: Review Request: erlang-rebar - Erlang Build Tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639263 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA Resolution||RAWHIDE Status|ON_QA |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
