[Bug 655379] Review Request: tritonus - Java Sound API Implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=655379 --- Comment #16 from Lukáš Zapletal l...@redhat.com 2010-12-07 03:45:36 EST --- @Jason - You are right and sorry for the inproper request. I have took the ownership in the pkgdb. Thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 648945] Review Request: maven - Java project management and project comprehension tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648945 Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2010-12-07 03:48:30 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 648945] Review Request: maven - Java project management and project comprehension tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648945 --- Comment #12 from Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com 2010-12-07 03:48:12 EST --- Built in koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2648811 Thanks for review, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 648945] Review Request: maven - Java project management and project comprehension tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648945 Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|652183(FE-JAVASIG) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 660600] Rename Request: pcsc-lite-ccid - Generic USB CCID smart card reader driver
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660600 Kalev Lember ka...@smartlink.ee changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rrel...@redhat.com Blocks||654377 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 660600] New: Rename Request: pcsc-lite-ccid - Generic USB CCID smart card reader driver
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Rename Request: pcsc-lite-ccid - Generic USB CCID smart card reader driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660600 Summary: Rename Request: pcsc-lite-ccid - Generic USB CCID smart card reader driver Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ka...@smartlink.ee QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://kalev.fedorapeople.org/pcsc-lite-ccid.spec SRPM URL: http://kalev.fedorapeople.org/pcsc-lite-ccid-1.4.0-3.fc15.src.rpm Description: Generic USB CCID (Chip/Smart Card Interface Devices) driver for use with the PC/SC Lite daemon. This is a review request for ccid - pcsc-lite-ccid rename. For rationale why this is desired, see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=654377#c6 Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2648902 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 660617] New: Review Request: ghc-process-leksah - A package libraries for dealing with system processes in leksah
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-process-leksah - A package libraries for dealing with system processes in leksah https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660617 Summary: Review Request: ghc-process-leksah - A package libraries for dealing with system processes in leksah Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lakshminaras2...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec file URL : https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-process-leksah.spec?attredirects=0d=1 SRPM URL : https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-process-leksah-1.0.1.3-1.fc14.src.rpm?attredirects=0d=1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 660617] Review Request: ghc-process-leksah - A package libraries for dealing with system processes in leksah
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660617 Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|low |medium CC||fedora-haskell-l...@redhat. ||com Alias||ghc-process-leksah -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 660617] Review Request: ghc-process-leksah - A package libraries for dealing with system processes in leksah
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660617 Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||634048(Haskell-pkg-reviews) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 660625] New: Review Request: techne - A general purpose, programmable physical simulator and renderer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: techne - A general purpose, programmable physical simulator and renderer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660625 Summary: Review Request: techne - A general purpose, programmable physical simulator and renderer Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tadej.ja...@tadej.hicsalta.si QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://tadej.fedorapeople.org/techne.spec SRPM URL: http://tadej.fedorapeople.org/techne-0.2-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: Techne is a general purpose, programmable physical simulator and renderer. It reads in a set of scripts wherein every aspect of a physical system is specified and then proceeds to simulate and render the system onscreen. A showcase for Techne are the Billiards cue sports simulator: http://www.nongnu.org/billiards/ and the Aviation flight simulator: http://www.nongnu.org/aviation/ Techne is a prerequisite for packaging both Billiards and Aviation for Fedora. A few notes to the reviewer: 1) A version of ode = 0:0.11.1-5 is required by Techne, because it includes the ode-double subpackage (see: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574034) It is included in rawhide, but it is not available in F14 and F13 yet. The koji builds for F14 and F13 are here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=204178 (F14) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2639094 (F13) 2) Techne 0.2 hasn't been officially released yet, but I'm contact with its author, who provided me with the unofficial tarball. The unofficial tarball is included in the SRPM. 3) rpmlint gives 4 warnings: techne.spec: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %clean techne.spec: W: no-buildroot-tag techne.spec: W: no-%clean-section techne.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: http://download.savannah.gnu.org/releases/techne/techne-0.2.tar.gz HTTP Error 404: Not Found The first 3 are invalid, because the Fedora Packaging Guidelines states that BuildRoot tag and %clean section are not required for F13 and above. The last warning is the consequence of Techne 0.2 not being officially released yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 660625] Review Request: techne - A general purpose, programmable physical simulator and renderer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660625 --- Comment #1 from Tadej Janež tadej.ja...@tadej.hicsalta.si 2010-12-07 06:38:02 EST --- One thing I forgot to mention, the koji scratch build of Techne against rawhide is available here: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2648939 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 658796] Review Request: ptpd - implements the Precision Time protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658796 --- Comment #14 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2010-12-07 07:19:52 EST --- (In reply to comment #13) Ok, no probs. Putting aside this issue for a moment, is the package itself looking sound now? I'll understand if you don't want to spend any more time reviewing it, just interesting in the current state of play. thanks Sorry for the delay. Yes, the package now looks good. I'll finish review after the FE-LEGAL will be listed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 660617] Review Request: ghc-process-leksah - A package libraries for dealing with system processes in leksah
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660617 --- Comment #1 from Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2...@gmail.com 2010-12-07 07:18:04 EST --- New srpm and spec file links (updated to v1.0.1.4) SRPM URL: https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-process-leksah-1.0.1.4-1.fc14.src.rpm?attredirects=0d=1 SPEC file URL : https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-process-leksah.spec?attredirects=0d=1 rpmlint -i ghc-process-leksah.spec ghc-process-leksah*1.0.1.4*.rpm ghc-process-leksah.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell - Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-process-leksah.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell - Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-process-leksah-devel.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell - Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-process-leksah-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-process-leksah-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-process-leksah-prof.i686: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-process-leksah-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ghc-6.12.3/process-leksah-1.0.1.4/libHSprocess-leksah-1.0.1.4_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 5 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 660637] Review Request: ghc-xml-types - Haskell library for XML types
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660637 --- Comment #1 from Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2...@gmail.com 2010-12-07 07:44:53 EST --- rpmlint -i ghc-xml-types*.rpm ghc-xml-types.spec ghc-xml-types.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell - Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-xml-types.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell - Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-xml-types-devel.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell - Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-xml-types-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-xml-types-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-xml-types-prof.i686: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-xml-types-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ghc-6.12.3/xml-types-0.1.1/libHSxml-types-0.1.1_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 5 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 660637] Review Request: ghc-xml-types - Haskell library for XML types
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660637 Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |ghc-xml-types - Haskell |ghc-xml-types - Haskell |library for xml types |library for XML types -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 660637] New: Review Request: ghc-xml-types - Haskell library for xml types
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-xml-types - Haskell library for xml types Alias: ghc-xml-types https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660637 Summary: Review Request: ghc-xml-types - Haskell library for xml types Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lakshminaras2...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Blocks: 634048 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SRPM URL : https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-xml-types-0.1.1-1.fc14.src.rpm?attredirects=0d=1 SPEC URL : https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-xml-types.spec?attredirects=0d=1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 660645] Review Request: ghc-monads-tf - A library to provide Monad classes using type families
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660645 --- Comment #1 from Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2...@gmail.com 2010-12-07 08:19:49 EST --- rpmlint -i ghc-monads-tf*.rpm ghc-monads-tf.spec ghc-monads-tf.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US http - HTTP The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-tf.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cecs - ceca, cess, secs The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-tf.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pdx - pd, pix, pax The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-tf.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US edu - ed, educ, due The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-tf.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mpj - mph, mp, mpg The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-tf.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US springschool - spring school, spring-school, Springsteen The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-tf.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US html - HTML, ht ml, ht-ml The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-tf.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mtl - mt, ml, mel The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-tf.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US http - HTTP The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-tf.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cecs - ceca, cess, secs The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-tf.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pdx - pd, pix, pax The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-tf.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US edu - ed, educ, due The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-tf.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mpj - mph, mp, mpg The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-tf.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US springschool - spring school, spring-school, Springsteen The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-tf.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US html - HTML, ht ml, ht-ml The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-tf.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mtl - mt, ml, mel The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-tf-devel.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US http - HTTP The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-tf-devel.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cecs - ceca, cess, secs The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-tf-devel.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pdx - pd, pix, pax The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-tf-devel.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US edu - ed, educ, due The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-tf-devel.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mpj - mph, mp, mpg The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-tf-devel.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US springschool - spring school, spring-school, Springsteen The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-tf-devel.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mtl - mt, ml, mel The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-tf-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-monads-tf-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-monads-tf-prof.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US http - HTTP The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-tf-prof.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cecs - ceca, cess, secs The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-tf-prof.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pdx - pd, pix, pax The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-tf-prof.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US edu - ed, educ, due The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-tf-prof.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mpj - mph, mp, mpg The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-tf-prof.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US springschool - spring school, spring-school, Springsteen The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please
[Bug 660645] New: Review Request: ghc-monads-tf - A library to provide Monad classes using type families
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-monads-tf - A library to provide Monad classes using type families Alias: ghc-monads-tf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660645 Summary: Review Request: ghc-monads-tf - A library to provide Monad classes using type families Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lakshminaras2...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com, fedora-haskell-l...@redhat.com Blocks: 634048 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC file URL : https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-monads-tf.spec?attredirects=0d=1 SRPM URL : https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-monads-tf-0.1.0.0-1.fc14.src.rpm?attredirects=0d=1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 660645] Review Request: ghc-monads-tf - A library to provide Monad classes using type families
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660645 --- Comment #2 from Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2...@gmail.com 2010-12-07 08:22:41 EST --- The LICENSE file's first line states that the license is The Glasgow Haskell Compiler License. In the spec file, the license tag is BSD. The license text matches BSD 3 clause variant https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/BSD#3ClauseBSD -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 554187] Review Request: shedskin - Python to C++ compiler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554187 --- Comment #21 from Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-07 08:27:18 EST --- (In reply to comment #20) Let me try a different way. Please tell me which file present in the built, non-debuginfo rpm, is under the MIT license. Just find one that is pure MIT with no GPL code compiled together with it. Pure MIT is the C++ header library, what I told above. What's confusing is, that you link later on when actually using shedskin with the MIT library, but you are using a GPLed python binary. So using and modifying the python parts needs to happen under the GPL, but using the C++ library allowes to use MIT. shedskin/lib/* is MIT, but nothing is build/linked at compile time. Only at 'using time' later on, so there is no binary (what was confusing me). Hope I did it right like this... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 660656] New: Review Request: ghc-data-binary-ieee754- Haskell parser/serialiser library for IEEE754 floating point values
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-data-binary-ieee754- Haskell parser/serialiser library for IEEE754 floating point values https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660656 Summary: Review Request: ghc-data-binary-ieee754- Haskell parser/serialiser library for IEEE754 floating point values Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lakshminaras2...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com, fedora-haskell-l...@redhat.com Blocks: 634048 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC file URL : https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-data-binary-ieee754.spec?attredirects=0d=1 SRPM URL : https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-data-binary-ieee754-0.4.2.1-1.fc14.src.rpm?attredirects=0d=1 rpmlint output: pmlint -i ghc-data-binary-ieee754*.rpm ghc-data-binary-ieee754.spec ghc-data-binary-ieee754.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell - Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-data-binary-ieee754.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) serialiser - serialist, serialism, serialize The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-data-binary-ieee754.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell - Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-data-binary-ieee754.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) serialiser - serialist, serialism, serialize The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-data-binary-ieee754-devel.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell - Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-data-binary-ieee754-devel.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) serialiser - serialist, serialism, serialize The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-data-binary-ieee754-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-data-binary-ieee754-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-data-binary-ieee754-prof.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) serialiser - serialist, serialism, serialize The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-data-binary-ieee754-prof.i686: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-data-binary-ieee754-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ghc-6.12.3/data-binary-ieee754-0.4.2.1/libHSdata-binary-ieee754-0.4.2.1_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 9 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 660625] Review Request: techne - A general purpose, programmable physical simulator and renderer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660625
Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||hdego...@redhat.com
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|hdego...@redhat.com
Flag||fedora-review?
--- Comment #2 from Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com 2010-12-07 10:58:25 EST
---
Full review done:
Good:
- rpmlint checks return:
techne.src: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %clean
techne.src: W: no-buildroot-tag
techne.src: W: no-%clean-section
techne.src: W: invalid-url Source0:
http://download.savannah.gnu.org/releases/techne/techne-0.2.tar.gz HTTP Error
404: Not Found
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.
The first 3 can be ignored, for the last one see below
- package meets naming guidelines
- package meets packaging guidelines
- license (GPLv3+) OK, text in %doc, matches source
- spec file legible, in am. english
- package compiles on devel (x86)
- no missing BR
- no unnecessary BR
- no locales
- not relocatable
- no duplicate files
- permissions ok
- %clean ok
- macro use consistent
- code, not content
- no need for -docs
- nothing in %doc affects runtime
- no need for .desktop file
MUST FIX / needs work:
- sources match upstream
I cannot verify this, please ask upstream to put a pre-release / alpha
/ beta tarbal somewhere.
- owns all directories that it creates
Currently the package does not own the following dirs:
%{_libdir}/%{name}
%{_datadir}/%{name}
%{_datadir}/%{name}/common
This can be fixed by replacing (in %files) this:
%{_libdir}/%{name}/*.so
%{_libdir}/%{name}/*.bin
%{_datadir}/%{name}/common/*
With:
%{_libdir}/%{name}
%{_datadir}/%{name}
- release field not properly used.
Since this is a pre release version being used the release field
should be something like:
Release: 0.1%{?dist}
or:
Release: 0.1.beta1%{?dist}
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630288] Review Request: ghc-enumerator - Implementation of Oleg Kiselyov's left-fold enumerators
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630288
Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag||fedora-review+
--- Comment #7 from Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2...@gmail.com 2010-12-07
11:15:09 EST ---
The review is provided here after applying the attached patch to the spec file.
Please apply the patch before adding the spec file to source control.
[+]MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in
the review.
rpmlint -i ghc-enumerator*.rpm ghc-enumerator.spec
ghc-enumerator-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-enumerator-devel
Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package
itself.
ghc-enumerator-prof.i686: W: no-documentation
The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include
documentation files.
ghc-enumerator-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/ghc-6.12.3/enumerator-0.4.2/libHSenumerator-0.4.2_p.a
A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If
you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a
development package.
4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings.
[+]MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[+]MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec
[+]MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
Naming-Yes
Version-release - Matches
License - OK
No prebuilt external bits - OK
Spec legibity - OK
Package template - OK
Arch support - OK
Libexecdir - OK
rpmlint - yes
changelogs - OK
Source url tag - OK, validated. A newer version (0.4.3.1) is
available.
Buildroot is ignored - present anyway. OK
%clean is ignored - present anyway. OK
Build Requires list - OK
Summary and description - OK
API documentation - OK, present in devel package.
[+]MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet
the Licensing Guidelines .
[+]MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
[+]MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.
packaged as license.txt
[+]MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[+]MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[+]MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream
source,as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task.
md5sum ghc-enumerator-0.4.2-1.fc14.src/enumerator-0.4.2.tar.gz
f50d24a77b57690eab31fa91aa4cd03b
ghc-enumerator-0.4.2-1.fc14.src/enumerator-0.4.2.tar.gz
md5sum ~/Downloads/enumerator-0.4.2.tar.gz
f50d24a77b57690eab31fa91aa4cd03b
/home/lvaikunt/Downloads/enumerator-0.4.2.tar.gz
[+]MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at
least one primary architecture.
Built on i686.
[+]MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch.
[+]MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires.
[NA]MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly using the %find_lang macro
[NA]MUST: Packages stores shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and
%postun.
[+]MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
Checked with rpmquery --list
[NA]MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state
this fact in the request for review.
[+]MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates.
Checked with rpmquery --whatprovides
[+]MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec
file's %files listings.
[+]MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly.
[+]MUST: Each package must consistently use macros.
[+]MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
[+]MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage.
[+]MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the
runtime of the application.
Fixed permission issue on readme.txt via fix.patch.
[+]MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package.
[NA]MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package.
[NA]MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix
(e.g.libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must
go in a -devel package.
[+]MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned
dependency: Requires: {name} = %{version}-%{release}
rpm -e ghc-enumerator
error: Failed dependencies:
ghc-enumerator
[Bug 654139] Review Request: ease - GNOME desktop presentation application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=654139 --- Comment #6 from Arun SAG saga...@gmail.com 2010-12-07 11:27:59 EST --- I see some .pc files in -devel subpackage, Don't they require 'pkgconfig' ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 654374] Review Request: navit - Car navigation system with routing engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=654374 --- Comment #26 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de 2010-12-07 12:00:43 EST --- (In reply to comment #25) We need this package in the distro, as there is a huge amount of work is going on to have a Geo spin for Fedora 15. Well, many kids want a pony, but ... There are many people interested to see this package in Fedora, just check the CC list of this bug, I am interested, too, however, the unpleasant truth is, this package has a lot of issues which _need_ to be resolved before it can go into Fedora. #1 issue is upstream's apparent carelessness about legal issues (A simple solution would be them to license their works under GPLv2+ or GPLv3), #2 issue is this package's apparent immaturity. The maps can be on a separate sub-package, will do it on the next review-update Thanks. Can I go ahead with the changes and review? Certainly. The next think you could do is to try working around the legal issues on your part, by refining your tarball cutting procedure (exclude the android code, exclude the fonts; If necessary, patch the sources to make them buildable without these subdirs in place.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630288] Review Request: ghc-enumerator - Implementation of Oleg Kiselyov's left-fold enumerators
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630288 Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com 2010-12-07 12:00:26 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: ghc-enumerator Short Description: Implementation of Oleg Kiselyov's left-fold enumerators Owners: mathstuf Branches: F-13 F-14 InitialCC: haskell-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 553649] Review Request: rhn-custom-info - Set and list custom values for RHN-enabled machines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553649 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-07 12:02:11 EST --- rhn-custom-info-5.4.5-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 553649] Review Request: rhn-custom-info - Set and list custom values for RHN-enabled machines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553649 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|rhn-custom-info-5.4.5-3.fc1 |rhn-custom-info-5.4.5-1.el5 |5 | Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 660600] Rename Request: pcsc-lite-ccid - Generic USB CCID smart card reader driver
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660600 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||lemen...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|lemen...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2010-12-07 12:52:00 EST --- I'll review it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 611372] Review Request: perl-Net-Twitter - Perl interface to Twitter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=611372
Andy Bailey bai...@akamai.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bai...@akamai.com
--- Comment #5 from Andy Bailey bai...@akamai.com 2010-12-07 12:49:40 EST ---
I'm able to fetch the spec and srpm, but I found some issues (bear with me,
this is a prereview, to determine my level of cluelessness):
download url is incorrect- although a converging-on-pi version was uploaded to
cpan, it isn't in the by-name area in the repository. For the review, I set it
to:
Source0:
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/M/MM/MMIMS/Net-Twitter-%{version}.tar.gz
The build then failed a few times for me using mock and fc-14 x86_64 as a
target.
* requested perl-Net-OAuth version doesn't exist yet (have 0.19, calls for
0.25)
* build fails during test target over missing Test::Exception module
* once that's added I got:
Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files
/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/perl-Net-Twitter-3.14002-1.fc14.x86_64
error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
/builddir/.cpan/build/Module-Build-0.3607-yl9YyP/t/install_test18260/foo/bar/Simple.pm
/builddir/.cpan/build/Module-Build-0.3607-yl9YyP/t/install_test18260/foo/base/bin/script
/builddir/.cpan/build/Module-Build-0.3607-yl9YyP/t/install_test18260/foo/base/html/lib/Simple.html
/builddir/.cpan/build/Module-Build-0.3607-yl9YyP/t/install_test18260/foo/base/html/site/lib/Simple.html
/builddir/.cpan/build/Module-Build-0.3607-yl9YyP/t/install_test18260/foo/base/lib/perl5/Simple.pm
so it looks like Module::Build is another missing build dependency. There were
also a bunch of other cpan-related things added, so it looks like cpan is auto
adding some other stuff as well (perl-version is one)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 660131] Review Request: mu - mu is a collection of utilties for indexing and searching Maildirs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660131 --- Comment #2 from Andy Bailey bai...@akamai.com 2010-12-07 14:35:34 EST --- user tibbs on #fedora-devel suggested that I review some other pendingreview packages to help secure a sponsorship of this one. I found a few interesting ones that I'll note here. First, 611372. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 643332] Review Request: notmuch - System for indexing, searching, and tagging email
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=643332 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-07 15:10:54 EST --- notmuch-0.5-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 652400] Review Request: rubygem-boxgrinder-build - Creates appliances for various virtual environments
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652400 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-07 15:11:01 EST --- rubygem-boxgrinder-build-0.6.4-3.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 643332] Review Request: notmuch - System for indexing, searching, and tagging email
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=643332 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-07 15:10:40 EST --- notmuch-0.5-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 652400] Review Request: rubygem-boxgrinder-build - Creates appliances for various virtual environments
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652400 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||rubygem-boxgrinder-build-0. ||6.4-3.fc13 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2010-12-07 15:11:06 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 656010] Review Request: libsrtp - An implementation of the Secure Real-time Transport Protocol (SRTP)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656010 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-07 15:08:22 EST --- libsrtp-1.4.4-1.20101004cvs.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update libsrtp'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libsrtp-1.4.4-1.20101004cvs.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 623868] Review Request: abattis-cantarell-fonts - Contemporary humanist sans-serif font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=623868 --- Comment #12 from Jared Smith jaredsm...@jaredsmith.net 2010-12-07 15:17:28 EST --- Renamed the spec file at http://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/Fonts/abattis-cantarell/abattis-cantarell-fonts.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 652400] Review Request: rubygem-boxgrinder-build - Creates appliances for various virtual environments
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652400 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|rubygem-boxgrinder-build-0. |rubygem-boxgrinder-build-0. |6.4-3.fc13 |6.4-3.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 652400] Review Request: rubygem-boxgrinder-build - Creates appliances for various virtual environments
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652400 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-07 15:17:59 EST --- rubygem-boxgrinder-build-0.6.4-3.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 484386] Review Request: gri - A language for scientific illustration
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484386 Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Blocks||201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution||CANTFIX Flag|needinfo?(my...@yahoo.com) | Last Closed||2010-12-07 15:52:47 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 505154] Tracker: Review Requests for Science and Technology related packages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505154 Bug 505154 depends on bug 484386, which changed state. Bug 484386 Summary: Review Request: gri - A language for scientific illustration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484386 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||CANTFIX Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 660061] Review Request: votca-tools - support library for votca-csg
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660061 Christoph Junghans jungh...@votca.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||WONTFIX Last Closed||2010-12-07 16:05:25 --- Comment #1 from Christoph Junghans jungh...@votca.org 2010-12-07 16:05:25 EST --- bug #659972 was closed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 659972] Review Request: votca-csg - a systematic coarse-graining toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659972 Christoph Junghans jungh...@votca.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||WONTFIX Last Closed||2010-12-07 16:04:14 --- Comment #10 from Christoph Junghans jungh...@votca.org 2010-12-07 16:04:14 EST --- And I am sorry to refuse to become a Fedora packager, I just like gentoo too much to change ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 604331] Review Request: redshift - Adjusts the color temperature of your screen according to time of day
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=604331 --- Comment #35 from Alexander Hunt alexander.hunt2...@gmail.com 2010-12-07 16:20:59 EST --- As per: Comment 29 Fedora Update System 2010-09-15 03:05:16 EDT redshift-1.5-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. Mamoru, do you think regular users know how bugzilla works in it's entirety? No, we don't; we rely on what is said in the comments to know what to do. Take out comments 28, 29 and 30, and put in one telling users to file new bug reports if that is what is expected, or lock it against changes by regular users, and don't be mean to people. I will file a new bug report now. Have a Happy Holidays -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 657520] Review Request: perl-Array-Utils - Small utils for array manipulation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657520
Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #6 from Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr
2010-12-07 16:18:20 EST ---
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Perl specific items
[x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported architecture.
Tested on: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2650083
[x] Rpmlint output: 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
[x] Package is not relocatable.
[x] Buildroot is correct
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
[x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
License type: GPL+ or Artistic
[-] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
[x] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
ac15e6dce2c7c9d1855ecab9eb00aee6 Array-Utils-0.5.tar.gz
[x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch
[x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[-] The spec file handles locales properly.
[-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[x] Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x] Permissions on files are set properly.
[x] Package consistently uses macros.
[x] Package contains code, or permissable content.
[-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present.
[-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[-] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la).
[-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
application.
[x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
=== SUGGESTED ITEMS ===
[x] Latest version is packaged.
[x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
Tested on: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
[x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
Tested on: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
[x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -fR $RPM_BUILD_ROOT.
[?] Package functions as described.
[-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
[-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct.
[-] File based requires are sane.
[x] %check is present and the tests pass
All tests successful.
Files=1, Tests=17, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.01 usr 0.00 sys + 0.02 cusr 0.00
csys = 0.03 CPU)
Result: PASS
APPROVED.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 646139] Review Request: kxstitch - tool that creates cross stitch patterns
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646139 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-07 16:39:43 EST --- kxstitch-0.8.4.1-5.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kxstitch-0.8.4.1-5.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 646139] Review Request: kxstitch - tool that creates cross stitch patterns
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646139 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 646139] Review Request: kxstitch - tool that creates cross stitch patterns
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646139 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-07 16:39:50 EST --- kxstitch-0.8.4.1-5.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kxstitch-0.8.4.1-5.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 661143] New: Review Request: votca-tools - VOTCA tools library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: votca-tools - VOTCA tools library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661143 Summary: Review Request: votca-tools - VOTCA tools library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jussi.leht...@iki.fi QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/votca-tools.spec SRPM URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/votca-tools-1.0.1-1.fc14.src.rpm Upstream URL: http://www.votca.org Description: Versatile Object-oriented Toolkit for Coarse-graining Applications (VOTCA) is a package intended to reduce the amount of routine work when doing systematic coarse-graining of various systems. The core is written in C++. rpmlint output: votca-tools.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US graining - gaining, raining, training votca-tools.src: W: invalid-url Source0: http://votca.googlecode.com/files/votca-tools-1.0.1.tar.gz HTTP Error 404: Not Found votca-tools.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US graining - gaining, raining, training votca-tools.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libvotca_tools.so.0.0.0 e...@glibc_2.2.5 votca-tools-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US graining - gaining, raining, training votca-tools-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. These are all OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 661154] New: Review Request: votca-csg - VOTCA coarse graining engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: votca-csg - VOTCA coarse graining engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661154 Summary: Review Request: votca-csg - VOTCA coarse graining engine Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jussi.leht...@iki.fi QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/votca-csg.spec SRPM URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/votca-csg-1.0.1-1.fc14.src.rpm Upstream URL: http://www.votca.org Description: Versatile Object-oriented Toolkit for Coarse-graining Applications (VOTCA) is a package intended to reduce the amount of routine work when doing systematic coarse-graining of various systems. The core is written in C++. rpmlint output: votca-csg.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) graining - gaining, raining, training votca-csg.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US graining - gaining, raining, training votca-csg.src: W: invalid-url Source0: http://votca.googlecode.com/files/votca-csg-1.0.1.tar.gz HTTP Error 404: Not Found votca-csg.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) graining - gaining, raining, training votca-csg.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US graining - gaining, raining, training votca-csg.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary multi_g_density votca-csg.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary csg_dump votca-csg.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary multi_g_rdf votca-csg.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary csg_gmxtopol votca-csg.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary csg_fmatch votca-csg.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary csg_part_dist votca-csg.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary csg_map votca-csg.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary csg_stat votca-csg.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary csg_property votca-csg.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary csg_resample votca-csg.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary csg_boltzmann votca-csg.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary csg_inverse votca-csg.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary csg_call votca-csg.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary csg_imcrepack votca-csg-bash.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US graining - gaining, raining, training votca-csg-bash.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US perl - Perl, peel, perk votca-csg-bash.noarch: W: no-documentation votca-csg-bash.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/bash_completion.d/votca votca-csg-common.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US graining - gaining, raining, training votca-csg-common.noarch: W: no-documentation votca-csg-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US graining - gaining, raining, training votca-csg-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation votca-csg-libs.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) graining - gaining, raining, training votca-csg-libs.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US graining - gaining, raining, training 7 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 29 warnings. These are all OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 660061] Review Request: votca-tools - support library for votca-csg
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660061 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|WONTFIX |DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2010-12-07 17:22:39 EST --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 661143 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 659972] Review Request: votca-csg - a systematic coarse-graining toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659972 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|WONTFIX |DUPLICATE --- Comment #11 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2010-12-07 17:22:29 EST --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 661154 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 661154] Review Request: votca-csg - VOTCA coarse graining engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661154 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jungh...@votca.org --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2010-12-07 17:22:29 EST --- *** Bug 659972 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 661143] Review Request: votca-tools - VOTCA tools library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661143 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jungh...@votca.org --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2010-12-07 17:22:39 EST --- *** Bug 660061 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 660159] Review Request: thunar-vfs - Virtual filesystem shipped with Thunar 1.0 and earlier releases
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660159
Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-12-07 19:13:00 EST ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [1]
[x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x] Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[x] Spec uses macros instead of hard-coded directory names.
[x] Package consistently uses macros.
[x] Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x] PreReq is not used.
[x] Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [2]
[x] Buildroot is correct
(%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)).
[x] Package run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) and the beginning of
%install.
[x] Package use %makeinstall only when ``make install DESTDIR=...'' doesn't
work.
[x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
[x] The spec file handles locales properly.
[x] Changelog in prescribed format.
[!] Rpmlint output is silent.
[x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
[x] License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines.
[3,4]
[x] Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
2e9eb4d5d414d946a4c8268415eaecde thunar-vfs-1.1.1.tar.bz2
2e9eb4d5d414d946a4c8268415eaecde thunar-vfs-1.1.1.tar.bz2.orig
[x] Compiler flags are appropriate.
[x] %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[x] Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x] Permissions on files are set properly.
[x] Each %files section contains %defattr.
[x] Package contains code, or permissable content.
[x] File names are valid UTF-8.
[x] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x] Package contains no bundled libraries.
[x] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x] Static libraries in -static subpackage, if present.
[x] Package contains no static executables.
[x] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present.
[x] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la).
[x] Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x] Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
[x] Package does not genrate any conflict.
[x] Package does not contains kernel modules.
[x] Package is not relocatable.
[x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported architecture.
[x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x] Package installs properly.
[x] Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [6]
=== SUGGESTED ITEMS ===
[x] Package functions as described.
[x] Latest version is packaged.
[x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x] SourceX is a working URL.
[x] SourceX / PatchY prefixed with %{name}.
[x] Final provides and requires are sane (rpm -q --provides and rpm -q
--requires).
[x] %check is present and all tests pass.
[x] Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package
using a fully versioned dependency.
[x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[x] Dist tag is present.
[x] Spec use %global instead of %define.
[x] Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
[x] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct.
[x] No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin,
[Bug 661179] Review Request: cement-devtools - Development Tools for the Cement CLI Application Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661179 --- Comment #1 from BJ Dierkes wdier...@rackspace.com 2010-12-07 21:11:19 EST --- Note, this depends on: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609295 Therefore, it will not build in mock until that is pushed to stable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 661179] Review Request: cement-devtools - Development Tools for the Cement CLI Application Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661179 BJ Dierkes wdier...@rackspace.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||609295 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 609295] Review Request: cement - CLI Application Framework for Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609295 BJ Dierkes wdier...@rackspace.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||661179 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 661179] New: Review Request: cement-devtools - Development Tools for the Cement CLI Application Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: cement-devtools - Development Tools for the Cement CLI Application Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661179 Summary: Review Request: cement-devtools - Development Tools for the Cement CLI Application Framework Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: wdier...@rackspace.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://5dollarwhitebox.org/tmp/cement-devtools.spec SRPM URL: http://5dollarwhitebox.org/tmp/cement-devtools-0.8.12-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: description here Cement is an advanced CLI Application Framework for Python. The 'devtools' package provides tools and libraries needed for developing applications that are built on Cement. $ rpmlint -i SPECS/cement-devtools.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint -i RPMS/noarch/cement-devtools-0.8.12-1.fc14.noarch.rpm cement-devtools.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/cement/paste/templates/cementapp/LICENSE cement-devtools.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/cement/paste/templates/cementplugin/LICENSE 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 0 warnings. Note: The two errors above are due to the fact that those two files are part of a template. They are empty by design, therefore the errors should be ignored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 623868] Review Request: abattis-cantarell-fonts - Contemporary humanist sans-serif font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=623868
--- Comment #13 from Stephen John Smoogen smo...@redhat.com 2010-12-07
23:06:16 EST ---
1) I want to thank Michael Gruber and Paul Flo Williams.. I have looked through
the updated spec and src.rpm and want to +1 their work as package reviewers.
2) I am including the below just to make sure I have done a review myself
correctly.
+ OK
? ISSUE
- N/A
W WARNING below
+ Package meets naming and packaging guidelines
+ Spec file matches base package name.
+ Spec has consistant macro usage.
+ Meets Packaging Guidelines.
W License
+ License field in spec matches
? License file included in package
+ Spec in American English
+ Spec is legible.
- Sources match upstream md5sum:
40785c6118f4891137a69fe31832dd64 Cantarell-Bold.sfd
5571bac0c11b2e0d042345d4847c7a06 Cantarell-BoldOblique.sfd
9f2607cb46af948d939e58a4ef289b17 Cantarell-Oblique.sfd
385cf2b29741381f41497521c6305a68 Cantarell-Regular.sfd
- Package needs ExcludeArch
+ BuildRequires correct
- Spec handles locales/find_lang
- Package is relocatable and has a reason to be.
- Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good.
+ Package has a correct %clean section.
+ Package has correct buildroot
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
+ Package is code or permissible content.
- Doc subpackage needed/used.
- Packages %doc files don't affect runtime.
- Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage.
- Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun
- .pc files in -devel subpackage/requires pkgconfig
- .so files in -devel subpackage.
- -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
- .la files are removed.
- Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file
+ Package compiles and builds on at least one arch.
+ Package has no duplicate files in %files.
+ Package doesn't own any directories other packages own.
+ Package owns all the directories it creates.
W No rpmlint output.
Sent rpm through koji and ran the results through rpmlint
rpmlint abattis-cantarell-fonts-1.001-3.fc15.*
abattis-cantarell-fonts.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US
Crossland - Cross land, Cross-land, Crossly
abattis-cantarell-fonts.noarch: W: invalid-license OFL 1.1+
abattis-cantarell-fonts.noarch: W: no-documentation
abattis-cantarell-fonts.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Crossland
- Cross land, Cross-land, Crossly
abattis-cantarell-fonts.src: W: invalid-license OFL 1.1+
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings.
- final provides and requires are sane:
$ rpm --requires -qp abattis-cantarell-fonts-1.001-3.fc15.noarch.rpm
/bin/sh
/bin/sh
config(abattis-cantarell-fonts) = 1.001-3.fc15
$ rpm --requires -qp abattis-cantarell-fonts-1.001-3.fc15.src.rpm
fontpackages-devel
fontforge
$ rpm --provides -qp abattis-cantarell-fonts-1.001-3.fc15.noarch.rpm
config(abattis-cantarell-fonts) = 1.001-3.fc15
font(:lang=aa)
font(:lang=af)
font(:lang=an)
font(:lang=ast)
font(:lang=ay)
font(:lang=bi)
font(:lang=br)
font(:lang=bs)
font(:lang=ca)
font(:lang=ch)
font(:lang=co)
font(:lang=crh)
font(:lang=cs)
font(:lang=csb)
font(:lang=cy)
font(:lang=da)
font(:lang=de)
font(:lang=en)
font(:lang=eo)
font(:lang=es)
font(:lang=et)
font(:lang=eu)
font(:lang=fi)
font(:lang=fil)
font(:lang=fj)
font(:lang=fo)
font(:lang=fr)
font(:lang=fur)
font(:lang=fy)
font(:lang=ga)
font(:lang=gd)
font(:lang=gl)
font(:lang=gv)
font(:lang=ho)
font(:lang=hr)
font(:lang=hsb)
font(:lang=ht)
font(:lang=hu)
font(:lang=ia)
font(:lang=id)
font(:lang=ie)
font(:lang=io)
font(:lang=is)
font(:lang=it)
font(:lang=jv)
font(:lang=ki)
font(:lang=kj)
font(:lang=kl)
font(:lang=ku-tr)
font(:lang=kwm)
font(:lang=la)
font(:lang=lb)
font(:lang=lg)
font(:lang=li)
font(:lang=lt)
font(:lang=lv)
font(:lang=mg)
font(:lang=mh)
font(:lang=ms)
font(:lang=mt)
font(:lang=na)
font(:lang=nb)
font(:lang=nds)
font(:lang=ng)
font(:lang=nl)
font(:lang=nn)
font(:lang=no)
font(:lang=nr)
font(:lang=nso)
font(:lang=ny)
font(:lang=oc)
font(:lang=om)
font(:lang=pap-an)
font(:lang=pap-aw)
font(:lang=pl)
font(:lang=pt)
font(:lang=rm)
font(:lang=rn)
font(:lang=rw)
font(:lang=sc)
font(:lang=se)
font(:lang=sg)
font(:lang=sk)
font(:lang=sl)
font(:lang=sma)
font(:lang=smj)
font(:lang=smn)
font(:lang=sn)
font(:lang=so)
font(:lang=sq)
font(:lang=ss)
font(:lang=st)
font(:lang=su)
font(:lang=sv)
font(:lang=sw)
font(:lang=tk)
font(:lang=tl)
font(:lang=tn)
font(:lang=tr)
font(:lang=ts)
font(:lang=uz)
font(:lang=vo)
font(:lang=vot)
font(:lang=wa)
font(:lang=wen)
font(:lang=wo)
font(:lang=xh)
font(:lang=yap)
font(:lang=za)
font(:lang=zu)
font(cantarell)
abattis-cantarell-fonts = 1.001-3.fc15
SHOULD Items:
+ Should
[Bug 661193] New: Review Request: man-pages-zh-CN - Chinese man pages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: man-pages-zh-CN - Chinese man pages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661193 Summary: Review Request: man-pages-zh-CN - Chinese man pages Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dc...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://dchen.fedorapeople.org/files/rpms/man-pages-zh-CN.spec SRPM URL: http://dchen.fedorapeople.org/files/rpms/man-pages-zh-CN-1.5.1-1.el6.src.rpm Description: manpages-zh is a sub-project from i18n-zh, from the Chinese Man Pages Project (CMPP). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 658611] Review Request: nuxwdog
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658611 --- Comment #9 from Ade Lee a...@redhat.com 2010-12-07 23:38:09 EST --- Attached new spec file and srpm. So - as you pointed out on #irc, there is one part of the perl module (ppport.h) which has the same as perl license. So, I have decided to make the remaining parts of the perl module GPL+ so that they will have the same Same as perl designation. The spec file has been updated accordingly, and I added a perl license file. New spec and sprm at: https://fedorahosted.org/released/nuxwdog/nuxwdog-1.0.0-9.fc13.src.rpm https://fedorahosted.org/released/nuxwdog/nuxwdog.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 545047] Review Request: NearTree - An API for finding nearest neighbors
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545047 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 545047] Review Request: NearTree - An API for finding nearest neighbors
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545047 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-08 01:43:55 EST --- NearTree-2.3.2-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/NearTree-2.3.2-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 545047] Review Request: NearTree - An API for finding nearest neighbors
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545047 --- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-08 02:01:15 EST --- NearTree-2.3.2-1.1.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/NearTree-2.3.2-1.1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 545047] Review Request: NearTree - An API for finding nearest neighbors
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545047 --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-08 02:00:25 EST --- NearTree-2.3.2-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/NearTree-2.3.2-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 658611] Review Request: nuxwdog
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658611 --- Comment #10 from Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org 2010-12-08 02:47:56 EST --- Same as perl is GPL+ or Artistic, not just GPL+. Of course, this is compatible with GPL+ so there's no need to change anything but it won't be Same as perl. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
