[Bug 467655] Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 --- Comment #88 from Ruediger Landmann 2010-12-16 01:00:34 EST --- Sorry Nicolas -- I've been delayed elsewhere; I'll take a look again in the next few days Cheers Rudi -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 661193] Review Request: man-pages-zh-CN - Chinese man pages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661193 Ding-Yi Chen changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Ding-Yi Chen 2010-12-15 23:58:58 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: man-pages-zh-CN Short Description: Chinese manpages Owners: dchen Branches: f14 f13 el6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 565232] Review Request: perl-Log-Any - Bringing loggers and listeners together
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=565232 --- Comment #11 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-12-15 21:58:28 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 661902] Review Request: moksha - A platform for creating real-time web applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661902 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|cdah...@redhat.com --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-12-15 22:01:40 EST --- Review tickets should be assigned to the reviewer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 661354] Review Request: identicurse - Curses based Status.net client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661354 --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-12-15 21:59:14 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 661902] Review Request: moksha - A platform for creating real-time web applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661902 --- Comment #11 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-12-15 22:01:58 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 565232] Review Request: perl-Log-Any - Bringing loggers and listeners together
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=565232 Steven Pritchard changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Steven Pritchard 2010-12-15 19:53:14 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: perl-Log-Any Short Description: Bringing loggers and listeners together Owners: steve Branches: f13 f14 el5 el6 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 663102] Review Request: pyscard - python module adding smart cards support.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663102 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Elwell 2010-12-15 19:09:03 EST --- Thanks. Updated srpm / spec are at http://dl.dropbox.com/u/6594808/Fedora/pyscard.spec and http://dl.dropbox.com/u/6594808/Fedora/pyscard-1.6.12-2.fc14.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 661902] Review Request: moksha - A platform for creating real-time web applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661902 Luke Macken changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Luke Macken 2010-12-15 17:33:53 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: moksha Short Description: A platform for creating real-time web applications Owners: lmacken johnp Branches: f13 f14 el6 el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 650712] Review Request: xcm - X Color Management tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=650712 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(kwiz...@gmail.com | |) | --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2010-12-15 17:33:18 EST --- Spec URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/review/xcm.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/review/xcm-0.3.0-2.fc14.src.rpm Description: X Color Management tools Changelog: Add Requires oyranos -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 467655] Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 --- Comment #87 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2010-12-15 17:33:48 EST --- Any update on this bug ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 635511] Review Request: assimp - Library to import various 3D model formats into applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=635511 --- Comment #22 from Rich Mattes 2010-12-15 17:11:10 EST --- They just got back to me[1], it looks like they are going to investigate moving it to 10 on their side as well. 6 was apparently picked because most file formats don't encode floating point numbers past that, so there was no point in processing any more than that. Assimp 2.0 was released a couple of weeks ago, which includes the separation of models with/without BSD licenses. I will rebase my changes to that release and post the updated srpm later tonight. [1] http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=26762291 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 661902] Review Request: moksha - A platform for creating real-time web applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661902 Casey Dahlin changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Casey Dahlin 2010-12-15 17:03:33 EST --- And we're good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 252108] Review Request: python-html5lib - A python based HTML5 parser/tokenizer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252108 --- Comment #26 from Matthew Miller 2010-12-15 15:57:41 EST --- Also — the current version is 0.90, as of January 2010. I thought that might fix up the deprecation warnings, but no such luck. http://code.google.com/p/html5lib/downloads/detail?name=html5lib-0.90.zip -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 252108] Review Request: python-html5lib - A python based HTML5 parser/tokenizer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252108 --- Comment #25 from Matthew Miller 2010-12-15 15:55:48 EST --- The tests are failing because there are tons of deprecation warnings, and the tests are (justifiably) run with warnings made into errors. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 652257] Review Request: focuswriter - A fullscreen, distraction-free writing program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652257 --- Comment #4 from Jean-Francois Saucier 2010-12-15 15:49:59 EST --- I effectively plan to package this for Fedora only at the moment. Thank you for taking the review for this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 552113] Review Request: libwiiuse - library to use wiiremotes via bluetooth
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552113 --- Comment #18 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-12-15 15:44:21 EST --- I don't think it's a significant problem that you renamed it, although we do try to stick with the upstream names when it makes sense. Either way is fine with me; I was just asking for an explanation. Unfortunately two problems were introduced. The big one is that the packages don't install; the -devel and -examples still depend on libwiiuse. Also, the new summary grew a trailing dot and is also somewhat overlong: wiiuse.x86_64: W: summary-ended-with-dot C The wiiuse library is used to access and control multiple Nintendo Wiimotes, the Wii remote controllers. wiiuse.x86_64: E: summary-too-long C The wiiuse library is used to access and control multiple Nintendo Wiimotes, the Wii remote controllers. (not sure where rpmlint gets the 'C' from). Honestly you can probably drop the comma and everything after if you need to free space. Sorry for all the back and forth. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 652257] Review Request: focuswriter - A fullscreen, distraction-free writing program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652257 Golo Fuchert changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 661354] Review Request: identicurse - Curses based Status.net client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661354 Steve Milner changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Steve Milner 2010-12-15 15:02:23 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: identicurse Short Description: A simple but powerful Identi.ca client with a curses-based UI. Owners: smilner Branches: f14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 605840] Review Request: Nini - An uncommonly powerful .NET configuration library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=605840 Steve Traylen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||steve.tray...@cern.ch --- Comment #3 from Steve Traylen 2010-12-15 14:43:30 EST --- The URL http://elsupergomez.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/Nini.spec is not working, In order to be sponsored can you do some informal reviews of some of the packages here http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html best to avoid the ones needing a sponsor , i.e the green ones. Once you have done some reviews report back here links to your reviews. Steve. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 661436] Review Request: rubygem-heroku - deploy apps to Heroku
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661436 --- Comment #11 from Minnikhanov 2010-12-15 14:45:08 EST --- Pack heroku-1.14.9 13/12/2010 Spec URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/14118661/rubygem-heroku.spec SRPM URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/14118661/rubygem-heroku-1.14.9-1.fc14.src.rpm At github (don't download by 'wget') > Spec URL: > https://github.com/minn/rubygem/blob/master/heroku/rubygem-heroku.spec > SRPM URL: > https://github.com/minn/rubygem/blob/master/heroku/rubygem-heroku-1.14.9-1.fc14.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 661902] Review Request: moksha - A platform for creating real-time web applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661902 --- Comment #7 from Luke Macken 2010-12-15 14:40:01 EST --- Spec URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/moksha.spec SRPM URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/moksha-0.5.0-4.fc14.src.rpm * Wed Dec 15 2010 Luke Macken - 0.5.0-4 - Add a logrotate configuration -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 635256] Review Request: qtop - tool for monitoring PBS systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=635256 --- Comment #10 from Steve Traylen 2010-12-15 14:38:19 EST --- Hi Fotis, Did you manage to review any other packages informally. http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 636930] Review Request:projectcenter - The GNUstep IDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=636930 --- Comment #6 from Jochen Schmitt 2010-12-15 13:51:18 EST --- New upstream release: Spec URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/projectcenter/projectcenter.spec SRPM URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/projectcenter/projectcenter-0.6.0-1.fc14.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 663102] Review Request: pyscard - python module adding smart cards support.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663102 Steve Traylen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||steve.tray...@cern.ch --- Comment #2 from Steve Traylen 2010-12-15 13:39:47 EST --- Hi Andrew, This is looking pretty good and thorough for a first package. Immediate things I notice, you are not compiling with correct compiler options, look at the example CFLAGS settings on the Python guidelines page and http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#Compiler_flags for a more general explanation. Concerning smartcard vs smart-card just because upstream is using the spelling of smartcard does not mean your .spec file has to... Though in this case smartcard seems to be in pretty common usage to me. More generally for obtaining sponsorship can continue to follow http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored and submit another package or two and provide some informal reviews of other reviews: http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/ report back here with links to some informal package review bugs you have done. When you review head this with "this is an informal review while I try to obtain package sponsorship" or something. Steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 635511] Review Request: assimp - Library to import various 3D model formats into applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=635511 --- Comment #21 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2010-12-15 13:42:53 EST --- Have you talked to assimp upstream about this? If they have a preferred default, it would be good to know it before I propose this change to irrlicht. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 661902] Review Request: moksha - A platform for creating real-time web applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661902 --- Comment #6 from Casey Dahlin 2010-12-15 12:43:49 EST --- Among the other things we said we would ignore was this: moksha.noarch: W: log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/moksha Hmm... not run in to this before... what's your thoughts? If it doesn't need log rotating then we can be done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 663405] New: Review Request: python-sqlamp - Library for working with hierarchical data structures using SQLAlchemy
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-sqlamp - Library for working with hierarchical data structures using SQLAlchemy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663405 Summary: Review Request: python-sqlamp - Library for working with hierarchical data structures using SQLAlchemy Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mbaco...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mbacovsk.fedorapeople.org/python-sqlamp/python-sqlamp.spec SRPM URL: http://mbacovsk.fedorapeople.org/python-sqlamp/python-sqlamp-0.5.2-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: sqlamp is an implementation of an efficient algorithm for working with hierarchical data structures. sqlamp uses (and depends on) SQLAlchemy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 663058] Review Request: rubygem-rack-restful_submit - Allows RESTful routing without Javascript and multiple submit buttons
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663058 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2010-12-15 11:37:05 EST --- rubygem-rack-restful_submit-1.1.2-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-rack-restful_submit-1.1.2-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 660131] Review Request: mu - mu is a collection of utilties for indexing and searching Maildirs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660131 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 663058] Review Request: rubygem-rack-restful_submit - Allows RESTful routing without Javascript and multiple submit buttons
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663058 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2010-12-15 11:37:01 EST --- rubygem-rack-restful_submit-1.1.2-1.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-rack-restful_submit-1.1.2-1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 660131] Review Request: mu - mu is a collection of utilties for indexing and searching Maildirs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660131 Andy Bailey changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||WONTFIX Last Closed||2010-12-15 11:01:19 --- Comment #4 from Andy Bailey 2010-12-15 11:01:19 EST --- Withdrawing submission, I think simply having a working spec file satisfies my needs. It'll be available at the same location if an established maintainer would like to create a new package later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 663244] Review Request: CUnit - A unit testing framework for C
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663244 --- Comment #2 from Shakthi Kannan 2010-12-15 11:09:05 EST --- * Updated datarootdir, datadir macros. * Updated postun, post ldconfig instructions. * Added smp flags for make. SPEC: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/CUnit.spec SRPM: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/CUnit-2.1_2-2.fc14.src.rpm Successful Koji builds for F-13, F-14 and EL-6: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2666721 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2666726 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2666731 $ rpmlint CUnit.spec CUnit.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: http://sourceforge.net/projects/cunit/files/CUnit/2.1-2/CUnit-2.1-2-src.tar.bz2 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. $ rpmlint CUnit-2.1_2-2.fc14.src.rpm CUnit.src: W: invalid-url Source0: http://sourceforge.net/projects/cunit/files/CUnit/2.1-2/CUnit-2.1-2-src.tar.bz2 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. $ rpmlint CUnit-2.1_2-2.fc14.i686.rpm CUnit.i686: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libcunit.so.1.0.1 e...@glibc_2.0 CUnit.i686: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man3/CUnit.3.gz 476: warning: macro `TP5' not defined (possibly missing space after `TP') CUnit.i686: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man3/CUnit.3.gz 484: warning: macro `BpTest->pName' not defined CUnit.i686: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man3/CUnit.3.gz 521: warning: macro `TP5' not defined (possibly missing space after `TP') CUnit.i686: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man3/CUnit.3.gz 523: warning: macro `TP5' not defined (possibly missing space after `TP') CUnit.i686: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man3/CUnit.3.gz 525: warning: macro `TP5' not defined (possibly missing space after `TP') CUnit.i686: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man3/CUnit.3.gz 527: warning: macro `TP5' not defined (possibly missing space after `TP') CUnit.i686: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man3/CUnit.3.gz 542: warning: macro `TP5' not defined (possibly missing space after `TP') CUnit.i686: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man3/CUnit.3.gz 544: warning: macro `TP5' not defined (possibly missing space after `TP') CUnit.i686: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man3/CUnit.3.gz 546: warning: macro `TP5' not defined (possibly missing space after `TP') CUnit.i686: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man3/CUnit.3.gz 548: warning: macro `TP5' not defined (possibly missing space after `TP') 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 11 warnings. $ rpmlint CUnit-devel-2.1_2-2.fc14.i686.rpm CUnit-devel.i686: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 663384] New: Review Request: scap-workbench - GUI tool that provides scanning, tailoring, editing and validation functionality for SCAP content
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: scap-workbench - GUI tool that provides scanning, tailoring, editing and validation functionality for SCAP content https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663384 Summary: Review Request: scap-workbench - GUI tool that provides scanning, tailoring, editing and validation functionality for SCAP content Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mbara...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: https://fedorahosted.org/scap-workbench/attachment/wiki/WikiStart/scap-workbench.spec?format=raw SRPM URL: https://fedorahosted.org/scap-workbench/attachment/wiki/WikiStart/scap-workbench-0.1.0-1.fc13.src.rpm?format=raw Description: Scap Workbench is a GUI tool that provides scanning, tailoring, editing and validation functionality for SCAP content. It uses openscap library to access SCAP functionalities. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 663092] Review Request: oxygen-gtk - Oxygen GTK theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663092 --- Comment #3 from Mohamed El Morabity 2010-12-15 10:40:12 EST --- cairo-devel as BR is useless, since it is already required by gtk2-devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 661832] Review Request: kdevelop-pg-qt - A parser generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661832 --- Comment #13 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-12-15 10:31:11 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 661832] Review Request: kdevelop-pg-qt - A parser generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661832 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Rex Dieter 2010-12-15 10:13:17 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: kdevelop-pg-qt Short Description: A parser generator Owners: rdieter,than,ltinkl,thomasj,kkofler Branches: f13,f14 InitialCC: rnovacek,tuxbrewr -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 654139] Review Request: ease - GNOME desktop presentation application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=654139 --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-12-15 08:54:26 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 650181] Review Request: tkabber-plugins - Additional plugins for tkabber
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=650181 --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-12-15 08:54:08 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 662604] Review Request: ibus-unikey - A Vietnamese engine for IBus input platform that uses Unikey.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=662604
--- Comment #1 from Christoph Wickert 2010-12-15
07:59:43 EST ---
Review for 194d2fae199c9f49dead1e45172c3e00 ibus-unikey-0.5.1-1.fc14.src.rpm
OK - MUST: $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-14-x86_64/result/ibus-unikey-*
ibus-unikey.src: W: invalid-url Source0:
http://ibus-unikey.googlecode.com/files/ibus-unikey-0.5.1.tar.gz HTTP Error
404: Not Found
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
Warning can be ignored, happens with all files on Google Code. I have verified
the URL with spectool.
OK - MUST: named according to the Package Naming Guidelines
OK - MUST: spec file name matches the base package %{name}
FIX - MUST: package does not meet the Packaging Guidelines, see below
OK - MUST: Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines (GPLv3)
OK - MUST: License field in spec file matches the actual license
OK - MUST: license file included in %doc
OK - MUST: spec is in American English
OK - MUST: spec is legible
OK - MUST: sources match the upstream source by MD5
0b8f79941dc3e9a4744d52e88e4401dc
OK - MUST: successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on F14 x86_64
N/A - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch.
OK - MUST: all build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires.
FIX - MUST: does not handle locales properly with %find_lang, see below
N/A - MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared
library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths,
must call ldconfig in %post and %postun.
OK - MUST: Package does not bundle copies of system libraries.
N/A - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must
state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for
relocation of that specific package.
FIX - MUST: does not own all directories that it creates, see below
OK - MUST: no duplicate files in the %files listing
OK - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly, includes %defattr(...)
OK - MUST: consistently uses macros
OK - MUST: package contains code, or permissable content
N/A - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage
OK - MUST: Files included as %doc do not affect the runtime of the application
N/A - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package
N/A - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package
N/A - MUST: library files that end in .so are in the -devel package.
N/A - MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully
versioned dependency
OK - MUST: The package does not contain any .la libtool archives.
N/A - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop
file.
FIX - MUST: package does owns own files or directories already owned by other
packages, seel below
OK - Should: at the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT.
OK - MUST: all filenames valid UTF-8
SHOULD Items:
OK - SHOULD: Source package includes license text(s) as a separate file.
N/A - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file
should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
OK - SHOULD: builds in mock.
OK - SHOULD: compiles and builds into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
OK - SHOULD: functions as described.
OK - SHOULD: Scriptlets are sane.
N/A - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency.
N/A - SHOULD: pkgconfig(.pc) files should be placed in a -devel pkg
OK - SHOULD: no file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or
/usr/sbin
N/A - SHOULD: package should contain man pages for binaries/scripts.
Other items:
OK - latest stable version
OK - SourceURL valid
OK - Compiler flags ok
OK - Debuginfo complete
OK - SHOULD: package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (
or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ).
N/A - SHOULD: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires:
pkgconfig'.
Issues:
Use of %{_datadir}/locale/... is forbidden, use %find_lang instead. See
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Handling_Locale_Files
The package does not own all folders that is creates:
%{_datadir}/%{name}/* will only own the files inside that folder, use
%{_datadir}/%{name}/ instead. See
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:UnownedDirectories
The package owns the folder %{_datadir}/ibus/component/, which is already owned
by the ibus package. Since ibus is a dependency of this package it should only
own %{_datadir}/ibus/component/unikey.xml. See
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#File_and_Directory_Ownership
The package does not build on F15, attaching a build.log. You might want to
contact upstream about this.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userpr
[Bug 662604] Review Request: ibus-unikey - A Vietnamese engine for IBus input platform that uses Unikey.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=662604 --- Comment #2 from Christoph Wickert 2010-12-15 08:00:37 EST --- Created attachment 468849 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=468849 build.log of F15 x86_64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 646836] Review Request: rubygem-bundler - The best way to manage your application's dependencies
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646836 Jozef Zigmund changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 634614] Review Request: mingw32-srvany - Utility for creating a service from any MinGW Windows binary
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634614 Andrew Beekhof changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RELEASE_PENDING --- Comment #13 from Andrew Beekhof 2010-12-15 06:44:28 EST --- Imported. Closing. Thankyou all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 661154] Review Request: votca-csg - VOTCA coarse graining engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661154 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2010-12-15 06:01:21 EST --- votca-csg-1.0.1-2.fc14,votca-tools-1.0.1-2.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/votca-csg-1.0.1-2.fc14,votca-tools-1.0.1-2.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 661143] Review Request: votca-tools - VOTCA tools library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661143 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2010-12-15 05:58:20 EST --- votca-tools-1.0.1-2.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/votca-tools-1.0.1-2.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 661143] Review Request: votca-tools - VOTCA tools library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661143 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2010-12-15 06:01:08 EST --- votca-csg-1.0.1-2.fc14,votca-tools-1.0.1-2.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/votca-csg-1.0.1-2.fc14,votca-tools-1.0.1-2.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 661154] Review Request: votca-csg - VOTCA coarse graining engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661154 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2010-12-15 06:00:19 EST --- votca-csg-1.0.1-2.fc13,votca-tools-1.0.1-2.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/votca-csg-1.0.1-2.fc13,votca-tools-1.0.1-2.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 661143] Review Request: votca-tools - VOTCA tools library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661143 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2010-12-15 06:00:14 EST --- votca-csg-1.0.1-2.fc13,votca-tools-1.0.1-2.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/votca-csg-1.0.1-2.fc13,votca-tools-1.0.1-2.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 661143] Review Request: votca-tools - VOTCA tools library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661143 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2010-12-15 05:58:12 EST --- votca-tools-1.0.1-2.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/votca-tools-1.0.1-2.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 661143] Review Request: votca-tools - VOTCA tools library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661143 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 661154] Review Request: votca-csg - VOTCA coarse graining engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661154 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2010-12-15 05:57:35 EST --- votca-csg-1.0.1-2.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/votca-csg-1.0.1-2.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 661154] Review Request: votca-csg - VOTCA coarse graining engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661154 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 661154] Review Request: votca-csg - VOTCA coarse graining engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661154 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2010-12-15 05:57:32 EST --- votca-csg-1.0.1-2.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/votca-csg-1.0.1-2.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 650181] Review Request: tkabber-plugins - Additional plugins for tkabber
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=650181 Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich 2010-12-15 05:54:13 EST --- Thanks. New Package SCM Request === Package Name: tkabber-plugins Short Description: Additional plugins for tkabber Owners: krege Branches: f13 f14 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 650181] Review Request: tkabber-plugins - Additional plugins for tkabber
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=650181 Peter Lemenkov changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Peter Lemenkov 2010-12-15 05:45:05 EST --- Ok, now it looks good enough for me. This package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 661810] Review Request: libcacard - Common Access Card emulation library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661810 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2010-12-15 05:45:13 EST --- libcacard-0.1.0-4.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libcacard-0.1.0-4.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 661810] Review Request: libcacard - Common Access Card emulation library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661810 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 663181] Review Request: ompc - MATLAB to Python syntax adapting compiler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663181 --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola 2010-12-15 05:32:30 EST --- By the way, usually one uses %patch0 -p1 %patch1 -p1 %patch2 -p1 instead of %patch -P0 -p1 %patch -P1 -p1 %patch -P2 -p1 which is more compact and IMHO also clearer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 650717] Review Request: PolicyKit-olpc - OLPC-specific PolicyKit overrides
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=650717 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 650717] Review Request: PolicyKit-olpc - OLPC-specific PolicyKit overrides
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=650717 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2010-12-15 05:09:19 EST --- PolicyKit-olpc-1.4-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/PolicyKit-olpc-1.4-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 663181] Review Request: ompc - MATLAB to Python syntax adapting compiler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663181 --- Comment #3 from Alon Levy 2010-12-15 05:04:18 EST --- ok - had a missing space in the %patch lines. (-P 0, not -P0) regarding the files you are absolutely right, strangely it seems the regular "python setup.py install" doesn't lead to that situation - so I'll have to look into that. If you install using "python setup.py install" you get a single directory /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/OMPC-1.0_beta-py2.7.egg/ It looks like that happens because of the egg creation and extraction that isn't happening with the default template I copied from - I'll just add that to the spec file install or build scripts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 663181] Review Request: ompc - MATLAB to Python syntax adapting compiler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663181 --- Comment #2 from Alon Levy 2010-12-15 04:51:17 EST --- Everything makes sense, just regarding the patches, I don't get the rpmlint message - I use them in %prep, and they are needed, so why doesn't rpmlint notice this? seems like an rpmlint bug. Maybe the BuildArch: noarch will "fix" that as well. I'll try. Alon -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 650181] Review Request: tkabber-plugins - Additional plugins for tkabber
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=650181 --- Comment #5 from Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich 2010-12-15 04:26:17 EST --- As many plugins have same licenses, I think there no need to make copy for each. Also, there are no GPL license files for those plugins that have it. Spec URL: http://krege.fedorapeople.org/tkabber/tkabber-plugins.spec SRPM URL: http://krege.fedorapeople.org/tkabber/tkabber-plugins-0.11.1-3.svn1948.fc14.src.rpm changelog * Wed Dec 15 2010 Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich - 0.11.1-3.svn1948 - Add license files to %%doc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 661961] Review Request: kyotocabinet - A lightweight database library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661961 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2010-12-15 04:04:07 EST --- kyotocabinet-1.2.29-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update kyotocabinet'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kyotocabinet-1.2.29-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 659896] Review Request: cp2k - A molecular dynamics engine capable of classical and Car-Parrinello simulations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659896 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2010-12-15 03:59:50 EST --- cp2k-2.1-2.20101006.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update cp2k'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cp2k-2.1-2.20101006.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 661660] Review Request: metamorphose2 - A cross platform file and folder mass renamer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661660 --- Comment #4 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2010-12-15 03:58:34 EST --- I asked upstream who said that metamorphose1 and metamorphose2 can coexist. I therefore renamed my rpm. Spec URL: http://pingou.fedorapeople.org/RPMs/metamorphose2.spec SRPM URL: http://pingou.fedorapeople.org/RPMs/metamorphose2-0.7.1-2.fc14.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561477] Review Request: jnr-posix - Java Posix layer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561477 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|jnr-posix-1.1.4-3.fc14 |jnr-posix-1.1.4-3.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 662349] Review Request: natus - A robust JavaScript shell built on the Natus meta-engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=662349 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2010-12-15 03:59:45 EST --- natus-0.1.3-2.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update natus'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/natus-0.1.3-2.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561477] Review Request: jnr-posix - Java Posix layer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561477 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2010-12-15 03:58:28 EST --- jnr-posix-1.1.4-3.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 646637] Review Request: jnr-netdb - Network services database access for java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646637 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|jnr-netdb-1.0.1-3.fc14 |jnr-netdb-1.0.1-3.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 646637] Review Request: jnr-netdb - Network services database access for java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646637 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2010-12-15 03:56:48 EST --- jnr-netdb-1.0.1-3.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 654139] Review Request: ease - GNOME desktop presentation application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=654139 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2010-12-15 03:52:34 EST --- Thanks! New Package SCM Request === Package Name: ease Short Description: GNOME desktop presentation application Owners: salimma Branches: f13 f14 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 663181] Review Request: ompc - MATLAB to Python syntax adapting compiler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663181
--- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2010-12-15 03:14:13
EST ---
rpmlint output:
ompc.src: E: invalid-version 1.0beta
ompc.src: W: summary-ended-with-dot C MATLAB to Python syntax adapting
compiler.
ompc.src: W: strange-permission ompc_gen_tarball.sh 0775L
ompc.src: W: patch-not-applied Patch1:
ompc-1.0beta-fix_compilation_for_ompc_supported.patch
ompc.src: W: patch-not-applied Patch2:
ompc-1.0beta-remove_ompc_pth_from_setup.patch
ompc.src: W: invalid-url Source0: ompc-1.0beta.tar.bz2
ompc.x86_64: E: invalid-version 1.0beta
ompc.x86_64: W: summary-ended-with-dot C MATLAB to Python syntax adapting
compiler.
ompc.x86_64: E: no-binary
ompc.x86_64: W: no-documentation
ompc.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ompceg/test.c
ompc.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ompceg/test.h
ompc-debuginfo.x86_64: E: invalid-version 1.0beta
ompc-debuginfo.x86_64: E: empty-debuginfo-package
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 5 errors, 9 warnings.
Please drop the unnecessary commented lines that remain from the python spec
file template.
Tag the package as BuildArch: noarch, as it is architecture independent.
Drop the patches if you don't need them.
Get rid of the test files.
You will need to stick to
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Package_Versioning
Having the git snapshot identifier in the release is IMHO quite pointless. I'd
use the date, which is a lot more understandable.
Abusive use of wildcards can lead to trouble. Avoid their use, unless
absolutely necessary. For instance this package has a clearly broken install.
The contents of %{python_sitelib} should be
%{python_sitelib}/ompc/
%{python_sitelib}/OMPC-*.egg-info
Currently there's a big bunch of additional stuff that in no case belongs
there, such as
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/test.py
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/test.pyc
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/test.pyo
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/LICENSE
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/OMPC-1.0_beta-py2.7.egg-info
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/README
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/licenses
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/licenses/ply
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/licenses/ply/ANNOUNCE
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/licenses/ply/CHANGES
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/licenses/ply/COPYING
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/licenses/ply/README
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/licenses/ply/TODO
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ompc.cfg
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ompceg
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ompceg/ompceg.py
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ompceg/ompceg.pyc
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ompceg/ompceg.pyo
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ompceg/test.c
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ompceg/test.h
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ompclib
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ompclib/__init__.py
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ompclib/__init__.pyc
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ompclib/__init__.pyo
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ompclib/byteplay.py
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ompclib/byteplay.pyc
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ompclib/byteplay.pyo
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ompclib/m_compile.py
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ompclib/m_compile.pyc
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ompclib/m_compile.pyo
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ompclib/matpy.py
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ompclib/matpy.pyc
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ompclib/matpy.pyo
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ompclib/matpy_gnuplot.py
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ompclib/matpy_gnuplot.pyc
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ompclib/matpy_gnuplot.pyo
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ompclib/matpy_platform.py
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ompclib/matpy_platform.pyc
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ompclib/matpy_platform.pyo
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ompclib/ompc_narginout.py
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ompclib/ompc_narginout.pyc
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ompclib/ompc_narginout.pyo
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ompclib/ompc_supported.py
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ompclib/ompc_supported.pyc
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ompclib/ompc_supported.pyo
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ompclib/ompclib_numpy.py
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ompclib/ompclib_numpy.pyc
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ompclib/ompclib_numpy.pyo
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ompclib/ompclib_numpy_base.py
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ompclib/ompclib_numpy_base.pyc
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ompclib/ompclib_numpy_base.pyo
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ompclib/ompclib_platform.py
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ompclib/ompclib_platform.pyc
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ompclib/ompclib_platform.pyo
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving
[Bug 663181] Review Request: ompc - MATLAB to Python syntax adapting compiler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663181 Jussi Lehtola changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jussi.leht...@iki.fi AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jussi.leht...@iki.fi Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 663244] Review Request: CUnit - A unit testing framework for C
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663244
Jussi Lehtola changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jussi.leht...@iki.fi
--- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2010-12-15 03:02:08
EST ---
A few notes:
Please use
--datarootdir=%{_datadir}
instead of
--datarootdir=/usr/share/
and %{_datadir} in place of %{_datarootdir} in %files, just to stick to
convention.
Is there any reason why SMP make is not used?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
