[Bug 661154] Review Request: votca-csg - VOTCA coarse graining engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661154 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-17 03:20:18 EST --- votca-csg-1.0.1-2.fc14, votca-tools-1.0.1-2.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update votca-csg votca-tools'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/votca-csg-1.0.1-2.fc14,votca-tools-1.0.1-2.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 661143] Review Request: votca-tools - VOTCA tools library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661143 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-17 03:20:11 EST --- votca-csg-1.0.1-2.fc14, votca-tools-1.0.1-2.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update votca-csg votca-tools'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/votca-csg-1.0.1-2.fc14,votca-tools-1.0.1-2.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 656363] Review Request: perl-Package-Stash-XS - Faster and more correct implementation of the Package::Stash API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656363 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-17 03:27:22 EST --- perl-Package-Stash-XS-0.17-2.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 656010] Review Request: libsrtp - An implementation of the Secure Real-time Transport Protocol (SRTP)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656010 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-17 03:23:36 EST --- libsrtp-1.4.4-1.20101004cvs.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 656010] Review Request: libsrtp - An implementation of the Secure Real-time Transport Protocol (SRTP)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656010 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||libsrtp-1.4.4-1.20101004cvs ||.fc13 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2010-12-17 03:23:43 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 554187] Review Request: shedskin - Python to C++ compiler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554187 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-17 03:25:14 EST --- shedskin-0.7-2.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update shedskin'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/shedskin-0.7-2.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 661810] Review Request: libcacard - Common Access Card emulation library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661810 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-17 03:24:49 EST --- libcacard-0.1.0-4.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update libcacard'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libcacard-0.1.0-4.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 663058] Review Request: rubygem-rack-restful_submit - Allows RESTful routing without Javascript and multiple submit buttons
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663058 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-17 03:27:40 EST --- rubygem-rack-restful_submit-1.1.1-3.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update rubygem-rack-restful_submit'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-rack-restful_submit-1.1.1-3.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 654139] Review Request: ease - GNOME desktop presentation application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=654139 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-17 03:24:55 EST --- ease-0.4-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update ease'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ease-0.4-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 650717] Review Request: PolicyKit-olpc - OLPC-specific PolicyKit overrides
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=650717 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-17 03:30:54 EST --- PolicyKit-olpc-1.4-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update PolicyKit-olpc'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/PolicyKit-olpc-1.4-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 646139] Review Request: kxstitch - tool that creates cross stitch patterns
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646139 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||kxstitch-0.8.4.1-5.fc13 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2010-12-17 03:35:49 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 646139] Review Request: kxstitch - tool that creates cross stitch patterns
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646139 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-17 03:35:44 EST --- kxstitch-0.8.4.1-5.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 545047] Review Request: NearTree - An API for finding nearest neighbors
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545047 --- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-17 03:38:44 EST --- NearTree-2.3.2-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 596593] Review Request: ibus-table-chinese - Chinese tables for IBus-Table
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596593 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-17 03:38:17 EST --- ibus-table-chinese-1.3.0.20101206-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 656363] Review Request: perl-Package-Stash-XS - Faster and more correct implementation of the Package::Stash API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656363 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-17 03:41:02 EST --- perl-Package-Stash-XS-0.17-2.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 545047] Review Request: NearTree - An API for finding nearest neighbors
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545047 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||NearTree-2.3.2-1.fc14 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2010-12-17 03:38:51 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 596593] Review Request: ibus-table-chinese - Chinese tables for IBus-Table
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596593 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||ibus-table-chinese-1.3.0.20 ||101206-1.fc14 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2010-12-17 03:38:25 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 646139] Review Request: kxstitch - tool that creates cross stitch patterns
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646139 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-17 03:43:44 EST --- kxstitch-0.8.4.1-5.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 545047] Review Request: NearTree - An API for finding nearest neighbors
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545047 --- Comment #34 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-17 03:44:03 EST --- NearTree-2.3.2-1.1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 656010] Review Request: libsrtp - An implementation of the Secure Real-time Transport Protocol (SRTP)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656010 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-17 03:43:31 EST --- libsrtp-1.4.4-1.20101004cvs.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 656010] Review Request: libsrtp - An implementation of the Secure Real-time Transport Protocol (SRTP)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656010 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|libsrtp-1.4.4-1.20101004cvs |libsrtp-1.4.4-1.20101004cvs |.fc13 |.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 646139] Review Request: kxstitch - tool that creates cross stitch patterns
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646139 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|kxstitch-0.8.4.1-5.fc13 |kxstitch-0.8.4.1-5.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 545047] Review Request: NearTree - An API for finding nearest neighbors
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545047 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|NearTree-2.3.2-1.fc14 |NearTree-2.3.2-1.1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 650712] Review Request: xcm - X Color Management tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=650712 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) kwiz...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) kwiz...@gmail.com 2010-12-17 05:27:10 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: xcm Short Description: X Color Management tools Owners: kwizart Branches: devel f14 f13 el6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 663737] Review Request: iwl6000g2a-firmware - Firmware for Intel(R) Wireless WiFi Link 6005 Series Adapters
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663737 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||lemen...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|lemen...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2010-12-17 05:28:52 EST --- I'll review it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 663914] New: Review Request: main package name here - short summary here
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: main package name here - short summary here https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663914 Summary: Review Request: main package name here - short summary here Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vondr...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/vondruch/rubygem-fssm.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/vondruch/rubygem-fssm-0.2.2-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: The File System State Monitor keeps track of the state of any number of paths and will fire events when said state changes (create/update/delete). FSSM supports using FSEvents on MacOS (with ruby 1.8), Inotify on GNU/Linux, and polling anywhere else. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 663914] Review Request: rubygem-fssm - File system state monitor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663914 Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: main |Review Request: |package name here - short |rubygem-fssm - File system |summary here |state monitor -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 636041] Rename pycairo to python-cairo for Fedora 15.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=636041
--- Comment #2 from Matthew Barnes mbar...@redhat.com 2010-12-17 06:26:05 EST
---
(In reply to comment #1)
python-cairo.src: W: strange-permission py2cairo-1.8.10.tar.gz 0444L
This should be probably 644
I'll fix the tarball permission the next time I upgrade the package.
Your spec is named pycairo.spec, whereas you should use python-cairo.spec
I linked to python-cairo.spec but forgot to change it in the uploaded source
package. I'll fix it when I actually rename the package.
not sure, why you use %{cairo_version}, which is the same as %{version}
That's true for 1.8.10, but isn't necessarily always true. cairo_version
refers to the minimum version of cairo needed to build the Python bindings for
cairo.
there is huge list of rpmlint warning such as:
python-cairo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/doc/python-cairo-1.8.10/examples/cairo_snippets/snippets/set_line_join.py
The file is installed with executable permissions, but was identified as one
that probably should not be executable. Verify if the executable bits are
desired, and remove if not.
I would tend to think that files in /usr/share/doc should not have executable
bits sets. But I will not block review on this.
I can't reproduce these warnings. All installed files use
%defattr(-,root,root,-).
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 663925] Review Request: autoconf-archive - The Autoconf Macro Archive
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663925 --- Comment #1 from Takanori MATSUURA t.mat...@gmail.com 2010-12-17 06:37:19 EST --- Koji scratch build successful on f13, f14, f15, 5E, and 6E. $ rpmlint autoconf-archive-2010.10.26-1.fc14.noarch.rpm, autoconf-archive-2010.10.26-1.fc14.src.rpm, and autoconf-archive.spec 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 663925] New: Review Request: autoconf-archive - The Autoconf Macro Archive
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: autoconf-archive - The Autoconf Macro Archive https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663925 Summary: Review Request: autoconf-archive - The Autoconf Macro Archive Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: t.mat...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://t-matsuu.sakura.ne.jp/mock/autoconf-archive/autoconf-archive.spec SRPM URL: http://t-matsuu.sakura.ne.jp/mock/autoconf-archive/autoconf-archive-2010.10.26-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: The GNU Autoconf Archive is a collection of more than 450 macros for GNU Autoconf that have been contributed as free software by friendly supporters of the cause from all over the Internet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 663925] Review Request: autoconf-archive - The Autoconf Macro Archive
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663925 Takanori MATSUURA t.mat...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||597307 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 597307] Review Request: fastx_toolkit - Tools to process short-reads FASTA/FASTQ files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597307 Takanori MATSUURA t.mat...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||663925 --- Comment #13 from Takanori MATSUURA t.mat...@gmail.com 2010-12-17 06:42:07 EST --- Autoconf-archive is now in review at bug 663925. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 663926] New: Review Request: lsyncd - Synchronize local directories with a remote targets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: lsyncd - Synchronize local directories with a remote targets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663926 Summary: Review Request: lsyncd - Synchronize local directories with a remote targets Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pbrobin...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/lsyncd.spec SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/lsyncd-2.0.0-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: Lsyncd watches a local directory trees event monitor interface (inotify). It aggregates and combines events for a few seconds and then spawns one (or more) process(es) to synchronize the changes. By default this is rsync. Lsyncd is thus a light-weight live mirror solution that is comparatively easy to install not requiring new filesystems or blockdevices and does not hamper local filesystem performance. koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2672754 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 663925] Review Request: autoconf-archive - The Autoconf Macro Archive
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663925 Takanori MATSUURA t.mat...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on|597307 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 597307] Review Request: fastx_toolkit - Tools to process short-reads FASTA/FASTQ files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597307 Takanori MATSUURA t.mat...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|663925 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 663914] Review Request: rubygem-fssm - File system state monitor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663914 Michal Fojtik mfoj...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mfoj...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mfoj...@redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Michal Fojtik mfoj...@redhat.com 2010-12-17 06:48:38 EST --- Taking this one for a review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 225829] Merge Review: gnome-pilot-conduits
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225829 Matthew Barnes mbar...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #6 from Matthew Barnes mbar...@redhat.com 2010-12-17 06:53:07 EST --- Sorry, this slipped through the cracks. Package cleanups applied to gnome-pilot-conduits-2.32.1-1.fc15. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 225830] Merge Review: gnome-pilot
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225830 Matthew Barnes mbar...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #4 from Matthew Barnes mbar...@redhat.com 2010-12-17 07:30:46 EST --- Package cleanups applied to gnome-pilot-2.32.0-3.fc15. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 588941] Review Request: pypy - Implementation of the Python language, using Python itself
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588941 --- Comment #34 from Dave Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com 2010-12-17 07:35:34 EST --- (In reply to comment #33) JVM backend is not mature enough to be shipped. Thanks; we'll leave it out, then. Btw: how did you end up having those files in the first place? Only things that are needed for a binary are ones that are packaged using package.py, which includes stdlib and .h files (and that's about it). Do you put all the source code with the package? If so, why? Sorry, it's not clear to me which files you're referring to in the above. The specfile is still using the scripted code from before; I haven't yet looked at the package.py you referred to. I plan to address this later today (note to self: comment #12 above). Regarding time - it was said here before I think, but using pypy to build pypy is already saving half of the time. That said, what I did when building ubuntu The specfile is written with the potential to build other configurations (stackless currently), and it use the ./pypy (i.e. the JIT-enabled binary) if it's already been built within this build. packages was simply replace the translate.py option with copying of already built pypy-c, this way it was much more convinient (do you also build KDE from scratch each time you want to test something on a package building process?) I'm not sure I understand the analogy here. Source RPMs are the granularity we work at when doing rebuilds. So we don't rebuild GCC each time, if that makes sense (and eventually you get into Reflections on Trusting Trust territory). If you're referring to using a pypy-c supplied as part of your tarball: we avoid using binaries supplied by upstream as a general policy across all of Fedora: - we want to ensure that we always can regenerate the full OS from source, using a fully open-source toolchain, and using binaries from an upstream tarball make it harder to assert that property of our OS. - avoiding prebuilt binaries reduces the knock-on effect of an upstream repository getting Trojanned More information on this policy is here (if bz doesn't mangle the link): http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#No_inclusion_of_pre-built_binaries_or_libraries There are exceptions allowed for compilers and cross-compilers, but as I understand it, they are intended for when someone is bootstrapping the buildsystem on a new architecture. My gut feeling is that the speedup, whilst desirable, doesn't outweigh the benefits of knowing that every binary was built in the same highly locked-down environment (e.g. we have a fresh chroot for every build, which we can reconstruct if we need to go back to investigate something). Another way to do this is: once a pypy package is in Fedora, it could have a build-time requirement on itself (i.e. build a new pypy package using the old one each time). Loops in the build-time dependency graph make me nervous; we try to minimize them, since it makes doing a full rebuild of source of all of Fedora more difficult (e.g. when introducing a new version of GCC). Hope all of the above makes sense (it's too early in the morning here) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630223] Review Request: ghc-failure - A simple type class for success/failure computations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630223 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-17 07:45:45 EST --- ghc-failure-0.1.0.1-1.fc13,ghc-neither-0.1.0-1.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-failure-0.1.0.1-1.fc13,ghc-neither-0.1.0-1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 655954] Review Request: drupal6-token - Tokens are small bits of text that can be placed into larger documents
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=655954 Paul W. Frields sticks...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sticks...@gmail.com Blocks||662103(InsightReviews) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 588941] Review Request: pypy - Implementation of the Python language, using Python itself
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588941 --- Comment #35 from Maciej Fijalkowski fij...@gmail.com 2010-12-17 07:46:09 EST --- (In reply to comment #34) (In reply to comment #33) JVM backend is not mature enough to be shipped. Thanks; we'll leave it out, then. Btw: how did you end up having those files in the first place? Only things that are needed for a binary are ones that are packaged using package.py, which includes stdlib and .h files (and that's about it). Do you put all the source code with the package? If so, why? Sorry, it's not clear to me which files you're referring to in the above. The specfile is still using the scripted code from before; I haven't yet looked at the package.py you referred to. I plan to address this later today (note to self: comment #12 above). I'm referring to prebuilt jars. They should not be there in the binary distribution at all, because the source code is not included (or a directory where they live in). How did you get a list of files that has to be included? Regarding time - it was said here before I think, but using pypy to build pypy is already saving half of the time. That said, what I did when building ubuntu The specfile is written with the potential to build other configurations (stackless currently), and it use the ./pypy (i.e. the JIT-enabled binary) if it's already been built within this build. packages was simply replace the translate.py option with copying of already built pypy-c, this way it was much more convinient (do you also build KDE from scratch each time you want to test something on a package building process?) I'm not sure I understand the analogy here. Source RPMs are the granularity we work at when doing rebuilds. So we don't rebuild GCC each time, if that makes sense (and eventually you get into Reflections on Trusting Trust territory). If you're referring to using a pypy-c supplied as part of your tarball: we avoid using binaries supplied by upstream as a general policy across all of Fedora: - we want to ensure that we always can regenerate the full OS from source, using a fully open-source toolchain, and using binaries from an upstream tarball make it harder to assert that property of our OS. - avoiding prebuilt binaries reduces the knock-on effect of an upstream repository getting Trojanned More information on this policy is here (if bz doesn't mangle the link): http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#No_inclusion_of_pre-built_binaries_or_libraries There are exceptions allowed for compilers and cross-compilers, but as I understand it, they are intended for when someone is bootstrapping the buildsystem on a new architecture. My gut feeling is that the speedup, whilst desirable, doesn't outweigh the benefits of knowing that every binary was built in the same highly locked-down environment (e.g. we have a fresh chroot for every build, which we can reconstruct if we need to go back to investigate something). Another way to do this is: once a pypy package is in Fedora, it could have a build-time requirement on itself (i.e. build a new pypy package using the old one each time). Loops in the build-time dependency graph make me nervous; we try to minimize them, since it makes doing a full rebuild of source of all of Fedora more difficult (e.g. when introducing a new version of GCC). Hope all of the above makes sense (it's too early in the morning here) Heh, hope your coffee tastes good :-) I'm not referring to the build process for a distribution itself (that should be fairly constrained, I admit) and while pypy would be cool to have, it's not more than suggested for a pypy build. What's I'm referring to is that when you work on a build system you might want to avoid the whole translation process at all, by say copying already built pypy binary and avoiding burden associated with creating it each time. you would still need to build one for the distribution though (but the length of build process is not as painful). That's just a suggestion and I guess I'm not getting the whole complexity of things associated anyway. Cheers, fijal -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 655954] Review Request: drupal6-token - Tokens are small bits of text that can be placed into larger documents
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=655954 Paul W. Frields sticks...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|sticks...@gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 532527] Review request: junit-addons - JUnitX helper classes for JUnit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532527 Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Blocks|163776(FE-NEW) |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution||WONTFIX Flag|fedora-review? | Last Closed||2010-12-17 07:52:44 --- Comment #8 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2010-12-17 07:52:44 EST --- mefoster has just orphaned all her packages. So this review is not going to be finished by her. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 655954] Review Request: drupal6-token - Tokens are small bits of text that can be placed into larger documents
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=655954 Paul W. Frields sticks...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||needinfo?(peter.bo...@gmail ||.com) --- Comment #2 from Paul W. Frields sticks...@gmail.com 2010-12-17 07:51:52 EST --- Peter, when you include rpmlint output, please remember to include it for the binary RPM as well. $ rpmlint rpmbuild/SPECS/drupal6-token.spec drupal6-token-1.15-1.fc14.src.rpm rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/drupal6-token-1.15-1.fc14.noarch.rpm drupal6-token.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.15 ['1.15-1.fc14', '1.15-1'] 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. * Fix your %changelog entry. This was a problem in another spec file also, if I recall correctly. * Your definition of %drupaldir at the top won't work in Fedora Rawhide/F-15 and should probably use guidance I provided for you in one of your other package review bugs. I don't see any other glaring problems, just repost when you have these fixed and I can complete a full review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 663914] Review Request: rubygem-fssm - File system state monitor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663914 --- Comment #2 from Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com 2010-12-17 08:34:53 EST --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/vondruch/rubygem-fssm.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/vondruch/rubygem-fssm-0.2.2-2.fc14.src.rpm Documentation moved into sub-package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 636947] Review Request: ding-libs - Ding is not Glib assorted utility libraries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=636947 Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2010-12-17 08:39:13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 663956] New: Review Request: python-numexpr - Fast numerical array expression evaluator for Python and NumPy.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-numexpr - Fast numerical array expression evaluator for Python and NumPy. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663956 Summary: Review Request: python-numexpr - Fast numerical array expression evaluator for Python and NumPy. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: thibault.no...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://tnorth.fedorapeople.org/python-numexpr.spec SRPM URL: http://tnorth.fedorapeople.org/python-numexpr-1.4.1-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: The numexpr package evaluates multiple-operator array expressions many times faster than NumPy can. It accepts the expression as a string, analyzes it, rewrites it more efficiently, and compiles it to faster Python code on the fly. It's the next best thing to writing the expression in C and compiling it with a specialized just-in-time (JIT) compiler, i.e. it does not require a compiler at runtime. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 663959] New: Review Request: httpcomponents-project - Common POM file for HttpComponents
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: httpcomponents-project - Common POM file for HttpComponents https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663959 Summary: Review Request: httpcomponents-project - Common POM file for HttpComponents Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: socho...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://sochotni.fedorapeople.org/packages/httpcomponents-project.spec SRPM URL: http://sochotni.fedorapeople.org/packages/httpcomponents-project-4.1.1-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: Common POM file for HttpComponents -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226079] Merge Review: libxml2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226079 Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added QAContact|fedora-package-rev...@redha |mc...@redhat.com |t.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226079] Merge Review: libxml2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226079
Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|needinfo? |
--- Comment #23 from Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com 2010-12-17 10:15:55 EST ---
Created attachment 469394
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=469394
commented output of fedpkg lint
(In reply to comment #21)
Side note, could you point Toshio Kuratomi to XML specification appendix F.
http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/#sec-guessing-with-ext-info
Just a side-note before doing a proper review ... the reason why you are right
and Toshio is (in this question) most likely wrong is that he considers XML
files as text files. They are clearly not, because one of the main important
characteristics of plain text files is exactly this ... they don't have
encoding metada. However, every XML has stated encoding (defaulting to UTF-8 if
missing). IMHO, XML files don't need to be touched.
Anyway, now the proper review (based on clone of the Fedora git):
- MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in
the review
Complete commented output of fedpkg lint has been attached. Here is only the
summary:
* Removing executable bits from examples, tests, and chvalid.c
* Running tests in %check
* Not sure about /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/libxml2mod.so providing
libxml2mod.so()(64bit)
* See in the patch fix for libxml2mod.a being in the non-static package.
+ MUST: package named according to the Package Naming Guidelines
+ MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}
+ MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines .
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Why_the_.25makeinstall_macro_should_not_be_used
I have on idea why %makeinstall is used, when
make install DESTDIR=%{?buildroot}
works apparently as well.
+ MUST: The package licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the
Licensing Guidelines
+ MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual
license
License: MIT
+ MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package must be included in %doc.
+ MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
+ MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
+ MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream
source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task
From srpm:
8127a65e8c3b08856093099b52599c86 libxml2-2.7.8.tar.gz
8127a65e8c3b08856093099b52599c86 libxml2-2.7.8.tar.gz.new
= MATCHES
+ MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at
least one primary architecture
- was builded many times in koji, but just to be sure my patch doesn't break
anything, here is another scratch build
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2673167
0 MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch
+ MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines
Build in koji
0 MUST: The spec file handles locales properly. This is done by using the
%find_lang macro
No locales
0 MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library
files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must
call ldconfig in %post and %postun.
Not appllicable
0 MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries
0 MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state
this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for
relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is
considered a blocker
+ MUST: Package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create
a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create
that directory
+ MUST: Package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files
listings
+ MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Every %files section must
include a %defattr(...) line.
+ MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf
%{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
+ MUST: Each package must consistently use macros
+ MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content
0 MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage
+ MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime
of the application
+ MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package
+ MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package
+ MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must
[Bug 567950] Review Request: aduna-commons-iteration - Iterations and iterators for various purposes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567950 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard|StalledSubmitter| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 567952] Review Request: aduna-commons-net - Extensions to the Java networking functionality
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567952 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard|StalledSubmitter| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 567951] Review Request: aduna-commons-xml - Extensions to the Java XML functionality
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567951 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard|StalledSubmitter| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 563483] Review Request: aduna-commons-lang - Extensions to the Java lang package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563483 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard|StalledSubmitter| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 567949] Review Request: aduna-commons-collections - Extensions to the Java Collections framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567949 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard|StalledSubmitter| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 563477] Review Request: aduna-commons-io - Extensions to the Java IO functionality
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563477 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard|StalledSubmitter| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 507912] Review Request: alp - Advanced Linux Programming, Book By CodeSourcery LLC, PDF format
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507912 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks||201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution||NOTABUG Status Whiteboard|StalledSubmitter| Last Closed||2010-12-17 10:22:57 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 540539] Review Request: gpdftext - Ebook PDF editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540539 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks||201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution||NOTABUG Status Whiteboard|StalledSubmitter| Last Closed||2010-12-17 10:26:47 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 532531] Review request: serp - Bytecode manipulation framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532531 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks|163776(FE-NEW) |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution||NOTABUG Status Whiteboard|StalledSubmitter| Last Closed||2010-12-17 10:24:37 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 532530] Review request: ognl - Object-Graph Navigation Language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532530 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks|163776(FE-NEW) |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution||NOTABUG Status Whiteboard|StalledSubmitter| Last Closed||2010-12-17 10:24:28 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 533091] Review Request: emacs-etach - Emacs extension for MIME processing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533091 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks||201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution||NOTABUG Status Whiteboard|StalledSubmitter| Last Closed||2010-12-17 10:26:19 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 549605] Review Request: libopenr2 - MFC/R2 call setup library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549605 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks||201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution||NOTABUG Status Whiteboard|StalledSubmitter| Last Closed||2010-12-17 10:27:21 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 539469] Review Request: OpenSRF - Open Scalable Request Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539469 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks||201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution||NOTABUG Status Whiteboard|StalledSubmitter| Last Closed||2010-12-17 10:26:37 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 531363] Review request: WiKIDToken - Token for the WiKID Strong Authentication System
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531363 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution||NOTABUG Status Whiteboard|StalledSubmitter| Last Closed||2010-12-17 10:24:49 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 532535] Review request: xml-security - Implementation of W3C security standards for XML
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532535 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks|163776(FE-NEW) |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution||NOTABUG Status Whiteboard|StalledSubmitter| Last Closed||2010-12-17 10:26:28 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 529569] Review Request: mingw32-speex - MinGW build of the Speex voice compression codec library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529569 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution||NOTABUG Status Whiteboard|StalledSubmitter| Last Closed||2010-12-17 10:25:23 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 532528] Review request: ldapsdk - Enables applications to manage information stored in an LDAP directory
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532528 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks|163776(FE-NEW) |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution||NOTABUG Status Whiteboard|StalledSubmitter| Last Closed||2010-12-17 10:24:18 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 542436] Review Request: python-cloudfiles - Python language bindings for Rackspace CloudFiles API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542436 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution||NOTABUG Status Whiteboard|StalledSubmitter| Last Closed||2010-12-17 10:26:55 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 546873] Review Request: celt051 - An audio codec for use in low-delay speech and audio communication
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546873 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks||201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution||NOTABUG Status Whiteboard|StalledSubmitter| Last Closed||2010-12-17 10:25:42 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 487587] Review Request: debuginfofs - network-mountable filesystem for debuginfo
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487587 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks||201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution||NOTABUG Status Whiteboard|StalledSubmitter| Last Closed||2010-12-17 10:23:15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 558849] Review Request: Jep - Java Embedded Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558849 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks||201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution||NOTABUG Status Whiteboard|StalledSubmitter| Last Closed||2010-12-17 10:27:07 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 529756] Review Request: mingw32-libtheora - MinGW build of the Theora Video Compression Codec library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529756 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution||NOTABUG Status Whiteboard|StalledSubmitter| Last Closed||2010-12-17 10:25:33 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 484051] Review Request: sockettest - Test My Socket
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484051 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks||201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution||NOTABUG Status Whiteboard|StalledSubmitter| Last Closed||2010-12-17 10:23:28 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 529560] Review Request: mingw32-libvorbis - MinGW build of the libvorbis Vorbis General Audio Compression Codec library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529560 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution||NOTABUG Status Whiteboard|StalledSubmitter| Flag|needinfo?(mi...@limbasan.ro | |) | Last Closed||2010-12-17 10:25:02 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 550104] Review Request: magento - Magento is an ecommerce web application.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550104 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution||NOTABUG Status Whiteboard|StalledSubmitter| Last Closed||2010-12-17 10:27:45 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 532522] Review request: hessian - Binary web service protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532522 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks|163776(FE-NEW) |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution||NOTABUG Status Whiteboard|StalledSubmitter| Last Closed||2010-12-17 10:24:06 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 660393] Review Request: netxen-firmware - QLogic Linux Intelligent Ethernet (3000 and 3100 Series) Adapter Firmware
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660393 --- Comment #3 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2010-12-17 10:51:47 EST --- Sucheta, the files are likely to be identical. This package is simply awaiting review for inclusion into Fedora (since it is a new package). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 627180] Review Request: django-paste - dpaste is a code pastebin application using Django.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=627180 --- Comment #13 from Clint Savage her...@gmail.com 2010-12-17 11:02:45 EST --- David, Any chance you'll be looking at this in the next bit? I'm working on getting fpaste-server built and this is a dependency. If not, I could build and maintain the rpm if you like. Cheers, Clint -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 663983] New: Review Request: rubygem-boxgrinder-build-ec2-platform-plugin - BoxGrinder plugin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-boxgrinder-build-ec2-platform-plugin - BoxGrinder plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663983 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-boxgrinder-build-ec2-platform-plugin - BoxGrinder plugin Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mgold...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://goldmann.fedorapeople.org/package_review/boxgrinder/rubygem-boxgrinder-build-ec2-platform-plugin.spec SRPM URL: http://goldmann.fedorapeople.org/package_review/boxgrinder/rubygem-boxgrinder-build-ec2-platform-plugin-0.0.7-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: BoxGrinder Build Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2) Platform Plugin to convert appliances to EC2 format -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 663213] Review Request: perl-File-Inplace - Perl module for in-place editing of files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663213 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||iarn...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|iarn...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 2010-12-17 11:06:40 EST --- How did I never spot this module before? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 663213] Review Request: perl-File-Inplace - Perl module for in-place editing of files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663213 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 2010-12-17 11:14:05 EST --- + source files match upstream. fae0848ebef6969502dde017805a31a1 File-Inplace-0.20.tar.gz + package meets naming and versioning guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. + summary is OK. + description is OK. + dist tag is present. + license field matches the actual license. GPL+ or Artistic + license is open source-compatible. + license text not included upstream. + latest version is being packaged. + BuildRequires are proper. + compiler flags are appropriate. + package builds in mock https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2664417 + package installs properly. + rpmlint has no useful complaints: 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings. [iarn...@microstar perl-File-Inplace]$ rpmlint -v ~/dl/perl-File-Inplace-0.20-1.fc15.*rpm perl-File-Inplace.noarch: I: checking perl-File-Inplace.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US unchomping - uncomplaining, uncompromising, uncomprehending perl-File-Inplace.noarch: I: checking-url http://search.cpan.org/dist/File-Inplace/ (timeout 10 seconds) perl-File-Inplace.src: I: checking perl-File-Inplace.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US unchomping - uncomplaining, uncompromising, uncomprehending perl-File-Inplace.src: I: checking-url http://search.cpan.org/dist/File-Inplace/ (timeout 10 seconds) perl-File-Inplace.src: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %clean perl-File-Inplace.src: W: no-buildroot-tag perl-File-Inplace.src: W: no-%clean-section perl-File-Inplace.src: I: checking-url http://www.cpan.org/modules/by-module/File/File-Inplace-0.20.tar.gz (timeout 10 seconds) 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings. + final provides and requires are sane: perl(File::Inplace) = 0.20 perl-File-Inplace = 0.20-1.fc15 = perl(Carp) perl(File::Basename) perl(File::Copy) perl(File::Temp) perl(IO::File) perl(IO::Handle) perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.2) perl(strict) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) = 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) = 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) = 4.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) = 5.2-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) = 3.0.3-1 + %check is present and all tests pass. + make test PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl -MExtUtils::Command::MM -e test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch') t/*.t t/File-Inplace.t .. ok All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=21, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.03 usr 0.01 sys + 0.07 cusr 0.00 csys = 0.11 CPU) Result: PASS + no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. + owns the directories it creates. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no generically named files + code, not content. + documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. + %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 661272] Review Request: lorax - tool for creating anaconda install images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661272 --- Comment #2 from Martin Gracik mgra...@redhat.com 2010-12-17 11:14:42 EST --- I fixed the things you pointed out, and updated the srpm and spec file on fedorahosted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 663926] Review Request: lsyncd - Synchronize local directories with a remote targets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663926 Ruben Kerkhof ru...@rubenkerkhof.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ru...@rubenkerkhof.com --- Comment #1 from Ruben Kerkhof ru...@rubenkerkhof.com 2010-12-17 11:26:53 EST --- Hi Peter, This looks good to me, but what's missing IMHO is an example config file and an initscript. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 516114] Review Request: trac-accountmanager-plugin - Trac plugin for account registration and management
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516114 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #13 from Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org 2010-12-17 11:33:00 EST --- Package Change Request == Package Name: trac-accountmanager-plugin New Branches: el6 Owners: pghmcfc Ben's not interested in maintaining this in EPEL at the moment (though of course he's welcome as co-maintainer at a later date if he wishes) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 661272] Review Request: lorax - tool for creating anaconda install images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661272 --- Comment #3 from Chris Lumens clum...@redhat.com 2010-12-17 11:38:31 EST --- Mandatory review guidelines: ok - rpmlint output A comment in the .spec file excuses this. ok - License files included in package %docs or not included in upstream source ok - Build succeeds on at least one supported platform ok - Build succeeds on all supported platforms or has ExcludeArch + bugs filed ok - BuildRequires correct Optional review guidelines: no - Man pages included for all executables This is fine for now. Packaging guidelines: ok - Correct BuildRoot tag on F10/EL6 ok - Correct %clean section on F13/EL6 ok - Requires correct, justified where necessary ok - All relevant documentation is packaged, tagged appropriately It would be nice to have some real documentation - either as docstrings or external. This is a big, complex project and needs some explaining. However, if having documentation were a requirement for being in Fedora, we'd have far less stuff. ok - Useful -debuginfo package or disabled and justified ok - Config files marked with %config no - %config files marked noreplace or justified Please use %config(noreplace) - see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Configuration_files ok - No %config files under /usr Python Guidelines: ok - Runtime Requires correct -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 661272] Review Request: lorax - tool for creating anaconda install images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661272 --- Comment #4 from Martin Gracik mgra...@redhat.com 2010-12-17 11:47:41 EST --- I fixed the config(noreplace) part. Will add the documentation part to my TODO. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 663926] Review Request: lsyncd - Synchronize local directories with a remote targets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663926 --- Comment #2 from Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com 2010-12-17 11:45:30 EST --- This looks good to me, but what's missing IMHO is an example config file and an initscript. OK, no examples included upstream so I'll have a look at our current custom compiled solution and see what I can come up with. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 661272] Review Request: lorax - tool for creating anaconda install images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661272 Chris Lumens clum...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 661272] Review Request: lorax - tool for creating anaconda install images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661272 Martin Gracik mgra...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 661272] Review Request: lorax - tool for creating anaconda install images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661272 --- Comment #5 from Martin Gracik mgra...@redhat.com 2010-12-17 12:05:20 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: lorax Short Description: Lorax is a tool for creating anaconda install images. Owners: mgracik Branches: InitialCC: anaconda-maint -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 588941] Review Request: pypy - Implementation of the Python language, using Python itself
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588941 --- Comment #36 from Dave Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com 2010-12-17 12:23:19 EST --- (In reply to comment #35) (In reply to comment #34) (In reply to comment #33) JVM backend is not mature enough to be shipped. Thanks; we'll leave it out, then. Btw: how did you end up having those files in the first place? Only things that are needed for a binary are ones that are packaged using package.py, which includes stdlib and .h files (and that's about it). Do you put all the source code with the package? If so, why? Sorry, it's not clear to me which files you're referring to in the above. The specfile is still using the scripted code from before; I haven't yet looked at the package.py you referred to. I plan to address this later today (note to self: comment #12 above). I'm referring to prebuilt jars. They should not be there in the binary distribution at all, because the source code is not included (or a directory where they live in). How did you get a list of files that has to be included? FWIW, those jar files are present within SVN/HG; looking here: http://codespeak.net/pypy/dist/pypy/translator/jvm/src/ I see them, and they seem to be in the source tarballs you're building: $ tar -tjvf pypy-1.4-src.tar.bz2 | grep jar -rw-r--r-- fijal/fijal 207224 2007-12-06 06:37 pypy-1.4/pypy/translator/jvm/src/jna.jar -rw-r--r-- fijal/fijal 128766 2009-04-18 11:54 pypy-1.4/pypy/translator/jvm/src/jasmin.jar $ md5sum pypy-1.4-src.tar.bz2 6c7e5a3fab4b3f6357aab84927420b49 pypy-1.4-src.tar.bz2 (which matches that on http://pypy.org/download.html ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 569671] Review Request: elliptics - Distributed hash table storage
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=569671 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks||201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution||NOTABUG Status Whiteboard|StalledSubmitter| Last Closed||2010-12-17 12:50:47 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 566412] Review Request: wapiti - A web application vulnerability scanner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566412 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks|563471(FE-SECLAB) |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution||NOTABUG Status Whiteboard|StalledSubmitter| Last Closed||2010-12-17 12:51:54 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 530047] Review Request: mingw32-tk - MinGW Windows graphical toolkit for the Tcl scripting language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530047 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks||201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution||NOTABUG Status Whiteboard|StalledSubmitter| Last Closed||2010-12-17 12:50:29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 567654] Review Request: Infobright Community Edition - Columnar database for analytics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567654 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution||NOTABUG Status Whiteboard|StalledSubmitter| Last Closed||2010-12-17 12:52:21 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 563471] Tracker: Review Requests for Fedora Security Lab related packages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563471 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on|579428(w3af)| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 505154] Tracker: Review Requests for Science and Technology related packages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505154 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on|506567 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 506567] Review Request: acl2 - Automated reasoning system based on Common Lisp
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506567 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks|505154(FE-SCITECH) |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution||NOTABUG Status Whiteboard|StalledSubmitter| Last Closed||2010-12-17 12:50:15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 579428] Package Review: w3af - Web Application Attach and Audit Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579428 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks|563471(FE-SECLAB) |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution||NOTABUG Status Whiteboard|StalledSubmitter| Last Closed||2010-12-17 12:51:25 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
