[Bug 188542] Review Request: hylafax
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=188542 --- Comment #113 from Lee Howard 2010-12-20 02:26:58 EST --- SRPM: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/hylafax/hylafax-5.5.0-1.src.rpm For what it's worth, I did solicit a sponsor on IRC as suggested. Although some brief discussion ensued nothing became of it other than comments similar to, "Oh, that package... I'm not going to touch it." I understand the blocks to be as follows: 1) package naming - there is some objection to using "hylafax" as the package name, however, as yet no prospective sponsor has committed to sponsoring the package inclusion if the package name is changed to "hylafax+". 2) conflict with mgetty-sendfax - in order for package inclusion to occur there will necessarily need to be collaboration in the "alternatives" so that users can switch between hylafax and mgetty-sendfax. (It is apparently unacceptable to have conflicting packages in the repository.) But, again, collaboration is apparently not easy to come-by. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 225830] Merge Review: gnome-pilot
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225830 Parag AN(पराग) changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #453178|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #6 from Parag AN(पराग) 2010-12-20 00:46:08 EST --- Created attachment 469677 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=469677 few more cleanups This patch will remove file extension .schema and modify %files accordingly. also saw rpmlint on srpm gave gnome-pilot.src:416: W: macro-in-%changelog %post -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 225830] Merge Review: gnome-pilot
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225830 Parag AN(पराग) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ASSIGNED --- Comment #5 from Parag AN(पराग) 2010-12-20 00:28:28 EST --- oops my bad! please remove filename extension .schema as its really not needed with gconf2 schema scriptlets. yum update to this package gave warning. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 225829] Merge Review: gnome-pilot-conduits
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225829 Parag AN(पराग) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ASSIGNED --- Comment #7 from Parag AN(पराग) 2010-12-20 00:10:19 EST --- Thanks for the update. Few items remaining are 1) Buildroot should be removed as it is wrong as per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#BuildRoot_tag 2) gnome-pilot-conduits.src: W: invalid-url Source0: http://download.gnome.org/source/gnome-pilot-conduits/2.0/gnome-pilot-conduits-2.32.1.tar.bz2 HTTP Error 404: Not Found 3) License still contains "MPLv1.0". Can you please specify in spec which code is MPLv1.0 licensed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 510864] Review Request: colorize - Perl script to colorize logs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510864 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ke...@tummy.com --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-12-20 00:10:19 EST --- Looks like this package was never imported and built? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 663213] Review Request: perl-File-Inplace - Perl module for in-place editing of files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663213 Ruediger Landmann changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||664359 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 663213] Review Request: perl-File-Inplace - Perl module for in-place editing of files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663213 Ruediger Landmann changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Ruediger Landmann 2010-12-19 22:59:45 EST --- Thanks for the review, Iain :) New Package SCM Request === Package Name: perl-File-Inplace Short Description: Perl module for in-place editing of files Owners: rlandmann Branches: f13 f14 el6 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 663213] Review Request: perl-File-Inplace - Perl module for in-place editing of files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663213 --- Comment #4 from Ruediger Landmann 2010-12-19 23:00:33 EST --- Sorry -- should do EL5 too: New Package SCM Request === Package Name: perl-File-Inplace Short Description: Perl module for in-place editing of files Owners: rlandmann Branches: f13 f14 el5 el6 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 662604] Review Request: ibus-unikey - A Vietnamese engine for IBus input platform that uses Unikey.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=662604 --- Comment #4 from Truong Anh Tuan 2010-12-19 20:50:31 EST --- I made some small changes in %changelog to meet the Guidelines at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Changelogs Btw, do I need to process "N/A" issues? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664339] New: Review Request: zarafa-webaccess-smime - Zarafa Webaccess plugin for S/MIME support
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: zarafa-webaccess-smime - Zarafa Webaccess plugin for S/MIME support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664339 Summary: Review Request: zarafa-webaccess-smime - Zarafa Webaccess plugin for S/MIME support Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: redhat-bugzi...@linuxnetz.de QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/zarafa-webaccess-smime.spec SRPM URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/zarafa-webaccess-smime-0.9-1.src.rpm Description: The S/MIME plugin allows users to send and receive signed and encrypted e-mails over Zarafa Webaccess. For signing and encryption the plugin uses the Mozilla Firefox certificate system at client/browser side. Receiving encrypted, verifying signed, sending encrypted and/or signed messages is supported. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664339] Review Request: zarafa-webaccess-smime - Zarafa Webaccess plugin for S/MIME support
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664339 Robert Scheck changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tcall...@redhat.com Blocks||182235(FE-Legal) --- Comment #1 from Robert Scheck 2010-12-19 19:02:17 EST --- Upstream told me in an e-mail, that they will include the license headers into the source code files at the next release. Further I was told in that e-mail, that the release of this version is 0.9, even if it's mentioned nowhere at the moment. Are these intentions good enough - especially the first one? So adding Fedora Legal for now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 644883] Review Request: django-simple-captcha - Django application to add captcha images to any Django form.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=644883 Clint Savage changed: What|Removed |Added CC||her...@gmail.com --- Comment #17 from Clint Savage 2010-12-19 17:49:39 EST --- Package Change Request == Package Name: django-simple-captcha` New Branches: el5 el6 Owners: dcr226 Adding this package as its a dependency for fpaste-server which is currently being tested on publictest7. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 627180] Review Request: django-paste - dpaste is a code pastebin application using Django.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=627180 --- Comment #15 from Clint Savage 2010-12-19 17:38:48 EST --- Oops, I updated the lang entries in the spec file below. While it still gives warnings on the build of the rpm, it doesn't have any issues using rpmlint. $ rpmlint rpmbuild/SRPMS/django-dpaste-0.2.4-2.fc14.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/django-dpaste-0.2.4-2.fc14.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint rpmbuild/SPECS/django-dpaste.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Clint http://herlo.fedorapeople.org/rpms/django-dpaste-0.2.4-2.fc14.src.rpm http://herlo.fedorapeople.org/rpms/django-dpaste.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 627180] Review Request: django-paste - dpaste is a code pastebin application using Django.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=627180 --- Comment #16 from Clint Savage 2010-12-19 17:41:15 EST --- Oh, I wanted to make sure we got this into epel 5/6 just so we don't forget. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 645354] Review Request: django-tracking - Django site visitor tracking, including basic blacklisting
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645354 --- Comment #15 from Clint Savage 2010-12-19 17:25:55 EST --- Sure. I can build rpms if needed :) Feel free to add me as a comaintainer. Clint -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 657577] Review Request: sdlhack - Force full-screen games to minimize
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657577 --- Comment #13 from Hicham HAOUARI 2010-12-19 17:23:09 EST --- (In reply to comment #12) > + install -Dpm 755 libsdlhack-i386.so libsdlhack-x86_64.so > /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/sdlhack-1.1-1.fc13.x86_64/usr/lib64/sdlhack/libsdlhack.so > install: target > `/home/makerpm/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/sdlhack-1.1-1.fc13.x86_64/usr/lib64/sdlhack/libsdlhack.so' > is not a directory > error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.mfzHwm (%install) Fixed : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2676567 About not bumping release number, I don't think it is worth it since we are dealing with trivial issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 657577] Review Request: sdlhack - Force full-screen games to minimize
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657577 --- Comment #12 from Volker Fröhlich 2010-12-19 16:04:30 EST --- + install -Dpm 755 libsdlhack-i386.so libsdlhack-x86_64.so /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/sdlhack-1.1-1.fc13.x86_64/usr/lib64/sdlhack/libsdlhack.so install: target `/home/makerpm/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/sdlhack-1.1-1.fc13.x86_64/usr/lib64/sdlhack/libsdlhack.so' is not a directory error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.mfzHwm (%install) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664298] Review Request: autojump - A fast way to navigate your filesystem from the command line
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664298 --- Comment #2 from Thibault North 2010-12-19 15:52:21 EST --- It seems that the problem occurs because rpmbuild uses xz for compression that epel can not unpack. I updated the srpm, now created with rpmbuild-md5. It builds: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2676428 Thanks, Thibault -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 657577] Review Request: sdlhack - Force full-screen games to minimize
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657577 --- Comment #11 from Hicham HAOUARI 2010-12-19 15:44:51 EST --- (In reply to comment #10) > OK, forget about the Requires. > > Please add a comment, when you change your spec-file and also increment the > release number and add an entry to the changelog. Otherwise the reviewer can't > easily see, he's looking at an updated version. > > Your current spec doesn't work. What do you mean by "doesn't work" ? I test if it builds before submitting any changes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 654544] Review Request: python-asyncmongo - An asynchronous Python MongoDB library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=654544 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2010-12-19 15:22:26 EST --- python-asyncmongo-0.1-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 654544] Review Request: python-asyncmongo - An asynchronous Python MongoDB library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=654544 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||python-asyncmongo-0.1-1.fc1 ||4 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2010-12-19 15:22:19 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 654544] Review Request: python-asyncmongo - An asynchronous Python MongoDB library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=654544 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|python-asyncmongo-0.1-1.fc1 |python-asyncmongo-0.1-1.fc1 |4 |3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 654544] Review Request: python-asyncmongo - An asynchronous Python MongoDB library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=654544 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2010-12-19 15:22:14 EST --- python-asyncmongo-0.1-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664298] Review Request: autojump - A fast way to navigate your filesystem from the command line
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664298 --- Comment #1 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2010-12-19 15:07:43 EST --- Before formal review. It build filed on El5: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2676375 If you plan maintain it for EL5 too, please fix it. If you don't plan do that, please gone BuildRoot, %clean and similar stuff. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664298] Review Request: autojump - A fast way to navigate your filesystem from the command line
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664298 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||pa...@hubbitus.info AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|pa...@hubbitus.info Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 657577] Review Request: sdlhack - Force full-screen games to minimize
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657577 --- Comment #10 from Volker Fröhlich 2010-12-19 14:51:27 EST --- OK, forget about the Requires. Please add a comment, when you change your spec-file and also increment the release number and add an entry to the changelog. Otherwise the reviewer can't easily see, he's looking at an updated version. Your current spec doesn't work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 627180] Review Request: django-paste - dpaste is a code pastebin application using Django.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=627180 --- Comment #14 from David Riches 2010-12-19 14:16:33 EST --- Hrm, with the alterations I still get: [da...@vmserver SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/django-dpaste-0.2.4-2.fc13.noarch.rpm django-dpaste.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/dpaste/locale/de/LC_MESSAGES/django.mo django-dpaste.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/dpaste/locale/en/LC_MESSAGES/django.mo 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. Any thoughts? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 645354] Review Request: django-tracking - Django site visitor tracking, including basic blacklisting
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645354 --- Comment #14 from David Riches 2010-12-19 14:08:24 EST --- Hi Clint, Thanks for the input. Are you happy to co-maintain this for EL5/6? Regards -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 657577] Review Request: sdlhack - Force full-screen games to minimize
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657577 Kevin Kofler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org --- Comment #8 from Kevin Kofler 2010-12-19 13:44:09 EST --- > SDLHack is a wrapper for SDL which lets you force full-screen games to > minimize. s/to minimize/into windowed mode/ "minimize" means to have the app shown only in the taskbar. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664303] Review Request: drupal6-auto_nodetitle - "auto_nodetitle" is a small and efficient module that allows hiding of the content title
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664303 Peter Borsa changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||662103(InsightReviews) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 657577] Review Request: sdlhack - Force full-screen games to minimize
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657577 --- Comment #9 from Kevin Kofler 2010-12-19 13:46:24 EST --- Hmmm, nevermind, actually the description is correct. (The readme introduces it first as "This is a simple LD_PRELOAD wrapper for SDL which enables switching away from a fullscreen game.", but if I read it more carefully, I see that it does this by minimizing entirely (which sucks, but that's not the package's problem).) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664303] New: Review Request: drupal6-auto_nodetitle - "auto_nodetitle" is a small and efficient module that allows hiding of the content title
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: drupal6-auto_nodetitle - "auto_nodetitle" is a small and efficient module that allows hiding of the content title https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664303 Summary: Review Request: drupal6-auto_nodetitle - "auto_nodetitle" is a small and efficient module that allows hiding of the content title Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: peter.bo...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://asrob.fedorapeople.org/SOURCES/drupal6-auto_nodetitle.spec SRPM URL: http://asrob.fedorapeople.org/SOURCES/drupal6-auto_nodetitle-1.2-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: "auto_nodetitle" is a small and efficient module that allows hiding of the content title field in the form. To prevent empty content title fields one can configure it to generate the title by a given pattern. When the token module is installed it's possible to use various node data for the auto generated title - e.g. use the text of a CCK field (since 5.x). Advanced users can also provide some PHP code, that is used for automatically generating an appropriate title. rpmlint output: [as...@alice SPECS]$ rpmlint drupal6-auto_nodetitle.spec ../SRPMS/drupal6-auto_nodetitle-1.2-1.fc14.src.rpm 1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. koji output: Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2676274 Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... 2676274 build (dist-f14, drupal6-auto_nodetitle-1.2-1.fc14.src.rpm): open (ppc12.phx2.fedoraproject.org) 2676275 buildArch (drupal6-auto_nodetitle-1.2-1.fc14.src.rpm, noarch): free 2676275 buildArch (drupal6-auto_nodetitle-1.2-1.fc14.src.rpm, noarch): free -> open (x86-11.phx2.fedoraproject.org) 2676275 buildArch (drupal6-auto_nodetitle-1.2-1.fc14.src.rpm, noarch): open (x86-11.phx2.fedoraproject.org) -> closed 0 free 1 open 1 done 0 failed 2676274 build (dist-f14, drupal6-auto_nodetitle-1.2-1.fc14.src.rpm): open (ppc12.phx2.fedoraproject.org) -> closed 0 free 0 open 2 done 0 failed 2676274 build (dist-f14, drupal6-auto_nodetitle-1.2-1.fc14.src.rpm) completed successfully -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 661436] Review Request: rubygem-heroku - deploy apps to Heroku
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661436 --- Comment #24 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-12-19 13:10:11 EST --- (In reply to comment #23) > Must I check myself by 'mock'? > Before place this Review Request I started to run, at one time, > 'mock -r fedora-14-x86_64 rebuild ../SRPMS/rubygem-heroku*.rpm' > after successful > rpmlint rubygem-heroku.spec ../RPMS/*/rubygem-heroku*.rpm > ../SRPMS/rubygem-heroku*.rpm - Checking if your srpm builds with mock is preferable, and once you gets sponsored you can use koji scratch build instead. And anyway I check srpms in review requests with koji scratch build by myself so that I can tell the submitter the result of build test. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 657577] Review Request: sdlhack - Force full-screen games to minimize
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657577 --- Comment #7 from Hicham HAOUARI 2010-12-19 13:03:11 EST --- (In reply to comment #6) > Or is it useful all on its own? The application that we will be forced to minimize should be using SDL. So SDL is brought through the application. The answer to your question is : sdlhack is not useful on its own, it becomes useful when you have an SDL fullscreen app that you want to force to minimize. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664298] New: Review Request: autojump - A fast way to navigate your filesystem from the command line
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: autojump - A fast way to navigate your filesystem from the command line https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664298 Summary: Review Request: autojump - A fast way to navigate your filesystem from the command line Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: thibault.no...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://tnorth.fedorapeople.org/autojump.spec SRPM URL: http://tnorth.fedorapeople.org/autojump-14-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: autojump is a faster way to navigate your filesystem. It works by maintaining a database of the directories you use the most from the command line. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 653467] Review Request: libpagemap - library for utilization of kernel pagemap interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=653467 Dan Horák changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2010-12-19 12:34:14 --- Comment #8 from Dan Horák 2010-12-19 12:34:14 EST --- package is imported and built, closing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 661436] Review Request: rubygem-heroku - deploy apps to Heroku
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661436 --- Comment #23 from Minnikhanov 2010-12-19 12:35:30 EST --- (In reply to comment #22) > (In reply to comment #19) > > Spec URL: > > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/14118661/rubygem-heroku.spec > > SRPM URL: > > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/14118661/rubygem-heroku-1.14.10-2.fc14.src.rpm > > > > Does not build... > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2675006 > I see build.log of this task - build failed. I place /.yardoc into -doc subpackage - I was not right :-( I improve that, shift '/.yardoc' into main package and create next release (rubygem-heroku-1.14.10-3.fc14.src.rpm) Must I check myself by 'mock'? Before place this Review Request I started to run, at one time, 'mock -r fedora-14-x86_64 rebuild ../SRPMS/rubygem-heroku*.rpm' after successful rpmlint rubygem-heroku.spec ../RPMS/*/rubygem-heroku*.rpm ../SRPMS/rubygem-heroku*.rpm It run a lot of time, more than 5min, I did not wait responses and close it. Internet was open when 'mock' was running. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 619593] Review Request: topgit - A different patch queue manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=619593 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2010-12-19 12:32:31 EST --- topgit-0.9-0.2.git9b25e848.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update topgit'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/topgit-0.9-0.2.git9b25e848.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 459211] Review Request: oolite - A space sim game, inspired by Elite
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459211 --- Comment #38 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2010-12-19 12:11:45 EST --- Wonderful news, thanks. This bug will just have to stay open until then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 657577] Review Request: sdlhack - Force full-screen games to minimize
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657577 --- Comment #6 from Volker Fröhlich 2010-12-19 11:50:29 EST --- Or is it useful all on its own? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 657577] Review Request: sdlhack - Force full-screen games to minimize
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657577 --- Comment #5 from Volker Fröhlich 2010-12-19 11:45:16 EST --- Yes, keeping buildroot and clean doesn't harm. Please add the rationale as a comment to the spec file. Maybe let upstream know. The simplification is just a little more general syntax. It doesn't change the behaviour. No need to change it. What would be the use to override something that isn't there? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630274] Review Request: ghc-blaze-builder - Builder to efficiently append text
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630274 Lakshmi Narasimhan changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lakshminaras2...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|lakshminaras2...@gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630292] Review Request: ghc-hamlet - Haml-like template files that are compile-time checked
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630292 Lakshmi Narasimhan changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lakshminaras2...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|lakshminaras2...@gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 648098] Review Request: ghc-zlib-bindings - Low-level bindings to the zlib package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648098 Lakshmi Narasimhan changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lakshminaras2...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|lakshminaras2...@gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 459211] Review Request: oolite - A space sim game, inspired by Elite
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459211 --- Comment #37 from Jens Ayton 2010-12-19 11:23:04 EST --- FYI, I’m currently working on updating Oolite to use trunk SpiderMonkey. The next release (1.75) will target whatever version of SM is stable at the time, and support building with thread-safe mode enabled. Realistically, 1.75 should be ready some time in February. The JS_C_STRINGS_ARE_UTF8 should no longer be an issue, as it’s now a runtime setting in SpiderMonkey. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 657577] Review Request: sdlhack - Force full-screen games to minimize
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657577 --- Comment #4 from Hicham HAOUARI 2010-12-19 11:23:18 EST --- A second thought about Requiring SDL. The program is basically overriding some calls in SDL, so I don't see why it should require it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 657577] Review Request: sdlhack - Force full-screen games to minimize
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657577
--- Comment #2 from Hicham HAOUARI 2010-12-19
11:05:17 EST ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> I assume, the hack is useless without SDL installed. Please require SDL.
>
> You may consider to build and install explicitly, since it requires about as
> many lines as the sed approach does.
>
> Writing "./build" and "./install" should be fine as well.
>
- You are right.
> Please give a rationale, why you choose to create an own directory for the
> library to install to.
>
- since the library isn't intended to be used by any other program, it should
go in a private dir.
> You can simplify the files section to:
>
> %{_bindir}/*
> %{_libdir}/%{name}
> %{_mandir}/man1/*
>
> I don't know if this package makes sense for EPEL. If you don't want to
> introduce it there, you can drop the buildroot, the clean section and the rm
> for buildroot in the install section.
- I thinking keeping the buildroot and clean is always a good idea, no harm in
keeping these.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 657577] Review Request: sdlhack - Force full-screen games to minimize
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657577
--- Comment #3 from Hicham HAOUARI 2010-12-19
11:07:06 EST ---
(In reply to comment #1)
>
> You can simplify the files section to:
>
> %{_bindir}/*
> %{_libdir}/%{name}
> %{_mandir}/man1/*
>
I don't where the simplification is.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 657577] Review Request: sdlhack - Force full-screen games to minimize
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657577 Volker Fröhlich changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 604031] Review Request: kde-plasma-kprayertime - Displays Islamic prayer Time
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=604031 Volker Fröhlich changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 658234] Review Request: gdal-grass - Standalone GRASS 6 Drivers for GDAL and OGR
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658234 Volker Fröhlich changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 657577] Review Request: sdlhack - Force full-screen games to minimize
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657577
--- Comment #1 from Volker Fröhlich 2010-12-19 09:37:39 EST
---
I assume, the hack is useless without SDL installed. Please require SDL.
You may consider to build and install explicitly, since it requires about as
many lines as the sed approach does.
Writing "./build" and "./install" should be fine as well.
Please give a rationale, why you choose to create an own directory for the
library to install to.
You can simplify the files section to:
%{_bindir}/*
%{_libdir}/%{name}
%{_mandir}/man1/*
I don't know if this package makes sense for EPEL. If you don't want to
introduce it there, you can drop the buildroot, the clean section and the rm
for buildroot in the install section.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 481411] Review Request: perl-Test-Email - Test email contents
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481411 --- Comment #7 from Xavier Bachelot 2010-12-19 09:16:32 EST --- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5) > > This package is needed for RT3 in EPEL6. however Ralf doesn't maintain > > packages > > in EPEL, thus I'm requesting a branch as Mark and I are maintaining RT3 > > there. > Thanks for wanting to maintain them in EPEL. > Thanks for building all of the huge RT3 stack in the first place :-) > > Owners: xavierb tremble > > Are you sure Mark is interested? I have to presume he is not, because he is > amongst those individuals who did not reply when trying to contact them. Mark recently stepped up to co-maintain RT3 in EPEL, so I assume he is. Regards, Xavier -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 662604] Review Request: ibus-unikey - A Vietnamese engine for IBus input platform that uses Unikey.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=662604 --- Comment #3 from Truong Anh Tuan 2010-12-19 08:59:39 EST --- I updated all "MUST FIX" issues into the spec file; rebuilt the source package and then re-uploaded both onto the same location on FedoraPeople space. Please review the updates for me. Tell me anything I should do more. Regarding to the building issues on the upcoming release F15, I am contacting to upstream. Thanks, Tuan -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 481411] Review Request: perl-Test-Email - Test email contents
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481411 --- Comment #6 from Ralf Corsepius 2010-12-19 08:20:40 EST --- (In reply to comment #5) > This package is needed for RT3 in EPEL6. however Ralf doesn't maintain > packages > in EPEL, thus I'm requesting a branch as Mark and I are maintaining RT3 there. Thanks for wanting to maintain them in EPEL. > Owners: xavierb tremble Are you sure Mark is interested? I have to presume he is not, because he is amongst those individuals who did not reply when trying to contact them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 659005] Review Request: drupal6-job_scheduler - Simple API for scheduling tasks once at a predetermined time or periodically at a fixed interval
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659005 --- Comment #3 from Peter Borsa 2010-12-19 08:19:36 EST --- Oops, I have missed PHP 5.2 from Requires. http://asrob.fedorapeople.org/SOURCES/drupal6-job_scheduler.spec http://asrob.fedorapeople.org/SOURCES/drupal6-job_scheduler-1.0-0.1.beta3.fc14.src.rpm rpmlint output: [as...@alice SPECS]$ rpmlint drupal6-job_scheduler.spec ../SRPMS/drupal6-job_scheduler-1.0-0.1.beta3.fc14.src.rpm 1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. koji output: Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2675876 Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... 2675876 build (dist-f14, drupal6-job_scheduler-1.0-0.1.beta3.fc14.src.rpm): free 2675876 build (dist-f14, drupal6-job_scheduler-1.0-0.1.beta3.fc14.src.rpm): free -> open (x86-04.phx2.fedoraproject.org) 2675877 buildArch (drupal6-job_scheduler-1.0-0.1.beta3.fc14.src.rpm, noarch): free 2675877 buildArch (drupal6-job_scheduler-1.0-0.1.beta3.fc14.src.rpm, noarch): free -> open (x86-05.phx2.fedoraproject.org) 2675877 buildArch (drupal6-job_scheduler-1.0-0.1.beta3.fc14.src.rpm, noarch): open (x86-05.phx2.fedoraproject.org) -> closed 0 free 1 open 1 done 0 failed 2675876 build (dist-f14, drupal6-job_scheduler-1.0-0.1.beta3.fc14.src.rpm): open (x86-04.phx2.fedoraproject.org) -> closed 0 free 0 open 2 done 0 failed 2675876 build (dist-f14, drupal6-job_scheduler-1.0-0.1.beta3.fc14.src.rpm) completed successfully -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 659005] Review Request: drupal6-job_scheduler - Simple API for scheduling tasks once at a predetermined time or periodically at a fixed interval
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659005 --- Comment #2 from Peter Borsa 2010-12-19 08:10:59 EST --- Updated files: http://asrob.fedorapeople.org/SOURCES/drupal6-job_scheduler.spec http://asrob.fedorapeople.org/SOURCES/drupal6-job_scheduler-1.0-0.1.beta3.fc14.src.rpm rpmlint output: [as...@alice SPECS]$ rpmlint drupal6-job_scheduler.spec ../SRPMS/drupal6-job_scheduler-1.0-0.1.beta3.fc14.src.rpm 1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. koji output: Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2675868 Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... 2675868 build (dist-f14, drupal6-job_scheduler-1.0-0.1.beta3.fc14.src.rpm): free 2675868 build (dist-f14, drupal6-job_scheduler-1.0-0.1.beta3.fc14.src.rpm): free -> open (x86-04.phx2.fedoraproject.org) 2675869 buildArch (drupal6-job_scheduler-1.0-0.1.beta3.fc14.src.rpm, noarch): free 2675869 buildArch (drupal6-job_scheduler-1.0-0.1.beta3.fc14.src.rpm, noarch): free -> open (x86-10.phx2.fedoraproject.org) 2675869 buildArch (drupal6-job_scheduler-1.0-0.1.beta3.fc14.src.rpm, noarch): open (x86-10.phx2.fedoraproject.org) -> closed 0 free 1 open 1 done 0 failed 2675868 build (dist-f14, drupal6-job_scheduler-1.0-0.1.beta3.fc14.src.rpm): open (x86-04.phx2.fedoraproject.org) -> closed 0 free 0 open 2 done 0 failed 2675868 build (dist-f14, drupal6-job_scheduler-1.0-0.1.beta3.fc14.src.rpm) completed successfully -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 653805] Review Request: drupal6-ctools - This suite is primarily a set of APIs and tools to improve the developer experience.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=653805 Peter Borsa changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(peter.bo...@gmail | |.com) | --- Comment #13 from Peter Borsa 2010-12-19 08:05:01 EST --- Updated files: http://asrob.fedorapeople.org/SOURCES/drupal6-ctools.spec http://asrob.fedorapeople.org/SOURCES/drupal6-ctools-1.8-1.fc14.src.rpm rpmlint output: [as...@alice SPECS]$ rpmlint drupal6-ctools.spec ../SRPMS/drupal6-ctools-1.8-1.fc14.src.rpm 1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. koji output: Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2675863 Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... 2675863 build (dist-f14, drupal6-ctools-1.8-1.fc14.src.rpm): open (ppc08.phx2.fedoraproject.org) 2675864 buildArch (drupal6-ctools-1.8-1.fc14.src.rpm, noarch): free 2675864 buildArch (drupal6-ctools-1.8-1.fc14.src.rpm, noarch): free -> open (x86-11.phx2.fedoraproject.org) 2675864 buildArch (drupal6-ctools-1.8-1.fc14.src.rpm, noarch): open (x86-11.phx2.fedoraproject.org) -> closed 0 free 1 open 1 done 0 failed 2675863 build (dist-f14, drupal6-ctools-1.8-1.fc14.src.rpm): open (ppc08.phx2.fedoraproject.org) -> closed 0 free 0 open 2 done 0 failed 2675863 build (dist-f14, drupal6-ctools-1.8-1.fc14.src.rpm) completed successfully -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630278] Review Request: ghc-ranges - Ranges and various functions on them
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630278 --- Comment #2 from Lakshmi Narasimhan 2010-12-19 08:03:05 EST --- Review is complete. The license text issue is blocking. Other things look fine. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 655954] Review Request: drupal6-token - Tokens are small bits of text that can be placed into larger documents
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=655954 Peter Borsa changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(peter.bo...@gmail | |.com) | --- Comment #3 from Peter Borsa 2010-12-19 07:50:36 EST --- Updated files: http://asrob.fedorapeople.org/SOURCES/drupal6-token.spec http://asrob.fedorapeople.org/SOURCES/drupal6-token-1.15-1.fc14.src.rpm rpmlint output: [as...@alice SPECS]$ rpmlint drupal6-token.spec ../SRPMS/drupal6-token-1.15-1.fc14.src.rpm 1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. koji output: Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2675858 Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... 2675858 build (dist-f14, drupal6-token-1.15-1.fc14.src.rpm): open (x86-11.phx2.fedoraproject.org) 2675859 buildArch (drupal6-token-1.15-1.fc14.src.rpm, noarch): open (x86-14.phx2.fedoraproject.org) 2675859 buildArch (drupal6-token-1.15-1.fc14.src.rpm, noarch): open (x86-14.phx2.fedoraproject.org) -> closed 0 free 1 open 1 done 0 failed 2675858 build (dist-f14, drupal6-token-1.15-1.fc14.src.rpm): open (x86-11.phx2.fedoraproject.org) -> closed 0 free 0 open 2 done 0 failed 2675858 build (dist-f14, drupal6-token-1.15-1.fc14.src.rpm) completed successfully -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630278] Review Request: ghc-ranges - Ranges and various functions on them
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630278 --- Comment #1 from Lakshmi Narasimhan 2010-12-19 07:47:59 EST --- Ben, The LICENSE file has this text "Do what you will." I think it will be better if we can ask the author to get the proper BSD 3clause variant license packaged with the sources. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 481411] Review Request: perl-Test-Email - Test email contents
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481411 Xavier Bachelot changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xav...@bachelot.org Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Xavier Bachelot 2010-12-19 07:29:44 EST --- This package is needed for RT3 in EPEL6. however Ralf doesn't maintain packages in EPEL, thus I'm requesting a branch as Mark and I are maintaining RT3 there. Package Change Request == Package Name: perl-Test-Email New Branches: el5 el6 Owners: xavierb tremble -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664221] New: Review Request: ghc-cautious-file - Provides ways to write a file cautiously
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-cautious-file - Provides ways to write a file cautiously Alias: ghc-cautious-file https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664221 Summary: Review Request: ghc-cautious-file - Provides ways to write a file cautiously Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lakshminaras2...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com, fedora-haskell-l...@redhat.com Blocks: 634048 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC file link : https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-cautious-file.spec?attredirects=0&d=1 SRPM link : https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-cautious-file-0.1.5-1.fc14.src.rpm?attredirects=0&d=1 rpmlint output: rpmlint -i *.rpm ../ghc-cautious-file.spec ghc-cautious-file.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US posix -> posit, pos ix, pos-ix The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-cautious-file.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US posix -> posit, pos ix, pos-ix The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-cautious-file-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US posix -> posit, pos ix, pos-ix The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-cautious-file-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-cautious-file-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-cautious-file-prof.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US posix -> posit, pos ix, pos-ix The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-cautious-file-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-cautious-file-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ghc-7.0.1/cautious-file-0.1.5/libHScautious-file-0.1.5_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 6 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 530047] Review Request: mingw32-tk - MinGW Windows graphical toolkit for the Tcl scripting language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530047 --- Comment #6 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2010-12-19 06:16:38 EST --- Spec URL: http://roma.fedorapeople.org/specs/mingw32-tk.spec SRPM URL: http://roma.fedorapeople.org/srpms/mingw32-tk-8.5.9-1.fc14.src.rpm Scratch Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2675829 Rpmlint output: [cascavel:~/RPMS144/lcgrpms] rpmlint mingw32-tk-8.5.9-1.fc14.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664219] New: Review Request: excalibur-logger - Avalon Excalibur's Log Management System
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: excalibur-logger - Avalon Excalibur's Log Management System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664219 Summary: Review Request: excalibur-logger - Avalon Excalibur's Log Management System Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lotharl...@gmx.de QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://lotharlutz.fedorapeople.org/excalibur-logger.spec SRPM URL: http://lotharlutz.fedorapeople.org/excalibur-logger-2.1-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: Excalibur-Logger integrates neatly into the Avalon ECM and Fortress. The main goal is to be able to define the log categories on a component basis by specifying a 'logger' attribute which denotes the log category to use for a particular component. Note: This package can only be build on fc15, because 'Requires: avalon-logkit >= 2.0' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 656408] Review Request: perl-Class-Load - A working (require "Class::Name") and more
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656408 --- Comment #3 from Paul Howarth 2010-12-19 05:24:33 EST --- The "Requires: perl(Exporter)" was mainly there as a reminder to myself what the automatically-added "Requires: perl(base)" was about though I guess a comment would do that every bit as well. Given that Exporter is such a fundamental part of perl, it's also extremely unlikely ever to be split out as a sub-package, so I'll go with your suggestion and drop the explicit dependency. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 656408] Review Request: perl-Class-Load - A working (require "Class::Name") and more
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656408 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Paul Howarth 2010-12-19 05:26:07 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: perl-Class-Load Short Description: A working (require "Class::Name") and more Owners: pghmcfc Branches: f13 f14 el4 el5 el6 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 530047] Review Request: mingw32-tk - MinGW Windows graphical toolkit for the Tcl scripting language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530047 Paulo Roma Cavalcanti changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NOTABUG | Keywords||Reopened --- Comment #5 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2010-12-19 05:03:33 EST --- In fact, I was just waiting for version 8.5.9 to be available in testing for F14. mingw32-tk should have been available for Fedora since the initial release of mingw32-tcl, and ideally, with the same maintainer. I will update myngw32-tk to 8.5.9 and post the .src.rpm here. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 555018] Review Request: gnac - An audio converter for GNOME (first package, seeking sponsor)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555018 --- Comment #22 from Christoph Wickert 2010-12-19 04:53:11 EST --- Taylon, is anything still unclear and you need help or can we continue? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664214] New: Review Request: ghc-gconf - Binding to the GNOME configuration database system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-gconf - Binding to the GNOME configuration database system Alias: ghc-gconf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664214 Summary: Review Request: ghc-gconf - Binding to the GNOME configuration database system Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lakshminaras2...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com, fedora-haskell-l...@redhat.com Blocks: 634048 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SRPM link : https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-gconf-0.11.1-1.fc14.src.rpm?attredirects=0&d=1 SPEC file link : https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-gconf.spec?attredirects=0&d=1 rpmlint output: rpmlint -i *.rpm ghc-gconf.spec ghc-gconf-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-gconf-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-gconf-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-gconf-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ghc-6.12.3/gconf-0.11.1/libHSgconf-0.11.1_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. Will upgrade to 0.12.0 for >f15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 663737] Review Request: iwl6000g2a-firmware - Firmware for Intel(R) Wireless WiFi Link 6005 Series Adapters
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663737
Peter Lemenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov 2010-12-19 03:48:22 EST
---
Sorry for the delay - my home routed died almost after I post my last message
in this ticket.
Ok, here is my
REVIEW:
Legend: + = PASSED, - = FAILED, 0 = Not Applicable
+ rpmlint is almost silent
sulaco ~: rpmlint
~/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/iwl6000g2a-firmware-17.168.5.1-1.fc12.noarch.rpm
iwl6000g2a-firmware.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US iwlagn ->
lagniappe, lasagna, lagging
^^^ this message should be ignored (false positive).
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
sulaco ~:
+ The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
+ The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
+ The package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
+ The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the
Licensing Guidelines.
+ The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license
(Redistributable w/o modifications).
+ The file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package, is included
in %doc.
+ The spec file is written in American English.
+ The spec file for the package is legible.
+ The sources used to build the package, match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES: sha256sum iwlwifi-6000g2a-ucode-17.168.5.1.tgz*
e77b9a890cb9e57429995dea507a86fe710a13ff493210ba26a4ba05ae0e541a
iwlwifi-6000g2a-ucode-17.168.5.1.tgz
e77b9a890cb9e57429995dea507a86fe710a13ff493210ba26a4ba05ae0e541a
iwlwifi-6000g2a-ucode-17.168.5.1.tgz.1
sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES:
+ The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
primary architecture.
+ All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires.
0 No need to handle locales.
0 No shared library files.
+ The package does NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
+ The package is not designed to be relocatable.
+ The package does not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files
listings.
+ Permissions on files are set properly.
+ The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
+ The package consistently uses macros.
+ The package contains code, or permissible content.
0 No extremely large documentation files.
+ Anything, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the
application.
0 No header files.
0 No static libraries.
0 No pkgconfig(.pc) files.
0 The package doesn't contain library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1).
0 No devel sub-package.
+ The package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives.
0 Not a GUI application.
+ The package does not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
+ At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
+ All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8.
I didn;t find any issues so this package is
APPROVED.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664208] New: Review Request: ghc-fingertree - Haskell package provides generic finger-tree structure
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-fingertree - Haskell package provides generic finger-tree structure Alias: ghc-fingertree https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664208 Summary: Review Request: ghc-fingertree - Haskell package provides generic finger-tree structure Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lakshminaras2...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com, fedora-haskell-l...@redhat.com Blocks: 634048 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SRPM link: https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-fingertree-0.0.1.0-1.fc14.src.rpm?attredirects=0&d=1 SPEC file link: https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-fingertree.spec?attredirects=0&d=1 rpmlint output: rpmlint -i *.rpm ../ghc-fingertree.spec ghc-fingertree-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-fingertree-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-fingertree-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-fingertree-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ghc-7.0.1/fingertree-0.0.1.0/libHSfingertree-0.0.1.0_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664150] Review Request: ghc-monads-fd - Monad classes, using functional dependencies
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664150 Lakshmi Narasimhan changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|634048(Haskell-pkg-reviews) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664155] Review Request: ghc-data-accessor-monads-fd - A package to access state in monads-fd State Monad
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664155 Lakshmi Narasimhan changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||634048(Haskell-pkg-reviews) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 663983] Review Request: rubygem-boxgrinder-build-ec2-platform-plugin - BoxGrinder plugin to convert appliances to EC2 format
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663983 --- Comment #6 from Marek Goldmann 2010-12-19 03:23:09 EST --- Thank you! New Package SCM Request === Package Name: rubygem-boxgrinder-build-ec2-platform-plugin Short Description: BoxGrinder plugin to convert appliances to EC2 format Owners:goldmann Branches: f13 f14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 663983] Review Request: rubygem-boxgrinder-build-ec2-platform-plugin - BoxGrinder plugin to convert appliances to EC2 format
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663983 Marek Goldmann changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664150] Review Request: ghc-monads-fd - Monad classes, using functional dependencies
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664150 Lakshmi Narasimhan changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||634048(Haskell-pkg-reviews) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664151] Review Request: ghc-Diff - A O(ND) diff algorithm in Haskell
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664151 Lakshmi Narasimhan changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||634048(Haskell-pkg-reviews) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
