[Bug 660393] Review Request: netxen-firmware - QLogic Linux Intelligent Ethernet (3000 and 3100 Series) Adapter Firmware
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660393 Peter Lemenkov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||lemen...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|lemen...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov 2010-12-22 02:43:06 EST --- I'll review it -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664932] New: Review Request: perl-HTML-Mason-PSGIHandler - PSGI handler for HTML::Mason
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-Mason-PSGIHandler - PSGI handler for HTML::Mason https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664932 Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-Mason-PSGIHandler - PSGI handler for HTML::Mason Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rc040...@freenet.de QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://corsepiu.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-HTML-Mason-PSGIHandler.spec SRPM URL: http://corsepiu.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-HTML-Mason-PSGIHandler-0.52-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: HTML::Mason::PSGIHandler is a PSGI handler for HTML::Mason. It's based on HTML::Mason::CGIHandler and allows you to process Mason templates on any web servers that support PSGI. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664910] Review Request: perl-Plack - Perl Superglue for Web frameworks and Web Servers (PSGI toolkit)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664910 Ralf Corsepius changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||664932 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664932] Review Request: perl-HTML-Mason-PSGIHandler - PSGI handler for HTML::Mason
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664932 Ralf Corsepius changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||664910 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 663092] Review Request: oxygen-gtk - Oxygen GTK theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663092
Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||kr...@land.ru
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|kr...@land.ru
Flag||fedora-review?
--- Comment #4 from Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich 2010-12-22 01:49:36
EST ---
And this is a review.
Good.
===
# rpmlint oxygen-gtk-1.0.0-1.fc14.src.rpm oxygen-gtk-1.0.0-1.fc14.x86_64.rpm
oxygen-gtk.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pixmaps -> pix maps,
pix-maps, bitmaps
oxygen-gtk.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pixmaps -> pix maps,
pix-maps, bitmaps
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
rpmlint output could be ignored.
The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
The spec file name must match the base package %{name}.
---
Spec name correct, but. Gtk engines are named as gtk-NAME-engine. Could we
rename package into gtk-oxygen-engine? There are no guides for it, just common
usage.
---
* The package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
* The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing
Guidelines.
* The License field in the package spec file matchs the actual license.
* File, containing the text of the license for the package, included in %doc.
* The spec file is written in American English.
* The spec file for the package is legible.
* The sources used to build the package matchs the upstream source with md5sum
441398b4569ce0282c39e5c21cb16dfc.
* The package built on F14 x86_64.
* There are no locales.
* There are no need in ldconfig.
* There are no bundle copies of system libraries.
* A package owns all directories that it creates.
* All files are not listed more than once in the spec file's %files listings.
* Permissions on files are set properly.
* Package consistently use macros.
* The package contains code.
* There are no large documentation
* Everything included as %doc does not affect the runtime of the application.
* No need in -devel.
* Package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages.
* All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8.
SHOULD:
* The package built in mock.
* The package works as described.
Not so good
===
1) All required build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, but cairo-devel
is dependence for gtk2-devel and not needed to be call explicitly.
2) Runtime dependence. We can't be sure there are all needed icons installed
with gtk2. Main icon theme is hicolor-icons-theme, if we have gtk2, we have it.
But this theme containe not all icons. oxygen-icon-theme, ie, containe them.
{gnome,nuvolla,...}-icon-theme - the same, but not hicolor-i-t. Somehow we need
anything to make sure - we have sufficient icon set.
Second is not a blocker.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 619355] Review Request: python26-numpy - A fast multidimensional array facility for Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=619355 --- Comment #5 from Steve Traylen 2010-12-22 01:22:11 EST --- I've closed #601891 since that one is obsoleted by this one. That was request to add a python26-numpy subpackage to the existing numpy package in EPEL5 and that proved to be a bad idea. Steve. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 619355] Review Request: python26-numpy - A fast multidimensional array facility for Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=619355 Steve Traylen changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|601891 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664910] Review Request: perl-Plack - Perl Superglue for Web frameworks and Web Servers (PSGI toolkit)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664910 Ralf Corsepius changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||664924 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664924] Review Request: perl-Plack-Middleware-Test-StashWarnings - Test your application's warnings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664924 Ralf Corsepius changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||664910 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 573910] Review Request: dcmtk - Offis DICOM Toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573910 --- Comment #18 from Andreas Loening 2010-12-22 01:08:13 EST --- Wouldn't be a bad idea to wait a little more for the 3.6.0 release... These releases only occur every couple years. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664924] New: Review Request: perl-Plack-Middleware-Test-StashWarnings - Test your application's warnings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Plack-Middleware-Test-StashWarnings - Test your application's warnings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664924 Summary: Review Request: perl-Plack-Middleware-Test-StashWarnings - Test your application's warnings Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rc040...@freenet.de QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://corsepiu.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Plack-Middleware-Test-StashWarnings.spec SRPM URL: http://corsepiu.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Plack-Middleware-Test-StashWarnings-0.04-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: Plack::Middleware::Test::StashWarnings is a Plack middleware component to record warnings generated by your application so that you can test them to make sure your application complains about the right things. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664912] Review Request: perl-HTML-TreeBuilder-LibXML - HTML::TreeBuilder and XPath compatible interface with libxml
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664912 Ralf Corsepius changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||664920 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664920] Review Request: perl-Web-Scraper - Web Scraping Toolkit using HTML and CSS Selectors or XPath expressions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664920 Ralf Corsepius changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||664912 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664920] New: Review Request: perl-Web-Scraper - Web Scraping Toolkit using HTML and CSS Selectors or XPath expressions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Web-Scraper - Web Scraping Toolkit using HTML and CSS Selectors or XPath expressions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664920 Summary: Review Request: perl-Web-Scraper - Web Scraping Toolkit using HTML and CSS Selectors or XPath expressions Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rc040...@freenet.de QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://corsepiu.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Web-Scraper.spec SRPM URL: http://corsepiu.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Web-Scraper-0.32-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: Web::Scraper is a web scraper toolkit, inspired by Ruby's equivalent Scrapi. It provides a DSL-ish interface for traversing HTML documents and returning a neatly arranged Perl data strcuture. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664912] New: Review Request: perl-HTML-TreeBuilder-LibXML - HTML::TreeBuilder and XPath compatible interface with libxml
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-TreeBuilder-LibXML - HTML::TreeBuilder and XPath compatible interface with libxml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664912 Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-TreeBuilder-LibXML - HTML::TreeBuilder and XPath compatible interface with libxml Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rc040...@freenet.de QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://corsepiu.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-HTML-TreeBuilder-LibXML.spec SRPM URL: http://corsepiu.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-HTML-TreeBuilder-LibXML-0.12-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: HTML::TreeBuilder::XPath is a libxml based compatible interface to HTML::TreeBuilder, which could be slow for a large document. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 661660] Review Request: metamorphose2 - A cross platform file and folder mass renamer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661660 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2010-12-22 00:19:06 EST --- metamorphose2-0.7.1-4.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/metamorphose2-0.7.1-4.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 661660] Review Request: metamorphose2 - A cross platform file and folder mass renamer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661660 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664911] Review Request: perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize-PSGI - Test PSGI programs using WWW::Mechanize
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664911 Ralf Corsepius changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||664910 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664911] New: Review Request: perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize-PSGI - Test PSGI programs using WWW::Mechanize
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize-PSGI - Test PSGI programs using WWW::Mechanize https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664911 Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize-PSGI - Test PSGI programs using WWW::Mechanize Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rc040...@freenet.de QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://corsepiu.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize-PSGI.spec SRPM URL: http://corsepiu.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize-PSGI-0.35-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: PSGI is a specification to decouple web server environments from web application framework code. Test::WWW::Mechanize is a subclass of WWW::Mechanize that incorporates features for web application testing. The Test::WWW::Mechanize::PSGI module meshes the two to allow easy testing of PSGI applications. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664910] Review Request: perl-Plack - Perl Superglue for Web frameworks and Web Servers (PSGI toolkit)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664910 Ralf Corsepius changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||664911 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664910] New: Review Request: perl-Plack - Perl Superglue for Web frameworks and Web Servers (PSGI toolkit)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Plack - Perl Superglue for Web frameworks and Web Servers (PSGI toolkit) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664910 Summary: Review Request: perl-Plack - Perl Superglue for Web frameworks and Web Servers (PSGI toolkit) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rc040...@freenet.de QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://corsepiu.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Plack.spec SRPM URL: http://corsepiu.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Plack-0.9959-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: Plack is a set of tools for using the PSGI stack. It contains middleware components, a reference server and utilities for Web application frameworks. Plack is like Ruby's Rack or Python's Paste for WSGI. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 659663] Review Request: python-netcf - python binding for netcf
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659663 --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-12-21 23:28:01 EST --- Seems to not build here: + /usr/bin/python setup.py test usage: setup.py [global_opts] cmd1 [cmd1_opts] [cmd2 [cmd2_opts] ...] or: setup.py --help [cmd1 cmd2 ...] or: setup.py --help-commands or: setup.py cmd --help error: invalid command 'test' Doesn't seem that the setup.py supports test? can you call the tests directly somehow? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664906] New: Review Request: perl-Regexp-Common-net-CIDR - Provide patterns for CIDR blocks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Regexp-Common-net-CIDR - Provide patterns for CIDR blocks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664906 Summary: Review Request: perl-Regexp-Common-net-CIDR - Provide patterns for CIDR blocks Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rc040...@freenet.de QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://corsepiu.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Regexp-Common-net-CIDR.spec SRPM URL: http://corsepiu.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Regexp-Common-net-CIDR-0.02-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: Patterns for CIDR blocks. Now only next IPv4 formats are supported: xxx.xxx/xx xxx.xxx.xxx/xx xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/xx -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664904] New: Review Request: perl-Authen-Simple-Passwd - Simple Passwd authentication
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Authen-Simple-Passwd - Simple Passwd authentication https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664904 Summary: Review Request: perl-Authen-Simple-Passwd - Simple Passwd authentication Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rc040...@freenet.de QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://corsepiu.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Authen-Simple-Passwd.spec SRPM URL: http://corsepiu.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Authen-Simple-Passwd-0.6-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: Authenticate against a passwd file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 663213] Review Request: perl-File-Inplace - Perl module for in-place editing of files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663213 Ruediger Landmann changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2010-12-21 20:35:18 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 663983] Review Request: rubygem-boxgrinder-build-ec2-platform-plugin - BoxGrinder plugin to convert appliances to EC2 format
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663983 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2010-12-21 19:04:46 EST --- rubygem-boxgrinder-core-0.1.5-1.fc13, rubygem-boxgrinder-build-0.7.0-1.fc13, rubygem-boxgrinder-build-rpm-based-os-plugin-0.0.9-1.fc13, rubygem-boxgrinder-build-local-delivery-plugin-0.0.6-1.fc13, rubygem-boxgrinder-build-vmware-platform-plugin-0.0.6-1.fc13, rubygem-boxgrinder-build-ec2-platform-plugin-0.0.7-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update rubygem-boxgrinder-core rubygem-boxgrinder-build rubygem-boxgrinder-build-rpm-based-os-plugin rubygem-boxgrinder-build-local-delivery-plugin rubygem-boxgrinder-build-vmware-platform-plugin rubygem-boxgrinder-build-ec2-platform-plugin'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-boxgrinder-core-0.1.5-1.fc13,rubygem-boxgrinder-build-0.7.0-1.fc13,rubygem-boxgrinder-build-rpm-based-os-plugin-0.0.9-1.fc13,rubygem-boxgrinder-build-local-delivery-plugin-0.0.6-1.fc13,rubygem-boxgrinder-build-vmware-platform-plugin-0.0.6-1.fc13,rubygem-boxgrinder-build-ec2-platform-plugin-0.0.7-1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 657405] Review Request: lbzip2 - fast, multi-threaded bzip2 utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657405 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||lbzip2-0.23-1.fc14 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2010-12-21 19:04:58 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 655379] Review Request: tritonus - Java Sound API Implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=655379 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2010-12-21 19:05:10 EST --- tritonus-0.3.7-0.9.20101108cvs.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664763] Add iwl6000g2a-firmware - Firmware for Intel(R) Wireless WiFi Link 6005 Series Adapters
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664763 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System 2010-12-21 19:04:32 EST --- iwl6000g2a-firmware-17.168.5.1-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update iwl6000g2a-firmware'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/iwl6000g2a-firmware-17.168.5.1-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 657405] Review Request: lbzip2 - fast, multi-threaded bzip2 utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657405 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2010-12-21 19:04:52 EST --- lbzip2-0.23-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 655379] Review Request: tritonus - Java Sound API Implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=655379 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||tritonus-0.3.7-0.9.20101108 ||cvs.fc14 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2010-12-21 19:05:16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664391] Review Request: libechonest - C++ wrapper for the Echo Nest API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664391 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2010-12-21 19:00:23 EST --- libechonest-1.1.0-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update libechonest'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libechonest-1.1.0-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 634037] Review Request: ghc-MissingH - Large utility library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634037 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|ghc-MissingH-1.1.0.3-2.fc13 |ghc-MissingH-1.1.0.3-2.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 634037] Review Request: ghc-MissingH - Large utility library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634037 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2010-12-21 18:59:46 EST --- ghc-MissingH-1.1.0.3-2.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 634037] Review Request: ghc-MissingH - Large utility library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634037 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||ghc-MissingH-1.1.0.3-2.fc13 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2010-12-21 18:57:57 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 634037] Review Request: ghc-MissingH - Large utility library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634037 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2010-12-21 18:57:51 EST --- ghc-MissingH-1.1.0.3-2.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 563481] Review Request: aduna-commons-i18n - Internationalization and localization utilities
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563481 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(mefos...@gmail.co | |m) | Last Closed||2010-12-21 18:42:30 --- Comment #11 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-12-21 18:42:30 EST --- I retired and blocked the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 565949] Review Request: perl-VOMS-Lite - Perl extension for VOMS Attribute certificate creation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=565949 Steve Traylen changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(steve.tray...@cer | |n.ch) | --- Comment #20 from Steve Traylen 2010-12-21 18:19:59 EST --- Marcella, I'll look at this in the new year, limited access till then. Thanks for the comments. Steve. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 569958] Review Request: qpid-tools - Management and diagnostic tools for Apache Qpid
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=569958 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rjo...@redhat.com Depends on||569955 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 569958] Review Request: qpid-tools - Management and diagnostic tools for Apache Qpid
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=569958 --- Comment #3 from Richard W.M. Jones 2010-12-21 18:17:00 EST --- This package appears to be very useful or even essential for controlling qpidd. Any progress on getting it into Fedora? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 569955] Review Request: python-qmf - Python QMF library for Apache Qpid
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=569955 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||569958 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 657577] Review Request: sdlhack - Force full-screen games to minimize
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657577 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2010-12-21 18:11:09 EST --- sdlhack-1.1-1.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sdlhack-1.1-1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 657577] Review Request: sdlhack - Force full-screen games to minimize
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657577 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2010-12-21 18:10:45 EST --- sdlhack-1.1-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sdlhack-1.1-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 657577] Review Request: sdlhack - Force full-screen games to minimize
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657577 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 588941] Review Request: pypy - Implementation of the Python language, using Python itself
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588941 --- Comment #43 from Dave Malcolm 2010-12-21 17:20:51 EST --- pypy-1.4.1 was released earlier today, so I've updated pypy.spec to use that Updated spec file is here (as before): http://fedorapeople.org/~dmalcolm/python-packaging/pypy.spec (I also copied in a patch we apply to the 2.7 stdlib in our cpython "python" src.rpm to the 2.5 stdlib in pypy, fixing one of the selftests) SRPM: http://fedorapeople.org/~dmalcolm/python-packaging/pypy-1.4.1-1.fc13.src.rpm Changes to spec file: http://fedorapeople.org/~dmalcolm/python-packaging/pypy-from-1.4-4-to-1.4.1-1.diff Successful scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2681960 Some minor glitches lead to new rpmlint warnings: > pypy-libs.i686: E: backup-file-in-package > /usr/share/pypy-1.4.1/lib-python/2.5.2/test/test_commands.py.orig Somehow this is coming from my new patch above > pypy-libs.i686: E: version-control-internal-file > /usr/share/pypy-1.4.1/lib_pypy/pyrepl/.svn/all-wcprops and again, for numerous other .svn directories. These appeared in the 1.4.1 tarball; I've mentioned them upstream as: https://codespeak.net/issue/pypy-dev/issue612 along with the pre-existing: > W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/pypy-libs-1.4.1/demo/bpnn.py My plan: - fix the above rpmlint issues - add a %check - fix the sys.path issue reported in comment #26 (I see this too, when using the scratch builds) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 659856] Review Request: eclipse-vrapper - Vim-like editing in Eclipse
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659856 Jesse Keating changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Jesse Keating 2010-12-21 17:17:41 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: eclipse-vrapper Short Description: Vim-like editing in Eclipse Owners: jkeating Branches: f14 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 634621] Review Request: mingw32-qpid-cpp - MinGW Windows AMQP daemons and libraries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634621 Andrew Beekhof changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |mingw32-qpid-cpp - MinGW|mingw32-qpid-cpp - MinGW |Windows port of AMQP C++|Windows AMQP daemons and |Daemons and Librarie|libraries Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Andrew Beekhof 2010-12-21 17:04:46 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: mingw32-qpid-cpp Short Description: MinGW Windows AMQP daemons and libraries Owners: beekhof Branches: f14 devel InitialCC: tross -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 658310] Review Request: wordpress-mu-plugin-fedora-release-counter - Fedora release counter Wordpress plugin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658310 --- Comment #2 from Nick Bebout 2010-12-21 17:00:50 EST --- Note: I would have approved Sijis' package, except for the issue with -mu going away. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 658310] Review Request: wordpress-mu-plugin-fedora-release-counter - Fedora release counter Wordpress plugin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658310 Nick Bebout changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 658310] Review Request: wordpress-mu-plugin-fedora-release-counter - Fedora release counter Wordpress plugin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658310 --- Comment #1 from Nick Bebout 2010-12-21 16:56:32 EST --- I've sponsored you. Can you re-package this as a non-mu specific plugin? Especially given that -mu has been deprecated by upstream? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 642857] Review Request: drupal6-advanced-help - Allows module developers to store their help outside the module system in html
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=642857 Sven Lankes changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(s...@lank.es) |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Sven Lankes 2010-12-21 16:48:17 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: drupal6-advanced-help Short Description: Allows module developers to store their help outside the module system in html Owners: slankes limb Branches: f13 f14 el6 el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 661354] Review Request: identicurse - Curses based Status.net client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661354 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2010-12-21 16:24:01 EST --- identicurse-0.4.1-3.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/identicurse-0.4.1-3.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 661354] Review Request: identicurse - Curses based Status.net client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661354 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 650744] Review Request: spor - Store file modes (permission/ownership) recursively
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=650744 --- Comment #8 from Rafael Aquini 2010-12-21 16:07:55 EST --- Markus, My bad... Fixed one thing and messed another... Now it's OK! Spec URL: http://aquini.fedorapeople.org/spor/spor.spec SRPM URL: http://aquini.fedorapeople.org/spor/spor-1.0-3.fc14.src.rpm Thanks for all your attention on reviewing this package! Best regards -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 634621] Review Request: mingw32-qpid-cpp - MinGW Windows port of AMQP C++ Daemons and Librarie
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634621 Lon Hohberger changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 634621] Review Request: mingw32-qpid-cpp - MinGW Windows port of AMQP C++ Daemons and Librarie
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634621 --- Comment #5 from Lon Hohberger 2010-12-21 15:36:00 EST --- Looks like there is a problem with my permissions; I can't set fedora-review+. While I chase this down, I'll try to get someone else to set it for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 634621] Review Request: mingw32-qpid-cpp - MinGW Windows port of AMQP C++ Daemons and Librarie
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634621 Lon Hohberger changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 634621] Review Request: mingw32-qpid-cpp - MinGW Windows port of AMQP C++ Daemons and Librarie
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634621 --- Comment #4 from Lon Hohberger 2010-12-21 15:32:43 EST --- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines Following these guidelines, the spec file and package pass based on the source RPM and spec file posted in comment #2 (after subsequent minor revision to the spec file). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 634621] Review Request: mingw32-qpid-cpp - MinGW Windows port of AMQP C++ Daemons and Librarie
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634621 Lon Hohberger changed: What|Removed |Added Group||windriver --- Comment #3 from Lon Hohberger 2010-12-21 15:29:42 EST --- [...@localhost Downloads]$ rpmlint mingw32-qpid-cpp.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 592487] Review Request: ffgtk - A solution for controlling Fritz!Box or compatible routers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592487 Louis Lagendijk changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard|StalledSubmitter| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664493] Review Request: httpcomponents-client - HTTP agent implementation based on httpcomponents HttpCore
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664493
Alexander Kurtakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Alexander Kurtakov 2010-12-21
15:08:55 EST ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[x] Rpmlint output:
httpcomponents-client.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc
/etc/maven/fragments/httpcomponents-client
Not a problem.
[x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines[1].
[x] Spec file name must match the base package name, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines[2].
[x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms.
[x] Buildroot definition is not present
[x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines[3,4].
[x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
License type: ASL 2.0
[x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
[!] All independent sub-packages have license of their own
[x] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
MD5SUM this package:003b803d1aa9c873c6d22e7471856254
MD5SUM upstream package:003b803d1aa9c873c6d22e7471856254
[x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines[5].
[x] Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x] Permissions on files are set properly.
[x] Package does NOT have a %clean section which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}
(or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). (not needed anymore)
[x] Package consistently uses macros (no %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
mixing)
[x] Package contains code, or permissable content.
[-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
application.
[x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x] Javadoc documentation files are generated and included in -javadoc
subpackage
[x] Javadocs are placed in %{_javadocdir}/%{name} (no -%{version} symlinks)
[x] Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on jpackage-utils
[x] Javadoc subpackages have Require: jpackage-utils
[-] Package uses %global not %define
[-] If package uses tarball from VCS include comment how to re-create that
tarball (svn export URL, git clone URL, ...)
[-] If source tarball includes bundled jar/class files these need to be
removed prior to building
[x] All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
[x] Jar files are installed to %{_javadir}/%{name}.jar (see [6] for details)
[x] If package contains pom.xml files install it (including depmaps) even when
building with ant
[x] pom files has correct add_to_maven_depmap call which resolves to the pom
file (use "JPP." and "JPP-" correctly)
=== Maven ===
[x] Use %{_mavenpomdir} macro for placing pom files instead of
%{_datadir}/maven2/poms
[-] If package uses "-Dmaven.test.skip=true" explain why it was needed in a
comment
[-] If package uses custom depmap "-Dmaven2.jpp.depmap.file=*" explain why
it's needed in a comment
[x] Package uses %update_maven_depmap in %post/%postun
[x] Packages have Requires(post) and Requires(postun) on jpackage-utils (for
%update_maven_depmap macro)
=== Other suggestions ===
[x] If possible use upstream build method (maven/ant/javac)
[x] Avoid having BuildRequires on exact NVR unless necessary
[x] Package has BuildArch: noarch (if possible)
[x] Latest version is packaged.
=== Issues ===
1. License in a javadoc subpoackage. Not a blocker though. Please fix it when
you commit.
This package is APPROVED.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 592487] Review Request: ffgtk - A solution for controlling Fritz!Box or compatible routers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592487 --- Comment #9 from Louis Lagendijk 2010-12-21 15:13:00 EST --- Updated to the latest stable release: Spec file: http://fazant.net/ffgtk/0.7.8-1/ffgtk.spec SRPM: http://fazant.net/ffgtk/0.7.8-1/ffgtk-0.7.8-1.fc14.src.rpm Rpmlint output: [lo...@travel ffgtk-0.7.8.patched]$ rpmlint ffgtk.spec ~/rpm/RPMS/x86_64/ffgtk* ~/rpm/SRPMS/ffgtk-0.7.8-1.fc14.src.rpm ffgtk-plugin-capifax.x86_64: E: world-writable /var/spool/ffgtk 0777L ffgtk-plugin-capifax.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/ffgtk 0777L 6 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 0 warnings. The 777 permission on the spool directory is required due to the somewhat limited spooler included. I will work on a proper one later that will not require the spool directory to be wide open... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 661436] Review Request: rubygem-heroku - deploy apps to Heroku
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661436 --- Comment #28 from Minnikhanov 2010-12-21 15:06:54 EST --- heroku-1.15.0 20/12/2010 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2682457 koji scratch build successful. Spec URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/14118661/rubygem-heroku.spec SRPM URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/14118661/rubygem-heroku-1.15.0-3.fc14.src.rpm Will you tell, what I should build next? Comment 22 I'll answer about hobo etc. late. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 661436] Review Request: rubygem-heroku - deploy apps to Heroku
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661436 --- Comment #27 from Minnikhanov 2010-12-21 14:53:17 EST --- (In reply to comment #23) > > > > Does not build... > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2675006 > > > > I see build.log of this task - build failed. Fix it. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2681968 koji scratch build successful. Spec URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/14118661/rubygem-heroku.spec SRPM URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/14118661/rubygem-heroku-1.14.10-3.fc14.src.rpm Just will make heroku-1.15. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664493] Review Request: httpcomponents-client - HTTP agent implementation based on httpcomponents HttpCore
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664493 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||akurt...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|akurt...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Alexander Kurtakov 2010-12-21 14:56:37 EST --- I'll do this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 650744] Review Request: spor - Store file modes (permission/ownership) recursively
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=650744
--- Comment #7 from Markus Mayer 2010-12-21 14:39:12 EST ---
Hi Rafael,
I am realy sorry! I did not test if rpmbuild is still working.
I can confirm that the man-page-fix is working.
rpmlint output:
spor.spec: W: invalid-url Source0:
http://spor.googlecode.com/files/spor-1.0.tar.bz2 HTTP Error 404: Not Found
spor.src:12: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 12)
As you mentioned above the first warning can be ignored. The 2nd
('mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs') can be fixed by replacing the 'tab' in line 12
with spaces.
Best regards
Markus
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664465] Review Request: httpcomponents-core - Set of low level Java HTTP transport components for HTTP services
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664465
Alexander Kurtakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Alexander Kurtakov 2010-12-21
14:23:59 EST ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[x] Rpmlint output:
httpcomponents-core.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc
/etc/maven/fragments/httpcomponents-core
[x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines[1].
[x] Spec file name must match the base package name, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines[2].
[x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms.
[x] Buildroot definition is not present
[x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines[3,4].
[x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
License type: ASL 2.0
[x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
[!] All independent sub-packages have license of their own-Javadoc subpackage
is missing license
[x] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
MD5SUM this package:5921a41284b6452a259c2ae55b1f78b6
MD5SUM upstream package:5921a41284b6452a259c2ae55b1f78b6
[x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines[5].
[x] Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x] Permissions on files are set properly.
[x] Package does NOT have a %clean section which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}
(or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). (not needed anymore)
[x] Package consistently uses macros (no %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
mixing)
[x] Package contains code, or permissable content.
[-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
application.
[x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x] Javadoc documentation files are generated and included in -javadoc
subpackage
[x] Javadocs are placed in %{_javadocdir}/%{name} (no -%{version} symlinks)
[x] Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on jpackage-utils
[x] Javadoc subpackages have Require: jpackage-utils
[-] Package uses %global not %define
[-] If package uses tarball from VCS include comment how to re-create that
tarball (svn export URL, git clone URL, ...)
[-] If source tarball includes bundled jar/class files these need to be
removed prior to building
[-] All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
[-] Jar files are installed to %{_javadir}/%{name}.jar (see [6] for details)
[x] If package contains pom.xml files install it (including depmaps) even when
building with ant
[x] pom files has correct add_to_maven_depmap call which resolves to the pom
file (use "JPP." and "JPP-" correctly)
=== Maven ===
[x] Use %{_mavenpomdir} macro for placing pom files instead of
%{_datadir}/maven2/poms
[-] If package uses "-Dmaven.test.skip=true" explain why it was needed in a
comment
[-] If package uses custom depmap "-Dmaven2.jpp.depmap.file=*" explain why
it's needed in a comment
[x] Package uses %update_maven_depmap in %post/%postun
[x] Packages have Requires(post) and Requires(postun) on jpackage-utils (for
%update_maven_depmap macro)
=== Other suggestions ===
[x] If possible use upstream build method (maven/ant/javac)
[x] Avoid having BuildRequires on exact NVR unless necessary
[x] Package has BuildArch: noarch (if possible)
[x] Latest version is packaged.
Issues:
Add the license in the javadoc subpackage.
Not a blocker though.
This package is APPROVED.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664054] Review Request: python-rhsm - Python library to communicate with a Red Hat Unified Entitlement Platform
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664054 Devan Goodwin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2010-12-21 14:26:56 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 661436] Review Request: rubygem-heroku - deploy apps to Heroku
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661436 --- Comment #26 from Minnikhanov 2010-12-21 14:21:31 EST --- (In reply to comment #23) > > > > Does not build... > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2675006 > > > > I see build.log of this task - build failed. Fix it. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2681968 koji scratch build successful. Spec URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/14118661/rubygem-heroku.spec SRPM URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/14118661/rubygem-heroku-1.14.10-3.fc14.src.rpm Just will make heroku-1.15. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664826] Review Request: lucene3 - High-performance, full-featured text search engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664826 Hicham HAOUARI changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||652183(FE-JAVASIG) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664826] New: Review Request: lucene3 - High-performance, full-featured text search engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: lucene3 - High-performance, full-featured text search engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664826 Summary: Review Request: lucene3 - High-performance, full-featured text search engine Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: hicham.haou...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hicham.fedorapeople.org/lucene3/lucene3.spec SRPM URL: http://hicham.fedorapeople.org/lucene3/lucene3-3.0.3-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: Jakarta Lucene is a high-performance, full-featured text search engine written entirely in Java. It is a technology suitable for nearly any application that requires full-text search, especially cross-platform. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 634621] Review Request: mingw32-qpid-cpp - MinGW Windows port of AMQP C++ Daemons and Librarie
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634621 --- Comment #2 from Adam Stokes 2010-12-21 13:44:46 EST --- According to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:MinGW#Dependencies a BuildRequires: mingw32-filesystem >= minimum-version Is needed in addition to other requires. Everything else looks fine according to the mingw32 specifics noted in above link -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664817] New: Review Request: perl-HTML-Selector-XPath - CSS Selector to XPath compiler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-Selector-XPath - CSS Selector to XPath compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664817 Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-Selector-XPath - CSS Selector to XPath compiler Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rc040...@freenet.de QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://corsepiu.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-HTML-Selector-XPath.spec SRPM URL: http://corsepiu.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-HTML-Selector-XPath-0.04-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: HTML::Selector::XPath is a utility function to compile CSS2 selector to the equivalent XPath expression. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664815] New: Review Request: perl-CGI-Emulate-PSGI - PSGI adapter for CGI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Emulate-PSGI - PSGI adapter for CGI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664815 Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Emulate-PSGI - PSGI adapter for CGI Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rc040...@freenet.de QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://corsepiu.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-CGI-Emulate-PSGI.spec SRPM URL: http://corsepiu.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-CGI-Emulate-PSGI-0.10-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: This module allows an application designed for the CGI environment to run in a PSGI environment, and thus on any of the backends that PSGI supports. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664812] New: Review Request: perl-HTML-Quoted - Extract structure of quoted HTML mail message
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-Quoted - Extract structure of quoted HTML mail message https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664812 Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-Quoted - Extract structure of quoted HTML mail message Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rc040...@freenet.de QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://corsepiu.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-HTML-Quoted.spec SRPM URL: http://corsepiu.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-HTML-Quoted-0.02-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: Extract structure of quoted HTML mail message -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 517416] Review Request: awl - Andrew's Web Libraries - PHP Utility Libraries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517416 Thomas Moschny changed: What|Removed |Added CC||thomas.mosc...@gmx.de --- Comment #6 from Thomas Moschny 2010-12-21 13:10:41 EST --- Ping? Would be nice to see this package in, especially as it already has been approved. Current version is 0.45. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664810] New: Review Request: perl-Regexp-IPv6 - Regular expression for IPv6 addresses
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Regexp-IPv6 - Regular expression for IPv6 addresses https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664810 Summary: Review Request: perl-Regexp-IPv6 - Regular expression for IPv6 addresses Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rc040...@freenet.de QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://corsepiu.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Regexp-IPv6.spec SRPM URL: http://corsepiu.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Regexp-IPv6-0.03-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: This module exports the $IPv6_re regular expression that matches any valid IPv6 address as described in "RFC 2373 - 2.2 Text Representation of Addresses" but ::. Any string not compliant with such RFC will be rejected. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 663956] Review Request: python-numexpr - Fast numerical array expression evaluator for Python and NumPy.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663956 --- Comment #6 from Thibault North 2010-12-21 12:23:34 EST --- >you're not supposed to reset the EVR when the package is actually imported in >>Fedora I agree with this, of course. But before versioning, old spec files are usually not available, as they are overwritten at each modification. Versioning is then equivalent to increment a number and add garbage in the %changelog section. But anyways :-/ Here are the updated files: Spec URL: http://tnorth.fedorapeople.org/python-numexpr.spec SRPM URL: http://tnorth.fedorapeople.org/python-numexpr-1.4.1-2.fc14.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 656363] Review Request: perl-Package-Stash-XS - Faster and more correct implementation of the Package::Stash API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656363 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2010-12-21 12:40:42 EST --- perl-Package-Stash-XS-0.17-2.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Package-Stash-XS-0.17-2.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 560894] Review Request: perl-Pod-Coverage-TrustPod - Allow a module's pod to contain Pod::Coverage hints
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=560894 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Pod-Coverage-TrustPod- |perl-Pod-Coverage-TrustPod- |0.092830-3.fc12 |0.092830-4.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 225672] Merge Review: cvs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225672 Vojtech Vitek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 659856] Review Request: eclipse-vrapper - Vim-like editing in Eclipse
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659856 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review |Review Request: |Request:eclipse-vrapper - |eclipse-vrapper - Vim-like |Vim-like editing in Eclipse |editing in Eclipse -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 560894] Review Request: perl-Pod-Coverage-TrustPod - Allow a module's pod to contain Pod::Coverage hints
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=560894 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2010-12-21 12:33:15 EST --- perl-Pod-Coverage-TrustPod-0.092830-4.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 663983] Review Request: rubygem-boxgrinder-build-ec2-platform-plugin - BoxGrinder plugin to convert appliances to EC2 format
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663983 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2010-12-21 12:13:52 EST --- rubygem-boxgrinder-core-0.1.5-1.fc13,rubygem-boxgrinder-build-0.7.0-1.fc13,rubygem-boxgrinder-build-rpm-based-os-plugin-0.0.9-1.fc13,rubygem-boxgrinder-build-local-delivery-plugin-0.0.6-1.fc13,rubygem-boxgrinder-build-vmware-platform-plugin-0.0.6-1.fc13,rubygem-boxgrinder-build-ec2-platform-plugin-0.0.7-1.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-boxgrinder-core-0.1.5-1.fc13,rubygem-boxgrinder-build-0.7.0-1.fc13,rubygem-boxgrinder-build-rpm-based-os-plugin-0.0.9-1.fc13,rubygem-boxgrinder-build-local-delivery-plugin-0.0.6-1.fc13,rubygem-boxgrinder-build-vmware-platform-plugin-0.0.6-1.fc13,rubygem-boxgrinder-build-ec2-platform-plugin-0.0.7-1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 663983] Review Request: rubygem-boxgrinder-build-ec2-platform-plugin - BoxGrinder plugin to convert appliances to EC2 format
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663983 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2010-12-21 12:13:43 EST --- rubygem-boxgrinder-core-0.1.5-1.fc14,rubygem-boxgrinder-build-0.7.0-1.fc14,rubygem-boxgrinder-build-rpm-based-os-plugin-0.0.9-1.fc14,rubygem-boxgrinder-build-local-delivery-plugin-0.0.6-1.fc14,rubygem-boxgrinder-build-vmware-platform-plugin-0.0.6-1.fc14,rubygem-boxgrinder-build-ec2-platform-plugin-0.0.7-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-boxgrinder-core-0.1.5-1.fc14,rubygem-boxgrinder-build-0.7.0-1.fc14,rubygem-boxgrinder-build-rpm-based-os-plugin-0.0.9-1.fc14,rubygem-boxgrinder-build-local-delivery-plugin-0.0.6-1.fc14,rubygem-boxgrinder-build-vmware-platform-plugin-0.0.6-1.fc14,rubygem-boxgrinder-build-ec2-platform-plugin-0.0.7-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 663983] Review Request: rubygem-boxgrinder-build-ec2-platform-plugin - BoxGrinder plugin to convert appliances to EC2 format
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663983 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 565949] Review Request: perl-VOMS-Lite - Perl extension for VOMS Attribute certificate creation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=565949 Marcela Mašláňová changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(steve.tray...@cer ||n.ch) --- Comment #19 from Marcela Mašláňová 2010-12-21 11:59:36 EST --- Chris covered almost everything. Rpmlint is complaining about: perl-VOMS-Lite.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/perl-VOMS-Lite-0.09/example/PROXYINFO.pl perl-VOMS-Lite.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/grid-security/voms.config 0600L Spec: buildroot is not needed since F-12, but you will need it for EL-5. On EL-6 should be new filter okay. Installation of server in sbin is probably okay. Provides: rpm -qp --provides perl-VOMS-Lite-0.09-5.fc15.noarch.rpm perl(VOMS::Lite) = 0.09 perl(VOMS::Lite::AC) = 0.09 perl(VOMS::Lite::ASN1Helper) = 0.09 perl(VOMS::Lite::Attribs::DBHelper) = 0.02 perl(VOMS::Lite::CertKeyHelper) = 0.09 perl(VOMS::Lite::KEY) perl(VOMS::Lite::MyProxy) = 0.09 perl(VOMS::Lite::OID) perl(VOMS::Lite::PEMHelper) = 0.09 perl(VOMS::Lite::PROXY) = 0.09 perl(VOMS::Lite::REQ) = 0.09 perl(VOMS::Lite::RSAHelper) = 0.09 perl(VOMS::Lite::RSAKey) = 0.09 perl(VOMS::Lite::VOMS) = 0.09 perl(VOMS::Lite::X509) = 0.09 perl-VOMS-Lite = 0.09-5.fc15 Requires: perl >= 0:5.004 perl(Crypt::CBC) perl(Crypt::DES_EDE3) perl(DBI) perl(Digest::MD2) perl(Digest::MD5) perl(Digest::SHA1) perl(Exporter) perl(File::Copy) perl(HTTP::Daemon::SSL) perl(HTTP::Request) perl(HTTP::Response) perl(HTTP::Status) perl(IO::Socket) perl(IO::Socket::SSL) perl(LWP::UserAgent) perl(Math::BigInt) perl(Math::BigInt::GMP) perl(MIME::Base64) perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.2) perl(Regexp::Common) perl(strict) perl(Sys::Hostname) perl(Term::ReadKey) perl(Time::Local) perl(vars) perl(VOMS::Lite) perl(VOMS::Lite::AC) perl(VOMS::Lite::ASN1Helper) perl(VOMS::Lite::CertKeyHelper) perl(VOMS::Lite::KEY) perl(VOMS::Lite::MyProxy) perl(VOMS::Lite::PEMHelper) perl(VOMS::Lite::PROXY) perl(VOMS::Lite::REQ) perl(VOMS::Lite::RSAHelper) perl(VOMS::Lite::RSAKey) perl(VOMS::Lite::VOMS) perl(VOMS::Lite::X509) perl(warnings) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 /usr/bin/perl Provides and requires ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 629664] Review Request: jtnef - Java TNEF package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629664 Orion Poplawski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2010-12-21 11:56:47 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664493] Review Request: httpcomponents-client - HTTP agent implementation based on httpcomponents HttpCore
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664493 Stanislav Ochotnicky changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||652183(FE-JAVASIG) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 499959] Review Request: redmine - redmine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499959
--- Comment #34 from Randy Zagar 2010-12-21 11:05:59 EST
---
So far, I am not having issues with Rubygem Rack-1.1 under Fedora 13...
I do have some suggestions:
* Redmine needs its own userid, since you're not using Mongrel.
* Redmine files and tmp should go in /var/lib/redmine.
I'm not expecting redmine will be allowed to modify files in /usr/share
* Logs should go in /var/log/redmine
I did this with symlinks:
ln -s /usr/share/redmine/config /etc/redmine
mkdir -p /var/lib/redmine/files
mkdir/var/lib/redmine/tmp
mkdir/var/log/redmine
chown -R apache.apache \
/var/lib/redmine /var/log/redmine
chmod -R 755 \
/var/lib/redmine /var/log/redmine
mv /usr/share/redmine/files{,.orig}
ln -s /var/lib/redmine/files /usr/share/redmine/files
mv /usr/share/redmine/tmp{,.orig}
ln -x /var/lib/redmine/tmp /usr/share/redmine/tmp
mv /usr/share/redmine/log{,.orig}
ln -s /var/log/redmine /usr/share/redmine/log
Has there been any other progress on this RPM?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 663695] Review Request: mingw32-sigar - MinGW Windows sigar library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663695 --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-12-21 11:03:12 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 663653] Review Request: rubygem-warden - Rack middle-ware that provides authentication
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663653 --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-12-21 11:02:52 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 523540] Review Request: opentracker - BitTorrent Tracker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523540 --- Comment #74 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-12-21 10:59:33 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630204] Review Request: ghc-mtlparse - Haskell mtlparse library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630204 --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-12-21 11:00:14 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 661660] Review Request: metamorphose2 - A cross platform file and folder mass renamer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661660 --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-12-21 11:02:02 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 659679] Review Request: sigar - System Information Gatherer And Reporter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659679 --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-12-21 11:01:12 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664619] Review Request: jspeex - Java Implementation of Speex
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664619
--- Comment #4 from Hicham HAOUARI 2010-12-21
10:37:45 EST ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > (In reply to comment #1)
> > > Few notes from just a quick look:
> > > * BuildRoot is not needed (ignore rpmlint warning)
> > > * rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %clean section not needed (see above)
> >
> > - I think there is no harm in keeping that, in case we want to maintain a
> > single spec across Fedora and EPEL
>
> This is only needed on EL-5 and earlier. But yes, if you plan to support older
> EPELs keep it in.
>
> > > * line "%doc %{_javadocdir}/%{name}/*" in %files should be removed
> > > (duplicate
> > > entry)
> > >
> >
> > - I believe the first entry is for directory ownership only, the second
> > marks
> > the files as doc ones.
>
> yes, but it's still not needed. Instead of those two lines you can just have:
> %doc %{_javadocdir}/%{name}
Ok, removed the duplicate line
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 663737] Review Request: iwl6000g2a-firmware - Firmware for Intel(R) Wireless WiFi Link 6005 Series Adapters
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663737 John W. Linville changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2010-12-21 10:23:09 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664763] New: Add iwl6000g2a-firmware - Firmware for Intel(R) Wireless WiFi Link 6005 Series Adapters
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Add iwl6000g2a-firmware - Firmware for Intel(R) Wireless WiFi Link
6005 Series Adapters
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664763
Summary: Add iwl6000g2a-firmware - Firmware for Intel(R)
Wireless WiFi Link 6005 Series Adapters
Product: Fedora
Version: 14
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: iwl6000g2a-firmware
AssignedTo: linvi...@redhat.com
ReportedBy: linvi...@redhat.com
QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: nott...@redhat.com, linvi...@redhat.com,
lemen...@gmail.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com
Depends on: 663737
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Clone Of: 663737
Add this package to f14...
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #663737 +++
Spec URL: http://linville.fedorapeople.org/iwl6000g2a-firmware.spec
SRPM URL:
http://linville.fedorapeople.org/iwl6000g2a-firmware-17.168.5.1-1.fc14.src.rpm
Description:
This package contains the firmware required by the iwlagn driver
for Linux to support the iwl6000g2a hardware. Usage of the firmware
is subject to the terms and conditions contained inside the provided
LICENSE file. Please read it carefully.
--- Additional comment from lemen...@gmail.com on 2010-12-17 05:28:52 EST ---
I'll review it.
--- Additional comment from lemen...@gmail.com on 2010-12-19 03:48:22 EST ---
Sorry for the delay - my home routed died almost after I post my last message
in this ticket.
Ok, here is my
REVIEW:
Legend: + = PASSED, - = FAILED, 0 = Not Applicable
+ rpmlint is almost silent
sulaco ~: rpmlint
~/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/iwl6000g2a-firmware-17.168.5.1-1.fc12.noarch.rpm
iwl6000g2a-firmware.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US iwlagn ->
lagniappe, lasagna, lagging
^^^ this message should be ignored (false positive).
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
sulaco ~:
+ The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
+ The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
+ The package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
+ The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the
Licensing Guidelines.
+ The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license
(Redistributable w/o modifications).
+ The file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package, is included
in %doc.
+ The spec file is written in American English.
+ The spec file for the package is legible.
+ The sources used to build the package, match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES: sha256sum iwlwifi-6000g2a-ucode-17.168.5.1.tgz*
e77b9a890cb9e57429995dea507a86fe710a13ff493210ba26a4ba05ae0e541a
iwlwifi-6000g2a-ucode-17.168.5.1.tgz
e77b9a890cb9e57429995dea507a86fe710a13ff493210ba26a4ba05ae0e541a
iwlwifi-6000g2a-ucode-17.168.5.1.tgz.1
sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES:
+ The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
primary architecture.
+ All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires.
0 No need to handle locales.
0 No shared library files.
+ The package does NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
+ The package is not designed to be relocatable.
+ The package does not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files
listings.
+ Permissions on files are set properly.
+ The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
+ The package consistently uses macros.
+ The package contains code, or permissible content.
0 No extremely large documentation files.
+ Anything, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the
application.
0 No header files.
0 No static libraries.
0 No pkgconfig(.pc) files.
0 The package doesn't contain library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1).
0 No devel sub-package.
+ The package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives.
0 Not a GUI application.
+ The package does not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
+ At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
+ All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8.
I didn;t find any issues so this package is
APPROVED.
--- Additional comment from linvi...@redhat.com on 2010-12-20 10:53:48 EST ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: iwl6000g2a-firmware
Short Description: Firmware for Intel(R) Wireless WiFi Link 6005 Series
Adapters
Owners: linville
Branches: f14
InitialCC: linville
--- Additional comment from ke...@tummy.com on 2010-12-21 01:23:06 EST ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are rece
[Bug 664763] Add iwl6000g2a-firmware - Firmware for Intel(R) Wireless WiFi Link 6005 Series Adapters
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664763 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System 2010-12-21 10:26:37 EST --- iwl6000g2a-firmware-17.168.5.1-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/iwl6000g2a-firmware-17.168.5.1-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
