[Bug 665885] Review Request: perl-AnyEvent-HTTP - Simple but non-blocking HTTP/HTTPS client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665885 Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com 2010-12-28 03:17:05 EST --- Thanks for the review New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-AnyEvent-HTTP Short Description: Simple but non-blocking HTTP/HTTPS client Owners: remi Branches: F-13 F-14 EL-6 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 626175] Review Request: DeTex - is a filter program that removes the LaTeX control sequences from tex files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=626175 --- Comment #6 from Christoph Wickert cwick...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-28 03:22:50 EST --- Usually we follow the rule first come, first served so I'd like Didi to finish this review instead of doing another one. Didi, you need help? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 652573] Review Request: ghc-zip-archive - Haskell zip-archive library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652573 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2010-12-28 03:50:17 EST --- Thank you for the review. :) New Package SCM Request === Package Name: ghc-zip-archive Short Description: Haskell zip-archive library Owners: petersen Branches: f14 f13 InitialCC: haskell-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 604033] Review Request: openemr - Practice Management, Electronic Medical Record
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=604033 --- Comment #2 from Rakesh Pandit rpan...@redhat.com 2010-12-28 04:36:13 EST --- Will update in Jan first week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 645277] Review Request: puddletag - Feature rich, easy to use tag editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645277 --- Comment #6 from Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com 2010-12-28 04:39:42 EST --- Created attachment 470930 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=470930 puddletag exception freeze with non-initialized quodlibet -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 645277] Review Request: puddletag - Feature rich, easy to use tag editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645277 Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mschwe...@gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com 2010-12-28 04:38:51 EST --- Good. [...] I've played a bit more with the run-time aspects of the app and have run into two problems: First, trouble testing the Music Library feature. A yum install quodlibet was necessary to make sense of the Tools Import Music Library menu, which only said: | No supported music libraries were found. Most likely the | required dependencies aren't installed. Visit the puddletag | website, puddletag.sourceforge.net for more details. Then reselecting the menu and loading QuodLibet made puddletag freeze (will attach the Python exception). Turned out one has to actually run the quodlibet app first to init some files. To reproduce: 1. rm -rf $HOME/.quodlibet 2. puddletag 3. open menu Tools Import Music Library 4. select QuodLibet and load it [...] Second issue was that the preferences default to using amarok -p as audio player. On systems where Amarok is not installed (all Fedora non-KDE default installs!), no error/warning dialog is displayed when trying to play a file. If one enters the preferences and removes the default amarok -p setting, there is a warning, at least. I wonder whether there could be a default better than amarok -p? Maybe use xdg-open (and a dependency on it)? [...] Apart from that: APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 645277] Review Request: puddletag - Feature rich, easy to use tag editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645277 Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 665995] New: Review Request: fmit - Free Music Instrument Tuner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: fmit - Free Music Instrument Tuner https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665995 Summary: Review Request: fmit - Free Music Instrument Tuner Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dwro...@ertelnet.rybnik.pl QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://dwrobel.fedorapeople.org/projects/rpmbuild/SPECS/fmit.spec SRPM URL: http://dwrobel.fedorapeople.org/projects/rpmbuild/SRPMS/fmit-0.98.1-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: fmit is a graphical utility for tuning musical instruments, with error and volume history and advanced features like waveform shape, harmonics ratio (formants), and micro-tonal tuning. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 652971] Review Request: code-editor - A text/code editor based on Qt Creator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652971 --- Comment #4 from Ilyes Gouta ilyes.go...@gmail.com 2010-12-28 05:34:27 EST --- Hi Michael, Just curious, what exceptions are those? I see the spec file mentions a %doc file, so JFYI: The guidelines say that you would need approval from Fedora Legal. Right. Actually that's wrongly mentioned in the spec file. I intend to release the entire package under an LGPL license. code-editor is derived from QtCreator which has an internal architecture based on plugins implementing the various functionalities and services of the tool, and these are released by Nokia under a Commercial and LGPL licenses. code-editor reuses a subset of these plugins, sometimes applying slight changes to mainly remove a little bit of functionality, where this one should be provided by another plugin that I didn't pickup for inclusion in code-editor. The same applies for QtCreator in terms of licensing. QtCreator acts as a loader/containers for these plugins and in the case of code-editor I'm actually bringing in some few modifications, such as to open files from the command line, re-organize the application's menu a little bit, changing the name of the application, to the original source code. Is the tarball available at some URL? Yes, both the srpm and the spec files are available at: http://ilyes.fedorapeople.org/code-editor-1-1.fc14.src.rpm http://ilyes.fedorapeople.org/code-editor.spec Requires: qt = 4.7.0 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Explicit_Requires I'll fix that asap and publish the new spec file and package on fedorapeople. Thanks! -Ilyes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664815] Review Request: perl-CGI-Emulate-PSGI - PSGI adapter for CGI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664815 Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cw...@alumni.drew.edu --- Comment #5 from Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr 2010-12-28 06:26:41 EST --- Imported but never built. I suspect that the real life problems that made Chris put his packaging efforts on hold prevented him from building and pushing this package. Given Chris' comments in fesco ticket 507, the simplest solution seems to be to add Ralf as a co-owner and him and Chris both maintain the package. Chris and/or Jason, can you do this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 575940] Review Request: php-pluf - Pluf
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=575940 --- Comment #7 from Guillaume Kulakowski llaum...@gmail.com 2010-12-28 06:43:18 EST --- New release: 20101110git SPEC, RPMs and SRPM are avalaible here: http://llaumgui.fedorapeople.org/review/php-pluf/ For information, php-pluf don't use php-unit but SimpleTest not yet in Fedora... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 652085] Review Request: SFML - A simple and fast multimedia library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652085 --- Comment #7 from MERCIER Jonathan bioinfornat...@gmail.com 2010-12-28 07:44:02 EST --- i choose b/ update rpm package scratch build here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2691167 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 620156] Review Request: mango - It is a collection of D packages with an orientation toward network programming
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620156 --- Comment #4 from MERCIER Jonathan bioinfornat...@gmail.com 2010-12-28 07:51:23 EST --- hi jason here you have all you wqant : http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/bioinfornatics/D/fedora-14/SRPMS/ it is ok? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 620156] Review Request: mango - It is a collection of D packages with an orientation toward network programming
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620156 --- Comment #5 from MERCIER Jonathan bioinfornat...@gmail.com 2010-12-28 08:45:13 EST --- spec file here: http://bioinfornatics.fedorapeople.org/mango.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 618668] Review Request: Derelict - a collection of D bindings to C shared libraries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618668 --- Comment #5 from MERCIER Jonathan bioinfornat...@gmail.com 2010-12-28 08:48:01 EST --- spec file here: http://bioinfornatics.fedorapeople.org/derelict.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 642208] Review Request: mingw32-win-iconv - iconv implementation using Win32 API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=642208 amori...@users.sourceforge.net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amori...@users.sourceforge. ||net --- Comment #1 from amori...@users.sourceforge.net 2010-12-28 09:16:28 EST --- Beware, this is my very first package review. Feedback on the review by a more experienced packager is welcome, particularly if I missed any crucial steps. [+] OK [!] Needs to be looked into [/] Not applicable [*] Overridden by MinGW guidelines Rpmlint --- $ rpmlint mingw32-win-iconv.spec mingw32-win-iconv.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: http://win-iconv.googlecode.com/files/win-iconv-0.0.1.tar.bz2 HTTP Error 404: Not Found 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. $ rpmlint mingw32-win-iconv-0.0.1-1.fc14.src.rpm mingw32-win-iconv.src: W: invalid-url Source0: http://win-iconv.googlecode.com/files/win-iconv-0.0.1.tar.bz2 HTTP Error 404: Not Found 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Harmless warning, URL works: $ wget http://win-iconv.googlecode.com/files/win-iconv-0.0.1.tar.bz2 --2010-12-28 11:15:59-- http://win-iconv.googlecode.com/files/win-iconv-0.0.1.tar.bz2 Resolving win-iconv.googlecode.com... 209.85.229.82 Connecting to win-iconv.googlecode.com|209.85.229.82|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 17338 (17K) [application/x-bzip2] Saving to: “win-iconv-0.0.1.tar.bz2” 100%[==] 17,338 --.-K/s in 0.1s 2010-12-28 11:16:00 (165 KB/s) - “win-iconv-0.0.1.tar.bz2” saved [17338/17338] $ rpm -i mingw32-win-iconv-0.0.1-1.fc14.src.rpm $ md5sum win-iconv-0.0.1.tar.bz2 22ee1bbaae404fe34dca835f1c669a1e win-iconv-0.0.1.tar.bz2 $ md5sum ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES/win-iconv-0.0.1.tar.bz2 22ee1bbaae404fe34dca835f1c669a1e /home/amorilia/rpmbuild/SOURCES/win-iconv-0.0.1.tar.bz2 $ diff mingw32-win-iconv.spec ~/rpmbuild/SPECS/mingw32-win-iconv.spec -s Files mingw32-win-iconv.spec and /home/amorilia/rpmbuild/SPECS/mingw32-win-iconv.spec are identical $ rpmbuild -ba mingw32-win-iconv.spec ... Build succeeds. $ rpmlint ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/mingw32-win-iconv-0.0.1-1.fc14.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings $ rpmlint ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/mingw32-win-iconv-debuginfo-0.0.1-1.fc14.noarch.rpm mingw32-win-iconv-debuginfo.noarch: E: debuginfo-without-sources 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/mingw32-win-iconv-static-0.0.1-1.fc14.noarch.rpm mingw32-win-iconv-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libiconv.a mingw32-win-iconv-static.noarch: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings. Looks fine, follows MinGW guidelines. Dependencies $ su -c 'yum install mingw32-iconv*' $ rpm -qa | grep mingw32-iconv mingw32-iconv-static-1.12-12.fc12.noarch mingw32-iconv-debuginfo-1.12-12.fc12.noarch mingw32-iconv-1.12-12.fc12.noarch $ su -c 'rpm -Uv /home/amorilia/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/mingw32-win-iconv*.rpm' Preparing packages for installation... mingw32-win-iconv-0.0.1-1.fc14 mingw32-win-iconv-static-0.0.1-1.fc14 mingw32-win-iconv-debuginfo-0.0.1-1.fc14 $ rpm -qa | grep mingw32-iconv mingw32-iconv-debuginfo-1.12-12.fc12.noarch [!] mingw32-iconv-debuginfo-1.12-12.fc12.noarch should have been removed. $ rpmquery --requires mingw32-win-iconv rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) = 3.0.3-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) = 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) = 4.0-1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) = 3.0.4-1 mingw32-filesystem = 63 mingw32-runtime mingw32(kernel32.dll) mingw32(msvcrt.dll) rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) = 5.2-1 $ rpmquery --provides mingw32-win-iconv mingw32-iconv = 1.12-13.fc14 mingw32(libiconv.dll) mingw32-win-iconv = 0.0.1-1.fc14 $ rpmquery --requires mingw32-win-iconv-static mingw32-win-iconv = 0.0.1-1.fc14 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) = 3.0.3-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) = 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) = 4.0-1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) = 3.0.4-1 mingw32-filesystem = 63 mingw32-runtime rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) = 5.2-1 $ rpmquery --provides mingw32-win-iconv-static mingw32-iconv-static = 1.12-13.fc14 mingw32-win-iconv-static = 0.0.1-1.fc14 $ rpmquery --requires mingw32-win-iconv-debuginfo rpmlib(FileDigests) = 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) = 4.0-1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) = 3.0.4-1 mingw32-filesystem = 63 mingw32-runtime rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) = 5.2-1 Does not require mingw32-win-iconv, but apparently native debuginfos are similar, so I guess this is fine. $ rpmquery --provides mingw32-win-iconv-debuginfo mingw32-win-iconv-debuginfo = 0.0.1-1.fc14 [!] Must
[Bug 666057] New: Review Request: weave-minimal - Minimal Firefox Sync Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: weave-minimal - Minimal Firefox Sync Server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666057 Summary: Review Request: weave-minimal - Minimal Firefox Sync Server Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: radf...@blackbean.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://blackbean.org/review/weave-minimal.spec SRPM URL: http://blackbean.org/review/weave-minimal-0.20091127-0.fc14.src.rpm Description: Minimal Firefox Sync Server -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 529441] Review Request: pdfbox - Java PDF library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529441 --- Comment #10 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com 2010-12-28 12:52:28 EST --- I think this is about right. Still need apache-rat. http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/pdfbox.spec http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/pdfbox-1.4.0-2.fc14.src.rpm * Tue Dec 27 2010 Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com - 1.4.0-2 - Create sub-packages - Use depmap file * Tue Dec 21 2010 Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com - 1.4.0-1 - Update to 1.4.0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664815] Review Request: perl-CGI-Emulate-PSGI - PSGI adapter for CGI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664815 --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2010-12-28 12:48:37 EST --- Seems reasonable, but Ralf will need to apply in pkgdb. I can approve that request if Chris doesn't or can't. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 647885] Review Request: apache-rat - Apache Release Audit Tool (RAT)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=647885
--- Comment #14 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com 2010-12-28 13:06:00
EST ---
* Mon Dec 27 2010 Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com 0.8-0.5.20100827
- Drop maven settings patch
- Add svn revision to export command
- Set maven.test.failure.ignore=true instead of maven.test.skip
- Use %%{_mavenpomdir}
http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/apache-rat.spec
http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/apache-rat-0.8-0.5.20100827.fc14.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 500277] Review Request: fmit - Free Music Instrument Tuner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500277 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE --- Comment #11 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2010-12-28 13:19:10 EST --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 665995 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 665995] Review Request: fmit - Free Music Instrument Tuner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665995 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||m...@blagblagblag.org --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2010-12-28 13:19:27 EST --- *** Bug 459455 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 665995] Review Request: fmit - Free Music Instrument Tuner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665995 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||henrique...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2010-12-28 13:19:10 EST --- *** Bug 500277 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 459455] Review Request: fmit - Free Music Instrument Tuner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459455 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|WONTFIX |DUPLICATE Flag|fedora-review+ | --- Comment #36 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2010-12-28 13:19:27 EST --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 665995 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 650744] Review Request: spor - Store file modes (permission/ownership) recursively
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=650744 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-28 15:53:32 EST --- spor-1.0-3.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/spor-1.0-3.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 650744] Review Request: spor - Store file modes (permission/ownership) recursively
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=650744 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 652406] Review Request: rubygem-boxgrinder-build-fedora-os-plugin - BoxGrinder files required to build appliances with Fedora OS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652406 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-28 15:56:26 EST --- rubygem-boxgrinder-build-fedora-os-plugin-0.0.5-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 510864] Review Request: colorize - Perl script to colorize logs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510864 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||colorize-0.3.4-2.fc14 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2010-12-28 15:58:18 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 652406] Review Request: rubygem-boxgrinder-build-fedora-os-plugin - BoxGrinder files required to build appliances with Fedora OS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652406 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||rubygem-boxgrinder-build-fe ||dora-os-plugin-0.0.5-1.fc14 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2010-12-28 15:55:25 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 650744] Review Request: spor - Store file modes (permission/ownership) recursively
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=650744 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-28 16:02:40 EST --- spor-1.0-3.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/spor-1.0-3.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 510864] Review Request: colorize - Perl script to colorize logs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510864 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-28 15:58:25 EST --- colorize-0.3.4-2.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 510864] Review Request: colorize - Perl script to colorize logs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510864 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|colorize-0.3.4-2.fc14 |colorize-0.3.4-2.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 652085] Review Request: SFML - A simple and fast multimedia library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652085 --- Comment #8 from Haïkel Guémar karlthe...@gmail.com 2010-12-28 16:11:40 EST --- * devel subpackages should require their non-devel counterpart. * since you use %cmake macro, you don't need to set CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX, CMAKE_INSTALL_LIBDIR or LIB_INSTALL_DIR (rpm --eval %cmake will tell which options are already enabled). You could probably drop the VERBOSE=1 as we set CMAKE_VERBOSE_MAKEFILE. * to improve spec readability, avoid lines longer than 80 columns or any reasonnable limit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 645277] Review Request: puddletag - Feature rich, easy to use tag editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645277 Terje Røsten terje...@phys.ntnu.no changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Terje Røsten terje...@phys.ntnu.no 2010-12-28 16:13:07 EST --- Thanks! I will have a look at these issues before pushing to stable. New Package SCM Request === Package Name: puddletag Short Description: Feature rich, easy to use tag editor Owners: terjeros Branches: f13 f14 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 665995] Review Request: fmit - Free Music Instrument Tuner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665995
Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||volke...@gmx.at
--- Comment #3 from Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at 2010-12-28 16:32:19 EST
---
I think, you should call make %{?_smp_mflags} in the build section.
It seems, the flag BUILD_SHARED_LIBS doesn't exist any more.
I suppose, you'll also have to use %find_lang:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Why_do_we_need_to_use_.25find_lang.3F
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 665995] Review Request: fmit - Free Music Instrument Tuner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665995
--- Comment #4 from Damian Wrobel dwro...@ertelnet.rybnik.pl 2010-12-28
18:00:08 EST ---
(In reply to comment #3)
I think, you should call make %{?_smp_mflags} in the build section.
Corrected.
It seems, the flag BUILD_SHARED_LIBS doesn't exist any more.
It's seems to be necessary, otherwise the program expected internal libraries
to be installed on the system and it simply didn't work.
I suppose, you'll also have to use %find_lang:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Why_do_we_need_to_use_.25find_lang.3F
I've disabled installation of the .ts file until upstream will produce properly
the .qm files.
Spec URL: http://dwrobel.fedorapeople.org/projects/rpmbuild/SPECS/fmit.spec
SRPM URL:
http://dwrobel.fedorapeople.org/projects/rpmbuild/SRPMS/fmit-0.98.1-2.fc13.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 665995] Review Request: fmit - Free Music Instrument Tuner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665995 --- Comment #5 from Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at 2010-12-28 18:30:37 EST --- .qm files can be created from .ts with Qt's lrelease, in case that helps. OK, BUILD_SHARED_LIBS is a Cmake flag, I only looked into the files. Setting it to off creates static libraries, which should be avoided: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Packaging_Static_Libraries -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664904] Review Request: perl-Authen-Simple-Passwd - Simple Passwd authentication
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664904 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-28 21:44:26 EST --- perl-Authen-Simple-Passwd-0.6-1.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Authen-Simple-Passwd-0.6-1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664904] Review Request: perl-Authen-Simple-Passwd - Simple Passwd authentication
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664904 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664815] Review Request: perl-CGI-Emulate-PSGI - PSGI adapter for CGI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664815 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664815] Review Request: perl-CGI-Emulate-PSGI - PSGI adapter for CGI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664815 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-28 22:26:49 EST --- perl-CGI-Emulate-PSGI-0.10-1.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-CGI-Emulate-PSGI-0.10-1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664815] Review Request: perl-CGI-Emulate-PSGI - PSGI adapter for CGI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664815 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-28 22:26:36 EST --- perl-CGI-Emulate-PSGI-0.10-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-CGI-Emulate-PSGI-0.10-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 575497] Review Request: perl-CGI-Emulate-PSGI - PSGI adapter for CGI applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=575497 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-28 22:26:54 EST --- perl-CGI-Emulate-PSGI-0.10-1.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-CGI-Emulate-PSGI-0.10-1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 575497] Review Request: perl-CGI-Emulate-PSGI - PSGI adapter for CGI applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=575497 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-28 22:26:41 EST --- perl-CGI-Emulate-PSGI-0.10-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-CGI-Emulate-PSGI-0.10-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664815] Review Request: perl-CGI-Emulate-PSGI - PSGI adapter for CGI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664815 --- Comment #9 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de 2010-12-28 22:28:46 EST --- (In reply to comment #6) Seems reasonable, With all due respect to Chris, he should develop the insight of being able to provide the necessary amount of attention and publically offer his packages for co-maintenance adoption. IMO, though he sporadically pops up, he effectively is AWOL. Many of his packages only survived because others stepped in and provided keep-alive maintenance. but Ralf will need to apply in pkgdb. Done. I can approve that request if Chris doesn't or can't. Please do so. For reasons I don't understand, pkgdb instaniously automatically granted me some privileges, but insists on approval of some others. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664815] Review Request: perl-CGI-Emulate-PSGI - PSGI adapter for CGI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664815 --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2010-12-29 00:00:24 EST --- I have given you full access to the package on all branches. The privileges that pkgdb immediately granted aren't really privileges; you don't need approval from anyone to see commits or bugzilla tickets. (After all, you could always read the commits list or search bugzilla.) You do need approval to be able to commit or modify ACLs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
