[Bug 648246] Review Request: ghc-data-default - A class for types with a default value

2011-01-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648246

--- Comment #1 from Lakshmi Narasimhan  2011-01-02 
03:01:49 EST ---
A mail has been sent to upstream requesting the license text to be included in
the source package.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 630278] Review Request: ghc-ranges - Ranges and various functions on them

2011-01-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630278

--- Comment #3 from Lakshmi Narasimhan  2011-01-02 
03:19:47 EST ---
A mail has been sent to upstream requesting to add the correct license  text to
the source package.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 571816] Review Request: clamav-unofficial-sigs - Scripts to download unoffical clamav signatures

2011-01-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571816

--- Comment #10 from Andrew Colin Kissa  2011-01-02 
04:21:25 EST ---
Updated.

The cron job runs as clamupdate not root.

http://topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/clamav-unofficial-sigs/clamav-unofficial-sigs.spec
http://topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/clamav-unofficial-sigs/clamav-unofficial-sigs-3.7.1-3.fc13.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 592645] Review Request: mkgmap - Convert OpenStreetMap data for Garmin GPSes

2011-01-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592645

--- Comment #24 from Steve Ratcliffe  2011-01-02 07:30:07 
EST ---
(In reply to comment #17)
> According to http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/2010q4/009248.html,
> mkgmap requires protobuf.jar (which is in protobuf-java), and also
> osmprotobuf.jar (which is not packaged). Apparently osmprotobuf is in Osmosis.

I want to clarify that the protobuf jars enable optional functionality and
are not required (any longer) to build mkgmap - the referenced message from the
mailing list is no longer relevant as the build process was changed shortly
after.  Now the build file will detect that the jars
are not present and simply not build the protobuf format plugin.

Reading protobuf is not particularly useful at the current time as in most
cases
you will be reading files produced by the splitter program which does not
currently write in the protobuf based format yet.

So I think that it is entirely acceptable to build without protobuf support
until such time as the osmprotobuf jars are more easily available.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 666726] New: Review Request: Amide - A Medical Image Data Examiner:

2011-01-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: Amide - A Medical Image Data Examiner:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666726

   Summary: Review Request: Amide - A Medical Image Data Examiner:
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
 Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: thinklinux@gmail.com
 QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora


Spec URL: http://susmit.fedorapeople.org/packaging/amide/amide.spec
SRPM URL:
http://susmit.fedorapeople.org/packaging/amide/amide-0.9.2-1.fc14.src.rpm
Description: Amide's a Medical Image Data Examiner: Amide is a tool for
viewing, registering, and analyzing anatomical and functional volumetric
medical imaging data sets.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 666726] Review Request: Amide - A Medical Image Data Examiner:

2011-01-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666726

--- Comment #1 from Susmit  2011-01-02 11:50:01 EST 
---
Note:
Contact upstream about the patch.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 588941] Review Request: pypy - Implementation of the Python language, using Python itself

2011-01-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588941

Kevin Fenzi  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+

--- Comment #48 from Kevin Fenzi  2011-01-02 14:33:41 EST ---
Wow. This is much nicer now. ;) 

I really appreciate all the comments in the spec explaining how things are
done/why they are done. 

All the issues from my initial review seem fixed. 
The source matches up from upstream. 
We can ignore the 2 rpmlint issues that are left. 

I'm not seeing any further blockers here, so this package is APPROVED. 

I'm sure you'll work on fixing tests and improving things over time as time
permits. ;)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 652257] Review Request: focuswriter - A fullscreen, distraction-free writing program

2011-01-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652257

--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System  
2011-01-02 14:48:07 EST ---
focuswriter-1.3.1-3.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. 
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 652257] Review Request: focuswriter - A fullscreen, distraction-free writing program

2011-01-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652257

--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System  
2011-01-02 14:48:56 EST ---
focuswriter-1.3.1-3.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. 
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 606498] Review Request: hwloc - portable abstraction of hierarchical architectures

2011-01-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=606498

--- Comment #37 from Fedora Update System  
2011-01-02 14:49:53 EST ---
hwloc-1.1-0.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository.  If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 606498] Review Request: hwloc - portable abstraction of hierarchical architectures

2011-01-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=606498

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|hwloc-1.1-0.fc13|hwloc-1.1-0.fc14

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 652257] Review Request: focuswriter - A fullscreen, distraction-free writing program

2011-01-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652257

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|focuswriter-1.3.1-3.fc13|focuswriter-1.3.1-3.fc14

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 652257] Review Request: focuswriter - A fullscreen, distraction-free writing program

2011-01-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652257

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||focuswriter-1.3.1-3.fc13
 Resolution||ERRATA
Last Closed||2011-01-02 14:48:12

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 592645] Review Request: mkgmap - Convert OpenStreetMap data for Garmin GPSes

2011-01-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592645

--- Comment #25 from Bruce Cowan  2011-01-02 14:49:47 EST ---
(In reply to comment #24)
> I want to clarify that the protobuf jars enable optional functionality and
> are not required (any longer) to build mkgmap - the referenced message from 
> the
> mailing list is no longer relevant as the build process was changed shortly
> after.  Now the build file will detect that the jars
> are not present and simply not build the protobuf format plugin.
> 
> Reading protobuf is not particularly useful at the current time as in most
> cases
> you will be reading files produced by the splitter program which does not
> currently write in the protobuf based format yet.
> 
> So I think that it is entirely acceptable to build without protobuf support
> until such time as the osmprotobuf jars are more easily available.

Thank you for clarifiying this. I have updated to r1760.

Spec : http://bruce89.fedorapeople.org/specs/mkgmap.spec
SRPM: http://bruce89.fedorapeople.org/rpms/mkgmap-0-0.7.1760svn.fc14.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 606498] Review Request: hwloc - portable abstraction of hierarchical architectures

2011-01-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=606498

--- Comment #36 from Fedora Update System  
2011-01-02 14:49:41 EST ---
hwloc-1.1-0.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository.  If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 606498] Review Request: hwloc - portable abstraction of hierarchical architectures

2011-01-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=606498

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|hwloc-1.0.2-1.el5   |hwloc-1.1-0.fc13

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 165930] Review Request: check : A unit test framework for C

2011-01-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=165930

--- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi  2011-01-02 15:08:59 EST ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 645277] Review Request: puddletag - Feature rich, easy to use tag editor

2011-01-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645277

--- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi  2011-01-02 15:11:40 EST ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 609638] Review Request: kpassgen - Random password creater

2011-01-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609638

--- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi  2011-01-02 15:10:53 EST ---
We can only act on Fedora Account System accounts, not email addresses. 
Can you update your request to use FAS names instead of emails in the CC field?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 652573] Review Request: ghc-zip-archive - Haskell zip-archive library

2011-01-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652573

--- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi  2011-01-02 15:12:57 EST ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 661436] Review Request: rubygem-heroku - deploy apps to Heroku

2011-01-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661436

--- Comment #40 from Kevin Fenzi  2011-01-02 15:14:17 EST ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 665885] Review Request: perl-AnyEvent-HTTP - Simple but non-blocking HTTP/HTTPS client

2011-01-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665885

--- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi  2011-01-02 15:16:00 EST ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 662255] Review Request: php-pear-CodeGen - Framework to create code generators that operate on XML descriptions

2011-01-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=662255

--- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi  2011-01-02 15:14:50 EST ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 664910] Review Request: perl-Plack - Perl Superglue for Web frameworks and Web Servers (PSGI toolkit)

2011-01-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664910

--- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi  2011-01-02 15:15:34 EST ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 662255] Review Request: php-pear-CodeGen - Framework to create code generators that operate on XML descriptions

2011-01-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=662255

--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  
2011-01-02 15:42:10 EST ---
php-pear-CodeGen-1.0.7-3.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-pear-CodeGen-1.0.7-3.fc13

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 662255] Review Request: php-pear-CodeGen - Framework to create code generators that operate on XML descriptions

2011-01-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=662255

--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  
2011-01-02 15:42:31 EST ---
php-pear-CodeGen-1.0.7-3.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-pear-CodeGen-1.0.7-3.el5

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 662255] Review Request: php-pear-CodeGen - Framework to create code generators that operate on XML descriptions

2011-01-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=662255

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |MODIFIED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 662255] Review Request: php-pear-CodeGen - Framework to create code generators that operate on XML descriptions

2011-01-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=662255

--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  2011-01-02 
15:41:39 EST ---
php-pear-CodeGen-1.0.7-3.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-pear-CodeGen-1.0.7-3.fc14

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 165930] Review Request: check : A unit test framework for C

2011-01-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=165930

--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  2011-01-02 
17:40:45 EST ---
check-0.9.3-5.el4 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 4.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/check-0.9.3-5.el4

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 648098] Review Request: ghc-zlib-bindings - Low-level bindings to the zlib package

2011-01-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648098

Ben Boeckel  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Flag||fedora-cvs?

--- Comment #2 from Ben Boeckel  2011-01-02 19:30:49 EST ---
New Package CVS Request
===
Package Name: ghc-zlib-bindings
Short Description: Low-level bindings to the zlib package
Owners: mathstuf
Branches: F-13 F-14
InitialCC: haskell-sig

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 630274] Review Request: ghc-blaze-builder - Builder to efficiently append text

2011-01-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630274

Ben Boeckel  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Flag||fedora-cvs?

--- Comment #2 from Ben Boeckel  2011-01-02 19:32:19 EST ---
New Package CVS Request
===
Package Name: ghc-blaze-builder
Short Description: Builder to efficiently append text
Owners: mathstuf
Branches: F-13 F-14
InitialCC: haskell-sig

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 630198] Review Request: ghc-safe - Library for safe (pattern match free) functions

2011-01-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630198

Ben Boeckel  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Flag||fedora-cvs?

--- Comment #4 from Ben Boeckel  2011-01-02 19:33:11 EST ---
New Package CVS Request
===
Package Name: ghc-safe
Short Description: Library for safe (pattern match free) functions
Owners: mathstuf
Branches: F-13 F-14
InitialCC: haskell-sig

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 666763] New: Review Request: ax_emergency_listen - monitors APRS emergency packets

2011-01-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: ax_emergency_listen - monitors APRS emergency packets

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666763

   Summary: Review Request: ax_emergency_listen - monitors APRS
emergency packets
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: medium
  Priority: low
 Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: gu...@trentalancia.com
 QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora


Spec URL: http://iz6rdb.trentalancia.com/en/ax_emergency_listen.spec
SRPM URL: http://iz6rdb.trentalancia.com/en/ax_emergency_listen-1.3.2-1.src.rpm
Description: The small ax_emergency_listen utility can be used to monitor for
APRSĀ® Emergency packets (Mic-E packets having the emergency status or Mic-E and
uncompressed packets using the emergency symbol). It is is inspired by the
"listen" program which is part of the ax25-apps package.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 664910] Review Request: perl-Plack - Perl Superglue for Web frameworks and Web Servers (PSGI toolkit)

2011-01-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664910

--- Comment #7 from Ralf Corsepius  2011-01-03 00:19:09 
EST ---
I am unable to build this package for f13 and f14,
because perl-Authen-Simple-Passwd is still missing from f13 and f14,
because I am unable to push these to f13 and f14, 
because they "This update has not yet met the minimum testing requirements
defined in the Package Update Acceptance Criteria"

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 630778] Review Request: llvm-py - Python bindings for LLVM

2011-01-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630778

Eric Smith  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|needinfo?(e...@brouhaha.com |
   |)   |

--- Comment #4 from Eric Smith  2011-01-03 01:10:34 EST ---
I made the recommended changes, and updated to a Subversion snapshot from
upstream to get support for LLVM 2.8.  I had a bit of trouble with getting the
environment variable set appropriately in your proposed python invocation for
the %check section; maybe you know of a better solution than what I used.

Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~brouhaha/llvm-py/llvm-py.spec
SRPM URL:
http://fedorapeople.org/~brouhaha/llvm-py/llvm-py-0.7-0.1.20101105svn.fc14.src.rpm
Koji scratch build for F14:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2697237

Thanks!
Eric

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 665885] Review Request: perl-AnyEvent-HTTP - Simple but non-blocking HTTP/HTTPS client

2011-01-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665885

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 665885] Review Request: perl-AnyEvent-HTTP - Simple but non-blocking HTTP/HTTPS client

2011-01-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665885

--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  2011-01-03 
01:27:36 EST ---
perl-AnyEvent-HTTP-1.46-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-AnyEvent-HTTP-1.46-1.fc14

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 665885] Review Request: perl-AnyEvent-HTTP - Simple but non-blocking HTTP/HTTPS client

2011-01-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665885

--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  2011-01-03 
01:28:09 EST ---
perl-AnyEvent-HTTP-1.46-1.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-AnyEvent-HTTP-1.46-1.fc13

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 591365] Review Request: libexplain - Library functions to explain system call errors

2011-01-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591365

--- Comment #8 from Eric Smith  2011-01-03 01:42:10 EST ---
The 'XX" macro problem has been fixed upstream.  I've addressed Martin's other
comments in the updated spec.

Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~brouhaha/libexplain/libexplain.spec
SRPM URL:
http://fedorapeople.org/~brouhaha/libexplain/libexplain-0.40.D001-1.fc14.src.rpm
Koji scratch build for Fedora 14:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2697280

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 609638] Review Request: kpassgen - Random password creater

2011-01-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609638

--- Comment #13 from Siddharth Sharma  2011-01-03 
02:28:35 EST ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: kpassgen
Short Description: Random password creator
Owners: siddharths
Branches: f14
FAS: siddharths

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review