[Bug 604971] Review Request: jwm - Joe's Window Manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=604971 --- Comment #8 from Germán Racca 2011-01-09 03:01:12 EST --- (In reply to comment #7) > Any progress implementing the .desktop file? > > Should this be updated to the current snapshot revision (seems to be 500)? Updated JWM to latest snapshot: SPEC: http://skytux.fedorapeople.org/packages/jwm.spec SRPM: http://skytux.fedorapeople.org/packages/jwm-2.0.1-3.20110108svn.fc14.src.rpm About the desktop file suggested in comment #3, I will contact upstream soon. Cheers, German. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 637352] Review Request: gsimplecal - Simple GTK calendar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=637352
--- Comment #7 from Germán Racca 2011-01-09 03:56:59 EST ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> You should clean %{buildroot} at the beginning of %install (add "rm -rf
> %{buildroot}" as the first line of %install).
Done.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 637352] Review Request: gsimplecal - Simple GTK calendar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=637352 --- Comment #8 from Germán Racca 2011-01-09 04:00:14 EST --- (In reply to comment #5) > Unfortunately it looks exactly the same as the clock-applet from gnome-panel. > So what's the point of having this ? From the site of gsimplecal: "It was intentionally made for use with tint2 panel in the openbox environment to be launched upon clock click..." Also, it doesn't depends on gnome-panel! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 637352] Review Request: gsimplecal - Simple GTK calendar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=637352
--- Comment #9 from Germán Racca 2011-01-09 04:12:41 EST ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Also, from the Packaging Guidelines:
>
> MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop
> file,
> and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the
> %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need
> a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your
> explanation.
>
> Which does not seem the case for this package.
>
> I also encountered a problem building with upstream g++ using -march=i386,
> although i386 is probably obsolete nowadays (the issue was about undefined
> references to `__sync_fetch_and_add_4', which is a somewhat known issue, don't
> know about g++ shipped with Fedora).
Please, are you interested in doing a complete review? If so, I will follow
your suggestions :)
Regards,
German.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 662301] Review Request: plotdrop - A minimal GNOME front-end to Gnuplot
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=662301
--- Comment #9 from Arun SAG 2011-01-09 04:19:57 EST ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> (In reply to comment #7)
> > PREFIX cannot be replaced with %{_prefix} since Makefile uses PREFIX.
>
> What Terje says here is that you should use PREFIX=%{_prefix} instead
> of PREFIX=/usr .
oh ok. I totally missed the point. Updated my spec.
SPEC : http://sagarun.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/plotdrop.spec
SRPM : http://sagarun.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/plotdrop-0.5.3-4.fc14.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 576272] Review Request: perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree-XPath - XPath access to XML::Parser::Lite::Tree structures
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576272 Jan Klepek changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Jan Klepek 2011-01-09 04:26:59 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree-XPath Short Description: XPath access to XML::Parser::Lite::Tree structures Owners: hpejakle Branches: f13 f14 el5 el6 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 668240] New: Review Request: clapham - Railroad diagram generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: clapham - Railroad diagram generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668240 Summary: Review Request: clapham - Railroad diagram generator Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: e...@brouhaha.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~brouhaha/clapham/clapham.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~brouhaha/clapham/clapham-0.1.003-1.fc14.src.rpm Koji scratch build for dist-14: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2710468 Description: Clapham is an open-source railroad diagram generator. Railroad diagrams are a graphical way of representing the grammar of a computer language. When a computer language is large, even people who use the language day-to-day have trouble remembering its nuances. A railroad diagram represents the grammar visually, and is easier to understand by non- or semi-technical users. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 666572] Review Request: zyGrib - Visualization of meteo data from files in GRIB Format
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666572 --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter 2011-01-09 06:14:13 EST --- Please check https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Desktop_files for the installation of the desktop file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 668243] New: Review Request: libqb - An IPC library for high performance servers.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libqb - An IPC library for high performance servers. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668243 Summary: Review Request: libqb - An IPC library for high performance servers. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: asalk...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://libqb.org/html/libqb.spec SRPM URL: http://libqb.org/html/libqb-0.4.0-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: libqb provides high performance client server reusable features. Initially these are IPC and poll. Hi, this is my first package, and I need a sponsor. Thanks Angus Salkeld -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 668243] Review Request: libqb - An IPC library for high performance servers.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668243 Angus Salkeld changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 598937] Review Request:ossec-hids - An Open Source Host-based Intrusion Detection System
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598937 --- Comment #6 from Udo Seidel 2011-01-09 06:52:57 EST --- Now working on the errors and warnings thrown by rpmlint on the binary packages ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 598937] Review Request:ossec-hids - An Open Source Host-based Intrusion Detection System
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598937 Udo Seidel changed: What|Removed |Added Version|rawhide |14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 598937] Review Request:ossec-hids - An Open Source Host-based Intrusion Detection System
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598937 --- Comment #5 from Udo Seidel 2011-01-09 06:49:12 EST --- (In reply to comment #4) > Ok ... build system updated to F14 .. and can confirm the rpmlint errors on > the > src rpm . :-( Fixed the warnings on the src rpm ... [usei...@fbuild ~]$ rpmlint RPM/SRPMS/ossec-hids-2.4.1-4.fc14.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [usei...@fbuild ~]$ New files uploaded http://home.arcor.de/ar0761471173/ossec-hids.spec http://home.arcor.de/ar0761471173/ossec-hids-2.4.1-4.fc14.src.rpm Deleted http://home.arcor.de/ar0761471173/ossec-hids-2.4.1-4.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664980] Review Request: perl-Test-TCP - Testing TCP program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664980 Ralf Corsepius changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review+ | --- Comment #6 from Ralf Corsepius 2011-01-09 07:01:33 EST --- (In reply to comment #5) > Since this package already exists, you cannot file a new package request for > it. If you want additional branches or want us to change something, please > either file a change request or tell us what you need changed. Urgh, somebody could have pointed out perl-Test-TCP already exists - I wasn't aware about this - I have just requested ownership. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 665081] Review Request: perl-Starlet - Simple, high-performance PSGI/Plack HTTP server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665081 Bug 665081 depends on bug 664980, which changed state. Bug 664980 Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-TCP - Testing TCP program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664980 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution||RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 665005] Review Request: perl-Server-Starter - Superdaemon for hot-deploying server programs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665005 Bug 665005 depends on bug 664980, which changed state. Bug 664980 Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-TCP - Testing TCP program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664980 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664980] Review Request: perl-Test-TCP - Testing TCP program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664980 Ralf Corsepius changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2011-01-09 07:35:14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 662301] Review Request: plotdrop - A minimal GNOME front-end to Gnuplot
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=662301 --- Comment #10 from Mohamed El Morabity 2011-01-09 07:48:55 EST --- Your package looks very good at this point. Anyway, isn't it obvious for a gnuplot GUI to require gnuplot? Please add gnuplot as Requires. Once this done, I will certainly approve your package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 637352] Review Request: gsimplecal - Simple GTK calendar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=637352
--- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-01-09 08:09:31 EST
---
(In reply to comment #4)
> You should clean %{buildroot} at the beginning of %install (add "rm -rf
> %{buildroot}" as the first line of %install).
I just wanted to point out that this information is not correct. The
BuildRoot: tag, cleaning of %buildroot at the beginning of %install and the
entire %clean section are not needed for any Fedora release or for EL6. If the
package is intended for EL4 or EL5 then those are required.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 576272] Review Request: perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree-XPath - XPath access to XML::Parser::Lite::Tree structures
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576272 --- Comment #3 from Dennis Gilmore 2011-01-09 10:23:43 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 598937] Review Request:ossec-hids - An Open Source Host-based Intrusion Detection System
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598937
--- Comment #8 from Udo Seidel 2011-01-09 10:51:57 EST ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> client and server package error-free ... updated version of SPEC file and SRC
> RPM uploaded
[usei...@fbuild SPECS]$ rpmlint
/home/useidel/RPM/RPMS/i386/ossec-hids-client-2.4.1-4.fc14.i386.rpm
ossec-hids-client.i386: W: non-standard-uid /var/ossec/queue/rids ossec
ossec-hids-client.i386: W: non-standard-gid /var/ossec/queue/rids ossec
ossec-hids-client.i386: W: non-standard-dir-in-var ossec
ossec-hids-client.i386: W: dangerous-command-in-%post chmod
ossec-hids-client.i386: W: dangerous-command-in-%preun rm
ossec-hids-client.i386: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/ossec-hids
ossec-hids-client.i386: W: incoherent-init-script-name ossec-hids
('ossec-hids-client', 'ossec-hids-clientd')
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 7 warnings.
[usei...@fbuild SPECS]$
[usei...@fbuild SPECS]$ rpmlint
/home/useidel/RPM/RPMS/i386/ossec-hids-server-2.4.1-4.fc14.i386.rpm
ossec-hids-server.i386: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag
/var/ossec/etc/decoder.xml
ossec-hids-server.i386: W: non-standard-gid /var/ossec/rules ossec
ossec-hids-server.i386: W: non-standard-uid /var/ossec/logs/alerts ossec
ossec-hids-server.i386: W: non-standard-gid /var/ossec/logs/alerts ossec
ossec-hids-server.i386: W: non-standard-uid /var/ossec/logs/archives ossec
ossec-hids-server.i386: W: non-standard-gid /var/ossec/logs/archives ossec
ossec-hids-server.i386: W: non-standard-uid /var/ossec/stats ossec
ossec-hids-server.i386: W: non-standard-gid /var/ossec/stats ossec
ossec-hids-server.i386: W: non-standard-gid /var/ossec/tmp ossec
ossec-hids-server.i386: W: non-standard-uid /var/ossec/logs/firewall ossec
ossec-hids-server.i386: W: non-standard-gid /var/ossec/logs/firewall ossec
ossec-hids-server.i386: W: non-standard-uid /var/ossec/queue/rootcheck ossec
ossec-hids-server.i386: W: non-standard-gid /var/ossec/queue/rootcheck ossec
ossec-hids-server.i386: W: non-standard-uid /var/ossec/queue/fts ossec
ossec-hids-server.i386: W: non-standard-gid /var/ossec/queue/fts ossec
ossec-hids-server.i386: W: non-standard-uid /var/ossec/queue/rids ossecr
ossec-hids-server.i386: W: non-standard-gid /var/ossec/queue/rids ossec
ossec-hids-server.i386: W: non-standard-uid /var/ossec/queue/agent-info ossecr
ossec-hids-server.i386: W: non-standard-gid /var/ossec/queue/agent-info ossec
ossec-hids-server.i386: W: non-standard-dir-in-var ossec
ossec-hids-server.i386: W: dangerous-command-in-%post chmod
ossec-hids-server.i386: W: dangerous-command-in-%preun rm
ossec-hids-server.i386: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/ossec-hids
ossec-hids-server.i386: W: incoherent-init-script-name ossec-hids
('ossec-hids-server', 'ossec-hids-serverd')
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 24 warnings.
[usei...@fbuild SPECS]$
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 598937] Review Request:ossec-hids - An Open Source Host-based Intrusion Detection System
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598937 --- Comment #7 from Udo Seidel 2011-01-09 10:50:54 EST --- client and server package error-free ... updated version of SPEC file and SRC RPM uploaded -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 591365] Review Request: libexplain - Library functions to explain system call errors
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591365 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard|StalledSubmitter| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 611054] Review Request: python-carrot - AMQP Messaging Framework for Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=611054 David Nalley changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||da...@gnsa.us AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|da...@gnsa.us Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 611054] Review Request: python-carrot - AMQP Messaging Framework for Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=611054 --- Comment #6 from David Nalley 2011-01-09 12:48:35 EST --- Fabian: Andrew's comments appear to be correct wrt to python-json - python2.6 (and 3000) contains a json module, so that BR should probably be stripped (or conditionalized if you plan on building this for the EL < 6) If you do plan on building for EL < 6 you need Buildroot specified. Andrew's informal review looks pretty good -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 549590] Review Request: php-pChart - A PHP class to build charts.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549590 --- Comment #26 from David Nalley 2011-01-09 13:03:26 EST --- Hi Jeffrey - sorry for the lag on this. I'd prefer you open a new review request for this (requestor is changing, and you are starting from bascially a clean spec file instead of picking up Eric's. Feel free to 'assign' the new ticket to me, and I'll be happy to complete the review. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 242901] Review Request: perl-Geo-METAR - Perl module for accessing aviation weather information
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242901 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2011-01-09 14:31:02 EST --- Package Change Request == Package Name: perl-Geo-METAR New Branches: el5 el6 Owners: kwizart -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 668287] New: Review Request: php-pChart - A PHP class to build charts.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: php-pChart - A PHP class to build charts. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668287 Summary: Review Request: php-pChart - A PHP class to build charts. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jn...@flip-edesign.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Hello, This is my first package and I will need sponsorship, I am wanting to get this package added to EPEL 4 & 5. The package started in Bugzilla #549590, but as David Nalley suggested was created here as I am taking over the build. I have successfully built this RPM on mock using fedora-14-i386 configuration, below you can see the rpmlints: $ rpmlint SPECS/php-pChart.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-14-i386/result/php-pChart-1.27-5.fc14.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. --- Spec URL: http://flip-edesign.com/source/php-pChart/php-pChart.spec SRPM URL: http://flip-edesign.com/source/php-pChart/php-pChart-1.27-5.fc14.src.rpm Description: pChart is a PHP class oriented framework designed to create aliased charts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 668287] Review Request: php-pChart - A PHP class to build charts.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668287 Jeffrey Ness changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 549590] Review Request: php-pChart - A PHP class to build charts.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549590 --- Comment #27 from Jeffrey Ness 2011-01-09 14:59:26 EST --- Thanks David, I created Bugzilla #668287 (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668287), but having trouble assigning it to you, it may be because this is my first package and I'm not sponsored. If you wouldn't mind picking up the new ticket (and closing out this one if you could). Thanks :) Jeffrey- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 651123] Review Request: sarGraphs - Graphical System Usage Web Interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=651123 --- Comment #23 from Jeffrey Ness 2011-01-09 15:01:48 EST --- New Bugzilla #668287 created for php-pChart (Required Package for sarGraphs) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668287 Jeffrey- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 668287] Review Request: php-pChart - A PHP class to build charts.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668287 Jeffrey Ness changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||651123 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 651123] Review Request: sarGraphs - Graphical System Usage Web Interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=651123 Jeffrey Ness changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on|549590 |668287 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 549590] Review Request: php-pChart - A PHP class to build charts.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549590 Jeffrey Ness changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|651123 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 551274] Review Request: akonadi-googledata -Akonadi resources to sync google calendar events and contacts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551274 Nicolas Troncoso Carrere changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ntron...@gmail.com --- Comment #31 from Nicolas Troncoso Carrere 2011-01-09 15:05:16 EST --- What is the status of this package? If it is approved it will be included in Fedora 15? As testing goes, I built it for my Fedora 13, it appears to be working since I got full synchronization with google <-> and Akonadi/Kaddressbook. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 551274] Review Request: akonadi-googledata -Akonadi resources to sync google calendar events and contacts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551274 --- Comment #32 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-01-09 15:12:50 EST --- Somebody has to review the package before it can be included. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 668288] Review Request: opentts - A text-to-speech framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668288 --- Comment #1 from Rex Dieter 2011-01-09 15:44:49 EST --- (Can be) used by ktssd (in kdeaccessibility) as a replacement for speech-dispatcher (which has it's own problems, see bug #569531 ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 668288] New: Review Request: opentts - A text-to-speech framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: opentts - A text-to-speech framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668288 Summary: Review Request: opentts - A text-to-speech framework Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rdie...@math.unl.edu QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/opentts/opentts.spec SRPM URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/opentts/opentts-0.1-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: A text-to-speech framework for POSIX operating systems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 660159] Review Request: thunar-vfs - Virtual filesystem shipped with Thunar 1.0 and earlier releases
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660159 Christoph Wickert changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-01-09 15:49:47 --- Comment #5 from Christoph Wickert 2011-01-09 15:49:47 EST --- Imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 654139] Review Request: ease - GNOME desktop presentation application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=654139 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2011-01-09 15:58:00 EST --- ease-0.4-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 654139] Review Request: ease - GNOME desktop presentation application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=654139 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||ease-0.4-1.fc14 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-01-09 15:58:06 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 654139] Review Request: ease - GNOME desktop presentation application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=654139 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2011-01-09 16:00:37 EST --- ease-0.4-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 654139] Review Request: ease - GNOME desktop presentation application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=654139 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|ease-0.4-1.fc14 |ease-0.4-1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 668288] Review Request: opentts - A text-to-speech framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668288 --- Comment #2 from Rex Dieter 2011-01-09 16:00:11 EST --- scratch build, http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2711044 $ rpmlint *.rpm x86_64/*.rpm opentts.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libopentts.so.0.0.0 e...@glibc_2.2.5 opentts.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary otts-say opentts.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary otts-send opentts.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary openttsd opentts-debuginfo.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/src/debug/opentts-0.1/src/modules/.libs opentts-debuginfo.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/src/debug/opentts-0.1/src/modules/.libs opentts-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 7 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 591365] Review Request: libexplain - Library functions to explain system call errors
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591365 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2011-01-09 16:00:31 EST --- libexplain-0.40.D001-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update libexplain'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libexplain-0.40.D001-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 650717] Review Request: PolicyKit-olpc - OLPC-specific PolicyKit overrides
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=650717 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2011-01-09 15:59:28 EST --- PolicyKit-olpc-1.4-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 650717] Review Request: PolicyKit-olpc - OLPC-specific PolicyKit overrides
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=650717 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||PolicyKit-olpc-1.4-1.fc14 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-01-09 15:59:32 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 657403] Review Request: spice-gtk - A GTK widget for SPICE clients
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657403 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2011-01-09 16:25:18 EST --- spice-gtk-0.4-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/spice-gtk-0.4-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 657403] Review Request: spice-gtk - A GTK widget for SPICE clients
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657403 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 659663] Review Request: python-netcf - python binding for netcf
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659663 --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2011-01-09 16:36:02 EST --- Any chance to get to a few pre-reviews? :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 350341] Review Request: postfix-logwatch - A postfix log analyzer for logwatch
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=350341 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG Last Closed|2008-03-31 17:39:46 |2011-01-09 16:35:39 --- Comment #24 from Kevin Fenzi 2011-01-09 16:35:39 EST --- Why don't you open a new review on the package when you are ready to submit? In the mean time we can close this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 668288] Review Request: opentts - A text-to-speech framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668288 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG Last Closed||2011-01-09 16:55:20 --- Comment #3 from Rex Dieter 2011-01-09 16:55:20 EST --- ok, apparently a short-lived fork, folded back into speech-dispatcher. back to work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 668243] Review Request: libqb - An IPC library for high performance servers.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668243 --- Comment #1 from Angus Salkeld 2011-01-09 20:26:10 EST --- Question: libqb does have tests that can run as a part of "make check". Is "make check" run as a part of the normal rpm creation? If so, is it desirable to run these as a part of building the rpm? I would need to add: BuildRequires: ... check-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630292] Review Request: ghc-hamlet - Haml-like template files that are compile-time checked
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630292 Bug 630292 depends on bug 630223, which changed state. Bug 630223 Summary: Review Request: ghc-failure - A simple type class for success/failure computations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630223 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution||ERRATA --- Comment #2 from Lakshmi Narasimhan 2011-01-09 23:11:01 EST --- Created attachment 472496 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=472496 Patch to upgrade to cabal2spec 0.22.4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630292] Review Request: ghc-hamlet - Haml-like template files that are compile-time checked
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630292 Lakshmi Narasimhan changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630292] Review Request: ghc-hamlet - Haml-like template files that are compile-time checked
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630292
--- Comment #3 from Lakshmi Narasimhan 2011-01-09
23:11:24 EST ---
[+]MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in
the review.
rpmlint -i ghc-hamlet-*.rpm ../ghc-hamlet.spec
ghc-hamlet.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haml -> Ham, Hal, Hamal
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-hamlet.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US http -> HTTP
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-hamlet.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US yesodweb -> mesoderm,
yesterday, yessed
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-hamlet.i686: W: executable-stack
/usr/lib/ghc-6.12.1/hamlet-0.6.0/libHShamlet-0.6.0-ghc6.12.1.so
The binary declares the stack as executable. Executable stack is usually an
error as it is only needed if the code contains GCC trampolines or similar
constructs which uses code on the stack. One common source for needlessly
executable stack cases are object files built from assembler files which don't
define a proper .note.GNU-stack section.
ghc-hamlet.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haml -> Ham, Hal, Hamal
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-hamlet.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US http -> HTTP
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-hamlet.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US yesodweb -> mesoderm,
yesterday, yessed
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-hamlet.src: W: strange-permission hamlet-0.6.0.tar.gz 0640L
A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions.
Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions.
ghc-hamlet-devel.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haml -> Ham, Hal, Hamal
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-hamlet-devel.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US http -> HTTP
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-hamlet-devel.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US yesodweb ->
mesoderm, yesterday, yessed
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-hamlet-devel.i686: W: no-documentation
The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include
documentation files.
ghc-hamlet-doc.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US http -> HTTP
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-hamlet-doc.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US yesodweb ->
mesoderm, yesterday, yessed
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-hamlet-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-hamlet-devel
Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package
itself.
ghc-hamlet-prof.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US http -> HTTP
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-hamlet-prof.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US yesodweb ->
mesoderm, yesterday, yessed
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-hamlet-prof.i686: W: no-documentation
The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include
documentation files.
ghc-hamlet-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/ghc-6.12.1/hamlet-0.6.0/libHShamlet-0.6.0_p.a
A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If
you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a
development package.
5 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 18 warnings.
[+]MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[+]MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec
[+]MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
Naming-Yes
Version-release - Matches
License - OK, BSD license
No prebuilt external bits - OK
Spec legibity - OK
Package templatse - OK, provided a patch to upgrade to cabal2spec
0.22.4
Arch support - OK
Libexecdir - OK
rpmlint - yes
changelogs - OK
Source url tag - OK, validated.
Buildroot is ignored - present anyway. OK. Patch provided to remove it
%clean is ignored - present anyway. OK. Patch provided to remove it
Build Requires list - OK
Summary and description - OK
API documentation - OK, in devel package (from F14 onwards)
[+]MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet
the Licensing Guidelines .
License is BSD
[+]MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
[+]MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, co
[Bug 663092] Review Request: oxygen-gtk - Oxygen GTK theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663092 Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich 2011-01-10 01:01:22 EST --- Sorry for delay. Rename: you said "no", OK. BR: OK. = APPROVED. = -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 551274] Review Request: akonadi-googledata -Akonadi resources to sync google calendar events and contacts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551274 --- Comment #33 from Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich 2011-01-10 01:12:46 EST --- (In reply to comment #32) > Somebody has to review the package before it can be included. See comment #27. Anybody wanted to take over this package have to open NEW review request and mark THIS one as DUPLICATE. One could use existing spec (keeping original %changelog) to make the process easier and faster. I will take that new review request (as I said before). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
