[Bug 665190] Review Request: perl-List-UtilsBy - Higher-order list utility functions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665190 --- Comment #7 from Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com 2011-01-10 04:12:54 EST --- (In reply to comment #5) Same for a local f15 built: # rpm -q --provides -p /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/result/perl-List-UtilsBy-0.06-1.fc15.noarch.rpm perl(List::UtilsBy) = 0.06 perl-List-UtilsBy = 0.06-1.fc15 Could it be you simply didn't specify the arguments in your rpmquery call correctly? Note what you wrote in comment #1: rpm -qp --provides ../RPMS/noarch/perl-List-UtilsBy-0.06-1.fc14.noarch.rpm perl-List-UtilsBy = 0.06-1.fc14 rpm -qp --provides ... -p is a positional argument which takes one argument. Ok, I had old testing rpm, which has troubles with creating correct provides. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664949] Review Request: perl-Proc-Wait3 - Perl extension for wait3 system call
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664949 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com 2011-01-10 04:15:10 EST --- ACCEPT -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 573848] Review Request: perl-NetPacket - Modules to assemble/disassemble network packets at the protocol level
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573848
Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review?, |fedora-review+
|needinfo?(jan.kle...@gmail. |
|com)|
--- Comment #12 from Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com 2011-01-10
04:25:37 EST ---
- rpmlint OK
- package must be named according to Guidelines OK
- spec file name must match the base package %{name} OK
- package must meet the Packaging Guidelines OK
- package must be licensed with Fedora approved license OK
- license field must match actual license OK
- text of the license in its own file must be included in %doc OK
- sources must match the upstream source OK
- package MUST successfully compile and build OK
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2711790
- architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla OK
- build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires OK
- handle locales properly with %find_lang macro OK
- shared library files must call ldconfig in %post(un) OK
- packages must NOT bundle system libraries OK
- package must own all directories that it creates OK
- permissions on files must be set properly OK
- package must consistently use macros OK
- package must contain code, or permissable content OK
- large documentation must go in a -doc OK
- %doc must not affect the runtime of the application OK
- header files must be in a -devel package OK
- static libraries must be in a -static package OK
- library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel OK
- devel package usually require base package OK
- packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives OK
- GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file OK
- packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages OK
rpm -q --provides perl-NetPacket
perl(NetPacket) = 1.0.1
perl(NetPacket::ARP) = 1.0.1
perl(NetPacket::Ethernet) = 1.0.1
perl(NetPacket::ICMP) = 1.0.1
perl(NetPacket::IGMP) = 1.0.1
perl(NetPacket::IP) = 1.0.1
perl(NetPacket::TCP) = 1.0.1
perl(NetPacket::UDP) = 1.0.1
perl-NetPacket = 1.0.1-1.fc15
rpm -q --requires perl-NetPacket
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.2)
perl(NetPacket)
perl(NetPacket::IP)
perl(constant)
perl(strict)
perl(vars)
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) = 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(FileDigests) = 4.6.0-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) = 4.0-1
rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) = 3.0.3-1
rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) = 5.2-1
Patch for EL-5 build looks fine.
ACCEPT
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664976] Review Request: perl-Class-Accessor-Lite - Minimalistic variant of Class::Accessor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664976 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com 2011-01-10 04:31:07 EST --- ACCEPT (fault of my test rpm package) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 665189] Review Request: perl-Convert-Color - Color space conversions and named lookups
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665189 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com 2011-01-10 04:31:29 EST --- ACCEPT -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226239] Merge Review: perl-Archive-Tar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226239 --- Comment #16 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com 2011-01-10 04:35:57 EST --- This package is missing `perl-sig' in InitialCC: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Archive-Tar -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 571816] Review Request: clamav-unofficial-sigs - Scripts to download unoffical clamav signatures
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571816 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-01-10 05:12:17 EST --- clamav-unofficial-sigs-3.7.1-3.el4 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 4. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/clamav-unofficial-sigs-3.7.1-3.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 571816] Review Request: clamav-unofficial-sigs - Scripts to download unoffical clamav signatures
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571816 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-01-10 05:12:24 EST --- clamav-unofficial-sigs-3.7.1-3.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/clamav-unofficial-sigs-3.7.1-3.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 571816] Review Request: clamav-unofficial-sigs - Scripts to download unoffical clamav signatures
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571816 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 571816] Review Request: clamav-unofficial-sigs - Scripts to download unoffical clamav signatures
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571816 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-01-10 05:12:37 EST --- clamav-unofficial-sigs-3.7.1-3.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/clamav-unofficial-sigs-3.7.1-3.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 571816] Review Request: clamav-unofficial-sigs - Scripts to download unoffical clamav signatures
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571816 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-01-10 05:12:30 EST --- clamav-unofficial-sigs-3.7.1-3.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/clamav-unofficial-sigs-3.7.1-3.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 663384] Review Request: scap-workbench - GUI tool that provides scanning, tailoring, editing and validation functionality for SCAP content
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663384 Tomas Mraz tm...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||tm...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|tm...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Tomas Mraz tm...@redhat.com 2011-01-10 07:34:34 EST --- Please add a desktop entry for the GUI application. According to the guidelines GUI applications should have an appropriate desktop entry. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Desktop_files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 668197] Review Request: ledctl - LED control app for Intel(R) storage controllers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668197 Ondrej Vasik ova...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||ova...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ova...@redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 637352] Review Request: gsimplecal - Simple GTK calendar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=637352
--- Comment #11 from Germán Racca gra...@gmail.com 2011-01-10 08:59:28 EST ---
(In reply to comment #10)
(In reply to comment #4)
You should clean %{buildroot} at the beginning of %install (add rm -rf
%{buildroot} as the first line of %install).
I just wanted to point out that this information is not correct. The
BuildRoot: tag, cleaning of %buildroot at the beginning of %install and the
entire %clean section are not needed for any Fedora release or for EL6. If
the
package is intended for EL4 or EL5 then those are required.
Thanks Jason, I know about it, but as I already defined BuildRoot tag in the
spec file, so I added the other lines.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 668197] Review Request: ledctl - LED control app for Intel(R) storage controllers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668197 --- Comment #2 from Ondrej Vasik ova...@redhat.com 2011-01-10 09:29:58 EST --- formal review is here, see the notes explaining OK* and BAD statuses below: N/A source files match upstream: can't be checked, as there is no public upstream url for sources download it's quite common in the case of intel packages in early life. Just for reference, sha1sums of checked components: $ sha256sum ledctl.spec 01ef25293aaf5dd83f499a86f8c8d83ae6816eaf5f7a0f6884d15f14b2669dcd ledctl.spec $ sha256sum ledctl-0.1.tgz 209a5430ffb166de65e9949f196e05be8da4937150997f1e509e27bd9ab601ec ledctl-0.1.tgz $ sha256sum ledctl-0.1-1.src.rpm ee2d3db2c4e781a3423fc0e8e66206e837ee29e8a3484b234d5b51e51df9af53 ledctl-0.1-1.src.rpm OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK license field matches the actual license. GPLv2+ OK license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. GPLv2+ OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. pod2man required for manpage generating, so BuildRequires: perl could be added for safety, however - perl is part of dependency tree of the basic buildtree so not required. MAYBE compiler flags are appropriate. make CFLAGS=$RPM_OPT_FLAGS --std=c99 - original Makefile uses hardcoded CFLAGS=-O0 -g -Wall -std=c99 - maybe you should remove this definition from Makefile if you want to use $RPM_OPT_FLAGS. OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/i686). OK debuginfo package looks complete. BAD rpmlint is silent. $ rpmlint ledctl.spec ledctl*.rpm ledctl.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: whoknows.com/ledctl-0.1.tgz ledctl-debuginfo.i686: W: no-url-tag ledctl.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US LEDs - LED, LED's, LED s ledctl.i686: W: no-url-tag ledctl.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US LEDs - LED, LED's, LED s ledctl.src: W: no-url-tag ledctl.src: W: invalid-url Source0: whoknows.com/ledctl-0.1.tgz 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 7 warnings. Please, do not use whoknows.com in Source0 - it will produce errors in the mass checks. I would prefer comment in spec (explaining why there is no upstream URL and tarball download place) OK final provides and requires look sane. N/A %check is present and all tests pass. N/A shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths with proper scriptlets OK owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK correct scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK headers in -devel OK pkgconfig files in -devel OK no libtool .la droppings. OK not a GUI app. Summary: Change the Source0 - no whoknows.com please. Add explanation to the spec file. I can confirm there is no Intel Enclosure LED utilities product at http://downloadcenter.intel.com/default.aspx at the moment, however URL could at least point to Intel pages. Consider this CFLAGS change. Please resubmit the spec file and srpm and I'll check the bad things before I'll approve this package review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 667205] Review Request: radius-engine - A Lua based real-time 2D graphics game engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=667205 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-01-10 10:05:53 EST --- radius-engine-0.6-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/radius-engine-0.6-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 667205] Review Request: radius-engine - A Lua based real-time 2D graphics game engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=667205 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-01-10 10:05:46 EST --- radius-engine-0.6-1.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/radius-engine-0.6-1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 667205] Review Request: radius-engine - A Lua based real-time 2D graphics game engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=667205 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 614416] Review Request: python-scripttest - Helper to test command-line scripts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614416 --- Comment #6 from Martin Bacovsky mbaco...@redhat.com 2011-01-10 10:15:21 EST --- Package Change Request == Package Name: python-scripttest New Branches: el6 Owners: mbacovsk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 614416] Review Request: python-scripttest - Helper to test command-line scripts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614416 Martin Bacovsky mbaco...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 668197] Review Request: ledctl - LED control app for Intel(R) storage controllers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668197 --- Comment #3 from Jiri Moskovcak jmosk...@redhat.com 2011-01-10 10:26:15 EST --- new spec and packages uploaded. Fixed: MAYBE compiler flags are appropriate Change the Source0 - no whoknows.com please. URL could at least point to Intel pages rpmlint: ledctl.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: ledctl.tgz 1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 652648] Review Request: erlang-skerl - Skein hash function for Erlang, via NIFs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652648 --- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2011-01-10 10:30:14 EST --- Ver. 1.0.0 (the same as previous git snapshot - just tagged as 1.0.0): http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-skerl.spec http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-skerl-1.0.0-1.fc12.src.rpm Koji scratchbuild for Rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2712377 rpmlint: sulaco ~: rpmlint Desktop/erlang-skerl-* erlang-skerl.src: W: invalid-url Source0: basho-skerl-skerl-1.0.0-0-g2c1ee57.tar.gz erlang-skerl.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency erlang-stdlib erlang-skerl.x86_64: W: no-documentation 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. sulaco ~: The error message above, regarding explicit-lib-dependency, is just a false positive. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 663914] Review Request: rubygem-fssm - File system state monitor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663914 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-01-10 11:18:14 EST --- rubygem-fssm-0.2.2-3.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-fssm-0.2.2-3.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 663914] Review Request: rubygem-fssm - File system state monitor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663914 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 668197] Review Request: ledctl - LED control app for Intel(R) storage controllers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668197 Ondrej Vasik ova...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Ondrej Vasik ova...@redhat.com 2011-01-10 11:42:57 EST --- Thanks, sha256sums of checked files: 08afcf3448cc9eb9b19a474367b81749731ca424aa28aa0178d1879c01eaec60 ledctl.spec 209a5430ffb166de65e9949f196e05be8da4937150997f1e509e27bd9ab601ec ledctl.tgz 99465542c9706fb4e2e6438e0ec40cb92e0a7666255048d22c7c76af01ca7c01 ledctl-0.1-1.src.rpm Looks sane for me now. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 487978] Review Request: sqlitebrowser - Design and edit database files compatible with SQLite
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487978 --- Comment #10 from Karel Volný kvo...@redhat.com 2011-01-10 11:57:24 EST --- (In reply to comment #9) Looks like I'm volunteering to maintain this package ? I'm new at that, anyone want to be my guide ? :-) if you volunteer to take this, please follow the wiki: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers and open a new review request (feel free to put me into CC) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 571816] Review Request: clamav-unofficial-sigs - Scripts to download unoffical clamav signatures
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571816 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-01-10 12:08:22 EST --- clamav-unofficial-sigs-3.7.1-3.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update clamav-unofficial-sigs'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/clamav-unofficial-sigs-3.7.1-3.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 668197] Review Request: ledctl - LED control app for Intel(R) storage controllers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668197 Jiri Moskovcak jmosk...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Jiri Moskovcak jmosk...@redhat.com 2011-01-10 13:05:25 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: ledctl Short Description: Enclosure LED Utilities Owners: jmoskovc Branches: f14 el6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 652546] Review Request: erlang-webmachine - A REST-based system for building web applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652546 --- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2011-01-10 13:23:21 EST --- Ver. 1.8.0: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-webmachine.spec http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-webmachine-1.8.0-1.fc12.src.rpm Koji scratchbuild for F-15: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2713130 rpmlint: sulaco ~/Desktop: rpmlint erlang-webmachine-1.8.0-1.fc15.* erlang-webmachine.src: W: invalid-url Source0: basho-webmachine-webmachine-1.8.0-0-g15d815e.tar.gz erlang-webmachine.x86_64: E: no-binary erlang-webmachine.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. sulaco ~/Desktop: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 225829] Merge Review: gnome-pilot-conduits
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225829 Matthew Barnes mbar...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #8 from Matthew Barnes mbar...@redhat.com 2011-01-10 13:36:09 EST --- Fixed in gnome-pilot-conduits-2.32.1-2.fc15. I couldn't find any reference to MPLv1.0 either so I removed it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 668542] Review Request: php-pChart - A PHP class to build charts.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668542 Jeffrey Ness jeffrey.n...@rackspace.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 551274] Review Request: akonadi-googledata -Akonadi resources to sync google calendar events and contacts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551274 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks|656997(kde-reviews) |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution||NOTABUG Last Closed||2011-01-10 13:48:08 --- Comment #34 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-01-10 13:48:08 EST --- I'm just going to close this, then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 668542] New: Review Request: php-pChart - A PHP class to build charts.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: php-pChart - A PHP class to build charts. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668542 Summary: Review Request: php-pChart - A PHP class to build charts. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jeffrey.n...@rackspace.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Hello, This is my first package and I will need sponsorship, I am wanting to get this package added to EPEL 4 5. The package started in Bugzilla #549590, but as David Nalley suggested was created here as I am taking over the build. I have successfully built this RPM on mock using fedora-14-i386 configuration, below you can see the rpmlints: $ rpmlint SPECS/php-pChart.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-14-i386/result/php-pChart-1.27-5.fc14.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. --- Spec URL: http://flip-edesign.com/source/php-pChart/php-pChart.spec SRPM URL: http://flip-edesign.com/source/php-pChart/php-pChart-1.27-5.fc14.src.rpm Description: pChart is a PHP class oriented framework designed to create aliased charts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 651123] Review Request: sarGraphs - Graphical System Usage Web Interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=651123 Bug 651123 depends on bug 668287, which changed state. Bug 668287 Summary: Review Request: php-pChart - A PHP class to build charts. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668287 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||CANTFIX Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 651123] Review Request: sarGraphs - Graphical System Usage Web Interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=651123 Jeffrey Ness jn...@flip-edesign.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||CANTFIX Last Closed||2011-01-10 13:48:56 --- Comment #24 from Jeffrey Ness jn...@flip-edesign.com 2011-01-10 13:48:56 EST --- Going to close out this Bug till I can get php-pChart approved, I will also be creating under a new usertag to avoid multiple handles. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 668287] Review Request: php-pChart - A PHP class to build charts.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668287 Jeffrey Ness jn...@flip-edesign.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||CANTFIX Last Closed||2011-01-10 13:52:52 --- Comment #1 from Jeffrey Ness jn...@flip-edesign.com 2011-01-10 13:52:52 EST --- To avoid confusion I am retiring this usertag (to avoid multiple handles in bugzill) and have created a new Bug with the correct account. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668542 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 225830] Merge Review: gnome-pilot
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225830 Matthew Barnes mbar...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jrei...@bitwagon.com --- Comment #7 from Matthew Barnes mbar...@redhat.com 2011-01-10 13:57:01 EST --- *** Bug 665085 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 225830] Merge Review: gnome-pilot
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225830 --- Comment #8 from Matthew Barnes mbar...@redhat.com 2011-01-10 13:57:25 EST --- Patch applied to gnome-pilot-2.32.0-4.fc15. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 573848] Review Request: perl-NetPacket - Modules to assemble/disassemble network packets at the protocol level
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573848 Jose Pedro Oliveira j...@di.uminho.pt changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #13 from Jose Pedro Oliveira j...@di.uminho.pt 2011-01-10 14:10:16 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: perl-NetPacket Short Description: Assemble/disassemble network packets at the protocol level Owners: jpo Branches: f13 f14 el5 el6 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 614416] Review Request: python-scripttest - Helper to test command-line scripts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614416 --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-01-10 14:21:34 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 242901] Review Request: perl-Geo-METAR - Perl module for accessing aviation weather information
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242901 --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-01-10 14:20:57 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 592487] Review Request: ffgtk - A solution for controlling Fritz!Box or compatible routers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592487 --- Comment #14 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-01-10 14:18:42 EST --- Seems there is some disagreement in FPC over whether md5.c should be given a copylib exemption, so this may get held up a bit. You are of course welcome to fix the other issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 573848] Review Request: perl-NetPacket - Modules to assemble/disassemble network packets at the protocol level
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573848 --- Comment #14 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-01-10 14:21:17 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 668197] Review Request: ledctl - LED control app for Intel(R) storage controllers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668197 --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-01-10 14:21:53 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 487978] Review Request: sqlitebrowser - Design and edit database files compatible with SQLite
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487978 --- Comment #11 from Erling Jacobsen linux...@email.dk 2011-01-10 14:32:30 EST --- (In reply to comment #10) if you volunteer to take this, please follow the wiki: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers I had looked at that page earlier ... I find I still have some questions that I'd like to ask before committing to the job, like: * What kind of hardware should I have ? * How many resources are required on the machine(s) (RAM, disk) ? * What are the requirements on the Fedora install(s) ? (So far, I have tended to skip every other release, lazy, probably. But that probably won't do, as a Fedora developer ? ) * Excluding the work done on the actual packages (which probably varies wildly), how much free time (per week ? day ??) must one have to keep up with things ? The wiki-page you mention doesn't answer all these (stupid) questions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 551274] Review Request: akonadi-googledata -Akonadi resources to sync google calendar events and contacts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551274 --- Comment #35 from Nicolas Troncoso Carrere ntron...@gmail.com 2011-01-10 14:34:52 EST --- I' willing to take over this package. Anything special I should do to make it possible? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 655333] Review Request: tanukiwrapper
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=655333 Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG Last Closed||2011-01-10 14:35:12 --- Comment #4 from Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com 2011-01-10 14:35:12 EST --- I thought it will be much easier. I'm giving it up for now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 655333] Review Request: tanukiwrapper
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=655333 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 666233] Review Request: gnome-paint - Easy to use paint program for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666233 --- Comment #3 from Tareq Al Jurf talj...@fedoraproject.org 2011-01-10 14:45:12 EST --- Sorry, I didn't do #3 But here's the result: Spec URL: http://taljurf.fedorapeople.org/Packages/i686/gnome-paint/gnome-paint.spec SRPM URL: http://taljurf.fedorapeople.org/Packages/i686/gnome-paint/gnome-paint-0.4.0-2.fc13.src.rpm KOJI URL: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2712738 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 598688] Review Request: archivemount - FUSE based filesystem for mounting compressed archives
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598688
--- Comment #8 from Niels de Vos nde...@redhat.com 2011-01-10 14:47:32 EST ---
Thanks Fabian!
(In reply to comment #7)
Just some quick comments:
- Man pages doesn't need %doc
Fixed.
- You can use the name macro (%{name}) instead of the application name. Make
sometimes the maintenance easier
Thanks for the pointer, but I prefer keeping the name as that is a little more
readable.
- Please preserve the time stamps when possible
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Timestamps).
Fixed.
The updated .spec and SRPM can be downloaded here:
- http://nixpanic.net/software/packages/archivemount
- http://nixpanic.net/software/packages/archivemount/archivemount.spec
-
http://nixpanic.net/software/packages/archivemount/archivemount-0.6.1-2.fc14.src.rpm
$ rpmlint archivemount.spec ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/archivemount-0.6.1-2.fc14.src.rpm
archivemount.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) filesystem - file system,
file-system, systematic
archivemount.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libarchive - lib
archive, lib-archive, archive
archivemount.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gz - g, z, gaz
archivemount.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US filesystem - file
system, file-system, systematic
1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 573848] Review Request: perl-NetPacket - Modules to assemble/disassemble network packets at the protocol level
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573848 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-01-10 14:52:42 EST --- perl-NetPacket-1.0.1-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-NetPacket-1.0.1-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 573848] Review Request: perl-NetPacket - Modules to assemble/disassemble network packets at the protocol level
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573848 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 598688] Review Request: archivemount - FUSE based filesystem for mounting compressed archives
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598688 --- Comment #9 from Niels de Vos nde...@redhat.com 2011-01-10 14:57:20 EST --- Oh, and just in case someone wonders: - a patch has been added (noted in the %changelog) - the patch was exported with 'git format-patch' and contains a description - the patch can be viewed on https://github.com/nixpanic/archivemount/commit/4ef79c9802d923bf90c259881d2dcae8deda66a2 - without this patch, archivemount reliably crashes when reading big files from the archive -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 573848] Review Request: perl-NetPacket - Modules to assemble/disassemble network packets at the protocol level
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573848 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-01-10 15:01:14 EST --- perl-NetPacket-1.0.1-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-NetPacket-1.0.1-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 524451] Review Request: puppet-module-yum-development - Puppet module for yum (development)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524451 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks||201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution||NOTABUG Last Closed||2011-01-10 15:02:16 --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-01-10 15:02:16 EST --- Well, nobody seems to care and all I can gather from IRC conversations is that this is a bad idea. So I'm going to risk flameage and close this; if someone really cares they can reopen. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 573848] Review Request: perl-NetPacket - Modules to assemble/disassemble network packets at the protocol level
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573848 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-01-10 15:00:37 EST --- perl-NetPacket-1.0.1-1.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-NetPacket-1.0.1-1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639874] Review Request: python-rocket - Modern, multi-threaded, comet-friendly WSGI web server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639874
Jeffrey Ness jeffrey.n...@rackspace.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jeffrey.n...@rackspace.com
--- Comment #3 from Jeffrey Ness jeffrey.n...@rackspace.com 2011-01-10
15:11:27 EST ---
Greetings,
A few things I noticed while looking at your SPEC and Bug Review:
* Every Review should include a rpmlint of both source rpm and rpm binary:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines
* Add %{version} to your Source0 tag, this will allow easy version upgrades.
http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/r/rocket/Rocket-%{version}.zip
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 668588] New: Review python26-imaging - Python's own image processing library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review python26-imaging - Python's own image processing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668588 Summary: Review python26-imaging - Python's own image processing library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: steve.tray...@cern.ch QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/python26-imaging/python26-imaging.spec SRPM URL: http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/python26-imaging/python26-imaging-1.1.7-3.el5.src.rpm Description: The Python Imaging Library (PIL) adds image processing capabilities to your Python interpreter. This is an EPEL5 only package for use with the python26 packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 668588] Review python26-imaging - Python's own image processing library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668588 Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||662753 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 668591] New: Review Request: - python26-markupsafe - Implements a XML/HTML/XHTML Markup safe string for Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: - python26-markupsafe - Implements a XML/HTML/XHTML Markup safe string for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668591 Summary: Review Request: - python26-markupsafe - Implements a XML/HTML/XHTML Markup safe string for Python Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: steve.tray...@cern.ch QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/python26-markupsafe/python26-markupsafe.spec SRPM URL: http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/python26-markupsafe/python26-markupsafe-0.11-2.el5.src.rpm Description: A library for safe markup escaping. This is an EPEL5 only package for python26. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 668591] Review Request: - python26-markupsafe - Implements a XML/HTML/XHTML Markup safe string for Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668591 Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||662739 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 652616] Review Request: erlang-ebloom - A NIF wrapper around a basic bloom filter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652616
Martin Gieseking martin.giesek...@uos.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||martin.giesek...@uos.de
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|martin.giesek...@uos.de
Flag||fedora-review?
--- Comment #2 from Martin Gieseking martin.giesek...@uos.de 2011-01-10
15:59:13 EST ---
I take this one. If you like, I'd appreciate a review of the tiny xqc package
(bug #655866) :)
Some initial comments:
- The binary package provides the erlang extension library ebloom_nifs.so.
Is this library supposed to be accessible by other external applications too?
If not, I suggest to filter it from the provides list as described in
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:AutoProvidesAndRequiresFiltering
- you can simplify the %files section by replacing all file/dir lines with the
single line
%{_libdir}/erlang/lib/%{realname}-%{version}/
But that's optional and a matter of personal preference
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 668591] Review Request: python26-markupsafe - Implements a XML/HTML/XHTML Markup safe string for Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668591 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: - |Review Request: |python26-markupsafe - |python26-markupsafe - |Implements a XML/HTML/XHTML |Implements a XML/HTML/XHTML |Markup safe string for |Markup safe string for |Python |Python -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 667416] Review Request: util-linux - rename from util-linux-ng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=667416 --- Comment #2 from Karel Zak k...@redhat.com 2011-01-10 16:13:10 EST --- (In reply to comment #1) - the uuidd, libmount, libblkid, libuuid subpackages must include their license text as %doc Fixed. - rpmlint throws a lot of warnings/errors, mostly can be ignored I think, but they deserve a review I fixed some warnings. - the compatibility Provides/Obsoletes should be cleaned up for the update path I suggest to use Obsoletes: util-linux-ng 2.19 (instead of 2.18.1) Fixed. - you can drop the Buildroot tag and the clean section, they are not needed in recent Fedoras (and next RHEL) Fixed. The rpm and spec at fedorapeople.org has been update. I have also added a new code for mtab to specfile. Please, review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 650181] Review Request: tkabber-plugins - Additional plugins for tkabber
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=650181 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-01-10 16:28:02 EST --- tkabber-plugins-0.11.1-3.svn1948.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 650181] Review Request: tkabber-plugins - Additional plugins for tkabber
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=650181 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|tkabber-plugins-0.11.1-3.sv |tkabber-plugins-0.11.1-3.sv |n1948.fc13 |n1948.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 650181] Review Request: tkabber-plugins - Additional plugins for tkabber
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=650181 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-01-10 16:27:31 EST --- tkabber-plugins-0.11.1-3.svn1948.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 667205] Review Request: radius-engine - A Lua based real-time 2D graphics game engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=667205 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-01-10 16:26:50 EST --- radius-engine-0.6-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update radius-engine'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/radius-engine-0.6-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 650181] Review Request: tkabber-plugins - Additional plugins for tkabber
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=650181 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||tkabber-plugins-0.11.1-3.sv ||n1948.fc13 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-01-10 16:27:36 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 663914] Review Request: rubygem-fssm - File system state monitor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663914 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-01-10 16:29:07 EST --- rubygem-fssm-0.2.2-3.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update rubygem-fssm'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-fssm-0.2.2-3.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 657403] Review Request: spice-gtk - A GTK widget for SPICE clients
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657403 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-01-10 16:28:44 EST --- spice-gtk-0.4-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update spice-gtk'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/spice-gtk-0.4-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 634621] Review Request: mingw32-qpid-cpp - MinGW Windows AMQP daemons and libraries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634621 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-01-10 18:10:35 EST --- mingw32-qpid-cpp-0.8-0.2.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-qpid-cpp-0.8-0.2.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 634621] Review Request: mingw32-qpid-cpp - MinGW Windows AMQP daemons and libraries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634621 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 587011] Review Request: tboot - uses Intel(R) TXT to perform a measured and verified launch of a kernel/VMM
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=587011 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-01-10 18:22:40 EST --- tboot-20101005-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tboot-20101005-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 587011] Review Request: tboot - uses Intel(R) TXT to perform a measured and verified launch of a kernel/VMM
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=587011 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 597725] Review Request: mozilla-svg-edit - A complete vector graphics editor in the browser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597725 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution||NOTABUG Status Whiteboard|StalledSubmitter| Last Closed||2011-01-10 18:35:00 --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-01-10 18:35:00 EST --- No response; closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 597771] Review Request: toothchart - Graphically shows how a baby's primary teeth have erupted
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597771 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution||NOTABUG Last Closed||2011-01-10 18:35:44 --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-01-10 18:35:44 EST --- No response after pings on the submitter's other tickets; closing them all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 563510] Review Request: php-xcache - yet another php cacher
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563510 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution||NOTABUG Status Whiteboard|StalledSubmitter| Last Closed||2011-01-10 18:37:50 --- Comment #20 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-01-10 18:37:50 EST --- No response for months in another of the submitter's tickets; closing them all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 464117] Review Request: perl-SVN-Notify - Perl module for Subversion activity notification
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464117 Bug 464117 depends on bug 464141, which changed state. Bug 464141 Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-Trac - Perl extension for formatting text with Trac Wiki Style https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464141 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 592504] Review Request: nodebrain - a declarative rule-based language for state and event monitoring
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592504 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution||NOTABUG Status Whiteboard|StalledSubmitter| Last Closed||2011-01-10 18:34:07 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 464141] Review Request: perl-Text-Trac - Perl extension for formatting text with Trac Wiki Style
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464141 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution||NOTABUG Status Whiteboard|StalledSubmitter| Last Closed||2011-01-10 18:37:02 --- Comment #17 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-01-10 18:37:02 EST --- No response in ages; closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 464117] Review Request: perl-SVN-Notify - Perl module for Subversion activity notification
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464117 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution||NOTABUG Last Closed||2011-01-10 18:38:28 --- Comment #14 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-01-10 18:38:28 EST --- No response after pings in another of the submitter's tickets; closing them all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 668628] New: Review Request: node.js - a javascript framework for server side application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: node.js - a javascript framework for server side application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668628 Summary: Review Request: node.js - a javascript framework for server side application Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: meta...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.metal3d.org/rpms/node.js.spec SRPM URL: http://www.metal3d.org/rpms/node.js-0.2.6-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: Node.js use V8 javascript Engine (used in Webkit). It's an engine to develop server side net application (http, socket...) It has severals modules to help to develop multi-clients applications, HTTP servers... etc... Koji said me that's ok, but some warnings appears with rpmlint node.js.x86_64: W: non-standard-group Development node.js.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib node.js.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib64/node/wafadmin/Tools/node_addon.py node.js.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib64/node/wafadmin/pproc.py node.js.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib64/node/wafadmin/ansiterm.py node.js.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary node-waf node.js.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary node-repl node.js-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) js - dis, ks, ja node.js-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US js - dis, ks, ja node.js-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Developpement - Developmental, Development, Developer node.js-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) js - dis, ks, ja node.js-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US javascript - java script, java-script, JavaScript node.js-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US developpement - developmental, development, developer node.js-devel.x86_64: W: non-standard-group Developpement node.js-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 12 warnings. I will correct errors and Developpement groupe name... but can you take a look on LICENSE text because it uses lot of licenses and one of them is apache like... Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 668639] New: Review Request: google-lato-fonts - A sanserif typeface family
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: google-lato-fonts - A sanserif typeface family
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668639
Summary: Review Request: google-lato-fonts - A sanserif
typeface family
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: pikachu.2...@gmail.com
QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Spec URL:
http://melmorabity.fedorapeople.org/packages/google-lato-fonts/google-lato-fonts.spec
SRPM URL:
http://melmorabity.fedorapeople.org/packages/google-lato-fonts/google-lato-fonts-1.010-1.fc14.src.rpm
Description:
Lato is a sanserif typeface family designed in the Summer 2010 by Warsaw-based
designer Łukasz Dziedzic (Lato means Summer in Polish). In December 2010
the
Lato family was published under the open-source Open Font License by his
foundry
tyPoland, with support from Google.
rpmlint issues:
$ rpmlint google-lato-fonts-1.010-1.fc14.src.rpm
google-lato-fonts.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US tyPoland -
typo land, typo-land, typology
google-lato-fonts.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US letterforms -
letter forms, letter forms, letterbombs
google-lato-fonts.src:14: W: macro-in-comment %{name}
google-lato-fonts.src:14: W: macro-in-comment %{version}
google-lato-fonts.src: W: invalid-url Source0: google-lato-fonts-1.010.zip
All these warnings are benign, even the last one: there is no direct URL to
retrieve the font archive.
$ rpmlint google-lato-fonts-1.010-1.fc14.noarch.rpm
google-lato-fonts.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US tyPoland -
typo land, typo-land, typology
google-lato-fonts.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US letterforms
- letter forms, letter-forms, letterbombs
google-lato-fonts.noarch: W: no-documentation
Notes:
Although the font designer has its own foundry (http://www.typoland.com/), he
apparently choosed to distribute its work through the Google Font Directory. So
I considered Google to be the foundry assigned to this package.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 609295] Review Request: python-cement - CLI Application Framework for Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609295 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-01-10 21:23:59 EST --- python-cement-0.8.14-5.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-cement-0.8.14-5.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 609295] Review Request: python-cement - CLI Application Framework for Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609295 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-01-10 21:23:39 EST --- python-cement-0.8.14-5.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-cement-0.8.14-5.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 609295] Review Request: python-cement - CLI Application Framework for Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609295 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608319] Review Request: memaker - An avatar creator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608319 --- Comment #6 from Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com 2011-01-10 21:33:46 EST --- Hello, SPEC: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/memaker/memaker.spec SRPM: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/memaker/memaker-20100110-1.fc15.src.rpm RPM: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/memaker/memaker-20100110-1.fc14.noarch.rpm rest of mock build results at: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/memaker/ I've made this one from a bzr checkout. This has a setup.py and seems to work well. The setup.py isn't complete, but it installs most of the files correctly. Thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 658234] Review Request: gdal-grass - Standalone GRASS 6 Drivers for GDAL and OGR
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658234 --- Comment #6 from Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at 2011-01-10 22:27:00 EST --- I'll try to finish the review this week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 663023] Review Request: anjuta-extras - Extras plugins for anjuta
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663023 Rakesh Pandit rpan...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|rpan...@redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639874] Review Request: python-rocket - Modern, multi-threaded, comet-friendly WSGI web server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639874 --- Comment #4 from Ilia Cheishvili ilia.cheishv...@gmail.com 2011-01-10 23:58:41 EST --- I made all updates suggested: Spec URL: http://github.com/icheishvili/rpms/raw/master/python-rocket.spec SRPM URL: http://github.com/icheishvili/rpms/raw/master/python-rocket-1.2.2-1.fc14.src.rpm Also, here's rpmlint output: 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 655866] Review Request: xqc - C/C++ API for interfacing with XQuery processors
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=655866 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||lemen...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|lemen...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2011-01-11 01:47:59 EST --- I'll review it -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 663018] Review Request: gnome-guitar - A small suite of applications for the guitarist
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663018 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||lemen...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|lemen...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2011-01-11 01:46:20 EST --- I'll review it -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 652648] Review Request: erlang-skerl - Skein hash function for Erlang, via NIFs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652648 Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lakshminaras2...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|lakshminaras2...@gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 652585] Review Request: erlang-luke - Dataflow / MapReduce coordination framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652585 Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lakshminaras2...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|lakshminaras2...@gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
