[Bug 590681] Review Request: objenesis - A library for instantiating Java objects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590681 --- Comment #4 from Alexander Kurtakov 2011-01-18 03:02:30 EST --- Few comments: * Drop buildroot * Drop clean section * Don't install versioned jars * Do we really need maven2-settings.xml and all the sed edits? * Does it build with maven 3? If yes please switch to using it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 191494] Review Request: perl-Authen-DigestMD5
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=191494 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Paul Howarth 2011-01-18 03:19:56 EST --- Package Change Request == Package Name: perl-Authen-DigestMD5 New Branches: el4 el5 el6 Owners: pghmcfc This has been requested as a dependency of swaks in EPEL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 633879] Review Request: perl-Test-Inter - Framework for more readable interactive test scripts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633879 Marcela Mašláňová changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mmasl...@redhat.com --- Comment #5 from Marcela Mašláňová 2011-01-18 03:19:32 EST --- *** Bug 669644 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 669644] Review Request: perl-Test-Inter - Framework for more readable interactive test scripts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=669644 Marcela Mašláňová changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||DUPLICATE Last Closed||2011-01-18 03:19:32 --- Comment #5 from Marcela Mašláňová 2011-01-18 03:19:32 EST --- Hm, looks like this is duplicate of 633879. Sorry for useless review :( *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 633879 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 652585] Review Request: erlang-luke - Dataflow / MapReduce coordination framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652585 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 652585] Review Request: erlang-luke - Dataflow / MapReduce coordination framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652585 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2011-01-18 03:28:03 EST --- erlang-luke-0.2.3-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/erlang-luke-0.2.3-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 663018] Review Request: gnome-guitar - A small suite of applications for the guitarist
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663018 --- Comment #11 from Lakshmi Narasimhan 2011-01-18 03:31:07 EST --- I had pasted the link of the rpm instead of the srpm in Comment 5. Here is the srpm link https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/gnome-guitar-0.8.1-9.fc15.src.rpm?attredirects=0&d=1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 652585] Review Request: erlang-luke - Dataflow / MapReduce coordination framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652585 Peter Lemenkov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2011-01-18 03:29:29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 652629] Review Request: erlang-riak_kv - Riak Key/Value Store
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652629 Bug 652629 depends on bug 652585, which changed state. Bug 652585 Summary: Review Request: erlang-luke - Dataflow / MapReduce coordination framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652585 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |MODIFIED Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 652665] Review Request: erlang-luwak - Large-object storage interface for Riak
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652665 Bug 652665 depends on bug 652585, which changed state. Bug 652585 Summary: Review Request: erlang-luke - Dataflow / MapReduce coordination framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652585 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |MODIFIED Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 668639] Review Request: google-lato-fonts - A sanserif typeface family
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668639
Pierre-YvesChibon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag||fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2011-01-18 03:48:10
EST ---
[OK] rpmlint must be run on every package.
Errors are spelling-errors and invalid Source0, all can be ignored here
[OK] The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
It follows http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:FontsPolicy#Naming
[OK] The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption.
[OK] The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
It respects the information provided on
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:FontsPolicy
and
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template
[OK] The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the
Licensing Guidelines.
[OK] The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license.
License is OFL
[OK] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for
the package must be included in %doc.
[OK] The spec file must be written in American English.
[OK] The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[N/A] The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
source from the src.rpm: 119833a4e1c682096c8effb6da18e2ef
I can regenerate this source tarball, but the script made to retrieve them is
clean
[OK] The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at
least one primary architecture.
Built on F14-x86_64
[N/A] If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch.
[OK] All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ;
inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional.
[N/A] The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the
%find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.
[N/A] Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library
files(not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths,
must
call ldconfig in %post and %postun.
[N/A] Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
[N/A] If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state
this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for
relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is
considered a blocker.
[OK] A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create
a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does
create that directory.
This is taken care of by the macro
[OK] A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's
%files listings.
This is taken care of by the macro
[OK] Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with
executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a
%defattr(...) line.
This is taken care of by the macro
[OK] Each package must consistently use macros.
[OK] The package must contain code, or permissable content.
[N/A[ Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage.
[OK] If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime
of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run
properly if it is not present.
[N/A] Header files must be in a -devel package.
[N/A] Static libraries must be in a -static package.
[N/A] If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1),
then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel
package.
[N/A] In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} =
%{version}-%{release}.
[N/A] Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed
in the spec if they are built.
[N/A] Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file,
and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the
%install section.
[OK] Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
[OK] All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
So this package is APPROVED.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receivin
[Bug 664912] Review Request: perl-HTML-TreeBuilder-LibXML - HTML::TreeBuilder and XPath compatible interface with libxml
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664912
--- Comment #3 from Petr Pisar 2011-01-18 04:04:01 EST ---
See the references I provided in parenthesis.
perl(HTML::TreeBuilder::XPath) >= 0.11 is (not only) run time dependency:
lib/HTML/TreeBuilder/LibXML.pm:
sub replace_original {
require HTML::TreeBuilder::XPath;
Thus binary package needs to Require it. rpm-build is not perfect. It cannot
find all dependencies. Like this one. In addition the module stated as run time
dependency in META.yml. Provided developers are not silly, the have a reason
why to require it.
Even the replace_original() method is used in module synopsis.
The perl(XML::LibXML) is not explicitly versioned in installed code. Thus
rpm-build could not discover the version and export the dependency unversioned.
However required version is defined in META.yml. This is current (unfortunate)
practice of perl developers. The track versions in META.yml only and they
assume user installs modules from CPAN directly.
You cannot assume a user has the same package versions as were present at build
time in Koji. The binary package must be self-describing. You can get the
package into system in many ways. E.g. by downloading the package by hand and
installing the package through rpm.
You are right all F13--15 bring perl(XML::LibXML) >= 1.70
(http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=962). Then you
needn't BuildRequire the version explicitly too. It's inconsistent.
So, I take back the perl(XML::LibXML) version FIX. However I insist on the
perl(HTML::TreeBuilder::XPath) requirement.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 667416] Review Request: util-linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=667416 Karel Zak changed: What|Removed |Added CC||k...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Karel Zak 2011-01-18 04:04:02 EST --- Package Change Request == Package Name: util-linux New Branches: Owners: kzak InitialCC: [rename util-linux-ng back to util-linux] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 667226] Review Request: tepsonic - A simple, fast and lightweight Qt audio player
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=667226 --- Comment #16 from Dan Vratil 2011-01-18 04:18:26 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: tepsonic Short Description: A simple, fast and lightweight Qt audio player. Owners: progdan Branches: f14 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 667226] Review Request: tepsonic - A simple, fast and lightweight Qt audio player
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=667226 Dan Vratil changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630282] Review Request: ghc-MonadCatchIO-mtl - Monad-transformer for Control.Exception
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630282 Shakthi Kannan changed: What|Removed |Added CC||shakthim...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|shakthim...@gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630282] Review Request: ghc-MonadCatchIO-mtl - Monad-transformer for Control.Exception
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630282 --- Comment #1 from Shakthi Kannan 2011-01-18 04:40:09 EST --- #001 Please use "License: Public Domain". #002 Why do you have text enclosed in '@' in the Description? Please remove it. #003 Please change the permission on the .spec file and .tar.gz file to 0664. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 669910] Review Request: todo.txt_cli - A simple and extensible shell script for managing your todo.txt file
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=669910 Zachary Doherty changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zrdohe...@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Zachary Doherty 2011-01-18 04:46:48 EST --- I'm new to this so I don't want to be the official reviewer, however I will do my best to do an "unofficial" review. - Upstream simply licenses todo.txt_cli as GPL, according to Fedora's licensing guidelines this means it is licensed under *any* version of the GPL. Your package licenses it under GPLv1 incorrectly (it should be GPL+ instead). That is the only thing I see wrong with MUST requirements. In regards to non-mandatory SHOULD guidelines: - Upstream should be queried to include license text with their releases. - Work with upstream to get man pages included. Those are the only problems I saw while looking through your package. Like I said, I'm new to doing package reviews so it's pretty likely that I missed something. --Zach -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 189678] Review Request: perl-List-MoreUtils - Provide the stuff missing in List::Util
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=189678 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2011-01-18 04:48:02 EST --- perl-List-MoreUtils-0.22-2.el4 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 4. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-List-MoreUtils-0.22-2.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 668639] Review Request: google-lato-fonts - A sanserif typeface family
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668639 --- Comment #4 from Mohamed El Morabity 2011-01-18 04:49:42 EST --- Thanks for this review Pierre-Yves :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 668639] Review Request: google-lato-fonts - A sanserif typeface family
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668639 Mohamed El Morabity changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Mohamed El Morabity 2011-01-18 04:51:23 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: google-lato-fonts Short Description: A sanserif typeface family Owners: melmorabity Branches: f13 f14 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 640205] Review Request: visualvm - Lightweight profiler that integrates many command-line JDK tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=640205 --- Comment #49 from Fedora Update System 2011-01-18 05:08:07 EST --- visualvm-1.3.1-1.1.4.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/visualvm-1.3.1-1.1.4.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 670168] Review Request: perl-POD2-Base - Base module for translations of Perl documentation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670168 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-POD2-Base-0.043-1.fc15 Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2011-01-18 05:13:29 --- Comment #4 from Petr Pisar 2011-01-18 05:13:29 EST --- Thanks for review and repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 670345] Review Request: cx_freeze - create executable from python scripts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670345 Pierre-YvesChibon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pin...@pingoured.fr Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 670090] Review Request: bicon - Bidirectional Console
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670090 fujiwara changed: What|Removed |Added CC||i18n-bugs@lists.fedoraproje ||ct.org Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from fujiwara 2011-01-18 05:27:44 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: bicon Short Description: Bidirectional Console Owners: fujiwara Branches: F-13, F-14 InitialCC: i18n-team Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2728197 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 670345] Review Request: cx_freeze - create executable from python scripts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670345
--- Comment #2 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2011-01-18 05:29:54
EST ---
Quickly reading the spec file:
># sitelib for noarch packages, sitearch for others (remove the unneeded one)
>%{!?python_sitelib: %global python_sitelib %(%{__python} -c "from
>>distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print(get_python_lib())")}
>%{!?python_sitearch: %global python_sitearch %(%{__python} -c "from
>>distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print(get_python_lib(1))")}
Choose one of the other, but one should be removed
> Name: cxfreeze
Why did you choose this name ? I see cx_freeze more often on the website.
Please see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines
> License:Python
hm, seeing this http://cx-freeze.sourceforge.net/LICENSE.txt I think it might
need to be reviewed to be sure the license is valid.
> Source0:cx_Freeze-%{version}.tar.gz
This is not correct, please see
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL
> Requires: python >= 2.3 gcc
Are you sure the gcc should be explicitly required ?
> #add shebang
> for f in ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}/%{python_sitearch}/cx_Freeze/initscripts/*
Why do you add shebang to file which will never be executed ?
> #not relevant
> rm -rf ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}/%{python_sitearch}/cx_Freeze/samples
Why is it not relevant ? Couldn't it be provided as doc ?
There are several comments on your spec which you could clean.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 188380] Review Request: perl-Test-Deep
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=188380 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fedora-perl-devel-list@redh ||at.com, p...@city-fan.org --- Comment #3 from Paul Howarth 2011-01-18 05:38:45 EST --- Hi Steve, I see that there are existing EL-4 branches for perl-Test-Deep and its dependency perl-Test-NoWarnings but they haven't been built. I've tried building the packages in mock as they stand and they build OK, so is there some reason why they're not built for EPEL-4? If you're no longer interested in EPEL-4 I'll happily take those branches off your hands. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 670451] New: Review Request: async-http-client - Asynchronous Http Client for Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: async-http-client - Asynchronous Http Client for Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670451 Summary: Review Request: async-http-client - Asynchronous Http Client for Java Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: socho...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://sochotni.fedorapeople.org/packages/async-http-client.spec SRPM URL: http://sochotni.fedorapeople.org/packages/async-http-client-1.4.1-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: Async Http Client library purpose is to allow Java applications to easily execute HTTP requests and asynchronously process the HTTP responses. The Async HTTP Client library is simple to use. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 669394] Review Request: netty - An asynchronous event-driven network application framework and tools for Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=669394 Stanislav Ochotnicky changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2011-01-18 05:49:58 --- Comment #8 from Stanislav Ochotnicky 2011-01-18 05:49:58 EST --- Built in rawhide. Thanks: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2728157 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 670451] Review Request: async-http-client - Asynchronous Http Client for Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670451 Stanislav Ochotnicky changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||652183(FE-JAVASIG) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 669394] Review Request: netty - An asynchronous event-driven network application framework and tools for Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=669394 Stanislav Ochotnicky changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|652183(FE-JAVASIG) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 670457] New: Review Request: toilet - colorful ASCII art generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: toilet - colorful ASCII art generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670457 Summary: Review Request: toilet - colorful ASCII art generator Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: zrdohe...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://kamokow.com/fedora/packaging/toilet/toilet.spec SRPM URL: http://kamokow.com/fedora/packaging/toilet/toilet-0.2-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: TOIlet is a program for generating ASCII art text in the terminal, and optionally passing it through a set of filters which apply additional effects (colors, etc). The package builds successfully through mock, and rpmlint reports no errors. PS. This is my first package and I'm looking for a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 670457] Review Request: toilet - colorful ASCII art generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670457 Zachary Doherty changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 619228] Review Request: shellinaboxd - AJAX based terminal emulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=619228 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fab...@bernewireless.net --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter 2011-01-18 06:31:17 EST --- The access to the spec file and the Source RPM is limited to "ASF Committers". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 619228] Review Request: shellinaboxd - AJAX based terminal emulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=619228 --- Comment #5 from Jochen Wiedmann 2011-01-18 06:35:08 EST --- What do you mean by that? I have no problem to view the spec file or download the SRPM in my browser? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 665189] Review Request: perl-Convert-Color - Color space conversions and named lookups
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665189 --- Comment #5 from Ralf Corsepius 2011-01-18 07:02:31 EST --- Package built for f15 - f13 and f14 are stuck waiting for Fedora QA's wait queue to release other packages they depend upon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 596138] Review Request: nss-gui - A graphical user interface for NSS security databases
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596138 --- Comment #16 from Kai Engert (kaie) 2011-01-18 07:16:50 EST --- Problems solved. Rawhide/XulRunner 2.0 required a compatibility update of this software. Done now. After you build and attempt to run nss-gui without parameters, you will get an error message that its default database does not yet exist. This error is expected, because you most likely don't use other software yet that uses that path. You can follow the instructions and create the given path. In other words, do this: mkdir -p $HOME/.pki/nssdb New files that have been tested on rawhide: http://kuix.de/fedora/nss-gui/nss-gui.spec http://kuix.de/fedora/nss-gui/nss-gui-0.3.6-1.fc14.src.rpm FYI, when you run the software, you will be shown user interface that is similar to what's being offered by Firefox in advanced encryption preferences. Thanks again for your help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 668001] Review Request: nepomukcontroller - Applet to control the Nepomuk file indexer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668001 Jaroslav Reznik changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Jaroslav Reznik 2011-01-18 07:25:29 EST --- Package Change Request == Package Name: nepomukcontroller New Branches: F14 Owners: jreznik rdieter than ltinkl thomasj kkofler Fedpkg does not work with master branch only, so askin for F-14 one too. Please check https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=619979 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 670477] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-PSGI - PSGI handler for HTTP::Server::Simple
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670477 Ralf Corsepius changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||665096 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 670477] New: Review Request: perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-PSGI - PSGI handler for HTTP::Server::Simple
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-PSGI - PSGI handler for HTTP::Server::Simple https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670477 Summary: Review Request: perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-PSGI - PSGI handler for HTTP::Server::Simple Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rc040...@freenet.de QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://corsepiu.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-PSGI.spec SRPM URL: http://corsepiu.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-PSGI-0.14-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: HTTP::Server::Simple::PSGI is a HTTP::Server::Simple based HTTP server that can run PSGI applications. This module only depends on HTTP::Server::Simple, which itself doesn't depend on any non-core modules so it's best to be used as an embedded web server. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 670164] Review Request: sonatype-oss-parent - Sonatype OSS Parent
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670164 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||akurt...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|akurt...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Alexander Kurtakov 2011-01-18 07:47:03 EST --- I'll do this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 646610] Rename review: drupal-views -> drupal6-views
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646610 --- Comment #10 from Sven Lankes 2011-01-18 08:24:45 EST --- Jon, you'll need to change the version to 2.12 from 6.x.2.12 This is what started the renaming discussion - a version of 6.x.2.12 violates the packaging guidelines. Also the 6.x is implied by the package name drupal6-modulename now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 646611] Rename review: drupal-cck -> drupal6-cck
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646611 --- Comment #7 from Sven Lankes 2011-01-18 08:24:13 EST --- Jon, you'll need to change the version to 2.8 from 6.x.2.8 This is what started the renaming discussion - a version of 6.x.2.8 violates the packaging guidelines. Also the 6.x is implied by the package name drupal6-modulename now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 669509] Review Request: drupal6-rules - It allows site administrators to define conditionally executed actions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=669509 Volker Fröhlich changed: What|Removed |Added CC||volke...@gmx.at --- Comment #1 from Volker Fröhlich 2011-01-18 08:42:52 EST --- Please correct the license to GPLv2+. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 570569] Review Request: drupal-ldap_integration - Drupal ldapauth, ldapgroups, and ldapdata modules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570569 Volker Fröhlich changed: What|Removed |Added CC||volke...@gmx.at --- Comment #3 from Volker Fröhlich 2011-01-18 08:47:24 EST --- Your files are not available. Please check, if you stated GPLv2+, as all modules hosted in Drupal's CVS must be. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 656017] Review Request: drupal6-imagefield - ImageField provides an image upload field for CCK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656017 Volker Fröhlich changed: What|Removed |Added CC||volke...@gmx.at --- Comment #1 from Volker Fröhlich 2011-01-18 08:48:03 EST --- Please correct the license to GPLv2+, as all modules hosted in Drupal's CVS must be. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 656190] Review Request: drupal6-pathauto - The Pathauto module automatically generates path aliases
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656190 Volker Fröhlich changed: What|Removed |Added CC||volke...@gmx.at --- Comment #2 from Volker Fröhlich 2011-01-18 08:52:48 EST --- Please correct the license to GPLv2+, as all modules hosted in Drupal's CVS must be. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 669910] Review Request: todo.txt_cli - A simple and extensible shell script for managing your todo.txt file
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=669910 --- Comment #3 from Magnus Tuominen 2011-01-18 08:49:50 EST --- Thanks for the unofficial review. The issues mentioned have been fixed and upstream has been asked to include the files. New spec and src.rpm: http://magnu5.fedorapeople.org/review/todo.txt/SPECS/todo.txt_cli.spec http://magnu5.fedorapeople.org/review/todo.txt/SRPMS/todo.txt_cli-2.7-2.fc14.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 642857] Review Request: drupal6-advanced-help - Allows module developers to store their help outside the module system in html
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=642857 Volker Fröhlich changed: What|Removed |Added CC||volke...@gmx.at --- Comment #7 from Volker Fröhlich 2011-01-18 08:51:35 EST --- Please check, if the license is stated as GPLv2+, as all modules hosted in Drupal's CVS must be. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 669327] Review Request: drupal6-views_bulk_operations - This module augments Views by allowing bulk operations to be executed
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=669327 Volker Fröhlich changed: What|Removed |Added CC||volke...@gmx.at --- Comment #2 from Volker Fröhlich 2011-01-18 08:53:24 EST --- Please correct the license to GPLv2+, as all modules hosted in Drupal's CVS must be. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 640830] Review Request: drupal-multisite_manager - Allows creation of new drupal sites from a central drupal site
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=640830 Volker Fröhlich changed: What|Removed |Added CC||volke...@gmx.at --- Comment #3 from Volker Fröhlich 2011-01-18 08:54:07 EST --- Please correct the license to GPLv2+, as all modules hosted in Drupal's CVS must be. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 570864] Review Request: drupal-securepages_prevent_hijack - Secure Pages add-on that prevents hijacked sessions from accessing SSL pages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570864 Volker Fröhlich changed: What|Removed |Added CC||volke...@gmx.at --- Comment #3 from Volker Fröhlich 2011-01-18 08:57:37 EST --- Please correct the license to GPLv2+, as all modules hosted in Drupal's CVS must be. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 191494] Review Request: perl-Authen-DigestMD5
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=191494 --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-01-18 08:57:50 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 656179] Review Request: drupal6-imagecache - ImageCache allows you to setup presets for image processing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656179 Volker Fröhlich changed: What|Removed |Added CC||volke...@gmx.at --- Comment #2 from Volker Fröhlich 2011-01-18 08:58:13 EST --- Please correct the license to GPLv2+, as all modules hosted in Drupal's CVS must be. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 656182] Review Request: drupal6-imageapi - This API is meant to be used in place of the API provided by image.inc
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656182 Volker Fröhlich changed: What|Removed |Added CC||volke...@gmx.at --- Comment #2 from Volker Fröhlich 2011-01-18 08:55:49 EST --- Please correct the license to GPLv2+, as all modules hosted in Drupal's CVS must be. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 656186] Review Request: drupal6-mimedetect - MimeDetect provides an API for consistent server side mime detection
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656186 Volker Fröhlich changed: What|Removed |Added CC||volke...@gmx.at --- Comment #1 from Volker Fröhlich 2011-01-18 08:54:51 EST --- Please correct the license to GPLv2+, as all modules hosted in Drupal's CVS must be. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664303] Review Request: drupal6-auto_nodetitle - "auto_nodetitle" is a small and efficient module that allows hiding of the content title
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664303 Volker Fröhlich changed: What|Removed |Added CC||volke...@gmx.at --- Comment #8 from Volker Fröhlich 2011-01-18 08:57:01 EST --- Please correct the license to GPLv2+, as all modules hosted in Drupal's CVS must be. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 670090] Review Request: bicon - Bidirectional Console
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670090 --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-01-18 09:03:13 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 667226] Review Request: tepsonic - A simple, fast and lightweight Qt audio player
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=667226 --- Comment #17 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-01-18 08:58:28 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 668639] Review Request: google-lato-fonts - A sanserif typeface family
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668639 --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-01-18 09:02:36 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 656160] Review Request: drupal6-filefield - FileField provides a universal file upload field for CCK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656160 Volker Fröhlich changed: What|Removed |Added CC||volke...@gmx.at --- Comment #1 from Volker Fröhlich 2011-01-18 08:59:16 EST --- Please correct the license to GPLv2+, as all modules hosted in Drupal's CVS must be. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 570862] Review Request: drupal-securepages - Redirect the required pages to a SSL version of the page
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570862 Volker Fröhlich changed: What|Removed |Added CC||volke...@gmx.at --- Comment #3 from Volker Fröhlich 2011-01-18 08:58:47 EST --- Please correct the license to GPLv2+, as all modules hosted in Drupal's CVS must be. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 646610] Rename review: drupal-views -> drupal6-views
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646610 --- Comment #11 from Paul W. Frields 2011-01-18 09:01:58 EST --- Dang, I missed that one, thanks Sven. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 668001] Review Request: nepomukcontroller - Applet to control the Nepomuk file indexer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668001 --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-01-18 08:59:08 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 658942] Review Request: drupal6-schema - The Schema API allows modules to declare their database tables in a structured array and provides API functions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658942 --- Comment #2 from Volker Fröhlich 2011-01-18 09:02:28 EST --- Your version numbering scheme is fine! Please correct the license to GPLv2+, as all modules hosted in Drupal's CVS must be. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 642858] Review Request: drupal6-footnotes - Allows to easily create automatically numbered footnote references
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=642858 Volker Fröhlich changed: What|Removed |Added CC||volke...@gmx.at --- Comment #12 from Volker Fröhlich 2011-01-18 09:01:25 EST --- Please check, if the license is stated as GPLv2+, as all modules hosted in Drupal's CVS must be. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 667416] Review Request: util-linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=667416 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-01-18 09:02:18 EST --- I'm not sure what you're asking for here. We do not rename packages; we just create a new package under the new name and let the package owner retire the old package. However, util-linux already exists in pkgdb, so we can't just create it, and it's not even retired. So I'm really not sure what you're asking us to do here. Please describe in detail what operations you need an SCM admin to take for you and re-raise the fedora-cvs flag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 670354] Review Request: perl-String-Similarity - Calculates the similarity of two strings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670354
Marcela Mašláňová changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mmasl...@redhat.com
Flag||fedora-review?
--- Comment #1 from Marcela Mašláňová 2011-01-18 09:01:05
EST ---
- rpmlint OK
- package must be named according to Guidelines OK
- spec file name must match the base package %{name} OK
- package must meet the Packaging Guidelines OK
- package must be licensed with Fedora approved license OK
FIX - license field must match actual license - it's GPLv2+ if you look in
source code
- text of the license in its own file must be included in %doc OK
- sources must match the upstream source OK
- package MUST successfully compile and build OK
- architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla OK
- build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires OK
- handle locales properly with %find_lang macro OK
- shared library files must call ldconfig in %post(un) OK
- packages must NOT bundle system libraries OK
- package must own all directories that it creates OK
- permissions on files must be set properly OK
- package must consistently use macros OK
- package must contain code, or permissable content OK
- large documentation must go in a -doc OK
- %doc must not affect the runtime of the application OK
- header files must be in a -devel package OK
- static libraries must be in a -static package OK
- library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel OK
- devel package usually require base package OK
- packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives OK
- GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file OK
- packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages OK
rpm -qp --provides perl-String-Similarity-1.04-1.fc15.i686.rpm
perl(String::Similarity) = 1.04
perl-String-Similarity = 1.04-1.fc15
perl-String-Similarity(x86-32) = 1.04-1.fc15
rpm -qp --requires perl-String-Similarity-1.04-1.fc15.i686.rpm
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.2)
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1
libc.so.6
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3)
perl(DynaLoader)
perl(Exporter)
rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1
rtld(GNU_HASH)
Also you can remove rm -rf from build part.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 646612] Rename review: drupal-date -> drupal6-date
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646612 Volker Fröhlich changed: What|Removed |Added CC||volke...@gmx.at --- Comment #3 from Volker Fröhlich 2011-01-18 09:03:33 EST --- Please change the version to 2.4 instead of 6.x.2.4. Please correct the license to GPLv2+, as all modules hosted in Drupal's CVS must be. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 653805] Review Request: drupal6-ctools - This suite is primarily a set of APIs and tools to improve the developer experience.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=653805 Volker Fröhlich changed: What|Removed |Added CC||volke...@gmx.at --- Comment #16 from Volker Fröhlich 2011-01-18 09:06:05 EST --- Please correct the license to GPLv2+, as all modules hosted in Drupal's CVS must be. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 670127] Review Request: The Board - A space for placing daily records in your GNOME desktop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670127 --- Comment #2 from Cosimo Cecchi 2011-01-18 09:06:46 EST --- Thanks for the review Fabian. I addressed your comments and suppressed some more warnings from rpmlint, whose output looks pretty OK now. New version SPEC URL: http://people.gnome.org/~cosimoc/the-board-pkg/the-board.spec SRPM URL: http://people.gnome.org/~cosimoc/the-board-pkg/the-board-0.1.0-2.fc15.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 646608] Rename review: drupal-service_links -> drupal6-service_links
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646608 Volker Fröhlich changed: What|Removed |Added CC||volke...@gmx.at --- Comment #4 from Volker Fröhlich 2011-01-18 09:07:44 EST --- Please correct the license to GPLv2+, as all modules hosted in Drupal's CVS must be. Please change the version number to 2.0 instead of 6.x.2.0. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 655184] Review Request: drupal6-data - Data module helps you model, manage and query related sets of tables.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=655184 Volker Fröhlich changed: What|Removed |Added CC||volke...@gmx.at --- Comment #6 from Volker Fröhlich 2011-01-18 09:04:50 EST --- Please correct the license to GPLv2+, as all modules hosted in Drupal's CVS must be. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 646614] Rename review: drupal-calendar -> drupal6-calendar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646614 Volker Fröhlich changed: What|Removed |Added CC||volke...@gmx.at --- Comment #4 from Volker Fröhlich 2011-01-18 09:10:07 EST --- Please change the version number to 2.2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 646606] Rename review: drupal-workspace -> drupal6-workspace
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646606 Volker Fröhlich changed: What|Removed |Added CC||volke...@gmx.at --- Comment #6 from Volker Fröhlich 2011-01-18 09:09:09 EST --- Please correct the license to GPLv2+, as all modules hosted in Drupal's CVS must be. Please change the version number to 1.4 instead of 6.x.1.4. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 191494] Review Request: perl-Authen-DigestMD5
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=191494 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2011-01-18 09:37:52 EST --- perl-Authen-DigestMD5-0.04-10.el4 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 4. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Authen-DigestMD5-0.04-10.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 191494] Review Request: perl-Authen-DigestMD5
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=191494 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2011-01-18 09:37:46 EST --- perl-Authen-DigestMD5-0.04-10.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Authen-DigestMD5-0.04-10.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 667226] Review Request: tepsonic - A simple, fast and lightweight Qt audio player
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=667226 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 667226] Review Request: tepsonic - A simple, fast and lightweight Qt audio player
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=667226 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2011-01-18 09:46:20 EST --- tepsonic-0.98.1-5.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tepsonic-0.98.1-5.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 668001] Review Request: nepomukcontroller - Applet to control the Nepomuk file indexer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668001 Jaroslav Reznik changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2011-01-18 09:48:45 --- Comment #8 from Jaroslav Reznik 2011-01-18 09:48:45 EST --- Thanks, build done for Rawhide - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2728667 - closing now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 670302] Review Request: libbacklight - Linux backlight abstraction library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670302 --- Comment #2 from Matthew Garrett 2011-01-18 09:54:29 EST --- Updates: C++ extern guards added unistd.h added (not sure why I'm not getting those warnings) Documentation added to README and libbacklight.h Argument passed to configure BRs fixed Thanks for the review! New versions of the files are at the same URL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 225672] Merge Review: cvs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225672 Marcela Mašláňová changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2011-01-18 10:15:01 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 670127] Review Request: the-board - A space for placing daily records in your GNOME desktop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670127 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: The Board - |Review Request: the-board - |A space for placing daily |A space for placing daily |records in your GNOME |records in your GNOME |desktop |desktop -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 642858] Review Request: drupal6-footnotes - Allows to easily create automatically numbered footnote references
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=642858 --- Comment #13 from Paul W. Frields 2011-01-18 10:39:55 EST --- Volker, thanks for catching that. Sven, you don't need to rebuild just for a change in the License field, but you should bump the Release and commit a change to the spec file (and note in %changelog) for that purpose before you do builds. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664924] Review Request: perl-Plack-Middleware-Test-StashWarnings - Test your application's warnings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664924 Marcela Mašláňová changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mmasl...@redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664303] Review Request: drupal6-auto_nodetitle - "auto_nodetitle" is a small and efficient module that allows hiding of the content title
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664303 --- Comment #9 from Paul W. Frields 2011-01-18 10:41:01 EST --- Volker, thanks for catching that. Peter, you don't need to rebuild just for a change in the License field, but you should bump the Release and commit a change to the spec file (and note in %changelog) for that purpose before you do any further builds. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 566598] Review Request: cover-thumbnailer - Display music cover and more in nautilus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566598 --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-01-18 10:41:02 EST --- FLOZz, did you still wish to submit this package? I don't use gnome so I can't be of much assistance here, but I can suggest that you read http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group and start doing some of the things indicated there. I notice a correspondence between your email domain and the upstream site; if you are the upstream author or involved in upstream development, you should communicate that to us. It would also be good to provide a real name to bugzilla (since you'll need to do that anyway when you obtain a Fedora account). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630282] Review Request: ghc-MonadCatchIO-mtl - Monad-transformer for Control.Exception
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630282 Ben Boeckel changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Ben Boeckel 2011-01-18 10:51:04 EST --- (In reply to comment #1) > #001 Please use "License: Public Domain". Ah. Oops. Needs an email to the maint to ensure it's valid for Fedora anyways. > #002 Why do you have text enclosed in '@' in the Description? Please remove > it. Used in cabal description and Haddock uses it. Missed it here > #003 Please change the permission on the .spec file and .tar.gz file to 0664. This is my umask. Won't be a problem in Fedora's git or the lookaside cache. I'll get around to this tonight hopefully. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 668639] Review Request: google-lato-fonts - A sanserif typeface family
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668639 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2011-01-18 10:53:32 EST --- google-lato-fonts-1.011-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/google-lato-fonts-1.011-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 668639] Review Request: google-lato-fonts - A sanserif typeface family
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668639 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 668639] Review Request: google-lato-fonts - A sanserif typeface family
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668639 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2011-01-18 10:58:52 EST --- google-lato-fonts-1.011-1.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/google-lato-fonts-1.011-1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 670541] New: Review Request: libxc - Library of exchange and correlation functionals to be used in DFT codes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libxc - Library of exchange and correlation functionals to be used in DFT codes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670541 Summary: Review Request: libxc - Library of exchange and correlation functionals to be used in DFT codes Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jussi.leht...@iki.fi QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/libxc.spec SRPM URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/libxc-1.0-1.src.rpm Upstream URL: http://www.tddft.org/programs/octopus/wiki/index.php/Libxc Description: Libxc is a library of exchange and correlation functionals. Its purpose is to be used in codes that implement density-functional theory. For the moment, the library includes most of the local density approximations (LDAs), generalized density approximation (GGAs), and meta-GGAs. The library provides values for the energy density and its 1st, 2nd, and (for the LDAs) 3rd derivatives. rpmlint output: libxc.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) functionals -> functional, functional s, functionary libxc.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US functionals -> functional, functional s, functionary libxc.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) functionals -> functional, functional s, functionary libxc.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US functionals -> functional, functional s, functionary libxc.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libxc.so.0.0.9 exit@GLIBC_2.2.5 libxc-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US functionals -> functional, functional s, functionary libxc-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 7 warnings. These are all OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 651101] Review Request: psfex - Model the Point Spread Function from FITS images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=651101 Sergio Pascual changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-01-18 11:11:21 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 668863] Review Request: dolphin-connector - Simple MySQL C API wrapper for C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668863 Pierre-YvesChibon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pin...@pingoured.fr AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|pin...@pingoured.fr -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 668863] Review Request: dolphin-connector - Simple MySQL C API wrapper for C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668863 --- Comment #1 from William Lima 2011-01-18 11:28:32 EST --- Created attachment 474096 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=474096 modified sample to use exception -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 657948] Review Request: launchy - open source keystroke launcher inspired by MacOS Quicksilver
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657948 Lukáš Zapletal changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(msu...@redhat.com ||) --- Comment #3 from Lukáš Zapletal 2011-01-18 11:29:03 EST --- @Mirek: Thanks. I have corrected libraries and added GCC dep and fixed the datadir. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2729101 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=2729102&name=launchy-2.5-3.fc15.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 598688] Review Request: archivemount - FUSE based filesystem for mounting compressed archives
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598688 Niels de Vos changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dw...@infradead.org Component|Package Review |0x Flag|needinfo?(nde...@redhat.com | |) | --- Comment #13 from Niels de Vos 2011-01-18 11:49:53 EST --- Tomas, nicely found! I'll inform the developer about this issue too. A new version (0.6.1-4) of the SRPM and SPEC that includes your patch can be found here: - http://nixpanic.net/software/packages/archivemount - http://nixpanic.net/software/packages/archivemount/archivemount.spec - http://nixpanic.net/software/packages/archivemount/archivemount-0.6.1-4.fc14.src.rpm Many thanks again, Niels -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 670541] Review Request: libxc - Library of exchange and correlation functionals to be used in DFT codes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670541 Jussi Lehtola changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||libxc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 670558] New: Review Request: ape - A tool for generating atomic pseudopotentials within a DFT framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ape - A tool for generating atomic pseudopotentials within a DFT framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670558 Summary: Review Request: ape - A tool for generating atomic pseudopotentials within a DFT framework Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jussi.leht...@iki.fi QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/ape.spec SRPM URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/ape-1.1.0-1.fc14.src.rpm Upstream URL: http://www.tddft.org/programs/APE Description: APE (Atomic Pseudopotential Engine) is a tool for generating atomic pseudopotentials within a Density-Functional Theory framework. rpmlint output: ape.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) pseudopotentials -> pseudo potentials, pseudo-potentials, potentials ape.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pseudopotentials -> pseudo potentials, pseudo-potentials, potentials ape.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) pseudopotentials -> pseudo potentials, pseudo-potentials, potentials ape.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pseudopotentials -> pseudo potentials, pseudo-potentials, potentials ape.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ape 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings. These are all OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 670558] Review Request: ape - A tool for generating atomic pseudopotentials within a DFT framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670558 Jussi Lehtola changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||670541 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
