[Bug 659368] Review Request: luabind - A library that helps create bindings between C++ and Lua
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659368 --- Comment #8 from Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich 2011-02-09 00:44:03 EST --- Rawhide build is completed. Future F15 will be supplied with it. There is no F14 luabind still. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 676216] New: Review Request: sugar-calendario - agenda/calendar for sugar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sugar-calendario - agenda/calendar for sugar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676216 Summary: Review Request: sugar-calendario - agenda/calendar for sugar Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: yajo...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://yaderv.fedorapeople.org/rpm/calendario/sugar-calendario.spec SRPM URL: http://yaderv.fedorapeople.org/rpm/calendario/sugar-calendario-3-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: Calendario is daily activity for sugar, this will allow children to introduce activities per day so they are reminded of past, present and future activities. This is my first package, and I need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 676159] Review Request: crlibm - Correctly Rounded mathematical library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676159 Pavel Zhukov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pa...@zhukoff.net Blocks|674008 |505154(FE-SCITECH) --- Comment #1 from Pavel Zhukov 2011-02-08 23:39:49 EST --- -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674008] Review Request: openrave - Open Robotics Automation Virtual Environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674008 Pavel Zhukov changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on|676159 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 505154] Tracker: Review Requests for Science and Technology related packages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505154 Pavel Zhukov changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||676159 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 676188] New: Review Request: qmidiarp - an arpeggiator, sequencer and MIDI LFO for ALSA
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: qmidiarp - an arpeggiator, sequencer and MIDI LFO for ALSA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676188 Summary: Review Request: qmidiarp - an arpeggiator, sequencer and MIDI LFO for ALSA Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: brendan.jones...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Hi a while back qmidiarp existed as a fairly simple MIDI arpeggiator. It has recently been re-imagined and extended and is currently under heavy development. SRPM and SPEC file can be found here: http://bsjones.fedorapeople.org/qmidiarp-0.3.9-1.fc14.src.rpm http://bsjones.fedorapeople.org/qmidiarp.spec Rpmlint output: rpmlint ../SRPMS/qmidiarp-0.3.9-1.fc14.src.rpm qmidiarp.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) arpeggiator -> arpeggiate, arpeggio, appoggiatura qmidiarp.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US arpeggiators -> arpeggiate, arpeggios, arpeggio qmidiarp.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US arp -> rap, Arp, ar 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. I will need to be sponsored as this will be my first package thanks Brendan Jones FAS: bsjones -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 668243] Review Request: libqb - An IPC library for high performance servers.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668243 --- Comment #22 from Angus Salkeld 2011-02-08 20:29:47 EST --- Here is another package (csync2) to review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676187 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 676187] New: Csync2 is a cluster synchronization tool.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Csync2 is a cluster synchronization tool. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676187 Summary: Csync2 is a cluster synchronization tool. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: asalk...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description: Csync2 is a cluster synchronization tool. It can be used to keep files on multiple hosts in a cluster in sync. Csync2 can handle complex setups with much more than just 2 hosts, handle file deletions and can detect conflicts. It is expedient for HA-clusters, HPC-clusters, COWs and server farms. SPEC: http://asalkeld.fedorapeople.org/csync2.spec SRPM: http://asalkeld.fedorapeople.org/csync2-1.34-1.fc14.src.rpm koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2799170 Other reviews: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668243 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675947 $ rpmlint csync2 csync2.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/csync2_ssl_cert.pem csync2.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/csync2_ssl_key.pem If we _really_ need this fixed then I'll need to patch the code to read then from their new location. csync2.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary csync2-compare Upstream does not provide a man page for this utility 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 676175] New: Review Request: fpaste-server - Fedora Pastebin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: fpaste-server - Fedora Pastebin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676175 Summary: Review Request: fpaste-server - Fedora Pastebin Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: her...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://herlo.fedorapeople.org/rpms/fpaste-server.spec SRPM URL: http://herlo.fedorapeople.org/rpms/fpaste-server-0.1-1.src.rpm Description: fpaste-server is simply put, a pastebin. Like many a pastebin application before it, fpaste-server strives to make it easy to share code and other information collaboratively. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674008] Review Request: openrave - Open Robotics Automation Virtual Environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674008 Tim Niemueller changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||676159 --- Comment #7 from Tim Niemueller 2011-02-08 18:32:06 EST --- Hi Rosen. Thanks for tuning in and the thorough list of packaged libraries. For packaging it would be much more pleasant if you could make tarball releases. Is that planned or could you think about it? About the libraries: collada-dom: keep as-is for now, once collada-dom is available as an updated package make an RPM, propose for inclusion and eventually use it. convexdecomposition: keep internal version, contains non-upstreamed patches, lib seems to be meant for inclusion (no build system), and is linked statically (i.e. no confusion/errant deps for other software) ann/flann: using system-wide version with my patch already fparser: keep the included version because of the local changes. If upstream becomes responsive revisit issue. crlibm: I have packaged it and it is up for review as bug #676159. minizip, pcre, zlib, qhull: I have made some changes to ensure system-version is used. I have also added statements to %prep stage to delete these directories in the source code before building. New SRPM is at http://fedorapeople.org/~timn/robotics/openrave-0.2.18-0.3.svn1975.fc14.src.rpm. Spec file has been changed in place. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 676159] Review Request: crlibm - Correctly Rounded mathematical library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676159 Tim Niemueller changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||674008 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 676159] New: Review Request: crlibm - Correctly Rounded mathematical library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: crlibm - Correctly Rounded mathematical library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676159 Summary: Review Request: crlibm - Correctly Rounded mathematical library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: t...@niemueller.de QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~timn/misc/crlibm.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~timn/misc/crlibm-1.0-0.1.beta4.fc14.src.rpm Description: CRlibm is a free mathematical library (libm) which provides: * implementations of the double-precision C99 standard elementary functions, * correctly rounded in the four IEEE-754 rounding modes, * with a comprehensive proof of both the algorithms used and their implementation, * sufficiently efficient in average time, worst-case time, and memory consumption to replace existing libms transparently. Project URL: http://lipforge.ens-lyon.fr/www/crlibm/ Koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2796232 rpmlint: crlibm.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libm -> limb, lib, lib m crlibm.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libms -> limbs, lib's, lib ms crlibm.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libm -> limb, lib, lib m crlibm.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libms -> limbs, lib's, lib ms - That is a false positive. In mentions libm (math lib) in the description. crlibm.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.0beta4-1 ['1.0-0.1.beta4.fc14', '1.0-0.1.beta4'] - I do not include the dist tag in the changelog entry and consider rpmlint broken in this regard. 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 676146] New: Review request: trace-gui - GUI tools from trace-cmd
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review request: trace-gui - GUI tools from trace-cmd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676146 Summary: Review request: trace-gui - GUI tools from trace-cmd Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jonstan...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec file: http://jstanley.fedorapeople.org/trace-gui.spec SRPM: http://jstanley.fedorapeople.org/trace-gui-1.0.4-1.fc13.src.rpm trace-cmd is a user interface to Ftrace. Instead of needing to use the debugfs directly, trace-cmd will handle of setting of options and tracers and will record into a data file. This package is the GUI components of trace-cmd, that is not packaged in RHEL, built for EPEL only. - This is meant only for EPEL - Fedora does not have trace-cmd packaged (I'll submit a separate review to get it in Fedora, and package the latest upstream release there, this tracks the RHEL release of trace-cmd) RHEL packages the upstream trace-cmd, but without the GUI components (trace-graph, trace-view, and kernelshark). This package includes ONLY those components, and has a requirement on trace-cmd being installed. Note that during the build process, the entire package is built. During %install, I remove the parts that are shipped in RHEL. This package only applies to RHEL6, since it depends on Ftrace in the kernel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 672203] Review Request: erlang-riak_err - Enhanced SASL Error Logger for Riak
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672203 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2011-02-08 18:00:26 EST --- erlang-riak_err-1.0.0-0.1.20110105git429f757.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 652576] Review Request: ghc-texmath - Haskell texmathml library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652576 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|ghc-texmath-0.4-3.fc13 |ghc-texmath-0.4-3.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 652576] Review Request: ghc-texmath - Haskell texmathml library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652576 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2011-02-08 17:59:30 EST --- ghc-texmath-0.4-3.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 672203] Review Request: erlang-riak_err - Enhanced SASL Error Logger for Riak
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672203 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||erlang-riak_err-1.0.0-0.1.2 ||0110105git429f757.fc14 Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 663244] Review Request: CUnit - A unit testing framework for C
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663244 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2011-02-08 17:54:15 EST --- CUnit-2.1.2-6.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 652582] Review Request: pandoc - Markdown markup converter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652582 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2011-02-08 17:57:23 EST --- pandoc-1.6.0.1-2.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 652582] Review Request: pandoc - Markdown markup converter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652582 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|pandoc-1.6.0.1-2.fc14 |pandoc-1.6.0.1-2.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 652576] Review Request: ghc-texmath - Haskell texmathml library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652576 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||ghc-texmath-0.4-3.fc13 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-02-08 17:57:52 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 663244] Review Request: CUnit - A unit testing framework for C
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663244 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||CUnit-2.1.2-6.fc14 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-02-08 17:54:07 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 663244] Review Request: CUnit - A unit testing framework for C
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663244 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2011-02-08 17:54:02 EST --- CUnit-2.1.2-6.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 652576] Review Request: ghc-texmath - Haskell texmathml library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652576 Bug 652576 depends on bug 648100, which changed state. Bug 648100 Summary: Review Request: ghc-xml - A simple XML library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648100 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2011-02-08 17:57:47 EST --- ghc-texmath-0.4-3.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 652582] Review Request: pandoc - Markdown markup converter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652582 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||pandoc-1.6.0.1-2.fc14 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-02-08 17:57:04 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 663244] Review Request: CUnit - A unit testing framework for C
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663244 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|CUnit-2.1.2-6.fc14 |CUnit-2.1.2-6.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 652582] Review Request: pandoc - Markdown markup converter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652582 Bug 652582 depends on bug 648100, which changed state. Bug 648100 Summary: Review Request: ghc-xml - A simple XML library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648100 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2011-02-08 17:56:58 EST --- pandoc-1.6.0.1-2.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673919] Review Request: monkey - Very small, fast and scalable web server for Linux.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673919 Guillermo Gómez changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|guillermo.go...@gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 647076] Review Request: jackbeat - audio sequencer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=647076 Brendan Jones changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(brendan.jones.it@ | |gmail.com) | Last Closed||2011-02-08 17:13:36 --- Comment #21 from Brendan Jones 2011-02-08 17:13:36 EST --- Closing for the time being -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673919] Review Request: monkey - Very small, fast and scalable web server for Linux.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673919 Guillermo Gómez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||guillermo.go...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Guillermo Gómez 2011-02-08 16:49:12 EST --- I'll review in parallel with Toshio. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 676129] New: Review Request: qconf - Allows you to have a nice configure script for your qmake-based project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: qconf - Allows you to have a nice configure script for your qmake-based project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676129 Summary: Review Request: qconf - Allows you to have a nice configure script for your qmake-based project Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dr...@land.ru QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Hello. It is my second package for Fedora. Spec URL: https://github.com/drizt/psi-plus/blob/master/qconf.spec SRPM URL: https://github.com/drizt/psi-plus/blob/master/qconf-1.4-1.fc14.src.rpm QConf allows you to have a nice configure script for your qmake-based project. It is intended for developers who don't need (or want) to use the more complex GNU autotools. With qconf/qmake, it is easy to maintain a cross-platform project that uses a familiar configuration interface on unix. koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2793306 Expected results: Additional info: Really this package is need only for psi-plus package. I will create Psi+ review request after qconf package will be added to Fedora repo. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 622904] Review Request: rubygem-state_machine - Adds support for creating state machines for attributes on any Ruby class
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=622904 --- Comment #12 from Guillermo Gómez 2011-02-08 16:37:24 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: rubygem-state_machine Short Description: Adds support for creating state machines for attributes on any Ruby class Owners: gomix Branches: el6 el5 InitialCC: gomix -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675495] Review Request: parallel - Shell tool for executing jobs in parallel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675495 --- Comment #5 from Golo Fuchert 2011-02-08 16:31:40 EST --- Just to prevent confusion: In the third point (splitting up) with "both packages" I meant GNU parallel and moreutils parallel, using them together would only be possible by renaming. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 676124] Review Request: racket - replacement package for renamed plt-scheme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676124 Gérard Milmeister changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugzilla.redhat.com ||/show_bug.cgi?id=647242 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 676124] New: Review Request: racket - replacement package for renamed plt-scheme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: racket - replacement package for renamed plt-scheme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676124 Summary: Review Request: racket - replacement package for renamed plt-scheme Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: g...@bluewin.ch QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://gemi.fedorapeople.org/racket.spec SRPM URL: http://gemi.fedorapeople.org/racket-5.0.2-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: This is based on the plt-scheme package that I maintained. PLT Scheme has been renamed to racket, so a new package is needed. The SPEC file is almost the same. Any discussions that targeted the plt-scheme package should therefore be redirected to this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674006] Review Request: openni - Library for human-machine Natural Interaction
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674006 --- Comment #4 from Tim Niemueller 2011-02-08 16:30:02 EST --- (In reply to comment #3) > libraries should be deleted explicitly in %prep. This should include Done. > It’s not a problem now, but if you do add version suffixes to the libraries, > you’ll probably have to un and re-register the libraries on upgrade. The > .so.suffix could change with new api versions. Also, is niReg creating a file > somewhere? If so, your package should own it if niReg -u doesn’t delete it > (so > it doesn’t get left behind on uninstall). The libraries are plugins, therefore they don't need version numbers. > I don’t really understand your rationale for leaving the changelog entry > different than the package version number. Changelog E-V-R doesn’t have > anything to do with the source tarball, and the actual version of the package > works out to 1.0.0.25-0.2.git4c9ff978. There shouldn’t be a .fc14 in there > either. I tried to mute rpmlint. But I agree and have removed the dist tag from changelog entries. > [-] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . > Bundled library and changelog notes above Done. > [-] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the > license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the > license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. > > Is there any reason the GPL text is also included? No, removed. > [-] MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries. > See above notes. It didn't, I patched them out. GL and Libs are deleted in %prep now, glh headers are C++ template headers, which are directly compiled into objects. The libraries are BSD licensed and do not seem to be available stand-alone but only as part of some NVidia SDK. > [-] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop > file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in > the > %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need > a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your > explanation. > The niViewer stuff in the samples is creating GUIs, you might want to note > that > you don’t want to include .desktop files. Added note in %files section. New SRPM at http://fedorapeople.org/~timn/robotics/openni-1.0.0.25-0.3.git4c9ff978.fc14.src.rpm, spec changed in place. Changed license to include BSD for glh headers. Renamed samples to examples sub-package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 654007] Review Request: python-simplemediawiki - Extremely low-level wrapper to the MediaWiki API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=654007 Guillermo Gómez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-02-08 16:28:33 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 669311] Review Request: mupdf - A lightweight PDF viewer and toolkit written in portable C
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=669311 Pavel Zhukov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed|2011-02-02 15:59:50 |2011-02-08 16:19:32 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 669311] Review Request: mupdf - A lightweight PDF viewer and toolkit written in portable C
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=669311 --- Comment #36 from Fedora Update System 2011-02-08 16:16:14 EST --- mupdf-0.7-7.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mupdf-0.7-7.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675495] Review Request: parallel - Shell tool for executing jobs in parallel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675495 --- Comment #4 from Golo Fuchert 2011-02-08 15:51:03 EST --- This is a tough one. What I learned so far: - The developer of GNU parallel says that the first version of his program would date back to 2001, but version control was introduced much later. He argues that renaming on a per-distribution basis would cause problems between machines running different distributions, since GNU parallel runs itself on remote machines while distributing the work load. - The problem for the parallel of moreutils seems to be that a lot of other things depend on this. So they are not wanting to rename either. - The Fedora packager of moreutils thinks that splitting up moreutils into a core package and a parallel sub-package is a bad idea, since it might be the case that on a multiuser system both packages ought to be used. - Personally, I really don't like the idea of a conflict between GNU parallel and the moreutils package, since moreutils is a collection of different tools and I can think of users that want to use tools from that, but the GNU implementation of parallel. So, what is the least bad solution? I don't know yet... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 669311] Review Request: mupdf - A lightweight PDF viewer and toolkit written in portable C
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=669311 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 669311] Review Request: mupdf - A lightweight PDF viewer and toolkit written in portable C
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=669311 --- Comment #35 from Fedora Update System 2011-02-08 15:42:47 EST --- mupdf-0.7-6.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mupdf-0.7-6.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 553055] Review Request: gpxe - Open Source network bootloader
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553055 --- Comment #13 from Terje Røsten 2011-02-08 15:39:57 EST --- Hi Jeroen, what is status here now? Do you still want this included? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 612796] Review Request: python-ping - An implementation of the standard ICMP ping in pure Python.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612796 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard||StalledSubmitter --- Comment #33 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-02-08 15:21:45 EST --- Not sure why this was returned to the review queue instead of just being closed, but I've marked it stalled. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 623868] Review Request: abattis-cantarell-fonts - Contemporary humanist sans-serif font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=623868 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rdie...@math.unl.edu Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 669311] Review Request: mupdf - A lightweight PDF viewer and toolkit written in portable C
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=669311 --- Comment #34 from Bill Nottingham 2011-02-08 15:05:48 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 663384] Review Request: scap-workbench - GUI tool that provides scanning, tailoring, editing and validation functionality for SCAP content
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663384 --- Comment #10 from Bill Nottingham 2011-02-08 15:04:32 EST --- f15 is not a valid branch - please resubmit with correct branches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 666222] Review Request: python-speaklater - implements a lazy string for python useful for use with gettext
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666222 --- Comment #10 from Bill Nottingham 2011-02-08 15:05:32 EST --- f15 is not a valid branch - please resubmit with correct branches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 623868] Review Request: abattis-cantarell-fonts - Contemporary humanist sans-serif font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=623868 --- Comment #26 from Bill Nottingham 2011-02-08 15:03:11 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 596138] Review Request: nss-gui - A graphical user interface for NSS security databases
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596138 --- Comment #22 from Bill Nottingham 2011-02-08 15:02:32 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 623868] Review Request: abattis-cantarell-fonts - Contemporary humanist sans-serif font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=623868 --- Comment #25 from Cosimo Cecchi 2011-02-08 14:57:38 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: abattis-cantarell-fonts Short Description: Cantarell, a Humanist sans-serif font family Owners: cosimoc Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 623868] Review Request: abattis-cantarell-fonts - Contemporary humanist sans-serif font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=623868 Cosimo Cecchi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 668591] Review Request: python26-markupsafe - Implements a XML/HTML/XHTML Markup safe string for Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668591 Steve Traylen changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||675628 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675628] Review Request: python26-jinja2 - General purpose template engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675628 Steve Traylen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||steve.tray...@cern.ch Depends on||668591 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 623868] Review Request: abattis-cantarell-fonts - Contemporary humanist sans-serif font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=623868 --- Comment #24 from Stephen John Smoogen 2011-02-08 14:01:14 EST --- *** APPROVED *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 623868] Review Request: abattis-cantarell-fonts - Contemporary humanist sans-serif font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=623868 --- Comment #23 from Cosimo Cecchi 2011-02-08 13:48:32 EST --- Stephen, thanks for the spec patch. Here are updated URLs for the spec and the srpm, which should be good to go. SPEC: http://people.gnome.org/~cosimoc/cantarell-pkg/abattis-cantarell-fonts.spec SRPM: http://people.gnome.org/~cosimoc/cantarell-pkg/abattis-cantarell-fonts-0.0.1-2.fc15.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 623868] Review Request: abattis-cantarell-fonts - Contemporary humanist sans-serif font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=623868 --- Comment #22 from Stephen John Smoogen 2011-02-08 13:35:44 EST --- [This review was done with the patch above so that the rpmlint would hush. The only rpmlint issues left were aspell not knowing how to spell words and COPYING not being Unix eol] Once more unto the breach, dear friends, once more; Or close the wall up with our Fedoran dead. Package Review == Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [1] [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags. [x] Spec uses macros instead of hard-coded directory names. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [-] Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [-] PreReq is not used. [x] Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [2] [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)). [x] Package run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) and the beginning of %install. [-] Package use %makeinstall only when ``make install DESTDIR=...'' doesn't work. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] The spec file handles locales properly. [x] Changelog in prescribed format. [x] Rpmlint output is silent. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [3,4] [x] Sources contain only permissible code or content. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. MD5SUM this package : d47d1ade6e292d90fc5f345db1ee67e7 MD5SUM upstream package : d47d1ade6e292d90fc5f345db1ee67e7 [x] Compiler flags are appropriate. [-] %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [-] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [-] Each %files section contains %defattr. [-] No %config files under /usr. [-] %config files are marked noreplace or the reason is justified. [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install file if it is a GUI application. [5] [-] Package contains a valid .desktop file. [-] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Package contains a SysV-style init script if in need of one. [x] File names are valid UTF-8. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x] Package contains no bundled libraries. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -static subpackage, if present. [x] Package contains no static executables. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x] Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. [x] Package does not genrate any conflict. [x] Package does not contains kernel modules. [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch. [x] Package installs properly. [x] Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [6] === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Package functions as described. [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file
[Bug 623868] Review Request: abattis-cantarell-fonts - Contemporary humanist sans-serif font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=623868 --- Comment #21 from Jared Smith 2011-02-08 13:22:23 EST --- I'm glad to hear that Gnome is working w/ Dave Crossland on this, and that we're making progress on getting it packaged. I'm glad to defer to someone else's spec file -- heaven knows mine wasn't perfect. It looks like the sources on the GNOME infrastructure have the updated license text, so I don't see that as being a blocker any more. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 623868] Review Request: abattis-cantarell-fonts - Contemporary humanist sans-serif font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=623868 --- Comment #20 from Stephen John Smoogen 2011-02-08 12:56:19 EST --- Created attachment 477662 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=477662 Fix to make patch spec to pass reivew To speed this up am adding patch to get this done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 659368] Review Request: luabind - A library that helps create bindings between C++ and Lua
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659368 Jan Kaluža changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jkal...@redhat.com --- Comment #7 from Jan Kaluža 2011-02-08 12:35:51 EST --- What's the state of this one please? I would like to add package which needs luabind. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 623868] Review Request: abattis-cantarell-fonts - Contemporary humanist sans-serif font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=623868 --- Comment #19 from Cosimo Cecchi 2011-02-08 12:16:20 EST --- (In reply to comment #18) > > Cosimo, could you summarize what you have changed in the spec file? We have 3 > spec files now from 3 people with 2 reviews. Nobody will be interested in > doing > another futile review. Of course! - as I mentioned previously, the font is now managed using the GNOME infrastructure, and released as versioned tarballs on our servers, in sync with the GNOME release cycle, so I changed the spec to fetch files from there. - the tarballs contains now both the source files for the font and the binary, there's no need for having multiple 'SourceX' entries in the spec file for each .sfd file, so I removed those. - the fontconfig file is now shipped inside the tarball too, so there's no need for having a separate Source entry for it. - the preferred binary format for this font is OTF now, as that's the format used by the binaries in the tarball too, so I changed the fontforge build lines to use that instead of TTF. - the upstream repository now removed the Oblique variants, so I removed those from this package. - the license of the font is now OFL-only, so I removed the reference to GPL in the spec. > What we don't have is much/any time left, if this is supposed to make it to > F15 > (feature freeze today). I suppose an exception could be granted for a Gnome 3 > dependency, though. Yeah, I guess so, as this is a very important package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 623868] Review Request: abattis-cantarell-fonts - Contemporary humanist sans-serif font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=623868 --- Comment #18 from Michael J Gruber 2011-02-08 11:48:59 EST --- (In reply to comment #17) > So, now Cantarell fonts moved to the GNOME infrastructure for releasing, bug > tracking and version control. The font will be the GNOME 3 default, so it's > now > very important to have it packaged in Fedora. > > I created another updated SPEC file based on the new release, which you can > find here > > SPEC: > http://people.gnome.org/~cosimoc/cantarell-pkg/abattis-cantarell-fonts.spec > SRPM: > http://people.gnome.org/~cosimoc/cantarell-pkg/abattis-cantarell-fonts-0.0.1-1.fc15.src.rpm > > I am proposing as the package maintainer for this package. Cosimo, could you summarize what you have changed in the spec file? We have 3 spec files now from 3 people with 2 reviews. Nobody will be interested in doing another futile review. What we don't have is much/any time left, if this is supposed to make it to F15 (feature freeze today). I suppose an exception could be granted for a Gnome 3 dependency, though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 663384] Review Request: scap-workbench - GUI tool that provides scanning, tailoring, editing and validation functionality for SCAP content
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663384 Peter Vrabec changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pvra...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Peter Vrabec 2011-02-08 11:49:03 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: scap-workbench Short Description: GUI tool that provides scanning, tailoring, editing and validation functionality for SCAP content Owners: mbarabas pvrabec Branches: f14 f15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 623868] Review Request: abattis-cantarell-fonts - Contemporary humanist sans-serif font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=623868 Cosimo Cecchi changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ccec...@redhat.com --- Comment #17 from Cosimo Cecchi 2011-02-08 11:38:31 EST --- So, now Cantarell fonts moved to the GNOME infrastructure for releasing, bug tracking and version control. The font will be the GNOME 3 default, so it's now very important to have it packaged in Fedora. I created another updated SPEC file based on the new release, which you can find here SPEC: http://people.gnome.org/~cosimoc/cantarell-pkg/abattis-cantarell-fonts.spec SRPM: http://people.gnome.org/~cosimoc/cantarell-pkg/abattis-cantarell-fonts-0.0.1-1.fc15.src.rpm I am proposing as the package maintainer for this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 676007] New: Review Request: python26-configobj - ConfigObj for Python 2.6
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python26-configobj - ConfigObj for Python 2.6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676007 Summary: Review Request: python26-configobj - ConfigObj for Python 2.6 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sh...@vecna.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.hmdc.harvard.edu/~shuff/epel/python26-configobj.spec SRPM URL: http://people.hmdc.harvard.edu/~shuff/epel/python26-configobj-4.6.0-1.src.rpm Description: This is a port of the existing python-configobj package (https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/python-configobj), built against Python 2.6. It's intended for EPEL 5 only, since it's unnecessary on RHEL 6 and impossible on RHEL 4. I have not submitted packages to Fedora or EPEL before; I'm looking for a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 676007] Review Request: python26-configobj - ConfigObj for Python 2.6
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676007 Steve Huff changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664624] Review Request: libdmapsharing3 - A DMAP client and server library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664624 --- Comment #4 from Cosimo Cecchi 2011-02-08 10:19:36 EST --- (In reply to comment #3) > Based on Michael's comments, I am going to mark this report WONTFIX. Since the > Rawhide Rhythmbox package has been updated to the version that uses > libdmapsharing-2.9+, I will build only this libdmapsharing series for Rawhide. > See http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2772656. Cosimo, can > you > re-enable the Rhythmbox DAAP plugin once this libdmapsharing build hits > Rawhide? Thanks, I just triggered a DAAP-enabled build in Koji. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675726] Review Request: cdm - Very minimalistic display manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675726 --- Comment #9 from Peter Lemenkov 2011-02-08 10:03:53 EST --- Ok, few more notes: * xinitrc must be installed into %{_datarootdir}/%{name}/ . * Missing requires - dialog, xorg-x11-utils, dbus, xorg-x11-xinit * cdmrc mentions 'awesome' as one of the window managers. Please change it to some more Fedora-specific. * Licensing terms are misleading - the LICENSE file contains GPLv3, but the main script, ./src/cdm, explicitly menions GPLv2+. Please, contact upstream for clarification. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675726] Review Request: cdm - Very minimalistic display manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675726 --- Comment #7 from Mikhail Kulemin 2011-02-08 09:12:15 EST --- Created attachment 477617 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=477617 New spec v3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675726] Review Request: cdm - Very minimalistic display manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675726 --- Comment #8 from Mikhail Kulemin 2011-02-08 09:13:02 EST --- Fixed https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=2784901&name=cdm-0.5.3-3.fc14.src.rpm spec in attachments -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 596138] Review Request: nss-gui - A graphical user interface for NSS security databases
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596138 Kai Engert (kaie) changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #21 from Kai Engert (kaie) 2011-02-08 08:49:45 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: nss-gui Short Description: GUI to manage contents of an NSS database Owners: kengert Branches: f14 el6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 566410] Review Request: snmpcheck - An utility to get information via SNMP protocols
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566410 --- Comment #9 from Fabian Affolter 2011-02-08 08:50:30 EST --- The latest release of snmpcheck is 1.8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675976] New: Review Request: jgoodies-common - Common library shared by JGoodies libraries and applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: jgoodies-common - Common library shared by JGoodies libraries and applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675976 Summary: Review Request: jgoodies-common - Common library shared by JGoodies libraries and applications Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pikachu.2...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://melmorabity.fedorapeople.org/packages/jgoodies-common/jgoodies-common.spec SRPM URL: http://melmorabity.fedorapeople.org/packages/jgoodies-common/jgoodies-common-1.1.1-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: The JGoodies Common library provides convenience code for other JGoodies libraries and applications. Note: This package is required by latest versions of jgoodies libraries (jgoodies-forms/looks in the repos). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675963] Review Request: perl-MDV-Packdrakeng - Simple Archive Extractor/Builder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675963 --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar 2011-02-08 08:50:21 EST --- Source tar ball is original. Ok. Summary verified from lib/MDV/Packdrakeng.pm. Ok. License verified from lib/MDV/Packdrakeng.pm. Ok. No C binding, noarch BuildArch Ok. Description verified from lib/MDV/Packdrakeng.pm. Ok. TODO: BuildRequire perl(File::Path) (lib/MDV/Packdrakeng.pm:23) as the package can dual-live in the future (http://search.cpan.org/~dland/File-Path/). perl(Compress::Zlib) dependency (lib/MDV/Packdrakeng.pm:144) is optional. Ok. FIX: BuildRequire perl(Test::More) to proceed all tests (t/01packdrakeng.t:6). FIX: BuildRequire perl(Digest::MD5) to proceed all tests (t/01packdrakeng.t:7). TODO: BuildRequire perl(Compress::Zlib) to perform all tests (t/02methodusage.t:12). All tests pass. Ok. $ rpmlint perl-MDV-Packdrakeng.spec ../SRPMS/perl-MDV-Packdrakeng-1.13-1.fc14.src.rpm ../RPMS/noarch/perl-MDV-Packdrakeng-1.13-1.fc14.noarch.rpm 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. rpmlint Ok. $ rpm -q -lv -p ../RPMS/noarch/perl-MDV-Packdrakeng-1.13-1.fc14.noarch.rpm drwxr-xr-x2 rootroot0 úno 8 14:38 /usr/share/doc/perl-MDV-Packdrakeng-1.13 -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 4065 srp 9 2007 /usr/share/doc/perl-MDV-Packdrakeng-1.13/ChangeLog -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 228 kvě 6 2007 /usr/share/doc/perl-MDV-Packdrakeng-1.13/README -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 4664 úno 8 14:38 /usr/share/man/man3/MDV::Packdrakeng.3pm.gz -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 1831 úno 8 14:38 /usr/share/man/man3/MDV::Packdrakeng::zlib.3pm.gz drwxr-xr-x2 rootroot0 úno 8 14:38 /usr/share/perl5/MDV drwxr-xr-x2 rootroot0 úno 8 14:38 /usr/share/perl5/MDV/Packdrakeng -rw-r--r--1 rootroot30528 srp 9 2007 /usr/share/perl5/MDV/Packdrakeng.pm -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 7517 srp 9 2007 /usr/share/perl5/MDV/Packdrakeng/zlib.pm File permissions and layout Ok. $ rpm -q --requires -p ../RPMS/noarch/perl-MDV-Packdrakeng-1.13-1.fc14.noarch.rpm | sort | uniq -c 1 perl(base) 1 perl(Compress::Zlib) 1 perl(File::Path) 1 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3) 1 perl(POSIX) 1 perl(strict) 1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 1 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 2 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 Binary requires Ok. rpm -q --provides -p ../RPMS/noarch/perl-MDV-Packdrakeng-1.13-1.fc14.noarch.rpm | sort | uniq -c 1 perl(MDV::Packdrakeng::zlib) 1 perl(MDV::Packdrakeng) = 1.13 1 perl-MDV-Packdrakeng = 1.13-1.fc14 Binary provides Ok. $ resolvedeps-f15 ../RPMS/noarch/perl-MDV-Packdrakeng-1.13-1.fc14.noarch.rpm Binary dependencies resolvable. Ok. FIX: Package does not build in F15 (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2784614). This is due to missing BuildRequires for tests. Othwerwise package is in line with Fedora and perl packaging guidelines. Please correct all `FIX' prefixed issues, consider fixing `TODO' prefixed issues, and provide new spec file. Resolution: Package NOT approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 612796] Review Request: python-ping - An implementation of the standard ICMP ping in pure Python.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612796 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW AssignedTo|fab...@bernewireless.net|nob...@fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675963] Review Request: perl-MDV-Packdrakeng - Simple Archive Extractor/Builder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675963 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||ppi...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ppi...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 596138] Review Request: nss-gui - A graphical user interface for NSS security databases
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596138 --- Comment #20 from Kai Engert (kaie) 2011-02-08 08:03:44 EST --- (In reply to comment #19) > Sorry for taking so long; I have been sick for the past several days. Hope you're recovering quickly > APPROVED Thank you very much -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675963] Review Request: perl-MDV-Packdrakeng - Simple Archive Extractor/Builder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675963 Marcela Mašláňová changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||671389 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675963] New: Review Request: perl-MDV-Packdrakeng - Simple Archive Extractor/Builder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-MDV-Packdrakeng - Simple Archive Extractor/Builder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675963 Summary: Review Request: perl-MDV-Packdrakeng - Simple Archive Extractor/Builder Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmasl...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-MDV-Packdrakeng.spec SRPM: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-MDV-Packdrakeng-1.13-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: MDV::Packdrakeng is a simple indexed archive builder and extractor using standard compression methods. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675726] Review Request: cdm - Very minimalistic display manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675726 --- Comment #6 from Peter Lemenkov 2011-02-08 07:42:53 EST --- Few notes before review: * Please, drop commented out lines in the %install section * Drop the following line as well install -Dm644 src/xinitrc.skel $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/xinitrc.example this file should be installed just as other docs (mark it as %doc in the %files section). * The directory %{_datarootdir}/%{name}/ left unowned. Please apply the following change: - %{_datarootdir}/%{name}/* + %{_datarootdir}/%{name}/ Note - trailing asterisk was removed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 668243] Review Request: libqb - An IPC library for high performance servers.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668243 --- Comment #21 from Angus Salkeld 2011-02-08 07:10:00 EST --- I have also cleaned up (deleted) the global variables and changed the include files section to how you suggested. Here is the new spec & srpm: http://asalkeld.fedorapeople.org/libqb.spec http://asalkeld.fedorapeople.org/libqb-0.4.1-2.fc14.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675914] Review Request: flush - GTK-based BitTorrent client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675914 --- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov 2011-02-08 07:03:43 EST --- Unfotrunately it failed to build in Koji. Please, fix this issue. There are other issues: 1) The directory %{_datadir}/%{name} is left unowned. Please fix the %files section in the following way: - %{_datadir}/%{name}/* + %{_datadir}/%{name}/ Note that I stripped trailing asterisk thus claiming ownership on the entire directory (not only on their contents). 2) The following change *should* be done with patch instead of sed. sed -i -e 's|strerror(e.system_error())|EE(e)|g' \ src/create_torrent_dialog.cpp 3) Please, ensure that none of bundled libaries (dbus-c++, libconfig, libtorrent) are used during building. I suggest you to remove both of then in the %prep section. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 668243] Review Request: libqb - An IPC library for high performance servers.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668243 --- Comment #20 from Angus Salkeld 2011-02-08 07:00:51 EST --- (In reply to comment #17) > (In reply to comment #16) > > (In reply to comment #15) > > > - Did you make sure that there were no dependencies on other headers in > > > the > > > devel > > > subpackage? The devel subpackage only requires pkgconfig. > > > > I believe so, we don't need std headers & man do we? > > Is here a way of checking? I have done rpmlint and koji builds without > > problems. > > Well, the reason is so that when you use these header files in code, the > compiler doesn't throw an error because an #include file couldn't be found. > > I ran the following (very very hacky) shell script from /usr/include in an > extracted version of the RPM: > > for j in $(for i in $(grep -r '#include <' . | \ > sed -e 's/.*#include <\(.*\)>$/\1/'); do find /usr/include | \ > grep $i; done | less); do rpm -qf $j; done | grep -v kernel-headers | \ > grep -v libstdc++-devel | grep -v glibc-headers > > (kernel-headers and glibc-headers are both deps for gcc; libstdc++-devel is a > dep for gcc-g++, so those don't need to be included.) > > Nothing showed up in the output of that script, so I guess you're good. > > >> - Do you have any other pending package reviews, or have you done any > >> informal reviews of other packages? > > > Nope, just this one. > > If you have something else you need to package, I would recommend submitting > that for review and having me take a look at it. My sponsoring you depends on > how well I feel you understand the Fedora packaging guidelines. I think you've > got a pretty good grasp on them, but I generally like to see more than one > package from any submitter. (Alternatively, you can take any package review, > do > an informal review of it, and link to that bug here.) Here is another package (sanlock) to review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675947 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675947] New: sanlock - a shared disk lock manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: sanlock - a shared disk lock manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675947 Summary: sanlock - a shared disk lock manager Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: asalk...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://asalkeld.fedorapeople.org/sanlock.spec SRPM URL: http://asalkeld.fedorapeople.org/sanlock-1.0-2.fc14.src.rpm Description: sanlock uses disk paxos to manage leases on shared storage. Hosts connected to a common SAN can use this to synchronize their access to the shared disks. Other Reviews in progress: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668243 koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2782824 rpmlint -v ./sanlock.spec ./sanlock.spec: I: checking-url https://fedorahosted.org/releases/s/a/sanlock/sanlock-1.0.tar.gz (timeout 10 seconds) 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675914] Review Request: flush - GTK-based BitTorrent client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675914 --- Comment #3 from Peter Lemenkov 2011-02-08 06:44:00 EST --- Koji scratch build for Rawhide (still wip at the moment of writing this): http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2782701 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675914] Review Request: flush - GTK-based BitTorrent client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675914 Peter Lemenkov changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov 2011-02-08 06:40:24 EST --- Unblocking FE-NEEDSPONSOR - I just sponsored Oksana. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675726] Review Request: cdm - Very minimalistic display manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675726 Peter Lemenkov changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #5 from Peter Lemenkov 2011-02-08 06:39:55 EST --- Unblocking FE-NEEDSPONSOR - I just sponsored Mikhail. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675726] Review Request: cdm - Very minimalistic display manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675726 Peter Lemenkov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||lemen...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|lemen...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov 2011-02-08 06:28:50 EST --- I'll review it -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675914] Review Request: flush - GTK-based BitTorrent client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675914 Peter Lemenkov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||lemen...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|lemen...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov 2011-02-08 06:28:18 EST --- I'll review it -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 659082] Review Request: redland-bindings - language bindings for redland
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659082 --- Comment #9 from Thomas Vander Stichele 2011-02-08 06:06:47 EST --- New version at http://thomas.apestaart.org/download/pkg/fedora-14-i386-updates/redland-bindings-1.0.11.1-5.fc14/ I also took the time to integrate the commited versions of my patches because upstream commited fixes - should make it easier to update for the next release. As a result the package now needs autotools to build, which is temporary. I think this resolves all problems you had with the review, so I hope you can approve this one! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 571019] Review Request: libmtag - An advanced C music tagging library with a simple API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571019 --- Comment #11 from Hans de Goede 2011-02-08 04:10:44 EST --- Hi, (In reply to comment #10) > (In reply to comment #9) > > Hmm, it seems the .src.rpm is 404 too. Please fix that, I need to src.rpm to > > complete the review. In the mean time I've done most of the review based on > > the > > .spec file: > > What's the point of providing the .spec file if it's generated from the .spec > and tarball? (both have been provided) > The src.rpm is what eventually will get imported into the buildsystem / package git. By providing it, you allow the reviewer to verify the tarbal as it will get imported. The reviewer can then verify that this matches the one provided by upstream. > Anyway, libmtag: > http://people.freedesktop.org/~felipec/fedora/libmtag.spec > http://people.freedesktop.org/~felipec/fedora/libmtag-0.3.6-1.fc14.src.rpm > Thanks! Looks good now. I'll approve this as soon as I'm ready to sponsor you (once the libmtag-python package is also reviewed). > libmtag-python: > http://people.freedesktop.org/~felipec/fedora/libmtag-python.spec > http://people.freedesktop.org/~felipec/fedora/libmtag-python-0.3.1-1.fc14.src.rpm > Thanks, please file a separate review bug for this, using the usual template and let me know the bz number. Regards, Hans -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675914] Review Request: flush - GTK-based BitTorrent client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675914 Oksana changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675914] New: Review Request: flush - GTK-based BitTorrent client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: flush - GTK-based BitTorrent client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675914 Summary: Review Request: flush - GTK-based BitTorrent client Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: oksana.kurysh...@vdel.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.ossportal.ru/sites/default/files/packages/flush.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ossportal.ru/sites/default/files/packages/flush-0.9.9-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: Flush - A GTK-based BitTorrent client. Features: * Controlling running instance by command line interface. * Running many instances with different configs from the same user. * Automatic copying finished downloads to specified directory. * Setting custom download path for each file of the torrent. * Ability to choose torrent file's character set encoding. * Automatic torrents loading from specified directory. * Automatic pausing and removing old torrents. * Temporary pausing and resuming torrents. * Overall and current session statistics. * Creating your own torrent files. * IP filter. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 448613] Review Request: perl-EV - Wrapper for the libev high-performance event loop library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448613 --- Comment #20 from Mathieu Bridon 2011-02-08 03:39:26 EST --- (In reply to comment #19) > If Nicholas wants to produce an updated package I'll finish the review (since > it's still assigned to me after all this time). I took over the submission from Nicolas (see comment 16) and produced an updated package (see comment 17). The srpm in comment 17 is the one I scratched built in Koji to show that it now uses the system libev (see comment 18). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review