[Bug 676544] Review Request: Pidgin-logviewer - User friendly and intuitive way of viewing chat logs in Pidgin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676544 --- Comment #2 from Praveen Kumar kumarpraveen.nit...@gmail.com 2011-02-11 03:52:35 EST --- Fixed all the issue which Mr. Rahul Sundaram pointed out, here is updated spec file and srpm Spec URL : http://kumarpraveen.fedorapeople.org/pidgin-logviewer/pidgin-logviewer.spec SRPM URL : http://kumarpraveen.fedorapeople.org/pidgin-logviewer/pidgin-logviewer-0.2-2.fc14.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674006] Review Request: openni - Library for human-machine Natural Interaction
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674006 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674006] Review Request: openni - Library for human-machine Natural Interaction
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674006 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-02-11 03:57:40 EST --- openni-1.0.0.25-0.3.git4c9ff978.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openni-1.0.0.25-0.3.git4c9ff978.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674006] Review Request: openni - Library for human-machine Natural Interaction
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674006 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-02-11 04:06:27 EST --- openni-1.0.0.25-0.4.git4c9ff978.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openni-1.0.0.25-0.4.git4c9ff978.el6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 676159] Review Request: crlibm - Correctly Rounded mathematical library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676159 --- Comment #6 from Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich kr...@land.ru 2011-02-11 04:10:11 EST --- 1. Liscence is LGPLv2+, but not LGPLv2. 2. scs_lib bundled in crlibm. As from http://lipforge.ens-lyon.fr/www/crlibm/, This library is independent from CRlibm. You need neither to get permision to bundle this lib with crlibm nor create seperate review for scslib package and use system one. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries, section Exceptions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 676791] New: Review Request: goocanvas2 - goocanvas goodness for Gtk3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: goocanvas2 - goocanvas goodness for Gtk3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676791 Summary: Review Request: goocanvas2 - goocanvas goodness for Gtk3 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: karlthe...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hguemar.fedorapeople.org/packages/goocanvas2.spec SRPM URL: http://hguemar.fedorapeople.org/packages/goocanvas2-1.90.2-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: goocanvas2 is a cairo-based canvas for Gtk3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674006] Review Request: openni - Library for human-machine Natural Interaction
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674006 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-02-11 03:58:59 EST --- openni-1.0.0.25-0.3.git4c9ff978.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openni-1.0.0.25-0.3.git4c9ff978.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 676544] Review Request: Pidgin-logviewer - User friendly and intuitive way of viewing chat logs in Pidgin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676544 --- Comment #3 from Praveen Kumar kumarpraveen.nit...@gmail.com 2011-02-11 05:46:09 EST --- Fixed all the issue which Mr. Rahul Sundaram pointed out, here is updated spec file and srpm Spec URL : http://kumarpraveen.fedorapeople.org/pidgin-logviewer/pidgin-logviewer.spec SRPM URL : http://kumarpraveen.fedorapeople.org/pidgin-logviewer/pidgin-logviewer-0.2-2.fc14.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675914] Review Request: flush - GTK-based BitTorrent client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675914 --- Comment #8 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2011-02-11 06:51:53 EST --- The package still uses internal bundled copies of the following libraries: * dbus-c++ * libconfig * libtorrent You should try to add --enable-system-libconfig and --enable-system-libtorrent to the %configure. Unfortunately, it seems that these commandline switches conflicts with --disable-bundle-package. Also there is no way to drop dependency on dbus-c++ w/o changing configure.ac (and reconfiguring it). Also there is one more issue - with updating icons cache. Take a look at the build logs: ... *** Icon cache not updated. After install please run: *** gtk-update-icon-cache -f -t /usr/share/icons/hicolor ... this also must be fixed. Otherwise looks good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 637360] Review Request: ghc-parameterized-data - Parameterized data library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=637360 --- Comment #3 from Shakthi Kannan shakthim...@gmail.com 2011-02-11 07:51:31 EST --- Lowered required version for ghc-rpm-macros to 0.7.3. SPEC: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/ghc-parameterized-data.spec SRPM: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/ghc-parameterized-data-0.1.5-2.fc14.src.rpm Successful Koji builds for F-13, F-14 respectively: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2832495 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2832498 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 637360] Review Request: ghc-parameterized-data - Parameterized data library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=637360 Shakthi Kannan shakthim...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Shakthi Kannan shakthim...@gmail.com 2011-02-11 07:54:04 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: ghc-parameterized-data Short Description: A parameterized-data library for Haskell Owners: shakthimaan Branches: F-13 F-14 InitialCC: haskell-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 672318] Review Request: python26-m2crypto - Support for using OpenSSL in python scripts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672318 Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com 2011-02-11 08:24:12 EST --- Here it goes: OK: - source matches upstream - builds on EPEL 5 for all platforms Warning: - rpmlint: * W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 33, tab: line 65) Looks good, please fix the spaces/tabs usage – I'm approving it. -- This package (python26-m2crypto) is APPROVED by goldmann -- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 646612] Rename review: drupal-date - drupal6-date
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646612 --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-02-11 08:32:49 EST --- Ah, just saw your comments on drupal6-calendar. Nevermind. SRPMS: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal6-date/drupal6-date-2.7-1.fc14.src.rpm SPEC: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal6-date/drupal6-date.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 676791] Review Request: goocanvas2 - goocanvas goodness for Gtk3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676791 Pierre-YvesChibon pin...@pingoured.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||pin...@pingoured.fr AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|pin...@pingoured.fr Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 646614] Rename review: drupal-calendar - drupal6-calendar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646614 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-02-11 08:38:50 EST --- Done. SRPM: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal6-calendar/drupal6-calendar-2.4-1.fc14.src.rpm SPEC: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal6-calendar/drupal6-calendar.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 676791] Review Request: goocanvas2 - goocanvas goodness for Gtk3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676791
Pierre-YvesChibon pin...@pingoured.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Pierre-YvesChibon pin...@pingoured.fr 2011-02-11 09:05:15
EST ---
[~OK] rpmlint must be run on every package.
rpmlint Downloads/goocanvas2-*
goocanvas2.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) cairo - Cairo, cairn, caird
goocanvas2.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cairo - Cairo, cairn,
caird
goocanvas2.src:15: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 2, tab: line
15)
goocanvas2.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) cairo - Cairo, cairn,
caird
goocanvas2.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cairo - Cairo,
cairn, caird
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings.
[OK] The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[OK] The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption.
[OK] The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
[OK] The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the
Licensing Guidelines.
[OK] The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license.
License is LGPLv2
[OK] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for
the package must be included in %doc.
[OK] The spec file must be written in American English.
[OK] The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[OK] The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
(sha1sum)
sources from the src.rpm: 8f32040accb3b5a96de98c34151750271d30b97c
rpmbuild/SOURCES/goocanvas-1.90.2.tar.bz2
sources from upstream:8f32040accb3b5a96de98c34151750271d30b97c
goocanvas-1.90.2.tar.bz2
[OK] The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at
least one primary architecture.
Built on rawhide:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2832696
[N/A] If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch.
[OK] All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ;
inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional.
[OK] The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the
%find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.
[OK] Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library
files(not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths,
must call ldconfig in %post and %postun.
[OK] Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
[N/A] If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state
this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for
relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is
considered a blocker.
[OK] A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create
a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does
create that directory.
[OK] A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's
%files listings.
[OK] Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with
executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a
%defattr(...) line.
[OK] Each package must consistently use macros.
[OK] The package must contain code, or permissable content.
[N/A] Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage.
The documentation is not big enough
[~OK] If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime
of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run
properly if it is not present.
I think it would be worth to include the AUTHORS NEWS and TODO as %doc
[OK] Header files must be in a -devel package.
[N/A] Static libraries must be in a -static package.
[OK] If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1),
then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel
package.
[OK] In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} =
%{version}-%{release}.
[OK] Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed
in the spec if they are built.
[N/A] Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file,
[Bug 676791] Review Request: goocanvas2 - goocanvas goodness for Gtk3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676791 Haïkel Guémar karlthe...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Haïkel Guémar karlthe...@gmail.com 2011-02-11 09:23:39 EST --- the mixed space and tabs thing is fixed (damn emacs configuration) is fixed, the same for documentation. Thank you ! New Package SCM Request === Package Name: goocanvas2 Short Description: Owners: hguemar Branches: f15 InitialCC: hgue...@fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673585] Review Request: perl-Apache-Htgroup - Manage Apache htgroup files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673585 --- Comment #4 from Steven Hadfield stevenhadfi...@letu.edu 2011-02-11 10:02:56 EST --- Thank you for your assistance. I have made the mentioned changes. Here's the updated URL to the srpm: http://www.letu.edu/people/stevenhadfield/rpm/SRPMS/perl-Apache-Htgroup-1.23-1.fc15.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 676853] New: Review Request: goocanvasmm2 - goocanvasmm2 goodness for Gtk3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: goocanvasmm2 - goocanvasmm2 goodness for Gtk3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676853 Summary: Review Request: goocanvasmm2 - goocanvasmm2 goodness for Gtk3 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: karlthe...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hguemar.fedorapeople.org/packages/goocanvasmm2.spec SRPM URL: http://hguemar.fedorapeople.org/packages/goocanvasmm2-1.90.3-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: C++ interface to goocanvas (Gtkmm30 flavoured) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 637360] Review Request: ghc-parameterized-data - Parameterized data library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=637360 --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-02-11 11:00:59 EST --- Added an f15 branch for you as well. Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 676791] Review Request: goocanvas2 - goocanvas goodness for Gtk3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676791 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-02-11 11:02:48 EST --- You have failed to provide anything for the short description field and you have used an email address instead of a FAS ID for the initialcc field. Please submit a corrected request and re-raise the fedora-cvs flag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 676175] Review Request: fpaste-server - Fedora Pastebin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676175 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-02-11 11:46:13 EST --- Unfortunately this fails to build: Executing(%build): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.bx39S2 Traceback (most recent call last): File setup.py, line 5, in module from setuptools import setup, find_packages ImportError: No module named setuptools RPM build errors: error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.bx39S2 (%build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226536] Merge Review: webalizer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226536 --- Comment #28 from Ruben Kerkhof ru...@rubenkerkhof.com 2011-02-11 11:48:58 EST --- Joe, would you mind looking at Patrice's comments in #21? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 676879] New: Review Request: mpiexec - MPI job launcher that uses the PBS task interface directly
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mpiexec - MPI job launcher that uses the PBS task interface directly https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676879 Summary: Review Request: mpiexec - MPI job launcher that uses the PBS task interface directly Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: christos.triantafylli...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://svn.hellasgrid.gr/svn/code.grid.auth.gr/mpiexec/trunk/mpiexec.spec SRPM URL: http://koji.afroditi.hellasgrid.gr/packages/mpiexec/0.83/2_torque_2.3.13.el5/src/mpiexec-0.83-2_torque_2.3.13.el5.src.rpm Description: Mpiexec gathers node settings from PBS, prepares for the MPI library run environment, and starts tasks through the PBS task manager interface. Attempts to duplicate mpirun as much as possible, while getting everything correct, and being faster than rsh. As a side effect, PBS maintains proper accounting of all tasks of a parallel job, and can terminate everything on job abort. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 676879] Review Request: mpiexec - MPI job launcher that uses the PBS task interface directly
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676879 --- Comment #1 from Christos Triantafyllidis christos.triantafylli...@gmail.com 2011-02-11 11:59:07 EST --- Hm... this is my first package so (if accepted) i'll need sponsorship... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 676175] Review Request: fpaste-server - Fedora Pastebin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676175 --- Comment #2 from Clint Savage her...@gmail.com 2011-02-11 12:05:05 EST --- Oh wow! In all the excitement of getting the rpm to build on my machine, I failed to do a simple scratch build. I'm so embarrassed :/ Well, I've updated the links above with new content and it successfully builds with koji. koji build --scratch dist-f14 SRPMS/fpaste-server-0.1-1.src.rpm Uploading srpm: SRPMS/fpaste-server-0.1-1.src.rpm [] 100% 00:00:03 135.99 KiB 34.48 KiB/sec Created task: 2833280 Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2833280 Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... 2833280 build (dist-f14, fpaste-server-0.1-1.src.rpm): open (x86-04.phx2.fedoraproject.org) 2833281 buildArch (fpaste-server-0.1-1.src.rpm, noarch): open (x86-01.phx2.fedoraproject.org) 2833281 buildArch (fpaste-server-0.1-1.src.rpm, noarch): open (x86-01.phx2.fedoraproject.org) - closed 0 free 1 open 1 done 0 failed 2833280 build (dist-f14, fpaste-server-0.1-1.src.rpm): open (x86-04.phx2.fedoraproject.org) - closed 0 free 0 open 2 done 0 failed 2833280 build (dist-f14, fpaste-server-0.1-1.src.rpm) completed successfully Thanks for doing the review. Clint -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226536] Merge Review: webalizer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226536 --- Comment #29 from Joe Orton jor...@redhat.com 2011-02-11 12:12:03 EST --- Please feel free to implement improvements as you see fit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 598688] Review Request: archivemount - FUSE based filesystem for mounting compressed archives
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598688 --- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-02-11 12:22:15 EST --- archivemount-0.6.1-4.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/archivemount-0.6.1-4.el6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 676879] Review Request: mpiexec - MPI job launcher that uses the PBS task interface directly
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676879 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-02-11 12:19:41 EST --- I suggest that you read these two documents and follow the advice therein: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226536] Merge Review: webalizer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226536 --- Comment #30 from Ruben Kerkhof ru...@rubenkerkhof.com 2011-02-11 12:32:33 EST --- Uh sorry, but unless I'm mistaken how this is supposed to work is that the reviewer reviews the package, and the maintainer does the improvements :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 637360] Review Request: ghc-parameterized-data - Parameterized data library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=637360 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 676791] Review Request: goocanvas2 - goocanvas goodness for Gtk3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676791 Haïkel Guémar karlthe...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Haïkel Guémar karlthe...@gmail.com 2011-02-11 12:24:04 EST --- Sorry, for the InitialCC, i was mislead by the field name New Package SCM Request === Package Name: goocanvas2 Short Description: canvas widget for Gtk+3 Owners: hguemar Branches: f15 InitialCC: hguemar -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675388] Review Request: xmlada - full XML stack for Ada
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675388 --- Comment #5 from Pavel Zhukov pa...@zhukoff.net 2011-02-11 13:10:11 EST --- new build gpr files move from to /usr/share/gpr http://landgraf.fedorapeople.org/packages/requested/xmlada/xmlada.spec http://landgraf.fedorapeople.org/packages/requested/xmlada/xmlada-3.2.1-6.fc14.src.rpm -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 637360] Review Request: ghc-parameterized-data - Parameterized data library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=637360 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-02-11 12:51:32 EST --- ghc-parameterized-data-0.1.5-2.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-parameterized-data-0.1.5-2.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 637360] Review Request: ghc-parameterized-data - Parameterized data library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=637360 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-02-11 12:51:40 EST --- ghc-parameterized-data-0.1.5-2.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-parameterized-data-0.1.5-2.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 676187] Review Request: csync2 - Cluster sync tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676187 Ian Weller i...@ianweller.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||i...@ianweller.org Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|i...@ianweller.org Summary|Review Request: csync2 is a |Review Request: csync2 - |cluster synchronization |Cluster sync tool |tool. | Alias||csync2 Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Ian Weller i...@ianweller.org 2011-02-11 15:13:09 EST --- (In reply to comment #2) Please fix your 'Review Summary' field. Did this for you. I'll review this package as a part of your sponsorship. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 668243] Review Request: libqb - An IPC library for high performance servers.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668243 Ian Weller i...@ianweller.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #23 from Ian Weller i...@ianweller.org 2011-02-11 15:18:46 EST --- (In reply to comment #21) Here is the new spec srpm: http://asalkeld.fedorapeople.org/libqb.spec http://asalkeld.fedorapeople.org/libqb-0.4.1-2.fc14.src.rpm This latest update took care of all of the previous issues. - This package libqb is APPROVED by ianweller - Let's go and take care of your other two packages, and then we'll get you sponsored. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 676187] Review Request: csync2 - Cluster sync tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676187 Ian Weller i...@ianweller.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(asalkeld@redhat.c ||om) --- Comment #4 from Ian Weller i...@ianweller.org 2011-02-11 15:45:54 EST --- Line 33: You create and install to /etc/xinetd.d. You shouldn't be creating this directory; add xinetd to your BuildRequires instead. [ OK ] specfiles match: 5f5579ec396913a6070e57002f61d02ed407cf81 csync2.spec 5f5579ec396913a6070e57002f61d02ed407cf81 csync2.spec.1 [ OK ] source files match upstream: 59b95388d378b659d64d17f7b736068dec7bf7ed csync2-1.34.tar.gz 59b95388d378b659d64d17f7b736068dec7bf7ed csync2-1.34.tar.gz.1 [ OK ] package meets naming and versioning guidelines. [ OK ] spec is properly named, cleanly written, and uses macros consistently. [ OK ] dist tag is present. [ OK ] build root is correct. [ OK ] license field matches the actual license. [ OK ] license is open source-compatible. [ OK ] license text included in package. [ OK ] latest version is being packaged. [FAILED] BuildRequires are proper. See the above message regarding line 33. Otherwise, the build logs from Koji look solid. [ OK ] compiler flags are appropriate. [ OK ] %clean is present. [ OK ] package builds in mock. [ OK ] package installs properly. [ OK ] debuginfo package looks complete. [ ] rpmlint is silent. Obviously, yeah, the no-manual-page-for-binary warning is just a warning. On the other hand, I feel like the PEM files would be better put somewhere in /var/lib, unless the files are meant to be user-configurable. Could you explain more about what these files are used for in the context of this application? What seems most likely is that you'll have to either move them out of /etc, or tag them as %config(noreplace). [FAILED] final provides and requires are sane There is no reason to list openssl and sqlite2, as RPM automatically adds the appropriate library requirements. Keep xinetd in there, though. [ N/A ] %check is present and all tests pass: [ OK ] no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. [ OK ] owns the directories it creates. [ OK ] doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. [ OK ] no duplicates in %files. [ OK ] file permissions are appropriate. [FAILED] scriptlets match those on ScriptletSnippets page. NEVER change /etc/services. This is especially not OK because it's difficult to automatically remove this line after the package is uninstalled. [ OK ] code, not content. [ OK ] documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. [ OK ] %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. [ OK ] no headers. [ OK ] no pkgconfig files. [ OK ] no libtool .la droppings. [ N/A ] desktop files valid and installed properly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 527402] Review Request: gmock - Google C++ Mocking Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527402 Terje Røsten terje...@phys.ntnu.no changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugzilla.redhat.com ||/show_bug.cgi?id=676930 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 539613] Review Request: gmock - Google's framework for writing and using C++ mock classes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539613 Terje Røsten terje...@phys.ntnu.no changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugzilla.redhat.com ||/show_bug.cgi?id=676930 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 676930] Review Request: gmock - Google C++ Mocking Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676930 Terje Røsten terje...@phys.ntnu.no changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugzilla.redhat.com ||/show_bug.cgi?id=527402, ||https://bugzilla.redhat.com ||/show_bug.cgi?id=539613 --- Comment #1 from Terje Røsten terje...@phys.ntnu.no 2011-02-11 16:26:14 EST --- Adding ref to older gmock reviews -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 676930] New: Review Request: gmock - Google C++ Mocking Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gmock - Google C++ Mocking Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676930 Summary: Review Request: gmock - Google C++ Mocking Framework Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: terje...@phys.ntnu.no QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora spec: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/gmock/gmock.spec srpm: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/gmock/gmock-1.5.0-1.fc16.src.rpm koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2833873 desc: Inspired by jMock, EasyMock, and Hamcrest, and designed with C++'s specifics in mind, Google C++ Mocking Framework (or Google Mock for short) is a library for writing and using C++ mock classes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 592487] Review Request: ffgtk - A solution for controlling Fritz!Box or compatible routers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592487 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-02-11 17:02:41 EST --- ffgtk-0.7.8-4.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ffgtk-0.7.8-4.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 592487] Review Request: ffgtk - A solution for controlling Fritz!Box or compatible routers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592487 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 592487] Review Request: ffgtk - A solution for controlling Fritz!Box or compatible routers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592487 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-02-11 17:03:53 EST --- ffgtk-0.7.8-4.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ffgtk-0.7.8-4.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 676939] New: Review Request: libeiskaltdcpp - A client library for the DC file sharing protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libeiskaltdcpp - A client library for the DC file sharing protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676939 Summary: Review Request: libeiskaltdcpp - A client library for the DC file sharing protocol Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tirtha.p.chatter...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.4shared.com/file/A2XmVfEu/libeiskaltdcpp.html SRPM URL: http://www.4shared.com/file/ZAuOC-KF/libeiskaltdcpp-220-1fc14src.html Description: EiskaltDC++ is a cross-platform program that uses the Direct Connect and ADC protocol. It is compatible with other DC clients, such as the original DC from Neomodus, DC++ and derivatives. EiskaltDC++ also inter-operates with all common DC hub software. This package provides the core EiskaltDC++ library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 676941] New: Review Request: eiskaltdcpp-gtk - GTK+ frontend to DC++ client library eiskaltdcpp
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: eiskaltdcpp-gtk - GTK+ frontend to DC++ client library eiskaltdcpp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676941 Summary: Review Request: eiskaltdcpp-gtk - GTK+ frontend to DC++ client library eiskaltdcpp Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tirtha.p.chatter...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.4shared.com/file/4Se1Dk4F/eiskaltdcpp-gtk.html SRPM URL: http://www.4shared.com/file/sAFNlTul/eiskaltdcpp-gtk-220-1fc14src.html Description: EiskaltDC++ is a cross-platform program that uses the Direct Connect and ADC protocol. It is compatible with other DC clients, such as the original DC from Neomodus, DC++ and derivatives. EiskaltDC++ also inter-operates with all common DC hub software. This package provides the GTK+ frontend to the EiskaltDC++ library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 676943] Review Request: eiskaltdcpp-qt - Qt frontend to DC++ client library eiskaltdcpp
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676943 Tirtha Chatterjee tirtha.p.chatter...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |eiskaltdcpp-gtk - Qt|eiskaltdcpp-qt - Qt |frontend to DC++ client |frontend to DC++ client |library eiskaltdcpp |library eiskaltdcpp -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 676943] New: Review Request: eiskaltdcpp-gtk - Qt frontend to DC++ client library eiskaltdcpp
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: eiskaltdcpp-gtk - Qt frontend to DC++ client library eiskaltdcpp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676943 Summary: Review Request: eiskaltdcpp-gtk - Qt frontend to DC++ client library eiskaltdcpp Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tirtha.p.chatter...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.4shared.com/file/lVHzTrXt/eiskaltdcpp-qt.html SRPM URL: http://www.4shared.com/file/09OFKZIX/eiskaltdcpp-qt-220-1fc14src.html Description: EiskaltDC++ is a cross-platform program that uses the Direct Connect and ADC protocol. It is compatible with other DC clients, such as the original DC from Neomodus, DC++ and derivatives. EiskaltDC++ also inter-operates with all common DC hub software. This package provides the Qt frontend to the EiskaltDC++ library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673029] Review Request: sil-nuosu-fonts - The Nuosu SIL Font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673029 --- Comment #6 from Peng Wu p...@redhat.com 2011-02-11 19:28:24 EST --- No, just applied it for safe. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 668052] Review Request: libtpms - Library providing Trusted Platform Module (TPM) functionality
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668052 Stefan Berger stef...@us.ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(stef...@us.ibm.co | |m) | --- Comment #2 from Stefan Berger stef...@us.ibm.com 2011-02-11 20:24:06 EST --- Sorry for the long delay. I now converted the build to produce a dynamic link library. It now has a dependency on freebl. With this we withdraw the previous version of the library. Items 1 - 5 have been addressed and many more modifications have been made to be able to use the makefile. The URLs now are: Spec URL: http://kyoder.users.sourceforge.net/libtpms.spec SRPM URL: http://kyoder.users.sourceforge.net/libtpms-0.5.1-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 462535] Review Request: python-foolscap - Next-generation RPC protocol, intended to replace Perspective Broker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462535 David Cantrell dcantr...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #16 from David Cantrell dcantr...@redhat.com 2011-02-11 20:40:36 EST --- Package Change Request == Package Name: python-foolscap New Branches: el6 Owners: dcantrel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 663018] Review Request: gnome-guitar - A small suite of applications for the guitarist
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663018 Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2...@gmail.com 2011-02-12 00:57:41 EST --- Rawhide build at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=228288 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 663018] Review Request: gnome-guitar - A small suite of applications for the guitarist
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663018 --- Comment #13 from Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2...@gmail.com 2011-02-12 00:56:58 EST --- Package Change Request == Package Name: gnome-guitar New Branches: f15 Owners: narasim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 483434] Review Request: argtable2 - A library for parsing GNU style command line arguments
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483434 Theodore Lee theo...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||theo...@gmail.com --- Comment #24 from Theodore Lee theo...@gmail.com 2011-02-12 01:04:00 EST --- I would be willing to take a shot at packaging this if anyone's still interested. I'll need a sponsor though. I have one pending package review (bug 639518), but I still need to get around to doing some informal reviews. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
