[Bug 656855] Review Request: omping - Utility to test IP multicast functionality

2011-02-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656855

Jan Friesse  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 656855] Review Request: omping - Utility to test IP multicast functionality

2011-02-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656855

--- Comment #14 from Jan Friesse  2011-02-14 02:33:09 EST 
---
Package Change Request
==
Package Name: omping
New Branches: el5
Owners: honzaf
InitialCC: 

Package should be included in RHEL 5, to allow customers to test their network
environment cooperation with OpenAIS/RHCS.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 673839] Review Request: boost141 - The free peer-reviewed portable C++ source libraries

2011-02-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673839

Matej Cepl  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|n...@fedoraproject.org|mc...@redhat.com
  QAContact|mc...@redhat.com|extras...@fedoraproject.org

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 671862] Review Request: synapse - gnome-do alternative (no mono)

2011-02-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671862

--- Comment #6 from Renich Bon Ciric  2011-02-14 
01:45:12 EST ---
umm... the spec is here:
http://renich.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/libzeitgeist.spec

SRPM:
http://renich.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/libzeitgeist-0.3.2-3.fc14.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 676187] Review Request: csync2 - Cluster sync tool

2011-02-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676187

--- Comment #8 from Angus Salkeld  2011-02-13 20:00:47 EST 
---
updated files:
http://asalkeld.fedorapeople.org/csync2-1.34-2.fc14.src.rpm
http://asalkeld.fedorapeople.org/csync2.spec

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 676187] Review Request: csync2 - Cluster sync tool

2011-02-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676187

--- Comment #7 from Angus Salkeld  2011-02-13 19:52:50 EST 
---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Line 33: You create and install to /etc/xinetd.d. You shouldn't be creating
> this directory; add xinetd to your BuildRequires instead.

Well we need this as 2 lines up we: rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
So even if I add BuildRequires: xinetd it gets "cleaned up".

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 676187] Review Request: csync2 - Cluster sync tool

2011-02-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676187

--- Comment #6 from Angus Salkeld  2011-02-13 19:28:56 EST 
---
OK, I will remove the pem files as this is a step that needs to be done by the
user (http://oss.linbit.com/csync2/paper.pdf).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 677181] New: Review Request: latexila - Integrated LaTeX Environment for the GNOME desktop

2011-02-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: latexila - Integrated LaTeX Environment for the GNOME 
desktop

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=677181

   Summary: Review Request: latexila - Integrated LaTeX
Environment for the GNOME desktop
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: medium
  Priority: unspecified
 Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: sebastien.wil...@gmail.com
 QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora


Spec URL: http://latexila.sourceforge.net/latexila.spec
SRPM URL:
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/latexila/latexila-2.0.5-1.fc14.src.rpm
Description:

Hello. There was already a review request for latexila in bug 655883. This is
an update to the 2.0.5 version.

Vala is no longer required because the C code generated is included in the
tarball.

And since it's my first review request, I need a sponsor.

(I'm the main developer of latexila)

LaTeXila is an Integrated LaTeX Environment for GNOME. The main features are:
  * Configurable buttons to compile, convert and view a document in one click
  * LaTeX commands auto-completion
  * Symbol tables (Greek letters, arrows, ...)
  * File browser integrated
  * Template managing
  * Menus with the most commonly used LaTeX commands
  * Easy projects management

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 677181] Review Request: latexila - Integrated LaTeX Environment for the GNOME desktop

2011-02-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=677181

Sébastien Wilmet  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 673839] Review Request: boost141 - The free peer-reviewed portable C++ source libraries

2011-02-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673839

--- Comment #17 from Robert Scheck  2011-02-13 
17:42:12 EST ---
Regarding comment #16: Opened https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/5185

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 673839] Review Request: boost141 - The free peer-reviewed portable C++ source libraries

2011-02-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673839

--- Comment #16 from Matej Cepl  2011-02-13 17:25:49 EST ---
BTW, concerning exit() in libboost_graph_parallel.so ... it is known in Debian
(http://lintian.debian.org/tags/shlib-calls-exit.html), but they didn't do
apparently anything about it, and I cannot find it in the upstream issue
tracker (https://svn.boost.org/trac/) either.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 673839] Review Request: boost141 - The free peer-reviewed portable C++ source libraries

2011-02-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673839

Robert Scheck  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||tcall...@redhat.com
 Blocks||182235(FE-Legal)

--- Comment #15 from Robert Scheck  2011-02-13 
17:12:50 EST ---
Tom, may you please have a look to the source code of boost regarding the
license? Please especially investigate to comment #11 at boost/rational.hpp.
Please also keep in mind, that RHEL 6 is actually shipping the same tarball.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 673839] Review Request: boost141 - The free peer-reviewed portable C++ source libraries

2011-02-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673839

--- Comment #14 from Robert Scheck  2011-02-13 
17:10:21 EST ---
Agreed with Matej on IRC that the next *.spec update will contain a comment
about why we are using another Source0 etc. and put in URL from comment #13
as reference and for verification.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 673839] Review Request: boost141 - The free peer-reviewed portable C++ source libraries

2011-02-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673839

--- Comment #13 from Robert Scheck  2011-02-13 
16:58:39 EST ---
http://gitorious.org/boost/cmake/archive-tarball/1.41.0.cmake0 is delivering
a tarball, which doesn't have same md5sum, but no diff-delta when comparing...

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 666311] Review Request: fritzing - Intuitive EDA platform from prototype to product

2011-02-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666311

Fabian Affolter  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||fab...@bernewireless.net

--- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter  2011-02-13 
16:10:54 EST ---
0.5.0b seams to be the latest version.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 674180] Review Request: knights - A chess board for KDE

2011-02-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674180

Julian Aloofi  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?

--- Comment #15 from Julian Aloofi  2011-02-13 
14:50:50 EST ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: knights
Short Description: A chess board for KDE
Owners: julian
Branches: f13 f14
InitialCC:

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 674180] Review Request: knights - A chess board for KDE

2011-02-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674180

--- Comment #16 from Julian Aloofi  2011-02-13 
14:51:47 EST ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> All right, no further objections.
> 
> 
> Package APPROVED
> 

Thanks for the review! :)
If I can return the favour some day, just send me a mail ;)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 646606] Rename review: drupal-workspace -> drupal6-workspace

2011-02-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646606

--- Comment #12 from Jochen Schmitt  2011-02-13 
14:32:51 EST ---
I have toruble to reference to qt-devel because I have forgooten the Epoch and
have got a try to get qt4-devel which was failed because the version and
release of this package doesn't fit the specificiation in the BR.

Due the Provide/Obsolet statement the package management will handelt both
names - the new and the old one, es they may be equal.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 667208] Review Request: fbg2 - A falling block stacking game

2011-02-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=667208

Mario Blättermann  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||mario.blaetterm...@gmail.co
   ||m

Bug 667208 depends on bug 667205, which changed state.

Bug 667205 Summary: Review Request: radius-engine - A Lua based real-time 2D 
graphics game engine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=667205

   What|Old Value   |New Value

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
 Resolution||ERRATA
 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED

--- Comment #1 from Mario Blättermann  2011-02-13 
12:59:18 EST ---
Nice little game, really!

Your package is OK, no issues from rpmlint. I was able to build it, and it
works fine. Your note about radius-engine is now obsolete, this package is
already updated in F14.

But the package name could be changed, currently it says almost nothing. Well,
the name comes from the tarball's name, but for package searches it is not
really useful.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 572515] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL

2011-02-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=572515

--- Comment #41 from Sylvestre Ledru  2011-02-13 
11:20:58 EST ---
Ping

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 673658] Review Request: R-Rcompression - In-memory decompression for GNU zip and bzip2 formats.

2011-02-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673658

--- Comment #3 from Pierre-YvesChibon  2011-02-13 05:47:27 
EST ---
Spec: http://pingou.fedorapeople.org/RPMs/R-Rcompression.spec
Srpm: http://pingou.fedorapeople.org/RPMs/R-Rcompression-0.92.0-2.fc13.src.rpm

Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2836812

I have contacted upstream to ask his opinion regarding relicensing.
I prefer to hear back from him before getting this package approved.

I will also contact him about this encrypted zip file.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 674180] Review Request: knights - A chess board for KDE

2011-02-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674180

Golo Fuchert  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-review+

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 674180] Review Request: knights - A chess board for KDE

2011-02-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674180

--- Comment #14 from Golo Fuchert  2011-02-13 05:44:08 EST 
---
All right, no further objections.


Package APPROVED


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 673665] Review Request: R-XML - Tools for parsing and generating xml within R and s-plus

2011-02-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673665

--- Comment #3 from Pierre-YvesChibon  2011-02-13 05:26:30 
EST ---
Thanks for the review Haikel !

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 673661] Review Request: R-ALL - Data of T- and B-cell Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia

2011-02-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673661

Pierre-YvesChibon  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 673661] Review Request: R-ALL - Data of T- and B-cell Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia

2011-02-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673661

--- Comment #2 from Pierre-YvesChibon  2011-02-13 05:26:47 
EST ---
Thanks for the review Haikel!

New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: R-ALL
Short Description:  Data of T- and B-cell Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia
Owners: pingou
Branches: f15
InitialCC:

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 673665] Review Request: R-XML - Tools for parsing and generating xml within R and s-plus

2011-02-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673665

--- Comment #2 from Pierre-YvesChibon  2011-02-13 05:25:59 
EST ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: R-XML
Short Description: Tools for parsing and generating xml within r and s-plus
Owners: pingou
Branches: f15
InitialCC:

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 673665] Review Request: R-XML - Tools for parsing and generating xml within R and s-plus

2011-02-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673665

Pierre-YvesChibon  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 672418] Review Request: fpdns - Fingerprint DNS

2011-02-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672418

--- Comment #1 from Frank Crawford  2011-02-13 
04:47:17 EST ---
A package review.

Legend:
+ - Ok.
- - Error.
+/- - It item acceptable, but I strongly recommend enhancement.
= - N/A.

MUST Requirements:

[+] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package

$ rpmlint *.rpm *.spec
1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

Note: rpmlint sometimes reports HTTP Error 404: Not Found, but appears to be an
rpmlint issue, not a package issue.

[+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines
[+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name} [...]
[+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines
[+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license
  and meet the Licensing Guidelines

License is New BSD (no advertising, 3 clause)

[+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the
  actual license
[+] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the 
  license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of 
 the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc
[+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream 
  source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for 
  this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, 
  please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this.

$ md5sum SRC/Net-DNS-Fingerprint-0.9.3.tar.gz
RPM/Net-DNS-Fingerprint-0.9.3.tar.gz 
16f1fbc9e5c8b935a0a48a509dc58899  SRC/Net-DNS-Fingerprint-0.9.3.tar.gz
16f1fbc9e5c8b935a0a48a509dc58899  RPM/Net-DNS-Fingerprint-0.9.3.tar.gz

[+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary 
 rpms on at least one primary architecture

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2740694
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2836720

[=] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on 
  an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the 
  spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST 
  have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package 
  does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST 
  be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line
[+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except 
  for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging 
  Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply 
  common sense.
[=] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by 
  using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly 
  forbidden
[=] MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared 
  library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's 
  default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun.
[=] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must 
  state this fact in the request for review, along with the 
  rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without 
  this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker.
[+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does 
  not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package 
  which does create that directory.
[+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files 
  listing.
[+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should 
  be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section 
  must include a %defattr(...) line.
[+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf
  %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT).

Not required for F-13 and above, but is contained in spec file.

[+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros.
[+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
[=] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The 
  definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but 
  is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or 
  quantity).
[+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the 
  runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the 
  program must run properly if it is not present.
[=] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package.
[=] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package.
[=] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: 
   

[Bug 677089] New: Review Request: php-pear-XML-RPC2 - XML-RPC client/server library

2011-02-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: php-pear-XML-RPC2 - XML-RPC client/server library

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=677089

   Summary: Review Request: php-pear-XML-RPC2 - XML-RPC
client/server library
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
 Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: fed...@famillecollet.com
 QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora


Spec URL: http://remi.fedorapeople.org/php-pear-XML-RPC2.spec
SRPM URL: http://remi.fedorapeople.org/php-pear-XML-RPC2-1.0.6-1.fc14.src.rpm
Description: 
XML_RPC2 is a pear package providing XML_RPC client and server services.
XML-RPC is a simple remote procedure call protocol built using HTTP as
transport and XML as encoding.
As a client library, XML_RPC2 is capable of creating a proxy class which
exposes the methods exported by the server. As a server library, XML_RPC2
is capable of exposing methods from a class or object instance, seamlessly
exporting local methods as remotely callable procedures.

--
rpmlint -s silent
Koji scratch build :
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2836735

This is a new dependency of PHPUnit

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 664817] Review Request: perl-HTML-Selector-XPath - CSS Selector to XPath compiler

2011-02-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664817

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|perl-HTML-Selector-XPath-0. |perl-HTML-Selector-XPath-0.
   |04-1.fc14   |04-1.fc13

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 664817] Review Request: perl-HTML-Selector-XPath - CSS Selector to XPath compiler

2011-02-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664817

--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System  
2011-02-13 03:59:30 EST ---
perl-HTML-Selector-XPath-0.04-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 205269] Review Request: perl-Sub-Exporter - Sophisticated exporter for custom-built routines

2011-02-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=205269

--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  2011-02-13 
04:23:27 EST ---
perl-Sub-Exporter-0.975-1.el4 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL
4.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Sub-Exporter-0.975-1.el4

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 674009] Review Request: bitten - A continuous integration plugin for Trac

2011-02-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674009

--- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov  2011-02-13 04:20:47 EST 
---
Koji scratchbuild for F-15:

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2836716

REVIEW:

Legend: + = PASSED, - = FAILED, 0 = Not Applicable

+/- rpmlint is NOT silent

sulaco ~: rpmlint Desktop/bitten-*
bitten.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) plugin -> plug in, plug-in,
plugging
bitten-master.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) plugin -> plug in,
plug-in, plugging
bitten-master.noarch: W: no-documentation
bitten-master.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/bitten/templates/bitten_admin_configs.html
bitten-master.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/bitten/templates/bitten_config.html
bitten-master.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/bitten/templates/bitten_summary_coverage.html
bitten-master.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/bitten/templates/bitten_admin_master.html
bitten-master.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/bitten/templates/bitten_summary_tests.html
bitten-master.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/bitten/templates/bitten_build.html
bitten-slave.noarch: W: no-documentation
bitten-slave.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/bitten-slave.conf 0640
bitten-slave.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary bitten-slave

^^^ these messages already explained in the comment above.

bitten-slave.noarch: W: dangerous-command-in-%postun userdel

^^^ Deleting users automatically is a very very bad practice and should be
omitted entirely. I strongly encourage you to remove the '%postun slave'
section entirely. Let system administrator to decide whether or not to remove
users from the system.

4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 7 errors, 6 warnings.
sulaco ~: 

+ The package is named according to the  Package Naming Guidelines.
+ The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
+ The package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
+ The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the
Licensing Guidelines.
+ The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license
(3-clause BSD).
+ The file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package, is included
in %doc.
+ The spec file is written in American English.
+ The spec file for the package is legible.
+ The sources used to build the package, match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.

sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES: sha256sum Bitten-0.6b3.tar.gz*
d3167fe928bb8d61e4367d71a6c286915c58f435b155c1886e0fea141f0501a8 
Bitten-0.6b3.tar.gz
d3167fe928bb8d61e4367d71a6c286915c58f435b155c1886e0fea141f0501a8 
Bitten-0.6b3.tar.gz.1
sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES: 

+ The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
primary architecture. See koji links above.
+ All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires.
0 No need to handle locales.
0 No shared library files.
+ The package does NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
+ The package is not designed to be relocatable.
+ The package owns all directories that it creates.
+ The package does not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files
listings.
+ Permissions on files are set properly.
+ The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
+ The package consistently uses macros.
+ The package contains code, or permissible content.
0 No extremely large documentation files.
+ Anything, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the
application.
0 No header files.
0 No static libraries.
0 No pkgconfig(.pc) files.
0 The package doesn't contain library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1).
0 No devel sub-package.
+ The package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives.
0 Not a GUI application.
+ The package does not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
+ At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
+ All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8.


Ok, the only issue is the user removal during uninstalling - please, remove it.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 640205] Review Request: visualvm - Lightweight profiler that integrates many command-line JDK tools

2011-02-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=640205

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||visualvm-1.3.1-1.1.6.fc14
 Resolution||ERRATA
Last Closed||2011-02-13 03:54:42

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 664911] Review Request: perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize-PSGI - Test PSGI programs using WWW::Mechanize

2011-02-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664911

--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  2011-02-13 
03:58:17 EST ---
perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize-PSGI-0.35-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14
stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 640205] Review Request: visualvm - Lightweight profiler that integrates many command-line JDK tools

2011-02-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=640205

--- Comment #52 from Fedora Update System  
2011-02-13 03:54:32 EST ---
visualvm-1.3.1-1.1.6.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. 
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 637212] Review Request: yubikey-ksm - The YubiKey Key Storage Module

2011-02-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=637212

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|yubikey-ksm-1.5-3.fc13  |yubikey-ksm-1.5-3.fc14

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 483728] Review Request: kde-plasma-ihatethecashew - Gets rid of the cashew on KDE Workspace

2011-02-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483728

--- Comment #43 from Fedora Update System  
2011-02-13 03:54:01 EST ---
kde-plasma-ihatethecashew-0.4-2.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 664817] Review Request: perl-HTML-Selector-XPath - CSS Selector to XPath compiler

2011-02-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664817

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-HTML-Selector-XPath-0.
   ||04-1.fc14
 Resolution||ERRATA
Last Closed||2011-02-13 03:56:53

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 664911] Review Request: perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize-PSGI - Test PSGI programs using WWW::Mechanize

2011-02-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664911

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize-PSG |perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize-PSG
   |I-0.35-1.fc13   |I-0.35-1.fc14

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 483728] Review Request: kde-plasma-ihatethecashew - Gets rid of the cashew on KDE Workspace

2011-02-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483728

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|kde-plasma-ihatethecashew-0 |kde-plasma-ihatethecashew-0
   |.4-2.fc13   |.4-2.fc14

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 637213] Review Request: yubikey-val - The YubiKey Validation Server

2011-02-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=637213

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|yubikey-val-2.7-2.fc14  |yubikey-val-2.7-2.fc13

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 664817] Review Request: perl-HTML-Selector-XPath - CSS Selector to XPath compiler

2011-02-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664817

--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System  
2011-02-13 03:56:47 EST ---
perl-HTML-Selector-XPath-0.04-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 637213] Review Request: yubikey-val - The YubiKey Validation Server

2011-02-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=637213

--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System  
2011-02-13 03:54:17 EST ---
yubikey-val-2.7-2.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository.  If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 637212] Review Request: yubikey-ksm - The YubiKey Key Storage Module

2011-02-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=637212

--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System  
2011-02-13 03:55:26 EST ---
yubikey-ksm-1.5-3.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository.  If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 637360] Review Request: ghc-parameterized-data - Parameterized data library

2011-02-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=637360

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  2011-02-13 
03:52:04 EST ---
ghc-parameterized-data-0.1.5-2.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 testing
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update ghc-parameterized-data'.  You
can provide feedback for this update here:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-parameterized-data-0.1.5-2.fc13

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 664911] Review Request: perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize-PSGI - Test PSGI programs using WWW::Mechanize

2011-02-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664911

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize-PSG
   ||I-0.35-1.fc13
 Resolution||ERRATA
Last Closed||2011-02-13 03:51:06

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 637213] Review Request: yubikey-val - The YubiKey Validation Server

2011-02-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=637213

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|yubikey-val-2.7-2.el6   |yubikey-val-2.7-2.fc14

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 674006] Review Request: openni - Library for human-machine Natural Interaction

2011-02-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674006

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  
2011-02-13 03:53:11 EST ---
openni-1.0.0.25-0.3.git4c9ff978.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update openni'.  You can provide
feedback for this update here:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openni-1.0.0.25-0.3.git4c9ff978.fc14

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 483728] Review Request: kde-plasma-ihatethecashew - Gets rid of the cashew on KDE Workspace

2011-02-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483728

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|0.4-1.fc11  |kde-plasma-ihatethecashew-0
   ||.4-2.fc13

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 664911] Review Request: perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize-PSGI - Test PSGI programs using WWW::Mechanize

2011-02-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664911

--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  2011-02-13 
03:51:01 EST ---
perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize-PSGI-0.35-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13
stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 637213] Review Request: yubikey-val - The YubiKey Validation Server

2011-02-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=637213

--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System  
2011-02-13 03:49:44 EST ---
yubikey-val-2.7-2.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository.  If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 637212] Review Request: yubikey-ksm - The YubiKey Key Storage Module

2011-02-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=637212

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|yubikey-ksm-1.5-3.el6   |yubikey-ksm-1.5-3.fc13

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 483728] Review Request: kde-plasma-ihatethecashew - Gets rid of the cashew on KDE Workspace

2011-02-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483728

--- Comment #42 from Fedora Update System  
2011-02-13 03:48:52 EST ---
kde-plasma-ihatethecashew-0.4-2.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 637212] Review Request: yubikey-ksm - The YubiKey Key Storage Module

2011-02-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=637212

--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System  
2011-02-13 03:47:45 EST ---
yubikey-ksm-1.5-3.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository.  If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review