[Bug 677693] Review Request: tintin - TinTin++, aka tt++, is a free MUD client.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=677693
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com 2011-02-16 03:11:19 EST ---
Spec file changes:
--- tintin.spec 2011-02-15 18:26:41.0 +0100
+++ tintin.spec.1 2011-02-15 19:15:50.0 +0100
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: tintin
Version:2.00.5
-Release:2%{?dist}
+Release:3%{?dist}
Summary:TinTin++, aka tt++, is a free MUD client
Group: Applications/Internet
License:GPLv2+
@@ -43,6 +43,7 @@
chmod 644 SCRIPTS
chmod 644 docs/* mv -v docs/* .
chmod 644 mods/*.mods mv -v mods/*.mods .
+iconv -f latin1 -t utf8 igr.mods igr.mods.utf8 mv igr.mods.utf8 igr.mods
%files
%defattr(-,root,root,-)
@@ -57,6 +58,9 @@
%doc SCRIPTS
%changelog
+* Tue Feb 15 2011 Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com - 2.00.5-3
+- igr.mods now gets converted to proper utf8
+
* Tue Feb 15 2011 Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com - 2.00.5-2
- Source corrected
- Description spelling corrected
FIX: Convert igr.mods into UTF-8.
+iconv -f latin1 -t utf8 igr.mods igr.mods.utf8 mv igr.mods.utf8 igr.mods
Ok.
$ rpmlint tintin.spec ../SRPMS/tintin-2.00.5-3.fc14.src.rpm
../RPMS/x86_64/tintin-2.00.5-3.fc14.x86_64.rpm
../RPMS/noarch/tintin-doc-2.00.5-3.fc14.noarch.rpm
tintin.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) tt - rt, tr, t
tintin.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US tt - rt, tr, t
tintin.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) tt - rt, tr, t
tintin.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US tt - rt, tr, t
tintin.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary tt++
tintin-doc.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US tt - rt, tr, t
3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings.
rpmlint Ok.
Package builds in F16
(http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2843512). Ok.
Package is in line with Fedora packaging guidelines.
Resolution: Package APPROVED.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 676188] Review Request: qmidiarp - an arpeggiator, sequencer and MIDI LFO for ALSA
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676188
--- Comment #4 from Martin Gieseking martin.giesek...@uos.de 2011-02-16
03:16:30 EST ---
Hi Brendan,
the package looks almost fine. Please adapt the scriptlet parts related to
updating the icon cache according to
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache
touch and gtk-update-icon-cache should be applied to the top level icon
directory (%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor).
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 650667] Review Request: hitori - Hitori game for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=650667 --- Comment #15 from Martin Gieseking martin.giesek...@uos.de 2011-02-16 03:32:29 EST --- Yes, it's hard to find any documentation on how to add translated summaries and descriptions to the spec. Nonetheless, you did it correctly, so they should work properly. The guideline not to repeat the package name in the Summary does not apply to the %description. Thus, you may use Hitori-Puzzle (or the like) instead of Puzzle dieses Namens for example. Please also add the ChangeLog files to the package (with %doc). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 677693] Review Request: tintin - TinTin++, aka tt++, is a free MUD client.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=677693 Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com 2011-02-16 03:32:45 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: tintin Short Description: TinTin++, aka tt++, is a free MUD client Owners: psabata Branches: f14 f15 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226536] Merge Review: webalizer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226536 --- Comment #34 from Joe Orton jor...@redhat.com 2011-02-16 03:46:32 EST --- If you dump random feature requests in a Merge Review bug and think that will inspire me to stop working on *bugs which actually affect our users* and jump to it, you are sadly mistaken. In fact, it only winds me up. If you want to improve the package, improve the package. If you are not a provenpackager, request commit privs and I'll ack them. If you commit changes I will get mailed the diffs and can review them. This stuff is not rocket science. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 676941] Review Request: eiskaltdcpp-gtk - GTK+ frontend to DC++ client library eiskaltdcpp
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676941 Martin Gieseking martin.giesek...@uos.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||martin.giesek...@uos.de Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 676939] Review Request: libeiskaltdcpp - A client library for the DC file sharing protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676939 Martin Gieseking martin.giesek...@uos.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||martin.giesek...@uos.de Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) --- Comment #1 from Martin Gieseking martin.giesek...@uos.de 2011-02-16 04:11:02 EST --- Hi, since you're not a member of the Fedora packager group yet (as far as I can see), you need a sponsor who approves you. Here are some more information on how to join the packager group: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored BTW, if you don't have access to a web server to upload your files to, you can also use something like Dropbox for example. Downloading files from a filehoster is pretty annoying and might prevent reviewers from taking a look at your submission. Please provide direct links to the SRPM and the spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 676943] Review Request: eiskaltdcpp-qt - Qt frontend to DC++ client library eiskaltdcpp
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676943 Martin Gieseking martin.giesek...@uos.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||martin.giesek...@uos.de Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673661] Review Request: R-ALL - Data of T- and B-cell Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673661 --- Comment #4 from Pierre-YvesChibon pin...@pingoured.fr 2011-02-16 04:15:03 EST --- I have mailed upstream and will wait for his confirmation regarding the licence before importing the package. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673665] Review Request: R-XML - Tools for parsing and generating xml within R and s-plus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673665 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-02-16 04:33:51 EST --- R-XML-3.2.0-2.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/R-XML-3.2.0-2.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673665] Review Request: R-XML - Tools for parsing and generating xml within R and s-plus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673665 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 528379] Review Request: gnunet-fuse - FUSE filesystem for GNUnet
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528379 Bug 528379 depends on bug 528332, which changed state. Bug 528332 Summary: Review Request: GNUnet - Secure peer-to-peer networking framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528332 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||NOTABUG Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 528333] Review Request: gnunet-gtk - GNUnet GTK+ User Interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528333 Bug 528333 depends on bug 528332, which changed state. Bug 528332 Summary: Review Request: GNUnet - Secure peer-to-peer networking framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528332 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||NOTABUG Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 528333] Review Request: gnunet-gtk - GNUnet GTK+ User Interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528333 Felix Kaechele fe...@fetzig.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Blocks||201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution||NOTABUG Last Closed||2011-02-16 04:40:55 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 528379] Review Request: gnunet-fuse - FUSE filesystem for GNUnet
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528379 Felix Kaechele fe...@fetzig.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks||201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution||NOTABUG Last Closed||2011-02-16 04:41:02 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 528332] Review Request: GNUnet - Secure peer-to-peer networking framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528332 Felix Kaechele fe...@fetzig.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Blocks||201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution||NOTABUG Last Closed||2011-02-16 04:40:06 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 669407] Review Request: ledmon - LED control app for Intel(R) storage controllers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=669407 Jiri Moskovcak jmosk...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-02-16 04:45:12 --- Comment #11 from Jiri Moskovcak jmosk...@redhat.com 2011-02-16 04:45:12 EST --- Packages pushed to rawhide and F14 - closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 668197] Review Request: ledctl - LED control app for Intel(R) storage controllers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668197 Jiri Moskovcak jmosk...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-02-16 04:46:40 --- Comment #8 from Jiri Moskovcak jmosk...@redhat.com 2011-02-16 04:46:40 EST --- This package has been obsoleted by ledmon - closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 676791] Review Request: goocanvas2 - goocanvas goodness for Gtk3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676791 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 676791] Review Request: goocanvas2 - goocanvas goodness for Gtk3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676791 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-02-16 05:16:38 EST --- goocanvas2-1.90.2-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/goocanvas2-1.90.2-1.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 502477] Review Request: arista - Easy to use multimedia transcoder for the GNOME Desktop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502477 Valent Turkovic valent.turko...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo? --- Comment #26 from Valent Turkovic valent.turko...@gmail.com 2011-02-16 05:27:48 EST --- What is the reported (if any) anybody send to upstream, please show which issue you reported in ther bugzilla so that I can join in the discussion: https://github.com/danielgtaylor/arista/issues -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 677943] Review Request: liblouis - Braille translation and back-translation library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=677943 Martin Gieseking martin.giesek...@uos.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lbj...@broadpark.no --- Comment #1 from Martin Gieseking martin.giesek...@uos.de 2011-02-16 05:33:06 EST --- *** Bug 597597 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 615783] Review Request: liblouisxml - Translate XML files into proper Braille
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615783 Bug 615783 depends on bug 597597, which changed state. Bug 597597 Summary: Review Request: liblouis - A Braille translator and back-translator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597597 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||DUPLICATE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 597597] Review Request: liblouis - A Braille translator and back-translator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597597 Martin Gieseking martin.giesek...@uos.de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||DUPLICATE Flag|fedora-review? | Last Closed||2011-02-16 05:33:06 --- Comment #13 from Martin Gieseking martin.giesek...@uos.de 2011-02-16 05:33:06 EST --- Closing this bug in agreement with Lars. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 677943 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 677943] New: Review Request: liblouis - Braille translation and back-translation library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: liblouis - Braille translation and back-translation library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=677943 Summary: Review Request: liblouis - Braille translation and back-translation library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: martin.giesek...@uos.de QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mgieseki.fedorapeople.org/liblouis/liblouis.spec SRPM URL: http://mgieseki.fedorapeople.org/liblouis/liblouis-2.2.0-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: Liblouis is an open-source braille translator and back-translator. It features support for computer and literary braille, supports contracted and uncontracted translation for many, many languages and has support for hyphenation. New languages can easily be added through tables that support a rule- or dictionary based approach. Liblouis also supports math braille (Nemeth and Marburg). Liblouis is based on the translation routines in the BRLTTY screenreader for Linux. It has, however, gone far beyond these routines. The library is named in honor of Louis Braille. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 677946] New: Review Request: liblouisutdml - Braille transcription library for UTDML documents
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: liblouisutdml - Braille transcription library for UTDML documents https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=677946 Summary: Review Request: liblouisutdml - Braille transcription library for UTDML documents Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: martin.giesek...@uos.de QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mgieseki.fedorapeople.org/liblouisutdml/liblouisutdml.spec SRPM URL: http://mgieseki.fedorapeople.org/liblouisutdml/liblouisutdml-1.7.0-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: This is a library intended to provide complete braille transcription services for UTDML (Unified Tactile Document Markup Language) documents. It translates into appropriate braille codes and formats according to its style sheet and the specifications in the document. liblouisutdml is the successor of liblouisxml. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 677943] Review Request: liblouis - Braille translation and back-translation library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=677943 Martin Gieseking martin.giesek...@uos.de changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||677946 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 677946] Review Request: liblouisutdml - Braille transcription library for UTDML documents
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=677946 Martin Gieseking martin.giesek...@uos.de changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||677943 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 677946] Review Request: liblouisutdml - Braille transcription library for UTDML documents
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=677946 Martin Gieseking martin.giesek...@uos.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lbj...@broadpark.no --- Comment #1 from Martin Gieseking martin.giesek...@uos.de 2011-02-16 05:41:22 EST --- *** Bug 615783 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 502477] Review Request: arista - Easy to use multimedia transcoder for the GNOME Desktop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502477 Valent Turkovic valent.turko...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #27 from Valent Turkovic valent.turko...@gmail.com 2011-02-16 05:42:35 EST --- (In reply to comment #21) You will have to report it upstream since this package is not in Fedora yet. You might have to try the latest version first. But if I have RPM Fusion repo enabled then PackageKit should find gstreamer faack component (gstreamer-plugins-bad-nonfree) right? Please just point me in the right direction. Should I report this as PackageKit bug because it is not finding it or Arista is looking for wrong package, or is the issue with RPM Fusion package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 502477] Review Request: arista - Easy to use multimedia transcoder for the GNOME Desktop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502477 --- Comment #28 from Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com 2011-02-16 07:42:09 EST --- Do take such discussions offlist. It has no connection to a review request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 670999] Review Request: perl-MongoDB - Database driver
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670999 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-02-16 08:16:15 EST --- perl-MongoDB-0.41-3.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-MongoDB-0.41-3.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 670999] Review Request: perl-MongoDB - Database driver
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670999 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-02-16 08:15:26 EST --- perl-MongoDB-0.41-3.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-MongoDB-0.41-3.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 670999] Review Request: perl-MongoDB - Database driver
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670999 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED Bug 670999 depends on bug 670997, which changed state. Bug 670997 Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-Types - Validate and convert data types https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670997 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||ERRATA Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674152] Review Request: mingw32-matahari - Matahari QMF Agents for Windows guests
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674152 Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #4 from Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net 2011-02-16 08:21:42 EST --- (In reply to comment #3) MUST: rpmlint must be run on the source rpm and all binary rpms the build produces. The output should be posted in the review.[1] Needs this output I think you're supposed to provide that but here it is anyway: mingw32-matahari.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ovirt - overt, oviduct, oviform mingw32-matahari.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US qpid - quid, sapid, rapid mingw32-matahari.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ovirt - overt, oviduct, oviform mingw32-matahari.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US qpid - quid, sapid, rapid mingw32-matahari.src: W: invalid-url Source0: matahari-matahari-060266b.tgz mingw32-matahari.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: matahari-matahari-060266b.tgz 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. The spelling errors are wrong and the spec explains how to obtain the tarball. [snip] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [3] Needs GPLv2+ Fixed. SRPM: http://www.clusterlabs.org/~beekhof/mingw32-matahari-0.4.0-0.12.060266b.git.fc14.src.rpm SPEC: http://www.clusterlabs.org/~beekhof/mingw32-matahari.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674152] Review Request: mingw32-matahari - Matahari QMF Agents for Windows guests
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674152 Adam Stokes asto...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674152] Review Request: mingw32-matahari - Matahari QMF Agents for Windows guests
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674152 Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net 2011-02-16 08:27:13 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: mingw32-matahari Short Description: Matahari QMF Agents for Windows guests Owners: beekhof astokes Branches: F14 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 677693] Review Request: tintin - TinTin++, aka tt++, is a free MUD client.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=677693 William Lima wl...@primate.com.br changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wl...@primate.com.br --- Comment #7 from William Lima wl...@primate.com.br 2011-02-16 08:37:24 EST --- Please change your Group tag to Amusements/Games. Did you asked the upstream author to fix permissions on doc files? Consider using %doc %attr instead. Why not keep mods subdir? ### chmod 644 docs/* mv -v docs/* . ### There is no need to move files from docs/ ... Just add an entry for docs/* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226536] Merge Review: webalizer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226536 Ruben Kerkhof ru...@rubenkerkhof.com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|ru...@rubenkerkhof.com |nob...@fedoraproject.org --- Comment #35 from Ruben Kerkhof ru...@rubenkerkhof.com 2011-02-16 08:44:34 EST --- Ok, that's not nice. I've been very patient for about 4 years now, and I jusked asked you to look at some comments. I never dumped random feature requests on you, and just like you I rather spend time working on real bugs in my own packages. If you don't have time to maintain webalizer, just orphan it and let someone pick it up who actually cares. Anyway, find yourself another reviewer. I have more important things to do. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 643679] Review Request: globus-gridmap-callout-error - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gridmap Callout Errors
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=643679 Dennis van Dok denni...@nikhef.nl changed: What|Removed |Added CC||denni...@nikhef.nl --- Comment #1 from Dennis van Dok denni...@nikhef.nl 2011-02-16 08:58:23 EST --- Unpacking the source rpm failed for me: rpm -i globus-gridmap-callout-error-0.3-1.fc12.src.rpm warning: user ellert does not exist - using root warning: group ellert does not exist - using root error: unpacking of archive failed on file /home/dennisvd/rpmbuild/SOURCES/epstopdf-2.9.5gw;4d5bd741: cpio: MD5 sum mismatch What is epstopdf doing in this src.rpm anyway? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 518441] Review Request: ike - Shrew Soft VPN Client For Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518441 --- Comment #28 from nucleo alekc...@googlemail.com 2011-02-16 09:21:37 EST --- What known about plans fro making 2.2.0 stable release or RC's? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 670999] Review Request: perl-MongoDB - Database driver
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670999 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-02-16 09:20:48 EST --- perl-MongoDB-0.41-3.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-MongoDB'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-MongoDB-0.41-3.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673665] Review Request: R-XML - Tools for parsing and generating xml within R and s-plus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673665 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-02-16 09:20:53 EST --- R-XML-3.2.0-2.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update R-XML'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/R-XML-3.2.0-2.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 677693] Review Request: tintin - TinTin++, aka tt++, is a free MUD client.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=677693
--- Comment #8 from Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com 2011-02-16 09:29:10 EST ---
(In reply to comment #7)
Please change your Group tag to Amusements/Games.
I wasn't sure about what category to choose. TinTin++ isn't actually a game,
just a client. In theory, it could be used to access other services as well.
Did you asked the upstream author to fix permissions on doc files?
Not yet.
Consider using %doc %attr instead.
Why not keep mods subdir?
###
chmod 644 docs/* mv -v docs/* .
###
There is no need to move files from docs/ ... Just add an entry for docs/*
Would you find this okay?
--- tintin.spec 2011-02-15 19:06:36.085563092 +0100
+++ tintin.spec.new 2011-02-16 15:27:17.439563027 +0100
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: tintin
Version:2.00.5
-Release:3%{?dist}
+Release:4%{?dist}
Summary:TinTin++, aka tt++, is a free MUD client
Group: Applications/Internet
License:GPLv2+
@@ -38,26 +38,28 @@
%install
cd src
make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot}
-cd ..
-chmod 644 COPYING CREDITS FAQ INSTALL README
-chmod 644 SCRIPTS
-chmod 644 docs/* mv -v docs/* .
-chmod 644 mods/*.mods mv -v mods/*.mods .
+cd ../mods
iconv -f latin1 -t utf8 igr.mods igr.mods.utf8 mv igr.mods.utf8 igr.mods
%files
%defattr(-,root,root,-)
-%doc COPYING CREDITS FAQ INSTALL README *.mods
+%doc %attr(0644,root,root) COPYING
+%doc %attr(0644,root,root) CREDITS FAQ INSTALL README
+%doc %attr(0755,root,root) mods/
+%doc %attr(0644,root,root) mods/*
%{_bindir}/tt++
%files doc
%defattr(-,root,root,-)
-%doc COPYING
-%doc chat_protocol.txt
-%doc tintin19.txt
-%doc SCRIPTS
+%doc %attr(0644,root,root) COPYING
+%doc %attr(0644,root,root) SCRIPTS
+%doc %attr(0755,root,root) docs
+%doc %attr(0644,root,root) docs/*
%changelog
+* Wed Feb 16 2011 Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com - 2.00.5-4
+- Changed documentation files structure, removed chmod's in favor of attr's
+
* Tue Feb 15 2011 Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com - 2.00.5-3
- igr.mods now gets converted to proper utf8
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 672246] Review Request: perl-Statistics-Basic - A collection of very basic statistics modules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672246 --- Comment #8 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com 2011-02-16 09:44:16 EST --- Really? Nasty RPM. I thought unversioned Provides never satisfied versioned Requires. Is it a feature, or should I report it as a bug to rpm? Nevertheless I fix it in perl-Statistics-Basic-1.6602-3. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 677693] Review Request: tintin - TinTin++, aka tt++, is a free MUD client.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=677693 --- Comment #10 from Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com 2011-02-16 10:10:32 EST --- William, upstream ships the docs directory with 0711 permissions; I have to change this if I want to include the directory without moving the files out of it, don't I? Ad doc files on one line: this is just a cosmetic change; I like to separate certain files from others if they are e.g. a different documentation category. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 666656] Review Request: praat - analyze, synthesize, and manipulate speech.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=56 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard||NotReady -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 643679] Review Request: globus-gridmap-callout-error - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gridmap Callout Errors
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=643679 --- Comment #2 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se 2011-02-16 10:26:31 EST --- Are you trying to build on RHEL/SL/CentOS 5? RHEL 5 has an older version of rpm, that can not verify the SRPM created on Fedora 12 because it uses newer a checksum algorithm. I downloaded the SRPM and it installed without problem on Fedora 14 for me. If I try to install it on CentOS 5 I get a similar error as you. The epstopdf is there for working around a bug in RHEL5, as explained in the specfile: # This is a workaround for the broken epstopdf script in RHEL5 # See: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450388 Source9: epstopdf-2.9.5gw -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 677693] Review Request: tintin - TinTin++, aka tt++, is a free MUD client.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=677693
--- Comment #11 from William Lima wl...@primate.com.br 2011-02-16 10:47:57
EST ---
(In reply to comment #10)
upstream ships the docs directory with 0711 permissions; I have to change this
if I want to include the directory without moving the files out of it, don't
I?
nope.
%files
%defattr(-,root,root,755)
%doc %attr(0644,root,root) COPYING CREDITS FAQ INSTALL README
%doc %attr(0755,root,root) mods
%{_bindir}/tt++
%files doc
%defattr(-,root,root,755)
%doc %attr(0644,root,root) COPYING
%doc %attr(0644,root,root) SCRIPTS
%doc %attr(0644,root,root) docs/*
Ad doc files on one line: this is just a cosmetic change; I like to separate
certain files from others if they are e.g. a different documentation
category.
yep ;)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 672246] Review Request: perl-Statistics-Basic - A collection of very basic statistics modules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672246 --- Comment #9 from Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org 2011-02-16 11:02:07 EST --- (In reply to comment #8) Really? Nasty RPM. I thought unversioned Provides never satisfied versioned Requires. Is it a feature, or should I report it as a bug to rpm? This has always been the case, and it's why rpmlint will complain if there is both a versioned and an unversioned provide for something in a package. It's not always possible to determine the version of something, which is why it's not a bug or even an rpmlint issue for an automatically generated provide to be unversioned normally. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 677693] Review Request: tintin - TinTin++, aka tt++, is a free MUD client.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=677693
--- Comment #12 from Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com 2011-02-16 11:16:58 EST
---
(In reply to comment #11)
(In reply to comment #10)
upstream ships the docs directory with 0711 permissions; I have to change
this
if I want to include the directory without moving the files out of it,
don't I?
nope.
%files
%defattr(-,root,root,755)
%doc %attr(0644,root,root) COPYING CREDITS FAQ INSTALL README
%doc %attr(0755,root,root) mods
%{_bindir}/tt++
%files doc
%defattr(-,root,root,755)
%doc %attr(0644,root,root) COPYING
%doc %attr(0644,root,root) SCRIPTS
%doc %attr(0644,root,root) docs/*
If I use this, I get some weird results
# ls -ld /usr/share/doc/tintin-*
drw-r--r-- 3 root root 4096 Feb 16 17:11 /usr/share/doc/tintin-2.00.5
drw-r--r-- 2 root root 4096 Feb 16 17:11 /usr/share/doc/tintin-doc-2.00.5
# ls -l /usr/share/doc/tintin-2.00.5/
total 48
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 18009 Jul 5 2009 COPYING
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1916 Dec 28 18:10 CREDITS
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4840 Dec 28 18:37 FAQ
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1209 Aug 2 2009 INSTALL
drw-r--r-- 2 root root 4096 Feb 16 17:11 mods
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 6736 Dec 28 18:40 README
Could you tell why executable bits aren't set?
I guess it could be caused by some mask in the case of the mods directory but
the parent directories in docdir scare me.
(current, stable F-14)
Ad doc files on one line: this is just a cosmetic change; I like to separate
certain files from others if they are e.g. a different documentation
category.
yep ;)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 677693] Review Request: tintin - TinTin++, aka tt++, is a free MUD client.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=677693 --- Comment #13 from Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com 2011-02-16 11:20:57 EST --- Never mind, I missed the %defattr there. Thanks for pointing this out, I'll include it with newpackage updates. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 672246] Review Request: perl-Statistics-Basic - A collection of very basic statistics modules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672246 --- Comment #10 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com 2011-02-16 11:56:58 EST --- (In reply to comment #9) It's not always possible to determine the version of something, which is why it's not a bug or even an rpmlint issue for an automatically generated provide to be unversioned normally. I'm not against Provides without version per se. That's completely reasonable. I'm against versioned Requires being satisfied with unversioned Provides (i.e. the bad one is dependency solver). Because either the version specifier (of Requires) is superfluous and unneeded and can (should) be removed, or the version specifier is meaningful, important and thus the two packages are obviously incompatible. To be clear: The perl-Statistics-Basic is buggy at sources level. Upstream should version the modules. Meantime I can fix it by manual versioning in spec file. I'm just curious about RPM dependency solver because current arithmetic seems broken for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674152] Review Request: mingw32-matahari - Matahari QMF Agents for Windows guests
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674152 --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-02-16 12:00:05 EST --- Is there any specific reason you don't want an f15 branch? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 590305] Review Request: vile - VI Like Emacs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590305 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|vile-9.8d-3.el6 |vile-9.8d-3.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 590305] Review Request: vile - VI Like Emacs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590305 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-02-16 12:25:09 EST --- vile-9.8d-3.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 590305] Review Request: vile - VI Like Emacs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590305 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|vile-9.8d-3.el4 |vile-9.8d-3.el6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675628] Review Request: python26-jinja2 - General purpose template engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675628 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-02-16 12:24:51 EST --- python26-jinja2-2.5.5-4.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python26-jinja2'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python26-jinja2-2.5.5-4.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 643679] Review Request: globus-gridmap-callout-error - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gridmap Callout Errors
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=643679 --- Comment #3 from Dennis van Dok denni...@nikhef.nl 2011-02-16 13:09:17 EST --- Yes, I used CentOS 5. In the meantime I have obtained the sources from elsewhere and successfully built an rpm. I will verify the product soon. The spec file describes how the source tarball was created (I reproduced these steps) but the epstopdf to me is unclear. I found epstopdf.pl in a recent texlive and this seemed to work, but could you provide the provenance of this source file? I would like to review the package, but my understanding is that a fedora member should do this and I am not. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 590305] Review Request: vile - VI Like Emacs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590305 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-02-16 12:24:33 EST --- vile-9.8d-3.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 590305] Review Request: vile - VI Like Emacs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590305 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-02-16 12:27:20 EST --- vile-9.8d-3.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 677181] Please update to latexila 2.0.5
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=677181 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC|fedora-package-review@redha | |t.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 590305] Review Request: vile - VI Like Emacs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590305 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||vile-9.8d-3.el4 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-02-16 12:24:43 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 590305] Review Request: vile - VI Like Emacs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590305 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-02-16 14:16:55 EST --- vile-9.8d-3.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 521909] Review Request: ne7ssh - SSH Library is a Secure Shell client software written in C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521909 --- Comment #47 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-02-16 14:17:07 EST --- ne7ssh-1.3.2-10.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 590305] Review Request: vile - VI Like Emacs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590305 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|vile-9.8d-3.el5 |vile-9.8d-3.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 521909] Review Request: ne7ssh - SSH Library is a Secure Shell client software written in C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521909 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||ne7ssh-1.3.2-10.fc13 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-02-16 14:17:15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 521909] Review Request: ne7ssh - SSH Library is a Secure Shell client software written in C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521909 --- Comment #48 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-02-16 14:20:01 EST --- ne7ssh-1.3.2-10.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 590305] Review Request: vile - VI Like Emacs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590305 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-02-16 14:20:37 EST --- vile-9.8d-3.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 521909] Review Request: ne7ssh - SSH Library is a Secure Shell client software written in C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521909 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|ne7ssh-1.3.2-10.fc13|ne7ssh-1.3.2-10.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673589] Review Request: UpTools - C++ library for hpc, networking, db, memory, etc.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673589 Sergio Belkin seb...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||UpTools -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673658] Review Request: R-Rcompression - In-memory decompression for GNU zip and bzip2 formats.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673658 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||658489(FE-BUNDLEDLIBS) --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-02-16 15:31:36 EST --- The licensing isn't a blocker but the bundled library is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 668204] Review Request: buzzbird - Twitter and identi.ca desktop client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668204
--- Comment #2 from Christopher Aillon cail...@redhat.com 2011-02-16 15:43:17
EST ---
* Your source tarball includes a few binary files including a windows EXE file
that need to get stripped. Also, if you're creating the source tarball
yourself, please consider using bzip2 or xz, which will offer better
compression (smaller tarballs).
* I looked at application.ini which claims
[Gecko]
MinVersion=1.8
MaxVersion=1.9.2.*
So please have your spec
Requires: gecko-libs = 1.8
Requires: gecko-libs 1.9.3
* If you're creating a .desktop file from scratch, just save it in its own
file, and include it as a Source2, like you're doing with the man page. And
send both to upstream so they can include them in the future.
* Is the extensions a Firefox extension? Based on extensions/install.rdf it
appears to be since it uses Firefox's Application ID. If so, it needs to be
installed into
%{_libdir}/mozilla/extensions/{ec8030f7-c20a-464f-9b0e-13a3a9e97384}/ and
perhaps subpackaged? But unless I'm missing something, it's just a noop now,
and can probably get dropped?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 678128] New: Review Request: cdw - Front-end for tools used for burning data CD/DVD
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: cdw - Front-end for tools used for burning data CD/DVD https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678128 Summary: Review Request: cdw - Front-end for tools used for burning data CD/DVD Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: seb...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/14217893/cdw.spec SRPM URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/14217893/cdw-0.6.0-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: Hi! I've made the cdw RPM package. If you are looking a faster alternative to k3b, cdw is great! I use it often in my job tasks as sysadmin. cdw is a front-end for some command-line tools used for burning data CD and DVD discs and for related tasks. cdw is able to rip tracks from your audio CD to raw audio files. Limited support for copying content of data CD and DVD discs to image files is also provided. cdw can verify correctness of writing ISO9660 image to CD or DVD disc using md5sum program (if it is installed on target machine). Bear in mind that I am not the author of the software, who is Kamil Ignacak the URL project is in http://cdw.sourceforge.net/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 678128] Review Request: cdw - Front-end for tools used for burning data CD/DVD
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678128 Sergio Belkin seb...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Alias||cdw -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 678128] Review Request: cdw - Front-end for tools used for burning data CD/DVD
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678128 Sergio Belkin seb...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Version|rawhide |14 --- Comment #1 from Sergio Belkin seb...@gmail.com 2011-02-16 16:08:58 EST --- Hi, I append this rpmlint and rpm output I guess you find useful (this is *not* a new files submission): [sergio@peque SPECS]$ rpmlint -iv /tmp/cdw-0.6.0-1.fc14.src.rpm cdw.src: I: checking cdw.src: I: checking-url http://cdw.sourceforge.net/ (timeout 10 seconds) cdw.src: I: checking-url http://downloads.sourceforge.net/cdw/cdw-0.6.0.tar.gz (timeout 10 seconds) 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [sergio@peque SPECS]$ rpmlint -iv /tmp/cdw-0.6.0-1.fc14.x86_64.rpm cdw.x86_64: I: checking cdw.x86_64: I: checking-url http://cdw.sourceforge.net/ (timeout 10 seconds) 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [sergio@peque SPECS]$ rpmlint -iv cdw.spec cdw.spec: I: checking-url http://downloads.sourceforge.net/cdw/cdw-0.6.0.tar.gz (timeout 10 seconds) 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [sergio@peque SPECS]$ rpmlint -iv ../RPMS/i686/cdw-0.6.0-1.fc14.i686.rpm cdw.i686: I: checking cdw.i686: I: checking-url http://cdw.sourceforge.net/ (timeout 10 seconds) 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings cdw-debuginfo.i686: I: checking cdw-debuginfo.i686: I: checking-url http://cdw.sourceforge.net/ (timeout 10 seconds) 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [sergio@peque SPECS]$ [sergio@peque SPECS]$ rpm -qlp ../RPMS/i686/cdw-0.6.0-1.fc14.i686.rpm /usr/bin/cdw /usr/share/man/man1/cdw.1.gz [sergio@peque SPECS]$ rpm -qlp /tmp/cdw-0.6.0-1.fc14.x86_64.rpm /usr/bin/cdw /usr/share/man/man1/cdw.1.gz I would appreciate your review and your sponsorship. Thanks in advance! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 677391] Review Request: lovelock-kde-theme - Lovelock KDE Theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=677391 --- Comment #2 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu 2011-02-16 16:23:10 EST --- I can review this... naming: ok license: ok installs: ok scriptlets: ok sources: 720a941bf21d539ee263f0cfedf1d746 lovelock-kde-theme-14.90.1.tar.bz2 I'll test out functionality here in a bit... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 628665] Review Request: Mars - An interactive development environment for programming in MIPS assembly language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=628665 --- Comment #11 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2011-02-16 16:35:18 EST --- Hmm, this is stil using 4.0.1 sources not 4.1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 677391] Review Request: lovelock-kde-theme - Lovelock KDE Theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=677391 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu 2011-02-16 16:40:25 EST --- functionality: ok otherwise relatively simple noarch pkg here, APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674207] Review Request: python-cloudfiles - Python language bindings for Rackspace CloudFiles API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674207 BJ Dierkes wdier...@rackspace.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo? --- Comment #5 from BJ Dierkes wdier...@rackspace.com 2011-02-16 16:53:36 EST --- I've started a thread on the devel list... definitely not the first package to have issues with GitHub. For now i've updated Source0 to use the PyPi download location (also maintained by the upstream vendor). SPEC: http://5dollarwhitebox.org/fedora/python-cloudfiles.spec SRPM: http://5dollarwhitebox.org/fedora/python-cloudfiles-1.7.8-1.fc14.src.rpm $ rpmlint -i SPECS/python-cloudfiles.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint -i RPMS/noarch/python-cloudfiles-1.7.8-1.fc14.noarch.rpm python-cloudfiles.noarch: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Working with upstream to fix their source tarbal to include ChangeLog/COPYING etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 642995] Review Request: rubygem-deltacloud-client - Deltacloud REST Client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=642995 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|rubygem-deltacloud-client-0 |rubygem-deltacloud-client-0 |.1.0-2.fc14 |.1.0-2.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 628665] Review Request: Mars - An interactive development environment for programming in MIPS assembly language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=628665 --- Comment #12 from W. Michael Petullo m...@flyn.org 2011-02-16 21:55:21 EST --- Spec URL: http://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/Mars.spec SRPM URL: http://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/Mars-4.1-2.fc14.src.rpm - Build 4.1 source -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 678195] New: Review Request: perl-MooseX-OneArgNew - Teach -new to accept single, non-hashref arguments
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-OneArgNew - Teach -new to accept single, non-hashref arguments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678195 Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-OneArgNew - Teach -new to accept single, non-hashref arguments Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/MooseX-OneArgNew/ OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarn...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-MooseX-OneArgNew.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-MooseX-OneArgNew-0.001-1.fc16.src.rpm Description: MooseX::OneArgNew lets your constructor take a single argument, which will be translated into the value for a one-entry hashref. It is a parameterized role with two parameters: Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2845776 *rt-0.10_01 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 678196] New: Review Request: perl-String-Errf - Simple sprintf-like dialect
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-String-Errf - Simple sprintf-like dialect Alias: perl-String-Errf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678196 Summary: Review Request: perl-String-Errf - Simple sprintf-like dialect Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/String-Errf/ OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarn...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-String-Errf.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-String-Errf-0.006-1.fc16.src.rpm Description: String::Errf provides errf, a simple string formatter that works something like sprintf. It is implemented using String::Formatter and Sub::Exporter. Their documentation may be useful in understanding or extending String::Errf. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2845794 *rt-0.10_01 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673658] Review Request: R-Rcompression - In-memory decompression for GNU zip and bzip2 formats.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673658 --- Comment #6 from Haïkel Guémar karlthe...@gmail.com 2011-02-17 00:49:41 EST --- The point is that Rcompression main functionnalities lie in a semi-generated wrapper (as explained in tuNotes.xml) around minizip code. I'm not sure that it's possible to get rid of this code without rewrite the whole stuff. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674671] Review Request: python-repoze-lru - A tiny LRU cache implementation and decorator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674671 Tim Lauridsen t...@rasmil.dk changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|t...@rasmil.dk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674671] Review Request: python-repoze-lru - A tiny LRU cache implementation and decorator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674671 Tim Lauridsen t...@rasmil.dk changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674671] Review Request: python-repoze-lru - A tiny LRU cache implementation and decorator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674671 Tim Lauridsen t...@rasmil.dk changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674671] Review Request: python-repoze-lru - A tiny LRU cache implementation and decorator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674671
--- Comment #2 from Tim Lauridsen t...@rasmil.dk 2011-02-17 01:19:06 EST ---
Source0 url is not pointing to upstream source
it should be
http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/r/repoze.lru/%{modname}-%{version}.tar.gz
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674667] Review Request: python-venusian - A library for deferring decorator actions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674667 Tim Lauridsen t...@rasmil.dk changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674667] Review Request: python-venusian - A library for deferring decorator actions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674667 --- Comment #1 from Tim Lauridsen t...@rasmil.dk 2011-02-17 01:25:52 EST --- I will review this bug -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674667] Review Request: python-venusian - A library for deferring decorator actions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674667 Tim Lauridsen t...@rasmil.dk changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|t...@rasmil.dk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674666] Review Request: python-translationstring - Utility library for i18n relied on by various Repoze packages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674666 Tim Lauridsen t...@rasmil.dk changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674666] Review Request: python-translationstring - Utility library for i18n relied on by various Repoze packages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674666 --- Comment #1 from Tim Lauridsen t...@rasmil.dk 2011-02-17 01:31:40 EST --- I will review this bug -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674667] Review Request: python-venusian - A library for deferring decorator actions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674667
--- Comment #2 from Tim Lauridsen t...@rasmil.dk 2011-02-17 01:29:49 EST ---
Source0 dont point to upstream source
It should be
http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/v/venusian/%{modname}-%{version}.tar.gz
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674666] Review Request: python-translationstring - Utility library for i18n relied on by various Repoze packages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674666 Tim Lauridsen t...@rasmil.dk changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674666] Review Request: python-translationstring - Utility library for i18n relied on by various Repoze packages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674666
--- Comment #2 from Tim Lauridsen t...@rasmil.dk 2011-02-17 01:36:29 EST ---
Source0 is not pointing to upstream source
should have been
http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/t/translationstring/%{modname}-%{version}.tar.gz
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674692] Review Request: python-pyramid - The Pyramid web application framework, a Pylons project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674692 --- Comment #1 from Tim Lauridsen t...@rasmil.dk 2011-02-17 01:42:49 EST --- I will review this bug -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674692] Review Request: python-pyramid - The Pyramid web application framework, a Pylons project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674692 Tim Lauridsen t...@rasmil.dk changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|t...@rasmil.dk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674692] Review Request: python-pyramid - The Pyramid web application framework, a Pylons project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674692 Tim Lauridsen t...@rasmil.dk changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
