[Bug 676188] Review Request: qmidiarp - an arpeggiator, sequencer and MIDI LFO for ALSA

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676188

--- Comment #7 from Brendan Jones brendan.jones...@gmail.com 2011-02-22 
03:02:29 EST ---
Thanks Martin - that would be great! I will update the spacing soon. 
I have performed an additional informal review here: Bug 678980



-- 
Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 678980] Review Request: openscad - Creates solid 3D CAD objects

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678980

Brendan Jones brendan.jones...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||brendan.jones...@gmail.com

--- Comment #4 from Brendan Jones brendan.jones...@gmail.com 2011-02-22 
03:00:44 EST ---

Hi Jebba - I have put together an informal review for you to help this on its
way. Comments of note are denoted with ***

regards,

Brendan

+ OK
- N/A
! Problem
? Not evaluated

Required
=
[+] rpmlint must be run on the source rpm and all binary rpms the build
produces
[!] named according to the Package Naming Guidelines 
 *** 20110220git is a more appropriate version number or an abbreviated git
hash. See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines
[+] The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec 
[+] Meet the Packaging Guidelines
[+] Be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing
Guidelines 
[!] The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license
 *** GPLv2+ rather than GPLv2
[+] License file must be included in %doc
[+] The spec file must be written in American English
[+] The spec file for the package MUST be legible
[+] The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source
[+] Successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary
architecture
[+] Proper use of ExcludeArch 
[+] All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires
[+] The spec file MUST handle locales properly
[+] Shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's
default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun
[+] Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries
[-] If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this
fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation
of that specific package
[+] A package must own all directories that it creates
[+] A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's
%files listings
[+] Permissions on files must be set properly. Every %files section must
include a %defattr(...) line
[+] Each package must consistently use macros
[+] The package must contain code, or permissable content
[+] Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage
[+] If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of
the application
[+] Header files must be in a -devel package
[-] Static libraries must be in a -static package
[+] library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package
[-] devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned
dependency
[+] Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives
[!] GUI apps must include a %{name}.desktop file, properly installed with
desktop-file-install in the %install section 
 *** no desktop file or icon included - query upstream or create as additional
sources

[+] Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages
[+] All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8

Should Items

[-] the packager SHOULD query upstream for any missing license text filesto
include it
[?] Non-English language support for description and summary sections in the
package spec if available
[+] The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock
[+] The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures
[+] The reviewer should test that the package functions as described
[-] If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane
[-] Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using
a fully versioned dependency
[-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) should usually be placed in a -devel pkg
[-] If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin,
/usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file
instead of the file itself
[!] Should contain man pages for binaries/scripts
 *** however, PDF docs are supplied



-- 
Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 676188] Review Request: qmidiarp - an arpeggiator, sequencer and MIDI LFO for ALSA

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676188

Martin Gieseking martin.giesek...@uos.de changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|martin.giesek...@uos.de
   Flag||fedora-review?

--- Comment #8 from Martin Gieseking martin.giesek...@uos.de 2011-02-22 
03:26:17 EST ---
OK, great. I'll have a look at your review later today.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 654879] Review Request: since - stateful tail

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=654879

--- Comment #12 from Martin Gieseking martin.giesek...@uos.de 2011-02-22 
03:40:51 EST ---
Sven, what's the status of this bug? Don't you want to request a Git repo for
the package?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 678980] Review Request: openscad - Creates solid 3D CAD objects

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678980

--- Comment #5 from jebba m...@blagblagblag.org 2011-02-22 03:45:10 EST ---
(In reply to comment #4)
 Required
 =
 [!] named according to the Package Naming Guidelines 
  *** 20110220git is a more appropriate version number or an abbreviated git
 hash. See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines

Upstream gives their latest release names like 2010.05, so I wanted to stay in
line with that. Also, when you go to Help--About in the program it gives a
version number like 2011.02.21.   I agree it is a bit ugly, but it is also
tracking upstream releases.

 [!] The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license
  *** GPLv2+ rather than GPLv2

I think it is actually GPLv2 with exceptions. GPLv2+ is GPLv2 or any later
versions. This one has exceptions to allow it to play ok with CGAL.

 [!] GUI apps must include a %{name}.desktop file, properly installed with
 desktop-file-install in the %install section 
  *** no desktop file or icon included - query upstream or create as additional
 sources

I have added them.

 Should Items
 
 [!] Should contain man pages for binaries/scripts
  *** however, PDF docs are supplied

No man pages available.

Thanks for the review!

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 678337] Review Request: apache-commons-csv - Utilities to assist with handling of CSV files

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678337

Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2011-02-22 03:53:53

--- Comment #4 from Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com 2011-02-22 
03:53:53 EST ---
Thanks for the review and repos.

Package built, closing:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2856672

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=178922

--- Comment #163 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info 
2011-02-22 03:56:10 EST ---
Sorry, but how Digium built such versions?
http://www.asterisk.org/downloads/yum
Is they use bundled version of speex?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 679027] Review Request: apache-james-project - Main project POM files and resources

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679027

Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2011-02-22 04:24:02

--- Comment #5 from Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com 2011-02-22 
04:24:02 EST ---
Thanks for the review and repo

Package built:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2856738

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 678887] Review Request: libst2205 - Library for accessing the display of hacked st2205 photo frames

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678887

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 678889] Review Request: serdisplib - Library to drive serial displays with built-in controllers

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678889

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 678887] Review Request: libst2205 - Library for accessing the display of hacked st2205 photo frames

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678887

--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-02-22 
04:32:38 EST ---
libst2205-1.4.3-2.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libst2205-1.4.3-2.fc15

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 678889] Review Request: serdisplib - Library to drive serial displays with built-in controllers

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678889

--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-02-22 
04:33:42 EST ---
serdisplib-1.97.9-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/serdisplib-1.97.9-1.fc15

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 678889] Review Request: serdisplib - Library to drive serial displays with built-in controllers

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678889

--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-02-22 
04:34:03 EST ---
serdisplib-1.97.9-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/serdisplib-1.97.9-1.fc14

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 678887] Review Request: libst2205 - Library for accessing the display of hacked st2205 photo frames

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678887

--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 
2011-02-22 04:34:20 EST ---
libst2205-1.4.3-2.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libst2205-1.4.3-2.fc13

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 678889] Review Request: serdisplib - Library to drive serial displays with built-in controllers

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678889

--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-02-22 
04:34:33 EST ---
serdisplib-1.97.9-1.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/serdisplib-1.97.9-1.fc13

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 678887] Review Request: libst2205 - Library for accessing the display of hacked st2205 photo frames

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678887

--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-02-22 
04:33:45 EST ---
libst2205-1.4.3-2.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libst2205-1.4.3-2.fc14

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 679027] Review Request: apache-james-project - Main project POM files and resources

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679027

Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks|652183(FE-JAVASIG)  |

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 678955] Review Request: opencsg - Library for Constructive Solid Geometry using OpenGL

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678955

--- Comment #3 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de 2011-02-22 05:15:33 
EST ---
(In reply to comment #2)
 I'm not sure what is causing the debuginfo-without-sources. 
The origin of this is this package's makefiles not honouring RPM_OPT_FLAGS and
them applying strip on binaries.

Both issues can be worked around by re-generating this packages's makefiles.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 675122] Review Request: php-pear-Auth-Yubico - Authentication class for verifying Yubico OTP tokens

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675122

--- Comment #4 from Patrick Monnerat p...@datasphere.ch 2011-02-22 05:24:53 
EST ---
 You have a duplicate requires on PEAR, please remove it before import.
So evident that I did not notice it! thank you for the review.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 679273] Review Request: repsnapper - Software for controlling the RepRap 3D printer

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679273

Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||lemen...@gmail.com

--- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2011-02-22 05:28:05 EST 
---
I'll review it.
Jebba, is it your first package?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 675122] Review Request: php-pear-Auth-Yubico - Authentication class for verifying Yubico OTP tokens

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675122

Patrick Monnerat p...@datasphere.ch changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?

--- Comment #5 from Patrick Monnerat p...@datasphere.ch 2011-02-22 05:25:46 
EST ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: php-pear-Auth-Yubico
Short Description: Authentication class for verifying Yubico OTP tokens
Owners: monnerat
Branches: f13 f14 f15
InitialCC:

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 676853] Review Request: goocanvasmm2 - goocanvasmm2 goodness for Gtk3

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676853

--- Comment #2 from Haïkel Guémar karlthe...@gmail.com 2011-02-22 05:39:25 
EST ---
spec and src.rpm updated to match recent changes in gtkmm packaging, mostly
related to documentation: 
* we co-own /usr/share/devhelp as allowed by guidelines as it's not required
for documentation consultation.

mock build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2856883

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 678891] Review Request: lcd4linux - Display system state on an external LCD display

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678891

--- Comment #7 from Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com 2011-02-22 05:41:38 EST 
---
Woops, sorry about that I missed a BuildRequires on gettext-devel. Now that
the other ones have been build, I've been able through put lcd4linux through a
koji scratchbuild:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2856877

With the missing build requires added it builds fine, but I did notice
some more (optional) BuildRequires where missing. Here is a new version with
all missing BuildRequires add (see the changelog):
Spec URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~jwrdegoede/lcd4linux.spec
SRPM URL:
http://people.fedoraproject.org/~jwrdegoede/lcd4linux-0.11-0.2.svn1143.fc15.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 672440] Review Request: flann - Fast Library for Approximate Nearest Neighbors

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672440

Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich kr...@land.ru changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||kr...@land.ru

--- Comment #19 from Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich kr...@land.ru 2011-02-22 05:58:08 
EST ---
/usr/include/flann/flann_mpi.hpp both require some mpi implementation and
boost.
1) Second could (but not need, see 2) be fixed by adding Requires: boost.
2) There is no mpi support in current fedora flann at all.

May be better to not provide flann_mpi.hpp?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 623868] Review Request: abattis-cantarell-fonts - Contemporary humanist sans-serif font

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=623868

--- Comment #28 from Michael J Gruber m...@fedoraproject.org 2011-02-22 
07:53:35 EST ---
(In reply to comment #27)
 Is it possible to make this font available also for Fedora 13 and 14?

You can install the F15 rpm in F13 and F14 (or grab the source rpm and
rebuild).

With F15 having branched, requests for an F13 package should be submitted
really soon (or it's too late).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 672954] Review Request: python26-ldap - An object-oriented API to access LDAP directory servers

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672954

Jeffrey Ness jeffrey.n...@rackspace.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|needinfo?(jeffrey.ness@rack |
   |space.com)  |

--- Comment #2 from Jeffrey Ness jeffrey.n...@rackspace.com 2011-02-22 
08:12:00 EST ---
Thank you for your review BJ, I have made changes to the SPEC to address the
failed checks above:

%changelog
* Tue Feb 22 2011 Jeffrey Ness jeffrey.n...@rackspace.com - 0:2.3.12-2
- Adding %%{release} to BuildRoot per Fedora guidelines:
  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/GuidelinesAndPolicies#BuildRoot_tag
- Splitting cleanup in %%prep for readability

The new build was successful in mock, see rpmlint below:

$ rpmlint SPECS/python26-ldap.spec 
sh: /usr/bin/python2.6: No such file or directory
sh: /usr/bin/python2.6: No such file or directory
sh: /usr/bin/python2.6: No such file or directory
sh: /usr/bin/python2.6: No such file or directory
sh: /usr/bin/python2.6: No such file or directory
sh: /usr/bin/python2.6: No such file or directory
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

$ rpmlint
/var/lib/mock/epel-5-x86_64/result/python26-ldap-2.3.12-2.el5.x86_64.rpm 
python26-ldap.x86_64: I: enchant-dictionary-not-found en_US
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

---

SPEC: http://flip-edesign.com/source/junk/python26-ldap.spec
SRPM: http://flip-edesign.com/source/junk/python26-ldap-2.3.12-2.el5.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 649495] Review Request: openstack-nova - OpenStack Compute (nova)

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=649495

--- Comment #8 from Major Hayden ma...@mhtx.net 2011-02-22 08:27:52 EST ---
Silas, The RPM looks quite good so far.  I just noticed that
/etc/logrotate.d/openstack-nova is the same file as /etc/nova/nova-manage.conf:

http://pastie.org/1593753

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 615508] Review Request: nut-nutrition - A nutritional Software

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615508

--- Comment #5 from Ondrej Vasik ova...@redhat.com 2011-02-22 08:40:43 EST ---
IMHO just update spec and srpm's to nut-nutrition name and submit links, that
should be enough.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 615508] Review Request: nut-nutrition - A nutritional Software

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615508

Ondrej Vasik ova...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||ova...@redhat.com
Summary|Review Request: nut - A |Review Request:
   |nutritional Software|nut-nutrition - A
   ||nutritional Software

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 679401] Review Request: qtsoap - The Simple Object Access Protocol Qt-based client side library

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679401

Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||656997(kde-reviews)

--- Comment #1 from Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com 2011-02-22 08:58:18 
EST ---
rpmlint qtsoap.spec 
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

rpmlint ../RPMS/x86_64/qtsoap-*
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

This package is needed for herqq (hupnp) which currently bundles own copy of
qtsoap (it's intention of qtsoap developers). The final dependency is
kio-upnp-ms (to be packaged).

Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2857314

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 673589] Review Request: UpTools - C++ library for hpc, networking, db, memory, etc.

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673589

Sergio Belkin seb...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Attachment #479452|0   |1
is obsolete||

--- Comment #20 from Sergio Belkin seb...@gmail.com 2011-02-22 09:08:27 EST 
---
Created attachment 480140
  -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=480140
Fixes the original spec made it known to bugzilla (Release 7)

Modifications for original spec file submitted.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 679401] New: Review Request: qtsoap - The Simple Object Access Protocol Qt-based client side library

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: qtsoap - The Simple Object Access Protocol Qt-based 
client side library

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679401

   Summary: Review Request: qtsoap - The Simple Object Access
Protocol Qt-based client side library
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
 Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: jrez...@redhat.com
 QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora


Spec URL: http://rezza.hofyland.cz/fedora/packages/qtsoap/qtsoap.spec
SRPM URL:
http://rezza.hofyland.cz/fedora/packages/qtsoap/qtsoap-1.7-1.fc14.src.rpm
Description: The SOAP (Simple Object Access Protocol) library uses the XML
standard
for describing how to exchange messages. Its primary usage is to invoke web
services and get responses from Qt-based applications.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 437321] Review Request: libarchive - A library for handling streaming archive formats

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437321

Tomáš Bžatek tbza...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?

--- Comment #9 from Tomáš Bžatek tbza...@redhat.com 2011-02-22 09:20:22 EST 
---
Package Change Request
==
Package Name: libarchive
New Branches: el5
Owners: tbzatek
InitialCC: devos

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 634911] Review Request: nodejs - Evented I/O for v8 JavaScript

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634911

Bug 634911 depends on bug 634909, which changed state.

Bug 634909 Summary: Review Request: v8 - JavaScript Engine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634909

   What|Old Value   |New Value

 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE
 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 634909] Review Request: v8 - JavaScript Engine

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634909

Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE
Last Closed||2011-02-22 09:42:13

--- Comment #26 from Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk 2011-02-22 09:42:13 EST ---
Imported and built.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 615508] Review Request: nut-nutrition - A nutritional Software

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615508

--- Comment #6 from Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com 2011-02-22 09:46:06 
EST ---
Hello,

All right. I'll submit the new spec etc. later tonight. 

Thanks,
Ankur

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 654047] Review Request: drupal6-feeds - An import and aggregation framework for Drupal.

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=654047

Peter Borsa peter.bo...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?

--- Comment #16 from Peter Borsa peter.bo...@gmail.com 2011-02-22 10:23:31 
EST ---
Package Change Request
==
Package Name: drupal6-feeds
New Branches: el5 el6
Owners: asrob

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=178922

--- Comment #164 from Jeffrey C. Ollie j...@ocjtech.us 2011-02-22 10:39:33 
EST ---
It looks like they build without speex support.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 678891] Review Request: lcd4linux - Display system state on an external LCD display

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678891

Tim Lauridsen t...@rasmil.dk changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+

--- Comment #8 from Tim Lauridsen t...@rasmil.dk 2011-02-22 11:07:55 EST ---

Package Review
==

Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated

[x] : MUST - Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at
least one supported architecture.
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2856877
[x] : MUST - Buildroot is correct (EPEL5  Fedora  10)
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
[x] : MUST - Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}
(or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT).(EPEL6  Fedora  13)
[x] : MUST - Each %files section contains %defattr
[x] : MUST - Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[x] : MUST - Package run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) and the
beginning of %install.
[x] : MUST - Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=...
doesn't work.
[x] : MUST - Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[!] : MUST - Rpmlint output is silent.

rpmlint lcd4linux-0.11-0.2.svn1143.fc16.x86_64.rpm
   

lcd4linux.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary lcd4X11
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
   


rpmlint lcd4linux-0.11-0.2.svn1143.fc16.src.rpm
   

lcd4linux.src:13: W: macro-in-comment %2F
lcd4linux.src: W: invalid-url Source0: lcd4linux-trunk-1143.zip
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
   


rpmlint lcd4linux-debuginfo-0.11-0.2.svn1143.fc16.i686.rpm
   

1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
   


rpmlint lcd4linux-debuginfo-0.11-0.2.svn1143.fc16.x86_64.rpm
   

1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
   


rpmlint lcd4linux-0.11-0.2.svn1143.fc16.i686.rpm
   

lcd4linux.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary lcd4X11
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
   


[!] : MUST - Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
MD5SUM this package : bf81e337d91f818ab80aa5f1a9e3c627
MD5SUM upstream package : upstream source not found

Ok, this is a svn snapshot

[x] : MUST - Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x] : MUST - Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x] : MUST - Spec uses macros instead of hard-coded directory names.
[x] : MUST - Package consistently uses macros.
[x] : MUST - Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x] : MUST - Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x] : MUST - All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[-] : MUST - The spec file handles locales properly.
[x] : MUST - Changelog in prescribed format.
[x] : MUST - License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x] : MUST - If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %doc.
[x] : MUST - License file installed when any subpackage combination is
installed.
[x] : MUST - Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and
meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x] : MUST - Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x] : MUST - Compiler flags are appropriate.
[x] : MUST - %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[-] : MUST - ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[x] : MUST - Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x] : MUST - Package does not own files or directories owned by other 

[Bug 678891] Review Request: lcd4linux - Display system state on an external LCD display

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678891

--- Comment #9 from Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com 2011-02-22 11:29:21 EST 
---
Thanks for the review!

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 678891] Review Request: lcd4linux - Display system state on an external LCD display

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678891

Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?

--- Comment #10 from Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com 2011-02-22 11:30:34 
EST ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: lcd4linux
Short Description: Display system state on an external LCD display
Owners: jwrdegoede
Branches: f13 f14 f15
InitialCC:

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 654047] Review Request: drupal6-feeds - An import and aggregation framework for Drupal.

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=654047

--- Comment #17 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-02-22 12:13:37 EST 
---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 637360] Review Request: ghc-parameterized-data - Parameterized data library

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=637360

--- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-02-22 12:13:20 EST 
---
I don't understand what's being requested here.  This package is already in the
repository.

Please explain what you'd like for us to do and re-raise the fedora-cvs flag.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 667207] Review Request: avoision - Arcade style game of evade and capture

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=667207

--- Comment #4 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2011-02-22 
12:13:09 EST ---
New SRPM:
http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/avoision-0.6-2.fc14.src.rpm
New SPEC: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/avoision.spec
Koji Scratch Build (dist-f15):
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2857900

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 437321] Review Request: libarchive - A library for handling streaming archive formats

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437321

--- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-02-22 12:10:14 EST 
---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 672318] Review Request: python26-m2crypto - Support for using OpenSSL in python scripts

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672318

--- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-02-22 12:13:52 EST 
---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 677089] Review Request: php-pear-XML-RPC2 - XML-RPC client/server library

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=677089

--- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-02-22 12:14:31 EST 
---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 675122] Review Request: php-pear-Auth-Yubico - Authentication class for verifying Yubico OTP tokens

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675122

--- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-02-22 12:14:11 EST 
---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 678891] Review Request: lcd4linux - Display system state on an external LCD display

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678891

--- Comment #11 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-02-22 12:14:47 EST 
---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 654476] Review Request: meego-facebook-plugins - Facebook plugin for libsocialweb and telepathy

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=654476

Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution||WONTFIX
   Flag|fedora-review?, needinfo-,  |
   |needinfo?(pbrobinson@gmail. |
   |com)|
Last Closed||2011-02-22 12:43:19

--- Comment #2 from Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com 2011-02-22 12:43:19 
EST ---
Even though it was said that this wasn't possible to merge upstream into
libsocialweb it seems that has been overcome and this has been merged into
libsocialweb 0.25.11 (headed to rawhide and F-15) so I'm closing this

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 551763] Review Request: lua-sec - Lua binding for OpenSSL library

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551763

Thom Carlin bugzilla.a...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||needinfo?(jo...@x-tnd.be)

--- Comment #10 from Thom Carlin bugzilla.a...@gmail.com 2011-02-22 12:53:25 
EST ---
Johan, how do you feel about nixio vs. lua-sec?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 654476] Review Request: meego-facebook-plugins - Facebook plugin for libsocialweb and telepathy

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=654476

Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks|620175(MeeGo12) |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 490140] Review Request: zsync - Client-side implementation of the rsync algorithm

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490140

Thom Carlin bugzilla.a...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||bugzilla.a...@gmail.com
   Flag||needinfo?(redhat-bugzilla@l
   ||inuxnetz.de)

--- Comment #10 from Thom Carlin bugzilla.a...@gmail.com 2011-02-22 13:09:32 
EST ---
Hey Robert, any updates on this bug?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 678980] Review Request: openscad - Creates solid 3D CAD objects

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678980

Martin Gieseking martin.giesek...@uos.de changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||martin.giesek...@uos.de

--- Comment #6 from Martin Gieseking martin.giesek...@uos.de 2011-02-22 
13:28:09 EST ---
Here are some additional comments:

- please always post links to the updated spec and srpm files

- the Release count should start with 1 (not with 0)

- 2011.02.20git is not a valid version number. Replace it with 2011.02.20 as
  this seems to be the version number chosen by upstream. 

- change the Release field according to 
  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Snapshot_packages
  e.g. Release: 0.%{X}.20110222git%{REV}%{?dist}
  where %{X} is the revision number to increase, and %{REV} is the Git 
  changeset hash used to build the package

- add a comment above Source0 with the commands required to recreate the 
  tarball with the same content

- According to the source file headers, the license is GPLv2+. I recommend to 
  ask the experts on the legal mailing list whether it's necessary to declare  
  the mentioned exception.

- the package doesn't build in mock because of missing BR: glew-devel

- you should drop Requires: opencsg as the dependency is detected automatically

- also drop Requires: desktop-file-utils

- add Requires: hicolor-icon-theme

- remove the --vendor switch from desktop-file-install 

- adapt the icon cache scriptlets according to 
  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache

- replace %{_datadir}/%{name}/* with %{_datadir}/%{name}/
  for proper directory ownership.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 672954] Review Request: python26-ldap - An object-oriented API to access LDAP directory servers

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672954

--- Comment #3 from BJ Dierkes wdier...@rackspace.com 2011-02-22 13:38:50 EST 
---
Looks good.  This review is complete.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 672954] Review Request: python26-ldap - An object-oriented API to access LDAP directory servers

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672954

BJ Dierkes wdier...@rackspace.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 672954] Review Request: python26-ldap - An object-oriented API to access LDAP directory servers

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672954

BJ Dierkes wdier...@rackspace.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|wdier...@rackspace.com  |jeffrey.n...@rackspace.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 678887] Review Request: libst2205 - Library for accessing the display of hacked st2205 photo frames

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678887

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 
2011-02-22 13:48:24 EST ---
libst2205-1.4.3-2.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing repository.  If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update libst2205'.  You can provide
feedback for this update here:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libst2205-1.4.3-2.fc14

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 678889] Review Request: serdisplib - Library to drive serial displays with built-in controllers

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678889

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-02-22 
13:49:05 EST ---
serdisplib-1.97.9-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 testing repository. 
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update serdisplib'.  You can provide
feedback for this update here:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/serdisplib-1.97.9-1.fc13

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 672954] Review Request: python26-ldap - An object-oriented API to access LDAP directory servers

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672954

Jeffrey Ness jeffrey.n...@rackspace.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 672954] Review Request: python26-ldap - An object-oriented API to access LDAP directory servers

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672954

--- Comment #4 from Jeffrey Ness jeffrey.n...@rackspace.com 2011-02-22 
13:52:26 EST ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: python26-ldap
Short Description: An object-oriented API to access LDAP directory servers
Owners: jeffreyness derks
Branches: el5

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 678774] Review Request: libscs - Software Carry-Save Multiple-Precision Library

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678774

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 
2011-02-22 13:53:27 EST ---
libscs-1.4.1-4.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing repository.  If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update libscs'.  You can provide
feedback for this update here:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libscs-1.4.1-4.fc14

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 676544] Review Request: pidgin-logviewer - User friendly and intuitive way of viewing chat logs in Pidgin

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676544

Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR)  |

--- Comment #15 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2011-02-22 
14:15:03 EST ---
Removing needsponsor

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 627637] Review Request: qroneko - A front end of crontab application

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=627637

Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR)  |
   Flag|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+

--- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2011-02-22 
14:14:29 EST ---
Well,
- this package is now okay
  ! Note that -p option is not needed for install used with
-d (i.e. when creating directory) (needed when installing
file), however not a blocker.
- you have another review request submission, now in progress.

--
This package (qroneko) is APPROVED by mtasaka
--

Please follow the procedure written on:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join
from Install the Client Tools (Koji).

Now I am sponsoring you.

If you want to import this package into Fedora 13/14, you also have
to look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Bodhi_Guide
(after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system).

When using Fedora SCM system, please check below for reference:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Using_Fedora_GIT

If you have questions, please ask me.

Removing NEEDSPONSOR.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 679273] Review Request: repsnapper - Software for controlling the RepRap 3D printer

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679273

--- Comment #2 from jebba m...@blagblagblag.org 2011-02-22 14:32:05 EST ---
(In reply to comment #1)
 I'll review it.

Cool, thx.

 Jebba, is it your first package?

OpenSCAD (#678980) and OpenCSG (#678955) have been submitted recently. I did do
part of the process years ago which are maintained by others, but these will be
the first ones where I am the maintainer.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 642773] Review Request: iguanaIR - Driver for Iguanaworks USB IR transceiver

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=642773

--- Comment #5 from Jarod Wilson ja...@redhat.com 2011-02-22 14:40:09 EST ---
I've got an updated spec file with the ldconfig fixup, and coincidentally, was
just contacted by someone at iguanaworks, from whom I'm seeking clarification
(and likely source code fixups) on the license terms. Will hold off on pushing
for any further review until the license issues have been discussed with him.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 678727] Review Request: pam-afs-session - AFS PAG and AFS tokens on login (sponsor requested)

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678727

Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||steve.tray...@cern.ch

--- Comment #1 from Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch 2011-02-22 14:43:57 
EST ---
Hi Ken,

Some initial comments:

1)
Name: pam-afs-session

There are some guidelines on the naming of pam modules:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Addon_Packages_.28httpd.2C_pam.2C_and_SDL.29

though in this case I appreciate it supersedes the normal use
name of tar ball which you followed.

2)
A very recent addition to the rules is to add %{?_isa} to the 
end of your -devel Buildrequires. e.g.

BuildRequires: pam-devel%{?_isa}

Other than that at first site it's looking pretty good.

Generally have a look at the Getting Sponsored pages. Provide some
informal reviews of other pending packages from here:

http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html

I'd avoid the Need sponsor ones. 

Report back here with some links to some reviews you have made.

Steve.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 678980] Review Request: openscad - Creates solid 3D CAD objects

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678980

--- Comment #7 from jebba m...@blagblagblag.org 2011-02-22 14:57:05 EST ---
(In reply to comment #6)
 Here are some additional comments:

Wow, thanks for all your suggestions. I have implemented them, but have a
question about the Version/Release.

 - 2011.02.20git is not a valid version number. Replace it with 2011.02.20 as
   this seems to be the version number chosen by upstream. 
 
 - change the Release field according to 
   http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Snapshot_packages
   e.g. Release: 0.%{X}.20110222git%{REV}%{?dist}
   where %{X} is the revision number to increase, and %{REV} is the Git 
   changeset hash used to build the package

Doing the above, if I understood correctly, results in quite a long package
name, with the date in there twice:

openscad-2011.02.22-0.1.20110222git420c36603b.fc14.src.rpm

Is this OK/correct? Maybe this (still long) would be better:

openscad-2011.02.22-0.1.git420c36603b.fc14.src.rpm

Thanks again!

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 675726] Review Request: cdm - Very minimalistic display manager

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675726

--- Comment #10 from Mikhail Kulemin mihkule...@gmail.com 2011-02-22 15:08:11 
EST ---
Fixed this issues.
Add ConsoleKit in requires list (it is used with dbus)
After discussion license issue was fixed - right license is GPLv2+ and now
upstream sources have correct license text in tarbal.

SRPM URL:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=2857478name=cdm-0.5.3-4.fc14.src.rpm

spec file in attachment

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 642773] Review Request: iguanaIR - Driver for Iguanaworks USB IR transceiver

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=642773

--- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-02-22 15:12:03 EST 
---
And it's here:

http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/legal/2011-February/001554.html

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 675726] Review Request: cdm - Very minimalistic display manager

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675726

Mikhail Kulemin mihkule...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Attachment #477430|0   |1
is obsolete||
 Attachment #477617|0   |1
is obsolete||

--- Comment #11 from Mikhail Kulemin mihkule...@gmail.com 2011-02-22 15:09:51 
EST ---
Created attachment 480233
  -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=480233
spec file v4

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 678980] Review Request: openscad - Creates solid 3D CAD objects

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678980

--- Comment #8 from Martin Gieseking martin.giesek...@uos.de 2011-02-22 
15:33:36 EST ---
(In reply to comment #7)
 Doing the above, if I understood correctly, results in quite a long package
 name, with the date in there twice:
 
 openscad-2011.02.22-0.1.20110222git420c36603b.fc14.src.rpm
 
 Is this OK/correct? Maybe this (still long) would be better:
 
 openscad-2011.02.22-0.1.git420c36603b.fc14.src.rpm

Yes, the filenames get pretty long indeed. However, you have to distinguish
between the upstream version number (2011.02.22) and the date you checked out
the sources (not the date of the changeset but actually the date you cloned or
pulled the sources). This way you ensure that the release tag of future
packages with newer snapshots but identical version number is greater than the
current one, e.g. 2011.02.22-0.1.20110222gitFOO 
2011.02.22-0.1.20110225gitBAR. Otherwise, rpm wouldn't be able to determine
what package is the newer one.

The hash value after git is optional though, and you can drop it if you want.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 678980] Review Request: openscad - Creates solid 3D CAD objects

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678980

Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||jussi.leht...@iki.fi

--- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2011-02-22 16:04:05 
EST ---
Jeff(?): Please input your full name in Bugzilla.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 675557] Review Request: matreshka - set of Ada libraries to help to develop information systems

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675557

Pavel Zhukov pa...@zhukoff.net changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Status Whiteboard||NotReady

--- Comment #3 from Pavel Zhukov pa...@zhukoff.net 2011-02-22 16:11:47 EST ---


-- 
Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 674667] Review Request: python-venusian - A library for deferring decorator actions

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674667

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 674667] Review Request: python-venusian - A library for deferring decorator actions

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674667

--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 
2011-02-22 16:37:12 EST ---
python-venusian-0.6-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-venusian-0.6-1.fc15

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 674671] Review Request: python-repoze-lru - A tiny LRU cache implementation and decorator

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674671

--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 
2011-02-22 16:34:19 EST ---
python-repoze-lru-0.3-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-repoze-lru-0.3-1.fc14

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 674666] Review Request: python-translationstring - Utility library for i18n relied on by various Repoze packages

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674666

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 674666] Review Request: python-translationstring - Utility library for i18n relied on by various Repoze packages

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674666

--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 
2011-02-22 16:37:48 EST ---
python-translationstring-0.3-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
15.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-translationstring-0.3-1.fc15

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 674666] Review Request: python-translationstring - Utility library for i18n relied on by various Repoze packages

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674666

--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-02-22 
16:37:41 EST ---
python-translationstring-0.3-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
14.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-translationstring-0.3-1.fc14

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 674667] Review Request: python-venusian - A library for deferring decorator actions

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674667

--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-02-22 
16:36:57 EST ---
python-venusian-0.6-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-venusian-0.6-1.fc14

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 674671] Review Request: python-repoze-lru - A tiny LRU cache implementation and decorator

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674671

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 674671] Review Request: python-repoze-lru - A tiny LRU cache implementation and decorator

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674671

--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 
2011-02-22 16:34:12 EST ---
python-repoze-lru-0.3-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-repoze-lru-0.3-1.el6

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 674667] Review Request: python-venusian - A library for deferring decorator actions

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674667

--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 
2011-02-22 16:37:04 EST ---
python-venusian-0.6-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-venusian-0.6-1.el6

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 678980] Review Request: openscad - Creates solid 3D CAD objects

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678980

--- Comment #10 from Jeff Moe m...@blagblagblag.org 2011-02-22 17:21:35 EST 
---
(In reply to comment #9)
 Jeff(?): Please input your full name in Bugzilla.

Jeff Moe. Done.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 642773] Review Request: iguanaIR - Driver for Iguanaworks USB IR transceiver

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=642773

--- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-02-22 15:04:25 EST 
---
I saw something from spot about progress with the legal issues; I thought that
went to this ticket but I guess not.  Let me see if I can dig that up.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 678728] Review Request: synce-connector - Connection framework and dccm-implementation

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678728

--- Comment #3 from Andreas Bierfert andreas.bierf...@lowlatency.de 
2011-02-22 16:19:10 EST ---
http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/synce-connector-0.15.1-2.fc14.src.rpm
http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/synce-connector.spec

Thank you for you comment. Changed!

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 678128] Review Request: cdw - Front-end for tools used for burning data CD/DVD

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678128

--- Comment #6 from Sergio Belkin seb...@gmail.com 2011-02-22 18:47:51 EST ---
Some 
- Minor change in BuildRequires
- Fixed typo in Requires and comment
- Added %%check section

Spec URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/14217893/cdw.spec
SRPM URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/14217893/cdw-0.6.0-5.fc16.src.rpm

I need your review and your sponsorship. Below you can read my review, rpmlint
output and file list.

MUST ITEMS

[x] rpmlint output


rpmlint -i -v cdw-0.6.0-5.fc16.i686.rpm:
cdw.i686: I: checking
cdw.i686: I: checking-url http://cdw.sourceforge.net/ (timeout 10 seconds)
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
rpmlint -i -v cdw-0.6.0-5.fc16.src.rpm:
cdw.src: I: checking
cdw.src: I: checking-url http://cdw.sourceforge.net/ (timeout 10 seconds)
cdw.src: I: checking-url http://downloads.sourceforge.net/cdw/cdw-0.6.0.tar.gz
(timeout 10 seconds)
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
rpmlint -i -v cdw-0.6.0-5.fc16.x86_64.rpm:
cdw.x86_64: I: checking
cdw.x86_64: I: checking-url http://cdw.sourceforge.net/ (timeout 10 seconds)
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
rpmlint -i -v cdw-debuginfo-0.6.0-5.fc16.i686.rpm:
cdw-debuginfo.i686: I: checking
cdw-debuginfo.i686: I: checking-url http://cdw.sourceforge.net/ (timeout 10
seconds)
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
rpmlint -i -v /home/sergio/rpmbuild/SPECS/cdw.spec:
/home/sergio/rpmbuild/SPECS/cdw.spec: I: checking-url
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/cdw/cdw-0.6.0.tar.gz (timeout 10 seconds)
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.


[x] The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines .
[x] The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec
[x] The package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
[x] The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the
Licensing Guidelines . (GPLv2)
[x] The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x] The source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file,
then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is
included in %doc.
[x] The spec file is written in American English.
[x] The spec file for the package is legible.
[x] The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL. md5sum: 808601f91e3aa13e539b98e684cec1a9
[x] The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on two
primary architectures
[x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires
[x] No locale files.
[x] Packages does NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
[x] Package is not designed to be relocatable.
[x] A package  owns all directories that it creates. (See below rpm output)
[x] No  file  listed more than once in the spec file's %files listings. 
[x] Permissions on files are set properly. Executables are set with executable
permissions. Every %files section  includes a %defattr(...) line.
[x] Each package has consistently use macros.
[x] The package  contains codes, or permissable content.
[x] There is no large documentation files
[x] The program runs properly even if %doc it is not present
[x] Packages does not own files or directories already owned by other packages.
[x] All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8.

File list  cdw-0.6.0-5.fc16.i686.rpm:
-rwxr-xr-x1 rootroot   224196 feb 22 17:00 /usr/bin/cdw
drwxr-xr-x2 rootroot0 feb 22 17:00
/usr/share/doc/cdw-0.6.0
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot  414 jul  1  2010
/usr/share/doc/cdw-0.6.0/AUTHORS
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot17992 may 30  2002
/usr/share/doc/cdw-0.6.0/COPYING
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot36554 oct 22 16:14
/usr/share/doc/cdw-0.6.0/ChangeLog
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot16394 oct 22 16:21
/usr/share/doc/cdw-0.6.0/NEWS
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot 4492 oct 22 15:46
/usr/share/doc/cdw-0.6.0/README
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot  194 jul  1  2010
/usr/share/doc/cdw-0.6.0/THANKS
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot 8910 feb 22 17:00
/usr/share/man/man1/cdw.1.gz
File list  cdw-0.6.0-5.fc16.src.rpm:
-rw-rw-r--1 mockbuilmockbuil   673530 ene 30 23:05
cdw-0.6.0.tar.gz
-rw-rw-r--1 mockbuilmockbuil 1690 feb 22 16:50 cdw.spec
File list  cdw-0.6.0-5.fc16.x86_64.rpm:
-rwxr-xr-x1 rootroot   220584 feb 22 17:00 /usr/bin/cdw
drwxr-xr-x2 rootroot0 feb 22 17:00
/usr/share/doc/cdw-0.6.0
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot  414 jul  1  2010
/usr/share/doc/cdw-0.6.0/AUTHORS
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot17992 may 30  2002
/usr/share/doc/cdw-0.6.0/COPYING
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot 

[Bug 674666] Review Request: python-translationstring - Utility library for i18n relied on by various Repoze packages

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674666

--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 
2011-02-22 16:37:55 EST ---
python-translationstring-0.3-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-translationstring-0.3-1.el6

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 674671] Review Request: python-repoze-lru - A tiny LRU cache implementation and decorator

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674671

--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 
2011-02-22 16:34:27 EST ---
python-repoze-lru-0.3-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-repoze-lru-0.3-1.fc15

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 679613] New: Review Request: python-flask - A microframework for Python based on Werkzeug, Jinja 2 and good intentions

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: python-flask - A microframework for Python based on 
Werkzeug, Jinja 2 and good intentions

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679613

   Summary: Review Request: python-flask - A microframework for
Python based on Werkzeug, Jinja 2 and good intentions
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
 Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: dyo...@mesd.k12.or.us
 QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora


Spec URL: http://files.mesd.k12.or.us/~dyoung/python-flask/python-flask.spec
SRPM URL:
http://files.mesd.k12.or.us/~dyoung/python-flask/python-flask-0.6.1-1.fc14.src.rpm
Description: 
A microframework for Python based on Werkzeug, Jinja 2 and good intentions

Flask is called a “microframework” because the idea to keep the core
simple but extensible. There is no database abstraction layer, no form
validation or anything else where different libraries already exist
that can handle that. However Flask knows the concept of extensions
that can add this functionality into your application as if it was
implemented in Flask itself. There are currently extensions for object
relational mappers, form validation, upload handling, various open
authentication technologies and more.

Upstream is here: http://flask.pocoo.org/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 539693] Review Request: plowsahre - command-line downloader/uploader for some of the most popular file-sharing websites

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539693

--- Comment #9 from Elder Marco elderma...@gmail.com 2011-02-22 19:51:29 EST 
---
I would like to contribute with this package. I have a spec file according
comment #8 (I guess...) that I mantain and a rpm package too. How can I do
this? Is it possible now?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 678680] Review Request: transifex-client - Command line tool for Transifex translation management

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678680

--- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-02-22 20:01:13 EST 
---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 678680] Review Request: transifex-client - Command line tool for Transifex translation management

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678680

Nick Bebout n...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 672954] Review Request: python26-ldap - An object-oriented API to access LDAP directory servers

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672954

--- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-02-22 20:00:04 EST 
---
Who did this review?  It should be assigned to that person.  Currently it's
assigned to the person who will own the package, which implies that you've
reviewed your own package.  That's not something we can allow.

Please fix or get a proper review done and re-raise the fedora-cvs flag.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 672440] Review Request: flann - Fast Library for Approximate Nearest Neighbors

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672440

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|flann-1.6.7-4.fc14  |flann-1.6.7-4.el6

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 672440] Review Request: flann - Fast Library for Approximate Nearest Neighbors

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672440

--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 
2011-02-22 20:31:43 EST ---
flann-1.6.7-4.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository.  If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 596138] Review Request: nss-gui - A graphical user interface for NSS security databases

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596138

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version||nss-gui-0.3.9-1.el6
 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 599715] Review Request: python26-eventlet - Highly concurrent networking library

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599715

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 
2011-02-22 20:32:05 EST ---
python26-eventlet-0.9.9-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python26-eventlet'.  You can
provide feedback for this update here:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python26-eventlet-0.9.9-1.el5

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 596138] Review Request: nss-gui - A graphical user interface for NSS security databases

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596138

--- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 
2011-02-22 20:32:10 EST ---
nss-gui-0.3.9-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository.  If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review