[Bug 675478] Review Request: gprbuild - Ada project builder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675478 Mikhail Kulemin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mihkule...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675478] Review Request: gprbuild - Ada project builder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675478 Mikhail Kulemin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mihkule...@gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Mikhail Kulemin 2011-02-28 03:54:22 EST --- I`ll review it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 670354] Review Request: perl-String-Similarity - Calculates the similarity of two strings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670354 Marcela Mašláňová changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(r.landmann@redhat ||.com) --- Comment #6 from Marcela Mašláňová 2011-02-28 04:57:12 EST --- Ping? Could you close it now? Closing review is a duty of reporter. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 573918] Review Request: perl-NetPacket-LLC - Assemble and disassemble IEEE 802.3 LLC protocol packets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573918 Marcela Mašláňová changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(jan.klepek@gmail. ||com) Bug 573918 depends on bug 573848, which changed state. Bug 573848 Summary: Review Request: perl-NetPacket - Modules to assemble/disassemble network packets at the protocol level https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573848 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED --- Comment #6 from Marcela Mašláňová 2011-02-28 05:00:08 EST --- Ping? Did you forget to push it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673589] Review Request: UpTools - C++ library for hpc, networking, db, memory, etc.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673589 Sergio Belkin changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #35 from Sergio Belkin 2011-02-28 07:23:58 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: UpTools Short Description: UpTools - C++ library for hpc, networking, db, memory, etc. Owners: sebelk Branches: f13 f14 f15 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 652598] Review Request: erlang-riak_core - Distributed systems infrastructure used by Riak
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652598 Peter Lemenkov changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard|NotReady| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673589] Review Request: UpTools - C++ library for hpc, networking, db, memory, etc.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673589 --- Comment #36 from Mamoru Tasaka 2011-02-28 07:28:07 EST --- I recommend to remove "UpTools -" from "Short Description" as it is redundant. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673589] Review Request: UpTools - C++ library for hpc, networking, db, memory, etc.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673589 --- Comment #38 from Sergio Belkin 2011-02-28 07:38:35 EST --- I wanted to say: should I *resubmit* the request, or can I remove it in a later stage? Thanks in advance -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673589] Review Request: UpTools - C++ library for hpc, networking, db, memory, etc.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673589 --- Comment #37 from Sergio Belkin 2011-02-28 07:36:00 EST --- Mamoru, should I submit request, or Can I remove it in a later stage? Thanks in advance -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 576591] Review Request: iptraf-ng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576591 --- Comment #19 from Terje Røsten 2011-02-28 07:46:00 EST --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 576591] Review Request: iptraf-ng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576591 --- Comment #20 from Nikola Pajkovsky 2011-02-28 07:53:28 EST --- yes? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 576591] Review Request: iptraf-ng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576591 --- Comment #21 from Terje Røsten 2011-02-28 07:57:03 EST --- I just wonder about any progress with the issues in comment #18. You still want the package included in Fedora? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 571458] Review Request: sqlite36 - Library that implements an embeddable SQL database engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571458 Steve Traylen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||WONTFIX Last Closed||2011-02-28 07:58:57 --- Comment #2 from Steve Traylen 2011-02-28 07:58:57 EST --- I am no longer interested in this package as I was only adding it to add svn16 package to EPEL and since that is now in RHEL5.6 this is no longer necessary. Thanks Brian for the review. Steve. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673589] Review Request: UpTools - C++ library for hpc, networking, db, memory, etc.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673589 --- Comment #39 from Mamoru Tasaka 2011-02-28 08:14:34 EST --- Please resubmit (just write modified SCM request again and keep cvs flag to ?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 220217] Review Request: perl-Test-Spelling - Check for spelling errors in POD files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220217 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||p...@city-fan.org Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Paul Howarth 2011-02-28 08:29:52 EST --- Package Change Request == Package Name: perl-Test-Spelling New Branches: el4 Owners: pghmcfc rmyers rmyers and I are the maintainers of the EPEL-5 and EPEL-6 branches respectively. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 576591] Review Request: iptraf-ng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576591 --- Comment #22 from Nikola Pajkovsky 2011-02-28 08:40:55 EST --- Sure I want iptraf-ng in Fedora ;) o include the obsolete/provides in comment #15. - fixed in commit 7abf0de222f3a o upload a tarball o fix changelog - I will fix it when git will be ready and iptraf-ng-1.1.0 ready to deploy. o fix the license issue bar.c - just print "Computing" on status bar. I have a plan to create an universal function for bar operation. So this module will be removed. cidr.c getpath.c - module will be removed and I will provide an option in configure ipcsum.c - if the ping is under GPLv2+ than even this module must be, because in_cksum() was taken from ping. mode.c - omg!!! I will remove it completely and provide only one simple macro tr.c - tricky one. The code was taken from Linux kernel in 2002. "You must contact the author (Gerard Paul Java) about these problems." I'm not sure if this will be doable. Upstream is dead and he didn't response. I will try it again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673589] Review Request: UpTools - C++ library for hpc, networking, db, memory, etc.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673589 --- Comment #40 from Sergio Belkin 2011-02-28 08:57:30 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: UpTools Short Description: C++ library for hpc, networking, db, memory, etc. Owners: sebelk Branches: f13 f14 f15 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 680921] New: Review Request: perl-PathTools - PathTools Perl module (Cwd, File::Spec)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-PathTools - PathTools Perl module (Cwd, File::Spec) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=680921 Summary: Review Request: perl-PathTools - PathTools Perl module (Cwd, File::Spec) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmasl...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-PathTools.spec SRPM: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-PathTools-3.33-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: PathTools Perl module Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2872887 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 680921] Review Request: perl-PathTools - PathTools Perl module (Cwd, File::Spec)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=680921 Marcela Mašláňová changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||680893 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 576591] Review Request: iptraf-ng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576591 --- Comment #23 from Terje Røsten 2011-02-28 09:20:57 EST --- Thanks for the feedback, please update the ticket when you have 1.1.0 ready. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673854] Review Request: rubygem-cloudfiles - Cloud Files API in ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673854 Nick Bebout changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673854] Review Request: rubygem-cloudfiles - Cloud Files API in ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673854 Nick Bebout changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|i...@ianweller.org |n...@fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #2 from Nick Bebout 2011-02-28 09:24:16 EST --- Taking, per email. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 679913] Review Request: ftop - Shows progress of open files and file systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679913 Sergio Belkin changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Sergio Belkin 2011-02-28 09:24:23 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: ftop Short Description. Shows progress of open files and file systems Owners: sebelk Branches: f13 f14 f15 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 678128] Review Request: cdw - Front-end for tools used for burning data CD/DVD
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678128 William Lima changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wl...@primate.com.br --- Comment #11 from William Lima 2011-02-28 09:32:31 EST --- why assign yourself to the bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673589] Review Request: UpTools - C++ library for hpc, networking, db, memory, etc.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673589 William Lima changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wl...@primate.com.br --- Comment #41 from William Lima 2011-02-28 09:43:37 EST --- Your last spec file have two blank lines at end. Also attachments with your spec aren't needed, just update links (spec/srpm). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 678128] Review Request: cdw - Front-end for tools used for burning data CD/DVD
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678128 Sergio Belkin changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|seb...@gmail.com|nob...@fedoraproject.org --- Comment #12 from Sergio Belkin 2011-02-28 09:48:09 EST --- Yup, it was a silly mistake. Removing. I though incorrectly that it was already approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 678128] Review Request: cdw - Front-end for tools used for burning data CD/DVD
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678128 --- Comment #13 from Sergio Belkin 2011-02-28 09:52:29 EST --- I was tempted for "Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it" message and that I could do it. Sorry again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675529] Review Request: perl-Test-CheckManifest - Check if your Manifest matches your distro
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675529 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-02-28 09:57:40 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674007] Review Request: openni-primesense - PrimeSensor/Kinect Modules for OpenNI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674007 --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-02-28 09:57:11 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675364] Review Request: perl-Digest-JHash - Perl extension for 32 bit Jenkins Hashing Algorithm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675364 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-02-28 09:57:25 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 220217] Review Request: perl-Test-Spelling - Check for spelling errors in POD files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220217 --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-02-28 09:55:08 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673589] Review Request: UpTools - C++ library for hpc, networking, db, memory, etc.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673589 --- Comment #42 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-02-28 09:56:46 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 676544] Review Request: pidgin-logviewer - User friendly and intuitive way of viewing chat logs in Pidgin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676544 --- Comment #24 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-02-28 09:58:26 EST --- The requested package name does not match the name in the ticket summary. Please fix whichever is wrong and re-raise the fedora-cvs flag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 680308] Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Schema - XML based database schema manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=680308 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-02-28 09:59:30 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 679913] Review Request: ftop - Shows progress of open files and file systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679913 --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-02-28 09:59:15 EST --- The SCM request is misformatted. Please fix and re-raise the fedora-cvs flag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 652778] Review Request: kanotf-fonts - OpenType Kannada fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652778 --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-02-28 10:00:15 EST --- Did you really not want an f15 branch? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 676544] Review Request: pidgin-logviewer - User friendly and intuitive way of viewing chat logs in Pidgin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676544 Praveen Kumar changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 676544] Review Request: pidgin-logviewer - User friendly and intuitive way of viewing chat logs in Pidgin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676544 --- Comment #25 from Praveen Kumar 2011-02-28 10:17:58 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: pidgin-logviewer Short Description: User-friendly and intuitive chat log viewer for Pidgin Owners: kumarpraveen Branches: f13 f14 f15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 679913] Review Request: ftop - Shows progress of open files and file systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679913 Sergio Belkin changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Sergio Belkin 2011-02-28 10:18:33 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: ftop Short Description: Shows progress of open files and file systems Owners: sebelk Branches: f14 f15 el6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 680936] New: Review Request: libssh2-python - Python bindings for the libssh2 library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libssh2-python - Python bindings for the libssh2 library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=680936 Summary: Review Request: libssh2-python - Python bindings for the libssh2 library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: clala...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/clalance/libssh2-python/libssh2-python.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/clalance/libssh2-python/libssh2-python-0.7.1-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: libssh2-python is a python binding for the libssh2 library. [clalance@localhost SPECS]$ rpmlint libssh2-python.spec libssh2-python.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: libssh2-python-0.7.1.tar.gz 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [clalance@localhost SPECS]$ rpmlint /home/clalance/rpmbuild/SRPMS/libssh2-python-0.7.1-1.fc14.src.rpm libssh2-python.src: W: invalid-license LGPL libssh2-python.src: W: invalid-url Source0: libssh2-python-0.7.1.tar.gz 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. The upstream project does not have tarball releases, so I believe the "invalid-url" warning is acceptable. The "invalid-license" is clearly more of an issue. The upstream git repository just says "LGPL", which I have reproduced here. I have been in contact with the author of the binding for clarification of his license. Once he responds, I will update the SPEC file accordingly. Finally, I know that the fedora guidelines prefer "python-" to "-python", but the upstream author of the bindings prefers "libssh2-python", which is what I've done here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 531107] Review Request: perl-SQL-Tokenizer - A Perl package to tokenize SQL, generically
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531107 Marcela Mašláňová changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(da...@fetter.org) --- Comment #18 from Marcela Mašláňová 2011-02-28 10:26:57 EST --- Ping? If you are still interested in this package, could you remove the file ._Tokenizer.pm or comment, why it is needed? We could finish it in that case. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 680666] Review Request: rssdler - A utility to automatically download enclosures and other objects linked to from various types of RSS feeds
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=680666 Sergio Belkin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seb...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Sergio Belkin 2011-02-28 10:30:47 EST --- Hi Ankur A note: Perhaps you don't need neither BuildRoot tag nor %clean section Greetings -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 676544] Review Request: pidgin-logviewer - User friendly and intuitive way of viewing chat logs in Pidgin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676544 --- Comment #26 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-02-28 10:59:10 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 679913] Review Request: ftop - Shows progress of open files and file systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679913 --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-02-28 10:59:26 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 680936] Review Request: libssh2-python - Python bindings for the libssh2 library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=680936 --- Comment #1 from Chris Lalancette 2011-02-28 11:09:54 EST --- OK, the maintainer got back to me and said: It's the GNU Lesser General Public License v2.1. Maybe I should add a copy of the license to the repository. I've encouraged him to do the latter. For now, I've updated the SPEC file to have this piece of information and rpmlint now says: [clalance@localhost SPECS]$ rpmlint libssh2-python.spec libssh2-python.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: libssh2-python-0.7.1.tar.gz 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [clalance@localhost SPECS]$ rpmlint /home/clalance/rpmbuild/SRPMS/libssh2-python-0.7.1-1.fc14.src.rpm libssh2-python.src: W: invalid-url Source0: libssh2-python-0.7.1.tar.gz 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673630] Review Request: habari - Lite blogging software
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673630 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jedelsky 2011-02-28 11:24:56 EST --- Thanks a lot for you review.. - sed hint: I think, there isn't building package, just copying. sed comand "prepare" files for this, so I think it should be in %prep section.. But I'm not sure :) - change log typo: fixed - locale files: I spend a lot of time, but I don't what's a right way to move files with %find_lang macro. I wrote to devel list but without answer (http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2011-February/148833.html). My SPEC file is with %find_lang now but rpmbuild return "warning: File listed twice" error. - I will move doc folder in next SPEC SPEC file: http://static.stderr.cz/fedora/habari/0.6.6-3/habari.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 651990] Review Request: Prahita Masterpiece Uni Sans font - Myanmar TrueType font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=651990 --- Comment #3 from Tin Myo Htet 2011-02-28 11:29:24 EST --- Hi, Thanks for informal review and advice, how can I get a package sponsor? Myo Htet -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 680936] Review Request: libssh2-python - Python bindings for the libssh2 library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=680936 Pavel Zhukov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pa...@zhukoff.net --- Comment #2 from Pavel Zhukov 2011-02-28 11:57:06 EST --- If you can't find a direct download URL, then put only the filename in SourceX and give download instructions in a comment. Please see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#Using_Revision_Control >> Maybe I should add a copy of the license to the repository. Yes, You should provide license text and contact upstream. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#License_Text -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 651990] Review Request: Prahita Masterpiece Uni Sans font - Myanmar TrueType font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=651990 --- Comment #4 from Ankur Sinha 2011-02-28 12:03:41 EST --- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 234667] Review Request: dwarves - DWARF Tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234667 Jon Stanley changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jonstan...@gmail.com Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #25 from Jon Stanley 2011-02-28 12:11:17 EST --- Package Change Request == Package Name: dwarves New Branches: EL-5 EL-6 Owners: jstanley InitialCC: acme -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 652778] Review Request: kanotf-fonts - OpenType Kannada fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652778 --- Comment #9 from Susmit 2011-02-28 12:19:58 EST --- Oops..I forgot that rawhide is now f16. Thanks for the correction. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 652778] Review Request: kanotf-fonts - OpenType Kannada fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652778 --- Comment #11 from Susmit 2011-02-28 12:21:18 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: kanotf-fonts Short Description: OpenType Kannada fonts Owners: susmit Branches: f14 f15 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 652778] Review Request: kanotf-fonts - OpenType Kannada fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652778 --- Comment #10 from Susmit 2011-02-28 12:20:24 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: kanotf-fonts Short Description: OpenType Kannada fonts Owners: susmit Branches: f14, f15 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 680936] Review Request: libssh2-python - Python bindings for the libssh2 library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=680936 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-02-28 12:24:08 EST --- Please note that no guideline we have should be construed to mean that the packager should add any license text that is not already present in the upstream sources. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 676544] Review Request: pidgin-logviewer - User friendly and intuitive way of viewing chat logs in Pidgin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676544 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System 2011-02-28 12:28:40 EST --- Package pidgin-logviewer-0.2-9.20110228svn15.fc15: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 15 updates-testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing pidgin-logviewer-0.2-9.20110228svn15.fc15' as soon as you are able to, then reboot. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pidgin-logviewer-0.2-9.20110228svn15.fc15 then log in and leave karma (feedback). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 676544] Review Request: pidgin-logviewer - User friendly and intuitive way of viewing chat logs in Pidgin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676544 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 676544] Review Request: pidgin-logviewer - User friendly and intuitive way of viewing chat logs in Pidgin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676544 --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System 2011-02-28 12:30:00 EST --- Package pidgin-logviewer-0.2-9.20110228svn15.fc14: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 14 updates-testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing pidgin-logviewer-0.2-9.20110228svn15.fc14' as soon as you are able to, then reboot. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pidgin-logviewer-0.2-9.20110228svn15.fc14 then log in and leave karma (feedback). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 676544] Review Request: pidgin-logviewer - User friendly and intuitive way of viewing chat logs in Pidgin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676544 --- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System 2011-02-28 12:31:12 EST --- Package pidgin-logviewer-0.2-9.20110228svn15.fc13: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 13 updates-testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing pidgin-logviewer-0.2-9.20110228svn15.fc13' as soon as you are able to, then reboot. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pidgin-logviewer-0.2-9.20110228svn15.fc13 then log in and leave karma (feedback). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 539693] Review Request: plowsahre - command-line downloader/uploader for some of the most popular file-sharing websites
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539693 --- Comment #18 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2011-02-28 12:52:49 EST --- Initially gocr was added by my request of new letitbit plugin (http://code.google.com/p/plowshare/issues/detail?id=65&can=1&q=letitbit&colspec=ID%20Type%20Status%20Priority%20Owner%20Summary%20Reporter%20Modified) and I think it is no needed now at all. Caca support also added by my request - http://code.google.com/p/plowshare/issues/detail?id=58&can=1&q=caca&colspec=ID%20Type%20Status%20Priority%20Owner%20Summary%20Reporter%20Modified and it is needed. http://hubbitus.info/rpm/Fedora13/plowshare/plowshare-0.9.4-0.3.svn1358.fc13.src.rpm Thibault, no problem absolutely, there now hurry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 643140] Review Request: autokey - A desktop automation utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=643140
--- Comment #9 from Raghu Udiyar 2011-02-28 13:02:39
EST ---
Resolved rpmlint errors :
- Added script to remove shebangs from python libraries
- Service not enabled by default any more
- Added lockfile to initscript (Patch has been posted to upstream)
SPEC : http://dl.dropbox.com/u/7899621/autokey/autokey.spec
SRPM : http://dl.dropbox.com/u/7899621/autokey/autokey-0.71.2-3.fc14.src.rpm
$ rpmlint autokey.spec ../SRPMS/autokey-0.71.2-3.fc14.src.rpm
../RPMS/noarch/autokey-*
autokey.spec: W: invalid-url Source0:
http://autokey.googlecode.com/files/autokey_0.71.2.tar.gz HTTP Error 404: Not
Found
autokey.src: W: invalid-url Source0:
http://autokey.googlecode.com/files/autokey_0.71.2.tar.gz HTTP Error 404: Not
Found
autokey.noarch: W: no-documentation
autokey-common.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency python-xlib
autokey-common.noarch: W: incoherent-init-script-name autokey
('autokey-common', 'autokey-commond')
5 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 4 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 680936] Review Request: libssh2-python - Python bindings for the libssh2 library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=680936 --- Comment #4 from Chris Lalancette 2011-02-28 13:07:52 EST --- (In reply to comment #3) > Please note that no guideline we have should be construed to mean that the > packager should add any license text that is not already present in the > upstream sources. I'm not doing that at all. As I said, I was clarifying that with upstream what the license is, and he mentioned that it should be LGPL v2.1. If he doesn't add the license text himself in the next couple of days, I'll submit my own patch to upstream to do that. That being said, I'm confident that this is LGPLv2.1, it just needs to be made explicit. So if someone wants to do the rest of the review, we can get that part out of the way and then have it ready to go once the license terms are in the upstream repository. Chris Lalancette -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 678128] Review Request: cdw - Front-end for tools used for burning data CD/DVD
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678128
Mamoru Tasaka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
Flag||fedora-review?
--- Comment #14 from Mamoru Tasaka 2011-02-28
13:20:06 EST ---
Some comments
* License
- The license tag should be GPLv2+, from source codes and
man file.
* Timestamps
- Please consider to use
-
make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p"
-
to keep timestamps on installed man file.
? ${LIBS}
- It seems that before setting LIBS environ LIBS is null, and
LIBS="-lm" is sufficient.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 234667] Review Request: dwarves - DWARF Tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234667 --- Comment #26 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-02-28 13:26:55 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 652778] Review Request: kanotf-fonts - OpenType Kannada fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652778 --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-02-28 13:27:10 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 680268] Review Request: cputnik - Dockapp which displays cpu and memory usage
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=680268 Mario Blättermann changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #13 from Mario Blättermann 2011-02-28 13:30:26 EST --- (In reply to comment #12) > Please don't forget to set the fedora-cvs flag to "?". Done. Thanks for the hint. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 679613] Review Request: python-flask - A microframework for Python based on Werkzeug, Jinja 2 and good intentions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679613 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2011-02-28 13:46:37 EST --- Package python-flask-0.6.1-2.fc14: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 14 updates-testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing python-flask-0.6.1-2.fc14' as soon as you are able to, then reboot. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-flask-0.6.1-2.fc14 then log in and leave karma (feedback). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 679613] Review Request: python-flask - A microframework for Python based on Werkzeug, Jinja 2 and good intentions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679613 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 679613] Review Request: python-flask - A microframework for Python based on Werkzeug, Jinja 2 and good intentions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679613 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2011-02-28 13:45:12 EST --- Package python-flask-0.6.1-2.fc15: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 15 updates-testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing python-flask-0.6.1-2.fc15' as soon as you are able to, then reboot. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-flask-0.6.1-2.fc15 then log in and leave karma (feedback). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 679613] Review Request: python-flask - A microframework for Python based on Werkzeug, Jinja 2 and good intentions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679613 Dan Young changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-02-28 13:49:18 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 679613] Review Request: python-flask - A microframework for Python based on Werkzeug, Jinja 2 and good intentions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679613 --- Comment #9 from Dan Young 2011-02-28 13:40:21 EST --- Thanks for the feedback on the intersphinx build function, Toshio. In a scratch build, that did in fact just time out as you mentioned. I went ahead and did the final builds exactly as reviewed. Will submit to Bodhi for f14 and f15, then close w/ NEXTRELEASE. Thanks all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 677943] Review Request: liblouis - Braille translation and back-translation library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=677943
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mari...@gnome.org
--- Comment #2 from Mario Blättermann 2011-02-28 14:27:41
EST ---
[mario@localhost ~]$ rpmlint liblouis.spec
liblouis.spec:18: W: unversioned-explicit-provides bundled(gnulib)
liblouis.spec:76: W: macro-in-comment %check
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
The second issue of rpmlint we can throw away. The first one declares the known
exception for gnulib libraries, but what's the reason of rpmlint for this
issue?
Additionally, you should replace the occurences of the package name in the
%files sections with the macro %{name}.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 678128] Review Request: cdw - Front-end for tools used for burning data CD/DVD
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678128
--- Comment #15 from Sergio Belkin 2011-02-28 14:55:26 EST
---
(In reply to comment #14)
Updated file URL's
***
Spec URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/14217893/cdw.spec
SRPM URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/14217893/cdw-0.6.0-7.fc16.src.rpm
***
> Some comments
>
> * License
> - The license tag should be GPLv2+, from source codes and
> man file.
You're right. Fixed.
>
> * Timestamps
> - Please consider to use
> -
> make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p"
> -
> to keep timestamps on installed man file.
Fixed!
>
> ? ${LIBS}
> - It seems that before setting LIBS environ LIBS is null, and
> LIBS="-lm" is sufficient.
Yup, it's null, fixed too!
Thanks Mamoru!
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 680308] Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Schema - XML based database schema manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=680308 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 680308] Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Schema - XML based database schema manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=680308 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2011-02-28 15:20:10 EST --- Package php-pear-MDB2-Schema-0.8.5-1.fc14: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 14 updates-testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing php-pear-MDB2-Schema-0.8.5-1.fc14' as soon as you are able to, then reboot. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-pear-MDB2-Schema-0.8.5-1.fc14 then log in and leave karma (feedback). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 680308] Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Schema - XML based database schema manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=680308 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2011-02-28 15:19:47 EST --- Package php-pear-MDB2-Schema-0.8.5-1.fc13: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 13 updates-testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing php-pear-MDB2-Schema-0.8.5-1.fc13' as soon as you are able to, then reboot. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-pear-MDB2-Schema-0.8.5-1.fc13 then log in and leave karma (feedback). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 680308] Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Schema - XML based database schema manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=680308 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2011-02-28 15:19:59 EST --- Package php-pear-MDB2-Schema-0.8.5-1.el6: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing php-pear-MDB2-Schema-0.8.5-1.el6' as soon as you are able to, then reboot. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-pear-MDB2-Schema-0.8.5-1.el6 then log in and leave karma (feedback). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 680308] Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Schema - XML based database schema manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=680308 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2011-02-28 15:19:35 EST --- Package php-pear-MDB2-Schema-0.8.5-1.fc15: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 15 updates-testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing php-pear-MDB2-Schema-0.8.5-1.fc15' as soon as you are able to, then reboot. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-pear-MDB2-Schema-0.8.5-1.fc15 then log in and leave karma (feedback). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 678128] Review Request: cdw - Front-end for tools used for burning data CD/DVD
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678128
--- Comment #16 from Mamoru Tasaka 2011-02-28
16:01:10 EST ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> (In reply to comment #14)
> > * Timestamps
> > - Please consider to use
> > -
> > make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p"
> > -
The above line is one line (i.e. INSTALL="install -p" is the option
of "make" command).
> > to keep timestamps on installed man file.
>
> > ? ${LIBS}
> > - It seems that before setting LIBS environ LIBS is null, and
> > LIBS="-lm" is sufficient.
>
> Yup, it's null, fixed too!
This does not seem to be fixed yet.
By the way, now you can use fedorapeople.org site for hosting your srpm
and so on. Please try it, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedorapeople.org
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 234667] Review Request: dwarves - DWARF Tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234667 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System 2011-02-28 16:13:48 EST --- Package dwarves-1.9-2.el6: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing dwarves-1.9-2.el6' as soon as you are able to, then reboot. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dwarves-1.9-2.el6 then log in and leave karma (feedback). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 677943] Review Request: liblouis - Braille translation and back-translation library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=677943
--- Comment #3 from Martin Gieseking 2011-02-28
17:01:49 EST ---
Thanks for the notes. I've added the release date of the bundled gnulib library
as there's no official version number. Also using %{name} more consistently
now.
Spec URL: http://mgieseki.fedorapeople.org/liblouis/liblouis.spec
SRPM URL:
http://mgieseki.fedorapeople.org/liblouis/liblouis-2.2.0-2.fc14.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 678128] Review Request: cdw - Front-end for tools used for burning data CD/DVD
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678128
--- Comment #17 from Sergio Belkin 2011-02-28 17:13:09 EST
---
(In reply to comment #16)
Hi Mamoru
Firstly the newly files URL's:
***
http://sebelk.fedorapeople.org/cdw-0.6.0-8.fc14.src.rpm
http://sebelk.fedorapeople.org/cdw.spec
***
> (In reply to comment #15)
> > (In reply to comment #14)
> > > * Timestamps
> > > - Please consider to use
> > > -
> > > make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p"
> > > -
>
> The above line is one line (i.e. INSTALL="install -p" is the option
> of "make" command).
Shame on me :(
>
> > > to keep timestamps on installed man file.
> >
> > > ? ${LIBS}
> > > - It seems that before setting LIBS environ LIBS is null, and
> > > LIBS="-lm" is sufficient.
> >
> > Yup, it's null, fixed too!
>
> This does not seem to be fixed yet.
Id. above.
>
> By the way, now you can use fedorapeople.org site for hosting your srpm
> and so on. Please try it, see:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedorapeople.org
Now those mistakes are fixed and files are in fedorapeople.org :)
Thanks in advance
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673854] Review Request: rubygem-cloudfiles - Cloud Files API in ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673854 --- Comment #3 from Nick Bebout 2011-02-28 17:21:00 EST --- [please fix] Each Ruby package must indicate the Ruby ABI version it depends on with a line like Requires: ruby(abi) = 1.8 [please fix] Ruby packages must require ruby at build with a BuildRequires: ruby, and may indicate the minimal ruby version they need for building. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 672953] Review Request: python26-jsonschema - JSON Schema is a specification for defining the structure of JSON data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672953 BJ Dierkes changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||678690 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 672953] Review Request: python26-jsonschema - JSON Schema is a specification for defining the structure of JSON data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672953 --- Comment #5 from BJ Dierkes 2011-02-28 17:55:55 EST --- Because this module does not exist in Fedora/EPEL under the stock python stack, I'd like to request that you convert this package to be 'python-jsonschema'. Then add python26-jsonschema as a subpackage utilizing __multiple_python_os_install_post macro. See: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678690 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673839] Review Request: boost141 - The free peer-reviewed portable C++ source libraries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673839 --- Comment #22 from Robert Scheck 2011-02-28 18:40:38 EST --- Spec URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/boost141.spec SRPM URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/boost141-1.41.0-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 550582] Review Request: dpkg - Package maintenance system for Debian Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550582 --- Comment #36 from Fedora Update System 2011-02-28 18:55:49 EST --- dpkg-1.15.5.6-6.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 550582] Review Request: dpkg - Package maintenance system for Debian Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550582 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|dpkg-1.15.5.6-3.fc11|dpkg-1.15.5.6-6.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 680308] Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Schema - XML based database schema manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=680308 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2011-02-28 18:55:27 EST --- php-pear-MDB2-Schema-0.8.5-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-pear-MDB2-Schema'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-pear-MDB2-Schema-0.8.5-1.el6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 205269] Review Request: perl-Sub-Exporter - Sophisticated exporter for custom-built routines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=205269 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2011-02-28 19:01:31 EST --- perl-Sub-Exporter-0.975-1.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674006] Review Request: openni - Library for human-machine Natural Interaction
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674006 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2011-02-28 19:01:54 EST --- openni-1.0.0.25-0.4.git4c9ff978.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 672807] Review Request: perl-CPAN-Meta-YAML - Read and write a subset of YAML for CPAN Meta files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672807 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2011-02-28 18:59:22 EST --- perl-CPAN-Meta-YAML-0.003-3.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-CPAN-Meta-YAML'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-CPAN-Meta-YAML-0.003-3.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 672801] Review Request: perl-Perl-OSType - Map Perl operating system names to generic types
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672801 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2011-02-28 19:00:32 EST --- perl-Perl-OSType-1.002-3.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Perl-OSType'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Perl-OSType-1.002-3.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 652778] Review Request: kanotf-fonts - OpenType Kannada fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652778 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 652778] Review Request: kanotf-fonts - OpenType Kannada fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652778 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2011-02-28 19:32:21 EST --- Package kanotf-fonts-20050515-1.fc15: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 15 updates-testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing kanotf-fonts-20050515-1.fc15' as soon as you are able to, then reboot. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kanotf-fonts-20050515-1.fc15 then log in and leave karma (feedback). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 652778] Review Request: kanotf-fonts - OpenType Kannada fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652778 Susmit changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-02-28 19:35:20 --- Comment #14 from Susmit 2011-02-28 19:35:20 EST --- Thanks Jason. Closing as NEXTRELEASE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 539693] Review Request: plowsahre - command-line downloader/uploader for some of the most popular file-sharing websites
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539693 --- Comment #19 from Elder Marco 2011-02-28 19:41:43 EST --- Thanks for your explanation Pavel. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675388] Review Request: xmlada - full XML stack for Ada
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675388
--- Comment #17 from Björn Persson 2011-02-28
19:59:03 EST ---
(In reply to comment #16)
I'm afraid Dmitrij was a little too eager to finish this review.
> + The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
> + With new Ada guide too.
It doesn't meet the recently approved Ada guidelines:
· "BuildRequires: gcc-gnat" is missing.
· The project files contain a hard-coded directory name:
"../../include/xmlada".
· "Requires: fedora-gnat-project-common >= 2" is missing from the -devel
package.
· The project files aren't placed in %{_GNAT_project_dir}.
> * Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files
> (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call
> ldconfig in %post and %postun.
> Package contain symlinks in %{_libdir}.
So it doesn't technically put the libraries in %{_libdir}, but don't they still
need to get into the linker's cache somehow? How will that happen if ldconfig
isn't run?
> + A package must own all directories that it creates.
It doesn't own the directory %{_libdir}/xmlada/relocatable.
> + In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package
> using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} =
> %{version}-%{release}
"%{?_isa}" is missing.
Some other things I have noticed:
· What is the empty directory %{_libdir}/xmlada/static needed for?
· The group of the -devel subpackage should be "Development/Libraries".
· The documentation should be in the -devel subpackage, except for COPYING.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675529] Review Request: perl-Test-CheckManifest - Check if your Manifest matches your distro
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675529 Ralf Corsepius changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2011-02-28 22:10:46 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675542] Review Request:perl-Hash-MoreUtils - Provide the stuff missing in Hash::Util
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675542 Bug 675542 depends on bug 675529, which changed state. Bug 675529 Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-CheckManifest - Check if your Manifest matches your distro https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675529 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 659082] Review Request: redland-bindings - language bindings for redland
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659082
Orcan Ogetbil changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #10 from Orcan Ogetbil 2011-02-28 22:38:18
EST ---
Sorry for the delay. This looks good. In the packaging list, we were advised to
name the common package "%{name}-common", whereas you simply named it %{name}.
This should not be an issue. Moreover, you could also apply the license
clarification patch.
However these are not blockers. I leave them up to you to keep as is or to
change.
---
This package (redland-bindings) is APPROVED by oget
---
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
