[Bug 681093] Review Request: wdiff - A front-end to GNU diff

2011-03-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681093

--- Comment #6 from Pavel Zhukov pa...@zhukoff.net 2011-03-01 03:02:56 EST ---
f a package contains a GUI application, then it needs to also include a
properly installed .desktop file
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Desktop_files

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 225937] Merge Review: jakarta-oro

2011-03-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225937

Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|INSUFFICIENT_DATA   |RAWHIDE

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 681093] Review Request: wdiff - A front-end to GNU diff

2011-03-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681093

Tim Lauridsen t...@rasmil.dk changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||t...@rasmil.dk

--- Comment #7 from Tim Lauridsen t...@rasmil.dk 2011-03-01 04:00:27 EST ---
Check here howto handle translation files
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Handling_Locale_Files

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 675388] Review Request: xmlada - full XML stack for Ada

2011-03-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675388

--- Comment #18 from Pavel Zhukov pa...@zhukoff.net 2011-03-01 04:54:27 EST 
---
(In reply to comment #17)
 (In reply to comment #16) 
 It doesn't meet the recently approved Ada guidelines:
 · BuildRequires: gcc-gnat is missing.
fixed

 · The project files contain a hard-coded directory name:
 ../../include/xmlada.
fixed 

 · Requires: fedora-gnat-project-common = 2 is missing from the -devel
 package.
Why -devel should depend on fedora-gnat-project-common? 

 · The project files aren't placed in %{_GNAT_project_dir}.
fixed

 It doesn't own the directory %{_libdir}/xmlada/relocatable.
fixed

 %{?_isa} is missing.
fixed 

 Some other things I have noticed:
 · What is the empty directory %{_libdir}/xmlada/static needed for?
It's needed for some other packages (gprbuild and aws for example)
 · The group of the -devel subpackage should be Development/Libraries.
fixed
 · The documentation should be in the -devel subpackage, except for COPYING.
Why? I cannot find guidelines about it. Why README (for example) should be in
-devel?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 681093] Review Request: wdiff - A front-end to GNU diff

2011-03-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681093

--- Comment #8 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2011-03-01 05:06:11 EST 
---

(In reply to comment #6)
 f a package contains a GUI application, then it needs to also include a
 properly installed .desktop file
 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Desktop_files

This package does not contain any GUI so no need to follow this.

(In reply to comment #7)
 Check here howto handle translation files
 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Handling_Locale_Files

I don't see %find_lang is going to work here.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 680473] Review Request: ghc-ForSyDe - Formal System Design methodology

2011-03-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=680473

Shakthi Kannan shakthim...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|needinfo?(shakthimaan@gmail |
   |.com)   |

--- Comment #3 from Shakthi Kannan shakthim...@gmail.com 2011-03-01 05:27:09 
EST ---
Since upstream has used the .vhd in the data-files section, it has been
included in the -devel package. Have also asked upstream for clarification, and
haven't got a reply yet.

Added ghc-mtl as dependency.

SPEC: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/ghc-ForSyDe.spec
SRPM:
http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/ghc-ForSyDe-3.1.1-2.fc14.src.rpm

Successful Koji build for F-14:

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2875536

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 681093] Review Request: wdiff - A front-end to GNU diff

2011-03-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681093

--- Comment #9 from Praveen Kumar kumarpraveen.nit...@gmail.com 2011-03-01 
05:24:38 EST ---
(In reply to comment #8)
 (In reply to comment #6)
  f a package contains a GUI application, then it needs to also include a
  properly installed .desktop file
  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Desktop_files
 
 This package does not contain any GUI so no need to follow this.
It is given on source main page but when I run it on terminal it doesn't show
any GUI.
 
 (In reply to comment #7)
  Check here howto handle translation files
  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Handling_Locale_Files
 
 I don't see %find_lang is going to work here.
Right, I added it before but it doesn't seem to work.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 674207] Review Request: python-cloudfiles - Python language bindings for Rackspace CloudFiles API

2011-03-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674207

Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|needinfo?   |

--- Comment #6 from Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com 2011-03-01 05:38:47 EST 
---

Can you import this package into rawhide and Fedora 15?  I need it for enabling
rackspace cloud support in Deja-dup and we are nearing the Alpha release.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 675388] Review Request: xmlada - full XML stack for Ada

2011-03-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675388

--- Comment #19 from Pavel Zhukov pa...@zhukoff.net 2011-03-01 05:51:07 EST 
---
SPEC: http://landgraf.fedorapeople.org/packages/requested/xmlada/xmlada.spec
SRPMS:
http://landgraf.fedorapeople.org/packages/requested/xmlada/xmlada-3.2.1-9.fc15.src.rpm
koji http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2875648

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 680308] Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Schema - XML based database schema manager

2011-03-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=680308

--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-01 
07:08:02 EST ---
Package php-pear-MDB2-Schema-0.8.0-2.el5:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 updates-testing repository,
* should be available at your local mirror within two days.
Update it with:
# su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing
php-pear-MDB2-Schema-0.8.0-2.el5'
as soon as you are able to, then reboot.
Please go to the following url:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-pear-MDB2-Schema-0.8.0-2.el5
then log in and leave karma (feedback).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 673854] Review Request: rubygem-cloudfiles - Cloud Files API in ruby

2011-03-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673854

--- Comment #4 from Major Hayden ma...@mhtx.net 2011-03-01 08:28:33 EST ---
Thanks for going over this for me, Nick.  Updates made:

http://majorhayden.com/RPMS/rubygem-cloudfiles/rubygem-cloudfiles.spec
http://majorhayden.com/RPMS/rubygem-cloudfiles/rubygem-cloudfiles-1.4.10-2.fc14.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 565858] Review Request: rubygem-thin - A thin and fast web server

2011-03-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=565858

Michal Fojtik mfoj...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?

--- Comment #27 from Michal Fojtik mfoj...@redhat.com 2011-03-01 08:53:48 EST 
---
Package Change Request
==
Package Name: rubygem-thin
New Branches: F15
Owners: mfojtik

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 680368] Review Request: decentxml - XML parser optimized for round-tripping and code reuse

2011-03-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=680368

Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2011-03-01 09:16:39

--- Comment #5 from Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com 2011-03-01 
09:16:39 EST ---
I fixed the javadoc generation.

Package built:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=230802

Thanks for review and repos.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 680368] Review Request: decentxml - XML parser optimized for round-tripping and code reuse

2011-03-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=680368

Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks|652183(FE-JAVASIG)  |

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 679913] Review Request: ftop - Shows progress of open files and file systems

2011-03-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679913

--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 
2011-03-01 09:43:19 EST ---
Package ftop-1.0-3.fc15:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora 15 updates-testing repository,
* should be available at your local mirror within two days.
Update it with:
# su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing ftop-1.0-3.fc15'
as soon as you are able to, then reboot.
Please go to the following url:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ftop-1.0-3.fc15
then log in and leave karma (feedback).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 679913] Review Request: ftop - Shows progress of open files and file systems

2011-03-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679913

--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 
2011-03-01 09:43:34 EST ---
Package ftop-1.0-3.fc14:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora 14 updates-testing repository,
* should be available at your local mirror within two days.
Update it with:
# su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing ftop-1.0-3.fc14'
as soon as you are able to, then reboot.
Please go to the following url:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ftop-1.0-3.fc14
then log in and leave karma (feedback).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 679913] Review Request: ftop - Shows progress of open files and file systems

2011-03-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679913

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 679913] Review Request: ftop - Shows progress of open files and file systems

2011-03-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679913

--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 
2011-03-01 09:43:26 EST ---
Package ftop-1.0-3.el6:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing repository,
* should be available at your local mirror within two days.
Update it with:
# su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing ftop-1.0-3.el6'
as soon as you are able to, then reboot.
Please go to the following url:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ftop-1.0-3.el6
then log in and leave karma (feedback).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 565858] Review Request: rubygem-thin - A thin and fast web server

2011-03-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=565858

--- Comment #28 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-03-01 09:53:36 EST 
---
This package already has an f15 branch.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 680268] Review Request: cputnik - Dockapp which displays cpu and memory usage

2011-03-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=680268

--- Comment #14 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-03-01 09:54:42 EST 
---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 676146] Review request: trace-gui - GUI tools from trace-cmd

2011-03-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676146

--- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-03-01 09:53:59 EST 
---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 674008] Review Request: openrave - Open Robotics Automation Virtual Environment

2011-03-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674008

--- Comment #16 from Rosen Diankov rosen.dian...@gmail.com 2011-03-01 
10:07:27 EST ---
Hi all,

openrave r2131 just added support for the Open Asset Import Library:

http://assimp.sourceforge.net/

This allows users to specify robot geometry in many more formats than was
previously possible:

http://assimp.sourceforge.net/main_features_formats.html

There is already a discussion in including it into fedora here:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=635511

perhaps usage with openrave can speed things up...

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 674008] Review Request: openrave - Open Robotics Automation Virtual Environment

2011-03-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674008

--- Comment #17 from Tim Niemueller t...@niemueller.de 2011-03-01 11:37:40 
EST ---
Looks like progress on assimp might take a while. Does that eliminate the need
for collada? Sorry, I haven't found a chance to look at your collada changes,
yet. Will do asap.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 681093] Review Request: wdiff - A front-end to GNU diff

2011-03-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681093

--- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2011-03-01 
11:40:54 EST ---
(In reply to comment #9)
  (In reply to comment #7)
   Check here howto handle translation files
   http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Handling_Locale_Files
  
  I don't see %find_lang is going to work here.
 Right, I added it before but it doesn't seem to work.

Really? I just tried and it works as usual (Did you surely
add -f %{name}.lang on the line of %files ?)

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/scratch/mtasaka/task_2876462/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 679980] Review Request: Octopus - TCP/IP Load Balancer

2011-03-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679980

--- Comment #4 from Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com 2011-03-01 12:47:17 
EST ---
* Please enter your real name in your bugzilla.redhat.com account preferences.
Currently, you are listed as (none) on the NEEDSPONSOR list, which isn't
helpful.


 BuildRequires: net-snmp-devel = 5.0, net-snmp-libs = 5.0, autoconf

Why autoconf? The spec file doesn't do anything with autoconf.


 Requires: net-snmp-libs = 5.0

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Explicit_Requires


 %doc README CHANGELOG COPYRIGHT INSTALL TODO AUTHORS COPYING

In case the file 'INSTALL' is the same as (or very similar to)
/usr/share/autoconf/INSTALL, it is not relevant to RPM package users and only
adds confusion.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 680268] Review Request: cputnik - Dockapp which displays cpu and memory usage

2011-03-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=680268

--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 
2011-03-01 12:25:25 EST ---
Package cputnik-0.2.0-4.fc14:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora 14 updates-testing repository,
* should be available at your local mirror within two days.
Update it with:
# su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing cputnik-0.2.0-4.fc14'
as soon as you are able to, then reboot.
Please go to the following url:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cputnik-0.2.0-4.fc14
then log in and leave karma (feedback).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 480056] Review Request: libchamplain-gtk - Gtk+ widget wrapper for libchamplain

2011-03-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480056

Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 CC||mschwe...@gmail.com
 Resolution||NOTABUG
   Flag|fedora-review?  |
Last Closed||2011-03-01 12:58:07

--- Comment #8 from Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com 2011-03-01 12:58:07 
EST ---
Yes, the packages have been merged, so there is no need to continue here
anymore.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 479978] Review Request: newmat - C++ matrix library

2011-03-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479978

Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-review?  |

--- Comment #32 from Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com 2011-03-01 13:03:30 
EST ---
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers#Get_Sponsored

| Review and approval for the first package for new packagers must be done
| by registered sponsors. Subsequent reviews can be done by any package
| maintainer. Informal reviews can always be done by anyone interested.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 464931] Review Request: appliance-os recipe for building the appliance operating system

2011-03-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464931

Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-review?  |

--- Comment #10 from Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com 2011-03-01 13:06:46 
EST ---
Resetting fedora-review flag (as the wrong setting leads to a wrong result in
the Cached Bugzilla Review Tracker).
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process#Contributor

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 674008] Review Request: openrave - Open Robotics Automation Virtual Environment

2011-03-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674008

--- Comment #18 from Rosen Diankov rosen.dian...@gmail.com 2011-03-01 
12:31:17 EST ---
collada stays.

assimp is used just for extracting geometry from non-collada files, which is
then combined with the openrave custom XML for kinematics.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 680268] Review Request: cputnik - Dockapp which displays cpu and memory usage

2011-03-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=680268

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 681093] Review Request: wdiff - A front-end to GNU diff

2011-03-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681093

--- Comment #11 from Praveen Kumar kumarpraveen.nit...@gmail.com 2011-03-01 
13:28:11 EST ---
(In reply to comment #10)
 (In reply to comment #9)
   (In reply to comment #7)
Check here howto handle translation files
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Handling_Locale_Files
   
   I don't see %find_lang is going to work here.
  Right, I added it before but it doesn't seem to work.
 
 Really? I just tried and it works as usual (Did you surely
 add -f %{name}.lang on the line of %files ?)
 
 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/scratch/mtasaka/task_2876462/
Sorry, I made a typo mistake (wrote .lany instead of .lang), Thanks for
pointing out here is updated spec and srpm url

Spec URL: http://kumarpraveen.fedorapeople.org/wdiff/wdiff.spec
SRPM URL: http://kumarpraveen.fedorapeople.org/wdiff/wdiff-0.6.5-4.fc14.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 680268] Review Request: cputnik - Dockapp which displays cpu and memory usage

2011-03-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=680268

--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 
2011-03-01 12:25:14 EST ---
Package cputnik-0.2.0-4.fc15:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora 15 updates-testing repository,
* should be available at your local mirror within two days.
Update it with:
# su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing cputnik-0.2.0-4.fc15'
as soon as you are able to, then reboot.
Please go to the following url:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cputnik-0.2.0-4.fc15
then log in and leave karma (feedback).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 672953] Review Request: python26-jsonschema - JSON Schema is a specification for defining the structure of JSON data

2011-03-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672953

Jeffrey Ness jeffrey.n...@rackspace.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||WONTFIX
Last Closed||2011-03-01 13:59:52

--- Comment #6 from Jeffrey Ness jeffrey.n...@rackspace.com 2011-03-01 
13:59:52 EST ---
It seems the python jsonschemaa project is dead and has not been updated since
2008.
   http://code.google.com/p/jsonschema/ 

I think it would be best to not push this dead package in to the active EPEL
community, I will be closing this bug.

Jeffrey-

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 539693] Review Request: plowshare - command-line downloader/uploader for some of the most popular file-sharing websites

2011-03-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539693

Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|Review Request: plowsare -  |Review Request: plowshare -
   |command-line|command-line
   |downloader/uploader for |downloader/uploader for
   |some of the most popular|some of the most popular
   |file-sharing websites   |file-sharing websites

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 539693] Review Request: plowsare - command-line downloader/uploader for some of the most popular file-sharing websites

2011-03-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539693

Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|Review Request: plowsahre - |Review Request: plowsare -
   |command-line|command-line
   |downloader/uploader for |downloader/uploader for
   |some of the most popular|some of the most popular
   |file-sharing websites   |file-sharing websites

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 674207] Review Request: python-cloudfiles - Python language bindings for Rackspace CloudFiles API

2011-03-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674207

--- Comment #7 from BJ Dierkes wdier...@rackspace.com 2011-03-01 15:12:51 EST 
---
I can't do anything until a formal review is completed.  

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process#Reviewer

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 674207] Review Request: python-cloudfiles - Python language bindings for Rackspace CloudFiles API

2011-03-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674207

--- Comment #8 from BJ Dierkes wdier...@rackspace.com 2011-03-01 15:16:27 EST 
---
I see you added the flag... but you gotta post more than just 'approved':

Include the text of your review in a comment in the ticket. For easy
readability, simply use a regular comment instead of an attachment.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 675388] Review Request: xmlada - full XML stack for Ada

2011-03-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675388

--- Comment #20 from Björn Persson bj...@xn--rombobjrn-67a.se 2011-03-01 
15:29:30 EST ---
(In reply to comment #18)
 (In reply to comment #17)
  · Requires: fedora-gnat-project-common = 2 is missing from the -devel
  package.
 Why -devel should depend on fedora-gnat-project-common? 

Because the -devel package contains project files which depend on
directories.gpr, which is in fedora-gnat-project-common, and we don't currently
have a mechanism to auto-detect this dependency. It must be = 2 because older
versions of fedora-gnat-project-common don't contain directories.gpr.

  Some other things I have noticed:
  · What is the empty directory %{_libdir}/xmlada/static needed for?
 It's needed for some other packages (gprbuild and aws for example)

It sounds odd, but I suppose it's OK. It doesn't break any guideline that I can
see.

  · The group of the -devel subpackage should be Development/Libraries.
 fixed

No, I still see System Environment/Libraries.

  · The documentation should be in the -devel subpackage, except for COPYING.
 Why? I cannot find guidelines about it. Why README (for example) should be in
 -devel?

Because the information in README is relevant only to developers who write
programs that use the library. Users who merely run programs linked to XMLada
won't be interested.

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Documentation
for example API documentation belongs in the -devel subpackage

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 675388] Review Request: xmlada - full XML stack for Ada

2011-03-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675388

--- Comment #21 from Pavel Zhukov pa...@zhukoff.net 2011-03-01 15:50:50 EST 
---
 Because the -devel package contains project files which depend on
 directories.gpr, which is in fedora-gnat-project-common, and we don't 
 currently
 have a mechanism to auto-detect this dependency. It must be = 2 because older
 versions of fedora-gnat-project-common don't contain directories.gpr.

I think the better way is to add fedora-gnat-common-project to gcc-gnat
Requires than adding one to all -devel packages. I'll create ticket for this.

 No, I still see System Environment/Libraries.
I'm sorry, fixed ... again

 Because the information in README is relevant only to developers who write
 programs that use the library. Users who merely run programs linked to XMLada
 won't be interested.
There are LICENSING, BUG REPORTS, USING THE LIBRARY sections in README not only
development information




-- 
Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 531107] Review Request: perl-SQL-Tokenizer - A Perl package to tokenize SQL, generically

2011-03-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531107

David Fetter da...@fetter.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|needinfo?(da...@fetter.org) |
   |,   |
   |needinfo?(da...@fetter.org) |

--- Comment #19 from David Fetter da...@fetter.org 2011-03-01 16:05:25 EST ---
Oops.  I'll try to get on this tonight.  How do I remove it?

Cheers,
David.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 679913] Review Request: ftop - Shows progress of open files and file systems

2011-03-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679913

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 
2011-03-01 16:35:59 EST ---
ftop-1.0-3.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 testing repository.  If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update ftop'.  You can provide
feedback for this update here:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ftop-1.0-3.fc15

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 680268] Review Request: cputnik - Dockapp which displays cpu and memory usage

2011-03-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=680268

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 
2011-03-01 16:36:47 EST ---
cputnik-0.2.0-4.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 testing repository.  If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update cputnik'.  You can provide
feedback for this update here:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cputnik-0.2.0-4.fc15

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 675402] Review Request: qpass - password manager

2011-03-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675402

--- Comment #6 from Golo Fuchert packa...@golotop.de 2011-03-01 16:57:23 EST 
---
Looks much better now, just two comments:

As it is stated in the Guidelines, you must not add a file more than once in
the %files section. So don't use
%{_datadir}/%{name}/
%{_datadir}/%{name}/translations/pl_PL.qm
the first line includes already the directory itself and everything that is
contained in that folder. The second line is neither needed, nor allowed.

Please make sure to update the %changelog and release number _every_ time you
change the spec file!

Are you aware of the sponsoring process? You should try to help other people
with their packages in order to convince a potential sponsor. For further
information see
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group
You sponsor will also make the final review.

Good luck!

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 668243] Review Request: libqb - An IPC library for high performance servers.

2011-03-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668243

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 668243] Review Request: libqb - An IPC library for high performance servers.

2011-03-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668243

--- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 
2011-03-01 17:24:45 EST ---
Package libqb-0.4.1-2.fc15:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora 15 updates-testing repository,
* should be available at your local mirror within two days.
Update it with:
# su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing libqb-0.4.1-2.fc15'
as soon as you are able to, then reboot.
Please go to the following url:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libqb-0.4.1-2.fc15
then log in and leave karma (feedback).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 619355] Review Request: python26-numpy - A fast multidimensional array facility for Python

2011-03-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=619355

--- Comment #12 from Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch 2011-03-01 17:51:29 
EST ---
Hi, any comment?

Steve

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 617400] Review Request: pfHandle - wrapper for tools to manage postfix mail queue

2011-03-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617400

--- Comment #17 from Carl Thompson fed...@red-dragon.com 2011-03-01 18:13:00 
EST ---
Package Change Request
==
Package Name: pfHandle
New Branches: EPEL5 EPEL6
Owners: redragon
InitialCC: redragon

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 617400] Review Request: pfHandle - wrapper for tools to manage postfix mail queue

2011-03-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617400

Carl Thompson fed...@red-dragon.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 673854] Review Request: rubygem-cloudfiles - Cloud Files API in ruby

2011-03-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673854

--- Comment #5 from Nick Bebout n...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-01 18:51:09 
EST ---
[nb@localhost SPECS]$ rpmlint rubygem-cloudfiles.spec 
rubygem-cloudfiles.spec:45: W: macro-in-comment %{buildroot}
rubygem-cloudfiles.spec:45: W: macro-in-comment %{_bindir}
rubygem-cloudfiles.spec:46: W: macro-in-comment %{buildroot}
rubygem-cloudfiles.spec:46: W: macro-in-comment %{geminstdir}
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.

[nb@localhost SPECS]$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/rubygem-cloudfiles-1.4.10-2.fc14.src.rpm 
rubygem-cloudfiles.src:45: W: macro-in-comment %{buildroot}
rubygem-cloudfiles.src:45: W: macro-in-comment %{_bindir}
rubygem-cloudfiles.src:46: W: macro-in-comment %{buildroot}
rubygem-cloudfiles.src:46: W: macro-in-comment %{geminstdir}
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.

[nb@localhost noarch]$ rpmlint rubygem-cloudfiles-*
rubygem-cloudfiles.noarch: E: zero-length
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/cloudfiles-1.4.10/TODO
rubygem-cloudfiles-doc.noarch: W: no-documentation
rubygem-cloudfiles-doc.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/cloudfiles-1.4.10/ri/CloudFiles/Connection/container_exists%3f-i.yaml
%3f
rubygem-cloudfiles-doc.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/cloudfiles-1.4.10/ri/CloudFiles/Connection/snet%3f-i.yaml
%3f
rubygem-cloudfiles-doc.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/cloudfiles-1.4.10/ri/CloudFiles/Container/public%3f-i.yaml
%3f
rubygem-cloudfiles-doc.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/cloudfiles-1.4.10/ri/CloudFiles/Container/log_retention%3d-i.yaml
%3d
rubygem-cloudfiles-doc.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/cloudfiles-1.4.10/ri/CloudFiles/Container/object_exists%3f-i.yaml
%3f
rubygem-cloudfiles-doc.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/cloudfiles-1.4.10/ri/CloudFiles/Container/empty%3f-i.yaml
%3f
rubygem-cloudfiles-doc.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/cloudfiles-1.4.10/ri/CloudFiles/Container/log_retention%3f-i.yaml
%3f
rubygem-cloudfiles-doc.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/cloudfiles-1.4.10/ri/CloudFiles/Connection/authok%3f-i.yaml
%3f
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 9 warnings.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 673854] Review Request: rubygem-cloudfiles - Cloud Files API in ruby

2011-03-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673854

Nick Bebout n...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+

--- Comment #6 from Nick Bebout n...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-01 18:57:10 
EST ---
These rpmlint warnings are ok.

Sources match upstream.

Package meets Fedora packaing guidelines including ruby specific guidelines.

This package is APPROVED.

I will sponsor you shortly.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 680473] Review Request: ghc-ForSyDe - Formal System Design methodology

2011-03-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=680473

Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |MODIFIED

--- Comment #4 from Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2...@gmail.com 2011-03-01 
20:04:26 EST ---
Added ghc-mtl as dependency.
Thanks, looks fine now

Since upstream has used the .vhd in the data-files section, it has been
included in the -devel package
The leksah package, which provides a executable binary, also needs some files
from the data section

http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/leksah.spec

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 678727] Review Request: pam-afs-session - AFS PAG and AFS tokens on login (sponsor requested)

2011-03-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678727

--- Comment #4 from Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com 2011-03-01 20:18:18 EST 
---
I've submitted a second package for review at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/681393 .

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 681393] Review Request: perl-Nagios-Plugin-WWW-Mechanize - Login to a web page as a user and get data as a Nagios plugin

2011-03-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681393

Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 681393] New: Review Request: perl-Nagios-Plugin-WWW-Mechanize - Login to a web page as a user and get data as a Nagios plugin

2011-03-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: perl-Nagios-Plugin-WWW-Mechanize - Login to a web page 
as a user and get data as a Nagios plugin

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681393

   Summary: Review Request: perl-Nagios-Plugin-WWW-Mechanize -
Login to a web page as a user and get data as a Nagios
plugin
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: medium
  Priority: unspecified
 Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: ktdre...@ktdreyer.com
 QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora


Spec URL:
http://adiemus.org/~kdreyer/rpms/perl-Nagios-Plugin-WWW-Mechanize.spec
SRPM URL:
http://adiemus.org/~kdreyer/rpms/perl-Nagios-Plugin-WWW-Mechanize-0.13-1.fc13.src.rpm
and 

Description: Login to a web page as a user and get data as a Nagios plugin.
This module ties Nagios::Plugin with WWW::Mechanize so that there's less code
in your perl script and the most common work is done for you.

I would like to get this package into Fedora. EPEL 5/6 would require getting
perl-WWW-Mechanize into EPEL (I may be willing to be the EPEL maintainer for
that in the future).

I'm a long-time Fedora user, and I'm looking to be a developer. I maintain a
few RPMs at work, but this is my first couple of packages in Fedora, so I'm
seeking a sponsor. My first package is at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678727



$ rpmlint SPECS/perl-Nagios-Plugin-WWW-Mechanize.spec 
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

$ rpmlint perl-Nagios-Plugin-WWW-Mechanize-0.13-1.fc13.noarch.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

$ rpmlint  perl-Nagios-Plugin-WWW-Mechanize-0.13-1.fc13.src.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

Koji scratch builds:
F13: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2877483
F14: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2877485
F15: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2877486

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 681393] Review Request: perl-Nagios-Plugin-WWW-Mechanize - Login to a web page as a user and get data as a Nagios plugin

2011-03-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681393

--- Comment #1 from Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com 2011-03-01 20:20:45 EST 
---
Koji scratch build for F15 is actually
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2877487

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 675104] Review Request: tweepy - Twitter library for python

2011-03-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675104

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 
2011-03-01 20:46:23 EST ---
tweepy-1.7.1-3.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 testing repository.  If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update tweepy'.  You can provide
feedback for this update here:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tweepy-1.7.1-3.fc13

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 674730] Review Request: qt-gstreamer - C++ bindings for GStreamer with a Qt-style API

2011-03-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674730

--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-01 
20:52:44 EST ---
qt-gstreamer-0.10.1-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. 
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 672779] Review Request: perl-Module-Metadata - Gather package and POD information from perl module files

2011-03-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672779

--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-01 
20:51:31 EST ---
perl-Module-Metadata-1.04-2.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 674730] Review Request: qt-gstreamer - C++ bindings for GStreamer with a Qt-style API

2011-03-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674730

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||qt-gstreamer-0.10.1-1.fc14
 Resolution||ERRATA
Last Closed||2011-03-01 20:52:49

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 617400] Review Request: pfHandle - wrapper for tools to manage postfix mail queue

2011-03-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617400

--- Comment #18 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-03-01 21:10:00 EST 
---
The branch names are EL-5 and EL-6; I fixed the request for you.

Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 617400] Review Request: pfHandle - wrapper for tools to manage postfix mail queue

2011-03-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617400

--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 
2011-03-01 21:42:49 EST ---
Package pfHandle-1.1-4.el5:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 updates-testing repository,
* should be available at your local mirror within two days.
Update it with:
# su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing pfHandle-1.1-4.el5'
as soon as you are able to, then reboot.
Please go to the following url:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pfHandle-1.1-4.el5
then log in and leave karma (feedback).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 617400] Review Request: pfHandle - wrapper for tools to manage postfix mail queue

2011-03-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617400

--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 
2011-03-01 21:43:47 EST ---
Package pfHandle-1.1-4.el6:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing repository,
* should be available at your local mirror within two days.
Update it with:
# su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing pfHandle-1.1-4.el6'
as soon as you are able to, then reboot.
Please go to the following url:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pfHandle-1.1-4.el6
then log in and leave karma (feedback).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 677496] Review Request: nbc - Next Byte Codes (NBC) and Not Exactly C (NXC)

2011-03-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=677496

--- Comment #2 from Rich Mattes richmat...@gmail.com 2011-03-01 21:40:16 EST 
---
(In reply to comment #1)
Thanks for the comments!
 - I suggest to choose a more descriptive Summary, e.g. something like
   Simple language to program LEGO's NXT programmable brick
 

I agree, I've done this.

 - Don't mix spaces and tabs for indentation. Just use one of them.
 

I don't think I have?  rpmlint usually complains about this, and I can't find
any tabs in the specfile

 - please preserve the timestamps of all %doc files and the manpage. You can   
   accomplish this by adding the following to the %prep section:
 cd doc
 for f in Readme Changelog; do
   dos2unix -n $f $f.tmp  \
   touch -r $f $f.tmp  \
   mv $f.tmp $f
 done
 
Neat trick, done.

   Drop the dos2unix lines from %build.
   Also, remove the call of gzip from the Makefile as rpmbuild compresses the 
   manpage automatically, and add switch -p to install.
 

Done.

 - Add %{_smp_mflags} to make in order to enable parallel builds.

Done.

New spec  srpm:

Spec URL: http://rmattes.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/nbc/nbc.spec
SRPM URL: http://rmattes.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/nbc/nbc-1.2.1.r3-3.fc14.src.rpm

$ rpmlint nbc.spec ../RPMS/x86_64/nbc-*
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 674207] Review Request: python-cloudfiles - Python language bindings for Rackspace CloudFiles API

2011-03-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674207

--- Comment #9 from Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com 2011-03-01 23:00:13 EST 
---

*shrug*   there isn't much of a review text here and I haven't added any
attachments.  If you want a checklist of items, here you go:

*  Follows the naming guidelines
*  rpmlint has no warnings and errors
*  License is acceptable and the license tag is correct
*  Redundant but harmless buildroot definition and %clean section
*  Verified build and run time requirements with a mock build
*  %doc should include license information.  Not done.  
*  Macro definitions follows guidelines

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 681093] Review Request: wdiff - A front-end to GNU diff

2011-03-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681093

--- Comment #12 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2011-03-01 23:24:03 
EST ---
(In reply to comment #10)
 (In reply to comment #9)
   (In reply to comment #7)
Check here howto handle translation files
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Handling_Locale_Files
   
   I don't see %find_lang is going to work here.
  Right, I added it before but it doesn't seem to work.
 
 Really? I just tried and it works as usual (Did you surely
 add -f %{name}.lang on the line of %files ?)
 
 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/scratch/mtasaka/task_2876462/

Argh! you are right. I was using %find_lang after scriptlets and also before
that because of 2 different .mo translations I thought direct use of %find_lang
with %{name} will not be possible.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 675104] Review Request: tweepy - Twitter library for python

2011-03-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675104

Pavel Zhukov pa...@zhukoff.net changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE
Last Closed||2011-03-01 23:42:59

--- Comment #17 from Pavel Zhukov pa...@zhukoff.net 2011-03-01 23:42:59 EST 
---
Bug closed. 




-- 
Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 681424] New: Review Request: perl-Net-SSH-Expect - SSH wrapper to execute remote commands

2011-03-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-SSH-Expect  - SSH wrapper to execute remote 
commands

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681424

   Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-SSH-Expect  - SSH wrapper to
execute remote commands
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
 Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: fed...@red-dragon.com
 QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora


Spec URL: http://red-dragon.com/perl-Net-SSH-Expect.spec
SRPM URL: http://red-dragon.com/perl-Net-SSH-Expect-1.09-1..fc13.src.rpm
Description: This is a perl module for SSH wrapper to execute remote commands

rpmlint on spec and binary rpms return no errors and 4 spelling warnings
koji build passed on F13-F15, rawhide, epel5/epel6

Submitting for F13+ at this time

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 681424] Review Request: perl-Net-SSH-Expect - SSH wrapper to execute remote commands

2011-03-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681424

--- Comment #1 from Carl Thompson fed...@red-dragon.com 2011-03-02 00:12:25 
EST ---
SRPM URL: http://red-dragon.com/perl-Net-SSH-Expect-1.09-1.fc13.src.rpm

Typo in original url

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 681393] Review Request: perl-Nagios-Plugin-WWW-Mechanize - Login to a web page as a user and get data as a Nagios plugin

2011-03-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681393

Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 681393] Review Request: perl-Nagios-Plugin-WWW-Mechanize - Login to a web page as a user and get data as a Nagios plugin

2011-03-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681393

Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||steve.tray...@cern.ch
 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|steve.tray...@cern.ch

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review