[Bug 672543] Review Request: perl-Test-DistManifest - Author test that validates a package MANIFEST
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672543 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com 2011-03-02 06:42:55 EST --- I'm sorry for such delay. ACCEPT -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673172] Review Request: perl-Perl-Critic-Deprecated - Perl::Critic policies which have been superseded by others
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673172 --- Comment #5 from Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com 2011-03-02 08:08:10 EST --- (In reply to comment #4) (In reply to comment #2) rpm -i /home/marca/Downloads/perl-Perl-Critic-Deprecated-1.108-1.fc15.noarch.rpm file /usr/share/man/man3/Perl::Critic::Utils::PPIRegexp.3pm.gz from install of perl-Perl-Critic-Deprecated-1.108-1.fc15.noarch conflicts with file from package perl-Perl-Critic-1.106-1.fc14.noarch file /usr/share/perl5/Perl/Critic/Utils/PPIRegexp.pm from install of perl-Perl-Critic-Deprecated-1.108-1.fc15.noarch conflicts with file from package perl-Perl-Critic-1.106-1.fc14.noarch You should solve this issue before pushing into Fedora. You have out-dated machine probably as current perl-Perl-Critic-1.111-1.fc15.noarch does not contain the module (because it's---deprecated). I'm targeting perl-Perl-Critic-Deprecated to F15 only, so I guess there is no problem. It's working with current perl-Perl-Critic. Also could you change core back to vendor? Thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673172] Review Request: perl-Perl-Critic-Deprecated - Perl::Critic policies which have been superseded by others
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673172 --- Comment #6 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com 2011-03-02 09:17:57 EST --- Installation directory reverted to vendor: Spec URL: http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-Perl-Critic-Deprecated/perl-Perl-Critic-Deprecated.spec SPRM URL: http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-Perl-Critic-Deprecated/perl-Perl-Critic-Deprecated-1.108-1.fc16.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 672779] Review Request: perl-Module-Metadata - Gather package and POD information from perl module files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672779 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Module-Metadata-1. ||04-2.fc15 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-03-02 09:27:52 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 555248] Review Request: perl-Pod-Eventual - Read a POD document as a series of trivial events
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555248 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||p...@city-fan.org --- Comment #14 from Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org 2011-03-02 09:33:06 EST --- All build requirements of this package will be available in EPEL-4 when perl-Mixin-Linewise comes out of testing in a couple of weeks (or sooner, given enough karma), so could we have an EPEL-4 branch? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 555248] Review Request: perl-Pod-Eventual - Read a POD document as a series of trivial events
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555248 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #15 from Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 2011-03-02 09:57:26 EST --- Package Change Request == Package Name: perl-Pod-Eventual New Branches: el4 Owners: iarnell InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 531107] Review Request: perl-SQL-Tokenizer - A Perl package to tokenize SQL, generically
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531107 --- Comment #20 from Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com 2011-03-02 10:04:27 EST --- (In reply to comment #19) Oops. I'll try to get on this tonight. How do I remove it? Cheers, David. You should remove it in prep part of spec file. rm -rf lib/SQL/._Tokenizer.pm I must ask. Are you already sponsored in Fedora? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 681424] Review Request: perl-Net-SSH-Expect - SSH wrapper to execute remote commands
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681424 Jeffrey Ness jeffrey.n...@rackspace.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jeffrey.n...@rackspace.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jeffrey.n...@rackspace.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 681424] Review Request: perl-Net-SSH-Expect - SSH wrapper to execute remote commands
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681424
--- Comment #2 from Jeffrey Ness jeffrey.n...@rackspace.com 2011-03-02
10:20:06 EST ---
PASSED PACKAGE SPECIFIC HAVE's:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl#Perl_Requires_and_Provides
[ pass ] - License tag
[ pass ] - Directory Ownership
[ pass ] - Requires and Provides (virtual name)
[ pass ] - Versioned MODULE_COMPAT_Requires
[ pass ] - URL Tag
[ pass ] - Testing and Test Suites
FAILED MUST HAVE's:
[ fail ] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros.
* Source0 should use %{version}
* In %check and %install you should use %{__make} similar to how you
did in %build
[ fail ] MUST: Using %{buildroot} vs $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#Using_.25.7Bbuildroot.7D_and_.25.7Boptflags.7D_vs_.24RPM_BUILD_ROOT_and_.24RPM_OPT_FLAGS
* You should pick a style and use it consistently throughout your
packaging.
PASSED MUST HAVE'S:
[ pass ] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package
[ pass ] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming
Guidelines
[ pass ] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}
[ pass ] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license
and meet the Licensing Guidelines
[ pass ] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the
actual license
[ ] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of
the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc
[ pass ] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[ pass ] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream
source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for
this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package,
please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this.
[ pass ] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary
rpms on at least one primary architecture
[ ] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on
an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the
spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST
have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package
does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST
be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line
[ pass ] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except
for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging
Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply
common sense.
[ ] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by
using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly
forbidden
[ ] MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared
library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's
default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun.
[ ] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must
state this fact in the request for review, along with the
rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without
this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker.
[ pass ] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does
not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package
which does create that directory.
[ pass ] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files
listing.
[ pass ] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should
be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section
must include a %defattr(...) line.
[ pass ] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf
%{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
[ pass ] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissible content.
[ ] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The
definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but
is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or
quantity).
[ ] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the
runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the
program must run properly if it is not present.
[ ] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package.
[ ] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package.
[ ] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires:
pkgconfig'
[Bug 681558] Review Request: libvirt-snmp - SNMP support for libvirt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681558 Michal Privoznik mpriv...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 681424] Review Request: perl-Net-SSH-Expect - SSH wrapper to execute remote commands
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681424 Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rc040...@freenet.de --- Comment #3 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de 2011-03-02 10:37:10 EST --- This package's spec file looks very strange - It seems to be cluttered with weird stuff. Please clean it up or add explicit comments outlining what you are doing to your spec file - I would not approve it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 670377] Review Request: perl-File-Finder - Nice wrapper for File::Find ala find(1)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670377 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||ppi...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ppi...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 638666] Review Request: whois - Improved WHOIS client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638666 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(fe...@fetzig.org) --- Comment #11 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com 2011-03-02 10:59:14 EST --- Any interest in finishing this review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 681558] Review Request: libvirt-snmp - SNMP support for libvirt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681558
Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||socho...@redhat.com
--- Comment #1 from Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com 2011-03-02
11:25:45 EST ---
Not a sponsor, just a quick look and few hints:
--
Release:1%{?dist}%{?extra_release}
should be just
Release:1%{?dist}
--
%clean sections and rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT at the beginning of %install is no
longer needed. (unless you plan to get this to EL-5)
--
Shouldn't this be %doc as well?
%{_datadir}/snmp/mibs/LIBVIRT-MIB.txt
--
I am guessing this will be automatically added by rpm when building package so
no need for it:
Requires: net-snmp
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 670377] Review Request: perl-File-Finder - Nice wrapper for File::Find ala find(1)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670377 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com 2011-03-02 11:33:17 EST --- Source file is original. Ok. Summary verified from lib/File/Finder.pm. Ok. Description verified from lib/File/Finder.pm. Ok. License verified from lib/File/Finder.pm. Ok. No XS or other C binding. noarch architecture is Ok. TODO: BuildRequire perl(Exporter) (lib/File/Finder.pm:7) as it can dual-live in the future (http://search.cpan.org/~ferreira/Exporter/). All tests pass. Ok. $ rpmlint perl-File-Finder.spec ../SRPMS/perl-File-Finder-0.53-2.fc14.src.rpm ../RPMS/noarch/perl-File-Finder-0.53-2.fc14.noarch.rpm 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. rpmlint Ok. $ rpm -q -lv -p ../RPMS/noarch/perl-File-Finder-0.53-2.fc14.noarch.rpm drwxr-xr-x2 rootroot0 bře 2 17:23 /usr/share/doc/perl-File-Finder-0.53 -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 1076 dub 8 2005 /usr/share/doc/perl-File-Finder-0.53/Changes -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 1076 pro 17 2003 /usr/share/doc/perl-File-Finder-0.53/README -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 748 dub 8 2005 /usr/share/doc/perl-File-Finder-0.53/TODO -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 4783 bře 2 17:23 /usr/share/man/man3/File::Finder.3pm.gz -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 6393 bře 2 17:23 /usr/share/man/man3/File::Finder::Steps.3pm.gz drwxr-xr-x2 rootroot0 bře 2 17:23 /usr/share/perl5/File drwxr-xr-x2 rootroot0 bře 2 17:23 /usr/share/perl5/File/Finder -rw-r--r--1 rootroot10859 dub 8 2005 /usr/share/perl5/File/Finder.pm -rw-r--r--1 rootroot17757 dub 8 2005 /usr/share/perl5/File/Finder/Steps.pm File layout and permissions are Ok. $ rpm -q --requires -p ../RPMS/noarch/perl-File-Finder-0.53-2.fc14.noarch.rpm | sort | uniq -c 1 perl(base) 1 perl(Carp) 1 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3) 1 perl(strict) 1 perl(Text::Glob) 1 perl(warnings) 1 perl = 0:5.006 1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) = 3.0.4-1 1 rpmlib(FileDigests) = 4.6.0-1 1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) = 4.0-1 1 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) = 5.2-1 1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) = 3.0.3-1 $ rpm -q --provides -p ../RPMS/noarch/perl-File-Finder-0.53-2.fc14.noarch.rpm | sort | uniq -c 1 perl(File::Finder::Steps) = 0.53 1 perl(File::Finder) = 0.53 1 perl-File-Finder = 0.53-2.fc14 Binary dependencies Ok. $ resolvedeps-f16 ../RPMS/noarch/perl-File-Finder-0.53-2.fc14.noarch.rpm Binary dependencies resolvable. Ok. Package builds in F16 (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2878749). Ok. Otherwise package is in line with Fedora and perl packaging guidelines. Please consider fixing all `TODO' prefixed issues before pushing package into repository. Resolution: Package APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 678931] Review Request: perl-Math-Random-Secure - Cryptographically-secure, cross-platform replacement for rand()
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678931 --- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr 2011-03-02 12:01:19 EST --- (In reply to comment #1) Fails to build in mock due to missing perl(Test::More). amongst other things. Fixed. Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Math-Random-Secure/perl-Math-Random-Secure.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Math-Random-Secure/perl-Math-Random-Secure-0.06-2.fc14.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664390] Review Request: sams - SQUID Account Management system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664390
Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktdre...@ktdreyer.com
--- Comment #2 from Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com 2011-03-02 12:08:08 EST
---
Hey Aleksey,
I'll informally review. I can see you have two packages in Fedora already, and
I'm new to reviewing, so I may miss some things :)
rpmlint is clean on the .spec, with one false positive on the SRPM. I built the
RPM successfully in mock on F13 on i686.
$ rpmlint sams.spec
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
$ rpmlint sams-2.0.0-rc1.fc13.src.rpm
sams.src: W: invalid-url URL: http://sams.perm.ru/ HTTP Error 500: Internal
Server Error
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
This is ok because the URL works fine when loading in a browser. The web server
is probably configured to refuse HEAD requests on this URL.
rpmlint output on theF13 i686 binaries:
$ rpmlint sams-2.0.0-rc1.fc13.i686.rpm
sams.i686: W: invalid-url URL: http://sams.perm.ru/ HTTP Error 500: Internal
Server Error
sams.i686: W: no-documentation
sams.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary sams2daemon
sams.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary sams_send_email
sams.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary samsparser
sams.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary samsredir
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings.
no-documentation is ok, because the docs are in a separate -docs package. The
binaries lack manpages, but I don't think that is a big deal.
$ rpmlint sams-debuginfo-2.0.0-rc1.fc13.i686.rpm
sams-debuginfo.i686: W: invalid-url URL: http://sams.perm.ru/ HTTP Error 500:
Internal Server Error
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
Looks good.
$ rpmlint sams-devel-2.0.0-rc1.fc13.i686.rpm
sams-devel.i686: W: invalid-url URL: http://sams.perm.ru/ HTTP Error 500:
Internal Server Error
sams-devel.i686: W: no-documentation
sams-devel.i686: E: library-without-ldconfig-postin
/usr/lib/libloadavg.so.1.0.0
sams-devel.i686: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun
/usr/lib/libloadavg.so.1.0.0
sams-devel.i686: E: library-without-ldconfig-postin
/usr/lib/libfsusage.so.1.0.0
sams-devel.i686: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun
/usr/lib/libfsusage.so.1.0.0
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 4 errors, 2 warnings.
You'll need to do the postin and postun sections for the -devel package.
$ rpmlint sams-doc-2.0.0-rc1.fc13.i686.rpm
sams-doc.i686: W: invalid-url URL: http://sams.perm.ru/ HTTP Error 500:
Internal Server Error
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
Looks good.
rpmlint sams-web-2.0.0-rc1.fc13.i686.rpm
sams-web.i686: W: invalid-url URL: http://sams.perm.ru/ HTTP Error 500:
Internal Server Error
sams-web.i686: W: no-documentation
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
Looks good.
===
Fedora Packaging Guidelines
===
[+] MUST: rpmlint must be run on the source rpm and all binary rpms the build
produces. The output should be posted in the review.
[?] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines
.
The package name is fine (sams) and matches the tarball, but the name sams2
is used in several areas and files (the config is in /etc/sams2,
/etc/sysconfig/sams2, docs in /usr/share/doc/sams2, web interface in
/usr/share/sams2, and so on). I don't know if this is a big issue or not.
The init.d file comment says SQUID Access Management System (SAMS), whereas
the .spec says Summary:SAMS2 (Squid Account Management System). You may
want to standardize on either Access or Account. The online docs say
Account.
[+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption.
[+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines .
[+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet
the Licensing Guidelines .
[+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license. (Yes, GPLv2+)
[+] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.
[-] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
The grammar of the description field can be improved.
For sams:
This program is used to administer Squid proxy authorization. There are access
controls for users in NTLM, LDAP, NCSA, BASIC or IP authorization mode.
For sams-web:
Change The %{srcname}-web package provides web administration tool to ...
provides a web administration tool.
For sams-doc:
Change ... includes the HTML version of the Using SAMS2 to ... of the
Using
[Bug 630644] Review Request: perl-Bio-SamTools - Bio::SamTools Perl module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630644
--- Comment #8 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com 2011-03-02 12:10:05 EST ---
Have you solved it? Following changes in spec file can do that. Note the Patch0
is not needed.
--- perl-Bio-SamTools.spec.old 2010-09-06 17:21:04.0 +0200
+++ perl-Bio-SamTools.spec 2011-03-02 18:09:20.547956138 +0100
@@ -6,7 +6,6 @@
Group: Development/Libraries
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Bio-SamTools/
Source0:
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/L/LD/LDS/Bio-SamTools-1.20.tar.gz
-Patch0: %{name}-include.patch
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
BuildRequires: perl = 0:5.008
#BuildRequires: perl(Bio::Root::Version) = 1.005009001
@@ -28,10 +27,9 @@
%prep
%setup -q -n Bio-SamTools-%{version}
-%patch0 -p1
+sed -i 's|= find_sam(|= (%{_includedir}/samtools, %{_libdir}|' Build.PL
%build
-export SAMTOOLS=/usr/share/samtools
%{__perl} Build.PL installdirs=vendor optimize=$RPM_OPT_FLAGS
./Build
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 678727] Review Request: pam-afs-session - AFS PAG and AFS tokens on login (sponsor requested)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678727 --- Comment #5 from Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com 2011-03-02 12:10:06 EST --- I've also informally reviewed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/664390 . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 555248] Review Request: perl-Pod-Eventual - Read a POD document as a series of trivial events
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555248 --- Comment #16 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-03-02 12:44:35 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 678727] Review Request: pam-afs-session - AFS PAG and AFS tokens on login (sponsor requested)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678727 Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|steve.tray...@cern.ch Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #6 from Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch 2011-03-02 12:57:06 EST --- Okay I'll look over all of this , just to warn you for me this is a first time so excuse any clunkiness in the process. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 678727] Review Request: pam-afs-session - AFS PAG and AFS tokens on login (sponsor requested)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678727 --- Comment #7 from Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com 2011-03-02 13:24:44 EST --- Steve, thank you. I hope I'm not interrupting you mid-review, but I've taken your naming suggestion and renamed it to pam_afs_session. This matches the module and the manpage. http://adiemus.org/~kdreyer/rpms/pam_afs_session.spec http://adiemus.org/~kdreyer/rpms/pam_afs_session-2.1-3.src.rpm Koji scratch build: EL5: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2879001 F14: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2879014 F15: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2879011 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 629744] Review Request: sparkleshare - sharing work made easy
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629744 Eric Christensen e...@christensenplace.us changed: What|Removed |Added CC||e...@christensenplace.us --- Comment #1 from Eric Christensen e...@christensenplace.us 2011-03-02 14:29:57 EST --- Have you addressed these known issues? Perhaps an upgrade to beta. I'll happily work the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 681393] Review Request: perl-Nagios-Plugin-WWW-Mechanize - Login to a web page as a user and get data as a Nagios plugin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681393 --- Comment #2 from Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com 2011-03-02 14:48:39 EST --- The requisite perl-WWW-Mechanize is in EPEL 6, so I have updated my package to build there. Updated -2 release: http://adiemus.org/~kdreyer/rpms/perl-Nagios-Plugin-WWW-Mechanize.spec http://adiemus.org/~kdreyer/rpms/perl-Nagios-Plugin-WWW-Mechanize-0.13-2.el6.src.rpm Koji scratch build: EL6: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2879094 F13: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2879105 F14: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2879107 F15: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2879109 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 638666] Review Request: whois - Improved WHOIS client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638666 Felix Kaechele fe...@fetzig.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review?, |fedora-review+, needinfo+ |needinfo?(fe...@fetzig.org) | --- Comment #12 from Felix Kaechele fe...@fetzig.org 2011-03-02 15:27:47 EST --- Sorry, I totally missed it. I just did a short check if there is anything that changed between my review and the update and everything is still fine. In the meantime a new version (5.11) of whois was released. I checked it locally by just bumping the version and it did not introduce anything that would block an approval. So before importing just update to this version. This package is APPROVED! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 573151] Review Request: python26 - Parallel-installable Python 2.6 for EPEL5
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573151 --- Comment #36 from Dave Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com 2011-03-02 15:56:08 EST --- FWIW, I started gathering some notes on this on this page: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Python26 Hopefully we can assemble some guidelines on how best to (re)package things for python26. All just a draft at this stage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 679980] Review Request: Octopus - TCP/IP Load Balancer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679980 --- Comment #5 from Al Reay alre...@gmail.com 2011-03-02 18:25:03 EST --- Hi guys, thanks for the advice. I've actually made a new build of the software with all filesystem objects renamed to 'octopuslb' instead of just 'octopus'. I don't want to deal with the binaries being called one thing when using RPM files and other when using the source tar.gz. I've added my real name to bugzilla, removed the explicit requires, autoconf from buildrequires, and the INSTALL file is no longer bundled with the RPM Here are the current SPEC and SRPM files. Neither has any rpmlint errors or warnings. http://octopuslb.sourceforge.net/octopuslb.spec http://octopuslb.sourceforge.net/octopuslb-1.11-1.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 646612] Rename review: drupal-date - drupal6-date
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646612 Bug 646612 depends on bug 646611, which changed state. Bug 646611 Summary: Rename review: drupal-cck - drupal6-cck https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646611 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-02 19:53:13 EST --- drupal6-date-2.7-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 646612] Rename review: drupal-date - drupal6-date
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646612 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||drupal6-date-2.7-1.el5 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-03-02 19:53:34 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 646612] Rename review: drupal-date - drupal6-date
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646612 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-02 19:55:25 EST --- drupal6-date-2.7-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608332] Review Request: rootplot - Plots ROOT data with matplotlib
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608332 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-02 19:54:21 EST --- rootplot-2.2.1-3.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 646612] Rename review: drupal-date - drupal6-date
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646612 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|drupal6-date-2.7-1.el5 |drupal6-date-2.7-1.el6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675628] Review Request: python26-jinja2 - General purpose template engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675628 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-02 19:54:05 EST --- python26-jinja2-2.5.5-4.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675628] Review Request: python26-jinja2 - General purpose template engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675628 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||python26-jinja2-2.5.5-4.el5 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-03-02 19:54:12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608332] Review Request: rootplot - Plots ROOT data with matplotlib
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608332 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|rootplot-2.2.1-3.el5|rootplot-2.2.1-3.el6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 197688] Review Request: inotify-tools - Command line utilities for inotify
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=197688 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-02 20:18:43 EST --- Package inotify-tools-3.14-1.el6: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing inotify-tools-3.14-1.el6' as soon as you are able to, then reboot. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/inotify-tools-3.14-1.el6 then log in and leave karma (feedback). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 592487] Review Request: ffgtk - A solution for controlling Fritz!Box or compatible routers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592487 --- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-02 21:47:14 EST --- ffgtk-0.7.8-4.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 592487] Review Request: ffgtk - A solution for controlling Fritz!Box or compatible routers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592487 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|ffgtk-0.7.8-4.fc14 |ffgtk-0.7.8-4.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 665995] Review Request: fmit - Free Music Instrument Tuner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665995 --- Comment #38 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-02 21:50:59 EST --- fmit-0.99.2-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 665995] Review Request: fmit - Free Music Instrument Tuner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665995 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||fmit-0.99.2-1.fc15 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-03-02 21:51:18 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674692] Review Request: python-pyramid - The Pyramid web application framework, a Pylons project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674692 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-02 21:56:42 EST --- python-pyramid-1.0-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675726] Review Request: cdm - Very minimalistic display manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675726 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-02 21:54:53 EST --- cdm-0.5.3-4.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675798] Review Request: liblzf - Small data compression library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675798 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||liblzf-3.6-2.fc15 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-03-02 21:57:14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674692] Review Request: python-pyramid - The Pyramid web application framework, a Pylons project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674692 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||python-pyramid-1.0-1.fc15 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-03-02 21:56:57 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675798] Review Request: liblzf - Small data compression library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675798 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-02 21:57:07 EST --- liblzf-3.6-2.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 677693] Review Request: tintin - TinTin++, aka tt++, is a free MUD client.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=677693 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|tintin-2.00.5-4.fc14|tintin-2.00.5-4.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674730] Review Request: qt-gstreamer - C++ bindings for GStreamer with a Qt-style API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674730 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|qt-gstreamer-0.10.1-1.fc14 |qt-gstreamer-0.10.1-1.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 657908] Review Request: esniper - A lightweight console application for sniping eBay auctions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657908 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-02 21:58:47 EST --- esniper-2.24.0-6.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 677693] Review Request: tintin - TinTin++, aka tt++, is a free MUD client.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=677693 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-02 22:00:08 EST --- tintin-2.00.5-4.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674730] Review Request: qt-gstreamer - C++ bindings for GStreamer with a Qt-style API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674730 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-02 22:02:10 EST --- qt-gstreamer-0.10.1-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 657908] Review Request: esniper - A lightweight console application for sniping eBay auctions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657908 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||esniper-2.24.0-6.fc15 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-03-02 21:59:03 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674666] Review Request: python-translationstring - Utility library for i18n relied on by various Repoze packages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674666 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-02 22:08:44 EST --- python-translationstring-0.3-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674671] Review Request: python-repoze-lru - A tiny LRU cache implementation and decorator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674671 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||python-repoze-lru-0.3-1.fc1 ||5 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-03-02 22:08:27 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674671] Review Request: python-repoze-lru - A tiny LRU cache implementation and decorator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674671 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-02 22:08:16 EST --- python-repoze-lru-0.3-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674666] Review Request: python-translationstring - Utility library for i18n relied on by various Repoze packages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674666 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||python-translationstring-0. ||3-1.fc15 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-03-02 22:08:49 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 648023] Review Request: erlang-js - A Friendly Erlang to Javascript Binding
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648023 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-02 22:09:32 EST --- erlang-js-0.5.0-2.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 678889] Review Request: serdisplib - Library to drive serial displays with built-in controllers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678889 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-02 22:13:00 EST --- serdisplib-1.97.9-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 678889] Review Request: serdisplib - Library to drive serial displays with built-in controllers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678889 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||serdisplib-1.97.9-1.fc15 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-03-02 22:13:06 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 677089] Review Request: php-pear-XML-RPC2 - XML-RPC client/server library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=677089 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||php-pear-XML-RPC2-1.0.6-1.f ||c15 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-03-02 22:13:35 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 678199] Review Request: perl-Role-Identifiable - Identifiable roles
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678199 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-02 22:11:01 EST --- perl-Role-Identifiable-0.005-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 677089] Review Request: php-pear-XML-RPC2 - XML-RPC client/server library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=677089 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-02 22:13:30 EST --- php-pear-XML-RPC2-1.0.6-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 678680] Review Request: transifex-client - Command line tool for Transifex translation management
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678680 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-02 22:13:46 EST --- transifex-client-0.4.2-0.3.226a185088efhg.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 648023] Review Request: erlang-js - A Friendly Erlang to Javascript Binding
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648023 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||erlang-js-0.5.0-2.fc15 Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 678199] Review Request: perl-Role-Identifiable - Identifiable roles
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678199 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Role-Identifiable-0.00 ||5-1.fc15 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-03-02 22:11:12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 678680] Review Request: transifex-client - Command line tool for Transifex translation management
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678680 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||transifex-client-0.4.2-0.3. ||226a185088efhg.fc15 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-03-02 22:13:54 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675122] Review Request: php-pear-Auth-Yubico - Authentication class for verifying Yubico OTP tokens
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675122 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-02 22:16:12 EST --- php-pear-Auth-Yubico-2.3-2.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675122] Review Request: php-pear-Auth-Yubico - Authentication class for verifying Yubico OTP tokens
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675122 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||php-pear-Auth-Yubico-2.3-2. ||fc15 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674009] Review Request: bitten - A continuous integration plugin for Trac
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674009 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-02 22:14:21 EST --- bitten-0.6b3-0.3.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 681424] Review Request: perl-Net-SSH-Expect - SSH wrapper to execute remote commands
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681424
--- Comment #4 from Carl Thompson fed...@red-dragon.com 2011-03-02 22:15:58
EST ---
Spec URL: http://red-dragon.com/perl-Net-SSH-Expect.spec
SRPM URL: http://red-dragon.com/perl-Net-SSH-Expect-1.09-2.fc13.src.rpm
1) Updated spec and used macros for everything
2) Got rid of the junk in spec from cpan2rpm and replaced it with reasonable
clean up code
3) Added %{version} macro to Source0
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664417] Review Request: spatialite-tools - A set of useful CLI tools for spatialite
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664417 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||spatialite-tools-2.4.0-0.2. ||RC4.fc15 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-03-02 22:19:07 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664417] Review Request: spatialite-tools - A set of useful CLI tools for spatialite
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664417 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-02 22:18:55 EST --- spatialite-tools-2.4.0-0.2.RC4.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 671884] Review Request: erlang-cluster_info - Cluster info/postmortem inspector for Erlang applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671884 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-02 22:20:17 EST --- erlang-cluster_info-0.1.0-0.3.20101229gitd077716.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 666943] Review Request: ignuit - Memorization aid based on the Leitner flashcard system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666943 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-02 22:19:22 EST --- ignuit-0.0.16-2.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674006] Review Request: openni - Library for human-machine Natural Interaction
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674006 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-02 22:20:39 EST --- openni-1.0.0.25-0.3.git4c9ff978.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 671884] Review Request: erlang-cluster_info - Cluster info/postmortem inspector for Erlang applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671884 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||erlang-cluster_info-0.1.0-0 ||.3.20101229gitd077716.fc15 Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 666943] Review Request: ignuit - Memorization aid based on the Leitner flashcard system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666943 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||ignuit-0.0.16-2.fc15 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-03-02 22:19:33 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 670999] Review Request: perl-MongoDB - Database driver
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670999 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-MongoDB-0.41-3.fc14|perl-MongoDB-0.41-3.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 670999] Review Request: perl-MongoDB - Database driver
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670999 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-02 22:25:02 EST --- perl-MongoDB-0.41-3.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 678887] Review Request: libst2205 - Library for accessing the display of hacked st2205 photo frames
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678887 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-02 22:26:45 EST --- libst2205-1.4.3-2.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 678887] Review Request: libst2205 - Library for accessing the display of hacked st2205 photo frames
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678887 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||libst2205-1.4.3-2.fc15 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-03-02 22:26:53 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673854] Review Request: rubygem-cloudfiles - Cloud Files API in ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673854 --- Comment #7 from Major Hayden ma...@mhtx.net 2011-03-02 22:36:24 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: ruby-cloudfiles Short Description: A Ruby version of the Rackspace Cloud Files API Owners: mhayden Branches: f14 f15 InitialCC: nb -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 678774] Review Request: libscs - Software Carry-Save Multiple-Precision Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678774 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-02 22:34:55 EST --- libscs-1.4.1-4.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 668243] Review Request: libqb - An IPC library for high performance servers.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668243 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-02 22:36:37 EST --- libqb-0.4.1-2.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update libqb'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libqb-0.4.1-2.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673854] Review Request: rubygem-cloudfiles - Cloud Files API in ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673854 Major Hayden ma...@mhtx.net changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674667] Review Request: python-venusian - A library for deferring decorator actions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674667 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-02 22:40:15 EST --- python-venusian-0.6-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674667] Review Request: python-venusian - A library for deferring decorator actions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674667 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||python-venusian-0.6-1.fc15 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-03-02 22:40:21 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673854] Review Request: rubygem-cloudfiles - Cloud Files API in ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673854 --- Comment #8 from Major Hayden ma...@mhtx.net 2011-03-02 22:53:41 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: rubygem-cloudfiles Short Description: A Ruby version of the Rackspace Cloud Files API Owners: mhayden Branches: f14 f15 InitialCC: nb -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674207] Review Request: python-cloudfiles - Python language bindings for Rackspace CloudFiles API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674207 Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|methe...@gmail.com --- Comment #11 from Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com 2011-03-03 00:37:24 EST --- There isn't a standard check list. Just a whole bunch of different ones floating around. I have checked it against what applies in this case. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 678554] Review Request: iceplayer - a simple media player
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678554 --- Comment #14 from Mike Ma zht...@gmail.com 2011-03-03 00:42:46 EST --- I'm sorry, I almost forgot there is a review. OK, I removed empty files and added BuildRequires. there is the new specfile: http://ekd123.fedorapeople.org/iceplayer.spec please check. Thanks for all! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673026] Review Request: ukij-tuz-fonts - Uyghur Computer Science Association (UKIJ) Unicode fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673026 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-03 00:59:09 EST --- Package ukij-tuz-fonts-2.0.0-5.fc13: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 13 updates-testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing ukij-tuz-fonts-2.0.0-5.fc13' as soon as you are able to, then reboot. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ukij-tuz-fonts-2.0.0-5.fc13 then log in and leave karma (feedback). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673026] Review Request: ukij-tuz-fonts - Uyghur Computer Science Association (UKIJ) Unicode fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673026 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-03 00:59:01 EST --- Package ukij-tuz-fonts-2.0.0-5.fc15: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 15 updates-testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing ukij-tuz-fonts-2.0.0-5.fc15' as soon as you are able to, then reboot. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ukij-tuz-fonts-2.0.0-5.fc15 then log in and leave karma (feedback). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673026] Review Request: ukij-tuz-fonts - Uyghur Computer Science Association (UKIJ) Unicode fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673026 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-03 00:59:17 EST --- Package ukij-tuz-fonts-2.0.0-5.fc14: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 14 updates-testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing ukij-tuz-fonts-2.0.0-5.fc14' as soon as you are able to, then reboot. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ukij-tuz-fonts-2.0.0-5.fc14 then log in and leave karma (feedback). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673029] Review Request: sil-nuosu-fonts - The Nuosu SIL Font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673029 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-03 01:06:45 EST --- Package sil-nuosu-fonts-2.1.1-3.fc14: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 14 updates-testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing sil-nuosu-fonts-2.1.1-3.fc14' as soon as you are able to, then reboot. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sil-nuosu-fonts-2.1.1-3.fc14 then log in and leave karma (feedback). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673029] Review Request: sil-nuosu-fonts - The Nuosu SIL Font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673029 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-03 01:06:53 EST --- Package sil-nuosu-fonts-2.1.1-3.fc15: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 15 updates-testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing sil-nuosu-fonts-2.1.1-3.fc15' as soon as you are able to, then reboot. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sil-nuosu-fonts-2.1.1-3.fc15 then log in and leave karma (feedback). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673029] Review Request: sil-nuosu-fonts - The Nuosu SIL Font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673029 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-03 01:07:00 EST --- Package sil-nuosu-fonts-2.1.1-3.fc13: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 13 updates-testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing sil-nuosu-fonts-2.1.1-3.fc13' as soon as you are able to, then reboot. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sil-nuosu-fonts-2.1.1-3.fc13 then log in and leave karma (feedback). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673027] Review Request: manchu-fonts - A Manchu OpenType (TrueType-flavored) font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673027 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-03 01:09:50 EST --- Package manchu-fonts-2.006-3.fc15: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 15 updates-testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing manchu-fonts-2.006-3.fc15' as soon as you are able to, then reboot. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/manchu-fonts-2.006-3.fc15 then log in and leave karma (feedback). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673027] Review Request: manchu-fonts - A Manchu OpenType (TrueType-flavored) font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673027 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673027] Review Request: manchu-fonts - A Manchu OpenType (TrueType-flavored) font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673027 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-03 01:09:42 EST --- Package manchu-fonts-2.006-3.fc13: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 13 updates-testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing manchu-fonts-2.006-3.fc13' as soon as you are able to, then reboot. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/manchu-fonts-2.006-3.fc13 then log in and leave karma (feedback). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673027] Review Request: manchu-fonts - A Manchu OpenType (TrueType-flavored) font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673027 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-03 01:09:35 EST --- Package manchu-fonts-2.006-3.fc14: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 14 updates-testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing manchu-fonts-2.006-3.fc14' as soon as you are able to, then reboot. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/manchu-fonts-2.006-3.fc14 then log in and leave karma (feedback). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
