[Bug 678889] Review Request: serdisplib - Library to drive serial displays with built-in controllers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678889 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|serdisplib-1.97.9-1.fc15|serdisplib-1.97.9-1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 678774] Review Request: libscs - Software Carry-Save Multiple-Precision Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678774 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-03 03:23:05 EST --- libscs-1.4.1-4.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 678889] Review Request: serdisplib - Library to drive serial displays with built-in controllers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678889 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-03 03:22:31 EST --- serdisplib-1.97.9-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 678680] Review Request: transifex-client - Command line tool for Transifex translation management
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678680 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-03 03:22:48 EST --- transifex-client-0.4.2-0.3.226a185088efhg.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 678680] Review Request: transifex-client - Command line tool for Transifex translation management
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678680 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|transifex-client-0.4.2-0.3. |transifex-client-0.4.2-0.3. |226a185088efhg.fc15 |226a185088efhg.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 678774] Review Request: libscs - Software Carry-Save Multiple-Precision Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678774 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||libscs-1.4.1-4.fc14 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-03-03 03:23:10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 678889] Review Request: serdisplib - Library to drive serial displays with built-in controllers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678889 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-03 03:32:11 EST --- serdisplib-1.97.9-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 678680] Review Request: transifex-client - Command line tool for Transifex translation management
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678680 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|transifex-client-0.4.2-0.3. |transifex-client-0.4.2-0.3. |226a185088efhg.fc14 |226a185088efhg.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 678889] Review Request: serdisplib - Library to drive serial displays with built-in controllers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678889 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|serdisplib-1.97.9-1.fc13|serdisplib-1.97.9-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 678680] Review Request: transifex-client - Command line tool for Transifex translation management
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678680 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-03 03:30:53 EST --- transifex-client-0.4.2-0.3.226a185088efhg.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 648023] Review Request: erlang-js - A Friendly Erlang to Javascript Binding
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648023 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|erlang-js-0.5.0-2.fc15 |erlang-js-0.5.0-2.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 671884] Review Request: erlang-cluster_info - Cluster info/postmortem inspector for Erlang applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671884 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-03 03:40:44 EST --- erlang-cluster_info-0.1.0-0.3.20101229gitd077716.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 678887] Review Request: libst2205 - Library for accessing the display of hacked st2205 photo frames
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678887 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|libst2205-1.4.3-2.fc14 |libst2205-1.4.3-2.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 678887] Review Request: libst2205 - Library for accessing the display of hacked st2205 photo frames
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678887 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-03 03:39:59 EST --- libst2205-1.4.3-2.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 678887] Review Request: libst2205 - Library for accessing the display of hacked st2205 photo frames
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678887 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-03 03:41:51 EST --- libst2205-1.4.3-2.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 648023] Review Request: erlang-js - A Friendly Erlang to Javascript Binding
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648023 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-03 03:41:29 EST --- erlang-js-0.5.0-2.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 678887] Review Request: libst2205 - Library for accessing the display of hacked st2205 photo frames
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678887 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|libst2205-1.4.3-2.fc15 |libst2205-1.4.3-2.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 671884] Review Request: erlang-cluster_info - Cluster info/postmortem inspector for Erlang applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671884 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|erlang-cluster_info-0.1.0-0 |erlang-cluster_info-0.1.0-0 |.3.20101229gitd077716.fc15 |.3.20101229gitd077716.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 638666] Review Request: whois - Improved WHOIS client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638666 --- Comment #13 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com 2011-03-03 04:09:48 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: whois Short Description: Improved WHOIS client Owners: ppisar Branches: f15 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 638666] Review Request: whois - Improved WHOIS client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638666 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo+ | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675122] Review Request: php-pear-Auth-Yubico - Authentication class for verifying Yubico OTP tokens
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675122 Patrick Monnerat p...@datasphere.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|ERRATA |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 681424] Review Request: perl-Net-SSH-Expect - SSH wrapper to execute remote commands
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681424
--- Comment #6 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de 2011-03-03 05:47:38
EST ---
MUSTFIXES:
* Please remove this:
%clean
[ %{buildroot} != / ] rm -rf %{buildroot}
It's superflous for a long time.
* What is this supposed to do:
%if 0%{?fedora} = 14
%define pvendorlib %{perl_privlib}
%endif
%if 0%{?fedora} = 15
%define pvendorlib %{perl_vendorlib}
%endif
%if 0%{?rhel} = 5
%define pvendorlib %{perl_vendorlib}
%endif
This %pvendorlib does not appear to be used anywhere inside of your spec, nor
have I evers seen it in any perl*spec before?
* Please remove this:
%define _use_internal_dependency_generator 1
Pardon, could it be you haven't packaged perl-modules for Fedora, before?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 681826] Review Request: xf86-input-multitouch - Multitouch X input driver
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681826 --- Comment #1 from Harald Hoyer har...@redhat.com 2011-03-03 06:37:54 EST --- rpmlint: xf86-input-multitouch.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US touchpads - touch pads, touch-pads, touchpapers well I think touchpad is pretty much accepted now :-) xf86-input-multitouch.src: W: invalid-url Source0: xf86-input-multitouch-20110303.tar.bz2 Upstream does not have tarballs. This is a git snapshot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 681826] New: Review Request: xf86-input-multitouch - Multitouch X input driver
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: xf86-input-multitouch - Multitouch X input driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681826 Summary: Review Request: xf86-input-multitouch - Multitouch X input driver Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: har...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://harald.fedorapeople.org/downloads/xf86-input-multitouch/xf86-input-multitouch-1.0-0.rc2.20110303.1/xf86-input-multitouch.spec SRPM URL: http://harald.fedorapeople.org/downloads/xf86-input-multitouch/xf86-input-multitouch-1.0-0.rc2.20110303.1/xf86-input-multitouch-1.0-0.rc2.20110303.1.fc14.src.rpm Description: This X input driver provides gestures support for multitouch touchpads, in particular those with integrated button. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 679913] Review Request: ftop - Shows progress of open files and file systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679913 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-03-03 06:58:05 --- Comment #14 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2011-03-03 06:58:05 EST --- Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673589] Review Request: UpTools - C++ library for hpc, networking, db, memory, etc.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673589 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-03-03 06:59:18 --- Comment #47 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2011-03-03 06:59:18 EST --- Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 658420] Review Request: zorba - General purpose XQuery processor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658420 Martin Gieseking martin.giesek...@uos.de changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|658489(FE-BUNDLEDLIBS) | --- Comment #12 from Martin Gieseking martin.giesek...@uos.de 2011-03-03 07:17:25 EST --- The jsonxx library has been granted a temporary bundling exception: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/52 Here are the updated files: Spec URL: http://mgieseki.fedorapeople.org/zorba/zorba.spec SRPM URL: http://mgieseki.fedorapeople.org/zorba/zorba-1.4.0-3.fc14.src.rpm I also added a patch for Fedora 14 that replaces calls of deprecated Boost functions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 681558] Review Request: libvirt-snmp - SNMP support for libvirt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681558
--- Comment #2 from Michal Privoznik mpriv...@redhat.com 2011-03-03 07:27:15
EST ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Not a sponsor, just a quick look and few hints:
--
Release:1%{?dist}%{?extra_release}
should be just
Release:1%{?dist}
--
I disagree. It is there for performing our automated builds and for people who
want to rebuild RPM and append unique string to identify their build. All our
virt related RPMS have this.
Other hints taken in. URLs stays the same.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 676544] Review Request: pidgin-logviewer - User friendly and intuitive way of viewing chat logs in Pidgin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676544 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-03-03 08:11:08 --- Comment #31 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2011-03-03 08:11:08 EST --- For F-16, I fixed gstreamer-plugins-bad-free and then rebuilt pidgin-logviewer. Closing as NEXTRELEASE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673096] Review Request: bamf-qt - Qt bindings and QML plugin for Bamf DBus server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673096 --- Comment #4 from Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com 2011-03-03 09:05:37 EST --- Package update to final release (using Ubuntu's sources as they don't care currently about non-Ubuntu users) Spec URL: http://rezza.hofyland.cz/fedora/packages/bamf-qt/bamf-qt.spec SRPM URL: http://rezza.hofyland.cz/fedora/packages/bamf-qt/bamf-qt-0.2-1.fc14.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673096] Review Request: bamf-qt - Qt bindings and QML plugin for Bamf DBus server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673096 --- Comment #5 from Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com 2011-03-03 09:11:35 EST --- Koji build http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2881775 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673854] Review Request: rubygem-cloudfiles - Cloud Files API in ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673854 --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-03-03 09:21:41 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673115] Review Request: dee-qt - Qt bindings and QML plugin for Dee
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673115 --- Comment #5 from Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com 2011-03-03 09:27:42 EST --- Package update to final release (using Ubuntu's sources as they don't care currently about non-Ubuntu users) Spec URL: http://rezza.hofyland.cz/fedora/packages/dee-qt/dee-qt.spec SRPM URL: http://rezza.hofyland.cz/fedora/packages/dee-qt/dee-qt-0.2-1.fc14.src.rpm Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2881824 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 681424] Review Request: perl-Net-SSH-Expect - SSH wrapper to execute remote commands
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681424
--- Comment #7 from Jeffrey Ness jeffrey.n...@rackspace.com 2011-03-03
09:33:18 EST ---
Carl,
Ralf is correct in the %clean portion is not needed for Fedora 13 or above, but
as we discussed this will be ported to EPEL 5/6 as well:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#.25clean
In this perl package your perl_privlib is the same across the board, I would
like to see you narrow your top portion down to a single define:
%define pvendorlib %{perl_vendorlib}
Ralf this variable is used in Carl's %file portion:
%files
%defattr(644,root,root)
%{_mandir}/man3/Net::SSH::Expect.3pm.gz
%{pvendorlib}/Net/SSH/Expect.pm
%{pvendorlib}/Net/SSH/Expect.pod
I am also not quite sure why you have '_use_internal_dependency_generator' set
to 1, in the documentation below it would seem it is always enabled unless set
off by setting to '0':
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/FilteringAutomaticDependencies
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 681424] Review Request: perl-Net-SSH-Expect - SSH wrapper to execute remote commands
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681424
--- Comment #8 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de 2011-03-03 09:57:17
EST ---
(In reply to comment #7)
Ralf this variable is used in Carl's %file portion:
%files
%defattr(644,root,root)
%{_mandir}/man3/Net::SSH::Expect.3pm.gz
%{pvendorlib}/Net/SSH/Expect.pm
%{pvendorlib}/Net/SSH/Expect.pod
We have a standardized macro for this: %{perl_vendorlib}
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Perl
I am also not quite sure why you have '_use_internal_dependency_generator' set
to 1, in the documentation below it would seem it is always enabled unless set
off by setting to '0':
Switching off rpm's internal_dependency_generator was the last resort to
implement filters to filter out bogus deps in the early days of fedora.
Meanwhile things have changed - this kind of manual filters only needed in very
rare exceptional cases (I am not aware of any such case - Most specs still
using them either try hard to stay compatible to ancient RHELs or simply are
outdated themselves).
BTW, @Carl: Are you familiar with cpanspec?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664619] Review Request: jspeex - Java Implementation of Speex
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664619 Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|652183(FE-JAVASIG) | --- Comment #9 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2011-03-03 10:35:15 EST --- I'm dropping the blocks on FE-JAVASIG. The package is reviewed and there is nothing more the Java SIG can do. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675388] Review Request: xmlada - full XML stack for Ada
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675388 --- Comment #22 from Pavel Zhukov pa...@zhukoff.net 2011-03-03 10:50:43 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: xmlada Short Description: Full XML stack for Ada Owners: landgraf Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 647885] Review Request: apache-rat - Apache Release Audit Tool (RAT)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=647885 --- Comment #16 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2011-03-03 11:00:26 EST --- Orion, ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675388] Review Request: xmlada - full XML stack for Ada
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675388 --- Comment #23 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com 2011-03-03 11:05:41 EST --- You don't want *any* branches? I would think at least f15, if not f14 and f13 as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 647885] Review Request: apache-rat - Apache Release Audit Tool (RAT)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=647885 --- Comment #17 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com 2011-03-03 11:17:13 EST --- Sorry, been busy. * Thu Mar 3 2011 Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com 0.8-0.6.20100827 - Drop unneeded rm from %%install - Don't ship BUILD.txt - Cleanup Requires http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/apache-rat.spec http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/apache-rat-0.8-0.6.20100827.fc14.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 677639] Review request: openerp-server (revisited)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=677639 Patrick Monnerat p...@datasphere.ch changed: What|Removed |Added CC||p...@datasphere.ch Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675388] Review Request: xmlada - full XML stack for Ada
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675388 --- Comment #24 from Pavel Zhukov pa...@zhukoff.net 2011-03-03 12:37:18 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: xmlada Short Description: Full XML stack for Ada Owners: landgraf Branches: F-15 InitialCC: -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 681976] New: Review Request: openfst - weighted finite-state transducer library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: openfst - weighted finite-state transducer library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681976 Summary: Review Request: openfst - weighted finite-state transducer library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: loganje...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/openfst/openfst.spec SRPM URL: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/openfst/openfst-1.2.7-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: OpenFst is a library for constructing, combining, optimizing, and searching weighted finite-state transducers (FSTs). Weighted finite-state transducers are automata where each transition has an input label, an output label, and a weight. The more familiar finite-state acceptor is represented as a transducer with each transition's input and output label equal. Finite-state acceptors are used to represent sets of strings (specifically, regular or rational sets); finite-state transducers are used to represent binary relations between pairs of strings (specifically, rational transductions). The weights can be used to represent the cost of taking a particular transition. FSTs have key applications in speech recognition and synthesis, machine translation, optical character recognition, pattern matching, string processing, machine learning, information extraction and retrieval among others. Often a weighted transducer is used to represent a probabilistic model (e.g., an n-gram model, pronunciation model). FSTs can be optimized by determinization and minimization, models can be applied to hypothesis sets (also represented as automata) or cascaded by finite-state composition, and the best results can be selected by shortest-path algorithms. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673545] Review Request: python26-virtualenv - Tool to create isolated Python environments
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673545 Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch 2011-03-03 13:47:54 EST --- Looks good. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 672975] Review Request: perl-Pango - Perl interface to the pango library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672975 --- Comment #2 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2011-03-03 13:52:58 EST --- Apologies for the delay. Good catch on perl-Glib, i'll get it sync'd up. The other items are fixed in -2: New SRPM: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/perl-Pango-1.221-2.fc14.src.rpm New SPEC: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/perl-Pango.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 681393] Review Request: perl-Nagios-Plugin-WWW-Mechanize - Login to a web page as a user and get data as a Nagios plugin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681393 Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch changed: What|Removed |Added QAContact|extras...@fedoraproject.org |steve.tray...@cern.ch Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 681424] Review Request: perl-Net-SSH-Expect - SSH wrapper to execute remote commands
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681424
--- Comment #9 from Carl Thompson fed...@red-dragon.com 2011-03-03 13:58:17
EST ---
Spec URL: http://red-dragon.com/perl-Net-SSH-Expect.spec
SRPM URL: http://red-dragon.com/perl-Net-SSH-Expect-1.09-4.fc13.src.rpm
I have removed
[ %{buildroot} != / ]
as your correct and it is no longer needed.
I use a custom macro defined based on the fedora/rhel build because those
macros are only standard per distro. Many of us packagers of perl modules
found out the hard way that these macros change with F15 when almost all of the
specs had to be updated so they would build on F15 due to the macro change.
I prefer to maintain a single spec for all distros instead of a seperate spec
for each distro so I use the if statements to define a custom macro based on
the distro of build.
As you can see from the macro section:
%if 0%{?fedora} = 14
%define pvendorlib %{perl_privlib}
%endif
%if 0%{?fedora} = 15
%define pvendorlib %{perl_vendorlib}
%endif
%if 0%{?rhel} = 5
%define pvendorlib %{perl_vendorlib}
%endif
the macro from F13 and F14 is perl_privlib while on F15+ as well as rhel its
perl_vendorlib. It gets even more convoluted when they are arch based
libraries instead of noarch.
I have removed the legacy internal_dependency_generator
I have added PERL5_CPANPLUS_IS_RUNNING=1 as a standard that I will do with all
my perl packages to prevent any current or new packages I build from pulling
directly from CPAN
I'm checking out cpanspec because I wasn't familiar with it and will most
likely use it on the next package I work on to ease the creation of a spec file
for perl modules.
This is my second perl module package for fedora/epel so all input to improve
my procedures is greatly appreciated.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 681393] Review Request: perl-Nagios-Plugin-WWW-Mechanize - Login to a web page as a user and get data as a Nagios plugin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681393
--- Comment #3 from Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch 2011-03-03 14:09:53
EST ---
- Package meets naming and packaging guidelines
It does.
- Spec file matches base package name.
Yes.
- Spec has consistant macro usage.
Yes.
- Meets Packaging Guidelines.
Yes
- License
GPL+ or Artistic
- License field in spec matches
It does.
- License file included in package
It does
- Spec in American English
Yes.
- Spec is legible.
Yes.
- Sources match upstream md5sum:
$ md5sum Nagios-Plugin-WWW-Mechanize-0.13.tar.gz
../SOURCES/Nagios-Plugin-WWW-Mechanize-0.13.tar.gz
8cfc2c93d84a8875c3d7a6baf69e Nagios-Plugin-WWW-Mechanize-0.13.tar.gz
8cfc2c93d84a8875c3d7a6baf69e
../SOURCES/Nagios-Plugin-WWW-Mechanize-0.13.tar.gz
- BuildRequires correct
Yes
- Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good.
- Package has a correct %clean section.
- Package has correct buildroot
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
- Package is code or permissible content.
- Doc subpackage needed/used
Not needed.
- Packages %doc files don't affect runtime.
The don't
- Package doesn't own any directories other packages own.
- Package owns all the directories it creates.
- No rpmlint output.
rpmint is clean as above.
- final provides and requires are sane:
COMMENT , a few double requires that could be cleaned up.
SHOULD Items:
- Should build in mock.
Yes
- Should build on all supported archs
Yes
- Should function as described.
The checks work at lease.
- Should have dist tag
Yes.
- Should package latest version
Yes it's the latest
Issues:
1) I'm not entirely sure why to be honest but in the past I've been asked to
change
make pure_install PERL_INSTALL_ROOT=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT
to
make pure_install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT
2) You have in your .spec file an explicit
Requires: perl(Nagios::Plugin)
Requires: perl(WWW::Mechanize)
which results in double entries in the requires from
rpm -qp --requires perl-Nagios-Plugin-WWW-Mechanize-0.13-2.fc14.noarch.rpm
As a gneral rule if yours requires are being auto determined you should not
include
them explicitly.
3) Something I try and do is when you have a BuildRequires that is only needed
on EL6
then I place it inside an OS conditional
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DistTag#Conditionals
This makes it obvious that when RHEL6 is buried you can get rid of these lines.
Of course
sometimes it is requirement since the dependency names changes between
releases.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664390] Review Request: sams - SQUID Account Management system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664390
Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steve.tray...@cern.ch
--- Comment #3 from Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch 2011-03-03 14:40:50
EST ---
Extra items to the informal review.
1) Requiring paths is genrally not good since it requires a whole load of
extra
data to be downloaded during a yum update.
Requires: /usr/bin/wbinfo
If the package name changes between distributions then use an OS
conditional.
2) Inconsistant use of macros.
%{_bindir} is used in some places where as %{_prefix}/bin is used elsewhere.
I think
%{_bindir} is better but I am not not sure why.
3) When installing files by hand e.g.
install -m 755 redhat/init.d %{buildroot}%{_initrddir}/samsd
Add a -p option to preserve the time.
4) You use chrpath, does the other sed option on libtool not work?
It normally does.
5) You called the package sam rather than sam2 as the tar ball is called and
the application
seems to be called. Your choice though.
6) For the sake of the informal reviewer add a comment to the patch
Patch0: sams2.shebang.patch
7) You have
Requires: pcre
Requires: unixODBC
but these are not needed since they are added with
libpcre.so.0()(64bit)
and
libodbc.so.2()(64bit)
remove the requires that are superflous.
8) The
/usr/lib64/libfsusage.so.1
/usr/lib64/libfsusage.so.1.0.0
/usr/lib64/libloadavg.so.1
/usr/lib64/libloadavg.so.1.0.0
files in the -devel package are run time files, they can't be built against
can they? So belong in the main package ? But it's odd nothing
in the main package actually uses them?
When if ever are these libs used? I'd have to look some more.
9) You will need to do a trick with the Release since this is an rc1 release so
see
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Pre-Release_packages
for how to handle this.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 634760] Review Request: amavisd-milter - Sendmail milter for amavisd-new with support for the AM.PDP protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634760 --- Comment #2 from Andy Cobaugh phale...@gmail.com 2011-03-03 14:57:26 EST --- Thanks for the comments. RHEL uses /var/amavis, so I've put in a test for rhel vs fedora for that. Regarding builroot and the clean section, what's the recommended way to handle that when building for RHEL? Are those two going away entirely, or just superfluous in fedora? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 516287] Review Request: perl-Config-Model-Itself - Model editor for Config::Model
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516287 --- Comment #12 from David Hannequin david.hanneq...@gmail.com 2011-03-03 15:29:34 EST --- Hi, New SRPM and Spec file. SRPM URL: http://hvad.fedorapeople.org/fedora/perl-Config-Model-Itself/perl-Config-Model-Itself-1.222-1.fc14.src.rpm Spec URL: http://hvad.fedorapeople.org/fedora/perl-Config-Model-Itself/perl-Config-Model-Itself.spec Best regard -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674007] Review Request: openni-primesense - PrimeSensor/Kinect Modules for OpenNI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674007 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674007] Review Request: openni-primesense - PrimeSensor/Kinect Modules for OpenNI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674007 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-03 16:33:21 EST --- Package openni-primesense-5.0.0.25-0.4.git894cea01.fc14: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 14 updates-testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing openni-primesense-5.0.0.25-0.4.git894cea01.fc14' as soon as you are able to, then reboot. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openni-primesense-5.0.0.25-0.4.git894cea01.fc14 then log in and leave karma (feedback). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674007] Review Request: openni-primesense - PrimeSensor/Kinect Modules for OpenNI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674007 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-03 16:38:01 EST --- Package openni-primesense-5.0.0.25-0.4.git894cea01.fc15: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 15 updates-testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing openni-primesense-5.0.0.25-0.4.git894cea01.fc15' as soon as you are able to, then reboot. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openni-primesense-5.0.0.25-0.4.git894cea01.fc15 then log in and leave karma (feedback). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674007] Review Request: openni-primesense - PrimeSensor/Kinect Modules for OpenNI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674007 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-03 16:39:41 EST --- Package openni-primesense-5.0.0.25-0.4.git894cea01.el6: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing openni-primesense-5.0.0.25-0.4.git894cea01.el6' as soon as you are able to, then reboot. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openni-primesense-5.0.0.25-0.4.git894cea01.el6 then log in and leave karma (feedback). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664619] Review Request: jspeex - Java Implementation of Speex
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664619 --- Comment #10 from Hicham HAOUARI hicham.haou...@gmail.com 2011-03-03 17:38:26 EST --- Thanks Stanislav for reviewing this package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664619] Review Request: jspeex - Java Implementation of Speex
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664619 --- Comment #11 from Hicham HAOUARI hicham.haou...@gmail.com 2011-03-03 17:39:34 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: jspeex Short Description: Java Implementation of Speex Owners: hicham Branches: f14 f15 InitialCC: hicham -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 531107] Review Request: perl-SQL-Tokenizer - A Perl package to tokenize SQL, generically
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531107 --- Comment #21 from David Fetter da...@fetter.org 2011-03-03 18:32:53 EST --- Done :) http://fetter.org/~shackle/perl-SQL-Tokenizer.spec http://fetter.org/~shackle/perl-SQL-Tokenizer-0.20-2.fc14.src.rpm Re: sponsorship, not that I know of. What's involved? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673545] Review Request: python26-virtualenv - Tool to create isolated Python environments
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673545 Mark McKinstry mmcki...@nexcess.net changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Mark McKinstry mmcki...@nexcess.net 2011-03-03 18:48:38 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: python26-virtualenv Short Description: Tool to create isolated Python environments Owners: mmckinst Branches: el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 672322] Review Request: python26-boto - A simple lightweight interface to Amazon Web Services
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672322 Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jkeat...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jkeat...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com 2011-03-03 19:29:12 EST --- snagging. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 672322] Review Request: python26-boto - A simple lightweight interface to Amazon Web Services
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672322 Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com 2011-03-03 19:38:43 EST --- naming looks right, globals work. FIles appear to be properly licensed. rpmlint runs OK with ignorable warnings. Pretty simple package, I can't see anything wrong with it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 670354] Review Request: perl-String-Similarity - Calculates the similarity of two strings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670354 Ruediger Landmann r.landm...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE Flag|needinfo?(r.landmann@redhat | |.com) | Last Closed||2011-03-03 22:00:10 --- Comment #7 from Ruediger Landmann r.landm...@redhat.com 2011-03-03 22:00:10 EST --- Sorry Marcela! Closing... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 670377] Review Request: perl-File-Finder - Nice wrapper for File::Find ala find(1)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670377 Ruediger Landmann r.landm...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Ruediger Landmann r.landm...@redhat.com 2011-03-03 23:26:08 EST --- Thanks Petr! New Package SCM Request === Package Name: perl-File-Find Short Description: Nice wrapper for File::Find ala find(1) Owners: rlandmann Branches: f14 f15 el6 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675542] Review Request:perl-Hash-MoreUtils - Provide the stuff missing in Hash::Util
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675542 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|iarn...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 2011-03-03 23:29:08 EST --- + source files match upstream. 07350a6b0813fbe88b8b48ef786dda98 Hash-MoreUtils-0.02.tar.gz + package meets naming and versioning guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. + summary is OK. + description is OK. + dist tag is present. + build root is OK. + license field matches the actual license. GPL+ or Artistic + license is open source-compatible. + license text not included upstream. + latest version is being packaged. + BuildRequires are proper. + compiler flags are appropriate. + %clean is present. + package builds in mock http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2883410 + package installs properly. + rpmlint has no meaningful complaints: perl-Hash-MoreUtils.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Util - Til, U til, Utile perl-Hash-MoreUtils.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Util - Til, U til, Utile 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. + final provides and requires are sane: perl(Hash::MoreUtils) = 0.02 perl-Hash-MoreUtils = 0.02-1.fc16 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3) perl(Exporter) perl(Scalar::Util) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) + %check is present and all tests pass. # Testing Hash::MoreUtils 0.02, Perl 5.012003, /usr/bin/perl t/00-load.t ... ok t/01-hash.t ... ok t/manifest.t .. ok t/pod-coverage.t .. ok t/pod.t ... ok All tests successful. Files=5, Tests=18, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.01 sys + 0.18 cusr 0.02 csys = 0.23 CPU) Result: PASS + no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. + owns the directories it creates. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no generically named files + code, not content. + documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. + %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. Despite disagreeing with you over t/manifest.t, it's your package and there's certainly nothing in the guidelines that says you mustn't jump through hoops to run release tests; just that you don't need to enable them. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 681093] Review Request: wdiff - A front-end to GNU diff
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681093 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #13 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2011-03-03 23:38:17 EST --- koji build-http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2883340 Suggestions:- 1) You are still using wrong way of writing Changelog. Note you MUST use hyphen between version and release and not a DOT. Replace * Tue Mar 1 2011 Praveen Kumar kumarpraveen.nit...@gmail.com 0.6.5.4 to * Tue Mar 1 2011 Praveen Kumar kumarpraveen.nit...@gmail.com 0.6.5-4 2) In Changelog you need to use % character as %% so replace - Adding %doc files to - Adding %%doc files APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 678931] Review Request: perl-Math-Random-Secure - Cryptographically-secure, cross-platform replacement for rand()
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678931 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|iarn...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 2011-03-03 23:46:28 EST --- + source files match upstream. 7397735ec33ef8fc69303b0a7d741b51 Math-Random-Secure-0.06.tar.gz + package meets naming and versioning guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. + summary is OK. + description is OK. + dist tag is present. + license field matches the actual license. Artistic 2.0 + license is open source-compatible. + license text included. + latest version is being packaged. + BuildRequires are proper. + compiler flags are appropriate. + package builds in mock http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2883478 + package installs properly. + rpmlint has no complaints: 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. + final provides and requires are sane: perl(Math::Random::Secure) = 0.06 perl-Math-Random-Secure = 0.06-2.fc16 perl(Math::Random::Secure::RNG) = 0.06 = perl = 0:5.008 perl(Any::Moose) perl(base) perl(constant) perl(Crypt::Random::Source::Factory) perl(Exporter) perl(if) perl(Math::Random::ISAAC) perl(Math::Random::Secure::RNG) perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3) perl(strict) + %check is present and all tests pass. All tests successful. Files=7, Tests=29, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.01 sys + 0.87 cusr 0.06 csys = 0.96 CPU) Result: PASS + no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. + owns the directories it creates. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no generically named files + code, not content. + documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. + %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED. You can remove META.json from %doc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 405171] Review Request: CriticalMass - SDL/OpenGL space shoot'em up game also known as critter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=405171 Bug 405171 depends on bug 407571, which changed state. Bug 407571 Summary: Review Request: tinyxml - A simple, small, C++ XML parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=407571 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 407571] Review Request: tinyxml - A simple, small, C++ XML parser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=407571 Rakesh Pandit rpan...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #22 from Rakesh Pandit rpan...@redhat.com 2011-03-04 00:43:11 EST --- This is request of EL-5 branch. Changing status to ASSIGNED. Will CLOSE once request is granted. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: tinyxml Short Description: A simple, small, C++ XML parser Owners:rakesh Branches: EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 622904] Review Request: rubygem-state_machine - Adds support for creating state machines for attributes on any Ruby class
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=622904 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-04 00:54:49 EST --- rubygem-state_machine-0.9.4-6.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 622904] Review Request: rubygem-state_machine - Adds support for creating state machines for attributes on any Ruby class
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=622904 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-04 00:54:36 EST --- rubygem-state_machine-0.9.4-6.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 672322] Review Request: python26-boto - A simple lightweight interface to Amazon Web Services
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672322 Garrett Holmstrom gho...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Garrett Holmstrom gho...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-04 01:30:46 EST --- Thanks for the review! New Package SCM Request === Package Name: python26-boto Short Description: A simple lightweight interface to Amazon Web Services Owners: gholms Branches: el5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 681393] Review Request: perl-Nagios-Plugin-WWW-Mechanize - Login to a web page as a user and get data as a Nagios plugin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681393 --- Comment #4 from Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com 2011-03-04 02:13:47 EST --- Thank you Steve. I've updated to a -3 release. http://adiemus.org/~kdreyer/rpms/perl-Nagios-Plugin-WWW-Mechanize.spec http://adiemus.org/~kdreyer/rpms/perl-Nagios-Plugin-WWW-Mechanize-0.13-3.el6.src.rpm ChangeLog for -3: - use DESTDIR in place of PERL_INSTALL_ROOT - rm explicit Requires (Nagios::Plugin and WWW::Mechanize are auto-determined) - Wrap BuildRequires for EL6 in a conditional DistTag Koji scratch builds: F13: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2884086 F14: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2884080 F15: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2884082 EL6: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2884084 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 670365] Review Request: perl-IO-Any - Read or write anything
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670365 --- Comment #6 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de 2011-03-04 02:13:06 EST --- Rudi? How about importing this package to git? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675364] Review Request: perl-Digest-JHash - Perl extension for 32 bit Jenkins Hashing Algorithm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675364 Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2011-03-04 02:19:57 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
