[Bug 626175] Review Request: DeTex - is a filter program that removes the LaTeX control sequences from tex files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=626175 --- Comment #11 from Ankur Sinha 2011-03-07 03:06:20 EST --- Hello! Aye aye Sir! I'll get down to this immediately. Thanks! Regards, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 682666] New: Review Request: DeTex - A program to remove TeX constructs from a text file
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: DeTex - A program to remove TeX constructs from a text
file
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682666
Summary: Review Request: DeTex - A program to remove TeX
constructs from a text file
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: sanjay.an...@gmail.com
QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/detex/detex.spec
SRPM URL: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/detex/detex-2.8-1.fc14.src.rpm
Description:
Detex is a program to remove TeX constructs from a text file. It recognizes
the \input command.
This program assumes it is dealing with LaTeX input if it sees the string
"\begin{document}" in the text. It recognizes the \include and \includeonly
commands.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 626175] Review Request: DeTex - is a filter program that removes the LaTeX control sequences from tex files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=626175 Ankur Sinha changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE --- Comment #12 from Ankur Sinha 2011-03-07 03:09:52 EST --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 682666 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 682666] Review Request: DeTex - A program to remove TeX constructs from a text file
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682666 Ankur Sinha changed: What|Removed |Added CC||d...@ribalba.de --- Comment #1 from Ankur Sinha 2011-03-07 03:09:52 EST --- *** Bug 626175 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630276] Review Request: ghc-clientsession - Store session data in a cookie
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630276 --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen 2011-03-07 03:21:33 EST --- yesod >= 0.7 no longer depends on clientsession (directly at least). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 555248] Review Request: perl-Pod-Eventual - Read a POD document as a series of trivial events
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555248 --- Comment #18 from Paul Howarth 2011-03-07 04:04:08 EST --- D'oh, you're waiting on Mixin::Linewise coming out of testing. Sorry for the noise. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630276] Review Request: ghc-clientsession - Store session data in a cookie
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630276 --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen 2011-03-07 04:18:37 EST --- (In reply to comment #2) > yesod >= 0.7 no longer depends on clientsession (directly at least). Ignore that: yesod-core needs it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630297] Review Request: ghc-persistent - Type-safe, non-relational, multi-backend persistence
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630297 Bug 630297 depends on bug 630283, which changed state. Bug 630283 Summary: Review Request: ghc-neither - Either with monad and applicative instances https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630283 What|Old Value |New Value Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA Resolution||ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Bug 630297 depends on bug 630288, which changed state. Bug 630288 Summary: Review Request: ghc-enumerator - Implementation of Oleg Kiselyov's left-fold enumerators https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630288 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen 2011-03-07 04:22:27 EST --- Now a dependency of yesod-persistent. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630279] Review Request: ghc-email-validate - Validating an email address string against RFC 5322
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630279 --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen 2011-03-07 04:20:51 EST --- Now a dependency of yesod-form. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630303] Review Request: yesod - Creation of type-safe, RESTful web applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630303 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||630292 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630297] Review Request: ghc-persistent - Type-safe, non-relational, multi-backend persistence
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630297 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on|630292 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630292] Review Request: ghc-hamlet - Haml-like template files that are compile-time checked
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630292 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|630297 |630303(yesod) Bug 630292 depends on bug 630274, which changed state. Bug 630274 Summary: Review Request: ghc-blaze-builder - Builder to efficiently append text https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630274 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA Resolution||ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630292] Review Request: ghc-hamlet - Haml-like template files that are compile-time checked
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630292 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2011-03-07 04:59:10 EST --- ghc-hamlet-0.6.1.2-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-hamlet-0.6.1.2-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630292] Review Request: ghc-hamlet - Haml-like template files that are compile-time checked
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630292 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2011-03-07 04:59:27 EST --- ghc-hamlet-0.6.1.2-1.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-hamlet-0.6.1.2-1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 638666] Review Request: whois - Improved WHOIS client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638666 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||whois-5.0.11-1.fc16 Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2011-03-07 05:33:05 --- Comment #15 from Petr Pisar 2011-03-07 05:33:05 EST --- Thanks to all of you for getting this package into Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 682130] Review Request: ibus-indic-table - Indic Table engine for IBus platform
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682130 --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(पराग) 2011-03-07 05:36:33 EST --- I see that you have a new tarball updated with no date suffix. koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2890131 Please add some detailed changelog to understand what got changed from older submission to this new srpm. Re-upload the same srpm with added changelog. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 682704] Review Request: uwsgi - Fast, self-healing, application container server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682704 Oskari Saarenmaa changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) --- Comment #1 from Oskari Saarenmaa 2011-03-07 05:47:30 EST --- This is my first package, and I need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 682704] New: Review Request: uwsgi - Fast, self-healing, application container server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: uwsgi - Fast, self-healing, application container server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682704 Summary: Review Request: uwsgi - Fast, self-healing, application container server Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: osk...@saarenmaa.fi QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://rpm.taisia.fi/custom/fedora/uwsgi.spec SRPM URL: http://rpm.taisia.fi/custom/fedora/uwsgi-0.9.6.8-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: uWSGI is a fast (pure C), self-healing, developer/sysadmin-friendly application container server. Born as a WSGI-only server, over time it has evolved in a complete stack for networked/clustered web applications, implementing message/object passing, caching, RPC and process management. It uses the uwsgi (all lowercase, already included by default in the Nginx and Cherokee releases) protocol for all the networking/interprocess communications. Can be run in preforking mode, threaded, asynchronous/evented and supports various form of green threads/coroutine (like uGreen and Fiber). Sysadmin will love it as it can be configured via command line, environment variables, xml, .ini and yaml files and via LDAP. Being fully modular can use tons of different technology on top of the same core. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 638666] Review Request: whois - Improved WHOIS client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638666 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2011-03-07 06:55:47 EST --- whois-5.0.11-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/whois-5.0.11-1.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630303] Review Request: yesod - Creation of type-safe, RESTful web applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630303 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||630295 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630297] Review Request: ghc-persistent - Type-safe, non-relational, multi-backend persistence
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630297 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on|630295 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630295] Review Request: ghc-web-routes-quasi - Data types and functions for web-routes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630295 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|630297 |630303(yesod) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673172] Review Request: perl-Perl-Critic-Deprecated - Perl::Critic policies which have been superseded by others
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673172 Marcela Mašláňová changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 682414] Review Request: reptyr - Attach a running process to a new terminal
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682414 Neal Becker changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ndbeck...@gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Neal Becker 2011-03-07 07:52:19 EST --- awesome! I'm looking forward to this package. Tested on F14. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673172] Review Request: perl-Perl-Critic-Deprecated - Perl::Critic policies which have been superseded by others
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673172 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Petr Pisar 2011-03-07 08:38:01 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: perl-Perl-Critic-Deprecated Short Description: Perl::Critic policies which have been superseded by others Owners: ppisar, mmaslano, psabata Branches: InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 682754] New: Review Request: perl-MooseX-GlobRef - Store a Moose object in glob reference
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-GlobRef - Store a Moose object in glob reference https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682754 Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-GlobRef - Store a Moose object in glob reference Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmasl...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SRPM: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-MooseX-GlobRef-0.0701-1.fc14.src.rpm SPEC: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-MooseX-GlobRef.spec Reason: I'd like to fix name of this package, which was wrong. See Provides/Obsoletes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 682754] Review Request: perl-MooseX-GlobRef - Store a Moose object in glob reference
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682754 Marcela Mašláňová changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||591775 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673197] Review Request: perl-Perl-Critic-Bangs - Collection of handy Perl::Critic policies
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673197
Marcela Mašláňová changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mmasl...@redhat.com
Flag||fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Marcela Mašláňová 2011-03-07 08:51:53
EST ---
- rpmlint OK
- package must be named according to Guidelines OK
- spec file name must match the base package %{name} OK
- package must meet the Packaging Guidelines OK
- package must be licensed with Fedora approved license OK
- license field must match actual license OK
(GPL+ or Artistic 2.0 in main pm file, in other files are GPLv3 or Artistic
2.0)
- text of the license in its own file must be included in %doc OK
- sources must match the upstream source OK
- package MUST successfully compile and build OK
- architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla OK
- build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires OK
- handle locales properly with %find_lang macro OK
- shared library files must call ldconfig in %post(un) OK
- packages must NOT bundle system libraries OK
- package must own all directories that it creates OK
- permissions on files must be set properly OK
- package must consistently use macros OK
- package must contain code, or permissable content OK
- large documentation must go in a -doc OK
- %doc must not affect the runtime of the application OK
- header files must be in a -devel package OK
- static libraries must be in a -static package OK
- library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel OK
- devel package usually require base package OK
- packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives OK
- GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file OK
- packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages OK
rpm -qp --provides perl-Perl-Critic-Bangs-1.06-1.fc14.noarch.rpm
perl(Perl::Critic::Bangs) = 1.06
perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::Bangs::ProhibitCommentedOutCode) = 1.06
perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::Bangs::ProhibitFlagComments) = 1.06
perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::Bangs::ProhibitNoPlan) = 1.06
perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::Bangs::ProhibitNumberedNames) = 1.06
perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::Bangs::ProhibitRefProtoOrProto) = 1.06
perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::Bangs::ProhibitUselessRegexModifiers) = 1.06
perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::Bangs::ProhibitVagueNames) = 1.06
perl-Perl-Critic-Bangs = 1.06-1.fc14
rpm -qp --requires perl-Perl-Critic-Bangs-1.06-1.fc14.noarch.rpm
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
perl(Perl::Critic) >= 1.098
perl(Perl::Critic::Policy)
perl(Perl::Critic::Utils)
perl(Perl::Critic::Utils::PPIRegexp)
perl(Readonly)
perl(Test::More)
perl(Test::Perl::Critic) >= 1.01
perl(base)
perl(strict)
perl(warnings)
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
ACCEPT (after build pass in koji, blocking package is still not in buildroot)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673197] Review Request: perl-Perl-Critic-Bangs - Collection of handy Perl::Critic policies
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673197 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar 2011-03-07 09:10:01 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: perl-Perl-Critic-Bangs Short Description: Collection of handy Perl::Critic policies Owners: ppisar, mmaslano, psabata Branches: InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 680473] Review Request: ghc-ForSyDe - Formal System Design methodology
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=680473 --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-03-07 10:27:32 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673197] Review Request: perl-Perl-Critic-Bangs - Collection of handy Perl::Critic policies
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673197 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-03-07 10:26:23 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 646789] Review Request: openturns - C++ reliability library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646789 --- Comment #4 from Julien Schueller 2011-03-07 10:25:01 EST --- Hi, I fixde all these problems : https://build.opensuse.org/package/view_file?file=openturns.spec&package=openturns&project=science%3Aopenturns Regards. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 670365] Review Request: perl-IO-Any - Read or write anything
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670365 --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-03-07 10:24:47 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 670377] Review Request: perl-File-Finder - Nice wrapper for File::Find ala find(1)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670377 --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-03-07 10:25:16 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673172] Review Request: perl-Perl-Critic-Deprecated - Perl::Critic policies which have been superseded by others
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673172 --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-03-07 10:25:57 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 682786] New: Review Request: gpick - Advanced color picker written in C++ using GTK+ toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gpick - Advanced color picker written in C++ using GTK+ toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682786 Summary: Review Request: gpick - Advanced color picker written in C++ using GTK+ toolkit Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pfrie...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/packages/SPECS/gpick.spec SRPM URL: http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/gpick-0.2.3-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: gpick is an advanced color picker written in C++ using the GTK+ toolkit. It has an array of advanced features such as creating palettes from images, color scheme creation, magnification, import/export in multiple formats, and more. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673197] Review Request: perl-Perl-Critic-Bangs - Collection of handy Perl::Critic policies
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673197 Bug 673197 depends on bug 673172, which changed state. Bug 673172 Summary: Review Request: perl-Perl-Critic-Deprecated - Perl::Critic policies which have been superseded by others https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673172 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673172] Review Request: perl-Perl-Critic-Deprecated - Perl::Critic policies which have been superseded by others
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673172 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Perl-Critic-Deprecated ||-1.108-1.fc16 Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2011-03-07 10:51:31 --- Comment #9 from Petr Pisar 2011-03-07 10:51:31 EST --- Thank you for review and repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 628665] Review Request: Mars - An interactive development environment for programming in MIPS assembly language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=628665 W. Michael Petullo changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #20 from W. Michael Petullo 2011-03-07 10:51:49 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: Mars Short Description: An interactive development environment for programming in MIPS assembly language Owners: mikep Branches: f14 f15 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 682786] Review Request: gpick - Advanced color picker written in C++ using GTK+ toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682786 Mohamed El Morabity changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||pikachu.2...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|pikachu.2...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Mohamed El Morabity 2011-03-07 10:52:49 EST --- I will review it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 682786] Review Request: gpick - Advanced color picker written in C++ using GTK+ toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682786 Paul W. Frields changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW --- Comment #2 from Paul W. Frields 2011-03-07 10:56:10 EST --- Whoops, there are a bunch of bundled things I missed in the source. I'm working on this, will update bug when I fix them. Please wait on your review until then, and thank you for your quick response! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 682786] Review Request: gpick - Advanced color picker written in C++ using GTK+ toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682786 Ralf Corsepius changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rc040...@freenet.de --- Comment #3 from Ralf Corsepius 2011-03-07 11:01:22 EST --- Just some comments (MUSTFIXES): # rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/*rpm gpick.src: W: invalid-url Source0: http://gpick.googlecode.com/files/gpick_0.2.3.tar.gz HTTP Error 404: Not Found gpick-debuginfo.x86_64: E: empty-debuginfo-package 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings. => broken debuginfos Likely your package doesn't honor RPM_OPT_FLAGS. Unfortunately it's impossible to tell because the logs being produced don't provide sufficient information: ... Compiling ==> build/source/gtk/Swatch.o Compiling ==> build/source/gtk/Zoomed.o Compiling ==> build/source/layout/Box.o Compiling ==> build/source/layout/Layout.o Compiling ==> build/source/layout/LuaBindings.o Compiling ==> build/source/layout/ReferenceCounter.o Compiling ==> build/source/layout/Style.o Compiling ==> build/source/layout/System.o ... => make the build process verbose. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673172] Review Request: perl-Perl-Critic-Deprecated - Perl::Critic policies which have been superseded by others
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673172 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|673197 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673197] Review Request: perl-Perl-Critic-Bangs - Collection of handy Perl::Critic policies
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673197 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Depends on|673172 | Fixed In Version||perl-Perl-Critic-Bangs-1.06 ||-1.fc16 Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2011-03-07 11:41:23 --- Comment #4 from Petr Pisar 2011-03-07 11:41:23 EST --- The dependency in Bugzilla was bogus. Thanks for review and repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 682786] Review Request: gpick - Advanced color picker written in C++ using GTK+ toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682786 --- Comment #4 from Mohamed El Morabity 2011-03-07 11:53:32 EST --- > Unfortunately it's impossible to tell because the logs being produced don't > provide sufficient information: In the meantime, to enable compilation logs, all the XXXCOMSTR should be unset in SConscript. The attached patch removes all definitions of these variables. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 555248] Review Request: perl-Pod-Eventual - Read a POD document as a series of trivial events
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555248 --- Comment #19 from Iain Arnell 2011-03-07 11:52:48 EST --- (In reply to comment #18) > D'oh, you're waiting on Mixin::Linewise coming out of testing. Sorry for the > noise. Though by next week, I'll probably forget why I was waiting for it in the first place. And, of course, you're more than welcome to make the build yourself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 682786] Review Request: gpick - Advanced color picker written in C++ using GTK+ toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682786 --- Comment #5 from Mohamed El Morabity 2011-03-07 11:54:24 EST --- Created attachment 482728 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=482728 Patch to enable compilation/linking logs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 573918] Review Request: perl-NetPacket-LLC - Assemble and disassemble IEEE 802.3 LLC protocol packets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573918 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 573918] Review Request: perl-NetPacket-LLC - Assemble and disassemble IEEE 802.3 LLC protocol packets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573918 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2011-03-07 13:02:12 EST --- perl-NetPacket-LLC-0.01-2.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-NetPacket-LLC-0.01-2.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 573918] Review Request: perl-NetPacket-LLC - Assemble and disassemble IEEE 802.3 LLC protocol packets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573918 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2011-03-07 13:02:21 EST --- perl-NetPacket-LLC-0.01-2.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-NetPacket-LLC-0.01-2.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 501101] Review Request: emacs-color-theme - elisp mode to customize emacs look and feel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501101 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System 2011-03-07 13:23:12 EST --- emacs-color-theme-6.6.0-4.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 501101] Review Request: emacs-color-theme - elisp mode to customize emacs look and feel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501101 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||emacs-color-theme-6.6.0-4.e ||l5 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 648023] Review Request: erlang-js - A Friendly Erlang to Javascript Binding
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648023 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2011-03-07 13:24:31 EST --- erlang-js-0.5.0-2.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 648023] Review Request: erlang-js - A Friendly Erlang to Javascript Binding
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648023 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|erlang-js-0.5.0-2.fc14 |erlang-js-0.5.0-2.el6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 682414] Review Request: reptyr - Attach a running process to a new terminal
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682414
--- Comment #5 from Ville Skyttä 2011-03-07 13:46:07 EST
---
(In reply to comment #3)
> NEEDSWORK:
> * Replace
> Source0:nelhage-reptyr-reptyr-%{version}-0-g%{gitrev}.tar.gz
> with the correct address
> Source0:
> https://download.github.com/nelhage-reptyr-reptyr-%{version}-0-g%{gitrev}.tar.gz
Not done; that URL results in 404 Not Found for me in wget, curl, and Firefox.
$ wget https://download.github.com/nelhage-reptyr-reptyr-0.2-0-g31b85ff.tar.gz
--2011-03-07 20:30:24--
https://download.github.com/nelhage-reptyr-reptyr-0.2-0-g31b85ff.tar.gz
Resolving download.github.com... 207.97.227.240
Connecting to download.github.com|207.97.227.240|:443... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found
2011-03-07 20:30:25 ERROR 404: Not Found.
When someone has downloaded the tarball once (e.g. from the links in their web
interface), it seems that github caches it for some time making it appear that
the URL works, but then it disappears again later as witnessed above. I don't
know of a way to link to their tarballs that would actually work with rpm and
be stable. If you do, let me know.
I *guess* something like
https://github.com/nelhage/reptyr/tarball/%{name}-%{version}/nelhage-reptyr-reptyr-%{version}-0-g%{gitrev}.tar.gz
would work but there's no way I can be sure right now due to the caching
behavior described above (it works for me ATM, but then again I guess the URL
you suggested worked for you too when you tried it).
> MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
> NEEDSWORK
> - You're not using a stable release, so you need to conform to
>
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Non-Numeric_Version_in_Release
But this is the 0.2 release, not a non-released snapshot. It's what you get
from downloading https://github.com/nelhage/reptyr/tarball/reptyr-0.2 .
github's tarball names are just ugly, if you know how to get prettier ones, let
me know.
> SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from
> upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. NEEDSWORK
> - No license included.
Hm? COPYING is included in the upstream tarball and shipped in the built
binary package.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 678955] Review Request: opencsg - Library for Constructive Solid Geometry using OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678955
--- Comment #9 from Jerry James 2011-03-07 13:47:49 EST
---
(In reply to comment #8)
> I have built and added to the repo x86_64 builds for Fedora-15 dev branch.
> These didn't show any of the rpmlint you show above either. Are those rawhide
> builds?
No, that was from a build on x86_64 Fedora 14. I just tried building on Fedora
15 and got the same result. Are you running rpmlint on the binary rpm files,
or on the installed packages? I don't believe rpmlint can do the undefined
non-weak symbol checks on the former.
> The package does need `make -j1`, otherwise it tries to build examples before
> the library is done.
That can be fixed by adding an explicit dependency to the Makefile. Put this
line just after the %{_qt4_qmake} line in your spec file:
sed -i 's/^sub-example-make_default:/sub-example-make_default:
sub-src-make_default/' Makefile
I built with -j5 on a quad-core machine with that line in place and with
%{?_smp_mflags} added and didn't have a problem. There is probably some way to
tweak the project file so that the Makefile is generated with that dependency
in the first place, but I know pretty much nothing about qmake.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 678554] Review Request: iceplayer - a simple media player
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678554 --- Comment #15 from Michael Schwendt 2011-03-07 15:47:31 EST --- The reviewers' comments about the spec %changelog are true. You are supposed to add your own entries - also during review. If you adapt a spec file from a package made by somebody else, make that clear by adding a first changelog entry with your full name and email address. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Changelogs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673026] Review Request: ukij-tuz-fonts - Uyghur Computer Science Association (UKIJ) Unicode fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673026 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2011-03-07 15:58:13 EST --- ukij-tuz-fonts-2.0.0-5.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673027] Review Request: manchu-fonts - A Manchu OpenType (TrueType-flavored) font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673027 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||manchu-fonts-2.006-3.fc14 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-03-07 15:58:04 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673026] Review Request: ukij-tuz-fonts - Uyghur Computer Science Association (UKIJ) Unicode fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673026 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||ukij-tuz-fonts-2.0.0-5.fc13 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-03-07 15:58:23 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673027] Review Request: manchu-fonts - A Manchu OpenType (TrueType-flavored) font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673027 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2011-03-07 15:57:51 EST --- manchu-fonts-2.006-3.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673029] Review Request: sil-nuosu-fonts - The Nuosu SIL Font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673029 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2011-03-07 16:01:21 EST --- sil-nuosu-fonts-2.1.1-3.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673029] Review Request: sil-nuosu-fonts - The Nuosu SIL Font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673029 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2011-03-07 15:59:18 EST --- sil-nuosu-fonts-2.1.1-3.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673026] Review Request: ukij-tuz-fonts - Uyghur Computer Science Association (UKIJ) Unicode fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673026 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2011-03-07 15:59:34 EST --- ukij-tuz-fonts-2.0.0-5.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673029] Review Request: sil-nuosu-fonts - The Nuosu SIL Font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673029 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|sil-nuosu-fonts-2.1.1-3.fc1 |sil-nuosu-fonts-2.1.1-3.fc1 |3 |4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673029] Review Request: sil-nuosu-fonts - The Nuosu SIL Font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673029 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||sil-nuosu-fonts-2.1.1-3.fc1 ||3 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-03-07 15:59:25 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673026] Review Request: ukij-tuz-fonts - Uyghur Computer Science Association (UKIJ) Unicode fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673026 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|ukij-tuz-fonts-2.0.0-5.fc13 |ukij-tuz-fonts-2.0.0-5.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673027] Review Request: manchu-fonts - A Manchu OpenType (TrueType-flavored) font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673027 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2011-03-07 16:07:02 EST --- manchu-fonts-2.006-3.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673027] Review Request: manchu-fonts - A Manchu OpenType (TrueType-flavored) font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673027 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|manchu-fonts-2.006-3.fc14 |manchu-fonts-2.006-3.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630292] Review Request: ghc-hamlet - Haml-like template files that are compile-time checked
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630292 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2011-03-07 16:06:37 EST --- ghc-hamlet-0.6.1.2-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update ghc-hamlet'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-hamlet-0.6.1.2-1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 628665] Review Request: Mars - An interactive development environment for programming in MIPS assembly language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=628665 --- Comment #21 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-03-07 17:06:19 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 682905] New: Review Request: lio-utils - Utilities for Generic Target Infrastructure
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: lio-utils - Utilities for Generic Target Infrastructure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682905 Summary: Review Request: lio-utils - Utilities for Generic Target Infrastructure Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: agro...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~grover/lio-utils.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~grover/srpms/lio-utils-3.2-1.src.rpm Description: This package is used to control the new kernel-based target infrastructure that is present in 2.6.38+. It allows the admin to export scsi block devices (LUNs) via iSCSI, FCoE, and the like. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 682545] Review Request: nutrika - Nutrient content calculator and intake analyzer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682545
--- Comment #7 from Péter Sulyok 2011-03-07 17:55:26 EST
---
I have
1) changed RPM_BUILD_ROOT to %{buildroot} for a consistent macro style
2) corrected License to GPLv3+
3) applied desktop-file-validate from desktop-file-install
4) removed unnecessary Requires tags
5) kept BuildRequires: gtk2-devel,sqlite-devel,gettext,desktop-file-utils,
because it is necessary for mock build
6) removed BuildRoot tag, cleaning in %install, and the %clean section (I do
not expect demand from EPEL5-)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 682353] Review Request: wmtop - Mini graphical version of the CPU monitoring utility top
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682353
Raghu Udiyar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||raghusidda...@gmail.com
--- Comment #6 from Raghu Udiyar 2011-03-07 18:18:12
EST ---
Hi,
This is an informal review per the package guidelines given here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines
MUST ITEMS
[-] rpmlint output
* Just some spelling errors (rpmlint -i will give more details) :
$ rpmlint wmtop.spec ../RPMS/x86_64/wmtop-* ../SRPMS/wmtop-0.84-3.fc14.src.rpm
wmtop.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(de) top -> Top, top-, -top
wmtop.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Dockapp -> Dock app,
Dock-app, Dockage
wmtop.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cpu -> CPU, cup, cp
wmtop.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l de Dockapp -> Dock, Andocke,
Documenta
wmtop.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l de top -> Top, top-, -top
wmtop.src: W: spelling-error Summary(de) top -> Top, top-, -top
wmtop.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Dockapp -> Dock app,
Dock-app, Dockage
wmtop.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cpu -> CPU, cup, cp
wmtop.src: W: spelling-error %description -l de Dockapp -> Dock, Andocke,
Documenta
wmtop.src: W: spelling-error %description -l de top -> Top, top-, -top
3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 10 warnings.
[x] The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines
[x] The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec
[x] The package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
[x] The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the
Licensing Guidelines . (GPLv2+)
[x] The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x] The source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file,
then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is
included in %doc.
[x] The spec file is written in American English.
[x] The spec file for the package is legible.
[x] The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL. (md5: 2bab22c5bc3a5b887e7c03d6dbfe59d7 )
[x] The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on two
primary architectures
(http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2886866)
[x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires
[x] No locale files.
[x] Packages does NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
[x] Package is not designed to be relocatable.
[x] A package owns all directories that it creates.
[x] No file listed more than once in the spec file's %files listings.
[x] Permissions on files are set properly. Executables are set with executable
permissions. Every %files section includes a %defattr(...) line.
[x] Each package has consistently use macros.
[x] The package contains codes, or permissable content.
[x] There is no large documentation files
[x] The program runs properly even if %doc it is not present
[x] Packages does not own files or directories already owned by other packages.
[x] All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8.
SHOULD ITEMS
[x] Source package includes license text(s) as a separate file from upstream.
[X] The description and summary sections in the package spec file does not
contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. (German
traslation provided)
[x] Tested the package was built fine in mock.
[?] The package compiles and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures. (Tested on x86_64 and i386 successfully)
[X] A package does not segfault. (Did not segfault for me)
[x] No scriptlet used
[x] No subpackage used
[x] No pkgconfig(.pc) used
[x] No file dependencies
[x] Manpage included
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 643140] Review Request: autokey - A desktop automation utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=643140 --- Comment #14 from Raghu Udiyar 2011-03-07 18:20:04 EST --- Informal review on : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682353 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 518441] Review Request: ike - Shrew Soft VPN Client For Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518441 --- Comment #31 from Ruediger Landmann 2011-03-07 18:49:58 EST --- (In reply to comment #30) > Rudi > > The libs are required by the binaries so putting them in a devel package is > not > really an option as the binaries will not work without the libs. Fair enough :) So, fix the perms on the logrotate file and I think we're done here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 680423] Review Request: drupal6-authfas - Drupal 6 module for authentication via a Fedora Account System
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=680423 Eric Christensen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||e...@christensenplace.us AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|e...@christensenplace.us Flag||fedora-review?, ||needinfo?(pfrields@redhat.c ||om) --- Comment #2 from Eric Christensen 2011-03-07 20:15:37 EST --- The source appears to be broken... rpmbuild -ba SPECS/drupal6-authfas.spec error: File /home/christensene/rpmbuild/SOURCES/authfas-0.2.1.tar.bz2: No such file or directory -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 680423] Review Request: drupal6-authfas - Drupal 6 module for authentication via a Fedora Account System
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=680423 --- Comment #3 from Eric Christensen 2011-03-07 20:19:20 EST --- Sorry... had a DOH! moment... disregard comment 2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 680423] Review Request: drupal6-authfas - Drupal 6 module for authentication via a Fedora Account System
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=680423
Eric Christensen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Flag|fedora-review?, |fedora-review+
|needinfo?(pfrields@redhat.c |
|om) |
--- Comment #4 from Eric Christensen 2011-03-07
20:31:14 EST ---
OK MUST: rpmlint must be run on the source rpm and all binary rpms the build
produces. The output should be posted in the review.[1]
OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines
.
OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [2] .
OK MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines .
OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet
the Licensing Guidelines .
OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license. [3]
OK MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.[4]
OK MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [5]
OK MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [6]
OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no
upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL
Guidelines for how to deal with this.
OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on
at least one primary architecture. [7]
OK MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in
bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on
that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the
corresponding ExcludeArch line. [8]
OK MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for
any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ;
inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense.
OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the
%find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.[9]
OK MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library
files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must
call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [10]
OK MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.[11]
NA MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state
this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for
relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is
considered a blocker. [12]
OK MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not
create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does
create that directory. [13]
OK MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec
file's %files listings. (Notable exception: license texts in specific
situations)[14]
OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set
with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a
%defattr(...) line. [15]
OK MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [16]
OK MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [17]
OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The
definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not
restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). [18]
OK MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the
runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must
run properly if it is not present. [18]
NA MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [19]
NA MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [20]
NA MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g.
libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in
a -devel package. [19]
NA MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} =
%{version}-%{release} [21]
NA MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be
removed in the spec if they are built.[20]
NA MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop
file, and that file must be properl
[Bug 675976] Review Request: jgoodies-common - Common library shared by JGoodies libraries and applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675976 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2011-03-07 21:15:25 EST --- jgoodies-common-1.1.1-2.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674007] Review Request: openni-primesense - PrimeSensor/Kinect Modules for OpenNI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674007 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2011-03-07 21:18:13 EST --- openni-primesense-5.0.0.25-0.4.git894cea01.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675976] Review Request: jgoodies-common - Common library shared by JGoodies libraries and applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675976 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||jgoodies-common-1.1.1-2.fc1 ||5 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-03-07 21:15:32 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673029] Review Request: sil-nuosu-fonts - The Nuosu SIL Font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673029 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2011-03-07 21:23:04 EST --- sil-nuosu-fonts-2.1.1-3.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673027] Review Request: manchu-fonts - A Manchu OpenType (TrueType-flavored) font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673027 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2011-03-07 21:22:12 EST --- manchu-fonts-2.006-3.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673027] Review Request: manchu-fonts - A Manchu OpenType (TrueType-flavored) font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673027 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|manchu-fonts-2.006-3.fc13 |manchu-fonts-2.006-3.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673029] Review Request: sil-nuosu-fonts - The Nuosu SIL Font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673029 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|sil-nuosu-fonts-2.1.1-3.fc1 |sil-nuosu-fonts-2.1.1-3.fc1 |4 |5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673026] Review Request: ukij-tuz-fonts - Uyghur Computer Science Association (UKIJ) Unicode fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673026 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2011-03-07 21:21:35 EST --- ukij-tuz-fonts-2.0.0-5.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673026] Review Request: ukij-tuz-fonts - Uyghur Computer Science Association (UKIJ) Unicode fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673026 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|ukij-tuz-fonts-2.0.0-5.fc14 |ukij-tuz-fonts-2.0.0-5.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 518546] Review Request: libva - VAAPI video playback acceleration
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518546 --- Comment #91 from Fedora Update System 2011-03-07 21:28:34 EST --- libva-1.0.10-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 679613] Review Request: python-flask - A microframework for Python based on Werkzeug, Jinja 2 and good intentions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679613 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2011-03-07 21:28:25 EST --- python-flask-0.6.1-2.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 518546] Review Request: libva - VAAPI video playback acceleration
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518546 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||libva-1.0.10-1.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 676175] Review Request: fpaste-server - Fedora Pastebin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676175 Eric Christensen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||e...@christensenplace.us --- Comment #3 from Eric Christensen 2011-03-07 21:27:52 EST --- $ rpmlint SRPMS/fpaste-server-0.1-1.src.rpm fpaste-server.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pastebin -> paste bin, paste-bin, pasteboard fpaste-server.src:39: W: setup-not-quiet 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/noarch/fpaste-server-0.1-1.noarch.rpm fpaste-server.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pastebin -> paste bin, paste-bin, pasteboard fpaste-server.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/httpd/conf.d/fpaste_server.conf fpaste-server.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/fpaste_server/manage.py 0644L /usr/bin/env 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpmlint SPECS/fpaste-server.spec SPECS/fpaste-server.spec:39: W: setup-not-quiet 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Need to make a few repairs... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 628665] Review Request: Mars - An interactive development environment for programming in MIPS assembly language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=628665 W. Michael Petullo changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-03-07 22:44:30 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 678221] Review Request: perl-EV - Wrapper for the libev high-performance event loop library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678221
--- Comment #5 from Mathieu Bridon 2011-03-07
22:47:44 EST ---
Sorry it took so long, $dayjob got in the way.
As you asked, I used only the perl-EV flicense in the license tag. I added a
comment just above it with more background on the licensing of the included
sources.
Here is an update package:
Spec URL: http://bochecha.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-EV.spec
SRPM URL: http://bochecha.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-EV-4.03-3.fc15.src.rpm
Full diff:
diff --git a/perl-EV.spec b/perl-EV.spec
index 2b29f94..4f244f9 100644
--- a/perl-EV.spec
+++ b/perl-EV.spec
@@ -1,10 +1,13 @@
Name: perl-EV
Version:4.03
-Release:2%{?dist}
+Release:3%{?dist}
Summary:Wrapper for the libev high-performance event loop library
Group: Development/Libraries
-License:(GPL+ or Artistic) and (BSD or GPLv2+)
+# Note: The source archive includes a libev/ folder which contents are
licensed
+# as "BSD or GPLv2+". However, those are removed at build-time and
+# perl-EV is instead built against the system-provided libev.
+License:GPL+ or Artistic
URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/EV/
Source0:
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/M/ML/MLEHMANN/EV-%{version}.tar.gz
Patch0: perl-EV-4.03-Don-t-ask-questions-at-build-time.patch
@@ -59,7 +62,6 @@ make %{?_smp_mflags}
%install
-rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
make pure_install PERL_INSTALL_ROOT=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT
find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} ';'
find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name '*.bs' -a -size 0 -exec rm -f {} ';'
@@ -91,6 +93,13 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%changelog
+* Tue Mar 08 2011 Mathieu Bridon - 4.03-3
+- Some more fixes as part of the review process:
+ - Fix the license tag to be only the license of perl-EV, and add a note
about
+the included libev sources.
+- Removed manual cleaning of the buildroot since it has been useless since
+ Fedora 10 and even EPEL (>=6) doesn't need it now.
+
* Wed Feb 23 2011 Mathieu Bridon - 4.03-2
- Fixes asked during the review process:
- Filter the private shared EV.so out of the automatic Provides
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 676175] Review Request: fpaste-server - Fedora Pastebin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676175 --- Comment #4 from Clint Savage 2011-03-07 23:36:49 EST --- I didn't fix the 'spelling-error' warning since pastebin is the word I intended. However, I've fixed the other linty problems and updated the spec and src.rpm Spec URL: http://herlo.fedorapeople.org/rpms/fpaste-server.spec SRPM URL: http://herlo.fedorapeople.org/rpms/fpaste-server-0.1-2.src.rpm Thanks for having a look at this, looking forward to the next round. Clint -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 682949] New: Review Request: perl-Test-Fixme - Check code for FIXMEs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Fixme - Check code for FIXMEs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682949 Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Fixme - Check code for FIXMEs Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: r.landm...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://rlandmann.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Test-Fixme.spec SRPM URL: http://rlandmann.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Test-Fixme-0.04-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: When coding it is common to come up against problems that need to be addressed but that are not a big deal at the moment. What generally happens is that the coder adds comments and marks them FIXME. Test::Fixme allows you to add a test file that ensures that none of these get forgotten in the module. rpmlint output: $ rpmlint SPECS/perl-Test-Fixme.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint SRPMS/perl-Test-Fixme-0.04-1.fc14.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/noarch/perl-Test-Fixme-0.04-1.fc14.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. scratchbuild in Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2892937 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 678554] Review Request: iceplayer - a simple media player
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678554 --- Comment #16 from Mike Ma 2011-03-08 00:22:38 EST --- OK. Added them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 676175] Review Request: fpaste-server - Fedora Pastebin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676175 Eric Christensen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|e...@christensenplace.us Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #5 from Eric Christensen 2011-03-08 00:57:46 EST --- Cool. I'll take a look at this again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 682487] Review Request: drupal6-image - Allows uploading, resizing and viewing of images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682487 --- Comment #1 from Tim Lauridsen 2011-03-08 01:12:24 EST --- I will review this bug -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 682487] Review Request: drupal6-image - Allows uploading, resizing and viewing of images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682487 Tim Lauridsen changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|t...@rasmil.dk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
