[Bug 457709] Review Request: perizia-fonts - English asymmetric font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457709 Paul Flo Williams p...@frixxon.co.uk changed: What|Removed |Added CC||p...@frixxon.co.uk --- Comment #15 from Paul Flo Williams p...@frixxon.co.uk 2011-03-10 03:28:34 EST --- Although the link is broken on the web site, it's just a simple typo (linko?) The content is still there, and the download link works: http://hiran.in/blog/thanks-perizia-is-now-a-font Ankur, I'd suggest you could just package the TTF and appropriate fontconfig, without waiting for an SFD that may never appear. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 457709] Review Request: perizia-fonts - English asymmetric font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457709 --- Comment #17 from Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com 2011-03-10 04:00:58 EST --- Hello, That's a little weird since Hiran himself commented on 2010-05-02 08:00:37 Sorry. Its since the Googlepages.com become off. I will make the new version of Both Perizia and Rufscript (with all latin letters) and will make its repo soon. I'll package them up soon and submit the spec/srpm. Thanks, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 538057] Review Request: rhnmd - Red Hat Network Monitoring Daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538057 Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(msu...@redhat.com | |) | --- Comment #8 from Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com 2011-03-10 04:21:12 EST --- Fixed in spacewalk.git commits: 7fda56e92719610c8e0fc14573a5111ada66e438 648558e2835ec6cbe31b12bbf44f1c7297914e81 Spec: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/rhnmd/rhnmd.spec src.rpm: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/rhnmd/rhnmd-5.3.8-1.fc14.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 668204] Review Request: buzzbird - Twitter and identi.ca desktop client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668204 --- Comment #8 from Jan Klepek jan.kle...@gmail.com 2011-03-10 06:29:01 EST --- updated spec/srpm Spec URL: http://hpejakle.fedorapeople.org/packages/buzzbird.spec SRPM URL: http://hpejakle.fedorapeople.org/packages/buzzbird-0.9.1-2.fc14.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 598688] Review Request: archivemount - FUSE based filesystem for mounting compressed archives
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598688 --- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-10 06:31:06 EST --- archivemount-0.6.1-4.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/archivemount-0.6.1-4.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683780] New: Review Request: rubygem-gem-open - Open gems on your favorite editor by running gem open command
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-gem-open - Open gems on your favorite editor by running gem open command https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683780 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-gem-open - Open gems on your favorite editor by running gem open command Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jan.kle...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hpejakle.fedorapeople.org/packages/rubygem-gem-open.spec SRPM URL: http://hpejakle.fedorapeople.org/packages/rubygem-gem-open-0.1.3-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: Open gems on your favorite editor by running a specific gem command like `gem open package`. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683790] New: Review Request: rubygem-hoe-yard - A Hoe plug-in for generating YARD documentation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-hoe-yard - A Hoe plug-in for generating YARD documentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683790 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-hoe-yard - A Hoe plug-in for generating YARD documentation Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jan.kle...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hpejakle.fedorapeople.org/packages/rubygem-hoe-yard.spec SRPM URL: http://hpejakle.fedorapeople.org/packages/rubygem-hoe-yard-0.1.2-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: A Hoe plug-in for generating YARD documentation. Using the Hoe YARD plug-in, projects can begin generating YARD documentation instantly. Additionally, any resulting RubyGems will be properly configured to automatically generate YARD documentation upon installation. rpmlint: rubygem-rubytree.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rubytree-0.8.1/.yardoc The file or directory is hidden. You should see if this is normal, and delete it from the package if not. rubygem-rubytree.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rubytree-0.8.1/.yardoc The file or directory is hidden. You should see if this is normal, and delete it from the package if not. 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683789] New: Review Request: rubygem-rubytree - RubyTree is a Ruby implementation of the generic tree data structure
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-rubytree - RubyTree is a Ruby implementation of the generic tree data structure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683789 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-rubytree - RubyTree is a Ruby implementation of the generic tree data structure Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jan.kle...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hpejakle.fedorapeople.org/packages/rubygem-rubytree.spec SRPM URL: http://hpejakle.fedorapeople.org/packages/rubygem-rubytree-0.8.1-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: RubyTree is a Ruby implementation of the generic tree data structure. It provides a node-based model to store keyed node-elements in the tree and simple APIs to access, modify and traverse the structure. RubyTree is node-centric, where individual nodes on the tree are the primary compositional and structural elements. This implementation also mixes in the Enumerable module to allow standard access to the tree as a collection. rpmlint: rubygem-rubytree.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rubytree-0.8.1/.yardoc The file or directory is hidden. You should see if this is normal, and delete it from the package if not. rubygem-rubytree.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rubytree-0.8.1/.yardoc The file or directory is hidden. You should see if this is normal, and delete it from the package if not. 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683790] Review Request: rubygem-hoe-yard - A Hoe plug-in for generating YARD documentation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683790 --- Comment #1 from Jan Klepek jan.kle...@gmail.com 2011-03-10 06:43:38 EST --- koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2900098 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 499959] Review Request: redmine - redmine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499959 Jan Klepek jan.kle...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||683789 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683790] Review Request: rubygem-hoe-yard - A Hoe plug-in for generating YARD documentation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683790 Jan Klepek jan.kle...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||683789 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683789] Review Request: rubygem-rubytree - RubyTree is a Ruby implementation of the generic tree data structure
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683789 Jan Klepek jan.kle...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||499959 Depends on||683790 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 555988] Review Request: rubygem-acts_as_tree - Tree structure plugin for ActiveRecord
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555988 Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vondr...@redhat.com --- Comment #9 from Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com 2011-03-10 07:33:06 EST --- Hi guys, This review is apparently blocked by unnecessary dependencies. Please execute the test suite by some alternative way, without use of rake. You can find some hints here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging_talk:Ruby -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 580755] Review Request: yad - Display graphical dialogs from shell scripts or command line
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=580755 Elder Marco elderma...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||elderma...@gmail.com --- Comment #6 from Elder Marco elderma...@gmail.com 2011-03-10 07:47:00 EST --- Hello Christoph, I'm sorry, I created a new review request for this package: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683150 Should I mark it as a duplicate of this bug? Can you review it? This is my first package.. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 555988] Review Request: rubygem-acts_as_tree - Tree structure plugin for ActiveRecord
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555988 --- Comment #10 from Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com 2011-03-10 07:49:04 EST --- BTW I am not sure if this version is compatible with Rails 3 which are available in F15 and above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 655582] Review Request: mod_cluster - Apache HTTPD based load balancer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=655582 --- Comment #4 from Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com 2011-03-10 08:34:52 EST --- Spec URL: http://goldmann.fedorapeople.org/package_review/mod_cluster/mod_cluster.spec SRPM URL: http://goldmann.fedorapeople.org/package_review/mod_cluster/mod_cluster-1.1.1-1.fc14.src.rpm I fixed described issues. Re warnings - I'm not a C programmer, will contact mod_cluster developers to fix it in the future versions if that's ok. rpmlint output: $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-14-x86_64/result/mod_cluster-1.1.1-1.fc14.x86_64.rpm mod_cluster.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US jk - j, k, ja mod_cluster.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US lifecycle - life cycle, life-cycle, lifestyle mod_cluster.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL: http://jboss.org/mod_cluster HTTP Error 403: Forbidden 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-14-x86_64/result/mod_cluster-1.1.1-1.fc14.src.rpm mod_cluster.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US httpd - HTTP mod_cluster.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US jk - j, k, ja mod_cluster.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US lifecycle - life cycle, life-cycle, lifestyle mod_cluster.src: W: invalid-url URL: http://jboss.org/mod_cluster HTTP Error 403: Forbidden 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2900512 Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675478] Review Request: gprbuild - Ada project builder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675478 --- Comment #7 from Pavel Zhukov pa...@zhukoff.net 2011-03-10 08:43:27 EST --- Koji ok http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2900576 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683071] Review Request: libvirt-php - PHP bindings for libvirt virtualization toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683071 Michal Novotny minov...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(tm...@redhat.com) --- Comment #8 from Michal Novotny minov...@redhat.com 2011-03-10 09:03:53 EST --- Spec URL: http://minovotn.fedorapeople.org/php-libvirt.spec SRPM URL: http://minovotn.fedorapeople.org/php-libvirt-0.4.1-2.fc14.src.rpm Description: Libvirt bindings for PHP is just a libvirt bindings for PHP platform to allow management of the virtual machines from your PHP scripts. For more information please refer to http://libvirt.org/php . Tomas, could you please review it? Thanks, Michal -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683071] Review Request: php-libvirt - PHP bindings for libvirt virtualization toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683071 Tomas Mraz tm...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: libvirt-php |Review Request: php-libvirt |- PHP bindings for libvirt |- PHP bindings for libvirt |virtualization toolkit |virtualization toolkit Flag|needinfo?(tm...@redhat.com) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683071] Review Request: php-libvirt - PHP bindings for libvirt virtualization toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683071 --- Comment #9 from Michal Novotny minov...@redhat.com 2011-03-10 09:28:45 EST --- (In reply to comment #8) Spec URL: http://minovotn.fedorapeople.org/php-libvirt.spec SRPM URL: http://minovotn.fedorapeople.org/php-libvirt-0.4.1-2.fc14.src.rpm Description: Libvirt bindings for PHP is just a libvirt bindings for PHP platform to allow management of the virtual machines from your PHP scripts. For more information please refer to http://libvirt.org/php . Tomas, could you please review it? Thanks, Michal Also, there's Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2900658 Michal -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 681558] Review Request: libvirt-snmp - SNMP support for libvirt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681558 Michal Privoznik mpriv...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(mprivozn@redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #4 from Michal Privoznik mpriv...@redhat.com 2011-03-10 09:30:53 EST --- Updated. Spec URL: http://www.libvirt.org/git/?p=libvirt-snmp.git;a=blob;f=libvirt-snmp.spec.in;hb=HEAD SRPM URL: ftp://libvirt.org/libvirt/snmp/libvirt-snmp-0.0.1-2.fc14.src.rpm new tarball: ftp://libvirt.org/libvirt/snmp/libvirt-snmp-0.0.1-2.tar.gz LIBVIRT-MIB.txt is also in %doc, because it is part of documentation to allow users see what information they can gather/set. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 681558] Review Request: libvirt-snmp - SNMP support for libvirt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681558 --- Comment #5 from Tomas Mraz tm...@redhat.com 2011-03-10 10:19:33 EST --- (In reply to comment #4) Updated. Spec URL: http://www.libvirt.org/git/?p=libvirt-snmp.git;a=blob;f=libvirt-snmp.spec.in;hb=HEAD SRPM URL: ftp://libvirt.org/libvirt/snmp/libvirt-snmp-0.0.1-2.fc14.src.rpm new tarball: ftp://libvirt.org/libvirt/snmp/libvirt-snmp-0.0.1-2.tar.gz This does not make much sense - the tarball should stay the same if you're just changing the .spec file and not the source files. I know that you have the .spec.in in the upstream git repository however the Fedora spec should track the upstream spec only on rebases of the sources. So I recommend to use the 0.0.x versioning for the upstream tarball and have the spec file changes tracked only in the upstream git. Not to change the tarball with all the spec changes. LIBVIRT-MIB.txt is also in %doc, because it is part of documentation to allow users see what information they can gather/set. This does not make much sense to me. The file is in the filesystem at one place and there is no reason to duplicate it as %doc somewhere else. Perhaps at most duplicate it as a symlink in the doc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 681558] Review Request: libvirt-snmp - SNMP support for libvirt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681558 --- Comment #6 from Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com 2011-03-10 11:08:14 EST --- (In reply to comment #5) LIBVIRT-MIB.txt is also in %doc, because it is part of documentation to allow users see what information they can gather/set. This does not make much sense to me. The file is in the filesystem at one place and there is no reason to duplicate it as %doc somewhere else. Perhaps at most duplicate it as a symlink in the doc. That was my suggestion because looking at contents of rpm I noticed *.txt file that was not in %doc. I almost changed my mind, but I really believe this file can be useful for users/developers so I believe you should keep it in spec. Symlink will do of course. Would anyone care to explain why do these files even have *.txt extension? It's doesn't make much sense to me... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 499959] Review Request: redmine - redmine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499959 --- Comment #37 from Jan Klepek jan.kle...@gmail.com 2011-03-10 11:28:49 EST --- Michal, you could work on redmine package and/or package plugins. Work is in progress and I today packaged rubytree. Seems anyway that redmine would need some internal hacking to get it working with system libraries :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683127] Review Request: TPM Quote Tools - TPM-based attestation using the TPM quote operation (tools)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683127 --- Comment #4 from John D. Ramsdell ramsd...@mitre.org 2011-03-10 11:41:08 EST --- (In reply to comment #3) I uploaded the corrected spec file to: http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/ramsdell/tools/tpm-quote-tools.spec (In reply to comment #1) Thanks for you quick reply. I fixed the errors in my local copy of the spec file, although I still don't see where the instructions say the Packager and Vendor tags should be omitted. I ran rpmlint, and it didn't complain about the tags, or maybe it did, and I didn't understand the warning I received. I don't understand what is wrong with my review summary. I thought I was supposed to supply the name of the package followed by a hyphen and then the summary from the spec file. Please tell me what I should have written. Please fix your review summary: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Create_Your_Review_Request Also take a look at Packaging Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines * The Packager tag should not be used in spec files. * The Vendor tag should not be used. Do you plan to release an EPEL5 package? Read about BuildRoot tag. Remove trousers explicit Require. Why package INSTALL file? Check Parallel make section under Guidelines too. You should understand most of this process before ask for sponsoring... so, let's read the docs :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675478] Review Request: gprbuild - Ada project builder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675478 --- Comment #8 from Mikhail Kulemin mihkule...@gmail.com 2011-03-10 11:57:48 EST --- Found xmlada package only in f15 repo. Do you plan to build xmlada and gprbuild for f14? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 499959] Review Request: redmine - redmine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499959 --- Comment #38 from Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com 2011-03-10 12:00:43 EST --- And one bad news is that in F15 are already (and only) Rails 3 which are not supported by Redmine yet :/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 682414] Review Request: reptyr - Attach a running process to a new terminal
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682414
--- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2011-03-10 12:02:24
EST ---
(In reply to comment #5)
(In reply to comment #3)
NEEDSWORK:
* Replace
Source0:nelhage-reptyr-reptyr-%{version}-0-g%{gitrev}.tar.gz
with the correct address
Source0:
https://download.github.com/nelhage-reptyr-reptyr-%{version}-0-g%{gitrev}.tar.gz
Not done; that URL results in 404 Not Found for me in wget, curl, and
Firefox.
Umm.. did you expand the macros? I tested it with
$ spectool -g reptyr.spec
and it worked.
It's not working anymore, since the tarball doesn't exist anymore. The current
snapshot from the master branch is
nelhage-reptyr-reptyr-0.2-2-g919fff7.tar.gz
In the 0.2 tag it is
nelhage-reptyr-reptyr-0.2-2-g919fff7.tar.gz
Note that this is a review blocker.
When someone has downloaded the tarball once (e.g. from the links in their web
interface), it seems that github caches it for some time making it appear that
the URL works, but then it disappears again later as witnessed above. I don't
know of a way to link to their tarballs that would actually work with rpm and
be stable. If you do, let me know.
I *guess* something like
https://github.com/nelhage/reptyr/tarball/%{name}-%{version}/nelhage-reptyr-reptyr-%{version}-0-g%{gitrev}.tar.gz
would work but there's no way I can be sure right now due to the caching
behavior described above (it works for me ATM, but then again I guess the URL
you suggested worked for you too when you tried it).
I was able to get the same tarball as you before, so this is not true.
It's not a problem if the source URL doesn't work anymore after the revision in
question has vanished from upstream.
However, that way it's just way easier for the maintainer to plug in the
correct snapshot ID in the spec file and run
$ spectool -g package.spec
But this is the 0.2 release, not a non-released snapshot. It's what you get
from downloading https://github.com/nelhage/reptyr/tarball/reptyr-0.2 .
github's tarball names are just ugly, if you know how to get prettier ones,
let
me know.
Whenever you use snapshots from VCS, you MUST insert the snapshot revision in
the Release field.
SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files
from
upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. NEEDSWORK
- No license included.
Hm? COPYING is included in the upstream tarball and shipped in the built
binary package.
Whoops, my mistake.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 678774] Review Request: libscs - Software Carry-Save Multiple-Precision Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678774 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-10 12:23:58 EST --- libscs-1.4.1-4.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674009] Review Request: bitten - A continuous integration plugin for Trac
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674009 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-10 12:24:17 EST --- bitten-0.6b3-0.3.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 678774] Review Request: libscs - Software Carry-Save Multiple-Precision Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678774 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-10 12:23:50 EST --- libscs-1.4.1-4.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674667] Review Request: python-venusian - A library for deferring decorator actions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674667 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-10 12:24:47 EST --- python-venusian-0.6-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 678692] Review Request: drupal6-theme-ninesixty - 960 Grid System (960.gs) theme for Drupal 6
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678692 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-10 12:23:36 EST --- drupal6-theme-ninesixty-1.0-3.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 672954] Review Request: python26-ldap - An object-oriented API to access LDAP directory servers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672954 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-10 12:24:24 EST --- python26-ldap-2.3.12-2.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674666] Review Request: python-translationstring - Utility library for i18n relied on by various Repoze packages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674666 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-10 12:24:05 EST --- python-translationstring-0.3-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 678692] Review Request: drupal6-theme-ninesixty - 960 Grid System (960.gs) theme for Drupal 6
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678692 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||drupal6-theme-ninesixty-1.0 ||-3.el6 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-03-10 12:23:41 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674667] Review Request: python-venusian - A library for deferring decorator actions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674667 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|python-venusian-0.6-1.fc14 |python-venusian-0.6-1.el6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674671] Review Request: python-repoze-lru - A tiny LRU cache implementation and decorator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674671 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-10 12:26:19 EST --- python-repoze-lru-0.3-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 677089] Review Request: php-pear-XML-RPC2 - XML-RPC client/server library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=677089 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-10 12:25:26 EST --- php-pear-XML-RPC2-1.0.6-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674671] Review Request: python-repoze-lru - A tiny LRU cache implementation and decorator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674671 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|python-repoze-lru-0.3-1.fc1 |python-repoze-lru-0.3-1.el6 |4 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 677089] Review Request: php-pear-XML-RPC2 - XML-RPC client/server library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=677089 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|php-pear-XML-RPC2-1.0.6-1.f |php-pear-XML-RPC2-1.0.6-1.e |c14 |l6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 678680] Review Request: transifex-client - Command line tool for Transifex translation management
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678680 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|transifex-client-0.4.2-0.3. |transifex-client-0.4.2-0.3. |226a185088efhg.el6 |226a185088efhg.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 672954] Review Request: python26-ldap - An object-oriented API to access LDAP directory servers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672954 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||python26-ldap-2.3.12-2.el5 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-03-10 12:24:29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 678680] Review Request: transifex-client - Command line tool for Transifex translation management
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678680 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|transifex-client-0.4.2-0.3. |transifex-client-0.4.2-0.3. |226a185088efhg.fc13 |226a185088efhg.el6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674009] Review Request: bitten - A continuous integration plugin for Trac
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674009 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-10 12:26:45 EST --- bitten-0.6b3-0.3.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 678680] Review Request: transifex-client - Command line tool for Transifex translation management
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678680 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-10 12:26:33 EST --- transifex-client-0.4.2-0.3.226a185088efhg.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 678680] Review Request: transifex-client - Command line tool for Transifex translation management
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678680 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-10 12:25:04 EST --- transifex-client-0.4.2-0.3.226a185088efhg.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675478] Review Request: gprbuild - Ada project builder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675478 --- Comment #9 from Pavel Zhukov pa...@zhukoff.net 2011-03-10 12:30:46 EST --- No, for F15 and later -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683948] New: Review Request: python-unicodenazi - Module that finds unicode/bytestring comparisions and other problems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-unicodenazi - Module that finds unicode/bytestring comparisions and other problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683948 Summary: Review Request: python-unicodenazi - Module that finds unicode/bytestring comparisions and other problems Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: a.bad...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://toshio.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-unicodenazi.spec SRPM URL: http://toshio.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-unicodenazi-1.1-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: A common source of unicode issues in python2 is that code mixes str and unicode and is valid for the cases the author tests for (because they only test with ASCII) but then throws an error when the code is used with non-ASCII strings. If enabled unicodenazi will complain when this mixing of unicode and byte str occurs. It's annoying as hell, has a huge runtime impact on performance, and will also complain about most of the stuff in the Python standard library. But it will point out some areas of your code that may traceback in python2 when given different data and make it easier to migrate to python3 where unicode and bytes no longer interoperate. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683948] Review Request: python-unicodenazi - Module that finds unicode/bytestring comparisions and other problems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683948 Tim Lauridsen t...@rasmil.dk changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|t...@rasmil.dk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683948] Review Request: python-unicodenazi - Module that finds unicode/bytestring comparisions and other problems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683948 Tim Lauridsen t...@rasmil.dk changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683948] Review Request: python-unicodenazi - Module that finds unicode/bytestring comparisions and other problems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683948 --- Comment #1 from Tim Lauridsen t...@rasmil.dk 2011-03-10 13:45:33 EST --- I will review this package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683948] Review Request: python-unicodenazi - Module that finds unicode/bytestring comparisions and other problems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683948 Tim Lauridsen t...@rasmil.dk changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683948] Review Request: python-unicodenazi - Module that finds unicode/bytestring comparisions and other problems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683948
Tim Lauridsen t...@rasmil.dk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Tim Lauridsen t...@rasmil.dk 2011-03-10 13:54:23 EST ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
[x] : MUST - Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at
least one supported architecture.
[x] : MUST - Each %files section contains %defattr
[x] : MUST - Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[x] : MUST - Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x] : MUST - Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=...
doesn't work.
[x] : MUST - Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x] : MUST - Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
MD5SUM this package : f9b3d2c25c7887df643e67e2c8d99c45
MD5SUM upstream package : f9b3d2c25c7887df643e67e2c8d99c45
[x] : MUST - Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[-] : MUST - %config files are marked noreplace or the reason is justified.
[-] : MUST - Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop using
desktop-file-install file if it is a GUI application.
[-] : MUST - Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[-] : MUST - Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] : MUST - ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[-] : MUST - License file installed when any subpackage combination is
installed.
[-] : MUST - The spec file handles locales properly.
[-] : MUST - No %config files under /usr.
[-] : MUST - Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] : MUST - Static libraries in -static subpackage, if present.
[!] : MUST - Rpmlint output is silent.
rpmlint python-unicodenazi-1.1-1.fc16.noarch.rpm
python-unicodenazi.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) unicode -
Unicode, uni code, uni-code
python-unicodenazi.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) bytestring
- byte string, byte-string, lutestring
python-unicodenazi.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US)
comparisions - comparisons, comparison, comparatives
python-unicodenazi.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US
unicode - Unicode, uni code, uni-code
python-unicodenazi.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US
runtime - run time, run-time, runtish
python-unicodenazi.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US
traceback - trace back, trace-back, traceable
python-unicodenazi.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US
interoperate - inter operate, inter-operate, interoperable
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 7 warnings.
rpmlint python-unicodenazi-1.1-1.fc16.src.rpm
python-unicodenazi.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) unicode -
Unicode, uni code, uni-code
python-unicodenazi.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) bytestring -
byte string, byte-string, lutestring
python-unicodenazi.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) comparisions
- comparisons, comparison, comparatives
python-unicodenazi.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US unicode
- Unicode, uni code, uni-code
python-unicodenazi.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US runtime
- run time, run-time, runtish
python-unicodenazi.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US
traceback - trace back, trace-back, traceable
python-unicodenazi.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US
interoperate - inter operate, inter-operate, interoperable
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 7 warnings.
[x] : MUST - Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and
meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[-] : MUST - %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x] : MUST - All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x] : MUST - Package contains no bundled libraries.
[x] : MUST - Changelog in prescribed format.
[x] : MUST - Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-] : MUST - Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x] : MUST - Package requires other packages for
[Bug 683071] Review Request: php-libvirt - PHP bindings for libvirt virtualization toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683071 --- Comment #10 from Tomas Mraz tm...@redhat.com 2011-03-10 14:02:40 EST --- The php-libvirt-0.4.1.tar.gz in the src.rpm and the http://libvirt.org/sources/php/php-libvirt-0.4.1.tar.gz tarballs still differ. The upstream project is still named libvirt-php - perhaps the tarball should stay with the name libvirt-php and just name the src.rpm package php-libvirt? Also I see the license was changed to LGPLv2+ - at least according to the LICENSE and README files - have you got an approval from all of the contributors to the project to change the license? You cannot change the license from GPLv2 to LGPLv2+ without it as the GPLv2 is stronger - more restrictive license. Also the LICENSE and probably also the README file should stay in the base package as %doc and should not go into the doc subpackage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 677943] Review Request: liblouis - Braille translation and back-translation library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=677943 Mario Blättermann mari...@gnome.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Mario Blättermann mari...@gnome.org 2011-03-10 14:30:21 EST --- (In reply to comment #7) Thank you for the review. Since you're now a member of the packager group, you are also allowed to approve this package if you can't find any packaging mistakes. Package APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674188] Review Request: libzeitgeist - Library to access zeitgeist; needed by synapse
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674188
--- Comment #15 from Renich Bon Ciric ren...@woralelandia.com 2011-03-10
14:33:14 EST ---
(In reply to comment #14)
Some notes for 0.3.4-1
Thank you for taking the time to help me out so much! ;)
Anyway, I've applied most of your suggestions. I couldn't remove:
%doc %{_datadir}/gtk-doc/html/zeitgeist-1.0/
Since it tells me that these files didn't get included in the RPM if missing.
And, one other thing, the make test fails in mock but works while using
rpmbuild -ba... any comments?
The test that fails is
TEST: test-log... (pid=8981)
/Zeitgeist/Log/InsertGetDelete:
GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_unref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)'
failed
aborting...
FAIL
GTester: last random seed: R02S4755c42d0d25f30be0e70f1de0ff8587
/bin/sh: line 1: 8900 Terminated gtester --verbose test-timerange
test-timestamp test-symbols test-monitor test-log test-event test-datasource
test-mimetypes
make[2]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/libzeitgeist-0.3.4/tests'
make[2]: *** [test] Error 143
make[1]: *** [check-am] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/libzeitgeist-0.3.4/tests'
make: *** [check-recursive] Error 1
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.tAlMVq (%check)
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.tAlMVq (%check)
RPM build errors:
Child returncode was: 1
EXCEPTION: Command failed. See logs for output.
# ['bash', '--login', '-c', 'rpmbuild -bb --target x86_64 --nodeps
builddir/build/SPECS/libzeitgeist.spec']
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/mock/trace_decorator.py, line 70, in
trace
result = func(*args, **kw)
File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/mock/util.py, line 325, in do
raise mock.exception.Error, (Command failed. See logs for output.\n # %s
% (command,), child.returncode)
Error: Command failed. See logs for output.
# ['bash', '--login', '-c', 'rpmbuild -bb --target x86_64 --nodeps
builddir/build/SPECS/libzeitgeist.spec']
LEAVE do -- EXCEPTION RAISED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 649802] Review Request: perl-RT-Extension-CommandByMail - Change metadata of a RT ticket via email
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=649802 David Nalley da...@gnsa.us changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(da...@gnsa.us)| --- Comment #5 from David Nalley da...@gnsa.us 2011-03-10 15:12:38 EST --- (In reply to comment #3) c) I think that BuildArch: noarch is not needed. Hi Christos, Can you tell me why you think BuildArch: noarch needs to be eliminated. This is code that is compiled at runtime, instead of during packaging. Is there some benefit I am missing? I've fixed the other issues you found. SPEC: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/perl-RT-Extension-CommandByMail.spec SRPM: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/perl-RT-Extension-CommandByMail-0.07-3.fc14.src.rpm Thanks!!! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683974] New: Review Request: xvst - Download tool for video clips
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: xvst - Download tool for video clips https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683974 Summary: Review Request: xvst - Download tool for video clips Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: christoph.k...@web.de QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://188.138.90.189/fedora/xvst.spec SRPM URL: http://188.138.90.189/fedora/xvst-2.4.1-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: xVideoServiceThief (a.k.a xVST) is a tool for downloading your favorite video clips from a lot of video websites (currently supports 76 websites and increasing!). To introduce myself: Hello, I am in process to try Fedora as my new main or secondary distribution. I want to contribute to the community with this package. It is my first package and I need a sponsor. I am glad about your feedback. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683974] Review Request: xvst - Download tool for video clips
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683974 Christoph Korn christoph.k...@web.de changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 680268] Review Request: cputnik - Dockapp which displays cpu and memory usage
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=680268 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|cputnik-0.2.0-4.fc15|cputnik-0.2.0-4.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 679613] Review Request: python-flask - A microframework for Python based on Werkzeug, Jinja 2 and good intentions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679613 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-10 15:51:15 EST --- python-flask-0.6.1-2.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 680268] Review Request: cputnik - Dockapp which displays cpu and memory usage
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=680268 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-10 15:51:02 EST --- cputnik-0.2.0-4.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683948] Review Request: python-unicodenazi - Module that finds unicode/bytestring comparisions and other problems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683948 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com 2011-03-10 16:07:41 EST --- Thanks Tim! New Package SCM Request === Package Name: python-unicodenazi Short Description: Module that finds unicode/bytestring comparisons and other problems Owners: toshio dmalcolm Branches: f14 f15 el5 el6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683610] Review Request: hxtools - A collection of several tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683610 Matthew Miller mat...@mattdm.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mat...@mattdm.org --- Comment #2 from Matthew Miller mat...@mattdm.org 2011-03-10 16:07:22 EST --- I would suggest making a sub-package like hxtools-pam_mount (or whatever) and putting the stuff you need in there. Then if people want to add other things for separate reasons, they can go in their own sub packages without causing crazy bloat. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 677943] Review Request: liblouis - Braille translation and back-translation library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=677943 Martin Gieseking martin.giesek...@uos.de changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Martin Gieseking martin.giesek...@uos.de 2011-03-10 16:18:02 EST --- Thanks again for the review. Please also assign this ticket to yourself. New Package SCM Request === Package Name: liblouis Short Description: Braille translation and back-translation library Owners: mgieseki Branches: f14 f15 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683610] Review Request: hxtools - A collection of several tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683610 --- Comment #3 from Till Maas opensou...@till.name 2011-03-10 16:22:50 EST --- (In reply to comment #2) I would suggest making a sub-package like hxtools-pam_mount (or whatever) and putting the stuff you need in there. Then if people want to add other things for separate reasons, they can go in their own sub packages without causing crazy bloat. I thought about this, too. But Imho it is very unlikely that someone else will want other items from the package. Therefore this would add unecessary complexity to the package without much gain. In the surprising case that this happens, subpackages can still be created. The current binaries only require libHX, which is the general purpose lib from the same author, that is probably used by all his binary tools. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 684006] Review Request: perl-XML-Rules - API layer for XML::Parser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=684006 Bill Pemberton wf...@virginia.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 684006] New: Review Request: perl-XML-Rules - API layer for XML::Parser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Rules - API layer for XML::Parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=684006 Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Rules - API layer for XML::Parser Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: wf...@virginia.edu QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Note that I am not yet a sponsored packager. Spec URL: http://wfp.fedorapeople.org/perl-XML-Rules.spec SRPM URL: http://wfp.fedorapeople.org/perl-XML-Rules-1.10-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: The XML::Rules module provides an API layer on top of XML::Parser. It allows you to specify rules that are subroutines to be run once a tag is fully parsed and either process the data from the tag itself and its children or specify what parts of the data and how to add to the data structure being built for the parent tag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 617405] Review Request: poezio - IRC-like jabber (XMPP) console client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617405 Christoph Wickert cwick...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||poezio-0.6.2-3.fc15 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-03-10 16:55:59 --- Comment #9 from Christoph Wickert cwick...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-10 16:55:59 EST --- I see this package was already build way back but not by Florent but by Matej. Florent, if you have any problems with the built system, don't hesitate to contact me or your sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 678855] Review Request: rpyc - A Transparent, Symmetrical Python Library for Distributed-Computing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678855 David Lutterkort lut...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lut...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|lut...@redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 682414] Review Request: reptyr - Attach a running process to a new terminal
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682414 --- Comment #7 from Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi 2011-03-10 17:12:29 EST --- (In reply to comment #6) Umm.. did you expand the macros? Of course. I tested it with $ spectool -g reptyr.spec and it worked. So did I, and it did *not* work. As said, I additionally tested with wget, curl and Firefox, it didn't work in any of them. It's not working anymore, since the tarball doesn't exist anymore. The current snapshot from the master branch is nelhage-reptyr-reptyr-0.2-2-g919fff7.tar.gz In the 0.2 tag it is nelhage-reptyr-reptyr-0.2-2-g919fff7.tar.gz Um, those are the same? And I'm NOT packaging the current master branch snapshot, I'm packaging the 0.2 release. Note that this is a review blocker. Well, your previous suggestion did not work, and I'm not going to put a URL that I *know* does not work there. See end of this comment for more about this. However, that way it's just way easier for the maintainer to plug in the correct snapshot ID in the spec file and run $ spectool -g package.spec Yes, I have quite a bit of experience with packaging and I'm pretty much the upstream of spectool nowadays, so I know about its use cases as well, and I'll be maintaining this package anyway, so... Whenever you use snapshots from VCS, you MUST insert the snapshot revision in the Release field. Oh come on. This is as a release as it gets and NOT a random VCS snapshot, there's just (to my knowledge) any way to get sane, stable github tarball download URLs. Or don't you think what upstream tagged as 0.2 is the 0.2 release? Then what is? The tarball sha1sums won't match and github has mangled the base dir inside the 0.2 tarball after I packaged it (mine was nelhage-reptyr-31b85ff, new one I just downloaded is nelhage-reptyr-9f9fd83, but both filenames are nelhage-reptyr-reptyr-0.2-0-g31b85ff.tar.gz), but the contents are *exactly* the same otherwise. Please also look at the git revision mentioned for the 0.2 release at https://github.com/nelhage/reptyr/downloads; it's 31b85ff which is the revision in my package. What else do you want in order to not call this a VCS snapshot but a release? The tarball in my package: $ sha1sum ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES/nelhage-reptyr-reptyr-0.2-0-g31b85ff.tar.gz b8b56a17d4a7efd9ee93295619b7495161b70732 /home/scop/rpmbuild/SOURCES/nelhage-reptyr-reptyr-0.2-0-g31b85ff.tar.gz The 0.2 tarball I get from the tar.gz download link for reptyr-0.2 at https://github.com/nelhage/reptyr/downloads (the tarball link points to https://github.com/nelhage/reptyr/tarball/reptyr-0.2;): $ wget --no-check-certificate https://github.com/nelhage/reptyr/tarball/reptyr-0.2; --2011-03-10 23:39:30-- https://github.com/nelhage/reptyr/tarball/reptyr-0.2 Resolving github.com... 207.97.227.239 Connecting to github.com|207.97.227.239|:443... connected. WARNING: certificate common name “*.github.com” doesn’t match requested host name “github.com”. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 302 Found Location: https://nodeload.github.com/nelhage/reptyr/tarball/reptyr-0.2 [following] --2011-03-10 23:39:31-- https://nodeload.github.com/nelhage/reptyr/tarball/reptyr-0.2 Resolving nodeload.github.com... 207.97.227.252 Connecting to nodeload.github.com|207.97.227.252|:443... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 302 Moved Temporarily Location: https://download.github.com/nelhage-reptyr-reptyr-0.2-0-g31b85ff.tar.gz [following] --2011-03-10 23:39:41-- https://download.github.com/nelhage-reptyr-reptyr-0.2-0-g31b85ff.tar.gz Resolving download.github.com... 207.97.227.240 Connecting to download.github.com|207.97.227.240|:443... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 12187 (12K) [application/octet-stream] Saving to: “nelhage-reptyr-reptyr-0.2-0-g31b85ff.tar.gz” 100%[===] 12,187 --.-K/s in 0s 2011-03-10 23:39:44 (257 MB/s) - “nelhage-reptyr-reptyr-0.2-0-g31b85ff.tar.gz” saved [12187/12187] $ sha1sum nelhage-reptyr-reptyr-0.2-0-g31b85ff.tar.gz e9d305d9a0b8d9a80644e7cf2987f8078350ed80 nelhage-reptyr-reptyr-0.2-0-g31b85ff.tar.gz ...so the sha1sums don't match, but: $ rpmdev-diff ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES/nelhage-reptyr-reptyr-0.2-0-g31b85ff.tar.gz nelhage-reptyr-reptyr-0.2-0-g31b85ff.tar.gz ...so the contents of the actual files in them are the same. You can also verify it by doing a checkout of the reptyr-0.2 upstream tag and comparing that to the tarballs' contents (git checkout reptyr-0.2 also outputs HEAD is now at 31b85ff... reptyr 0.2 -- note again the 31b85ff git revision which IS the 0.2 release). If you won't approve the package as is, I suggest posting a concrete
[Bug 678855] Review Request: rpyc - A Transparent, Symmetrical Python Library for Distributed-Computing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678855 David Lutterkort lut...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from David Lutterkort lut...@redhat.com 2011-03-10 17:17:20 EST --- A couple of issues with the spec file: (1) The version in the changelog should be '3.0.7-1', not 'RPM created' (2) rpmlint complains about a number of non-executable-script errors; (see 'rpmlint -I non-executable-script' for how to fix that) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683948] Review Request: python-unicodenazi - Module that finds unicode/bytestring comparisions and other problems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683948 --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-03-10 17:24:30 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 677943] Review Request: liblouis - Braille translation and back-translation library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=677943 --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-03-10 17:24:07 EST --- This ticket is not assigned to anyone. It should be assigned to the reviewer. Please fix and re-raise the fedora-cvs flag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 678925] Review Request: perl-Math-Random-ISAAC - Perl interface to the ISAAC PRNG algorithm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678925 Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr 2011-03-10 17:24:59 EST --- Package Change Request == Package Name: perl-Math-Random-ISAAC New Branches: f14 Owners: eseyman InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 678931] Review Request: perl-Math-Random-Secure - Cryptographically-secure, cross-platform replacement for rand()
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678931 Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr 2011-03-10 17:24:28 EST --- Upstream has requested a F14 branch. Package Change Request == Package Name: perl-Math-Random-Secure New Branches: f14 Owners: eseyman InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 678929] Review Request: perl-Crypt-Random-Source - Get weak or strong random data from pluggable sources
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678929 Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr 2011-03-10 17:26:12 EST --- Package Change Request == Package Name: perl-Crypt-Random-Source New Branches: f14 Owners: eseyman InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 678929] Review Request: perl-Crypt-Random-Source - Get weak or strong random data from pluggable sources
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678929 --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-03-10 17:30:23 EST --- This package already has an f14 branch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 678925] Review Request: perl-Math-Random-ISAAC - Perl interface to the ISAAC PRNG algorithm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678925 --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-03-10 17:30:04 EST --- This package already has an f14 branch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 678931] Review Request: perl-Math-Random-Secure - Cryptographically-secure, cross-platform replacement for rand()
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678931 --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-03-10 17:30:46 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683257] Review Request: perl-Test-Command - Test routines for external commands
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683257 --- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr 2011-03-10 17:32:45 EST --- (In reply to comment #0) SRPM URL: http://hvad.fedorapeople.org/fedora/perl-Test-Command/perl-Test-Command-0.08-1.fc14.noarch.rpm ??? This is a binary package, not a source rpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 678221] Review Request: perl-EV - Wrapper for the libev high-performance event loop library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678221 Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr 2011-03-10 17:56:47 EST --- (In reply to comment #5) Sorry it took so long, $dayjob got in the way. Tell me about it. The changes work for me. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 529441] Review Request: pdfbox - Java PDF library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529441 --- Comment #11 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com 2011-03-10 18:45:10 EST --- * Thu Mar 10 2011 Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com - 1.5.0-1 - Update to 1.5.0 http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/pdfbox.spec http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/pdfbox-1.5.0-1.fc14.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 617405] Review Request: poezio - IRC-like jabber (XMPP) console client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617405 --- Comment #10 from Florent Le Coz lo...@louiz.org 2011-03-10 18:24:35 EST --- Thank you for your concern :) I do not have any problem with the build system, I’m just waiting for a “stabilization” of the SleekXMPP library, which is still in heavy development. The packaging of both poezio and SleekXMPP is done but I do not yet consider poezio to be “stable” enough. Also, I haven’t received any request for an urgent inclusion of poezio in fedora’s repository so I’m kind of taking my time and waiting for a good release (that’s my goal for 0.7.5). Is this in any way problematic? Or does it not matter? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675495] Review Request: parallel - Shell tool for executing jobs in parallel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675495 --- Comment #8 from Marc Bradshaw fed...@marcbradshaw.co.uk 2011-03-10 19:34:37 EST --- I am wondering (as maintainer for moreutils) how the split for moreutils-parallel should be done. Most importantly, the upgrade for current users the upgrade should be seamless, moreutils-parallel should be installed by yum update automatically. However, users should then be free to switch to gnu parallels if they desire, and possibly even uninstall parallels entirely. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 682414] Review Request: reptyr - Attach a running process to a new terminal
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682414 --- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2011-03-10 20:11:54 EST --- Created attachment 483621 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=483621 Patch against specfile to fix issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 682414] Review Request: reptyr - Attach a running process to a new terminal
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682414
--- Comment #8 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2011-03-10 20:10:36
EST ---
With
Source0:
https://download.github.com/nelhage-reptyr-reptyr-%{version}-0-g%{gitrev}.tar.gz
I get the sha1sums
$ sha1sum ../SOURCES/nelhage-reptyr-reptyr-0.2-0-g31b85ff.tar.gz
nelhage-reptyr-reptyr-0.2-0-g31b85ff.tar.gz
b8b56a17d4a7efd9ee93295619b7495161b70732
../SOURCES/nelhage-reptyr-reptyr-0.2-0-g31b85ff.tar.gz
e9d305d9a0b8d9a80644e7cf2987f8078350ed80
nelhage-reptyr-reptyr-0.2-0-g31b85ff.tar.gz
Thus one is able to get a tarball with identical content, but the shasum
doesn't match (timestamps probably).
This is not a problem, except for the automatical sources check that is
performed every now and them, but it shouldn't cause any troubles since you'll
know to expect it. It is my *strong* recommendation that you use the explicit
source URL.
If not, you will have to make the comment more verbose as per
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Using_Revision_Control
In addition, in either case you MUST use
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Snapshot_packages
I'll attach a patch that addresses both of these issues shortly.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 684087] New: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-View-HTML-Template - HTML::Template View Class
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-View-HTML-Template - HTML::Template View Class https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=684087 Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-View-HTML-Template - HTML::Template View Class Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Catalyst-View-HTML-Templat e/ OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarn...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Catalyst-View-HTML-Template.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Catalyst-View-HTML-Template-0.03-1.fc16.src.rpm Description: This is the HTML::Template view class. Your subclass should inherit from this class. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2903030 *rt-0.10_01 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683948] Review Request: python-unicodenazi - Module that finds unicode/bytestring comparisions and other problems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683948 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-11 00:50:31 EST --- python-unicodenazi-1.1-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-unicodenazi-1.1-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683948] Review Request: python-unicodenazi - Module that finds unicode/bytestring comparisions and other problems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683948 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-11 00:50:47 EST --- python-unicodenazi-1.1-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-unicodenazi-1.1-1.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683948] Review Request: python-unicodenazi - Module that finds unicode/bytestring comparisions and other problems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683948 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-11 00:50:39 EST --- python-unicodenazi-1.1-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-unicodenazi-1.1-1.el6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683948] Review Request: python-unicodenazi - Module that finds unicode/bytestring comparisions and other problems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683948 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 681093] Review Request: wdiff - A front-end to GNU diff
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681093 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-11 01:08:40 EST --- wdiff-0.6.5-5.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 681093] Review Request: wdiff - A front-end to GNU diff
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681093 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||wdiff-0.6.5-5.fc15 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-03-11 01:08:46 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 677391] Review Request: lovelock-kde-theme - Lovelock KDE Theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=677391 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||lovelock-kde-theme-14.90.1- ||1.fc15 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-03-11 01:09:46 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 677391] Review Request: lovelock-kde-theme - Lovelock KDE Theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=677391 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-11 01:09:41 EST --- lovelock-kde-theme-14.90.1-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 682545] Review Request: nutrika - Nutrient content calculator and intake analyzer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682545 Pavel Zhukov pa...@zhukoff.net changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 682545] Review Request: nutrika - Nutrient content calculator and intake analyzer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682545 Pavel Zhukov pa...@zhukoff.net changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|pa...@zhukoff.net |nob...@fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 682545] Review Request: nutrika - Nutrient content calculator and intake analyzer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682545 Pavel Zhukov pa...@zhukoff.net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW --- Comment #9 from Pavel Zhukov pa...@zhukoff.net 2011-03-11 01:34:38 EST --- Sorry, You need a sponsor, I cannot become sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
