[Bug 688033] Review Request: gujarati-typing-booster - Gujarati typing booster table ime for ibus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688033 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2011-03-16 02:00:16 EDT --- Thanks for scratch build. Review: + Package following guidelines. + sha1sum matches as fd38b89a1a19f60e212a6b082a744aa8727640b3 gujarati-typing-booster-0.0.1.tar.gz fd38b89a1a19f60e212a6b082a744aa8727640b3 ../SOURCES/gujarati-typing-booster-0.0.1.tar.gz APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 684398] Review Request: Webilder - Configurable and automatic desktop wallpaper changer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=684398 --- Comment #11 from Pavel Zhukov pa...@zhukoff.net 2011-03-16 02:33:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) It looks OK, even though there are still two warnings from rpmlint: $ rpmlint gnome-applet-webilder-0.7-1.fc14.x86_64.rpm gnome-applet-webilder.x86_64: E: no-binary You cannot use noarch because _libdir of gnome-applets is arch-dependency. So, You can ignore this error, $ rpmlint gnome-applet-webilder-0.7-1.fc14.src.rpm gnome-applet-webilder.src: W: %ifarch-applied-patch Patch0: Webilder-lib64.patch If upstream fix libdir error for X86_64 You can remove patch from package and fix this warning. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 489226] Review Request: perl-local-lib - Create and use a local lib/ for perl modules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489226 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||iarn...@gmail.com Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 2011-03-16 03:15:57 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: perl-local-lib New Branches: el5 el6 Owners: iarnell InitialCC: perl-sig Chris isn't interested in epel and has no problem with others branching his packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 688056] New: Review Request: sir - A simple application for resizing images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sir - A simple application for resizing images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688056 Summary: Review Request: sir - A simple application for resizing images Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kumarpraveen.nit...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://kumarpraveen.fedorapeople.org/sir/sir.spec SRPM URL: http://kumarpraveen.fedorapeople.org/sir/sir-2.1.1-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: SIR (Simple Image Resizer) is a simple application for resizing images,inspired by GTPY - ImageResizer But it use C++/QT and QImage class to convert the images.it also can rotate your images. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 688056] Review Request: sir - A simple application for resizing images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688056 Praveen Kumar kumarpraveen.nit...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683071] Review Request: php-libvirt - PHP bindings for libvirt virtualization toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683071 Tomas Mraz tm...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #38 from Tomas Mraz tm...@redhat.com 2011-03-16 03:44:45 EDT --- Michal, I have set it again when I posted the previous comment. But then you reset it again as you posted comment 37. If you get the mid-air collision, always copy your comment text and load the bug from scratch to avoid this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 522821] Review Request: bluetile - A modern tiling window manager with a gentle learning curve
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522821 --- Comment #20 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2011-03-16 04:47:11 EDT --- Thanks for testing. Spec: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/bluetile/bluetile.spec SRPM: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/bluetile/bluetile-0.5.3-2.fc14.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2916632 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675947] Review Request: sanlock - a shared disk lock manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675947 Angus Salkeld asalk...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||WORKSFORME Last Closed||2011-03-16 04:50:43 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 676187] Review Request: csync2 - Cluster sync tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676187 Angus Salkeld asalk...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||WORKSFORME Last Closed||2011-03-16 04:49:37 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683071] Review Request: php-libvirt - PHP bindings for libvirt virtualization toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683071 --- Comment #39 from Michal Novotny minov...@redhat.com 2011-03-16 05:10:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #38) Michal, I have set it again when I posted the previous comment. But then you reset it again as you posted comment 37. If you get the mid-air collision, always copy your comment text and load the bug from scratch to avoid this. Well, this is the strange thing about mid-air collisions. I did experience it just once - for comment 35 but not comment 37 and also sometimes I'm not given the mid-air collision and the flags are just changed without any attention from the site user. I'm not the only one that experienced this AFAIK but unfortunately I'm not sure when it exactly happens, i.e. how reproducible this is and what are the exact steps to do that to file a report against Bugzilla itself. Michal -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 652216] Review Request: rubygem-i18n - New wave Internationalization support for Ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652216 --- Comment #14 from Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com 2011-03-16 05:48:52 EDT --- f14 seems to be ok. Thank you very much. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 634052] Review Request: ghc-ConfigFile - configuration file library for Haskell
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634052 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #8 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2011-03-16 06:18:20 EDT --- Built for rawhide and now for f13, f14, f15. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 681558] Review Request: libvirt-snmp - SNMP support for libvirt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681558 Michal Privoznik mpriv...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Michal Privoznik mpriv...@redhat.com 2011-03-16 06:47:18 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: libvirt-snmp Short Description: Provide full snmp functionality for libvirtd Owners: mprivozn Branches: f15 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 688056] Review Request: sir - A simple application for resizing images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688056 Arun SAG saga...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||saga...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|saga...@gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 688121] New: Review Request: mod_flvx - FLV progressive download streaming for the Apache HTTP Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mod_flvx - FLV progressive download streaming for the Apache HTTP Server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688121 Summary: Review Request: mod_flvx - FLV progressive download streaming for the Apache HTTP Server Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: redhat-bugzi...@linuxnetz.de QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/mod_flvx.spec SRPM URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/mod_flvx-0-0.1.20100525git.src.rpm Description: FLV streaming means it can be sought to any position during video, and browser (Flash player) will buffer only from this position to the end. Thus streaming allows to skip boring parts or see video ending without loading the whole file, which simply saves bandwidth. Even H264 is more efficient, FLV is still a common container format for videos, because H264 is supported by Flash since version 9.115. For using FLV streaming on the web, a pseudo-streaming compliant Flash player, such as Flowplayer, is needed. Streaming requires that the FLV has embedded key-frame markers (meta-data), that can be injected by any supported tool, e.g. flvtool2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 688121] Review Request: mod_flvx - FLV progressive download streaming for the Apache HTTP Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688121 Robert Scheck redhat-bugzi...@linuxnetz.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tcall...@redhat.com Blocks||182235(FE-Legal) --- Comment #1 from Robert Scheck redhat-bugzi...@linuxnetz.de 2011-03-16 07:44:13 EDT --- Tom, as already talked with you on IRC, mod_flvx is not being a legal issue from your point of view, because there's nothing FLV-related itself inside. May you just state here that officially and lift FE-Legal afterwards? Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683487] Review Request: R-ACCLMA - R contrib package for ACC LMA Graph Plotting
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683487 --- Comment #3 from Madhavprasad Pai mk...@redhat.com 2011-03-16 07:53:11 EDT --- Hello Jose', Thank you for reviewing my request. I have read https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join I shall take up your suggestion and read other review requests at http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html so that I can help others. Thanks again and regards, -- Pai -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 489226] Review Request: perl-local-lib - Create and use a local lib/ for perl modules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489226 --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-03-16 08:25:24 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 681558] Review Request: libvirt-snmp - SNMP support for libvirt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681558 --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-03-16 08:25:39 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 447368] Review Request: schroot - Execute commands in a chroot environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447368 --- Comment #25 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-03-16 08:24:55 EDT --- This SCM request is not valid; it lists no owners. These are processed by a script, so please do not deviate from the formats given in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_SCM_admin_requests -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683071] Review Request: php-libvirt - PHP bindings for libvirt virtualization toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683071 --- Comment #40 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-03-16 08:26:01 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 684915] Review Request: php-pecl-igbinary - Replacement for the standard PHP serializer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=684915 --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-03-16 08:26:40 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683071] Review Request: php-libvirt - PHP bindings for libvirt virtualization toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683071 --- Comment #41 from Michal Novotny minov...@redhat.com 2011-03-16 08:38:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #40) Git done (by process-git-requests). Thanks a lot! Michal -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683071] Review Request: php-libvirt - PHP bindings for libvirt virtualization toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683071 --- Comment #42 from Michal Novotny minov...@redhat.com 2011-03-16 08:49:24 EDT --- Oh, just one thing I can't find answer to. If I put the master (dist-rawhide) branch to koji using `fedpkg build` I'm getting BuildError: package php-libvirt not in list for tag dist-f16. Shouldn't master branch go to the dist-rawhide that should be devel branch by default? Do I have to create a new SCM request later to support dist-f16 branch too? I'm unable to find those information on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Get_a_Fedora_Account :( Also, when trying to sign the package for bodhi I was getting error: $ fedpkg update Creating a new update for php-libvirt-0.4.1-2.fc15 Password for minovotn: Creating a new update for php-libvirt-0.4.1-2.fc15 php-libvirt-0.4.1-2.fc15 not tagged as an update candidate $ What should I do about this? Thanks, Michal -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683071] Review Request: php-libvirt - PHP bindings for libvirt virtualization toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683071 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683071] Review Request: php-libvirt - PHP bindings for libvirt virtualization toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683071 --- Comment #43 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-16 08:52:45 EDT --- php-libvirt-0.4.1-2.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-libvirt-0.4.1-2.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683071] Review Request: php-libvirt - PHP bindings for libvirt virtualization toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683071 --- Comment #44 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-16 08:56:11 EDT --- php-libvirt-0.4.1-2.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-libvirt-0.4.1-2.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683071] Review Request: php-libvirt - PHP bindings for libvirt virtualization toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683071 --- Comment #45 from Tomas Mraz tm...@redhat.com 2011-03-16 09:08:01 EDT --- No, for rawhide the branch request is not needed. Could you try to build it again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 678678] Review Request: rubygem-vte - Ruby binding of vte
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678678 Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||vondr...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|vondr...@redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com 2011-03-16 09:07:05 EDT --- Taking this one for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 539387] Review Request: InsightToolkit - Medical imaging processing library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539387 --- Comment #13 from Per Inge Mathisen per.mathi...@gmail.com 2011-03-16 09:26:24 EDT --- Created attachment 485731 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=485731 Updated spec file for version 3.20 with fixes for lib/lib64 issue I took the latest spec file posted in this ticket and updated it to work against version 3.20, and worked around a showstopper issue related to it putting 64bit libraries in /usr/lib for install but expecting them in /usr/lib64 for packaging. The workaround might be ugly but at least I got an RPM out of it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683071] Review Request: php-libvirt - PHP bindings for libvirt virtualization toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683071 --- Comment #46 from Michal Novotny minov...@redhat.com 2011-03-16 09:34:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #45) No, for rawhide the branch request is not needed. Could you try to build it again? Oh, tried to build the master branch again and now it passed. Thanks, Michal -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 688121] Review Request: mod_flvx - FLV progressive download streaming for the Apache HTTP Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688121 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|182235(FE-Legal)| --- Comment #2 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2011-03-16 09:34:42 EDT --- Yep. This code makes no attempt to do anything with the FLV format, not even parsing it, so there are no legal concerns that I am aware of at this time. Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 688157] New: Review Request: cpupowerutils - Tools to determine and set CPU power related settings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: cpupowerutils - Tools to determine and set CPU power related settings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688157 Summary: Review Request: cpupowerutils - Tools to determine and set CPU power related settings Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: psab...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://psabata.fedorapeople.org/packages/cpupowerutils/cpupowerutils.spec SRPM URL: http://psabata.fedorapeople.org/packages/cpupowerutils/cpupowerutils-009-0.1.p1.fc14.src.rpm Description: This tool is to make access to the Linux kernel's processor power subsystems like CPU frequency switching (cpufreq) or CPU sleep states (cpuidle) for users and userspace tools easier. Note: This package intends to replace cpufrequtils. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 688157] Review Request: cpupowerutils - Tools to determine and set CPU power related settings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688157 Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||685158 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 680921] Review Request: perl-PathTools - PathTools Perl module (Cwd, File::Spec)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=680921 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 680921] Review Request: perl-PathTools - PathTools Perl module (Cwd, File::Spec)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=680921 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-16 09:56:12 EDT --- perl-PathTools-3.33-1.fc15,perl-5.12.3-155.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-PathTools-3.33-1.fc15,perl-5.12.3-155.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630644] Review Request: perl-Bio-SamTools - Bio::SamTools Perl module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630644
--- Comment #15 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com 2011-03-16 10:30:30 EDT ---
Standalone spec file and spec file in SRPM differ. I will use the standalone
one in this review.
Spec file changes:
--- perl-Bio-SamTools.spec 2011-03-13 02:06:15.0 +0100
+++ perl-Bio-SamTools.spec.1 2011-03-14 22:52:48.0 +0100
@@ -1,24 +1,28 @@
Name: perl-Bio-SamTools
-Version: 1.21
-Release: 3%{?dist}
+Version: 1.27
+Release: 1%{?dist}
Summary: Bio::SamTools Perl module
-License: GPL+ or Artistic
+License: Artistic 2.0
Group: Development/Libraries
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Bio-SamTools/
-Source0:
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/L/LD/LDS/Bio-SamTools-1.21.tar.gz
-#Patch0: %%{name}-%%{version}-includes.patch
+Source0:
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/L/LD/LDS/Bio-SamTools-%{version}.tar.gz
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
BuildRequires: perl = 0:5.008
-#BuildRequires: perl(Bio::Root::Version) = 1.005009001
-BuildRequires: perl-bioperl
-BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::CBuilder)
-BuildRequires: perl(Module::Build)
-BuildRequires: samtools-devel = 0.1.8
-BuildRequires: zlib-devel
-#Requires: perl(Bio::Root::Version) = 1.005009001
+BuildRequires: perl(Bio::PrimarySeq)
+BuildRequires: perl(Bio::SeqFeature::Lite)
+BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::CBuilder)
+BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
+BuildRequires: perl(Module::Build)
+BuildRequires: perl(Exporter)
+BuildRequires: perl(File::Spec)
+BuildRequires: perl(File::Temp)
+BuildRequires: perl(Cwd)
+BuildRequires: perl(Test)
+BuildRequires: samtools-devel = 0.1.8
+BuildRequires: zlib-devel
+
Requires: perl-bioperl
Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo
$version))
-Requires: samtools-devel = 0.1.8
%{?perl_default_filter}
@@ -32,7 +36,6 @@
sed -i 's|= find_sam(|= (%{_includedir}/samtools, %{_libdir}|' Build.PL
%build
-#export SAMTOOLS=/usr/include/samtools
%{__perl} Build.PL installdirs=vendor optimize=$RPM_OPT_FLAGS
./Build
@@ -60,6 +63,13 @@
%{_bindir}/bamToGBrowse.pl
%changelog
+* Mon Mar 14 2011 Adam Huffman bl...@verdurin.com - 1.27-1
+- new upstream version 1.27
+- remove unnecessary runtime samtools-devel R
+- more fine-grained module BR for bioperl and others
+- fix license
+- remove commented cruft
+
* Sun Mar 13 2011 Adam Huffman bl...@verdurin.com - 1.21-3
- better fix for samtools headers from Petr Pisar
Source file is original. Ok.
License is GPL+ or Artistic 2.0 (LICENSE, lib/Bio/DB/Sam.pm).
FIX: Correct License tag to reflect Artistic license version. See
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main#Good_Licenses for license names.
-License: GPL+ or Artistic
+License: Artistic 2.0
FIX: The package is dual-licensed. User can select between GPL+ and Artistic
2.0. Please mention both licenses in the License tag.
TODO: You can remove BuildRoot definition and it's purge in %install
section and %clean section as this is obsolete in Fedora.
I'm hoping to build for EPEL5 - isn't this still needed there?
Yes, it's needed for EPEL5. Then keeping the BuildRoot code makes sense if you
want one spec file for Fedora and EPEL.
Build time dependencies are Ok.
All tests pass. Ok.
FIX: Remove samtools-devel from Requires. Or is there any reason?
-Requires: samtools-devel = 0.1.8
Ok.
FIX: Is the samtools-devel needed at run time?
$ rpmlint perl-Bio-SamTools.spec ../SRPMS/perl-Bio-SamTools-1.27-1.fc14.src.rpm
../RPMS/x86_64/perl-Bio-SamTools-*1.27-1.fc14.x86_64.rpm
perl-Bio-SamTools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary bamToGBrowse.pl
3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
rpmlint Ok.
$ rpm -q -lv -p ../RPMS/x86_64/perl-Bio-SamTools-1.27-1.fc14.x86_64.rpm
-rwxr-xr-x1 rootroot 1913 bře 16 15:03
/usr/bin/bamToGBrowse.pl
drwxr-xr-x2 rootroot0 bře 16 15:03
/usr/lib64/perl5/Bio
drwxr-xr-x2 rootroot0 bře 16 15:03
/usr/lib64/perl5/Bio/DB
drwxr-xr-x2 rootroot0 bře 16 15:03
/usr/lib64/perl5/Bio/DB/Bam
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot11125 bře 16 15:03
/usr/lib64/perl5/Bio/DB/Bam/AlignWrapper.pm
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot17097 bře 16 15:03
/usr/lib64/perl5/Bio/DB/Bam/Alignment.pm
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot 335 bře 16 15:03
/usr/lib64/perl5/Bio/DB/Bam/FetchIterator.pm
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot 2499 bře 16 15:03
/usr/lib64/perl5/Bio/DB/Bam/Pileup.pm
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot 1993 bře 16 15:03
/usr/lib64/perl5/Bio/DB/Bam/PileupWrapper.pm
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot 4596 bře 16 15:03
/usr/lib64/perl5/Bio/DB/Bam/Query.pm
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot 402 bře 16 15:03
[Bug 688183] Review Request: main package name here - short summary here
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688183 Mike Ma zht...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zht...@gmail.com Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 688183] New: Review Request: main package name here - short summary here
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: main package name here - short summary here https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688183 Summary: Review Request: main package name here - short summary here Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: zht...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ekd123.fedorapeople.org/iceplayer.spec SRPM URL: http://ekd123.fedorapeople.org/iceplayer-4.0.4-7.fc14.src.rpm Description: A simple media player. It can download lyrics and show them automatically, and supports themes, ID3, Equalizer and more. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 688033] Review Request: gujarati-typing-booster - Gujarati typing booster table ime for ibus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688033 Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com 2011-03-16 10:38:28 EDT --- Parag thanks for review, added git request -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 688183] Review Request: main package name here - short summary here
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688183 --- Comment #1 from Mike Ma zht...@gmail.com 2011-03-16 10:41:26 EDT --- mike@mike-laptop SPECS$ rpmlint iceplayer.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. I tried rpmlint, there is no error or warning. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 688183] Review Request: main package name here - short summary here
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688183 William Lima wl...@primate.com.br changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wl...@primate.com.br --- Comment #2 from William Lima wl...@primate.com.br 2011-03-16 10:43:53 EDT --- Please fix your 'Review Summary'. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 678554] Review Request: iceplayer - a simple media player
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678554 Mike Ma zht...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||CANTFIX Last Closed||2011-03-16 10:42:15 --- Comment #19 from Mike Ma zht...@gmail.com 2011-03-16 10:42:15 EDT --- I have re-opened a Review about this.. Thanks for all helps! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 688183] Review Request: iceplayer - A simple music player for Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688183 Mike Ma zht...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: main |Review Request: iceplayer - |package name here - short |A simple music player for |summary here |Linux --- Comment #3 from Mike Ma zht...@gmail.com 2011-03-16 10:49:57 EDT --- Everything up-to-date. New SRPM: http://ekd123.fedorapeople.org/iceplayer-4.0.4-9.fc14.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683725] Review Request: marathi-typing-booster - Marathi Typing Booster Table IMEngine for ibus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683725 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-16 10:51:58 EDT --- marathi-typing-booster-0.0.1-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/marathi-typing-booster-0.0.1-1.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683725] Review Request: marathi-typing-booster - Marathi Typing Booster Table IMEngine for ibus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683725 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-16 10:53:19 EDT --- marathi-typing-booster-0.0.1-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/marathi-typing-booster-0.0.1-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 684112] Review Request: hindi-typing-booster - Hindi Typing Booster Table IMEngine for ibus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=684112 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-16 10:55:01 EDT --- hindi-typing-booster-0.0.1-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/hindi-typing-booster-0.0.1-1.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 688033] Review Request: gujarati-typing-booster - Gujarati typing booster table ime for ibus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688033 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-03-16 10:58:03 EDT --- There is no SCM request to process here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 688033] Review Request: gujarati-typing-booster - Gujarati typing booster table ime for ibus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688033 Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com 2011-03-16 11:05:56 EDT --- ohh missed that :( New Package SCM Request === Package Name: gujarati-typing-booster Short Description: Gujarati typing booster table IMEngine for ibus Owners: pravins Branches: f14, f15, devel InitialCC: i18n-team Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 684112] Review Request: hindi-typing-booster - Hindi Typing Booster Table IMEngine for ibus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=684112 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-16 11:14:31 EDT --- hindi-typing-booster-0.0.1-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/hindi-typing-booster-0.0.1-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 688033] Review Request: gujarati-typing-booster - Gujarati typing booster table ime for ibus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688033 --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-03-16 11:15:10 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). I'm curious, though; where did you find any documentation that mentions a Cvsextras Commits line? That's not something we use in an SCM request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 678678] Review Request: rubygem-vte - Ruby binding of vte
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678678 Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com 2011-03-16 11:14:52 EDT --- * Installation original gem - This is apparently upstream bug, comparing the 'vte-0.90.8/ext/vte/depend' with the 'gtksourceview2-0.90.8/ext/gtksourceview2/depend', which I reviewed for you previously. So I am wondering if this bug is reported upstream? - This gem repackaging stuff seems to me pretty ugly. I would suggest the other way around, i.e. install the gem without the '--with-pkg-config-dir' which is working just fine and later move the generated ruby-vte.pc into appropriate place. Or is there something I am missing? * gtk2 dependency - Upstream specifies gtk2 = 0.90.8 runtime dependency while you allow dependency on 0.90.7. I just want to ensure that this is intentional, not by mistake. * rpmlint output: - rubygem-vte.src: W: strange-permission vte-0.90.8.gem 0600L -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 688033] Review Request: gujarati-typing-booster - Gujarati typing booster table ime for ibus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688033 --- Comment #6 from Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com 2011-03-16 11:33:29 EDT --- Yes, you are right. It was there 2-3 years back and unfortunately i copied it from my very old package request and forgot to remove that line. Next time will take care for same, will use latest one -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 447368] Review Request: schroot - Execute commands in a chroot environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447368 Zach Carter z.car...@f5.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #26 from Zach Carter z.car...@f5.com 2011-03-16 11:42:28 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: zachcarter New Branches: el6 Owners: zachcarter -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 447368] Review Request: schroot - Execute commands in a chroot environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447368 --- Comment #28 from Zach Carter z.car...@f5.com 2011-03-16 11:43:11 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: schroot New Branches: el6 Owners: zachcarter -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 447368] Review Request: schroot - Execute commands in a chroot environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447368 --- Comment #27 from Zach Carter z.car...@f5.com 2011-03-16 11:42:52 EDT --- crap, sorry -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 688223] New: Review Request: libdeltacloud - C API for accessing deltacloud
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libdeltacloud - C API for accessing deltacloud https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688223 Summary: Review Request: libdeltacloud - C API for accessing deltacloud Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: clala...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/clalance/libdeltacloud/rpmreview/libdeltacloud.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/clalance/libdeltacloud/rpmreview/libdeltacloud-0.7-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: Libdeltacloud is a library for accessing deltacloud via a convenient C API. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 688223] Review Request: libdeltacloud - C API for accessing deltacloud
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688223 --- Comment #1 from Chris Lalancette clala...@redhat.com 2011-03-16 11:41:18 EDT --- I also ran this through rpmlint: [clalance@localhost libdeltacloud (master)]$ rpmlint libdeltacloud.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [clalance@localhost libdeltacloud (master)]$ rpmlint ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/libdeltacloud-0.7-1.fc14.src.rpm libdeltacloud.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) deltacloud - delta cloud, delta-cloud, deltaic libdeltacloud.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US deltacloud - delta cloud, delta-cloud, deltaic 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. [clalance@localhost libdeltacloud (master)]$ (the warnings are wrong, since the name of the API that we are targeting is indeed deltacloud) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 688222] New: Review Request: perl-HTTP-Date - Date conversion routines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTTP-Date - Date conversion routines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688222 Summary: Review Request: perl-HTTP-Date - Date conversion routines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ppi...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-HTTP-Date/perl-HTTP-Date.spec SRPM URL: http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-HTTP-Date/perl-HTTP-Date-6.00-1.fc16.src.rpm Description: This module provides functions that deal the date formats used by the HTTP protocol (and then some more). Only the first two functions, time2str() and str2time(), are exported by default. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 688222] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Date - Date conversion routines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688222 --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com 2011-03-16 11:44:49 EDT --- This package collides with perl-libwww-perl-5.837-3.fc15.noarch because this is new version of module that has been unbundled from perl-libwww-perl-6. I will add proper Conflicts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 688033] Review Request: gujarati-typing-booster - Gujarati typing booster table ime for ibus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688033 Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2011-03-16 11:48:26 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 688033] Review Request: gujarati-typing-booster - Gujarati typing booster table ime for ibus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688033 --- Comment #7 from Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com 2011-03-16 11:48:09 EDT --- built for master, f15 and f14. Thanks for quickly processing git request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 688222] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Date - Date conversion routines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688222 Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||psab...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|psab...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 676879] Review Request: mpiexec - MPI job launcher that uses the PBS task interface directly
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676879
Doug Ledford dledf...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dledf...@redhat.com,
||fenla...@redhat.com
--- Comment #11 from Doug Ledford dledf...@redhat.com 2011-03-16 11:53:28 EDT
---
Sorry to take so long, but sometimes you're just busy.
So, here's what I see from reading up on the mpiexec website.
First, this doesn't necessarily work with lots of batch systems. It works with
OpenPBS, PBS Pro, and Torque. However, these are all three forks of OpenPBS
where OpenPBS appears to be dead, PBS Pro is (I guess) some group taking
OpenPBS and delivering ongoing service and support around it, and Torque is an
actively developed fork of OpenPBS.
Second, it's not intended to be multi-MPI friendly. Not really anyway. I know
the web page talks about a lot of MPI packages, but in truth, there are only a
few MPI families, with lots of forks along those families. There is the mpich
family, which includes mpich, mpich2, mvapich, mvapich2, intel mpi, etc. Then
there is the lam family, which includes lam and openmpi. I don't know of any
other open source mpi families that are still alive. There might be other
closed source mpis out there, but we don't care about those. In any case, the
mpiexec website basically calls out that lam/openmpi get things right on their
own so there is no need to use mpiexec there and recommends that you don't
(side note: this does not surprise me in the least, the mpich family of job
starting daemons has always been nothing more than a bunch of scripts calling
rsh, hardly what I would call robust or well designed, more like a quick and
dirty job to get things running in the early days and then they never went back
and did things right later).
So, for all the talk on the web site about how many mpis this supports, and how
many PBSes this supports, it really only supports one mpi family and one pbs
family. Given that, this *absolutely* does not belong in the main path. I
know that's already been fixed, but I'm putting this here so that someone
doesn't get the idea in the future to undo that fix.
Now, what's more, is I'm not entirely certain that this will work transparently
with different mpich mpis from a single build. You have to specify the default
communication method in the configure script, as well as a few other options.
I haven't looked into it, but I know that mvapich and mvapich2 are enough
different from mpich and mpich2 that I'm not certain that the same build
parameters will work with both. If it doesn't, then you might have to build it
more than once in the spec file with different options, create an mpiexec base
package, and then mpiexec-%{mpiname} sub packages that have the files specific
to that particular mpi implementation.
As an example, if needed, you could create an mpiexec shell script and place it
in the directory specified in your environment modules file. This shell script
could then execute %{mpidir}/bin/mpiexec-pbs. You would then place the mpiexec
binary this build process spits out into %{mpidir}/bin/mpiexec-pbs for each of
the mpis you intend to support and place the files into subpackages of mpiexec
specific to each mpi implementation. That way, if you need different options
for different mpis, it can be done. However, as I haven't tried to use this
program, I don't know if this is even necessary. Before the package goes into
Fedora as is though, this needs to be tested. It's much easier to fix this
before it hits repos than it is after.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 688222] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Date - Date conversion routines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688222 --- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com 2011-03-16 11:55:37 EDT --- Updated package with Conflicts is on the same URL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 426537] Review Request: perl-Test-YAML-Valid - Lets you test the validity of YAML files in unit tests
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426537 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||p...@city-fan.org --- Comment #7 from Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org 2011-03-16 12:02:41 EDT --- I would like to request EPEL-4 and EPEL-5 branches of this package. I am willing to maintain/co-maintain if the current maintainer isn't interested. This is needed for a Test::CPAN::Meta::YAML package I'm preparing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 684915] Review Request: php-pecl-igbinary - Replacement for the standard PHP serializer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=684915 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 684915] Review Request: php-pecl-igbinary - Replacement for the standard PHP serializer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=684915 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-16 12:08:24 EDT --- php-pecl-igbinary-1.1.1-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-pecl-igbinary-1.1.1-1.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 688239] New: Review Request: perl-File-Listing - Parse directory listing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-Listing - Parse directory listing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688239 Summary: Review Request: perl-File-Listing - Parse directory listing Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ppi...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-File-Listing/perl-File-Listing.spec SRPM URL: http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-File-Listing/perl-File-Listing-6.01-1.fc16.src.rpm Description: This module exports a single function called parse_dir(), which can be used to parse directory listings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 688239] Review Request: perl-File-Listing - Parse directory listing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688239 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||688222 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 688222] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Date - Date conversion routines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688222 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||688239 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 688222] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Date - Date conversion routines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688222
Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-review?
--- Comment #3 from Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com 2011-03-16 12:32:25 EDT ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [1]
[x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x] Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[x] Spec uses macros instead of hard-coded directory names.
[x] Package consistently uses macros.
[-] Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x] PreReq is not used.
[x] Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [2]
[-] Buildroot is correct
(%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)).
[-] Package run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) and the beginning of
%install.
[-] Package use %makeinstall only when ``make install DESTDIR=...'' doesn't
work.
[-] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
[-] The spec file handles locales properly.
[x] Changelog in prescribed format.
[x] Rpmlint output is silent.
[x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[-] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
[-] License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines.
[3,4]
[x] Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
MD5SUM this package : 41b875ac89c14d7f66515b52cdd12acd
MD5SUM upstream package : 41b875ac89c14d7f66515b52cdd12acd
[-] Compiler flags are appropriate.
[-] %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[x] Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[-] Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x] Permissions on files are set properly.
[x] Each %files section contains %defattr.
[x] No %config files under /usr.
[-] %config files are marked noreplace or the reason is justified.
[-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop using
desktop-file-install file if it is a GUI application. [5]
[-] Package contains a valid .desktop file.
[x] Package contains code, or permissable content.
[-] Package contains a SysV-style init script if in need of one.
[x] File names are valid UTF-8.
[-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x] Package contains no bundled libraries.
[-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Static libraries in -static subpackage, if present.
[x] Package contains no static executables.
[-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present.
[-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[-] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la).
[-] Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[-] Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
[x] Package does not genrate any conflict.
[x] Package does not contains kernel modules.
[x] Package is not relocatable.
[-] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported architecture.
[x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x] Package installs properly.
[x] Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [6]
=== SUGGESTED ITEMS ===
[?] Package functions as described.
[x] Latest version is packaged.
[x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-] If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x] SourceX is a working URL.
[-] SourceX / PatchY prefixed with
[Bug 688263] New: Review Request: perl-Encode-Locale - Determine the locale encoding
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Encode-Locale - Determine the locale encoding https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688263 Summary: Review Request: perl-Encode-Locale - Determine the locale encoding Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ppi...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-Encode-Locale/perl-Encode-Locale.spec SRPM URL: http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-Encode-Locale/perl-Encode-Locale-1.01-1.fc16.src.rpm Description: In many applications it's wise to let Perl use Unicode for the strings it processes. Most of the interfaces Perl has to the outside world is still byte based. Programs therefore needs to decode byte strings that enter the program from the outside and encode them again on the way out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 676879] Review Request: mpiexec - MPI job launcher that uses the PBS task interface directly
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676879 --- Comment #12 from Christos Triantafyllidis christos.triantafylli...@gmail.com 2011-03-16 12:48:19 EDT --- Hi Doug, i would agree with most of the things you are writing but i have the following comments: a) As stated in package description, this package supports only the PBS batch system family. Given that Fedora has only torque in its repositories i would say that this package supports all PBS batch systems available. b) Regarding MPI libraries i totally agree that different implementation use different parameters, namely for packages that are available in fedora at the moment we have the following libraries: - MPICH2 - OpenMPI From those, OpenMPI (as already commented) provides a mpiexec that works as far as OpenMPI is build against the batch system (namely torque). So i find much more convenient to have as default the parameters that MPICH needs as this is actually the one that creates the need for yet another mpiexec. Note that this is the DEFAULT communication method, meaning that can be overridden at any time. I may not know the Fedora packaging internals that well but i clearly find it a bad idea to have the same code installed multiple times just to avoid the usage of a parameter. Are you sure this is actually needed to include it to the distribution? c) The installation should be totally transparent to anyone who don't intent to use it as it is enabled by the relevant environment module. For those who intent to use it, i guess it is not that inconvenient to add their runtime parameters if needed. d) This build (in specific the 0.83 el5 one) has been used extensively in our Grid cluster on production quality without a single error report. Finally, i'm not a mpiexec fan... we (as a grid site) are using it and with current config this seems to make our users/community happy. Given that i'm building this package for our infrastructure i thought it may be useful for others. If the resulted package is not usable for us i don't see any reason to maintain it for fedora :). Regards, Christos -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 688263] Review Request: perl-Encode-Locale - Determine the locale encoding
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688263 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||683784 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 688239] Review Request: perl-File-Listing - Parse directory listing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688239 Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||psab...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|psab...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 688222] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Date - Date conversion routines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688222 --- Comment #4 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com 2011-03-16 13:03:38 EDT --- Fixed package: Spec URL: http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-HTTP-Date/perl-HTTP-Date.spec SRPM URL: http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-HTTP-Date/perl-HTTP-Date-6.00-1.fc16.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 688222] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Date - Date conversion routines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688222
Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com 2011-03-16 13:09:03 EDT ---
--- perl-HTTP-Date.spec 2011-03-16 16:51:20.0 +0100
+++ perl-HTTP-Date.spec.new 2011-03-16 17:59:13.0 +0100
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/HTTP-Date/
Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/G/GA/GAAS/HTTP-Date-%{version}.tar.gz
BuildArch: noarch
-BuildArch: perl(Exporter)
+BuildRequires: perl(Exporter)
BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
BuildRequires: perl(Time::Local)
BuildRequires: perl(Time::Zone)
*** APPROVED ***
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 688239] Review Request: perl-File-Listing - Parse directory listing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688239
--- Comment #1 from Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com 2011-03-16 13:07:20 EDT ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [1]
[x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x] Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[x] Spec uses macros instead of hard-coded directory names.
[x] Package consistently uses macros.
[-] Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x] PreReq is not used.
[x] Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [2]
[-] Buildroot is correct
(%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)).
[-] Package run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) and the beginning of
%install.
[-] Package use %makeinstall only when ``make install DESTDIR=...'' doesn't
work.
[-] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
[-] The spec file handles locales properly.
[x] Changelog in prescribed format.
[x] Rpmlint output is silent.
[x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[-] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
[-] License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines.
[3,4]
[x] Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
MD5SUM this package : cd0b6fd131127be775d6f64044e7cd5d
MD5SUM upstream package : cd0b6fd131127be775d6f64044e7cd5d
[-] Compiler flags are appropriate.
[-] %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[x] Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[-] Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x] Permissions on files are set properly.
[x] Each %files section contains %defattr.
[x] No %config files under /usr.
[-] %config files are marked noreplace or the reason is justified.
[-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop using
desktop-file-install file if it is a GUI application. [5]
[-] Package contains a valid .desktop file.
[x] Package contains code, or permissable content.
[-] Package contains a SysV-style init script if in need of one.
[x] File names are valid UTF-8.
[-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x] Package contains no bundled libraries.
[-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Static libraries in -static subpackage, if present.
[x] Package contains no static executables.
[-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present.
[-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la).
[-] Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x] Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
[x] Package does not genrate any conflict.
[x] Package does not contains kernel modules.
[x] Package is not relocatable.
[-] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported architecture.
[x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x] Package installs properly.
[x] Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [6]
=== SUGGESTED ITEMS ===
[?] Package functions as described.
[x] Latest version is packaged.
[-] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-] If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x] SourceX is a working URL.
[-] SourceX / PatchY prefixed with %{name}.
[!] Final provides and requires are sane (rpm -q --provides and rpm -q
--requires).
[x] %check is present and all tests pass.
[-] Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package
using a fully versioned
[Bug 688239] Review Request: perl-File-Listing - Parse directory listing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688239 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||683784 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 688264] New: Review Request: perl-Test-CPAN-Meta-YAML - Validate a META.yml file within a CPAN distribution
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-CPAN-Meta-YAML - Validate a META.yml file within a CPAN distribution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688264 Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-CPAN-Meta-YAML - Validate a META.yml file within a CPAN distribution Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: p...@city-fan.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://subversion.city-fan.org/repos/cfo-repo/perl-Test-CPAN-Meta-YAML/branches/fedora/perl-Test-CPAN-Meta-YAML.spec SRPM URL: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/perl-Test-CPAN-Meta-YAML/perl-Test-CPAN-Meta-YAML-0.17-2.fc16.src.rpm Description This module was written to ensure that a META.yml file, provided with a standard distribution uploaded to CPAN, meets the specifications that are slowly being introduced to module uploads, via the use of ExtUtils::MakeMaker, Module::Build and Module::Install. EPEL-4/5 builds of this package will require branching/building of perl-Test-YAML-Valid, which I have requested in Bug #426537 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 555248] Review Request: perl-Pod-Eventual - Read a POD document as a series of trivial events
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555248 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-16 12:53:26 EDT --- perl-Pod-Eventual-0.093330-1.el4 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 4. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Pod-Eventual-0.093330-1.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 688222] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Date - Date conversion routines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688222 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 611372] Review Request: perl-Net-Twitter - Perl interface to Twitter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=611372 --- Comment #8 from Julian C. Dunn jd...@aquezada.com 2011-03-16 13:18:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) Is someone still working on this? I need the Net::Twitter::Lite module and there doesn't seem to be an RPM for it currently. Any chance we'll get one in the near future? Hi Steven, I would love to, but I need the maintainer of Net::OAuth to push the upgraded version before I can work on this further. See bug 619644. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 688263] Review Request: perl-Encode-Locale - Determine the locale encoding
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688263 Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||psab...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|psab...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 539387] Review Request: InsightToolkit - Medical imaging processing library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539387 Arnaud Gelas arnaud_ge...@hms.harvard.edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||arnaud_ge...@hms.harvard.ed ||u --- Comment #14 from Arnaud Gelas arnaud_ge...@hms.harvard.edu 2011-03-16 13:26:43 EDT --- When you set cmake variable, you set twice BUILD_EXAMPLES once to ON, once to OFF. I guess you should either set it to ON or OFF. [..] -DBUILD_EXAMPLES:BOOL=ON \ -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE:STRING=Release\ -DCMAKE_VERBOSE_MAKEFILE=OFF\ -DBUILD_EXAMPLES=OFF\ -DBUILD_TESTING=OFF\ -DITK_USE_REVIEW:BOOL=OFF \ -DITK_USE_PATENTED:BOOL=OFF \ -DITK_USE_SYSTEM_TIFF=ON \ -DITK_USE_SYSTEM_PNG=ON \ -DITK_USE_SYSTEM_ZLIB=ON \ -DITK_USE_SYSTEM_LIBXML2=ON \ -DUSE_FFTWD=ON . [...] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 688239] Review Request: perl-File-Listing - Parse directory listing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688239 --- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com 2011-03-16 13:26:13 EDT --- Fixed package on the same URL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 688263] Review Request: perl-Encode-Locale - Determine the locale encoding
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688263
Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com 2011-03-16 13:32:40 EDT ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [1]
[x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x] Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[x] Spec uses macros instead of hard-coded directory names.
[x] Package consistently uses macros.
[-] Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x] PreReq is not used.
[x] Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [2]
[-] Buildroot is correct
(%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)).
[-] Package run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) and the beginning of
%install.
[-] Package use %makeinstall only when ``make install DESTDIR=...'' doesn't
work.
[-] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
[-] The spec file handles locales properly.
[x] Changelog in prescribed format.
[x] Rpmlint output is silent.
[x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[-] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
[-] License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines.
[3,4]
[x] Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
MD5SUM this package : e92740d24715c60682325b5bd971b38a
MD5SUM upstream package : e92740d24715c60682325b5bd971b38a
[-] Compiler flags are appropriate.
[-] %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[x] Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[-] Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x] Permissions on files are set properly.
[x] Each %files section contains %defattr.
[x] No %config files under /usr.
[-] %config files are marked noreplace or the reason is justified.
[-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop using
desktop-file-install file if it is a GUI application. [5]
[-] Package contains a valid .desktop file.
[x] Package contains code, or permissable content.
[-] Package contains a SysV-style init script if in need of one.
[x] File names are valid UTF-8.
[-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x] Package contains no bundled libraries.
[-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Static libraries in -static subpackage, if present.
[x] Package contains no static executables.
[-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present.
[-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la).
[-] Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[-] Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
[x] Package does not genrate any conflict.
[x] Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x] Package is not relocatable.
[-] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported architecture.
[x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x] Package installs properly.
[x] Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [6]
=== SUGGESTED ITEMS ===
[?] Package functions as described.
[x] Latest version is packaged.
[-] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-] If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x] SourceX is a working URL.
[-] SourceX / PatchY prefixed with
[Bug 683071] Review Request: php-libvirt - PHP bindings for libvirt virtualization toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683071 Michal Novotny minov...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-03-16 13:35:15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 688239] Review Request: perl-File-Listing - Parse directory listing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688239 --- Comment #3 from Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com 2011-03-16 13:35:42 EDT --- --- perl-File-Listing.spec 2011-03-16 17:09:02.0 +0100 +++ perl-File-Listing.spec.new 2011-03-16 18:22:42.0 +0100 @@ -20,7 +20,9 @@ Conflicts: perl-libwww-perl 6 # Remove underspecified dependencies -%filter_from_requires /^perl(HTTP::Date)\s*$/ +%filter_from_requires /^perl(HTTP::Date)\s*$/d +# Do not provide private modules +%filter_from_provides /^perl(File::Listing::/d %filter_setup %description @@ -54,3 +56,4 @@ - Specfile autogenerated by cpanspec 1.78. - Remove BuildRoot stuff - Conflict with perl-libwww-perl-5* and older +- Do not provide private modules --- Seems alright. I'll approve once perl-HTTP-Date makes it into Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 688222] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Date - Date conversion routines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688222 --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-03-16 14:00:41 EDT --- I see no SCM request to process. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 447368] Review Request: schroot - Execute commands in a chroot environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447368 --- Comment #29 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-03-16 14:00:20 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 688157] Review Request: cpupowerutils - Tools to determine and set CPU power related settings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688157 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mmasl...@redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 680308] Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Schema - XML based database schema manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=680308 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-16 14:18:09 EDT --- php-pear-MDB2-Schema-0.8.0-2.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 246537] Review Request: perl-Test-Output - Utilities to test STDOUT and STDERR messages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246537 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-16 14:18:53 EDT --- perl-Test-Output-0.10-2.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 680308] Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Schema - XML based database schema manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=680308 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|php-pear-MDB2-Schema-0.8.5- |php-pear-MDB2-Schema-0.8.5- |1.fc14 |1.el6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 681393] Review Request: perl-Nagios-Plugin-WWW-Mechanize - Login to a web page as a user and get data as a Nagios plugin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681393 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-16 14:18:02 EDT --- perl-Nagios-Plugin-WWW-Mechanize-0.13-3.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 680308] Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Schema - XML based database schema manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=680308 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-16 14:17:27 EDT --- php-pear-MDB2-Schema-0.8.5-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 496473] Review Request: perl-Mixin-Linewise - Write your linewise code for handles; this does the rest
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496473 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-16 14:18:34 EDT --- perl-Mixin-Linewise-0.002-2.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 667403] Review Request: perl-Dist-CheckConflicts - Declare version conflicts for your dist
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=667403 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-16 14:18:43 EDT --- perl-Dist-CheckConflicts-0.02-2.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
