[Bug 688786] Review Request: perl-NTLM - perl module for NTLM authentication

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688786

--- Comment #3 from Ruediger Landmann  2011-03-18 
02:07:02 EDT ---
Question on legal list:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/legal/2011-March/001578.html

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 688786] Review Request: perl-NTLM - perl module for NTLM authentication

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688786

--- Comment #2 from Ruediger Landmann  2011-03-18 
01:10:34 EDT ---
General observations:

* use a macro for the version in the SOURCE0 line
* you don't need to explicitly Require perl(Digest::HMAC_MD5)
* please BR: perl(Test::Pod) to enable the test (not a blocker though)
* thanks for working with upstream to get the license clarified. However, we
now have a package that's (dual) licensed under the GPL, but does not ship with
a copy of the GPL. I'm not sure what needs to happen here, so am requesting
guidance from legal list. At the very least, please add the file that contains
that email to the %docs line, since it's considered part of the license now.

Also, unless you're planning to build this for EL5, you don't need:
* the BuildRoot: line
* the %clean section
* to clean the buildroot in the %install section.

Otherwise, all good! Hopefully, we'll get something definitive on the license
question pretty quickly.

- = N/A
 / = Check
 ! = Problem
 ? = Not evaluated

=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
 [/] Rpmlint output is clean:
$ rpmlint SPECS/perl-NTLM.spec 
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
$ rpmlint SRPMS/perl-NTLM-1.05-1.fc14.src.rpm
perl-NTLM.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US IMAPClient ->
Clientship, Clientage, Clientele
perl-NTLM.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US eg -> Eg, eh, e
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
$ rpmlint RPMS/noarch/perl-NTLM-1.05-1.fc14.noarch.rpm
perl-NTLM.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US IMAPClient ->
Clientship, Clientage, Clientele
perl-NTLM.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US eg -> Eg, eh, e
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.

 [/] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
 [/] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
 [/] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Language specific
items
 [/] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines.
 [/] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 License type: GPL+ or artistic
 [!] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
* see above

 [/] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
 [/] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
$ md5sum SOURCES/NTLM-1.05.tar.gz 
5d148e88d96785d996bdd8e1517b9d8c  SOURCES/NTLM-1.05.tar.gz
$ md5sum ~/Download/NTLM-1.05.tar.gz 
5d148e88d96785d996bdd8e1517b9d8c  /home/rlandmann/Download/NTLM-1.05.tar.gz

 [/] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported architecture.
 Tested: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2922596
 [/] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch
 [/] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
* yes, but see general comments above

 [-] The spec file handles locales properly (with the %find_lang macro)
 [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
 [/] Package does not bundle copies of system libraries
 [/] Package is not relocatable.
 [/] Package must own all directories that it creates.
 [/] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
 [/] Permissions on files are set properly
 [/] %files section includes a %defattr(...) line
 [!] Package consistently uses macros.
* please fix SOURCE0

 [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
 [/] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
 [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
 [-] Static libraries in -static subpackage, if present.
 [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
 [-] -devel packages require base package with full versioning.
 [/] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la).
 [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
application.
 [/] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
 [/] Filenames are valid UTF-8

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 675587] Review Request: pytest - Simple powerful testing with Python

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675587

Robin Lee  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||robinlee.s...@gmail.com

--- Comment #2 from Robin Lee  2011-03-18 00:14:31 EDT 
---
It seems that python3-py and python3-sphinx are not available in F14.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 680488] Review Request: erlang-basho_stats - Basic Erlang statistics library

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=680488

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version||erlang-basho_stats-1.0.1-1.
   ||fc15
 Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 652543] Review Request: erlang-riak_client - Erlang client for Riak

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652543

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version||erlang-riak_client-1.1.0-1.
   ||fc15
 Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 680488] Review Request: erlang-basho_stats - Basic Erlang statistics library

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=680488

--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  2011-03-17 
23:52:18 EDT ---
erlang-basho_stats-1.0.1-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable
repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 652543] Review Request: erlang-riak_client - Erlang client for Riak

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652543

--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System  
2011-03-17 23:52:38 EDT ---
erlang-riak_client-1.1.0-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable
repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 688786] Review Request: perl-NTLM - perl module for NTLM authentication

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688786

Ruediger Landmann  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||r.landm...@redhat.com
 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|r.landm...@redhat.com
   Flag||fedora-review?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 579449] Review Request: emacs-common-riece - Yet Another IRC Client for Emacs and XEmacs

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579449

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  
2011-03-17 22:41:49 EDT ---
emacs-common-riece-7.0.3-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 testing
repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 579449] Review Request: emacs-common-riece - Yet Another IRC Client for Emacs and XEmacs

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579449

--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  2011-03-17 
21:41:58 EDT ---
emacs-common-riece-7.0.3-1.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/emacs-common-riece-7.0.3-1.fc13

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 579449] Review Request: emacs-common-riece - Yet Another IRC Client for Emacs and XEmacs

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579449

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 579449] Review Request: emacs-common-riece - Yet Another IRC Client for Emacs and XEmacs

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579449

--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  
2011-03-17 21:42:07 EDT ---
emacs-common-riece-7.0.3-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/emacs-common-riece-7.0.3-1.fc15

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 579449] Review Request: emacs-common-riece - Yet Another IRC Client for Emacs and XEmacs

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579449

--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  2011-03-17 
21:41:51 EDT ---
emacs-common-riece-7.0.3-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/emacs-common-riece-7.0.3-1.fc14

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 688786] New: Review Request: perl-NTLM - perl module for NTLM authentication

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: perl-NTLM - perl module for NTLM authentication

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688786

   Summary: Review Request: perl-NTLM - perl module for NTLM
authentication
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
 Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: n...@fedoraproject.org
 QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora


Spec URL: http://nb.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-NTLM.spec
SRPM URL: http://nb.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-NTLM-1.05-1.fc15.src.rpm
Koji scratch build URL:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2922330
Description: 

This module provides methods to use NTLM authentication.  It can be used
as an authenticate method with the Mail::IMAPClient module to perform
the challenge/response mechanism for NTLM connections or it can be used
on its own for NTLM authentication with other protocols (eg. HTTP).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 688786] Review Request: perl-NTLM - perl module for NTLM authentication

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688786

--- Comment #1 from Nick Bebout  2011-03-17 21:33:32 
EDT ---
[nb@desktop SPECS]$ rpmlint perl-NTLM.spec
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

[nb@desktop SRPMS]$ rpmlint perl-NTLM-1.05-1.fc15.src.rpm 
perl-NTLM.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US IMAPClient -> Impatient
perl-NTLM.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US eg -> eh, e, g
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.

[nb@desktop noarch]$ rpmlint perl-NTLM-1.05-1.fc16.noarch.rpm 
perl-NTLM.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US IMAPClient ->
Impatient
perl-NTLM.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US eg -> eh, e, g
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.

The spelling errors are not errors.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 579449] Review Request: emacs-common-riece - Yet Another IRC Client for Emacs and XEmacs

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579449

--- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts  2011-03-17 20:52:05 EDT 
---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 426985] Review Request: php-suhosin - Suhosin extension for the php language

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426985

nfo...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||nfo...@gmail.com

--- Comment #28 from nfo...@gmail.com 2011-03-17 20:49:51 EDT ---
Can someone please push php-suhosin-0.9.32.1-1.fc14 to updates?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 441805] Review Request: imapsync - Tool to migrate email between IMAP servers

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441805

--- Comment #11 from Jason Tibbitts  2011-03-17 20:51:45 EDT 
---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 579449] Review Request: emacs-common-riece - Yet Another IRC Client for Emacs and XEmacs

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579449

Daiki Ueno  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?

--- Comment #6 from Daiki Ueno  2011-03-17 20:22:45 EDT ---
Thanks for the review, Rudi.

New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: emacs-common-riece
Short Description: Yet Another IRC Client for Emacs and XEmacs
Owners: ueno
Branches: f15 f14 f13
InitialCC: i18n-team

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 676175] Review Request: fpaste-server - Fedora Pastebin

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676175

--- Comment #6 from Nick Bebout  2011-03-17 20:19:12 
EDT ---
Ping sparks.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 441805] Review Request: imapsync - Tool to migrate email between IMAP servers

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441805

Nick Bebout  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||n...@fedoraproject.org
   Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?

--- Comment #10 from Nick Bebout  2011-03-17 20:12:51 
EDT ---
Package Change Request
==
Package Name: imapsync
New Branches: el4
Owners: nb

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 688777] New: Review Request: postfix-policyd-spf-perl - Postfix SMTPd policy server for SPF checking

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: postfix-policyd-spf-perl - Postfix SMTPd policy server 
for SPF checking

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688777

   Summary: Review Request: postfix-policyd-spf-perl - Postfix
SMTPd policy server for SPF checking
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
 Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: bo...@rexursive.com
 QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora


Spec URL:
ftp://ftp.rexursive.com/pub/postfix-policyd-spf-perl/postfix-policyd-spf-perl.spec
SRPM URL:
ftp://ftp.rexursive.com/pub/postfix-policyd-spf-perl/postfix-policyd-spf-perl-2.007-1.fc14.src.rpm
Description:
postfix-policyd-spf-perl is a Postfix SMTPd policy server for SPF checking.
It is implemented in pure Perl and uses the Mail::SPF CPAN module. Note that
Mail::SPF is a complete re-implementation of SPF based on the final SPF RFC,
RFC 4408. It shares no code with the older Mail::SPF::Query that was the
original SPF development implementation.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 675587] Review Request: pytest - Simple powerful testing with Python

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675587

--- Comment #1 from Thomas Moschny  2011-03-17 19:41:00 
EDT ---
Spec URL: http://thm.fedorapeople.org/pytest/pytest.spec
SRPM URL: http://thm.fedorapeople.org/pytest/pytest-2.0.2-1.fc14.src.rpm

%changelog
* Thu Mar 17 2011 Thomas Moschny <..> - 2.0.2-1
- Update to 2.0.2.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 688264] Review Request: perl-Test-CPAN-Meta-YAML - Validate a META.yml file within a CPAN distribution

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688264

--- Comment #3 from Paul Howarth  2011-03-17 18:10:36 EDT ---
License inconsistency raised upstream:

https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=66692

Thanks for the review Iain.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 688264] Review Request: perl-Test-CPAN-Meta-YAML - Validate a META.yml file within a CPAN distribution

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688264

Paul Howarth  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?

--- Comment #2 from Paul Howarth  2011-03-17 18:05:43 EDT ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: perl-Test-CPAN-Meta-YAML
Short Description: Validate a META.yml file within a CPAN distribution
Owners: pghmcfc
Branches: EL-4 EL-5 EL-6 F-13 F-14 F-15
InitialCC: perl-sig

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 688408] Review Request: xfce4-cpufreq-plugin - CPU frequency scaling plugin for the Xfce4 panel

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688408

Mario Blättermann  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||mari...@gnome.org

--- Comment #1 from Mario Blättermann  2011-03-17 17:38:05 
EDT ---
Some issues:

Because your package is using the folder

%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/

you should add the following line:

Requires: hicolor-icon-theme

This installation (not runtime!) dependency won't picked up automatically.


Moreover, no group is defined. I would recommend »User Interface/Desktops«, as
usual for other Xfce plugins.

Please use macros consistently. Replace $RPM_BUILD_ROOT with %{buildroot}.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 676308] Review Request: rubygem-net-scp - A pure Ruby implementation of the SCP client protocol

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676308

--- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka  2011-03-17 
16:03:48 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #4)
>
> I agree that we have to avoid pollution. But at the end, if the test pollutes
> the %buildroot of %_builddir, you still have to either do cleanup or exclude
> these files from installing/copying. So building into %buildroot cannot save
> you and it is invalid argument in this discussion.

- Well, perhaps you are just confused about %_builddir vs %buildroot
  (I don't know what you mean here by "the %buildroot of %_builddir")
  Usually 
  * %_builddir is ~/rpmbuild/BUILD
With normal %setup -q,
- rpmbuild firstly moves to ~/rpmbuild/BUILD (%_builddir)
- unpack tarball
- then move to  ~/rpmbuild/BUILD/%name-%version
- And then, when %build, %install, %check begins, rpmbuild
  will always move to ~/rpmbuild/BUILD/%name-%version first
  * On the other hand, %buildroot is usually ~/
rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-%{_arch}.
On install, files must be installed under %buildroot.

  So what I am saying is that usually 
  - %install section should generally just do copy files under 
~/rpmbuild/BUILD into ~/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT
  - and do not touch files under ~/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT during %check
and touch only files under ~/rpmbuild/BUILD
  And rpmbuild always do the scripts in the order of
  %prep -> %build -> %install -> %check (not %prep -> %build -> %check
  -> %install).

  So even if testsuite may pollute files under %_builddir on %check,
  files under %buildroot won't be polluted (again %install is done
  before %check).

  Also please check this:

 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Scriplets_are_only_allowed_to_write_in_certain_directories

  (%_builddir and %buildroot are clearly distinguished and it is written
   that %check should not write anything under %buildroot).

> It is always good to follow parallels. So I agree that we should probably
> follow the %prep, %build and %install as you described above, although in this
> particular case it will be more work. But we should be strict about it,
> therefore I would like to see this in Ruby packaging guidelines, instead of
> this paragraph: "The %prep and %build sections of the specfile should be
> empty."

- Note that when containing C extension modules, the paragraph is already
  invalid (as written in ruby packaging guidelines). 
  Well, we may really have to revise current ruby packaging guideline
  (even for arch-independent gem based srpm).

> But I can't agree that the test suite should be always executed in %_builddir,
> because as I already pointed above, it might happen that you will not catch 
> all
> possible bugs and you have to care about pollution anyway.

- Well, I don't think we can catch all possible bugs anyway...
  And for %buildroot pollution issue, please check my comments above.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 234667] Review Request: dwarves - DWARF Tools

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234667

--- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System  
2011-03-17 15:56:43 EDT ---
dwarves-1.9-2.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dwarves-1.9-2.el5

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 654047] Review Request: drupal6-feeds - An import and aggregation framework for Drupal.

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=654047

--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System  
2011-03-17 15:49:04 EDT ---
drupal6-feeds-1.0-0.6.beta10.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
EPEL 5.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/drupal6-feeds-1.0-0.6.beta10.el5

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 654047] Review Request: drupal6-feeds - An import and aggregation framework for Drupal.

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=654047

--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System  
2011-03-17 15:37:47 EDT ---
drupal6-feeds-1.0-0.6.beta10.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/drupal6-feeds-1.0-0.6.beta10.el6

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 682487] Review Request: drupal6-image - Allows uploading, resizing and viewing of images

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682487

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|drupal6-image-6.x.1.1-1.fc1 |drupal6-image-6.x.1.1-1.fc1
   |3   |4

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 682487] Review Request: drupal6-image - Allows uploading, resizing and viewing of images

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682487

--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System  
2011-03-17 14:54:17 EDT ---
drupal6-image-6.x.1.1-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable
repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 682486] Review Request: drupal6-video - Allows Creation of CCK Video Fields

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682486

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|drupal6-video-6.x.4.2.beta2 |drupal6-video-6.x.4.2.beta2
   |-2.fc15 |-2.fc14

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 682488] Review Request: drupal6-filefield - Defines a file field type

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682488

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|drupal6-filefield-6.x.3.9-1 |drupal6-filefield-6.x.3.9-1
   |.fc14   |.fc13

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 674007] Review Request: openni-primesense - PrimeSensor/Kinect Modules for OpenNI

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674007

--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System  
2011-03-17 14:53:16 EDT ---
openni-primesense-5.0.0.25-0.4.git894cea01.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora
14 stable repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 682486] Review Request: drupal6-video - Allows Creation of CCK Video Fields

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682486

--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System  
2011-03-17 14:51:13 EDT ---
drupal6-video-6.x.4.2.beta2-2.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable
repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 674007] Review Request: openni-primesense - PrimeSensor/Kinect Modules for OpenNI

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674007

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||openni-primesense-5.0.0.25-
   ||0.4.git894cea01.fc14
 Resolution||ERRATA
Last Closed||2011-03-17 14:53:21

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 682479] Review Request: drupal6-yubikey - Provides YubiKey based strong two-factor user authentication capabilities

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682479

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|drupal6-yubikey-6.x.2.0.bet |drupal6-yubikey-6.x.2.0.bet
   |a2-1.fc14   |a2-1.fc13

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 682486] Review Request: drupal6-video - Allows Creation of CCK Video Fields

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682486

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|drupal6-video-6.x.4.2.beta2 |drupal6-video-6.x.4.2.beta2
   |-2.fc14 |-2.fc13

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 682486] Review Request: drupal6-video - Allows Creation of CCK Video Fields

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682486

--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System  
2011-03-17 14:52:17 EDT ---
drupal6-video-6.x.4.2.beta2-2.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable
repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 682488] Review Request: drupal6-filefield - Defines a file field type

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682488

--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System  
2011-03-17 14:50:52 EDT ---
drupal6-filefield-6.x.3.9-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable
repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 682479] Review Request: drupal6-yubikey - Provides YubiKey based strong two-factor user authentication capabilities

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682479

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|drupal6-yubikey-6.x.2.0.bet |drupal6-yubikey-6.x.2.0.bet
   |a2-1.fc15   |a2-1.fc14

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 682487] Review Request: drupal6-image - Allows uploading, resizing and viewing of images

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682487

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|drupal6-image-6.x.1.1-1.fc1 |drupal6-image-6.x.1.1-1.fc1
   |5   |3

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 682488] Review Request: drupal6-filefield - Defines a file field type

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682488

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|drupal6-filefield-6.x.3.9-1 |drupal6-filefield-6.x.3.9-1
   |.fc15   |.fc14

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 682479] Review Request: drupal6-yubikey - Provides YubiKey based strong two-factor user authentication capabilities

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682479

--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System  
2011-03-17 14:47:42 EDT ---
drupal6-yubikey-6.x.2.0.beta2-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable
repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 682488] Review Request: drupal6-filefield - Defines a file field type

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682488

--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System  
2011-03-17 14:49:49 EDT ---
drupal6-filefield-6.x.3.9-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable
repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 682487] Review Request: drupal6-image - Allows uploading, resizing and viewing of images

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682487

--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System  
2011-03-17 14:47:30 EDT ---
drupal6-image-6.x.1.1-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable
repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 682479] Review Request: drupal6-yubikey - Provides YubiKey based strong two-factor user authentication capabilities

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682479

--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System  
2011-03-17 14:50:01 EDT ---
drupal6-yubikey-6.x.2.0.beta2-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable
repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 683974] Review Request: xvst - Download tool for video clips

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683974

--- Comment #5 from Christoph Korn  2011-03-17 14:41:59 
EDT ---
Hi,
thanks again for the review.
I changes the source RPM accordingly (actually the -c option was required
because the zip archive does not contain a top-level directory).

http://188.138.90.189/fedora/xvst-2.4.1-4.fc14.src.rpm
http://188.138.90.189/fedora/xvst.spec

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 673784] Rename Request: mingw32-filesystem -> mingw-filesystem - Cross compiler base filesystem and environment

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673784

Erik van Pienbroek  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|Rename Request: |Rename Request:
   |mingw32-filesystem ->   |mingw32-filesystem ->
   |cross-filesystem - Cross|mingw-filesystem - Cross
   |compiler base filesystem|compiler base filesystem
   |and environment |and environment

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 673784] Rename Request: mingw32-filesystem -> cross-filesystem - Cross compiler base filesystem and environment

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673784

--- Comment #17 from Erik van Pienbroek  
2011-03-17 14:10:34 EDT ---
After discussion with some members of the Fedora MinGW SIG we decided to drop
the 'cross-*' prefix for now and stick with 'mingw-*' as prefix. Support for
Mac OS X may take a long while to get ready (possible even never because of the
legal issues), so we can use 'mingw-*' for now. We've also filed a ticket at
the Fedora Packaging Committee with a request to approve the (updated) draft
guidelines: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/71

Updated package:
Spec URL:
http://svn.openftd.org/svn/fedora_cross/mingw-filesystem/mingw-filesystem.spec
SRPM URL:
http://ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw-filesystem-66-1.fc15.src.rpm

* Thu Mar 17 2011 Erik van Pienbroek  - 66-1
- Renamed the package to mingw-filesystem
- Fixed rpmlint issues
- Dropped the provides: mingw32-dlfcn for now as we still
  need to discuss whether to retire it or not
- Fixed permissions of the scripts (775 -> 755)
- Fixed description of the various subpackages

I think it's okay to ignore the other rpmlint issues. The RPM files really need
to be placed in /usr/lib/rpm (even for x86_64)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 683974] Review Request: xvst - Download tool for video clips

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683974

--- Comment #4 from Mario Blättermann  2011-03-17 14:05:15 
EDT ---
Koji scratch build:

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2920870

Again, the main source should be defined as a URL, not as the name of the
tarball included in the source rpm only. It's no problem that the tarball
unpacks to a folder named different from it. Just define a different folder
name with

%setup -n xVST_2_4_1_src

Look here: http://www.rpm.org/max-rpm/s1-rpm-inside-macros.html

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 234667] Review Request: dwarves - DWARF Tools

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234667

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version||dwarves-1.9-2.el6
 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 234667] Review Request: dwarves - DWARF Tools

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234667

--- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System  
2011-03-17 13:04:28 EDT ---
dwarves-1.9-2.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 688663] Review Request: PyXB - Python XML Schema Bindings

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688663

--- Comment #1 from Marek Mahut  2011-03-17 12:48:27 EDT ---
Scratch build http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2920721

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 688663] New: Review Request: PyXB - Python XML Schema Bindings

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: PyXB - Python XML Schema Bindings

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688663

   Summary: Review Request: PyXB - Python XML Schema Bindings
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
 Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: mma...@redhat.com
 QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora


Spec URL: http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/PyXB/PyXB.spec
SRPM URL: http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/PyXB/PyXB-1.1.2-1.el6.src.rpm
Description: PyXB (“pixbee”) is a pure Python package that generates Python
source code for classes that correspond to data structures defined by
XMLSchema.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 688659] New: Review Request: thunarx-python - Python bindings for the Thunar Extension Framework

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: thunarx-python - Python bindings for the Thunar 
Extension Framework

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688659

   Summary: Review Request: thunarx-python - Python bindings for
the Thunar Extension Framework
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
 Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: balaji...@gmail.com
 QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora


http://balajig8.fedorapeople.org/packages/thunarx-python.spec -Python bindings
for the Thunar Extension Framework
http://balajig8.fedorapeople.org/packages/thunarx-python-0.2.3-1.fc14.src.rpm 

Python bindings for the Thunar Extension Framework.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 688659] Review Request: thunarx-python - Python bindings for the Thunar Extension Framework

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688659

Kevin Fenzi  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ke...@scrye.com

--- Comment #1 from Kevin Fenzi  2011-03-17 12:30:57 EDT ---
I'll go ahead and review this when I get a chance here.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 688264] Review Request: perl-Test-CPAN-Meta-YAML - Validate a META.yml file within a CPAN distribution

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688264

--- Comment #1 from Iain Arnell  2011-03-17 12:26:09 EDT ---
Spec looks sane, clean and consistent; make test passes cleanly.

There's a potential for confusion over the license: four files state
"Artistic 2.0", but somewhat ironically, META.yml states "perl". I
believe that upstream really intends this to be "Artistic 2.0", but you
should report the inconsistency.

APPROVED.

koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2920593

Source tarballs match upstream (sha1sum):
ea8b7610f3826c35001c64c16990602e3d70674e Test-CPAN-Meta-YAML-0.17.tar.gz
ea8b7610f3826c35001c64c16990602e3d70674e Test-CPAN-Meta-YAML-0.17.tar.gz.srpm

Final provides / requires are sane:

==> perl-Test-CPAN-Meta-YAML-0.17-2.fc16.noarch.rpm <==
> rpmlint
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
> provides
perl(Test::CPAN::Meta::YAML) = 0.17
perl-Test-CPAN-Meta-YAML = 0.17-2.fc16
perl(Test::CPAN::Meta::YAML::Version) = 0.17
> requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)  
perl(strict)  
perl(Test::Builder)  
perl(Test::CPAN::Meta::YAML::Version)  
perl(Test::YAML::Valid)  
perl(vars)  
perl(warnings)  
perl(YAML::Syck)  
> obsoletes
> conflicts

==> perl-Test-CPAN-Meta-YAML-0.17-2.fc16.src.rpm <==
> rpmlint
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
> provides
> requires
perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)  
perl(Test::Builder)  
perl(Test::Builder::Tester)  
perl(Test::More)  
perl(Test::Pod)  
perl(Test::Pod::Coverage)  
perl(Test::YAML::Valid) >= 0.03
perl(YAML::Syck)  
> obsoletes
> conflicts


> mock install
INFO: mock.py version 1.1.9 starting...
State Changed: init plugins
INFO: selinux enabled
State Changed: start
Mock Version: 1.1.9
INFO: Mock Version: 1.1.9
State Changed: lock buildroot
INFO: installing package(s): perl-Test-CPAN-Meta-YAML-0.17-2.fc16.noarch.rpm
INFO: 

 Package  Arch   Version   Repository  Size

Installing:
 perl-Test-CPAN-Meta-YAML noarch 0.17-2.fc16  
/perl-Test-CPAN-Meta-YAML-0.17-2.fc16.noarch
   45 k
Installing for dependencies:
 perl-CPANnoarch 1.9402-156.fc16   local  246 k
 perl-Digest-SHA  x86_64 1:5.47-156.fc16   local   63 k
 perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker  noarch 6.56-156.fc16 local  289 k
 perl-ExtUtils-ParseXSnoarch 1:2.2206-156.fc16 local   44 k
 perl-Test-Harnessnoarch 3.17-156.fc16 local  239 k
 perl-Test-Simple noarch 0.98-1.fc16   fedora 117 k
 perl-Test-YAML-Valid noarch 0.04-4.fc15   fedora  12 k
 perl-YAMLnoarch 0.72-2.fc15   fedora  82 k
 perl-YAML-Syck   x86_64 1.17-2.fc15   fedora  80 k
 perl-devel   x86_64 4:5.12.3-156.fc16 local  448 k
 python   x86_64 2.7.1-6.fc15  fedora  73 k
 systemtap-sdt-devel  x86_64 1.4-5.fc16fedora  41 k

Transaction Summary

Install  13 Package(s)

Total size: 1.7 M
Installed size: 4.5 M

Installed:
  perl-Test-CPAN-Meta-YAML.noarch 0:0.17-2.fc16 

Dependency Installed:
  perl-CPAN.noarch 0:1.9402-156.fc16
  perl-Digest-SHA.x86_64 1:5.47-156.fc16
  perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker.noarch 0:6.56-156.fc16
  perl-ExtUtils-ParseXS.noarch 1:2.2206-156.fc16
  perl-Test-Harness.noarch 0:3.17-156.fc16  
  perl-Test-Simple.noarch 0:0.98-1.fc16 
  perl-Test-YAML-Valid.noarch 0:0.04-4.fc15 
  perl-YAML.noarch 0:0.72-2.fc15
  perl-YAML-Syck.x86_64 0:1.17-2.fc15   
  perl-devel.x86_64 4:5.12.3-156.fc16   
  python.x86_64 0:2.7.1-6.fc15  
  systemtap-sdt-devel.x86_64 0:1.4-5.fc16   


State Changed: unlock buildroot

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@l

[Bug 688264] Review Request: perl-Test-CPAN-Meta-YAML - Validate a META.yml file within a CPAN distribution

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688264

Iain Arnell  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 677804] Review Request: drwright - Typing monitor to force typing breaks

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=677804

Christopher Aillon  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE
Last Closed||2011-03-17 12:10:11

--- Comment #9 from Christopher Aillon  2011-03-17 12:10:11 
EDT ---
Built for f15 and f16.  Closing bug.  Thanks.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 688264] Review Request: perl-Test-CPAN-Meta-YAML - Validate a META.yml file within a CPAN distribution

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688264

Iain Arnell  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|iarn...@gmail.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 688264] Review Request: perl-Test-CPAN-Meta-YAML - Validate a META.yml file within a CPAN distribution

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688264

Iain Arnell  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-review?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 642583] Review Request: rubygem-rr - RR is a framework that features a rich selection of double techniques

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=642583

Jozef Zigmund  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|jzigm...@redhat.com |vondr...@redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 688157] Review Request: cpupowerutils - Tools to determine and set CPU power related settings

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688157

Marcela Mašláňová  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-review+

--- Comment #5 from Marcela Mašláňová  2011-03-17 10:51:14 
EDT ---
APPROVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 642592] Review Request: rubygem-macaddr - Cross platform mac address determination for Ruby

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=642592

Vít Ondruch  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||vondr...@redhat.com

--- Comment #9 from Vít Ondruch  2011-03-17 10:47:43 EDT 
---
Could you provide updates spec file please?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 642583] Review Request: rubygem-rr - RR is a framework that features a rich selection of double techniques

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=642583

Vít Ondruch  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||vondr...@redhat.com

--- Comment #6 from Vít Ondruch  2011-03-17 10:36:07 EDT 
---
This appears to be the new spec with updated license:

Spec URL: http://mifo.sk/RPMS/rubygem-rr.spec
SRPM URL: http://mifo.sk/RPMS/rubygem-rr-1.0.0-3.fc14.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 688507] Review Request: perl-LWP-MediaTypes - Guess media type for a file or a URL

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688507

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-LWP-MediaTypes-6.01-1.
   ||fc16
 Resolution||RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2011-03-17 10:34:56

--- Comment #4 from Petr Pisar  2011-03-17 10:34:56 EDT ---
Thank you for the review and the repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 688222] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Date - Date conversion routines

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688222

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-HTTP-Date-6.00-1.fc16
 Resolution||RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2011-03-17 10:33:58

--- Comment #9 from Petr Pisar  2011-03-17 10:33:58 EDT ---
Thank you for the review and the repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 688580] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Daemon - Simple HTTP server class

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688580

Bug 688580 depends on bug 688507, which changed state.

Bug 688507 Summary: Review Request: perl-LWP-MediaTypes - Guess media type for 
a file or a URL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688507

   What|Old Value   |New Value

 Resolution||RAWHIDE
 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 688513] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Message - HTTP style message

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688513

Bug 688513 depends on bug 688222, which changed state.

Bug 688222 Summary: Review Request: perl-HTTP-Date - Date conversion routines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688222

   What|Old Value   |New Value

 Resolution||RAWHIDE
 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 688513] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Message - HTTP style message

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688513

Bug 688513 depends on bug 688507, which changed state.

Bug 688507 Summary: Review Request: perl-LWP-MediaTypes - Guess media type for 
a file or a URL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688507

   What|Old Value   |New Value

 Resolution||RAWHIDE
 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 688239] Review Request: perl-File-Listing - Parse directory listing

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688239

Bug 688239 depends on bug 688222, which changed state.

Bug 688222 Summary: Review Request: perl-HTTP-Date - Date conversion routines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688222

   What|Old Value   |New Value

 Resolution||RAWHIDE
 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 688536] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Cookies - HTTP cookie jars

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688536

Bug 688536 depends on bug 688222, which changed state.

Bug 688222 Summary: Review Request: perl-HTTP-Date - Date conversion routines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688222

   What|Old Value   |New Value

 Resolution||RAWHIDE
 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 688580] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Daemon - Simple HTTP server class

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688580

Bug 688580 depends on bug 688222, which changed state.

Bug 688222 Summary: Review Request: perl-HTTP-Date - Date conversion routines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688222

   What|Old Value   |New Value

 Resolution||RAWHIDE
 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 688263] Review Request: perl-Encode-Locale - Determine the locale encoding

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688263

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Encode-Locale-1.01-1.f
   ||c16
 Resolution||RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2011-03-17 10:32:52

--- Comment #4 from Petr Pisar  2011-03-17 10:32:52 EDT ---
Thank your for the review and the repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 688513] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Message - HTTP style message

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688513

Bug 688513 depends on bug 688263, which changed state.

Bug 688263 Summary: Review Request: perl-Encode-Locale - Determine the locale 
encoding
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688263

   What|Old Value   |New Value

 Resolution||RAWHIDE
 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 688263] Review Request: perl-Encode-Locale - Determine the locale encoding

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688263

--- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts  2011-03-17 10:14:46 EDT 
---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 688222] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Date - Date conversion routines

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688222

--- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts  2011-03-17 10:14:24 EDT 
---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 683257] Review Request: perl-Test-Command - Test routines for external commands

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683257

--- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts  2011-03-17 10:13:45 EDT 
---
It is way too early for f16 branches; we haven't even released f15 yet.
Otherwise,

Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 688507] Review Request: perl-LWP-MediaTypes - Guess media type for a file or a URL

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688507

--- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts  2011-03-17 10:15:03 EDT 
---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 688157] Review Request: cpupowerutils - Tools to determine and set CPU power related settings

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688157

--- Comment #4 from Petr Sabata  2011-03-17 10:12:49 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Build passed.
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2920007
> 
> There's problem with license:
> - license field must match actual license - license must be GPLv2 (for example
> files in lib directory)

Corrected.
http://psabata.fedorapeople.org/packages/cpupowerutils/cpupowerutils.spec
http://psabata.fedorapeople.org/packages/cpupowerutils/cpupowerutils-009-0.3.p1.fc14.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 678727] Review Request: pam_afs_session - AFS PAG and AFS tokens on login (sponsor requested)

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678727

--- Comment #15 from Jason Tibbitts  2011-03-17 10:12:46 EDT 
---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 560894] Review Request: perl-Pod-Coverage-TrustPod - Allow a module's pod to contain Pod::Coverage hints

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=560894

--- Comment #25 from Jason Tibbitts  2011-03-17 10:12:03 EDT 
---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 683684] Review Request: dtrx - Intelligent archive extractor

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683684

--- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts  2011-03-17 10:14:05 EDT 
---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 677804] Review Request: drwright - Typing monitor to force typing breaks

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=677804

--- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts  2011-03-17 10:12:30 EDT 
---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 688536] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Cookies - HTTP cookie jars

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688536

--- Comment #1 from Petr Sabata  2011-03-17 10:02:15 EDT ---
Package Review
==

Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated

=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[x]  Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [1]
[x]  Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]  Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]  Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[x]  Spec uses macros instead of hard-coded directory names.
[x]  Package consistently uses macros.
[-]  Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]  PreReq is not used.
[x]  Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]  All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [2]
[-]  Buildroot is correct
(%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)).
[-]  Package run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) and the beginning of
%install.
[-]  Package use %makeinstall only when ``make install DESTDIR=...'' doesn't
work.
[-]  Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
[-]  The spec file handles locales properly.
[x]  Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]  Rpmlint output is silent.
[x]  License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[-]  If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
[-]  License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]  Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines.
[3,4]
[x]  Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]  Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
 MD5SUM this package : 21bed72b30a46604c152b7e25cf1cb45
 MD5SUM upstream package : 21bed72b30a46604c152b7e25cf1cb45
[-]  Compiler flags are appropriate.
[-]  %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[-]  ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[x]  Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]  Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[-]  Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]  Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]  Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]  Each %files section contains %defattr.
[x]  No %config files under /usr.
[-]  %config files are marked noreplace or the reason is justified.
[-]  Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop using
desktop-file-install file if it is a GUI application. [5]
[-]  Package contains a valid .desktop file.
[x]  Package contains code, or permissable content.
[-]  Package contains a SysV-style init script if in need of one.
[x]  File names are valid UTF-8.
[-]  Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[x]  Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]  Package contains no bundled libraries.
[-]  Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-]  Static libraries in -static subpackage, if present.
[x]  Package contains no static executables.
[-]  Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present.
[-]  Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-]  Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[x]  Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la).
[-]  Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[-]  Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
[x]  Package does not genrate any conflict.
[x]  Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]  Package is not relocatable.
[-]  Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported architecture.
[x]  Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]  Package installs properly.
[x]  Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]  Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [6]

=== SUGGESTED ITEMS ===
[?]  Package functions as described.
[x]  Latest version is packaged.
[-]  Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]  If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[-]  Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]  SourceX is a working URL.
[-]  SourceX / PatchY prefixed with %{name}.
[x]  Final provides and requires are sane (rpm -q --provides and rpm -q
--requires).
[x]  %check is present and all tests pass.
[-]  Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package
using a fully versioned dependency.
[?]  Reviewer 

[Bug 688157] Review Request: cpupowerutils - Tools to determine and set CPU power related settings

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688157

--- Comment #3 from Marcela Mašláňová  2011-03-17 09:59:15 
EDT ---
Build passed.
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2920007

There's problem with license:
- license field must match actual license - license must be GPLv2 (for example
files in lib directory)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 688605] Review Request: perl-WWW-RobotRules - Database of robots.txt-derived permissions

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688605

Petr Sabata  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||psab...@redhat.com
 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|psab...@redhat.com
   Flag||fedora-review?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 688605] New: Review Request: perl-WWW-RobotRules - Database of robots.txt-derived permissions

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: perl-WWW-RobotRules - Database of robots.txt-derived 
permissions

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688605

   Summary: Review Request: perl-WWW-RobotRules - Database of
robots.txt-derived permissions
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
 Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: ppi...@redhat.com
 QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora


Spec URL:
http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-WWW-RobotRules/perl-WWW-RobotRules.spec
SRPM URL:
http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-WWW-RobotRules/perl-WWW-RobotRules-6.01-1.fc16.src.rpm
Description:
This module parses /robots.txt files as specified in "A Standard for Robot
Exclusion", at . Webmasters can
use the /robots.txt file to forbid conforming robots from accessing parts
of their web site.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 688605] Review Request: perl-WWW-RobotRules - Database of robots.txt-derived permissions

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688605

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||683784

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 688597] Review Request: perl-Net-HTTP - Low-level HTTP connection (client)

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688597

Petr Sabata  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||psab...@redhat.com
 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|psab...@redhat.com
   Flag||fedora-review?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 688513] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Message - HTTP style message

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688513

--- Comment #1 from Petr Sabata  2011-03-17 09:12:55 EDT ---
Package Review
==

Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated

=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[x]  Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [1]
[x]  Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]  Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]  Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[x]  Spec uses macros instead of hard-coded directory names.
[x]  Package consistently uses macros.
[-]  Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]  PreReq is not used.
[x]  Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]  All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [2]
[-]  Buildroot is correct
(%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)).
[-]  Package run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) and the beginning of
%install.
[-]  Package use %makeinstall only when ``make install DESTDIR=...'' doesn't
work.
[-]  Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
[-]  The spec file handles locales properly.
[x]  Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]  Rpmlint output is silent.
[x]  License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[-]  If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
[-]  License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]  Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines.
[3,4]
[x]  Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]  Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
 MD5SUM this package : 186d35ca521858cd661c54504ad73f0a
 MD5SUM upstream package : 186d35ca521858cd661c54504ad73f0a
[-]  Compiler flags are appropriate.
[-]  %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[-]  ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[x]  Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]  Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[-]  Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]  Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]  Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]  Each %files section contains %defattr.
[x]  No %config files under /usr.
[-]  %config files are marked noreplace or the reason is justified.
[-]  Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop using
desktop-file-install file if it is a GUI application. [5]
[-]  Package contains a valid .desktop file.
[x]  Package contains code, or permissable content.
[-]  Package contains a SysV-style init script if in need of one.
[x]  File names are valid UTF-8.
[-]  Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[-]  Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]  Package contains no bundled libraries.
[-]  Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-]  Static libraries in -static subpackage, if present.
[x]  Package contains no static executables.
[-]  Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present.
[-]  Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-]  Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[x]  Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la).
[-]  Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[-]  Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
[x]  Package does not genrate any conflict.
[x]  Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]  Package is not relocatable.
[-]  Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported architecture.
[x]  Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]  Package installs properly.
[x]  Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]  Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [6]

=== SUGGESTED ITEMS ===
[?]  Package functions as described.
[x]  Latest version is packaged.
[-]  Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]  If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[-]  Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]  SourceX is a working URL.
[-]  SourceX / PatchY prefixed with %{name}.
[x]  Final provides and requires are sane (rpm -q --provides and rpm -q
--requires).
[x]  %check is present and all tests pass.
[-]  Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package
using a fully versioned dependency.
[?]  Reviewer 

[Bug 688597] New: Review Request: perl-Net-HTTP - Low-level HTTP connection (client)

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-HTTP - Low-level HTTP connection (client)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688597

   Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-HTTP - Low-level HTTP
connection (client)
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
 Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: ppi...@redhat.com
 QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora


Spec URL: http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-Net-HTTP/perl-Net-HTTP.spec
SRPM URL:
http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-Net-HTTP/perl-Net-HTTP-6.00-1.fc16.src.rpm
Description:
The Net::HTTP class is a low-level HTTP client. An instance of the
Net::HTTP class represents a connection to an HTTP server. The HTTP
protocol is described in RFC 2616. The Net::HTTP class supports HTTP/1.0
and HTTP/1.1.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 688597] Review Request: perl-Net-HTTP - Low-level HTTP connection (client)

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688597

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||683784

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 688590] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Negotiate - Choose a variant to serve

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688590

Petr Sabata  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-review?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 688590] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Negotiate - Choose a variant to serve

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688590

Petr Sabata  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||psab...@redhat.com
 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|psab...@redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 688513] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Message - HTTP style message

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688513

Petr Sabata  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-review?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 688507] Review Request: perl-LWP-MediaTypes - Guess media type for a file or a URL

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688507

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||683784

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 688513] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Message - HTTP style message

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688513

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||683784

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review