[Bug 672811] Review Request: perl-Perl-Critic-Compatibility - Perl::Critic policies for compatibility with Perl versions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672811
Ruediger Landmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||r.landm...@redhat.com
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|r.landm...@redhat.com
Flag||fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Ruediger Landmann 2011-03-23
02:38:15 EDT ---
Thanks Petr; all good here.
APPROVED
- = N/A
/ = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[/] Rpmlint output is clean:
$ rpmlint SPECS/perl-Perl-Critic-Compatibility.spec
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
$ rpmlint SRPMS/perl-Perl-Critic-Compatibility-1.001-1.fc14.src.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
$ rpmlint RPMS/noarch/perl-Perl-Critic-Compatibility-1.001-1.fc14.noarch.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
[/] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[/] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[/] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Language specific
items
[/] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines.
[/] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
License type: GPL+ or Artistic
[-] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
[/] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[/] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
$ md5sum SOURCES/Perl-Critic-Compatibility-1.001.tar.gz
30d38d6106380333d12159604281cd62
SOURCES/Perl-Critic-Compatibility-1.001.tar.gz
$ md5sum ~/Download/Perl-Critic-Compatibility-1.001.tar.gz
30d38d6106380333d12159604281cd62
/home/rlandmann/Download/Perl-Critic-Compatibility-1.001.tar.gz
[/] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported architecture.
Tested: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2935396
[/] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch
[/] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[-] The spec file handles locales properly (with the %find_lang macro)
[-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[/] Package does not bundle copies of system libraries
[/] Package is not relocatable.
[/] Package must own all directories that it creates.
[/] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[/] Permissions on files are set properly
[/] %files section includes a %defattr(...) line
[/] Package consistently uses macros.
[-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[/] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Static libraries in -static subpackage, if present.
[-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] -devel packages require base package with full versioning.
[/] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la).
[-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
application.
[/] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[/] Filenames are valid UTF-8
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 573917] Review Request: perl-NetPacket-SpanningTree - Assemble and disassemble IEEE 802.1D Spanning Tree protocol packets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573917
--- Comment #11 from Ruediger Landmann 2011-03-23
02:27:53 EDT ---
Actually, I take back comment #10 -- I've been doing some more exploring and
realise that I was asking for something beyond Fedora's normal requirements+.
Include the GPL text if you want to, but I'm not going to push the point. Sorry
for the drama.
One last thing I noticed however: GPL aside, the developer agreed to Artistic,
but in the License line, you put Artistic 2.0, which is something quite
different. Please drop the "2.0" and we're done here.
Everything else checks out:
- = N/A
/ = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[/] Rpmlint output is clean:
$ rpmlint SPECS/perl-NetPacket-SpanningTree.spec
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
$ rpmlint SRPMS/perl-NetPacket-SpanningTree-0.01-2.fc14.src.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
$ rpmlint RPMS/noarch/perl-NetPacket-SpanningTree-0.01-2.fc14.noarch.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
[/] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[/] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[/] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Language specific
items
[!] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines.
[/] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
License type: GPL+ or Artistic 2.0
[/] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
Email from copyright holder included
[/] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[/] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
$ md5sum SOURCES/NetPacket-SpanningTree-0.01.tar.gz
bd657ce34022611b22f1882413a74184 SOURCES/NetPacket-SpanningTree-0.01.tar.gz
$md5sum ~/Download/NetPacket-SpanningTree-0.01.tar.gz
bd657ce34022611b22f1882413a74184
/home/rlandmann/Download/NetPacket-SpanningTree-0.01.tar.gz
[/] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported architecture.
Tested: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2935377
[/] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch
[/] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[-] The spec file handles locales properly (with the %find_lang macro)
[-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[/] Package does not bundle copies of system libraries
[/] Package is not relocatable.
[/] Package must own all directories that it creates.
[/] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[/] Permissions on files are set properly
[/] %files section includes a %defattr(...) line
[/] Package consistently uses macros.
[-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[/] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Static libraries in -static subpackage, if present.
[-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] -devel packages require base package with full versioning.
[/] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la).
[-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
application.
[/] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[/] Filenames are valid UTF-8
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 688867] Review Request: bharati-m17n - An Input Method based on InScript layout
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688867 sandeep shedmake changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from sandeep shedmake 2011-03-23 02:18:51 EDT --- Thanks for the review. New Package SCM Request === Package Name: bharati-m17n Short Description: An Input Method based on InScript layout Owners: sandeeps Branches: f14, f15, devel InitialCC: i18n-team -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 688786] Review Request: perl-NTLM - perl module for NTLM authentication
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688786 Ruediger Landmann changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(nb@fedoraproject. ||org) --- Comment #6 from Ruediger Landmann 2011-03-23 01:56:10 EDT --- Sorry Nick; I've done a bit more digging and conclude that I've been a bit too paranoid here. It turns out, however, that although you don't need to explicitly Require perl(Digest::HMAC_MD5), you *do* need to BR: it. If you fix that, I'm happy to approve the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 690038] New: Review Request: ompl - The Open Motion Planning Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ompl - The Open Motion Planning Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690038 Summary: Review Request: ompl - The Open Motion Planning Library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: richmat...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://rmattes.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/ompl/ompl.spec SRPM URL: http://rmattes.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/ompl/ompl-0.9.2-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: The Open Motion Planning Library (OMPL) consists of many state-of-the-art sampling-based motion planning algorithms. OMPL itself does not contain any code related to, e.g., collision checking or visualization. This is a deliberate design choice, so that OMPL is not tied to a particular collision checker or visualization front end. Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2935340 rpmlint: $ rpmlint ompl.spec ../RPMS/x86_64/ompl* ompl.x86_64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libompl.so libompl.so 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. Upstream doesn't include a soversion. It looks like they recently removed it (going from 0.9.1 to 0.9.2,) I will ask why. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674008] Review Request: openrave - Open Robotics Automation Virtual Environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674008 --- Comment #30 from Rosen Diankov 2011-03-23 01:19:21 EDT --- hi tim, Ok, i added the crlibm check back in (r2188). You should also be able to set the path openravepy installs in by setting OPENRAVEPY_INSTALL_DIR via the command line. As for sympy, the biggest problem I reported is Issue 2081: http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?can=2&q=2081&colspec=ID%20Type%20Status%20Priority%20Milestone%20Owner%20Summary%20Stars&id=2081 Basically, it is possible for sympy to give you wrong equations, which would make the openrave ikfast solver return wrong solutions. They are still wondering how to fix it so that everyone's happy. We're looking at the problem from two different angles here: I need to make openrave 100% reliable, you need to reduce unnecessary dependencies so management is easier. I committed a temporary compromise (r2189): If you limit openrave to only sympy 0.6.7, I might have come up with a workaround where you don't have to install a local sympy (ie executing ikfast will replace the wrong function in memory). We can probably support more sympy versions, but they will require IK to be re-tested. There'a an openrave testing server now, so this might be possible in the future: http://www.openrave.org/testing/job/openrave/ If you ever decide to update the sympy version in fedora core, please email me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 684112] Review Request: hindi-typing-booster - Hindi Typing Booster Table IMEngine for ibus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=684112 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||hindi-typing-booster-0.0.1- ||1.fc15 Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675478] Review Request: gprbuild - Ada project builder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675478 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||gprbuild-2010-7.fc15 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 684112] Review Request: hindi-typing-booster - Hindi Typing Booster Table IMEngine for ibus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=684112 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2011-03-23 01:06:09 EDT --- hindi-typing-booster-0.0.1-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675478] Review Request: gprbuild - Ada project builder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675478 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2011-03-23 01:06:23 EDT --- gprbuild-2010-7.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683725] Review Request: marathi-typing-booster - Marathi Typing Booster Table IMEngine for ibus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683725 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||marathi-typing-booster-0.0. ||1-1.fc15 Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 688264] Review Request: perl-Test-CPAN-Meta-YAML - Validate a META.yml file within a CPAN distribution
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688264 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2011-03-23 01:03:43 EDT --- perl-Test-CPAN-Meta-YAML-0.17-2.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683725] Review Request: marathi-typing-booster - Marathi Typing Booster Table IMEngine for ibus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683725 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2011-03-23 01:02:41 EDT --- marathi-typing-booster-0.0.1-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 684915] Review Request: php-pecl-igbinary - Replacement for the standard PHP serializer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=684915 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||php-pecl-igbinary-1.1.1-1.f ||c15 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-03-23 00:58:23 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 684915] Review Request: php-pecl-igbinary - Replacement for the standard PHP serializer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=684915 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2011-03-23 00:58:18 EDT --- php-pecl-igbinary-1.1.1-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 676308] Review Request: rubygem-net-scp - A pure Ruby implementation of the SCP client protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676308 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2011-03-23 00:44:33 EDT --- rubygem-net-scp-1.0.4-2.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673030] Review Request: perl-Locale-US - Two letter codes for state identification in the United States and vice versa
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673030 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2011-03-23 00:44:38 EDT --- perl-Locale-US-1.2-2.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 688659] Review Request: thunarx-python - Python bindings for the Thunar Extension Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688659 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2011-03-23 00:44:25 EDT --- thunarx-python-0.2.3-3.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 682353] Review Request: wmtop - Mini graphical version of the CPU monitoring utility top
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682353 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2011-03-23 00:44:54 EDT --- wmtop-0.84-3.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 669726] Review Request: rubygem-escape - HTML/URI/shell escaping utilities
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=669726 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2011-03-23 00:45:05 EDT --- rubygem-escape-0.0.4-2.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 690026] New: Review Request: libfreenect - Open device driver for the Kinect
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libfreenect - Open device driver for the Kinect https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690026 Summary: Review Request: libfreenect - Open device driver for the Kinect Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: richmat...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://rmattes.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/libfreenect/libfreenect.spec SRPM URL: http://rmattes.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/libfreenect/libfreenect-0-0.1.687b2da5git.fc15.src.rpm Description: libfreenect is a free and open source library that provides access to the Kinect device. Currently, the library supports the RGB webcam, the depth image, the LED, and the tilt motor. Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2935127 Rpmlint: $ rpmlint libfreenect.spec ../RPMS/x86_64/libfreenect* libfreenect.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: libfreenect-687b2da5.tar.bz2 - OK, taken from a git snapshot libfreenect.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US webcam -> web cam, web-cam, became - OK, "webcam" is a common spelling libfreenect.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary freenect-glview libfreenect.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary freenect-glpclview libfreenect.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary freenect-tiltdemo libfreenect.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary freenect-hiview libfreenect.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary freenect-cppview - OK, project does not provide manpages libfreenect-python.x86_64: W: private-shared-object-provides /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/freenect.so freenect.so()(64bit) - I think this is OK, it's part of the python bindings libfreenect-python.x86_64: W: no-documentation libfreenect-static.x86_64: W: no-documentation - Both depend on packages with documentation 5 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 10 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 690025] New: Review Request: cminpack - Solver for nonlinear equations and nonlinear least squares problems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: cminpack - Solver for nonlinear equations and nonlinear least squares problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690025 Summary: Review Request: cminpack - Solver for nonlinear equations and nonlinear least squares problems Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: richmat...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://rmattes.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/cminpack/cminpack.spec SRPM URL: http://rmattes.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/cminpack/cminpack-1.1.3-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: cminpack is an ISO C99 implementation of the FORTRAN Minpack solver package. It is fully re-entrant and thread-safe. Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2935119 Rpmlint: $ rpmlint cminpack.spec ../RPMS/x86_64/cminpack* 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 635511] Review Request: assimp - Library to import various 3D model formats into applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=635511 --- Comment #30 from Rich Mattes 2011-03-23 00:02:17 EDT --- I've emailed the assimp upstream about possibly changing the names of their internal functions (applying spot's assimp patch) so that we can more easily build against the external irrXML. The thread should show up soon at https://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=assimp-discussions -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 670127] Review Request: the-board - A space for placing daily records in your GNOME desktop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670127 Peter Robinson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dw...@infradead.org, ||pbrobin...@gmail.com Component|Package Review |0x -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 678855] Review Request: rpyc - A Transparent, Symmetrical Python Library for Distributed-Computing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678855 --- Comment #3 from David Lutterkort 2011-03-22 20:50:47 EDT --- APPROVED Please follow http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_SCM_admin_requests#New_Packages and import the package. Close this bug as RAWHIDE once it's been successfully imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 573917] Review Request: perl-NetPacket-SpanningTree - Assemble and disassemble IEEE 802.1D Spanning Tree protocol packets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573917 --- Comment #10 from Ruediger Landmann 2011-03-22 19:23:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > I was watching that discussion, however my understanding is that if upstream > does not supply it, I will be liable if I will add license text and it will be > not that one under which upstream released that package. The risk here is including the *wrong* license text.[0] Which is why it's so important to show upstream the license text that you intend to include in the package, obtain their consent to add that text, and include that consent (with its headers) in the package itself. > From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines (and similar > text in reviewguidelines): > If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its > own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the > package > must be included in %doc. If the source package does not include the text of > the license(s), the packager should contact upstream and encourage them to > correct this mistake. > > Therefore I don't see any "must" requirement to include copy of GPL by myself > if upstream decide that they will not bundle it with tarball. There is no "must" here: if upstream does not want to (or cannot) include it in the tarball, the advice on legal list suggests that we could probably ship the package safely and rely on the copy of the GPL provided with Perl itself. However, best practice (as discussed in that thread) is to include a copy of the GPL with GPL-licensed packages that we ship. In a best case, this is included by upstream itself; less good is to include the license text with the explicit consent of upstream; even less good is to ship without the license text. Because it's not a "must", I will not block the review on this point, but I would strongly prefer it if you asked upstream if you can include a copy of the license if he cannot or will not. He seems to be responsive and friendly -- there's nothing to lose here. If you respond here and tell me that you refuse to ask upstream about this, I will note that in the same legal list thread (just for the purpose of any future reference) and I will continue the review as normal. Sorry to be a pain -- I just think we should always aim high! :) Cheers Rudi [0] 'Now, the reason we simply do not have a policy that says "When a copy of the license text is missing, you must add it" is because there is the possibility that you, the Fedora packager, gets the license wrong, and by including a copy of the incorrect license text, put yourself at potential legal risk when the copyright holder claims you're distributing their software under terms they never gave you permission to use.' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 554101] Review Request: surf - Simple web browser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554101 Christoph Wickert changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|INSUFFICIENT_DATA | Flag||needinfo?(cassmodiah@fedora ||project.org) --- Comment #30 from Christoph Wickert 2011-03-22 18:49:44 EDT --- The package has not been renamed and re-reviewed yet. Simon, please rename the package and submit a new review. Post the bug number here, clear the NEEDINFO flag and close this bug again. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 625592] Review Request: PyCAM -Open Source CAM - Toolpath Generation for 3-Axis CNC machining
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625592 Dominic Hopf changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(fabian.kanngiesse ||r...@yahoo.de) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 635511] Review Request: assimp - Library to import various 3D model formats into applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=635511 --- Comment #29 from Tim Niemueller 2011-03-22 18:49:33 EDT --- I'd vote for speeding this up by including the patches in the Fedora packages until they are upstreamed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 554101] Review Request: surf - Simple web browser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554101 Dominic Hopf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||INSUFFICIENT_DATA Flag|needinfo?(cassmodiah@fedora | |project.org)| Last Closed|2010-01-19 14:44:00 |2011-03-22 18:28:28 --- Comment #29 from Dominic Hopf 2011-03-22 18:28:28 EDT --- The bug is NEEDINFO since 2010-12-11 18:11:09 EST (see history of this bug). I think it is valid to close the issue. Feel free to reopen in case of any concerns. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 573917] Review Request: perl-NetPacket-SpanningTree - Assemble and disassemble IEEE 802.1D Spanning Tree protocol packets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573917 --- Comment #9 from Ruediger Landmann 2011-03-22 18:20:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Legally, it's questionable, because a Fedora packager added license file isn't > legally binding to upstream (only upstream can do this). Right -- which is why we need to seek upstream's consent to add the file (or, better, ask them to do it themselves for us). > > From the email, it sounds like it's unlikely that upstream will generate a > > new > > tarball for us, so instead could you please contact them again and: > > > > * attach a copy of the GPLv1 (not any other version) to the email > Are you sure? This GPLv1 is dead for more than a decade. I was initially surprised by this too; but Spot's rationale makes sense to me: "(yes, the GPLv1, not a later version, because the perl licensing they granted is GPLv1 or later. If upstream adds a copy of GPLv2 or GPLv3, that is sufficient for us to distribute to meet this technicality, but if we're going to do it, we're going to do it right.)"[0] [0] http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/legal/2011-March/001584.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 539693] Review Request: plowshare - command-line downloader/uploader for some of the most popular file-sharing websites
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539693 --- Comment #37 from Fedora Update System 2011-03-22 18:17:45 EDT --- plowshare-0.9.4-0.5.svn1391.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/plowshare-0.9.4-0.5.svn1391.el6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 539693] Review Request: plowshare - command-line downloader/uploader for some of the most popular file-sharing websites
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539693 --- Comment #36 from Fedora Update System 2011-03-22 18:01:40 EDT --- plowshare-0.9.4-0.5.svn1391.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/plowshare-0.9.4-0.5.svn1391.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 539693] Review Request: plowshare - command-line downloader/uploader for some of the most popular file-sharing websites
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539693 --- Comment #35 from Fedora Update System 2011-03-22 17:51:36 EDT --- plowshare-0.9.4-0.5.svn1391.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/plowshare-0.9.4-0.5.svn1391.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 539693] Review Request: plowshare - command-line downloader/uploader for some of the most popular file-sharing websites
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539693 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 539693] Review Request: plowshare - command-line downloader/uploader for some of the most popular file-sharing websites
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539693 --- Comment #34 from Fedora Update System 2011-03-22 17:46:06 EDT --- plowshare-0.9.4-0.5.svn1391.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/plowshare-0.9.4-0.5.svn1391.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 689629] Review Request: gnome-tweak-tool - A tool for advanced GNOME 3 customization
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689629 --- Comment #11 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-03-22 17:43:45 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 689629] Review Request: gnome-tweak-tool - A tool for advanced GNOME 3 customization
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689629 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2011-03-22 17:38:44 EDT --- Thanks to all the reviewers for their inputs. New Package SCM Request === Package Name: gnome-tweak-tool Short Description: A tool for advanced GNOME 3 customization Owners: salimma Branches: F-15 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 689961] New: Review Request: lego-udevrules - Provide access to LEGO robots and controller boards
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: lego-udevrules - Provide access to LEGO robots and controller boards https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689961 Summary: Review Request: lego-udevrules - Provide access to LEGO robots and controller boards Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mar...@laptop.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://dev.laptop.org/git/packages/robots-udevrules/tree/ SRPM URL: http://dev.laptop.org/~martin/public_rpms/lego-udevrules-1.0-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: udev rules granting access to LEGO NXT and WeDo robots. This trivial package will allow the existing nxt_python and nbc packages coexist. OLPC's current efforts will probably bring about a few more packages that control the same robots/boards. I am working at the same time on revisions to nbc (with its maintainer) and I am current maintainer of nxt_python. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 688408] Review Request: xfce4-cpufreq-plugin - CPU frequency scaling plugin for the Xfce4 panel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688408 --- Comment #14 from Christoph Wickert 2011-03-22 16:46:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > (In reply to comment #12) > > * The plugin does not work with Fedora's default setup. Scaling is only > > allowed > > for root or through PolicyKit, but the plugin doesn't support the latter. > > How > > did you make the plugin work? > > I missed that, I will work with upstream to add polkit support ASAP. Thanks, but does the plugin work for you? I tried it and it didn't and as long as it does not work, it shouldn't be in the repo. > > * There usually is no need for changing frequencies or the governor, > > ondemand > > will handle this best. > > I don't agree, under certain conditions I want to force the cpu to use a > certain frequency to keep my laptop cool. I don't disagree, but we were told so by the kernel and power management people. > > Some notes on the package: > > 1) The description is formatted a little strange > > Define "strange". The indented lines look strange, better use * as bullets or markdown (will give you proper bullet points in packagekit) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 682353] Review Request: wmtop - Mini graphical version of the CPU monitoring utility top
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682353 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2011-03-22 16:42:09 EDT --- wmtop-0.84-3.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/wmtop-0.84-3.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 682353] Review Request: wmtop - Mini graphical version of the CPU monitoring utility top
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682353 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 682353] Review Request: wmtop - Mini graphical version of the CPU monitoring utility top
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682353 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2011-03-22 16:42:18 EDT --- wmtop-0.84-3.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/wmtop-0.84-3.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 627637] Review Request: qroneko - A front end of crontab application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=627637 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|qroneko-0.5.4-4.fc15|qroneko-0.5.4-4.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 627637] Review Request: qroneko - A front end of crontab application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=627637 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2011-03-22 14:55:22 EDT --- qroneko-0.5.4-4.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 573910] Review Request: dcmtk - Offis DICOM Toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573910 --- Comment #29 from Per Inge Mathisen 2011-03-22 14:33:34 EDT --- Now it works fine here, as well. Great work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674188] Review Request: libzeitgeist - Library to access zeitgeist; needed by synapse
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674188
--- Comment #24 from Mamoru Tasaka 2011-03-22
13:54:19 EDT ---
By the way for 0.3.6-1:
* BR
- Why is ruby-gio2-devel listed as BR?
(In reply to comment #21)
> (In reply to comment #20)
> > - And it is very likely that "Requires: zeitgeist" should be
> > %{_isa} specific.
>
> I think not; since zeitgeist is .noarch ;)
Ah, thank you.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 597307] Review Request: fastx_toolkit - Tools to process short-reads FASTA/FASTQ files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597307 --- Comment #18 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-03-22 13:51:58 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 573910] Review Request: dcmtk - Offis DICOM Toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573910 --- Comment #28 from Mario Ceresa 2011-03-22 13:47:09 EDT --- Ok let's try again: http://mrceresa.fedorapeople.org/dcmtk-3.6.0-3.fc14.src.rpm http://mrceresa.fedorapeople.org/dcmtk.spec Added cmake br. I don't understand why it doesn't find the man pages: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=2933305&name=build.log In my workstation compiles and installs just fine... *puzzled* Best Mario -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 597307] Review Request: fastx_toolkit - Tools to process short-reads FASTA/FASTQ files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597307 Adam Huffman changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #17 from Adam Huffman 2011-03-22 13:30:00 EDT --- Many thanks for the review - I've made that last change in -4 New Package SCM Request === Package Name: fastx_toolkit Short Description: Tools to process short-reads FASTA/FASTQ files Owners: verdurin Branches: f14 f15 el5 el6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 635511] Review Request: assimp - Library to import various 3D model formats into applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=635511 --- Comment #28 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2011-03-22 13:25:11 EDT --- I'm working with the irrlicht upstream to merge the fast_atof improvements that assimp needs. They're on board in principle, but they didn't like some of the function naming (the original patch changed the existing function strtol10 from returning a signed int to an unsigned int), so I reworked the code so that strtol10 returns a signed int, and there are new "u" functions (e.g. strtoul10) that return the unsigned ints. I had to patch assimp for the new names, here's that patch: http://spot.fedorapeople.org/assimp-2.0.863-new-fastatof-typenames.patch For reference, the irrlicht patch is here: http://spot.fedorapeople.org/irrlicht-1.7.2-fastatof-improvements-typefixes.patch I've done test compiles with both patches in play, and things look good. Now, we just need more feedback from irrlicht upstream as to whether they will take this change or not. I'm happy to carry the irrlicht patch in the short term. It would probably be a good idea to let assimp know about this, and get their feedback on the name changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 689870] New: Review Request: tabix - Generic indexer for TAB-delimited genome position files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: tabix - Generic indexer for TAB-delimited genome position files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689870 Summary: Review Request: tabix - Generic indexer for TAB-delimited genome position files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bl...@verdurin.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://verdurin.fedorapeople.org/reviews/tabix/tabix.spec SRPM URL: http://verdurin.fedorapeople.org/reviews/tabix/tabix-0.2.3-1.fc16.src.rpm Description: Tabix indexes a TAB-delimited genome position file in.tab.bgz and creates an index file in.tab.bgz.tbi when region is absent from the command-line. The input data file must be position sorted and compressed by bgzip which has a gzip(1) like interface. After indexing, tabix is able to quickly retrieve data lines overlapping regions specified in the format "chr:beginPos-endPos". Fast data retrieval also works over network if URI is given as a file name and in this case the index file will be downloaded if it is not present locally. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 688659] Review Request: thunarx-python - Python bindings for the Thunar Extension Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688659 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2011-03-22 13:11:14 EDT --- thunarx-python-0.2.3-3.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/thunarx-python-0.2.3-3.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 597307] Review Request: fastx_toolkit - Tools to process short-reads FASTA/FASTQ files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597307
Jussi Lehtola changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #16 from Jussi Lehtola 2011-03-22 13:07:59
EDT ---
You're missing ownership of
%{_datadir}/%{name}
It should be owned by -galaxy. Otherwise things should be fine.
Please fix the ownership before git import; what you need to do is change
%{_datadir}/%{name}/galaxy/
to
%{_datadir}/%{name}/
in -galaxy.
This package has been
APPROVED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673030] Review Request: perl-Locale-US - Two letter codes for state identification in the United States and vice versa
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673030 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2011-03-22 12:57:19 EDT --- perl-Locale-US-1.2-2.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Locale-US-1.2-2.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673030] Review Request: perl-Locale-US - Two letter codes for state identification in the United States and vice versa
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673030 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2011-03-22 12:57:11 EDT --- perl-Locale-US-1.2-2.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Locale-US-1.2-2.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673030] Review Request: perl-Locale-US - Two letter codes for state identification in the United States and vice versa
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673030 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2011-03-22 12:57:26 EDT --- perl-Locale-US-1.2-2.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Locale-US-1.2-2.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673030] Review Request: perl-Locale-US - Two letter codes for state identification in the United States and vice versa
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673030 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674188] Review Request: libzeitgeist - Library to access zeitgeist; needed by synapse
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674188 --- Comment #22 from Mamoru Tasaka 2011-03-22 12:42:32 EDT --- Created attachment 486845 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=486845 gdb log for test-log failure I appreciate if you would post the correct srpm URL :) By the way for test failure on test-log, gdb log is attached -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674188] Review Request: libzeitgeist - Library to access zeitgeist; needed by synapse
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674188 --- Comment #23 from Mamoru Tasaka 2011-03-22 12:44:00 EDT --- Created attachment 486846 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=486846 Workaround patch And the workaround patch Build result on koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2933142 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 688659] Review Request: thunarx-python - Python bindings for the Thunar Extension Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688659 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2011-03-22 12:42:29 EDT --- thunarx-python-0.2.3-3.fc14.1 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/thunarx-python-0.2.3-3.fc14.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683463] Review Request: trafficserver - Apache Traffic Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683463 --- Comment #6 from Zhao Yongming 2011-03-22 12:42:54 EDT --- Bump to v2.1.7, uploaded in http://yum.zymlinux.net/trafficserver/rpm/2.1.7-1/ http://yum.zymlinux.net/trafficserver/rpm/2.1.7-1/trafficserver.spec http://yum.zymlinux.net/trafficserver/rpm/2.1.7-1/trafficserver-2.1.7-1.fc16.src.rpm http://yum.zymlinux.net/trafficserver/rpm/2.1.7-1/trafficserver-2.1.7-1.fc16.x86_64.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 688659] Review Request: thunarx-python - Python bindings for the Thunar Extension Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688659 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674207] Review Request: python-cloudfiles - Python language bindings for Rackspace CloudFiles API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674207 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2011-03-22 12:30:55 EDT --- python-cloudfiles-1.7.8-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 220217] Review Request: perl-Test-Spelling - Check for spelling errors in POD files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220217 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2011-03-22 12:31:12 EDT --- perl-Test-Spelling-0.11-1.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674207] Review Request: python-cloudfiles - Python language bindings for Rackspace CloudFiles API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674207 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|python-cloudfiles-1.7.8-1.e |python-cloudfiles-1.7.8-1.e |l5 |l6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674207] Review Request: python-cloudfiles - Python language bindings for Rackspace CloudFiles API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674207 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|python-cloudfiles-1.7.8-1.f |python-cloudfiles-1.7.8-1.e |c14 |l5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674207] Review Request: python-cloudfiles - Python language bindings for Rackspace CloudFiles API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674207 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2011-03-22 12:32:12 EDT --- python-cloudfiles-1.7.8-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 166065] Review Request: perl-Exception-Class
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=166065 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2011-03-22 12:31:23 EDT --- perl-Exception-Class-1.23-2.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 688408] Review Request: xfce4-cpufreq-plugin - CPU frequency scaling plugin for the Xfce4 panel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688408 --- Comment #13 from Hicham HAOUARI 2011-03-22 12:14:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > Too bad I wasn't aware of this review. Next time you package something for > Xfce, please ping the Xfce SIG. Right, I talked to nirik before submitting it. > > I packaged this plugin earlier, but we agreed to not include it in Fedora for > several reasons: > * Usually the power managers take care of scaling the CPU frequency. Right > * The plugin does not work with Fedora's default setup. Scaling is only > allowed > for root or through PolicyKit, but the plugin doesn't support the latter. How > did you make the plugin work? I missed that, I will work with upstream to add polkit support ASAP. > * There usually is no need for changing frequencies or the governor, ondemand > will handle this best. I don't agree, under certain conditions I want to force the cpu to use a certain frequency to keep my laptop cool. > > Some notes on the package: > 1) The description is formatted a little strange Define "strange". > 2) "Requires: hicolor-icon-theme" is not needed because the plugin requires > gtk2 which already has a dependency to hicolor-icon-theme. Right > 3) The Requires for xfce4-panel should be versioned and the version should be > adjusted for the different Fedora releases. A plugin built for Xfce4-panel > xfce4-panel 4.8 will not work with 4.6 or 4.4, even though the srpm is the > same. I will work on that Thanks Christoph for helping with this review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 688408] Review Request: xfce4-cpufreq-plugin - CPU frequency scaling plugin for the Xfce4 panel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688408 Christoph Wickert changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cwick...@fedoraproject.org --- Comment #12 from Christoph Wickert 2011-03-22 11:59:10 EDT --- Too bad I wasn't aware of this review. Next time you package something for Xfce, please ping the Xfce SIG. I packaged this plugin earlier, but we agreed to not include it in Fedora for several reasons: * Usually the power managers take care of scaling the CPU frequency. * The plugin does not work with Fedora's default setup. Scaling is only allowed for root or through PolicyKit, but the plugin doesn't support the latter. How did you make the plugin work? * There usually is no need for changing frequencies or the governor, ondemand will handle this best. Some notes on the package: 1) The description is formatted a little strange 2) "Requires: hicolor-icon-theme" is not needed because the plugin requires gtk2 which already has a dependency to hicolor-icon-theme. 3) The Requires for xfce4-panel should be versioned and the version should be adjusted for the different Fedora releases. A plugin built for Xfce4-panel xfce4-panel 4.8 will not work with 4.6 or 4.4, even though the srpm is the same. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 537640] Review Request: pdfmod - A simple application for modifying PDF documents
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537640 --- Comment #20 from Claudio Rodrigo Pereyra DIaz 2011-03-22 11:33:31 EDT --- Update the .spec and .srpm files for the latest upstream version Spec URL: http://elsupergomez.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/pdfmod.spec SRPM URL: http://elsupergomez.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/pdfmod-0.9.1-1.fc14.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673116] Review Request: perl-Test-Perl-Critic-Progressive - Gradually enforce coding standards
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673116 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Test-Perl-Critic-Progr ||essive-0.03-1.fc16 Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2011-03-22 10:52:52 --- Comment #6 from Petr Pisar 2011-03-22 10:52:52 EDT --- Thank you for the review and the repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 689815] New: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Role-TraitConstructor - Wrapper for new that can accept a traits parameter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Role-TraitConstructor - Wrapper for new that can accept a traits parameter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689815 Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Role-TraitConstructor - Wrapper for new that can accept a traits parameter Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmasl...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SRPM: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-MooseX-Role-TraitConstructor-0.01-1.fc14.src.rpm SPEC: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-MooseX-Role-TraitConstructor.spec Description: This role allows you to easily accept a traits argument (or another name) into your constructor, which will easily mix roles into an anonymous class before construction, much like Moose::Meta::Attribute does. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 689629] Review Request: gnome-tweak-tool - A tool for advanced GNOME 3 customization
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689629 Cristian Ciupitu changed: What|Removed |Added Hours Worked||1 Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Cristian Ciupitu 2011-03-22 10:15:15 EDT --- I declare this package approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 689629] Review Request: gnome-tweak-tool - A tool for advanced GNOME 3 customization
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689629 Mohamed El Morabity changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pikachu.2...@gmail.com --- Comment #8 from Mohamed El Morabity 2011-03-22 10:12:27 EDT --- Works very fine here too :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 689629] Review Request: gnome-tweak-tool - A tool for advanced GNOME 3 customization
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689629 Tomasz Torcz changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zdzi...@irc.pl --- Comment #7 from Tomasz Torcz 2011-03-22 10:11:42 EDT --- gnome-tweak-tool-2.91.92-3.fc15.noarch.rpm works fine. After installation, it is available in GNOME-Shell application list, can be run, settings can be changed and take effect. Great work! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 678924] Review Request: perl-Math-Random-ISAAC-XS - C implementation of the ISAAC PRNG algorithm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678924 --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-03-22 09:56:08 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607405] Review Request: poppler-sharp - C Sharp Bindings for Poppler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607405 --- Comment #5 from Claudio Rodrigo Pereyra DIaz 2011-03-22 09:57:35 EDT --- Translate summary and description to spanish Spec URL: http://elsupergomez.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/poppler-sharp.spec SRPM URL: http://elsupergomez.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/poppler-sharp-0.0.1-3.fc14.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 689629] Review Request: gnome-tweak-tool - A tool for advanced GNOME 3 customization
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689629
--- Comment #6 from Cristian Ciupitu 2011-03-22
10:09:05 EDT ---
Review for the latest release:
-
http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/gnome/gnome-tweak-tool-2.91.92-3.fc15.src.rpm
- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2932379
· MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet
the Licensing Guidelines .
OK
· MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license. ^[3]
OK
· MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package must be included in %doc.^[4]
OK
· MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop
file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the
%install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need
a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation.
^[22]
OK
===
I still can not test the package because I can not run GNOME3 on my hardware,
but as soon as someone else tests it, I will approve this package.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673030] Review Request: perl-Locale-US - Two letter codes for state identification in the United States and vice versa
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673030 --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-03-22 09:45:38 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673116] Review Request: perl-Test-Perl-Critic-Progressive - Gradually enforce coding standards
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673116 --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-03-22 09:46:06 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 689797] New: Review Request: perl-Task-Kensho-Toolchain - Task::Kensho::Toolchain Perl module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Task-Kensho-Toolchain - Task::Kensho::Toolchain Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689797 Summary: Review Request: perl-Task-Kensho-Toolchain - Task::Kensho::Toolchain Perl module Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmasl...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SRPM: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Task-Kensho-Toolchain-0.27-1.fc14.src.rpm SPEC: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Task-Kensho-Toolchain.spec Description: Kenshō (見性) (C. Wu) is a Japanese term for enlightenment experiences—most commonly used within the confines of Zen Buddhism—literally meaning "seeing one's nature"[1] or "true self."[2] It generally "refers to the realization of nonduality of subject and object."[3] Task::Kensho is a first cut at building a list of recommended modules for Enlightened Perl development. CPAN is wonderful, but there are too many wheels and you have to pick and choose amongst the various competing technologies. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607405] Review Request: poppler-sharp - C Sharp Bindings for Poppler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607405 --- Comment #4 from Claudio Rodrigo Pereyra DIaz 2011-03-22 09:31:08 EDT --- Translate summary and description to spanish Spec URL: http://elsupergomez.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/poppler-sharp.spec SRPM URL: http://elsupergomez.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/poppler-sharp-0.0.1-3.fc14.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 573910] Review Request: dcmtk - Offis DICOM Toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573910 --- Comment #27 from Peter Lemenkov 2011-03-22 08:59:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #26) > It is great to see activity on this again! I tried building the src rpm on > Fedora 13, and that worked, but on install I got this: > > bash-4.1# rpm -Uvh rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/dcmtk-3.6.0-2.fc13.x86_64.rpm > error: Failed dependencies: > libdcmdsig.so()(64bit) is needed by dcmtk-3.6.0-2.fc13.x86_64 > libijg12.so()(64bit) is needed by dcmtk-3.6.0-2.fc13.x86_64 > libijg16.so()(64bit) is needed by dcmtk-3.6.0-2.fc13.x86_64 > libijg8.so()(64bit) is needed by dcmtk-3.6.0-2.fc13.x86_64 > liblibi2d.so()(64bit) is needed by dcmtk-3.6.0-2.fc13.x86_64 > > Not sure why. They were moved by mistake to -devel subpackage because they don't have a versioned suffix (as other libraries). This is an issue and must be fixed. Mario, you forgot to add cmake to the buildrequires and I commented out man-pages from %files in order to build it. See koji build-log: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2931897 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673116] Review Request: perl-Test-Perl-Critic-Progressive - Gradually enforce coding standards
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673116 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Petr Pisar 2011-03-22 08:48:13 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: perl-Test-Perl-Critic-Progressive Short Description: Gradually enforce coding standards Owners: ppisar mmaslano psabata Branches: InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 495563] Review Request: febootstrap - Bootstrap a new Fedora system (like debootstrap)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495563 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What|Removed |Added Alias|febootstrap | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 598511] Review Request: libgtextutils - Assaf Gordon text utilities
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598511 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2011-03-22 08:23:29 EDT --- libgtextutils-0.6-5.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libgtextutils-0.6-5.el6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 598511] Review Request: libgtextutils - Assaf Gordon text utilities
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598511 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2011-03-22 08:24:16 EDT --- libgtextutils-0.6-5.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libgtextutils-0.6-5.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 676308] Review Request: rubygem-net-scp - A pure Ruby implementation of the SCP client protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676308 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2011-03-22 08:16:39 EDT --- rubygem-net-scp-1.0.4-2.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-net-scp-1.0.4-2.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 676308] Review Request: rubygem-net-scp - A pure Ruby implementation of the SCP client protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676308 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 598511] Review Request: libgtextutils - Assaf Gordon text utilities
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598511 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2011-03-22 08:07:12 EDT --- libgtextutils-0.6-5.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libgtextutils-0.6-5.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 598511] Review Request: libgtextutils - Assaf Gordon text utilities
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598511 Adam Huffman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-03-22 08:03:27 --- Comment #15 from Adam Huffman 2011-03-22 08:03:27 EDT --- Forgot to build this before now - closing. Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 597307] Review Request: fastx_toolkit - Tools to process short-reads FASTA/FASTQ files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597307 Bug 597307 depends on bug 598511, which changed state. Bug 598511 Summary: Review Request: libgtextutils - Assaf Gordon text utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598511 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 689432] Review Request: collada-dom - COLLADA Document Object Model Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689432 Peter Lemenkov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||lemen...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|lemen...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov 2011-03-22 07:54:04 EDT --- I'll review it -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 597307] Review Request: fastx_toolkit - Tools to process short-reads FASTA/FASTQ files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597307 --- Comment #15 from Jussi Lehtola 2011-03-22 07:45:27 EDT --- Crap, I had forgotten all about this review. Taking a look shortly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 597307] Review Request: fastx_toolkit - Tools to process short-reads FASTA/FASTQ files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597307 --- Comment #14 from Adam Huffman 2011-03-22 07:32:49 EDT --- Jussi, Have you had a change to look at the latest version? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 637402] Review Request: sqlninja - A tool for SQL server injection and takeover
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=637402 --- Comment #17 from Hicham HAOUARI 2011-03-22 07:27:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > (In reply to comment #15) > > @Arun, > > > > The software would be still useful without the binaries ? > > Yes! The software supports multiple modes, one of the mode is upload mode. > Binaries are required for only upload mode. If the user wants to use upload > mode, he can manually download these binaries. > > Also please look into the scripts directory, the files under the scripts > directory qualify as a binary? Of course not. I am not sure if the tarball needs to be cleaned up from the binaries though, I will look more into that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 637402] Review Request: sqlninja - A tool for SQL server injection and takeover
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=637402 Hicham HAOUARI changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 669726] Review Request: rubygem-escape - HTML/URI/shell escaping utilities
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=669726 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2011-03-22 07:22:14 EDT --- rubygem-escape-0.0.4-2.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-escape-0.0.4-2.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
