[Bug 678195] Review Request: perl-MooseX-OneArgNew - Teach -new to accept single, non-hashref arguments
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678195 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-04-02 01:56:51 EDT --- perl-MooseX-OneArgNew-0.001-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675649] Review Request: perl-Log-Any-Adapter-Dispatch - Log::Any::Adapter::Dispatch Perl module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675649 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Log-Any-Adapter-Dispat ||ch-0.06-1.fc15 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-04-02 01:59:45 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675649] Review Request: perl-Log-Any-Adapter-Dispatch - Log::Any::Adapter::Dispatch Perl module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675649 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-04-02 01:59:40 EDT --- perl-Log-Any-Adapter-Dispatch-0.06-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 560894] Review Request: perl-Pod-Coverage-TrustPod - Allow a module's pod to contain Pod::Coverage hints
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=560894 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-04-02 02:09:05 EDT --- perl-Pod-Coverage-TrustPod-0.092830-4.el4 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 4. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Pod-Coverage-TrustPod-0.092830-4.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 693034] New: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Aliases - Easy aliasing of methods and attributes in Moose
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Aliases - Easy aliasing of methods and attributes in Moose Alias: perl-MooseX-Aliases https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693034 Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Aliases - Easy aliasing of methods and attributes in Moose Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/MooseX-Aliases/ OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarn...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-MooseX-Aliases.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-MooseX-Aliases-0.09-1.fc16.src.rpm Description: The MooseX::Aliases module will allow you to quickly alias methods in Moose. It provides an alias parameter for has() to generate aliased accessors as well as the standard ones. Attributes can also be initialized in the constructor via their aliased names. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2968055 *rt-0.10_01 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 693037] New: Review Request: perl-Test-HasVersion - Check Perl modules have version numbers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-HasVersion - Check Perl modules have version numbers Alias: perl-Test-HasVersion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693037 Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-HasVersion - Check Perl modules have version numbers Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Test-HasVersion/ OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarn...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Test-HasVersion.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Test-HasVersion-0.012-1.fc16.src.rpm Description: Do you wanna check that every one of your Perl modules in a distribution has a version number? You wanna make sure you don't forget the brand new modules you just added? Well, that's the module you have been looking for. Use it! Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2968073 *rt-0.10_01 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 693042] New: Review Request: perl-MooseX-ChainedAccessors - Accessor class for chained accessors with Moose
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-ChainedAccessors - Accessor class for chained accessors with Moose https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693042 Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-ChainedAccessors - Accessor class for chained accessors with Moose Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/MooseX-ChainedAccessors/ OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarn...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-MooseX-ChainedAccessors.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-MooseX-ChainedAccessors-0.02-1.fc16.src.rpm Description: MooseX::ChainedAccessors is a Moose Trait which allows for method chaining on accessors by returning $self on write/set operations. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2968084 *rt-0.10_01 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 691972] Review Request: zanata-python-client - library and client for working with Zanata server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691972 --- Comment #7 from James Ni j...@redhat.com 2011-04-02 05:21:38 EDT --- Hi, Dean I have apply your patch and fix path issue of VERSION-FILE, i have update the package to 1.2.2, this new package include a make file for generating tar ball. Also, if you want to running zanata command directly under the folder extract from tar ball, you should copy the VERSION-FILE to zanataclient folder. Spec URL: http://jamesni.fedorapeople.org/zanata-python-client/zanata-python-client.spec SRPM URL: http://jamesni.fedorapeople.org/zanata-python-client/zanata-python-client-1.2.2-1.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 691027] Review Request: n2n - A layer-two peer-to-peer virtual private network
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691027
Michel Alexandre Salim michel+...@sylvestre.me changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|needinfo?(michel+fdr@sylves |
|tre.me) |
--- Comment #13 from Michel Alexandre Salim michel+...@sylvestre.me
2011-04-02 05:51:15 EDT ---
Hi Hushan,
I am not personally familiar with n2n, and I assume you are, so it's up to you.
If you want to track the trunk branch, though, since it's not tagged 2.1.0 yet,
you have to follow the guidelines for pre-release versions for the release tag:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Pre-Release_packages
Release Tag for Pre-Release Packages: 0.%{X}.%{alphatag}
in this case it would be something like
n2n-2.1.0-0.1.some-svn-tag here
The packaging guideline recommends putting the date there, but I never see it
stated as an explicit requirement. It probably dates back to CVS days where
each file tracked in CVS has is own version number!
I'd recommend also adding the SVN revision to this. See e.g. the nouveau
driver:
$ rpm -q xorg-x11-drv-nouveau
xorg-x11-drv-nouveau-0.0.16-24.20110324git8378443.fc15.x86_64
^ date ^ ^ commit ID ^
I'd recommend using the SVN revision number instead, so:
git svn clone --no-minimize-url
https://svn.ntop.org/svn/ntop/trunk/n2n/n2n_v2
git log -1 # show last commit - Jan 31, revision
# wow, that's not very auspicious in some culture's numerology!
thus the N-V-R will be
n2n-2.1.0-0.1.20110131svn%{?dist}
by tracking trunk, you can just do a 'git svn rebase' to pull in later changes.
When 2.1.0 is tagged, you can either do another 'git svn clone' for that tag,
as described in the previous commit, or just, from within the Git clone,
checkout the revision corresponding to the tag:
git checkout $(git svn find-rev r)
and then do the `git archive` as described before. The release tag for a
released version will be of the normal form -- %{X}%{?dist} -- no need
to include the SVN revision (but if, say, upstream has a branch for bugfixes
that you're tracking, and release patches without bumping the release number,
then it's like the pre-releases but without the '0.' prefix.
A bit complicated, but whenever I see a Scala package on Maven, I shudder at
their horrible versioning practice -- in Fedora we try to make sure a package's
NVR is always monotonically increasing, allowing smooth upgrades (when that
failed for some reason -- upstream renaming their release scheme, for instance,
that's when you see packages with 'Epoch' numbers. Those are super-versions)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 691226] Review Request: perl-HTML-Form - Class that represents an HTML form element
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691226 Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2011-04-02 05:55:33 --- Comment #5 from Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr 2011-04-02 05:55:33 EDT --- Imported and build on rawhide. (In reply to comment #2) After you'll create this package, could you also rebuild WWW::Mechanize? It depends on this package. Done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 691972] Review Request: zanata-python-client - library and client for working with Zanata server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691972 --- Comment #8 from James Ni j...@redhat.com 2011-04-02 05:58:46 EDT --- Hi, Dean I just update the setup.py so the tall ball have correct VERSION-FILE under zanataclient folder now. But if you use git and running zanata command, you still need to copy the VERSION-FILE to zanataclient. Spec URL: http://jamesni.fedorapeople.org/zanata-python-client/zanata-python-client.spec SRPM URL: http://jamesni.fedorapeople.org/zanata-python-client/zanata-python-client-1.2.2-1.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 690359] Review Request: perl-Shipwright - Build and Manage Self-contained Software Bundle
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690359 --- Comment #2 from Robin Lee robinlee.s...@gmail.com 2011-04-02 06:03:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) Couldn't you replace bundled Module::Install from inc to system's Module::Install? Any example or guideline? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 573932] Review Request: perl-IO-Compress - IO::Compress Perl module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573932 Tomo Vuckovic tomo.vucko...@atomixlinux.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tomo.vuckovic@atomixlinux.c ||om --- Comment #32 from Tomo Vuckovic tomo.vucko...@atomixlinux.com 2011-04-02 07:21:58 EDT --- Duplicate package perl-IO-Compress in Fedora 15 repository : http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/development/15/i386/os/Packages/perl-IO-Compress-2.026-155.fc15.i686.rpm and http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/development/15/i386/os/Packages/perl-IO-Compress-2.033-2.fc15.noarch.rpm This package create from different source, one from core perl, other from standalone perl module IO-Compress. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 690305] Review Request: pdfgrep - Tool to search text in PDF files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690305 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-04-02 07:48:54 EDT --- pdfgrep-1.2-2.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pdfgrep-1.2-2.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 690305] Review Request: pdfgrep - Tool to search text in PDF files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690305 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 690305] Review Request: pdfgrep - Tool to search text in PDF files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690305 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-04-02 07:49:43 EDT --- pdfgrep-1.2-2.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pdfgrep-1.2-2.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 690305] Review Request: pdfgrep - Tool to search text in PDF files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690305 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-04-02 07:50:31 EDT --- pdfgrep-1.2-2.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pdfgrep-1.2-2.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 693003] Version 2.0.0 update of gtkpod
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693003 Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fab...@bernewireless.net, ||t...@pobox.com Component|Package Review |gtkpod AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|t...@pobox.com Summary|Review Request: gtkpod -|Version 2.0.0 update of |version 2.0.0 update of |gtkpod |existing package| --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net 2011-04-02 09:11:45 EDT --- gtkpod is already in the Fedora Package Collection [1]. No new review request is needed. I think that you want an update of gtkpod to the latest version. Am I wrong? [1] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/gtkpod -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 666233] Review Request: gnome-paint - Easy to use paint program for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666233 --- Comment #8 from Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net 2011-04-02 09:14:20 EDT --- Can you provide a new SRPM with the fixes? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 667790] Review Request: python-audioprocessing - Python audio processing suite
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=667790 Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(pa...@iki.fi) --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net 2011-04-02 09:16:02 EDT --- Do you still want to maintain this package in the Fedora Package Collection? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 658164] Review Request: python-asciitable - Extensible ASCII table reader and writer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658164 --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net 2011-04-02 09:21:32 EDT --- python3-numpy is available for some months. The latest release is 1.6.0 b1. [1] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=237065 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 693003] Version 2.0.0 update of gtkpod
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693003 Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net changed: What|Removed |Added CC|fedora-package-review@redha | |t.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 666233] Review Request: gnome-paint - Easy to use paint program for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666233 --- Comment #10 from Tareq Al Jurf talj...@fedoraproject.org 2011-04-02 10:13:37 EDT --- Sorry a mistake in SRPM URL: SRPM URL: http://taljurf.fedorapeople.org/Packages/i686/gnome-paint/gnome-paint-0.4.0-3.fc14.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 666233] Review Request: gnome-paint - Easy to use paint program for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666233 --- Comment #9 from Tareq Al Jurf talj...@fedoraproject.org 2011-04-02 10:12:06 EDT --- Sorry for the delay, There you go: Spec URL: http://taljurf.fedorapeople.org/Packages/i686/gnome-paint/gnome-paint.spec SRPM URL: http://taljurf.fedorapeople.org/Packages/i686/gnome-paint/gnome-paint-0.4.0-3.fc13.src.rpm KOJI URL: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2968516 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 688183] Review Request: iceplayer - A simple music player for Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688183 Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fab...@bernewireless.net --- Comment #7 from Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net 2011-04-02 10:13:24 EDT --- Just some comments on your spec file: - The description is too long. Do not exceed 80 characters per line. I think that rpmlint will complain about that anyway. - Check https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Desktop_files for details about installation of .desktop files. - There are some typos in the .desktop files. And nobody cares where a piece of software is coming from. The .desktop files points to an icon but your are not installing the icon in your spec file. - The update of the desktop database is missing, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#desktop-database - Isn't RPM picking the Requires: automatically? - The Vendor: tag is not needed. - The Release: tag should contain the release of the spec file. Please check https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Package_Version for details. I strongly suggest that you read the Fedora Packaging guidelines. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 688183] Review Request: iceplayer - A simple music player for Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688183 --- Comment #8 from Mike Ma zht...@gmail.com 2011-04-02 11:58:21 EDT --- Oh, i'm wrong. OK. Fixed all of the wrongs (and changed the .desktop file, reported a bug about this to developer). Thank you for all. ... well, i can't understand Isn't RPM picking the Requires: automatically?, sorry. It works well for me. $ rpmlint iceplayer.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. New SRPM: http://ekd123.fedorapeople.org/iceplayer-4.0.4-13.fc14.src.rpm New SPEC: http://ekd123.fedorapeople.org/iceplayer.spec Please check. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 653800] Review Request: lde - Linux disk editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=653800 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #8 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info 2011-04-02 13:12:47 EDT --- Mario thank you. I think you forgot fire fedora-review flag and status to assigned. I have set its. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 590573] Review Request: cuneiform - OCR System
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590573 --- Comment #14 from Sergey Raspopov sergey.li...@gmail.com 2011-04-02 13:20:54 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) (In reply to comment #10) Pong Sergey, could I take cuneiform? Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 671862] Review Request: synapse - A semantic launcher written in Vala
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671862 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: synapse - |Review Request: synapse - A |gnome-do alternative (no|semantic launcher written |mono) |in Vala Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #20 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@fedoraproject.org 2011-04-02 13:54:35 EDT --- Well, I would suggest to move also README file to main package. --- This package (synapse) is APPROVED by mtasaka --- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 672418] Review Request: fpdns - Fingerprint DNS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672418 Mark McKinstry mmcki...@nexcess.net changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 653800] Review Request: lde - Linux disk editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=653800
Mario Blättermann mari...@freenet.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #9 from Mario Blättermann mari...@freenet.de 2011-04-02 15:03:42
EDT ---
$ rpmlint -v *
lde.src: I: checking
lde.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ncurses - nurses, curses, n
curses
lde.src: I: checking-url http://lde.sourceforge.net/ (timeout 10 seconds)
lde.src: I: checking-url http://dl.sf.net/lde/lde-2.6.1.tar.gz (timeout 10
seconds)
lde.i686: I: checking
lde.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ncurses - nurses, curses, n
curses
lde.i686: I: checking-url http://lde.sourceforge.net/ (timeout 10 seconds)
lde.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary grep-inode
lde-debuginfo.i686: I: checking
lde-debuginfo.i686: I: checking-url http://lde.sourceforge.net/ (timeout 10
seconds)
lde.spec: I: checking-url http://dl.sf.net/lde/lde-2.6.1.tar.gz (timeout 10
seconds)
3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
Besides the issues from the spellchecker, this package looks good now.
Koji scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2968774
-
key:
[+] OK
[.] OK, not applicable
[X] needs work
-
[+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}.
[+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license.
GPLv2
[+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
[+] MUST: The file containing the text of the license(s) for the package must
be included in %doc.
[+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source.
$ md5sum *
7cd3a798cafc07d084db240fd1d1c830 lde-2.6.1.tar.gz
7cd3a798cafc07d084db240fd1d1c830 lde-2.6.1.tar.gz.packaged
[+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on
at least one primary architecture.
- See Koji build above.
[.] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, ...
[+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires.
[.] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly.
[.] MUST: If a package installs files below %{_datadir}/icons, the icon cache
must be updated.
[.] MUST: Packages storing shared library files (not just symlinks) must call
ldconfig in %post and %postun.
[.] MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
[.] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, ...
[+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates.
[+] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in %files.
[+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly.
[+] MUST: Packages must not provide RPM dependency information when that
information is not global in nature, or are otherwise handled.
[.] MUST: When filtering automatically generated RPM dependency information,
the filtering system implemented by Fedora must be used.
[+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros.
[+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
[.] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage.
[+] MUST: Files in %doc must not affect the runtime of the application.
[.] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package.
[.] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package.
[.] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g.
libfoo.so.1.1), ...
[.] MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned
dependency.
[.] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives.
[+] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop
file
[+] MUST: .desktop files must be properly installed with desktop-file-install
in the %install section.
[+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
[+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
[.] SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a
separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream...
[+] SHOULD: Timestamps of files should be preserved.
[+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
See Koji build above (which uses mock anyway)
[+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described.
I assume the packager has tested it...
[+] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane.
[.] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the
[Bug 693117] New: Review Request: drupal6-backup_migrate - Database backup, restore, and migrate module for Drupal 6
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: drupal6-backup_migrate - Database backup, restore, and migrate module for Drupal 6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693117 Summary: Review Request: drupal6-backup_migrate - Database backup, restore, and migrate module for Drupal 6 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sticks...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec URL: http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/drupal6-backup_migrate.spec SRPM URL: http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/drupal6-backup_migrate-2.4-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: Backup and Migrate simplifies the task of backing up and restoring your Drupal database or copying your database from one Drupal site to another. It supports gzip, bzip and zip compression as well as automatic scheduled backups. With Backup and Migrate you can dump some or all of your database tables to a file download or save to a file on the server, and to restore from an uploaded or previously saved database dump. You can chose which tables and what data to backup and cache data is excluded by default. * * * $ rpmlint rpmbuild/SPECS/drupal6-backup_migrate.spec rpmbuild/SRPMS/drupal6-backup_migrate-2.4-1.fc15.src.rpm rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/drupal6-backup_migrate-2.4-1.fc15.noarch.rpm drupal6-backup_migrate.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gzip - zip, grip, g zip drupal6-backup_migrate.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US bzip - zip, blip, b zip drupal6-backup_migrate.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gzip - zip, grip, g zip drupal6-backup_migrate.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US bzip - zip, blip, b zip 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 693118] New: Review Request: drupal6-admin_menu - Theme-independent administration interface for Drupal 6
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: drupal6-admin_menu - Theme-independent administration interface for Drupal 6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693118 Summary: Review Request: drupal6-admin_menu - Theme-independent administration interface for Drupal 6 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sticks...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec URL: http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/packages/SPECS/drupal6-admin_menu.spec SRPM URL: http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/drupal6-admin_menu-1.6-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: Administration menu module provides a theme-independent administration interface (aka. navigation, back-end) for Drupal. It's a helper for novice Drupal users coming from other CMS, a real time-saver for Drupal site administrators, and definitely a must for Drupal developers and site builders (keyword: Devel integration). The module renders all administrative menu items below 'administer' in a clean, attractive and purely CSS-based menu at the top of your website. It contains not only regular menu items - local tasks are also included, giving you extremely fast access to any administrative resource and function your Drupal installation provides. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 684446] Review Request: libkqueue - A userspace implementation of the kqueue kernel event notification mechanism
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=684446 --- Comment #4 from Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com 2011-04-02 15:10:35 EDT --- Run rpmlint on the spec file, srpm and binary rpms and try to fix any warnings and errors. Files which should be in -devel subpackage are not. You shouldn't package libtool archive (.la) and static library (.a). Fix the summary as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 693119] New: Review Request: drupal6-login_destination - Customize login landing page in Drupal 6
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: drupal6-login_destination - Customize login landing page in Drupal 6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693119 Summary: Review Request: drupal6-login_destination - Customize login landing page in Drupal 6 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sticks...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec URL: http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/packages/SPECS/drupal6-login_destination.spec SRPM URL: http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/drupal6-login_destination-2.12-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: The Login Destination module allows you to customize the destination that a user is redirected to after logging in. The destination can be an internal page or an external URL. It is possible to specify certain conditions like referring pages or user roles and make the destination depend upon them. You may use PHP snippets to provide custom conditions and destinations. It also possible to keep users on the currently visited page after logging in or out. * * * $ rpmlint rpmbuild/SPECS/drupal6-login_destination.spec rpmbuild/SRPMS/drupal6-login_destination-2.12-1.fc15.src.rpm rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/drupal6-login_destination-2.12-1.fc15.noarch.rpm drupal6-login_destination.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) login - loin, logic, lo gin drupal6-login_destination.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) login - loin, logic, lo gin drupal6-login_destination.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/drupal6/modules/login_destination/.project 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 653800] Review Request: lde - Linux disk editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=653800 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info 2011-04-02 15:23:16 EDT --- Mario, thank you very much! New Package SCM Request === Package Name: lde Short Description: Linux disk editor Owners: hubbitus Branches: F-13 F-14 EL-5 EL-6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 573932] Review Request: perl-IO-Compress - IO::Compress Perl module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573932 --- Comment #33 from Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org 2011-04-02 16:03:01 EDT --- This is normal and expected. Many perl modules are dual-lived, being bundled with perl and also distributed separately via CPAN. There's no problem having multiple versions in the repository; yum will pick the highest versioned for you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 688322] Review Request - rubygem-webby - Awesome static website creation and management!
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688322 --- Comment #1 from Chris Lalancette clala...@redhat.com 2011-04-02 16:28:53 EDT --- Based on review comments in BZ 688316, I've made a new package available. Note that this package is *older* (0.9.4 vs. 0.9.4.1) than the previous one, but it is the released version rather than a git snapshot. The new SRPM and SPEC file are available here: http://people.redhat.com/clalance/rubygem-webby/rubygem-webby.spec http://people.redhat.com/clalance/rubygem-webby/rubygem-webby-0.9.4-1.fc14.src.rpm Thanks, Chris Lalancette -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 688318] Review Request - rubygem-directory_watcher - Rubygem for watching files in a directory and generating events when they change
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688318 --- Comment #1 from Chris Lalancette clala...@redhat.com 2011-04-02 16:39:12 EDT --- Based on review comments in BZ 688316, I've made a new package available. This version uses the released gem of directory_watcher instead of the git version. I've uploaded a new SPEC file and SRPM: http://people.redhat.com/clalance/rubygem-directory_watcher/rubygem-directory_watcher.spec http://people.redhat.com/clalance/rubygem-directory_watcher/rubygem-directory_watcher-1.4.0-2.fc14.src.rpm Thanks, Chris Lalancette -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 693117] Review Request: drupal6-backup_migrate - Database backup, restore, and migrate module for Drupal 6
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693117 Paul W. Frields sticks...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||662103(InsightReviews) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 693118] Review Request: drupal6-admin_menu - Theme-independent administration interface for Drupal 6
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693118 Paul W. Frields sticks...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||662103(InsightReviews) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 693119] Review Request: drupal6-login_destination - Customize login landing page in Drupal 6
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693119 Paul W. Frields sticks...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||662103(InsightReviews) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 693126] New: Review Request: Administrator Module for the Open Vulnerability Assessment System (OpenVAS)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: Administrator Module for the Open Vulnerability Assessment System (OpenVAS) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693126 Summary: Review Request: Administrator Module for the Open Vulnerability Assessment System (OpenVAS) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: re...@seznam.cz QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Hello, Please I would like to ask you for review of a new openvas-administrator package. Spec URL: http://rebus.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/openvas-administrator.spec SRPM URL: http://rebus.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/openvas-administrator-1.1.1-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: The OpenVAS Administrator acts as a command line tool or as a full service daemon offering the OpenVAS Administration Protocol (OAP). The most important tasks are the user management and feed management. GSA support OAP and users with the role Admin can access the OAP functionality. Best regards Michal Ambroz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 688315] Review Request - rubygem-little-plugger - gem based plugin management
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688315 --- Comment #1 from Chris Lalancette clala...@redhat.com 2011-04-02 16:44:41 EDT --- Based on review comments from BZ 688316, I've updated the spec file to use the released gem instead of the git version. The new SPEC and SRPM are here: http://people.redhat.com/clalance/rubygem-little-plugger/rubygem-little-plugger.spec http://people.redhat.com/clalance/rubygem-little-plugger/rubygem-little-plugger-1.1.2-2.fc14.src.rpm Thanks, Chris Lalancette -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 692733] Review Request: openvas-cli - Command-line tool to drive OpenVAS Manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=692733 Michal Ambroz re...@seznam.cz changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugzilla.redhat.com ||/show_bug.cgi?id=693126 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 693126] Review Request: Administrator Module for the Open Vulnerability Assessment System (OpenVAS)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693126 Michal Ambroz re...@seznam.cz changed: What|Removed |Added CC||huzai...@redhat.com, ||re...@seznam.cz See Also||https://bugzilla.redhat.com ||/show_bug.cgi?id=692733 Alias||openvas-admin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 688317] Review Request - rubygem-loquacious - Descriptive configuration files for Ruby written in Ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688317 --- Comment #1 from Chris Lalancette clala...@redhat.com 2011-04-02 16:50:05 EDT --- Based on review comments in BZ 688316, I've made a new version of the package available that uses the released gem rather than one built from git. The new SPEC and SRPM are here: http://people.redhat.com/clalance/rubygem-loquacious/rubygem-loquacious.spec http://people.redhat.com/clalance/rubygem-loquacious/rubygem-loquacious-1.7.1-2.fc14.src.rpm Thanks, Chris Lalancette -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 693126] Review Request: Administrator Module for the Open Vulnerability Assessment System (OpenVAS)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693126 --- Comment #1 from Michal Ambroz re...@seznam.cz 2011-04-02 16:58:55 EDT --- koji build dist-f16 --scratch /home/mambroz/rpmbuild/SRPMS/openvas-administrator-1.1.1-1.fc14.src.rpm Uploading srpm: /home/mambroz/rpmbuild/SRPMS/openvas-administrator-1.1.1-1.fc14.src.rpm [] 100% 00:00:04 137.46 KiB 33.44 KiB/sec Created task: 2969158 Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2969158 Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... 2969158 build (dist-f16, openvas-administrator-1.1.1-1.fc14.src.rpm): open (x86-17.phx2.fedoraproject.org) 2969160 buildArch (openvas-administrator-1.1.1-1.fc14.src.rpm, i686): open (x86-20.phx2.fedoraproject.org) 2969159 buildArch (openvas-administrator-1.1.1-1.fc14.src.rpm, x86_64): open (x86-02.phx2.fedoraproject.org) 2969160 buildArch (openvas-administrator-1.1.1-1.fc14.src.rpm, i686): open (x86-20.phx2.fedoraproject.org) - closed 0 free 2 open 1 done 0 failed 2969158 build (dist-f16, openvas-administrator-1.1.1-1.fc14.src.rpm): open (x86-17.phx2.fedoraproject.org) - closed 0 free 1 open 2 done 0 failed 2969159 buildArch (openvas-administrator-1.1.1-1.fc14.src.rpm, x86_64): open (x86-02.phx2.fedoraproject.org) - closed 0 free 0 open 3 done 0 failed 2969158 build (dist-f16, openvas-administrator-1.1.1-1.fc14.src.rpm) completed successfully -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 671862] Review Request: synapse - A semantic launcher written in Vala
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671862 --- Comment #21 from Renich Bon Ciric ren...@woralelandia.com 2011-04-02 17:04:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #20) Well, I would suggest to move also README file to main package. --- This package (synapse) is APPROVED by mtasaka --- Did that and thanks! ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 671862] Review Request: synapse - A semantic launcher written in Vala
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671862 --- Comment #23 from Renich Bon Ciric ren...@woralelandia.com 2011-04-02 17:06:02 EDT --- Updated: SPEC: http://renich.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/synapse.spec SRPM: http://renich.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/synapse-0.2.4.1-4.fc14.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 671862] Review Request: synapse - A semantic launcher written in Vala
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671862 Renich Bon Ciric ren...@woralelandia.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #22 from Renich Bon Ciric ren...@woralelandia.com 2011-04-02 17:04:41 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: synapse Short Description: a mono-free alternative to gnome-do Owners: renich mtasaka Branches: f14 f15 InitialCC: renich mtasaka -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674188] Review Request: libzeitgeist - Client library for zeitgeist
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674188 --- Comment #36 from Renich Bon Ciric ren...@woralelandia.com 2011-04-02 17:13:16 EDT --- Ok, some updates - Added -p to some install statements (forgot them the first time) - Moved README to the main package SRPM: http://renich.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/libzeitgeist-0.3.6-4.fc14.src.rpm SPEC: http://renich.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/libzeitgeist.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 693119] Review Request: drupal6-login_destination - Customize login landing page in Drupal 6
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693119 Eric Christensen e...@christensenplace.us changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||e...@christensenplace.us AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|e...@christensenplace.us -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 688183] Review Request: iceplayer - A simple music player for Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688183
--- Comment #9 from Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net 2011-04-02
17:23:08 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #8)
OK. Fixed all of the wrongs (and changed the .desktop file, reported a bug
about this to developer).
Thank you for all.
... well, i can't understand Isn't RPM picking the Requires: automatically?,
sorry.
RPM is able to pick the requirements of a package in most cases automatically.
Remove the packages named as Requires: and see what happens.
$ rpmlint iceplayer.spec
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
rpmlint should be run against the packages too.
[fab@laptop023 x86_64]$ rpmlint iceplayer*
iceplayer.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libnotify
iceplayer.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US linux - Linux
iceplayer.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long C iceplayer is a open-source
linux music player. It can play music. And it's a free software.
iceplayer.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/doc/iceplayer-4.0.4/AUTHORS
iceplayer.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/doc/iceplayer-4.0.4/COPYING
iceplayer.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary iceplayer
iceplayer-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/src/debug/iceplayer-4.0.4-20110318/desktop_lrc.h
iceplayer-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/src/debug/iceplayer-4.0.4-20110318/keybinding.h
iceplayer-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/src/debug/iceplayer-4.0.4-20110318/download.c
iceplayer-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/src/debug/iceplayer-4.0.4-20110318/list.h
iceplayer-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/src/debug/iceplayer-4.0.4-20110318/equalizer.h
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 9 warnings.
- Source0: http://ekd123.fedorapeople.org/%{name}-%{version}-20110318.tar.gz
is wrong. This must point to the upstream location of the source code.
- The naming of the package is wrong. Upstream is releasing different version
under the same version number but with a new date. Your package must reflect
that circumstance. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines
- desktop-file-validate is not needed.
- mimeinfo is for XML files. You don't need this.
- There is a skin directory. Have you consider to put those skins in a separate
subpackage?
- The build of your package failed on Koji
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2969153
- The interface of iceplayer is in Chinese (i think). At the moment I'm not
sure if this will become an issue.
I'm not a sponsor. I suggest that you follow
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 693131] New: Review Request: sudoku-savant - Solve and generate sudoku puzzles through logical means
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sudoku-savant - Solve and generate sudoku puzzles through logical means https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693131 Summary: Review Request: sudoku-savant - Solve and generate sudoku puzzles through logical means Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mari...@freenet.de QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/19373040/Fedora/SPECS/sudoku-savant.spec SRPM URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/19373040/Fedora/sudoku-savant-1.3-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: A simple GUI-driven application to solve and generate sudoku puzzles through logical means. Also supports manual solving, with pencil marks and cell coloring. Should be able to solve any standard sudoku from a newspaper or magazine. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2969203 $ rpmlint -v sudoku* sudoku-savant.i686: I: checking sudoku-savant.i686: I: checking-url http://sourceforge.net/projects/sudoku-savant/ (timeout 10 seconds) sudoku-savant.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary sudoku-savant sudoku-savant.src: I: checking sudoku-savant.src: I: checking-url http://sourceforge.net/projects/sudoku-savant/ (timeout 10 seconds) sudoku-savant.src: I: checking-url http://downloads.sourceforge.net/sudoku-savant/sudoku-savant-1.3.tar.bz2 (timeout 10 seconds) sudoku-savant-debuginfo.i686: I: checking sudoku-savant-debuginfo.i686: I: checking-url http://sourceforge.net/projects/sudoku-savant/ (timeout 10 seconds) sudoku-savant.spec: I: checking-url http://downloads.sourceforge.net/sudoku-savant/sudoku-savant-1.3.tar.bz2 (timeout 10 seconds) 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 693034] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Aliases - Easy aliasing of methods and attributes in Moose
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693034
Mario Blättermann mari...@freenet.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||mari...@freenet.de
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mari...@freenet.de
Flag||fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Mario Blättermann mari...@freenet.de 2011-04-02 18:03:57
EDT ---
$ rpmlint -v *
perl-MooseX-Aliases.noarch: I: checking
perl-MooseX-Aliases.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US accessors
- accessory, accessorize, successors
perl-MooseX-Aliases.noarch: I: checking-url
http://search.cpan.org/dist/MooseX-Aliases/ (timeout 10 seconds)
perl-MooseX-Aliases.src: I: checking
perl-MooseX-Aliases.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US accessors -
accessory, accessorize, successors
perl-MooseX-Aliases.src: I: checking-url
http://search.cpan.org/dist/MooseX-Aliases/ (timeout 10 seconds)
perl-MooseX-Aliases.src: I: checking-url
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/D/DO/DOY/MooseX-Aliases-0.09.tar.gz (timeout 10
seconds)
perl-MooseX-Aliases.spec: I: checking-url
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/D/DO/DOY/MooseX-Aliases-0.09.tar.gz (timeout 10
seconds)
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
Fine, rpmlint is very silent. Two warnings from the spellchecker only.
-
key:
[+] OK
[.] OK, not applicable
[X] needs work
-
[+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}.
[+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license.
GPL+ or Artistic
[+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
[+] MUST: The file containing the text of the license(s) for the package must
be included in %doc.
[+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source.
$ md5sum *
19739592f44861b5618c00deb0b2793f MooseX-Aliases-0.09.tar.gz
19739592f44861b5618c00deb0b2793f MooseX-Aliases-0.09.tar.gz.packaged
[+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on
at least one primary architecture.
- Nothing to compile either, but it builds, of course. See Koji build above.
[.] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, ...
[+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires.
[.] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly.
[.] MUST: If a package installs files below %{_datadir}/icons, the icon cache
must be updated.
[.] MUST: Packages storing shared library files (not just symlinks) must call
ldconfig in %post and %postun.
[.] MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
[.] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, ...
[+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates.
[+] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in %files.
[+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly.
[+] MUST: Packages must not provide RPM dependency information when that
information is not global in nature, or are otherwise handled.
[.] MUST: When filtering automatically generated RPM dependency information,
the filtering system implemented by Fedora must be used.
[+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros.
[+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
[.] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage.
[+] MUST: Files in %doc must not affect the runtime of the application.
[.] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package.
[.] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package.
[.] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g.
libfoo.so.1.1), ...
[.] MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned
dependency.
[.] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives.
[+] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop
file
[+] MUST: .desktop files must be properly installed with desktop-file-install
in the %install section.
[+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
[+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
[.] SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a
separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream...
[+] SHOULD: Timestamps of files should be preserved.
[+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
See Koji build above
[Bug 668240] Review Request: clapham - Railroad diagram generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668240 Mario Blättermann mari...@freenet.de changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 668240] Review Request: clapham - Railroad diagram generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668240
Mario Blättermann mari...@freenet.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||mari...@freenet.de
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mari...@freenet.de
--- Comment #1 from Mario Blättermann mari...@freenet.de 2011-04-02 18:17:50
EDT ---
$ rpmlint -v *
clapham.src: I: checking
clapham.src: I: checking-url http://clapham.hydromatic.net/ (timeout 10
seconds)
clapham.src: I: checking-url
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/clapham/clapham-0.1.003-src.zip (timeout 10
seconds)
clapham.spec: I: checking-url
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/clapham/clapham-0.1.003-src.zip (timeout 10
seconds)
1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
No issues from rpmlint, OK.
Some hints anyway:
- For better consistency, replace all occurences of th package name with
%{name}.
- In my mind, it's better to use the universal install command instead of
cp.
- To avoid ambiguity, you could append ...for computer languages to summary.
Otherwise, readers could assume it is a generator for railway maps ;-)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630275] Review Request: ghc-cereal - A binary serialization library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630275 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-04-02 18:49:41 EDT --- ghc-cereal-0.3.0.0-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630278] Review Request: ghc-ranges - Ranges and various functions on them
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630278 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-04-02 18:49:54 EDT --- ghc-ranges-0.2.3-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630215] Review Request: ghc-MemoTrie - Trie-based memo functions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630215 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-04-02 18:50:12 EDT --- ghc-MemoTrie-0.4.9-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 682353] Review Request: wmtop - Mini graphical version of the CPU monitoring utility top
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682353 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-04-02 18:50:54 EDT --- wmtop-0.84-3.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 690519] Review Request: snappy - Fast compression and decompression library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690519 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-04-02 18:53:48 EDT --- snappy-1.0.0-3.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630215] Review Request: ghc-MemoTrie - Trie-based memo functions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630215 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|ghc-MemoTrie-0.4.9-2.fc15 |ghc-MemoTrie-0.4.9-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630275] Review Request: ghc-cereal - A binary serialization library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630275 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|ghc-cereal-0.3.0.0-1.fc15 |ghc-cereal-0.3.0.0-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630278] Review Request: ghc-ranges - Ranges and various functions on them
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630278 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|ghc-ranges-0.2.3-2.fc15 |ghc-ranges-0.2.3-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 682353] Review Request: wmtop - Mini graphical version of the CPU monitoring utility top
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682353 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|wmtop-0.84-3.fc15 |wmtop-0.84-3.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630215] Review Request: ghc-MemoTrie - Trie-based memo functions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630215 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-04-02 18:51:07 EDT --- ghc-MemoTrie-0.4.9-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630278] Review Request: ghc-ranges - Ranges and various functions on them
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630278 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-04-02 18:52:31 EDT --- ghc-ranges-0.2.3-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 690519] Review Request: snappy - Fast compression and decompression library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690519 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|snappy-1.0.0-3.fc15 |snappy-1.0.0-3.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 690305] Review Request: pdfgrep - Tool to search text in PDF files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690305 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-04-02 18:50:47 EDT --- pdfgrep-1.2-2.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630275] Review Request: ghc-cereal - A binary serialization library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630275 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-04-02 18:54:25 EDT --- ghc-cereal-0.3.0.0-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630275] Review Request: ghc-cereal - A binary serialization library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630275 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|ghc-cereal-0.3.0.0-1.fc14 |ghc-cereal-0.3.0.0-1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 693137] New: Review Request: python-ffc - a compiler for finite element variational forms
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-ffc - a compiler for finite element variational forms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693137 Summary: Review Request: python-ffc - a compiler for finite element variational forms Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fab...@bernewireless.net QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-ffc.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-ffc-0.9.9-1.fc14.src.rpm Project URL: https://launchpad.net/ffc Description: FFC is a compiler for finite element variational forms. From a high level description of the form, it generates efficient low-level C++ code that can be used to assemble the corresponding discrete operator (tensor). In particular, a bilinear form may be assembled into a matrix and a linear form may be assembled into a vector. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2969232 rpmlint output: [fab@laptop023 SRPMS]$ rpmlint python-ffc-0.9.9-1.fc14.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab@laptop023 noarch]$ rpmlint python-ffc-0.9.9-1.fc14.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 693137] Review Request: python-ffc - A compiler for finite element variational forms
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693137 Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||693135 Summary|Review Request: python-ffc |Review Request: python-ffc |- a compiler for finite |- A compiler for finite |element variational forms |element variational forms -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 693135] Review Request: ufl-python - A Python implementation of Universal Foundation Libraries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693135 Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||693137 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 690954] Review Request: postler - A super sexy, ultra simple desktop mail client built in vala
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690954
--- Comment #5 from Christoph Wickert cwick...@fedoraproject.org 2011-04-02
20:21:33 EDT ---
Review for 4494cd46098d379815e9df41842df4cd postler-0.1.1-1.fc14.src.rpm
OK - MUST: $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-14-x86_64/result/postler-*
postler.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US automagic - automatic,
auto magic, auto-magic
postler.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) vala - lava, val, ala
postler.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US automagic - automatic,
auto magic, auto-magic
postler.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary postler
postler.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary postler-mbsync
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings.
OK - MUST: named according to the Package Naming Guidelines
OK - MUST: spec file name matches the base package %{name}
OK - MUST: package meets the Packaging Guidelines
OK - MUST: Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines: LGPLv2+
FIX - MUST: License field in spec file does not match the actual license
OK - MUST: license file included in %doc
OK - MUST: spec is in American English
OK - MUST: spec is legible
OK - MUST: sources match the upstream source by MD5
02e502c9f4a4b92e4ace32d9e268f06d
OK - MUST: successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on x86_64
N/A - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch.
OK - MUST: all build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires.
OK - MUST: handles locales properly with %find_lang
N/A - MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared
library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths,
must call ldconfig in %post and %postun.
OK - MUST: Package does not bundle copies of system libraries.
N/A - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must
state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for
relocation of that specific package
OK - MUST: owns all directories that it creates
OK - MUST: no duplicate files in the %files listing
OK - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly, includes %defattr(...)
OK - MUST: consistently uses macros
OK - MUST: package contains code, or permissable content
N/A - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage
OK - MUST: Files included as %doc do not affect the runtime of the application
N/A - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package
N/A - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package
N/A - MUST: library files that end in .so are in the -devel package.
N/A - MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully
versioned dependency
OK - MUST: The package does not contain any .la libtool archives.
OK - MUST: Package contains a GUI application and includes a %{name}.desktop
file, and that file is properly validated with desktop-file-validate
OK - MUST: package does not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
OK - Should: at the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot}
OK - MUST: all filenames valid UTF-8
SHOULD Items:
OK - SHOULD: Source package includes license text(s) as a separate file.
N/A - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file
should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
OK - SHOULD: builds in mock.
OK - SHOULD: compiles and builds into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
WELL - SHOULD: functions as described.
OK - SHOULD: Scriptlets are sane.
N/A - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency.
N/A - SHOULD: pkgconfig(.pc) files should be placed in a -devel pkg
N/A - SHOULD: no file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or
/usr/sbin
N/A - SHOULD: package should contain man pages for binaries/scripts.
Other items:
OK - latest stable version
OK - SourceURL valid
OK - Compiler flags ok
OK - Debuginfo complete
OK - SHOULD: package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}
N/A - SHOULD: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files should 'Requires:
pkgconfig'.
Issues:
- License is LGPLv2+ and not LGPLv2 because there is a or any later version
clause.
- The icon should have a different name as explained in comment #4.
- Require dexxter once it's in the repo.
- Does not build on rawhide:
Waf: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/postler-0.1.1/_build_'
[ 1/44] valac: postler/dexter.vala postler/dockmanager.vala
postler/elementary-entry.vala postler/postler-accounts.vala
postler/postler-accountsetup.vala postler/postler-app.vala
postler/postler-attachments.vala postler/postler-bureau.vala
postler/postler-cellrenderertoggle.vala postler/postler-client.vala
postler/postler-composer.vala postler/postler-content.vala
[Bug 691673] Review Request: perl-Module-Mask - Pretend certain modules are not installed
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691673 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-04-03 00:22:37 EDT --- perl-Module-Mask-0.03-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 691673] Review Request: perl-Module-Mask - Pretend certain modules are not installed
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691673 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Module-Mask-0.03-1.fc1 ||5 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-04-03 00:22:42 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674188] Review Request: libzeitgeist - Client library for zeitgeist
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674188 --- Comment #37 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@fedoraproject.org 2011-04-03 01:04:47 EDT --- For libzeitgeist, please try to build it on koji and submit push requests on bodhi. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 688035] Review Request: perl-CHI - Unified cache handling interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688035 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-04-03 01:16:02 EDT --- perl-CHI-0.44-3.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-CHI-0.44-3.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 688035] Review Request: perl-CHI - Unified cache handling interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688035 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Bug 688035 depends on bug 675649, which changed state. Bug 675649 Summary: Review Request: perl-Log-Any-Adapter-Dispatch - Log::Any::Adapter::Dispatch Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675649 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Bug 688035 depends on bug 691673, which changed state. Bug 691673 Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Mask - Pretend certain modules are not installed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691673 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 660637] Review Request: ghc-xml-types - Haskell library for XML types
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660637 --- Comment #3 from Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2...@gmail.com 2011-04-03 01:39:27 EDT --- http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-xml-types.spec http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-xml-types-0.1.1-2.fc14.src.rpm rpmlint -i ghc-xml-types.spec ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/ghc-xml-types-0.1.1-2.fc14.src.rpm ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/i686/ghc-xml-types- ghc-xml-types-0.1.1-2.fc14.i686.rpm ghc-xml-types-devel-0.1.1-2.fc14.i686.rpm ghc-xml-types-prof-0.1.1-2.fc14.i686.rpm [narasimhan@localhost packaging_work]$ rpmlint -i ghc-xml-types.spec ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/ghc-xml-types-0.1.1-2.fc14.src.rpm ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/i686/ghc-xml-types-*.rpm ghc-xml-types.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell - Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-xml-types.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell - Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-xml-types-devel.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell - Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-xml-types-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-xml-types-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-xml-types-prof.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell - Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-xml-types-prof.i686: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-xml-types-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ghc-6.12.3/xml-types-0.1.1/libHSxml-types-0.1.1_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 6 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664150] Review Request: ghc-monads-fd - Monad classes, using functional dependencies
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664150 --- Comment #1 from Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2...@gmail.com 2011-04-03 01:40:49 EDT --- http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-monads-fd.spec http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-monads-fd-0.1.0.4-2.fc14.src.rpm rpmlint -i ghc-monads-fd.spec ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/i686/ghc-monads-fd- ghc-monads-fd-0.1.0.4-2.fc14.i686.rpm ghc-monads-fd-devel-0.1.0.4-2.fc14.i686.rpm ghc-monads-fd-prof-0.1.0.4-2.fc14.i686.rpm [narasimhan@localhost packaging_work]$ rpmlint -i ghc-monads-fd.spec ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/i686/ghc-monads-fd-*.rpm ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/ghc-monads-fd-0.1.0.4-2.fc14.src.rpm ghc-monads-fd.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US http - HTTP The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-fd.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cecs - ceca, cess, secs The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-fd.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pdx - pd, pix, pax The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-fd.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US edu - ed, educ, due The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-fd.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mpj - mph, mp, mpg The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-fd.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US springschool - spring school, spring-school, Springsteen The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-fd.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US html - HTML, ht ml, ht-ml The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-fd.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mtl - mt, ml, mel The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-fd-devel.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US http - HTTP The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-fd-devel.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cecs - ceca, cess, secs The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-fd-devel.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pdx - pd, pix, pax The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-fd-devel.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US edu - ed, educ, due The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-fd-devel.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mpj - mph, mp, mpg The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-fd-devel.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US springschool - spring school, spring-school, Springsteen The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-fd-devel.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mtl - mt, ml, mel The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-fd-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-monads-fd-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-monads-fd-prof.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US http - HTTP The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-fd-prof.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cecs - ceca, cess, secs The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-fd-prof.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pdx - pd, pix, pax The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-fd-prof.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US edu - ed, educ, due The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-fd-prof.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mpj - mph, mp, mpg The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-fd-prof.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US springschool - spring school, spring-school, Springsteen The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-fd-prof.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US html - HTML, ht ml, ht-ml The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-fd-prof.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mtl - mt, ml, mel The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-fd-prof.i686: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-monads-fd-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ghc-6.12.3/monads-fd-0.1.0.4/libHSmonads-fd-0.1.0.4_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development
[Bug 660656] Review Request: ghc-data-binary-ieee754- Haskell parser/serialiser library for IEEE754 floating point values
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660656 --- Comment #2 from Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2...@gmail.com 2011-04-03 01:50:33 EDT --- http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-data-binary-ieee754-0.4.2.1-1.fc14.src.rpm http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-data-binary-ieee754-0.4.2.1-2.fc14.src.rpm rpmlint -i ghc-data-binary-ieee754.spec ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/ghc-data-binary-ieee754-0.4.2.1-2.fc14.src.rpm ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/i686/ghc-data-binary-ieee754-*.rpm ghc-data-binary-ieee754.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell - Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-data-binary-ieee754.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) serialiser - serialist, serialism, serialize The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-data-binary-ieee754.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell - Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-data-binary-ieee754.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) serialiser - serialist, serialism, serialize The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-data-binary-ieee754-devel.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell - Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-data-binary-ieee754-devel.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) serialiser - serialist, serialism, serialize The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-data-binary-ieee754-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-data-binary-ieee754-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-data-binary-ieee754-prof.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell - Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-data-binary-ieee754-prof.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) serialiser - serialist, serialism, serialize The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-data-binary-ieee754-prof.i686: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-data-binary-ieee754-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ghc-6.12.3/data-binary-ieee754-0.4.2.1/libHSdata-binary-ieee754-0.4.2.1_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 10 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 660645] Review Request: ghc-monads-tf - A library to provide Monad classes using type families
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660645 --- Comment #4 from Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2...@gmail.com 2011-04-03 01:47:57 EDT --- http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-monads-tf.spec http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-monads-tf-0.1.0.0-2.fc14.src.rpm rpmlint -i ghc-monads-tf.spec /home/narasimhan/rpmbuild/RPMS/i686/ghc-monads-tf-*.rpm /home/narasimhan/rpmbuild/SRPMS/ghc-monads-tf-0.1.0.0-2.fc14.src.rpm ^C(none): E: interrupted, exiting while reading /home/narasimhan/Desktop/packaging_work/ghc-monads-tf.spec 0 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [narasimhan@localhost packaging_work]$ rpmlint -i ghc-monads-tf.spec ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/i686/ghc-monads-tf-*.rpm ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/ghc-monads-tf-0.1.0.0-2.fc14.src.rpm ghc-monads-tf.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US http - HTTP The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-tf.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cecs - ceca, cess, secs The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-tf.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pdx - pd, pix, pax The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-tf.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US edu - ed, educ, due The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-tf.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mpj - mph, mp, mpg The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-tf.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US springschool - spring school, spring-school, Springsteen The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-tf.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US html - HTML, ht ml, ht-ml The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-tf.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mtl - mt, ml, mel The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-tf-devel.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US http - HTTP The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-tf-devel.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cecs - ceca, cess, secs The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-tf-devel.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pdx - pd, pix, pax The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-tf-devel.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US edu - ed, educ, due The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-tf-devel.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mpj - mph, mp, mpg The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-tf-devel.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US springschool - spring school, spring-school, Springsteen The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-tf-devel.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mtl - mt, ml, mel The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-tf-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-monads-tf-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-monads-tf-prof.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US http - HTTP The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-tf-prof.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cecs - ceca, cess, secs The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-tf-prof.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pdx - pd, pix, pax The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-tf-prof.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US edu - ed, educ, due The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-tf-prof.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mpj - mph, mp, mpg The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-tf-prof.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US springschool - spring school, spring-school, Springsteen The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-tf-prof.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US html - HTML, ht ml, ht-ml The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-tf-prof.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mtl - mt, ml, mel The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monads-tf-prof.i686: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-monads-tf-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ghc-6.12.3/monads-tf-0.1.0.0/libHSmonads-tf-0.1.0.0_p.a A development file (usually source code)
[Bug 664151] Review Request: ghc-Diff - A O(ND) diff algorithm in Haskell
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664151 --- Comment #2 from Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2...@gmail.com 2011-04-03 01:51:52 EDT --- http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-Diff-0.1.2-2.fc14.src.rpm http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-Diff.spec rpmlint -i ghc-Diff.spec ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/ghc-Diff-0.1.2-2.fc14.src.rpm ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/i686/ghc-Diff-*.rpm ghc-Diff-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-Diff-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-Diff-prof.i686: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-Diff-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ghc-6.12.3/Diff-0.1.2/libHSDiff-0.1.2_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664155] Review Request: ghc-data-accessor-monads-fd - A package to access state in monads-fd State Monad
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664155 --- Comment #3 from Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2...@gmail.com 2011-04-03 01:54:06 EDT --- http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-data-accessor-monads-fd.spec http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-data-accessor-monads-fd-0.2.0.3-1.fc14.src.rpm rpmlint -i ghc-data-accessor-monads-fd.spec ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/ghc-data-accessor-monads-fd-0.2.0.3-1.fc14.src.rpm ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/i686/ghc-data-accessor-monads-fd-*.rpm ghc-data-accessor-monads-fd-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-data-accessor-monads-fd-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-data-accessor-monads-fd-prof.i686: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-data-accessor-monads-fd-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ghc-6.12.3/data-accessor-monads-fd-0.2.0.3/libHSdata-accessor-monads-fd-0.2.0.3_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664205] Review Request: ghc-dlist - Haskell package that provides difference lists
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664205 --- Comment #2 from Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2...@gmail.com 2011-04-03 01:55:12 EDT --- http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-dlist-0.5-2.fc14.src.rpm http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-dlist.spec rpmlint -i ghc-dlist.spec ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/ghc-dlist-0.5-2.fc14.src.rpm ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/i686/ghc-dlist-*.rpm ghc-dlist-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-dlist-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-dlist-prof.i686: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-dlist-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ghc-6.12.3/dlist-0.5/libHSdlist-0.5_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
