[Bug 675009] Review Request: c3p0 - JDBC DataSources/Resource Pools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675009 --- Comment #4 from Spike spikefed...@gmail.com 2011-04-18 02:06:14 EDT --- Sure, have a look at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#Maven_pom.xml_files_and_depmaps Even if you build it with ant, other packages might want do use c3p0 with maven. So to prevent that every package that depends on c3p0 needs its own custom depmap (or an entry in common-poms), you provide the depmap fragment yourself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 697401] New: Review Request: perl-Ouch - Exceptions that don't hurt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Ouch - Exceptions that don't hurt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697401 Summary: Review Request: perl-Ouch - Exceptions that don't hurt Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: psab...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec URL: http://psabata.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Ouch/perl-Ouch.spec SRPM URL: http://psabata.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Ouch/perl-Ouch-0.0300-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: Ouch provides a class for exception handling that doesn't require a lot of boilerplate, nor any up front definition. If Exception::Class is working for you, great! But if you want something that is faster, easier to use, requires less typing, and has no prereqs, but still gives you much of that same functionality, then Ouch is for you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 697411] New: Review Request: perl-Data-Alias - Comprehensive set of aliasing operations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-Alias - Comprehensive set of aliasing operations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697411 Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-Alias - Comprehensive set of aliasing operations Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmasl...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- SPEC: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Data-Alias.spec SRPM: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Data-Alias-1.12-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: Aliasing is the phenomenon where two different expressions actually refer to the same thing. Modifying one will modify the other, and if you take a reference to both, the two values are the same. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 697411] Review Request: perl-Data-Alias - Comprehensive set of aliasing operations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697411 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cw...@alumni.drew.edu --- Comment #1 from Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com 2011-04-18 03:50:21 EDT --- *** Bug 202876 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 202876] Review Request: perl-Data-Alias - Comprehensive set of aliasing operations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=202876 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||DUPLICATE Last Closed|2006-08-17 21:36:11 |2011-04-18 03:50:21 --- Comment #7 from Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com 2011-04-18 03:50:21 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 697411 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 693275] Review Request: cuneiform - Command-line OCR system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693275 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW AssignedTo|lemen...@gmail.com |nob...@fedoraproject.org --- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2011-04-18 03:53:14 EDT --- Unfortunately I don't have enough time to start the review so I'm resigning from this ticket -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 697139] Review Request: apache-commons-email - Apache Commons Email Package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697139 Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||socho...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|socho...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com 2011-04-18 04:04:06 EDT --- I'll do the review. Btw: wb :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 676129] Review Request: qconf - Allows you to have a nice configure script for your qmake-based project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676129 --- Comment #26 from Ivan Romanov dr...@land.ru 2011-04-18 04:07:16 EDT --- Source package with both patches. https://github.com/drizt/psi-plus/raw/dce9824171a29d07100e560b128b68decc33d38e/qconf-1.4-2.fc14.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 697425] New: Review Request: sound-theme-beethoven-fifth - Sound theme based on Beethoven's fifth symphony
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sound-theme-beethoven-fifth - Sound theme based on Beethoven's fifth symphony https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697425 Summary: Review Request: sound-theme-beethoven-fifth - Sound theme based on Beethoven's fifth symphony Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: el...@doom.co.il QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec URL: http://elad.fedorapeople.org/reviews/sound-theme-beethoven-fifth.spec SRPM URL: http://elad.fedorapeople.org/reviews/sound-theme-beethoven-fifth-1.0-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: Sound theme by the Fedora Sound SIG, based on Beethoven's fifth symphony, processed from a public domain recording. This is the first sound theme from the fedora sound SIG :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 697401] Review Request: perl-Ouch - Exceptions that don't hurt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697401
Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Flag||fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com 2011-04-18 04:45:05
EDT ---
- rpmlint OK
- package must be named according to Guidelines OK
- spec file name must match the base package %{name} OK
- package must meet the Packaging Guidelines OK
- package must be licensed with Fedora approved license OK
- license field must match actual license OK
- text of the license in its own file must be included in %doc OK
- sources must match the upstream source OK
- package MUST successfully compile and build OK
- architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla OK
- build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires OK
- handle locales properly with %find_lang macro OK
- shared library files must call ldconfig in %post(un) OK
- packages must NOT bundle system libraries OK
- package must own all directories that it creates OK
- permissions on files must be set properly OK
- package must consistently use macros OK
- package must contain code, or permissable content OK
- large documentation must go in a -doc OK
- %doc must not affect the runtime of the application OK
- header files must be in a -devel package OK
- static libraries must be in a -static package OK
- library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel OK
- devel package usually require base package OK
- packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives OK
- GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file OK
- packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages OK
APPROVED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 678855] Review Request: rpyc - A Transparent, Symmetrical Python Library for Distributed-Computing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678855 --- Comment #4 from Erez Shinan e...@redhat.com 2011-04-18 04:58:09 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: python-rpyc Short Description: A Transparent, Symmetrical Python Library for Distributed-Computing Owners: erez Branches: f15 el6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 697139] Review Request: apache-commons-email - Apache Commons Email Package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697139
Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com 2011-04-18
05:01:30 EDT ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[x] Rpmlint output:
apache-commons-email.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc
/etc/maven/fragments/apache-commons-email
apache-commons-email.src: W: strange-permission commons-email-1.2-src.tar.gz
0400L
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
Those permissions are indeed a bit weird, just make sure you fix them up before
final upload
[x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines[1].
[x] Spec file name must match the base package name, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines[2].
[x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms.
[x] Buildroot definition is not present
[x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines[3,4].
[x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
License type: ASL 2.0
[x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
[x] All independent sub-packages have license of their own
[x] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
MD5SUM this package: 66a415001e48616a6e2f93e9716f55ea
MD5SUM upstream package: 66a415001e48616a6e2f93e9716f55ea
[x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines[5].
[x] Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x] Permissions on files are set properly.
[x] Package does NOT have a %clean section which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}
(or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). (not needed anymore)
[x] Package consistently uses macros (no %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
mixing)
[x] Package contains code, or permissable content.
[x] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
application.
[x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x] Javadoc documentation files are generated and included in -javadoc
subpackage
[x] Javadocs are placed in %{_javadocdir}/%{name} (no -%{version} symlinks)
[x] Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on jpackage-utils
[x] Javadoc subpackages have Require: jpackage-utils
[x] Package uses %global not %define
[-] If package uses tarball from VCS include comment how to re-create that
tarball (svn export URL, git clone URL, ...)
[-] If source tarball includes bundled jar/class files these need to be
removed prior to building
[x] All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
[x] Jar files are installed to %{_javadir}/%{name}.jar (see [6] for details)
[x] If package contains pom.xml files install it (including depmaps) even when
building with ant
[x] pom files has correct add_to_maven_depmap call which resolves to the pom
file (use JPP. and JPP- correctly)
=== Maven ===
[x] Use %{_mavenpomdir} macro for placing pom files instead of
%{_datadir}/maven2/poms
[x] If package uses -Dmaven.test.skip=true explain why it was needed in a
comment
[x] If package uses custom depmap -Dmaven2.jpp.depmap.file=* explain why
it's needed in a comment
[x] Package uses %update_maven_depmap in %post/%postun
[x] Packages have Requires(post) and Requires(postun) on jpackage-utils (for
%update_maven_depmap macro)
=== Other suggestions ===
[x] If possible use upstream build method (maven/ant/javac)
[x] Avoid having BuildRequires on exact NVR unless necessary
[x] Package has BuildArch: noarch (if possible)
[x] Latest version is packaged.
[x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
Tested on: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
=== Issues ===
1. None! There is only one way to describe this package: perfect example :-)
*** APPROVED ***
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 697401] Review Request: perl-Ouch - Exceptions that don't hurt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697401 Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com 2011-04-18 05:02:01 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: perl-Ouch Short Description: Exceptions that don't hurt Owners: psabata mmaslano ppisar Branches: f14 f15 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 Ortal ogv...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ogv...@redhat.com --- Comment #90 from Ortal ogv...@redhat.com 2011-04-18 05:46:51 EDT --- *** Bug 697442 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 696813] Review Request: eclipse-mylyn-context - Eclipse Mylyn task focused plug-ins
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=696813
--- Comment #4 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2011-04-18
06:09:45 EDT ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[!] Rpmlint output:
eclipse-mylyn-context-pde.noarch: W: self-obsoletion eclipse-mylyn-pde
3.5.0-1.fc14 obsoletes eclipse-mylyn-pde
eclipse-mylyn-context-java.noarch: W: self-obsoletion eclipse-mylyn-java
3.5.0-1.fc14 obsoletes eclipse-mylyn-java
eclipse-mylyn-context-cdt.noarch: W: self-obsoletion eclipse-mylyn-cdt
3.5.0-1.fc14 obsoletes eclipse-mylyn-cdt
Please add version to the provides.
[x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines[1].
[x] Spec file name must match the base package name, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines[2].
[x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms.
[x] Buildroot definition is not present
[x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines[3,4].
[x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
License type: EPL
[x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
[x] All independent sub-packages have license of their own
[x] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines[5].
[x] Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x] Permissions on files are set properly.
[x] Package does NOT have a %clean section which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}
(or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). (not needed anymore)
[x] Package consistently uses macros (no %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
mixing)
[x] Package contains code, or permissable content.
[x] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
application.
[x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[-] Javadoc documentation files are generated and included in -javadoc
subpackage
[-] Javadocs are placed in %{_javadocdir}/%{name} (no -%{version} symlinks)
[x] Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on jpackage-utils
[-] Javadoc subpackages have Require: jpackage-utils
[-] Package uses %global not %define
[x] If package uses tarball from VCS include comment how to re-create that
tarball (svn export URL, git clone URL, ...)
[x] If source tarball includes bundled jar/class files these need to be
removed prior to building
[x] All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
[-] Jar files are installed to %{_javadir}/%{name}.jar (see [6] for details)
[-] If package contains pom.xml files install it (including depmaps) even when
building with ant
[-] pom files has correct add_to_maven_depmap call which resolves to the pom
file (use JPP. and JPP- correctly)
=== Issues ===
1. Add versions to the virtual provides.
2. Remove cleaning of buildroot from beginning of %install
3. Use %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT consistently.
4. Add version to the mylyn BR/R e.g. BR: eclipse-mylyn = 3.5.0 this will ease
the building/installation for upgraders/testers
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 696813] Review Request: eclipse-mylyn-context - Eclipse Mylyn task focused plug-ins
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=696813 --- Comment #5 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2011-04-18 06:12:01 EDT --- Ooops, 3. is not an issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 697127] Review Request: eclipse-mylyn-tasks - Eclipse Mylyn task connectors
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697127 Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|akurt...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2011-04-18 06:15:18 EDT --- And this one is mine :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 697068] Review Request: eclipse-mylyn-ide - Mylyn Context Connector: Eclipse IDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697068 Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|akurt...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2011-04-18 06:12:50 EDT --- I'll do this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 640205] Review Request: visualvm - Lightweight profiler that integrates many command-line JDK tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=640205 --- Comment #54 from jiri vanek jva...@redhat.com 2011-04-18 06:47:53 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: visualvm New Branches: el5 el6 Owners: jvanek dbhole -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 638647] Review Request: mom - Dynamically manage system resources on virtualization hosts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638647 MERCIER Jonathan bioinfornat...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bioinfornat...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|bioinfornat...@gmail.com --- Comment #29 from MERCIER Jonathan bioinfornat...@gmail.com 2011-04-18 06:49:40 EDT --- I will take a look soon thanks for your works -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 697068] Review Request: eclipse-mylyn-ide - Mylyn Context Connector: Eclipse IDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697068
--- Comment #2 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2011-04-18
07:07:12 EDT ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[!] Rpmlint output:
eclipse-mylyn-ide.src:40: W: setup-not-quiet
Please fix it :)
eclipse-mylyn-ide.src: W: invalid-url Source0:
eclipse-mylyn-ide-R_3_5_0-fetched-src.tar.bz2
There is a fetch script so not a problem.
[x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines[1].
[x] Spec file name must match the base package name, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines[2].
[x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms.
[x] Buildroot definition is not present
[x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines[3,4].
[x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
License type: EPL
[x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
[x] All independent sub-packages have license of their own
[x] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines[5].
[x] Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x] Permissions on files are set properly.
[x] Package does NOT have a %clean section which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}
(or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). (not needed anymore)
[x] Package consistently uses macros (no %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
mixing)
[x] Package contains code, or permissable content.
[x] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
application.
[x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[-] Javadoc documentation files are generated and included in -javadoc
subpackage
[-] Javadocs are placed in %{_javadocdir}/%{name} (no -%{version} symlinks)
[x] Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on jpackage-utils
[-] Javadoc subpackages have Require: jpackage-utils
[-] Package uses %global not %define
[x] If package uses tarball from VCS include comment how to re-create that
tarball (svn export URL, git clone URL, ...)
[x] If source tarball includes bundled jar/class files these need to be
removed prior to building
[x] All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
[-] Jar files are installed to %{_javadir}/%{name}.jar (see [6] for details)
[-] If package contains pom.xml files install it (including depmaps) even when
building with ant
[-] pom files has correct add_to_maven_depmap call which resolves to the pom
file (use JPP. and JPP- correctly)
=== Issues ===
1. Fix setup not quiet rpmlint warning.
2. remove rm -rf %{buildroot} from beginning of install section
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 697127] Review Request: eclipse-mylyn-tasks - Eclipse Mylyn task connectors
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697127
--- Comment #2 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2011-04-18
07:33:58 EDT ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[!] Rpmlint output:
eclipse-mylyn-tasks-bugzilla.noarch: W: self-obsoletion eclipse-bugzilla
1:0.2.5 obsoletes eclipse-bugzilla = 1:0.2.4-4.fc6
Hmm, fc6? Just drop this provides/obsoletes. Btw, do the same for all
eclipse-mylar provides/obsoletes, they have stayed long enough.
eclipse-mylyn-tasks-bugzilla.noarch: W: non-etc-or-var-file-marked-as-conffile
/usr/share/eclipse/dropins/mylyn-bugzilla/redhat-bugzilla-custom-transitions.txt
eclipse-mylyn-tasks-bugzilla.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag
/usr/share/eclipse/dropins/mylyn-bugzilla/redhat-bugzilla-custom-transitions.txt
Please drop the conffile, we dont' want people to start editing the file, do
we?
[x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines[1].
[x] Spec file name must match the base package name, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines[2].
[x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms.
[x] Buildroot definition is not present
[x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines[3,4].
[x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
License type: EPL
[x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
[x] All independent sub-packages have license of their own
[x] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines[5].
[x] Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x] Permissions on files are set properly.
[x] Package does NOT have a %clean section which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}
(or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). (not needed anymore)
[x] Package consistently uses macros (no %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
mixing)
[x] Package contains code, or permissable content.
[x] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
application.
[x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[-] Javadoc documentation files are generated and included in -javadoc
subpackage
[-] Javadocs are placed in %{_javadocdir}/%{name} (no -%{version} symlinks)
[x] Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on jpackage-utils
[-] Javadoc subpackages have Require: jpackage-utils
[-] Package uses %global not %define
[x] If package uses tarball from VCS include comment how to re-create that
tarball (svn export URL, git clone URL, ...)
[x] If source tarball includes bundled jar/class files these need to be
removed prior to building
[x] All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
[-] Jar files are installed to %{_javadir}/%{name}.jar (see [6] for details)
[-] If package contains pom.xml files install it (including depmaps) even when
building with ant
[-] pom files has correct add_to_maven_depmap call which resolves to the pom
file (use JPP. and JPP- correctly)
=== Issues ===
1. Drop obsoletes/provides for eclipse-bugzilla, eclipse-mylar-* packages.
2. remove rm -rf %{buildroot} from beginning of install section
3. Drop the conffile marker forthe redhat bugzilla file
4. redhat-bugzilla-custom-transitions.txt.patch should be a regular file, kept
as source and installed directly
5. url should be changed to http://eclipse.org/mylyn/tasks/ to be more
accurate.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 652623] Review Request: erlang-bitcask - Eric Brewer-inspired key/value store
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652623 --- Comment #9 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2011-04-18 07:47:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) Ping? The upstream added a licensing info to one of two files in question https://github.com/basho/bitcask/commit/6e4fc07 I don't think that we need an explicit licensing information for include/bitcask.hrl as it might be considered as a derivative work from files in src/ directory (thus inheriting all their legal information). Unfortunately (or fortunately) IANAL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 638647] Review Request: mom - Dynamically manage system resources on virtualization hosts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638647 --- Comment #30 from Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org 2011-04-18 08:01:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #29) I will take a look soon thanks for your works Jonathan, are you a sponsor ? It seems not and this bug blocks FE-NEEDSPONSOR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 697483] Review Request: django-celery - Django Celery Integration
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697483 Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||611277(python-celery) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 611277] Review Request: python-celery - Task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=611277 Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||697483 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 697483] New: Review Request: django-celery - Django Celery Integration
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: django-celery - Django Celery Integration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697483 Summary: Review Request: django-celery - Django Celery Integration Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: methe...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec URL: http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/django-celery.spec SRPM URL: http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/django-celery-2.2.4-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: django-celery provides Celery integration for Django; Using the Django ORM and cache backend for storing results, autodiscovery of task modules for applications listed in INSTALLED_APPS, and more. Celery is a task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well. The execution units, called tasks, are executed concurrently on a single or more worker servers. Tasks can execute asynchronously (in the background) or synchronously (wait until ready). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 697492] New: Review Request: django-keyedcache - Utilities for simplified development of cache aware objects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: django-keyedcache - Utilities for simplified development of cache aware objects https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697492 Summary: Review Request: django-keyedcache - Utilities for simplified development of cache aware objects Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: methe...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec URL: http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/django-keyedcache.spec SRPM URL: http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/django-keyedcache-1.4.1-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: Django Keyedcache provides utilities and class mixins for simplified development of cache-aware objects. Used in Satchmo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 696813] Review Request: eclipse-mylyn-context - Eclipse Mylyn task focused plug-ins
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=696813 --- Comment #6 from Severin Gehwolf sgehw...@redhat.com 2011-04-18 09:28:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) === Issues === 1. Add versions to the virtual provides. Fixed. 2. Remove cleaning of buildroot from beginning of %install Done. 4. Add version to the mylyn BR/R e.g. BR: eclipse-mylyn = 3.5.0 this will ease the building/installation for upgraders/testers Done. Updated spec file is here: http://fedorapeople.org/~jerboaa/rpm/mylyn/eclipse-mylyn-context.spec Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 696813] Review Request: eclipse-mylyn-context - Eclipse Mylyn task focused plug-ins
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=696813 --- Comment #7 from Severin Gehwolf sgehw...@redhat.com 2011-04-18 09:29:37 EDT --- SRPM is here: http://fedorapeople.org/~jerboaa/rpm/mylyn/eclipse-mylyn-context-3.5.0-2.fc15.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 697068] Review Request: eclipse-mylyn-ide - Mylyn Context Connector: Eclipse IDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697068
--- Comment #3 from Severin Gehwolf sgehw...@redhat.com 2011-04-18 09:35:51
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
=== Issues ===
1. Fix setup not quiet rpmlint warning.
Fixed.
2. remove rm -rf %{buildroot} from beginning of install section
Done.
Updated spec: http://fedorapeople.org/~jerboaa/rpm/mylyn/eclipse-mylyn-ide.spec
Updated SRPM:
http://fedorapeople.org/~jerboaa/rpm/mylyn/eclipse-mylyn-ide-3.5.0-2.fc15.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 685008] Review Request: rubygem-cloudservers - A Ruby API to the Rackspace Cloud Servers product
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=685008 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 685008] Review Request: rubygem-cloudservers - A Ruby API to the Rackspace Cloud Servers product
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=685008 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-04-18 09:45:36 EDT --- rubygem-cloudservers-0.4.1-2.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-cloudservers-0.4.1-2.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 697068] Review Request: eclipse-mylyn-ide - Mylyn Context Connector: Eclipse IDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697068 Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2011-04-18 09:47:52 EDT --- APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 696813] Review Request: eclipse-mylyn-context - Eclipse Mylyn task focused plug-ins
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=696813 Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2011-04-18 09:47:07 EDT --- Thanks, looks good. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 685008] Review Request: rubygem-cloudservers - A Ruby API to the Rackspace Cloud Servers product
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=685008 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-04-18 09:52:37 EDT --- rubygem-cloudservers-0.4.1-2.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-cloudservers-0.4.1-2.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 696813] Review Request: eclipse-mylyn-context - Eclipse Mylyn task focused plug-ins
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=696813 Severin Gehwolf sgehw...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Severin Gehwolf sgehw...@redhat.com 2011-04-18 10:07:58 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: eclipse-mylyn-context Short Description: Eclipse Mylyn task focused plug-ins Owners: jerboaa akurtakov Branches: f15 InitialCC: overholt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 697068] Review Request: eclipse-mylyn-ide - Mylyn Context Connector: Eclipse IDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697068 Severin Gehwolf sgehw...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Severin Gehwolf sgehw...@redhat.com 2011-04-18 10:10:21 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: eclipse-mylyn-ide Short Description: Mylyn context connector: Eclipse IDE Owners: jerboaa akurtakov Branches: f15 InitialCC: overholt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 676129] Review Request: qconf - Allows you to have a nice configure script for your qmake-based project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676129 Michal Schmidt mschm...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #27 from Michal Schmidt mschm...@redhat.com 2011-04-18 11:08:04 EDT --- I am satisfied with the latest package. The only small remaining issue (the applicability of qconf-1.4-optflags.patch upstream) is being discussed with the upstream author. I see no reason to block the review. I approve this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 606421] Review Request: quickfix - Open Source FIX Engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=606421 --- Comment #19 from Martin Dengler mar...@martindengler.com 2011-04-18 11:56:43 EDT --- I've updated and improved the package for F14, which builds fine ( http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3008700 )...excising the upstream-distributed UnitTest++ version is all that remains before another review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 693117] Review Request: drupal6-backup_migrate - Database backup, restore, and migrate module for Drupal 6
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693117 Eric Christensen e...@christensenplace.us changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(stickster@gmail.c ||om) --- Comment #1 from Eric Christensen e...@christensenplace.us 2011-04-18 12:18:50 EDT --- I get a 404 file not found error when trying to download the SPEC and SRPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 693117] Review Request: drupal6-backup_migrate - Database backup, restore, and migrate module for Drupal 6
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693117 Eric Christensen e...@christensenplace.us changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 692733] Review Request: openvas-cli - Command-line tool to drive OpenVAS Manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=692733 --- Comment #3 from Michal Ambroz re...@seznam.cz 2011-04-18 12:22:00 EDT --- Hello Stjepan, all the dependencies (openvas-libraries, openvas-scanner, openvas-manager) should be now available in updates or updates-testing repositories so you shuold be able to try openvas-cli again. Best regards Michal Ambroz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 644711] Review Request: diaser - disk based backup volume accumulator, replication and management system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=644711 Damian d...@interlinux.co.uk changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo? --- Comment #5 from Damian d...@interlinux.co.uk 2011-04-18 12:32:46 EDT --- Thanks Raghu I have added the package release - also in chronologically descending order. %changelog * Mon Apr 18 2011 Damian L Brasher d...@interlinux.co.uk 1.1.0 - Code maintenance. * Thu Oct 28 2010 Damian L Brasher d...@interlinux.co.uk 1.0.8 - Corrections: Red Hat Bugzilla Bug 644711 Review Request. * Wed May 20 2010 Damian L Brasher d...@interlinux.co.uk 1.0.1 - Initial implementation. The SRPM is now available here: SRPM URL: http://sourceforge.net/projects/diaser/files/diaser/1.1.0-beta3-dev/diaser-1.1.0-1.fc14.src.rpm SPEC URL remains the same: Spec URL: http://diaser.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/diaser/diaser.spec Do you mean find a reviewer? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 252108] Review Request: python-html5lib - A python based HTML5 parser/tokenizer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252108 Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED CC||methe...@gmail.com Resolution||CANTFIX Last Closed|2010-02-21 06:14:02 |2011-04-18 12:49:08 --- Comment #27 from Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com 2011-04-18 12:49:08 EDT --- This seems to be a dead review for a long time. I am closing this since I am going to open a new review request for the same software (need it as a dependency of a software that I would like to see in Fedora). Oded Arbel, if you are still interested in being a Fedora package maintainer, drop a me a mail and I will find a way to get you sponsored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 252108] Review Request: python-html5lib - A python based HTML5 parser/tokenizer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252108 Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|CANTFIX | --- Comment #28 from Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com 2011-04-18 12:56:11 EDT --- On second thought, the last comment has been about four months back and does have a assigned reviewer. I will give it say a week time before closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 676129] Review Request: qconf - Allows you to have a nice configure script for your qmake-based project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676129 --- Comment #28 from Ivan Romanov dr...@land.ru 2011-04-18 13:11:28 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: qconf Short Description: Tool for generating configure script for qmake-based projects Owners: ivanromanov Branches: f15 InitialCC: ivanromanov -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 679613] Review Request: python-flask - A microframework for Python based on Werkzeug, Jinja 2 and good intentions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679613 Dan Young dyo...@mesd.k12.or.us changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from Dan Young dyo...@mesd.k12.or.us 2011-04-18 13:18:05 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: python-flask New Branches: el6 Owners: dyoung -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 629027] Review Request: python-ZODB3 - Zope Object Database: Object Database and Persistence
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629027 Robin Lee robinlee.s...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Robin Lee robinlee.s...@gmail.com 2011-04-18 13:41:50 EDT --- Request Unretiring devel, f15 and el6 branches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 693804] Review Request: octave-octcdf - A NetCDF interface for octave
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693804 Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-04-18 13:50:02 --- Comment #5 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com 2011-04-18 13:50:02 EDT --- Thanks all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 474036] Review Request: terminator - Store and run multiple GNOME terminals in one window
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474036 --- Comment #19 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-04-18 13:55:17 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 640455] Review Request: python-pyro - Pyro is short for PYthon Remote Objects.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=640455 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #17 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-04-18 13:59:27 EDT --- There is no SCM request to process here. I do not understand what you are requesting from the SCM admins. Please either supply an SCM request according to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_SCM_admin_requests or describe what you need from the SCM admins, and re-raise the fedora-cvs flag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 629027] Review Request: python-ZODB3 - Zope Object Database: Object Database and Persistence
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629027 --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-04-18 14:04:30 EDT --- I'm confused; it appears that you just retired this package yesterday. What's going on? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 679613] Review Request: python-flask - A microframework for Python based on Werkzeug, Jinja 2 and good intentions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679613 --- Comment #15 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-04-18 14:07:58 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 640455] Review Request: python-pyro - Pyro is short for PYthon Remote Objects.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=640455 --- Comment #18 from David Hannequin david.hanneq...@gmail.com 2011-04-18 14:06:04 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: python-pyro Short Description: Pyro stands for PYthon Remote Objects. Owners: hvad Branches: f14 f15 el6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 648007] Review Request: ghc-binary-shared - Haskell library for sharing binary elements
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648007 --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-04-18 14:07:39 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 694651] Review Request: IBSimu - Ion beam simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=694651 --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-04-18 14:10:13 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 697068] Review Request: eclipse-mylyn-ide - Mylyn Context Connector: Eclipse IDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697068 --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-04-18 14:10:54 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 696813] Review Request: eclipse-mylyn-context - Eclipse Mylyn task focused plug-ins
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=696813 --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-04-18 14:10:35 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 697401] Review Request: perl-Ouch - Exceptions that don't hurt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697401 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-04-18 14:12:06 EDT --- This review is not assigned to anyone. It should be assigned to the reviewer. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process#Reviewer Please fix and re-raise the fedora-cvs flag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 629027] Review Request: python-ZODB3 - Zope Object Database: Object Database and Persistence
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629027 --- Comment #11 from Robin Lee robinlee.s...@gmail.com 2011-04-18 14:12:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) I'm confused; it appears that you just retired this package yesterday. What's going on? But soon Jerry James asked for ownership of this package. I should have orphaned it first. I'm sorry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 640455] Review Request: python-pyro - Pyro is short for PYthon Remote Objects.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=640455 --- Comment #19 from David Hannequin david.hanneq...@gmail.com 2011-04-18 14:39:24 EDT --- sorry, I was too hasty. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 499959] Review Request: redmine - redmine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499959 David Hannequin david.hanneq...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||ERRATA Flag|needinfo?(david.hannequin@g | |mail.com) | Last Closed|2009-12-04 13:26:46 |2011-04-18 14:53:53 --- Comment #40 from David Hannequin david.hanneq...@gmail.com 2011-04-18 14:53:53 EDT --- Hi, Since the fork, I have no time to work on the packaging of redmine. I am compelled to abandon. If someone wants to resume the work already done. Best regard -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 693117] Review Request: drupal6-backup_migrate - Database backup, restore, and migrate module for Drupal 6
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693117 Paul W. Frields sticks...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(stickster@gmail.c | |om) | --- Comment #2 from Paul W. Frields sticks...@gmail.com 2011-04-18 14:52:09 EDT --- Sorry Eric! Here they are: Spec: http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/packages/SPECS/drupal6-backup_migrate.spec SRPM: http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/drupal6-backup_migrate-2.4-1.fc15.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 689685] Review Request: Anchorman - The recording-studio-in-a-box
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689685 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||rdie...@math.unl.edu AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|rdie...@math.unl.edu Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #7 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu 2011-04-18 15:13:38 EDT --- I can review/sponsor here, as promised. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 689685] Review Request: Anchorman - The recording-studio-in-a-box
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689685 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu 2011-04-18 15:25:37 EDT --- 1. As mentioned in comment #6, BR: gcc-c++ should be dropped. Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3009270 sources ok ba211b882225cec7a85923b0d626ef57 anchorman-0.0.1.tar.gz rpmlint *.rpm x86_64/*.rpm anchorman.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US webcam - web cam, web-cam, webcast anchorman.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US icecast - ice cast, ice-cast, icecap anchorman.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US webcam - web cam, web-cam, webcast anchorman.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US icecast - ice cast, ice-cast, icecap anchorman.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary anchorman 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings. mostly harmless here. licensing: ok naming: ok scriptlets: n/a runtime: naively running the binary (without option or webcam hardware present), gives me a segfault, but we can let that slide being a very new project. otherwise, nice-n-simple source and packaging all around. I won't block on item 1 above, but would appreciate it being fixed prior to doing any official builds. APPROVED (lifting NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 697127] Review Request: eclipse-mylyn-tasks - Eclipse Mylyn task connectors
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697127
--- Comment #3 from Severin Gehwolf sgehw...@redhat.com 2011-04-18 15:43:07
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
=== Issues ===
1. Drop obsoletes/provides for eclipse-bugzilla, eclipse-mylar-* packages.
2. remove rm -rf %{buildroot} from beginning of install section
3. Drop the conffile marker forthe redhat bugzilla file
4. redhat-bugzilla-custom-transitions.txt.patch should be a regular file, kept
as source and installed directly
5. url should be changed to http://eclipse.org/mylyn/tasks/ to be more
accurate.
Should be fixed now. Updated SRPM:
http://fedorapeople.org/~jerboaa/rpm/mylyn/eclipse-mylyn-tasks-3.5.0-2.fc15.src.rpm
Spec file: http://fedorapeople.org/~jerboaa/rpm/mylyn/eclipse-mylyn-tasks.spec
Thanks!
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 695745] Review Request: wso2-wsf-cpp - Web Services Framework for C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=695745 Ian Main im...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Ian Main im...@redhat.com 2011-04-18 16:40:36 EDT --- Looks good to me. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 643140] Review Request: autokey - A desktop automation utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=643140 --- Comment #18 from Raghu Udiyar raghusidda...@gmail.com 2011-04-18 16:48:51 EDT --- Updated package to new upstream release : SPEC : http://dl.dropbox.com/u/7899621/autokey/autokey.spec SRPM : http://dl.dropbox.com/u/7899621/autokey/autokey-0.71.3-1.fc14.src.rpm $ rpmlint autokey.spec ../RPMS/noarch/autokey-* ../SRPMS/autokey-0.71.3-1.fc14.src.rpm autokey.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: http://autokey.googlecode.com/files/autokey_0.71.3.tar.gz HTTP Error 404: Not Found autokey.noarch: W: no-documentation autokey.src: W: invalid-url Source0: http://autokey.googlecode.com/files/autokey_0.71.3.tar.gz HTTP Error 404: Not Found 5 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 522821] Review Request: bluetile - A modern tiling window manager with a gentle learning curve
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522821 --- Comment #35 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-04-18 17:20:18 EDT --- bluetile-0.5.3-4.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 590355] Review Request: golly - cellular automata simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590355 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-04-18 17:21:11 EDT --- golly-2.2-2.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630205] Review Request: ghc-regexpr - Regular expression like Perl/Ruby in Haskell
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630205 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-04-18 17:23:45 EDT --- ghc-regexpr-0.5.3-2.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 685008] Review Request: rubygem-cloudservers - A Ruby API to the Rackspace Cloud Servers product
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=685008 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-04-18 17:24:25 EDT --- rubygem-cloudservers-0.4.1-2.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630205] Review Request: ghc-regexpr - Regular expression like Perl/Ruby in Haskell
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630205 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||ghc-regexpr-0.5.3-1.fc13 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-04-18 17:22:48 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 696813] Review Request: eclipse-mylyn-context - Eclipse Mylyn task focused plug-ins
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=696813 Severin Gehwolf sgehw...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-04-18 17:23:55 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 522821] Review Request: bluetile - A modern tiling window manager with a gentle learning curve
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522821 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|bluetile-0.5.3-4.fc15 |bluetile-0.5.3-4.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630205] Review Request: ghc-regexpr - Regular expression like Perl/Ruby in Haskell
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630205 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-04-18 17:22:42 EDT --- ghc-regexpr-0.5.3-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 590355] Review Request: golly - cellular automata simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590355 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|golly-2.2-2.fc15|golly-2.2-2.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630205] Review Request: ghc-regexpr - Regular expression like Perl/Ruby in Haskell
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630205 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|ghc-regexpr-0.5.3-1.fc13|ghc-regexpr-0.5.3-2.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 697673] New: Review Request: sjinn - Simple tool for sending receiving data from RS-232 devices
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sjinn - Simple tool for sending receiving data from RS-232 devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697673 Summary: Review Request: sjinn - Simple tool for sending receiving data from RS-232 devices Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: linvi...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec URL: http://linville.fedorapeople.org/sjinn.spec SRPM URL: http://linville.fedorapeople.org/sjinn-1.01-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: S-Jinn is a free, lightweight, open-source Linux application written in C. It is a simple command-line tool designed for sending receiving data from PC controlled TIA/EIA-232 (RS-232) test, measurement, and control devices. Depending on your application you may be able to use stty or C-Kermit, but I believe you will find that S-Jinn is easier-to-use, more intuitive, and more concise in the area of command-line and/or scripted RS-232 data acquisition and control. Popular Linux communications packages like Minicom will also communicate with RS-232 devices, but they are better suited to modems, computers, network devices, etc. They typically lack support for any combination of UART communication settings required by many of the RS-232 test, measurement, and control devices on the market. Most communications packages also lack command-line support. Some provide scripting languages, but S-Jinn frees you from application-specific languages. S-Jinn simply directs the data to STDOUT where you can display it, pipe it, and/or redirect it to be processed by your favorite Unix shell and/or scripting language regardless of whether you prefer Bash, Python, Perl, Expect, or you name it. Other S-Jinn features include the ability to: * Control RS-232 DTR and RTS lines from the command-line * Display DTR, RTS, CTS DSR status * Send control characters (including the NULL character) * Send values in hex * Specify read length * Set programmable delay times for both send read. * Support for virtually all baud rates, parity, and data lengths found in standard PC UARTS * Output Formatting: ASCII, hex, ASCII-over-hex, wrap text, truncate lines, suppress trailing line feeds -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 694651] Review Request: IBSimu - Ion beam simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=694651 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-04-18 17:35:42 EDT --- IBSimu-1.0.4-4.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/IBSimu-1.0.4-4.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 694651] Review Request: IBSimu - Ion beam simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=694651 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 694651] Review Request: IBSimu - Ion beam simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=694651 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-04-18 17:35:57 EDT --- IBSimu-1.0.4-4.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/IBSimu-1.0.4-4.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 694651] Review Request: IBSimu - Ion beam simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=694651 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-04-18 17:35:49 EDT --- IBSimu-1.0.4-4.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/IBSimu-1.0.4-4.el6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 697673] Review Request: sjinn - Simple tool for sending receiving data from RS-232 devices
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697673 --- Comment #1 from John W. Linville linvi...@redhat.com 2011-04-18 17:38:22 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3009531 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 697680] New: Review Request: surf-geometry - visualizer for real algebraic geometry
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: surf-geometry - visualizer for real algebraic geometry https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697680 Summary: Review Request: surf-geometry - visualizer for real algebraic geometry Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: loganje...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec URL: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/surf-geometry/surf-geometry.spec SRPM URL: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/surf-geometry/surf-geometry-1.0.6-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: Surf is a tool to visualize some real algebraic geometry: plane algebraic curves, algebraic surfaces and hyperplane sections of surfaces. The package is named surf-geometry because there is already a surf package, and a /usr/bin/surf binary, in Fedora. Surf comes with a GTK 1.2 UI, which is disabled in this package. More modern UIs are provided by the (to be submitted soon) packages surfer and surfex. The surfer and surfex packages are dependencies of SINGULAR, which is a dependency of SAGE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 678955] Review Request: opencsg - Library for Constructive Solid Geometry using OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678955 --- Comment #10 from Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com 2011-04-18 18:02:56 EDT --- Jeff, do you intend to continue with this review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 697425] Review Request: sound-theme-beethoven-fifth - Sound theme based on Beethoven's fifth symphony
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697425 Christopher Antila crant...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||crant...@fedoraproject.org --- Comment #1 from Christopher Antila crant...@fedoraproject.org 2011-04-18 18:33:16 EDT --- Is this theme intended to be standard-issue in all Fedora installations? Either way, has anybody thought about the socio-cultural implications of this particular sound theme? I'm not definitively either for or against this sound theme, in principle, but the very fact that it is what it is means that we are likely to endorse it as a good, neutral, positive change for the distribution. Because musical cultural problems are otherwise likely to go unnoticed, I feel obliged to stand here waving my arms and pointing at them. Here's what I think we need to consider, and I'm being brief: 1.) Everything stems from the fact that most of the Fedora developers live in the Western European music culture, or its out-growths that include North America and Oceania. If we intend to make a universally distributable distribution, which seems to be the project's intention, then we cannot *just* let this music culture dominate without deciding that we want it to do so. 2.) Music is not universal. Sometimes, we fall into this trap as a result of sloppy thought-processes, and sometimes we wilfully mislead ourselves into thinking that music is universal. It's not, and in 2011, it isn't difficult to explain how not and why not. There are cultures that use very different music from our own - many of them unburdened by the artificial distinction between art music and popular music. When we say that music is universal, what we mean is that music has the ability to transcend natural language barriers. 3.) Beethoven is, and historically has been, often constructed as the ultimate genius. His music, therefore, is very frequently called upon by people wishing to forward the argument of universality. When we access any Beethoven composition, we automatically invoke this argument. 4.) Worse still, Beethoven's fifth symphony, which is very obviously the basis for this sound theme, is one of the most well-known pieces of classical music, that is - even more than the ninth symphony - called upon to lead the how could you not appreciate this?!?! charge. By hijacking this symphony, we add yet another element to the train of thought that holds this work as universally good, which represents the universally good composer, the universally good classical music tradition, and the universally good Western European tradition that allowed it to develop. 5.) And universally good means superior to every alternative. Classical music is also often upheld as one of the supreme achievements of... well... anything. It may or may not be, but do we want to be pushing this message as part of the Fedora Project? And moreover, do we want to be pushing it very forcefully by using Beethoven's fifth symphony? We need to think about this, and because we're an open-source project, our thought process needs to be documented for future reference by ourselves and others. Basically what I'm saying is that, if this is to be the default sound theme (or even just the first sound theme), then we as a collective Project must decide whether or not we want to push the Western classical music tradition, and therefore the achievements of Western society, as superior to the achievements of all other cultures. And for the record, Ubuntu has not, in my opinion, successfully solved this problem. They're simply co-opting a generic African culture, both with their name and with their sound theme, and thereby falling victim to good, old-fashioned Primitivism. I think, however, that Microsoft has solved the problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 697697] New: Review Request: sugar-surf - Web Browser activity for Sugar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sugar-surf - Web Browser activity for Sugar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697697 Summary: Review Request: sugar-surf - Web Browser activity for Sugar Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pbrobin...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/sugar-surf.spec SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/sugar-surf-115-1.fc14.src.rpm Desciption: Surf is a Web browser built on WebKit and thus uses the same HTML rendering engine as Epiphany. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 697425] Review Request: sound-theme-beethoven-fifth - Sound theme based on Beethoven's fifth symphony
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697425 Onyeibo twoho...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||twoho...@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Onyeibo twoho...@gmail.com 2011-04-18 19:49:51 EDT --- To cut the long story short. The answer is no! I believe the author of this sound-theme intended it be one of many sound-themes that will be developed by the musicians and creative artists at Fedora Sound SIG. It does not represent a default sound-theme for fedora product but an option different from the freedesktop theme which has been the only theme shipping with fedora for 3 yrs AFAIK The People at Fedora Sound SIG are basically giving meaning to an existing and mostly overlooked implementation in the Project. The XDG sound theme specification has been used in the Project since 2008 but unlike other aspects of Fedora Project, it remains mostly unexploited by contributors and end-users. By Contributors I mean those that are not directly involved in the implementation ... those who probably know nothing about scripting or programming. Those contributors can be anybody from any discipline with a good taste of sound and music. The Beethoven Sound theme is proof of concept -- if you will. It does not represent the collective decision of the Fedora Project members. It is to the Fedora Sound SIG like what echo-Icon-theme is to the Fedora Design-team. Echo Icon theme is not the default icon theme in Fedora product but contributors continue to improve it. Users have a choice of using it at its present state. What we should be considering is the provision of options (which promotes 'freedom' for which the project stand for). So far, our users have not been that privileged in the sound event section. That is what the SIG is trying to change and the Beethoven Theme is their first product. It follows that no particular culture is being favoured although the present appear to suggest a preference to Western European Music. A contributor from a different part of the globe may submit something entirely different. Its all about options ... and freedom. Later, when the SIG matures we can start thinking of a theme that the Project can call theirs == The Fedora Sound Theme. 'Old-Fashioned Primitivism'? That doesn't sound objective -- not nice either. If you believe Microsoft has solved the problem then it can be done, more so, by Fedora Contributors when they put there resources to it. I see a lot of reasoning in your argument though it doesn't fully apply in this case. We could use more of your constructive approach/analysis at #fedora-sound channel (freenode). Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 697247] Review Request: gsmartcontrol - Graphical user interface for smartctl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697247 --- Comment #1 from Eric Smith e...@brouhaha.com 2011-04-17 04:13:04 EDT --- Various parts of this package are covered by various licenses, all of which are already OK for Fedora except the Whatever license: Whatever License THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED 'AS-IS', WITHOUT ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTY. IN NO EVENT WILL THE AUTHORS BE HELD LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGES ARISING FROM THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE. Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim or modified copies of this license document. Permission is granted to anyone to use this software for any purpose, including commercial applications, and to alter it and redistribute it freely. I have posted a request to the Fedora legal mailing list about it. --- Comment #2 from Eric Smith e...@brouhaha.com 2011-04-18 20:27:10 EDT --- Tom Callaway posted to the Fedora legal mailing list that the Whatever license is acceptable as an extremely permissive variant of the MIT license, and should be marked as such. I've updated the License tag in the spec accordingly: Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~brouhaha/gsmartcontrol/gsmartcontrol.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~brouhaha/gsmartcontrol/gsmartcontrol-0.8.5-2.fc14.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 633063] Review Request: python-txamqp - A Python library for communicating with AMQP peers and brokers using Twisted
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633063 Silas Sewell si...@sewell.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Silas Sewell si...@sewell.ch 2011-04-19 01:30:03 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: python-txamqp Short Description: Twisted AMQP Library Owners: silas Branches: F-15 EL-6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 697401] Review Request: perl-Ouch - Exceptions that don't hurt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697401 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mmasl...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
