[Bug 701866] Review Request: php-pecl-yaml - Support for YAML 1.1 serialization using the LibYAML library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701866 Theodore Lee theo...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 698576] Review Request: pal - Command line calendar that displays holidays and events
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698576 --- Comment #6 from Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com 2011-05-04 03:18:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) Uhm, could you please read the description again? Pal is command-line calendar program that can keep track of events pal is a command-line calendar program for Unix/Linux systems that can keep track of events. [...] I think this should really be corrected (e.g. remove the first part until pal is a...). Agreed, Martin you can add that to the needswork list... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701668] Review Request: mozilla-monkeysphere - Firefox extension for using Monkeysphere on the web
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701668 Michal Nowak mno...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||mozilla-monkeysphere -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 225280] Merge Review: aspell-pl - Polish dictionaries for Aspell
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225280 Ivana Varekova varek...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | Summary|Merge Review: aspell-pl |Merge Review: aspell-pl - ||Polish dictionaries for ||Aspell Flag||fedora-cvs? Keywords||Reopened --- Comment #10 from Ivana Varekova varek...@redhat.com 2011-05-04 03:58:03 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: aspell-pl Short Description: Polish dictionaries for Aspell Owners: varekova Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 633104] Review Request: monkeysphere - Use the OpenPGP web of trust to verify ssh connections
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633104
Michal Nowak mno...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://bugzilla.redhat.com
||/show_bug.cgi?id=701668
Status Whiteboard|StalledSubmitter|
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #12 from Michal Nowak mno...@redhat.com 2011-05-04 04:00:34 EDT
---
FORMAL REVIEW
=
[PASS]* MUST: rpmlint must be run on the source rpm and all binary rpms the
build produces. The output should be posted in the review.[1]
[PASS]* MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming
Guidelines .
[PASS]* MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in
the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [2] .
[PASS]* MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines .
[PASS]* MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license
and meet the Licensing Guidelines .
[PASS]* MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the
actual license. [3]
[PASS]* MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.[4]
[PASS]* MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [5]
[PASS]* MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [6]
[PASS] MD5: 481ac14c9fdef0ccd1944c593bd4f517* MUST: The sources used to
build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL.
Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified
for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with
this.
[PASS]* MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary
rpms on at least one primary architecture. [7]
[WAIVE]* MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work
on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed
[PASS]* MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires,
except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging
Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common
sense.
[WAIVE]* MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by
using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly
forbidden.[9]
[WAIVE]* MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared
library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths,
must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [10]
[PASS]* MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.[11]
[PASS]* MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager
must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization
for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is
considered a blocker. [12]
[PASS]* MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it
does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package
which does create that directory. [13]
[PASS]* MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the
spec file's %files listings. (Notable exception: license texts in specific
situations)[14]
[PASS]* MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should
be set with executable permissions, for example. [15]
[PASS]* MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [16]
[PASS]* MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [17]
[WAIVE]* MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The
definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not
restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). [18]
[PASS]* MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect
the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program
must run properly if it is not present. [18]
[WAIVE]* MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [19]
[WAIVE]* MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [20]
[PASS]* MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g.
libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in
a -devel package. [19]
[WAIVE]* MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require
the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name}%{?_isa}
= %{version}-%{release} [21]
[PASS]* MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these
must be removed in the spec if they are built.[20]
[WAIVE]* MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a
[Bug 693664] Review Request: supybot-gribble - Cross-platform support bot based on supybot
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693664 --- Comment #12 from David Riches davi...@ultracar.co.uk 2011-05-04 04:34:28 EDT --- Sorry for the delay folks... Jon: Thanks for the commit acl's on supybot-fedora and supybot-koji , I've done the updates, bumped, built and updated. Kevin: Thanks for the advice and acl's on meetbot, I'd prefer to keep the tar'd format if thats ok; its the default for git-archive, and I just feel that using the git-archive command to create the tarball is so much nicer than pulling, checking out a hash then bz'ing it...although if you think its worth the extra effort, I can certainly work on it.. I've added Conflicts: supybot-gribble to supybot (thanks Ricky), and done the replacements for supybot-meetbot, fedora and koji.. Turns out, twisted isn't a requirement of supybot, its a recommendation - so I have removed the dependency, the documentation for the bot does indeed recommend twisted, but I have also added it to the package description. so (I think) it might possibly be ready :-).. SPEC: http://dcr226.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/supybot-gribble.spec SRPM: http://dcr226.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/supybot-gribble-0.83.4.1-2.fc13.src.rpm Koji Stuff: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3049458 - f13 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3049450 - f14 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3049452 - f15 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3049454 - rawhide http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3049456 - el6 All built correctly, sadly there will be no gribble for el5 due to el5 running a version of python that just wont work.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 524992] Review Request: toppler - platform game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524992 Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #22 from Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com 2011-05-04 04:54:47 EDT --- Looks good to me now, approved! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 524992] Review Request: toppler - platform game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524992 Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #23 from Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org 2011-05-04 05:09:03 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: toppler Short Description: platform game Owners: xavierb Branches: f14 f15 el5 el6 InitialCC: Thanks again for the review and patches, Hans :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 700667] Review Request python26-crypto
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=700667 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dmalc...@redhat.com, ||p...@city-fan.org --- Comment #4 from Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org 2011-05-04 05:38:59 EDT --- (python-crypto maintainer here) Another possibility, given that python26-crypto doesn't currently exist and the EPEL-5 python-crypto package is quite old (2.0.1; current upstream is 2.3) would be to make the new python26-crypto package use the current upstream release, as that is likely to be more useful to python26 users? That would of course need a new review as it would be a new package rather than a subpackage of the existing python-crypto package. I've no objection to the subpackage approach other than that I think a more recent version would be a better option going forward given that it's essentially a new package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701785] Review Request: puzzle-master - Fun and addictive jigsaw puzzle game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701785 David Riches davi...@ultracar.co.uk changed: What|Removed |Added CC||davi...@ultracar.co.uk --- Comment #3 from David Riches davi...@ultracar.co.uk 2011-05-04 06:55:40 EDT --- not reviewing: but, I couldn't even build the src.rpm because of: BuildRequires: pkgconfig(QtCore), pkgconfig(QtGui), pkgconfig(QtOpenGL) this line really needs to be the packages that we pull from the fedora repos have a peek at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#BuildRequires -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701932] New: Review Request: pymacs - Emacs and Python integration framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pymacs - Emacs and Python integration framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701932 Summary: Review Request: pymacs - Emacs and Python integration framework Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: socho...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec URL: http://sochotni.fedorapeople.org/packages/pymacs.spec SRPM URL: http://sochotni.fedorapeople.org/packages/pymacs-0.23-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: Pymacs is a powerful tool which, once started from Emacs, allows both-way communication between Emacs Lisp and Python. Pymacs aims Python as an extension language for Emacs rather than the other way around, and this asymmetry is reflected in some design choices. Within Emacs Lisp code, one may load and use Python modules. Python functions may themselves use Emacs services, and handle Emacs Lisp objects kept in Emacs Lisp space. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701937] New: Review Request: rope - Python refactoring library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: rope - Python refactoring library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701937
Summary: Review Request: rope - Python refactoring library
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: socho...@redhat.com
QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Spec URL: http://sochotni.fedorapeople.org/packages/rope.spec
SRPM URL: http://sochotni.fedorapeople.org/packages/rope-0.9.3-1.fc14.src.rpm
Description:
Rope is a python refactoring library. Some of the main features
include:
* Rename everything!
* Extract method/local variable
* Move class/function/module/package/method
* Inline method/local variable/parameter
* Restructuring (like converting ${a}.f(${b}) to ${b}.g(${a}) where a:
type=mymod.A)
* Introduce factory
* Change method signature
* Transform module to package
* Encapsulate field
* Replace method with method object
* And a few others
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701426] Review Request: python-taboot - Client utility for scripted multi-system administration over Func
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701426 Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktdre...@ktdreyer.com --- Comment #1 from Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com 2011-05-04 07:32:18 EDT --- Welcome Tim! Please block FE-NEEDSPONSOR. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 684835] Review Request: deltacloud-core - Deltacloud REST API server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=684835
--- Comment #6 from Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com 2011-05-04 07:38:08 EDT
---
* the line mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_bindir} in %install section is duplicated.
* support folder content
- If I admit that support folder has some meaning for the original gem, it
has
not much sense on Fedora.
- If I admit the Folder would be on Fedora, it should contain up-to-date
content, e.g. the RPM spec file should be the same I am currently
reviewing,
but I am afraid you can never ever achieve it.
- The easiest solution would be to delete it IMO.
* Deleting the %{_builddir}
- It is bad practice to delete %{_builddir} in installation step. It is not
harmful in this particular case, but once there would be binary extensions
it may cause troubles. This is coming from Ruby guidelines:
Finally at %install stage the whole tree under the directory created at %prep
stage should be copied (not moved) to under %{buildroot}%{gemdir}.
When all tree under the directory created at %prep stage is moved to under
%{buildroot}, find_debuginfo.sh will complain that the corresponding
source
files are missing.
I pointed this once but I have to stress it again. Please, do not delete
anything in %{_builddir}, unless you have very good reason.
This time you are not exactly deleting but moving and the result might be the
same. Moreover, the documentation is not generated due to move instead of
copy
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 624705] Review Request: pam_script - execute scripts from within pam
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624705 Marcus Moeller marcus.moel...@gmx.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard|BuildFails | --- Comment #7 from Marcus Moeller marcus.moel...@gmx.ch 2011-05-04 07:45:24 EDT --- Updated Spec: http://mmoeller.fedorapeople.org/build/pam_script/1.1.4-6/pam_script.spec and SRPM: http://mmoeller.fedorapeople.org/build/pam_script/1.1.4-6/pam_script-1.1.4-6.fc14.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701785] Review Request: puzzle-master - Fun and addictive jigsaw puzzle game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701785
--- Comment #4 from Timur Kristóf ti...@sch.bme.hu 2011-05-04 08:04:29 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
You should document how to generate the tarball instead of linking to the
file on fedorapeople.
The upstream author (which happens to be myself) puts the released tarball onto
Fedorapeople. So I see nothing wrong with that.
If you insist on the git instructions instead, I could of course include them
in the .spec.
Looking at source, puzzle-master.desktop is executable.
The permission can be fixed with %attr:
%attr(644,root,root) %{_datadir}/applications/puzzle-master.desktop
Thanks, I fixed the permissions for both the .desktop and the icon file.
other files have wrong permissions too, like png images.
Only the icon file (puzzle-master.png) is relevant, the others are not in the
package. (They are embedded into the executable by Qt.)
Also check desktop-file-install usage:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop
Okay, I added desktop-file-validate to my .spec file.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701954] New: Review Request: ropemode - Helper for using rope refactoring library in IDEs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ropemode - Helper for using rope refactoring library in IDEs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701954 Summary: Review Request: ropemode - Helper for using rope refactoring library in IDEs Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: socho...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec URL: http://sochotni.fedorapeople.org/packages/ropemode.spec SRPM URL: http://sochotni.fedorapeople.org/packages/ropemode-0.1-0.1.rc2.fc14.src.rpm Description: Ropemode is a helper library for use of rope refactoring from within IDEs, mainly used by ropemacs within Emacs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701785] Review Request: puzzle-master - Fun and addictive jigsaw puzzle game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701785 --- Comment #5 from Timur Kristóf ti...@sch.bme.hu 2011-05-04 08:05:37 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) but, I couldn't even build the src.rpm because of: BuildRequires: pkgconfig(QtCore), pkgconfig(QtGui), pkgconfig(QtOpenGL) this line really needs to be the packages that we pull from the fedora repos Not true, even mock can understand these and yum can resolve them too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701937] Review Request: rope - Python refactoring library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701937 Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||701954 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701954] Review Request: ropemode - Helper for using rope refactoring library in IDEs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701954 Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||701937 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701785] Review Request: puzzle-master - Fun and addictive jigsaw puzzle game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701785 --- Comment #6 from William Lima wl...@primate.com.br 2011-05-04 08:20:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) not reviewing: but, I couldn't even build the src.rpm because of: BuildRequires: pkgconfig(QtCore), pkgconfig(QtGui), pkgconfig(QtOpenGL) this line really needs to be the packages that we pull from the fedora repos have a peek at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#BuildRequires There is no reference to pkgconfig use in BuildRequires. You can also install using double quotes (). It's OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701494] Review Request: wlmproxy - An advanced proxy for the MSN Messenger protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701494 --- Comment #4 from William Lima wl...@primate.com.br 2011-05-04 09:07:49 EDT --- latest package files Spec URL: http://poetinha.fedorapeople.org/wlmproxy.spec SRPM URL: http://poetinha.fedorapeople.org/wlmproxy-0.1.2-2.fc15.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 690580] Review Request: perl-Perl-Critic-More - Supplemental policies for Perl::Critic
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690580 --- Comment #13 from Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com 2011-05-04 09:07:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) I have no problem in adding perl-Perl-Critic-More into F15, provided it does not imply upgrading other packages. (AFAIK it doesn't. Marcela, verify it, I have no Fedora available now). http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3049683 At least build in F-15 passed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 690580] Review Request: perl-Perl-Critic-More - Supplemental policies for Perl::Critic
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690580 --- Comment #14 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com 2011-05-04 09:17:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) (In reply to comment #12) I have no problem in adding perl-Perl-Critic-More into F15, provided it does not imply upgrading other packages. (AFAIK it doesn't. Marcela, verify it, I have no Fedora available now). http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3049683 At least build in F-15 passed. And now the run-time part: Are all Requires satisfied in F15? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701982] New: Review Request: osm-gps-map - A Gtk+ widget for displaying OpenStreetMap tiles
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: osm-gps-map - A Gtk+ widget for displaying OpenStreetMap tiles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701982 Summary: Review Request: osm-gps-map - A Gtk+ widget for displaying OpenStreetMap tiles Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j...@ocjtech.us QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec URL: http://jcollie.fedorapeople.org/osm-gps-map.spec SRPM URL: http://jcollie.fedorapeople.org/osm-gps-map-0.7.3-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: A Gtk+ widget that when given GPS co-ordinates, draws a GPS track, and points of interest on a moving map display. Downloads map data from a number of websites, including openstreetmap.org. Scratch build here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3049662 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701426] Review Request: python-taboot - Client utility for scripted multi-system administration over Func
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701426 Tim Bielawa tbiel...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701811] Review Request: vo-aacenc - Advanced Audio Coding (AAC) audio codec Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701811 Michal Nowak mno...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mno...@redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Michal Nowak mno...@redhat.com 2011-05-04 09:33:39 EDT --- I thought AAC is patent encumbered, doesn't it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 694950] Review Request: torrent-search - A torrent searching graphical application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=694950 Michal Nowak mno...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mno...@redhat.com --- Comment #8 from Michal Nowak mno...@redhat.com 2011-05-04 09:45:45 EDT --- Seeing Bonobo and GNOME Applet here makes me ask: How does torrent-search behaves in Fedora 15 with GNOME Shell? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701284] Review Request: python-py2pack - Generate distribution packages from Python packages on PyPI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701284 Haïkel Guémar karlthe...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||karlthe...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|karlthe...@gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701996] New: Review Request: ropemacs - Plugin for performing python refactorings in emacs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ropemacs - Plugin for performing python refactorings in emacs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701996 Summary: Review Request: ropemacs - Plugin for performing python refactorings in emacs Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: socho...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec URL: http://sochotni.fedorapeople.org/packages/ropemacs.spec SRPM URL: http://sochotni.fedorapeople.org/packages/ropemacs-0.6-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: Ropemacs is a plugin for performing python refactorings in Emacs. It uses rope library and pymacs and supports full rope functionality. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701426] Review Request: python-taboot - Client utility for scripted multi-system administration over Func
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701426 --- Comment #2 from Tim Bielawa tbiel...@redhat.com 2011-05-04 09:47:22 EDT --- Oh man, missed that! I thought I had gotten everything. It's blocking now. Thanks for the pointer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701811] Review Request: vo-aacenc - VisualOn AAC encoder library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701811 PRABIN KUMAR DATTA linux.n@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: vo-aacenc - |Review Request: vo-aacenc - |Advanced Audio Coding (AAC) |VisualOn AAC encoder |audio codec Library |library -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 690580] Review Request: perl-Perl-Critic-More - Supplemental policies for Perl::Critic
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690580 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #15 from Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com 2011-05-04 09:47:56 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: perl-Perl-Critic-More New Branches: f15 Owners: ppisar mmaslano psabata -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 698681] Review Request: grilo - Content discovery framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698681 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-05-04 10:17:43 EDT --- grilo-0.1.15-2.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/grilo-0.1.15-2.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701840] Review Request: codehaus-parent - codehaus parent pom
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701840 --- Comment #1 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com 2011-05-04 10:16:00 EDT --- Sorry: Spec URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/codehause-parent.spec SRPM URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/codehaus-parent-3-1.fc15.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701840] Review Request: codehaus-parent - codehaus parent pom
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701840 --- Comment #2 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com 2011-05-04 10:17:18 EDT --- http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/codehaus-parent.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 700757] Review Request: lsyncd - File change monitoring and synchronization daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=700757 --- Comment #6 from Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com 2011-05-04 10:23:54 EDT --- *** Bug 663926 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 698692] Review Request: grilo-plugins - Plugins for the Grilo framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698692 Bastien Nocera bnoc...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on|698681 | --- Comment #1 from Bastien Nocera bnoc...@redhat.com 2011-05-04 10:24:29 EDT --- Grilo itself is built in F15 and rawhide, removing the dependency. Anyone interested in reviewing the package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 663926] Review Request: lsyncd - Synchronize local directories with a remote targets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663926 Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||DUPLICATE Last Closed||2011-05-04 10:23:54 --- Comment #5 from Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com 2011-05-04 10:23:54 EDT --- It seems a dupe that was filed after this was done *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 700757 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 698681] Review Request: grilo - Content discovery framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698681 Bastien Nocera bnoc...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|698692 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 700757] Review Request: lsyncd - File change monitoring and synchronization daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=700757 Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pbrobin...@gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com 2011-05-04 10:23:15 EDT --- There was already and open review for this package. You should really search for it first! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701840] Review Request: codehaus-parent - codehaus parent pom
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701840 Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||socho...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|socho...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com 2011-05-04 10:25:35 EDT --- I am taking this -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 698681] Review Request: grilo - Content discovery framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698681 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701840] Review Request: codehaus-parent - codehaus parent pom
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701840
--- Comment #4 from Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com 2011-05-04
10:44:00 EDT ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[!] Rpmlint output:
codehaus-parent.src: W: summary-not-capitalized C codehaus-parent pom
codehaus-parent.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary C codehaus-parent
This should probably be Parent pom file for codehaus project
codehaus-parent.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US codehause -
codename, Wodehouse, Oberhausen
codehaus-parent.src: W: invalid-license Unknown
This can't stay like this. I've packaged few codehaus projects that were
missing licensing information and upstream was quite quick in releasing new
version with license header included. Please get in touch with them
codehaus-parent.noarch: W: summary-not-capitalized C codehaus-parent pom
codehaus-parent.noarch: W: name-repeated-in-summary C codehaus-parent
codehaus-parent.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US codehause -
codename, Wodehouse, Oberhausen
codehaus-parent.noarch: W: invalid-license Unknown
codehaus-parent.noarch: W: no-documentation
codehaus-parent.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc
/etc/maven/fragments/codehaus-parent
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 10 warnings.
[x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines[1].
[x] Spec file name must match the base package name, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines[2].
[x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms.
[x] Buildroot definition is not present
[!] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines[3,4].
[!] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
License type: Unknown
Mentioned in rpmlint output, these need to be fixed.
[-] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
[-] All independent sub-packages have license of their own
[-] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
MD5SUM this package: 3fb466284d96486048d564c1725e9f84
MD5SUM upstream package: 3fb466284d96486048d564c1725e9f84
[x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines[5].
[x] Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x] Permissions on files are set properly.
[x] Package does NOT have a %clean section which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}
(or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). (not needed anymore)
[x] Package consistently uses macros (no %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
mixing)
[x] Package contains code, or permissable content.
[x] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
application.
[x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[-] Javadoc documentation files are generated and included in -javadoc
subpackage
[-] Javadocs are placed in %{_javadocdir}/%{name} (no -%{version} symlinks)
[x] Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on jpackage-utils
[-] Javadoc subpackages have Require: jpackage-utils
[-] Package uses %global not %define
[-] If package uses tarball from VCS include comment how to re-create that
tarball (svn export URL, git clone URL, ...)
[-] If source tarball includes bundled jar/class files these need to be
removed prior to building
[x] All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
[-] Jar files are installed to %{_javadir}/%{name}.jar (see [6] for details)
[x] If package contains pom.xml files install it (including depmaps) even when
building with ant
[x] pom files has correct add_to_maven_depmap call which resolves to the pom
file (use JPP. and JPP- correctly)
=== Maven ===
[x] Use %{_mavenpomdir} macro for placing pom files instead of
%{_datadir}/maven2/poms
[-] If package uses -Dmaven.test.skip=true explain why it was needed in a
comment
[-] If package uses custom depmap -Dmaven2.jpp.depmap.file=* explain why
it's needed in a comment
[x] Package uses %update_maven_depmap in %post/%postun
[x] Packages have Requires(post) and Requires(postun) on jpackage-utils (for
%update_maven_depmap macro)
=== Other suggestions ===
[-] If possible use upstream build method (maven/ant/javac)
[-] Avoid having BuildRequires on exact NVR unless necessary
[x] Package has BuildArch: noarch (if possible)
[x] Latest version is packaged.
[x] Reviewer
[Bug 702018] New: Review Request: Very simple, very easy GUI programming in Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: Very simple, very easy GUI programming in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702018 Summary: Review Request: Very simple, very easy GUI programming in Python Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: l...@jcomserv.net QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Description: Experienced Pythonistas need support for quick and dirty GUI features. New Python programmers need GUI capabilities that don't require any knowledge of Tkinter, frames, widgets, callbacks or lambda. This is what EasyGUI provides. Using EasyGUI, all GUI interactions are invoked by simple function calls. EasyGUI is different from other GUIs in that EasyGUI is NOT event-driven. It allows you to program in a traditional linear fashion, and to put up dialogs for simple input and output when you need to. If you have not yet learned the event-driven paradigm for GUI programming, EasyGUI will allow you to be productive with very basic tasks immediately. Later, if you wish to make the transition to an event-driven GUI paradigm, you can do so with a more powerful GUI package such as anygui, PythonCard, Tkinter, wxPython, etc. SPEC: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/python-easygui/python-easygui.spec SRPM: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/python-easygui/python-easygui-0.96-0.fc14.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 702018] Review Request: Very simple, very easy GUI programming in Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702018 William Lima wl...@primate.com.br changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wl...@primate.com.br --- Comment #1 from William Lima wl...@primate.com.br 2011-05-04 10:48:37 EDT --- Please fix your Review Summary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701840] Review Request: codehaus-parent - codehaus parent pom
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701840 --- Comment #5 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com 2011-05-04 11:20:59 EDT --- Filed issue upstream for license: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/HAUS-2084. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 702018] Review Request: Very simple, very easy GUI programming in Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702018 --- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-05-04 11:23:16 EDT --- Review Summary? And fix how? I'm not sure what you mean. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 702018] Review Request: Very simple, very easy GUI programming in Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702018 --- Comment #3 from William Lima wl...@primate.com.br 2011-05-04 11:47:31 EDT --- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers#Create_Your_Review_Request * Make sure that you put the name of the package (excluding version and release numbers) in the 'Review Summary' field, along with a very brief summary of what the package is. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/File:PackageReviewProcess_review.png -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701112] Review Request: mingw32-wxWidgets - C++ cross-platform GUI library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701112 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Sailer t.sai...@alumni.ethz.ch 2011-05-04 12:24:15 EDT --- I've updated the package according to your requests: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~sailer/mingw32-wxWidgets-2.8.12-1.fc14.src.rpm http://people.fedoraproject.org/~sailer/mingw32-wxWidgets.spec The reason for the png issue was that wxWidgets tries to link with -lpng. While our mingw32-libpng package contains a libpng.la file, it neither contains libpng.a nor libpng.dll.a. This seems strange to me. Anyway, I fixed it by patching configure to link against -lpng14. Scratch Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3049917 The rpmlint messages: $ rpmlint mingw32-wxWidgets-* mingw32-wxWidgets.noarch: W: no-documentation mingw32-wxWidgets-debuginfo.noarch: E: debuginfo-without-sources mingw32-wxWidgets-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libwx_mswu_core-2.8-i686-pc-mingw32.a mingw32-wxWidgets-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libwx_baseu-2.8-i686-pc-mingw32.a mingw32-wxWidgets-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libwx_mswu_richtext-2.8-i686-pc-mingw32.a mingw32-wxWidgets-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libwx_mswu_qa-2.8-i686-pc-mingw32.a mingw32-wxWidgets-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libwx_baseu_net-2.8-i686-pc-mingw32.a mingw32-wxWidgets-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libwxregexu-2.8-i686-pc-mingw32.a mingw32-wxWidgets-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libwx_mswu_adv-2.8-i686-pc-mingw32.a mingw32-wxWidgets-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libwx_baseu_xml-2.8-i686-pc-mingw32.a mingw32-wxWidgets-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libwx_mswu_xrc-2.8-i686-pc-mingw32.a mingw32-wxWidgets-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libwx_mswu_html-2.8-i686-pc-mingw32.a mingw32-wxWidgets-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libwx_mswu_aui-2.8-i686-pc-mingw32.a mingw32-wxWidgets-static.noarch: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 12 errors, 2 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 702077] New: Review Request: signal_ext - This extension adds dynamically loadable signal handling to Tcl/Tk scripts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: signal_ext - This extension adds dynamically loadable signal handling to Tcl/Tk scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702077 Summary: Review Request: signal_ext - This extension adds dynamically loadable signal handling to Tcl/Tk scripts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: or...@cora.nwra.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/signal_ext.spec SRPM URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/signal_ext-1.4-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: This extension adds dynamically loadable signal handling to Tcl/Tk scripts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608319] Review Request: memaker - An avatar creator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608319 --- Comment #9 from Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com 2011-05-04 13:30:26 EDT --- Hi Mario, Martin, Thanks for the comments. I've updated the spec. * Wed May 04 2011 Ankur Sinha ankursinha AT fedoraproject DOT org - 20100110-1 - #608319 - replaced memaker with name macro - changed cp -v to cp -av to preserve timestamps - update to upstream dev http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/memaker/memaker.spec http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/memaker/memaker-20100110-1.fc15.src.rpm http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/memaker/memaker-20100110-1.fc15.noarch.rpm Regards, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701785] Review Request: puzzle-master - Fun and addictive jigsaw puzzle game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701785 --- Comment #7 from Timur Kristóf ti...@sch.bme.hu 2011-05-04 13:53:05 EDT --- Uploaded new version: http://venemo.fedorapeople.org/sources/puzzle-master.spec http://venemo.fedorapeople.org/sources/puzzle-master-1.2.2-2.fc15.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 700199] Review Request: tomcat - Apache Servlet/JSP Engine, RI for Servlet 3.0/JSP 2.2 API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=700199 Ole ole.er...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ole.er...@gmail.com --- Comment #7 from Ole ole.er...@gmail.com 2011-05-04 13:55:29 EDT --- This line appears twice in the spec here: https://github.com/vanaf/tomcat7-fedora/raw/master/tomcat.spec Requires(pre):shadow-utils Requires(pre):shadow-utils -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701785] Review Request: puzzle-master - Fun and addictive jigsaw puzzle game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701785 William Lima wl...@primate.com.br changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from William Lima wl...@primate.com.br 2011-05-04 14:05:35 EDT --- This package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701982] Review Request: osm-gps-map - A Gtk+ widget for displaying OpenStreetMap tiles
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701982 Jeffrey C. Ollie j...@ocjtech.us changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||702103 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 702103] Review Request: python-osmgpsmap - Python bindings for osm-gps-map GTK+ widget
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702103 Jeffrey C. Ollie j...@ocjtech.us changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||701982 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 702103] New: Review Request: python-osmgpsmap - Python bindings for osm-gps-map GTK+ widget
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-osmgpsmap - Python bindings for osm-gps-map GTK+ widget https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702103 Summary: Review Request: python-osmgpsmap - Python bindings for osm-gps-map GTK+ widget Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j...@ocjtech.us QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec URL: http://jcollie.fedorapeople.org/python-osmgpsmap.spec SRPM URL: http://jcollie.fedorapeople.org/python-osmgpsmap-0.7.3-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: Python bindings for a GTK+ widget that when given GPS co-ordinates, draws a GPS track, and points of interest on a moving map display. Downloads map data from a number of websites, including openstreetmap.org. This will be required for Gramps 3.3.0 once it it has been released. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701494] Review Request: wlmproxy - An advanced proxy for the MSN Messenger protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701494 Timur Kristóf ti...@sch.bme.hu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Timur Kristóf ti...@sch.bme.hu 2011-05-04 15:08:33 EDT --- I see that you've fixed the problems I found. - 'gzip -n' fixed the md5sum issue - You've fixed the scriptlet issue - As I see it, the rpmlint E error for wlmproxy.conf is intentional. I've also tested the package with a simple usecase and it appears to be working properly. I see no further obstacles for this package. The package is now APPROVED. Congratulations! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701785] Review Request: puzzle-master - Fun and addictive jigsaw puzzle game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701785 Timur Kristóf ti...@sch.bme.hu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 352761] Review Request: ds9 - Astronomical Data Visualization Application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=352761 --- Comment #26 from Sergio Pascual sergio.pa...@gmail.com 2011-05-04 17:53:30 EDT --- This package has been always a nightmare. If it contains software that is forbidden in Fedora I think we should remove ds9. Or give it to someone else who wants to patch and unbundled libraries new libraries each new upstream release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 702209] New: Review Request: apache-commons-vfs - Provides a single API for accessing various different file systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: apache-commons-vfs - Provides a single API for accessing various different file systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702209 Summary: Review Request: apache-commons-vfs - Provides a single API for accessing various different file systems Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: or...@cora.nwra.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/apache-commons-vfs.spec SRPM URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/apache-commons-vfs-1.0-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: Commons VFS provides a single API for accessing various different file systems. It presents a uniform view of the files from various different sources, such as the files on local disk, on an HTTP server, or inside a Zip archive. Some of the features of Commons VFS are: * A single consistent API for accessing files of different types. * Support for numerous file system types . * Caching of file information. Caches information in-JVM, and optionally can cache remote file information on the local file system. * Event delivery. * Support for logical file systems made up of files from various different file systems. * Utilities for integrating Commons VFS into applications, such as a VFS-aware ClassLoader and URLStreamHandlerFactory. * A set of VFS-enabled Ant tasks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 693131] Review Request: sudoku-savant - Solve and generate sudoku puzzles through logical means
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693131 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||sudoku-savant-1.3-3.fc15 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-05-05 01:01:59 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 694864] Review Request: php-pecl-gearman - PHP wrapper to libgearman
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=694864 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-05-05 01:06:59 EDT --- php-pecl-gearman-0.7.0-4.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 691088] Review Request: zeromq-ada - Ada bindings for zeromq
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691088 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-05-05 01:08:00 EDT --- zeromq-ada-2.1.0-5.24032011git.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 699902] Review Request: python-manuel - Build tested documentation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=699902 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-05-05 01:06:39 EDT --- python-manuel-1.5.0-2.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 691088] Review Request: zeromq-ada - Ada bindings for zeromq
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691088 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||zeromq-ada-2.1.0-5.24032011 ||git.fc15 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 699902] Review Request: python-manuel - Build tested documentation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=699902 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||python-manuel-1.5.0-2.fc15 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-05-05 01:06:46 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 694864] Review Request: php-pecl-gearman - PHP wrapper to libgearman
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=694864 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||php-pecl-gearman-0.7.0-4.fc ||15 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-05-05 01:07:04 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 590681] Review Request: objenesis - A library for instantiating Java objects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590681 Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||or...@cora.nwra.com --- Comment #16 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com 2011-05-05 01:29:57 EDT --- Guido - looks like a F15 build has been done, but you need to submit an update. Please do so. I need objenesis for some stuff I'm looking to package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
