[Bug 693608] Review Request: icinga - System Monitoring Application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693608 Dirk Götz dirk.go...@drv-bund.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dirk.go...@drv-bund.de --- Comment #5 from Dirk Götz dirk.go...@drv-bund.de 2011-05-05 03:21:11 EDT --- Found this bug while discussing the future use of icinga instead of nagios for monitoring and just wanted to add a comment on idoutils. Idoutils are provided for mysql, postgresql and oracle. If it is build with --enable-idoutils like in the spec it is build for use with mysql. If --with-pgsql is also added it is build for postgresql. --with-oracle would build for oracle but needs ocilib or oracle instant client, both not use able for build because of licensing. See: http://docs.icinga.org/1.3.0/en/quickstart-idoutils.html I can see the difficulties in building both mysql and postgresql support, but I think it would be good to do so and split idoutils in three packages: - idoutils providing the common files - idoutils-mysql providing the files for mysql - idoutils-postgresql providing the files for postgresql and delete the oracle specific files. Also I hope it could provided for epel! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701840] Review Request: codehaus-parent - codehaus parent pom
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701840 Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|652183(FE-JAVASIG) | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com 2011-05-05 03:50:10 EDT --- Great, you're good to go. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 613001] Review Request: Heimdal - Alternative Kerberos implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613001 J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) rdas...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugzilla.redhat.com ||/show_bug.cgi?id=702266 External Bug ID||Red Hat Knowledge Base ||55149 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 702277] New: Review Request: perl-Digest-MD5-File - Perl extension for getting MD5 sums for files and URLs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Digest-MD5-File - Perl extension for getting MD5 sums for files and URLs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702277 Summary: Review Request: perl-Digest-MD5-File - Perl extension for getting MD5 sums for files and URLs Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: p...@city-fan.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec URL: http://subversion.city-fan.org/repos/cfo-repo/perl-Digest-MD5-File/branches/fedora/perl-Digest-MD5-File.spec SRPM URL: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/perl-Digest-MD5-File/perl-Digest-MD5-File-0.07-1.fc16.src.rpm Description: Get MD5 sums for files of a given path or content of a given URL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 702277] Review Request: perl-Digest-MD5-File - Perl extension for getting MD5 sums for files and URLs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702277 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||646832 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 702277] Review Request: perl-Digest-MD5-File - Perl extension for getting MD5 sums for files and URLs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702277 Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||psab...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|psab...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 479874] Review Request: mingw32-postgresql - postgresql development library's libpq
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479874 Kalev Lember ka...@smartlink.ee changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ka...@smartlink.ee --- Comment #25 from Kalev Lember ka...@smartlink.ee 2011-05-05 06:49:10 EDT --- Itamar, are you still interested in this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 702277] Review Request: perl-Digest-MD5-File - Perl extension for getting MD5 sums for files and URLs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702277
--- Comment #1 from Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com 2011-05-05 07:28:11 EDT ---
Package: perl-Digest-MD5-File
Version: 0.07
Release: 1.fc16
Sources: Digest-MD5-File-0.07.tar.gz
Patches:
--
Package successfully built locally.
Package successfully built in mock, fedora-rawhide-x86_64.
Package successfully built in mock, fedora-rawhide-i386.
Package successfully built in mock, fedora-15-x86_64.
Package successfully built in mock, fedora-15-i386.
Package successfully built in mock, fedora-14-x86_64.
Package successfully built in mock, fedora-14-i386.
Package successfully built in koji, dist-rawhide.
MUST items:
[ OK ] Package does NOT include pre-built binaries or libraries
[ OK ] Spec file is legible and written in American english
[ OK ] Package successfully builds on at least one supported primary
architecture
[ -- ] All ExcludeArch tags valid, referencing proper bug reports
[ OK ] Package obeys FHS (with _libexecdir and /srv exceptions)
[ OK ] No errors reported by rpmlint
[ OK ] Changelog present and properly formatted
[ OK ] Package does NOT include Packager, Vendor, Copyright or PreReq tags
[ OK ] Source tags are working URLs and sources match upstream or justified
otherwise
[ FAIL ] Requires correct or justified otherwise
[ OK ] BuildRequires correct or justified otherwise
[ OK ] All file names are in proper UTF-8 encoding
[ OK ] All plain text failes are in proper UTF-8 encoding
[ -- ] Large documentation files are located in doc subpackage
[ OK ] All documentation prefixed with %doc
[ OK ] Documentation is NOT executable
[ OK ] No files in %doc are needed at run-time
[ -- ] Compiler flags honor Fedora defaults or are justified
[ -- ] Package generates useful debuginfo packages
[ -- ] Header files are placed in devel subpackage
[ -- ] Unversioned shared libraries are placed in devel subpackage
[ -- ] Pkgconfig files are placed in devel subpackage
[ -- ] Full-versioned Requires of the base package in subpackages
[ -- ] Package calls ldconfig in post and postun sections for all
subpackages, if applicable
[ -- ] Static libraries are provided by static subpackage
[ OK ] Package contains no static executables unless approved by FESCo
[ OK ] Package does NOT bundle any system libraries
[ -- ] RPath not used for anything besides internal libraries
[ -- ] All config files are marked noreplace or justified otherwise
[ OK ] No config files are located under /usr
[ -- ] Package contains a SystemV-compatible initscript
[ -- ] A GUI application installs a proper desktop file
[ -- ] All desktop files are installed by desktop-file-install or justified
otherwise
[ OK ] Package consistently uses macros
[ -- ] makeinstall macro is used only if make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot}
does NOT work
[ -- ] Macros in Summary and description are expandable at build-time
[ -- ] globals used in place of defines
[ -- ] Locales handled correctly -- package requires gettext and uses
find_lang, if applicable
[ -- ] Scriptlets are sane
[ OK ] Package is not relocatable unless justified
[ OK ] Package contains only acceptable code or content
[ OK ] Package owns all the files and directories it creates, installs and/or
uses unless those are already owned by another package
[ OK ] files sections do NOT contain duplicate files except for licenses
[ OK ] Package does NOT cause any conflicts
[ OK ] Package does NOT contain kernel modules
[ OK ] Package does NOT bundle fonts or other general purpose data
[ OK ] Final Requires and Provides are sane
SHOULD items:
[ OK ] The Summary does NOT end with a period
[ FAIL ] Package does NOT include BuildRoot tag, clean section or buildroot
removal in install section
[ OK ] Package should preserve files timestamps
[ OK ] Package does NOT explicitly BuildRequire bash, bzip2, coreutils, cpio,
diffutils, fedora-release, findutils, gawk, gcc, gcc-c++, grep, gzip, info,
make, patch, redhat-rpm-config, rpm-build, sed, shadow-utils, tar, unzip,
util-linux-ng, which or xz
[ OK ] Description does NOT consist of lines longer than 80 characters
[ OK ] Package uses parallel make
[ -- ] In case of a web application, package installs date into /usr/share
instead of /var/www
[ -- ] All patches have a comment or an upstream bug link
[ -- ] Package installs manpages for all executables
[ OK ] Package contains check section and all tests pass
[ ?? ] Package works as expected
NOTES:
--
Package should Require perl(Encode), perl(Exporter) and perl(File::Spec). Those
are 'required' in the module but not caught by RPM.
Additionally, BuildRoot and its cleaning is no longer needed and should be
removed. The same applies to the %defattr macro.
Fix the deps.
Not approved.
--
Configure bugmail:
[Bug 702277] Review Request: perl-Digest-MD5-File - Perl extension for getting MD5 sums for files and URLs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702277 --- Comment #2 from Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org 2011-05-05 07:54:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) NOTES: -- Package should Require perl(Encode), perl(Exporter) and perl(File::Spec). Those are 'required' in the module but not caught by RPM. Fixed in -2. Additionally, BuildRoot and its cleaning is no longer needed and should be removed. The same applies to the %defattr macro. These are needed for EPEL-4/5 compatibility; I intend to build the package for all current target releases. Spec URL: http://subversion.city-fan.org/repos/cfo-repo/perl-Digest-MD5-File/branches/fedora/perl-Digest-MD5-File.spec SRPM URL: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/perl-Digest-MD5-File/perl-Digest-MD5-File-0.07-2.fc16.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 702277] Review Request: perl-Digest-MD5-File - Perl extension for getting MD5 sums for files and URLs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702277 Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com 2011-05-05 08:04:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) (In reply to comment #1) NOTES: -- Package should Require perl(Encode), perl(Exporter) and perl(File::Spec). Those are 'required' in the module but not caught by RPM. Fixed in -2. Looks okay. Additionally, BuildRoot and its cleaning is no longer needed and should be removed. The same applies to the %defattr macro. These are needed for EPEL-4/5 compatibility; I intend to build the package for all current target releases. Fine with me. Spec URL: http://subversion.city-fan.org/repos/cfo-repo/perl-Digest-MD5-File/branches/fedora/perl-Digest-MD5-File.spec SRPM URL: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/perl-Digest-MD5-File/perl-Digest-MD5-File-0.07-2.fc16.src.rpm Approving. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 702277] Review Request: perl-Digest-MD5-File - Perl extension for getting MD5 sums for files and URLs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702277 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org 2011-05-05 08:09:56 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: perl-Digest-MD5-File Short Description: Perl extension for getting MD5 sums for files and URLs Owners: pghmcfc Branches: EL-4 EL-5 EL-6 F-13 F-14 F-15 InitialCC: perl-sig Thanks for the review Petr. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 684835] Review Request: deltacloud-core - Deltacloud REST API server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=684835 --- Comment #7 from Michal Fojtik mfoj...@redhat.com 2011-05-05 08:22:29 EDT --- -- version 0.3.0-r2 - http://mifo.sk/fedora/deltacloud-core/master/deltacloud-core.spec http://mifo.sk/fedora/deltacloud-core/master/deltacloud-core-0.3.0-2.fc14.src.rpm Changes: * Fixed documentation generation * Replaced moving with copying * Removed support folder from doc subpackage -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 684835] Review Request: deltacloud-core - Deltacloud REST API server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=684835 --- Comment #8 from Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com 2011-05-05 08:57:27 EDT --- I have no other objections. The package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 684835] Review Request: deltacloud-core - Deltacloud REST API server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=684835 Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701840] Review Request: codehaus-parent - codehaus parent pom
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701840 Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com 2011-05-05 09:06:34 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: codehaus-parent Short Description: Parent pom file for codehaus project Owners: orion Branches: f15 f14 el6 el5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 700571] Review Request: spindown - Daemon that can spindown idle disks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=700571 --- Comment #4 from Martin Cermak mcer...@redhat.com 2011-05-05 10:02:55 EDT --- I belive all issues are fixed now in spindown-0.4.0-2: Spec URL: http://www.physics.muni.cz/~cermak/spindown-0.4.0-2/spindown.spec SRPM URL: http://www.physics.muni.cz/~cermak/spindown-0.4.0-2/spindown-0.4.0-2.fc14.src.rpm Patch0 URL: http://www.physics.muni.cz/~cermak/spindown-0.4.0-2/spindown-0.4.0-initscript.patch Patch1 URL: http://www.physics.muni.cz/~cermak/spindown-0.4.0-2/spindown-0.4.0-Makefile.patch Patch2 URL: http://www.physics.muni.cz/~cermak/spindown-0.4.0-2/spindown-0.4.0-iniparser.patch All changes are described in the changelog. Because the project is not under version control yet, I'm creating patches against pure sources. For this reason patches changed (for example [1] differs from [2]). Also I'm omitting the licence change announcement on fedora-devel-list in this case. Here are rpmlint results: + rpmlint spindown.spec spindown.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: http://spindown.googlecode.com/files/spindown-0.4.0.tar.gz HTTP Error 404: Not Found 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. + rpmlint spindown-0.4.0-2.fc14.src.rpm spindown.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US sg - SG, chg, cig spindown.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US hdparm - hardpan, harmed, Parma spindown.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US swappable - trappable, mappable, unflappable spindown.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US hda - had, hd, ha spindown.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US sdb - sd, sb, db spindown.src: W: invalid-url Source0: http://spindown.googlecode.com/files/spindown-0.4.0.tar.gz HTTP Error 404: Not Found 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. + rpmlint spindown-debuginfo-0.4.0-2.fc14.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. + rpmlint spindown-0.4.0-2.fc14.x86_64.rpm spindown.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US sg - SG, chg, cig spindown.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US hdparm - hardpan, harmed, Parma spindown.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US swappable - trappable, mappable, unflappable spindown.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US hda - had, hd, ha spindown.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US sdb - sd, sb, db spindown.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary spindownd 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. The package does not explicitly require sg3_utils because custom power management binaries (like sg_start or hdparm) can be used. I also performed sanity testing of the package on a machine with multiple disks. --- [1] http://www.physics.muni.cz/~cermak/spindown-0.4.0-2/spindown-0.4.0-Makefile.patch [2] http://www.physics.muni.cz/~cermak/spindown/spindown-0.4.0-Makefile.patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 700815] Review Request: mingw32-gtk3 - MinGW Windows GTK+ library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=700815
Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #7 from Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl 2011-05-05
10:35:08 EDT ---
$ rpmlint mingw32-gtk3.spec
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
$ rpmlint mingw32-gtk3-3.0.9-3.fc15.src.rpm
mingw32-gtk3.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multi - mulch, mufti
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
$ rpmlint mingw32-gtk3-3.0.9-3.fc15.noarch.rpm
mingw32-gtk3.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multi - mulch,
mufti
mingw32-gtk3.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/glib-2.0/schemas/org.gtk.Settings.FileChooser.gschema.xml
mingw32-gtk3.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/gtk-3.0/gtk/gtkactiongroup.h
mingw32-gtk3.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/gtk-3.0/gtk/gtkcolorbutton.h
mingw32-gtk3.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/gtk-3.0/gtk/gtkappchooserwidget.h
mingw32-gtk3.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/gtk-3.0/gtk/gtkaboutdialog.h
mingw32-gtk3.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/gtk-3.0/gtk/gtktoggleaction.h
mingw32-gtk3.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/gtk-3.0/gtk/gtkaction.h
mingw32-gtk3.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/gtk-3.0/gtk/gtkradioaction.h
mingw32-gtk3.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/share/doc/mingw32-gtk3-3.0.9/COPYING
mingw32-gtk3.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/gtk-3.0/gtk/gtkappchooserdialog.h
mingw32-gtk3.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/gtk-3.0/gtk/gtknumerableicon.h
mingw32-gtk3.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/gtk-3.0/gtk/gtkappchooser.h
mingw32-gtk3.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/gtk-3.0/gtk/gtkappchooserbutton.h
mingw32-gtk3.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/gtk-3.0/gtk/gtkuimanager.h
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 14 errors, 1 warnings.
$ rpm --query --requires mingw32-gtk3
pkgconfig
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) = 4.0-1
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) = 3.0.4-1
mingw32(gdi32.dll)
mingw32(kernel32.dll)
mingw32(libatk-1.0-0.dll)
mingw32(libcairo-2.dll)
mingw32(libcairo-gobject-2.dll)
mingw32(libgailutil-3-0.dll)
mingw32(libgdk-3-0.dll)
mingw32(libgdk_pixbuf-2.0-0.dll)
mingw32(libgio-2.0-0.dll)
mingw32(libglib-2.0-0.dll)
mingw32(libgmodule-2.0-0.dll)
mingw32(libgobject-2.0-0.dll)
mingw32(libgtk-3-0.dll)
mingw32(libintl-8.dll)
mingw32(libpango-1.0-0.dll)
mingw32(libpangocairo-1.0-0.dll)
mingw32(libpangowin32-1.0-0.dll)
mingw32(msvcrt.dll)
mingw32(ole32.dll)
mingw32(user32.dll)
rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) = 5.2-1
$ rpm --query --provides mingw32-gtk3
mingw32(libgailutil-3-0.dll)
mingw32(libgdk-3-0.dll)
mingw32(libgtk-3-0.dll)
mingw32(libwimp.dll)
mingw32(im-am-et.dll)
mingw32(im-cedilla.dll)
mingw32(im-cyrillic-translit.dll)
mingw32(im-ime.dll)
mingw32(im-inuktitut.dll)
mingw32(im-ipa.dll)
mingw32(im-multipress.dll)
mingw32(im-thai.dll)
mingw32(im-ti-er.dll)
mingw32(im-ti-et.dll)
mingw32(im-viqr.dll)
mingw32(libgail.dll)
mingw32-gtk3 = 3.0.9-3.fc15
$ curl -s ftp://ftp.gnome.org/pub/gnome/sources/gtk+/3.0/gtk+-3.0.9.tar.bz2 |
md5sum
ff6be6e773dce2853d9ff98a52ae6e76 -
$ md5sum gtk+-3.0.9.tar.bz2
ff6be6e773dce2853d9ff98a52ae6e76 gtk+-3.0.9.tar.bz2
+ OK
! Needs to be looked into
/ Not applicable
* Overridden by MinGW guidelines
[+] Files are installed in /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw
[+] BuildRequires: mingw32-filesystem = xx is in the .spec file
[+] Requires are OK
[+] BuildArch: noarch
[+] No man pages or info files
[+] default strip and objdump commands are overridden with mingw32 specific
ones
[+] rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the
review
[+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines
[+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines
[+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines
[+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet
the Licensing Guidelines .
[+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
[Bug 684835] Review Request: deltacloud-core - Deltacloud REST API server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=684835 Michal Fojtik mfoj...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Michal Fojtik mfoj...@redhat.com 2011-05-05 10:38:01 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: deltacloud-core New Branches: EL-5 EL-6 F14 F15 Owners: mfojtik -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 700815] Review Request: mingw32-gtk3 - MinGW Windows GTK+ library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=700815 Kalev Lember ka...@smartlink.ee changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Kalev Lember ka...@smartlink.ee 2011-05-05 11:11:08 EDT --- Thanks for the review, Erik! New Package SCM Request === Package Name: mingw32-gtk3 Short Description: MinGW Windows GTK+ library Owners: kalev epienbro Branches: f15 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 190362] Review Request: unifdef
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190362 --- Comment #15 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-05-05 11:20:11 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 225280] Merge Review: aspell-pl - Polish dictionaries for Aspell
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225280 --- Comment #11 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-05-05 11:26:44 EDT --- This package already exists in the package database; you cannot file a new package request for it. Could you describe what you need the SCM admins to do for you? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 233519] Review Request: amqp - grammar for amqp wire format
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233519 --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-05-05 11:27:05 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 524992] Review Request: toppler - platform game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524992 --- Comment #24 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-05-05 11:29:10 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 242228] Review Request: ps2eps - PS-to-EPS converter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242228 --- Comment #13 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-05-05 11:28:43 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 588941] Review Request: pypy - Implementation of the Python language, using Python itself
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588941 --- Comment #54 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-05-05 11:35:40 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 684429] Review Request: wbfs-manager - A WBFS manager for Linux using GTK+
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=684429 David Riches davi...@ultracar.co.uk changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |linux-wbfs-manager - A WBFS |wbfs-manager - A WBFS |manager for Linux using |manager for Linux using |GTK+|GTK+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 678442] Review Request: os-prober - Probes disks on the system for installed operating systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678442 --- Comment #15 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-05-05 11:36:01 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 678855] Review Request: rpyc - A Transparent, Symmetrical Python Library for Distributed-Computing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678855 --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-05-05 11:37:23 EDT --- The requested package name does not match the package name in the ticket summary. Please fix whichever is incorrect and re-raise the fedora-cvs flag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701426] Review Request: python-taboot - Client utility for scripted multi-system administration over Func
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701426 --- Comment #4 from Tim Bielawa tbiel...@redhat.com 2011-05-05 11:41:01 EDT --- Today I released Taboot 0.2.12-1. The specfile listed has been updated to reflect this. The new SRPM address is: http://people.redhat.com/~tbielawa/taboot/releases/taboot-latest/python-taboot-0.2.12-1.fc14.src.rpm Side note: I make concurrent releases for el5/el6/FC14. There are SRPMs for el5 and el6 in that directory as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 679060] Review Request: mingw32-antlr - MinGW Windows ANTLR C++ run-time library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679060 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs- --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-05-05 11:42:40 EDT --- This package does not seem to meet the naming requirements for mingw packages. Specifically, the source package name (which is what you are asking me to create) does not begin with mingw-. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:MinGW#Package_naming I did not check other aspects of the guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 210553] Review Request: xerces-c - Validating XML Parser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210553 --- Comment #27 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-05-05 11:41:35 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 694651] Review Request: IBSimu - Ion beam simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=694651 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-05-05 11:53:00 EDT --- IBSimu-1.0.4-4.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 694651] Review Request: IBSimu - Ion beam simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=694651 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|IBSimu-1.0.4-4.fc14 |IBSimu-1.0.4-4.el6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 679060] Review Request: mingw32-antlr - MinGW Windows ANTLR C++ run-time library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679060 Thomas Sailer t.sai...@alumni.ethz.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs- |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Thomas Sailer t.sai...@alumni.ethz.ch 2011-05-05 11:51:20 EDT --- Please check out the version of the MinGW packaging guidelines that apply to f14 and f15, which are here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:MinGW_Old As far as I know the new ones are still pending some legal review, and will never apply to anything older than f16. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 651591] Review Request: partiwm - partitioning window manager and related tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=651591 Martin Dengler mar...@martindengler.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(a...@redhat.com) | --- Comment #8 from Martin Dengler mar...@martindengler.com 2011-05-05 12:18:45 EDT --- Clearing NEEDINFO -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 679060] Review Request: mingw32-antlr - MinGW Windows ANTLR C++ run-time library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679060 Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl changed: What|Removed |Added CC||erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl --- Comment #7 from Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl 2011-05-05 12:22:32 EDT --- Hi Jason and Thomas, Right now we're in the middle of getting support for mingw-w64 landed in Fedora 16. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Mingw-w64_cross_compiler for more details about that. As part of this feature, we've had to update the packaging guidelines and have them approved by the FPC. This was done recently. This is only one of the steps required to get everything ready. Right now we're waiting for 5 packages to be reviewed and approved before we can continue. One of these packages, mingw-filesystem, implements all the macros specified in the new guidelines. As long as that package isn't approved, the new packaging guidelines can't be enforced yet. Packages awaiting review: mingw-filesystem: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673784 mingw-binutils: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673786 mingw-gcc: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673788 mingw-headers: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673790 mingw-crt: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673792 So to summarize, as long as the 5 packages mentioned above (where mingw-filesystem is the most important one) aren't approved we can't use the new guidelines yet and we've got to stick with the old ones. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 700667] Review Request python26-crypto
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=700667 --- Comment #6 from Andy Grimm agr...@gmail.com 2011-05-05 12:53:59 EDT --- Updated to 2.3 and posted here (and my apologies for Google's content-type issue on the spec file): SRPM: https://www.grimmslanding.org/rpms/python26-crypto-2.3-4.el5.src.rpm SPEC: https://www.grimmslanding.org/rpms/python26-crypto.spec I tried to change the spec as little as possible from the current version in he python-crypto master branch. However, filter_provides_in obviously doesn't do anything in rpm 4.4.x, and I wasn't sure whether I should leave that in. Also, I thought about overriding _provides to white out the shared lib deps, but did not. (This practice is mentioned in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/BetterRpmAutoReqProvFiltering , but it doesn't seem to be common in EPEL). Thoughts? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 666517] Review Request: scim-typing-booster - Indic Typing Booster Table IMEngine for SCIM
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666517 Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG Last Closed||2011-05-05 13:25:17 --- Comment #6 from Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com 2011-05-05 13:25:17 EDT --- Parag Thanks for Review of this package. I think it will be better if we only concentrate presently to improve things for ibus first, then we can take a look at it -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 678855] Review Request: python-rpyc - A Transparent, Symmetrical Python Library for Distributed-Computing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678855 Dan Kenigsberg dan...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: rpyc - A|Review Request: python-rpyc |Transparent, Symmetrical|- A Transparent, |Python Library for |Symmetrical Python Library |Distributed-Computing |for Distributed-Computing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 679133] Review Request: starcal - A desktop calendar with Gregorian, Jalali and Hijri support
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679133 --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-05-05 14:19:04 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 689039] Review Request: csdp - C library for SemiDefinite Programming
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689039 --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-05-05 14:20:30 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 690580] Review Request: perl-Perl-Critic-More - Supplemental policies for Perl::Critic
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690580 --- Comment #16 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-05-05 14:20:54 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 691096] Review Request: iperf3 - Measurement tool for TCP/UDP bandwidth performance
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691096 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-05-05 14:22:59 EDT --- iperf3-3.0-0.0.b4.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 684835] Review Request: deltacloud-core - Deltacloud REST API server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=684835 --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-05-05 14:20:10 EDT --- This package does not appear to exist in pkgdb currently; you cannot submit a change request for somethng that does not exist. Can you please describe what you need the SVM admins to do for you? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 699209] Review Request: perl-ORLite-Mirror - Extend ORLite to support remote SQLite databases
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=699209 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-05-05 14:24:45 EDT --- perl-ORLite-Mirror-1.20-3.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 691096] Review Request: iperf3 - Measurement tool for TCP/UDP bandwidth performance
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691096 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|iperf3-3.0-0.0.b4.fc15 |iperf3-3.0-0.0.b4.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 618985] Review Request: swift - XMPP client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618985 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||swift-1.0-2.fc14 Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 699209] Review Request: perl-ORLite-Mirror - Extend ORLite to support remote SQLite databases
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=699209 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-ORLite-Mirror-1.20-3.f |perl-ORLite-Mirror-1.20-3.f |c15 |c13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 640455] Review Request: python-pyro - Pyro is short for PYthon Remote Objects.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=640455 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-05-05 14:26:11 EDT --- python-pyro-4.3-2.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 618985] Review Request: swift - XMPP client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618985 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-05-05 14:25:11 EDT --- swift-1.0-2.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 699209] Review Request: perl-ORLite-Mirror - Extend ORLite to support remote SQLite databases
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=699209 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-05-05 14:25:54 EDT --- perl-ORLite-Mirror-1.20-3.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 699209] Review Request: perl-ORLite-Mirror - Extend ORLite to support remote SQLite databases
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=699209 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-ORLite-Mirror-1.20-3.f |perl-ORLite-Mirror-1.20-3.f |c13 |c14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 640455] Review Request: python-pyro - Pyro is short for PYthon Remote Objects.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=640455 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||python-pyro-4.3-2.fc14 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-05-05 14:26:18 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 692437] Review Request: tycho - plugins and extensions for building Eclipse plugins and OSGI bundles with Maven
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=692437 --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-05-05 14:38:19 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701237] Review Request: perl-Test-Trap - Trap exit codes, exceptions, output, etc
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701237 --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-05-05 14:39:49 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 696516] Review Request: django-robots - Robots exclusion application for Django, complementing Sitemaps
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=696516 --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-05-05 14:38:54 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 700141] Review Request: perl-Devel-PatchPerl - Patch perl source à la Devel::PPPort's buildperl.pl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=700141 --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-05-05 14:39:30 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 700667] Review Request python26-crypto
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=700667 --- Comment #7 from Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org 2011-05-05 14:36:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) Updated to 2.3 and posted here (and my apologies for Google's content-type issue on the spec file): SRPM: https://www.grimmslanding.org/rpms/python26-crypto-2.3-4.el5.src.rpm SPEC: https://www.grimmslanding.org/rpms/python26-crypto.spec I tried to change the spec as little as possible from the current version in he python-crypto master branch. However, filter_provides_in obviously doesn't do anything in rpm 4.4.x, and I wasn't sure whether I should leave that in. Also, I thought about overriding _provides to white out the shared lib deps, but did not. (This practice is mentioned in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/BetterRpmAutoReqProvFiltering , but it doesn't seem to be common in EPEL). Thoughts? To filter those you'd need to manually include the provides filter included in /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/macros (redhat-rpm-config package) in Fedora. I wouldn't bother, and I'd strip out the existing provides filtering code as it has no effect in EPEL 6. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701494] Review Request: wlmproxy - An advanced proxy for the MSN Messenger protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701494 --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-05-05 14:40:04 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 689039] Review Request: csdp - C library for SemiDefinite Programming
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689039 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-05-05 15:03:12 EDT --- csdp-6.1.1-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/csdp-6.1.1-1.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 689039] Review Request: csdp - C library for SemiDefinite Programming
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689039 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-05-05 15:03:19 EDT --- csdp-6.1.1-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/csdp-6.1.1-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 689039] Review Request: csdp - C library for SemiDefinite Programming
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689039 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701031] Review Request: zeitgeist-datahub - The zeitgeist engine data logger
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701031 --- Comment #8 from Mario Blättermann mari...@freenet.de 2011-05-05 15:24:52 EDT --- Actually, I like to write a formal review now to approve your package, but it seems to be impossible to fetch the files from fedorapeople.org. Unfortunately, the Koji scratch build has crowded the spec and srpm. Seems to be a temporary problem on fedorapeople.org itself, because I cannot fetch other files, too. I try it again tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 614036] Review Request: stdair - C++ Standard Airline IT Library - FE-NEEDSPONSOR
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614036 --- Comment #11 from Son Nguyen Kim nguyenk...@gmail.com 2011-05-05 15:37:50 EDT --- As I have no longer time to be responsible for that package, I hand over that responsibility to Denis Arnaud, who is one of the upstream maintainers. I've talked to him, and he agrees to take back StdAir from me -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701112] Review Request: mingw32-wxWidgets - C++ cross-platform GUI library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701112
--- Comment #4 from Kalev Lember ka...@smartlink.ee 2011-05-05 15:39:22 EDT
---
Fedora review mingw32-wxWidgets-2.8.12-1.fc14.src.rpm 2011-05-05
+ OK
! needs attention
+ rpmlint output
+ The package is named according to Fedora MinGW packaging guidelines
+ The spec file name matches the package base name
+ The package meets the Packaging Guidelines
+ The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the
Licensing Guidelines.
+ The license field in the spec file matches the actual license
+ The stated license is the same as the one for the corresponding
native Fedora package
! The package doesn't contain the license file
+ Spec file is written in American English
+ Spec file is legible
+ Upstream sources match sources in the srpm. md5sum:
2fa39da14bc06ea86fe902579fedc5b1 wxWidgets-2.8.12.tar.gz
2fa39da14bc06ea86fe902579fedc5b1 Download/wxWidgets-2.8.12.tar.gz
+ The package builds in koji
n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed
+ BuildRequires look sane
n/a The spec file MUST handle locales properly
n/a ldconfig in %post and %postun
+ Package does not bundle copies of system libraries
n/a Package isn't relocatable
+ Package owns all directories it creates
+ No duplicate files in %files
+ Permissions are properly set
+ Consistent use of macros
+ The package must contain code or permissible content
n/a Large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage
+ Files marked %doc should not affect package
n/a Header files should be in -devel
Fedora MinGW guidelines allow headers in main package
+ Static libraries should be in -static
n/a Library files that end in .so must go in a -devel package
n/a -devel must require the fully versioned base
n/a Packages should not contain libtool .la files
Fedora MinGW guidelines allow .la files
n/a Packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file
+ Directory ownership sane
+ Filenames are valid UTF-8
Issues:
! The binary rpm doesn't contain any license files, although they are
shipped in the upstream tarball.
Can you also move the _mingw32_debug_package macro so it'd be right before the
%prep section? This is far from a blocker, but the way it currently is breaks
'spectool -g'.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 690580] Review Request: perl-Perl-Critic-More - Supplemental policies for Perl::Critic
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690580 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #17 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com 2011-05-05 15:44:18 EDT --- Jason-san, thank you for processing the request exactly as asked. Unfortunately, Marcela forgot to request InitialCC for perl-sig. Please add that one to f15 branch: Package Name: perl-Perl-Critic-More Branches: f15 Owners: ppisar mmaslano psabata InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701840] Review Request: codehaus-parent - codehaus parent pom
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701840 --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-05-05 15:46:46 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701785] Review Request: puzzle-master - Fun and addictive jigsaw puzzle game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701785 --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-05-05 15:46:26 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 702277] Review Request: perl-Digest-MD5-File - Perl extension for getting MD5 sums for files and URLs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702277 --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-05-05 15:47:08 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 690580] Review Request: perl-Perl-Critic-More - Supplemental policies for Perl::Critic
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690580 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #18 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-05-05 15:51:40 EDT --- Should be good now. As always with things I have to manually edit, please double check and let me know if there are any issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 697976] Review Request: pyrenamer - A mass file renamer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697976 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-05-05 15:56:28 EDT --- Sorry, I have not had the time to pursue the odd cases (just time to run the script) and at this point I think I'm unfortunately the only person processing these. Everything should be all set now. As usual with anything I have to do by hand, please double check that things are as you expect and let me know if there are issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 697976] Review Request: pyrenamer - A mass file renamer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697976 --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-05-05 16:06:41 EDT --- No worries, thanks, looks good so far! Are you in need of more cvsadmin folk? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 697976] Review Request: pyrenamer - A mass file renamer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697976 --- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-05-05 16:22:05 EDT --- Needs to be unblocked. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3052657 Is that a rel-eng Trac, then? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 700667] Review Request python26-crypto
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=700667 --- Comment #8 from Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org 2011-05-05 16:38:30 EDT --- Created attachment 497224 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=497224 Some simplifications I think there are some other simplifications that can be made too: %pybasever is defined in the spec so its use doesn't need to be conditionalized %pythonver can be replaced by %pybasever since they have the same value No need to evaluate the python-abi value as we're defining it as %pybasever ourselves No need to specify a version requirement for python26-devel as any version will be OK Attached patch implements these suggestions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 678442] Review Request: os-prober - Probes disks on the system for installed operating systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678442 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-05-05 16:42:59 EDT --- os-prober-1.46-2.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/os-prober-1.46-2.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 679133] Review Request: starcal - A desktop calendar with Gregorian, Jalali and Hijri support
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679133 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 679133] Review Request: starcal - A desktop calendar with Gregorian, Jalali and Hijri support
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679133 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-05-05 16:42:30 EDT --- starcal-1.5.3-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/starcal-1.5.3-1.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 679133] Review Request: starcal - A desktop calendar with Gregorian, Jalali and Hijri support
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679133 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-05-05 16:42:28 EDT --- starcal-1.5.3-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/starcal-1.5.3-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 678442] Review Request: os-prober - Probes disks on the system for installed operating systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678442 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701841] Review Request: cargo-parent - cargo parent pom
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701841 Bug 701841 depends on bug 701840, which changed state. Bug 701840 Summary: Review Request: codehaus-parent - codehaus parent pom https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701840 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701840] Review Request: codehaus-parent - codehaus parent pom
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701840 Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-05-05 17:01:14 --- Comment #10 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com 2011-05-05 17:01:14 EDT --- Checked in and built. Thanks all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 702277] Review Request: perl-Digest-MD5-File - Perl extension for getting MD5 sums for files and URLs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702277 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-05-05 17:16:42 EDT --- perl-Digest-MD5-File-0.07-2.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Digest-MD5-File-0.07-2.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 702277] Review Request: perl-Digest-MD5-File - Perl extension for getting MD5 sums for files and URLs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702277 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-05-05 17:16:33 EDT --- perl-Digest-MD5-File-0.07-2.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Digest-MD5-File-0.07-2.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 702277] Review Request: perl-Digest-MD5-File - Perl extension for getting MD5 sums for files and URLs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702277 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-05-05 17:17:00 EDT --- perl-Digest-MD5-File-0.07-2.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Digest-MD5-File-0.07-2.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 702277] Review Request: perl-Digest-MD5-File - Perl extension for getting MD5 sums for files and URLs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702277 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-05-05 17:16:52 EDT --- perl-Digest-MD5-File-0.07-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Digest-MD5-File-0.07-2.el6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 702277] Review Request: perl-Digest-MD5-File - Perl extension for getting MD5 sums for files and URLs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702277 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701112] Review Request: mingw32-wxWidgets - C++ cross-platform GUI library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701112 --- Comment #5 from Thomas Sailer t.sai...@alumni.ethz.ch 2011-05-05 17:36:35 EDT --- Ok, thanks for the review! I've added the license files and moved _mingw32_debug_package to the more logical place you suggested. New files (now on another location as fedorapeople is down): http://www.baycom.org/~tom/fedora/mingw32-wxWidgets-2.8.12-2.fc14.src.rpm http://www.baycom.org/~tom/fedora/mingw32-wxWidgets.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701112] Review Request: mingw32-wxWidgets - C++ cross-platform GUI library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701112 Kalev Lember ka...@smartlink.ee changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Kalev Lember ka...@smartlink.ee 2011-05-05 17:48:31 EDT --- Looks good. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701112] Review Request: mingw32-wxWidgets - C++ cross-platform GUI library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701112 --- Comment #7 from Thomas Sailer t.sai...@alumni.ethz.ch 2011-05-05 17:53:56 EDT --- Thanks! New Package SCM Request === Package Name: mingw32-wxWidgets Short Description: MinGW port of the wxWidgets GUI library Owners: sailer kalev Branches: f14 f15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701112] Review Request: mingw32-wxWidgets - C++ cross-platform GUI library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701112 Thomas Sailer t.sai...@alumni.ethz.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 689039] Review Request: csdp - C library for SemiDefinite Programming
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689039 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-05-05 17:52:25 EDT --- csdp-6.1.1-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 679133] Review Request: starcal - A desktop calendar with Gregorian, Jalali and Hijri support
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679133 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-05-05 17:51:43 EDT --- starcal-1.5.3-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 678442] Review Request: os-prober - Probes disks on the system for installed operating systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678442 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-05-05 17:53:15 EDT --- os-prober-1.46-2.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 702077] Review Request: tcl-signal - This extension adds dynamically loadable signal handling to Tcl/Tk scripts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702077
Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: signal_ext |Review Request: tcl-signal
|- This extension adds |- This extension adds
|dynamically loadable signal |dynamically loadable signal
|handling to Tcl/Tk scripts |handling to Tcl/Tk scripts
--- Comment #1 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com 2011-05-05 18:15:44
EDT ---
Spec URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/tcl-signal.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/tcl-signal-1.4-2.fc14.src.rpm
* Thu May 5 2011 Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com 1.4-2
- Rename to tcl-signal
- Rename library and move to %%{_libdir}
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701785] Review Request: puzzle-master - Fun and addictive jigsaw puzzle game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701785 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-05-05 19:01:04 EDT --- puzzle-master-1.2.2-2.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/puzzle-master-1.2.2-2.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701785] Review Request: puzzle-master - Fun and addictive jigsaw puzzle game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701785 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673784] Rename Request: mingw32-filesystem - mingw-filesystem - Cross compiler base filesystem and environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673784 Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673784] Rename Request: mingw32-filesystem - mingw-filesystem - Cross compiler base filesystem and environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673784
Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|m...@cchtml.com
Flag||needinfo?(erik-fedora@vanpi
||enbroek.nl)
--- Comment #23 from Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com 2011-05-05 20:32:48
EDT ---
My first review. Go easy on me!
+ OK
! needs attention
rpmlint output:
$ rpmlint mingw-filesystem mingw-filesystem-scripts mingw32-filesystem
mingw64-filesystem
mingw-filesystem.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided cross-filesystem
mingw-filesystem.noarch: W: no-documentation
mingw-filesystem-scripts.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided
cross-filesystem-scripts
mingw-filesystem-scripts.noarch: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
mingw-filesystem-scripts.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/libexec/mingw-scripts
mingw-filesystem-scripts.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/share/doc/mingw-filesystem-scripts-69/COPYING
mingw32-filesystem.noarch: W: no-documentation
mingw32-filesystem.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/bin/mingw32-configure
/usr/libexec/mingw-scripts
mingw32-filesystem.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mingw32-configure
mingw64-filesystem.noarch: W: no-documentation
mingw64-filesystem.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/bin/mingw64-configure
/usr/libexec/mingw-scripts
mingw64-filesystem.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mingw64-configure
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 10 warnings.
I don't think the FSF address is an issue, but you may want to correct it. The
rest of the messages look harmless.
+ rpmlint output
+ The package is named according to the latest Fedora MinGW packaging
guidelines
+ The spec file name matches the package base name
+ The package meets the Packaging Guidelines
+ The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the
Licensing Guidelines.
+ The license field in the spec file matches the actual license
+ The stated license is the same as the one for the corresponding
native Fedora package
+ The package contains the license file (COPYING)
+ Spec file is written in American English
+ Spec file is legible
? Upstream sources match sources in the srpm.
They are all plain-text scripts, but where is upstream?
+ The package builds in koji
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3053279
n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed
+ BuildRequires look sane
n/a The spec file MUST handle locales properly
n/a ldconfig in %post and %postun
+ Package does not bundle copies of system libraries
n/a Package isn't relocatable
+ Package owns all directories it creates
+ No duplicate files in %files
+ Permissions are properly set
+ Consistent use of macros
+ The package must contain code or permissible content
n/a Large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage
+ Files marked %doc should not affect package
n/a Header files should be in -devel
Fedora MinGW guidelines allow headers in main package
n/a Static libraries should be in -static
n/a Library files that end in .so must go in a -devel package
n/a -devel must require the fully versioned base
n/a Packages should not contain libtool .la files
Fedora MinGW guidelines allow .la files
n/a Packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file
+ Directory ownership sane
+ Filenames are valid UTF-8
If you want to, you can also remove the %clean section and the BuildRoot lines
which are also no longer required in current Fedora releases, before importing
the package to git.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#.25clean
I'll approve it once I know where the upstream is. I feel a comment should be
put where a VC system containing the scripts is. If there is no VC system then
I guess it passes. I don't see a guideline that prohibits script-only packages.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701494] Review Request: wlmproxy - An advanced proxy for the MSN Messenger protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701494 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-05-05 21:16:01 EDT --- wlmproxy-0.1.2-2.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/wlmproxy-0.1.2-2.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701494] Review Request: wlmproxy - An advanced proxy for the MSN Messenger protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701494 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
