[Bug 633104] Review Request: monkeysphere - Use the OpenPGP web of trust to verify ssh connections
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633104 --- Comment #15 from Michal Nowak mno...@redhat.com 2011-05-16 02:08:21 EDT --- Bernie? Ping. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 693425] Review Request: openerp - OpenERP business application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693425 --- Comment #45 from Panos Christeas x...@hellug.gr 2011-05-16 04:19:57 EDT --- I think we're ready to apply for exceptions. In short: - bad copyrights have been restored (upstream) - threadinglocal.py is removed, msgfmt.py is taken from python-tools. (unbundling) - SpiffGtkWidgets have merged our work into their tree. Will apply for exception until we test a little more and Fedora ships the new upstream ver. https://github.com/knipknap/SpiffGtkWidgets - faces-project has been resurrected (I talked with original author and collected the forks, into the original project page) http://sourceforge.net/projects/faces-project/ http://faces-project.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=faces- project/faces-project;a=summary - pyftpdlib is a copylib+hack case. A not-so-nice one. We either need an exception until we find resources to merge their 0.5.x API and push the required changes upstream, or let us not have the FTP functionality in Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 704544] Review Request: perl-Dancer - Lightweight yet powerful web application framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=704544 --- Comment #3 from Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com 2011-05-16 04:46:50 EDT --- http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Dancer-1.3040-2.fc14.src.rpm http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Dancer.spec I've added build requires of tests. I might file a bug on FSF address. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701183] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-RateLimit - Limits runmode call rate per user
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701183
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com 2011-05-16 06:34:44 EDT ---
Spec file changes:
--- perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-RateLimit.spec 2011-05-01 23:46:44.0
+0200
+++ perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-RateLimit.spec.1 2011-05-14 22:58:18.0
+0200
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-RateLimit
Version:1.0
-Release:1%{?dist}
+Release:2%{?dist}
Summary:Limits runmode call rate per user
License:GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -9,10 +9,13 @@
BuildArch: noarch
BuildRequires: perl(CGI)
BuildRequires: perl(CGI::Application)
-BuildRequires: perl(Class::Accessor)
+BuildRequires: perl(Class::Accessor::Fast)
BuildRequires: perl(DBD::SQLite)
+BuildRequires: perl(DBI)
BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
+BuildRequires: perl(File::Temp)
BuildRequires: perl(Test::More)
+Requires: perl(CGI::Application)
Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo
$version))
%{?perl_default_filter}
@@ -31,7 +34,6 @@
make %{?_smp_mflags}
%install
-rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
make pure_install PERL_INSTALL_ROOT=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT
@@ -45,11 +47,13 @@
%files
-%defattr(-,root,root,-)
%doc Changes README
%{perl_vendorlib}/*
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Sat May 14 2011 Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr - 1.0-2
+- Clean up spec as per package review (#701183)
+
* Thu Nov 25 2010 Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr 1.0-1
- Specfile autogenerated by cpanspec 1.78.
FIX: BuildRequire on perl(Class::Accessor::Fast) instead of
perl(Class::Accessor) as Class::Accessor::Fast is used in code
(RateLimit.pm:26)
-BuildRequires: perl(Class::Accessor)
+BuildRequires: perl(Class::Accessor::Fast)
Ok.
FIX: BuildRequire perl(DBI) because of tests (t/02simple.t:15)
+BuildRequires: perl(DBI)
Ok.
FIX: BuildRequire perl(File::Temp) because of tests (t/02simple.t:16)
+BuildRequires: perl(File::Temp)
Ok.
TODO: Remove obsolete BuildRoot cleaning in %install section.
-rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
Ok.
TODO: Remove already implicit %defattr in %files section.
-%defattr(-,root,root,-)
Ok.
Done (first I've heard of this)
It's news
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#File_Permissions).
FIX: Require perl(Class::Accessor::Fast) explicitly as it's not discovered by
rpmbuild (RateLimit.pm:26)
$ rpm -q --requires -p
../RPMS/noarch/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-RateLimit-1.0-2.fc16.noarch.rpm
|sort |uniq -c
1 perl = 0:5.006
1 perl(base)
1 perl(Carp)
1 perl(CGI::Application)
1 perl(Class::Accessor::Fast)
1 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
1 perl(strict)
1 perl(warnings)
1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) = 3.0.4-1
1 rpmlib(FileDigests) = 4.6.0-1
1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) = 4.0-1
1 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) = 5.2-1
Fixed in F16 dependency generator. Ok.
TODO: Require perl(CGI::Application) explicitly as this module is extension
for that class.
+Requires: perl(CGI::Application)
Ok.
Package builds in koji
(http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3073704). Ok.
Resolution: Package APPROVED.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701841] Review Request: cargo-parent - cargo parent pom
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701841 Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|652183(FE-JAVASIG) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 184008] Review Request: paco
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=184008 Damien Durand splinu...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||splinu...@gmail.com --- Comment #6 from Damien Durand splinu...@gmail.com 2011-05-16 06:45:22 EDT --- Hello, Open a new one for more clarity, it's better. I'll close my request as duplicate of your :-) Damien -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705010] New: Review Request: beust-jcommander - Java framework for parsing command line parameters
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: beust-jcommander - Java framework for parsing command line parameters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705010 Summary: Review Request: beust-jcommander - Java framework for parsing command line parameters Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jca...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec URL: http://tavvva.net/files/redhat/beust-jcommander/1/beust-jcommander.spec SRPM URL: http://tavvva.net/files/redhat/beust-jcommander/1/beust-jcommander-1.17-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: Hi. I would appreciate a review for beust-jcommander. JCommander is a very small Java framework that makes it trivial to parse command line parameters (with annotations). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 691114] Review Request: python-msgpack - A MessagePack (de)serializer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691114 --- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net 2011-05-16 07:36:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) are you going to provide a new (changed) SRPM? Yes, I am. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701183] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-RateLimit - Limits runmode call rate per user
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701183 Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr 2011-05-16 07:38:19 EDT --- Thank you, Petr. Requesting SCM. New Package SCM Request === Package Name: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-RateLimit Short Description: Limits runmode call rate per user Owners: eseyman Branches: f15 f14 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 666233] Review Request: gnome-paint - Easy to use paint program for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666233 --- Comment #12 from Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net 2011-05-16 07:48:18 EDT --- You can go on with the VCS process and import the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 694950] Review Request: torrent-search - A torrent searching graphical application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=694950 --- Comment #13 from Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com 2011-05-16 07:48:59 EDT --- Please read: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:UnownedDirectories#Common_Mistakes [ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#File_and_Directory_Ownership ] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705010] Review Request: beust-jcommander - Java framework for parsing command line parameters
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705010 Jaromír Cápík jca...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||652183(FE-JAVASIG) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 667790] Review Request: python-audioprocessing - Python audio processing suite
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=667790 --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net 2011-05-16 08:22:12 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705010] Review Request: beust-jcommander - Java framework for parsing command line parameters
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705010 Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||socho...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|socho...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com 2011-05-16 08:46:30 EDT --- I'll do the review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 567563] Review request: tikiwiki - Website/Wiki/Groupware/CMS/Forum/Blog/Bug Tracker written in PHP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567563 --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net 2011-05-16 09:06:40 EDT --- The latest release of TikiWiki is 6.3. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705043] Review Request: paco - a source code package organizer for Unix
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705043 Veeti Paananen veeti.paana...@rojekti.fi changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705043] New: Review Request: paco - a source code package organizer for Unix
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: paco - a source code package organizer for Unix https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705043 Summary: Review Request: paco - a source code package organizer for Unix Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: veeti.paana...@rojekti.fi QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec: http://rojekti.fi/files/paco/paco.spec SRPM: http://rojekti.fi/files/paco/paco-2.0.9-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: After the installation of a source package with ./configure make make install, one is usually left with having no idea of what it was installed and where it all went, making it difficult to uninstall the package in the future. Paco was written to solve this problem in a quite simple fashion. When installing a package from sources, paco wraps the make install command (or whatever command or group of commands are needed to install the files into the system), and saves installation information into a text database. This is my first package and I need a sponsor. (There is a very old previous request for the same application at bug 184008. I've been adviced to create a new request.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705010] Review Request: beust-jcommander - Java framework for parsing command line parameters
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705010
Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com 2011-05-16
09:31:23 EDT ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[x] Rpmlint output:
beust-jcommander.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc
/etc/maven/fragments/beust-jcommander
beust-jcommander.src: W: invalid-url Source0: beust-jcommander-1.17.tar.xz
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
[x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines[1].
[x] Spec file name must match the base package name, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines[2].
[x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms.
[x] Buildroot definition is not present
[x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines[3,4].
[x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
License type: ASL 2.0
[x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
[x] All independent sub-packages have license of their own
[x] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
MD5SUM this package: 4cc69f21ca9f6d5bb08916bb97dd3016
[x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines[5].
[x] Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x] Permissions on files are set properly.
[x] Package does NOT have a %clean section which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}
(or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). (not needed anymore)
[x] Package consistently uses macros (no %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
mixing)
[x] Package contains code, or permissable content.
[x] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
application.
[-] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x] Javadoc documentation files are generated and included in -javadoc
subpackage
[x] Javadocs are placed in %{_javadocdir}/%{name} (no -%{version} symlinks)
[x] Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on jpackage-utils
[x] Javadoc subpackages have Require: jpackage-utils
[x] Package uses %global not %define
[x] If package uses tarball from VCS include comment how to re-create that
tarball (svn export URL, git clone URL, ...)
[x] If source tarball includes bundled jar/class files these need to be
removed prior to building
[x] All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
[x] Jar files are installed to %{_javadir}/%{name}.jar (see [6] for details)
[x] If package contains pom.xml files install it (including depmaps) even when
building with ant
[x] pom files has correct add_to_maven_depmap call which resolves to the pom
file (use JPP. and JPP- correctly)
=== Maven ===
[x] Use %{_mavenpomdir} macro for placing pom files instead of
%{_datadir}/maven2/poms
[-] If package uses -Dmaven.test.skip=true explain why it was needed in a
comment
[-] If package uses custom depmap -Dmaven2.jpp.depmap.file=* explain why
it's needed in a comment
[x] Package uses %update_maven_depmap in %post/%postun
[x] Packages have Requires(post) and Requires(postun) on jpackage-utils (for
%update_maven_depmap macro)
=== Other suggestions ===
[x] If possible use upstream build method (maven/ant/javac)
[x] Avoid having BuildRequires on exact NVR unless necessary
[x] Package has BuildArch: noarch (if possible)
[x] Latest version is packaged.
[x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
Tested on: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
=== Issues ===
1. None really
=== Final Notes ===
1. I assume comment:
# tests skipped - cyclic dependency to testng
is leftover and shouldn't be there.
2. We generally use javadoc:aggregate and not javadoc:jar goal for
creating javadocs. Javadoc:jar just adds another step so it's not a
dealbreaker, just unnecesary step.
I would be nice to fix these things before first commit, but package itself
is good to go.
*** APPROVED ***
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines
[2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines
[3]
[Bug 184008] Review Request: paco
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=184008 --- Comment #7 from Veeti Paananen veeti.paana...@rojekti.fi 2011-05-16 09:35:36 EDT --- Hi! I've created a new request at bug 705043. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 693363] Review Request: st - A simple terminal implementation for X
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693363 --- Comment #5 from David Nalley da...@gnsa.us 2011-05-16 10:12:48 EDT --- Hi Petr: Let me ping some of the upstream OpenStack-swift folks and get their input. I'll try and do that today. I just reparsed: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Conflicts#Conflicting_Files and that looks remarkably bleak. It appears from looking at version control that st pre-dates at least the open sourcing of swift, though I don't know what the reaction will be regardless. Thanks, David -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 693363] Review Request: st - A simple terminal implementation for X
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693363 --- Comment #6 from Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com 2011-05-16 10:22:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) Hi Petr: Let me ping some of the upstream OpenStack-swift folks and get their input. I'll try and do that today. I just reparsed: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Conflicts#Conflicting_Files and that looks remarkably bleak. It appears from looking at version control that st pre-dates at least the open sourcing of swift, though I don't know what the reaction will be regardless. Thanks, David Thank you! If that won't go well, we'll have to stick with 'Conflicts'. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 703322] Review Request: tpp - text presentation program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703322 --- Comment #15 from Jesus M. Rodriguez jes...@redhat.com 2011-05-16 10:45:13 EDT --- Added Martin's change to the spec. http://jmrodri.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/tpp-1.3.1-8.fc13.src.rpm http://jmrodri.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/tpp.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705043] Review Request: paco - a source code package organizer for Unix
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705043 Damien Durand splinu...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||spli...@fedoraproject.org --- Comment #1 from Damien Durand splinu...@gmail.com 2011-05-16 10:58:05 EDT --- *** Bug 184008 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 184008] Review Request: paco
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=184008 Damien Durand splinu...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|WONTFIX |DUPLICATE --- Comment #8 from Damien Durand splinu...@gmail.com 2011-05-16 10:58:05 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 705043 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705010] Review Request: beust-jcommander - Java framework for parsing command line parameters
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705010 --- Comment #3 from Jaromír Cápík jca...@redhat.com 2011-05-16 11:03:01 EDT --- Spec URL: http://tavvva.net/files/redhat/beust-jcommander/2/beust-jcommander.spec SRPM URL: http://tavvva.net/files/redhat/beust-jcommander/2/beust-jcommander-1.17-2.fc14.src.rpm Fixed ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 688421] Review Request: pyicu - Python extension wrapping IBM's ICU C++ libraries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688421 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-05-16 11:05:18 EDT --- pyicu-1.1-2.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pyicu-1.1-2.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 688421] Review Request: pyicu - Python extension wrapping IBM's ICU C++ libraries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688421 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 700199] Review Request: tomcat - Apache Servlet/JSP Engine, RI for Servlet 3.0/JSP 2.2 API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=700199 --- Comment #10 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2011-05-16 11:08:23 EDT --- Oops. sorry for the delay I got distracted by other things but I promise to get back to this review soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 618354] Review Request: cwallpaper - A front end for fbsetbg, Esetroot, feh, and other wallpaper changers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618354 --- Comment #5 from Martin Gieseking martin.giesek...@uos.de 2011-05-16 11:17:31 EDT --- Germán, what's the status of this package? Would you still like to maintain it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705010] Review Request: beust-jcommander - Java framework for parsing command line parameters
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705010 Jaromír Cápík jca...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Jaromír Cápík jca...@redhat.com 2011-05-16 11:25:26 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: beust-jcommander Short Description: Java framework for parsing command line parameters representation Owners: jcapik Branches: f15 InitialCC: java-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 688421] Review Request: pyicu - Python extension wrapping IBM's ICU C++ libraries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688421 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-05-16 11:29:28 EDT --- pyicu-1.1-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pyicu-1.1-2.el6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 452427] Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427 Michal Nowak mno...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||WONTFIX Last Closed||2011-05-16 11:47:49 --- Comment #116 from Michal Nowak mno...@redhat.com 2011-05-16 11:47:49 EDT --- 3.4.10 is out. ...and I realized I don't care about awesome anymore. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 676335] Review Request: dmtcp - Checkpoint/Restart functionality for Linux processes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676335 --- Comment #10 from Matthew Farrellee m...@redhat.com 2011-05-16 11:55:08 EDT --- I understand there is a dependency on libc.a that is being eliminated, please update when that change is available. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705104] Review Request: freediams - Pharmaceutical Drugs Prescriptor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705104 Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||673841(fedora-medical) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705104] New: Review Request: freediams - Pharmaceutical Drugs Prescriptor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: freediams - Pharmaceutical Drugs Prescriptor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705104 Summary: Review Request: freediams - Pharmaceutical Drugs Prescriptor Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sanjay.an...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec URL: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/freediam/freediams.spec SRPM URL: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/freediam/freediams-0.5.4-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: FreeDiams prescriber is the result of FreeMedForms prescriber plugins built into a standalone application. FreeDiams is a multi-platform (MacOS, Linux, FreeBSD, Windows), free and open source released under the new BSD license. It is developed by medical doctors and is intended for use by these same professionals. It can be used alone to prescribe and / or test drug interactions within a prescription. It can be linked to any application thanks to its command line parameters. The therapeutic and interactions database are synchronized with data from the French AFSSAPS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705106] New: Review Request: snakeyaml - YAML parser and emitter for the Java programming language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: snakeyaml - YAML parser and emitter for the Java programming language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705106 Summary: Review Request: snakeyaml - YAML parser and emitter for the Java programming language Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jca...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec URL: http://jcapik.fedorapeople.org/files/snakeyaml/1/snakeyaml.spec SRPM URL: http://jcapik.fedorapeople.org/files/snakeyaml/1/snakeyaml-1.8-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: Hi. I would appreciate a review for snakeyaml. SnakeYAML features: * a complete YAML 1.1 parser. In particular, SnakeYAML can parse all examples from the specification. * Unicode support including UTF-8/UTF-16 input/output. * high-level API for serializing and deserializing native Java objects. * support for all types from the YAML types repository. * relatively sensible error messages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705109] New: Review Request: main package name here - short summary here
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: main package name here - short summary here https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705109 Summary: Review Request: main package name here - short summary here Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: linux.n@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec URL: http://prabindatta.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/python-qserve.spec SRPM URL: http://prabindatta.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/python-qserve-0.0.1-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: qserve is used in python-mwlib. It's a job queue server written in python and it's missing documentation. Koji Build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3073913 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705106] Review Request: snakeyaml - YAML parser and emitter for the Java programming language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705106 Jaromír Cápík jca...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||652183(FE-JAVASIG) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 687875] Review Request: aarddict - Multi-platform dictionary and offline Wikipedia reader
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=687875 --- Comment #13 from PRABIN KUMAR DATTA linux.n@gmail.com 2011-05-16 13:35:30 EDT --- upstream fixed single click install link in Maemo installation notes in doc. Updated files: SPECS :http://prabindatta.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/aarddict.spec SRPMS: http://prabindatta.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/aarddict-0.9.2-3.fc14.src.rpm [Info] Pushed pyicu into fedora repo. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705109] Review Request: main package name here - short summary here
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705109 --- Comment #1 from PRABIN KUMAR DATTA linux.n@gmail.com 2011-05-16 12:45:48 EDT --- [prabindatta@localhost ~]$ rpmlint -i rpmbuild/SPECS/python-qserve.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- [prabindatta@localhost ~]$ rpmlint -i rpmbuild/SRPMS/python-qserve-0.0.1-1.fc14.src.rpm python-qserve.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) mwlib - Malibu, Mowgli, millibar The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. python-qserve.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mwlib - Malibu, Mowgli, millibar The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. -- [prabindatta@localhost ~]$ rpmlint -i rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/python-qserve-0.0.1-1.fc14.noarch.rpm python-qserve.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) mwlib - Malibu, Mowgli, millibar The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. python-qserve.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mwlib - Malibu, Mowgli, millibar The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705109] Review Request: python-qserve - Job queue server used in python-mwlib
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705109 PRABIN KUMAR DATTA linux.n@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: main |Review Request: |package name here - short |python-qserve - Job queue |summary here |server used in python-mwlib -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705108] New: Review Request: shinken - python monitoring tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: shinken - python monitoring tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705108 Summary: Review Request: shinken - python monitoring tool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: david.hanneq...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec URL: http://hvad.fedorapeople.org/fedora/shinken/shinken.spec SRPM URL: http://hvad.fedorapeople.org/fedora/shinken/shinken-0.6-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: The main goal of Shinken is to allow users to have a fully flexible architecture for their monitoring system that can easily scale to large environments. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 704635] Review Request: mingw-gstreamer - MinGW Windows gstreamer library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=704635 Kalev Lember ka...@smartlink.ee changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lfar...@lfarkas.org --- Comment #1 from Kalev Lember ka...@smartlink.ee 2011-05-16 13:42:41 EDT --- *** Bug 491317 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 491317] Review Request: mingw32-gstreamer - MinGW Windows gstreamer library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491317 Kalev Lember ka...@smartlink.ee changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED CC||ka...@smartlink.ee Resolution||DUPLICATE Last Closed||2011-05-16 13:42:41 --- Comment #31 from Kalev Lember ka...@smartlink.ee 2011-05-16 13:42:41 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 704635 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 694950] Review Request: torrent-search - A torrent searching graphical application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=694950 --- Comment #14 from Praveen Kumar kumarpraveen.nit...@gmail.com 2011-05-16 12:52:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) Please read: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:UnownedDirectories#Common_Mistakes [ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#File_and_Directory_Ownership ] Thanks for suggestion. SPEC : http://kumarpraveen.fedorapeople.org/torrent-search/torrent-search.spec SRPM : http://kumarpraveen.fedorapeople.org/torrent-search/torrent-search-0.9.2.3-4.fc15.src.rpm Koji Build : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3074312 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705109] Review Request: python-qserve - Job queue server used in python-mwlib
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705109 --- Comment #2 from PRABIN KUMAR DATTA linux.n@gmail.com 2011-05-16 12:49:04 EDT --- Upstream reply about shebang: / If the shebang is at all required after installation for 1. /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/qs/qserve.py 2. /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/qs/rpcserver.py 3. /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/qs/slave.py 4. /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/qs/jobs.py 5. /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/qs/proc.py no. --/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705104] Review Request: freediams - Pharmaceutical Drugs Prescriptor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705104 --- Comment #1 from Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com 2011-05-16 14:00:53 EDT --- There are some rpmlint errors to do with RPATH. I don't know how to handle these :/ freediams-devel.i686: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib/freediams/libListView.so ['$ORIGIN', '$ORIGIN/..'] freediams-devel.i686: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib/freediams/libMainWindow.so ['$ORIGIN', '$ORIGIN/..'] freediams-devel.i686: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib/freediams/libTextEditor.so ['$ORIGIN', '$ORIGIN/..'] freediams-devel.i686: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib/freediams/libCore.so ['$ORIGIN', '$ORIGIN/..'] freediams-devel.i686: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib/freediams/libDrugs.so ['$ORIGIN', '$ORIGIN/..'] freediams-devel.i686: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib/freediams/libDrugsBase.so ['$ORIGIN', '$ORIGIN/..'] freediams-devel.i686: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib/freediams/libPrinter.so ['$ORIGIN', '$ORIGIN/..'] freediams-devel.i686: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib/freediams/libTemplates.so ['$ORIGIN', '$ORIGIN/..'] freediams-devel.i686: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib/freediams/libSaveRestore.so ['$ORIGIN', '$ORIGIN/..'] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 702861] Review Request: libidn2 - Library to support IDNA2008 internationalized domain names
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702861 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-05-16 14:13:42 EDT --- libidn2-0.4-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libidn2-0.4-1.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 702861] Review Request: libidn2 - Library to support IDNA2008 internationalized domain names
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702861 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-05-16 14:14:25 EDT --- libidn2-0.4-1.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libidn2-0.4-1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 702861] Review Request: libidn2 - Library to support IDNA2008 internationalized domain names
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702861 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-05-16 14:14:04 EDT --- libidn2-0.4-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libidn2-0.4-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 702861] Review Request: libidn2 - Library to support IDNA2008 internationalized domain names
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702861 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705133] New: Review Request: btparser - Parser and analyzer for backtraces produced by GDB
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: btparser - Parser and analyzer for backtraces produced by GDB https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705133 Summary: Review Request: btparser - Parser and analyzer for backtraces produced by GDB Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kk...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec URL: http://kklic.fedorapeople.org/btparser.spec SRPM URL: http://kklic.fedorapeople.org/btparser-0.13-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: Btparser is a backtrace parser and analyzer, which works with backtraces produced by the GNU Project Debugger. It can parse a text file with a backtrace to a tree of C structures, allowing to analyze the threads and frames of the backtrace and work with them. Btparser also contains some backtrace manipulation and extraction routines: - it can find a frame in the crash-time backtrace where the program most likely crashed (a chance is that the function described in that frame is buggy) - it can produce a duplication hash of the backtrace, which helps to discover that two crash-time backtraces are duplicates, triggered by the same flaw of the code - it can rate the backtrace quality, which depends on the number of frames with and without the function name known (missing function name is caused by missing debugging symbols) $ rpmlint btparser-0.13-1.fc14.src.rpm btparser.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Backtrace - Backtrack, Back trace, Back-trace btparser.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) backtraces - backtracks, back traces, back-traces btparser.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US backtrace - backtrack, back trace, back-trace btparser.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US backtraces - backtracks, back traces, back-traces 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. - Backtrace is a commonly used word. The word is used in the GDB and glibc manuals, and it is present in dictionaries. $ rpmlint btparser-0.13-1.fc14.i386.rpm btparser.i386: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Backtrace - Backtrack, Back trace, Back-trace btparser.i386: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) backtraces - backtracks, back traces, back-traces btparser.i386: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US backtrace - backtrack, back trace, back-trace btparser.i386: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US backtraces - backtracks, back traces, back-traces btparser.i386: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libbtparser.so.2.2.2 exit@GLIBC_2.0 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings. - The shared library calls function exit only when malloc fails because of some serious programming error. $ rpmlint btparser-debuginfo-0.13-1.fc14.i386.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint btparser-devel-0.13-1.fc14.i386.rpm btparser-devel.i386: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 700427] Review Request: jopt-simple - A Java command line parser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=700427 --- Comment #4 from Karel Klíč kk...@redhat.com 2011-05-16 15:13:49 EDT --- Alexander, thanks. I'm going to modify the jopt-simple package to use maven v3 when Fedora 15 is released. I cannot develop/test/use maven v3 package on my computers running F-14, and it's too much hassle to do it in a virtual machine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 687942] Review Request: mysql-sandbox - Quick painless install of side by side MySQL server in isolation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=687942 --- Comment #9 from Jeffrey Ness jeffrey.n...@rackspace.com 2011-05-16 15:29:30 EDT --- Direct SRPM Link: https://github.com/jness/mysql-sandbox-RPM/raw/master/SRPMS/mysql-sandbox-3.0.17-4.fc14.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 687942] Review Request: mysql-sandbox - Quick painless install of side by side MySQL server in isolation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=687942 Jeffrey Ness jeffrey.n...@rackspace.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|WONTFIX | Keywords||Reopened --- Comment #8 from Jeffrey Ness jeffrey.n...@rackspace.com 2011-05-16 15:28:29 EDT --- After some discussion we are going to move forward with getting this build in for EPEL and Fedora: SPEC: https://github.com/jness/mysql-sandbox-RPM/blob/master/SPECS/mysql-sandbox.spec SRPM: https://github.com/jness/mysql-sandbox-RPM/blob/master/SRPMS/mysql-sandbox-3.0.17-4.fc14.src.rpm RPMLINT: $ rpmlint SPECS/mysql-sandbox.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint SRPMS/mysql-sandbox-3.0.17-4.fc14.src.rpm mysql-sandbox.src: I: enchant-dictionary-not-found en_US 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 696357] Review Request: fedora-logo-gnome-shell-extension - adds a Fedora logo to Gnome shell's Activities button
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=696357 --- Comment #7 from Timur Kristóf ti...@sch.bme.hu 2011-05-16 15:47:08 EDT --- Both of the minor points have been fixed. The new files can be found at http://venemo.fedorapeople.org/sources/ (as usual) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 688421] Review Request: pyicu - Python extension wrapping IBM's ICU C++ libraries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688421 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-05-16 17:04:17 EDT --- pyicu-1.1-2.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 695819] Review Request: php-pecl-rrd - PHP Bindings for rrdtool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=695819 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-05-16 17:15:57 EDT --- php-pecl-rrd-1.0.3-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 633104] Review Request: monkeysphere - Use the OpenPGP web of trust to verify ssh connections
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633104 Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #16 from Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org 2011-05-16 18:05:45 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: monkeysphere Short Description: Use the OpenPGP web of trust to verify ssh Owners: bernie mnowak Branches: f14 f15 InitialCC: bernie mnowak -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 633104] Review Request: monkeysphere - Use the OpenPGP web of trust to verify ssh connections
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633104 --- Comment #17 from Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org 2011-05-16 18:10:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) Bernie? Ping. Sorry for the delay, I was travelling. I'm not sure about your suggestion to remove the build stage: currently it doesn't do anything, but if this changes in future upstream releases, we risk silently breaking something. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 669911] Review Request: guestfs-browser - Guest filesystem browser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=669911 --- Comment #3 from Julian Sikorski beleg...@gmail.com 2011-05-16 19:21:20 EDT --- Created attachment 499242 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=499242 Fedora 15 x86_64 build log The package does not build in mock for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 690919] Review Request: aswvdial - Dockapp for wvdial
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690919
--- Comment #6 from Robert Scheck redhat-bugzi...@linuxnetz.de 2011-05-16
19:23:50 EDT ---
Okay, here we go:
[ DONE ] MUST: rpmlint must be run on the source rpm and all binary rpms the
build produces. The output should be posted in the review.
[ OK ] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming
Guidelines.
[ OK ] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the
format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption.
[ ?? ] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
[FAILED] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and
meet the Licensing Guidelines.
- Should be GPLv2+ and MIT because of aswvdial/strlcpy.c file
[FAILED] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
- Should be GPLv2+ and MIT because of aswvdial/strlcpy.c file
[ OK ] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of
the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.
[ OK ] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[ OK ] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[ OK ] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream
source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for
this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package,
please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this.
- 75cd1aff9392542609e9023f9f24bd37 aswvdial-1.7.tar.bz2
- 75cd1aff9392542609e9023f9f24bd37 aswvdial-1.7.tar.bz2.1
[ OK ] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary
rpms on at least one primary architecture.
[ N/A ] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on
an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the
spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST
have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package
does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST
be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line.
[ OK ] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except
for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging
Guidelines; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply
common sense.
[ N/A ] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by
using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly
forbidden.
[ N/A ] MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared
library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's
default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun.
[ OK ] MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
[ N/A ] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager
must state this fact in the request for review, along with the
rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without
this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker.
[ OK ] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does
not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package
which does create that directory.
[ OK ] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the
spec file's %files listings. (Notable exception: license texts in
specific situations)
[ OK ] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should
be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section
must include a %defattr(...) line.
[FAILED] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros.
- $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %{buildroot} is used
[ OK ] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
[ N/A ] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The
definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but
is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or
quantity).
[ OK ] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect
the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the
program must run properly if it is not present.
[ N/A ] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package.
[ N/A ] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package.
[ N/A ] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g.
libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix)
must go in a -devel package.
[
[Bug 689039] Review Request: csdp - C library for SemiDefinite Programming
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689039 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-05-16 20:50:37 EDT --- csdp-6.1.1-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 689039] Review Request: csdp - C library for SemiDefinite Programming
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689039 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|csdp-6.1.1-1.fc15 |csdp-6.1.1-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 702861] Review Request: libidn2 - Library to support IDNA2008 internationalized domain names
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702861 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-05-16 20:50:50 EDT --- libidn2-0.4-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 681976] Review Request: openfst - weighted finite-state transducer library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681976 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-05-16 20:59:02 EDT --- openfst-1.2.7-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 702277] Review Request: perl-Digest-MD5-File - Perl extension for getting MD5 sums for files and URLs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702277 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-05-16 20:56:41 EDT --- perl-Digest-MD5-File-0.07-2.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 681976] Review Request: openfst - weighted finite-state transducer library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681976 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||openfst-1.2.7-1.fc14 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-05-16 20:59:08 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701494] Review Request: wlmproxy - An advanced proxy for the MSN Messenger protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701494 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-05-16 21:01:15 EDT --- wlmproxy-0.1.2-2.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701494] Review Request: wlmproxy - An advanced proxy for the MSN Messenger protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701494 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||wlmproxy-0.1.2-2.fc14 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-05-16 21:01:27 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 668240] Review Request: clapham - Railroad diagram generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668240 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-05-16 21:04:53 EDT --- clapham-0.1.003-4.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 702277] Review Request: perl-Digest-MD5-File - Perl extension for getting MD5 sums for files and URLs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702277 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-05-16 21:06:07 EDT --- perl-Digest-MD5-File-0.07-2.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 668240] Review Request: clapham - Railroad diagram generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668240 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||clapham-0.1.003-4.fc14 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-05-16 21:04:59 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 684835] Review Request: deltacloud-core - Deltacloud REST API server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=684835 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-05-16 21:06:24 EDT --- deltacloud-core-0.3.0-4.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701237] Review Request: perl-Test-Trap - Trap exit codes, exceptions, output, etc
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701237 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Test-Trap-0.2.1-1.fc14 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-05-16 21:07:48 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701237] Review Request: perl-Test-Trap - Trap exit codes, exceptions, output, etc
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701237 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-05-16 21:07:43 EDT --- perl-Test-Trap-0.2.1-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 684835] Review Request: deltacloud-core - Deltacloud REST API server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=684835 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||deltacloud-core-0.3.0-4.fc1 ||4 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-05-16 21:06:29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 704088] Review Request: gcal - GNU Gregorian calendar program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=704088 --- Comment #2 from Daiki Ueno du...@redhat.com 2011-05-16 21:27:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) Thank you for the review. The binaries in the package are missing man pages, although they have quite comprehensive info documentation. Perhaps upstream could be asked to convert some of the docs? The man pages are available in the upstream git repository but not in the tarballs. So I included them in the new SRPM. $ rpmls gcal-3.6-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm [...] -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/gcal/CREDITS -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/gcal/Makefile.in -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/gcal/README [...] It seems a bit odd that these files are installed under /usr/share - are they needed, or can they just be excluded? Hmm, at least Makefile.in is useless - removed. I don't think any of these issues are blocking though, so were I a sponsored packager, I would declare this package APPROVED. Thanks, I'll ask someone to do the formal review - based on your comprehensive review, it should be quick. Spec URL: http://ueno.fedorapeople.org/gcal/gcal.spec SRPM URL: http://ueno.fedorapeople.org/gcal/gcal-3.6-2.fc15.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 704088] Review Request: gcal - GNU Gregorian calendar program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=704088 Hushan Jia h...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||h...@redhat.com QAContact|extras...@fedoraproject.org |h...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701845] Review Request: shunit2 - A xUnit based unit testing for Unix shell scripts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701845 Daiki Ueno du...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||du...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|du...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 529441] Review Request: pdfbox - Java PDF library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529441 Orcan Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW AssignedTo|oget.fed...@gmail.com |nob...@fedoraproject.org --- Comment #13 from Orcan Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com 2011-05-16 22:23:43 EDT --- Sorry guys. I thought we finished this one. I do not have the time to review it at this very moment but I'll try get to it soon, unless someone else picks it up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701845] Review Request: shunit2 - A xUnit based unit testing for Unix shell scripts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701845
--- Comment #2 from Daiki Ueno du...@redhat.com 2011-05-16 22:32:29 EDT ---
Here is the review:
[+]:ok, [=]:needs attention, [-]:needs fixing, [ ]: not applicable
MUST Items:
[-] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package.
After installing, rpmlint -i shunit2 gives an error:
shunit2.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/share/doc/shunit2-2.1.6/LGPL-2.1
The Free Software Foundation address in this file seems to be outdated or
misspelled. Ask upstream to update the address, or if this is a license
file,
possibly the entire file with a new copy available from the FSF.
[+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}
[+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet
the Licensing Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
[+] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.
[+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL.
4af955ef88c454808754939c83afa22b shunit2-2.1.6.tgz
4af955ef88c454808754939c83afa22b shunit2-2.1.6.tgz.upstream
[+] MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on
at least one supported architecture.
[+] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch.
[+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires
[ ] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the
%find_lang macro.
[ ] MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just
symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in
%post and %postun.
[ ] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state
this fact in the request for review
[+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not
create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does
create that directory.
[-] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing.
It seems that %doc %{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/* covers %doc
%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/examples/* too.
warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/doc/shunit2-2.1.6/examples
warning: File listed twice:
/usr/share/doc/shunit2-2.1.6/examples/equality_test.sh
warning: File listed twice:
/usr/share/doc/shunit2-2.1.6/examples/lineno_test.sh
warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/doc/shunit2-2.1.6/examples/math.inc
warning: File listed twice:
/usr/share/doc/shunit2-2.1.6/examples/math_test.sh
warning: File listed twice:
/usr/share/doc/shunit2-2.1.6/examples/mkdir_test.sh
warning: File listed twice:
/usr/share/doc/shunit2-2.1.6/examples/party_test.sh
[+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set
with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a
%defattr(...) line.
[+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros
section of Packaging Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissible content. This is
described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines.
[+] MUST: Large documentation files should go in a doc subpackage.
[+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the
runtime of the application.
[ ] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package.
[ ] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package.
[ ] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'
(for directory ownership and usability).
[ ] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g.
libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in
a -devel package.
[ ] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} =
%{version}-%{release}
[+] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be
removed in the spec.
[ ] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop
file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the
%install section.
[+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
[+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
SHOULD Items:
[ ] SHOULD: If the source package does not
[Bug 688421] Review Request: pyicu - Python extension wrapping IBM's ICU C++ libraries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688421 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-05-16 23:16:43 EDT --- pyicu-1.1-2.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pyicu-1.1-2.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701845] Review Request: shunit2 - A xUnit based unit testing for Unix shell scripts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701845 --- Comment #3 from Hushan Jia h...@redhat.com 2011-05-17 00:15:33 EDT --- Hi Daiki, I have fix the 3 issues, please review: http://hushan.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/shunit2.spec http://hushan.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/shunit2-2.1.6-2.el6.src.rpm I plan to build for EPEL, so cleaning buildroot is required. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 704088] Review Request: gcal - GNU Gregorian calendar program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=704088 Hushan Jia h...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 704088] Review Request: gcal - GNU Gregorian calendar program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=704088 Hushan Jia h...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|h...@redhat.com QAContact|h...@redhat.com |extras...@fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
