[Bug 609817] Review Request: dojo - Modular JavaScript toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609817 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 609817] Review Request: dojo - Modular JavaScript toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609817 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2011-05-21 05:03:21 EDT --- dojo-1.6.0-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dojo-1.6.0-1.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705376] Review Request: perl-MIME-Lite-HTML - Provide routine to transform a HTML page in a MIME-Lite mail
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705376 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Emmanuel Seyman 2011-05-21 05:09:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > > Fixed. cpanspec was overzealous and I was too lazy when checking the spec :-(. Thank you. > > This again? Xavier, please consider filing a bug upstream to correct this. > > Done : https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=68303 Thanks. > Spec URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/perl-MIME-Lite-HTML.spec > SRPM URL: > http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/perl-MIME-Lite-HTML-1.23-2.fc14.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3085051 All problems are fixed. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 609817] Review Request: dojo - Modular JavaScript toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609817 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2011-05-21 05:10:21 EDT --- dojo-1.6.0-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dojo-1.6.0-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664205] Review Request: ghc-dlist - Haskell package that provides difference lists
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664205 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2011-05-21 05:18:21 EDT --- ghc-dlist-0.5-3.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-dlist-0.5-3.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664205] Review Request: ghc-dlist - Haskell package that provides difference lists
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664205 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2011-05-21 05:18:13 EDT --- ghc-dlist-0.5-3.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-dlist-0.5-3.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664205] Review Request: ghc-dlist - Haskell package that provides difference lists
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664205 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664205] Review Request: ghc-dlist - Haskell package that provides difference lists
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664205 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2011-05-21 05:18:05 EDT --- ghc-dlist-0.5-3.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-dlist-0.5-3.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705376] Review Request: perl-MIME-Lite-HTML - Provide routine to transform a HTML page in a MIME-Lite mail
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705376 Xavier Bachelot changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Xavier Bachelot 2011-05-21 06:01:44 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: perl-MIME-Lite-HTML Short Description: Provide routine to transform a HTML page in a MIME-Lite mail Owners: xavierb Branches: f14 f15 el5 el6 InitialCC: perl-sig Thanks for the review Emmanuel :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 706593] New: Review Request: qwtpolar - Display values on a polar coordinate system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: qwtpolar - Display values on a polar coordinate system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=706593 Summary: Review Request: qwtpolar - Display values on a polar coordinate system Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: volke...@gmx.at QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec URL: http://www.geofrogger.net/review/qwtpolar.spec SRPM URL: http://www.geofrogger.net/review/qwtpolar-0.1.0-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: The QwtPolar library contains classes for displaying values on a polar coordinate system. It is an add-on package for to the Qwt Library. --- Maybe the summary is rubbish. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 678910] Review Request: kde-plasma-activitymanager - KDE plasma activity manager applet
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678910 Magnus Tuominen changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Magnus Tuominen 2011-05-21 07:08:12 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: kde-plasma-activitymanager Short Description: KDE plasma activity manager applet Owners: magnu5 Branches: f14 f15 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 703322] Review Request: tpp - text presentation program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703322
--- Comment #17 from Golo Fuchert 2011-05-21 07:59:51 EDT
---
Yes, there are still some issues with this package.
- Right now, the Requirements (i.e. emacs-filesystem) guarantee the ownership
of
%{_emacs_sitelispdir} only for F15, since the package is not available for
F<15. There are packages, which do own %{_emacs_sitelispdir} there, however,
none of that is required by tpp. So tpp has to own it as well, otherwise
after
the uninstall of tpp that dir might remain and pollute the user's system.
So, in the %files section we need
%if 0%{?fedora} < 15
%dir %{_emacs_sitelispdir}/
%endif
- You can think of the install command as a cp, so in the build section you
copy
all files from contrib to the emacs and vim related directories. Then,
however, you add the contrib folder to the %doc files. Not only is this
useless, but a file is not allowed to be packaged more than once without good
reason.
- In the newest %changelog entry the mail address is now missing completely.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs
- rpmlint still complains about the wrong fsf address, this won't block tpp I
guess, however, upstream should really be informed in order to fix this.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 609817] Review Request: dojo - Modular JavaScript toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609817 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2011-05-21 08:29:31 EDT --- dojo-1.6.0-1.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dojo-1.6.0-1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 609817] Review Request: dojo - Modular JavaScript toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609817 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2011-05-21 08:43:47 EDT --- dojo-1.6.0-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dojo-1.6.0-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 609817] Review Request: dojo - Modular JavaScript toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609817 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2011-05-21 08:52:12 EDT --- dojo-1.6.0-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dojo-1.6.0-1.el6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 651656] Review Request: ghc-ltk - A UI toolkit for Leksah
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=651656 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2011-05-21 09:19:08 EDT --- ghc-ltk-0.10.0.4-2.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-ltk-0.10.0.4-2.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 651656] Review Request: ghc-ltk - A UI toolkit for Leksah
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=651656 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 651656] Review Request: ghc-ltk - A UI toolkit for Leksah
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=651656 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2011-05-21 09:19:17 EDT --- ghc-ltk-0.10.0.4-2.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-ltk-0.10.0.4-2.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705104] Review Request: freediams - Pharmaceutical Drugs Prescriptor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705104 Golo Fuchert changed: What|Removed |Added CC||packa...@golotop.de --- Comment #2 from Golo Fuchert 2011-05-21 10:29:01 EDT --- Have you tried these? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Removing_Rpath -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705377] Review Request: perl-AuthCAS - Client library for CAS 2.0 authentication server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705377 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||emmanuel.seyman@club-intern ||et.fr AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|emmanuel.seyman@club-intern ||et.fr Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Emmanuel Seyman 2011-05-21 11:14:00 EDT --- Taking. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 643140] Review Request: autokey - A desktop automation utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=643140 --- Comment #19 from Raghu Udiyar 2011-05-21 14:16:56 EDT --- Can a sponsor look at this review. I just want to know if there is anything else I can do to take this request forward. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705377] Review Request: perl-AuthCAS - Client library for CAS 2.0 authentication server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705377
--- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman
2011-05-21 14:40:42 EDT ---
=== KEY ===
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[!] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Perl specific items
Test::More is only used in the module's tests. It is therefore a BuildRequire,
not a Require. Please fix your spec.
[x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported architecture.
Tested on: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3085326
[x] Rpmlint output: 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
[x] Package is not relocatable.
[x] Buildroot is correct
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
[x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
License type: GPL+ or Artistic
[-] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
[x] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
cfc26405b47d498496e0c5557d2a9fb2 AuthCAS-1.5.tar.gz
[x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch
[x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[-] The spec file handles locales properly.
[-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[x] Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x] Permissions on files are set properly.
[x] Package consistently uses macros.
[x] Package contains code, or permissable content.
[-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[-] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present.
[-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[-] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la).
[-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
application.
[x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
=== SUGGESTED ITEMS ===
[x] Latest version is packaged.
[x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
Tested on: rawhide.x86_64
[x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
Tested on: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3085326
[?] Package functions as described.
[-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
[-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct.
[-] File based requires are sane.
[x] %check is present and the tests pass
All tests successful.
Files=3, Tests=2, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.01 sys + 0.11 cusr 0.02
csys = 0.16 CPU)
Result: PASS
NOT APPROVED.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705377] Review Request: perl-AuthCAS - Client library for CAS 2.0 authentication server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705377 --- Comment #3 from Xavier Bachelot 2011-05-21 14:50:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > [!] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Perl specific items > > Test::More is only used in the module's tests. It is therefore a BuildRequire, > not a Require. Please fix your spec. > Yes, indeed. I was about to fix it when you posted. http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/perl-AuthCAS.spec http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/perl-AuthCAS-1.5-2.fc14.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 555655] Review Request: sslstrip - tool that provides a demonstration of HTTPS stripping attacks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555655 emoziko changed: What|Removed |Added CC||emobux...@yahoo.com --- Comment #3 from emoziko 2011-05-21 16:11:18 EDT --- Hello. When will be available this package in Fedora repos? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 571019] Review Request: libmtag - An advanced C music tagging library with a simple API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571019 --- Comment #12 from Hans de Goede 2011-05-21 16:42:57 EDT --- Ping, any update on this / progress with this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 706565] Review Request: sheepdog - The Sheepdog Distributed Storage System for KVM/QEMU
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=706565 --- Comment #1 from David Nalley 2011-05-21 17:22:50 EDT --- Updated SPEC: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/sheepdog.spec Updated SRPM: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/sheepdog-0.2.3-1.fc14.src.rpm Upstream just updated to 0.2.3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705377] Review Request: perl-AuthCAS - Client library for CAS 2.0 authentication server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705377 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Emmanuel Seyman 2011-05-21 18:01:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > > http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/perl-AuthCAS-1.5-2.fc14.src.rpm APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 643140] Review Request: autokey - A desktop automation utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=643140 David Timms changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dti...@iinet.net.au --- Comment #20 from David Timms 2011-05-21 19:08:09 EDT --- Hi Raghu, I'm not a sponsor, but offer the following, mainly regarding readability: - Line spacing: I like to see a fixed number of blank lines between each spec section header. Currently you have either 1 or 2. (I prefer to use 2 so that each heading stands out, but at least be consistent). - Use of tabs: in the top part, if you really want to use tabs, then the same number of tabs should be used between each ':' and value. (Currently there is some 2x or 1x tab, equating to between 1 and 4 characters spacing). - Can the package by used command line only ? - There seems to be no files assigned to the main package. Does that create a real but no files present package ? Could the -common subpackage instead just be the main package ? - As a side note: Upstream mentions it is essentially maintenance only, and that the most up2date autohotkey compatibility is found with IronAHK. What made you choose autokey rather than IronAHK for packaging ? - If bugs are present in autokey, do you feel that you would be able to tackle them without upstream support ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 693363] Review Request: st - A simple terminal implementation for X
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693363 --- Comment #7 from David Nalley 2011-05-21 19:36:46 EDT --- So long story short Petr, Silas Sewell and I have exchanged a few emails, and I think from both Silas and I our POV is: * hacking openstack-swift or st to have a different binary results in documentation not working, and fedora specific 'problems' * st and openstack-swift are not very likely to both want to be on a single system at once. So I think the conflicts idea works at least from the openstack-swift perspective. My current plan wrt openstack-swift is to introduce this conflicts with openstack-swift 1.3.0, which may be a bit, there are some additional as-of-yet-unpackaged dependencies that need to be introduced to Fedora, so it won't be immediate, but certainly soon, though adding the conflicts to st should resolve the immediate issue I believe. Thoughts, comments?? flames?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 698692] Review Request: grilo-plugins - Plugins for the Grilo framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698692 --- Comment #12 from Bastien Nocera 2011-05-21 22:00:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > If you're building for el6, I believe it needs the %clean section: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#.25clean I don't want to build for el6, so I really wouldn't worry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 698692] Review Request: grilo-plugins - Plugins for the Grilo framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698692 --- Comment #13 from Bastien Nocera 2011-05-21 22:01:45 EDT --- Huh, I see that the request included el6. I don't know why I copied that from the example page. I don't intend on building it for RHEL 6. Ever. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 698692] Review Request: grilo-plugins - Plugins for the Grilo framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698692 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 698692] Review Request: grilo-plugins - Plugins for the Grilo framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698692 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2011-05-21 22:24:12 EDT --- grilo-plugins-0.1.15-4.fc15,grilo-0.1.15-3.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/grilo-plugins-0.1.15-4.fc15,grilo-0.1.15-3.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705377] Review Request: perl-AuthCAS - Client library for CAS 2.0 authentication server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705377 Xavier Bachelot changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Xavier Bachelot 2011-05-21 23:26:41 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: perl-AuthCAS Short Description: Client library for CAS 2.0 authentication server Owners: xavierb Branches: f14 f15 el5 el6 InitialCC: perl-sig Thanks for the review Emmanuel :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664140] Review Request: leksah-server - Package that provides the interface to GHC-API for leksah
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664140 --- Comment #2 from Lakshmi Narasimhan 2011-05-22 00:02:04 EDT --- Yes, will update to the latest version 0.10.0.4. I have sent a mail to the authors. Will update the spec again once I get a response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664140] Review Request: leksah-server - Package that provides the interface to GHC-API for leksah
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664140 --- Comment #3 from Lakshmi Narasimhan 2011-05-22 01:33:03 EDT --- Updated spec file and srpm links: http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/leksah-server.spec http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/leksah-server-0.10.0.4-1.fc14.src.rpm Koji build at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3085715 rpmlint -i *.rpm ../leksah-server.spec leksah-server.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary leksahecho Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. leksah-server.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary leksah-server Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
