[Bug 710672] Review Request: pnmixer - Lightweight mixer applet
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710672 --- Comment #8 from Mario Blättermann 2011-06-08 02:43:46 EDT --- New upstream version available: https://github.com/downloads/nicklan/pnmixer/pnmixer-0.3.tar.gz This version solves the licensing problem. Everything is updated to GPLv3+. Moreover, the gettext stack is now working and the package ships a German translation. Means, the find_lang macro has to be applied. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705361] Review Request: perl-Proc-SyncExec - Spawn processes but report exec() errors
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705361 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2011-06-08 02:43:38 EDT --- perl-Proc-SyncExec-1.01-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Proc-SyncExec-1.01-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705361] Review Request: perl-Proc-SyncExec - Spawn processes but report exec() errors
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705361 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2011-06-08 02:42:12 EDT --- perl-Proc-SyncExec-1.01-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Proc-SyncExec-1.01-1.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 711313] Review Request: wicd-kde - a Wicd client built on the KDE Development Platform
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711313
--- Comment #4 from Minh 2011-06-08 02:11:12 EDT ---
>Use desktop-file-install for desktop files:
>http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Desktop_files
Fixed
>Please insert license text to package.
A license text is already in the file COPYING
>you build package for KDE4 so you need read
>https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/KDE/Packaging/Guidelines. There are some
>KDE-specific macros. Please use these instead of the standard macros.
>P.S. %{_prefix}/libexec == %{_libexecdir}
Fixed
Spec URL: http://fpaste.org/VHLr/
SRPM URL:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=3118421&name=wicd-kde-0.2.2-1.fc15.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 711313] Review Request: wicd-kde - a Wicd client built on the KDE Development Platform
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711313
Pavel Zhukov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pa...@zhukoff.net
--- Comment #3 from Pavel Zhukov 2011-06-08 00:07:33 EDT ---
I'm using KDE and wicd. But I'm not sponsor.
Few comments:
Use desktop-file-install for desktop files:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Desktop_files
Please insert license text to package.
you build package for KDE4 so you need read
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/KDE/Packaging/Guidelines. There are some
KDE-specific macros. Please use these instead of the standard macros.
P.S. %{_prefix}/libexec == %{_libexecdir}
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 555655] Review Request: sslstrip - tool that provides a demonstration of HTTPS stripping attacks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555655 --- Comment #5 from Adam Miller 2011-06-07 23:59:03 EDT --- Spec URL: http://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/sslstrip.spec SRPM URL: http://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/sslstrip-0.9-1.fc15.src.rpm Fixed up and updated to latest upstream release. No worries on the delay, life happens :) -AdamM -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 711058] Review Request: akonadi-googledata - Google contacts and calendar akonadi resource
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711058 --- Comment #12 from Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich 2011-06-07 23:45:49 EDT --- Hm. Looks like I have twice give a wgong sugestion that boost is not requires in Requires section. It is required. akonadi-googledata test it is installed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 711058] Review Request: akonadi-googledata - Google contacts and calendar akonadi resource
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711058
--- Comment #11 from Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich 2011-06-07 23:41:18
EDT ---
> 3) Remove, I use just Fedora, I can't looking for EPEL. But it needed to leave
> DESTDIR in make install to compile without error;
buildroot var will be generated automaticaly, you not need to specify it
manually. That what I meant. DESTDIR still is required with the reference to
%{buildroot}
> 4) Remove %{_kde4_datadir}/akonadi but I don't understand...How can I
> understand which files are owner by other rpm files?
Just look at what your package creates, apply common scence, remember that all
installed FILES must be described in %files section as well as package's own
DIRs. Beside, "yum provides \*///" (to query repo) or
"rpm -qf ///" (if package is installed on your system)
could give you an answer. In last case path could be relevant.
Note: why "\*/" but not "". Just because yum with "provides" option
wants a pattern but not exact string.
> P.S. to create the package I use mock. I don't use kojij like explain here:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Install_the_Client_Tools_.28Koji.29
You will use koji :) Testing on local machine - mock, including final result
into Fedora repo - koji.
One thing with %files section. You not need another %files entry to just add
filelist akonadi_gcal_resource.lang.
And in Requires section boost is mentioned. As I undestand, it is not required
to be explicitly mentioned either.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 707819] Review Request: DSDP - Software for semidefinite programming
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707819 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2011-06-07 23:37:33 EDT --- DSDP-5.8-2.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/DSDP-5.8-2.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 707819] Review Request: DSDP - Software for semidefinite programming
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707819 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2011-06-07 23:40:05 EDT --- DSDP-5.8-2.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/DSDP-5.8-2.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 707819] Review Request: DSDP - Software for semidefinite programming
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707819 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 707819] Review Request: DSDP - Software for semidefinite programming
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707819 --- Comment #13 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-06-07 21:58:01 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 707819] Review Request: DSDP - Software for semidefinite programming
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707819 Jerry James changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Jerry James 2011-06-07 19:07:40 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: DSDP Short Description: Software for semidefinite programming Owners: jjames Branches: f14 f15 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 710452] Review Request: unzix - A WinZix archive extractor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710452 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2011-06-07 19:04:41 EDT --- unzix-0.3.0-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 711547] Review Request: sketch - Free Graphics Software for the TeX, LaTeX, and PSTricks Community
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711547 --- Comment #4 from Ryan 2011-06-07 18:38:01 EDT --- Why is it not necessary? The makefile they create uses those things, if they are for some reason missing... http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3117116 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 711547] Review Request: sketch - Free Graphics Software for the TeX, LaTeX, and PSTricks Community
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711547
--- Comment #3 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2011-06-07
18:30:49 EDT ---
please start reading.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Package_Maintainers
I think no need the flowing lines.
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
BuildRequires: gcc
BuildRequires: flex
BuildRequires: bison
your spec file is missing changelog.
please post here the link of a koji scratch build of your package.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 711181] Review Request: mono-reflection - Helper library for Mono Reflection support
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711181
--- Comment #1 from Christian Krause 2011-06-07 18:13:03 EDT
---
Here is the full review of the package:
* rpmlint: OK
rpmlint RPMS/i686/mono-reflection-*
SRPMS/mono-reflection-0.1-0.1.201105123git04d1df.fc15.src.rpm
SPECS/mono-reflection.spec
mono-reflection.i686: E: no-binary
mono-reflection.i686: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
-> false positives (mono assemblies are supposed to be in %{_libdir} and they
are not recognized as (ELF) binaries)
mono-reflection-devel.i686: W: no-documentation
-> OK, package does not ship any further API documentation
mono-reflection.src: W: invalid-url Source0:
mono-reflection-201105123git04d1df.tar.bz2
SPECS/mono-reflection.spec: W: invalid-url Source0:
mono-reflection-201105123git04d1df.tar.bz2
-> OK, source obtained via VCS
3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 4 warnings.
* naming: OK
- spec file name matches package name
- the upstream name is "mono.reflection"
- however, according to
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Separators the
separator for name
parts should be "-" so the chosen name is OK
* sources: TODO
- Source0 tag ok
- spectool -g does not work, which is OK for VCS checkouts
- I followed exactly the steps from the spec file to create the source tarball,
but I get a source package with another md5sum:
chkr: b68ba65fbc6ed8db9cf1feea31a1b694
mono-reflection-201105123git04d1df.tar.bz2
spot: 49c3f06edbdb02c5cb4454645824fc15
mono-reflection-201105123git04d1df.tar.bz2
- actually the sources itself match, but the .git directory doesn't which
causes the different md5sums
- however, there are two problems here:
a) .git is packaged
b) the steps to re-create the tarball are not referring to a specific revision
For my packages I have usually added a small script which creates a "normal"
tarball (without any VCS directories) from a specific revision/commit:
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=banshee.git;a=blob;f=banshee-make-git-snapshot.sh;h=24847e5154b556bb11e51b2564410fc75d538ddb;hb=HEAD
The comment in the spec file is then reduced to something like this:
"# sh banshee-make-git-snapshot.sh "
This will ensure that it is always possible to re-create exactly the same
tarball.
* binaries in upstream sources: TODO
- although it is not used during compilation, there is one pre-compiled C#
assembly:
mono-reflection-201105123git04d1df/Test/target.dll
- just to be sure I would delete it in %prep
* License: OK
- MIT is a Fedora approved License
- License in spec file match the actual license (as mentioned in the source
files)
- Probably you could ask upstream to include a license file.
* spec file written in American English and legible: OK
* compilation: OK
- builds fine in koji: F16/rawhide
* BuildRequires: OK
* Requires: TODO
- the -devel package should use the fully versioned arch-specific dependency:
Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}
* bundled copies of system libraries: OK (n/a)
* locales handling: OK (n/a)
* ldconfig in %post and %postun: OK (n/a)
* package owns all directories that it creates: OK
* %files section: OK
* no files listed twice in %files: OK
* file permissions: OK
* macro usage: OK
* code vs. content: OK (no content)
* main package should not contain development related parts: OK
* large documentation into subpackage: OK (n/a)
* header files in -devel subpackage: OK (n/a)
* static libraries in -static package: OK (n/a)
* *.so link in -devel package: OK (n/a)
* devel package requires base package using fully versioned dependency: OK
* packages must not contain *.la files: OK (n/a)
* GUI applications must provide *.desktop file: OK (n/a)
* packages must not own files/dirs already owned by other packages: OK
* all filenames UTF-8: OK
* debuginfo sub-package: OK (n/a)
Summary of the open issues:
- better (reproducible) creation of the tarball from git repository
- deleting all pre-compiled binaries/assemblies in %prep
- use of fully versioned dependency in Requires:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 711547] Review Request: sketch - Free Graphics Software for the TeX, LaTeX, and PSTricks Community
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711547 --- Comment #2 from Ryan 2011-06-07 17:58:13 EDT --- indeed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 707819] Review Request: DSDP - Software for semidefinite programming
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707819 Richard Shaw changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Richard Shaw 2011-06-07 17:30:11 EDT --- Yup. I only added the ? under SHOULD since it would be nice if they converted to a more common license but OHWELL :) Spec file looks good so your package is approved! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 707819] Review Request: DSDP - Software for semidefinite programming
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707819 --- Comment #10 from Jerry James 2011-06-07 17:26:17 EDT --- I got a response. We're to call this license "DSDP". I made that change, but didn't bump the release number again, so the URLs are the same as before. (I hope that's okay.) Under SHOULD, I don't need to query upstream for the license text, because it is already included in the file "dsdp-license". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 619355] Review Request: python26-numpy - A fast multidimensional array facility for Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=619355 Jerry James changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #22 from Jerry James 2011-06-07 17:20:46 EDT --- The reply says to call that license "eGenix". I'll trust you to put that into the license field when you import the package. Since everything else is ready to go, I'll approve this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 711606] New: Review Request: gnome-shell-extension-mediaplayers - A gnome-shell extension to control mediaplayers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gnome-shell-extension-mediaplayers - A gnome-shell extension to control mediaplayers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711606 Summary: Review Request: gnome-shell-extension-mediaplayers - A gnome-shell extension to control mediaplayers Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fab...@bernewireless.net QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/gnome-shell-extension-mediaplayers.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/gnome-shell-extension-mediaplayers-0-0.1.git259f96e.fc15.src.rpm Project URL: https://github.com/Caccc/Gnome-shell-extension-Mediasplayers Description: Gnome shell extension Mediasplayers is a simple extension for displaying player control, music and music cover in Gnome Shell. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3117439 rpmlint output: [fab@laptop021 SRPMS]$ rpmlint gnome-shell-extension-mediaplayers* 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab@laptop021 noarch]$ rpmlint gnome-shell-extension-mediaplayers* 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 711547] Review Request: sketch - Free Graphics Software for the TeX, LaTeX, and PSTricks Community
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711547 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ita...@ispbrasil.com.br --- Comment #1 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2011-06-07 16:47:08 EDT --- is this your first package ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 710995] Review Request: kradview - An image viewer oriented to images obtained by X-Ray machines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710995 Volker Fröhlich changed: What|Removed |Added CC||volke...@gmx.at --- Comment #1 from Volker Fröhlich 2011-06-07 16:45:00 EDT --- The invalid URL is easy to sort out: http://www.orcero.org/irbis/kradview I suggest to run rpmlint on ALL your RPM files or run it after having installed the packages: rpmlint my_package No buildroot definition, no rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT necessary. $ desktop-file-validate ./src/kradview.desktop ./src/kradview.desktop: warning: key "Encoding" in group "Desktop Entry" is deprecated ./src/kradview.desktop: warning: value "kradview %i %m -caption "%c"" for key "Exec" in group "Desktop Entry" contains a deprecated field code "%m" ./src/kradview.desktop: warning: boolean key "Terminal" in group "Desktop Entry" has value "0", which is deprecated: boolean values should be "false" or "true" I'm not an expert in Docbook, but it seems to me, the documentation is still in Docbook format -- not HTML. It is common to put %doc as the first element of the files list, but don't know whether it's a rule. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 551912] Review Request: monodevelop-java - A java plugin for monodevelop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551912 Christian Krause changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(paul@all-the-john ||sons.co.uk) --- Comment #10 from Christian Krause 2011-06-07 16:43:56 EDT --- Paul, are you still interested getting this package reviewed? Claudio, if you want to take over this review, I think the best way would be if you create a new Review Request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 551914] Review Request: monodevelop-database - A database plugin for monodevelop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551914 Christian Krause changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(paul@all-the-john ||sons.co.uk) --- Comment #15 from Christian Krause 2011-06-07 16:45:41 EDT --- Paul, are you still interested in getting this package reviewed? Claudio, if you want to take over this review, I think the best way would be if you create a new Review Request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 711058] Review Request: akonadi-googledata - Google contacts and calendar akonadi resource
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711058
--- Comment #10 from Mario Santagiuliana 2011-06-07
16:33:05 EDT ---
Hi to all,
In response to comment 4:
1) Done;
2) Done;
3) Remove, I use just Fedora, I can't looking for EPEL. But it needed to leave
DESTDIR in make install to compile without error;
4) Remove %{_kde4_datadir}/akonadi but I don't understand...How can I
understand which files are owner by other rpm files?
Then, generally, how can I undestand where the files of a packages will be
placed?
How can I be secure to include all the files installed by a package and don't
lost them? And, expecially, don't include file owned by other rpm?
Now, can you check if spec file is correct?
http://marionline.fedorapeople.org/packages/SPECS/akonadi-googledata.spec
I update all package in my fedorapeople area. I use the last official release
of akonadi-googledata, 1.2.0 in respect of Rex comment.
I subscribe devel-announce list and package-review list.
Thank you :)
P.S. to create the package I use mock. I don't use kojij like explain here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Install_the_Client_Tools_.28Koji.29
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 711181] Review Request: mono-reflection - Helper library for Mono Reflection support
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711181 Christian Krause changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||c...@plauener.de AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|c...@plauener.de Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 682544] Review request: gargoyle - multi-format interactive fiction interpreter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682544 --- Comment #9 from Carlo Teubner 2011-06-07 16:01:19 EDT --- Jason, it's the upstream gargoyle project that does the bundling. And it's not bundling libraries, but it's distributing its own versions of the executables for each interpreter, modified to use the Gargoyle display library. Indeed, that is the only library contained in this package. So even if one of the bundled interpreters was present on a system, gargoyle would be unable to take advantage of that, even in principle. Changing this would be a major rearchitecting of the upstream project. Ken, I agree that is some weird phrasing. But it is not self-contradictory, merely redundant. So I don't see it as a problem. If it is a problem, how could this be addressed? Would I need to obtain a statement from Andrew Plotkin clarifying his intention? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 592733] Review Request: turpial - Is cool twitter client with many features and very light
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592733 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2011-06-07 15:46:54 EDT --- turpial-1.5.0-2.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/turpial-1.5.0-2.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 710194] Review Request: tepache - Code sketcher for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710194 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2011-06-07 14:57:42 EDT --- tepache-1.1.2-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tepache-1.1.2-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 710194] Review Request: tepache - Code sketcher for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710194 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 710194] Review Request: tepache - Code sketcher for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710194 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2011-06-07 14:59:01 EDT --- tepache-1.1.2-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tepache-1.1.2-1.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 711547] New: Review Request: sketch - Free Graphics Software for the TeX, LaTeX, and PSTricks Community
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sketch - Free Graphics Software for the TeX, LaTeX, and PSTricks Community https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711547 Summary: Review Request: sketch - Free Graphics Software for the TeX, LaTeX, and PSTricks Community Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: m...@ryanlewis.net QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec URL: http://rhl.fedorapeople.org/sketch.spec SRPM URL: http://rhl.fedorapeople.org/sketch-0.3.2-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: Sketch is a small, simple system for producing line drawings of two- or three-dimensional solid objects and scenes. It began as a way to make illustrations for a textbook after we could find no suitable tool for this purpose. Existing scene processors emphasized GUIs and/or photo-realism, both un-useful to us. We wanted to produce finely wrought, mathematically-based illustrations with no extraneous detail. The input language is reminiscent of PSTricks, so will be easy to learn for current PSTricks users. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 710203] Review Request: gambas3 - IDE based on a basic interpreter with object extensions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710203 --- Comment #2 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2011-06-07 14:35:25 EDT --- Yeah, I think that is bogus. Good catch. New SPEC: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/gambas3.spec New SRPM: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/gambas3-2.99.1-2.fc15.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 708371] Review Request: perl-RPM-VersionCompare - Compare RPM version strings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708371 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla 2011-06-07 14:13:20 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705361] Review Request: perl-Proc-SyncExec - Spawn processes but report exec() errors
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705361 --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla 2011-06-07 14:12:47 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 703178] Review Request: rubygem-declarative_authorization - The declarative_authorization plug in provides readable auth rules for Rails.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703178 Darryl L. Pierce changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-06-07 13:36:02 --- Comment #10 from Darryl L. Pierce 2011-06-07 13:36:02 EDT --- Thanks for the quick repo creation, Jason! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 709328] Review Request: psi-plus - Jabber client based on Qt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709328
--- Comment #15 from Raphael Groner 2011-06-07 13:18:21 EDT ---
Could you provide for each source an url where it is from?
Source0:
http://koji.russianfedora.ru/storage/psi-plus/%{name}-%{version}-20110530svn3954.tar.bz2
Source1:iconsets.tar.bz2
Source2:language_ru.tar.bz2
Source3:skins.tar.bz2
Source4:themes.tar.bz2
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 706357] Review Request: lsw - Prints all window titles of DISPLAY to standard output
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=706357
Jaromír Cápík changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from Jaromír Cápík 2011-06-07 11:49:10 EDT
---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
[x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported architecture.
Tested on: fedora-15-x86_64
[x] Rpmlint output:
$ rpmlint lsw-0.2-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm
lsw.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US stdout -> stout, std out,
std-out
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
$ rpmlint lsw-debuginfo-0.2-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
$ rpmlint lsw-0.2-1.fc15.src.rpm
lsw.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US stdout -> stout, std out,
std-out
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
[x] Package is not relocatable.
[x] Package does NOT include BuildRoot tag, clean section or buildroot removal
in install section
[x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
License type: MIT
[x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
[x] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
MD5SUM this package: 5ddd61d04ff084a39494b2aa06c00b65
MD5SUM upstream package: 5ddd61d04ff084a39494b2aa06c00b65
[x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch, OR:
Arches excluded: -
Why: -
[x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[-] The spec file handles locales properly -- package requires gettext and
uses find_lang, if applicable
[-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[x] Package must own all directories that it creates.
[-] Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x] Permissions on files are set properly.
[x] Package consistently uses macros.
[x] Package contains code, or permissable content.
[-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present.
[-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la).
[-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
application.
[-] All desktop files are installed by desktop-file-install or justified
otherwise
[x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x] Package does NOT include/bundle any pre-built binaries or libraries, fonts
or other general purpose data
[x] Changelog present in the spec file and is properly formatted
[x] Package does NOT include Packager, Vendor, Copyright or PreReq tags
[x] All documentation prefixed with %doc
[x] No files in %doc are needed at run-time
[x] Compiler flags honor Fedora defaults or are justified
[x] Package generates useful debuginfo packages
[x] Package contains no static executables unless approved by FESCo
[-] All config files are marked noreplace or justified otherwise
[x] No config files are located under /usr
[-] Package contains a SystemV-compatible initscript, if applicable
[-] makeinstall macro is used only if make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} does
NOT work
[-] globals used in place of defines
[x] Package does NOT cause any conflicts
[x] Package does NOT contain kernel modules
[x] Final Requires and Provides are sane
[x] Macros in Summary and description are expandable at build-time
=== SUGGESTED ITEMS ===
[x] Latest version is packaged.
[x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
Tested on: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
[x] Packa
[Bug 706357] Review Request: lsw - Prints all window titles of DISPLAY to standard output
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=706357 Jaromír Cápík changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jca...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jca...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Jaromír Cápík 2011-06-07 11:47:49 EDT --- I'll do the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 711058] Review Request: akonadi-googledata - Google contacts and calendar akonadi resource
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711058 --- Comment #9 from Mario Santagiuliana 2011-06-07 11:42:09 EDT --- Thank you Rex and than you Dmitrij, I will create the new rpm with spec file fix. I will subscribe the ML and follow the steps to become the package mantainer. I will create new version of this package from svn trunk and I will post new things here ok? P.S. thanks Dmitrij, I created the packages for other architecture using mock ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 711462] Review Request: perl-Fedora-Rebuild - Rebuilds Fedora packages from scratch
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711462
--- Comment #3 from Marcela Mašláňová 2011-06-07 11:35:39
EDT ---
- rpmlint OK
perl-Fedora-Rebuild.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary getperlsourcenames
- package must be named according to Guidelines OK
- spec file name must match the base package %{name} OK
- package must meet the Packaging Guidelines OK
- package must be licensed with Fedora approved license OK
- license field must match actual license OK
- text of the license in its own file must be included in %doc OK
- sources must match the upstream source OK
- package MUST successfully compile and build ?
- architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla OK
- build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires OK
- handle locales properly with %find_lang macro OK
- shared library files must call ldconfig in %post(un) OK
- packages must NOT bundle system libraries OK
- package must own all directories that it creates OK
- permissions on files must be set properly OK
- package must consistently use macros OK
- package must contain code, or permissable content OK
- large documentation must go in a -doc OK
- %doc must not affect the runtime of the application OK
- header files must be in a -devel package OK
- static libraries must be in a -static package OK
- library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel OK
- devel package usually require base package OK
- packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives OK
- GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file OK
- packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages OK
rpm -q --provides perl-Fedora-Rebuild
perl(Fedora::Rebuild)
perl(Fedora::Rebuild::Package)
perl(Fedora::Rebuild::Package::StateLock)
perl(Fedora::Rebuild::RPM)
perl(Fedora::Rebuild::Scheduler)
perl(Fedora::Rebuild::Set::Package)
perl-Fedora-Rebuild = 0.0.1-1.fc14
rpm -q --requires perl-Fedora-Rebuild
/bin/sh
/usr/bin/perl
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
perl(Carp)
perl(Data::Dumper)
perl(Fedora::Rebuild)
perl(Fedora::Rebuild::Package)
perl(Fedora::Rebuild::Package::StateLock)
perl(Fedora::Rebuild::RPM)
perl(Fedora::Rebuild::Scheduler)
perl(Fedora::Rebuild::Set::Package)
perl(File::Copy)
perl(File::Path)
perl(File::Spec)
perl(IO::Handle)
perl(Moose)
perl(Moose::Util::TypeConstraints)
perl(MooseX::Types::Moose)
perl(Proc::SyncExec)
perl(RPM2)
perl(RPM::VersionCompare)
perl(Scalar::Util)
perl(Thread::Semaphore)
perl(constant)
perl(namespace::clean)
perl(strict)
perl(threads)
perl(threads::shared)
perl(version) >= 0.77
perl(warnings)
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0
resolvedeps-f16 ../RPMS/noarch/perl-Fedora-Rebuild-0.0.1-1.fc14.noarch.rpm
Binary dependencies resolvable. Ok.
Only problem -> can't be built in rawhide (problem above).
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 711462] Review Request: perl-Fedora-Rebuild - Rebuilds Fedora packages from scratch
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711462 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||705361, 708371 --- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar 2011-06-07 11:29:59 EDT --- perl-RPM-VersionCompare and perl-Proc-SyncExec are only in F16 currently. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705361] Review Request: perl-Proc-SyncExec - Spawn processes but report exec() errors
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705361 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Petr Pisar 2011-06-07 11:27:37 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: perl-Proc-SyncExec New Branches: f14 f15 Owners: ppisar mmaslano psabata InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705361] Review Request: perl-Proc-SyncExec - Spawn processes but report exec() errors
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705361 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||711462 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 708371] Review Request: perl-RPM-VersionCompare - Compare RPM version strings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708371 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||711462 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 708371] Review Request: perl-RPM-VersionCompare - Compare RPM version strings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708371 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Petr Pisar 2011-06-07 11:26:53 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: perl-RPM-VersionCompare New Branches: f14 f15 Owners: ppisar mmaslano psabata InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 711462] Review Request: perl-Fedora-Rebuild - Rebuilds Fedora packages from scratch
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711462 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||711472 --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar 2011-06-07 11:15:30 EDT --- There is bug #711472 in perl-Data-Compare package preventing building this package in Koji. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 703178] Review Request: rubygem-declarative_authorization - The declarative_authorization plug in provides readable auth rules for Rails.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703178 --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-06-07 11:10:12 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 711462] Review Request: perl-Fedora-Rebuild - Rebuilds Fedora packages from scratch
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711462 Marcela Mašláňová changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mmasl...@redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 709233] Review Request: base64coder - Fast and compact Base64 encoder/decoder Java library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709233 --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-06-07 11:10:37 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 165919] Review Request: pam_ssh Pluggable Authentication Module for ssh
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=165919 --- Comment #50 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-06-07 11:09:50 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705133] Review Request: btparser - Parser and analyzer for backtraces produced by GDB
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705133 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2011-06-07 11:01:57 EDT --- btparser-0.13-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/btparser-0.13-1.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705133] Review Request: btparser - Parser and analyzer for backtraces produced by GDB
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705133 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 710452] Review Request: unzix - A WinZix archive extractor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710452 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2011-06-07 10:52:39 EDT --- unzix-0.3.0-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/unzix-0.3.0-1.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 710452] Review Request: unzix - A WinZix archive extractor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710452 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2011-06-07 10:52:31 EDT --- unzix-0.3.0-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/unzix-0.3.0-1.el6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 710452] Review Request: unzix - A WinZix archive extractor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710452 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 710452] Review Request: unzix - A WinZix archive extractor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710452 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2011-06-07 10:52:22 EDT --- unzix-0.3.0-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/unzix-0.3.0-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 711462] New: Review Request: perl-Fedora-Rebuild - Rebuilds Fedora packages from scratch
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Fedora-Rebuild - Rebuilds Fedora packages from scratch https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711462 Summary: Review Request: perl-Fedora-Rebuild - Rebuilds Fedora packages from scratch Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ppi...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec URL: http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-Fedora-Rebuild/perl-Fedora-Rebuild.spec SRPM URL: http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-Fedora-Rebuild/perl-Fedora-Rebuild-0.0.1-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: Main goal is to rebuild perl modules packages for Fedora. The rebuild is driven from bottom to top, i.e. from perl interpreter to modules depending on intermediate modules. This way, it's possible to upgrade perl interpreter to incompatible version and to rebuild all modules against the new interpreter. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705106] Review Request: snakeyaml - YAML parser and emitter for the Java programming language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705106 --- Comment #5 from Jaromír Cápík 2011-06-07 10:49:48 EDT --- new version ... base64coder renamed Spec URL: http://jcapik.fedorapeople.org/files/snakeyaml/3/snakeyaml.spec SRPM URL: http://jcapik.fedorapeople.org/files/snakeyaml/3/snakeyaml-1.8-3.fc15.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 711058] Review Request: akonadi-googledata - Google contacts and calendar akonadi resource
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711058 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) --- Comment #8 from Rex Dieter 2011-06-07 10:29:58 EDT --- wrt to snapshotting or not, I'd recommend using the release tarball for pkg review purposes, and postpone adding patches or using snapshots until after this is fully reviewed and imported into git. Regardless, I'd be happy to finish reviewing this and be your sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 709233] Review Request: base64coder - Fast and compact Base64 encoder/decoder Java library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709233 Jaromír Cápík changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: base64coder |base64coder-java - Fast and |- Fast and compact Base64 |compact Base64 |encoder/decoder Java |encoder/decoder library |library Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Jaromír Cápík 2011-06-07 10:25:35 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: base64coder Short Description: Fast and compact Base64 encoder/decoder Java library Owners: jcapik Branches: f15 InitialCC: java-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 691114] Review Request: python-msgpack - A MessagePack (de)serializer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691114 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||python-msgpack -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 696527] Review Request: django-kombu - Kombu transport using the Django database as a message store
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=696527 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fab...@bernewireless.net Alias||django-kombu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 703178] Review Request: rubygem-declarative_authorization - The declarative_authorization plug in provides readable auth rules for Rails.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703178 Darryl L. Pierce changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Darryl L. Pierce 2011-06-07 10:07:08 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: rubygem-declarative_authorization Short Description: The declarative_authorization plug in provides readable auth rules for Rails. Owners: mcpierce Branches: F15 InitialCC: mcpierce -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 710203] Review Request: gambas3 - IDE based on a basic interpreter with object extensions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710203 Kevin Kofler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org --- Comment #1 from Kevin Kofler 2011-06-07 09:17:26 EDT --- Is the kdelibs3-devel dependency still current? I don't see any KDE 3 module being built, nor do I see the dependency listed in upstream's documentation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 165919] Review Request: pam_ssh Pluggable Authentication Module for ssh
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=165919 Dmitry Butskoy changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #49 from Dmitry Butskoy 2011-06-07 09:11:59 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: pam_ssh New Branches: el6 Owners: buc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 703719] Review Request: spice-xpi - mozilla extension for spice client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703719
--- Comment #3 from Hans de Goede 2011-06-07 09:07:11 EDT
---
Hi,
Full review done:
Good:
=
- package meets naming guidelines
- spec file legible, in am. english
- package compiles on devel (x86)
- no missing BR
- no locales
- not relocatable
- owns all directories that it creates
- no duplicate files
- permissions ok
- macro use consistent
- code, not content
- no need for -docs
- nothing in %doc affects runtime
- no need for .desktop file
Needs work:
===
- rpmlint checks return:
[hans@shalem ~]$ rpmlint rpmbuild/SRPMS/spice-xpi-2.5-1.fc15.src.rpm
rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/spice-xpi-*
spice-xpi.src: W: invalid-url Source0: spice-xpi-2.5.tar.bz2
spice-xpi.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 2.5.1 ['2.5-1.fc15',
'2.5-1']
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
Both will need to be fixed:
-now that we've an official tarbal up please replace Source0 with:
Source0: http://spice-space.org/download/releases/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2
-The version in the changelog should be 2.5-1 not 2.5.1
-Note that you're supposed to bump the release field each time you make
changes, even during review so the next changelog entry should have:
2.5-2 (and Release: near the top should be 2)
- please drop the tarname and tarversion macro-s they are identical to Name
resp Release and rpm automatically defines %{name} and %{version} for these.
- License: should be: "MPLv1.1 or GPLv2+ or LGPLv2+"
- please change the URL to http://spice-space.org
- please drop BuildRoot, it is not needed in recent Fedora (no in epel-6 or
newer)
- likewise drop the "rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT" from %install and the entire
%clean
section
- please drop the gcc-c++ BuildRequires, gcc-c++ is part of the default
buildroot, see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#BuildRequires
(and then exceptions list)
- please add a comment explaining why ExclusiveArch is used in this case simply
add the following line above the ExclusiveArch line:
# https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613529
- Please drop the following Requires:
-log4cpp, this is a used library, rpm automatically generates dependencies
for dynamically linked libraries
-firefox, this plugin should be usable in other browsers too
- please drop the " -n %{tarname}-%{tarversion}" arguments to %setup,
%setup uses " -n %{name}-%{version}" as default
- make dist has already generated configure and Makefile.in, etc. No need to
redo that, please drop the following calls from %build:
aclocal
libtoolize --automake
autoheader
automake --add-missing
autoconf
- with these dropped the following BuildRequires can also be removed:
BuildRequires: automake
BuildRequires: libtool
BuildRequires: autoconf
- the standard for %defattr used in Fedora is:
%defattr(-,root,root,-)
- it is convention to have the %doc line as the first line after %defattr in
%files
Regards,
Hans
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664140] Review Request: leksah-server - Package that provides the interface to GHC-API for leksah
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664140 --- Comment #8 from Lakshmi Narasimhan 2011-06-07 08:49:21 EDT --- Will update the spec file and srpm and post the links here by Thursday. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 711058] Review Request: akonadi-googledata - Google contacts and calendar akonadi resource
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711058 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fab...@bernewireless.net Summary|akonadi-googledata |Review Request: ||akonadi-googledata - Google ||contacts and calendar ||akonadi resource -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 711058] akonadi-googledata
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711058 Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW AssignedTo|kr...@land.ru |nob...@fedoraproject.org --- Comment #7 from Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich 2011-06-07 08:15:31 EDT --- As you not sponsored, I dropped assigment (I cant be a sponsor), but I'm still here. (In reply to comment #6) > Hi Dmitrij, > today I will correct the spec file. I think the better solution is to create a > pre-release package from svn version. Test it with current akonadi version. May be there realy is better to just apply only one patch? But it is all your choice. > Last night I start to understand how to do that on my local system and test > it. May be you will be interested in utility called "mock". > I need to join the ML devel and inform the upstream developer of thi rpm > package. Upstream information is usfull only after review request is completed or near it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683127] Review Request: tpm-quote-tools - TPM-based attestation using the TPM quote operation (tools)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683127 --- Comment #12 from John D. Ramsdell 2011-06-07 08:12:16 EDT --- If you would like to read about a protocol and its analysis built on top of TPM Quote, check out http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/ramsdell/papers/caves.pdf. This paper describes a remote attestation protocol and shows it achieves its security goals. The root of trust for reporting is a TPM, and the TPM Quote operation. TPM Quote Tools provides the functionality needed to implement the attestation protocol. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683127] Review Request: tpm-quote-tools - TPM-based attestation using the TPM quote operation (tools)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683127 --- Comment #11 from John D. Ramsdell 2011-06-07 08:06:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > Added FE-NEEDSPONSOR to you. > > For more information read: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group I read the information. Is this step blocked on me? I didn't see what I was supposed to do except wait for someone to offer to be my sponsor. If anything else is blocking on me now, please let me know. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 709233] Review Request: base64coder-java - Fast and compact Base64 encoder/decoder library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709233 Stanislav Ochotnicky changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Stanislav Ochotnicky 2011-06-07 07:42:42 EDT --- Package is good now, Christian d'Heureuse did a really nice thing for us so I applaud him for such fast tweaks to his software :-) APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 565902] Review Request: csync - a bidirectional file synchronizer for roaming home directories
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=565902 Andreas Schneider changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(a...@redhat.com) | --- Comment #20 from Andreas Schneider 2011-06-07 07:40:22 EDT --- I'm still here. As nobody cared I lost the interest... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 709233] Review Request: base64coder-java - Fast and compact Base64 encoder/decoder library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709233 --- Comment #4 from Jaromír Cápík 2011-06-07 07:22:39 EDT --- Spec URL: http://jcapik.fedorapeople.org/files/base64coder/2/base64coder.spec SRPM URL: http://jcapik.fedorapeople.org/files/base64coder/2/base64coder-20101219-2.fc15.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 711058] akonadi-googledata
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711058 --- Comment #6 from Mario Santagiuliana 2011-06-07 06:17:47 EDT --- Hi Dmitrij, today I will correct the spec file. I think the better solution is to create a pre-release package from svn version. Last night I start to understand how to do that on my local system and test it. For now akonadi google resource seems to work better than old stable release. > Hope you are sponsored already? No...I don't start the process to become a package mantainer, sorry... I am in this step: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Create_Your_Review_Request I need to join the ML devel and inform the upstream developer of thi rpm package. (Today I have some problem with my hosting, I can't use email for a bit). In response to comment 5: revision 1211814 should be included in the last commit of trunk. I review the code to be sure of this patch! Thank you for your help! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 711350] New: Review Request: jboss-parent - JBoss Parent POM
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: jboss-parent - JBoss Parent POM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711350 Summary: Review Request: jboss-parent - JBoss Parent POM Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mgold...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec URL: http://goldmann.fedorapeople.org/package_review/jboss-parent/1/jboss-parent.spec SRPM URL: http://goldmann.fedorapeople.org/package_review/jboss-parent/1/jboss-parent-6-0.1.beta2.fc15.src.rpm Description: The Project Object Model files for JBoss packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 711350] Review Request: jboss-parent - JBoss Parent POM
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711350 Marek Goldmann changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||652183(FE-JAVASIG) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 711313] Review Request: wicd-kde - a Wicd client built on the KDE Development Platform
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711313 --- Comment #2 from Minh 2011-06-07 05:12:08 EDT --- I'm sorry. This is the last second fix :) Spec URL: http://fpaste.org/npzz/ SRPM URL: http://rghost.net/9737101 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3115413 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675009] Review Request: c3p0 - JDBC DataSources/Resource Pools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675009 --- Comment #9 from Mat Booth 2011-06-07 04:55:42 EDT --- Sure, I will make assumption that we don't care about EPEL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 707923] Review Request: rubygem-net-ssh-gateway - A simple library to assist in establishing tunneled Net::SSH connections
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707923 Vít Ondruch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2011-06-07 04:40:05 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 711313] Review Request: wicd-kde - a Wicd client built on the KDE Development Platform
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711313 --- Comment #1 from Minh 2011-06-07 04:37:38 EDT --- Spec file checked http://fpaste.org/cbsN/ SRPM URL: http://rghost.net/9732771 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 710848] Review Request: python-myhdl - A python hardware description and verification language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710848 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: myhdl - A |Review Request: |python hardware description |python-myhdl - A python |and verification language |hardware description and ||verification language -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 706934] Review Request: rubygem-rspec-rails - RSpec-2 for Rails-3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=706934 Vít Ondruch changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||708793 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 706934] Review Request: rubygem-rspec-rails - RSpec-2 for Rails-3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=706934 --- Comment #3 from Vít Ondruch 2011-06-07 04:25:12 EDT --- It seems that the build is broken again by another issue (#708793) :/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603346] Review Request: php-voms-admin - Web based interface to control VOMS parameters written in PHP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603346 --- Comment #6 from Andrii Salnikov 2011-06-07 04:08:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) Hi Lev, I have forgot about fixes made in upstream for PHP 5.3.3 included into Fedora 14 distribution. When you mentioned ‘sources visibility’ I realized what the problem is. Now I have finished with PHP 5.3.3 fixes for 0.5.1, update an SVN tagged version and src.rpm mentioned in previous post. You can find updated version following the same URLs. > > And the last question, do you have a FAS account, and, if you do, are you in > the 'packager' group? If not, either Mattias should maintain and submit the > spec for this package, or you should follow the sponsorship procedure > described > in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group. No, I have not FAS account. My packages, that seems to work for me, was posted for you on bug request. If you confirm that now SVN version is woks on you Fedora 14, I will ask Mattias to make an official commit after his final spec corrections. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 669146] Review Request: gnumed-server - medical practice management - server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=669146 Susmit changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-06-07 03:47:54 --- Comment #20 from Susmit 2011-06-07 03:47:54 EDT --- Closing as NEXTRELEASE. Thanks everyone. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 669146] Review Request: gnumed-server - medical practice management - server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=669146 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 669146] Review Request: gnumed-server - medical practice management - server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=669146 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2011-06-07 03:37:04 EDT --- gnumed-server-15.5-2.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnumed-server-15.5-2.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 669146] Review Request: gnumed-server - medical practice management - server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=669146 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2011-06-07 03:34:49 EDT --- gnumed-server-15.5-2.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnumed-server-15.5-2.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 711313] Review Request: wicd-kde - a Wicd client built on the KDE Development Platform
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711313 Minh changed: What|Removed |Added Version|rawhide |15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 711313] New: Review Request: wicd-kde - a Wicd client built on the KDE Development Platform
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: wicd-kde - a Wicd client built on the KDE Development Platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711313 Summary: Review Request: wicd-kde - a Wicd client built on the KDE Development Platform Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: nlmin...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec URL: http://fpaste.org/tnmQ/ SRPM URL: http://rghost.net/9723221 Description: A Wicd client built on the KDE Development Platform. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
