[Bug 690728] Review Request: Nitrate - A test case management system written in Django
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690728 --- Comment #34 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2011-06-09 02:03:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #32) One question, you suggested to drop BuildRoot but it seems after I remove this macro from spec, this variable '$RPM_BUILD_ROOT' will become undefined thus causing errors while packaging. Where are you testing? They are no longer need to be defined for Fedora releases or EPEL 6: they are still needed for EPEL5 afaik: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#.25clean But if you really intend to build for EPEL5 I guess you could still keep them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 703719] Review Request: spice-xpi - mozilla extension for spice client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703719 --- Comment #6 from Peter Hatina phat...@redhat.com 2011-06-09 02:54:54 EDT --- My fedora account name is phatina. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 690728] Review Request: Nitrate - A test case management system written in Django
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690728 --- Comment #35 from Yuguang Wang yuw...@redhat.com 2011-06-09 03:08:36 EDT --- Where are you testing? They are no longer need to be defined for Fedora releases or EPEL 6: they are still needed for EPEL5 afaik: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#.25clean But if you really intend to build for EPEL5 I guess you could still keep them. I'm testing using EPEL5, so I'd like to keep this variable for now. Will remove it in next version, thanks. I changed Django from 1.2.3 to 1.2.5, and fixed the issues you mentioned in comment 31, following is the new package: http://yuwang.fedorapeople.org/nitrate.spec https://fedorahosted.org/releases/n/i/nitrate/nitrate-3.3.4-2.src.rpm https://fedorahosted.org/releases/n/i/nitrate/nitrate-3.3.4.tar.bz2 Thanks :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 703719] Review Request: spice-xpi - mozilla extension for spice client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703719 --- Comment #7 from Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com 2011-06-09 03:29:04 EDT --- OK, I've added you to the packagers group and sponsored you, next step is to create a package scm admin request, so that a new module can be created in pkg git and bugzilla for spice-xpi. See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_SCM_admin_requests Note it may take up to an hour for your new rights to propagate, so if you cannot set the fedora-cvs flag, that is why. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705376] Review Request: perl-MIME-Lite-HTML - Provide routine to transform a HTML page in a MIME-Lite mail
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705376 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-06-09 03:53:38 EDT --- perl-MIME-Lite-HTML-1.23-2.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 711762] Review Request: osc - openSUSE Build Service Commander
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711762 --- Comment #6 from Haïkel Guémar karlthe...@gmail.com 2011-06-09 03:55:12 EDT --- in #711764 YanChuan noticed accurately that /usr/share is a better location for arch-independent file than /usr/lib. Sorry for the inconvenience (my fault) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705376] Review Request: perl-MIME-Lite-HTML - Provide routine to transform a HTML page in a MIME-Lite mail
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705376 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-MIME-Lite-HTML-1.23-2. |perl-MIME-Lite-HTML-1.23-2. |fc14|el6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 711762] Review Request: osc - openSUSE Build Service Commander
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711762 --- Comment #7 from Jerome Soyer sai...@gmail.com 2011-06-09 04:30:48 EDT --- New upload with your advices : Spec URL : http://fedorapeople.org/~saispo/osc.spec SRPMS URL : http://fedorapeople.org/~saispo/osc-0.132.1-3.fc15.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 711764] Review Request: osc-source_validator - osc source validator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711764 --- Comment #2 from Jerome Soyer sai...@gmail.com 2011-06-09 04:29:45 EDT --- Hi, I update my Spec and my SRPMS. I prefer to keep buildroot for EPEL. Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~saispo/osc-source_validator.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~saispo/osc-source_validator-0.1-2.fc15.src.rpm Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 704239] Review Request: python-yolk - Command-line tool querying PyPI and Python packages installed on your system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=704239 --- Comment #3 from Jerome Soyer sai...@gmail.com 2011-06-09 04:48:39 EDT --- And another one : Spec URL: http://saispo.fedorapeople.org/python-yolk.spec SRPM URL: http://saispo.fedorapeople.org/python-yolk-0.4.1-3.fc15.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 711764] Review Request: osc-source_validator - osc source validator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711764 --- Comment #3 from Haïkel Guémar karlthe...@gmail.com 2011-06-09 04:53:01 EDT --- @Yanchuan, thanks for your pertinent comments. 1. 2. osc-source_validator does not provides source tarballs (jerome had the same issue with osc #711762). I second Yanchuan on removing source1, i'd rather advise that you put a comment explaining how generating the tarball from git (2 lines) and fix pristine sources either by patching them or using sed within your spec 3. since jerome plans to support EPEL, it shouldn't be a problem. 4. second that 5. since osc is looking for helpers in /usr/lib/osc, that would break everything. It should be possible to fix source_validators path in osc, for instance: sed -i 's#/usr/lib/osc/source_validators#/usr/share/osc/source_validators#' osc/conf.py # note that tests might need the same fix too Could you contact upstream and ask them if they could fix that issue ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 711762] Review Request: osc - openSUSE Build Service Commander
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711762 Haïkel Guémar karlthe...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||711764 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 703719] Review Request: spice-xpi - mozilla extension for spice client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703719 Peter Hatina phat...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Peter Hatina phat...@redhat.com 2011-06-09 05:30:40 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: spice-xpi Short Description: Spice extension for Mozilla allows the client to be used from a web browser. Owners: phatina Branches: f14 f15 InitialCC: jwrdegoede -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 704239] Review Request: python-yolk - Command-line tool querying PyPI and Python packages installed on your system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=704239 Pierre-YvesChibon pin...@pingoured.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|karlthe...@gmail.com|pin...@pingoured.fr Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 711777] Review Request: perl-Test-Spec - Write tests in a declarative specification style
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711777 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-06-09 05:37:26 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 703719] Review Request: spice-xpi - mozilla extension for spice client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703719 --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-06-09 05:36:19 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 711764] Review Request: osc-source_validator - osc source validator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711764 Haïkel Guémar karlthe...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||711762 --- Comment #4 from Haïkel Guémar karlthe...@gmail.com 2011-06-09 04:58:02 EDT --- add a dependency to #711762 (osc) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 712017] New: Review Request: libreport - Generic library for reporting various problems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libreport - Generic library for reporting various problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712017 Summary: Review Request: libreport - Generic library for reporting various problems Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jmosk...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec URL: http://jmoskovc.fedorapeople.org/libreport.spec SRPM URL: http://jmoskovc.fedorapeople.org/libreport-2.0.2-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: Libraries providing API for reporting different problems in applications to different bug targets like Bugzilla, ftp, trac, etc... libreport.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US trac - trace, tract, track libreport-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation libreport-gtk.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US backend - backed, back end, back-end libreport-gtk.x86_64: W: no-documentation libreport-gtk.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary bug-reporting-wizard libreport-gtk-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation - documentation is in progress will be added soon -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 706701] Review Request: perl-Test-Pod-Content - Test a Pod's content
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=706701 Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr 2011-06-09 06:06:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) I'm not at all concerned about the author tests, but Ralf is correct about missing deps if building for f14. Given that this is a dep for perl-Test-ConsistentVersion, itself a dep I need to update perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Authentication in rawhide, I'll just release it for F15 and rawhide. APPROVED. \o/ Thanks for the review, Iain. (In reply to comment #3) For example, in recent times, I have been facing bugs in perl's aspell/hunspell integration, which so far only have been exposed in AUTHOR checks in other packages. Ah, I didn't think something like this could happen. I'll activate the tests before import. Thanks for pointing that out. New Package SCM Request === Package Name: perl-Test-Pod-Content Short Description: Test a Pod's content Owners: eseyman Branches: f15 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 712017] Review Request: libreport - Generic library for reporting various problems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712017 Dan Horák d...@danny.cz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||d...@danny.cz AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|d...@danny.cz Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 711764] Review Request: osc-source_validator - osc source validator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711764
--- Comment #5 from Haïkel Guémar karlthe...@gmail.com 2011-06-09 06:16:30
EDT ---
The helpers issue is not that clear, Matthieu Bridon pointed this:
/usr/lib includes object files, libraries, and internal binaries that are not
intended to be executed directly by users or shell scripts. [22]
http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#USRLIBLIBRARIESFORPROGRAMMINGANDPA
Some packages like systemd put helpers scripts in /usr/lib, some like dracut
put them in /usr/share. Since FHS explicitely allows helpers scripts in
/usr/lib but doesn't forbid putting them in /usr/share.
%{_libexecdir} is also a strong option according Fedora Packaging Guidelines
for helpers scripts. Since it's not recommended by FHS, it's almost certain
that it won't be upstream-able
I requested my fellow packagers opinions on that matter on devel mailing list.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 712017] Review Request: libreport - Generic library for reporting various problems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712017
--- Comment #1 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz 2011-06-09 06:53:59 EDT ---
formal review is here, see the notes explaining OK* and BAD statuses below:
OK source files match upstream:
95e3414edaf08373d32dae3ea6ff9e3b26db77ba libreport-2.0.2.tar.gz
OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
BAD specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros
consistently.
OK dist tag is present.
BAD license field matches the actual license.
OK license is open source-compatible. License text included in package.
OK latest version is being packaged.
OK BuildRequires are proper.
OK compiler flags are appropriate.
OK %clean is present.
OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64).
OK debuginfo package looks complete.
OK* rpmlint is silent.
OK final provides and requires look sane.
N/A %check is present and all tests pass.
OK shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths,
scriptlets exist
BAD owns the directories it creates.
BAD doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
OK no duplicates in %files.
OK file permissions are appropriate.
OK correct scriptlets present.
OK code, not content.
OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
OK headers in -devel
OK pkgconfig files in -devel
OK no libtool .la droppings.
OK* a GUI app.
- you mix $RPM_BUILD_ROOT, ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT} and %{buildroot}
- 2 files are licensed under GPLv2-only (libreport.h and binhex.c), licensing
header completely missing in some
- rpmlint warns about spelling (false positives), missing docs and man page
(would be nice to have)
- %{includedir}/libreport is not owned
- should it really own the /etc/abrt directory?
- is GUI app, but not intended to be run by user, correct?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 708765] Review Request: Frogr - Flickr Remote Organizer for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765 --- Comment #49 from Mario Sanchez Prada msanc...@igalia.com 2011-06-09 07:02:30 EDT --- Just wondering... is there any place where I can follow the status of this request to the FPC? I found this site, but I'm not sure that's the place to follow it: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/report/1 If there's anything else I can do from my side to help, just let me know. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 711313] Review Request: wicd-kde - a Wicd client built on the KDE Development Platform
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711313 --- Comment #11 from Minh nlmin...@gmail.com 2011-06-09 07:14:31 EDT --- %make_install defines DESTDIR var itself. Check it. Speration two desktop-file-install with empty line will add legibility. fixed You had not mentioned any changes done with spec file in the %changelog section (with Release number update). this package's not yet in the fedora repository. So it's not necessary to mention any changes in the %changelog section. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 711313] Review Request: wicd-kde - a Wicd client built on the KDE Development Platform
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711313 --- Comment #12 from Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org 2011-06-09 07:26:45 EDT --- this package's not yet in the fedora repository. So it's not necessary to mention any changes in the %changelog section. Actually, you should start maintaining the changelog as soon as you submit the first version for review. That allows reviewers to track what review comments you already addressed and which are still open. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705798] Review Request: perl-Data-Hexify - Perl extension for hexdumping arbitrary data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705798 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||ppi...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ppi...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 685014] Review Request: perl-Sys-Path - Supply autoconf style installation directories
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=685014 --- Comment #3 from Ruediger Landmann r.landm...@redhat.com 2011-06-09 07:38:30 EDT --- Sorry Marcela; I seemed to miss the Bugzilla email in March :( I've removed the redundant Requires: and rebuilt the package: new specfile: http://rlandmann.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Sys-Path.spec new SRPM: http://rlandmann.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Sys-Path-0.10-2.fc14.src.rpm new scratchbuild: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3121429 Thanks! Rudi -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 703719] Review Request: spice-xpi - mozilla extension for spice client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703719 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-06-09 07:59:34 EDT --- spice-xpi-2.5-2.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/spice-xpi-2.5-2.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 703719] Review Request: spice-xpi - mozilla extension for spice client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703719 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705798] Review Request: perl-Data-Hexify - Perl extension for hexdumping arbitrary data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705798 --- Comment #5 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com 2011-06-09 08:02:55 EDT --- Source tar ball is original. Ok. Summary verified from lib/Data/Hexify.pm. Ok. License verified from lib/Data/Hexify.pm. Ok. TODO: You can remove BuildRoot: definition and all occurrences of it's deletion (as the whole %clean section) if you are not going to package this software for EPEL as they are not needed in Fedora anymore (they are done by rpmbuild automatically). Package does not contain Perl C binding. noarch architecture is Ok. Description is reasonable (maybe replacing `hexdumping' with some codified words would be better). Ok. FIX: BuildRequire perl(Exporter) because of running test as this module can dual-live in the future (lib/Data/Hexify.pm:18, http://search.cpan.org/~ferreira/Exporter/). TODO: Remove %defattr from %files section as it's done automatically by rpmbuild. All tests pass. Ok. $ rpmlint perl-Data-Hexify.spec ../SRPMS/perl-Data-Hexify-1.00-1.fc15.src.rpm ../RPMS/noarch/perl-Data-Hexify-1.00-1.fc15.noarch.rpm perl-Data-Hexify.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) hexdumping - hex dumping, hex-dumping, thumping perl-Data-Hexify.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US hexdumping - hex dumping, hex-dumping, thumping perl-Data-Hexify.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) hexdumping - hex dumping, hex-dumping, thumping perl-Data-Hexify.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US hexdumping - hex dumping, hex-dumping, thumping 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. I recommend to use the hyphen variation. rpmlint is OK. $ rpm -q -lv -p ../RPMS/noarch/perl-Data-Hexify-1.00-1.fc15.noarch.rpm drwxr-xr-x2 rootroot0 čen 9 13:54 /usr/share/doc/perl-Data-Hexify-1.00 -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 224 lis 5 2004 /usr/share/doc/perl-Data-Hexify-1.00/Changes -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 1627 čen 29 2004 /usr/share/doc/perl-Data-Hexify-1.00/README -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 3085 čen 9 13:54 /usr/share/man/man3/Data::Hexify.3pm.gz drwxr-xr-x2 rootroot0 čen 9 13:54 /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Data -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 8407 lis 5 2004 /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Data/Hexify.pm File permissions and layout is Ok. $ rpm -q --requires -p ../RPMS/noarch/perl-Data-Hexify-1.00-1.fc15.noarch.rpm |sort |uniq -c 1 perl(bytes) 1 perl(Carp) 1 perl(Exporter) 1 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3) 1 perl(strict) 1 perl(warnings) 1 perl = 0:5.006 1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) = 3.0.4-1 1 rpmlib(FileDigests) = 4.6.0-1 1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) = 4.0-1 1 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) = 5.2-1 Binary requires Ok. $ rpm -q --provides -p ../RPMS/noarch/perl-Data-Hexify-1.00-1.fc15.noarch.rpm |sort |uniq -c 1 perl(Data::Hexify) = 1.00 1 perl-Data-Hexify = 1.00-1.fc15 Binary provides Ok. $ resolvedeps rawhide ../RPMS/noarch/perl-Data-Hexify-1.00-1.fc15.noarch.rpm Binary dependencies resolvable. Ok. Package builds in F16 (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3121493). Ok. Otherwise package is in line with Fedora and perl packaging guidelines. Please correct all `FIX' prefixed issues, consider fixing `TODO' issues, and provide new spec file. Resolution: Package NOT approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 703719] Review Request: spice-xpi - mozilla extension for spice client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703719 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-06-09 08:15:28 EDT --- spice-xpi-2.5-2.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/spice-xpi-2.5-2.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705798] Review Request: perl-Data-Hexify - Perl extension for hexdumping arbitrary data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705798 --- Comment #6 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2011-06-09 08:16:08 EDT --- Updated package (I rebuilt it but didn't bump the release): http://oirase.annexia.org/reviews/evtx/perl-Data-Hexify.spec http://oirase.annexia.org/reviews/evtx/perl-Data-Hexify-1.00-1.fc15.src.rpm This should address all of the concerns there. rpmlint is still complaining that hexdump isn't a word, but I think it's a perfectly cromulent word. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 712069] New: Review Request: smartirc4net - an IRC connection library for Mono/.net
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: smartirc4net - an IRC connection library for Mono/.net https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712069 Summary: Review Request: smartirc4net - an IRC connection library for Mono/.net Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fed...@alexhudson.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec URL: http://alexh.fedorapeople.org/reviews/smartirc4net/smartirc4net.spec SRPM URL: http://alexh.fedorapeople.org/reviews/smartirc4net/smartirc4net-0.4.5.1-2.fc15.src.rpm Description: SmartIrc4net is a multi-threaded and thread-safe IRC library written in C#. It allows you to communicate with IRC servers. The API features full channel syncing and is split in 3 layers: IrcConnection, IrcCommands and IrcClient. This is a pretty simple package, and is used by Smuxi (not yet in Fedora) and SparkleShare (open for review, #629744). It's basically rpmlint clean: $ rpmlint rpmbuild/SPECS/smartirc4net.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint rpmbuild/SRPMS/smartirc4net-0.4.5.1-2.fc15.src.rpm smartirc4net.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multi - mulch, mufti 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. I'm open to suggestions on the spelling error - I think it's fine :) There are warnings on the binary RPMs: $ rpmlint rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/smartirc4net-* smartirc4net.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multi - mulch, mufti smartirc4net.x86_64: E: no-binary smartirc4net.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib smartirc4net.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/smartirc4net-0.4.5.1/LICENSE smartirc4net-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multi - mulch, mufti smartirc4net-devel.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/smartirc4net-devel-0.4.5.1/LICENSE 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 3 warnings. The incorrect FSF addresses are bugs that I will address upstream. The other warnings and errors, spelling apart, are normal for Mono packages as I understand it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 712069] Review Request: smartirc4net - an IRC connection library for Mono/.net
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712069 Alex Hudson (Fedora Address) fed...@alexhudson.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||629744 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 629744] Review Request: sparkleshare - sharing work made easy
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629744 Alex Hudson (Fedora Address) fed...@alexhudson.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||712069 --- Comment #7 from Alex Hudson (Fedora Address) fed...@alexhudson.com 2011-06-09 08:33:14 EDT --- Sorry, I was just in the process of cleaning it up further! Spec URL: http://alexh.fedorapeople.org/reviews/sparkleshare/sparkleshare.spec SRPM URL: http://alexh.fedorapeople.org/reviews/sparkleshare/sparkleshare-0.2.1-1.fc15.src.rpm I've also added a dependency to bug #712069, which separates out the SmartIrc4Net library which is otherwise included within SparkleShare. The packages are rpmlint clean: $ rpmlint SPECS/sparkleshare.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint SRPMS/sparkleshare-0.2.1-1.fc15.src.rpm sparkleshare.src: W: file-size-mismatch sparkleshare-0.2.1.tar.gz = 1413871, https://github.com/downloads/hbons/SparkleShare/sparkleshare-0.2.1.tar.gz = 1521334 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. This warning is because I have packaged an updated copy of the source, which includes the patch to separate out SmartIrc4Net. I wrote this patch for SparkleShare, and I'm hopeful that a 0.2.2 release won't be too far away. Usually I would have done this via a patch, but it's a change early in the build system which would be a substantial patch to the released (i.e., post-autogen) tarball. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/sparkleshare-0.2.1-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm sparkleshare.x86_64: E: no-binary sparkleshare.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings. This error/warning I believe is normal for a Mono-based app, as the binaries are not detected as such. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 712017] Review Request: libreport - Generic library for reporting various problems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712017
--- Comment #2 from Jiri Moskovcak jmosk...@redhat.com 2011-06-09 08:36:05
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
formal review is here, see the notes explaining OK* and BAD statuses below:
OK source files match upstream:
95e3414edaf08373d32dae3ea6ff9e3b26db77ba libreport-2.0.2.tar.gz
OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
BAD specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros
consistently.
OK dist tag is present.
BAD license field matches the actual license.
OK license is open source-compatible. License text included in package.
OK latest version is being packaged.
OK BuildRequires are proper.
OK compiler flags are appropriate.
OK %clean is present.
OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64).
OK debuginfo package looks complete.
OK* rpmlint is silent.
OK final provides and requires look sane.
N/A %check is present and all tests pass.
OK shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths,
scriptlets exist
BAD owns the directories it creates.
BAD doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
OK no duplicates in %files.
OK file permissions are appropriate.
OK correct scriptlets present.
OK code, not content.
OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
OK headers in -devel
OK pkgconfig files in -devel
OK no libtool .la droppings.
OK* a GUI app.
- you mix $RPM_BUILD_ROOT, ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT} and %{buildroot}
- fixed
- 2 files are licensed under GPLv2-only (libreport.h and binhex.c), licensing
header completely missing in some
- fixed
- rpmlint warns about spelling (false positives), missing docs and man page
(would be nice to have)
- coming soon :)
- %{includedir}/libreport is not owned
- fixed
- should it really own the /etc/abrt directory?
- yes, it's considered a part of ABRT and it shares some config files
- is GUI app, but not intended to be run by user, correct?
- exactly
- I reuploaded spec, srpm and sources, please re-check
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705798] Review Request: perl-Data-Hexify - Perl extension for hexdumping arbitrary data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705798
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #7 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com 2011-06-09 08:52:07 EDT ---
Spec file changes:
--- perl-Data-Hexify.spec 2011-05-19 09:49:02.0 +0200
+++ perl-Data-Hexify.spec.1 2011-06-09 14:14:47.0 +0200
@@ -1,20 +1,20 @@
Name: perl-Data-Hexify
Version:1.00
Release:1%{?dist}
-Summary:Perl extension for hexdumping arbitrary data
+Summary:Perl extension to hexdump arbitrary data
License:GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/Data-Hexify/
Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/J/JV/JV/Data-Hexify-%{version}.tar.gz
-BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
BuildArch: noarch
BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
BuildRequires: perl(Test::More)
+BuildRequires: perl(Exporter)
Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo
$version))
%description
-Perl extension for hexdumping arbitrary data.
+Perl extension to hexdump arbitrary data.
%prep
@@ -46,7 +46,6 @@
%files
-%defattr(-,root,root,-)
%doc Changes README
%{perl_vendorlib}/*
%{_mandir}/man3/*
TODO: You can remove BuildRoot: definition and all occurrences of it's
deletion (as the whole %clean section) if you are not going to package this
software for EPEL as they are not needed in Fedora anymore (they are done by
rpmbuild automatically).
-BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
Ok.
TODO: I meant to remove `rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT' commands either and the %clean
section itself as it became empty.
FIX: BuildRequire perl(Exporter) because of running test as this module can
dual-live in the future (lib/Data/Hexify.pm:18,
http://search.cpan.org/~ferreira/Exporter/).
+BuildRequires: perl(Exporter)
Ok.
TODO: Remove %defattr from %files section as it's done automatically by
rpmbuild.
-%defattr(-,root,root,-)
Ok.
$ rpmlint perl-Data-Hexify.spec ../SRPMS/perl-Data-Hexify-1.00-1.fc15.src.rpm
../RPMS/noarch/perl-Data-Hexify-1.00-1.fc15.noarch.rpm
perl-Data-Hexify.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) hexdump - hex dump,
hex-dump, headlamp
perl-Data-Hexify.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US hexdump - hex
dump, hex-dump, headlamp
perl-Data-Hexify.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) hexdump - hex dump,
hex-dump, headlamp
perl-Data-Hexify.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US hexdump - hex
dump, hex-dump, headlamp
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.
I don't think changing noun to verb with the same stem is such an improvement.
Package builds in F16
(http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3121578). Ok.
Please consider fixing the `TODO' issues before building the package.
Resolution: Package APPROVED.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 709290] Review Request: perl-LWP-Protocol-http10 - Legacy HTTP/1.0 support for LWP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709290 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||ppi...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ppi...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 706701] Review Request: perl-Test-Pod-Content - Test a Pod's content
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=706701 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-06-09 09:13:55 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705798] Review Request: perl-Data-Hexify - Perl extension for hexdumping arbitrary data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705798 --- Comment #8 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2011-06-09 09:17:41 EDT --- I've removed the two rm -rf commands and the %clean section. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664140] Review Request: leksah-server - Package that provides the interface to GHC-API for leksah
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664140 --- Comment #9 from Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2...@gmail.com 2011-06-09 09:21:26 EDT --- SRPM link : http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/leksah-server-0.10.0.4-2.fc14.src.rpm Spec file link : http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/leksah-server.spec rpmlint output: ghc-leksah-server-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-leksah-server-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-leksah-server-prof.i686: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-leksah-server-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ghc-6.12.3/leksah-server-0.10.0.4/libHSleksah-server-0.10.0.4_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. leksah-server.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary leksahecho Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. leksah-server.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary leksah-server Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. 5 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 4 warnings. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3121602 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 592733] Review Request: turpial - Is cool twitter client with many features and very light
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592733 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-06-09 09:24:56 EDT --- turpial-1.5.0-2.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/turpial-1.5.0-2.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705798] Review Request: perl-Data-Hexify - Perl extension for hexdumping arbitrary data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705798 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2011-06-09 09:25:59 EDT --- Thanks for the review! Here is the git request. New Package SCM Request === Package Name: perl-Data-Hexify Short Description: Perl extension to hexdump arbitrary data Owners: rjones Branches: f15 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664054] Review Request: python-rhsm - Python library to communicate with a Red Hat Unified Entitlement Platform
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664054 Bryan Kearney bkear...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 710115] Review Request: jlatexmath - Implementation of LaTeX math mode wrote in Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710115 --- Comment #6 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2011-06-09 09:36:37 EDT --- Ping, what is your FAS name? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664054] Review Request: python-rhsm - Python library to communicate with a Red Hat Unified Entitlement Platform
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664054 --- Comment #8 from Bryan Kearney bkear...@redhat.com 2011-06-09 09:33:55 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: python-rhsm New Branches: el5 Owners: dgoodwin, jmrodri InitialCC: Pulp would like to see this in el5. It is currently in el6. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705798] Review Request: perl-Data-Hexify - Perl extension for hexdumping arbitrary data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705798 --- Comment #10 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com 2011-06-09 09:41:37 EDT --- Please add `perl-sig' to InitalCC of SCM Request structure. All Perl packages should do so. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705798] Review Request: perl-Data-Hexify - Perl extension for hexdumping arbitrary data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705798 --- Comment #11 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2011-06-09 09:51:22 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: perl-Data-Hexify Short Description: Perl extension to hexdump arbitrary data Owners: rjones Branches: f15 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 685014] Review Request: perl-Sys-Path - Supply autoconf style installation directories
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=685014 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com 2011-06-09 09:50:34 EDT --- deffattr is not needed in latest rpm, but that's not a blocker. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664054] Review Request: python-rhsm - Python library to communicate with a Red Hat Unified Entitlement Platform
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664054 --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-06-09 09:55:40 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705798] Review Request: perl-Data-Hexify - Perl extension for hexdumping arbitrary data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705798 --- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-06-09 09:56:20 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705798] Review Request: perl-Data-Hexify - Perl extension for hexdumping arbitrary data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705798 --- Comment #13 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2011-06-09 10:12:18 EDT --- Thanks everyone. I've pushed this and built it in Rawhide and F15: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3121708 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3121710 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705798] Review Request: perl-Data-Hexify - Perl extension for hexdumping arbitrary data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705798 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705798] Review Request: perl-Data-Hexify - Perl extension for hexdumping arbitrary data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705798 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-06-09 10:13:24 EDT --- perl-Data-Hexify-1.00-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Data-Hexify-1.00-1.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 709290] Review Request: perl-LWP-Protocol-http10 - Legacy HTTP/1.0 support for LWP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709290 --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com 2011-06-09 10:09:17 EDT --- Standalone and in-SRPM spec files differ in changelog entry. I will review the standalone one as its time stamp is newer. Source tar ball is original. Ok. Summary verified from lib/LWP/Protocol/http10.pm. Ok. License verified from lib/LWP/Protocol/http10.pm. Ok. No perl C binding, noarch architecture is Ok. Description verified from lib/LWP/Protocol/http10.pm. Ok. TODO: Description contains orthographic mistake: `module _provide_ support'. There should be `provides'. TODO: No tests are presented, thus the package in question is not executed at build time. You can remove all BuildRequires except perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker). TODO: Remove %defattr from %files section as this is implicit already. $ rpmlint perl-LWP-Protocol-http10.spec ../SRPMS/perl-LWP-Protocol-http10-6.02-1.fc16.src.rpm ../RPMS/noarch/perl-LWP-Protocol-http10-6.02-1.fc16.noarch.rpm perl-LWP-Protocol-http10.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US implementor - implement or, implement-or, implementer perl-LWP-Protocol-http10.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US http - HTTP, HP, HT perl-LWP-Protocol-http10.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US implementor - implement or, implement-or, implementer perl-LWP-Protocol-http10.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US http - HTTP, HP, HT 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. These are literals. Ok. $ rpm -q -lv -p ../RPMS/noarch/perl-LWP-Protocol-http10-6.02-1.fc16.noarch.rpm drwxr-xr-x2 rootroot0 Jun 9 15:56 /usr/share/doc/perl-LWP-Protocol-http10-6.02 -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 470 Apr 9 12:17 /usr/share/doc/perl-LWP-Protocol-http10-6.02/Changes -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 866 Apr 9 12:15 /usr/share/doc/perl-LWP-Protocol-http10-6.02/README -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 2164 Jun 9 15:56 /usr/share/man/man3/LWP::Protocol::http10.3pm.gz drwxr-xr-x2 rootroot0 Jun 9 15:56 /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/LWP drwxr-xr-x2 rootroot0 Jun 9 15:56 /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/LWP/Protocol -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 8857 Apr 9 12:15 /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/LWP/Protocol/http10.pm File permissions and layout is Ok. $ rpm -q --requires -p ../RPMS/noarch/perl-LWP-Protocol-http10-6.02-1.fc16.noarch.rpm |sort |uniq -c 1 perl(HTTP::Response) = 6 1 perl(HTTP::Status) = 6 1 perl(IO::Select) 1 perl(IO::Socket) 1 perl(LWP::Protocol) = 6 1 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3) 1 perl(strict) 1 perl(vars) 1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) = 3.0.4-1 1 rpmlib(FileDigests) = 4.6.0-1 1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) = 4.0-1 1 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) = 5.2-1 FIX: Require perl(URI::Escape) (lib/LWP/Protocol/http10.pm:74). $ rpm -q --provides -p ../RPMS/noarch/perl-LWP-Protocol-http10-6.02-1.fc16.noarch.rpm |sort |uniq -c 1 perl(LWP::Protocol::http10) = 6.02 1 perl-LWP-Protocol-http10 = 6.02-1.fc16 Binary provides Ok. $ ~/bin/resolvedeps rawhide ../RPMS/noarch/perl-LWP-Protocol-http10-6.02-1.fc16.noarch.rpm Binary dependencies resolvable. Ok. Package builds in F16 (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3121698). Ok. Otherwise package is in line with Fedora and perl packaging guidelines. Please correct all `FIX' prefixed issues, consider fixing `TODO' items, and provide new spec file. Resolution: Package NOT approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 710115] Review Request: jlatexmath - Implementation of LaTeX math mode wrote in Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710115 --- Comment #7 from Clément DAVID c.davi...@gmail.com 2011-06-09 11:02:43 EDT --- Sorry for the delay, I just send my introduction on the devel ML. My FAS name is davidcl [http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/userinfo?userID=1793]. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 710115] Review Request: jlatexmath - Implementation of LaTeX math mode wrote in Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710115 Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #8 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2011-06-09 11:30:38 EDT --- Sponsored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 711313] Review Request: wicd-kde - a Wicd client built on the KDE Development Platform
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711313 --- Comment #13 from Minh Ngo nlmin...@gmail.com 2011-06-09 11:27:44 EDT --- Actually, you should start maintaining the changelog as soon as you submit the first version for review. That allows reviewers to track what review comments you already addressed and which are still open. Spec URL: https://raw.github.com/Ignotus/wicd-kde-fedora/aa975b605f713d72d97d5b108f17989a044cf322/wicd-kde.spec SRPM URL: https://github.com/Ignotus/wicd-kde-fedora/blob/aa975b605f713d72d97d5b108f17989a044cf322/wicd-kde-0.2.2-1.fc15.src.rpm?raw=true -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 709818] Review Request: testng - Java-based testing framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709818 Bug 709818 depends on bug 705106, which changed state. Bug 705106 Summary: Review Request: snakeyaml - YAML parser and emitter for the Java programming language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705106 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561484] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561484 Bug 561484 depends on bug 705106, which changed state. Bug 705106 Summary: Review Request: snakeyaml - YAML parser and emitter for the Java programming language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705106 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705106] Review Request: snakeyaml - YAML parser and emitter for the Java programming language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705106 Jaromír Cápík jca...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-06-09 11:16:35 --- Comment #9 from Jaromír Cápík jca...@redhat.com 2011-06-09 11:16:35 EDT --- Issue 121 resolved: http://code.google.com/p/snakeyaml/issues/detail?id=121 The package has been built successfuly: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=247086 Thanks for the review and git repo. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 626122] Review Request: libqmf - Qt Messaging Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=626122 --- Comment #19 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu 2011-06-09 12:18:38 EDT --- Looks like we'll be needing this sooner rather than later, as it's need by PyQtMobility which I'm working on packaging now. I'll get to work on a newer build based on: http://repo.meego.com/MeeGo/builds/trunk/latest/repos/oss/source/qmf-1.0.7~2011w13-1.51.src.rpm anyone feel free to chime in and/or help, if you've got anything to add. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 710386] Review Request: gnome-shell-extension-system-monitor-applet - A Gnome shell system monitor extension
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710386 Hin-Tak Leung ht...@users.sourceforge.net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ht...@users.sourceforge.net --- Comment #9 from Hin-Tak Leung ht...@users.sourceforge.net 2011-06-09 12:18:15 EDT --- I also found the sys-mon applet indispensible - I often start a compile/download and then do something else but switch back to those when I see the sys-load or network activity stops. checking 'activities' etc just takes too long and too distracting. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 710115] Review Request: jlatexmath - Implementation of LaTeX math mode wrote in Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710115 Clément DAVID c.davi...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Clément DAVID c.davi...@gmail.com 2011-06-09 12:18:14 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: jlatexmath Short Description: Java API to display mathematical formulas written in LaTeX Owners: davidcl Branches: f14 f15 el4 el5 el6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 626122] Review Request: libqmf - Qt Messaging Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=626122 --- Comment #20 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu 2011-06-09 12:35:15 EDT --- Hrm, that rpm uses qt-qmf it seems: * Fri Mar 25 2011 Fathi Boudra fathi.bou...@nokia.com - 1.0.7~2011w11 - Update to 1.0.7~2011w11 and switch to upstream QMF - Update URL with URL:http://qt.gitorious.org/qt-labs/messagingframework Now I'm confused on which one we should use. :( oh well, I'll continue work on sync'ing with the srp rom repo.meego.com, and we'll go from there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 710115] Review Request: jlatexmath - Implementation of LaTeX math mode wrote in Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710115 --- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-06-09 12:43:43 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 665877] Review Request: freeDiameter - a Diameter protocol open implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665877 Shakthi Kannan shakthim...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Shakthi Kannan shakthim...@gmail.com 2011-06-09 12:48:11 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: freeDiameter Short Description: A Diameter protocol open implementation Owners: shakthimaan Branches: F-15 F-16 EL-6 InitialCC: shakthimaan -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 665877] Review Request: freeDiameter - a Diameter protocol open implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665877 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-06-09 12:55:44 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). devel==f16, created by default. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 691894] Review Request: pyrit - A GPGPU-driven WPA/WPA2-PSK key cracker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691894 --- Comment #5 from knabberknusperh...@yahoo.de 2011-06-09 14:35:35 EDT --- Upstream here. The license-issue regarding the dump-files has also been discussed for inclusion in Debian6. To resolve, I've contacted the original owners of these files and have written permission to include them in Pyrit's distribution (under the terms of the GPLv3+). The README refers to that in the License-section. The file dict.gz is not mentioned but falls under then same agreement as wpa2psk-linksys.dump.gz and wpapsk-linksys.dump.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 711777] Review Request: perl-Test-Spec - Write tests in a declarative specification style
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711777 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 711777] Review Request: perl-Test-Spec - Write tests in a declarative specification style
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711777 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-06-09 14:44:17 EDT --- perl-Test-Spec-0.31-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Test-Spec-0.31-1.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 711547] Review Request: sketch - Free Graphics Software for the TeX, LaTeX, and PSTricks Community
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711547 --- Comment #7 from Ryan m...@ryanlewis.net 2011-06-09 15:13:43 EDT --- Ok, i've updated the spec file and the srpm, and posted the rpms as well. http://rhl.fedorapeople.org the Data directory looks like examples, and the Doc directory will eventually be broken out into it's own package sketch-docs, right now I am not building it, as I cannot get them to build currently (I suspect they depend on texlive 2010), and the data there is a carbon copy of what is provided on the sketch website. let me know if there are any more problems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 712203] New: Review Request: eclipse-mercurial - Mercurial plugin for Eclipse
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-mercurial - Mercurial plugin for Eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712203 Summary: Review Request: eclipse-mercurial - Mercurial plugin for Eclipse Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mzi...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec URL: http://mziaei1.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-mercurial/eclipse-mercurial.spec SRPM URL: http://mziaei1.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-mercurial/eclipse-mercurial-1.8.1-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: The eclipse-mercurial package contains Eclipse plugins to interact with Mercurial Repositories. Hi, I would appreciate a review for this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 711547] Review Request: sketch - Free Graphics Software for the TeX, LaTeX, and PSTricks Community
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711547 --- Comment #8 from Ryan m...@ryanlewis.net 2011-06-09 15:15:16 EDT --- sorry and here is the koji build against dist-f15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 711547] Review Request: sketch - Free Graphics Software for the TeX, LaTeX, and PSTricks Community
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711547 --- Comment #6 from Ryan m...@ryanlewis.net 2011-06-09 15:13:29 EDT --- Ok, i've updated the spec file and the srpm, and posted the rpms as well. http://rhl.fedorapeople.org the Data directory looks like examples, and the Doc directory will eventually be broken out into it's own package sketch-docs, right now I am not building it, as I cannot get them to build currently (I suspect they depend on texlive 2010), and the data there is a carbon copy of what is provided on the sketch website. let me know if tehre are any more problems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 711547] Review Request: sketch - Free Graphics Software for the TeX, LaTeX, and PSTricks Community
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711547 --- Comment #9 from Ryan m...@ryanlewis.net 2011-06-09 15:15:37 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3122219 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 712203] Review Request: eclipse-mercurial - Mercurial plugin for Eclipse
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712203 Andrew Overholt overh...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|overh...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Andrew Overholt overh...@redhat.com 2011-06-09 16:43:28 EDT --- I can look at this tomorrow, but first up, drop The eclipse-mercurial package contains from the description. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 626122] Review Request: libqmf - Qt Messaging Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=626122 --- Comment #21 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu 2011-06-09 16:53:35 EDT --- Well, so much for that qmf-1.0 doesn't seem to satisfy build requirements for either qt-mobility-1.2.x or PYQtMobility, trying a git snapshot of http://meego.gitorious.org/meego-middleware/messagingframework now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674082] Review Request: mchange-commons - A collection of general purpose utilities for c3p0
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674082 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-06-09 16:55:41 EDT --- mchange-commons-0.2-0.3.20110130hg.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mchange-commons-0.2-0.3.20110130hg.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 712203] Review Request: eclipse-mercurial - Mercurial plugin for Eclipse
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712203 --- Comment #2 from minoo ziaei mzi...@redhat.com 2011-06-09 17:08:26 EDT --- Thanks for reviewing it. I removed it from the .spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 626122] Review Request: libqmf - Qt Messaging Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=626122 --- Comment #22 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu 2011-06-09 17:10:03 EDT --- and, seems meego-qmf doesn't build, seemingly because fedora's libaccounts-qt-0.31-4.fc15.x86_64 is too old. :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 626122] Review Request: libqmf - Qt Messaging Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=626122 --- Comment #23 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu 2011-06-09 17:11:21 EDT --- Pardon one minor rant, lack of qt/meego upstream releases or clear (versioned!) dependencies make resolving this more that a little frustrating. :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 626122] Review Request: libqmf - Qt Messaging Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=626122 --- Comment #24 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu 2011-06-09 17:25:42 EDT --- (sorry for the multiple posts) in case it's useful for anyone, http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/qmf/ currently includes qt-qmf-1.0.7-1.1011w13.fc15.src.rpm my attempt at making an updated qmf-1.0.x rpm per comment #19 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 633594] Review Request: fldigi-doc - Documentation for the Fldigi project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633594 Randall Randy Berry randyn3...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-06-09 17:34:43 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674082] Review Request: mchange-commons - A collection of general purpose utilities for c3p0
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674082 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 685014] Review Request: perl-Sys-Path - Supply autoconf style installation directories
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=685014 Ruediger Landmann r.landm...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Ruediger Landmann r.landm...@redhat.com 2011-06-09 19:05:24 EDT --- Thanks Marcela :) New Package SCM Request === Package Name: perl-Sys-Path Short Description: Supply autoconf style installation directories Owners: rlandmann Branches: f14 f15 el6 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 685014] Review Request: perl-Sys-Path - Supply autoconf style installation directories
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=685014 --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-06-09 19:11:38 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 685014] Review Request: perl-Sys-Path - Supply autoconf style installation directories
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=685014 Ruediger Landmann r.landm...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2011-06-09 19:45:39 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 665877] Review Request: freeDiameter - a Diameter protocol open implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665877
Shakthi Kannan shakthim...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #7 from Shakthi Kannan shakthim...@gmail.com 2011-06-09 22:59:25
EDT ---
http://www.freediameter.net/hg/%{name}/archive/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz works,
otherwise rpmlint would have complained as well.
I am not able to switch to f-15 or el-6 branch. I get:
$ fedpkg switch-branch f15
Unable to switch to another branch: Unknown remote branch f15
The commit access is not approved? See:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/freeDiameter
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 711313] Review Request: wicd-kde - a Wicd client built on the KDE Development Platform
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711313 --- Comment #14 from Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich kr...@land.ru 2011-06-09 23:04:10 EDT --- And again, Release number update: 0.2.2-1 - 0.2.2-2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 665877] Review Request: freeDiameter - a Diameter protocol open implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665877 --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-06-09 23:14:42 EDT --- No problem switching branch for me, and the ACLs appear quite fine on the server. Everything looks fine in pkgdb as well; I don't see anything wrong at the link you gave. Perhaps you could indicate what you think is incorrect there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639518] Review Request: gst-entrans - Plug-ins and tools for transcoding and recording with GStreamer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639518 --- Comment #8 from Theodore Lee theo...@gmail.com 2011-06-09 23:54:30 EDT --- Okay, I've split up the package and made the necessary changes. The new spec and SRPM files are at: Spec URL: http://water-spirits.net/lazyadmin-stuff/gst-entrans.spec SRPM URL: http://water-spirits.net/lazyadmin-stuff/gst-entrans-0.10.3-2.fc15.src.rpm $ rpmlint *.rpm gst-entrans.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) transcoding - trans coding, trans-coding, transcending gst-entrans.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US GEntrans - Gentians, Gen trans, Gen-trans gst-entrans.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US transcoding - trans coding, trans-coding, transcending gst-entrans.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US GStreamer - G Streamer, Streamer, Steamer gst-entrans.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) transcoding - trans coding, trans-coding, transcending gst-entrans.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US GEntrans - Gentians, Gen trans, Gen-trans gst-entrans.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US transcoding - trans coding, trans-coding, transcending gst-entrans.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US GStreamer - G Streamer, Streamer, Steamer gst-entrans.x86_64: E: no-binary gst-entrans-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gst-entrans-0.10.3/gst/transcode/gstcsub.c gst-entrans-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gst-entrans-0.10.3/gst/virtualdub/gstxsharpen.c gst-entrans-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gst-entrans-0.10.3/gst/transcode/gstdetectinter.c gst-entrans-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gst-entrans-0.10.3/gst/transcode/gstwhitebalance.c gst-entrans-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gst-entrans-0.10.3/gst/avidemux/gststabilize.c gst-entrans-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gst-entrans-0.10.3/gst/avidemux/gstsoften.c gst-entrans-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gst-entrans-0.10.3/gst/mencoder/gstdelogo.c gst-entrans-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gst-entrans-0.10.3/gst/transcode/gstdecimate.c gst-entrans-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gst-entrans-0.10.3/gst/transcode/gstsmooth.c gst-entrans-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gst-entrans-0.10.3/gst/transcode/gstivtc.c gst-entrans-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gst-entrans-0.10.3/gst/mencoder/gstunsharp.c gst-entrans-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gst-entrans-0.10.3/gst/transcode/gstdnr.c gst-entrans-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gst-entrans-0.10.3/gst/transcode/gstastat.c gst-entrans-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gst-entrans-0.10.3/gst/virtualdub/gstkerneldeint.c gst-entrans-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gst-entrans-0.10.3/gst/transcode/gstcshift.c gst-entrans-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gst-entrans-0.10.3/gst/virtualdub/gstmsharpen.c gst-entrans-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gst-entrans-0.10.3/gst/transcode/gstdivxkey.c gstreamer-plugins-entrans.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US GEntrans - Gentians, Gen trans, Gen-trans gstreamer-plugins-entrans.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US transcoding - trans coding, trans-coding, transcending gstreamer-plugins-entrans.x86_64: W: no-documentation gstreamer-plugins-entrans-docs.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US GEntrans - Gentians, Gen trans, Gen-trans gstreamer-plugins-entrans-docs.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US transcoding - trans coding, trans-coding, transcending 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 18 errors, 13 warnings. The FSF address issue has been filed upstream: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailaid=3314502group_id=194944atid=951457 Regarding any possible legal issues, should I contact the maintainer and ask for more information? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 712270] New: Review Request: derive - A program and library to derive instances for data types
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: derive - A program and library to derive instances for data types Alias: ghc-derive https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712270 Summary: Review Request: derive - A program and library to derive instances for data types Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lakshminaras2...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com, fedora-haskell-l...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec file : http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/derive.spec SRPM file : http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/derive-2.5.2-1.fc14.src.rpm Koji build : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3122647 rpmlint output: derive.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell - Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. derive.i686: W: name-repeated-in-summary C derive The name of the package is repeated in its summary. This is often redundant information and looks silly in various programs' output. Make the summary brief and to the point without including redundant information in it. derive.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary derive Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. derive.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell - Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. derive.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary C derive The name of the package is repeated in its summary. This is often redundant information and looks silly in various programs' output. Make the summary brief and to the point without including redundant information in it. ghc-derive-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-derive-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-derive-prof.i686: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-derive-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ghc-7.0.2/derive-2.5.2/libHSderive-2.5.2_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. 5 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 7 warnings. Required for yi -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 712271] New: Review Request: ghc-fclabels - A package that provides first class accessor labels
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-fclabels - A package that provides first class accessor labels Alias: ghc-fclabels https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712271 Summary: Review Request: ghc-fclabels - A package that provides first class accessor labels Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lakshminaras2...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com, fedora-haskell-l...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec file : http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-fclabels.spec SRPM file : http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-fclabels-0.11.1.1-1.fc14.src.rpm Koji build : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3122646 rpmlint output: ghc-fclabels.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) accessor - accessory, access or, access-or The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-fclabels.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US composable - com posable, com-posable, compo sable The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-fclabels.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) accessor - accessory, access or, access-or The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-fclabels.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US composable - com posable, com-posable, compo sable The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-fclabels-devel.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) accessor - accessory, access or, access-or The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-fclabels-devel.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US composable - com posable, com-posable, compo sable The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-fclabels-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-fclabels-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-fclabels-prof.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) accessor - accessory, access or, access-or The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-fclabels-prof.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US composable - com posable, com-posable, compo sable The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-fclabels-prof.i686: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-fclabels-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ghc-7.0.2/fclabels-0.11.1.1/libHSfclabels-0.11.1.1_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 10 warnings. Required for yi. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 711313] Review Request: wicd-kde - a Wicd client built on the KDE Development Platform
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711313 --- Comment #15 from Minh Ngo nlmin...@gmail.com 2011-06-10 00:28:11 EDT --- And again, Release number update: 0.2.2-1 - 0.2.2-2. Spec URL: https://github.com/Ignotus/wicd-kde-fedora/blob/fa03d59c4413288f8eb519289e0b5e984d18f5db/wicd-kde.spec SPRM URL: https://github.com/Ignotus/wicd-kde-fedora/blob/fa03d59c4413288f8eb519289e0b5e984d18f5db/wicd-kde-0.2.2-2.fc15.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 712272] New: Review Request: ghc-unix-compat - A portable POSIX-compatibility layer for Haskell
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-unix-compat - A portable POSIX-compatibility layer for Haskell Alias: ghc-unix-compat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712272 Summary: Review Request: ghc-unix-compat - A portable POSIX-compatibility layer for Haskell Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lakshminaras2...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec file : http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-unix-compat.spec SRPM file : http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-unix-compat-0.2.1.3-1.fc14.src.rpm Koji build : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3122645 rpmlint output: ghc-unix-compat-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-unix-compat-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-unix-compat-prof.i686: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-unix-compat-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ghc-7.0.2/unix-compat-0.2.1.3/libHSunix-compat-0.2.1.3_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. Required for yi. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 712271] Review Request: ghc-fclabels - A package that provides first class accessor labels
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712271 Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||712273(ghc-pointedlist) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 712270] Review Request: derive - A program and library to derive instances for data types
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712270 Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||712273(ghc-pointedlist) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 712273] New: Review Request: ghc-pointedlist - A zipper-like comonad
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-pointedlist - A zipper-like comonad Alias: ghc-pointedlist https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712273 Summary: Review Request: ghc-pointedlist - A zipper-like comonad Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lakshminaras2...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com, fedora-haskell-l...@redhat.com Depends on: 712270,712271 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec file : http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-pointedlist.spec SRPM file : http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-pointedlist-0.4.0.2-1.fc14.src.rpm rpmlint output: ghc-pointedlist.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) comonad - co monad, co-monad, commonage The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-pointedlist.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US comonad - co monad, co-monad, commonage The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-pointedlist.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) comonad - co monad, co-monad, commonage The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-pointedlist.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US comonad - co monad, co-monad, commonage The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-pointedlist-devel.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) comonad - co monad, co-monad, commonage The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-pointedlist-devel.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US comonad - co monad, co-monad, commonage The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-pointedlist-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-pointedlist-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-pointedlist-prof.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) comonad - co monad, co-monad, commonage The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-pointedlist-prof.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US comonad - co monad, co-monad, commonage The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-pointedlist-prof.i686: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-pointedlist-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ghc-6.12.3/pointedlist-0.4.0.2/libHSpointedlist-0.4.0.2_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 10 warnings. Required for yi. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 665877] Review Request: freeDiameter - a Diameter protocol open implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665877 Shakthi Kannan shakthim...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Shakthi Kannan shakthim...@gmail.com 2011-06-10 00:43:34 EDT --- Never mind. I am able to switch to f15 and el6 branches now, and able to upload the package. Thanks for your reply. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
