[Bug 604005] Review Request: ledgersmb - Financial accounting program

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=604005

--- Comment #9 from Rakesh Pandit  2011-06-20 03:05:46 EDT 
---
(In reply to comment #8)
> I shall take this.

feel free to. I wouldn't be able to work on it for next 10-15 days either.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 567086] Review Request: VXL - C++ Libraries for Computer Vision Research and Implementation

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567086

Ankur Sinha  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|lemen...@gmail.com  |sanjay.an...@gmail.com
   Flag||fedora-review?

--- Comment #28 from Ankur Sinha  2011-06-20 03:50:27 
EDT ---
Taking over review

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 714036] Review Request: perl-PPI-PowerToys - Handy collection of small PPI-based utilities

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714036

--- Comment #3 from Petr Pisar  2011-06-20 05:09:12 EDT ---
FSF address issue reported to upstream
.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 714036] Review Request: perl-PPI-PowerToys - Handy collection of small PPI-based utilities

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714036

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 714036] Review Request: perl-PPI-PowerToys - Handy collection of small PPI-based utilities

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714036

--- Comment #4 from Petr Pisar  2011-06-20 05:11:22 EDT ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: perl-PPI-PowerToys 
Short Description: Handy collection of small PPI-based utilities
Owners: ppisar mmaslano psabata
Branches: f15
InitialCC: perl-sig

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 639518] Review Request: gst-entrans - Plug-ins and tools for transcoding and recording with GStreamer

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639518

--- Comment #10 from Theodore Lee  2011-06-20 05:40:17 EDT 
---
Okay, no problem, thanks again for the review.

I've added the COPYING files to the relevant subpackages - the updated files
are here:
Spec URL: http://water-spirits.net/lazyadmin-stuff/gst-entrans.spec
SRPM URL:
http://water-spirits.net/lazyadmin-stuff/gst-entrans-0.10.3-3.fc15.src.rpm

$ rpmlint *.rpm
gst-entrans.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) transcoding -> trans coding,
trans-coding, transcending
gst-entrans.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US GEntrans -> Gentians,
Gen trans, Gen-trans
gst-entrans.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US transcoding -> trans
coding, trans-coding, transcending
gst-entrans.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US GStreamer -> G
Streamer, Streamer, Steamer
gst-entrans.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) transcoding -> trans
coding, trans-coding, transcending
gst-entrans.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US GEntrans ->
Gentians, Gen trans, Gen-trans
gst-entrans.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US transcoding ->
trans coding, trans-coding, transcending
gst-entrans.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US GStreamer -> G
Streamer, Streamer, Steamer
gst-entrans.x86_64: E: no-binary
gst-entrans-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/gst-entrans-0.10.3/gst/transcode/gstcsub.c
gst-entrans-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/gst-entrans-0.10.3/gst/virtualdub/gstxsharpen.c
gst-entrans-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/gst-entrans-0.10.3/gst/transcode/gstdetectinter.c
gst-entrans-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/gst-entrans-0.10.3/gst/transcode/gstwhitebalance.c
gst-entrans-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/gst-entrans-0.10.3/gst/avidemux/gststabilize.c
gst-entrans-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/gst-entrans-0.10.3/gst/avidemux/gstsoften.c
gst-entrans-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/gst-entrans-0.10.3/gst/mencoder/gstdelogo.c
gst-entrans-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/gst-entrans-0.10.3/gst/transcode/gstdecimate.c
gst-entrans-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/gst-entrans-0.10.3/gst/transcode/gstsmooth.c
gst-entrans-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/gst-entrans-0.10.3/gst/transcode/gstivtc.c
gst-entrans-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/gst-entrans-0.10.3/gst/mencoder/gstunsharp.c
gst-entrans-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/gst-entrans-0.10.3/gst/transcode/gstdnr.c
gst-entrans-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/gst-entrans-0.10.3/gst/transcode/gstastat.c
gst-entrans-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/gst-entrans-0.10.3/gst/virtualdub/gstkerneldeint.c
gst-entrans-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/gst-entrans-0.10.3/gst/transcode/gstcshift.c
gst-entrans-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/gst-entrans-0.10.3/gst/virtualdub/gstmsharpen.c
gst-entrans-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/gst-entrans-0.10.3/gst/transcode/gstdivxkey.c
gstreamer-plugins-entrans.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US
GEntrans -> Gentians, Gen trans, Gen-trans
gstreamer-plugins-entrans.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US
transcoding -> trans coding, trans-coding, transcending
gstreamer-plugins-entrans-docs.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US
GEntrans -> Gentians, Gen trans, Gen-trans
gstreamer-plugins-entrans-docs.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US
transcoding -> trans coding, trans-coding, transcending
5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 18 errors, 12 warnings.

For the for the /usr/share/gtk-doc/html directory, I figured it would be best
to remain consistent with the approach used in the main GStreamer plugins
packages.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 658164] Review Request: python-asciitable - Extensible ASCII table reader and writer

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658164

Sergio Pascual  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE
   Flag|needinfo?(sergio.pasra@gmai |
   |l.com)  |
Last Closed||2011-06-20 06:10:13

--- Comment #12 from Sergio Pascual  2011-06-20 
06:10:13 EDT ---
It's already done. Thanks for the remainder

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 710699] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Unique - Perl bindings for the C library "libunique"

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710699

--- Comment #8 from Liang Suilong  2011-06-20 06:16:05 
EDT ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: perl-Gtk2-Unique
Short Description: Perl bindings for the C library "libunique"
Owners: liangsuilong
Branches: f14 f15 el6

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 710699] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Unique - Perl bindings for the C library "libunique"

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710699

Liang Suilong  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 705109] Review Request: python-qserve - Job queue server used in python-mwlib

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705109

--- Comment #13 from PRABIN KUMAR DATTA  2011-06-20 
07:23:29 EDT ---
Sorry, I disturbed you a lot.
Actually, I have read your comments but I was confused that:
1. I have already done initial build as 0.0.1-1.
2. So, for next change log, if it's ok to use 0-0.1.git
  since version 0 < version 0.0.1

After conversation with Ankur Sinha on IRC channel.
I have removed all change logs and resubmitting this package.

Spec URL: http://prabindatta.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/python-qserve.spec
SRPM URL:
http://prabindatta.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/python-qserve-0-0.1.git31b9e43.fc15.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 710699] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Unique - Perl bindings for the C library "libunique"

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710699

--- Comment #9 from Emmanuel Seyman  
2011-06-20 07:30:29 EDT ---
please add perl-sig as InitialCC:
All perl modules should do this.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 710699] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Unique - Perl bindings for the C library "libunique"

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710699

--- Comment #10 from Liang Suilong  2011-06-20 07:34:48 
EDT ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: perl-Gtk2-Unique
Short Description: Perl bindings for the C library "libunique"
Owners: liangsuilong
Branches: f14 f15 el6
InitialCC: perl-sig

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 693231] Review Request: gedit-collaboration - collaboration plugin for gedit

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693231

Tomáš Bžatek  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE
Last Closed||2011-06-20 07:52:57

--- Comment #13 from Tomáš Bžatek  2011-06-20 07:52:57 EDT 
---
Thanks, successfully built gedit-collaboration-3.0.0-1.fc16 and
gedit-collaboration-3.0.0-1.fc15 in koji.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 702998] Review Request: pyttsx - Cross platform text-to-speech

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702998

--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  2011-06-20 
07:56:49 EDT ---
pyttsx-1.0-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pyttsx-1.0-1.fc14

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 693231] Review Request: gedit-collaboration - collaboration plugin for gedit

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693231

--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System  
2011-06-20 07:54:21 EDT ---
gedit-collaboration-3.0.0-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gedit-collaboration-3.0.0-1.fc15

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 693231] Review Request: gedit-collaboration - collaboration plugin for gedit

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693231

Tomáš Bžatek  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version||gedit-collaboration-3.0.0-1
   ||.fc15

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 710137] Review Request: gedit-cossa - gedit plugin for GTK+ themes design

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710137

Tomáš Bžatek  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE
Last Closed||2011-06-20 07:57:12

--- Comment #8 from Tomáš Bžatek  2011-06-20 07:57:12 EDT 
---
Thanks for the git, built gedit-cossa-3.1.1-1.fc16 and
gedit-cossa-3.0.1-1.fc15.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 710699] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Unique - Perl bindings for the C library "libunique"

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710699

--- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla  2011-06-20 07:59:11 EDT ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 702998] Review Request: pyttsx - Cross platform text-to-speech

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702998

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 712913] Review Request: virt-dmesg - Print kernel messages from a Linux virtual machine

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712913

Richard W.M. Jones  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2011-06-20 07:58:31

--- Comment #7 from Richard W.M. Jones  2011-06-20 07:58:31 
EDT ---
I completely forgot when I requested the branches that virt-dmesg
requires an updated libvirt (only in Rawhide).  Not sure whether
it's right to retire[1] the F14 and F15 branches (but not Rawhide).
Currently I have left those branches empty.

[1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 714036] Review Request: perl-PPI-PowerToys - Handy collection of small PPI-based utilities

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714036

--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla  2011-06-20 08:02:26 EDT ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 710848] Review Request: python-myhdl - A python hardware description and verification language

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710848

--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla  2011-06-20 08:01:55 EDT ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

f16==devel, no need to request.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 709180] Review Request: jackctlmmc - control JACK transport via MIDI

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709180

--- Comment #3 from Brendan Jones  2011-06-20 
08:04:07 EDT ---
Thanks for the review Orcan.

No issue with any of your catches. Will post an update as soon as upstream gets
back to me regarding the license.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 702998] Review Request: pyttsx - Cross platform text-to-speech

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702998

--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  2011-06-20 
08:07:05 EDT ---
pyttsx-1.0-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pyttsx-1.0-1.fc15

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 714036] Review Request: perl-PPI-PowerToys - Handy collection of small PPI-based utilities

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714036

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|CURRENTRELEASE  |RAWHIDE

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 714036] Review Request: perl-PPI-PowerToys - Handy collection of small PPI-based utilities

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714036

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-PPI-PowerToys-0.14-1.f
   ||c16
 Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE
Last Closed||2011-06-20 08:30:14

--- Comment #6 from Petr Pisar  2011-06-20 08:30:14 EDT ---
Thank you for the review and the repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 714036] Review Request: perl-PPI-PowerToys - Handy collection of small PPI-based utilities

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714036

--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  2011-06-20 
08:32:16 EDT ---
perl-PPI-PowerToys-0.14-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-PPI-PowerToys-0.14-1.fc15

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 702998] Review Request: pyttsx - Cross platform text-to-speech

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702998

--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  2011-06-20 
08:37:19 EDT ---
pyttsx-1.0-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pyttsx-1.0-1.el6

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 704484] Review Request: idjc - DJ application with streaming capabilities

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=704484

--- Comment #1 from Nikos Roussos  2011-06-20 09:00:33 EDT 
---
I'm not yet a Fedora packager, so I'll need a sponsor. I have other packages
too, but I'm waiting for this one to get reviewed to see if I'm doing
everything right.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 698362] Review Request: writetype - Light word processor

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698362

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |MODIFIED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 698362] Review Request: writetype - Light word processor

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698362

--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System  
2011-06-20 09:08:23 EDT ---
writetype-1.2.130-6.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/writetype-1.2.130-6.fc14

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 698362] Review Request: writetype - Light word processor

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698362

--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System  
2011-06-20 09:18:08 EDT ---
writetype-1.2.130-6.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/writetype-1.2.130-6.fc15

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 698362] Review Request: writetype - Light word processor

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698362

--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System  
2011-06-20 09:27:32 EDT ---
writetype-1.2.130-6.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/writetype-1.2.130-6.el6

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 714716] New: Review Request: SuiteSparse - A set of packages to do with sparse matrix algorithms

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: SuiteSparse - A set of packages to do with sparse 
matrix algorithms

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714716

   Summary: Review Request: SuiteSparse - A set of packages to do
with sparse matrix algorithms
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
 Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: sanjay.an...@gmail.com
 QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
  Story Points: ---


Spec URL: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/SuiteSparse/SuiteSparse.spec
SRPM URL:
http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/SuiteSparse/SuiteSparse-3.6.1-1.fc15.src.rpm

Description: 
A collection of tools to do with sparse matrix algorithms:

-   AMD: symmetric approximate minimum degree
-   BTF: permutation to block triangular form
-   CAMD: symmetric approximate minimum degree
-   CCOLAMD: constrained column approximate minimum degree
-   COLAMD: column approximate minimum degree
-   CHOLMOD: sparse supernodal Cholesky factorization and update/downdate
-   CSparse: a concise sparse matrix package
-   CXSparse: an extended version of CSparse
-   KLU: sparse LU factorization, for circuit simulation
-   LDL: a simple LDL^T factorization
-   UMFPACK: sparse multifrontal LU factorization
-   RBio: MATLAB toolbox for reading/writing sparse matrices
-   UFconfig: common configuration for all but CSparse
-   LINFACTOR: solve Ax=b using LU or CHOL
-   MESHND: 2D and 3D mesh generation and nested dissection
-   SSMULT: sparse matrix times sparse matrix
-   SuiteSparseQR: multifrontal sparse QR 

Plus this software (in SuiteSparse itself, not downloaded separately):

-   UFcollection: software for managing the collection
-   MATLAB_Tools: various m-file utilities 


=
The package only provides static libraries. Therefore debuginfo is disabled.

rpmlint output:
[ankur@ankur SRPMS]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/result/*.rpm
../SPECS/SuiteSparse.spec
SuiteSparse.i686: E: devel-dependency SuiteSparse-static
SuiteSparse.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US supernodal -> super
nodal, super-nodal, supernal
SuiteSparse.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US downdate -> down
date, down-date, downstate
SuiteSparse.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multifrontal ->
multinational
SuiteSparse.i686: W: no-documentation
SuiteSparse.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/SuiteSparse/libbtf.1.1.2.a
SuiteSparse.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/SuiteSparse/libamd.2.2.2.a
SuiteSparse.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/SuiteSparse/libldl.2.0.3.a
SuiteSparse.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/SuiteSparse/libklu.1.1.2.a
SuiteSparse.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/SuiteSparse/libcxsparse.2.2.5.a
SuiteSparse.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/SuiteSparse/libufconfig.3.6.0.a
SuiteSparse.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/SuiteSparse/libcholmod.1.7.3.a
SuiteSparse.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/SuiteSparse/libumfpack.5.5.1.a
SuiteSparse.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/SuiteSparse/libcolamd.2.7.3.a
SuiteSparse.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/SuiteSparse/libspqr.1.2.1.a
SuiteSparse.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/SuiteSparse/librbio.2.0.1.a
SuiteSparse.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/SuiteSparse/libcamd.2.2.2.a
SuiteSparse.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/SuiteSparse/libccolamd.2.7.3.a
SuiteSparse.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US supernodal -> super
nodal, super-nodal, supernal
SuiteSparse.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US downdate -> down date,
down-date, downstate
SuiteSparse.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multifrontal ->
multinational
SuiteSparse.src:57: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %prep sed -i -e "s|\(INSTALL_LIB
=\)|\1 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_libdir}/%{name}|" -e "s|\(INSTALL_INCLUDE =\)|\1
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_includedir}/%{name}/|" -e "s|\(CFLAGS =\)|\1 %{optflags}|"
-e "s|\(F77FLAGS =\)|\1 %{optflags} -I%{_libdir}/gfortran/modules|"
UFconfig/UFconfig.mk CSparse3/Lib/Makefile CXSparse/Demo/Makefile
SuiteSparse-debuginfo.i686: E: empty-debuginfo-package
SuiteSparse-devel.i686: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
SuiteSparse-devel.i686: W: no-documentation
SuiteSparse-devel.i686: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/lib/SuiteSparse/libcamd.a libcamd.2.2.2.a
SuiteSparse-devel.i686: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/lib/SuiteSpars

[Bug 714716] Review Request: suitesparse - A set of packages to do with sparse matrix algorithms

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714716

Ankur Sinha  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|Review Request: SuiteSparse |Review Request: suitesparse
   |- A set of packages to do   |- A set of packages to do
   |with sparse matrix  |with sparse matrix
   |algorithms  |algorithms
  Alias||suitesparse

--- Comment #1 from Ankur Sinha  2011-06-20 10:14:56 
EDT ---
http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/suitesparse/suitesparse.spec

http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/suitesparse/suitesparse-3.6.1-1.fc15.src.rpm

Corrected packagename

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 714716] Review Request: suitesparse - A set of packages to do with sparse matrix algorithms

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714716

Rex Dieter  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 CC||rdie...@math.unl.edu
 Resolution||NOTABUG
Last Closed||2011-06-20 10:51:04

--- Comment #2 from Rex Dieter  2011-06-20 10:51:04 EDT 
---
fedora already has a suitesparse pkg,
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/suitesparse

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 713920] Review Request: CSparse - Sparse Matrix software library

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=713920

José Matos  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||jama...@fc.up.pt

--- Comment #3 from José Matos  2011-06-20 11:03:18 EDT ---
While following bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714716 I
noticed that Fedora already has suitesparse pkg,
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/suitesparse

that aggregates several sparse libraries:

$ yum info suitesparse
Installed Packages
Name: suitesparse
...
Summary : A collection of sparse matrix libraries
URL : http://www.cise.ufl.edu/research/sparse/SuiteSparse
License : LGPLv2+ and GPLv2+
Description : suitesparse is a collection of libraries for computations
involving sparse
: matrices.  The package includes the following libraries:
...
:   CSparse a concise sparse matrix package
...

whiteout going further into the details is this a different package?

If it is I will have closer look and I will review the package.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 226204] Merge Review: nss

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226204

--- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla  2011-06-20 11:49:23 EDT ---
Well, F15 just came out, so F16 is very early now, pre-alpha.  Is this early
enough?  If so, I'd say make the changes you intend to, and I'll re-review
that.  If that's not and you'd rather wait until after f17 is branched, I'll
review what's in rawhide now.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 226117] Merge Review: mailman

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226117

--- Comment #35 from Jon Ciesla  2011-06-20 11:55:36 EDT ---
Agreed, please post here when you get 3.x in rawhide, and I'll review it.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 693608] Review Request: icinga - System Monitoring Application

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693608

--- Comment #11 from Michael Friedrich  
2011-06-20 12:05:19 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> I have created two Spec-files. The first one I have left the permissions
> unchanged so icinga can read and write its configs, but I don't see why this
> should be needed so I have created the second one.

Thanks, I'll have a look what I can merge into the upstream available
icinga.spec file.

https://dev.icinga.org/issues/1666

2 more topic to discuss ... 

1) the so called "icinga api" is mainly a php based abstraction layer on the
idoutils rdbms. shouldn't this be renamed into "icinga-phpapi" in their
respective package name (if you consider adding this from scratch)? i can't
change that in the official spec file but e.g. debian maintainers did due to
the nature of its behaviour.

2) the newly introduced "module definition" in 1.4.0 -
https://dev.icinga.org/issues/162 can now be used to load neb modules without
enabling them in icinga.cfg explicitely.
1.4.x still contains the modules/idoutils.cfg which contains commented sample
configs. this is known bug (make install overrides existing source installs) -
https://dev.icinga.org/issues/1625 - and it will be replaced by
modules/idoutils.cfg-sample allowing the same procedure as you know about
idomod/ido2db.cfg

https://git.icinga.org/?p=icinga-core.git;a=commit;h=6e9e78f686c0aa0de436e66b840984a6a122ab66

https://git.icinga.org/?p=icinga-core.git;a=commit;h=65a76c55df7052884354de4884684e8fc0803981


(all recent changes can be found in this git branch until they hit the release
branches 
https://git.icinga.org/?p=icinga-core.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/test/core
whilst cgis and ido do have their own)

> It fixes the most issues mentioned above I think. Most warnings come from 
> using
> user icinga and groups icinga and icingacmd. 
> 
> > icinga.x86_64: W: non-executable-in-bin /usr/bin/p1.pl 0644
> > icinga.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/bin/p1.pl
> > icinga.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/bin/p1.pl 0644 None
> If my perl knowledge is right, it is a perl module so I gave no execution
> permissions, but did not move it because I think it will break something.

p1.pl is only used if embedded perl is enabled (by configure/compile) and if
enabled explicitely in icinga.cfg. this is intentionally disabled in future
releases as the embedded perl interpreter could cause memory leaks which
haven't been fixed / cannot be fixed for some years now. don't ask me about the
details, i'm no expert at this stage of coding.

even more, nearly each know distribution moans about the location of p1.pl in
$bindir so the recent git commit introduces default $libdir and a new configure
option to be named '--with-p1-file-dir' and is targetted to be used by
packagers who don't like to do the normal mv and sed stuff.

https://git.icinga.org/?p=icinga-core.git;a=commit;h=08b0437c5648bfe014e096c14be73b784e2d4f02

so expect older packages to be having an old p1.pl floating around, but that's
something to be mentioned seperately in the changelogs.

due to these changes, the icinga-spec provided with the official releases will
change too.
and some more changes, because the target of p1.pl in (new_)mini_epn.c in
contrib/ (which can be used to manually execute and test perl plugins) have a
lot of hardcoded stuff which is now to be replaced to be more packager
friendly.

the intended location for an official distribution package is
$libdir/icinga/p1.pl which is enabled in configure and the filelist itsself.

https://dev.icinga.org/issues/1569

https://git.icinga.org/?p=icinga-core.git;a=commit;h=15d9ce78b907811b2048a8fb99983d08be2de6e8

though i'm not sure if introducing such changes would make sense in 1.4.2 as it
will remain a bugfix release.


> > icinga-idoutils-mysql.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libdbi-dbd-mysql
> > icinga-idoutils-pgsql.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libdbi-dbd-pgsql
> It is not really the lib, it is the driver needed by the lib.

probably a change which can only be done with a fresh package start. existing
rpmbuilds will suffer from revoking icinga-idoutils, but that's fine if it will
be kept as an alternative over here.


> Building the package works fine on rhel5, rhel6 and f14 also i386 and x86_64,
> install is only tested on rhel5 and it works.
> 
> I hope the provided files are useful, but I am sorry I am not allow to do
> packaging and maintain packages by my employer, so someone else has to step 
> in.

i'm doing internal packaging stuff (still learning!), but my daily job is
partly icinga core development, so i'd be very happy to see an official
maintainer. also possible as part of team icinga as we are trying to keep
communication channels easy and changes - if they fit - mostly upstream.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- Y

[Bug 226204] Merge Review: nss

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226204

Elio Maldonado Batiz  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||cail...@redhat.com

--- Comment #13 from Elio Maldonado Batiz  2011-06-20 
12:38:14 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #12)
To explain why I am cautious let's look at the latest warnings and error report
for autoqa.

Stored logs available at


nss-pkcs11-devel.i686: W: no-documentation
nss-tools.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency zlib

nss-tools.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/signtool
['$ORIGIN/../lib64', '$ORIGIN/../lib']
nss-tools.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/crlutil
['$ORIGIN/../lib64', '$ORIGIN/../lib']
nss-tools.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/signver
['$ORIGIN/../lib64', '$ORIGIN/../lib']
nss-tools.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
/usr/lib64/nss/unsupported-tools/ocspclnt ['$ORIGIN/../lib64',
'$ORIGIN/../lib']
nss-tools.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
/usr/lib64/nss/unsupported-tools/pp ['$ORIGIN/../lib64', '$ORIGIN/../lib']
nss-tools.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
/usr/lib64/nss/unsupported-tools/derdump ['$ORIGIN/../lib64', '$ORIGIN/../lib']
nss-tools.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/pk12util
['$ORIGIN/../lib64', '$ORIGIN/../lib']
nss-tools.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
/usr/lib64/nss/unsupported-tools/atob ['$ORIGIN/../lib64', '$ORIGIN/../lib']
nss-tools.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/ssltap
['$ORIGIN/../lib64', '$ORIGIN/../lib']
nss-tools.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
/usr/lib64/nss/unsupported-tools/strsclnt ['$ORIGIN/../lib64',
'$ORIGIN/../lib']
nss-tools.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
/usr/lib64/nss/unsupported-tools/btoa ['$ORIGIN/../lib64', '$ORIGIN/../lib']
nss-tools.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
/usr/lib64/nss/unsupported-tools/symkeyutil ['$ORIGIN/../lib64',
'$ORIGIN/../lib']
nss-tools.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
/usr/lib64/nss/unsupported-tools/tstclnt ['$ORIGIN/../lib64', '$ORIGIN/../lib']
nss-tools.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/certutil
['$ORIGIN/../lib64', '$ORIGIN/../lib']
nss-tools.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
/usr/lib64/nss/unsupported-tools/vfyserv ['$ORIGIN/../lib64', '$ORIGIN/../lib']
nss-tools.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/modutil
['$ORIGIN/../lib64', '$ORIGIN/../lib']
nss-tools.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
/usr/lib64/nss/unsupported-tools/selfserv ['$ORIGIN/../lib64',
'$ORIGIN/../lib']
nss-tools.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/cmsutil
['$ORIGIN/../lib64', '$ORIGIN/../lib']
nss-tools.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
/usr/lib64/nss/unsupported-tools/vfychain ['$ORIGIN/../lib64',
'$ORIGIN/../lib']
nss-tools.x86_64: W: no-documentation
nss-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ssltap
nss-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary certutil
nss-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary cmsutil
nss-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary modutil
nss-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary signver
nss-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary crlutil
nss-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary signtool
nss-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary pk12util
nss-devel.i686: W: no-documentation
nss-devel.i686: E: rpath-in-buildconfig /usr/bin/nss-config lines ['130']
nss-devel.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary nss-config
nss-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
nss-devel.x86_64: E: rpath-in-buildconfig /usr/bin/nss-config lines ['130']
nss-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary nss-config
nss-sysinit.x86_64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libnsssysinit.so
libnsssysinit.so
nss-sysinit.x86_64: W: no-documentation
nss-sysinit.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary setup-nsssysinit.sh
nss.i686: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib/libnsspem.so libnsspem.so
nss.i686: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib/libnssckbi.so libnssckbi.so
nss.i686: W: no-documentation
nss-pkcs11-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
nss.src: W: strange-permission setup-nsssysinit.sh 0755
nss.src:75: W: unversioned-explicit-provides nss-system-init
nss.src:248: W: macro-in-comment %global
nss.src:249: W: macro-in-comment %global
nss.src: W: invalid-url Source12: nss-pem-20100412.tar.bz2
nss.src: W: invalid-url Source0: nss-3.12.6-stripped.tar.bz2
nss.x86_64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libnsspem.so libnsspem.so
nss.x86_64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libnssckbi.so libnssckbi.so
nss.x86_64: W: no-documentation
nss-sysinit.i686: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib/libnsssysinit.so libnsssysinit.so
nss-sysinit.i686: W: no-documentation
nss-sysinit.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary setup-nsssysinit.sh
nss-tools.i686: E: exp

[Bug 712560] Review Request: gnome-shell-extension-theme-selector - extension for review & change gnome-shell themes

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712560

--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  2011-06-20 
12:44:03 EDT ---
gnome-shell-extension-theme-selector-0.9-3.fc15 has been submitted as an update
for Fedora 15.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnome-shell-extension-theme-selector-0.9-3.fc15

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 712560] Review Request: gnome-shell-extension-theme-selector - extension for review & change gnome-shell themes

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712560

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 693608] Review Request: icinga - System Monitoring Application

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693608

--- Comment #12 from Bill McGonigle  
2011-06-20 12:54:22 EDT ---
If the p1.pl relocation patch:

https://git.icinga.org/?p=icinga-core.git;a=commitdiff;h=08b0437c5648bfe014e096c14be73b784e2d4f02;hp=d362c03fd78789dfb7e1a24164cf656ab5dd6ce1

applies cleanly to 1.4.2, then I'd advocate carrying the patch for moving p1.pl
in the Fedora spec to avoid trying to move it in the next release (and putting
it in a silly place to start with).

Thanks for all of your work, guys.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 712564] Review Request: gnome-shell-theme-orta - the orta gnome-shell theme

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712564

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 712564] Review Request: gnome-shell-theme-orta - the orta gnome-shell theme

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712564

--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  2011-06-20 
13:22:36 EDT ---
gnome-shell-theme-orta-1.0-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
15.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnome-shell-theme-orta-1.0-1.fc15

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 693608] Review Request: icinga - System Monitoring Application

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693608

--- Comment #13 from Michael Friedrich  
2011-06-20 13:24:01 EDT ---
currently it won't apply cleanly against 1.4.x release target, as this was
intentionally built against latest dev branches for 1.5 to be released in
August.

the reason i'm asking in advance is that this will introduce a change several
packagers have been asking for, but i am not very keen on doing this within a
bug fix release as it is still a rather major change (although it would just
affect those actually using embedded perl, and that's mostly within packages,
not within the quickstart guides).

so the question remains, where to put that logically. the idoutils.cfg-sample
fix is now included for 1.4.2 upstream release which is planned next week or
similar.

https://git.icinga.org/?p=icinga-core.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/r1.4

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 226204] Merge Review: nss

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226204

--- Comment #14 from Christopher Aillon  2011-06-20 
15:34:44 EDT ---
The rpath issue honestly sounds like something that really needs to be done
upstream first...

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 712923] Review Request: gnome-contacts - Contacts manager for GNOME

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712923

Mario Blättermann  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||mari...@freenet.de

--- Comment #7 from Mario Blättermann  2011-06-20 16:45:40 
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > At the moment I have no Fedora Rawhide machine available but it seams that 
> > this
> > is a gui application.  Tools with a gui needs a .desktop file.
> It's a gui application in early development stage, that doesn't have upstream
> desktop file or even an icon. I prefer to wait for upstream to provide a
> desktop file and an icon.

Should't be that hard to add a *.desktop file. Look here:

---

#!/usr/bin/env xdg-open

[Desktop Entry]
Version=1.0
Type=Application
Terminal=false
Exec=gnome-contacts
Name=Contacts
Icon=gnome-panel-launcher

--

"Icon" should be replaced by a GTK stock icon or by an icon from
hicolor-icon-theme while adding this to "Requires".

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 714543] Review Request: maze5 - A program for generating mazes of miscellaneous styles and sizes

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714543

Veeti Paananen  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||veeti.paana...@rojekti.fi

--- Comment #1 from Veeti Paananen  2011-06-20 
17:25:24 EDT ---
Just commenting: wouldn't it make sense to split the GIMP plugin into a
subpackage?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 714543] Review Request: maze5 - A program for generating mazes of miscellaneous styles and sizes

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714543

--- Comment #2 from Veeti Paananen  2011-06-20 
17:27:37 EDT ---
Oh, and you need to add scons as a build requirement.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 620112] Review Request: udpxy - UDP-to-HTTP multicast traffic relay daemon

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620112

--- Comment #19 from Ivan Afonichev  2011-06-20 
17:36:52 EDT ---
Patch was included in upsteam in 1.0-Chipmunk-BLD20

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 714491] Review Request: xmodconfig - A graphical front end for xmodmap

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714491

Veeti Paananen  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||veeti.paana...@rojekti.fi

--- Comment #3 from Veeti Paananen  2011-06-20 
17:58:43 EDT ---
Just commenting: you might want to change the SourceForge URL to follow this
format:

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Sourceforge.net

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 620112] Review Request: udpxy - UDP-to-HTTP multicast traffic relay daemon

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620112

--- Comment #20 from nucleo  2011-06-20 18:34:18 EDT 
---
(In reply to comment #19)
> Patch was included in upsteam in 1.0-Chipmunk-BLD20

Thank you for the information.

- udpxy 1.0-Chipmunk-BLD20

Spec URL: 
http://nucleo.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/udpxy/1.0.20/udpxy.spec

SRPM URL: 
http://nucleo.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/udpxy/1.0.20/udpxy-1.0.20-1.fc15.src.rpm

Scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3146166

rpmlint output:
$ rpmlint udpxy-1.0.20-1.fc15.i686.rpm udpxy-debuginfo-1.0.20-1.fc15.i686.rpm
udpxy-1.0.20-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm udpxy-debuginfo-1.0.20-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm
udpxy-1.0.20-1.fc15.src.rpm 
udpxy.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) multicast -> Multics, simulcast
udpxy.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multicast -> Multics,
simulcast
udpxy.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary udpxrec
udpxy.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary udpxy
udpxy.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) multicast -> Multics, simulcast
udpxy.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multicast -> Multics,
simulcast
udpxy.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary udpxrec
udpxy.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary udpxy
udpxy.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) multicast -> Multics, simulcast
udpxy.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multicast -> Multics,
simulcast
5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 10 warnings.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 712923] Review Request: gnome-contacts - Contacts manager for GNOME

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712923

Matthias Clasen  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||mcla...@redhat.com

--- Comment #8 from Matthias Clasen  2011-06-20 19:33:41 
EDT ---
I have committed a desktop file upstream, so the problem should solve itself in
short order.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 710848] Review Request: python-myhdl - A python hardware description and verification language

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710848

--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  2011-06-20 
23:07:17 EDT ---
python-myhdl-0.7-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-myhdl-0.7-1.el6

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 710848] Review Request: python-myhdl - A python hardware description and verification language

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710848

--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  2011-06-20 
23:07:25 EDT ---
python-myhdl-0.7-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-myhdl-0.7-1.fc15

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 710848] Review Request: python-myhdl - A python hardware description and verification language

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710848

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 710848] Review Request: python-myhdl - A python hardware description and verification language

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710848

--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  2011-06-20 
23:07:08 EDT ---
python-myhdl-0.7-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-myhdl-0.7-1.fc14

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review