[Bug 715119] Review Request: gnome-encfs - Makes using encfs easier
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715119 Paul Flo Williams changed: What|Removed |Added CC||p...@frixxon.co.uk Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 604033] Review Request: openemr - Practice Management, Electronic Medical Record
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=604033 Rakesh Pandit changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(rpan...@redhat.co | |m) | --- Comment #6 from Rakesh Pandit 2011-06-22 01:52:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Hi Rakesh, > > Would you continue to work on this? If you don't intend to, please close the > ticket so that someone can open a new one. > > There's a needinfo requested already. > > Thanks, > Ankur I work on this and other package this weekend. In case I don't show up by 26th will close it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 715180] Review Request: freemat - A free environment for rapid engineering, scientific prototyping and data processing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715180 Ankur Sinha changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||freemat -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 715180] New: Review Request: freemat - A free environment for rapid engineering, scientific prototyping and data processing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: freemat - A free environment for rapid engineering, scientific prototyping and data processing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715180 Summary: Review Request: freemat - A free environment for rapid engineering, scientific prototyping and data processing Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sanjay.an...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec URL: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/freemat/freemat.spec SRPM URL: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/freemat/freemat-20110620-0.1svn4185.fc15.src.rpm Description: FreeMat is a free environment for rapid engineering and scientific prototyping and data processing. It is similar to commercial systems such as MATLAB from Mathworks, and IDL from Research Systems, but is Open Source. FreeMat is available under the GPL license. rpmlint output: [ankur@ankur SRPMS]$ rpmlint ../SPECS/freemat.spec freemat-20110620-0.1svn4185.fc15.src.rpm /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/result/*.rpm ../SPECS/freemat.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: freemat.tar.gz freemat.src: W: invalid-url Source0: freemat.tar.gz freemat.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/FreeMat-4.1/toolbox/test/addArrays.c freemat.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/FreeMat-4.1/toolbox/general/license.m freemat.i686: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/FreeMat-4.1/help/text/fwrite.mdc freemat.i686: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/FreeMat-4.1/help/text/ind2sub.mdc freemat.i686: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/FreeMat-4.1/help/text/fopen.mdc freemat.i686: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/FreeMat-4.1/help/text/patch.mdc freemat.i686: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/FreeMat-4.1/help/text/fseek.mdc freemat.i686: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/FreeMat-4.1/help/text/fflush.mdc freemat.i686: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/FreeMat-4.1/help/text/ftell.mdc freemat.i686: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/FreeMat-4.1/help/text/feof.mdc freemat.i686: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/FreeMat-4.1/help/text/fclose.mdc freemat.i686: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/FreeMat-4.1/help/text/angle.mdc freemat.i686: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/FreeMat-4.1/help/text/issquare.mdc freemat.i686: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/FreeMat-4.1/help/text/cumtrapz.mdc freemat.i686: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/FreeMat-4.1/help/text/nnz.mdc freemat.i686: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/FreeMat-4.1/help/text/trapz.mdc freemat.i686: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/FreeMat-4.1/help/text/fscanf.mdc freemat.i686: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/FreeMat-4.1/help/text/fgetline.mdc freemat.i686: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/FreeMat-4.1/help/text/ismatrix.mdc freemat.i686: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/FreeMat-4.1/help/text/tril.mdc freemat.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/freemat-20110620/COPYING freemat.i686: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/FreeMat-4.1/help/text/trace.mdc freemat.i686: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/FreeMat-4.1/help/text/triu.mdc freemat.i686: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/FreeMat-4.1/help/text/fread.mdc freemat.i686: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/FreeMat-4.1/help/text/datacursormode.mdc freemat.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary FreeMat freemat.src: W: invalid-url Source0: freemat.tar.gz freemat-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/freemat/FreeMat/src/MainApp.hpp freemat-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/freemat/FreeMat/src/MainApp.cpp freemat-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/freemat/FreeMat/libs/libFreeMat/DebugStream.hpp freemat-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/freemat/FreeMat/src/main.cpp freemat-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/freemat/FreeMat/src/application.hpp freemat-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/freemat/FreeMat/libs/libXP/FMFontDialog.hpp freemat-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/freemat/FreeMat/libs/libFreeMat/SymbolTable.hpp freemat-debuginfo.i686: E
[Bug 712690] Review Request: gnome-shell-theme-dark-glass - Dark Glass gnome-shell theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712690 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 712561] Review Request: gnome-shell-theme-atolm - the atolm gnome-shell theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712561 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 712561] Review Request: gnome-shell-theme-atolm - the atolm gnome-shell theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712561 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2011-06-22 01:44:27 EDT --- gnome-shell-theme-atolm-1.0-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnome-shell-theme-atolm-1.0-1.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 715119] Review Request: gnome-encfs - Makes using encfs easier
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715119
Yanchuan Nian changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yanch...@nfs-china.com
--- Comment #1 from Yanchuan Nian 2011-06-22 01:05:57
EDT ---
At first glance,%{_datadir}/%{name}/* should be changed to
%{_datadir}/%{name}/.Otherwise,directory /usr/share/hg_date can't be removed
from your system when erasing this package.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 712565] Review Request: gnome-shell-theme-smooth-inset - the smooth-inset gnome-shell theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712565 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2011-06-22 01:01:52 EDT --- gnome-shell-theme-smooth-inset-1.0-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnome-shell-theme-smooth-inset-1.0-1.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 712565] Review Request: gnome-shell-theme-smooth-inset - the smooth-inset gnome-shell theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712565 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 712690] Review Request: gnome-shell-theme-dark-glass - Dark Glass gnome-shell theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712690 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2011-06-22 00:58:47 EDT --- gnome-shell-theme-dark-glass-1.0-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnome-shell-theme-dark-glass-1.0-1.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 712563] Review Request: gnome-shell-theme-gaia - the gaia gnome-shell theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712563 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 712563] Review Request: gnome-shell-theme-gaia - the gaia gnome-shell theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712563 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2011-06-22 00:56:12 EDT --- gnome-shell-theme-gaia-1.0-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnome-shell-theme-gaia-1.0-1.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 604033] Review Request: openemr - Practice Management, Electronic Medical Record
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=604033 Ankur Sinha changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sanjay.an...@gmail.com Blocks||673841(fedora-medical) Alias||openemr --- Comment #5 from Ankur Sinha 2011-06-21 23:58:01 EDT --- Hi Rakesh, Would you continue to work on this? If you don't intend to, please close the ticket so that someone can open a new one. There's a needinfo requested already. Thanks, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 715154] Review Request: o-palm - A coupler for all the applications built upon existing independent models
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715154 Ankur Sinha changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||673841(fedora-medical) Alias||o-palm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 715154] New: Review Request: o-palm - A coupler for all the applications built upon existing independent models
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: o-palm - A coupler for all the applications built upon
existing independent models
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715154
Summary: Review Request: o-palm - A coupler for all the
applications built upon existing independent models
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: sanjay.an...@gmail.com
QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Spec URL: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/o-palm/o-palm.spec
SRPM URL: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/o-palm/o-palm-4.0.0-1.fc15.src.rpm
Description:
The most useful PALM features for such applications are:
- The graphical user interface, making the set-up of a coupled
application very simple, even with many coupled models.
- The independent interfaces, allowing the use of existing models
with very few changes, no matter what the other coupled entities are.
- The management of parallel communications, making the coupling
of parallel models almost automatic.
- The dynamic coupling capabilities, allowing more flexible
coupling strategies.
- The explicit time reference for the exchanged fields, allowing
the coupling of iterative models with different time steps.
- The predefined algebra toolbox, allowing field manipulations,
conversions and interpolations on the fly.
- The debugging, performances analysis and run time monitoring
tools, simplifying the set-up, the tuning and the control of
coupled applications.
==
rpmlint output:
[ankur@ankur SRPMS]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/result/*.rpm
o-palm.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) coupler -> couplet, couple,
couples
o-palm.i686: E: arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share
/usr/share/o-palm/PrePALM_MP/STEPLANG/steplang-i386
o-palm.i686: W: unstripped-binary-or-object
/usr/share/o-palm/PrePALM_MP/STEPLANG/steplang-i386
o-palm.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary steplang
o-palm.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) coupler -> couplet, couple,
couples
o-palm.src:67: W: macro-in-comment %{_includedir}
o-palm.src:68: W: macro-in-comment %{_libdir}
o-palm.src:76: W: macro-in-comment %{_includedir}
o-palm.src:77: W: macro-in-comment %{_libdir}
o-palm.src:92: W: macro-in-comment %{_includedir}
o-palm.src:93: W: macro-in-comment %{_libdir}
o-palm.src:102: W: macro-in-comment %{_includedir}
o-palm.src:103: W: macro-in-comment %{_libdir}
o-palm-debuginfo.i686: E: empty-debuginfo-package
o-palm-devel.i686: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/libpalm_so.so
o-palm-devel.i686: W: no-soname /usr/lib/libpalm_so.so
o-palm-devel.i686: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libpalm_so.so
exit@GLIBC_2.0
o-palm-devel.i686: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libpalm_so.so
exit@@GLIBC_2.0
o-palm-devel.i686: W: no-documentation
o-palm-doc.i686: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/share/doc/o-palm/PrePALM_MP/doc_idcards.txt
5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 18 warnings.
I need to test if it's working properly. The package may just need a little
more work.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 708473] Review Request: mingw32-cxxtest - cxxtest for mingw32
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708473 Adam Stokes changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Adam Stokes 2011-06-21 23:34:06 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: mingw32-cxxtest Short Description: CxxTest ported to mingw32 Owners: astokes Branches: f15 devel InitialCC: abeek...@redhat.com pmy...@redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 648250] Review Request: ghc-xss-sanitize - Sanitize untrusted HTML to prevent XSS attacks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648250 Bug 648250 depends on bug 630272, which changed state. Bug 630272 Summary: Review Request: ghc-tagsoup - Parsing HTML/XML documents library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630272 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen 2011-06-21 21:42:24 EDT --- Needed by yesod-form. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 648249] Review Request: ghc-web-routes - Maintain correctness and composability of URLs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648249 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard||NotReady -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 648249] Review Request: ghc-web-routes - Maintain correctness and composability of URLs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648249 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|630303(yesod) | --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen 2011-06-21 21:38:44 EDT --- AFAICT yesod-core >= 0.8 no longer uses webroutes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630303] Review Request: yesod - Creation of type-safe, RESTful web applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630303 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on|648249 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 648099] Review Request: ghc-http-enumerator - Haskell http-enumerator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648099 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on|648095 | Status Whiteboard||NotReady --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen 2011-06-21 21:28:33 EDT --- http-enumerator >= 0.4.0 doesn't depend any more on HSOpenSSL (seems to use tls instead). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630302] Review Request: ghc-pureMD5 - MD5 implementations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630302 --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen 2011-06-21 21:33:19 EDT --- Required for yesod-auth. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 648095] Review Request: ghc-HsOpenSSL - (Incomplete) OpenSSL binding for Haskell
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648095 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|648099 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630295] Review Request: ghc-web-routes-quasi - Data types and functions for web-routes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630295 --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen 2011-06-21 21:31:08 EDT --- yesod-core dep -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630227] Review Request: ghc-convertible-text - Typeclasses and instances for converting between types
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630227 --- Comment #8 from Jens Petersen 2011-06-21 21:24:28 EDT --- (Just noting that object-data-json is no longer needed by authenticate.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630273] Review Request: ghc-authenticate - Authentication methods for Haskell web applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630273 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on|630267 | --- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen 2011-06-21 21:18:28 EDT --- authenticate >= 0.9 no longer depends on data-object-json. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630267] Review Request: ghc-data-object-json - Serialize JSON data using the data-object library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630267 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|630273(ghc-authenticate)| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 713701] Review Request: tamil-typing-booster - Tamil typing booster table for ibus indic table
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=713701 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2011-06-21 19:56:37 EDT --- tamil-typing-booster-0.0.1-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 711462] Review Request: perl-Fedora-Rebuild - Rebuilds Fedora packages from scratch
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711462 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA Bug 711462 depends on bug 711472, which changed state. Bug 711472 Summary: perl-Data-Compare misses perl(Find::File::Rule) dependency https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711472 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2011-06-21 19:51:42 EDT --- perl-Fedora-Rebuild-0.2.1-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 714899] Review Request: tbo - Gnome comic creator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714899
--- Comment #6 from Yanchuan Nian 2011-06-21 19:44:28
EDT ---
As you have used %find_lang, it's best to remove #%lang(es)
%{_datadir}/locale/es/LC_MESSAGES/%{name}.mo from the specfile.There are
potentially-multiline-macros in this
comment.https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_an_RPM_package#Spec_file_pieces_explained
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 700814] Review Request: din - A musical instrument using multiple Bezier curves
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=700814 --- Comment #9 from Adam Huffman 2011-06-21 19:12:53 EDT --- New version at: http://verdurin.fedorapeople.org/reviews/din/din.spec http://verdurin.fedorapeople.org/reviews/din/din-1.6.3-1.fc14.src.rpm Andrew - could you try this one and see if you see the same crashes? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 715127] New: Review Request: abcMIDI - ABC to/from MIDI conversion utilities
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: abcMIDI - ABC to/from MIDI conversion utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715127 Summary: Review Request: abcMIDI - ABC to/from MIDI conversion utilities Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: c...@oleastre.be QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- This is an attempt to revive an orphan package. I started from the old abcMIDI spec and reworked it a little bit to match latest upstream releases. This is my first package submission, and I will be happy to give some info about my motivations and background. Spec URL: http://www.oleastre.be/fedora/abcMIDI.spec SRPM URL: http://www.oleastre.be/fedora/abcMIDI-20110610-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: The abcMIDI package contains four programs: abc2midi to convert ABC music notation to MIDI, midi2abc to convert MIDI files to (a first approximation to) the corresponding ABC, abc2abc to reformat and/or transpose ABC files, and yaps to typeset ABC files as PostScript. For a description of the ABC syntax, please see the ABC user guide which is a part of the abcm2ps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 715119] Review Request: gnome-encfs - Makes using encfs easier
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715119 Rahul Sundaram changed: What|Removed |Added CC||methe...@gmail.com Summary|Review Request: heybuddy - |Review Request: gnome-encfs |Makes using encfs easier|- Makes using encfs easier -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 715119] New: Review Request: heybuddy - Makes using encfs easier
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: heybuddy - Makes using encfs easier https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715119 Summary: Review Request: heybuddy - Makes using encfs easier Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: info-2...@fedora-blog.de QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec URL: https://dl.dropbox.com/s/whokbypjv4neatm/gnome-encfs.spec?dl=1 SRPM URL: https://dl.dropbox.com/s/hol109qbmn9kvec/gnome-encfs-23hg-1.20110621.fc15.src.rpm?dl=1 Description: Integrate EncFS folders into the GNOME desktop by storing their passwords in the keyring and optionally mounting them at login using GNOME's autostart mechanism. At the moment I still need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 571993] Review Request: non-sequencer - A powerful, real-time, pattern-based MIDI sequencer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571993 --- Comment #17 from Adam Huffman 2011-06-21 17:42:52 EDT --- I admit I've neglected this one, as upstream hasn't been active for quite a while. However, I still think it's a useful package, so I'm hoping to have time to work on it at the weekend. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 712203] Review Request: eclipse-mercurial - Mercurial plugin for Eclipse
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712203 --- Comment #20 from Andrew Overholt 2011-06-21 16:50:59 EDT --- This seems fine, Minoo. Please check in what you have and then you can update it when upstream adds their feature to their hg repository. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 714382] Review Request: aldabra-theme-gnome - Aldabra theme pack for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714382 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 714382] Review Request: aldabra-theme-gnome - Aldabra theme pack for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714382 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2011-06-21 16:39:15 EDT --- aldabra-theme-gnome-0.7.5-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/aldabra-theme-gnome-0.7.5-1.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 714382] Review Request: aldabra-theme-gnome - Aldabra theme pack for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714382 --- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla 2011-06-21 16:10:03 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 714382] Review Request: aldabra-theme-gnome - Aldabra theme pack for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714382 --- Comment #9 from Mohamed El Morabity 2011-06-21 15:45:10 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: aldabra-theme-gnome Short Description: Aldabra theme pack for GNOME Owners: melmorabity Branches: f15 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 714382] Review Request: aldabra-theme-gnome - Aldabra theme pack for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714382 Mohamed El Morabity changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 714382] Review Request: aldabra-theme-gnome - Aldabra theme pack for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714382 --- Comment #8 from Mohamed El Morabity 2011-06-21 15:43:49 EDT --- Thank you very much for your review :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 714382] Review Request: aldabra-theme-gnome - Aldabra theme pack for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714382
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #7 from Mario Blättermann 2011-06-21 15:31:51
EDT ---
Referring to the rpmlint output provided by you:
The "dangling symlinks" are false positive. All of the dependencies are
present.
-
key:
[+] OK
[.] OK, not applicable
[X] needs work
-
[+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}.
[+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license.
LGPLv2
[+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
[+] MUST: The file containing the text of the license(s) for the package must
be included in %doc.
[+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source.
$ md5sum *
abe7f9234ea3842dc78b08643b1f2d51 142247-Aldabra-0.7.5.zip
abe7f9234ea3842dc78b08643b1f2d51 142247-Aldabra-0.7.5.zip.packaged
[+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on
at least one primary architecture.
- Build on my own machine was succesful.
[.] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, ...
[+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires.
[.] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly.
[.] MUST: If a package installs files below %{_datadir}/icons, the icon cache
must be updated.
[.] MUST: Packages storing shared library files (not just symlinks) must call
ldconfig in %post and %postun.
[.] MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
[.] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, ...
[+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates.
[+] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in %files.
[+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly.
[+] MUST: Packages must not provide RPM dependency information when that
information is not global in nature, or are otherwise handled.
[.] MUST: When filtering automatically generated RPM dependency information,
the filtering system implemented by Fedora must be used.
[+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros.
[+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
[.] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage.
[+] MUST: Files in %doc must not affect the runtime of the application.
[.] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package.
[.] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package.
[.] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g.
libfoo.so.1.1), ...
[.] MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned
dependency.
[.] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives.
[.] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop
file
[.] MUST: .desktop files must be properly installed with desktop-file-install
in the %install section.
[+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
[+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
[+] SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a
separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream...
Well, the first package v0.7.5 provided by the upstream developers came without
a license declaration. But it was updated recently without pushing the version
number. Somewhat odd though, but now we have a valid license.
[+] SHOULD: Timestamps of files should be preserved.
[+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
Builds without errors.
[+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described.
Works perfectly.
[+] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane.
[.] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency.
[.] SHOULD: pkgconfig(.pc) files should be placed in a -devel pkg.
[.] SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin,
/usr/bin, or /usr/sbin ...
[.] SHOULD: Your package should contain man pages for binaries/scripts.
-
PACKAGE APPROVED
-
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
__
[Bug 673589] Review Request: UpTools - C++ library for hpc, networking, db, memory, etc.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673589 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|UpTools-8.5.4-11.fc15 |UpTools-8.5.5-2.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673589] Review Request: UpTools - C++ library for hpc, networking, db, memory, etc.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673589 --- Comment #57 from Fedora Update System 2011-06-21 15:27:44 EDT --- UpTools-8.5.5-2.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 710848] Review Request: python-myhdl - A python hardware description and verification language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710848 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2011-06-21 15:27:07 EDT --- python-myhdl-0.7-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 714382] Review Request: aldabra-theme-gnome - Aldabra theme pack for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714382 Mario Blättermann changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mari...@freenet.de Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 714382] Review Request: aldabra-theme-gnome - Aldabra theme pack for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714382 --- Comment #6 from Mario Blättermann 2011-06-21 15:07:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > One issue: Please add the switch -p to cp to keep timestamps. > According to « man cp »: > -a, --archive > same as -dR --preserve=all > The « -a » preserves timestamps. Ok, you are right. Never used this before, I always use "install -p" or "cp -p". Sorry for the blurb. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 697780] Review Request: rubygem-daemon_controller - A library for implementing daemon management capabilities
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697780 Steve Snodgrass changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ssnod...@pheran.com --- Comment #17 from Steve Snodgrass 2011-06-21 15:06:42 EDT --- Is this package going to make it into EPEL6? It would be helpful. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 714382] Review Request: aldabra-theme-gnome - Aldabra theme pack for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714382 --- Comment #5 from Mohamed El Morabity 2011-06-21 14:58:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > One issue: Please add the switch -p to cp to keep timestamps. According to « man cp »: -a, --archive same as -dR --preserve=all The « -a » preserves timestamps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 697049] Review Request: sawfish-pager - A pager for the Sawfish window manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697049 --- Comment #4 from Mario Blättermann 2011-06-21 14:47:54 EDT --- Just tested it on my own machine. The missing file is /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/sawfish-pager-0.90.1-2.fc15.x86_64/usr/lib64/sawfish/*/sawfishpager. Please remove the second asterisk, and it works. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 714899] Review Request: tbo - Gnome comic creator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714899 --- Comment #5 from Veeti Paananen 2011-06-21 14:04:46 EDT --- More comments: 1. Remove the --vendor option from desktop-file-install: according to the guidelines, it shouldn't be used: "For new packages, do not apply a vendor tag to desktop files." 2. You might want to fix the description text: "comic" should be "comics". 3. You should start updating the %changelog section every time you make changes and post the new spec & SRPM here so that reviewers and commenters can keep track of the changes you've made. (You also need to bump the Release number every time you do so.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 714382] Review Request: aldabra-theme-gnome - Aldabra theme pack for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714382 --- Comment #4 from Mario Blättermann 2011-06-21 14:00:09 EDT --- One issue: Please add the switch -p to cp to keep timestamps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 713159] Review Request: rubygem-rbvmomi - Ruby interface to the VMware vSphere API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=713159 --- Comment #2 from Maros Zatko 2011-06-21 12:55:38 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3150513 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 712923] Review Request: gnome-contacts - Contacts manager for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712923 --- Comment #11 from Mario Blättermann 2011-06-21 13:50:29 EDT --- Just add the desktop file from Git as a second source. This seems to be the most painless temporary solution. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 712705] Review Request: gnome-shell-extension-icon-manager - A gnome-shell extension to manage icons in top bar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712705 --- Comment #6 from Guillaume Kulakowski 2011-06-21 13:49:51 EDT --- Error reporting : https://github.com/MrTheodor/gnome-shell-ext-icon-manager/issues/1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705361] Review Request: perl-Proc-SyncExec - Spawn processes but report exec() errors
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705361 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Proc-SyncExec-1.01-1.f |perl-Proc-SyncExec-1.01-1.f |c15 |c14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 697049] Review Request: sawfish-pager - A pager for the Sawfish window manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697049 Mario Blättermann changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mari...@freenet.de Bug 697049 depends on bug 692543, which changed state. Bug 692543 Summary: Review Request: sawfish - An extensible window manager for the X Window System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=692543 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA Resolution||ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED --- Comment #3 from Mario Blättermann 2011-06-21 14:40:09 EDT --- Building this package for F15 fails: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3150739 build.log says: error: File not found by glob: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/sawfish-pager-0.90.1-2.fc15.x86_64/usr/lib64/sawfish/*/*/sawfishpager Missing file or wrong folder name? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 577951] Review Request: mingw32-wine-gecko - MinGW Gecko library required for Wine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577951
--- Comment #21 from Erik van Pienbroek
2011-06-21 14:37:28 EDT ---
Very nice to see that you based this package on the new MinGW packaging
guidelines (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:MinGW_Future) !
Some small comments:
Please start the .spec file with these set of lines:
%global __strip %{mingw_strip}
%global __objdump %{mingw_objdump}
%define __debug_install_post %{mingw_debug_install_post}
And add a line with %{?mingw_debug_package} right before the start of the first
%package tag. This is needed to automatically extract debug information
I noticed you used the %{description} tag in some places. Last time I tried,
this didn't give the expected results, so you may need to manually add a real
description instead of this macro.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 711777] Review Request: perl-Test-Spec - Write tests in a declarative specification style
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711777 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Test-Spec-0.31-1.fc15 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-06-21 13:40:50 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 711777] Review Request: perl-Test-Spec - Write tests in a declarative specification style
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711777 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2011-06-21 13:40:44 EDT --- perl-Test-Spec-0.31-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705361] Review Request: perl-Proc-SyncExec - Spawn processes but report exec() errors
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705361 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2011-06-21 13:44:35 EDT --- perl-Proc-SyncExec-1.01-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 712579] Review Request: disper - on-the-fly display switch utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712579 --- Comment #1 from Mario Santagiuliana 2011-06-21 14:31:30 EDT --- Update dependencies. New packages provide. Please let me know if my spec file is wrong. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 706359] Review Request: lsx - List executables in a directory tree
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=706359 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||lsx-0.1-1.fc15 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-06-21 13:39:10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705361] Review Request: perl-Proc-SyncExec - Spawn processes but report exec() errors
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705361 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Proc-SyncExec-1.01-1.f |perl-Proc-SyncExec-1.01-1.f |c16 |c15 Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 690919] Review Request: aswvdial - Dockapp for wvdial
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690919 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|aswvdial-1.7-4.fc14 |aswvdial-1.7-4.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 690919] Review Request: aswvdial - Dockapp for wvdial
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690919 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2011-06-21 13:40:58 EDT --- aswvdial-1.7-4.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 713690] Review Request: rubygem-http_connection - RightScale's robust HTTP/S connection module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=713690 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2011-06-21 13:38:42 EDT --- rubygem-http_connection-1.4.1-2.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 652085] Review Request: SFML - A simple and fast multimedia library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652085 --- Comment #9 from Tim Niemueller 2011-06-21 14:21:54 EDT --- F-15 requires some trivial fixes to build (NULL undefined, just replace with 0). Would you consider to go on with the review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 710917] Review Request: vmpk - Virtual MIDI Piano Keyboard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710917 --- Comment #4 from Robin Lee 2011-06-21 14:17:18 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > (In reply to comment #1) > > > Here is my review for this > > > - rpmlint output is clean > > > > > > ? The package bundles the rtmidi library. Normally, we do not allow > > > bundled > > > libraries in Fedora. However as far as I remember, the last time we > > > checked > > > (1-2 years ago?), the rtmidi library was not packagable, so we allowed > > > this as > > > an exception. Did you look into this? > > rtmidi library is still not dynamically linkable. > > > > No it is not. But > 1- It can be made dynamically linkable. But this might conflict with > upstream's > intentions. It should better be asked upstream. > 2- Even if it should remain static, should we not package it separately? I am > not sure if bundling is the correct solution. > I think we are not necessary to talk about the issue of this library here: 1. The guide line says 'A package should not include or build against a local copy of a library that *exists* on a system.' Since RtMidi doesn't exist in Fedora, we can consider it just part of this very work. 2. We should not choose a shared library name for RtMidi upstream, who doesn't intend to make it a shared library. I will ask RtMidi upstream for this issue later. > > > > > > * The license tag as GPLv3+ is correct, except the bundled rtmidi library > > > is > > > MIT. Depending on the unbundling situation we might need to add MIT to the > > > license tag. > > According to > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/FAQ#How_should_I_handle_multiple_licensing_situations.3F > > , since MIT is compatible with GPL, so only GPL is needed listed. > > > > I know about that guideline, which contradicts what FE-Legal says. I was > thinking exactly the same way you are, and a package reviewer asked me to list > all the licenses separately in the license tag of a package that all code was > compiled into a single binary. > > I asked FE-Legal, quoting the link you gave above, and they told me to list > all > the licenses separately: > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2009-December/msg00029.html > I think we can try to ask FPC to make the guidelines for this situation more explicit and detailed. > > > > > > > ? Should we build this package with jack support? Jack is the most common > > > sound > > > server used in audio production type applications. > > I prefer upstream default setting. > > After you build the "vmpk" binary, you can pass some additional flag to cmake > to build another binary with jack support, you can even call the second binary > vmpk-jack. Please see the README and CMakeLists.txt files. > > $ cmake . -DRTMIDI_DRIVER=JACK -DPROGRAM_NAME=vmpk-jack > > Compiling with jack support is important, since we have a large collection of > jack-supporting programs, and this will allow "vmpk" to communicate with all > of > them. jack is pretty much the standard sound server in Linux audio production > software. Do you have an argument why compiling with jack support will be bad > for Fedora users? OK. Actually I don't have a strong position. SRPM URL: http://cheeselee.fedorapeople.org/vmpk-0.4.0-2.fc15.src.rpm Change: - Use JACK driver instead of ALSA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 712560] Review Request: gnome-shell-extension-theme-selector - extension for review & change gnome-shell themes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712560 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2011-06-21 13:38:58 EDT --- gnome-shell-extension-theme-selector-0.9-3.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 577951] Review Request: mingw32-wine-gecko - MinGW Gecko library required for Wine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577951 --- Comment #20 from Andreas Bierfert 2011-06-21 14:16:26 EDT --- All new fun build on f16 with cross enabled. Please test and leave feedback. Once all pieces of cross/mingw64 are in rawhide I hope someone will review: http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/mingw-wine-gecko.spec http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/mingw-wine-gecko-1.2.0-2.fc16.src.rpm http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/mingw32-wine-gecko-1.2.0-2.fc16.noarch.rpm http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/mingw64-wine-gecko-1.2.0-2.fc16.noarch.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 713690] Review Request: rubygem-http_connection - RightScale's robust HTTP/S connection module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=713690 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|rubygem-http_connection-1.4 |rubygem-http_connection-1.4 |.1-2.fc14 |.1-2.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 707819] Review Request: DSDP - Software for semidefinite programming
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707819 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|DSDP-5.8-2.fc15 |DSDP-5.8-2.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 703719] Review Request: spice-xpi - mozilla extension for spice client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703719 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|spice-xpi-2.5-2.fc14|spice-xpi-2.5-2.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 707819] Review Request: DSDP - Software for semidefinite programming
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707819 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2011-06-21 13:38:23 EDT --- DSDP-5.8-2.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 706359] Review Request: lsx - List executables in a directory tree
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=706359 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2011-06-21 13:39:04 EDT --- lsx-0.1-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 710115] Review Request: jlatexmath - Implementation of LaTeX math mode wrote in Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710115 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||jlatexmath-0.9.6-2.fc15 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-06-21 13:34:55 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705361] Review Request: perl-Proc-SyncExec - Spawn processes but report exec() errors
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705361 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2011-06-21 13:37:39 EDT --- perl-Proc-SyncExec-1.01-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 703719] Review Request: spice-xpi - mozilla extension for spice client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703719 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2011-06-21 13:35:40 EDT --- spice-xpi-2.5-2.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 714899] Review Request: tbo - Gnome comic creator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714899 --- Comment #4 from Nikos Roussos 2011-06-21 13:37:36 EDT --- Thanx for the guidance. Spec and SRPM updated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 708371] Review Request: perl-RPM-VersionCompare - Compare RPM version strings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708371 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-RPM-VersionCompare-0.1 |perl-RPM-VersionCompare-0.1 |.0-1.fc15 |.0-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 710115] Review Request: jlatexmath - Implementation of LaTeX math mode wrote in Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710115 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2011-06-21 13:34:43 EDT --- jlatexmath-0.9.6-2.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 708371] Review Request: perl-RPM-VersionCompare - Compare RPM version strings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708371 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2011-06-21 13:33:31 EDT --- perl-RPM-VersionCompare-0.1.0-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 710672] Review Request: pnmixer - Lightweight mixer applet
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710672 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2011-06-21 13:34:30 EDT --- pnmixer-0.3-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 712203] Review Request: eclipse-mercurial - Mercurial plugin for Eclipse
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712203 --- Comment #17 from Jon Ciesla 2011-06-21 12:56:32 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 665877] Review Request: freeDiameter - a Diameter protocol open implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665877 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2011-06-21 13:28:29 EDT --- freeDiameter-1.1.0-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 706701] Review Request: perl-Test-Pod-Content - Test a Pod's content
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=706701 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2011-06-21 13:29:41 EDT --- perl-Test-Pod-Content-0.0.5-2.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 486687] Review Request: chisholm-rubbing-fonts - Decorative Sans Serif Font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486687 Paul Flo Williams changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Blocks||201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution||NOTABUG Flag|fedora-review+, | |needinfo?(jeremy.hankinson@ | |ingres.com) | Last Closed||2011-06-21 13:27:42 --- Comment #21 from Paul Flo Williams 2011-06-21 13:27:42 EDT --- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews Closing as submitter has left, even though package is approved. Note for anyone else wanting to pick this up: fontlint shows that Rubbing Font has a number of problems that cause it to not work well in Inkscape or Fontmatrix, so you might be dealing with bug reports very soon after release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 706701] Review Request: perl-Test-Pod-Content - Test a Pod's content
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=706701 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Test-Pod-Content-0.0.5 ||-2.fc15 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-06-21 13:29:47 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 665877] Review Request: freeDiameter - a Diameter protocol open implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665877 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||freeDiameter-1.1.0-1.fc15 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-06-21 13:28:36 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 710194] Review Request: tepache - Code sketcher for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710194 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|tepache-1.1.2-1.fc14|tepache-1.1.2-1.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 592733] Review Request: turpial - Is cool twitter client with many features and very light
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592733 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|turpial-1.5.0-2.fc14|turpial-1.5.0-2.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675705] Review Request: rubygem-tilt - Generic interface to multiple Ruby template engines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675705 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2011-06-21 13:28:48 EDT --- rubygem-tilt-1.2.2-2.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 710194] Review Request: tepache - Code sketcher for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710194 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2011-06-21 13:29:25 EDT --- tepache-1.1.2-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705798] Review Request: perl-Data-Hexify - Perl extension for hexdumping arbitrary data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705798 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Data-Hexify-1.00-1.fc1 ||5 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-06-21 13:25:51 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705798] Review Request: perl-Data-Hexify - Perl extension for hexdumping arbitrary data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705798 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2011-06-21 13:25:44 EDT --- perl-Data-Hexify-1.00-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 708371] Review Request: perl-RPM-VersionCompare - Compare RPM version strings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708371 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-RPM-VersionCompare-0.1 |perl-RPM-VersionCompare-0.1 |.0-1.fc16 |.0-1.fc15 Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 592733] Review Request: turpial - Is cool twitter client with many features and very light
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592733 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System 2011-06-21 13:25:25 EDT --- turpial-1.5.0-2.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
