[Bug 697483] Review Request: django-celery - Django Celery Integration
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697483 --- Comment #5 from Matthias Runge 2011-06-24 02:25:04 EDT --- As you already saw, python-celery blocks this and has some depending packages; their review process currently stalled. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 711764] Review Request: osc-source_validator - osc source validator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711764
--- Comment #7 from Haïkel Guémar 2011-06-24 01:57:00
EDT ---
os-source_validator (python package)
MUST: rpmlint must be run on src.rpm and rpm. KO
$rpmlint -iv osc-source_validator-0.1-2.fc15.src.rpm
osc-source_validator.src: I: checking
osc-source_validator.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) validator ->
invalidator, validation, validate
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
osc-source_validator.src: W: summary-not-capitalized C osc source validator
Summary doesn't begin with a capital letter.
osc-source_validator.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pre -> per,
ore, pee
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
osc-source_validator.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US checkin ->
chicken, checking, check in
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
osc-source_validator.src: I: checking-url
http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Build_Service_Tools#OSC_source_validator
(timeout 10 seconds)
osc-source_validator.src:20: E: hardcoded-library-path in
%{_prefix}/lib/osc/source_validators
A library path is hardcoded to one of the following paths: /lib, /usr/lib. It
should be replaced by something like /%{_lib} or %{_libdir}.
osc-source_validator.src:21: E: hardcoded-library-path in
%{_prefix}/lib/osc/source_validators
A library path is hardcoded to one of the following paths: /lib, /usr/lib. It
should be replaced by something like /%{_lib} or %{_libdir}.
osc-source_validator.src:26: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/osc
A library path is hardcoded to one of the following paths: /lib, /usr/lib. It
should be replaced by something like /%{_lib} or %{_libdir}.
osc-source_validator.src:30: W: macro-in-%changelog %{SOURCE1}
Macros are expanded in %changelog too, which can in unfortunate cases lead to
the package not building at all, or other subtle unexpected conditions that
affect the build. Even when that doesn't happen, the expansion results in
possibly "rewriting history" on subsequent package revisions and generally odd
entries eg. in source rpms, which is rarely wanted. Avoid use of macros in
%changelog altogether, or use two '%'s to escape them, like '%%foo'.
osc-source_validator.src: W: no-%build-section
The spec file does not contain a %build section. Even if some packages don't
directly need it, section markers may be overridden in rpm's configuration to
provide additional "under the hood" functionality, such as injection of
automatic -debuginfo subpackages. Add the section, even if empty.
osc-source_validator.src: W: invalid-url Source0:
osc-source_validator-0.1.tar.bz2
The value should be a valid, public HTTP, HTTPS, or FTP URL.
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 7 warnings.
$ rpmlint -iv osc-source_validator-0.1-2.fc15.noarch.rpm
osc-source_validator.noarch: I: checking
osc-source_validator.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) validator ->
invalidator, validation, validate
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
osc-source_validator.noarch: W: summary-not-capitalized C osc source validator
Summary doesn't begin with a capital letter.
osc-source_validator.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pre ->
per, ore, pee
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
osc-source_validator.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US checkin ->
chicken, checking, check in
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
osc-source_validator.noarch: I: checking-url
http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Build_Service_Tools#OSC_source_validator
(timeout 10 seconds)
osc-source_validator.noarch: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
There are only non binary files in /usr/lib so they should be in /usr/share.
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings.
==> you should fix the summary issue
==> since there's no upstream tarball, you should add a comment explaining how
did you generate the provided tarball
==> missing requires: osc (obvious), other requirements were correctly detected
by rpm
==> missing %build section
MUST: package named accordingly to package naming guidelines. OK
osc is mostly a command-line tool and does not provide a module usable by
third-party.
MUST: spec file name match %{name}. OK
MUST: package meets packaging guidelines.
MUST: package must be licensed under a fedora-compliant license. OK (GPLv2+)
MUST: license field in package spec match actual license. OK
MUST: spec is in legible american english. OK
MUST sources provided match upstream's. KO
no upstream tarball, no explanation on how did you get the sources
MUST: package successfully compiles on at least one primary architecture (all
of them). OK
MUST: all build dependencies are listed in BR (mock compliant). OK
MUST: package must own all
[Bug 711764] Review Request: osc-source_validator - osc source validator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711764 Haïkel Guémar changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 716352] New: Review Request: toothchart - A PHP script which graphically shows how a baby's primary teeth have erupted
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: toothchart - A PHP script which graphically shows how a baby's primary teeth have erupted https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716352 Summary: Review Request: toothchart - A PHP script which graphically shows how a baby's primary teeth have erupted Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sanjay.an...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec URL: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/toothchart/toothchart.spec SRPM URL: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/toothchart/toothchart-0-0.02.0beta.fc15.src.rpm Description: The Baby Tooth chart is a PHP script which graphically shows how a baby's primary teeth have erupted - Eventually it'll become a POST/PHP-Nuke module. Uses only PHP and static images (i.e. no PHP graphics or FLASH, so no extra libraries needed) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 716352] Review Request: toothchart - A PHP script which graphically shows how a baby's primary teeth have erupted
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716352 Ankur Sinha changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||673841(fedora-medical) Alias||toothchart -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 696982] Review Request: ghc-strict - Haskell library providing strict data types
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=696982 --- Comment #6 from Lakshmi Narasimhan 2011-06-24 00:43:34 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: ghc-strict Short Description: Haskell library providing strict data types Owners: narasim Branches: f14 f15 InitialCC: haskell-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 696982] Review Request: ghc-strict - Haskell library providing strict data types
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=696982 Lakshmi Narasimhan changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Lakshmi Narasimhan 2011-06-24 00:42:47 EDT --- Thanks for the review. Will update this package shortly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673776] Review Request: leksah - An IDE for Haskell
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673776 --- Comment #4 from Lakshmi Narasimhan 2011-06-24 00:40:38 EDT --- >Minor detail/nitpicking but guess date of latest changlog entry is wrong. :) No problems. Thanks for pointing it out. Will update the package to the latest cabal2spec and post the links here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673776] Review Request: leksah - An IDE for Haskell
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673776 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|peter...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? Bug 673776 depends on bug 664140, which changed state. Bug 664140 Summary: Review Request: leksah-server - Package that provides the interface to GHC-API for leksah https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664140 What|Old Value |New Value Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA Resolution||ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen 2011-06-24 00:08:27 EDT --- Minor detail/nitpicking but guess date of latest changlog entry is wrong. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673776] Review Request: leksah - An IDE for Haskell
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673776 --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen 2011-06-24 00:09:16 EDT --- Do you mind updating the packaging to cabal2spec-0.23.2? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 716344] Review Request: elmer - Open Source Finite Element Software for Multiphysical Problems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716344 Ankur Sinha changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||673841(fedora-medical) Depends on||715496(elmer-matc), ||715498(elmer-hutiter), ||715503(elmer-meshgen2d), ||715618(elmer-eio), ||715619(elmer-elmergrid), ||715620(elmer-fem) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 715503] Review Request: elmer-meshgen2d - Open Source Finite Element Software for Multiphysical Problems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715503 Ankur Sinha changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||716344(elmer) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 715498] Review Request: elmer-hutiter - Open Source Finite Element Software for Multiphysical Problems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715498 Ankur Sinha changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||716344(elmer) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 715619] Review Request: elmer-elmergrid - Open Source Finite Element Software for Multiphysical Problems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715619 Ankur Sinha changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||716344(elmer) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 715618] Review Request: elmer-eio - Open Source Finite Element Software for Multiphysical Problems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715618 Ankur Sinha changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||716344(elmer) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 715620] Review Request: elmer-fem - Open Source Finite Element Software for Multiphysical Problems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715620 Ankur Sinha changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||716344(elmer) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 715496] Review Request: elmer-matc - Open Source Finite Element Software for Multiphysical Problems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715496 Ankur Sinha changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||716344(elmer) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 716344] New: Review Request: elmer - Open Source Finite Element Software for Multiphysical Problems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: elmer - Open Source Finite Element Software for Multiphysical Problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716344 Summary: Review Request: elmer - Open Source Finite Element Software for Multiphysical Problems Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sanjay.an...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec URL: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/elmer/elmer.spec SRPM URL: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/elmer/elmer-20110623-0.1svn5244.fc15.src.rpm Description: Elmer is an open source multiphysical simulation software developed by CSC - IT Center for Science (CSC). Elmer development was started 1995 in collaboration with Finnish Universities, research institutes and industry. Elmer includes physical models of fluid dynamics, structural mechanics, electromagnetics, heat transfer and acoustics, for example. These are described by partial differential equations which Elmer solves by the Finite Element Method (FEM). These pages are intended to give information on the Elmer software and to improve the information transfer in the Elmer community. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 716344] Review Request: elmer - Open Source Finite Element Software for Multiphysical Problems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716344 Ankur Sinha changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||elmer -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 666954] Review Request: cherrytree - Hierarchical note taking application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666954 --- Comment #36 from Robin Lee 2011-06-23 23:50:54 EDT --- (In reply to comment #35) > Thanks for these. I figured out that it was not the macro I used before but > that is was placed within the %if clause. So I switched back and move the > global 2 lines down. > > SPEC: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/cherrytree.spec > SRPM: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/cherrytree-0.22.1-2.fc16.src.rpm That doesn't solve the issue, since Python isn't in the basic build root of F15 and Rawhide(F16). Mock build failed: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3157539 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 710911] Review Request: octave-audio - Audio for Octave
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710911 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||octave-control-2.0.2-2.fc15 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-06-23 23:48:20 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 710903] Review Request: octave-miscellaneous - Miscellaneous functions for Octave
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710903 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||octave-control-2.0.2-2.fc15 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-06-23 23:48:09 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 710909] Review Request: octave-symbolic - Symbolic computations for Octave
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710909 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||octave-control-2.0.2-2.fc15 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-06-23 23:48:25 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 711606] Review Request: gnome-shell-extension-mediaplayers - A gnome-shell extension to control mediaplayers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711606 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||gnome-shell-extension-media ||players-0-0.1.git259f96e.fc ||15 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-06-23 23:51:22 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 712561] Review Request: gnome-shell-theme-atolm - the atolm gnome-shell theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712561 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2011-06-23 23:49:51 EDT --- gnome-shell-theme-atolm-1.0-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 710914] Review Request: octave-quaternion - Quaternion package for Octave
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710914 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||octave-control-2.0.2-2.fc15 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-06-23 23:48:14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 710907] Review Request: octave-specfun - Specfun for Octave
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710907 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||octave-control-2.0.2-2.fc15 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-06-23 23:48:04 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 712565] Review Request: gnome-shell-theme-smooth-inset - the smooth-inset gnome-shell theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712565 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2011-06-23 23:49:16 EDT --- gnome-shell-theme-smooth-inset-1.0-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 710045] Review Request: ghc-MonadCatchIO-mtl - Monad-transformer for Control.Exception
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710045 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|ghc-MonadCatchIO-mtl-0.3.0. |ghc-MonadCatchIO-mtl-0.3.0. |3-2.fc14|3-2.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 711606] Review Request: gnome-shell-extension-mediaplayers - A gnome-shell extension to control mediaplayers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711606 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2011-06-23 23:51:17 EDT --- gnome-shell-extension-mediaplayers-0-0.1.git259f96e.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 710045] Review Request: ghc-MonadCatchIO-mtl - Monad-transformer for Control.Exception
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710045 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2011-06-23 23:50:52 EDT --- ghc-MonadCatchIO-mtl-0.3.0.3-2.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 714382] Review Request: aldabra-theme-gnome - Aldabra theme pack for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714382 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2011-06-23 23:50:04 EDT --- aldabra-theme-gnome-0.7.5-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 492266] Review Request: photoprint-borders Collection of frames for PhotoPrint utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492266 Matt Domsch changed: What|Removed |Added CC||matt_dom...@dell.com --- Comment #17 from Matt Domsch 2011-06-23 23:46:07 EDT --- photoprint-0.4.2-0.2.pre2.fc14 and higher dist tags now obsolete photoprint-borders as that content was merged upstream into the photoprint tarball at version 0.4.1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 491128] Review Request: photoprint - Utility for printing digital photographs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491128 Matt Domsch changed: What|Removed |Added CC||matt_dom...@dell.com --- Comment #30 from Matt Domsch 2011-06-23 23:45:35 EDT --- photoprint-0.4.2-0.2.pre2.fc14 and higher dist tags now obsolete photoprint-borders as that content was merged upstream into the photoprint tarball at version 0.4.1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 710902] Review Request: octave-struct - Structure handling for Octave
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710902 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||octave-control-2.0.2-2.fc15 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-06-23 23:47:56 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 710912] Review Request: octave-control - Control systems for Octave
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710912 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||octave-control-2.0.2-2.fc15 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-06-23 23:48:30 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 710909] Review Request: octave-symbolic - Symbolic computations for Octave
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710909 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2011-06-23 23:47:46 EDT --- octave-control-2.0.2-2.fc15, octave-symbolic-1.0.9-2.fc15, octave-audio-1.1.4-2.fc15, octave-quaternion-1.0.0-2.fc15, octave-miscellaneous-1.0.11-2.fc15, octave-specfun-1.0.9-2.fc15, octave-struct-1.0.9-3.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 710914] Review Request: octave-quaternion - Quaternion package for Octave
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710914 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2011-06-23 23:47:36 EDT --- octave-control-2.0.2-2.fc15, octave-symbolic-1.0.9-2.fc15, octave-audio-1.1.4-2.fc15, octave-quaternion-1.0.0-2.fc15, octave-miscellaneous-1.0.11-2.fc15, octave-specfun-1.0.9-2.fc15, octave-struct-1.0.9-3.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 710902] Review Request: octave-struct - Structure handling for Octave
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710902 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2011-06-23 23:47:20 EDT --- octave-control-2.0.2-2.fc15, octave-symbolic-1.0.9-2.fc15, octave-audio-1.1.4-2.fc15, octave-quaternion-1.0.0-2.fc15, octave-miscellaneous-1.0.11-2.fc15, octave-specfun-1.0.9-2.fc15, octave-struct-1.0.9-3.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 710912] Review Request: octave-control - Control systems for Octave
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710912 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2011-06-23 23:47:51 EDT --- octave-control-2.0.2-2.fc15, octave-symbolic-1.0.9-2.fc15, octave-audio-1.1.4-2.fc15, octave-quaternion-1.0.0-2.fc15, octave-miscellaneous-1.0.11-2.fc15, octave-specfun-1.0.9-2.fc15, octave-struct-1.0.9-3.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 708473] Review Request: mingw32-cxxtest - cxxtest for mingw32
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708473 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2011-06-23 23:45:57 EDT --- mingw32-cxxtest-3.10.1-4.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 712690] Review Request: gnome-shell-theme-dark-glass - Dark Glass gnome-shell theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712690 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2011-06-23 23:46:45 EDT --- gnome-shell-theme-dark-glass-1.0-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 710903] Review Request: octave-miscellaneous - Miscellaneous functions for Octave
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710903 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2011-06-23 23:47:31 EDT --- octave-control-2.0.2-2.fc15, octave-symbolic-1.0.9-2.fc15, octave-audio-1.1.4-2.fc15, octave-quaternion-1.0.0-2.fc15, octave-miscellaneous-1.0.11-2.fc15, octave-specfun-1.0.9-2.fc15, octave-struct-1.0.9-3.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 710907] Review Request: octave-specfun - Specfun for Octave
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710907 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2011-06-23 23:47:26 EDT --- octave-control-2.0.2-2.fc15, octave-symbolic-1.0.9-2.fc15, octave-audio-1.1.4-2.fc15, octave-quaternion-1.0.0-2.fc15, octave-miscellaneous-1.0.11-2.fc15, octave-specfun-1.0.9-2.fc15, octave-struct-1.0.9-3.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 710911] Review Request: octave-audio - Audio for Octave
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710911 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2011-06-23 23:47:41 EDT --- octave-control-2.0.2-2.fc15, octave-symbolic-1.0.9-2.fc15, octave-audio-1.1.4-2.fc15, octave-quaternion-1.0.0-2.fc15, octave-miscellaneous-1.0.11-2.fc15, octave-specfun-1.0.9-2.fc15, octave-struct-1.0.9-3.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 693275] Review Request: cuneiform - Command-line OCR system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693275 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|cuneiform-1.1.0-3.fc14 |cuneiform-1.1.0-3.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 710775] Review Request: python-xgoogle - Python library to search Google without using their API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710775 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2011-06-23 23:40:25 EDT --- python-xgoogle-1.4-3.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664140] Review Request: leksah-server - Package that provides the interface to GHC-API for leksah
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664140 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2011-06-23 23:35:39 EDT --- leksah-server-0.10.0.4-2.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 678855] Review Request: python-rpyc - A Transparent, Symmetrical Python Library for Distributed-Computing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678855 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2011-06-23 23:38:05 EDT --- python-rpyc-3.0.7-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 693275] Review Request: cuneiform - Command-line OCR system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693275 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2011-06-23 23:39:06 EDT --- cuneiform-1.1.0-3.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 710045] Review Request: ghc-MonadCatchIO-mtl - Monad-transformer for Control.Exception
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710045 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||ghc-MonadCatchIO-mtl-0.3.0. ||3-2.fc14 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-06-23 23:34:04 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664140] Review Request: leksah-server - Package that provides the interface to GHC-API for leksah
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664140 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|leksah-server-0.10.0.4-2.fc |leksah-server-0.10.0.4-2.fc |15 |14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 693275] Review Request: cuneiform - Command-line OCR system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693275 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||cuneiform-1.1.0-3.fc14 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-06-23 23:32:51 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 708475] Review Request: pysdm - Python based Storage Device Manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708475 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|pysdm-0.4.1-2.fc15 |pysdm-0.4.1-2.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 710045] Review Request: ghc-MonadCatchIO-mtl - Monad-transformer for Control.Exception
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710045 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2011-06-23 23:33:59 EDT --- ghc-MonadCatchIO-mtl-0.3.0.3-2.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 708475] Review Request: pysdm - Python based Storage Device Manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708475 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2011-06-23 23:34:12 EDT --- pysdm-0.4.1-2.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 712017] Review Request: libreport - Generic library for reporting various problems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712017 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2011-06-23 23:31:16 EDT --- libreport-2.0.3-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 712682] Review Request: pinpoint - a tool for making hackers do excellent presentations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712682 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2011-06-23 23:32:06 EDT --- pinpoint-0.1.2-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 693275] Review Request: cuneiform - Command-line OCR system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693275 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2011-06-23 23:32:45 EDT --- cuneiform-1.1.0-3.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 712017] Review Request: libreport - Generic library for reporting various problems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712017 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||libreport-2.0.3-1.fc15 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-06-23 23:31:22 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 712682] Review Request: pinpoint - a tool for making hackers do excellent presentations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712682 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||pinpoint-0.1.2-1.fc15 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-06-23 23:32:11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705585] Review Request: fflas-ffpack - Finite field linear algebra subroutines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705585 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2011-06-23 23:30:38 EDT --- fflas-ffpack-1.4.1-2.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664140] Review Request: leksah-server - Package that provides the interface to GHC-API for leksah
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664140 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2011-06-23 23:28:53 EDT --- leksah-server-0.10.0.4-2.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664140] Review Request: leksah-server - Package that provides the interface to GHC-API for leksah
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664140 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||leksah-server-0.10.0.4-2.fc ||15 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-06-23 23:29:00 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 710699] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Unique - Perl bindings for the C library "libunique"
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710699 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2011-06-23 23:26:53 EDT --- perl-Gtk2-Unique-0.05-2.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 666233] Review Request: gnome-paint - Easy to use paint program for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666233 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2011-06-23 23:25:41 EDT --- gnome-paint-0.4.0-4.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 457709] Review Request: hiran-perizia-fonts - English asymmetric font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457709 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|hiran-perizia-fonts-0.1.0-1 |hiran-perizia-fonts-0.1.0-1 |.fc14 |.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 712563] Review Request: gnome-shell-theme-gaia - the gaia gnome-shell theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712563 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2011-06-23 23:27:08 EDT --- gnome-shell-theme-gaia-1.0-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 457709] Review Request: hiran-perizia-fonts - English asymmetric font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457709 --- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System 2011-06-23 23:27:23 EDT --- hiran-perizia-fonts-0.1.0-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 708475] Review Request: pysdm - Python based Storage Device Manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708475 Bug 708475 depends on bug 710194, which changed state. Bug 710194 Summary: Review Request: tepache - Code sketcher for python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710194 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2011-06-23 23:19:55 EDT --- pysdm-0.4.1-2.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 708475] Review Request: pysdm - Python based Storage Device Manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708475 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||pysdm-0.4.1-2.fc15 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-06-23 23:20:02 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 715618] Review Request: elmer-eio - Open Source Finite Element Software for Multiphysical Problems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715618 --- Comment #1 from Ankur Sinha 2011-06-23 23:14:27 EDT --- http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/elmer/eio/elmer-eio.spec http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/elmer/eio/elmer-eio-20110623-0.1svn5244.fc15.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 690728] Review Request: Nitrate - A test case management system written in Django
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690728 --- Comment #42 from He Rui 2011-06-23 22:32:54 EDT --- (In reply to comment #41) > (In reply to comment #40) > > Now waiting for tinymce review(bug 608574), I could also do some review > > work. > > The review is stalled since Dec. ;) > I recommend trying to help getting it moving again or > if they are no longer interested submitting a new tinymce package for review. > :) We've contacted the tinymce package owner, he can do the fix-ups if there's a reviewer. I've sent out a review request to the devel@: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2011-June/153277.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 693317] Review Request: emacs-flim - Basic library for handling email messages for Emacs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693317 --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen 2011-06-23 21:19:36 EDT --- Another ping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 696982] Review Request: ghc-strict - Haskell library providing strict data types
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=696982
Jens Petersen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen 2011-06-23 21:18:27 EDT
---
Here is the review:
+:ok, NA: not applicable
MUST Items:
[+] MUST: rpmlint output
clean
[+] MUST: Package Naming Guidelines
[+] MUST: spec file name must match base package %{name}
[+] MUST: Packaging Guidelines.
[+] MUST: Licensing Guidelines
[+] MUST: License field in the package spec file must match actual license.
[+] MUST: include license files in %doc if available in source
[+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English and be legible.
[+] MUST: source md5sum matches upstream release
35442576f7bd5b12b961c64144c6cb2d strict-0.3.2.tar.gz
[+] MUST: must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on one main arch
[NA] MUST: if necessary use ExcludeArch for other archs
[+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires
Though better use above patch.
[NA] MUST: use %find_lang macro for .po translations
[NA] MUST: packages which store shared library files in the dynamic linker's
default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun.
[NA] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must
state this fact in the request for review
[+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates.
[+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing.
[+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Every %files section must
include a %defattr(...) line.
rpm -qlpv output looks sane.
[+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros
section of Packaging Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
[NA] MUST: Large documentation files should go in a doc subpackage.
[+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the
runtime of the application.
[+] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package.
[NA] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package.
[NA] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g.
libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in
a -devel package.
[+] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency
[+] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be
removed in the spec.
[NA] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop
file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the
%install section.
[+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
[+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
SHOULD Items:
[+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[+] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all
supported architectures.
[+] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane.
Package is APPROVED by petersen.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 696982] Review Request: ghc-strict - Haskell library providing strict data types
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=696982 --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen 2011-06-23 21:10:42 EDT --- Created attachment 509655 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=509655 ghc-strict.spec-1.patch Update to cabal2spec-0.23.2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 690728] Review Request: Nitrate - A test case management system written in Django
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690728 --- Comment #41 from Jens Petersen 2011-06-23 20:42:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #40) > Now waiting for tinymce review(bug 608574), I could also do some review work. The review is stalled since Dec. ;) I recommend trying to help getting it moving again or if they are no longer interested submitting a new tinymce package for review. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 688786] Review Request: perl-NTLM - perl module for NTLM authentication
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688786 Nick Bebout changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-06-23 18:50:04 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 716299] New: Review Request: clipit - lightweight, fully featured GTK+ clipboard manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: clipit - lightweight, fully featured GTK+ clipboard manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716299 Summary: Review Request: clipit - lightweight, fully featured GTK+ clipboard manager Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ni...@autoverse.net QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec URL: http://comzeradd.fedorapeople.org/specs/clipit.spec SRPM URL: http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/comzeradd/autoverse/fedora-15/SRPMS/clipit-1.4.1-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: ClipIt is a lightweight, fully featured GTK+ clipboard manager. It was forked from Parcellite, adding additional features and bugfixes to the project. rpmlint clipit-1.4.1-1.fc15.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. I'm not yet a Fedora packager, so I'll need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 716299] Review Request: clipit - lightweight, fully featured GTK+ clipboard manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716299 Nikos Roussos changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 666954] Review Request: cherrytree - Hierarchical note taking application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666954 --- Comment #35 from Christoph Wickert 2011-06-23 17:19:31 EDT --- Thanks for these. I figured out that it was not the macro I used before but that is was placed within the %if clause. So I switched back and move the global 2 lines down. SPEC: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/cherrytree.spec SRPM: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/cherrytree-0.22.1-2.fc16.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705585] Review Request: fflas-ffpack - Finite field linear algebra subroutines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705585 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705585] Review Request: fflas-ffpack - Finite field linear algebra subroutines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705585 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2011-06-23 16:54:26 EDT --- fflas-ffpack-1.4.1-2.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fflas-ffpack-1.4.1-2.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 232624] Review Request: perl-ConfigReader - Read directives from a configuration file
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=232624 Orion Poplawski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||or...@cora.nwra.com --- Comment #4 from Orion Poplawski 2011-06-23 16:36:04 EDT --- I'd like to see this in epel (5 and 6). Andreas - would you want to be the owner there? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683218] Review Request: drizzle7 - A Lightweight SQL Database for Cloud and Web
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683218 --- Comment #4 from BJ Dierkes 2011-06-23 16:32:00 EDT --- No, I do not need a sponsor... and apologize for the long delay in following up with this. I have been working on ironing out some issue upstream and then updating with the latest version 2011.03.13. I am nearly there, however due to a bug tests are failing on F15 which I'm trying to work out first. I should be able to update this soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 666954] Review Request: cherrytree - Hierarchical note taking application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666954 Robin Lee changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #509599|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #34 from Robin Lee 2011-06-23 15:47:00 EDT --- Created attachment 509600 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=509600 make cherrytree get a python(abi) requirement properly Shorter version -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705585] Review Request: fflas-ffpack - Finite field linear algebra subroutines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705585 --- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla 2011-06-23 15:36:34 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 666954] Review Request: cherrytree - Hierarchical note taking application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666954 --- Comment #33 from Robin Lee 2011-06-23 15:30:59 EDT --- Created attachment 509599 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=509599 make cherrytree get a python(abi) requirement properly I met a similar situation before, and a method suggested by Toshio Kuratomi solved that problem[1]. But this one now seems worse, and we may need a trickier solution. [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567348#c21 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705585] Review Request: fflas-ffpack - Finite field linear algebra subroutines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705585 Jerry James changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Jerry James 2011-06-23 15:25:39 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: fflas-ffpack Short Description: Finite field linear algebra subroutines Owners: jjames Branches: f15 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705585] Review Request: fflas-ffpack - Finite field linear algebra subroutines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705585 --- Comment #9 from Jerry James 2011-06-23 15:23:24 EDT --- No problem. Obviously I've been busy myself, given how many days it has taken me to find out that you approved the package. :-) Okay, I'll add that note to the spec file and turn on the checks. Thanks for your help! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 666954] Review Request: cherrytree - Hierarchical note taking application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666954
Christoph Wickert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|needinfo?(cwickert@fedorapr |
|oject.org) |
--- Comment #32 from Christoph Wickert 2011-06-23
14:39:31 EDT ---
I thought rpm would add it automatically when I drop the egg into
%{python_sitelib}. This didn't work but the manually added requirement doesn't
work in mock anymore because get_python_version() returns nothing and rpm will
fail building the srpm with
Error: line 22: Version required: Requires: python(abi) =
I guess python is no longer in the default build root, at least for the srpm.
Any ideas how to get the dep versioned?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 666954] Review Request: cherrytree - Hierarchical note taking application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666954 Robin Lee changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(cwickert@fedorapr ||oject.org) --- Comment #31 from Robin Lee 2011-06-23 14:01:27 EDT --- It seems you removed the python(abi) Requires which has been added in #20. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 666954] Review Request: cherrytree - Hierarchical note taking application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666954
--- Comment #30 from Christoph Wickert 2011-06-23
13:38:02 EDT ---
Sorry, I am extremely busy and I lost interest in this package. Nevertheless I
updated it and fixed some more rpmlint warnings. Here is what I got:
SPEC: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/cherrytree.spec
SRPM: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/cherrytree-0.22.1-1.fc16.src.rpm
$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/cherrytree-0.22.1-1.fc16.*
cherrytree.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ctd -> ct, std, cad
cherrytree.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary cherrytree
cherrytree.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ctd -> ct, std, cad
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
I think the quickest is to finish this review but in long term I'd like to have
somebody else (co-)maintain this package because I don't really use it.
(In reply to comment #23)
> The main point is that if
> %{_datadir}/application-registry/%{name}.applications
> is included, then this package must require gnome-mime-data, which provides
> the
> directory %{_datadir}/application-registry/ .
For the record: This is not correct, the file and directory ownership
guidelines were revisited already in March 2010 and do allow multiple directory
ownership to avoid unnecessary deps. Nevertheless I dropped
%{_datadir}/{application-registry,mime-info} because nothing is using it
anymore these days. It was last used in GNOME 2.18.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 530684] Review Request: nordugrid-arc - Advanced Resource Connector Grid Middleware
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530684
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla 2011-06-23 13:01:08 EDT ---
Or, as it happens, not build.
Making all in python
make[2]: Entering directory
`/home/limb/rpmbuild/BUILD/nordugrid-arc-1.0.0/python'
cd .. && /bin/sh ./config.status python/Makefile depfiles
config.status: creating python/Makefile
config.status: executing depfiles commands
make[2]: Leaving directory
`/home/limb/rpmbuild/BUILD/nordugrid-arc-1.0.0/python'
make[2]: Entering directory
`/home/limb/rpmbuild/BUILD/nordugrid-arc-1.0.0/python'
make[2]: Warning: File `Makefile' has modification time 249 s in the future
/bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=compile g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I..
-I../include -I/usr/include/python2.7 -I/usr/include/libxml2 -pthread
-I/usr/include/giomm-2.4 -I/usr/lib64/giomm-2.4/include
-I/usr/include/glibmm-2.4 -I/usr/lib64/glibmm-2.4/include
-I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib64/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/sigc++-2.0
-I/usr/lib64/sigc++-2.0/include -fno-strict-aliasing -DSWIG_COBJECT_TYPES -O2
-g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector
--param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -c -o _arc_la-arc_init.lo `test
-f 'arc_init.cpp' || echo './'`arc_init.cpp
libtool: compile: g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I../include
-I/usr/include/python2.7 -I/usr/include/libxml2 -pthread
-I/usr/include/giomm-2.4 -I/usr/lib64/giomm-2.4/include
-I/usr/include/glibmm-2.4 -I/usr/lib64/glibmm-2.4/include
-I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib64/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/sigc++-2.0
-I/usr/lib64/sigc++-2.0/include -fno-strict-aliasing -DSWIG_COBJECT_TYPES -O2
-g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector
--param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -c arc_init.cpp -fPIC -DPIC -o
.libs/_arc_la-arc_init.o
/bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=compile g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I..
-I../include -I/usr/include/python2.7 -I/usr/include/libxml2 -pthread
-I/usr/include/giomm-2.4 -I/usr/lib64/giomm-2.4/include
-I/usr/include/glibmm-2.4 -I/usr/lib64/glibmm-2.4/include
-I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib64/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/sigc++-2.0
-I/usr/lib64/sigc++-2.0/include -fno-strict-aliasing -DSWIG_COBJECT_TYPES -O2
-g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector
--param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -c -o _arc_la-arc_wrap.lo `test
-f 'arc_wrap.cpp' || echo './'`arc_wrap.cpp
libtool: compile: g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I../include
-I/usr/include/python2.7 -I/usr/include/libxml2 -pthread
-I/usr/include/giomm-2.4 -I/usr/lib64/giomm-2.4/include
-I/usr/include/glibmm-2.4 -I/usr/lib64/glibmm-2.4/include
-I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib64/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/sigc++-2.0
-I/usr/lib64/sigc++-2.0/include -fno-strict-aliasing -DSWIG_COBJECT_TYPES -O2
-g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector
--param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -c arc_wrap.cpp -fPIC -DPIC -o
.libs/_arc_la-arc_wrap.o
arc_wrap.cpp:3132:13: error: 'ptrdiff_t' does not name a type
arc_wrap.cpp:3169:21: error: expected ';' at end of member declaration
arc_wrap.cpp:3169:39: error: expected ')' before 'n'
arc_wrap.cpp:3184:34: error: declaration of 'operator+=' as non-function
arc_wrap.cpp:3184:30: error: expected ';' at end of member declaration
arc_wrap.cpp:3184:44: error: expected ')' before 'n'
arc_wrap.cpp:3189:34: error: declaration of 'operator-=' as non-function
arc_wrap.cpp:3189:30: error: expected ';' at end of member declaration
arc_wrap.cpp:3189:44: error: expected ')' before 'n'
arc_wrap.cpp:3194:33: error: declaration of 'operator+' as non-function
arc_wrap.cpp:3194:30: error: expected ';' at end of member declaration
arc_wrap.cpp:3194:43: error: expected ')' before 'n'
arc_wrap.cpp:3199:33: error: declaration of 'operator-' as non-function
arc_wrap.cpp:3199:30: error: expected ';' at end of member declaration
arc_wrap.cpp:3199:43: error: expected ')' before 'n'
arc_wrap.cpp:3204:5: error: 'ptrdiff_t' does not name a type
arc_wrap.cpp:3360:22: error: 'SWIG_From_ptrdiff_t' declared as an 'inline'
variable
arc_wrap.cpp:3360:22: error: 'ptrdiff_t' was not declared in this scope
arc_wrap.cpp:3360:22: note: suggested alternatives:
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.6.0/../../../../include/c++/4.6.0/x86_64-redhat-linux/bits/c++config.h:1737:20:
note: 'std::ptrdiff_t'
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.6.0/../../../../include/c++/4.6.0/x86_64-redhat-linux/bits/c++config.h:1737:20:
note: 'std::ptrdiff_t'
arc_wrap.cpp:3361:1: error: expected ',' or ';' before '{' token
arc_wrap.cpp:3413:39: error: 'ptrdiff_t' has not been declared
arc_wrap.cpp: In function 'int SWIG_AsVal_ptrdiff_t(PyObject*, int*)':
arc_wrap.cpp:3417:46: error: expected type-specifier before 'ptrdiff_t'
arc_wrap.cpp:3417:46: error: expected '>' before 'ptrdiff_t'
arc_wrap.cpp:3417:46: error: expected
[Bug 666954] Review Request: cherrytree - Hierarchical note taking application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666954 --- Comment #29 from Robin Lee 2011-06-23 12:27:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #28) > What doesn't mean to "take over" and to review? To test it? Just mean that you have a way to take the maintainership of this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 530684] Review Request: nordugrid-arc - Advanced Resource Connector Grid Middleware
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530684 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla 2011-06-23 12:20:43 EDT --- Good $_DEITY this takes a long time to build. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 666954] Review Request: cherrytree - Hierarchical note taking application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666954 --- Comment #28 from veron 2011-06-23 12:14:01 EDT --- I'm not a programmer, just a new Fedora user. But I think this is a great and useful program and many other Fedora users will be satisfied if they only have it available. I've been using it for a few months on Ubuntu and I must tell that I haven't found any better alternative. So, I may only confirm following the original requester that keeping it in repositories is a good idea. I will write to the author on his forum and ask if he can engage and keep an eye on it. cherrytree is also present here: http://gtk-apps.org/content/show.php/CherryTree?content=113350 I don't understand this: "And you can take over this request if the requester keeps unresponsive[2]." What doesn't mean to "take over" and to review? To test it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 666954] Review Request: cherrytree - Hierarchical note taking application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666954 --- Comment #27 from Robin Lee 2011-06-23 11:56:48 EDT --- This is the very request for getting cherrytree into Fedora repository. But the requester, or who wants to maintain cherrytree in Fedora, has not paid attention to this request for a while. Or you can just join the Fedora packagers[1] if interested. And you can take over this request if the requester keeps unresponsive[2]. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews#Submitter_not_responding -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 666954] Review Request: cherrytree - Hierarchical note taking application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666954 --- Comment #26 from veron 2011-06-23 11:40:35 EDT --- Million of thanks. I'm a new user of Fedora. Forgive me my ignorance, but what can we do to make this program get into the official Fedora repository or at least RPM fusion. It is developed continuously and and new versions are released frequently. On other distributions wishes are reported on their bugzilla sites. On Fedora there is https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_maintainers_wishlist but it looks look packages wait quite long to be made, besides they request real name to register. Generally I wish I could have every new update of cherry tree available in repository for easy install. Is is possible at all in Fedora world? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 666954] Review Request: cherrytree - Hierarchical note taking application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666954 --- Comment #25 from Robin Lee 2011-06-23 11:19:59 EDT --- I am the reviewer but not the requester of this package. But I just made a binary rpm based on the requester's specfile: RPM: http://cheeselee.fedorapeople.org/cherrytree-0.22.1-1.fc15.noarch.rpm SRPM: http://cheeselee.fedorapeople.org/cherrytree-0.22.1-1.fc15.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
