[Bug 639518] Review Request: gst-entrans - Plug-ins and tools for transcoding and recording with GStreamer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639518 Remi Collet changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639518] Review Request: gst-entrans - Plug-ins and tools for transcoding and recording with GStreamer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639518 --- Comment #12 from Remi Collet 2011-06-25 03:02:56 EDT --- I've just approved you to the packager group. Welcome ! So you can now proceed with the SCM request and import your package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 691115] Review Request: python-kombu - AMQP Messaging Framework for Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691115 --- Comment #5 from Lakshmi Narasimhan 2011-06-25 03:38:06 EDT --- Thanks Fabian, I will complete the review by 26th. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 712567] Review Request: gnome-shell-theme-ambiance - the ambiance gnome-shell theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712567 Tim Lauridsen changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |gnome-shell-theme-ubuntu-am |gnome-shell-theme-ambiance |biance - the|- the ambiance gnome-shell |ubuntu-ambiance gnome-shell |theme |theme | --- Comment #6 from Tim Lauridsen 2011-06-25 04:09:57 EDT --- Ok, now I have renamed the package to *-ambiance The 3 include theme variant is now named Ambiance-light etc. Review images are replaced, with screen shots under fedora. SPEC: http://timlau.fedorapeople.org/files/packages/theme-selector/SPECS/gnome-shell-theme-ambiance.spec SRPM: http://timlau.fedorapeople.org/files/packages/theme-selector/SRPMS/gnome-shell-theme-ambiance-1.0-1.fc15.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 712705] Review Request: gnome-shell-extension-icon-manager - A gnome-shell extension to manage icons in top bar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712705
Mohamed El Morabity changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #8 from Mohamed El Morabity 2011-06-25
06:04:45 EDT ---
Here is the review.
MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package.
->OK, only false-positive spelling issues
MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
->OK
MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption.
->OK
MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
->OK
MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the
Licensing Guidelines.
->OK
MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license.
->OK, all files under GPL v3 or more
MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for
the package must be included in %doc.
->N/A
MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
->OK
MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
->OK
MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
->OK, md5sum = 21c385a7c6ae635b27e7b6fdb9c41f0c
MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at
least one primary architecture.
->OK
MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch.
->N/A
MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ;
inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional.
->OK
MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the
%find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.
->N/A
MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library
files
(not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must
call ldconfig in %post and %postun.
->N/A
MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
->OK
MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state
this
fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for
relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is
considered a blocker.
->N/A
MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create
a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does
create that directory.
>OK
MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's
%files listings.
->OK
MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with
executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a
%defattr(...) line.
->OK
MUST: Each package must consistently use macros.
->OK
MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
->OK
MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage.
->N/A
MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime
of
the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run
properly if it is not present.
->OK
MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package.
->N/A
MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package.
->N/A
MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1),
then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel
package.
->N/A
MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} =
%{version}-%{release}.
->N/A
MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed
in the spec if they are built.
->N/A
MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file,
and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the
%install section.
->N/A
MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
->OK
MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
->OK
Approved.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 716580] Review Request: httpry - A specialized packet sniffer designed for displaying and logging HTTP traffic
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716580 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fab...@bernewireless.net Blocks||563471(FE-SECLAB) Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2011-06-25 06:17:43 EDT --- You can't review your own package ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 563471] Tracker: Review Requests for Fedora Security Lab related packages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563471 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||716580 Bug 563471 depends on bug 672418, which changed state. Bug 672418 Summary: Review Request: fpdns - Fingerprint DNS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672418 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Bug 563471 depends on bug 691619, which changed state. Bug 691619 Summary: Review Request: openvas-manager - Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Manager (edit) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691619 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 716580] Review Request: httpry - A specialized packet sniffer designed for displaying and logging HTTP traffic
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716580
--- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter 2011-06-25
06:39:18 EDT ---
Just some comments on your spec file:
- If you want to build your package for EPEL your build root needs to be
cleaned
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag
Otherwise remove all unnecessary stuff 'BuildRoot:' and %clean section.
- The man page httpry.1 is missing
install -Dp -m 0644 %{name}.1 %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man1/%{name}.1
- There is no statement that httpry is GPLv2+, form my point of view it GPLv2.
[1]
- tcp.h = BSD
- Complier flags are not honoured
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Compiler_flags
[1] License check
[fab@laptop021 httpry-0.1.5]$ licensecheck * -r
config.h: UNKNOWN
error.h: UNKNOWN
format.c: UNKNOWN
format.h: UNKNOWN
httpry.c: UNKNOWN
methods.c: UNKNOWN
methods.h: UNKNOWN
scripts/parse_log.pl: UNKNOWN
scripts/plugins/content_analysis.pm: UNKNOWN
scripts/plugins/sample_plugin.pm: UNKNOWN
scripts/plugins/find_proxies.pm: UNKNOWN
scripts/plugins/db_dump.pm: UNKNOWN
scripts/plugins/tokenize.pm: UNKNOWN
scripts/plugins/common_log.pm: UNKNOWN
scripts/plugins/search_terms.pm: UNKNOWN
scripts/plugins/hostnames.pm: UNKNOWN
scripts/plugins/xml_output.pm: UNKNOWN
scripts/plugins/log_summary.pm: UNKNOWN
tcp.h: BSD (2 clause)
utility.c: UNKNOWN
utility.h: UNKNOWN
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 626004] Review Request: osm2pgsql - Imports map data from OpenStreetMap to a PostgreSQL database
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=626004 --- Comment #10 from Fabian Affolter 2011-06-25 06:57:22 EDT --- Thanks Mario for your comment. * Sat Jun 25 2011 Fabian Affolter - 0.70.5-0.4.20110327svn - Fix autotool issue (osm2pgsql-configure.patch updated) Updated files: Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/osm2pgsql.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/osm2pgsql-0.70.5-0.4.20110327svn.fc15.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 712705] Review Request: gnome-shell-extension-icon-manager - A gnome-shell extension to manage icons in top bar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712705 Guillaume Kulakowski changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Guillaume Kulakowski 2011-06-25 08:34:52 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: gnome-shell-extension-icon-manager Short Description: A gnome-shell extension to manage icons in top bar Owners: llaumgui Branches: f15 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705426] Review Request: blender25 - 3D modeling, animation, rendering and post-production
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705426 --- Comment #8 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2011-06-25 08:43:06 EDT --- LuxRender Yafaray have sub-package that plug into a dedicated version of blender. I both version are provided, then there is a need to build the plugin for both flavor. Feature repo is a repo like http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Virtualization_Preview_Repository Where a given version of a package can be downloaded with other related dependencies. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 575940] Review Request: php-pluf - Pluf
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=575940 --- Comment #8 from Guillaume Kulakowski 2011-06-25 08:57:02 EDT --- Release issu is Fixed. Updated: SPEC: http://llaumgui.fedorapeople.org/review/php-pluf/php-pluf.spec SRPM: http://llaumgui.fedorapeople.org/review/php-pluf/php-pluf-1.0-1.fc15.src.rpm RPM: http://llaumgui.fedorapeople.org/review/php-pluf/php-pluf-1.0-1.fc15.noarch.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 712705] Review Request: gnome-shell-extension-icon-manager - A gnome-shell extension to manage icons in top bar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712705 --- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla 2011-06-25 09:24:03 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 716610] Review Request: ghc-monad-peel - A library to lift control in monad transformers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716610 --- Comment #1 from Lakshmi Narasimhan 2011-06-25 09:24:28 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3160457 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 716610] New: Review Request: ghc-monad-peel - A library to lift control in monad transformers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-monad-peel - A library to lift control in monad transformers Alias: ghc-monad-peel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716610 Summary: Review Request: ghc-monad-peel - A library to lift control in monad transformers Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lakshminaras2...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Blocks: 662481 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- spec file : http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-monad-peel.spec srpm file : http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-monad-peel-0.1-1.fc15.src.rpm rpmlint output: rpmlint -i ghc-monad-peel.spec ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/ghc-monad-peel-*.rpm ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/ghc-monad-peel-0.1-1.fc15.src.rpm ghc-monad-peel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US monads -> nomads, gonads The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monad-peel-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US monads -> nomads, gonads The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-monad-peel.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US monads -> nomads, gonads The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 716614] New: Review Request: gpaste - Clipboard management system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gpaste - Clipboard management system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716614 Summary: Review Request: gpaste - Clipboard management system Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pikachu.2...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec URL: http://melmorabity.fedorapeople.org/packages/gpaste/gpaste.spec SRPM URL: http://melmorabity.fedorapeople.org/packages/gpaste/gpaste-0.99-1.17dd47git.fc15.src.rpm Description: gpasted is a clipboard management daemon with DBus interface. gpaste is its CLI client and gpaste-settings is a tool to edit gpasted settings. Notable rpmlint issues gpaste.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/bash_completion.d/gpaste There's no need to tag this file with %config since it's not intended to be modified in any way by the user. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 712705] Review Request: gnome-shell-extension-icon-manager - A gnome-shell extension to manage icons in top bar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712705 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 716613] New: Review Request: gpaste - Clipboard management system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gpaste - Clipboard management system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716613 Summary: Review Request: gpaste - Clipboard management system Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pikachu.2...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec URL: http://melmorabity.fedorapeople.org/packages/gpaste/gpaste.spec SRPM URL: http://melmorabity.fedorapeople.org/packages/gpaste/gpaste-0.99-1.17dd47git.fc15.src.rpm Description: gpasted is a clipboard management daemon with DBus interface. gpaste is its CLI client and gpaste-settings is a tool to edit gpasted settings. Notable rpmlint issues gpaste.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/bash_completion.d/gpaste There's no need to tag this file with %config since it's not intended to be modified in any way by the user. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 712705] Review Request: gnome-shell-extension-icon-manager - A gnome-shell extension to manage icons in top bar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712705 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2011-06-25 09:56:12 EDT --- gnome-shell-extension-icon-manager-0-0.2.gite9deb2b.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnome-shell-extension-icon-manager-0-0.2.gite9deb2b.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 716615] New: Review Request: php-zipstream - zipstream-php
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: php-zipstream - zipstream-php https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716615 Summary: Review Request: php-zipstream - zipstream-php Product: Fedora Version: 15 Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: llaum...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- ZipStream is a library for dynamically streaming dynamic zip files from PHP without writing to the disk at all on the server. http://pablotron.org/software/zipstream-php/ --- SPEC: http://llaumgui.fedorapeople.org/review/php-zipstream/php-zipstream.spec SRPM: http://llaumgui.fedorapeople.org/review/php-zipstream/php-zipstream-0.2.2-1.fc15.src.rpm RPM: http://llaumgui.fedorapeople.org/review/php-zipstream/php-zipstream-0.2.2-1.fc15.noarch.rpm --- rpmlint: builder@enterprise ~> rpmlint rpmbuild/**/php-zipstream* 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings Pear CompatInfo:+-+-+---+++ | Files | Version | C | Extensions | Constants/Tokens | +-+-+---+++ | .//*| 5.1.2 | 0 | date | FALSE | | | | | hash | NULL | | | | | pcre | TRUE | | | | || __FILE__ | | | | || private| +-+-+---+++ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 716615] Review Request: php-zipstream - zipstream-php
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716615 Guillaume Kulakowski changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||575956 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 575956] Review Request: indefero - Indefero
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=575956 Guillaume Kulakowski changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||716615 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 575956] Review Request: indefero - Indefero
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=575956 --- Comment #3 from Guillaume Kulakowski 2011-06-25 10:26:56 EDT --- Update: SPEC: http://llaumgui.fedorapeople.org/review/indefero/indefero-1.1.2-3.fc15.noarch.rpm SRPM: http://llaumgui.fedorapeople.org/review/indefero/indefero-1.1.2-3.fc15.src.rpm RPM: http://llaumgui.fedorapeople.org/review/indefero-1.0-3.fc13.noarch.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683150] Review Request: yad - Display graphical dialogs from shell scripts or command line
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683150 --- Comment #7 from Elder Marco 2011-06-25 11:30:14 EDT --- New upstream release: SPEC URL: http://eldermarco.fedorapeople.org/files/specs/yad.spec SRPM URL: http://eldermarco.fedorapeople.org/files/srpms/yad-0.12.3-1.fc15.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 691115] Review Request: python-kombu - AMQP Messaging Framework for Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691115 --- Comment #6 from Lakshmi Narasimhan 2011-06-25 13:31:12 EDT --- Hi Fabian, there are some rpmlint issues that need fixing. >>python-kombu.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.1.3.1 >>['1.1.3-1.fc15', '1.1.3-1'] The latest entry in %changelog contains a version identifier that is not coherent with the epoch:version-release tuple of the package. 1) Needs fixing python-kombu.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/doc/python-kombu-1.1.3/docs/.static/.keep The file or directory is hidden. You should see if this is normal, and delete it from the package if not. python-kombu.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/python-kombu-1.1.3/docs/.static/.keep python-kombu.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/doc/python-kombu-1.1.3/docs/.static The file or directory is hidden. You should see if this is normal, and delete it from the package if not. python-kombu.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/doc/python-kombu-1.1.3/docs/.static The file or directory is hidden. You should see if this is normal, and delete it from the package if not. 2) I noticed that the docs folder has files which cannot be viewed in a browser. It also has a makefile. It turns out that the makefile can be used to generate html files. I have attached a modified spec file that does that. Although we don't have all the dependent modules in the repo to generate the docs, the makefile seems to be ok with that. I checked the generated docs and it seems to be usable. 3) For generating the docs, python-couchdb is needed (and could be used at runtime as well). However the tests fail if python-couchdb is installed. It seems that a required class definition is not available for python v > 2.7. This would definitely cause an issue at runtime. Could you contact upstream and ask for a fix. Attaching the modified spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 691115] Review Request: python-kombu - AMQP Messaging Framework for Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691115 --- Comment #7 from Lakshmi Narasimhan 2011-06-25 13:32:16 EDT --- Created attachment 509911 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=509911 patch to generate docs and fix evr in changelog -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 651591] Review Request: partiwm - partitioning window manager and related tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=651591 Ben Boeckel changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(a...@redhat.com) --- Comment #9 from Ben Boeckel 2011-06-25 14:06:23 EDT --- Ping? @Martin: If no response by next week, want to open another review (marking this as a duplicate)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 648246] Review Request: ghc-data-default - A class for types with a default value
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648246 Ben Boeckel changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(maths...@gmail.co | |m) | --- Comment #4 from Ben Boeckel 2011-06-25 14:29:50 EDT --- Spec URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-data-default/ghc-data-default.spec SRPM URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-data-default/ghc-data-default-0.2.0.1-1.fc16.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630299] Review Request: ghc-wai - Web Application Interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630299 Ben Boeckel changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(maths...@gmail.co | |m) | --- Comment #8 from Ben Boeckel 2011-06-25 14:32:39 EDT --- Spec URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-wai/ghc-wai.spec SRPM URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-wai/ghc-wai-0.4.0-1.fc16.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 712705] Review Request: gnome-shell-extension-icon-manager - A gnome-shell extension to manage icons in top bar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712705 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2011-06-25 16:02:04 EDT --- gnome-shell-extension-icon-manager-0-0.2.gite9deb2b.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701866] Review Request: php-pecl-yaml - Support for YAML 1.1 serialization using the LibYAML library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701866 Theodore Lee changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Theodore Lee 2011-06-25 20:42:22 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: php-pecl-yaml Short Description: Support for YAML 1.1 serialization using the LibYAML library Owners: antiaircraft Branches: f14 f15 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639518] Review Request: gst-entrans - Plug-ins and tools for transcoding and recording with GStreamer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639518 Theodore Lee changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #13 from Theodore Lee 2011-06-25 20:43:52 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: gst-entrans Short Description: Plug-ins and tools for transcoding and recording with GStreamer Owners: antiaircraft Branches: f14 f15 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701866] Review Request: php-pecl-yaml - Support for YAML 1.1 serialization using the LibYAML library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701866 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla 2011-06-25 20:46:06 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639518] Review Request: gst-entrans - Plug-ins and tools for transcoding and recording with GStreamer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639518 --- Comment #14 from Jon Ciesla 2011-06-25 20:45:37 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 651591] Review Request: partiwm - partitioning window manager and related tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=651591 --- Comment #10 from Martin Dengler 2011-06-25 20:49:11 EDT --- Sure -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 707199] Review Request: openstack-nova - OpenStack Compute (nova)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707199 Silas Sewell changed: What|Removed |Added CC||si...@sewell.ch --- Comment #5 from Silas Sewell 2011-06-25 20:48:52 EDT --- *** Bug 649495 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 649495] Review Request: openstack-nova - OpenStack Compute (nova)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=649495 Silas Sewell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||DUPLICATE Flag|needinfo?(si...@sewell.ch) | Last Closed||2011-06-25 20:48:52 --- Comment #22 from Silas Sewell 2011-06-25 20:48:52 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 707199 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
