[Bug 688183] Review Request: iceplayer - A simple music player for Linux

2011-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688183

--- Comment #15 from Mike Ma  2011-07-02 02:32:21 EDT ---
Hi, Elder.

Thanks for your comments.

My computer can't connect to Internet now, so I can't edit the spec file.
(sorry. but I'll modify it later.)

Well, this software is in Chinese, and doesn't have i18n now.
If that is a problem, can I close the Review Request? (I think FedoraPeople is
enough.)

Thank you.

PS, NEWS and THANKS are empty files.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 673776] Review Request: leksah - An IDE for Haskell

2011-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673776

Lakshmi Narasimhan  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|needinfo?(lakshminaras2002@ |
   |gmail.com)  |

--- Comment #14 from Lakshmi Narasimhan  2011-07-02 
01:49:40 EDT ---
Updated spec file and srpm

http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/leksah.spec

http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/leksah-0.10.0.4-3.fc14.src.rpm

Applied patch from previous comment. Also removed leksah_manual and leksah_mime
definitions.

Thanks.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 701079] Review Request: wmSun - Rise/Set time of Sun in a dockapp

2011-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701079

Ankur Sinha  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+

--- Comment #8 from Ankur Sinha  2011-07-01 23:49:27 
EDT ---
Package looks good. Please do inform upstream about the incorrect FSF address
when you can. 

Final rpmlint output:

[ankur@ankur SRPMS]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/result/*.rpm
wmSun.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) dockapp -> dock app, dock-app,
paddock
wmSun.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US dockapp -> dock app,
dock-app, paddock
wmSun.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/wmSun-1.03/COPYING
wmSun.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) dockapp -> dock app, dock-app,
paddock
wmSun.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US dockapp -> dock app,
dock-app, paddock
wmSun.src:54: W: macro-in-%changelog %{buildroot}
wmSun-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/wmSun-1.03/wmSun/wmSun.c
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 5 warnings.


Ignorable. 

This package is XXX APPROVED XXX :D

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 483663] Review Request: tetgen - A tetrahedral mesh generator

2011-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483663

--- Comment #6 from Ankur Sinha  2011-07-01 23:42:03 
EDT ---
Mailed them.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 688183] Review Request: iceplayer - A simple music player for Linux

2011-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688183

Elder Marco  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||elderma...@gmail.com

--- Comment #14 from Elder Marco  2011-07-01 19:34:54 EDT 
---
Hi,

Just a few comments.

- It's a good idea to add each dependencies on a single line. It's more
readable. In this case:

   BuildRequires: gtk2-devel
   BuildRequires: gstreamer-devel
   BuildRequires: libnotify-devel
   BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils

- The strings in source code is in Japanese/Chinese .. I don't know, but this
is a problem.

- In Source0 field, you could use:
  Source0:
http://iceplayer.googlecode.com/files/%{name}-src-%{version}-%{date}.tar.gz

- Use %{?_smp_mflags} instead of %{_smp_mflags}.

- In %files section, add the files NEWS THANKS in %doc.
   - For the files, you could use:
  %{_bindir}/%{name}
  %{_datadir}/applications/%{name}.desktop
  %dir %{_datadir}/%{name}/
  %{_datadir}/%{name}/*

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 626004] Review Request: osm2pgsql - Imports map data from OpenStreetMap to a PostgreSQL database

2011-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=626004

--- Comment #13 from Roy Rankin  2011-07-01 19:23:40 EDT 
---
Also add "BuildRequires:  libtool"

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 693664] Review Request: supybot-gribble - Cross-platform support bot based on supybot

2011-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693664

--- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System  
2011-07-01 19:17:41 EDT ---
supybot-gribble-0.83.4.1-6.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/supybot-gribble-0.83.4.1-6.fc14

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 693664] Review Request: supybot-gribble - Cross-platform support bot based on supybot

2011-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693664

--- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System  
2011-07-01 19:03:46 EDT ---
supybot-gribble-0.83.4.1-6.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/supybot-gribble-0.83.4.1-6.fc15

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 483663] Review Request: tetgen - A tetrahedral mesh generator

2011-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483663

Kevin Kofler  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org

--- Comment #5 from Kevin Kofler  2011-07-01 18:43:38 
EDT ---
> Someone should let berlios know that this software should not be hosted there.

+1. Over 2 years have passed and this software which is neither Free nor Open
Source is still hosted on BerliOS, which claims to be about Open Source
hosting.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 708690] Review Request: -

2011-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708690

Toshio Kuratomi  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Group|private |

--- Comment #1 from Toshio Kuratomi  2011-07-01 18:03:57 
EDT ---
Hey, just noticed that this was marked Private and therefore no one could see
it.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 617340] Review Request: throttle - copy stdin to stdout at the specified speed (or lower)

2011-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617340

--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System  
2011-07-01 18:04:16 EDT ---
throttle-1.2-4.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/throttle-1.2-4.el5

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 617340] Review Request: throttle - copy stdin to stdout at the specified speed (or lower)

2011-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617340

--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System  
2011-07-01 17:45:45 EDT ---
throttle-1.2-4.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/throttle-1.2-4.el6

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 617340] Review Request: throttle - copy stdin to stdout at the specified speed (or lower)

2011-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617340

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 617340] Review Request: throttle - copy stdin to stdout at the specified speed (or lower)

2011-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617340

--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System  
2011-07-01 17:45:05 EDT ---
throttle-1.2-4.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/throttle-1.2-4.fc15

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 705108] Review Request: shinken - python monitoring tool

2011-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705108

--- Comment #11 from David Hannequin  2011-07-01 
17:28:00 EDT ---
Hi,

Requires in the sub packages have been removed and i putting the Requires on
one line each.

After discussion with the developer of Shinken, Shinken plugins can be place on
Nagios Plugins but it's possible to put in an other directory. 

Shinken was released in version 0.6.5. I still have tests to do before
uploading the SRPM and SPEC.

Best regard

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 675050] Review Request: cloudfs - Cloud Filesystem

2011-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675050

--- Comment #11 from David Nalley  2011-07-01 16:19:44 EDT ---
kkeithley: I don't see an updated SPEC or SRPM, can you post links to the
latest version?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 718270] Review Request: openr2 - MFC/R2 telephony signaling protocol over E1 lines

2011-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=718270

--- Comment #7 from Jeffrey C. Ollie  2011-07-01 16:06:36 EDT 
---
Spec URL: http://jcollie.fedorapeople.org/openr2.spec
SRPM URL: http://jcollie.fedorapeople.org/openr2-1.3.1-2.fc15.src.rpm

* Fri Jul  1 2011 Jeffrey Ollie  - 1.3.1-2
- Replace commas in license field with 'and's
- use _sysconfdir macro instead of hardcoded path

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 718270] Review Request: openr2 - MFC/R2 telephony signaling protocol over E1 lines

2011-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=718270

--- Comment #6 from Jeffrey C. Ollie  2011-07-01 16:06:01 EDT 
---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Don't use commas as separators in the License field, use "LGPLv2 and LGPLv2+
> and GPLv2+"

Good to know.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 718270] Review Request: openr2 - MFC/R2 telephony signaling protocol over E1 lines

2011-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=718270

Tom "spot" Callaway  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||tcall...@redhat.com

--- Comment #5 from Tom "spot" Callaway  2011-07-01 
15:20:18 EDT ---
Don't use commas as separators in the License field, use "LGPLv2 and LGPLv2+
and GPLv2+"

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 718270] Review Request: openr2 - MFC/R2 telephony signaling protocol over E1 lines

2011-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=718270

--- Comment #4 from Jeffrey C. Ollie  2011-07-01 15:13:32 EDT 
---
(In reply to comment #3)
> we are in the wrong part of the world, because we still use E1 lines.
> 
> I don't have hardware to test too, I am poor, after everything ok we will send
> a mail to mailling list's (moy, asterisk-br, etc...) and ask the people to try
> it.

I can understand.

> can you make rpmlint happy ?

> openr2.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US spandsp -> spandex,
> Span, span
> openr2.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libteletone -> 
> limestone

These are false positives, the original spelling is correct.

> openr2.x86_64: W: invalid-license LGPLv2, LGPLv2+, GPLv2+
> openr2-devel.x86_64: W: invalid-license LGPLv2, LGPLv2+, GPLv2+
> openr2-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-license LGPLv2, LGPLv2+, GPLv2+

The files are an odd mixture of licenses, so I think that the license line is
correct, rpmlint's being too picky.

> openr2.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8
> /usr/share/doc/openr2-1.3.1/doc/intro-openr2-es.alaw

Another false positive, this is a binary sound file.

> openr2.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary r2dtmf_detect

It'd be nice to have a manual page, but I really don't know enough to even
attempt to write one.

> openr2-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
> /usr/src/debug/openr2-1.3.1/src/openr2/queue.h
> openr2-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
> /usr/src/debug/openr2-1.3.1/src/queue.c
> openr2-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
> /usr/src/debug/openr2-1.3.1/src/openr2/r2engine.h
> openr2-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
> /usr/src/debug/openr2-1.3.1/src/r2engine.c

I'm not sure it's worth patching these files to have the correct address.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 718317] New: Review Request: asforza4 - 4-in-a-row in a dockapp

2011-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: asforza4 - 4-in-a-row in a dockapp

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=718317

   Summary: Review Request: asforza4 - 4-in-a-row in a dockapp
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
 Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: mari...@freenet.de
 QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Classification: Fedora
  Story Points: ---


Spec URL: http://mariobl.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/asforza4.spec
SRPM URL:
http://mariobl.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/asforza4-2.10-1.fc15.src.rpm
Description:
asforza4 is a dockable applet for the desktop manager Afterstep, WindowMaker,
Blackbox and any other which can handle dockapps.
Forza 4 is the italian name of the 4-in-a-row (or 4-in-line) game.

Koji scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3174957

There is still a problem building the package for x86_64. It needs the Pascal
compiler, and the compiler call is hardcoded as "ppc86" in the Makefile, that's
why I've patched it. But there seems to be another obstacle. Please have a look
at the build logs.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 718317] Review Request: asforza4 - 4-in-a-row in a dockapp

2011-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=718317

Mario Blättermann  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Alias||asforza4

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 702103] Review Request: python-osmgpsmap - Python bindings for osm-gps-map GTK+ widget

2011-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702103

--- Comment #7 from Jeffrey C. Ollie  2011-07-01 15:07:20 EDT 
---
I have an updated package, but it's on my laptop at home which is currently
shut down.  I've got a number of offline activities tonight and tomorrow during
the day so I hope to put up a new package Saturday evening sometime.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 666233] Review Request: gnome-paint - Easy to use paint program for GNOME

2011-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666233

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|gnome-paint-0.4.0-4.fc15|gnome-paint-0.4.0-4.fc14

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 666233] Review Request: gnome-paint - Easy to use paint program for GNOME

2011-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666233

--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System  
2011-07-01 15:03:11 EDT ---
gnome-paint-0.4.0-4.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 666233] Review Request: gnome-paint - Easy to use paint program for GNOME

2011-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666233

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version|0.4.0-1.fc13|gnome-paint-0.4.0-4.fc15
 Resolution||ERRATA
Last Closed||2011-07-01 15:00:37

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 710699] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Unique - Perl bindings for the C library "libunique"

2011-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710699

--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System  
2011-07-01 14:56:31 EDT ---
perl-Gtk2-Unique-0.05-2.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable
repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 666233] Review Request: gnome-paint - Easy to use paint program for GNOME

2011-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666233

--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System  
2011-07-01 15:00:27 EDT ---
gnome-paint-0.4.0-4.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 710699] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Unique - Perl bindings for the C library "libunique"

2011-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710699

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Gtk2-Unique-0.05-2.fc1
   ||4
 Resolution||ERRATA
Last Closed||2011-07-01 14:54:06

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 710699] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Unique - Perl bindings for the C library "libunique"

2011-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710699

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|perl-Gtk2-Unique-0.05-2.fc1 |perl-Gtk2-Unique-0.05-2.fc1
   |4   |5

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 716352] Review Request: toothchart - A PHP script which graphically shows how a baby's primary teeth have erupted

2011-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716352

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  
2011-07-01 14:54:15 EDT ---
toothchart-0.02.0-0.1beta.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 testing
repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 710699] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Unique - Perl bindings for the C library "libunique"

2011-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710699

--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System  
2011-07-01 14:54:01 EDT ---
perl-Gtk2-Unique-0.05-2.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable
repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 718270] Review Request: openr2 - MFC/R2 telephony signaling protocol over E1 lines

2011-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=718270

--- Comment #3 from Itamar Reis Peixoto  2011-07-01 
14:37:43 EDT ---
we are in the wrong part of the world, because we still use E1 lines.

I don't have hardware to test too, I am poor, after everything ok we will send
a mail to mailling list's (moy, asterisk-br, etc...) and ask the people to try
it.

can you make rpmlint happy ?

[itamar@itamarssd openr2]$ rpmlint
/home/itamar/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/openr2-1.3.1-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm
/home/itamar/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/openr2-devel-1.3.1-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm
/home/itamar/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/openr2-debuginfo-1.3.1-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm
openr2.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US spandsp -> spandex,
Span, span
openr2.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libteletone -> limestone
openr2.x86_64: W: invalid-license LGPLv2, LGPLv2+, GPLv2+
openr2.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8
/usr/share/doc/openr2-1.3.1/doc/intro-openr2-es.alaw
openr2.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary r2dtmf_detect
openr2-devel.x86_64: W: invalid-license LGPLv2, LGPLv2+, GPLv2+
openr2-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-license LGPLv2, LGPLv2+, GPLv2+
openr2-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/openr2-1.3.1/src/openr2/queue.h
openr2-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/openr2-1.3.1/src/queue.c
openr2-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/openr2-1.3.1/src/openr2/r2engine.h
openr2-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/openr2-1.3.1/src/r2engine.c
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 4 errors, 7 warnings.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 694139] Review Request: openvas-gsd - Greenbone Security Desktop client application for OpenVAS

2011-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=694139

--- Comment #2 from Michal Ambroz  2011-07-01 14:07:54 EDT ---
Hello Volker,

(In reply to comment #1)
> Even EPEL 5 ships Cmake 2.6. I think, you don't need the version constraint.
CMakeLists.txt:cmake_minimum_required (VERSION 2.6)
That's the reason I included the version constraint

> Please inform upstream about the incorrect FSF postal address.
I will do. 

> Please see
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Handling_Locale_Files
I have seen it when packaging the gsd - that guideline is for gettext
localisations. Translations in GSD are not done using gettext, but it uses the
QT functionalities for that. As there are no special guideline for that I have
checked how it is in other projects using the QT (scribus, smplayer, scidavis)
and left it as it is in the translations directory.

> You try to own the directory /etc/openvas, which is already owned by another
> package.
Historical reasons for that - openvas-libraries originally didn't own the
directory so it is owned by each of the openvas packages storing there the
configuration. I will remove it.


> Don't include INSTALL.
OK I will remove it.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 718242] Review Request: gnome-shell-extension-weather - A simple extension for displaying weather notifications

2011-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=718242

Elad Alfassa  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 CC||el...@doom.co.il
 Resolution||WONTFIX
Last Closed||2011-07-01 14:01:58

--- Comment #1 from Elad Alfassa  2011-07-01 14:01:58 EDT ---
Sorry, but we asked fedora legal long ago, and, well, this extension can't be
included in fedora due to the license terms of the yahoo api.
see http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/legal/2011-May/001633.html for
more information.



-- 
Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 701079] Review Request: wmSun - Rise/Set time of Sun in a dockapp

2011-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701079

--- Comment #7 from Mario Blättermann  2011-07-01 13:52:51 
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> - You can maybe change the spelling (dockapp -> dock app).
> 
It is the usual spelling for Windowmaker related applets:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dockapp

> - You can also get rid of the rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT in the install section. 
> It
> is not needed any more. 
>
Done.
> - Debuginfo is still empty. This is because the fedora optflags are not being
> honoured in the build:
...
> make COPTS='%{optflags}' %{?_smp_mflags}
> 
Done.

Updated package:

Spec URL: http://mariobl.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/wmSun.spec
SRPM URL:
http://mariobl.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/wmSun-1.03-4.fc15.src.rpm

Koji scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3174781

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 718270] Review Request: openr2 - MFC/R2 telephony signaling protocol over E1 lines

2011-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=718270

Itamar Reis Peixoto  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ita...@ispbrasil.com.br
   Flag||fedora-review?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 702103] Review Request: python-osmgpsmap - Python bindings for osm-gps-map GTK+ widget

2011-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702103

--- Comment #6 from Paul Franklin (RHlists)  2011-07-01 
13:37:29 EDT ---
I observe:
1) gramps 3.3.0 has been released by the gramps developers, and
2) the previous comment is more than a month old,

and since I need both this one as well as 701982 to use that new
gramps 3.3.0 feature, I am asking for a status report on this bug.

Thanks.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 718270] Review Request: openr2 - MFC/R2 telephony signaling protocol over E1 lines

2011-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=718270

--- Comment #2 from Jeffrey C. Ollie  2011-07-01 13:25:54 EDT 
---
(In reply to comment #1)
> looks good, any reason to not use %{_sysconfdir} for /etc ?

No, just an oversight.  I'll fix it up after I get back from lunch.

> will you build asterisk with openr2 support ?

Yes, otherwise I wouldn't bother :)  Are you able to do some actual testing?  I
don't have the appropriate DAHDI hardware and am in the wrong part of the world
anyway...

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 718270] Review Request: openr2 - MFC/R2 telephony signaling protocol over E1 lines

2011-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=718270

Itamar Reis Peixoto  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||ita...@ispbrasil.com.br

--- Comment #1 from Itamar Reis Peixoto  2011-07-01 
13:18:08 EDT ---
looks good, any reason to not use %{_sysconfdir} for /etc ?

will you build asterisk with openr2 support ?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 718188] Review Request: jpathwatch - Java library for monitoring directories for changes

2011-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=718188

--- Comment #1 from Jaromír Cápík  2011-07-01 12:39:25 EDT 
---
Please wait with the review till #718281 is resolved. I'll alter the package
accordingly.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 708836] Review Request: jansi-native - Jansi Native implements the JNI Libraries used by the Jansi project.

2011-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708836

Jaromír Cápík  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||718281

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 718188] Review Request: jpathwatch - Java library for monitoring directories for changes

2011-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=718188

Jaromír Cápík  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||718281

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 714336] Review Request: tetgen - A Quality Tetrahedral Mesh Generator and a 3D Delaunay Triangulator

2011-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714336

Fabian Affolter  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||fab...@bernewireless.net
 Resolution|CANTFIX |DUPLICATE

--- Comment #11 from Fabian Affolter  2011-07-01 
12:12:38 EDT ---


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 483663 ***

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 483663] Review Request: tetgen - A tetrahedral mesh generator

2011-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483663

Fabian Affolter  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||sanjay.an...@gmail.com

--- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter  2011-07-01 
12:12:38 EDT ---
*** Bug 714336 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 718270] New: Review Request: openr2 - MFC/R2 telephony signaling protocol over E1 lines

2011-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: openr2 - MFC/R2 telephony signaling protocol over E1 
lines

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=718270

   Summary: Review Request: openr2 - MFC/R2 telephony signaling
protocol over E1 lines
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
 Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: j...@ocjtech.us
 QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Classification: Fedora
  Story Points: ---


Spec URL: http://jcollie.fedorapeople.org/openr2.spec
SRPM URL: http://jcollie.fedorapeople.org/openr2-1.3.1-1.fc15.src.rpm
Description:

OpenR2 is a library that implements the MFC/R2 signaling over E1 lines
using DAHDI. The MF R2 tones required for the signaling are generated
by code borrowed from the LGPL library SpanDSP written by Steve
Underwood, the user has the option to provide a MF interface to use
his own MF R2 tone generation and detection so the library will use
them when needed, that's why this library does not depend directly on
spandsp, libteletone or DAHDI for tone generation and detection
(depends on DAHDI for CAS bits and general media transmission though)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 715314] Review Request: metis - A set of serial programs for partitioning graphs, partitioning finite element meshes, and producing fill reducing orderings for sparse matrices

2011-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715314

Ankur Sinha  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution||CANTFIX
Last Closed||2011-07-01 11:48:25

--- Comment #4 from Ankur Sinha  2011-07-01 11:48:25 
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> It still doesn't look like the licensing is Free here, but I'll wait to see
> what clarification comes from upstream.

Here's the clarification(quoting):

"
Hi Ankur

Metis is used as the main strategy for mesh partitioning i.e. its relevant only
for parallel computations. We have a historical OK from Metis developers to
distribute it with Elmer. However, I understand that this does not make Metis
free software. There is an alternative package, Scotch [1], which to my
understanding provides similar functionality. It is used in the Debian build of
Elmer. We should try to invest some time to test these packages and use perhaps
it instead of Metis. As a quick solution I think that building ElmerGrid
without Metis is OK. Just change the #define PARTMETIS in femelmer.h to zero
and there is some alternative text printed in case Metis is called. 

Best regards,
Peter

[1] http://www.labri.fr/perso/pelegrin/scotch/
"

I'm going to go look at scotch. This one's a CANTFIX :/

Thanks all for the inputs :)

Regards,
Ankur

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 715620] Review Request: elmer-fem - Open Source Finite Element Software for Multiphysical Problems

2011-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715620

Bug 715620 depends on bug 715314, which changed state.

Bug 715314 Summary: Review Request: metis - A set of serial programs for 
partitioning graphs, partitioning finite element meshes, and producing fill 
reducing orderings for sparse matrices
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715314

   What|Old Value   |New Value

 Resolution||CANTFIX
 Status|NEW |CLOSED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 715314] Review Request: metis - A set of serial programs for partitioning graphs, partitioning finite element meshes, and producing fill reducing orderings for sparse matrices

2011-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715314

--- Comment #5 from Ankur Sinha  2011-07-01 11:49:53 
EDT ---
Oh! And I'm going to build elmergrid without elmer as upstream suggests for the
time being. When scotch is ready, I'll rebuild elmergrid with it. 

Thanks,
Ankur

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 717681] Review Request: python26-argparse - Optparse inspired command line parser for Python

2011-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=717681

--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  2011-07-01 
11:28:27 EDT ---
python26-argparse-1.2.1-3.el5,packagedb-cli-1.0.0-6.el5 has been submitted as
an update for Fedora EPEL 5.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python26-argparse-1.2.1-3.el5,packagedb-cli-1.0.0-6.el5

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 717555] Review Request: packagedb-cli - A CLI for pkgdb

2011-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=717555

--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System  
2011-07-01 11:28:33 EDT ---
python26-argparse-1.2.1-3.el5,packagedb-cli-1.0.0-6.el5 has been submitted as
an update for Fedora EPEL 5.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python26-argparse-1.2.1-3.el5,packagedb-cli-1.0.0-6.el5

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 706846] Review Request: hibernate-jpa-2.0-api - Java Persistence 2.0 (JSR 317) API

2011-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=706846

--- Comment #5 from Marek Goldmann  2011-07-01 11:01:00 
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> There was a lengthy email thread on how to resolve the licensing issues here,
> is there any progress on a new package?

Tom, this request will be updated with the resolution found in that thread.

Sorry I haven't done it earlier.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 715314] Review Request: metis - A set of serial programs for partitioning graphs, partitioning finite element meshes, and producing fill reducing orderings for sparse matrices

2011-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715314

Tom "spot" Callaway  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||tcall...@redhat.com

--- Comment #3 from Tom "spot" Callaway  2011-07-01 
10:49:01 EDT ---
It still doesn't look like the licensing is Free here, but I'll wait to see
what clarification comes from upstream.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 718242] New: Review Request: gnome-shell-extension-weather - A simple extension for displaying weather notifications

2011-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: gnome-shell-extension-weather - A simple extension for 
displaying weather notifications

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=718242

   Summary: Review Request: gnome-shell-extension-weather - A
simple extension for displaying weather notifications
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
 Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: antti.andreim...@mail.ee
 QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Classification: Fedora
  Story Points: ---


Spec URL: http://anttix.org/fedora/pkg/gnome-shell-extension-weather.spec
SRPM URL:
http://anttix.org/fedora/pkg/gnome-shell-extension-weather-0-1.20111007git2289eb1.fc15.src.rpm
Koji Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3174087
Description:
gnome-shell-extension-weather is a simple extension for displaying weather
notifications in GNOME Shell. Currently, the weather report including forecast
for today and tomorrow is fetched from Yahoo! Weather.

gnome-shell-extension-weather uses gsettings to save your configuration.
You can use dconf-editor or gsettings from the command line to modify some
parameters:

gsettings set org.gnome.shell.extensions.weather woeid your_woeid

See README.md for more details.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 706846] Review Request: hibernate-jpa-2.0-api - Java Persistence 2.0 (JSR 317) API

2011-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=706846

Tom "spot" Callaway  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||tcall...@redhat.com

--- Comment #4 from Tom "spot" Callaway  2011-07-01 
10:47:17 EDT ---
There was a lengthy email thread on how to resolve the licensing issues here,
is there any progress on a new package?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 672555] Review Request: openicc-data - The Color Management Data (CMD)

2011-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672555

Tom "spot" Callaway  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks|182235(FE-Legal)|

--- Comment #3 from Tom "spot" Callaway  2011-07-01 
10:44:45 EDT ---
Okay, assuming that 1.2.0 gets packaged, I'm lifting FE-Legal.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 717645] Review Request: rubygem-compass-960-plugin - Compass compatible Sass port of 960.gs

2011-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=717645

--- Comment #8 from Vít Ondruch  2011-07-01 10:19:28 EDT 
---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Git done (by process-git-requests).
> 
> Note to Vit:  Take ownership of Review bugs you're offically working on
> and/or approving.

Hmm, strange ... assigned doesn't mean assigned to me? :) Will try to do better
next time.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 717645] Review Request: rubygem-compass-960-plugin - Compass compatible Sass port of 960.gs

2011-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=717645

Vít Ondruch  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|vondr...@redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 717645] Review Request: rubygem-compass-960-plugin - Compass compatible Sass port of 960.gs

2011-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=717645

--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla  2011-07-01 10:11:40 EDT ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

Note to Vit:  Take ownership of Review bugs you're offically working on
and/or approving.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 673790] Rename Request: mingw32-w32api -> mingw-headers - Win32/Win64 header files and stubs

2011-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673790

--- Comment #5 from Erik van Pienbroek  2011-07-01 
10:10:00 EDT ---
Hi Tom,

We've made this package block FE-LEGAL because we're not entirely sure if the
contents of this package (and the mingw-crt package, bug 673792) are okay to
add to Fedora. In earlier discussions on the fedora-mingw mailing list there
have been some signals about a legal audit which should be done:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/mingw/2010-March/002557.html
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/mingw/2010-May/002589.html
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/mingw/2011-January/003347.html

As we're uncertain if Red Hat/Fedora approves the use of these libraries and
headers we decided to have RH-Legal/Fedora legal take a look at it before
continuing with the introduction of mingw-w64 in Fedora.

Kai Tietz, one of the mingw-w64 developers has been hired by Red Hat recently
and he started to get the legal issues cleared in Red Hat internally. I don't
know what the progress of that is, but perhaps you could get in touch with each
other for further discussion?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 716299] Review Request: clipit - lightweight, fully featured GTK+ clipboard manager

2011-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716299

--- Comment #3 from Elder Marco  2011-07-01 09:58:34 EDT 
---
Hello, 

This is the same spec file. but the srpm is OK.

Good luck.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 717645] Review Request: rubygem-compass-960-plugin - Compass compatible Sass port of 960.gs

2011-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=717645

Chris Lalancette  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?

--- Comment #6 from Chris Lalancette  2011-07-01 09:25:50 
EDT ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: rubygem-compass-960-plugin
Short Description: Compass compatible Sass port of 960.gs
Owners: clalance vondruch
Branches:
InitialCC:

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 717748] Review Request: UST - LTTng Userspace Tracer

2011-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=717748

Paolo Bonzini  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||pbonz...@redhat.com

--- Comment #2 from Paolo Bonzini  2011-07-01 08:24:02 EDT 
---
Have you consider putting UST in the Fedora 16 features, so that it is
advertised in the release notes?  You still have almost two weeks.

See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Policy for more information on the
process, it is lighter-weight than it seems! ;)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 717337] Review Request: URCU - Userspace RCU Implementation

2011-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=717337

Paolo Bonzini  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||pbonz...@redhat.com

--- Comment #4 from Paolo Bonzini  2011-07-01 08:21:33 EDT 
---
An alternative way to fix the rpath problem is to rebuild autoconf-generated
files at RPM build time.  This has the advantage of incorporating bugfixes to
autoconf/automake/libtool automatically.

So that would be

BuildRequires:  pkgconfig, autoconf, automake, libtool
...
%build
autoreconf -fvi
%configure

without the sed lines mentioned in the packaging guidelines.  I'll let you and
other reviewers decide the preferred resolution.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 688316] Review Request: rubygem-logging - A flexible and extendable logging library for Ruby

2011-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688316

--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla  2011-07-01 08:13:23 EDT ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 714336] Review Request: tetgen - A Quality Tetrahedral Mesh Generator and a 3D Delaunay Triangulator

2011-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714336

--- Comment #10 from Ankur Sinha  2011-07-01 08:12:17 
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Good luck… Reading the LICENSE file, I get the impression that upstream knows
> very well what Free Software means, but isn't interested. :-(
> 
> Do you have any further review requests which depend on this? If so, it might
> be worth trying to get them working without this stuff. (AFAICT, qhull can do
> similar computations, but I have no idea how different the feature set and the
> API are.)

Mailed upstream.

This isn't really a build requires. It was to be an add on tool for one of the
fedora-medical packages. It'll lose some minor functionality. Not really a big
deal :)

Thanks,
Ankur

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 617340] Review Request: throttle - copy stdin to stdout at the specified speed (or lower)

2011-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617340

--- Comment #20 from Jon Ciesla  2011-07-01 08:12:24 EDT ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 668794] Review Request: pgsphere -Spherical data types, functions, and operators for PostgreSQL

2011-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668794

--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla  2011-07-01 08:08:35 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> -n %{name}-%{version} and the defattr line can be left out.
> 
> sparse.c: GPL 
> sparse.h: GPL

Good catch.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 709233] Review Request: base64coder - Fast and compact Base64 encoder/decoder Java library

2011-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709233

Alexander Kurtakov  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks|652183(FE-JAVASIG)  |

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 705106] Review Request: snakeyaml - YAML parser and emitter for the Java programming language

2011-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705106

Alexander Kurtakov  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks|652183(FE-JAVASIG)  |

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 708765] Review Request: Frogr - Flickr Remote Organizer for GNOME

2011-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765

--- Comment #54 from Gianluca Sforna  2011-07-01 07:05:55 EDT 
---
Few fixes to do:

1. Missing a BR for intltool
2. debuginfo package is missing sources because of the "-g0" CFLAG hardcoded in
configure.ac; upstream should just omit it and things will not change for
manual builds, while allowing our "-g" override. I used a trivial patch on
configure to achieve this
3. rplint claims there's another incorrect FSF address in
/usr/src/debug/frogr-0.5/src/flicksoup/fsp-session.c
4. there is a trailing ',' on the gtk3-devel BR line. You may want to remove
it, and possibly also the "> version" thing, as F15 has the correct versions.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 718188] Review Request: jpathwatch - Java library for monitoring directories for changes

2011-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=718188

Jaromír Cápík  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||652183(FE-JAVASIG)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 716299] Review Request: clipit - lightweight, fully featured GTK+ clipboard manager

2011-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716299

--- Comment #2 from Nikos Roussos  2011-07-01 06:40:56 EDT 
---
Thanx for the advice. I wasn't aware of the %config option.

I updated both spec and srpm:

Spec URL: http://comzeradd.fedorapeople.org/specs/clipit.spec
SRPM URL:
http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/comzeradd/autoverse/fedora-15/SRPMS/clipit-1.4.1-2.fc15.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 718188] New: Review Request: jpathwatch - Java library for monitoring directories for changes

2011-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: jpathwatch - Java library for monitoring directories 
for changes

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=718188

   Summary: Review Request: jpathwatch - Java library for
monitoring directories for changes
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
 Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: jca...@redhat.com
 QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Classification: Fedora
  Story Points: ---


Spec URL: http://jcapik.fedorapeople.org/files/jpathwatch/jpathwatch.spec
SRPM URL:
http://jcapik.fedorapeople.org/files/jpathwatch/jpathwatch-0.94-1.fc15.src.rpm
Description: 
jpatchwatch is a Java library for monitoring directories
for changes. It uses the host platform’s native OS functions
to achieve this to avoid polling.

The following events on a directory can be monitored:

  - File creation and deletion
  - File modification
  - File renaming
  - Changes in subdirectories (recursive monitoring)
  - Invalidation (a watched directory becomes unavailable)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 718165] Review Request: ibus-gucharmap - Unicode input engine (using Gucharmap) for IBus platform

2011-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=718165

Parag AN(पराग)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||panem...@gmail.com
 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com
   Flag||fedora-review?

--- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग)  2011-07-01 06:23:26 EDT 
---
Review:
+ koji build->http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3173566
+ rpmlint output is
ibus-gucharmap.src: W: invalid-url Source0: ibus-gucharmap-0ec429009.tar.gz
+ Other than following suggestions, package looks ok.

Suggestions
1) I think you can use word "Gucharmap" as "gucharmap" as its the command name
actually in %description and summary.
2) defattr(-,root,root,-) is not needed now as per new guidelines and its also
pointless since rpm 4.4 version. See
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#File_Permissions
3) Is the Versioned Requires on ibus really a hard requirement to be mentioned
in spec? you should just write 
Requires: ibus

4) Steps to reproduce tarball is not working
git archive --format tar --prefix ibus-gucharmap-${ibusgucharmapcommit}
${ibusgucharmapcommit} |gzip -c >
../ibus-gucharmap-${ibusgucharmapcommit}.tar.gz
==> fatal: Not a valid object name

Though not relevant here but I see build.log is showing same warning many
times. Looks something like casting issue. Also, it showed zh_CN.po warning
message.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 714336] Review Request: tetgen - A Quality Tetrahedral Mesh Generator and a 3D Delaunay Triangulator

2011-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714336

--- Comment #9 from Kevin Kofler  2011-07-01 05:43:53 
EDT ---
Good luck… Reading the LICENSE file, I get the impression that upstream knows
very well what Free Software means, but isn't interested. :-(

Do you have any further review requests which depend on this? If so, it might
be worth trying to get them working without this stuff. (AFAICT, qhull can do
similar computations, but I have no idea how different the feature set and the
API are.)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 718165] New: Review Request: ibus-gucharmap - Unicode input engine (using Gucharmap) for IBus platform

2011-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: ibus-gucharmap - Unicode input engine (using 
Gucharmap) for IBus platform

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=718165

   Summary: Review Request: ibus-gucharmap - Unicode input engine
(using Gucharmap) for IBus platform
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
  Severity: unspecified
  Priority: unspecified
 Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: du...@redhat.com
 QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Classification: Fedora
  Story Points: ---


Spec URL: http://ueno.fedorapeople.org/ibus-gucharmap/ibus-gucharmap.spec
SRPM URL:
http://ueno.fedorapeople.org/ibus-gucharmap/ibus-gucharmap-1.3.99.20110701-0.1.git0ec429009.fc15.src.rpm
Description:
A Unicode input engine (using Gucharmap) for IBus, which supports
character-map view and searching by Unicode names with easy key
navigation.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review