[Bug 708765] Review Request: Frogr - Flickr Remote Organizer for GNOME

2011-07-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765

--- Comment #56 from Christophe Fergeau cferg...@redhat.com 2011-07-04 
04:31:27 EDT ---
If you patch configure.ac or Makefile.am, you should add an autoreconf -fi
before %configure in %prep

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 718681] Review Request: luajit - Just-In-Time Compiler for Lua

2011-07-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=718681

Andrei Lapshin alaps...@gmx.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 718681] New: Review Request: luajit - Just-In-Time Compiler for Lua

2011-07-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: luajit - Just-In-Time Compiler for Lua

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=718681

   Summary: Review Request: luajit - Just-In-Time Compiler for Lua
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: medium
  Priority: unspecified
 Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: alaps...@gmx.com
 QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Classification: Fedora
  Story Points: ---


Spec URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/11270386/luajit.spec
SRPM URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/11270386/luajit-2.0.0-0.1.beta8.fc16.src.rpm

Description:
LuaJIT implements the full set of language features defined by Lua 5.1.
The virtual machine (VM) is API- and ABI-compatible to the standard
Lua interpreter and can be deployed as a drop-in replacement.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 718165] Review Request: ibus-gucharmap - Unicode input engine (using gucharmap) for IBus platform

2011-07-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=718165

Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+

--- Comment #3 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2011-07-04 05:18:08 EDT 
---
+ Koji build - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3178401

APPROVED.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 225280] Merge Review: aspell-pl - Polish dictionaries for Aspell

2011-07-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225280

--- Comment #13 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2011-07-04 05:25:14 
EDT ---
Ivana,
  Can this review be closed or you need any branch for this package?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 712923] Review Request: gnome-contacts - Contacts manager for GNOME

2011-07-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712923

--- Comment #13 from Bastien Nocera bnoc...@redhat.com 2011-07-04 05:53:19 
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #12)
 (In reply to comment #11)
  Just add the desktop file from Git as a second source. This seems to be the
  most painless temporary solution.
 The desktop file is generated on compile time, which means applying two 
 patches
 from git. 
 I don't know how to extract singular patches from git yet, so I can't do it.
 I tried to create a new version of the gnome-contacts rpm from git master but
 it won't build since we don't have vala 0.13 on rawhide yet.

gnome-contacts 0.1.1 was released:
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/ftp-release-list/2011-July/msg3.html

As for creating a patch from git, try git format-patch -1 SHA where SHA
identifies the commit. Or snarf it from the git web interface.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 718415] Review Request: sushi - A quick previewer for the Nautilus

2011-07-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=718415

Bastien Nocera bnoc...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||bnoc...@redhat.com
 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|bnoc...@redhat.com

--- Comment #6 from Bastien Nocera bnoc...@redhat.com 2011-07-04 06:21:19 EDT 
---
(In reply to comment #4)
 (In reply to comment #3)
 Every package belongs to a certain group.
 Non of our utilities (yum, packagekit, anaconda) uses the rpm group tag.
 I don't think this howto section is up-to-data, and I didn't see anything 
 about
 it in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines so unless there is a
 specific guideline that says I must have a group tag, I won't add one.

Just add it already. This isn't really the place to take a stance on packaging
guidelines.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 718415] Review Request: sushi - A quick previewer for the Nautilus

2011-07-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=718415

Bastien Nocera bnoc...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 718415] Review Request: sushi - A quick previewer for the Nautilus

2011-07-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=718415

--- Comment #7 from Bastien Nocera bnoc...@redhat.com 2011-07-04 06:37:26 EDT 
---
sushi.src:71: W: macro-in-%changelog %doc

Don't use macros there, it won't work as you expect.

Built fine in scratch, rpmlint warnings for the binary packages are pretty
bogus:

sushi.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/libsushi-1.0.so.0.0.0 /usr/lib64/libgirepository-1.0.so.1
sushi.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/libsushi-1.0.so.0.0.0 /usr/lib64/libffi.so.5
sushi.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/libsushi-1.0.so.0.0.0 /usr/lib64/libgjs-dbus.so.0
sushi.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/libsushi-1.0.so.0.0.0 /usr/lib64/libgjs.so.0
sushi.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/libsushi-1.0.so.0.0.0 /lib64/libdbus-1.so.3
sushi.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/libsushi-1.0.so.0.0.0 /lib64/libpthread.so.0
sushi.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/libsushi-1.0.so.0.0.0 /usr/lib64/libclutter-gtk-1.0.so.0
sushi.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/libsushi-1.0.so.0.0.0 /usr/lib64/libclutter-gst-1.0.so.0
sushi.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/libsushi-1.0.so.0.0.0 /usr/lib64/libgstbase-0.10.so.0
sushi.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/libsushi-1.0.so.0.0.0 /usr/lib64/libjson-glib-1.0.so.0
sushi.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/libsushi-1.0.so.0.0.0 /usr/lib64/libGL.so.1
sushi.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/libsushi-1.0.so.0.0.0 /usr/lib64/libdrm.so.2
sushi.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/libsushi-1.0.so.0.0.0 /usr/lib64/libX11.so.6
sushi.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/libsushi-1.0.so.0.0.0 /usr/lib64/libXext.so.6
sushi.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/libsushi-1.0.so.0.0.0 /usr/lib64/libXdamage.so.1
sushi.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/libsushi-1.0.so.0.0.0 /usr/lib64/libXcomposite.so.1
sushi.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/libsushi-1.0.so.0.0.0 /usr/lib64/libXfixes.so.3
sushi.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/libsushi-1.0.so.0.0.0 /usr/lib64/libxml2.so.2
sushi.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/libsushi-1.0.so.0.0.0 /usr/lib64/libwebkitgtk-3.0.so.0
sushi.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/libsushi-1.0.so.0.0.0 /usr/lib64/libsoup-2.4.so.1
sushi.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/libsushi-1.0.so.0.0.0 /usr/lib64/libatk-1.0.so.0
sushi.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/libsushi-1.0.so.0.0.0 /usr/lib64/libpangoft2-1.0.so.0
sushi.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/libsushi-1.0.so.0.0.0 /usr/lib64/libpangocairo-1.0.so.0
sushi.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/libsushi-1.0.so.0.0.0 /usr/lib64/libpng12.so.0
sushi.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/libsushi-1.0.so.0.0.0 /lib64/libm.so.6
sushi.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/libsushi-1.0.so.0.0.0 /usr/lib64/libcairo-gobject.so.2
sushi.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/libsushi-1.0.so.0.0.0 /usr/lib64/libfontconfig.so.1
sushi.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/libsushi-1.0.so.0.0.0 /lib64/libgmodule-2.0.so.0
sushi.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/libsushi-1.0.so.0.0.0 /lib64/libgthread-2.0.so.0
sushi.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/libsushi-1.0.so.0.0.0 /lib64/librt.so.1
sushi.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary sushi
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 31 warnings.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 644711] Review Request: diaser - disk based backup volume accumulator, replication and management system

2011-07-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=644711

--- Comment #9 from Damian L Brasher fed...@interlinux.org.uk 2011-07-04 
06:53:59 EDT ---
rpmlint -i diaser.spec 
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

rpmlint -i diaser-1.1.0-1.fc15.src.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 644711] Review Request: diaser - disk based backup volume accumulator, replication and management system

2011-07-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=644711

--- Comment #10 from Damian L Brasher fed...@interlinux.org.uk 2011-07-04 
06:55:21 EDT ---
rpmlint -i diaser.spec 
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

rpmlint -i diaser-1.1.0-1.fc15.src.rpm 
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 718415] Review Request: sushi - A quick previewer for the Nautilus

2011-07-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=718415

--- Comment #8 from Bastien Nocera bnoc...@redhat.com 2011-07-04 06:56:38 EDT 
---
Spec file looks mostly correct.


 This is %{name}, 

Remove the use of macros in description fields:


 the Nautilus
Nope, just nautilus.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 718681] Review Request: luajit - Just-In-Time Compiler for Lua

2011-07-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=718681

--- Comment #1 from Damian L Brasher fed...@interlinux.org.uk 2011-07-04 
07:19:21 EDT ---
Informal review, initial check,

rpmlint -i luajit.spec 
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

rpmlint -i luajit-2.0.0-0.1.beta8.fc16.src.rpm 
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

Damian Brasher

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 712923] Review Request: gnome-contacts - Contacts manager for GNOME

2011-07-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712923

--- Comment #14 from Elad Alfassa el...@doom.co.il 2011-07-04 07:53:12 EDT ---
There is no use in updating the srpm until we have vala 0.13 in rawhide - it
won't build without it.




-- 
Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 704672] Review Request: fusiondirectory - Web Based LDAP Administration Program

2011-07-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=704672

--- Comment #3 from Damian L Brasher fed...@interlinux.org.uk 2011-07-04 
08:03:53 EDT ---
Initial informal review,

rpmlint -i fusiondirectory-1.0.1-3.fc15.src.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings.

-fusiondirectory.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US posix - posit 
-fusiondirectory.src: E: unknown-key GPG#62b4981f
-fusiondirectory.src:246: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes
fusiondirectory-plugin-heimdal

rpmlint -i fusiondirectory.spec 
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
fusiondirectory.spec:246: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes
fusiondirectory-plugin-heimdal

rpmbuild --rebuild fusiondirectory-1.0.1-3.fc15.src.rpm worked fine.

Damian Brasher - (new to FP)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 718415] Review Request: sushi - A quick previewer for the Nautilus

2011-07-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=718415

--- Comment #9 from Elad Alfassa el...@doom.co.il 2011-07-04 08:12:00 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #8)
 Spec file looks mostly correct.
 
 
  This is %{name}, 
 
 Remove the use of macros in description fields:
 
Ok
 
  the Nautilus
 Nope, just nautilus.
Oops, how did that the got there?
Oh, It's from upstream README.
(In reply to comment #6)
 Just add it already. This isn't really the place to take a stance on packaging
 guidelines.
If you say so.

Spec URL: http://elad.fedorapeople.org/reviews/sushi.spec
SRPM URL: http://elad.fedorapeople.org/reviews/sushi-0.0.3-3.fc16.src.rpm




-- 
Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 704672] Review Request: fusiondirectory - Web Based LDAP Administration Program

2011-07-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=704672

--- Comment #4 from Olivier BONHOMME obonho...@nerim.net 2011-07-04 08:13:00 
EDT ---
Hello,

Thnaks for this first review.

For the error on GPG key, our GPG public key is available on our official
donwload site here :
http://download.fusiondirectory.org/gpg/fusiondirectory_public.key

Regards

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 672395] Review Request: eigen3 - A lightweight C++ template library for vector and matrix math

2011-07-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672395

Mario Ceresa mrcer...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||mrcer...@gmail.com

--- Comment #8 from Mario Ceresa mrcer...@gmail.com 2011-07-04 08:23:08 EDT 
---
Hello! what is the current status of this review? it seems almost finished,
isn't it?

Thanks,

Mario

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 644711] Review Request: diaser - disk based backup volume accumulator, replication and management system

2011-07-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=644711

--- Comment #11 from Damian L Brasher fed...@interlinux.org.uk 2011-07-04 
08:43:15 EDT ---
diaser.spec:

inserted lines between %changelog entries
%defattr removed

Package maintainers:

Have joined FAS2 and completed FPCA

I have undertaken informal reviews for these packages:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714491
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=704672
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=718681

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 716777] Review Request: perl-Crypt-RC4 - Perl implementation of the RC4 encryption algorithm

2011-07-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716777

--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-07-04 10:34:02 EDT ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 712624] Review Request: aeskulap - A full open source replacement for commercially available DICOM viewer

2011-07-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712624

--- Comment #10 from Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com 2011-07-04 10:53:13 
EDT ---
rebuilt :)

Should build on F14 now.(I've actually tested it ;))


http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/aeskulap/aeskulap.spec

http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/aeskulap/aeskulap-0.2.2-0.3beta1.fc15.src.rpm

Thanks!
Ankur

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 717768] Review Request: iwhd - image warehouse daemon

2011-07-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=717768

--- Comment #4 from Jim Meyering meyer...@redhat.com 2011-07-04 11:19:19 EDT 
---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: iwhd
Short Description: image warehouse daemon
Owners: meyering zaitcev
Branches: f16
InitialCC:

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 717768] Review Request: iwhd - image warehouse daemon

2011-07-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=717768

--- Comment #5 from Jim Meyering meyer...@redhat.com 2011-07-04 11:35:00 EDT 
---
Rereading, it seems I should leave the Branches: field blank to get F16:

New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: iwhd
Short Description: image warehouse daemon
Owners: meyering zaitcev
Branches:
InitialCC:

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 718798] New: Review Request: rpbar - A Ratpoison taskbar

2011-07-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: rpbar - A Ratpoison taskbar

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=718798

   Summary: Review Request: rpbar - A Ratpoison taskbar
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
 Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: i...@ianweller.org
 QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Classification: Fedora
  Story Points: ---


Spec URL:
http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/rpbar/0-0.1.20110704git0a44407/rpbar.spec
SRPM URL:
http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/rpbar/0-0.1.20110704git0a44407/rpbar-0-0.1.20110704git0a44407.fc15.src.rpm

Description:
The 'default' way to switch windows in Ratpoison is to press C-t-w to get the
window list, find the number of the window you want to switch to (let's say
it's 2), and press C-t-2 to switch. rpbar is a simple taskbar that gives a
permanent display of the windows in the current group in order to make the
first C-t-w unnecesary. As a concession to The Rat, clicking on a window title
will select that window. This is useful for one-handed window selection.

The main inspiration is the simple task bars you get in other minimalistic
window managers such as Awesome or wmii. rpbar's appearance is modeled on these
task bars.

rpbar requires that you adjust your .ratpoisonrc; instructions are available in
the README.md provided with this package.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 559552] Review Request: qca-pkcs11 - Smartcard integration for QCA

2011-07-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559552

Juha Tuomala t...@iki.fi changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|needinfo?(t...@iki.fi)  |

--- Comment #11 from Juha Tuomala t...@iki.fi 2011-07-04 13:26:18 EDT ---
Hi, I'm back with this.

So rebuilt the package for f14:
http://tuju.fi/fedora/14/qca-pkcs11.spec
http://tuju.fi/fedora/14/qca-pkcs11.cpp.vsnprintf.patch
http://tuju.fi/fedora/14/qca-pkcs11-2.0.0-1.fc14.beta2.src.rpm

% rpmlint /home/tuju/PKGS/SRPMS/qca-pkcs11-2.0.0-1.fc14.beta2.src.rpm
qca-pkcs11.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Smartcard - Smart card,
Smart-card, Smartness
qca-pkcs11.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US smartcard - smart
card, smart-card, smartness
qca-pkcs11.src:37: W: configure-without-libdir-spec
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.

% qcatool2 plugins
Qt Library Paths:/
  /usr/lib64/qt4/plugins
  /usr/bin
  /usr/lib64/kde4/plugins
Available Providers:
  qca-ossl
This product includes cryptographic software written by Eric Young
(e...@cryptsoft.com)
  qca-pkcs11
%

% qcatool2 keystore list-stores

Card 200c [TUOMALA,JUHA *, (]
Sys  f1da [System Trusted Certificates]
Unknown signature value:  795 
Unknown signature value:  795 
Unknown signature value:  668 
Unknown signature value:  668 
Unknown signature value:  668 
Unknown signature value:  795 
Unknown signature value:  668 
Unknown signature value:  795 
Unknown signature value:  668 

% qcatool2 keystore list 200c  
Unknown signature value:  795 
Unknown signature value:  795 
Unknown signature value:  668 
Unknown signature value:  668 
Unknown signature value:  668 
Unknown signature value:  795 
Unknown signature value:  668 
Unknown signature value:  795 
Unknown signature value:  668 
Key  1966 [TUOMALA,JUHA *,]


% qcatool2 show kb 200c:1966
Unknown signature value:  795 
Unknown signature value:  795 
Unknown signature value:  668 
Unknown signature value:  668 
Unknown signature value:  668 
Unknown signature value:  795 
Unknown signature value:  668 
Unknown signature value:  795 
Unknown signature value:  668 
Keybundle contains 1 certificates.  Displaying primary:
Serial Number: 
Subject
   Common Name (CN): TUOMALA,JUHA ,*
   Email Address: juha.*.tuom...@eesti.ee
   Organization (O): ESTEID
   Organizational Unit (OU): authentication
   Country Code (C): EE
Issuer
   Common Name (CN): ESTEID-SK 2007
   Organization (O): AS Sertifitseerimiskeskus
   Organizational Unit (OU): ESTEID
   Country Code (C): EE
Validity
   Not before: Wed Sep 1 21:00:00 2010
   Not after:  Sun Aug 30 21:00:00 2015
Constraints
   Digital Signature
   Key Encipherment
   Data Encipherment
   Client Authentication
   Email Protection
Policies
   1.3.6.1.4.1.10015.1.1.2.2
Issuer Key ID: 4806debe8c875795807863fa9c232b2ba03a1875
Subject Key ID: 2227bb7571563c6a8afc6e6cd1cbb9d6b04bf955
CA: No
Signature Algorithm: EMSA3(SHA1)
Public Key:
-BEGIN PUBLIC KEY-
MIGgMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4GOADCBigKBgQDQ1OnqTxu0koh3J0lQjuDBLP1/
kiiCpzy4mTaBfM4+dfVUDr2fy03/Ai9mIdvEOIqgWtQoP9OYiBNy91J4IZCWyQfn
+Mdkoud9Xv6EW9rCScaBlhEm3RpfqpEQRrpr9laCP4Dzhd3pC+QGikm4Mx0M3jap
PBkqOhJjSzzU/o5OqQIEAK9sGQ==
-END PUBLIC KEY-
SHA1 Fingerprint: a3:57:94:7d:e1:3e:8c:7b:6a:72:f7:06:3e:b2:d9:3c:e1:00:ca:37
MD5 Fingerprint: 83:bb:91:34:a1:21:ac:00:90:21:d6:c9:9b:c2:3e:72

It appears to work.

I did not change the name from qca-pkcs11 to qca2-pkcs11, not sure should I.

Alon, I dont' recall how that vsprintf(%s, NULL) went, it's been too long
already. Do you have any better ideas for that?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 718681] Review Request: luajit - Just-In-Time Compiler for Lua

2011-07-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=718681

--- Comment #2 from Andrei Lapshin alaps...@gmx.com 2011-07-04 13:28:31 EDT 
---
After build libluajit-5.1.so.2.0.0 was not executable and rpmbuild created
wrong cyclic dependencies. Fixed.

Spec URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/11270386/luajit-2.0.0-0.1.beta8.fc16.src.rpm
SRPM URL: file:///home/alapshin/Dropbox/Public/luajit.spec


[alapshin@localhost rpmbuild]$ rpmlint -i SPECS/luajit.spec 
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

[alapshin@localhost rpmbuild]$ rpmlint -i
SRPMS/luajit-2.0.0-0.1.beta8.fc16.src.rpm 
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 559552] Review Request: qca-pkcs11 - Smartcard integration for QCA

2011-07-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559552

--- Comment #12 from Juha Tuomala t...@iki.fi 2011-07-04 13:36:47 EDT ---
Scratch builds:
f14: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3179505
f15: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3179508
raw: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3179511

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 559552] Review Request: qca-pkcs11 - Smartcard integration for QCA

2011-07-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559552

--- Comment #13 from Juha Tuomala t...@iki.fi 2011-07-04 13:45:49 EDT ---
Alon, is there any python bindings for qca? Didn't find anything.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 716613] Review Request: gpaste - Clipboard management system

2011-07-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716613

Guillaume Kulakowski llaum...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||needinfo?(pikachu.2014@gmai
   ||l.com)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 712923] Review Request: gnome-contacts - Contacts manager for GNOME

2011-07-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712923

--- Comment #15 from Mario Blättermann mari...@freenet.de 2011-07-04 13:45:47 
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #14)
 There is no use in updating the srpm until we have vala 0.13 in rawhide - it
 won't build without it.
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team
 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers

Add a dependency to bug #710421 to your review request. That's it (for the time
being).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 716615] Review Request: php-zipstream - zipstream-php

2011-07-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716615

Guillaume Kulakowski llaum...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?

--- Comment #2 from Guillaume Kulakowski llaum...@gmail.com 2011-07-04 
13:47:55 EDT ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: php-zipstream
Short Description: Streaming dynamic zip from PHP without writing to the disk
Owners: llaumgui
Branches: f15 f14 el6
InitialCC:

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 559552] Review Request: qca-pkcs11 - Smartcard integration for QCA

2011-07-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559552

--- Comment #14 from Alon Bar-Lev alon.bar...@gmail.com 2011-07-04 13:59:58 
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #13)
 Alon, is there any python bindings for qca? Didn't find anything.

I don't think so it is pure Qt API.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 559552] Review Request: qca-pkcs11 - Smartcard integration for QCA

2011-07-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559552

--- Comment #15 from Alon Bar-Lev alon.bar...@gmail.com 2011-07-04 14:04:16 
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #11)
 I did not change the name from qca-pkcs11 to qca2-pkcs11, not sure should I.

I don't think you should do this as the .so should be installed at qca2
prefix... at least this is how Gentoo installs it.

 Alon, I dont' recall how that vsprintf(%s, NULL) went, it's been too long
 already. Do you have any better ideas for that?

Qt-4 had this bug or feature... so I wish to avoid using Qt's string printf.
Anyway this is most for debug purposes so I do not think it is go no-go
decision.

In Qt-5 I will be recheck assumption... :)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 716615] Review Request: php-zipstream - zipstream-php

2011-07-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716615

--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-07-04 14:08:18 EDT ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 718681] Review Request: luajit - Just-In-Time Compiler for Lua

2011-07-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=718681

--- Comment #3 from Andrei Lapshin alaps...@gmx.com 2011-07-04 14:12:48 EDT 
---
Sorry, SRPM URL:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/11270386/luajit-2.0.0-0.1.beta8.fc16.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 559552] Review Request: qca-pkcs11 - Smartcard integration for QCA

2011-07-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559552

--- Comment #16 from Juha Tuomala t...@iki.fi 2011-07-04 14:14:45 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #15)
 I don't think you should do this as the .so should be installed at qca2
 prefix... at least this is how Gentoo installs it.

Now it ends up to:
/usr/lib64/qt4/plugins/crypto/libqca-pkcs11.so

what should be named as qca2 - libqca2-pkcs... ? I don't have gentoo here where
to check.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 712923] Review Request: gnome-contacts - Contacts manager for GNOME

2011-07-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712923

Bug 712923 depends on bug 717653, which changed state.

Bug 717653 Summary: Please update vala to 0.13
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=717653

   What|Old Value   |New Value

 Resolution||DUPLICATE
 Status|NEW |CLOSED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 712923] Review Request: gnome-contacts - Contacts manager for GNOME

2011-07-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712923

Elad Alfassa el...@doom.co.il changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on|717653  |710421

--- Comment #16 from Elad Alfassa el...@doom.co.il 2011-07-04 14:16:26 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #15)
 (In reply to comment #14)
  There is no use in updating the srpm until we have vala 0.13 in rawhide - it
  won't build without it.
  
  
  
  
  -- 
  Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team
  https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers
 
 Add a dependency to bug #710421 to your review request. That's it (for the 
 time
 being).
It already depends on #717653, which I now see is a dupe of #710421. 



-- 
Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 716615] Review Request: php-zipstream - zipstream-php

2011-07-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716615

--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-07-04 
14:34:14 EDT ---
php-zipstream-0.2.2-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-zipstream-0.2.2-1.fc15

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 716615] Review Request: php-zipstream - zipstream-php

2011-07-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716615

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |MODIFIED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 559552] Review Request: qca-pkcs11 - Smartcard integration for QCA

2011-07-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559552

--- Comment #17 from Alon Bar-Lev alon.bar...@gmail.com 2011-07-04 14:34:14 
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #16)
 (In reply to comment #15)
  I don't think you should do this as the .so should be installed at qca2
  prefix... at least this is how Gentoo installs it.
 
 Now it ends up to:
 /usr/lib64/qt4/plugins/crypto/libqca-pkcs11.so
 
 what should be named as qca2 - libqca2-pkcs... ? I don't have gentoo here 
 where
 to check.

I don't know redhat standards for side-by-side installations.
Go ahead with what you have and what works.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 716615] Review Request: php-zipstream - zipstream-php

2011-07-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716615

--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-07-04 
14:34:23 EDT ---
php-zipstream-0.2.2-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-zipstream-0.2.2-1.el6

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 716615] Review Request: php-zipstream - zipstream-php

2011-07-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716615

--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-07-04 
14:34:31 EDT ---
php-zipstream-0.2.2-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-zipstream-0.2.2-1.fc14

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 559552] Review Request: qca-pkcs11 - Smartcard integration for QCA

2011-07-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559552

--- Comment #18 from Alon Bar-Lev alon.bar...@gmail.com 2011-07-04 14:36:10 
EDT ---
I see that /usr/share/qt4/mkspecs/features/crypto.prf permits to override the
include and lib of qca but not of plugins...

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 639518] Review Request: gst-entrans - Plug-ins and tools for transcoding and recording with GStreamer

2011-07-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639518

--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 
2011-07-04 14:49:48 EDT ---
gst-entrans-0.10.3-3.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 678680] Review Request: transifex-client - Command line tool for Transifex translation management

2011-07-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678680

--- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 
2011-07-04 14:50:03 EDT ---
transifex-client-0.5.2-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 639518] Review Request: gst-entrans - Plug-ins and tools for transcoding and recording with GStreamer

2011-07-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639518

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||gst-entrans-0.10.3-3.fc15
 Resolution||ERRATA
Last Closed||2011-07-04 14:49:56

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 708765] Review Request: Frogr - Flickr Remote Organizer for GNOME

2011-07-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765

--- Comment #57 from Mario Blättermann mari...@freenet.de 2011-07-04 14:49:15 
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #56)
 If you patch configure.ac or Makefile.am, you should add an autoreconf -fi
 before %configure in %prep

Doesn't work, same error message. Due to the fact that all the patches are
taken from Git, I should either use the Git content directly as source, or I
should wait until frogr-0.6 has been released.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 678680] Review Request: transifex-client - Command line tool for Transifex translation management

2011-07-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678680

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|transifex-client-0.5-1.el5  |transifex-client-0.5.2-1.fc
   ||14

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 710775] Review Request: python-xgoogle - Python library to search Google without using their API

2011-07-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710775

--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 
2011-07-04 14:54:39 EDT ---
python-xgoogle-1.4-3.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 639518] Review Request: gst-entrans - Plug-ins and tools for transcoding and recording with GStreamer

2011-07-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639518

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|gst-entrans-0.10.3-3.fc15   |gst-entrans-0.10.3-3.fc14

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 696982] Review Request: ghc-strict - Haskell library providing strict data types

2011-07-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=696982

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||ghc-strict-0.3.2-2.fc15
 Resolution||ERRATA
Last Closed||2011-07-04 14:55:10

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 701866] Review Request: php-pecl-yaml - Support for YAML 1.1 serialization using the LibYAML library

2011-07-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701866

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||php-pecl-yaml-1.0.1-4.fc14
 Resolution||ERRATA
Last Closed||2011-07-04 14:55:28

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 712705] Review Request: gnome-shell-extension-icon-manager - A gnome-shell extension to manage icons in top bar

2011-07-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712705

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||gnome-shell-extension-icon-
   ||manager-0-0.2.gite9deb2b.fc
   ||15
 Resolution||ERRATA
Last Closed||2011-07-04 14:54:57

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 639518] Review Request: gst-entrans - Plug-ins and tools for transcoding and recording with GStreamer

2011-07-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639518

--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 
2011-07-04 14:53:28 EDT ---
gst-entrans-0.10.3-3.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 712705] Review Request: gnome-shell-extension-icon-manager - A gnome-shell extension to manage icons in top bar

2011-07-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712705

--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 
2011-07-04 14:54:52 EDT ---
gnome-shell-extension-icon-manager-0-0.2.gite9deb2b.fc15 has been pushed to the
Fedora 15 stable repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 701866] Review Request: php-pecl-yaml - Support for YAML 1.1 serialization using the LibYAML library

2011-07-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701866

--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-07-04 
14:55:20 EDT ---
php-pecl-yaml-1.0.1-4.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 696982] Review Request: ghc-strict - Haskell library providing strict data types

2011-07-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=696982

--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 
2011-07-04 14:55:05 EDT ---
ghc-strict-0.3.2-2.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 678680] Review Request: transifex-client - Command line tool for Transifex translation management

2011-07-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678680

--- Comment #34 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 
2011-07-04 14:57:12 EDT ---
transifex-client-0.5.2-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 710775] Review Request: python-xgoogle - Python library to search Google without using their API

2011-07-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710775

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||python-xgoogle-1.4-3.fc15
 Resolution||ERRATA
Last Closed||2011-07-04 14:54:44

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 710775] Review Request: python-xgoogle - Python library to search Google without using their API

2011-07-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710775

--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 
2011-07-04 14:58:54 EDT ---
python-xgoogle-1.4-3.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 714382] Review Request: aldabra-theme-gnome - Aldabra theme pack for GNOME

2011-07-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714382

--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 
2011-07-04 14:58:31 EDT ---
aldabra-theme-gnome-0.7.5-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable
repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 701866] Review Request: php-pecl-yaml - Support for YAML 1.1 serialization using the LibYAML library

2011-07-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701866

--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 
2011-07-04 14:57:44 EDT ---
php-pecl-yaml-1.0.1-4.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 701866] Review Request: php-pecl-yaml - Support for YAML 1.1 serialization using the LibYAML library

2011-07-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701866

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|php-pecl-yaml-1.0.1-4.fc14  |php-pecl-yaml-1.0.1-4.fc15

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 678680] Review Request: transifex-client - Command line tool for Transifex translation management

2011-07-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678680

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|transifex-client-0.5.2-1.fc |transifex-client-0.5.2-1.fc
   |14  |15

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 710775] Review Request: python-xgoogle - Python library to search Google without using their API

2011-07-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710775

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|python-xgoogle-1.4-3.fc15   |python-xgoogle-1.4-3.fc14

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 714382] Review Request: aldabra-theme-gnome - Aldabra theme pack for GNOME

2011-07-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714382

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||aldabra-theme-gnome-0.7.5-1
   ||.fc15
 Resolution||ERRATA
Last Closed||2011-07-04 14:58:37

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 718502] Review Request: Temperature.app - Window Maker applet which fetches local temperature information

2011-07-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=718502

--- Comment #2 from Mario Blättermann mari...@freenet.de 2011-07-04 15:08:47 
EDT ---
The Group tag was missing. New files:

Spec URL: http://mariobl.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/Temperature.app.spec
SRPM URL:
http://mariobl.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/Temperature.app-1.5-3.fc15.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 710386] Review Request: gnome-shell-extension-system-monitor-applet - A Gnome shell system monitor extension

2011-07-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710386

--- Comment #13 from Mohamed El Morabity pikachu.2...@gmail.com 2011-07-04 
15:13:30 EDT ---
 At the moment no translations and no configuration script added to this 
 package
 because a proper makefile is still missing from upstream.
Why not installing the locale files manually?

Preferences is not working because of a missing file in 1.92-1.
What is this missing file? Is it possible to cherrypick this file from later
commits on the git repo?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 718479] Review Request: wmwave - Statistics about a current wireless Ethernet connection

2011-07-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=718479

--- Comment #1 from Mario Blättermann mari...@freenet.de 2011-07-04 15:14:58 
EDT ---
The Group tag was missing. New files:

Spec URL: http://mariobl.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/wmwave.spec
SRPM URL:
http://mariobl.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/wmwave-0.4-2.fc15.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 708765] Review Request: Frogr - Flickr Remote Organizer for GNOME

2011-07-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765

--- Comment #58 from Mario Sanchez Prada msanc...@igalia.com 2011-07-04 
15:20:43 EDT ---
I think in debian they used the workaround of ensuring that the m4 directory
existed prior to that. Not sure if that could be applied here as well. 

Also, if you have some specific suggestion for integrating upstream I'll be
glad to push it if that helps :)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 716613] Review Request: gpaste - Clipboard management system

2011-07-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716613

Mohamed El Morabity pikachu.2...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|needinfo?(pikachu.2014@gmai |
   |l.com)  |

--- Comment #5 from Mohamed El Morabity pikachu.2...@gmail.com 2011-07-04 
15:38:37 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #4)
 Question, why don't use this URL for generate archive :
 https://github.com/downloads/Keruspe/%{alt_name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2 ?
I'm not using a stable release. I'm using the latest commit, which fixes a lot
of buges since the stable release 0.99.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 718317] Review Request: asforza4 - 4-in-a-row in a dockapp

2011-07-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=718317

--- Comment #4 from Martin Gieseking martin.giesek...@uos.de 2011-07-04 
15:51:27 EDT ---
Created attachment 511221
  -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=511221
move themes and guile files to /usr/share/asforza4

Here's a patch that modifies the main Makefile and the sources to use
%{_datadir}/%{name} for the themes and guile files. You also have to add 
ASDATADIR='%{_datadir}/%{name}' 
to make in %build and 
ASDATADIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/%{name}
to make install.

I'm not sure how the app is supposed to work. It always terminates with 
X Error of failed request:  BadName (named color or font does not exist)
  Major opcode of failed request:  45 (X_OpenFont)
  Serial number of failed request:  71
  Current serial number in output stream:  77

Maybe an additional font has to be installed.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 718317] Review Request: asforza4 - 4-in-a-row in a dockapp

2011-07-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=718317

--- Comment #5 from Mario Blättermann mari...@freenet.de 2011-07-04 16:15:24 
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #4)

 I'm not sure how the app is supposed to work. It always terminates with 
 X Error of failed request:  BadName (named color or font does not exist)
   Major opcode of failed request:  45 (X_OpenFont)
   Serial number of failed request:  71
   Current serial number in output stream:  77
 
 Maybe an additional font has to be installed.

It's missing obviously the font package xorg-x11-fonts-misc in Requires, as
some other of my dockapp packages.

Thanks for your hints and your patch. I'll have a look at it tomorrow.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 683591] Review Request: tclap - Templatized Command Line Argument Parser

2011-07-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683591

--- Comment #2 from Bruno Postle br...@postle.net 2011-07-04 17:37:57 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
 I'd follow the lead of eigen2[1] with this and make a -devel package with an
 empty base package.
 
 [1]http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=eigen2.git;a=tree

Ok, that seems simple enough and it gets rid of the rpmlint warnings.  Here is
a spec that produces just tclap-devel and tclap-doc packages:
http://bugbear.postle.net/~bruno/apt/SPECS/tclap.spec

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 714408] Review Request: tlomt-league-gothic-fonts - a sans serif gothic typeface

2011-07-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714408

Khusro Jaleel kernelj...@kerneljack.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 714408] Review Request: tlomt-league-gothic-fonts - a sans serif gothic typeface

2011-07-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714408

--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-07-04 20:07:42 EDT ---
Please complete a SCM request if setting the fedora-cvs flag.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 718165] Review Request: ibus-gucharmap - Unicode input engine (using gucharmap) for IBus platform

2011-07-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=718165

Daiki Ueno du...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?

--- Comment #4 from Daiki Ueno du...@redhat.com 2011-07-04 20:57:26 EDT ---
Thanks for the review, Parag.

New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: ibus-gucharmap
Short Description: Unicode input engine (using gucharmap) for IBus platform
Owners: ueno
Branches: f15 f14
InitialCC: i18n-team

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 717502] Review Request: i4uc - IDE for developing micro-controllers firmware

2011-07-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=717502

--- Comment #13 from Guillermo Gómez guillermo.go...@gmail.com 2011-07-04 
23:23:50 EDT ---
%changelog release numbers are still wrong (all entries points to 0.5.6-1)

Release: 4%{dist}
...

%changelog
* Thu Jun 30 2011 lletelier larry.letel...@gmail.com - 0.5.6-1
- Fixed Release
- Sed RPM_BUILD_ROOT - buildroot
- Clean, clean.

* Wed Jun 29 2011 lletelier larry.letel...@gmail.com - 0.5.6-1
- Fixed Licence GPLv3+
- Add doc macro section
- Remove .la static library
- Remove unnecessary entries
- Add i4uc.mo language file

* Mon Jun 27 2011 lletelier larry.letel...@gmail.com - 0.5.6-1
- Fixed docs 

* Sun Jun 12 2011 germanrs germa...@fedoraproject.org - 0.5.6-1
- Initial package

Next time, fix old entries, bump the release and create a new changelog
(0.5.6-5)

Please post spec url, srpm url, and rpmlint outputs for the next time.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 714408] Review Request: tlomt-league-gothic-fonts - a sans serif gothic typeface

2011-07-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714408

Khusro Jaleel kernelj...@kerneljack.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?

--- Comment #7 from Khusro Jaleel kernelj...@kerneljack.com 2011-07-05 
00:57:25 EDT ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: tlomt-league-gothic-fonts
Short Description: League Gothic is a revival of an old classic, Alternate
Gothic
No.1.
Owners: kjaleel
Branches: f14 f15 el5 el6
InitialCC: fonts-sig

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 716779] Review Request: perl-HTML-FormatText-WithLinks-AndTables - Converts HTML to Text with tables intact

2011-07-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716779

--- Comment #2 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2011-07-05 00:58:32 EDT 
---
If planning this package only for devel then you should remove
1) buildroot tag
2) cleaning of buildroot in %install
3) %clean section
4) defattr(-,root,root,-)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 716779] Review Request: perl-HTML-FormatText-WithLinks-AndTables - Converts HTML to Text with tables intact

2011-07-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716779

Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||panem...@gmail.com
 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com
   Flag||fedora-review+

--- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2011-07-05 00:57:29 EDT 
---
Review:
+ koji build - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3162771
+ rpmlint output is
perl-HTML-FormatText-WithLinks-AndTables.noarch: W: spelling-error %description
-l en_US multi - mulch, mufti
perl-HTML-FormatText-WithLinks-AndTables.src: W: spelling-error %description -l
en_US multi - mulch, mufti
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.

+ source verified as (sha1sum)
b585e7e616c41f5ab1e8d142fbd9007f6337e7d0 
HTML-FormatText-WithLinks-AndTables-0.01.tar.gz
b585e7e616c41f5ab1e8d142fbd9007f6337e7d0 
../SOURCES/HTML-FormatText-WithLinks-AndTables-0.01.tar.gz

+ make test
All tests successful.
Files=3, Tests=2,  0 wallclock secs ( 0.01 usr  0.01 sys +  0.12 cusr  0.01
csys =  0.15 CPU)
+ Package perl-HTML-FormatText-WithLinks-AndTables-0.01-2.fc15.noarch
Provides: perl(HTML::FormatText::WithLinks::AndTables) = 0.01
Requires: perl(HTML::FormatText::WithLinks) perl(HTML::TreeBuilder) perl(base)
perl(strict) perl(warnings)


APPROVED.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review