[Bug 674008] Review Request: openrave - Open Robotics Automation Virtual Environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674008 Tim Niemueller t...@niemueller.de changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #486706|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #50 from Tim Niemueller t...@niemueller.de 2011-07-23 02:14:57 EDT --- Created attachment 514810 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=514810 Patch for upstreaming by Rosen -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674008] Review Request: openrave - Open Robotics Automation Virtual Environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674008 Tim Niemueller t...@niemueller.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dw...@infradead.org Component|Package Review |0x Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #49 from Tim Niemueller t...@niemueller.de 2011-07-23 02:13:57 EDT --- I have updated the package to the latest release 0.4.1. Rosen, I had to make some changes to make OpenRAVE compatible again. Most importantly I had to remove the extra library suffix before the .so, that's pretty uncommon and confusing. I changed pkgconfig and cmake files along the way. The include directory now contains the full version instead of just major and minor, I do not see a good reason to shorten it. I have also made a couple of fixes for the new Boost version. I'll attach the patch to this ticket for your review and hopefully upstream application. If you have a minute, would you mind to write a cmake-based buildsys for fparser? It comes as bare code with nothing but C++ files. Ideally, it installed pkg-config and cmake files to find the library, so that we can then use this in OpenRAVE to detect if its installed system-wide. Peter, please check the new SRPM and let me know what you think. SRPM is at http://fedorapeople.org/~timn/robotics/openrave-0.4.1-1.fc15.src.rpm. It requires a new collada build, which I have just uploaded. If you want to rebuild please check Koji for collada-dom and download the latest build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 724869] Review Request: python-flask-oauth - Adds OAuth support to Flask
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=724869 pjp pj.pan...@yahoo.co.in changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||pj.pan...@yahoo.co.in AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|pj.pan...@yahoo.co.in --- Comment #1 from pjp pj.pan...@yahoo.co.in 2011-07-23 02:44:30 EDT --- [X] Package name - ok. [X] Package group - ok. [X] Package license - ok. [X] Build successful - ok. [X] $ rpmlint SRPMS/python-flask-oauth-0.9-1.fc14.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. - ok. [X] $ rpmlint RPMS/noarch/python-flask-oauth-0.9-1.fc14.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. - ok. [X] Install/Un-install - ok. Overall good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 724869] Review Request: python-flask-oauth - Adds OAuth support to Flask
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=724869 pjp pj.pan...@yahoo.co.in changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from pjp pj.pan...@yahoo.co.in 2011-07-23 02:44:59 EDT --- Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 724869] Review Request: python-flask-oauth - Adds OAuth support to Flask
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=724869 Praveen Kumar kumarpraveen.nit...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Praveen Kumar kumarpraveen.nit...@gmail.com 2011-07-23 02:54:09 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: python-flask-oauth Short Description: Adds OAuth support to Flask Owners: kumarpraveen sundaram pjp Branches: f14 f15 el6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 724874] Review Request: python-flask-lastuser - Flask extension for LastUser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=724874 pjp pj.pan...@yahoo.co.in changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from pjp pj.pan...@yahoo.co.in 2011-07-23 03:01:44 EDT --- Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 724874] Review Request: python-flask-lastuser - Flask extension for LastUser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=724874 pjp pj.pan...@yahoo.co.in changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||pj.pan...@yahoo.co.in AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|pj.pan...@yahoo.co.in --- Comment #1 from pjp pj.pan...@yahoo.co.in 2011-07-23 03:01:13 EDT --- [X] Package name - ok. [X] Package group - ok. [X] Package license - ok. [X] Build successful - ok. [X] $ rpmlint SRPMS/python-flask-lastuser-0.2-1.20110722git3bf2a0.fc14.src.rpm python-flask-lastuser.src: W: invalid-url Source0: flask-lastuser-0.2.20110722git3bf2a0.tar.xz 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. - ok. [X] $ rpmlint RPMS/noarch/python-flask-lastuser-0.2-1.20110722git3bf2a0.fc14.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. - ok. Install/Un-install - ok. Overall good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 724874] Review Request: python-flask-lastuser - Flask extension for LastUser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=724874 Praveen Kumar kumarpraveen.nit...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Praveen Kumar kumarpraveen.nit...@gmail.com 2011-07-23 03:10:47 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: python-flask-lastuser Short Description: Flask extension for LastUser Owners: kumarpraveen sundaram pjp Branches: f14 f15 el6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 725131] Review Request: python-lamson - A modern Pythonic mail server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725131 pjp pj.pan...@yahoo.co.in changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from pjp pj.pan...@yahoo.co.in 2011-07-23 03:15:34 EDT --- Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 725131] Review Request: python-lamson - A modern Pythonic mail server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725131 pjp pj.pan...@yahoo.co.in changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|pj.pan...@yahoo.co.in -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 725131] Review Request: python-lamson - A modern Pythonic mail server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725131 pjp pj.pan...@yahoo.co.in changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||pj.pan...@yahoo.co.in --- Comment #1 from pjp pj.pan...@yahoo.co.in 2011-07-23 03:15:11 EDT --- [X] Package name - ok. [X] Package group - ok. [X] Package license - ok. [X] Build successful - ok. [X] $ rpmlint SRPMS/python-lamson-1.1-1.fc14.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. - ok. [X] $ rpmlint RPMS/noarch/python-lamson-1.1-1.fc14.noarch.rpm python-lamson.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary lamson 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. - ok. [X] Install/Un-install - ok. Overall good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 725131] Review Request: python-lamson - A modern Pythonic mail server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725131 --- Comment #3 from Praveen Kumar kumarpraveen.nit...@gmail.com 2011-07-23 03:33:59 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: python-lamson Short Description: A modern Pythonic mail server Owners: kumarpraveen sundaram pjp Branches: f14 f15 el6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 724936] Review Request: python-mock - A Python Mocking and Patching Library for Testing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=724936 Satya Komaragiri satya.komarag...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|satya.komarag...@gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 724936] Review Request: python-mock - A Python Mocking and Patching Library for Testing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=724936 Satya Komaragiri satya.komarag...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||satya.komarag...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Satya Komaragiri satya.komarag...@gmail.com 2011-07-23 03:35:21 EDT --- [X] Package name - ok. [X] package group - ok. [X] Build successful - ok. [X] rpmlint output: -ok. SRPM: $ rpmlint python-mock-0.7.2-1.fc14.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. SPEC: $ rpmlint python-mock.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. RPM: $ rpmlint python-mock-0.7.2-1.fc14.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [X] Install/Un-install - ok. [X] Package license - They license name mentioned is 'BSD'. The link provided with the source is to 'The Voidspace Open Source License' (which is a BSD variant but please confirm with Fedora legal as mentioned by mether on IRC). In any case it would still be nice to have a copy of the license with the source. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 725131] Review Request: python-lamson - A modern Pythonic mail server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725131 Praveen Kumar kumarpraveen.nit...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 725128] Review Request: phat - GTK library for audio software
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725128
Martin Gieseking martin.giesek...@uos.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||martin.giesek...@uos.de
--- Comment #1 from Martin Gieseking martin.giesek...@uos.de 2011-07-23
03:47:53 EDT ---
Here are some initial comments:
- The license seems to be GPLv2+ according to the copyright info in
phat/phatknob.c.
- Drop BR: gtk-doc, and add Requires: gtk-doc to the docs package.
- I recommend to replace the explicit name phat with %{name} in the Requires
fields. It ensures that the subpackages always require the base package
even if the name changes for some reason.
- As the devel package contains more than just the header files, I suggest to
mention the other files as well.
- Please be a bit more specific in %files:
%{_bindir}/phat*
- To simplify future updates, avoid mentioning the soversion and replace
%{_libdir}/libphat.so.0* with %{_libdir}/libphat.so.*
- Fedora usually doesn't ship static libraries except if necessary for some
purpose. Thus, add --disable-static to %configure and drop the .a file
from %files devel.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 725139] Review Request: python-lastuser - User management application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725139 pjp pj.pan...@yahoo.co.in changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||pj.pan...@yahoo.co.in AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|pj.pan...@yahoo.co.in --- Comment #1 from pjp pj.pan...@yahoo.co.in 2011-07-23 03:48:29 EDT --- [X] Package name - ok. [X] Package group - ok. [?] Package license - the source tarball does not have license text copy. Please write to the upstream and request them to add a LICENSE/COPYING file to the source. [?] Build requires following packages to be installed. Please add them to the SPEC file. - BuildRequire: python-flask-mail - BuildRequire: python-flask-webassets - BuildRequire: python-wtforms - BuildRequire: python-flask-wtf - BuildRequire: pytz [X ]$ rpmlint SPECS/python-lastuser.spec SPECS/python-lastuser.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: lastuser-0.1.20110722git584fe0.tar.xz 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. - ok. [X] $ rpmlint SRPMS/python-lastuser-0.1-1.20110722git584fe0.fc14.src.rpm python-lastuser.src: W: invalid-url Source0: lastuser-0.1.20110722git584fe0.tar.xz 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. - ok. [X] $ rpmlint RPMS/noarch/python-lastuser-0.1-1.20110722git584fe0.fc14.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. - ok. [X] Install/Uninstall - ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 725135] Review Request: python-flask-mail - Flask extension for sending email
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725135 Satya Komaragiri satya.komarag...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Satya Komaragiri satya.komarag...@gmail.com 2011-07-23 04:07:21 EDT --- APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 725135] Review Request: python-flask-mail - Flask extension for sending email
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725135 Satya Komaragiri satya.komarag...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||satya.komarag...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Satya Komaragiri satya.komarag...@gmail.com 2011-07-23 04:06:45 EDT --- [X] Package name - ok. [X] package group - ok. [X] Package license - ok [X] Build successful - ok. [X] Install/Un-install - ok. [X] rpmlint output: -ok. SRPM: $ rpmlint python-flask-mail-0.6.1-1.fc15.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. SPEC: $ rpmlint python-flask-mail.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. RPM: $ rpmlint python-flask-mail-0.6.1-1.fc14.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Overall - good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674008] Review Request: openrave - Open Robotics Automation Virtual Environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674008 --- Comment #51 from Rosen Diankov rosen.dian...@gmail.com 2011-07-23 04:30:06 EDT --- Hi Tim, The version number suffixes allow multiple versions of openrave to be installed at the same (0.4.1 was still experimental, but the newest 0.4.2 does a much better job of this). We will eventually have symlinks installed through update-alternatives that change the openrave version used. We worked very hard to make this possible, so it would be great if the fedora package is consistent with the ubuntu packages. Users shouldn't have to deal with fedora-only quirks. We still have to integrate the new fparser into OpenRAVE. We're about to release 0.4.2, so it'll be a great timing to have a cmake-package for fparser for it. Please send the boost fixes asap so we can integrate them in 0.4.2. Are you talking about the recent release of collada-dom 2.3? thanks, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674008] Review Request: openrave - Open Robotics Automation Virtual Environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674008 --- Comment #52 from Rosen Diankov rosen.dian...@gmail.com 2011-07-23 04:31:22 EDT --- I just saw the patch for the boost filesystem fixes, thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674008] Review Request: openrave - Open Robotics Automation Virtual Environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674008 --- Comment #53 from Rosen Diankov rosen.dian...@gmail.com 2011-07-23 04:49:03 EDT --- Hi Tim, We just committed r2633 that fixes the boost problems (just removing the ::native right?), and we fixed the openrave.pc.in file Also, after looking at your patches it seems you replaced the MAJOR.MINOR string with OPENRAVE_VERSION. This is not a good idea. The openrave patch versions preserve ABI compatibility and the shared objects of the same major.minor version are always interchangeable. Here's a small explanation of how we're managing verisons: http://openrave.org/en/main/devel/releases.html#versioning -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 688886] Review Request: kflickr - Standalone Flickr Uploader
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=66 Jan Klepek jan.kle...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(jan.klepek@gmail. | |com)| --- Comment #10 from Jan Klepek jan.kle...@gmail.com 2011-07-23 04:48:31 EDT --- 1,2,3,4 - fixed Spec URL: http://hpejakle.fedorapeople.org/packages/kflickr.spec SRPM URL: http://hpejakle.fedorapeople.org/packages/kflickr-20100817-3.fc15.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683610] Review Request: hxtools - A collection of several tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683610 --- Comment #5 from Till Maas opensou...@till.name 2011-07-23 05:22:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) Some comments: *BuildRequires: - You are using autoreconf in autogen.sh, so you must include it. Done. *Remove the blank line at the end of the file. Done The following are not oficially part of guideliness (but I think that are in its spirit): *Summary - The problem with hxtools summary is that says nothing specific to the package! Would you install some package that you ever heard in the life with such a description? :-) *Well let's read the description - Oh, I see, now it's clear enough! No, not really, I am joking. You are forcing to either read the code, go to the project site or read the man pages *I think you made two interesting programs that make *two specific tasks Why don't you make two different packages in the UNUX-style? :) I am not the author of the tools/package and I only need two of them to be able to update pam_mount in Fedora. There is no real similiarity between the tools except the upstream author, therefore no good summary or description can be given. Updated files: Spec URL: http://till.fedorapeople.org/review/hxtools.spec SRPM URL: http://till.fedorapeople.org/review/hxtools-20110721-1.tillf14.src.rpm Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3224706 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674008] Review Request: openrave - Open Robotics Automation Virtual Environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674008 --- Comment #54 from Rosen Diankov rosen.dian...@gmail.com 2011-07-23 08:20:00 EDT --- Also, after looking at your patches it seems you replaced the MAJOR.MINOR string with OPENRAVE_VERSION. This is not a good idea. The openrave patch versions preserve ABI compatibility and the shared objects of the same major.minor version are always interchangeable. Therefore, we only want the user to specifically pick in the programs an openrave major.minor version, and not the full major.minor.patch version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 567131] Review Request: shibboleth - Web Single Sign On
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567131 --- Comment #5 from Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to 2011-07-23 09:25:06 EDT --- The limitations of nss_compat_ossl are covered here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Nss_compat_ossl Based on comments in https://bugs.internet2.edu/jira/browse/CPPXT-9 , not being able to use file based certificates may be the biggest limitation. It may be that the way to move forward on this, is to start by adding that support to nss_compat_ossl. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 725128] Review Request: phat - GTK library for audio software
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725128 --- Comment #2 from Brendan Jones brendan.jones...@gmail.com 2011-07-23 09:30:26 EDT --- Thanks Martin, I have made the required changes. bsjones@f15laptop ~$rpmlint /home/rawhide/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/phat*0.4.1-2*.rpm /home/rawhide/rpmbuild/SRPMS/phat-0.4.1-2.fc16.src.rpm phat.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary phatfanslider phat.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary phatsliderbutton phat.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary phatpad phat.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary phatknob phat.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary phatkeyboard phat-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/phat-0.4.1/phat/phatknob.c phat-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US developming - developing, development phat-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 7 warnings. Ignore the address warning, it is split over two lines and the '*' in the comment causes the false positive. http://bsjones.fedorapeople.org/phat-0.4.1-2.fc16.src.rpm http://bsjones.fedorapeople.org/phat.spec Cheers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 725128] Review Request: phat - GTK library for audio software
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725128 --- Comment #3 from Brendan Jones brendan.jones...@gmail.com 2011-07-23 09:35:06 EDT --- And corrected spelling. bsjones@f15laptop ~$rpmlint /home/rawhide/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/phat*0.4.1-3*.rpm /home/rawhide/rpmbuild/SRPMS/phat-0.4.1-3.fc16.src.rpm phat.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary phatfanslider phat.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary phatsliderbutton phat.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary phatpad phat.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary phatknob phat.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary phatkeyboard phat-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/phat-0.4.1/phat/phatknob.c phat-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 6 warnings. http://bsjones.fedorapeople.org/phat-0.4.1-3.fc16.src.rpm http://bsjones.fedorapeople.org/phat.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 723924] Review Request: python-flask-assets - Asset management for flask
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=723924 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-07-23 10:29:10 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 724864] Review Request: python-flask-openid - OpenID support for Flask
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=724864 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-07-23 10:34:09 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 724006] Review Request: python-flask-wtf - Simple integration of Flask and WTForms
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=724006 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-07-23 10:32:13 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 724857] Review Request: python-blinker - Fast, simple object-to-object and broadcast signaling
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=724857 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-07-23 10:33:13 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 724874] Review Request: python-flask-lastuser - Flask extension for LastUser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=724874 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-07-23 10:48:44 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 724869] Review Request: python-flask-oauth - Adds OAuth support to Flask
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=724869 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-07-23 10:47:32 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 725131] Review Request: python-lamson - A modern Pythonic mail server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725131 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-07-23 10:49:06 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 724878] Review Request: TexStudio - A feature-rich editor for LaTeX documents
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=724878 --- Comment #2 from hannes johannes.l...@googlemail.com 2011-07-23 11:11:47 EDT --- Alright thanks for your feedback. I will start packaging Qcodeeditor and make note in this bug. Also I will ask upstream if and how the dependencies could be resolved with libraries already in fedora and without using bundled ones. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 725128] Review Request: phat - GTK library for audio software
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725128
Veeti Paananen veeti.paana...@rojekti.fi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||veeti.paana...@rojekti.fi
--- Comment #4 from Veeti Paananen veeti.paana...@rojekti.fi 2011-07-23
11:50:48 EDT ---
The base package requirement in the subpackages needs to be in the format
%{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}
(http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Requiring_Base_Package).
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674008] Review Request: openrave - Open Robotics Automation Virtual Environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674008 --- Comment #55 from Tim Niemueller t...@niemueller.de 2011-07-23 13:59:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #51) Hi Tim, The version number suffixes allow multiple versions of openrave to be installed at the same (0.4.1 was still experimental, but the newest 0.4.2 does a much better job of this). We will eventually have symlinks installed through update-alternatives that change the openrave version used. This is a no-go. There is one version installed via the package manager, that's it. I only kept it in the include dir because there is another openrave dir inside it. And you still can have multiple versions, as the SOVERSION is attached to the file name. Keeping up2date with OpenRAVE is hard enough, having more than one version would make things pretty bad. We worked very hard to make this possible, so it would be great if the fedora package is consistent with the ubuntu packages. Users shouldn't have to deal with fedora-only quirks. Nope, that's a Debian/Ubuntu thing, but cannot happen on Fedora besides very specific exceptions (core libraries like glib/gtk for example). We still have to integrate the new fparser into OpenRAVE. We're about to release 0.4.2, so it'll be a great timing to have a cmake-package for fparser for it. Great! Please send the boost fixes asap so we can integrate them in 0.4.2. Are you talking about the recent release of collada-dom 2.3? It's 2.3.1, I needed it to have the cmake files. Update is pending, cf. Bodhi and Koji. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674008] Review Request: openrave - Open Robotics Automation Virtual Environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674008 --- Comment #56 from Tim Niemueller t...@niemueller.de 2011-07-23 14:04:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #54) Therefore, we only want the user to specifically pick in the programs an openrave major.minor version, and not the full major.minor.patch version. You're trying to solve problems particularly prevalent on source installs, here the distro will keep up with OpenRAVE and that will be one specific sequence of versions. So actually I'm probably going to remove all version numbers, so even the one from the exclude file. If you have a long-term stable 1.0 release at some point, and then a couple of years later a 2.0, then having a multi-install could be an option, like for Eigen. But not just for minor versions because the API is still a moving target. The solution is to stabilize the API, not increase the number of required (and obviously incompatible) versions on a system. So I'd like to have some way to optionalize your version suffixes. So if there was an OPT flag we could simply turn it off on Fedora. Developers should use pkg-config or cmake to get the appropriate include and link flags so there are no fundamental differences between Ubuntu and Fedora afterwards. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 573917] Review Request: perl-NetPacket-SpanningTree - Assemble and disassemble IEEE 802.1D Spanning Tree protocol packets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573917 --- Comment #13 from Jan Klepek jan.kle...@gmail.com 2011-07-23 15:51:23 EDT --- license fixed http://hpejakle.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-NetPacket-SpanningTree.spec SRPM URL: http://hpejakle.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-NetPacket-SpanningTree-0.01-3.fc15.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 576272] Review Request: perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree-XPath - XPath access to XML::Parser::Lite::Tree structures
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576272 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-07-23 16:04:54 EDT --- perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree-XPath-0.24-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree-XPath-0.24-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 576272] Review Request: perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree-XPath - XPath access to XML::Parser::Lite::Tree structures
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576272 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 576272] Review Request: perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree-XPath - XPath access to XML::Parser::Lite::Tree structures
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576272 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-07-23 16:04:37 EDT --- perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree-XPath-0.24-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree-XPath-0.24-1.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 576272] Review Request: perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree-XPath - XPath access to XML::Parser::Lite::Tree structures
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576272 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-07-23 16:04:47 EDT --- perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree-XPath-0.24-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree-XPath-0.24-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608574] Review Request: tinymce - Web based Javascript HTML WYSIWYG editor control
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608574 --- Comment #15 from Neal Gompa ngomp...@gmail.com 2011-07-23 17:26:45 EDT --- TinyMCE has been pushed to git, and the packages are building for the appropriate branches by koji. Next step... tinymce-spellchecker[1], which is required by many tinymce-using programs. [2]: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608575 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705382] Review Request: sympa - Mailing list manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705382 --- Comment #2 from Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org 2011-07-23 18:04:03 EDT --- Update to 6.1.6 : Spec URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/sympa.spec SRPM URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/sympa-6.1.6-1.fc15.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 725139] Review Request: python-lastuser - User management application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725139 Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||methe...@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com 2011-07-23 18:34:34 EDT --- rename to lastuser. apparently this doesn't function as a module at all -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 722725] Review Request: django-authopenid-1.0.1-1.fc15 - Revive Orphaned Package django-auth-openid
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=722725 Nick Bebout n...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||n...@fedoraproject.org Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #2 from Nick Bebout n...@fedoraproject.org 2011-07-23 19:46:38 EDT --- I've sponsored Kieran. Anyone can feel free to do the review now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 722725] Review Request: django-authopenid-1.0.1-1.fc15 - Revive Orphaned Package django-auth-openid
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=722725 Nick Bebout n...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG Last Closed||2011-07-23 20:12:47 --- Comment #3 from Nick Bebout n...@fedoraproject.org 2011-07-23 20:12:47 EDT --- No review needed, per new orphan policy, because package was not deprecated in EL6 branch. Resolving this as NOTABUG. Go forth and commit :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 724936] Review Request: python-mock - A Python Mocking and Patching Library for Testing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=724936 --- Comment #2 from Praveen Kumar kumarpraveen.nit...@gmail.com 2011-07-23 21:32:43 EDT --- Added license file, I think it's doesn't need to bump up release . Spec URL: http://kumarpraveen.fedorapeople.org/mock/python-mock.spec SRPM URL: http://kumarpraveen.fedorapeople.org/mock/python-mock-0.7.2-1.fc15.src.rpm koji Build : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3225612 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 725139] Review Request: lastuser - User management application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725139 Praveen Kumar kumarpraveen.nit...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: lastuser - |python-lastuser - User |User management application |management application | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 725139] Review Request: lastuser - User management application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725139 --- Comment #3 from Praveen Kumar kumarpraveen.nit...@gmail.com 2011-07-23 22:10:28 EDT --- Renamed.Added licence file and buildrequire. Spec URL: http://kumarpraveen.fedorapeople.org/lastuser/lastuser.spec SRPM URL: http://kumarpraveen.fedorapeople.org/lastuser/lastuser-0.1-2.20110724gitf41a49.fc15.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 725135] Review Request: python-flask-mail - Flask extension for sending email
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725135 Praveen Kumar kumarpraveen.nit...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Praveen Kumar kumarpraveen.nit...@gmail.com 2011-07-23 22:12:16 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: python-flask-mail Short Description: Flask extension for sending email Owners: sundaram pjp kumarpraveen Branches: f14 f15 el6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 725200] Review Request: raptor2 - RDF Parser Toolkit for Redland
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725200 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||656997(kde-reviews) --- Comment #1 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu 2011-07-24 00:15:18 EDT --- this is required for a rasqal/redland stack update. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 725200] Review Request: raptor2 - RDF Parser Toolkit for Redland
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725200 --- Comment #2 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu 2011-07-24 00:15:48 EDT --- *** Bug 723909 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 725200] New: Review Request: raptor2 - RDF Parser Toolkit for Redland
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: raptor2 - RDF Parser Toolkit for Redland https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725200 Summary: Review Request: raptor2 - RDF Parser Toolkit for Redland Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rdie...@math.unl.edu QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/raptor2/raptor2.spec SRPM URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/raptor2/raptor2-2.0.3-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: Raptor is the RDF Parser Toolkit for Redland that provides a set of standalone RDF parsers, generating triples from RDF/XML or N-Triples. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674008] Review Request: openrave - Open Robotics Automation Virtual Environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674008 --- Comment #57 from Rosen Diankov rosen.dian...@gmail.com 2011-07-24 00:18:04 EDT --- hi tim, thank you for the feedback, it was really helpful. I'm worried that removing suffixes would make it difficult for openrave-aware programs to run cross platform. Whether fedora allows multiple openrave versions or only one is up to you, so even if there are suffixes on the files, users will only be interacting with one version. How about we add these symlinks to give the fedora core users the impression that openrave is installed without version numbers: /usr/include/openrave - /usr/include/openrave-0.4 /usr/share/openrave - /usr/share/openrave-0.4 Are there any other files necessary? Please don't misunderstand my hesitation for adding a cmake option to remove the suffixes. I agree with you that the solution is to stabilize the API, but let's be serious here, all library developers want to stablize their APIs once and never touch it again. And how many times do APIs evolve into something that the users just don't like and want to go back to the old one easily? It is because we don't know how motion planning technologies will develop that makes it difficult to solidify an API. And even though OpenRAVE undergoes changes, we take very careful precautions to preserve backward compatibility. If anything breaks, it is very minor and rare (like a function returning bool now returns void because it throws exceptions on errors). As for the package names, if you name the packages openrave0.3, openrave0.4, openrave0.5, then you should be able to install multiple openrave packages. I'm not sure how python packages work on fedora, but I would be surprised if you are locked into only one python version per fedora distribution. In OpenRAVE, you can set -DOPT_BUILD_PACKAGE_DEFAULT=OFF to avoid installing the symlinks of a particular package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 725135] Review Request: python-flask-mail - Flask extension for sending email
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725135 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-07-24 00:28:33 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). Satya, in the future, please take ownership of review requests you're working on. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674008] Review Request: openrave - Open Robotics Automation Virtual Environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674008 --- Comment #58 from Rosen Diankov rosen.dian...@gmail.com 2011-07-24 00:43:23 EDT --- Sorry it should be: /usr/include/openrave - /usr/include/openrave-0.4/openrave attached to the file name. Keeping up2date with OpenRAVE is hard enough, having more than one version would make things pretty bad. Please tell us what is so difficult to keep up with OpenRAVE updates so we can attempt to resolve the problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
