[Bug 727646] Review Request: link-grammar - A Grammar Checking library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=727646 --- Comment #3 from hannes 2011-08-06 01:47:18 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: link-grammar Short Description: A Grammar Checking library Owners: hannes Branches: f15 f16 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 727646] Review Request: link-grammar - A Grammar Checking library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=727646 hannes changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728403] Review Request: libepc - Easy Publish and Consume library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728403
Remi Collet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Remi Collet 2011-08-06 01:41:16
EDT ---
=== FORMAL REVIEW ===
-=N/A x=Check !=Problem, ?=Not evaluated
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[x] Rpmlint output:
libepc-ui.x86_64: W: no-documentation
[x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines
[x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
License type: LGPLv2+
[x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
[x] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
md5sum : c7fde118546d09d747af7b08cb52bfad libepc-0.4.0.tar.bz2
[x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported architecture.
Tested on: f15 x86_64
[x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch
[x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x] The spec file handles locales properly.
[x] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[x] Packages don't bundle copies of system librarie
[x] Package is not relocatable.
[x] Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x] Permissions on files are set properly.
[x] Package consistently uses macros.
[x] Package contains code, or permissable content.
[x] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x] Static libraries in -static subpackage, if present.
[x] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages with %{?_isa}, if present.
[x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la).
[-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
[x] All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8
[x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
=== SUGGESTED ITEMS ===
[x] Final requires
libepc
libavahi-client.so.3()(64bit)
libavahi-common.so.3()(64bit)
libavahi-glib.so.1()(64bit)
libc.so.6()(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.14)(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit)
libgio-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
libgmodule-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
libgnutls.so.26()(64bit)
libgnutls.so.26(GNUTLS_1_4)(64bit)
libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
libgthread-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
libpthread.so.0()(64bit)
libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)
librt.so.1()(64bit)
libsoup-2.4.so.1()(64bit)
libuuid.so.1()(64bit)
libuuid.so.1(UUID_1.0)(64bit)
libepc-ui
libatk-1.0.so.0()(64bit)
libavahi-client.so.3()(64bit)
libavahi-common.so.3()(64bit)
libavahi-glib.so.1()(64bit)
libc.so.6()(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)
libcairo.so.2()(64bit)
libepc(x86-64) = 0.4.0-1.fc15.remi
libepc-1.0.so.3()(64bit)
libfontconfig.so.1()(64bit)
libfreetype.so.6()(64bit)
libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
libgio-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
libgmodule-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
libgnutls.so.26()(64bit)
libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
libgthread-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
libm.so.6()(64bit)
libpango-1.0.so.0()(64bit)
libpangocairo-1.0.so.0()(64bit)
libpangoft2-1.0.so.0()(64bit)
libpng12.so.0()(64bit)
libpthread.so.0()(64bit)
librt.so.1()(64bit)
libsoup-2.4.so.1()(64bit)
libuuid.so.1()(64bit)
libepc-devel
avahi-ui-devel(x86-64) >= 0.6
glib2-devel(x86-64) >= 2.15.1
gnutls-devel(x86-64) >= 1.4
gtk2-devel(x86-64) >= 2.10
libepc(x86-64) = 0.4.0-1.fc15.remi
libepc-1.0.so.3()(64bit)
libepc-ui(x86-64) = 0.4.0-1.fc15.remi
libepc-ui-1.0.so.3()(64bit)
libsoup-devel(x86-64) >= 2.3
libuuid-devel >= 1.36
pkgconfig(avahi-client)
pkgconfig(avahi-glib)
pkgconfig(gtk+-2.0)
pkgconfig(libepc-1.0)
pkgconfig(libsoup-2.4)
[x] Final provides
libepc
libepc-1.0.so.3()(64bit)
libepc = 0.4.0-1.fc15
libepc(x86-64) = 0.4.0-1.fc15
libepc-ui
libepc-ui
[Bug 714326] Review Request: libtpcmisc - Miscellaneous PET functions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714326 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-06 00:58:22 EDT --- libtpcmisc-1.4.8-3.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libtpcmisc-1.4.8-3.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 714326] Review Request: libtpcmisc - Miscellaneous PET functions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714326 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 714326] Review Request: libtpcmisc - Miscellaneous PET functions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714326 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-06 00:58:14 EDT --- libtpcmisc-1.4.8-3.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libtpcmisc-1.4.8-3.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 714326] Review Request: libtpcmisc - Miscellaneous PET functions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714326 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-06 00:58:29 EDT --- libtpcmisc-1.4.8-3.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libtpcmisc-1.4.8-3.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705426] Review Request: blender25 - 3D modeling, animation, rendering and post-production
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705426
--- Comment #12 from Richard Shaw 2011-08-05 22:53:37
EDT ---
I was playing around with the blender-cycles branch to see if I can get a good
build. I'm using the "make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot}" instead of manually
installing. My build seems to create a lot of libraries that don't get
installed. Are you building the libraries statically into the binary?
Something I noticed from your spec file:
%global blenderlib %{_datadir}/blender/%{blender_api}
%global blenderarch %{_libdir}/blender/%{belnder_api}
It looks like blenderlib and blenderarch are assigned opposite of what they
should be? Or maybe I'm not understanding your naming scheme.
Also your spec URL isn't valid, I tried dropping the "25" and it worked but it
doesn't match what's in the spec file.
The SRPM as provided doesn't build. The spec file is missing a BR: for cmake.
Can you fix those and repost new links?
Thanks,
Richard
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 709180] Review Request: jackctlmmc - control JACK transport via MIDI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709180 --- Comment #7 from Brendan Jones 2011-08-05 22:43:38 EDT --- OK - updated as suggested - thanks guys. SPEC: http://bsjones.fedorapeople.org/jackctlmmc.spec SRPM: http://bsjones.fedorapeople.org/jackctlmmc-4-3.fc17.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728649] New: Review Request: airrac - C++ Simulated Revenue Accounting (RAC) System Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: airrac - C++ Simulated Revenue Accounting (RAC) System Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728649 Summary: Review Request: airrac - C++ Simulated Revenue Accounting (RAC) System Library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: denis.arnaud_fed...@m4x.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/sim/airrac/airrac-0.1.0-1.spec SRPM URL: https://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/airrac/fedora_15/airrac-0.1.0-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: AirRAC is a C++ library of airline revenue accounting classes and functions, mainly targeting simulation purposes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 530684] Review Request: nordugrid-arc - Advanced Resource Connector Grid Middleware
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530684 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-05 19:58:24 EDT --- nordugrid-arc-doc-1.0.2-1.fc14, nordugrid-arc-1.0.1-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 704835] Review Request: nordugrid-arc-doc - Advanced Resource Connector Documentation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=704835 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|nordugrid-arc-doc-1.0.2-1.f |nordugrid-arc-doc-1.0.2-1.f |c15 |c14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 530684] Review Request: nordugrid-arc - Advanced Resource Connector Grid Middleware
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530684 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|nordugrid-arc-doc-1.0.2-1.f |nordugrid-arc-doc-1.0.2-1.f |c15 |c14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 704835] Review Request: nordugrid-arc-doc - Advanced Resource Connector Documentation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=704835 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-05 19:58:30 EDT --- nordugrid-arc-doc-1.0.2-1.fc14, nordugrid-arc-1.0.1-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 704835] Review Request: nordugrid-arc-doc - Advanced Resource Connector Documentation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=704835 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||nordugrid-arc-doc-1.0.2-1.f ||c15 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-08-05 19:58:07 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 530684] Review Request: nordugrid-arc - Advanced Resource Connector Grid Middleware
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530684 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||nordugrid-arc-doc-1.0.2-1.f ||c15 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-08-05 19:58:03 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 530684] Review Request: nordugrid-arc - Advanced Resource Connector Grid Middleware
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530684 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-05 19:57:47 EDT --- nordugrid-arc-doc-1.0.2-1.fc15, nordugrid-arc-1.0.1-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 704835] Review Request: nordugrid-arc-doc - Advanced Resource Connector Documentation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=704835 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-05 19:57:58 EDT --- nordugrid-arc-doc-1.0.2-1.fc15, nordugrid-arc-1.0.1-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728178] Review Request: xfce4-wmdock-plugin - Compatibility layer for running dockapps in an Xfce panel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728178 Mario Blättermann changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||cwick...@fedoraproject.org, ||mari...@freenet.de AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mari...@freenet.de Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Mario Blättermann 2011-08-05 18:34:48 EDT --- Nice to know that xfce4-wmdock-plugin is back! I'll have a look at it tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 643140] Review Request: autokey - A desktop automation utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=643140 --- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-05 17:37:04 EDT --- autokey-0.71.3-4.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/autokey-0.71.3-4.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 643140] Review Request: autokey - A desktop automation utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=643140 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 643140] Review Request: autokey - A desktop automation utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=643140 --- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-05 17:37:22 EDT --- autokey-0.71.3-4.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/autokey-0.71.3-4.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 643140] Review Request: autokey - A desktop automation utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=643140 --- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-05 17:37:14 EDT --- autokey-0.71.3-4.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/autokey-0.71.3-4.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 722966] Review Request: mydumper - A high-performance multi-threaded backup toolset for MySQL and Drizzle
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=722966 --- Comment #11 from Andrew Hutchings 2011-08-05 17:12:38 EDT --- Found the cause, filed a feature request in Bug #728634 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 727635] Review Request: java-1.7.0-openjdk - OpenJDK runtime environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=727635 Deepak Bhole changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2011-08-05 16:36:26 --- Comment #10 from Deepak Bhole 2011-08-05 16:36:26 EDT --- Thanks for the review Omair! New builds for F16 and Rawhide are ready: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=257376 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=257378 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728460] Review Request: xnio - JBoss XNIO
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728460 Bug 728460 depends on bug 727635, which changed state. Bug 727635 Summary: Review Request: java-1.7.0-openjdk - OpenJDK runtime environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=727635 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||RAWHIDE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728296] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-WebKit - Web content engine library for Gtk2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728296 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-05 16:08:07 EDT --- perl-Gtk2-WebKit-0.09-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 716469] Review Request: rubygem-rhc - Openshift Express Client Tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716469 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|rubygem-rhc-0.71.2-2.fc15 |rubygem-rhc-0.71.2-2.el6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 716469] Review Request: rubygem-rhc - Openshift Express Client Tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716469 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-05 15:54:30 EDT --- rubygem-rhc-0.71.2-2.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 644711] Review Request: diaser - disk based backup volume accumulator, replication and management system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=644711 --- Comment #33 from Damian L Brasher 2011-08-05 15:43:36 EDT --- -build (dist-rawhide, /diaser: ... completed successfully -build (f15-candidate, /diaser: ... completed successfully -bodhi - 2011-08-05 19:41:56 (karma 0) This update has been submitted for testing by dbrasher. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 644711] Review Request: diaser - disk based backup volume accumulator, replication and management system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=644711 Damian L Brasher changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-08-05 15:44:15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 644711] Review Request: diaser - disk based backup volume accumulator, replication and management system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=644711 --- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-05 15:41:40 EDT --- diaser-1.1.0-3.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/diaser-1.1.0-3.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 644711] Review Request: diaser - disk based backup volume accumulator, replication and management system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=644711 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 722966] Review Request: mydumper - A high-performance multi-threaded backup toolset for MySQL and Drizzle
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=722966 --- Comment #10 from Andrew Hutchings 2011-08-05 14:21:44 EDT --- Many thanks for narrowing that down. It also appears to affect Mandriva as their packaging team have pointed out. I have a F15 box to play with so I'll see if anything can be done about it without changing your MySQL binaries next week. My wild guess (without looking at the .spec or anything) is MySQL is compiled with a GCC visibility flag or something which is hiding the my_net_read function as it is not supposed to be a publicly accessible part of the API but is needed for binary log retrieval. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728407] Review Request: xqilla - XQuery and XPath 2.0 library, built on top of Xerces-C
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728407
--- Comment #3 from Martin Gieseking 2011-08-05
13:19:31 EDT ---
Here's the review. The package looks almost fine. There are just a couple of
minor things to be addressed:
- add a short comment above Patch0 that the patch has already been applied
to the upstream repository
http://xqilla.hg.sourceforge.net/hgweb/xqilla/xqilla/rev/fcb3a70b99a8
- update the fully versioned dependency to
Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}
(the guidelines have been changed a few months ago)
- add INSTALL='install -p" to "make install" in order to preserve the
timestamps of the header files
- replace %{_mandir}/man1/%{name}.1.gz with %{_mandir}/man1/%{name}.1*
as the spec shouldn't rely on a specific compression format applied to
manpages.
- since the -doc package doesn't require the base package, add file LICENSE
to it.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#Subpackage_Licensing
- please tell upstream about the shared-lib-calls-exit issue and ask whether
they could replace the call of exit() with something less radical, e.g.
exceptions
$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-15-x86_64/result/*.rpm
xqilla.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) XQuery -> X Query, Query, Equerry
xqilla.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) XQuery -> X Query, Query,
Equerry
xqilla.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libxqilla.so.5.0.4
exit@GLIBC_2.2.5
xqilla-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
xqilla-doc.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US api -> pi, ape, apt
5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings.
-
key:
[+] OK
[.] OK, not applicable
[X] needs work
-
[+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}.
[+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license.
[+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
[+] MUST: The file containing the text of the license(s) for the package must
be included in %doc.
[+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source.
$ md5sum XQilla-2.2.4.tar.gz*
a00672133d06772f54f18d0fda304c02 XQilla-2.2.4.tar.gz
a00672133d06772f54f18d0fda304c02 XQilla-2.2.4.tar.gz.1
[+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on
at least one primary architecture.
[.] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, ...
[+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires.
[+] MUST: When compiling C, C++, or Fortran files, %{optflags} must be applied.
[.] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly.
[+] MUST: Packages storing shared library files (not just symlinks) must call
ldconfig in %post and %postun.
[+] MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
[.] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, ...
[+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates.
[+] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in %files.
[+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly.
[+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros.
[+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
[+] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage.
[+] MUST: Files in %doc must not affect the runtime of the application.
[+] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package.
[.] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package.
[+] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix, then .so (without
suffix) must go in a -devel package.
[X] MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned
dependency.
[+] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives.
[.] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop
file.
[+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
[+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
EPEL <= 5 only:
[+] MUST: The spec file must contain a valid BuildRoot field.
[+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf
%{buildroot}.
[+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf
%{buildroot}.
[.] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'
[.] SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a
separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[X] SHOULD: Timestamps of files should be preserved.
[.] SHOULD: Patch files should be prefixed with %{name}-
[X] SHOULD: All patches should be c
[Bug 728403] Review Request: libepc - Easy Publish and Consume library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728403 Remi Collet changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fed...@famillecollet.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|fed...@famillecollet.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 727382] Review Request: django-recaptcha-works - Integrate the reCaptcha service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=727382 Rahul Sundaram changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED CC||methe...@gmail.com Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2011-08-05 12:19:54 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728296] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-WebKit - Web content engine library for Gtk2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728296 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-05 11:46:13 EDT --- perl-Gtk2-WebKit-0.09-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Gtk2-WebKit-0.09-1.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728296] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-WebKit - Web content engine library for Gtk2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728296 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-05 11:45:44 EDT --- perl-Gtk2-WebKit-0.09-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Gtk2-WebKit-0.09-1.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728296] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-WebKit - Web content engine library for Gtk2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728296 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 722966] Review Request: mydumper - A high-performance multi-threaded backup toolset for MySQL and Drizzle
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=722966 --- Comment #9 from Jeffrey Ness 2011-08-05 10:51:49 EDT --- Hello Andrew, As you can see in the build.log I never ran in to this undefined reference while building for EL5: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=3254341&name=build.log I did throw in a Fedora 15 build just to see the result and I was able to reproduce the error listed in the bug above: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=3254355&name=build.log What is strange is I do not run across this issue on Fedora 14: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=3254371&name=build.log == Jeffrey- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 714326] Review Request: libtpcmisc - Miscellaneous PET functions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714326 --- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla 2011-08-05 10:46:27 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 714327] Review Request: libtpcimgio - Turku PET Centre for image file input and output procedures
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714327 --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla 2011-08-05 10:46:54 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728296] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-WebKit - Web content engine library for Gtk2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728296 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla 2011-08-05 10:47:29 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728555] New: Review Request: screenie-composer - Fancy screenshot composer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: screenie-composer - Fancy screenshot composer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728555 Summary: Review Request: screenie-composer - Fancy screenshot composer Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: martin.giesek...@uos.de QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://mgieseki.fedorapeople.org/review/screenie-composer.spec SRPM URL: http://mgieseki.fedorapeople.org/review/screenie-composer-1.0.0-0.1.20110805git49c2630.fc15.src.rpm Description: Screenie is an easy to use screenshot composer tool that lets you create fancy and stylish screenshots from a given set of images. Note: Since the original upstream name "screenie" collides with the screenie screen wrapper utility, I renamed the binary and this package to "screenie-composer". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728296] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-WebKit - Web content engine library for Gtk2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728296 Remi Collet changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Remi Collet 2011-08-05 10:36:56 EDT --- Thanks for the review New Package SCM Request === Package Name: perl-Gtk2-WebKit Short Description: Web content engine library for Gtk2 Owners: remi Branches: f15 f16 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 714327] Review Request: libtpcimgio - Turku PET Centre for image file input and output procedures
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714327 Ankur Sinha changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Ankur Sinha 2011-08-05 10:32:59 EDT --- Thank you for the review Richard :D New Package SCM Request === Package Name: libtpcimgio Short Description: Turku PET Centre for image file input and output procedures Owners: ankursinha Branches: f14 f15 f16 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 714326] Review Request: libtpcmisc - Miscellaneous PET functions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714326 Ankur Sinha changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Ankur Sinha 2011-08-05 10:31:10 EDT --- Thank you for the review Richard :) I'll update. New Package SCM Request === Package Name: libtpcmisc Short Description: Miscellaneous PET functions Owners: ankursinha Branches: f14 f15 f16 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 714327] Review Request: libtpcimgio - Turku PET Centre for image file input and output procedures
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714327 --- Comment #6 from Richard Shaw 2011-08-05 10:26:12 EDT --- +: OK -: must be fixed =: should be fixed (at your discretion) ?: Question or clairification needed N: not applicable MUST: [+] rpmlint output: shown in comment: No unexpected output [+] follows package naming guidelines [+] spec file base name matches package name [+] package meets the packaging guidelines [+] package uses a Fedora approved license: LGPLv2+ [+] license field matches the actual license. [N] license file is included in %doc: [+] spec file is in American English [+] spec file is legible [+] sources match upstream: md5sums match: ced548015aae0c1f50827b6d51aade9c [+] package builds on at least one primary arch: Tested F14/F15 [N] appropriate use of ExcludeArch [+] all build requirements in BuildRequires [N] spec file handles locales properly [N] ldconfig in %post and %postun [+] no bundled copies of system libraries [N] no relocatable packages [N] package owns all directories that it creates [+] no files listed twice in %files [+] proper permissions on files [+] consistent use of macros [+] code or permissible content [N] large documentation in -doc [+] no runtime dependencies in %doc [+] header files in -devel [+] static libraries in -static: In -devel with -static Provides [+] .so in -devel [+] -devel requires main package [+] package contains no libtool archives [N] package contains a desktop file, uses desktop-file-install/validate [+] package does not own files/dirs owned by other packages [+] all filenames in UTF-8 SHOULD: [N] query upstream for license text [N] description and summary contains available translations [+] package builds in mock [+] package builds on all supported arches [?] package functions as described: Did not test. [+] sane scriptlets [N] subpackages require the main package (other than -devel) [N] placement of pkgconfig files [N] file dependencies versus package dependencies [=] package contains man pages for binaries/scripts: *** APPROVED *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 714327] Review Request: libtpcimgio - Turku PET Centre for image file input and output procedures
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714327 Richard Shaw changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 714326] Review Request: libtpcmisc - Miscellaneous PET functions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714326 Richard Shaw changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Richard Shaw 2011-08-05 10:16:42 EDT --- Ok, everything looks good. I noticed that upstream has gone to version 1.4.9. Probably wouldn't be a bad idea to update your package before checking it in. +: OK -: must be fixed =: should be fixed (at your discretion) ?: Question or clairification needed N: not applicable MUST: [+] rpmlint output: shown in comment: No unexpected output [+] follows package naming guidelines [+] spec file base name matches package name [+] package meets the packaging guidelines [+] package uses a Fedora approved license: LGPLv2+ [+] license field matches the actual license. [N] license file is included in %doc: [+] spec file is in American English [+] spec file is legible [+] sources match upstream: md5sums match: a64787a2a98ec8d7dded6af9c5fc82a8 [+] package builds on at least one primary arch: Tested F14/F15 [N] appropriate use of ExcludeArch [+] all build requirements in BuildRequires [N] spec file handles locales properly [N] ldconfig in %post and %postun [+] no bundled copies of system libraries [N] no relocatable packages [N] package owns all directories that it creates [+] no files listed twice in %files [+] proper permissions on files [+] consistent use of macros [+] code or permissible content [N] large documentation in -doc [+] no runtime dependencies in %doc [+] header files in -devel [+] static libraries in -static: In -devel with -statis Provides [+] .so in -devel [+] -devel requires main package [+] package contains no libtool archives [N] package contains a desktop file, uses desktop-file-install/validate [+] package does not own files/dirs owned by other packages [+] all filenames in UTF-8 SHOULD: [N] query upstream for license text [N] description and summary contains available translations [+] package builds in mock [+] package builds on all supported arches [?] package functions as described: Did not test. [+] sane scriptlets [N] subpackages require the main package (other than -devel) [N] placement of pkgconfig files [N] file dependencies versus package dependencies [=] package contains man pages for binaries/scripts: *** APPROVED *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728282] Review Request: perl-Bot-BasicBot - Simple irc bot baseclass
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728282 Petr Sabata changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Bot-BasicBot-0.87-1.fc ||f17 Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2011-08-05 09:39:51 --- Comment #4 from Petr Sabata 2011-08-05 09:39:51 EDT --- Thank you both. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728282] Review Request: perl-Bot-BasicBot - Simple irc bot baseclass
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728282 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla 2011-08-05 09:20:40 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 727646] Review Request: link-grammar - A Grammar Checking library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=727646 --- Comment #2 from hannes 2011-08-05 08:43:53 EDT --- Alright thanks for the fast review. Is anyone interested in co-maintainership? I don't really have strong feelings for this package so anyone who is interested in abiword might like to step in to help maintaining it. If there is no one interested I will file a SCM request tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728506] Review Request: rubygem-i18n_data - Country/language names and 2-letter-code pairs, in 85 languages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728506 Vít Ondruch changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||705510 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728506] New: Review Request: rubygem-i18n_data - Country/language names and 2-letter-code pairs, in 85 languages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-i18n_data - Country/language names and 2-letter-code pairs, in 85 languages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728506 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-i18n_data - Country/language names and 2-letter-code pairs, in 85 languages Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vondr...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/vondruch/rubygem-i18n_data.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/vondruch/rubygem-i18n_data-0.2.7-1.fc17.src.rpm Description: Country/language names and 2-letter-code pairs, in 85 languages Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3254084 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728282] Review Request: perl-Bot-BasicBot - Simple irc bot baseclass
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728282 Petr Sabata changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Petr Sabata 2011-08-05 07:43:06 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: perl-Bot-BasicBot Short Description: Simple IRC bot baseclass Owners: psabata mmaslano ppisar Branches: InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728504] New: Review Request: jboss-sasl - SASL Provider for J2SE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: jboss-sasl - SASL Provider for J2SE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728504 Summary: Review Request: jboss-sasl - SASL Provider for J2SE Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mgold...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://goldmann.fedorapeople.org/package_review/jboss-sasl/1/jboss-sasl.spec SRPM URL: http://goldmann.fedorapeople.org/package_review/jboss-sasl/1/jboss-sasl-1.0.0-0.1.Beta1.fc16.src.rpm Description: SASL Provider for J2SE $ rpmlint ./jboss-sasl.spec ./jboss-sasl.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: jboss-sasl-1.0.0.Beta1.tar.xz 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. $ rpmlint jboss-sasl-1.0.0-0.1.Beta1.fc16.src.rpm jboss-sasl.src: I: enchant-dictionary-not-found en_US jboss-sasl.src: W: invalid-url Source0: jboss-sasl-1.0.0.Beta1.tar.xz 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728282] Review Request: perl-Bot-BasicBot - Simple irc bot baseclass
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728282
Marcela Mašláňová changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag||fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Marcela Mašláňová 2011-08-05 07:37:29
EDT ---
- rpmlint OK
- package must be named according to Guidelines OK
- spec file name must match the base package %{name} OK
- package must meet the Packaging Guidelines OK
- package must be licensed with Fedora approved license OK
- license field must match actual license OK
- text of the license in its own file must be included in %doc OK
- sources must match the upstream source OK
- package MUST successfully compile and build OK
- architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla OK
- build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires OK
- handle locales properly with %find_lang macro OK
- shared library files must call ldconfig in %post(un) OK
- packages must NOT bundle system libraries OK
- package must own all directories that it creates OK
- permissions on files must be set properly OK
- package must consistently use macros OK
- package must contain code, or permissable content OK
- large documentation must go in a -doc OK
- %doc must not affect the runtime of the application OK
- header files must be in a -devel package OK
- static libraries must be in a -static package OK
- library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel OK
- devel package usually require base package OK
- packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives OK
- GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file OK
- packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages OK
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3254045
rpm -qp --provides ~/Downloads/perl-Bot-BasicBot-0.87-1.fc17.noarch.rpm
perl(Bot::BasicBot) = 0.87
perl-Bot-BasicBot = 0.87-1.fc17
rpm -qp --requires ~/Downloads/perl-Bot-BasicBot-0.87-1.fc17.noarch.rpm
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.1)
perl(Carp)
perl(Encode)
perl(Exporter)
perl(IRC::Utils)
perl(POE::Component::IRC) >= 6.62
perl(POE::Component::IRC::Plugin::Connector)
perl(POE::Component::IRC::State)
perl(POE::Filter::Line)
perl(POE::Kernel)
perl(POE::Session)
perl(POE::Wheel::Run)
perl(Text::Wrap)
perl(base)
perl(strict)
perl(warnings)
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1
APPROVED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728504] Review Request: jboss-sasl - SASL Provider for J2SE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728504 Marek Goldmann changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||652183(FE-JAVASIG) Depends on||726351, 728171, 727220 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 727220] Review Request: maven-injection-plugin - Bytecode injection at Maven build time
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=727220 Marek Goldmann changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||728504 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728171] Review Request: jboss-logging-tools - JBoss Logging I18n Tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728171 Marek Goldmann changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||728504 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 726351] Review Request: jboss-logging - JBoss Logging Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=726351 Marek Goldmann changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||728504 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728501] New: Review Request: jboss-remoting - JBoss Remoting 3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: jboss-remoting - JBoss Remoting 3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728501 Summary: Review Request: jboss-remoting - JBoss Remoting 3 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mgold...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://goldmann.fedorapeople.org/package_review/jboss-remoting/1/jboss-remoting.spec SRPM URL: http://goldmann.fedorapeople.org/package_review/jboss-remoting/1/jboss-remoting-3.2.0-0.1.Beta2.fc16.src.rpm Description: The purpose of JBoss Remoting is to provide a general purpose framework for symmetric and asymmetric communication over a network. It supports various modes of interaction, including invocations, one way messaging, and asynchronous callbacks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728501] Review Request: jboss-remoting - JBoss Remoting 3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728501 Marek Goldmann changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||652183(FE-JAVASIG) Depends on||728171, 728460 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728460] Review Request: xnio - JBoss XNIO
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728460 Marek Goldmann changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||728501 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728171] Review Request: jboss-logging-tools - JBoss Logging I18n Tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728171 Marek Goldmann changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||728501 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 727087] Review Request: perl-Alien-SDL - Building, finding and using SDL binaries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=727087 Marcela Mašláňová changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2011-08-05 07:09:59 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 643140] Review Request: autokey - A desktop automation utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=643140 Rahul Sundaram changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|methe...@gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 --- Comment #169 from Juha Tuomala 2011-08-05 06:15:18 EDT --- Yep, noticed that after digging further, unfortunately bz doesn't allow editing/removing comments in next couple hours. :-/ Asterisk is already running. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728407] Review Request: xqilla - XQuery and XPath 2.0 library, built on top of Xerces-C
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728407 --- Comment #2 from Haïkel Guémar 2011-08-05 06:14:39 EDT --- @Martin: nice catch, i ensure that the embedded xqc.h won't be used/installed and i added xqc as BR and R to xqilla-devel. spec and src.rpm above updated scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3253957 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 643140] Review Request: autokey - A desktop automation utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=643140 --- Comment #30 from Jon Ciesla 2011-08-05 06:00:15 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). Added f16 branch. Also, please take ownership of review requests you're working on. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728006] Review Request: mhddfs - Fuse-based file system for unifying several mount points into one
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728006 --- Comment #21 from Jon Ciesla 2011-08-05 06:03:02 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 723703] Review Request: eclipse-gprof - Eclipse plug-ins for gprof support
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=723703 --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla 2011-08-05 06:01:31 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 644711] Review Request: diaser - disk based backup volume accumulator, replication and management system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=644711 --- Comment #31 from Jon Ciesla 2011-08-05 06:00:50 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 726690] Review Request: rubygem-rails2.3 - rails 2 alongside rails 3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=726690 --- Comment #16 from Emanuel Rietveld 2011-08-05 05:45:07 EDT --- Thank you, Vít Ondruch. There is probably no harm in moving the script to /usr/bin/rails2.3 and making it default to rails 2 even when rails 3 is installed. Or would you suggest to revert that change? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728128] Review Request: mod_map_user - Apache module designed to reformat authenticated username
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728128 Marcus Moeller changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG Last Closed||2011-08-05 04:30:54 --- Comment #1 from Marcus Moeller 2011-08-05 04:30:54 EDT --- Recent versions of mod_auth_kerb support the option: KrbLocalUserMapping on to map user names, so mod_map_user (or using userPrincipalName) is not necessary anymore. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 725906] Review Request: php53-extras - Additional PHP modules from the standard PHP distribution
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725906 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-05 04:30:39 EDT --- php53-extras-5.3.3-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 722427] Review Request: python-importlib - Backport of importlib.import_module() from Python 2.7
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=722427 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|python-importlib-1.0.2-1.el |python-importlib-1.0.2-1.el |6 |5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 722427] Review Request: python-importlib - Backport of importlib.import_module() from Python 2.7
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=722427 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-05 04:32:14 EDT --- python-importlib-1.0.2-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 722427] Review Request: python-importlib - Backport of importlib.import_module() from Python 2.7
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=722427 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||python-importlib-1.0.2-1.el ||6 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-08-05 04:27:45 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 722427] Review Request: python-importlib - Backport of importlib.import_module() from Python 2.7
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=722427 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-05 04:27:40 EDT --- python-importlib-1.0.2-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728460] Review Request: xnio - JBoss XNIO
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728460 Marek Goldmann changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||652183(FE-JAVASIG) Depends on||727635 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 727635] Review Request: java-1.7.0-openjdk - OpenJDK runtime environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=727635 Marek Goldmann changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||728460 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 727780] Review Request: qt-ruby - Ruby bindings for Qt 4
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=727780 --- Comment #11 from Vít Ondruch 2011-08-05 04:25:29 EDT --- The package looks good. However * Is it possible to execute the test suite in %check section? * The examples might be worth of including into -doc subpackage. * There is "rails_support" available in sources. It might be good idea to include it in some -rails subpackage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728460] New: Review Request: xnio - JBoss XNIO
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: xnio - JBoss XNIO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728460 Summary: Review Request: xnio - JBoss XNIO Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mgold...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://goldmann.fedorapeople.org/package_review/xnio/1/xnio.spec SRPM URL: http://goldmann.fedorapeople.org/package_review/xnio/1/xnio-3.0.0-0.1.Beta4.fc16.src.rpm Description: XNIO is a simplified low-level I/O layer which can be used anywhere you are using NIO today. It frees you from the hassle of dealing with Selectors and the lack of NIO support for multicast sockets and non-socket I/O, while still maintaining all the capabilities present in NIO. $ rpmlint ./xnio.spec ./xnio.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: xnio-3.0.0.Beta4.tar.xz 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. $ rpmlint xnio-3.0.0-0.1.Beta4.fc16.src.rpm xnio.src: I: enchant-dictionary-not-found en_US xnio.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary C XNIO xnio.src: W: invalid-url URL: http://www.jboss.org/xnio HTTP Error 403: Forbidden xnio.src: W: invalid-url Source0: xnio-3.0.0.Beta4.tar.xz 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728282] Review Request: perl-Bot-BasicBot - Simple irc bot baseclass
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728282 Marcela Mašláňová changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mmasl...@redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728296] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-WebKit - Web content engine library for Gtk2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728296
Haïkel Guémar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag||fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Haïkel Guémar 2011-08-05 04:07:57
EDT ---
perl-Gtk2-WebKit (Perl package)
MUST: rpmlint must be run on src.rpm and rpm. OK
$ rpmlint -iv perl-Gtk2-WebKit-0.09-1.fc15.src.rpm
perl-Gtk2-WebKit.src: I: checking
perl-Gtk2-WebKit.src: I: checking-url http://search.cpan.org/dist/Gtk2-WebKit/
(timeout 10 seconds)
perl-Gtk2-WebKit.src: I: checking-url
http://www.cpan.org/modules/by-module/Gtk2/Gtk2-WebKit-0.09.tar.gz (timeout 10
seconds)
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
$ rpmlint -iv perl-Gtk2-WebKit-0.09-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm
perl-Gtk2-WebKit.x86_64: I: checking
perl-Gtk2-WebKit.x86_64: I: checking-url
http://search.cpan.org/dist/Gtk2-WebKit/ (timeout 10 seconds)
perl-Gtk2-WebKit.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/Gtk2/WebKit/Install/webkit-autogen.h
A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If
you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a
development package.
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
According perl SIG packaging guidelines, C headers in binary module packages
are OK
MUST: package named accordingly to package naming guidelines. OK
MUST: spec file name match %{name} OK
MUST: package meets packaging guidelines OK
MUST: package must be licensed under a fedora-compliant license OK (LGPLv2+)
MUST: License field in package spec match actual license OK
Note: no license file was included, i checked directly on CPAN
MUST: spec in legible american english OK
MUST: sources provided match upstream's OK
provided sources sha1sum: fb16b7be71c9c80c2fed8737605572ac7e54ce51
upstream sources sha1sum: fb16b7be71c9c80c2fed8737605572ac7e54ce51
MUST: package successfully compiles on at least one primary architecture (all
of them) OK
MUST: all build dependencies are listed in BR OK
MUST: package must own all directories it creates OK
MUST: package does not list a file more than once in %files section OK
MUST: permissions are properly set OK
MUST: package consistenly use macros OK
MUST: package contains permissable content OK
MUST: package does not own directories owned by other packages OK
MUST: all filenames in package are valid UTF-8 OK
SHOULD: packager should request upstream to include a proper license file
NOTABLOCKER
SHOULD: mock builds were done for fedora 16 on all primary architectures
(x86/x86_64) OK
scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3253746
SHOULD: the module provided works (tested with gtest) OK
SHOULD: man pages are provided OK
This package respect general & Perl Fedora Packaging guidelines so i hereby
approve the inclusion into Fedora Packages Collection.
Don't forget to ask upstream to add license file.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 727646] Review Request: link-grammar - A Grammar Checking library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=727646
Niels de Vos changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag||fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Niels de Vos 2011-08-05 03:41:13 EDT ---
Some details from the review for reference:
+:ok, =:needs attention, -:needs fixing
MUST Items:
[+] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package.
$ rpmlint link-grammar-4.7.4-1.fc15.src.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
$ rpmlint link-grammar.spec
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-14-x86_64/result/*.rpm
link-grammar.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit
/usr/lib64/liblink-grammar.so.4.7.4 exit@GLIBC_2.2.5
link-grammar-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) liblink -> li
blink, li-blink, lib link
link-grammar-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US liblink ->
li blink, li-blink, lib link
link-grammar-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
link-grammar-java.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) liblink -> li blink,
li-blink, lib link
link-grammar-java.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US liblink -> li
blink, li-blink, lib link
link-grammar-java.x86_64: W: no-documentation
link-grammar-java-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) liblink -> li
blink, li-blink, lib link
link-grammar-java-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US liblink
-> li blink, li-blink, lib link
link-grammar-java-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
6 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 10 warnings.
[+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}
[+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet
the Licensing Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
[+] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.
COPYING and LICENSE are provided in the source, they are exactly the same -
including one of them should be fine
[+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL.
$ md5sum link-grammar-4.7.4.tar.gz*
e90e702a953641713a1292db20677bd2 link-grammar-4.7.4.tar.gz
e90e702a953641713a1292db20677bd2 link-grammar-4.7.4.tar.gz._src.rpm
[+] MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on
at least one supported architecture.
[+] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch.
[+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires
[+] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the
%find_lang macro.
[+] MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just
symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in
%post and %postun.
[+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not
create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does
create that directory.
[+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing.
[+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set
with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a
%defattr(...) line.
[+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf
%{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
[+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros
section of Packaging Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissible content. This is
described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines.
[+] MUST: Large documentation files should go in a doc subpackage.
[+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the
runtime of the application.
[+] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package.
[+] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'
(for directory ownership and usability).
[+] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g.
libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in
a -devel package.
[+] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} =
%{version}-%{release}
[+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
[+] MUST: All f
[Bug 726690] Review Request: rubygem-rails2.3 - rails 2 alongside rails 3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=726690 --- Comment #15 from Vít Ondruch 2011-08-05 03:32:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) You are right, they are the same ... but they are the same just as long as the package is prepared using the same version of RubyGems. In that case it seems that RPM can handle it correctly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 727664] Review Request: florist - Open-source implementation of IEEE Standard 1003.5b-1996
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=727664 Oxana Kurysheva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||okurysh...@yahoo.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|okurysh...@yahoo.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 727664] Review Request: florist - Open-source implementation of IEEE Standard 1003.5b-1996
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=727664 --- Comment #2 from Oxana Kurysheva 2011-08-05 03:28:27 EDT --- I'll review it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 577951] Review Request: mingw-wine-gecko - MinGW Gecko library required for Wine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577951 --- Comment #24 from Jacek Caban 2011-08-05 03:17:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #23) > My suggestion at this point is to change mingw-wine-gecko spec file to work > with the current MinGW toolchain in Fedora This is not possible. MinGW is not sufficient for Wine Gecko compilation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226383] Merge Review: rwall
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226383 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-05 02:59:44 EDT --- rwall-0.17-32.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rwall-0.17-32.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
