[Bug 635511] Review Request: assimp - Library to import various 3D model formats into applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=635511 Simon Thompson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||s...@roamingzebra.co.uk --- Comment #38 from Simon Thompson 2011-08-11 03:41:57 EDT --- I just tried building this in mock on my machine and it fell over: DEBUG: In file included from /builddir/build/BUILD/assimp/code/irrXMLWrapper.h:45In file included from /builddir/build/BUILD/assimp/code/DXFLoader.cpp:52: DEBUG: /usr/include/irrlicht/fast_atof.h:8:21: error: irrMath.h: No such file or directory DEBUG: In file included from /builddir/build/BUILD/assimp/code/CSMLoader.cpp:53: DEBUG: /usr/include/irrlicht/fast_atof.h:8:21: error: irrMath.h: No such file or directory Was building against irrlicht-1.7.2-8.fc17 built locally. Adding: BuildRequires: irrlicht-devel to assimp results in a successful build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664980] Review Request: perl-Test-TCP - Testing TCP program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664980 --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla 2011-08-11 04:19:23 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 575491] Review Request: perl-Test-SharedFork - Fork test
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=575491 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla 2011-08-11 04:17:19 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 575493] Review Request: perl-Hash-MultiValue - Store multiple values per key
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=575493 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla 2011-08-11 04:18:31 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 575492] Review Request: perl-Filesys-Notify-Simple - Simple and dumb file system watcher
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=575492 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla 2011-08-11 04:17:59 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 581321] Review Request: perl-Devel-StackTrace-AsHTML - Displays a stack trace in HTML
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=581321 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla 2011-08-11 04:18:53 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 670477] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-PSGI - PSGI handler for HTTP::Server::Simple
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670477 --- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla 2011-08-11 04:19:51 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 237041] Review Request: perl-JSON - Parse and convert to JSON (JavaScript Object Notation)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=237041 --- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla 2011-08-11 04:16:42 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 691403] Review Request: perl-IO-Stty - Change and print terminal line settings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691403 --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla 2011-08-11 04:21:03 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 729669] Review Request: nafees-tehreer-naskh-fonts - Nafees tehreer naskh font for writing Urdu in the naskh script
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729669 Parag AN(पराग) changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) 2011-08-11 04:32:38 EDT --- Review: + Koji build ->http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3265344 + Source is verified as (sha1sum) 99b05c59a0225bf2970f8221a6eace03e21d30a0 Nafees_Tahreer_Naskh_v1.0.zip 99b05c59a0225bf2970f8221a6eace03e21d30a0 ../SOURCES/Nafees_Tahreer_Naskh_v1.0.zip + rpmlint output gave nafees-tehreer-naskh-fonts.src: I: checking nafees-tehreer-naskh-fonts.src: I: checking-url http://www.crulp.org/index.htm (timeout 10 seconds) nafees-tehreer-naskh-fonts.src: I: checking-url http://www.crulp.org/Downloads/localization/fonts/NafeesTahreerNaskh/Nafees_Tahreer_Naskh_v1.0.zip (timeout 10 seconds) nafees-tehreer-naskh-fonts.noarch: I: checking nafees-tehreer-naskh-fonts.noarch: I: checking-url http://www.crulp.org/index.htm (timeout 10 seconds) 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. + follows packaging guidelines Suggestions: 1) remove buildroot tag 2) remove cleaning of buildroot in %build 3) remove %clean section APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 237041] Review Request: perl-JSON - Parse and convert to JSON (JavaScript Object Notation)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=237041 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-11 04:56:18 EDT --- perl-JSON-2.17-1.el4 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 4. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-JSON-2.17-1.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 678221] Review Request: perl-EV - Wrapper for the libev high-performance event loop library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678221 Mathieu Bridon changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Mathieu Bridon 2011-08-11 04:59:50 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: perl-EV New Branches: el6 Owners: bochecha InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 729674] Review Request: nafees-pakistani-naskh-fonts - Nafees pakistani naskh font for writing Urdu in the Naskh script
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729674 Parag AN(पराग) changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) 2011-08-11 04:59:08 EDT --- Review: + Koji build ->http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3265340 + Source is verified as (sha1sum) 49c89321b2ce8211becabd819ac91d88fbc79f15 Nafees_Pakistani_Naskh_v2.01.zip 49c89321b2ce8211becabd819ac91d88fbc79f15 ../SOURCES/Nafees_Pakistani_Naskh_v2.01.zip + rpmlint output gave nafees-pakistani-naskh-fonts.src: I: checking nafees-pakistani-naskh-fonts.src: I: checking-url http://www.crulp.org/index.htm (timeout 10 seconds) nafees-pakistani-naskh-fonts.src: I: checking-url http://www.crulp.org/Downloads/localization/fonts/NafeesPakistaniNaskh/Nafees_Pakistani_Naskh_v2.01.zip (timeout 10 seconds) nafees-pakistani-naskh-fonts.noarch: I: checking nafees-pakistani-naskh-fonts.noarch: I: checking-url http://www.crulp.org/index.htm (timeout 10 seconds) 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. + follows packaging guidelines Suggestions: 1) remove buildroot tag 2) remove cleaning of buildroot in %build 3) remove %clean section -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 729666] Review Request: nafees-nastaleeq-fonts - Nafees nastaleeq font for writing Urdu in the Nastaleeq script
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729666 Parag AN(पराग) changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) 2011-08-11 04:59:26 EDT --- Review: + Koji build ->http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3265338 + Source is verified as (sha1sum) 58636b076c1277037ab7e75bc5370335586feebc Nafees_Nastaleeq_v1.02.zip 58636b076c1277037ab7e75bc5370335586feebc ../SOURCES/Nafees_Nastaleeq_v1.02.zip + rpmlint output gave nafees-nastaleeq-fonts.src: I: checking nafees-nastaleeq-fonts.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US leeq -> liq, lee, lees The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. nafees-nastaleeq-fonts.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US glyphs -> glyph, glyph s The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. nafees-nastaleeq-fonts.src: I: checking-url http://www.crulp.org/index.htm (timeout 10 seconds) nafees-nastaleeq-fonts.src: I: checking-url http://www.crulp.org/Downloads/localization/fonts/NafeesNastaleeq/Nafees_Nastaleeq_v1.02.zip (timeout 10 seconds) nafees-nastaleeq-fonts.noarch: I: checking nafees-nastaleeq-fonts.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US leeq -> liq, lee, lees The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. nafees-nastaleeq-fonts.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US glyphs -> glyph, glyph s The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. nafees-nastaleeq-fonts.noarch: I: checking-url http://www.crulp.org/index.htm (timeout 10 seconds) 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. + follows packaging guidelines Suggestions: 1) remove buildroot tag 2) remove cleaning of buildroot in %build 3) remove %clean section -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 729671] Review Request: nafees-riqa-fonts - Nafees riqa font for writing Urdu in the Riqa script
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729671 Parag AN(पराग) changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) 2011-08-11 04:58:58 EDT --- Review: + Koji build ->http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3265342 + Source is verified as (sha1sum) fb03dd257ca68fd274f5870b95ace4c46d4c9af6 Nafees_Riqa_v1.0.zip fb03dd257ca68fd274f5870b95ace4c46d4c9af6 ../SOURCES/Nafees_Riqa_v1.0.zip + rpmlint output gave nafees-riqa-fonts.src: I: checking nafees-riqa-fonts.src: I: checking-url http://www.crulp.org/index.htm (timeout 10 seconds) nafees-riqa-fonts.src: I: checking-url http://www.crulp.org/Downloads/localization/fonts/NafeesRiqa/Nafees_Riqa_v1.0.zip (timeout 10 seconds) nafees-riqa-fonts.noarch: I: checking nafees-riqa-fonts.noarch: I: checking-url http://www.crulp.org/index.htm (timeout 10 seconds) 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. + follows packaging guidelines Suggestions: 1) remove buildroot tag 2) remove cleaning of buildroot in %build 3) remove %clean section -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 729651] Review Request: nafees-naskh-fonts - Nafees naskh font for writing Urdu in the Naskh script with full aerab support
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729651 Parag AN(पराग) changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) 2011-08-11 04:59:17 EDT --- Review: + Koji build ->http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3265336 + Source is verified as (sha1sum) 8039809dc660961f6665c5ef25361d7f6fd7a25f Nafees_Naskh_v2.01.zip 8039809dc660961f6665c5ef25361d7f6fd7a25f ../SOURCES/Nafees_Naskh_v2.01.zip + rpmlint output gave nafees-naskh-fonts.src: I: checking nafees-naskh-fonts.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) aerab -> aerate The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. nafees-naskh-fonts.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US aerab -> aerate The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. nafees-naskh-fonts.src: I: checking-url http://www.crulp.org/index.htm (timeout 10 seconds) nafees-naskh-fonts.src: I: checking-url http://www.crulp.org/Downloads/localization/fonts/NafeesNaskh/Nafees_Naskh_v2.01.zip (timeout 10 seconds) nafees-naskh-fonts.noarch: I: checking nafees-naskh-fonts.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) aerab -> aerate The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. nafees-naskh-fonts.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US aerab -> aerate The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. nafees-naskh-fonts.noarch: I: checking-url http://www.crulp.org/index.htm (timeout 10 seconds) 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. + follows packaging guidelines Suggestions: 1) remove buildroot tag 2) remove cleaning of buildroot in %build 3) remove %clean section -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 726210] Review Request: freewrl - X3D / VRML visualization program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=726210 Steve Traylen changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Steve Traylen 2011-08-11 05:10:45 EDT --- Indeed I was on NVIDEA, does not work from a Mac either but it's fine on an intel card. You did not switch from chrpath to a sed of libtool and http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Removing_Rpath says to use chrpath as a last resort. Having said that the end result is good so I leave to you. APPROVED. I'd like to see these in EPEL (5 and 6) as well and am happy to maintain them if you do not want to do this? Let me know. Steve. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630303] Review Request: yesod - Creation of type-safe, RESTful web applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630303 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|634048(Haskell-pkg-reviews) | --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen 2011-08-11 05:41:37 EDT --- Latest yesod release is 0.8.2.1 and 0.9 is coming out soon. Ok, I moving yesod off Haskell-pkg-reviews for now until is gets updated. I think it will probably be better to do it in parts since the whole dependency tree is really large, maybe starting to yesod-core or even taking library packages from the bottom of the dependency tree to Haskell-pkg-reviews. That will make it easier eventually to get the whole of yesod reviewed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630303] Review Request: yesod - Creation of type-safe, RESTful web applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630303 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||712272(ghc-unix-compat) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 712272] Review Request: ghc-unix-compat - A portable POSIX-compatibility layer for Haskell
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712272 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||630303(yesod) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 712272] Review Request: ghc-unix-compat - A portable POSIX-compatibility layer for Haskell
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712272 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||peter...@redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen 2011-08-11 05:54:12 EDT --- I'd like to review this. Lakshmi, do you have time to update it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 729926] New: Review Request: httpserver - JBoss httpserver
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: httpserver - JBoss httpserver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729926 Summary: Review Request: httpserver - JBoss httpserver Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mgold...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://goldmann.fedorapeople.org/package_review/httpserver/1/httpserver.spec SRPM URL: http://goldmann.fedorapeople.org/package_review/httpserver/1/httpserver-1.0.0-0.1.Beta1.fc17.src.rpm Description: This package contains JBoss httpserver Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3265572 $ rpmlint ./httpserver.spec ./httpserver.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: httpserver-1.0.0.Beta1.tar.xz 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. $ rpmlint httpserver-1.0.0-0.1.Beta1.fc17.src.rpm httpserver.src: I: enchant-dictionary-not-found en_US httpserver.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary C httpserver httpserver.src: W: invalid-url Source0: httpserver-1.0.0.Beta1.tar.xz 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 729926] Review Request: httpserver - JBoss httpserver
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729926 Marek Goldmann changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||652183(FE-JAVASIG) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 729777] Review Request: perl-Switch - A switch statement for Perl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729777 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||p...@city-fan.org --- Comment #1 from Paul Howarth 2011-08-11 06:17:40 EDT --- spot.fedoraproject.org => NXDOMAIN -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 717867] Review Request: ghc-http-types - Generic HTTP types for Haskell
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=717867 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||634048(Haskell-pkg-reviews) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 729926] Review Request: jboss-httpserver - JBoss httpserver
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729926 Marek Goldmann changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: httpserver |Review Request: |- JBoss httpserver |jboss-httpserver - JBoss ||httpserver -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 729926] Review Request: httpserver - JBoss httpserver
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729926 --- Comment #1 from Marek Goldmann 2011-08-11 06:30:44 EDT --- Package renamed to jboss-httpserver: Spec URL: http://goldmann.fedorapeople.org/package_review/httpserver/2/jboss-httpserver.spec SRPM URL: http://goldmann.fedorapeople.org/package_review/httpserver/2/jboss-httpserver-1.0.0-0.2.Beta1.fc17.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 635511] Review Request: assimp - Library to import various 3D model formats into applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=635511 Simon Thompson changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||725752 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 725752] Review Request: gazebo - 3D multiple robot simulator with dynamics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725752 Simon Thompson changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||635511 --- Comment #6 from Simon Thompson 2011-08-11 07:23:27 EDT --- I found that 0.9.0 wouldn't build against OGRE 1.7.x so have bumped version to 0.10.0. Spec URL: http://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/~sjt/rpm/gazebo-0.10.0-1.spec SRPM URL: http://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/~sjt/rpm/gazebo-0.10.0-1.el6.src.rpm Its patched to use the external assimp library. There's options for --with ffmpeg and --with bullet - it currently won't build with the Fedora bullet package though as it requires changes: OPTION(USE_DOUBLE_PRECISION "Use double precision" ON) OPTION(INSTALL_LIBS "Set when you want to install libraries" ON) in bullet's CMakeLists.txt There's a couple of patches in there to make it build and to install unversioned .so files into /usr/lib/package style as well a patch to make it work on x86_64 style machines (based on the architecture detection used in player) so that lib64 is substituted appropriately. Adding bug 635511 (assimp) as blocking this. Any comments on this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 729681] Review Request: maven-reporting-exec - classes managing report plugin execution
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729681
--- Comment #2 from Alexander Kurtakov 2011-08-11
08:18:28 EDT ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[!] Rpmlint output:
maven-reporting-exec.i686: E: no-binary
maven-reporting-exec-debuginfo.i686: E: empty-debuginfo-package
I see no reason for this package to not be noarch
[x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines[1].
[x] Spec file name must match the base package name, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines[2].
[x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms.
[x] Buildroot definition is not present
[x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines[3,4].
[x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
License type: ASL 2.0
[x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
[x] All independent sub-packages have license of their own
[x] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
MD5SUM this package:ddc79b59dcacc6d6d8ff8951b422f1f8
MD5SUM upstream package:ddc79b59dcacc6d6d8ff8951b422f1f8
[x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines[5].
[x] Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x] File sections do not contain %defattr(-,root,root,-) unless changed with
good reason
[x] Permissions on files are set properly.
[x] Package does NOT have a %clean section which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}
(or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). (not needed anymore)
[x] Package consistently uses macros (no %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
mixing)
[x] Package contains code, or permissable content.
[x] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[x] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
application.
[x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x] Javadoc documentation files are generated and included in -javadoc
subpackage
[x] Javadocs are placed in %{_javadocdir}/%{name} (no -%{version} symlinks)
[x] Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on jpackage-utils
[x] Javadoc subpackages have Require: jpackage-utils
[x] Package uses %global not %define
[-] If package uses tarball from VCS include comment how to re-create that
tarball (svn export URL, git clone URL, ...)
[-] If source tarball includes bundled jar/class files these need to be
removed prior to building
[x] All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
[x] Jar files are installed to %{_javadir}/%{name}.jar (see [6] for details)
[x] If package contains pom.xml files install it (including depmaps) even when
building with ant
[x] pom files has correct add_maven_depmap
=== Maven ===
[x] Use %{_mavenpomdir} macro for placing pom files instead of
%{_datadir}/maven2/poms
[x] If package uses "-Dmaven.test.skip=true" explain why it was needed in a
comment
[x] If package uses custom depmap "-Dmaven.local.depmap.file=*" explain why
it's needed in a comment
[x] Package DOES NOT use %update_maven_depmap in %post/%postun
[x] Packages DOES NOT have Requires(post) and Requires(postun) on
jpackage-utils for %update_maven_depmap macro
=== Other suggestions ===
[x] If possible use upstream build method (maven/ant/javac)
[x] Avoid having BuildRequires on exact NVR unless necessary
[!] Package has BuildArch: noarch (if possible)
[x] Latest version is packaged.
[x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
=== Issues ===
1. Is there a reason for this package to not be noarch. I don't see any please
fix it unless you have a reason
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 729777] Review Request: perl-Switch - A switch statement for Perl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729777 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||Security Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Group||security CC||emmanuel.seyman@club-intern ||et.fr, ||security-response-team@redh ||at.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|emmanuel.seyman@club-intern ||et.fr Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman 2011-08-11 08:30:59 EDT --- I'm going to pretend that reads : Spec URL: http://spot.fedorapeople.org/perl-Switch.spec SRPM URL: http://spot.fedorapeople.org/perl-Switch-2.16-1.fc15.src.rpm Taking. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 729970] Review Request: jandex - Java Annotation Indexer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729970 Marek Goldmann changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||652183(FE-JAVASIG) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 729681] Review Request: maven-reporting-exec - classes managing report plugin execution
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729681 --- Comment #3 from Tomas Radej 2011-08-11 08:33:00 EDT --- Created attachment 517788 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=517788 Fixed BuildArch -> noarch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 729681] Review Request: maven-reporting-exec - classes managing report plugin execution
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729681 Tomas Radej changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #517788|Fixed BuildArch -> noarch |maven-reporting-exec-1.0.1- description||1.src.rpm Fixed BuildArch ||-> noarch --- Comment #4 from Tomas Radej 2011-08-11 08:35:32 EDT --- Comment on attachment 517788 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=517788 maven-reporting-exec-1.0.1-1.src.rpm Fixed BuildArch -> noarch Fixed Issue 1 - changed architecture to noarch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 690728] Review Request: Nitrate - A test case management system written in Django
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690728 --- Comment #52 from James Laska 2011-08-11 08:34:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #51) > Ah, thank you James for that information. > Are javascript frameworks mentioned there somewhere? You know, I was wondering that too. I don't see them explicitly mentioned, and it's hard to determine where the line is between a collection of .js files (libraries) and a framework. We can certainly raise this topic on packaging@ for clarification. Some initial poking I did gave me the same impression you note later on ... that this is just the *current* policy, and it's subject to change. > So then it sounds like the separate packaging I requested > is not strictly necessary? Anyway I glad that tinymce > was packaged up. > > If Fedora later changes the bundling policy for website javascript, > I think it may be hard work to clean up... Agreed! If js frameworks are okay to bundle for now, I think it would still be wise to at least start package reviews for them ... but not require their completion for this review? Thoughts/comments/concerns? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 729970] New: Review Request: jandex - Java Annotation Indexer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: jandex - Java Annotation Indexer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729970 Summary: Review Request: jandex - Java Annotation Indexer Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mgold...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://goldmann.fedorapeople.org/package_review/jandex/1/jandex.spec SRPM URL: http://goldmann.fedorapeople.org/package_review/jandex/1/jandex-1.0.0-1.fc17.src.rpm Description: This package contains Java Annotation Indexer $ rpmlint ./jandex.spec ./jandex.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: jandex-1.0.0.Final.tar.xz 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. $ rpmlint jandex-1.0.0-1.fc17.src.rpm jandex.src: I: enchant-dictionary-not-found en_US jandex.src: W: invalid-url Source0: jandex-1.0.0.Final.tar.xz 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3265807 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 729972] New: Review Request: perl-Test-Mojibake - Check your source for encoding misbehavior
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Mojibake - Check your source for encoding misbehavior https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729972 Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Mojibake - Check your source for encoding misbehavior Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: p...@city-fan.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://subversion.city-fan.org/repos/cfo-repo/perl-Test-Mojibake/branches/fedora/perl-Test-Mojibake.spec SRPM URL: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/perl-Test-Mojibake/perl-Test-Mojibake-0.3-2.fc17.src.rpm Description: Many modern text editors automatically save files using UTF-8 codification. However, the perl interpreter does not expect it by default. Whilst this does not represent a big deal on (most) backend-oriented programs, Web framework (Catalyst, Mojolicious) based applications will suffer so-called Mojibake (literally: "unintelligible sequence of characters"). Even worse: if an editor saves BOM (Byte Order Mark, U+FEFF character in Unicode) at the start of a script with the executable bit set (on Unix systems), it won't execute at all, due to shebang corruption. Avoiding codification problems is quite simple: * Always use utf8/use common::sense when saving source as UTF-8 * Always specify =encoding utf8 when saving POD as UTF-8 * Do neither of above when saving as ISO-8859-1 * Never save BOM (not that it's wrong; just avoid it as you'll barely notice its presence when in trouble) However, if you find yourself upgrading old code to use UTF-8 or trying to standardize a big project with many developers, each one using a different platform/editor, reviewing all files manually can be quite painful, especially in cases where some files have multiple encodings (note: it all started when I realized that gedit and derivatives are unable to open files with character conversion tables). Enter the Test::Mojibake ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 729681] Review Request: maven-reporting-exec - classes managing report plugin execution
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729681 --- Comment #5 from Tomas Radej 2011-08-11 08:47:56 EDT --- Fixed issue 1 - changed architecture to noarch SRPM URL: http://tradej.fedorapeople.org/maven-reporting-exec-1.0.1-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 678221] Review Request: perl-EV - Wrapper for the libev high-performance event loop library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678221 --- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla 2011-08-11 08:54:00 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 724878] Review Request: TexStudio - A feature-rich editor for LaTeX documents
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=724878
Martin Gieseking changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|martin.giesek...@uos.de
Flag||fedora-review?
--- Comment #9 from Martin Gieseking 2011-08-11
08:54:00 EDT ---
Here's the formal review of the package. I'm sorry, there are still a few
things to fix.
- Add a slash between $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir} and %{name} in the rm
statements. Currently, the files supposed to be removed are still packaged.
- The package provides qm locale files that must be installed with
%find_lang %{name} --with-qt and %files -f %{name}.lang. However, as they
are located in %{_datadir}/texstudio/ instead of a separate subfolder, it's
a bit complicated to separate them from the other files in that directory.
The qm files must not be added by one of the entries in the %files section.
Also, texstudio seems to bundle Qt locales (qt_FOO.mq). Please ask upstream
if they are modified or if they can be removed so that the original locale
files that come with Qt are used.
- Please use the original spelling "TeXstudio" in the %description
- Ask upstream to add the GPLv3 license text to the qcodeedit folder.
He should also fix the FSF address in COPYING.
$ rpmlint *.rpm
texstudio.src:26: W: unversioned-explicit-provides bundled(qcodeedit)
texstudio.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/texstudio-2.2/COPYING
texstudio.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/texstudio/COPYING
texstudio.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary texstudio
texstudio-debuginfo.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir
/usr/src/debug/texstudio2.2/.ui
texstudio-debuginfo.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir
/usr/src/debug/texstudio2.2/.ui
texstudio-debuginfo.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir
/usr/src/debug/texstudio2.2/.moc
texstudio-debuginfo.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir
/usr/src/debug/texstudio2.2/.moc
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 6 warnings.
-
key:
[+] OK
[.] OK, not applicable
[X] needs work
-
[+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}.
[+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license.
- GPLv2+ and GPLv3 (bundled and statically linked qcodeedit library)
[+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
[+] MUST: The file containing the text of the license(s) for the package must
be included in %doc.
[+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source.
$ md5sum texstudio-2.2.tar.gz*
d23cf71c90f3fd950d49bf480285e920 texstudio-2.2.tar.gz
d23cf71c90f3fd950d49bf480285e920 texstudio-2.2.tar.gz.1
[+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on
at least one primary architecture.
[.] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, ...
[+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires.
[+] MUST: When compiling C, C++, or Fortran files, %{optflags} must be applied.
[X] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly.
[+] MUST: If a package installs files below %{_datadir}/icons, the icon cache
must be updated.
[.] MUST: Packages storing shared library files (not just symlinks) must call
ldconfig in %post and %postun.
[+] MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
- exception for qcodeedit has been granted
[.] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, ...
[+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates.
[X] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in %files.
- COPYING and AUTHORS packaged twice due to missing slash in
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}%{name}/...
[+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly.
[+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros.
[+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
[.] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage.
[+] MUST: Files in %doc must not affect the runtime of the application.
[.] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package.
[.] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package.
[.] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g.
libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in
a -devel package.
[.] MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned
dependency.
[+]
[Bug 729681] Review Request: maven-reporting-exec - classes managing report plugin execution
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729681 --- Comment #6 from Tomas Radej 2011-08-11 08:56:56 EDT --- Fixed issue 1 - changed architecture to noarch Spec URL: http://tradej.fedorapeople.org/maven-reporting-exec.spec SRPM URL: http://tradej.fedorapeople.org/maven-reporting-exec-1.0.1-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675588] Review Request: pycmd - Tools for managing/searching Python related files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675588 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675587] Review Request: pytest - Simple powerful testing with Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675587 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675587] Review Request: pytest - Simple powerful testing with Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675587 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-11 08:59:09 EDT --- pytest-2.1.0-2.fc16,pycmd-1.0-3.fc16,python-py-1.4.4-2.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pytest-2.1.0-2.fc16,pycmd-1.0-3.fc16,python-py-1.4.4-2.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675588] Review Request: pycmd - Tools for managing/searching Python related files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675588 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-11 08:59:04 EDT --- pytest-2.1.0-2.fc16,pycmd-1.0-3.fc16,python-py-1.4.4-2.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pytest-2.1.0-2.fc16,pycmd-1.0-3.fc16,python-py-1.4.4-2.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 729681] Review Request: maven-reporting-exec - classes managing report plugin execution
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729681 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #517788|0 |1 is obsolete|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 729681] Review Request: maven-reporting-exec - classes managing report plugin execution
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729681 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Alexander Kurtakov 2011-08-11 09:00:45 EDT --- Looks good now. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 729777] Review Request: perl-Switch - A switch statement for Perl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729777
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Emmanuel Seyman
2011-08-11 08:58:41 EDT ---
=== KEY ===
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Perl specific items
[x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported architecture.
Tested on: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3265813
[x] Rpmlint output: 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
[x] Package is not relocatable.
[x] Buildroot is correct
None specified, default used.
[x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
License type: GPL+ or Artistic
[-] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
[x] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
bf75dc7f171b4718a2118c3d6cbe6013 Switch-2.16.tar.gz
[x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch
[x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[-] The spec file handles locales properly.
[-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[x] Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x] Permissions on files are set properly.
[x] Package consistently uses macros.
[x] Package contains code, or permissable content.
[-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[-] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present.
[-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[-] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la).
[-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
application.
[x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
=== SUGGESTED ITEMS ===
[x] Latest version is packaged.
[x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
Tested on: rawhide.x86_64
[x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
Tested on: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3265813
[?] Package functions as described.
[-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
[-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct.
[-] File based requires are sane.
[x] %check is present and the tests pass
All tests successful.
Files=3, Tests=590, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.06 usr 0.01 sys + 0.39 cusr 0.01
csys = 0.47 CPU)
Result: PASS
APPROVED.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 700427] Review Request: jopt-simple - A Java command line parser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=700427 --- Comment #11 from Karel Klíč 2011-08-11 09:16:03 EDT --- Spec URL: http://kklic.fedorapeople.org/jopt-simple.spec SRPM URL: http://kklic.fedorapeople.org/jopt-simple-3.3-3.fc14.src.rpm * Thu Aug 11 2011 Karel Klíč - 3.3-3 - Include the license text in the javadoc package, which is independent from the main package - Use %%add_maven_depmap instead of %%add_to_maven_depmap -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 729777] Review Request: perl-Switch - A switch statement for Perl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729777 Tomas Hoger changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|Security| Group|security| CC|security-response-team@redh | |at.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608470] Review Request: perl-Test-Script-Run - Test scripts with Perl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608470 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC||emmanuel.seyman@club-intern ||et.fr Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-08-11 09:21:18 --- Comment #15 from Emmanuel Seyman 2011-08-11 09:21:18 EDT --- This looks fixed (the module has been build and released). Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 700427] Review Request: jopt-simple - A Java command line parser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=700427 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #12 from Alexander Kurtakov 2011-08-11 09:23:03 EDT --- Looks good. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 729681] Review Request: maven-reporting-exec - classes managing report plugin execution
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729681 Tomas Radej changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Tomas Radej 2011-08-11 09:31:27 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: maven-reporting-exec Short Description: Classes to manage report plugin executions with Maven 3 Owners: tradej Branches: fc15 InitialCC: akurtakov -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 729681] Review Request: maven-reporting-exec - classes managing report plugin execution
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729681 --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla 2011-08-11 09:42:22 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). Corrected fc15 to f15, added f16. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 700427] Review Request: jopt-simple - A Java command line parser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=700427 Karel Klíč changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #13 from Karel Klíč 2011-08-11 09:42:53 EDT --- Thank you for the review. New Package SCM Request === Package Name: jopt-simple Short Description: A Java command line parser Owners: kklic Branches: f15 f16 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 729926] Review Request: jboss-httpserver - JBoss httpserver
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729926 Pierre-YvesChibon changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|pin...@pingoured.fr -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 700427] Review Request: jopt-simple - A Java command line parser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=700427 --- Comment #14 from Jon Ciesla 2011-08-11 10:03:06 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728664] Review Request: django-pylibmc - Django cache backend using pylibmc
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728664 --- Comment #3 from Praveen Kumar 2011-08-11 10:00:53 EDT --- Koji Build : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3265945 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728664] Review Request: django-pylibmc - Django cache backend using pylibmc
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728664 --- Comment #4 from Praveen Kumar 2011-08-11 10:14:07 EDT --- Spec URL: http://kumarpraveen.fedorapeople.org/django-pylibmc/django-pylibmc.spec SRPM URL: http://kumarpraveen.fedorapeople.org/django-pylibmc/django-pylibmc-0.2.1-2.20110806gitb56e74.fc15.src.rpm koji build : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3265978 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 729926] Review Request: jboss-httpserver - JBoss httpserver
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729926
Pierre-YvesChibon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag||fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2011-08-11 10:34:15
EDT ---
[!] rpmlint must be run on every package.
jboss-httpserver.src: W: invalid-url Source0:
jboss-httpserver-1.0.0.Beta1.tar.xz
jboss-httpserver.noarch: W: no-documentation
jboss-httpserver-javadoc.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Javadocs
-> Java docs, Java-docs, Avocados
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
-> That is using the jpackage-utils from rawhide
[X] The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[X] The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption.
Since the name httpserver is very generic and this is a jboss related
package the name jboss-httpserver make things clearer.
[X] The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
[X] The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the
Licensing Guidelines.
[!] The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license.
License is a mixture of GPLv2 only, GPLv2+ and GPLv2 only with exception
[NA] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for
the package must be included in %doc.
[X] The spec file must be written in American English.
[X] The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[X] The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
source from the src.rpm:
f753544e067b93b0d72166689296212a695b9606
../rpmbuild/SOURCES/jboss-httpserver-1.0.0.Beta1.tar.xz
source regenerated using the comment in the spec:
f753544e067b93b0d72166689296212a695b9606
jboss-httpserver-1.0.0.Beta1.tar.xz
[X] The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at
least one primary architecture.
compiled fine on F15 x86_64
koji build : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3265967
[NA] If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch.
[X] All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ;
inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional.
[NA] The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the
%find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.
[NA] Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library
files(not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths,
must call ldconfig in %post and %postun.
[X] Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
[NA] If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state
this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for
relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is
considered a blocker.
[X] A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create
a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does
create that directory.
[X] A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's
%files listings.
[X] Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with
executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a
%defattr(...) line.
[!] Each package must consistently use macros.
[X] The package must contain code, or permissable content.
[X] Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage.
That's the -javadoc package here
[NA] If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime
of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run
properly if it is not present.
[NA] Header files must be in a -devel package.
[NA] Static libraries must be in a -static package.
[NA] If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1),
then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel
package.
[NA] In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} =
%{version}-%{release}.
[NA] Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed
in the spec if they are built.
[NA] Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file,
a
[Bug 729653] Review Request: perl-Pod-Wordlist-hanekomu - Add words for spell checking POD
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729653 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||728329(perl-Test-Version) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728972] Review Request: perl-Test-Vars - Detects unused variables
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728972 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||728329(perl-Test-Version) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 729813] Review Request: perl-Test-CPAN-Meta-JSON - Validate a META.json file within a CPAN distribution
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729813 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||728329(perl-Test-Version) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 729972] Review Request: perl-Test-Mojibake - Check your source for encoding misbehavior
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729972 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||728329(perl-Test-Version) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728329] Review Request: perl-Test-Version - Check to see that versions in modules are sane
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728329 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||729653, 729813, 729972, ||728972 --- Comment #2 from Paul Howarth 2011-08-11 10:57:06 EDT --- Updated for extra release test coverage: Spec URL: http://subversion.city-fan.org/repos/cfo-repo/perl-Test-Version/branches/fedora/perl-Test-Version.spec SRPM URL: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/perl-Test-Version/perl-Test-Version-1.0.0-3.fc17.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728664] Review Request: django-pylibmc - Django cache backend using pylibmc
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728664 Ankur Sinha changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Ankur Sinha 2011-08-11 11:01:23 EDT --- Okay! Nice work. Package is good to go. [ankur@ankur SRPMS]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-*/result/*.rpm django-pylibmc.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) backend -> backed, back end, back-end django-pylibmc.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US memcached -> schemed django-pylibmc.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US backend -> backed, back end, back-end django-pylibmc.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) backend -> backed, back end, back-end django-pylibmc.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US memcached -> schemed django-pylibmc.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US backend -> backed, back end, back-end django-pylibmc.src: W: invalid-url Source0: django-pylibmc-0.2.1.20110806gitb56e74.tar.xz django-pylibmc.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) backend -> backed, back end, back-end django-pylibmc.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US memcached -> schemed django-pylibmc.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US backend -> backed, back end, back-end django-pylibmc.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) backend -> backed, back end, back-end django-pylibmc.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US memcached -> schemed django-pylibmc.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US backend -> backed, back end, back-end django-pylibmc.src: W: invalid-url Source0: django-pylibmc-0.2.1.20110806gitb56e74.tar.xz 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 14 warnings. XXX APPROVED XXX Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730033] New: Review Request: perl-autobox-dump - Human/perl readable strings from the results of an EXPR
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-autobox-dump - Human/perl readable strings from the results of an EXPR Alias: perl-autobox-dump https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730033 Summary: Review Request: perl-autobox-dump - Human/perl readable strings from the results of an EXPR Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/autobox-dump/ OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarn...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-autobox-dump.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-autobox-dump-20090426.1746-1.fc17.src.rpm Description: The autobox::dump pragma adds, via the autobox pragma, a method to normal expression (such as scalars, arrays, hashes, math, literals, etc.) that produces a human/perl readable representation of the value of that expression. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3266166 *rt-0.10_01 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730031] New: Review Request: perl-autobox-Core - Core functions exposed as methods in primitive types
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-autobox-Core - Core functions exposed as methods in primitive types Alias: perl-autobox-Core https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730031 Summary: Review Request: perl-autobox-Core - Core functions exposed as methods in primitive types Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/autobox-Core/ OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarn...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-autobox-Core.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-autobox-Core-1.2-1.fc17.src.rpm Description: The autobox module lets you call methods on primitive datatypes such as scalars and arrays. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3266154 *rt-0.10_01 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730034] New: Review Request: perl-autobox-List-Util - Bring the List::Util functions to autobox
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-autobox-List-Util - Bring the List::Util functions to autobox https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730034 Summary: Review Request: perl-autobox-List-Util - Bring the List::Util functions to autobox Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/autobox-List-Util/ OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarn...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-autobox-List-Util.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-autobox-List-Util-20090629-1.fc17.src.rpm Description: autobox::List::Util brings all of the functions from List::Util to arrays as methods. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3266175 *rt-0.10_01 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730037] New: Review Request: perl-autovivification - Lexically disable autovivification
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-autovivification - Lexically disable autovivification https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730037 Summary: Review Request: perl-autovivification - Lexically disable autovivification Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/autovivification/ OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarn...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-autovivification.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-autovivification-0.09-1.fc17.src.rpm Description: When an undefined variable is dereferenced, it gets silently upgraded to an array or hash reference (depending of the type of the dereferencing). This behavior is called autovivification and usually does what you mean (e.g. when you store a value) but it's sometimes unnatural or surprising because your variables gets populated behind your back. This is especially true when several levels of dereferencing are involved, in which case all levels are vivified up to the last, or when it happens in intuitively read-only constructs like exists. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3266179 *rt-0.10_01 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730038] New: Review Request: perl-Child - Object oriented simple interface to fork()
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Child - Object oriented simple interface to fork() Alias: perl-Child https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730038 Summary: Review Request: perl-Child - Object oriented simple interface to fork() Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Child/ OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarn...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Child.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Child-0.009-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: Fork is too low level, and difficult to manage. Often people forget to exit at the end, reap their children, and check exit status. The problem is the low level functions provided to do these things. Throw in pipes for IPC and you just have a pile of things nobody wants to think about. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3266193 *rt-0.10_01 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730041] New: Review Request: perl-Date-JD - Conversion between flavors of Julian Date
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Date-JD - Conversion between flavors of Julian Date Alias: perl-Date-JD https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730041 Summary: Review Request: perl-Date-JD - Conversion between flavors of Julian Date Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Date-JD/ OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarn...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Date-JD.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Date-JD-0.005-1.fc17.src.rpm Description: For date and time calculations it is convenient to represent dates by a simple linear count of days, rather than in a particular calendar. This is such a good idea that it has been invented several times. If there were a single such linear count then it would be the obvious data interchange format between calendar modules. With several versions, calendar modules can use such sensible data formats and still have interoperability problems. This module tackles that problem, by performing conversions between different flavors of day count. These day count systems are generically known as "Julian Dates", after the most venerable of them. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3266224 *rt-0.10_01 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 700427] Review Request: jopt-simple - A Java command line parser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=700427 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-11 11:43:33 EDT --- jopt-simple-3.3-3.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jopt-simple-3.3-3.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730040] New: Review Request: perl-Date-ISO8601 - Three ISO 8601 numerical calendars
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Date-ISO8601 - Three ISO 8601 numerical calendars Alias: perl-Date-ISO8601 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730040 Summary: Review Request: perl-Date-ISO8601 - Three ISO 8601 numerical calendars Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Date-ISO8601/ OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarn...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Date-ISO8601.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Date-ISO8601-0.004-1.fc17.src.rpm Description: The international standard ISO 8601 "Data elements and interchange formats - Information interchange - Representation of dates and times" defines three distinct calendars by which days can be labeled. It also defines textual formats for the representation of dates in these calendars. This module provides functions to convert dates between these three calendars and Chronological Julian Day Numbers, which is a suitable format to do arithmetic with. It also supplies functions that describe the shape of these calendars, to assist in calendrical calculations. It also supplies functions to represent dates textually in the ISO 8601 formats. ISO 8601 also covers time of day and time periods, but this module does nothing relating to those parts of the standard; this is only about labeling days. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3266206 *rt-0.10_01 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 700427] Review Request: jopt-simple - A Java command line parser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=700427 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 700427] Review Request: jopt-simple - A Java command line parser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=700427 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-11 11:43:43 EDT --- jopt-simple-3.3-3.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jopt-simple-3.3-3.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730043] New: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Epoch - Convert DateTimes to/from epoch seconds
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Epoch - Convert DateTimes to/from epoch seconds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730043 Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Epoch - Convert DateTimes to/from epoch seconds Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/DateTime-Format-Epoch/ OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarn...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-DateTime-Format-Epoch.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-DateTime-Format-Epoch-0.13-1.fc17.src.rpm Description: This module can convert a DateTime object (or any object that can be converted to a DateTime object) to the number of seconds since a given epoch. It can also do the reverse. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3266232 *rt-0.10_01 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730047] New: Review Request: perl-Hash-FieldHash - Lightweight field hash implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Hash-FieldHash - Lightweight field hash implementation Alias: perl-Hash-FieldHash https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730047 Summary: Review Request: perl-Hash-FieldHash - Lightweight field hash implementation Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Hash-FieldHash/ OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarn...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Hash-FieldHash.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Hash-FieldHash-0.10-1.fc17.src.rpm Description: Hash::FieldHash provides the field hash mechanism which supports the inside- out technique. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3266244 *rt-0.10_01 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683071] Review Request: php-libvirt - PHP bindings for libvirt virtualization toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683071 --- Comment #59 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-11 11:57:07 EDT --- php-libvirt-0.4.3-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-libvirt-0.4.3-1.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 596461] Review Request: lzma-sdk - SDK for lzma compression
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461 --- Comment #61 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-08-11 11:54:12 EDT --- Note that I'm still on to review this, assuming that Jon agrees with what you've done and wants to proceed. Just let me know. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 729681] Review Request: maven-reporting-exec - classes managing report plugin execution
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729681 Tomas Radej changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-08-11 12:11:43 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728664] Review Request: django-pylibmc - Django cache backend using pylibmc
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728664 --- Comment #6 from Praveen Kumar 2011-08-11 12:22:57 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: django-pylibmc Short Description: Django cache backend using pylibmc Owners: sundaram pjp kumarpraveen Branches: f14 f15 el6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 710203] Review Request: gambas3 - IDE based on a basic interpreter with object extensions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710203 --- Comment #12 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2011-08-11 12:29:34 EDT --- New SRPM: http://spot.fedorapeople.org/gambas3-2.99.2-1.fc15.src.rpm New SPEC: http://spot.fedorapeople.org/gambas3.spec I think that all the rpmlint errors are now safe to ignore (hidden-files, missing docs, one incorrect FSF address) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730069] New: Review Request: perl-indirect - Lexically warn about using the indirect object syntax
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-indirect - Lexically warn about using the indirect object syntax Alias: perl-indirect https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730069 Summary: Review Request: perl-indirect - Lexically warn about using the indirect object syntax Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/indirect/ OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarn...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-indirect.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-indirect-0.24-1.fc17.src.rpm Description: When enabled (or disabled as some may prefer to say, since you actually turn it on by calling no indirect), this pragma warns about indirect object syntax constructs that may have slipped into your code. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3266314 *rt-0.10_01 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 722709] Review Request: mbrowse - GUI SNMP MIB browser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=722709 --- Comment #3 from Nathan Owe 2011-08-11 13:21:17 EDT --- The group tag is no longer necessary Also running rpmlint on the RPM gives me there is no man pages for binary https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Man_pages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 727030] Review Request: ufw - uncomplicated firewall
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=727030 --- Comment #14 from Nathan Owe 2011-08-11 13:22:50 EDT --- I am not sure what to do about the following init scripts: /lib/ufw/ufw-init /lib/ufw/ufw-init-functions I know ufw enable will pretty much do /lib/ufw/ufw-init start. So really do I need to install it to /etc/rc.d/init.d even though ufw looks for them in /lib and I also tried doing something like it shows in the wiki: /sbin/chkconfig --add /lib/ufw/ufw-init and it gives a error like "error reading information on service ufw-init: No such file or directory" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 720864] Review Request: gadmin-httpd - Apache GUI tool - First package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720864 Nathan Owe changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG Last Closed||2011-08-11 13:29:26 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 537727] Review Request: Slack - A lazy systems administration configuration management toolkit.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537727 Nathan Owe changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG Last Closed||2011-08-11 13:30:08 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 537727] Review Request: Slack - A lazy systems administration configuration management toolkit.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537727 Nathan Owe changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 729777] Review Request: perl-Switch - A switch statement for Perl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729777 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2011-08-11 14:22:21 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: perl-Switch Short Description: A switch statement for Perl Owners: spot Branches: f16 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 726210] Review Request: freewrl - X3D / VRML visualization program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=726210 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2011-08-11 14:20:55 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: freewrl Short Description: X3D / VRML visualization program Owners: spot Branches: el5 el6 f14 f15 f16 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 726210] Review Request: freewrl - X3D / VRML visualization program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=726210 --- Comment #10 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2011-08-11 14:18:51 EDT --- I'm not really interested in EPEL for this one, but I'll ask for the branches and you can maintain them. Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 729777] Review Request: perl-Switch - A switch statement for Perl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729777 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla 2011-08-11 14:40:08 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 726210] Review Request: freewrl - X3D / VRML visualization program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=726210 --- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla 2011-08-11 14:39:29 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 722709] Review Request: mbrowse - GUI SNMP MIB browser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=722709 --- Comment #4 from Volker Fröhlich 2011-08-11 15:13:34 EDT --- Can you cite the ruling or the section in the guidelines concerning the group tag? Well, the guidelines say "should". Since it is a graphical application, I don't regard it as terribly useful. There actually happens to be an old manpage from Debian: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/hardy/man1/mbrowse.1.html. I'll consider including it, because there is no other help. I'll have to look over it, if it is still up to date. Upstream seemingly had it with 0.3.1 but I can't find a trace of it in trunk. http://mbrowse.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=mbrowse/mbrowse;a=blob;f=debian/changelog;h=94fd1f123a54026003befc0959d04774c39656f9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 726962] Review Request: wmweather - Applet which shows local weather conditions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=726962 --- Comment #3 from Mario Blättermann 2011-08-11 15:21:45 EDT --- The "Group" tag was missing. New files: Spec URL: http://mariobl.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/wmweather.spec SRPM URL: http://mariobl.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/wmweather-2.4.5-2.fc15.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 722709] Review Request: mbrowse - GUI SNMP MIB browser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=722709 --- Comment #5 from Nathan Owe 2011-08-11 15:27:00 EDT --- Here is a bit about the Group tag, it is more of a talk: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/packaging/2008-September/005091.html Also I didn't notice the man page either. Supposedly it said adding a man page fixed bug number. But I even looked for the bug that it was referencing and I didn't see that either. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 726210] Review Request: freewrl - X3D / VRML visualization program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=726210 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 726210] Review Request: freewrl - X3D / VRML visualization program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=726210 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-11 15:36:45 EDT --- freewrl-1.22.12-0.3.pre2.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/freewrl-1.22.12-0.3.pre2.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 726210] Review Request: freewrl - X3D / VRML visualization program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=726210 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-11 15:37:10 EDT --- freewrl-1.22.12-0.3.pre2.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/freewrl-1.22.12-0.3.pre2.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
