[Bug 722713] Review Request: ace - Optimal route search in a complete graph
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=722713 --- Comment #4 from Mauricio Cleveland mauricio.clevel...@gmail.com 2011-08-17 01:59:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) %defattr line is no longer needed unless you are building for the RPEL Remove Requires: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Requires Since RPM will find the dependency needed automaticly. BuildRoot line is not required unless building for the EPEL Also each time you update the SPEC file, bump up the release and note the change in the Changelog OK. According to the homepage, the package is GPLv3+ OK. Also the %clean section isn't needed except for EPEL Prefix: tag isn't needed either OK. Running rpmlint on the RPM package(not SRPM) gives that you need a man page for it as well bash-4.2$ rpmlint ace-1.5-4.fc15.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Description is too long http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_Rpmlint_issues#description-line-too-long OK. This is how mine would look if I did it, except with my name and email of course: http://github.com/ndowens/Fedora-Rpms/raw/master/SPECS/ace.spec The only issue that rpmlint gives me is that a man page is needed OK. http://code.google.com/p/curvatura/source/browse/ace.spec http://code.google.com/p/curvatura/source/browse/RPMS/ace-1.5-4.fc15.noarch.rpm http://code.google.com/p/curvatura/source/browse/RPMS/ace-1.5-4.fc15.src.rpm I hope this all right. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728555] Review Request: screenie-composer - Fancy screenshot composer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728555 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-08-17 02:41:46 EDT --- screenie-composer-1.0.0-0.2.20110805git49c2630.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/screenie-composer-1.0.0-0.2.20110805git49c2630.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728555] Review Request: screenie-composer - Fancy screenshot composer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728555 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-08-17 02:41:54 EDT --- screenie-composer-1.0.0-0.2.20110805git49c2630.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/screenie-composer-1.0.0-0.2.20110805git49c2630.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728555] Review Request: screenie-composer - Fancy screenshot composer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728555 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 225645] Merge Review: cleanfeed
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225645 Lukáš Nykrýn lnyk...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lnyk...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|lnyk...@redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 712272] Review Request: ghc-unix-compat - A portable POSIX-compatibility layer for Haskell
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712272 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 712272] Review Request: ghc-unix-compat - A portable POSIX-compatibility layer for Haskell
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712272 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|peter...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 662259] Review Request: git-annex - Manage files with git, without checking their contents in
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=662259 Bug 662259 depends on bug 713361, which changed state. Bug 713361 Summary: Review Request: ghc-pcre-light - Haskell binding to pcre https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=713361 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA Resolution||ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2011-08-17 03:23:26 EDT --- I assume Andrew is not intending to review this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 731066] Review Request: django-annoying - Eliminate annoying things in the Django framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731066 Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com 2011-08-17 04:19:01 EDT --- You don't need to override CFLAGS explicitly in this case. Other than that, this follows the standard template. == APPROVED == -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 731110] Review Request: maven-filtering - Shared component providing resource filtering
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731110
Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2011-08-17
04:26:30 EDT ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[x] Rpmlint output:
0 errors, 0 warnings.
Impressive :)
[x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines[1].
[x] Spec file name must match the base package name, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines[2].
[x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms.
[x] Buildroot definition is not present
[x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines[3,4].
[x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
License type: ASL 2.0
[x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
[x] All independent sub-packages have license of their own
[x] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
MD5SUM this package:0fb6fb5d407bd7c8d752762859fe530c
MD5SUM upstream package:0fb6fb5d407bd7c8d752762859fe530c
[x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines[5].
[x] Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x] File sections do not contain %defattr(-,root,root,-) unless changed with
good reason
[x] Permissions on files are set properly.
[x] Package does NOT have a %clean section which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}
(or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). (not needed anymore)
[x] Package consistently uses macros (no %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
mixing)
[x] Package contains code, or permissable content.
[x] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[x] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
application.
[x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x] Javadoc documentation files are generated and included in -javadoc
subpackage
[x] Javadocs are placed in %{_javadocdir}/%{name} (no -%{version} symlinks)
[x] Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on jpackage-utils
[x] Javadoc subpackages have Require: jpackage-utils
[x] Package uses %global not %define
[-] If package uses tarball from VCS include comment how to re-create that
tarball (svn export URL, git clone URL, ...)
[-] If source tarball includes bundled jar/class files these need to be
removed prior to building
[x] All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
[x] Jar files are installed to %{_javadir}/%{name}.jar (see [6] for details)
[x] If package contains pom.xml files install it (including depmaps) even when
building with ant
[x] pom files has correct add_maven_depmap
=== Maven ===
[x] Use %{_mavenpomdir} macro for placing pom files instead of
%{_datadir}/maven2/poms
[x] If package uses -Dmaven.test.skip=true explain why it was needed in a
comment
[-] If package uses custom depmap -Dmaven.local.depmap.file=* explain why
it's needed in a comment
[x] Package DOES NOT use %update_maven_depmap in %post/%postun
[x] Packages DOES NOT have Requires(post) and Requires(postun) on
jpackage-utils for %update_maven_depmap macro
=== Other suggestions ===
[x] If possible use upstream build method (maven/ant/javac)
[x] Avoid having BuildRequires on exact NVR unless necessary
[x] Package has BuildArch: noarch (if possible)
[x] Latest version is packaged.
*** APPROVED ***
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 725905] Review Request: p11-kit - Library for loading and sharing PKCS#11 modules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725905 Tomas Mraz tm...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||tm...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|tm...@redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608574] Review Request: tinymce - Web based Javascript HTML WYSIWYG editor control
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608574 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #16 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2011-08-17 05:36:27 EDT --- Could you please push the updates for releases into Bodhi? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 690728] Review Request: Nitrate - A test case management system written in Django
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690728 --- Comment #53 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2011-08-17 05:34:20 EDT --- Do you have an update to this package then? so we can continue with the review or do you prefer we quickly review the new packages first? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630206] Review Request: ghc-hledger-lib - Core types and utilities for working with hledger data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630206 --- Comment #11 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2011-08-17 05:40:03 EDT --- Ping-a-ling?! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 690728] Review Request: Nitrate - A test case management system written in Django
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690728 --- Comment #54 from Yuguang Wang yuw...@redhat.com 2011-08-17 05:46:48 EDT --- I'd prefer a quick review on the new packages first. for nitrate, I think I could provide a new package early next week. Thanks. :) (In reply to comment #53) Do you have an update to this package then? so we can continue with the review or do you prefer we quickly review the new packages first? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 225645] Merge Review: cleanfeed
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225645 Lukáš Nykrýn lnyk...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Lukáš Nykrýn lnyk...@redhat.com 2011-08-17 05:53:22 EDT --- Checked git commit: a79564bb2bc60af43dde6748eafb23d853f80bde YES source files match upstream YES package meets naming and versioning guidelines. YES specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently YES dist tag is present YES clean section and buildroot present YES license field matches the actual license YES license is open source-compatible YES License text included in package YES latest version is being packaged N/A BuildRequires are proper N/A compiler flags are appropriate YES package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64) N/A debuginfo package looks complete YES rpmlint is silent YES final provides and requires look sane -- dependence on perl is added automatically, but maybe it would by good to define it explicitly N/A %check is present and all tests pass N/A no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths YES owns the directories it creates YES doesn't own any directories it shouldn't YES no duplicates in %files N/A scriptlets must be sane YES code, not content N/A large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage YES %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package YES no headers YES no pkgconfig files YES no libtool .la droppings. YES not a GUI app. Additional comments: User news is not by default in system, so it use root, I don't know if it is desired behavior. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 717864] Review Request: ghc-case-insensitive - Haskell case-insensitive string comparison
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=717864 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2011-08-17 05:53:22 EDT --- Thank you for reviewing :) New Package SCM Request === Package Name: ghc-case-insensitive Short Description: Haskell case-insensitive string comparison Owners: petersen Branches: f14 f15 f16 InitialCC: haskell-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 726210] Review Request: freewrl - X3D / VRML visualization program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=726210 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-08-17 06:00:18 EDT --- freewrl-1.22.12-0.3.pre2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/freewrl-1.22.12-0.3.pre2.el6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675557] Review Request: matreshka - set of Ada libraries to help to develop information systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675557 --- Comment #22 from Pavel Zhukov pa...@zhukoff.net 2011-08-17 06:11:11 EDT --- New build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3279184 SRPMS: http://landgraf.fedorapeople.org/packages/requested/matreshka/matreshka-0.1.1-5.fc15.src.rpm SPEC: http://landgraf.fedorapeople.org/packages/requested/matreshka/matreshka.spec rpmlint: http://fpaste.org/S5OQ/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 708115] Review Request: python-atfork - Provides an API to register pre and post callbacks when forking
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708115 --- Comment #3 from Martin Krizek mkri...@redhat.com 2011-08-17 06:38:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) (In reply to comment #1) Hi James, my *informal* review: Hi Martin, many thanks for your informal review feedback! snip [ TODO ] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. This should be [ OK ] as far as I know, since the package only includes a python library at this time. TODO was for me, I didn't notice that I forgot to change it to OK. You are right, sorry about that. [ BAD ] SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. === License is not included. Thank you for finding this, I have raised this issue with upstream and will monitor for updates. https://code.google.com/p/python-atfork/issues/detail?id=2 [ BAD ] SHOULD: your package should contain man pages for binaries/scripts. If it doesn't, work with upstream to add them where they make sense. === No man pages. There are no scripts or binaries included with python-atfork. My understanding is that this should be NA for this particular package. Feel free to correct me, though. Right. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 573929] Review Request: perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib - Low-Level Interface to zlib compression library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573929 --- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-08-17 06:54:09 EDT --- perl-threads-shared-1.37-3.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-threads-shared-1.37-3.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 708115] Review Request: python-atfork - Provides an API to register pre and post callbacks when forking
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708115 --- Comment #4 from Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com 2011-08-17 07:07:56 EDT --- I use python-atfork along with python-signalfd. Are you interested in packaging python-signalfd? http://launchpad.net/python-signalfd -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 573929] Review Request: perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib - Low-Level Interface to zlib compression library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573929 --- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-08-17 07:09:51 EDT --- perl-parent-0.225-4.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-parent-0.225-4.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 663181] Review Request: ompc - MATLAB to Python syntax adapting compiler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663181 --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2011-08-17 07:19:31 EDT --- Ping, what is the status of this bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 710904] Review Request: octave-communications - Communications for Octave
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710904
--- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2011-08-17 07:18:44
EDT ---
Please add comments about the functionality of Patch0 and Patch1.
**
Why aren't you using %{octave_pkg_build}?
**
You need to add the -v flag to the mkoctfile commend so that build flags can be
seen.
**
The package fails to build:
+ '[' -e
/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/octave-communications-1.0.10-1.fc15.x86_64/usr/share/octave/packages/communications-1.0.10/packinfo/on_uninstall.m
']'
+ echo 'function on_uninstall (desc)'
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.7FEKFz: line 44:
/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/octave-communications-1.0.10-1.fc15.x86_64/usr/share/octave/packages/communications-1.0.10/packinfo/on_uninstall.m:
No such file or directory
RPM build errors:
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.7FEKFz (%install)
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.7FEKFz (%install)
Child returncode was: 1
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 658420] Review Request: zorba - General purpose XQuery processor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658420
Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #13 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2011-08-17 07:30:43
EDT ---
Whoa, seems we all had forgotten this. As per comment #6, all the issues in the
review were attended to, and the only thing blocking the review was the
bundling exception that has been granted.
However, there has been a change of guidelines, and you MUST make the Requires
architecture specific:
Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}%{?_isa}
Otherwise I believe there are no other issues, and thus this package must be
APPROVED
Please add the %{?_isa} stuff before import to git.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 717864] Review Request: ghc-case-insensitive - Haskell case-insensitive string comparison
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=717864 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-08-17 08:02:11 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226505] Merge Review: ttcp
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226505 Michal Sekletar msekl...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msekl...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|msekl...@redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 727780] Review Request: qt-ruby - Ruby bindings for Qt 4
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=727780 Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #13 from Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com 2011-08-17 08:22:09 EDT --- Ok, thanks Than and Vit! I agree with Than regarding rails_support but of course if someone asks, it can be packaged separately. rpmlint ruby-qt-4.7.0-1.fc15.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. package builds correctly http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3279572 APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 729512] Review Request: graphite2 - Font rendering capabilities for complex non-Roman writing systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729512 --- Comment #4 from Martin Krizek mkri...@redhat.com 2011-08-17 08:28:03 EDT --- $ rpmlint rpmbuild/SRPMS/graphite2-1.0.1-2.fc15.src.rpm rpmbuild/SPECS/graphite2.spec rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/graphite2-* graphite2.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary gr2fonttest graphite2.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary comparerenderer graphite2.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary gr2fonttest graphite2.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary comparerenderer graphite2-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/graphite2-1.0.1/src/gr_features.cpp graphite2-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/graphite2-1.0.1/src/direct_machine.cpp graphite2-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/graphite2-1.0.1/src/TtfTypes.h graphite2-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/graphite2-1.0.1/src/opcodes.h graphite2-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/graphite2-1.0.1/src/Bidi.cpp graphite2-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/graphite2-1.0.1/src/Face.cpp graphite2-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/graphite2-1.0.1/src/Face.h graphite2-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/graphite2-1.0.1/include/graphite2/XmlLog.h graphite2-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/graphite2-1.0.1/include/graphite2/Types.h graphite2-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/graphite2-1.0.1/src/gr_font.cpp graphite2-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/graphite2-1.0.1/src/SegCacheEntry.cpp graphite2-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/graphite2-1.0.1/src/Sparse.cpp graphite2-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/graphite2-1.0.1/src/NameTable.h graphite2-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/graphite2-1.0.1/src/opcode_table.h graphite2-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/graphite2-1.0.1/src/XmlTraceLog.cpp graphite2-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/graphite2-1.0.1/src/GlyphFaceCache.h graphite2-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/graphite2-1.0.1/src/NameTable.cpp graphite2-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/graphite2-1.0.1/tests/comparerenderer/CompareRenderer.cpp graphite2-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/graphite2-1.0.1/src/SegCache.h graphite2-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/graphite2-1.0.1/include/graphite2/Font.h graphite2-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/graphite2-1.0.1/src/SegCache.cpp graphite2-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/graphite2-1.0.1/src/SegCacheStore.h graphite2-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/graphite2-1.0.1/src/CachedFace.h graphite2-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/graphite2-1.0.1/src/Slot.h graphite2-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/graphite2-1.0.1/src/TtfUtil.h graphite2-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/graphite2-1.0.1/src/Font.h graphite2-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/graphite2-1.0.1/src/gr_segment.cpp graphite2-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/graphite2-1.0.1/src/Main.h graphite2-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/graphite2-1.0.1/tests/comparerenderer/RenderedLine.h graphite2-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/graphite2-1.0.1/src/Silf.cpp graphite2-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/graphite2-1.0.1/src/FeatureMap.h graphite2-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/graphite2-1.0.1/tests/comparerenderer/FeatureParser.h graphite2-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/graphite2-1.0.1/src/Segment.h graphite2-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/graphite2-1.0.1/src/Segment.cpp graphite2-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/graphite2-1.0.1/tests/comparerenderer/Renderer.h graphite2-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/graphite2-1.0.1/src/CmapCache.h graphite2-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/graphite2-1.0.1/src/SegCacheStore.cpp graphite2-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/graphite2-1.0.1/src/XmlTraceLogTags.cpp graphite2-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/graphite2-1.0.1/tests/comparerenderer/GrRenderer.h graphite2-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/graphite2-1.0.1/src/GlyphFaceCache.cpp graphite2-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/graphite2-1.0.1/src/FeatureVal.h graphite2-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/graphite2-1.0.1/src/GlyphFace.cpp
[Bug 589867] Review Request: logcheck - analyzes logfiles and sends email
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589867 --- Comment #36 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-08-17 08:23:47 EDT --- logcheck-1.3.13-4.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/logcheck-1.3.13-4.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 729512] Review Request: graphite2 - Font rendering capabilities for complex non-Roman writing systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729512 --- Comment #5 from Martin Krizek mkri...@redhat.com 2011-08-17 08:30:49 EDT --- During informal review I didn't find any issues, except those stated in the rpmlint output. I do however have some comments on the spec file: I think following lines cp LICENSE $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/share/graphite2 %files %doc /usr/share/graphite2/LICENSE should be replaced with just %files %doc LICENSE Also this line: %doc /usr/share/graphite2/*.cmake seems incorrect to me. Assuming *.cmake belongs to %doc (which I don't know) and therefore package can run without those files - is it neccessary to use the whole path? At least I would replace /usr/share with the macro (and graphite2 for that matter). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 708115] Review Request: python-atfork - Provides an API to register pre and post callbacks when forking
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708115 --- Comment #5 from James Laska jla...@redhat.com 2011-08-17 08:34:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) I use python-atfork along with python-signalfd. Are you interested in packaging python-signalfd? http://launchpad.net/python-signalfd Sure! Contact me directly and we can figure out how to proceed. I have it packaged locally now ... but I'd need some clarification from upstream on the appropriate LICENSE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 225622] Merge Review: boost
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225622 --- Comment #40 from Denis Arnaud denis.arnaud_fed...@m4x.org 2011-08-17 08:41:00 EDT --- The mainstream Boost package is now tracked by #711845. So, this bug could be closed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 731191] Review Request: libspnav - Open source alternative to 3DConnextion drivers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731191 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|rdie...@math.unl.edu Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu 2011-08-17 08:46:25 EDT --- I can help review this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 731191] Review Request: libspnav - Open source alternative to 3DConnextion drivers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731191 --- Comment #3 from Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com 2011-08-17 08:53:20 EDT --- Great! I've also got spacenavd and spnavcfg packaged but haven't submitted review requests just yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 725905] Review Request: p11-kit - Library for loading and sharing PKCS#11 modules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725905 Tomas Mraz tm...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 731191] Review Request: libspnav - Open source alternative to 3DConnextion drivers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731191
--- Comment #4 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu 2011-08-17 09:00:46 EDT
---
naming: ok
license: BSD, ok
sources: ok
b85a0f4ab711e2d4f73a40e2e371f5ae libspnav-0.2.2.tar.gz
scriptlets: ok
1. MUST: build doesn't use $RPM_OPT_FLAGS. maybe use something like:
--- configure.opt 2011-08-17 07:47:12.275486930 -0500
+++ configure 2011-08-17 07:52:24.599256027 -0500
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@
fi
if [ $OPT = 'yes' ]; then
- echo 'opt = -O3' Makefile
+ echo 'opt = -O3 $(RPM_OPT_FLAGS)' Makefile
fi
if [ $X11 = 'yes' ]; then
2. MUST. static library build/packaged. Please provide
justification/rationale for doing so, or remove it.
3. SHOULD. In %files, be explicit about what soname to package, so future abi
bumps don't come as a surprise, use something like
%files
%{_libdir}/libspnav.so.0*
instead?
4. SHOULD. Given all the configure/makefile hacks (optflags, DESTDIR, lib64)
in the .spec, I'm wondering if it may be more worthwhile to make an
upstreamable patch instead? I can help do that, if that's agreeable with you.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728757] Review Request: gnumed - The gnumed client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728757 Miroslav Lichvar mlich...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Miroslav Lichvar mlich...@redhat.com 2011-08-17 09:12:46 EDT --- It looks good. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 731191] Review Request: libspnav - Open source alternative to 3DConnextion drivers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731191
--- Comment #5 from Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com 2011-08-17 09:12:15 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #4)
1. MUST: build doesn't use $RPM_OPT_FLAGS. maybe use something like:
--- configure.opt 2011-08-17 07:47:12.275486930 -0500
+++ configure 2011-08-17 07:52:24.599256027 -0500
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@
fi
if [ $OPT = 'yes' ]; then
- echo 'opt = -O3' Makefile
+ echo 'opt = -O3 $(RPM_OPT_FLAGS)' Makefile
fi
if [ $X11 = 'yes' ]; then
I'll get this updated and see if a patch wouldn't be better then a bunch of sed
hacks. I usually just sed update CFLAGS = to CFLAGS +=
2. MUST. static library build/packaged. Please provide
justification/rationale for doing so, or remove it.
Yeah, I was wondering about that. I only packaged it because it built it. I
guess I just need to rm -f it so I don't get an installed but unpackaged
error
3. SHOULD. In %files, be explicit about what soname to package, so future
abi
bumps don't come as a surprise, use something like
%files
%{_libdir}/libspnav.so.0*
instead?
OK
4. SHOULD. Given all the configure/makefile hacks (optflags, DESTDIR,
lib64)
in the .spec, I'm wondering if it may be more worthwhile to make an
upstreamable patch instead? I can help do that, if that's agreeable with you.
I'll ask but these makefiles are VERY simple and the packages have not been
updated recently so I wonder how active upstream is.
I'll post a new spec and SRPM shortly.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 725905] Review Request: p11-kit - Library for loading and sharing PKCS#11 modules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725905 Tomas Mraz tm...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(kalevlember@gmail ||.com) --- Comment #11 from Tomas Mraz tm...@redhat.com 2011-08-17 09:19:12 EDT --- There is a problem that the -devel subpackage puts doc files in /usr/share/gtk-doc/html but this directory is not owned by anything that is required by p11-kit-devel. Also parts of the documentation document the configuration file format and that should be perhaps documented somehow in the main package, or even some kind of example config files included in the main package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 731191] Review Request: libspnav - Open source alternative to 3DConnextion drivers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731191 --- Comment #6 from Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com 2011-08-17 09:33:22 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hobbes1069.fedorapeople.org/libspnav/libspnav.spec SRPM URL: http://hobbes1069.fedorapeople.org/libspnav/libspnav-0.2.2-2.fc15.src.rpm * Wed Aug 17 2011 Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com - 0.2.2-2 - Patched make file to honor Fedora CFLAGS defaults. - Removed static library package. - Other minor updates to the spec file. This addresses 1-3. If you want to help with the makefile that's great as I'm not an expert at it :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 725905] Review Request: p11-kit - Library for loading and sharing PKCS#11 modules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725905 Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(kalevlember@gmail | |.com) | --- Comment #12 from Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com 2011-08-17 09:47:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) There is a problem that the -devel subpackage puts doc files in /usr/share/gtk-doc/html but this directory is not owned by anything that is required by p11-kit-devel. That directory is owned by the p11-kit-devel package itself to avoid a runtime dependency on the gtk-doc package: $ rpm -qlp p11-kit-devel-0.3-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm | grep gtk-doc /usr/share/gtk-doc /usr/share/gtk-doc/html /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/p11-kit /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/p11-kit/api-index-full.html /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/p11-kit/config-format.html ... See the section in the packaging guidelines on File and Directory Ownership [1] that specifically explains how to deal with gtk-doc directory ownership: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#The_directory_is_owned_by_a_package_which_is_not_required_for_your_package_to_function Also parts of the documentation document the configuration file format and that should be perhaps documented somehow in the main package, or even some kind of example config files included in the main package. I don't really want to put large html documentation in the main package. p11-kit is probably going to be included in the live CD and it's nice to keep the size down. However, instead of having the docs in the -devel package, it would be easy to split them out to a separate -doc package. In the future, when upstream has some example config files, we could also put these in the -doc subpackage. Would that be better than shipping all the docs in -devel? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728757] Review Request: gnumed - The gnumed client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728757 Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com 2011-08-17 10:40:32 EDT --- Thank you for the review Miroslav :) New Package SCM Request === Package Name: gnumed Short Description: The gnumed client Owners: ankursinha Branches: f14 f15 f16 InitialCC: susmit mrceresa -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 662259] Review Request: git-annex - Manage files with git, without checking their contents in
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=662259 --- Comment #7 from Andrew McNabb amcn...@mcnabbs.org 2011-08-17 10:47:22 EDT --- I originally started to, but as I got into it, all of the Haskell-specific stuff creeped me out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 725905] Review Request: p11-kit - Library for loading and sharing PKCS#11 modules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725905
Tomas Mraz tm...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #13 from Tomas Mraz tm...@redhat.com 2011-08-17 10:48:56 EDT ---
You're right, I somehow overlooked that in the file list.
As for the documentation - I don't think splitting it to a separate -doc
subpackage is a solution. The configuration file format is really simple and
the documentation or example would be pretty minimal and doing a separate
subpackage for it would be an overkill.
I'd really like to see the global and example module config file directly in
the main package. And/or manual page for the p11-kit binary. However I will not
block the package on this.
rpmlint output:
rpmlint -v SRPMS/p11-kit-0.3-1.fc14.src.rpm RPMS/x86_64/p11-kit*
p11-kit.src: I: checking
p11-kit.src: I: checking-url http://p11-glue.freedesktop.org/p11-kit.html
(timeout 10 seconds)
p11-kit.src: I: checking-url
http://p11-glue.freedesktop.org/releases/p11-kit-0.3.tar.gz (timeout 10
seconds)
p11-kit-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking
p11-kit-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking-url
http://p11-glue.freedesktop.org/p11-kit.html (timeout 10 seconds)
p11-kit-devel.x86_64: I: checking
p11-kit-devel.x86_64: I: checking-url
http://p11-glue.freedesktop.org/p11-kit.html (timeout 10 seconds)
p11-kit.x86_64: I: checking
p11-kit.x86_64: I: checking-url http://p11-glue.freedesktop.org/p11-kit.html
(timeout 10 seconds)
p11-kit.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary p11-kit
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
A manual page for the p11-kit would be nice however this is not a blocker.
The package is named according to the naming guidelines.
The package meets licensing and packaging guidelines.
The source tarball is the same as the upstream tarball.
Note for future - there will have to be probably added gettext if the
localization of p11-kit is completed and configure also searches for the
gtk-doc binaries. But they are both not needed to build the package now.
The requires on the base package should be changed to
Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}
But this is again a nitpick, but please change it before the import.
The package is ACCEPTed.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728757] Review Request: gnumed - The gnumed client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728757 --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-08-17 10:48:55 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 725905] Review Request: p11-kit - Library for loading and sharing PKCS#11 modules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725905 Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #15 from Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com 2011-08-17 11:01:56 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: p11-kit Short Description: Library for loading and sharing PKCS#11 modules Owners: kalev mclasen Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730764] Review Request: wxpdfdoc - A library for creating PDF documents in C++ with wxWidgets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730764 --- Comment #4 from Domingo Becker domingobec...@gmail.com 2011-08-17 11:00:22 EDT --- New spec with Dan's proposal for every 64 bit architectures. Spec URL: http://beckerde.fedorapeople.org/wxpdfdoc/wxpdfdoc.spec SRPM URL: http://beckerde.fedorapeople.org/wxpdfdoc/wxpdfdoc-0.9.1-3.fc14.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 725905] Review Request: p11-kit - Library for loading and sharing PKCS#11 modules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725905
--- Comment #14 from Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com 2011-08-17 11:00:15
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #13)
The requires on the base package should be changed to
Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}
But this is again a nitpick, but please change it before the import.
Will do. Thanks for the review, Tomáš!
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 725905] Review Request: p11-kit - Library for loading and sharing PKCS#11 modules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725905 --- Comment #16 from Tomas Mraz tm...@redhat.com 2011-08-17 11:26:30 EDT --- Can you please add me as comaintainer? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 725905] Review Request: p11-kit - Library for loading and sharing PKCS#11 modules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725905 --- Comment #17 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-08-17 11:28:49 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 662259] Review Request: git-annex - Manage files with git, without checking their contents in
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=662259 --- Comment #8 from Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com 2011-08-17 11:29:37 EDT --- git-annex is on Hackage now with a cabal build system, so I'll update to use it rather than the Makefile stuff sometime this week hopefully. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728691] Review Request: django-registration - A user-registration application for Django
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728691 --- Comment #10 from Praveen Kumar kumarpraveen.nit...@gmail.com 2011-08-17 11:35:39 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: django-registration Short Description: A user-registration application for Django Owners: sundaram pjp kumarpraveen Branches: f14 f15 f16 el6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 725905] Review Request: p11-kit - Library for loading and sharing PKCS#11 modules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725905 --- Comment #18 from Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com 2011-08-17 11:38:17 EDT --- Grr, I forgot to request the f16 branch. Tomas, I think you'll need to request the ACLs for the master branch in pkgdb, but the SCM admin request should cover the ACLs in f16. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 731066] Review Request: django-annoying - Eliminate annoying things in the Django framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731066 --- Comment #2 from Praveen Kumar kumarpraveen.nit...@gmail.com 2011-08-17 11:34:14 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: django-annoying Short Description: Eliminate annoying things in the Django framework Owners: sundaram pjp kumarpraveen Branches: f14 f15 f16 el6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 725905] Review Request: p11-kit - Library for loading and sharing PKCS#11 modules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725905 Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #19 from Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com 2011-08-17 11:38:41 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: p11-kit New Branches: f16 Owners: kalev mclasen tmraz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 725905] Review Request: p11-kit - Library for loading and sharing PKCS#11 modules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725905 --- Comment #20 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-08-17 11:40:36 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 725905] Review Request: p11-kit - Library for loading and sharing PKCS#11 modules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725905 Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||p11-kit-0.3-2.fc16 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-08-17 11:59:48 --- Comment #21 from Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com 2011-08-17 11:59:48 EDT --- Package imported and built; closing the ticket. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 713461] Review Request: tomahawk - The Social Music Player
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=713461 Magnus Tuominen magnus.tuomi...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||magnus.tuomi...@gmail.com --- Comment #6 from Magnus Tuominen magnus.tuomi...@gmail.com 2011-08-17 12:09:21 EDT --- There seems to be missing some build requires: qca2-devel and maybe boost-devel too -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728757] Review Request: gnumed - The gnumed client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728757 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-08-17 12:16:23 EDT --- gnumed-0.9.9-4.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnumed-0.9.9-4.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728757] Review Request: gnumed - The gnumed client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728757 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-08-17 12:16:31 EDT --- gnumed-0.9.9-4.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnumed-0.9.9-4.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728757] Review Request: gnumed - The gnumed client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728757 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728757] Review Request: gnumed - The gnumed client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728757 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-08-17 12:16:40 EDT --- gnumed-0.9.9-4.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnumed-0.9.9-4.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 727780] Review Request: qt-ruby - Ruby bindings for Qt 4
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=727780 Ngo Than t...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #14 from Ngo Than t...@redhat.com 2011-08-17 12:19:09 EDT --- Thanks! New Package SCM Request === Package Name: ruby-qt Short Description: Ruby bindings for Qt 4 Owners: than rdieter jreznik kkofler ltinkl rnovacek Branches: f15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 731455] Review Request: django-authopenid - Django application to integrate Django authentication system with OpenID
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731455 Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||methe...@gmail.com Alias||django-authopenid -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 731455] New: Review Request: django-authopenid - Django application to integrate Django authentication system with OpenID
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: django-authopenid - Django application to integrate Django authentication system with OpenID https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731455 Summary: Review Request: django-authopenid - Django application to integrate Django authentication system with OpenID Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sanjay.an...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/django-authopenid/django-authopenid.spec SRPM URL: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/django-authopenid/django-authopenid-1.0-1.20110817hg.fc15.src.rpm Description: A Django application that allows you to authenticate your users while using django auth contrib. This application allows a user to connect to you website with : -legacy account : username/password -openid url The idea is to have a workflow integrating openid and legacy authentification. If the user connects with an openid he could associate it with its legaccy account or just create a new django account. When the user is connected you could manage him like you usually do with `auth contrib or django-registration which is the default. This application also provide views to: * change password * change account email * change associated openid * delete account * send a new password Source produced By Benoît Chesneau for Enki Multimedia for the Friendsnippets project. = Only spelling errors in rpmlint :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 663181] Review Request: ompc - MATLAB to Python syntax adapting compiler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663181 --- Comment #6 from Alon Levy al...@redhat.com 2011-08-17 13:52:11 EDT --- My second attempt at a rpm package at the time, the real blocker was a problem with setup.py, I don't remember what it was unfortunately, so I'll try to give it another try, I still want to get it in. Alon -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 713461] Review Request: tomahawk - The Social Music Player
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=713461 --- Comment #8 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu 2011-08-17 13:52:21 EDT --- See bug #731456 for jreen review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 713461] Review Request: tomahawk - The Social Music Player
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=713461 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||731456(jreen) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 713461] Review Request: tomahawk - The Social Music Player
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=713461 --- Comment #7 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu 2011-08-17 13:50:15 EDT --- Spec URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/tomahawk/tomahawk.spec SRPM URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/tomahawk/tomahawk-0.2.1-2.fc15.src.rpm %changelog * Wed Aug 17 2011 Rex Dieter rdie...@fedoraproject.org 0.2.1-2 - unbundle jreen, BR: jreen-devel - BR: boost-devel qca2-devel - Requires: qca-ossl -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 731456] New: Review Request: jreen - Qt XMPP Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: jreen - Qt XMPP Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731456 Summary: Review Request: jreen - Qt XMPP Library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rdie...@math.unl.edu QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/tomahawk/jreen.spec SRPM URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/tomahawk/jreen-0.1.0-0.2.20110816.fc15.src.rpm Description: Qt XMPP Library -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 731456] Review Request: jreen - Qt XMPP Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731456 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||713461, 656997(kde-reviews) Alias||jreen -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 731455] Review Request: django-authopenid - Django application to integrate Django authentication system with OpenID
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731455 --- Comment #1 from Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com 2011-08-17 14:10:01 EDT --- Use the description and tarball from http://pypi.python.org/pypi/django-authopenid/ instead of generating it yourself. Snapshots can change API and break existing software that depends on it. Unless upstream does a new stable release, we shouldn't be typically using it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 715180] Review Request: FreeMat - A free environment for rapid engineering, scientific prototyping and data processing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715180 Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|hobbes1...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 713461] Review Request: tomahawk - The Social Music Player
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=713461 --- Comment #9 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu 2011-08-17 14:42:13 EDT --- f16 scratch build (using bundled jreen for now, to allow non-bootstrapped building): http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3280479 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730851] Review Request: chocolate-doom - Conservative Doom source port
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730851 Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sanjay.an...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|sanjay.an...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com 2011-08-17 14:39:02 EDT --- Hello, I shall take up this ticket. Thanks, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 731455] Review Request: django-authopenid - Django application to integrate Django authentication system with OpenID
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731455 --- Comment #2 from Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com 2011-08-17 14:46:23 EDT --- Hello, Updated http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/django-authopenid/django-authopenid.spec http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/django-authopenid/django-authopenid-1.0.1-2.fc15.src.rpm Thanks, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 731455] Review Request: django-authopenid - Django application to integrate Django authentication system with OpenID
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731455 --- Comment #4 from Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com 2011-08-17 14:52:03 EDT --- Note that you can remove the first line that defines python_sitelib as that is redundant now. You should also use name and version macros more instead of hardcoding those but these are not blockers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 731455] Review Request: django-authopenid - Django application to integrate Django authentication system with OpenID
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731455 Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com 2011-08-17 14:49:29 EDT --- == APPROVED == -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 731456] Review Request: jreen - Qt XMPP Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731456 --- Comment #1 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu 2011-08-17 14:49:37 EDT --- f16 scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3280425 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 731191] Review Request: libspnav - Open source alternative to 3DConnextion drivers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731191 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu 2011-08-17 14:51:39 EDT --- good enough methinks, APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 731191] Review Request: libspnav - Open source alternative to 3DConnextion drivers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731191 Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com 2011-08-17 15:06:41 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: libspnav Short Description: Open source alternative to 3DConnextion drivers Owners: hobbes1069 Branches: f15 f16 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 731515] New: Review Request: qtweetlib - Qt Twitter library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: qtweetlib - Qt Twitter library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731515 Summary: Review Request: qtweetlib - Qt Twitter library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rdie...@math.unl.edu QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/tomahawk/qtweetlib.spec SRPM URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/tomahawk/qtweetlib-0.0-0.1.20110602.fc15.src.rpm Description: Qt Twitter library -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 713461] Review Request: tomahawk - The Social Music Player
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=713461 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||tomahawk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 713461] Review Request: tomahawk - The Social Music Player
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=713461 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||731515(qtweetlib) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 731515] Review Request: qtweetlib - Qt Twitter library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731515 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||713461(tomahawk), ||656997(kde-reviews) Alias||qtweetlib -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 731519] New: Review Request: spacenavd - A free, compatible alternative for 3Dconnecxion's input drivers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: spacenavd - A free, compatible alternative for 3Dconnecxion's input drivers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731519 Summary: Review Request: spacenavd - A free, compatible alternative for 3Dconnecxion's input drivers Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: hobbes1...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://hobbes1069.fedorapeople.org/spacenavd/spacenavd.spec SRPM URL: http://hobbes1069.fedorapeople.org/spacenavd/spacenavd-0.5-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: Spacenavd, is a free software replacement user-space driver (daemon), for 3Dconnexion's space-something 6dof input devices. It's compatible with the original 3dxsrv proprietary daemon provided by 3Dconnexion, and works perfectly with any program that was written for the 3Dconnexion driver. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 731519] Review Request: spacenavd - A free, compatible alternative for 3Dconnecxion's input drivers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731519
Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias||spacenavd
--- Comment #1 from Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com 2011-08-17 15:17:51 EDT
---
rpmlint output:
# ls *.rpm
spacenavd-0.5-1.fc15.src.rpm spacenavd-debuginfo-0.5-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm
spacenavd-0.5-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm
# rpmlint *.rpm
spacenavd.src:32: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build %configure
--prefix=%{buildroot}%{_prefix}
Necessary because make file does not support DESTDIR
spacenavd.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary spacenavd
Is a daemon, not an end user binary.
spacenavd.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary spnavd_ctl
Not sure what to do here, upstream doesn't provide anything beyond a README.
spacenavd.x86_64: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/spacenavd
You'll only install this if you need to so should be on by default.
spacenavd.x86_64: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/spacenavd $prog
Rpmlint has issues with $ variables in init scripts which is why this is a
warning and not an error. Not really a problem.
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 731524] New: Review Request: gnatcoll - Suite of reusable software components and utilities
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gnatcoll - Suite of reusable software components and utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731524 Summary: Review Request: gnatcoll - Suite of reusable software components and utilities Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pa...@zhukoff.net QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://landgraf.fedorapeople.org/packages/requested/gnatcoll/gnatcoll.spec SRPM URL: http://landgraf.fedorapeople.org/packages/requested/gnatcoll/gnatcoll-2011-3.fc15.src.rpm Description: The GNAT Component Collection is a suite of reusable software components and utilities. It has been used by AdaCore in developing the GNAT tool set, the GPS Integrated Development Environment, and GNAT Tracker, its web-based customer support interface koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3280577 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 731525] New: Review Request: spnavcfg - Spacenav daemon interactive configuration program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: spnavcfg - Spacenav daemon interactive configuration program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731525 Summary: Review Request: spnavcfg - Spacenav daemon interactive configuration program Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: hobbes1...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://hobbes1069.fedorapeople.org/spnavcfg/spnavcfg.spec SRPM URL: http://hobbes1069.fedorapeople.org/spnavcfg/spnavcfg-0.2.1-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: Spacenav daemon interactive configuration program. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 731525] Review Request: spnavcfg - Spacenav daemon interactive configuration program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731525
Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias||spnavcfg
--- Comment #1 from Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com 2011-08-17 15:28:23 EDT
---
rpmlint output:
$ ls *.rpm
spnavcfg-0.2.1-1.fc15.src.rpm spnavcfg-debuginfo-0.2.1-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm
spnavcfg-0.2.1-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm
$ rpmlint *.rpm
spnavcfg.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Spacenav - Spacemen
spnavcfg.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Spacenav - Spacemen
spnavcfg.src:29: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build %configure
--prefix=%{buildroot}%{_prefix}
spnavcfg.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Spacenav - Spacemen
spnavcfg.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Spacenav - Spacemen
spnavcfg.x86_64: E: setuid-binary /usr/bin/spnavcfg root 04775L
spnavcfg.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/spnavcfg 04775L
spnavcfg.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/spnavcfg 04775L
- They uses setuid in order to allow normal users to write to the config file
in /etc. Supposedly it's secure because they have a frontend (gui) and backend
part of the program so only the backend runs as root.
spnavcfg.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary spnavcfg
- This is a gui only app.
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 6 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 731524] Review Request: gnatcoll - Suite of reusable software components and utilities
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731524 --- Comment #1 from Pavel Zhukov pa...@zhukoff.net 2011-08-17 15:38:13 EDT --- new build (Add ldconfig and ExcludeArch) SRPM URL: http://landgraf.fedorapeople.org/packages/requested/gnatcoll/gnatcoll-2011-4.fc15.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 731191] Review Request: libspnav - Open source alternative to 3DConnextion drivers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731191 --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-08-17 15:58:20 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 708554] Review Request: umph - Command line tool for parsing video links from Youtube feeds
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708554 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-08-17 16:20:48 EDT --- umph-0.1.8-2.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/umph-0.1.8-2.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 708554] Review Request: umph - Command line tool for parsing video links from Youtube feeds
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708554 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 708554] Review Request: umph - Command line tool for parsing video links from Youtube feeds
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708554 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-08-17 16:19:11 EDT --- umph-0.1.8-2.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/umph-0.1.8-2.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728757] Review Request: gnumed - The gnumed client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728757 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-08-17 16:24:52 EDT --- gnumed-0.9.9-4.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728555] Review Request: screenie-composer - Fancy screenshot composer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728555 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-08-17 16:24:21 EDT --- screenie-composer-1.0.0-0.2.20110805git49c2630.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 731191] Review Request: libspnav - Open source alternative to 3DConnextion drivers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731191 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-08-17 17:02:56 EDT --- libspnav-0.2.2-2.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libspnav-0.2.2-2.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
