[Bug 705363] Review Request: spacewalk-web - Spacewalk Web site packages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705363 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ppi...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728826] Review Request: wadofstuff-django-serializers - Extended Django Serializer Module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728826 --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen 2011-08-19 02:38:49 EDT --- Could you please post an srpm? You need to include the release number in changelog entries: wadofstuff-django-serializers.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.1.0 ['1.1.0-1.fc15', '1.1.0-1'] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 690728] Review Request: Nitrate - A test case management system written in Django
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690728 --- Comment #55 from Jens Petersen 2011-08-19 02:39:40 EDT --- Ok that's cool. I think all 3 now need input from you. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 731219] Review Request: pipebench - Measures the speed of stdin/stdout communication
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731219
--- Comment #2 from Nathan Owe 2011-08-18 23:39:18 EDT ---
Also in the files section why is it %{_mandir}/man?/ instead of
%{_mandir}/man1/
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 731219] Review Request: pipebench - Measures the speed of stdin/stdout communication
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731219 Nathan Owe changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ndowen...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Nathan Owe 2011-08-18 23:16:27 EDT --- I have created a patch to use in place of the sed. As I have seen some reviewers prefer the patch over sed. Here is the patch if you would like to use it: https://gitorious.org/ndowens-packager/master/blobs/master/patches/pipebench-0.40-Makefile-CFLAGS.patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730815] Review Request: pamtester - Utility to test Pluggable Authentication Modules (PAM)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730815 Nathan Owe changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ndowen...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Nathan Owe 2011-08-18 22:39:17 EDT --- I am wanting to make sure, you know the upstream source of this program hasn't been updated since 2005 nor in CVS? You are probably aware of this, just wanting to point out, just in case you didn't see it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 731906] Review Request: logsurfer+ - Real Time Log Monitoring and Alerting
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731906 Tomonori Takekawa changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fedora-package-review@redha ||t.com Component|Package Review |Package Review Version|rawhide |el5 Product|Fedora |Fedora EPEL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 729512] Review Request: graphite2 - Font rendering capabilities for complex non-Roman writing systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729512 --- Comment #7 from Nicholas van Oudtshoorn 2011-08-18 22:27:18 EDT --- Thanks Martin (and Martin). Have updated the SPEC according to your suggestions above. As for the FSF address, I'd already notified upstream - and am pleased to see that it's already been fixed in a new release (to which I have re-based the package). Spec URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/8648526/graphite2.spec SRPM URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/8648526/graphite2-1.0.2-1.fc15.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 731906] Review Request: logsurfer+ - Real Time Log Monitoring and Alerting
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731906 Tomonori Takekawa changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fedora-package-review@redha ||t.com Component|Package Review |Package Review Version|rawhide |el5 Product|Fedora |Fedora EPEL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 731906] Review Request: logsurfer+ - Real Time Log Monitoring and Alerting
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731906 Nathan Owe changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) --- Comment #1 from Nathan Owe 2011-08-18 22:11:53 EDT --- Setting FE-NEEDSPONSOR since you need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 731906] New: Review Request: logsurfer+ - Real Time Log Monitoring and Alerting
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: logsurfer+ - Real Time Log Monitoring and Alerting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731906 Summary: Review Request: logsurfer+ - Real Time Log Monitoring and Alerting Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: t...@takekawa.tk QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://www.takekawa.tk/packages/rhel5/SRPMS/logsurfer+.spec SRPM URL: http://www.takekawa.tk/packages/rhel5/SRPMS/logsurfer+-1.7-1.el5.src.rpm Description: Logsurfer is a program for monitoring system logs in real-time, and reporting on the occurrence of events. It is similar to the well-known swatch program on which it is based, but offers a number of advanced features which swatch does not support. Hello. This is my first package here. So I'm very happy if I find a package sponsor. Thank you for your time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 676335] Review Request: dmtcp - Checkpoint/Restart functionality for Linux processes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676335 --- Comment #22 from Kapil Arya 2011-08-18 20:45:06 EDT --- Hi All, Here are the links to updated SPRM and SPEC which address the concerns raised by Neal and others. Please let us know the feedback. Spec URL: http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/kapil/fedora_rpms/dmtcp.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/kapil/fedora_rpms/dmtcp-1.2.3-1.svn1264.fc15.src.rpm Thanks, -Kapil -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 632056] Review Request: libsocialweb-qt - Qt4 API for libsocialweb client DBUS interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632056 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(supercyper1@gmail | |.com) | Last Closed||2011-08-18 20:22:48 --- Comment #6 from Rex Dieter 2011-08-18 20:22:48 EDT --- :( closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 731898] Review Request: opendkim - DKIM library and milter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731898 Steve Jenkins changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 632056] Review Request: libsocialweb-qt - Qt4 API for libsocialweb client DBUS interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632056 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|656997(kde-reviews) | AssignedTo|rdie...@math.unl.edu|nob...@fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review+ | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 731898] New: Review Request: opendkim - DKIM library and milter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: opendkim - DKIM library and milter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731898 Summary: Review Request: opendkim - DKIM library and milter Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: st...@stevejenkins.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- This is my first package and I am seeking a sponsor. Spec URL: http://packages.stevejenkins.com/opendkim/2.4.2/sources/opendkim.spec SRPM URL: http://packages.stevejenkins.com/opendkim/2.4.2/sources/opendkim-2.4.2-2.src.rpm Description: OpenDKIM provides an open source library that implements the DKIM service, plus a milter-based filter application that can plug in to any milter-aware MTA, including sendmail, Postfix, or any other MTA that supports the milter protocol. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 719456] Review Request: edg-gridftp-client - Command line clients to GridFTP libraries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719456 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-18 18:03:59 EDT --- edg-gridftp-client-1.2.9.2-2.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 731191] Review Request: libspnav - Open source alternative to 3DConnextion drivers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731191 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-18 18:04:10 EDT --- libspnav-0.2.2-2.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 731524] Review Request: gnatcoll - Suite of reusable software components and utilities
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731524 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-18 18:04:21 EDT --- gnatcoll-2011-5.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 717864] Review Request: ghc-case-insensitive - Haskell case-insensitive string comparison
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=717864 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-18 18:03:41 EDT --- Package ghc-case-insensitive-0.2.0.2-1.fc16: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 16 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing ghc-case-insensitive-0.2.0.2-1.fc16' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-case-insensitive-0.2.0.2-1.fc16 then log in and leave karma (feedback). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 731891] New: Review Request: python-cairo - Python 2 cairo bindings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-cairo - Python 2 cairo bindings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731891 Summary: Review Request: python-cairo - Python 2 cairo bindings Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jo...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://johnp.fedorapeople.org/downloads/python-cairo/python-cairo.spec SRPM URL: http://johnp.fedorapeople.org/downloads/python-cairo/python-cairo-1.10.0-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: The pycairo package changed its name internally to python-cairo to be consistent with python3-cairo. This unfortunately causes issues with uploading new sources. Since upstream has changed the build procedure and we need to get the new package name approved and listed as a existing package, it makes sense to put the package through another review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 731851] Review Request: pygobject3 - Parallel installable python module for GObject Introspection
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731851 --- Comment #1 from John (J5) Palmieri 2011-08-18 16:42:22 EDT --- You will need the latest version of pygobject2 from rawhide if you wish to install this otherwise you will get conflicts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 715180] Review Request: FreeMat - A free environment for rapid engineering, scientific prototyping and data processing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715180 --- Comment #19 from Richard Shaw 2011-08-18 16:43:12 EDT --- Ok, I got what looks like a good build. I've got two questions for now: 1. Shouldn't the desktop file go in the main package and not the data package? 2. Does blas.ini belong in the main package or data package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 731851] New: Review Request: pygobject3 - Parallel installable python module for GObject Introspection
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pygobject3 - Parallel installable python module for GObject Introspection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731851 Summary: Review Request: pygobject3 - Parallel installable python module for GObject Introspection Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jo...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://johnp.fedorapeople.org/downloads/pygobject3/pygobject3.spec SRPM URL: http://johnp.fedorapeople.org/downloads/pygobject3/pygobject3-2.90.2-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: This packages installs in parallel with pygobject2 to provide GObject Introspection support. pygobject2 sticks around to provide legacy support for the static python gobject bindings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 698405] Review Request: mcollective - A framework to build server orchestration or parallel job execution systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698405
--- Comment #2 from Steve Traylen 2011-08-18 15:45:00
EDT ---
1) You have a few mentions of '/etc/init.d' which should be /etc/rc.d/init.d
and in fact should be %{_initrddir}. You have to set this if you
are targeting EPEL5 as well (yes please).
2) Given that mcollective and mcollective-client requires mcollective-common
I see no need to duplicate the
Requires: ruby
Requires: rubygems
Requires: rubygem-stomp
on these packages.
3) Version 1.3.0 looks to be the newest version.
4) You have
Requires: rubygem(stomp)
and
Requires: rubygem-stomp
in some places.
See ruby guidelines:
5) The ruby(abi) requires should be defined.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Ruby
6) Notice how ruby_sitelib is defined here.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Ruby
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 698405] Review Request: mcollective - A framework to build server orchestration or parallel job execution systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698405 --- Comment #1 from Steve Traylen 2011-08-18 15:18:28 EDT --- rpmlint errors as below, with the exception of "no-manual-page-for-binary" I expect the rest can possibly be fixed. I'll look some more now. SPECS/mcollective.spec:7: W: non-standard-group System Tools SPECS/mcollective.spec:36: W: non-standard-group System Tools SPECS/mcollective.spec:50: W: non-standard-group System Tools SPECS/mcollective.spec:121: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 73, tab: line 121) mcollective.noarch: W: non-standard-group System Tools mcollective.noarch: W: invalid-license Apache License, Version 2 mcollective.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/mcollective/server.cfg 0440L mcollective.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mcollectived mcollective-client.noarch: W: non-standard-group System Tools mcollective-client.noarch: W: invalid-license Apache License, Version 2 mcollective-client.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/mcollective/rpc-help.erb mcollective-client.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mc-controller mcollective-client.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mc-rpc mcollective-client.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mc-find-hosts mcollective-client.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mc-inventory mcollective-client.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mc-facts mcollective-client.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mc-call-agent mcollective-client.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mc-ping mcollective-common.noarch: W: non-standard-group System Tools mcollective-common.noarch: W: invalid-license Apache License, Version 2 mcollective.src: W: non-standard-group System Tools mcollective.src: W: invalid-license Apache License, Version 2 mcollective.src:121: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 73, tab: line -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 731820] Review Request: kcm-qt-graphicssystem - Easily configure the standard Qt graphics system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731820 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||656997(kde-reviews) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 731820] New: Review Request: kcm-qt-graphicssystem - Easily configure the standard Qt graphics system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: kcm-qt-graphicssystem - Easily configure the standard Qt graphics system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731820 Summary: Review Request: kcm-qt-graphicssystem - Easily configure the standard Qt graphics system Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rdie...@math.unl.edu QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/kcm-qt-graphicssystem/kcm-qt-graphicssystem.spec SRPM URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/kcm-qt-graphicssystem/kcm-qt-graphicssystem-1.2-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: Easily configure the standard Qt graphics system -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 698405] Review Request: mcollective - A framework to build server orchestration or parallel job execution systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698405 Steve Traylen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||steve.tray...@cern.ch QAContact|extras...@fedoraproject.org |steve.tray...@cern.ch Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 691894] Review Request: pyrit - A GPGPU-driven WPA/WPA2-PSK key cracker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691894
--- Comment #7 from Garrett Holmstrom 2011-08-18
14:29:32 EDT ---
Most everything looks good. Just fix the permissions on _cpyrit_cpu.so and
that should do it.
Review of pyrit-0.4.0-2.fc15:
Mandatory review guidelines:
NO - rpmlint output
pyrit.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pre -> per, ore, pee
pyrit.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pre -> per, ore, pee
pyrit.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm
/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/cpyrit/_cpyrit_cpu.so 0775L
pyrit.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary pyrit
--
The spelling-error warnings are bogus. Man pages are optional.
ok - Package meets naming guidelines
ok - Spec file name matches base package name
ok - License is acceptable (GPLv3+ with exceptions)
ok - License field in spec is correct
The file "pyrit" has no license header; assuming GPLv3+
ok - License files included in package %docs or not included in upstream source
ok - License files installed when any subpackage combination is installed
ok - Spec written in American English
ok - Spec is legible
ok - Sources match upstream unless altered to fix permissibility issues
Upstream MD5: 7258b6f3dacfb09736ddeed2a379df2d pyrit-0.4.0.tar.gz
Your MD5: 7258b6f3dacfb09736ddeed2a379df2d pyrit-0.4.0.tar.gz
ok - Build succeeds on at least one supported platform
ok - Build succeeds on all supported platforms or has ExcludeArch + bugs filed
ok - BuildRequires correct
-- - Package handles locales with %find_lang
-- - %post, %postun call ldconfig if package contains shared .so files
ok - No bundled system libs
-- - Relocatability is justified
ok - Package owns all directories it creates
ok - Package requires other packages for directories it uses but does not own
ok - No duplicate files in %files unless necessary for license files
NO - File permissions are sane
-rwxrwxr-x /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/cpyrit/_cpyrit_cpu.so
ok - Each %files section contains %defattr on EL4
ok - Consistent use of macros
ok - Sources contain only permissible code or content
-- - Large documentation files go in -doc package
ok - Missing %doc files do not affect runtime
-- - Headers go in -devel package
-- - Static libs go in -static package
-- - Unversioned .so files go in -devel package
-- - Devel packages require base with fully-versioned dependency
ok - Package contains no .la files
-- - GUI app installs .desktop file w/desktop-file-install or has justification
ok - Package's files and directories don't conflict with others' or justified
ok - File names are valid UTF-8
Optional review guidelines:
ok - Query upstream about including license files
no - Translations of description, Summary
ok - Builds in mock
ok - Builds on all supported platforms
ok - Functions as described
-- - Scriptlets are sane
-- - Non-devel subpackage Requires are sane
-- - .pc files go in -devel unless main package is a development tool
ok - No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin
no - Man pages included for all executables
ok - Package with test-suite executes it in %check section
Packaging guidelines:
ok - Has dist tag
ok - Useful without external bits
ok - Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir, /usr/target, /run
-- - Programs launched before FS mounting use /run instead of /var/run
-- - Binaries in /bin, /sbin do not depend on files in /usr
ok - Changelog in prescribed format
ok - Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags
no - Correct BuildRoot tag on < F10/EL6
This prevents building for epel-5
no - Correct %clean section on < F13/EL6
This prevents building for epel-5
ok - Requires correct, justified where necessary
ok - Summary, description do not use trademarks incorrectly
ok - All relevant documentation is packaged, tagged appropriately
ok - Documentation files do not have executable permissions
ok - %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise
-- - Package with .pc files Requires pkgconfig on < EL6
ok - Useful -debuginfo package or disabled and justified
ok - No static executables
ok - Rpath absent or only used for internal libs
-- - Config files marked with %config
-- - %config files marked noreplace or justified
-- - No %config files under /usr
-- - SysV-style init script
ok - Spec uses macros instead of hard-coded directory names where appropriate
ok - Spec uses macros for executables only when configurability is needed
-- - %makeinstall used only when ``make install DESTDIR=...'' doesn't work
ok - Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time
-- - Spec uses %{SOURCE#} instead of $RPM_SOURCE_DIR or %{sourcedir}
ok - %global instead of %define where appropriate
-- - Package containing translations BuildRequires gettext
-- - File timestamps preserved by file ops
-- - Parallel make
ok - Spec does not use Requires(pr
[Bug 715180] Review Request: FreeMat - A free environment for rapid engineering, scientific prototyping and data processing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715180 --- Comment #18 from Richard Shaw 2011-08-18 13:52:29 EDT --- Ok, that will work. I tried doing some simple searching but didn't find that bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 731524] Review Request: gnatcoll - Suite of reusable software components and utilities
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731524 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-18 13:43:34 EDT --- gnatcoll-2011-5.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnatcoll-2011-5.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 697049] Review Request: sawfish-pager - A pager for the Sawfish window manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697049 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 731524] Review Request: gnatcoll - Suite of reusable software components and utilities
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731524 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-18 13:20:20 EDT --- gnatcoll-2011-5.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnatcoll-2011-5.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 697049] Review Request: sawfish-pager - A pager for the Sawfish window manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697049 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-18 13:20:35 EDT --- sawfish-pager-0.90.2-3.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sawfish-pager-0.90.2-3.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 731524] Review Request: gnatcoll - Suite of reusable software components and utilities
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731524 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 731683] Review Request: pyppd - PPD file compressor and generator for CUPS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731683
--- Comment #3 from Jiri Popelka 2011-08-18 13:22:35 EDT
---
[OK] MUST: rpmlint must be run on the source rpm and all binary rpms the build
produces. The output should be posted in the review.
pyppd.noarch: E: non-executable-script
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pyppd/pyppd-ppdfile.in 0644L /usr/bin/python
There's a comment in spec file saying that pyppd-ppdfile.in is only a template
so I think this is acceptable.
[OK] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming
Guidelines.
[OK] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the
format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption.
[OK] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
[OK] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet
the Licensing Guidelines .
[OK] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
[OK] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.
[OK] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[OK] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[OK] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream
source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task.
7161916c91af10b0493fa6b31ff53a0d pyppd-0.4.9.tar.gz
7161916c91af10b0493fa6b31ff53a0d pyppd-0.4.9.tar.gz
[OK] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on
at least one primary architecture.
[N/A] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch.
[OK] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires.
[N/A] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using
the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.
[N/A] MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared
library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths,
must call ldconfig in %post and %postun.
[OK] MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
[N/A] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must
state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for
relocation of that specific package.
[OK] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not
create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does
create that directory.
[OK] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec
file's %files listings. (Notable exception: license texts in specific
situations)
[OK] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set
with executable permissions, for example.
[OK] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros.
[OK] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
[OK] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage.
Do we need the -doc subpackage for 4 txt files having 32KiB in sum ?
[OK] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the
runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must
run properly if it is not present.
[N/A] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package.
[N/A] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package.
[N/A] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g.
libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in
a -devel package.
[N/A] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} =
%{version}-%{release}
[N/A] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be
removed in the spec if they are built.
[N/A] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop
file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the
%install section.
[N/A] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
[OK] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
[N/A] SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a
separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[N/A] SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file
should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[OK] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[OK] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all
supported architectures.
[OK] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described.
A package should not segfault instead of running, for example.
[N/A
[Bug 728649] Review Request: airrac - C++ Simulated Revenue Accounting (RAC) System Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728649 Martin Gieseking changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||martin.giesek...@uos.de AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|martin.giesek...@uos.de Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Martin Gieseking 2011-08-18 13:16:46 EDT --- I'm going to sponsor Martin, so taking over the review. Since I'm busy at the moment, I'll continue later tonight or tomorrow morning. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 731683] Review Request: pyppd - PPD file compressor and generator for CUPS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731683 Jiri Popelka changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jpope...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 727780] Review Request: ruby-qt - Ruby bindings for Qt 4
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=727780 Ngo Than changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2011-08-18 13:10:31 --- Comment #18 from Ngo Than 2011-08-18 13:10:31 EDT --- ruby-qt was commited and built. thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 731455] Review Request: django-authopenid - Django application to integrate Django authentication system with OpenID
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731455 --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla 2011-08-18 13:08:12 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 731794] New: Review Request: Qt Quick 3D - Qt 3D for QML scripts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: Qt Quick 3D - Qt 3D for QML scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731794 Summary: Review Request: Qt Quick 3D - Qt 3D for QML scripts Product: Fedora Version: 15 Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tomasmiljeno...@hotmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- SPEC file: http://live.tomasm.tk/fedorarepo/TMM/qt-quick3d.spec SRPM: http://live.tomasm.tk/fedorarepo/TMM/SRPMS/qt-quick3d-0.tp1.1.TMM.fc15.srpm Despite what I said on #fedora-kde, this can also be built separately from Qt (just needs qt4 sources); specfile attached -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 715180] Review Request: FreeMat - A free environment for rapid engineering, scientific prototyping and data processing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715180 --- Comment #17 from Ankur Sinha 2011-08-18 12:41:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > Ankur, > > It looks like FreeMat requires llvm 2.9 and only 2.8 is available for Fedora. > Have you contacted the llvm maintainer to see if there is a plan to go to 2.9? Hi Richard, There was already a bug filed. llvm 2.9 will not hit f15. It'll only hit f16 onwards. Here's Michael's comment to the bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=694785#c6 Therefore, freemat builds for F16+ :) I won't request an f15 branch. Thanks, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 719456] Review Request: edg-gridftp-client - Command line clients to GridFTP libraries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719456 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-18 12:41:26 EDT --- edg-gridftp-client-1.2.9.2-2.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/edg-gridftp-client-1.2.9.2-2.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 719456] Review Request: edg-gridftp-client - Command line clients to GridFTP libraries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719456 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-18 12:41:33 EDT --- edg-gridftp-client-1.2.9.2-2.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/edg-gridftp-client-1.2.9.2-2.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 719456] Review Request: edg-gridftp-client - Command line clients to GridFTP libraries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719456 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-18 12:41:40 EDT --- edg-gridftp-client-1.2.9.2-2.el4 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 4. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/edg-gridftp-client-1.2.9.2-2.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 719456] Review Request: edg-gridftp-client - Command line clients to GridFTP libraries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719456 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 719456] Review Request: edg-gridftp-client - Command line clients to GridFTP libraries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719456 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-18 12:41:56 EDT --- edg-gridftp-client-1.2.9.2-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/edg-gridftp-client-1.2.9.2-2.el6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 719456] Review Request: edg-gridftp-client - Command line clients to GridFTP libraries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719456 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-18 12:41:48 EDT --- edg-gridftp-client-1.2.9.2-2.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/edg-gridftp-client-1.2.9.2-2.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730657] Review Request: perl-DateTime-TimeZone - Time zone object base class and factory
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730657 Iain Arnell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Blocks||730658 Depends on|730658 | Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2011-08-18 12:35:34 --- Comment #8 from Iain Arnell 2011-08-18 12:35:34 EDT --- Closing this. Track progress in bug 730658. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 731455] Review Request: django-authopenid - Django application to integrate Django authentication system with OpenID
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731455 Ankur Sinha changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Ankur Sinha 2011-08-18 12:33:59 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: django-authopenid New Branches: f15 f16 Owners: ankursinha sundaram InitialCC: Creating branches for f15 f16. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730656] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Locale - Localization support for DateTime.pm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730656 Iain Arnell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Blocks||730658 Depends on|730658 | Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2011-08-18 12:34:48 --- Comment #7 from Iain Arnell 2011-08-18 12:34:48 EDT --- Closing this. Track progress in bug 730658. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 715180] Review Request: FreeMat - A free environment for rapid engineering, scientific prototyping and data processing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715180 --- Comment #16 from Richard Shaw 2011-08-18 12:35:13 EDT --- Ankur, It looks like FreeMat requires llvm 2.9 and only 2.8 is available for Fedora. Have you contacted the llvm maintainer to see if there is a plan to go to 2.9? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730657] Review Request: perl-DateTime-TimeZone - Time zone object base class and factory
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730657 Iain Arnell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #7 from Iain Arnell 2011-08-18 12:10:05 EDT --- Imported and built for rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730656] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Locale - Localization support for DateTime.pm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730656 Iain Arnell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #6 from Iain Arnell 2011-08-18 12:09:44 EDT --- Imported and built for rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 725614] Review Request: libcryptui - Library for prompting for GPG keys
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725614 --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla 2011-08-18 12:03:20 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 719456] Review Request: edg-gridftp-client - Command line clients to GridFTP libraries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719456 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla 2011-08-18 12:02:28 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). Edited request for syntax, let me know if something isn't as expected. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 719456] Review Request: edg-gridftp-client - Command line clients to GridFTP libraries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719456 Steve Traylen changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+, fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Steve Traylen 2011-08-18 11:43:55 EDT --- Mattias, I switched the wrong flag, could your reassign the flag. Steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 708765] Review Request: Frogr - Flickr Remote Organizer for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765 --- Comment #75 from Mario Sanchez Prada 2011-08-18 11:44:53 EDT --- As you wish, but as I said, I think it's very likely that I release the 0.6.1 during today or tomorrow (I found some kind beta testers who will help me trying it :-)), so keep that in mind in case you finally prefer to wait a day more or so. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 727030] Review Request: ufw - uncomplicated firewall
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=727030 Nathan Owe changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 719456] Review Request: edg-gridftp-client - Command line clients to GridFTP libraries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719456 Steve Traylen changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Steve Traylen 2011-08-18 11:40:27 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: edg-gridftp-client Short Description: Command line clients to GridFTP libraries Owners: stevetraylen Branches: f15 f16 el4 el5 el6 InitialCC Thanks for the review, I'll glob the man page endings before import. Steve. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 725614] Review Request: libcryptui - Library for prompting for GPG keys
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725614 Matthew Barnes changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Matthew Barnes 2011-08-18 11:43:07 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: libcryptui Short Description: Interface components for OpenPGP Owners: tbzatek Branches: f16 InitialCC: mbarnes Tomas already owns seahorse. He agreed to take libcryptui. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 708765] Review Request: Frogr - Flickr Remote Organizer for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765 --- Comment #74 from Gianluca Sforna 2011-08-18 11:20:23 EDT --- Once in the repositories, the package can be updated a number of times during the lifetime of each Fedora release so no, the memory leak is not a problem for the review. I'll try to finalize it as soon as possible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 731066] Review Request: django-annoying - Eliminate annoying things in the Django framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731066 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla 2011-08-18 11:18:55 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 725614] Review Request: libcryptui - Library for prompting for GPG keys
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725614 Matthias Clasen changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Matthias Clasen 2011-08-18 11:13:33 EDT --- Looks good to me now; approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728691] Review Request: django-registration - A user-registration application for Django
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728691 --- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla 2011-08-18 11:18:18 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 731683] Review Request: pyppd - PPD file compressor and generator for CUPS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731683 --- Comment #2 from Tim Waugh 2011-08-18 11:02:59 EDT --- Thanks. Updated URLs: Spec URL: http://twaugh.fedorapeople.org/pyppd/pyppd.spec SRPM URL: http://twaugh.fedorapeople.org/pyppd/pyppd-0.4.9-1.fc16.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 719456] Review Request: edg-gridftp-client - Command line clients to GridFTP libraries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719456 Mattias Ellert changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Mattias Ellert 2011-08-18 11:03:08 EDT --- Fedora review edg-gridftp-client 2011-08-18 + rpmlint output: edg-gridftp-client.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mkdir -> mk dir, mk-dir, midiron edg-gridftp-client.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US rmdir -> rm dir, rm-dir, midiron edg-gridftp-client.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mkdir -> mk dir, mk-dir, midiron edg-gridftp-client.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US rmdir -> rm dir, rm-dir, midiron edg-gridftp-client.src: W: invalid-url Source0: edg-gridftp-client-1.2.9.2.tar.gz 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings. These warnings can be ignored. + The package is named according to the guidelines + The specfile is named after the package + The package's License tag (EU Datagrid) is a Fedora approved license + The License tag matches the actual license statements in the sources + Package installs LICENSE file as %doc + Specfile is written in legible English + Source matches upstream (ignoring CVS directories) diff -ur --exclude CVS checkout/edg-gridftp-client-1.2.9.2 edg-gridftp-client-1.2.9.2 (no output) + The package builds in mock (F15 x96_64) + BuildRequires are sane + no locales + no shared libraries + no bundled sources + no created directories + no duplicate %files Comment: The manpages are normally listed as xxx.1* and not xxx.1.* in the %files section in order to also allow non-compressed files. + File permissions are sane + Macros are used consistently + Package contains code + No large documentation files + %doc is not runtime essential + no headers + no static libraries + no sub-packages + no libtool archives + no GUIs + Package does not own other's directories + Filenames are UTF8 Apart from the comment about the manpages in %files there are no issues. Package approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 716299] Review Request: clipit - lightweight, fully featured GTK+ clipboard manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716299 --- Comment #14 from Nikos Roussos 2011-08-18 11:01:28 EDT --- Hi Christoph. Sorry for the delay, but we are kind in a vacation mode here in Greece :) I'm getting back to packaging right away. I'll soon have something. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 731066] Review Request: django-annoying - Eliminate annoying things in the Django framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731066 Praveen Kumar changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728691] Review Request: django-registration - A user-registration application for Django
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728691 Praveen Kumar changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 621559] Review Request: perl-Data-Properties - Perl equivalent of java.util.Properties
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621559 --- Comment #7 from Jessica Jones 2011-08-18 10:03:48 EDT --- As this was being added as a required dependency of Gold Allocation Manager, I've asked the Gold maintainer if a different Perl module might be used instead, but understandably he does not wish to change. The maintainer of Data::Properties does not wish to maintain his package and has refused to update it as 'a superior version exists'. I attempted to build perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker, but at present it does not compile on Fedora 16. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 648093] Review Request: ghc-attoparsec-enumerator - Convert an Attoparsec parser into an iteratee
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648093 Lakshmi Narasimhan changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lakshminaras2...@gmail.com Flag||needinfo?(maths...@gmail.co ||m) --- Comment #2 from Lakshmi Narasimhan 2011-08-18 10:03:02 EDT --- I can take up this for review. Ben, Can you update the spec file to cabal2spec-0.24? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 717867] Review Request: ghc-http-types - Generic HTTP types for Haskell
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=717867 Lakshmi Narasimhan changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lakshminaras2...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|lakshminaras2...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Lakshmi Narasimhan 2011-08-18 10:00:08 EDT --- Will review this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 621559] Review Request: perl-Data-Properties - Perl equivalent of java.util.Properties
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621559 --- Comment #6 from Jessica Jones 2011-08-18 09:56:35 EDT --- Upstream does not want to update the module in CPAN as it is no longer maintained. I am only really adding it as it is a dependency of something else. Attempting to rebuild has highlighted a dependency on perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker, which is not part of Fedora at present. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 231861] Merge Review: cyrus-imapd - high-performance mail server (IMAP, POP3, ...)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=231861 Michal Sekletar changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #20 from Michal Sekletar 2011-08-18 09:39:11 EDT --- Git commit 6fe53495447ec5cf6bb6bf697335c732f839f81e YES source file match upstream YES package meets naming and versioning guidelines YES spec file is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently YES dist tag is present YES clean section and buildroot present YES license field matches the actual license YES license is included in package YES latest version is being packaged YES build BuildRequires are proper YES compiler flags are appropriate YES package builds in mock YES debuginfo package seems ok NO rpmlint is silent - some spelling-error warnings could be ignored - %patch1 and %patch2 are commented out but still in preamble of spec file - invalid patch url (Patch3) - some warnings about missing manpages for utils - ignored - warnings about directory permissions - ignored - warnings about hardcoded library paths - might be solved by replacing hard-coded paths with macros - private-shared-objects-provides warnings - rpmlint output was consulted with maintainer, added as attachment YES final provides and requires look sane N/A %check is present and all tests pass YES no shared libraries are added to regular linker search paths YES it owns directories it creates YES it doesn't own directories it shouldn't YES no duplicates in %files YES scriptlets looks sane YES code, not content YES large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage - documentation is about 1MB in size, not big enough that it is worthed to make standalone doc package YES %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package YES no headers YES no pkgconfig files YES no libtool .la droppings YES not a GUI app -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 231861] Merge Review: cyrus-imapd - high-performance mail server (IMAP, POP3, ...)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=231861 --- Comment #19 from Michal Sekletar 2011-08-18 09:37:39 EDT --- Created attachment 518874 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=518874 cyrus-imapd fedpkg lint log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728649] Review Request: airrac - C++ Simulated Revenue Accounting (RAC) System Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728649
Martin Krizek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mkri...@redhat.com
Bug 728649 depends on bug 702987, which changed state.
Bug 702987 Summary: Review Request: stdair - C++ Standard Airline IT Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702987
What|Old Value |New Value
Resolution||ERRATA
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
--- Comment #1 from Martin Krizek 2011-08-18 09:24:08 EDT
---
Hi Denis,
*informal* review follows:
[ OK ] MUST: rpmlint must be run on the source rpm and all binary rpms the
build produces. The output should be posted in the review.
$ rpmlint rpmbuild/SPECS/airrac.spec Downloads/airrac-0.1.0-1.fc15.src.rpm
1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
[ OK ] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming
Guidelines.
[ BAD ] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the
format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. ===> Needs to be
renamed to airrac.spec
[ OK ] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
[ OK ] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and
meet the Licensing Guidelines.
[ OK ] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
[ OK ] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.
[ OK ] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[ OK ] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[ OK ] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream
source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task.
If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL
Guidelines for how to deal with this.
[ BAD ] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms
on at least one primary architecture.
[ BAD ] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in
bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on
that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the
corresponding ExcludeArch line.
===> I could not build rpm from provided srpm using 'mock -r fedora-15-x86_64
--rebuild airrac-0.1.0-1.fc15.src.rpm' -- seems like problem with tex, sorry if
it was my bad due to unapproriate usage of mock.
[ OK ] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for
any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ;
inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense.
[ NA ] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using
the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.
[ OK ] MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared
library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths,
must call ldconfig in %post and %postun.
[ OK ] MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
[ OK ] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must
state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for
relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is
considered a blocker.
[ OK ] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not
create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does
create that directory.
[ OK ] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec
file's %files listings. (Notable exception: license texts in specific
situations)
[ OK ] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be
set with executable permissions, for example.
[ OK ] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros.
[ OK ] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
[ OK ] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The
definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not
restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity).
[ OK ] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the
runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must
run properly if it is not present.
[ OK ] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package.
[ OK ] MUST: St
[Bug 729263] Review Request: rubygem-virt-p2v - Send a machine's storage and metadata to virt-p2v-server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729263 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|rjo...@redhat.com --- Comment #7 from Richard W.M. Jones 2011-08-18 09:12:24 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: rubygem-virt-p2v Short Description: Send a machine's storage and metadata to virt-p2v-server Owners: mdbooth rjones Branches: f14 f15 f16 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 727780] Review Request: ruby-qt - Ruby bindings for Qt 4
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=727780 --- Comment #17 from Jon Ciesla 2011-08-18 09:02:40 EDT --- Complete, but there were hiccups, let me know if anything isn't right. It should be fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 729263] Review Request: rubygem-virt-p2v - Send a machine's storage and metadata to virt-p2v-server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729263 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla 2011-08-18 09:01:23 EDT --- Richard, please take ownership of the bug, and correct your FAS username in the request. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 729263] Review Request: rubygem-virt-p2v - Send a machine's storage and metadata to virt-p2v-server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729263 Matthew Booth changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Matthew Booth 2011-08-18 08:56:39 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: rubygem-virt-p2v Short Description: Send a machine's storage and metadata to virt-p2v-server Owners: mdbooth rwmjones Branches: f14 f15 f16 InitialCC: mdbooth -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730657] Review Request: perl-DateTime-TimeZone - Time zone object base class and factory
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730657 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla 2011-08-18 08:57:42 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730656] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Locale - Localization support for DateTime.pm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730656 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla 2011-08-18 08:56:43 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 708765] Review Request: Frogr - Flickr Remote Organizer for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765 --- Comment #73 from Mario Sanchez Prada 2011-08-18 08:44:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #72) > [...] > If »soon« means within a week or two, I would wait with packaging. The "new > package" policy in Fedora allows me to add a package during the whole > distribution forming process. However, the package could remain in the testing > repository somewhat longer, but it would be available anyway. In my mind, it > is > better to have as less patches as possible. Let's wait for 0.6.1. In this specific case, I'm afraid soon means "really soon", like in "this week", which was my original idea when I wrote that comment, but even perhaps during today or tomorrow, if I manage to get some time. Since it's a bugfixing release, and the number of patches to include is fairly small, not much additional testing will be needed, nor the usual additional steps that use to take more time when doing a normal release, so let's be optimist :-) Thanks for understanding, Mario -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730657] Review Request: perl-DateTime-TimeZone - Time zone object base class and factory
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730657 Iain Arnell changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Iain Arnell 2011-08-18 08:37:30 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: perl-DateTime-TimeZone Short Description: Time zone object base class and factory Owners: iarnell Branches: f14 f15 f16 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730656] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Locale - Localization support for DateTime.pm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730656 Iain Arnell changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Iain Arnell 2011-08-18 08:36:14 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: perl-DateTime-Locale Short Description: Localization support for DateTime.pm Owners: iarnell Branches: f14 f15 f16 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 726131] Review Request: yourls - your own url shortening service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=726131 Martin Gieseking changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|martin.giesek...@uos.de Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 708765] Review Request: Frogr - Flickr Remote Organizer for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765 --- Comment #72 from Mario Blättermann 2011-08-18 08:18:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #71) > So, I'll probably release 0.6.1 soon, including that patch and some others > less > important (but important anyway) bugs detected after the release. In summary, > the patches I'd be applying, unless some other sever bugs show up, would be: > > - fix a HUGE memory leak loading pixbufs in details window > - more mem leaks fixed by Christophe Fergeau > - a segfault in systems using GTK < 2.24 > - some problems in the Mac version (can't authorize) > > Not sure whether this impacts or not packaging frogr for fedora, but just > telling you in case you prefer to wait for the new bugfixing release. If »soon« means within a week or two, I would wait with packaging. The "new package" policy in Fedora allows me to add a package during the whole distribution forming process. However, the package could remain in the testing repository somewhat longer, but it would be available anyway. In my mind, it is better to have as less patches as possible. Let's wait for 0.6.1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 225658] Merge Review: cpuspeed
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225658 Ondrej Vasik changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC||ova...@redhat.com Resolution||WONTFIX Last Closed||2011-08-18 08:10:53 --- Comment #5 from Ondrej Vasik 2011-08-18 08:10:53 EDT --- as cpuspeed is dead package now, closing WONTFIX... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 731110] Review Request: maven-filtering - Shared component providing resource filtering
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731110 Tomas Radej changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-08-18 08:11:45 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 731683] Review Request: pyppd - PPD file compressor and generator for CUPS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731683 Jiri Popelka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jpope...@redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Jiri Popelka 2011-08-18 08:07:25 EDT --- Just informally: You can remove the %defattr clauses, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#File_Permissions -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 731110] Review Request: maven-filtering - Shared component providing resource filtering
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731110 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 731110] Review Request: maven-filtering - Shared component providing resource filtering
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731110 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-18 08:01:56 EDT --- maven-filtering-1.0-2.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/maven-filtering-1.0-2.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 729263] Review Request: rubygem-virt-p2v - Send a machine's storage and metadata to virt-p2v-server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729263 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Richard W.M. Jones 2011-08-18 07:36:38 EDT --- Updated spec file includes a changelog section: http://oirase.annexia.org/reviews/rubygem-virt-p2v.spec I have pushed a patch upstream which updates the FSF addresses in all comments and documentation: http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/?p=virt-v2v.git;a=commitdiff;h=2b4d755b3e1f249f2a7631e1450f5b225c31761e - Therefore this package is APPROVED by rjones. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 729263] Review Request: rubygem-virt-p2v - Send a machine's storage and metadata to virt-p2v-server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729263
--- Comment #3 from Richard W.M. Jones 2011-08-18 07:22:25
EDT ---
This package is ExclusiveArch: i686 (for perfectly good reasons).
However this means I could not build it on my local machine. Therefore
all testing was done using the packages built in Koji.
- rpmlint output
No %changelog section in the spec file.
Multiple instances of 'incorrect-fsf-address' in the source. I will
submit a patch upstream to fix this.
+ package name satisfies the packaging naming guidelines
+ specfile name matches the package base name
+ package should satisfy packaging guidelines
%defattr lines are not strictly required, but can be left in for
EPEL compatibility.
BuildRoot is no longer needed, but can be left in for EPEL compat.
+ license meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora
+ license matches the actual package license
+ %doc includes license file
+ spec file written in American English
+ spec file is legible
+ upstream sources match sources in the srpm
+ package successfully builds on at least one architecture
(only on i686)
n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed
+ BuildRequires list all build dependencies
(because of Koji scratch build)
n/a %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/*
n/a binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and
%postun
+ does not use Prefix: /usr
+ package owns all directories it creates
+ no duplicate files in %files
+ consistent use of macros
+ package must contain code or permissible content
+ large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage
+ files marked %doc should not affect package
n/a header files should be in -devel
n/a static libraries should be in -static
n/a packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig'
n/a libfoo.so must go in -devel
n/a -devel must require the fully versioned base
n/a packages should not contain libtool .la files
n/a packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file
Although this is a "GUI app" it is not a desktop app. It boots
from an ISO on a separate machine, so no desktop file is required.
+ packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages
+ filenames must be valid UTF-8
Optional:
n/a if there is no license file, packager should query upstream
n/a translations of description and summary for non-English languages, if
available
+ reviewer should build the package in mock
+ the package should build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures
+ review should test the package functions as described
n/a scriptlets should be sane
n/a pkgconfig files should go in -devel
n/a shouldn't have file dependencies outside /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin or
/usr/sbin
-
The package has a couple of errors which are very simple to fix, so I'll
just go ahead and submit fixes on behalf of the packager.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 729263] Review Request: rubygem-virt-p2v - Send a machine's storage and metadata to virt-p2v-server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729263 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 726210] Review Request: freewrl - X3D / VRML visualization program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=726210 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-18 07:10:59 EDT --- freewrl-1.22.12-0.3.pre2.el5.2 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/freewrl-1.22.12-0.3.pre2.el5.2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 708765] Review Request: Frogr - Flickr Remote Organizer for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765 --- Comment #71 from Mario Sanchez Prada 2011-08-18 07:03:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #70) > Sorry for the noise, the bug was in my own system, see > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=656688#c2. All is OK now, please go > ahead with reviewing. That's great. However, and in order to perpetuate the bad luck I'm having with this tiny app :(, I think I will need to rollout a 0.6.1 bugfix release anyway, since I found a HUGE memory leak that is causing frogr to waste quite a lot of memory whenever the user opens the details dialog (a pretty common operation). So, I'll probably release 0.6.1 soon, including that patch and some others less important (but important anyway) bugs detected after the release. In summary, the patches I'd be applying, unless some other sever bugs show up, would be: - fix a HUGE memory leak loading pixbufs in details window - more mem leaks fixed by Christophe Fergeau - a segfault in systems using GTK < 2.24 - some problems in the Mac version (can't authorize) Not sure whether this impacts or not packaging frogr for fedora, but just telling you in case you prefer to wait for the new bugfixing release. Thanks and sorry for the mess, Mario -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 731683] New: Review Request: pyppd - PPD file compressor and generator for CUPS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pyppd - PPD file compressor and generator for CUPS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731683 Summary: Review Request: pyppd - PPD file compressor and generator for CUPS Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: twa...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://twaugh.fedorapeople.org/pyppd/pyppd.spec SRPM URL: http://twaugh.fedorapeople.org/pyppd/pyppd-0.4.9-1.fc16.src.rpm Description: This program holds a compressed archive of PostScript Printer Description files. It can generate the PPD files on the fly for CUPS. The point of this program is to be run at build time by printer driver packages such as hplip or foomatic. For packages that ship lots of static PPDs, pyppd can save huge amounts of disk space. For foomatic, which generates PPDs on the fly from XML files, pyppd can greatly increase performance. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
