[Bug 517615] Review Request: icoutils - Utilities for extracting and converting Microsoft icon and cursor files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517615 Martin Gieseking changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from Martin Gieseking 2011-08-27 02:53:07 EDT --- icoutils is required to build the recent version of Wine. (bug #733801) Package Change Request == Package Name: icoutils New Branches: el6 Owners: mgieseki -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 713122] Review Request: flyback - Git based backup software
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=713122 Volker Fröhlich changed: What|Removed |Added CC||volke...@gmx.at --- Comment #11 from Volker Fröhlich 2011-08-27 02:42:48 EDT --- You're still using macros for mkdir and install. Replace that with commands. As Martin also mentioned, the clean section is still there. The defattr line was found to be no longer necessary some time ago. "Apple's Time Machine for Linux" -- That comment in the desktop file is inacceptable. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#Trademarks_in_Summary_or_Description The chmod doesn't seem to do anything. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 731972] Review Request: cab - Haskell Cabal package maintenance program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731972 Lakshmi Narasimhan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||lakshminaras2...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|lakshminaras2...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 717867] Review Request: ghc-http-types - Generic HTTP types for Haskell
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=717867
Lakshmi Narasimhan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Lakshmi Narasimhan 2011-08-27
00:17:36 EDT ---
[+]MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in
the review.
rpmlint -i *.rpm ../ghc-http-types.spec
3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
[+]MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[+]MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec
[+]MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
Naming-Yes
Version-release - Matches
No prebuilt external bits - OK
Spec legibity - OK
Package template - OK, based on cabal2spec 0.24
Arch support - OK
Libexecdir - OK
rpmlint - yes
changelogs - OK
Source url tag - OK, validated.
Build Requires list - OK
Summary and description - OK
API documentation - OK, in devel package
[+]MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet
the Licensing Guidelines.
Licensed with BSD.
[+]MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
[+]MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.
LICENSE file is included.
[+]MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[+]MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[+]MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream
source,as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task.
md5sum ~/Downloads/http-types-0.6.5.tar.gz
d11d13ee2edc395fd81af98d563af9b9 ~/Downloads/http-types-0.6.5.tar.gz
md5sum ghc-http-types-0.6.5-1.fc15.src/http-types-0.6.5.tar.gz
d11d13ee2edc395fd81af98d563af9b9
ghc-http-types-0.6.5-1.fc15.src/http-types-0.6.5.tar.gz
[+]MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at
least one primary architecture.
Built on x86_64.
[+]MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch.
[+]MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires.
[+]MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
Checked with rpmquery --list
[+]MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates.
Checked with rpmquery --whatprovides
[+]MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec
file's %files listings.
[+]MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly.
[+]MUST: Each package must consistently use macros.
[+]MUST: The package must contain code, or permissible content.
[+]MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage.
Documentation is in devel package.
[+]MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the
runtime of the application.
[+]MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned
dependency: Requires: {name} = %{version}-%{release}
pm -e ghc-http-types
error: Failed dependencies:
ghc-http-types = 0.6.5-1.fc15 is needed by (installed)
ghc-http-types-devel-0.6.5-1.fc15.x86_64
[+]MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
[+]MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
Should items
[+]SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
LICENSE file is included.
[+]SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described.
Installed the package. Imported Network.HTTP.Types into ghci. No issues.
[+]SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane.
cabal2spec-diff is OK.
APPROVED.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 731219] Review Request: pipebench - Measures the speed of stdin/stdout communication
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731219
--- Comment #12 from Nathan Owe 2011-08-26 21:17:19 EDT
---
First off, the macros needs to be used consistently, so for example, if you are
going to use %{name}, it needs to be used everywhere pipebench is used at,
except of course Name: pipebench :).
Also noticed that during mkdir for man dir:
mkdir -m 755 -p %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man1
I would specify that the man dir needs to have executive permission, so I would
just do:
mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man1
Also there is no need of the Group tag any more, though also doesn't say it
must be removed, but in the wiki it says there is no use for it any more.
Also when I ran rpmlint on the SPEC file and SRPM, it gave a error with the
Source0: and I found out it the Source listed needs to be
http://www.habets.pp.se/synscan/files/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz or w/o macro,
whichever way chosen.
And of course changelog and revision needs to be +1
Sorry, didn't notice these earlier.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 731219] Review Request: pipebench - Measures the speed of stdin/stdout communication
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731219 --- Comment #13 from Nathan Owe 2011-08-26 21:18:18 EDT --- Also before I forget: pipebench.src:13: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 13, tab: line 1) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675557] Review Request: matreshka - set of Ada libraries to help to develop information systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675557
--- Comment #26 from Björn Persson 2011-08-26
18:50:31 EDT ---
matreshka-devel should own the directory %{_GNAT_project_dir}/%{name}.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 729972] Review Request: perl-Test-Mojibake - Check your source for encoding misbehavior
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729972 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-26 18:43:42 EDT --- perl-Test-Mojibake-0.3-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Test-Mojibake-0.3-2.el6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 729972] Review Request: perl-Test-Mojibake - Check your source for encoding misbehavior
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729972 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-26 18:43:51 EDT --- perl-Test-Mojibake-0.3-2.el4 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 4. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Test-Mojibake-0.3-2.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 729972] Review Request: perl-Test-Mojibake - Check your source for encoding misbehavior
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729972 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-26 18:43:34 EDT --- perl-Test-Mojibake-0.3-2.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Test-Mojibake-0.3-2.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 729653] Review Request: perl-Pod-Wordlist-hanekomu - Add words for spell checking POD
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729653 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-26 18:33:29 EDT --- perl-Pod-Wordlist-hanekomu-1.110090-3.el4 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 4. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Pod-Wordlist-hanekomu-1.110090-3.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 729653] Review Request: perl-Pod-Wordlist-hanekomu - Add words for spell checking POD
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729653 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-26 18:33:20 EDT --- perl-Pod-Wordlist-hanekomu-1.110090-3.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Pod-Wordlist-hanekomu-1.110090-3.el6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 729653] Review Request: perl-Pod-Wordlist-hanekomu - Add words for spell checking POD
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729653 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-26 18:33:12 EDT --- perl-Pod-Wordlist-hanekomu-1.110090-3.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Pod-Wordlist-hanekomu-1.110090-3.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 729813] Review Request: perl-Test-CPAN-Meta-JSON - Validate a META.json file within a CPAN distribution
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729813 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-26 18:11:27 EDT --- perl-Test-CPAN-Meta-JSON-0.10-2.el4 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 4. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Test-CPAN-Meta-JSON-0.10-2.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705587] Review Request: android-tools - Android platform tools (adb, fastboot, etc)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705587 --- Comment #9 from Ivan Afonichev 2011-08-26 18:08:02 EDT --- Spec URL: https://github.com/vanaf/android-tools-fedora/blob/master/android-tools.spec SRPM URL: http://baldr.sgu.ru/rpm/android-tools-20110816.80d508f-2.fc15.src.rpm - Remove the rm in the install section - Remove defattr - Use install command(not macro) - Add description of fastboot This package includes only adb and fastboot binaries. As far as I know debuggerd/arm/pr-support.c: GPL debuggerd/arm/unwind.c: GPL sh/arith.c: GPL (with incorrect FSF address) are not used for them and some binary files in adb/ and fastboot/ dirs also are not necessary for building this package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 693037] Review Request: perl-Test-HasVersion - Check Perl modules have version numbers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693037 --- Comment #26 from Paul Howarth 2011-08-26 18:05:37 EDT --- Hi Iain, the EPEL builds are now in stable, so you can expire the buildroot overrides now. Thanks for your help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 725914] Review Request: php-channel-pearplex - Adds the PearPlex channel to PEAR
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725914 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|php-channel-pearplex-1.3-2. |php-channel-pearplex-1.3-2. |el5 |el6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 711547] Review Request: sketch - Free Graphics Software for the TeX, LaTeX, and PSTricks Community
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711547 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|sketch-0.3.2-6.fc15 |sketch-0.3.2-6.el6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 693037] Review Request: perl-Test-HasVersion - Check Perl modules have version numbers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693037 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-26 17:57:30 EDT --- perl-Test-HasVersion-0.012-3.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 693037] Review Request: perl-Test-HasVersion - Check Perl modules have version numbers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693037 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-26 17:57:15 EDT --- perl-Test-HasVersion-0.012-2.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 672543] Review Request: perl-Test-DistManifest - Author test that validates a package MANIFEST
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672543 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-26 17:56:50 EDT --- perl-Test-DistManifest-1.011-4.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 711547] Review Request: sketch - Free Graphics Software for the TeX, LaTeX, and PSTricks Community
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711547 --- Comment #34 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-26 17:54:34 EDT --- sketch-0.3.2-6.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 672543] Review Request: perl-Test-DistManifest - Author test that validates a package MANIFEST
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672543 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-26 17:57:38 EDT --- perl-Test-DistManifest-1.011-4.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 672543] Review Request: perl-Test-DistManifest - Author test that validates a package MANIFEST
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672543 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-26 17:54:09 EDT --- perl-Test-DistManifest-1.011-4.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 725914] Review Request: php-channel-pearplex - Adds the PearPlex channel to PEAR
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725914 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-26 17:54:19 EDT --- php-channel-pearplex-1.3-2.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 693037] Review Request: perl-Test-HasVersion - Check Perl modules have version numbers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693037 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-26 17:56:29 EDT --- perl-Test-HasVersion-0.012-3.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 237041] Review Request: perl-JSON - Parse and convert to JSON (JavaScript Object Notation)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=237041 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-26 17:55:33 EDT --- perl-JSON-2.17-1.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 725914] Review Request: php-channel-pearplex - Adds the PearPlex channel to PEAR
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725914 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|php-channel-pearplex-1.3-2. |php-channel-pearplex-1.3-2. |fc16|el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 725914] Review Request: php-channel-pearplex - Adds the PearPlex channel to PEAR
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725914 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-26 17:53:25 EDT --- php-channel-pearplex-1.3-2.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 731820] Review Request: kcm-qt-graphicssystem - Easily configure the standard Qt graphics system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731820 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-26 17:19:17 EDT --- kcm-qt-graphicssystem-1.3-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kcm-qt-graphicssystem-1.3-1.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 732200] Review Request: Berusky2 - 3D sequel of Berusky
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732200 --- Comment #14 from Richard Shaw 2011-08-26 17:15:08 EDT --- I forgot to mention: 7. Since the data package is totally separate, we probably need some kind of license file put in the archive. You could probably just use the same COPYING file that's in base package. 8. Do we need the "Save/profiles" directories? It's the only thing left in the source archive that's not installed. If so, are they designed to be written to? Richard -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 732200] Review Request: Berusky2 - 3D sequel of Berusky
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732200 --- Comment #13 from Richard Shaw 2011-08-26 17:09:14 EDT --- Created attachment 520142 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=520142 Updates spec for data package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 732200] Review Request: Berusky2 - 3D sequel of Berusky
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732200
--- Comment #12 from Richard Shaw 2011-08-26 17:08:19
EDT ---
Ok, preliminary review for berusky2-data:
1. Typical stuff:
BuildRoot, %clean, "rm -rf %{buildroot}" in %install and defattrib's can be
removed.
2. Changed macro "define" to "global" as it's preferred[1].
3. I fixed the Source: line to use the official sourceforge URL[1] but left the
URL: for you to update to whatever is most appropriate.
4. In this case since there's nothing to build, %build can be removed. rpmlint
will complain but we can ignore it.
5. I cleaned up the "mv" operation to a bit to improve readability.
6. If a package owns a directory and all items in it then you can just
reference the directory (without leading "/" I believe) and it will grab
everything. That simplifies your:
%dir %{_datadir}/%{game_name}
%{_datadir}/%{game_name}/*
to:
%{_datadir}/%{game_name}
I'll upload a new sepc but you should update the changelog and bump the
revision as I did not.
Richard
[1]
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#.25global_preferred_over_.25define
[2] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#Sourceforge.net
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 715503] Review Request: elmer-meshgen2d - Open Source Finite Element Software for Multiphysical Problems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715503 Volker Fröhlich changed: What|Removed |Added CC||volke...@gmx.at --- Comment #3 from Volker Fröhlich 2011-08-26 17:03:02 EDT --- Please use different description texts for you elmer packages. For instance, meshgen2d has exactly the same as hutiter. Please also see the notes I put up on the hutiter ticket. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 715154] Review Request: o-palm - A coupler for all the applications built upon existing independent models
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715154 Volker Fröhlich changed: What|Removed |Added CC||volke...@gmx.at --- Comment #1 from Volker Fröhlich 2011-08-26 16:55:16 EDT --- Did you already progress on that? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 715498] Review Request: elmer-hutiter - Open Source Finite Element Software for Multiphysical Problems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715498
Volker Fröhlich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||volke...@gmx.at
--- Comment #3 from Volker Fröhlich 2011-08-26 16:53:16 EDT
---
Please adapt the BR syntax according to the new ruling:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#Requiring_Base_Package
Drop "-n %{name}".
Defattr is no longer necessary.
Probably be a bit more specific in the files section. Also label the
documentation as such.
Installing via install -p -m 0644 AUTHORS ChangeLog COPYING NEWS README -t
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_docdir}/hutiter/ and so on is wrong. Use the %doc macro.
Is it possible to build shared libs?
I'm not a hundred percent sure if the package is really GPLv2+. Do you have a
statement somewhere?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 732200] Review Request: Berusky2 - 3D sequel of Berusky
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732200 --- Comment #11 from Martin Stransky 2011-08-26 16:36:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > Are you the package owner at sourceforge? If so, we could probably go ahead > and > roll in the header fixs instead of using sed hacks. Yes, I'm the package owner at sourceforge, but I prefer to leave this change to next version. I have some other fixes in queue so I'd like to release them together. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 732552] Review Request: nodejs - Evented I/O for V8 JavaScript
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732552 --- Comment #17 from T.C. Hollingsworth 2011-08-26 16:32:26 EDT --- The build is still failing because YUM is still installing the old http-parser 0.3-6.20100911git.fc15. It won't succeed until 1.0 is in the buildroot. I'll patch CMake to set the -I in CFLAGS properly but I still think that's npm's problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705587] Review Request: android-tools - Android platform tools (adb, fastboot, etc)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705587 --- Comment #8 from Volker Fröhlich 2011-08-26 16:27:18 EDT --- If you aim for EPEL5 and older, define a buildroot. If not, delete the rm in the install section. Defattr is not necessary anymore as well. The install macro is not used anymore; just use the install command. I'm under the impression, the description only describes one part of the package. Is this correct? The description could probably be more concise in the end. "etc" and "etc.." should be "etc." There are a few files licensed under GPL: debuggerd/arm/pr-support.c: GPL debuggerd/arm/unwind.c: GPL sh/arith.c: GPL (with incorrect FSF address) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 732704] Review Request: npm - Node.js Package Manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732704 --- Comment #3 from T.C. Hollingsworth 2011-08-26 16:23:55 EDT --- Looks like it can't find the Node.js headers (because they're in /usr/include/nodejs instead of /usr/include/node). Hopefully it's something I can patch in npm and they aren't hardcoded in each package's Makefiles. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 732200] Review Request: Berusky2 - 3D sequel of Berusky
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732200 --- Comment #10 from Richard Shaw 2011-08-26 16:22:12 EDT --- Sorry, I completely missed the second set of spec and SRPM links. Downloading now. Are you the package owner at sourceforge? If so, we could probably go ahead and roll in the header fixs instead of using sed hacks. Richard -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730560] Review Request: drupal7-ctools - CTools module for Drupal 7
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730560 Paul W. Frields changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(jaredsmith@jareds ||mith.net) --- Comment #1 from Paul W. Frields 2011-08-26 16:05:30 EDT --- $ rpmlint rpmbuild/SPECS/drupal7-ctools.spec rpmbuild/SRPMS/drupal7-ctools-1.0-0.1.rc1.fc15.src.rpm rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/drupal7-ctools-1.0-0.1.rc1.fc15.noarch.rpm drupal7-ctools.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US responder -> responded, res ponder, res-ponder drupal7-ctools.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US responder -> responded, res ponder, res-ponder drupal7-ctools.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.0-rc1 ['1.0-0.1.rc1.fc15', '1.0-0.1.rc1'] drupal7-ctools.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/drupal7-ctools-1.0/LICENSE.txt 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 3 warnings. The spelling warnings can be ignored. The third warning can be fixed by using one of the correct versions. (I prefer the second since you can then reuse the content for other branches more easily.) The error should be reported upstream, but you can use a current copy of the correct LICENSE file from the FSF, since upstream intent is clear (GPLv2+). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730559] Review Request: drupal7-date - Date content type and APIs for Drupal 7
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730559 Paul W. Frields changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(jaredsmith@jareds ||mith.net) --- Comment #1 from Paul W. Frields 2011-08-26 16:02:48 EDT --- $ rpmlint rpmbuild/SPECS/drupal7-date.spec rpmbuild/SRPMS/drupal7-date-2.0-0.1.alpha3.fc15.src.rpm rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/drupal7-date-2.0-0.1.alpha3.fc15.noarch.rpm drupal7-date.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 2.0-alpha3 ['2.0-0.1.alpha3.fc15', '2.0-0.1.alpha3'] drupal7-date.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/drupal7-date-2.0/LICENSE.txt drupal7-date.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/drupal7/modules/date/help/date-views.html 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 1 warnings. The warning can be fixed by using one of the correct versions. (I prefer the second since you can then reuse the content for other branches more easily.) The first error should be reported upstream, but you can use a current copy of the correct LICENSE file from the FSF, since upstream intent is clear (GPLv2+). The second can be corrected with a 'find | xargs rm -f' -- some existing D6 modules are using this as well. Make sure the existence of the file in question isn't required for the module to run properly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 682489] Review Request: drupal6-acidfree - A full-featured media management system for Drupal
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682489 --- Comment #3 from Paul W. Frields 2011-08-26 15:57:20 EDT --- Hi Eric, hopefully the changes I made to some of your other packages show what needs to be done for this one. If you don't have time to work on this package, let me know and I'll release the review for now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 732200] Review Request: Berusky2 - 3D sequel of Berusky
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732200 --- Comment #9 from Martin Stransky 2011-08-26 15:51:00 EDT --- Thanks for the review and updated spec file! > 2. I could not get the package to build because it was failing to find some > headers. I had to add the following: > > # Fix header references > sed -i "s/menu.h/Menu.h/g" src/kofola/Menu.cpp > sed -i "s/menu.h/Menu.h/g" src/kofola/game_main.cpp > sed -i "s/menu.h/Menu2.h/g" src/kofola/Menu2.cpp > > I'm not sure how you got it to build without this. Perhaps you're not using > gcc > 4.6 and in previous versions this was only a warning? You're right, I'm using gcc-4.5 on F14. > 4. This package has a manual requires for berusky2-data. From your sourceforge > link it appears that the data source is separate for a good reason? Yes, the data tar ball is 300MB big and stable. It's the original game data so there's no need to change it. > I noticed that it has a version of 0.4 while this has a version of 0.3. Are > they intended to revise separately? Yes, they're independent. The game binary version is going to upgrade rapidly :) > If so we should probably cover the review request for the data package here as > well. Yes, I submitted both to one bug (this). > I would usually leave the updates to be made by the requester as it's a good > way to learn but there are so many changes I'll attach my updated spec file > for > you to review. Thanks a lot, looks okay to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 707199] Review Request: openstack-nova - OpenStack Compute (nova)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707199 Matt Domsch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #15 from Matt Domsch 2011-08-26 15:48:32 EDT --- assigning to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730570] Review Request: python-requests - Python HTTP library for Humans
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730570 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-26 15:35:29 EDT --- python-requests-0.6.1-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-requests-0.6.1-1.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 702957] Review Request: pclock - WindowMaker dockapp which displays an analog clock
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702957 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||pclock-0.13.1-3.fc15 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-08-26 15:10:04 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 726962] Review Request: wmweather - Applet which shows local weather conditions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=726962 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||wmweather-2.4.5-2.fc15 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-08-26 15:09:49 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 726962] Review Request: wmweather - Applet which shows local weather conditions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=726962 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-26 15:09:43 EDT --- wmweather-2.4.5-2.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 702957] Review Request: pclock - WindowMaker dockapp which displays an analog clock
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702957 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-26 15:09:58 EDT --- pclock-0.13.1-3.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730570] Review Request: python-requests - Python HTTP library for Humans
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730570 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-26 15:09:33 EDT --- python-requests-0.6.1-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-requests-0.6.1-1.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730038] Review Request: perl-Child - Object oriented simple interface to fork()
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730038 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Child-0.009-1.fc15 |perl-Child-0.009-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730038] Review Request: perl-Child - Object oriented simple interface to fork()
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730038 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-26 15:12:42 EDT --- perl-Child-0.009-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 530910] Review Request: hyena - Hyena is a library of GUI and non-GUI C# code
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530910 --- Comment #13 from Claudio Rodrigo Pereyra DIaz 2011-08-26 15:06:12 EDT --- Yes please, I wish. I think at the moment no other package needs poppler-sharp. But pdfmod includes version 0.0.1 and is now available the 0.0.2 version ready for poppler 0.16 This library would be useful to program in monodevelop. The package is now ready for review in bug 607405. But as you seem to be more convenient. (In reply to comment #12) > I'll review them if you wish. > > poppler-sharp is used by another app? AFAIK sources are included in pdfmod, so > I think is right to keep in one package for the moment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730040] Review Request: perl-Date-ISO8601 - Three ISO 8601 numerical calendars
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730040 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Date-ISO8601-0.004-2.f |perl-Date-ISO8601-0.004-2.f |c14 |c15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730037] Review Request: perl-autovivification - Lexically disable autovivification
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730037 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-26 15:08:41 EDT --- perl-autovivification-0.09-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730040] Review Request: perl-Date-ISO8601 - Three ISO 8601 numerical calendars
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730040 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-26 15:06:04 EDT --- perl-Date-ISO8601-0.004-2.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730040] Review Request: perl-Date-ISO8601 - Three ISO 8601 numerical calendars
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730040 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Date-ISO8601-0.004-2.f ||c14 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-08-26 15:00:50 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730034] Review Request: perl-autobox-List-Util - Bring the List::Util functions to autobox
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730034 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-autobox-List-Util-2009 |perl-autobox-List-Util-2009 |0629-1.fc15 |0629-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730041] Review Request: perl-Date-JD - Conversion between flavors of Julian Date
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730041 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Date-JD-0.005-1.fc15 |perl-Date-JD-0.005-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730040] Review Request: perl-Date-ISO8601 - Three ISO 8601 numerical calendars
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730040 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-26 15:00:44 EDT --- perl-Date-ISO8601-0.004-2.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730041] Review Request: perl-Date-JD - Conversion between flavors of Julian Date
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730041 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-26 15:02:35 EDT --- perl-Date-JD-0.005-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730034] Review Request: perl-autobox-List-Util - Bring the List::Util functions to autobox
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730034 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-26 14:59:22 EDT --- perl-autobox-List-Util-20090629-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 708554] Review Request: umph - Command line tool for parsing video links from Youtube feeds
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708554 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||umph-0.1.8-2.fc15 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-08-26 14:53:57 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730031] Review Request: perl-autobox-Core - Core functions exposed as methods in primitive types
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730031 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-autobox-Core-1.2-2.fc1 |perl-autobox-Core-1.2-2.fc1 |4 |5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 709180] Review Request: jackctlmmc - control JACK transport via MIDI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709180 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|jackctlmmc-4-3.fc15 |jackctlmmc-4-3.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730031] Review Request: perl-autobox-Core - Core functions exposed as methods in primitive types
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730031 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-26 14:56:21 EDT --- perl-autobox-Core-1.2-2.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730034] Review Request: perl-autobox-List-Util - Bring the List::Util functions to autobox
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730034 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-26 14:54:09 EDT --- perl-autobox-List-Util-20090629-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730033] Review Request: perl-autobox-dump - Human/perl readable strings from the results of an EXPR
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730033 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-26 14:57:05 EDT --- perl-autobox-dump-20090426.1746-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 709180] Review Request: jackctlmmc - control JACK transport via MIDI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709180 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-26 14:58:23 EDT --- jackctlmmc-4-3.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730034] Review Request: perl-autobox-List-Util - Bring the List::Util functions to autobox
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730034 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-autobox-List-Util-2009 ||0629-1.fc15 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-08-26 14:54:15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 709180] Review Request: jackctlmmc - control JACK transport via MIDI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709180 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||jackctlmmc-4-3.fc15 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-08-26 14:54:36 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730033] Review Request: perl-autobox-dump - Human/perl readable strings from the results of an EXPR
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730033 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-autobox-dump-20090426. |perl-autobox-dump-20090426. |1746-1.fc14 |1746-1.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 709180] Review Request: jackctlmmc - control JACK transport via MIDI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709180 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-26 14:54:31 EDT --- jackctlmmc-4-3.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730033] Review Request: perl-autobox-dump - Human/perl readable strings from the results of an EXPR
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730033 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-autobox-dump-20090426. ||1746-1.fc14 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-08-26 14:53:10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730041] Review Request: perl-Date-JD - Conversion between flavors of Julian Date
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730041 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Date-JD-0.005-1.fc15 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-08-26 14:50:57 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728555] Review Request: screenie-composer - Fancy screenshot composer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728555 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||screenie-composer-1.0.0-0.2 ||.20110805git49c2630.fc15 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-08-26 14:53:42 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226383] Merge Review: rwall
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226383 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||rwall-0.17-32.fc15 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-08-26 14:52:25 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730031] Review Request: perl-autobox-Core - Core functions exposed as methods in primitive types
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730031 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-26 14:52:44 EDT --- perl-autobox-Core-1.2-2.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730033] Review Request: perl-autobox-dump - Human/perl readable strings from the results of an EXPR
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730033 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-26 14:53:04 EDT --- perl-autobox-dump-20090426.1746-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730041] Review Request: perl-Date-JD - Conversion between flavors of Julian Date
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730041 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-26 14:50:52 EDT --- perl-Date-JD-0.005-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728555] Review Request: screenie-composer - Fancy screenshot composer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728555 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-26 14:53:37 EDT --- screenie-composer-1.0.0-0.2.20110805git49c2630.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 708554] Review Request: umph - Command line tool for parsing video links from Youtube feeds
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708554 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-26 14:53:51 EDT --- umph-0.1.8-2.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226383] Merge Review: rwall
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226383 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-26 14:52:14 EDT --- rwall-0.17-32.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730031] Review Request: perl-autobox-Core - Core functions exposed as methods in primitive types
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730031 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-autobox-Core-1.2-2.fc1 |perl-autobox-Core-1.2-2.fc1 |6 |4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730038] Review Request: perl-Child - Object oriented simple interface to fork()
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730038 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Child-0.009-1.fc16 |perl-Child-0.009-1.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730038] Review Request: perl-Child - Object oriented simple interface to fork()
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730038 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-26 14:50:37 EDT --- perl-Child-0.009-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730037] Review Request: perl-autovivification - Lexically disable autovivification
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730037 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-26 14:51:14 EDT --- perl-autovivification-0.09-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607405] Review Request: poppler-sharp - C Sharp Bindings for Poppler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607405 --- Comment #6 from Claudio Rodrigo Pereyra DIaz 2011-08-26 14:36:49 EDT --- I just update the spec and src.rpm for 0.0.2 upstream version Please somebody review Spec URL: http://elsupergomez.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/poppler-sharp.spec SRPM URL: http://elsupergomez.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/poppler-sharp-0.0.2-1.fc14.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 637402] Review Request: sqlninja - A tool for SQL server injection and takeover
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=637402 --- Comment #25 from Jon Ciesla 2011-08-26 14:35:13 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730570] Review Request: python-requests - Python HTTP library for Humans
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730570 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-26 14:37:54 EDT --- python-requests-0.6.1-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-requests-0.6.1-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 530910] Review Request: hyena - Hyena is a library of GUI and non-GUI C# code
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530910 --- Comment #12 from Ismael Olea 2011-08-26 14:22:56 EDT --- I'll review them if you wish. poppler-sharp is used by another app? AFAIK sources are included in pdfmod, so I think is right to keep in one package for the moment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 555018] Review Request: gnac - An audio converter for GNOME (first package, seeking sponsor)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555018 danny.picciri...@member.fsf.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||danny.picciri...@member.fsf ||.org --- Comment #26 from danny.picciri...@member.fsf.org 2011-08-26 14:11:55 EDT --- 0.2.3 is out now: http://gnac.sourceforge.net/archives/26 Thanks for working on this-- appreciate it a lot! Take your time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 637402] Review Request: sqlninja - A tool for SQL server injection and takeover
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=637402 Arun SAG changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #24 from Arun SAG 2011-08-26 14:04:50 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: sqlninja Short Description: A tool for SQL server injection and takeover Owners: sagarun Branches: F-14 F-15 F-16 InitialCC: shakthimaan -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 530910] Review Request: hyena - Hyena is a library of GUI and non-GUI C# code
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530910 --- Comment #11 from Claudio Rodrigo Pereyra DIaz 2011-08-26 13:59:33 EDT --- I want maintain this package and pdfmod and poppler-sharp (In reply to comment #10) > Claudio, Ryan: anyone plans to maintain it? (and the same with pdfmod > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537640 ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 707199] Review Request: openstack-nova - OpenStack Compute (nova)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707199 --- Comment #14 from Mark McLoughlin 2011-08-26 12:10:28 EDT --- Okay, I've done a good bit more work on this. The main change I've made is to collapse all the sub-packages into openstack-nova, apart from python-nova. >From my commit message: The many, many subpackages isn't really buying us anything. The packages themselves are tiny (at around ~10k) and none of them have any massiv dependency set which would be nice to avoid. Collapsing the sub-packages simplifies the packaging hugely, makes things a lot more attractive and gets rid of the clunky 'node-full' package name. If needs be, we can start splitting individual components out again later. A starting point would probably be to create openstack-core and openstack-compute subpackages. The new bits are here: Spec URL: https://raw.github.com/markmc/openstack-fedora-specs/acdfd0f6/SPECS/openstack-nova.spec SRPM URL: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=3304149&name=openstack-nova-2011.3-0.3.d4.fc16.src.rpm Scratch Koji Build URL: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3304148 Fedora 16 yum repo URL: http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/markmc/openstack/fedora-openstack.repo Please someone review! Pretty please! :-) (Oh - I had to disable the docs build in that scratch build above because Sphinx has started segfaulting on my in the koji builder. Doesn't happen locally) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 733572] Review Request: gnome-schedule - A graphical interface to crontab and at
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=733572 Rahul Sundaram changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2011-08-26 11:53:28 --- Comment #13 from Rahul Sundaram 2011-08-26 11:53:28 EDT --- Built for Rawhide, Fedora 16 and Fedora 15 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnome-schedule-2.1.4-2.fc16 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnome-schedule-2.1.4-2.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 732660] Review Request: nodejs-which - A JavaScript implementation of the 'which' command
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732660 --- Comment #2 from Matěj Cepl 2011-08-26 11:53:20 EDT --- Probably not a packaging review deal breaker, but still interesting enough to be recorded somewhere (and I don't have a component to file a bug against): bradford:nodejs-which-1.0.0 $ which.nodejs node.js:134 throw e; // process.nextTick error, or 'error' event on first tick ^ Error: Cannot find module '../' at Function._resolveFilename (module.js:315:11) at Function._load (module.js:261:25) at require (module.js:343:19) at Object. (/usr/bin/which.nodejs:2:13) at Module._compile (module.js:399:26) at Object..js (module.js:405:10) at Module.load (module.js:331:31) at Function._load (module.js:292:12) at Array. (module.js:418:10) at EventEmitter._tickCallback (node.js:126:26) bradford:nodejs-which-1.0.0 $ rpm -V nodejs-which bradford:nodejs-which-1.0.0 $ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 733572] Review Request: gnome-schedule - A graphical interface to crontab and at
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=733572 --- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla 2011-08-26 11:36:18 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
