[Bug 542045] Review Request: php-htmlpurifier - standards-compliant HTML filter library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542045 Adam Williamson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||awill...@redhat.com --- Comment #12 from Adam Williamson 2011-08-30 23:32:32 EDT --- hey, david, still active? I might pick up this review as I'm thinking of packaging tt-rss, and it uses htmlpurifier. Are you aware of any changes that might be needed now, or should Pavel's comment "Please include documentation and properly register in system PEAR database and I'll approve package." still apply, and thus you'd expect this to be approved now? Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 717864] Review Request: ghc-case-insensitive - Haskell case-insensitive string comparison
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=717864 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-30 21:41:30 EDT --- ghc-case-insensitive-0.2.0.2-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 717864] Review Request: ghc-case-insensitive - Haskell case-insensitive string comparison
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=717864 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|ghc-case-insensitive-0.2.0. |ghc-case-insensitive-0.2.0. |2-1.fc14|2-1.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728649] Review Request: airrac - C++ Simulated Revenue Accounting (RAC) System Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728649 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|airrac-0.1.1-1.fc15 |airrac-0.1.0-2.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 719456] Review Request: edg-gridftp-client - Command line clients to GridFTP libraries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719456 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-30 21:35:33 EDT --- edg-gridftp-client-1.2.9.2-2.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728649] Review Request: airrac - C++ Simulated Revenue Accounting (RAC) System Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728649 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-30 21:37:54 EDT --- airrac-0.1.0-2.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 719456] Review Request: edg-gridftp-client - Command line clients to GridFTP libraries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719456 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|edg-gridftp-client-1.2.9.2- |edg-gridftp-client-1.2.9.2- |2.fc16 |2.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728737] Review Request: libinstpatch - MIDI instrument patch library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728737 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|libinstpatch-1.0.0-3.201108 |libinstpatch-1.0.0-3.201108 |06svn386.fc16 |06svn386.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728737] Review Request: libinstpatch - MIDI instrument patch library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728737 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-30 21:36:10 EDT --- libinstpatch-1.0.0-3.20110806svn386.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728649] Review Request: airrac - C++ Simulated Revenue Accounting (RAC) System Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728649 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|airrac-0.1.0-2.fc16 |airrac-0.1.1-1.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 714328] Review Request: xmedcon - A medical image conversion utility and library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714328 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|xmedcon-0.10.7-4.fc14 |xmedcon-0.10.7-4.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 714328] Review Request: xmedcon - A medical image conversion utility and library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714328 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-30 21:32:00 EDT --- xmedcon-0.10.7-4.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728649] Review Request: airrac - C++ Simulated Revenue Accounting (RAC) System Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728649 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-30 21:33:53 EDT --- airrac-0.1.1-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 697049] Review Request: sawfish-pager - A pager for the Sawfish window manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697049 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||sawfish-pager-0.90.2-3.fc15 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-08-30 21:31:48 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 714328] Review Request: xmedcon - A medical image conversion utility and library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714328 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||xmedcon-0.10.7-4.fc14 Resolution|CURRENTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 714328] Review Request: xmedcon - A medical image conversion utility and library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714328 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-30 21:30:54 EDT --- xmedcon-0.10.7-4.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 697049] Review Request: sawfish-pager - A pager for the Sawfish window manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697049 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-30 21:31:41 EDT --- sawfish-pager-0.90.2-3.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 708473] Review Request: mingw32-cxxtest - cxxtest for mingw32
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708473 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version|mingw32-cxxtest-3.10.1-4.fc |mingw32-cxxtest-3.10.1-5.fc |15 |15 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed|2011-07-08 14:06:16 |2011-08-30 21:28:45 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 717864] Review Request: ghc-case-insensitive - Haskell case-insensitive string comparison
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=717864 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|ghc-case-insensitive-0.2.0. |ghc-case-insensitive-0.2.0. |2-1.fc16|2-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 708473] Review Request: mingw32-cxxtest - cxxtest for mingw32
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708473 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-30 21:28:39 EDT --- mingw32-cxxtest-3.10.1-5.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 717864] Review Request: ghc-case-insensitive - Haskell case-insensitive string comparison
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=717864 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-30 21:27:01 EDT --- ghc-case-insensitive-0.2.0.2-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226383] Merge Review: rwall
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226383 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|rwall-0.17-32.fc15 |rwall-0.17-32.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226383] Merge Review: rwall
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226383 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-30 21:22:57 EDT --- rwall-0.17-32.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675557] Review Request: matreshka - set of Ada libraries to help to develop information systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675557
--- Comment #29 from Björn Persson 2011-08-30
21:00:44 EDT ---
Generic MUST Items:
· rpmlint must be run on the source rpm and all binary rpms the build produces.
→ OK. None of the warnings are real problems:
matreshka.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US grapheme -> ephemera
matreshka.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US codec -> codex, code,
codes
matreshka.src:143: W: macro-in-comment %{GPRbuild_optflags}
matreshka.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US grapheme -> ephemera
matreshka.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US codec -> codex, code,
codes
matreshka.i686: W: executable-stack /usr/lib/libleague.so.0.1.1
matreshka.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US grapheme ->
ephemera
matreshka.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US codec -> codex,
code, codes
matreshka.x86_64: W: executable-stack /usr/lib64/libleague.so.0.1.1
matreshka-debuginfo.i686: W: hidden-file-or-dir
/usr/src/debug/matreshka-0.1.1/.objs
matreshka-debuginfo.i686: W: hidden-file-or-dir
/usr/src/debug/matreshka-0.1.1/.objs
matreshka-debuginfo.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir
/usr/src/debug/matreshka-0.1.1/.objs
matreshka-debuginfo.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir
/usr/src/debug/matreshka-0.1.1/.objs
matreshka-fastcgi.i686: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib/libmatreshka-fastcgi.so.0.1.1 /usr/lib/libgnarl-4.6.so
matreshka-fastcgi.i686: W: executable-stack
/usr/lib/libmatreshka-fastcgi.so.0.1.1
matreshka-fastcgi.i686: W: no-documentation
matreshka-fastcgi.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/libmatreshka-fastcgi.so.0.1.1 /usr/lib64/libgnarl-4.6.so
matreshka-fastcgi.x86_64: W: executable-stack
/usr/lib64/libmatreshka-fastcgi.so.0.1.1
matreshka-fastcgi.x86_64: W: no-documentation
matreshka-fastcgi-devel.i686: W: no-documentation
matreshka-fastcgi-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
matreshka-sql-core.i686: W: no-documentation
matreshka-sql-core.x86_64: W: no-documentation
matreshka-sql-core-devel.i686: W: no-documentation
matreshka-sql-core-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
matreshka-sql-postgresql.i686: W: no-documentation
matreshka-sql-postgresql.x86_64: W: no-documentation
matreshka-sql-postgresql-devel.i686: W: no-documentation
matreshka-sql-postgresql-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
matreshka-sql-sqlite.i686: W: no-documentation
matreshka-sql-sqlite.x86_64: W: no-documentation
matreshka-sql-sqlite-devel.i686: W: no-documentation
matreshka-sql-sqlite-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
· The warnings about spelling errors are false positives; the spelling is
correct.
· The macro in a comment won't cause any problems in this case.
· Executable stack is OK as noted in the Ada packaging guidelines.
· The hidden directory in the debuginfo package is odd, but not something a
packager should be required to change.
· The unused dependency on libgnarl seems to be something that Gnat does, and
is probably not something that a packager should tamper with.
· Lack of documentation in the subpackages is OK because they require the
main package and the devel subpackage.
· The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
→ OK.
· The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption.
→ OK. The names match.
· The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
→ OK.
· The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the
Licensing Guidelines.
→ OK. The license is three-clause BSD according to the file LICENSE and a few
sampled source file headers.
· The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license.
→ OK.
· If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package must be included in %doc.
→ OK. LICENSE is in the main package.
· The spec file must be written in American English.
→ OK. The grammar isn't perfect but it's comprehensible.
· The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
→ OK.
· The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
→ OK. The tarballs are identical.
· The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least
one primary architecture.
→ OK. It builds in Koji on at least x86 and x86-64.
· If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch.
→ Possible issue: You may need to add ExclusiveArch, or maybe not. People
working on secondary architectures where Gnat isn't available seem to have
problems with some Ada packages and not with others, and I've never understood
what makes the difference.
· All buil
[Bug 733179] Review Request: filebench - A model based file system workload generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=733179 --- Comment #4 from Hushan Jia 2011-08-30 20:39:01 EDT --- test build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3314413 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 733179] Review Request: filebench - A model based file system workload generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=733179 --- Comment #3 from Hushan Jia 2011-08-30 20:31:32 EDT --- remove defattr, and INSTALL in doc files, and convert LICENSE to utf-8 encoding: Spec URL: http://hushan.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/filebench.spec SRPM URL: http://hushan.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/filebench-1.4.9-2.el6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 734531] Review Request: unison - File synchronisation tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734531 Volker Fröhlich changed: What|Removed |Added CC||volke...@gmx.at --- Comment #1 from Volker Fröhlich 2011-08-30 18:48:49 EDT --- Did you try to contact the maintainers? You can find them via the package database: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb Some comments: - Use the name macro - License is GPLv3+ (it seems) - Run rpmlint on all your packages: unison240-debuginfo.x86_64: E: debuginfo-without-sources - desktop-file-validate usr/share/applications/fedora-unison-2.40.desktop usr/share/applications/fedora-unison-2.40.desktop: warning: key "Encoding" in group "Desktop Entry" is deprecated usr/share/applications/fedora-unison-2.40.desktop: warning: value "Utility;Application;" for key "Categories" in group "Desktop Entry" contains a deprecated value "Application" Also use the icon in the desktop file. - Compiler flags are not honored - Try to solve file permissions before the files section - Use -p with install and cp commands; don't use -f with cp though - cat-ing the desktop file can go to the prep section. You could also have a file instead and use sed to place ver_compat. - Since you require ocaml 3.12 or above, you won't take this package to EPEL5. You can therefore drop the clean section, the buildroot rm in the install section and the buildroot definition. In order to find a sponsor, you should also take part in other reviews. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 733179] Review Request: filebench - A model based file system workload generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=733179
Volker Fröhlich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||volke...@gmx.at
--- Comment #2 from Volker Fröhlich 2011-08-30 18:16:19 EDT
---
Don't ship INSTALL.
Defattr is no longer necessary, if you don't aim for EPEL4 or older.
Use the name macro in the files section. You can shorten the files section to:
%files
%doc AUTHORS ChangeLog COPYING LICENSE NEWS README TODO
%{_bindir}/%{name}
%{_datadir}/%{name}
Rpmlint:
filebench.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/filebench-1.4.9/LICENSE
filebench.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary filebench
At least Sun had some sort of manpage, as far as I can see.
Please change the encoding of the licensefile to UTF-8 in the first place.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 725885] Review Request: phpMyAdmin3 - Handle the administration of MySQL over the World Wide Web
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725885 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-30 17:15:02 EDT --- phpMyAdmin3-3.4.4-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/phpMyAdmin3-3.4.4-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 604971] Review Request: jwm - Joe's Window Manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=604971 --- Comment #27 from Germán Racca 2011-08-30 17:16:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #26) > It's not necessary to explicitly set the %opflags. They are defined correctly > by the %configure macro. The debug package is empty due to the call of "strip" > in src/Makefile. It should be sufficient to remove it from src/Makefile.in > with > a patch. > > The include path /usr/include/freetype2 is correct. Thus the compiler should > be > able to find it if freetype-devel has been installed. OK, I have removed optflags and applied a patch to remove the stripping of the binary, and that did the trick. Please find new files here: SPEC: http://skytux.fedorapeople.org/packages/jwm.spec SRPM: http://skytux.fedorapeople.org/packages/jwm-2.0.1-6.svn500.fc15.src.rpm Koji builds from scratch: dist-f15: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3313321 dist-rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3313797 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 725885] Review Request: phpMyAdmin3 - Handle the administration of MySQL over the World Wide Web
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725885 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728286] Review Request: perl-Module-Extract-VERSION - Extract a module version without running code
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728286 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-30 17:04:10 EDT --- perl-Module-Extract-VERSION-1.01-3.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 729813] Review Request: perl-Test-CPAN-Meta-JSON - Validate a META.json file within a CPAN distribution
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729813 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-30 17:03:37 EDT --- perl-Test-CPAN-Meta-JSON-0.10-2.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728286] Review Request: perl-Module-Extract-VERSION - Extract a module version without running code
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728286 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-30 17:02:39 EDT --- perl-Module-Extract-VERSION-1.01-3.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728286] Review Request: perl-Module-Extract-VERSION - Extract a module version without running code
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728286 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-30 17:03:50 EDT --- perl-Module-Extract-VERSION-1.01-3.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 729813] Review Request: perl-Test-CPAN-Meta-JSON - Validate a META.json file within a CPAN distribution
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729813 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-30 17:02:00 EDT --- perl-Test-CPAN-Meta-JSON-0.10-2.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 717863] Review Request: perl-Locale-Codes - Distribution of modules to handle locale codes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=717863 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-30 16:48:44 EDT --- Package perl-5.14.1-187.fc16, perl-Locale-Codes-3.17-1.fc16: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 16 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing perl-5.14.1-187.fc16 perl-Locale-Codes-3.17-1.fc16' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-5.14.1-187.fc16,perl-Locale-Codes-3.17-1.fc16 then log in and leave karma (feedback). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 733603] Review Request: sugar-ruler - Ruler is a simple collection of measurement tools that are displayed on the screen.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=733603
--- Comment #8 from Nikos Roussos 2011-08-30 16:44:58 EDT
---
I'll do a review. I'm not a sponsor, so this is informal.
FIX - MUST: $ rpmlint sugar-ruler-11-1.fc15.noarch.rpm
sugar-ruler.noarch: W: summary-ended-with-dot C Ruler is a simple collection
of measurement tools that are displayed on the screen.
sugar-ruler.noarch: E: summary-too-long C Ruler is a simple collection of
measurement tools that are displayed on the screen.
sugar-ruler.noarch: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities
sugar-ruler.noarch: W: invalid-license GPL
sugar-ruler.noarch: E: invalid-lc-messages-dir
/usr/share/locale/cpp/LC_MESSAGES/com.laptop.Ruler.mo
sugar-ruler.noarch: E: invalid-lc-messages-dir
/usr/share/locale/nah/LC_MESSAGES/com.laptop.Ruler.mo
sugar-ruler.noarch: E: incorrect-locale-subdir
/usr/share/locale/templates/LC_MESSAGES/com.laptop.Ruler.mo
sugar-ruler.noarch: E: invalid-lc-messages-dir
/usr/share/locale/templates/LC_MESSAGES/com.laptop.Ruler.mo
sugar-ruler.noarch: E: invalid-lc-messages-dir
/usr/share/locale/ton/LC_MESSAGES/com.laptop.Ruler.mo
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 6 errors, 3 warnings.
Some ideas: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_Rpmlint_issues
OK - MUST: named according to the Package Naming Guidelines
OK - MUST: spec file name matches the base package %{name}
OK - MUST: package meets the Packaging Guidelines
FIX - MUST: Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines (GPLv3+)
You must specify a GPL version (see the COPYING file on upstream source)
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#GPL_and_LGPL
FIX - MUST: License field in spec file matches the actual license
OK - MUST: license file included in %doc
OK - MUST: spec is in American English
OK - MUST: spec is legible
OK - MUST: sources match the upstream source by MD5
OK - MUST: successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on x86_64
N/A - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch.
OK - MUST: all build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires.
Suggestion: Use a seperate BuildRequires line for each dependency
OK - MUST: handles locales properly with %find_lang
N/A - MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared
library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths,
must call ldconfig in %post and %postun.
OK - MUST: Package does not bundle copies of system libraries.
N/A - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must
state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for
relocation of that specific package.
OK - MUST: owns all directories that it creates
OK - MUST: no duplicate files in the %files listing
OK - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly, includes %defattr(...)
FIX - MUST: consistently uses macros
Use %{__python} on %install section as well
OK - MUST: package contains code, or permissable content
N/A - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage
OK - MUST: Files included as %doc do not affect the runtime of the application
N/A - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package
N/A - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package
N/A - MUST: library files that end in .so are in the -devel package.
N/A - MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully
versioned dependency
OK - MUST: The package does not contain any .la libtool archives.
N/A - MUST: Package contains a GUI application and includes a %{name}.desktop
file, and that file is properly installed with desktop-file-install in the
%install section.
OK - MUST: package does not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
OK - MUST: all filenames valid UTF-8
SHOULD Items:
OK - SHOULD: Source package includes license text(s) as a separate file.
N/A - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file
should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
OK - SHOULD: builds in mock.
OK - SHOULD: compiles and builds into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
OK - SHOULD: functions as described.
OK - SHOULD: Scriptlets are sane.
N/A - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency.
N/A - SHOULD: pkgconfig(.pc) files should be placed in a -devel pkg
OK - SHOULD: no file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or
/usr/sbin
N/A - SHOULD: package should contain man pages for binaries/scripts.
FIX - SHOULD: at the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf
%{buildroot}
It could be a good idea to add this for compatibility reasons.
Other items:
OK - latest stable version
OK - SourceURL valid
OK - Compiler flags ok
OK - Debuginfo complete
FIX - SHOULD: packa
[Bug 730426] Review Request: mindless - Find the secret code
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730426 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||mindless-1.0.0-4.fc16 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-08-30 16:45:14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 729681] Review Request: maven-reporting-exec - classes managing report plugin execution
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729681 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||maven-reporting-exec-1.0.1- ||3.fc16 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730426] Review Request: mindless - Find the secret code
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730426 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-30 16:45:08 EDT --- mindless-1.0.0-4.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728737] Review Request: libinstpatch - MIDI instrument patch library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728737 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||libinstpatch-1.0.0-3.201108 ||06svn386.fc16 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-08-30 16:44:31 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728737] Review Request: libinstpatch - MIDI instrument patch library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728737 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-30 16:44:26 EDT --- libinstpatch-1.0.0-3.20110806svn386.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 734168] Review Request: perl-Plack-Test-ExternalServer - Run HTTP tests on external live servers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734168 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-30 16:45:25 EDT --- perl-Plack-Test-ExternalServer-0.01-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730043] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Epoch - Convert DateTimes to/from epoch seconds
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730043 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-30 16:44:39 EDT --- perl-DateTime-Format-Epoch-0.13-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 729681] Review Request: maven-reporting-exec - classes managing report plugin execution
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729681 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-30 16:45:36 EDT --- maven-reporting-exec-1.0.1-3.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 716299] Review Request: clipit - lightweight, fully featured GTK+ clipboard manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716299 --- Comment #15 from Nikos Roussos 2011-08-30 16:46:25 EDT --- Hi Christoph, I did an informal review on: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=733603 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 727220] Review Request: maven-injection-plugin - Bytecode injection at Maven build time
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=727220
Andrew Robinson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review?, needinfo+ |fedora-review+, needinfo-
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Robinson 2011-08-30 16:43:01
EDT ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[X] Rpmlint output:
maven-injection-plugin.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Bytecode -> Byte
code, Byte-code, Decorate
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
maven-injection-plugin.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US bytecode ->
byte code, byte-code, decorate
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
maven-injection-plugin.src: W: invalid-url URL: http://www.jboss.org HTTP Error
403: Forbidden
The value should be a valid, public HTTP, HTTPS, or FTP URL.
maven-injection-plugin.src: W: invalid-url Source0:
maven-injection-plugin-1.0.2.tar.xz
The value should be a valid, public HTTP, HTTPS, or FTP URL.
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.
[X] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines[1].
[X] Spec file name must match the base package name, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[X] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines[2].
[X] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms.
[X] Buildroot definition is not present
[X] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines[3,4].
[X] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
License type: LGPLv2+
[X] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
[X] All independent sub-packages have license of their own
[X] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[X] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
MD5SUM this package:9d593d08689d8ef3f40af2431d35fc78
MD5SUM upstream package:9d593d08689d8ef3f40af2431d35fc78
[X] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines[5].
[X] Package must own all directories that it creates.
[X] Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[X] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[X] File sections do not contain %defattr(-,root,root,-) unless changed with
good reason
[X] Permissions on files are set properly.
[X] Package does NOT have a %clean section which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}
(or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). (not needed anymore)
[X] Package consistently uses macros (no %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
mixing)
[X] Package contains code, or permissable content.
[X] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
application.
[X] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[X] Javadoc documentation files are generated and included in -javadoc
subpackage
[X] Javadocs are placed in %{_javadocdir}/%{name} (no -%{version} symlinks)
[X] Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on jpackage-utils
[X] Javadoc subpackages have Require: jpackage-utils
[-] Package uses %global not %define
[X] If package uses tarball from VCS include comment how to re-create that
tarball (svn export URL, git clone URL, ...)
[-] If source tarball includes bundled jar/class files these need to be
removed prior to building
[X] All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
[X] Jar files are installed to %{_javadir}/%{name}.jar (see [6] for details)
[X] If package contains pom.xml files install it (including depmaps) even when
building with ant
[X] pom files has correct add_maven_depmap
=== Maven ===
[X] Use %{_mavenpomdir} macro for placing pom files instead of
%{_datadir}/maven2/poms
[-] If package uses "-Dmaven.test.skip=true" explain why it was needed in a
comment
[-] If package uses custom depmap "-Dmaven.local.depmap.file=*" explain why
it's needed in a comment
[X] Package DOES NOT use %update_maven_depmap in %post/%postun
[X] Packages DOES NOT have Requires(post) and Requires(postun) on
jpackage-utils for %update_maven_depmap macro
=== Other suggestions ===
[X] If possible use upstream build method (maven/ant/javac)
[X] Avoid having BuildRequires on exact NVR unless necessary
[X] Package has BuildArch: noarch (if possible)
[X] Latest version is packaged.
[X] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
Tested on: x86_64, i386
APPROVED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/u
[Bug 720435] Review Request: epson-inkjet-printer-escpr - Drivers for Epson inkjet printers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720435 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-30 16:41:46 EDT --- epson-inkjet-printer-escpr-1.0.4-3.1lsb3.2.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 732651] Review Request: sshpass - Non-interactive ssh authentication utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732651 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-30 16:40:13 EDT --- sshpass-1.05-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 731110] Review Request: maven-filtering - Shared component providing resource filtering
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731110 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||maven-filtering-1.0-2.fc16 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 731110] Review Request: maven-filtering - Shared component providing resource filtering
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731110 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-30 16:41:17 EDT --- maven-filtering-1.0-2.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 731683] Review Request: pyppd - PPD file compressor and generator for CUPS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731683 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||pyppd-0.4.9-1.fc16 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-08-30 16:39:36 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 731683] Review Request: pyppd - PPD file compressor and generator for CUPS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731683 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-30 16:39:31 EDT --- pyppd-0.4.9-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 733984] Review Request: perl-Sub-Exporter-ForMethods - Helper routines for using Sub::Exporter to build methods
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=733984 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-30 16:37:33 EDT --- perl-Sub-Exporter-ForMethods-0.100050-2.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 717864] Review Request: ghc-case-insensitive - Haskell case-insensitive string comparison
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=717864 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||ghc-case-insensitive-0.2.0. ||2-1.fc16 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-08-30 16:38:48 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 733848] Review Request: octave-gsl - Octave bindings to the GNU Scientific Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=733848 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-30 16:37:58 EDT --- octave-gsl-1.0.8-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728649] Review Request: airrac - C++ Simulated Revenue Accounting (RAC) System Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728649 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||airrac-0.1.0-2.fc16 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-08-30 16:38:11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 734160] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Types-LoadableClass - ClassName type constraint with coercion to load the class
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734160 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-30 16:36:52 EDT --- perl-MooseX-Types-LoadableClass-0.006-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 717864] Review Request: ghc-case-insensitive - Haskell case-insensitive string comparison
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=717864 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-30 16:38:43 EDT --- ghc-case-insensitive-0.2.0.2-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 734164] Review Request: perl-Plack-Middleware-ReverseProxy - Supports app to run as a reverse proxy backend
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734164 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-30 16:35:45 EDT --- perl-Plack-Middleware-ReverseProxy-0.10-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728649] Review Request: airrac - C++ Simulated Revenue Accounting (RAC) System Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728649 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-30 16:38:06 EDT --- airrac-0.1.0-2.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 727030] Review Request: ufw - uncomplicated firewall
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=727030 --- Comment #17 from Haïkel Guémar 2011-08-30 16:23:48 EDT --- Created attachment 520684 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=520684 ufw sample systemd service Sorry, i forgot to add it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 727030] Review Request: ufw - uncomplicated firewall
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=727030 --- Comment #16 from Nathan Owe 2011-08-30 15:32:53 EDT --- I don't see any attached files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 652987] Review Request: go - The Go programming language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652987 --- Comment #46 from W. Michael Petullo 2011-08-30 15:23:04 EDT --- Spec URL: http://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/go.spec SRPM URL: http://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/go-r59-1.fc15.src.rpm - Updated to release.r59 - Use make.bash, not all.bash, to speed up build - Build both 32- and 64-bit compilers - Remove _smp_mflags and --build-id; broke build on F15 - Small formatting fixes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 189775] Review Request: dnsmasq - A lightweight DHCP/caching DNS server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=189775 --- Comment #9 from Douglas Schilling Landgraf 2011-08-30 15:05:53 EDT --- Hello Jon, Thanks, you are so fast dude! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 189775] Review Request: dnsmasq - A lightweight DHCP/caching DNS server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=189775 --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla 2011-08-30 14:56:29 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 472066] Review Request: python-distutils-extra - Integrate more support into Python's distutils
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472066 --- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla 2011-08-30 14:57:06 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 189775] Review Request: dnsmasq - A lightweight DHCP/caching DNS server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=189775 Douglas Schilling Landgraf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dougsl...@redhat.com --- Comment #7 from Douglas Schilling Landgraf 2011-08-30 14:39:16 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: dnsmasq New Branches: EL-6 Owners: dougsland -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 189775] Review Request: dnsmasq - A lightweight DHCP/caching DNS server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=189775 Douglas Schilling Landgraf changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 472066] Review Request: python-distutils-extra - Integrate more support into Python's distutils
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472066 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Fabian Affolter 2011-08-30 14:34:49 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: python-distutils-extra New Branches: el6 Owners: fab InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 710475] Review Request: gnome-shell-extension-iconplacesbookmarks - A gnome-shell extension to add a Places and Bookmarks menu
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710475 Mario Blättermann changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||mari...@freenet.de AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mari...@freenet.de Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Mario Blättermann 2011-08-30 14:37:19 EDT --- The source package 1.0 is no longer available, please update to 1.1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 734531] Review Request: unison - File synchronisation tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734531 Mario Blättermann changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mari...@freenet.de Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 225622] Merge Review: boost
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225622 Petr Machata changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard|NotReady| --- Comment #43 from Petr Machata 2011-08-30 13:37:36 EDT --- I addressed the comments that I found here or in bug 673839. The updated package is in the repository. Partial scratch build is available here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3311740 This failed on x86_64 for some reason—make is not found mid-installation. I don't know what this could have been caused by, but it's not the first time that I see this. It usually goes away on rebuild, which I didn't attempt at this time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 734531] New: Review Request: unison - File synchronisation tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: unison - File synchronisation tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734531 Summary: Review Request: unison - File synchronisation tool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: yellowca...@gmx.net QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/4023668/unison240.spec SRPM URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/4023668/unison240-2.40.63-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: Unison is a multi-master file-synchronization tool. It allows two replicas of a collection of files and directories to be stored on different hosts (or different locations on the same host), modified separately, and then brought up to date by propagating the changes in each replica to the other. The unison package seems to be unmaintained (3 years since the last upgrade). This is my first package. I used the old spec and upgraded it too the recent stable version of unison. I may need a sponsor. unison240 fixes Bug 698833 (amongst others) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 733984] Review Request: perl-Sub-Exporter-ForMethods - Helper routines for using Sub::Exporter to build methods
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=733984 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-30 11:58:50 EDT --- perl-Sub-Exporter-ForMethods-0.100050-2.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Sub-Exporter-ForMethods-0.100050-2.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 733984] Review Request: perl-Sub-Exporter-ForMethods - Helper routines for using Sub::Exporter to build methods
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=733984 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-30 11:58:58 EDT --- perl-Sub-Exporter-ForMethods-0.100050-2.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Sub-Exporter-ForMethods-0.100050-2.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 734168] Review Request: perl-Plack-Test-ExternalServer - Run HTTP tests on external live servers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734168 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-30 11:54:21 EDT --- perl-Plack-Test-ExternalServer-0.01-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Plack-Test-ExternalServer-0.01-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 734160] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Types-LoadableClass - ClassName type constraint with coercion to load the class
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734160 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-30 11:57:03 EDT --- perl-MooseX-Types-LoadableClass-0.006-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-MooseX-Types-LoadableClass-0.006-1.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 733984] Review Request: perl-Sub-Exporter-ForMethods - Helper routines for using Sub::Exporter to build methods
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=733984 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-30 11:58:41 EDT --- perl-Sub-Exporter-ForMethods-0.100050-2.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Sub-Exporter-ForMethods-0.100050-2.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 734168] Review Request: perl-Plack-Test-ExternalServer - Run HTTP tests on external live servers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734168 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-30 11:54:13 EDT --- perl-Plack-Test-ExternalServer-0.01-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Plack-Test-ExternalServer-0.01-1.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 734160] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Types-LoadableClass - ClassName type constraint with coercion to load the class
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734160 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-30 11:57:19 EDT --- perl-MooseX-Types-LoadableClass-0.006-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-MooseX-Types-LoadableClass-0.006-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 734160] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Types-LoadableClass - ClassName type constraint with coercion to load the class
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734160 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-30 11:57:10 EDT --- perl-MooseX-Types-LoadableClass-0.006-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-MooseX-Types-LoadableClass-0.006-1.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 733984] Review Request: perl-Sub-Exporter-ForMethods - Helper routines for using Sub::Exporter to build methods
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=733984 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 734168] Review Request: perl-Plack-Test-ExternalServer - Run HTTP tests on external live servers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734168 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-30 11:54:05 EDT --- perl-Plack-Test-ExternalServer-0.01-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Plack-Test-ExternalServer-0.01-1.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 734160] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Types-LoadableClass - ClassName type constraint with coercion to load the class
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734160 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 734168] Review Request: perl-Plack-Test-ExternalServer - Run HTTP tests on external live servers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734168 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 734164] Review Request: perl-Plack-Middleware-ReverseProxy - Supports app to run as a reverse proxy backend
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734164 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-30 11:52:41 EDT --- perl-Plack-Middleware-ReverseProxy-0.10-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Plack-Middleware-ReverseProxy-0.10-1.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 734164] Review Request: perl-Plack-Middleware-ReverseProxy - Supports app to run as a reverse proxy backend
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734164 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 734164] Review Request: perl-Plack-Middleware-ReverseProxy - Supports app to run as a reverse proxy backend
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734164 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-30 11:52:49 EDT --- perl-Plack-Middleware-ReverseProxy-0.10-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Plack-Middleware-ReverseProxy-0.10-1.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 734164] Review Request: perl-Plack-Middleware-ReverseProxy - Supports app to run as a reverse proxy backend
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734164 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-30 11:52:57 EDT --- perl-Plack-Middleware-ReverseProxy-0.10-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Plack-Middleware-ReverseProxy-0.10-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 734119] Review Request: libwbxml-compat - Library to parse, encode and handle WBXML documents
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734119 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla 2011-08-30 11:41:13 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). psabata, please take ownership of your review BZs. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 731980] Review Request: python-novaclient - Python API and CLI for OpenStack Nova
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731980 --- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla 2011-08-30 11:35:35 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 731980] Review Request: python-novaclient - Python API and CLI for OpenStack Nova
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731980 Matt Domsch changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Matt Domsch 2011-08-30 11:14:58 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: python-novaclient New Branches: el6 Owners: markmc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 444356] Review Request: bpython - Fancy Curses Interface To The Python Interactive Interpreter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444356 Matt Domsch changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mar...@redhat.com, ||matt_dom...@dell.com --- Comment #8 from Matt Domsch 2011-08-30 10:55:52 EDT --- terjeros, would you please branch and build bpython for el6? openstack-nova needs it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 725168] Review Request: Xspice - X and Spice server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725168 --- Comment #6 from Marc-Andre Lureau 2011-08-30 10:39:54 EDT --- looks ok to me now, you should try to find an official packager now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 734119] Review Request: libwbxml-compat - Library to parse, encode and handle WBXML documents
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734119 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 734119] Review Request: libwbxml-compat - Library to parse, encode and handle WBXML documents
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734119 --- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar 2011-08-30 10:38:32 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: libwbxml-compat Short Description: Library to parse, encode and handle WBXML documents Owners: ppisar awjb Branches: f16 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 732200] Review Request: Berusky2 - 3D sequel of Berusky
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732200
--- Comment #18 from Richard Shaw 2011-08-30 10:34:16
EDT ---
Ok, just a couple of things and I think it will be ready:
The source for the game package needs to be updated to:
Source:
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
In the berusky2.desktop file, the .png extension should be removed from the
Icon field. Basically the rule is if you only specify the name it should be
without the extension, if it's the full path to the icon name, then it should
be included.
I'll do the full review sometime today so don't worry about building a new
release until I'm done in case I find something.
Richard
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 733692] Review Request: python-yourls - simple python client to the YOURLS URL shortner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=733692 --- Comment #4 from Tim Flink 2011-08-30 10:35:28 EDT --- Gah, simple mistakes. Uploaded fixed spec and SRPM http://tflink.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-yourls/python-yourls.spec http://tflink.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-yourls/python-yourls-0.1.1-1.fc15.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
