[Bug 736801] Review Request: pure-gen - A Pure C bindings generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736801 --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen 2011-09-13 23:23:37 EDT --- I think you can BR ghc-language-c-devel instead of prof and also need to BR llvm to get this to build. pure-gen.src: W: invalid-url Source0: http://pure-lang.googlecode.com/files/pure-gen-0.12.tar.gz HTTP Error 404: Not Found I am afraid that is probably normal for googlecode. BTW it seems 0.13 was released a few days ago and seems to include all the patches. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 530688] Review Request: ghc-language-c - Haskell language-c library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530688 --- Comment #16 from Jens Petersen 2011-09-13 21:56:03 EDT --- Apart from the last change the package looks fine to me and rpmlint is clean. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 530688] Review Request: ghc-language-c - Haskell language-c library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530688 --- Comment #15 from Jens Petersen 2011-09-13 21:46:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/funpl/ghc-language-c-0.4.2.fc15.src.rpm I guess you mean: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/funpl/ghc-language-c-0.4.2-2.fc15.src.rpm :) > the manually-added BuildRequires are also needed at runtime, otherwise the > Language.C* modules cannot be imported. Tested with the linked pure-gen review > request I think this is a bug in current f15 and f14 ghc-rpm-macros as I just discovered this week, when using cabal2spec-0.24. I have backported a fix from F16 so that ghc-dep.sh gets activated also for the newer templates in cabal2spec-0.24: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-rpm-macros-0.13.10-1.fc15 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-rpm-macros-0.13.10-1.fc14 and those builds are in Koji override until the end of next week to avoid this issue. Perhaps you could test that it solves your problem? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 736582] Review Request: ghc-primitive - Wrappers for primitive operations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736582 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2011-09-13 21:18:22 EDT --- ghc-vector-0.7.1-1.fc14,ghc-primitive-0.3.1-2.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-vector-0.7.1-1.fc14,ghc-primitive-0.3.1-2.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 736586] Review Request: ghc-vector - Efficient Arrays for Haskell
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736586 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2011-09-13 21:18:14 EDT --- ghc-vector-0.7.1-1.fc15,ghc-primitive-0.3.1-2.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-vector-0.7.1-1.fc15,ghc-primitive-0.3.1-2.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 736586] Review Request: ghc-vector - Efficient Arrays for Haskell
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736586 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2011-09-13 21:18:27 EDT --- ghc-vector-0.7.1-1.fc14,ghc-primitive-0.3.1-2.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-vector-0.7.1-1.fc14,ghc-primitive-0.3.1-2.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 736582] Review Request: ghc-primitive - Wrappers for primitive operations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736582 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2011-09-13 21:18:08 EDT --- ghc-vector-0.7.1-1.fc15,ghc-primitive-0.3.1-2.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-vector-0.7.1-1.fc15,ghc-primitive-0.3.1-2.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 454125] Review Request: gtest - Google C++ testing framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454125 Akira TAGOH changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ta...@redhat.com, ||terje...@phys.ntnu.no Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Akira TAGOH 2011-09-13 21:09:54 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: gtest New Branches: el5 el6 Owners: tagoh InitialCC: To satisfy the dependency of mozc on EPEL, I need this one as well. I'm willing to own this for EPEL since current maintainer seems not that interesting to maintain it on EPEL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 736582] Review Request: ghc-primitive - Wrappers for primitive operations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736582 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 736586] Review Request: ghc-vector - Efficient Arrays for Haskell
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736586 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 707132] Review Request: java-service-wrapper - Java service wrapper
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707132 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|java-service-wrapper-3.2.5- |java-service-wrapper-3.2.5- |2.fc16 |5.el6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 707132] Review Request: java-service-wrapper - Java service wrapper
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707132 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2011-09-13 20:29:06 EDT --- java-service-wrapper-3.2.5-5.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 707132] Review Request: java-service-wrapper - Java service wrapper
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707132 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|java-service-wrapper-3.2.5- |java-service-wrapper-3.2.5- |5.el6 |5.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 707132] Review Request: java-service-wrapper - Java service wrapper
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707132 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2011-09-13 20:29:27 EDT --- java-service-wrapper-3.2.5-5.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 729653] Review Request: perl-Pod-Wordlist-hanekomu - Add words for spell checking POD
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729653 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2011-09-13 20:29:19 EDT --- perl-Pod-Wordlist-hanekomu-1.110090-3.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 729653] Review Request: perl-Pod-Wordlist-hanekomu - Add words for spell checking POD
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729653 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2011-09-13 20:28:16 EDT --- perl-Pod-Wordlist-hanekomu-1.110090-3.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 729972] Review Request: perl-Test-Mojibake - Check your source for encoding misbehavior
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729972 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2011-09-13 20:27:56 EDT --- perl-Test-Mojibake-0.3-2.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 729653] Review Request: perl-Pod-Wordlist-hanekomu - Add words for spell checking POD
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729653 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2011-09-13 20:26:47 EDT --- perl-Pod-Wordlist-hanekomu-1.110090-3.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 729972] Review Request: perl-Test-Mojibake - Check your source for encoding misbehavior
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729972 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2011-09-13 20:26:55 EDT --- perl-Test-Mojibake-0.3-2.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 729972] Review Request: perl-Test-Mojibake - Check your source for encoding misbehavior
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729972 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2011-09-13 20:28:39 EDT --- perl-Test-Mojibake-0.3-2.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 729813] Review Request: perl-Test-CPAN-Meta-JSON - Validate a META.json file within a CPAN distribution
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729813 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2011-09-13 20:28:08 EDT --- perl-Test-CPAN-Meta-JSON-0.10-2.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 697326] Review Request: libisoburn - Library to enable creation and expansion of ISO-9660 filesystems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697326 Dennis van Dok changed: What|Removed |Added CC||denni...@nikhef.nl --- Comment #5 from Dennis van Dok 2011-09-13 18:45:40 EDT --- This is just an informal review. rpmlint (minus some spell checks false positives): libisoburn.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) filesystems -> file systems, file-systems, ecosystems The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. libisoburn.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/libisoburn-1.1.2/COPYING The Free Software Foundation address in this file seems to be outdated or misspelled. Ask upstream to update the address, or if this is a license file, possibly the entire file with a new copy available from the FSF. libisoburn.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/libisoburn-1.1.2/COPYRIGHT The Free Software Foundation address in this file seems to be outdated or misspelled. Ask upstream to update the address, or if this is a license file, possibly the entire file with a new copy available from the FSF. xorriso.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary xorrecord Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. xorriso.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary osirrox Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. Naming: OK Spec file matches base name: OK Approved license: OK Spec file license matches actual license: OK License in %doc: OK Spec file in English: OK Spec file legibility: OK Upstream source matches SRPM: OK Package builds in mock: OK ExcludeArch: No excludes BuildRequires lists build dependencies: OK Locale handling: N/A Library package calls ldconfig in %post, %postun: OK Not bundling system libraries: OK Relocatable: N/A Package owns created directories: OK List files only once: OK Correct file permissions: OK Consistent use of macros: OK Package contains code: OK Large doc subpackage: N/A Documentation does not affect runtime: did not test this, but seems unlikely. Header files in -devel: OK Static libraries in -static: N/A Devel package requires base package: OK Do not install libtool files: OK Include .desktop file for GUI apps: N/A Packages must not own files already owned by other packages: OK Filenames are valid UTF-8: OK Some additional comments: The URL in the spec file http://libburnia-project.org/ currently shows a placeholder page. Although the subpackage xorisso implicitly depends on libisoburn, it doesn't require the exact base package it was built with. This may not be a problem. It doesn't include the copyright and license, and strictly speaking this is covered by the base package, but as it is not named after the base package it might be better to include these files separately in this package. After installing libisoburn on a CentOS 5 box, rpmlint reports the following: libisoburn.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libisoburn.so.1.69.0 /usr/lib64/libz.so.1 libisoburn.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libisoburn.so.1.69.0 /lib64/libacl.so.1 This suggests that upstream should review the dependencies and maybe drop the -lz and -lacl. Installed xorriso and used it to create a 400 MB .iso file. No actual burn test as the VM lacked a DVD burner ;-) Final comment: there seems to be another newer upstream release, 1.1.4. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 732480] Review Request: gofer - An extensible, light weight, universal python agent
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732480
--- Comment #8 from Jeff Ortel 2011-09-13 18:44:06 EDT ---
In 0.48-3, I moved /usr/lib/gofer/journal to /usr/share/gofer/journal and
rpmlint seems much happier. I believe this is more appropriate.
I also added noreplace: %config(noreplace) per rpmlint warnings.
SRPM URL: https://fedorahosted.org/releases/g/o/gofer/gofer-0.48-3.fc14.src.rpm
RPMLINT:
[jortel@localhost gofer]$ rpmlint /tmp/tito/gofer-0.48-3.fc14.src.rpm
gofer.src:31: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes %{name}-lib
gofer.src:110: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package (main package)
%{_libdir}/%{name}/plugins/
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
[jortel@localhost gofer]$ rpmlint /tmp/tito/noarch/gofer-0.48-3.fc14.noarch.rpm
gofer.noarch: W: log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/gofer
gofer.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary goferd
gofer.noarch: W: service-default-enabled /etc/init.d/goferd
gofer.noarch: W: no-reload-entry /etc/init.d/goferd
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 736069] Review Request: apache-parent
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736069 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2011-09-13 18:21:01 EDT --- apache-parent-10-2.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 732150] Review Request: btm - Bitronix Transaction Manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732150 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2011-09-13 18:20:15 EDT --- btm-2.1.1-3.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 735454] Review Request: java-uuid-generator - a pure java UUID generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735454 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2011-09-13 18:21:44 EDT --- java-uuid-generator-3.1.2-2.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607873] Review Request: OTRS - Open Source Ticket Request System
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607873 --- Comment #11 from Vincent Danen 2011-09-13 17:54:44 EDT --- Now that OTRS is removed, can we close this bug or do we still need it open for something? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737399] Review Request: gedit-latex - gedit plugin for editing latex documents
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737399 Sergio Pascual changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sergio.pa...@gmail.com --- Comment #10 from Sergio Pascual 2011-09-13 17:09:59 EDT --- Hi, I'm sergiopr :) This review is for a package rename, from gedit-latex-plugin to gedit-plugin in F-17 and F-16. Ignacio, does the plugin work in F-15 or not? F-14 will continue providing gedit-latex-plugin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737399] Review Request: gedit-latex - gedit plugin for editing latex documents
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737399
--- Comment #9 from Matěj Cepl 2011-09-13 16:55:30 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> I think the reason this is not noarch is because we need to use the libdir
> macro.
a) why?
b) I think %{_libdir} is available everywhere, for arch as well as for noarch.
Try it.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 738079] New: Review Request: quartz - Enterprise Job Scheduler for Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: quartz - Enterprise Job Scheduler for Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738079 Summary: Review Request: quartz - Enterprise Job Scheduler for Java Product: Fedora Version: 16 Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: agr...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Name: quartz Version : 1.6.6 Group : Development/Libraries License : ASL 2.0 URL : http://www.quartz-scheduler.org/ Summary : Enterprise Job Scheduler for Java Description : Quartz is a job scheduling system that can be integrated with, or used along side virtually any J2EE or J2SE application. Quartz can be used to create simple or complex schedules for executing tens, hundreds, or even tens-of-thousands of jobs; jobs whose tasks are defined as standard Java components or EJBs. SPEC: https://downloads.eucalyptus.com/software/devel/fedora-16/SPECS/quartz.spec SRPM: https://downloads.eucalyptus.com/software/devel/fedora-16/SRPMS/quartz-1.6.6-2.fc15.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 735454] Review Request: java-uuid-generator - a pure java UUID generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735454 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2011-09-13 15:34:41 EDT --- java-uuid-generator-3.1.2-2.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/java-uuid-generator-3.1.2-2.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 735454] Review Request: java-uuid-generator - a pure java UUID generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735454 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 736069] Review Request: apache-parent
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736069 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2011-09-13 15:26:25 EDT --- apache-parent-10-2.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/apache-parent-10-2.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 736069] Review Request: apache-parent
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736069 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 722713] Review Request: ace - Optimal route search in a complete graph
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=722713 --- Comment #6 from Mauricio Cleveland 2011-09-13 15:18:48 EDT --- Ready! (In reply to comment #5) > Changelog in English, please. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 736069] Review Request: apache-parent
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736069
--- Comment #4 from Andy Grimm 2011-09-13 14:56:51 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> I'll do the shortened version because the spec is really small and clean.
> Licensing is OK (ASL 2.0) rpmlint is completely clean. Basically everything is
> A-OK. I just have 2 suggestions:
>
> 1. You can put the url directly into Source0. It would be a problem if there
> were more pom.xml files, but that's not the case so...
The reason I did not do this is that when you install the SRPM into your
personal "rpmbuild" environment, you end up with a file called "pom.xml" in
SOURCES ... and when I'm packaging lots of maven-based packages concurrently,
this doesn't work out well. I suppose that if I switch to using git/fedpkg for
all of my development, this is no longer an issue.
> 2. It's usually better to be specific i.e. have %{_mavendepmapfragdir}/%{name}
> instead of * (same for the pom line)
This makes sense, though it would be good to see it in the guidelines if we
prefer not to have people using globs.
> These two non-issues are really small and basically up to you if you want to
> handle them. Package is APPROVED. I'll remove common-poms apache-parent once
> this package is in...
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737694] Review Request: drupal7-backup_migrate - Backup and migrate Drupal 7 data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737694 Paul W. Frields changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||sticks...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|sticks...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 738057] Review Request: semantik - mind mapping tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738057 Gregor Tätzner changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugzilla.redhat.com ||/show_bug.cgi?id=731535 Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 738057] New: Review Request: semantik - mind mapping tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: semantik - mind mapping tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738057 Summary: Review Request: semantik - mind mapping tool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: gre...@freenet.de QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/4023668/semantik.spec SRPM URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/4023668/semantik-0.7.3-2.fc15.src.rpm Description: Semantik (previously Kdissert) is a mind mapping tool to help students to produce complicated documents very quickly and efficiently : presentations, dissertations, thesis, reports. While targeted mostly at students, Kdissert can also help teachers, decision maker, engineers and businessmen. Hi, this is my second review request. A special thank goes to rdieter, he initially created the package and helped me out! https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731535 rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/semantik-0.7.3-2.fc15.x86_64.rpm semantik.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/libnablah.so semantik.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary semantik 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. I think the library thing is a problem. the wiki page 'Common rpmlint issues' wasn't very helpful. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 703824] Review Request python26-paramiko for EPEL 5
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703824 Andy Grimm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-09-13 13:50:40 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 703824] Review Request python26-paramiko for EPEL 5
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703824 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2011-09-13 13:48:08 EDT --- python26-paramiko-1.7.7.1-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python26-paramiko-1.7.7.1-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 703824] Review Request python26-paramiko for EPEL 5
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703824 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 732150] Review Request: btm - Bitronix Transaction Manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732150 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 732150] Review Request: btm - Bitronix Transaction Manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732150 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2011-09-13 13:25:03 EDT --- btm-2.1.1-3.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/btm-2.1.1-3.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 732150] Review Request: btm - Bitronix Transaction Manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732150 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2011-09-13 13:26:03 EDT --- btm-2.1.1-3.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/btm-2.1.1-3.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 729970] Review Request: jandex - Java Annotation Indexer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729970 Roland Grunberg changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737969] Review Request: stax2-api - Experimental API extending basic StAX implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737969 Jaromír Cápík changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||738034 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 738034] Review Request: woodstox-core-asl - High-performance XML processor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738034 Jaromír Cápík changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||652183(FE-JAVASIG) Depends on||737969 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 738034] New: Review Request: woodstox-core-asl - High-performance XML processor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: woodstox-core-asl - High-performance XML processor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738034 Summary: Review Request: woodstox-core-asl - High-performance XML processor Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jca...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://jcapik.fedorapeople.org/files/woodstox-core-asl/woodstox-core-asl.spec SRPM URL: http://jcapik.fedorapeople.org/files/woodstox-core-asl/woodstox-core-asl-4.1.2-1.fc17.src.rpm Description: Woodstox is a high-performance validating namespace-aware StAX-compliant (JSR-173) Open Source XML-processor written in Java. XML processor means that it handles both input (== parsing) and output (== writing, serialization)), as well as supporting tasks such as validation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 716779] Review Request: perl-HTML-FormatText-WithLinks-AndTables - Converts HTML to Text with tables intact
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716779 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla 2011-09-13 12:51:24 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737399] Review Request: gedit-latex - gedit plugin for editing latex documents
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737399 --- Comment #8 from Ignacio Casal Quinteiro (nacho) 2011-09-13 12:41:16 EDT --- I think the reason this is not noarch is because we need to use the libdir macro. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737399] Review Request: gedit-latex - gedit plugin for editing latex documents
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737399 --- Comment #7 from Ignacio Casal Quinteiro (nacho) 2011-09-13 12:32:48 EDT --- ah! ok, first time I make a noarch package. I'll fix it next week thanks a lot for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737399] Review Request: gedit-latex - gedit plugin for editing latex documents
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737399 Matěj Cepl changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mc...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737399] Review Request: gedit-latex - gedit plugin for editing latex documents
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737399
--- Comment #6 from Matěj Cepl 2011-09-13 12:24:23 EDT ---
Let me add couple of quick notes before doing a proper review:
First of all, who is sergiopr and what's his role in maintaing this package? Is
he still the official maintainer of nor, or what?
(In reply to comment #5)
> gedit-latex.x86_64: E: no-binary
> that's fine
No, it isn't ... if gedit-latex is noarch (which I suspect it is), it should be
noarch.
Actually when looking through the build gedit-latex-3.1.1-1.fc16.x86_64.rpm I
don't see anything arch-specific, so this package should be noarch IMHO. The
only problem is that there is a bug in spec not using standard Python macros.
Specifically %{python_sitelib} should be used.
See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python for more details.
> gedit-latex.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
> not binary there.
ditto
> gedit-latex-debuginfo.x86_64: E: empty-debuginfo-package
> that's fine.
ditto ... no debuginfo should happen, because this shouldn't be arch-specific
package.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 724936] Review Request: python-mock - A Python Mocking and Patching Library for Testing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=724936 --- Comment #7 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2011-09-13 12:26:49 EDT --- Clark has updated mock to use the mockbuild module name (see bug 601725 ) so I think it's safe to proceed with this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 716779] Review Request: perl-HTML-FormatText-WithLinks-AndTables - Converts HTML to Text with tables intact
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716779 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppi...@redhat.com Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Petr Pisar 2011-09-13 12:22:22 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: perl-HTML-FormatText-WithLinks-AndTables New Branches: f16 Owners: rlandmann InitialCC: perl-sig Please create branch for F16 as this one does not exist and we need it for rebuilding this package against new Perl in this branch. Current build inherited from F15 cannot be installed into F16 system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 735518] Review Request: htmlunit-core-js - a Rhino fork for HtmlUnit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735518 --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla 2011-09-13 12:05:19 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). Excellent, thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 735518] Review Request: htmlunit-core-js - a Rhino fork for HtmlUnit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735518 Andy Grimm changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 735518] Review Request: htmlunit-core-js - a Rhino fork for HtmlUnit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735518 Andy Grimm changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |html-unit-core-js - a Rhino |htmlunit-core-js - a Rhino |fork for HtmlUnit |fork for HtmlUnit --- Comment #8 from Andy Grimm 2011-09-13 11:57:55 EDT --- fixed issue summary to remove the extra hyphen. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737694] Review Request: drupal7-backup_migrate - Backup and migrate Drupal 7 data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737694 --- Comment #2 from Scott Dodson 2011-09-13 11:43:43 EDT --- Updated SPEC and SRPM Spec URL: http://sdodson.fedorapeople.org/drupal7-backup_migrate.spec SRPM URL: http://sdodson.fedorapeople.org/drupal7-backup_migrate-2.2-2.fc15.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737694] Review Request: drupal7-backup_migrate - Backup and migrate Drupal 7 data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737694 Paul W. Frields changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pfrie...@redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Paul W. Frields 2011-09-13 11:22:37 EDT --- Hi Scott, my rpmlint reports that the FSF address is wrong in the license file. You should report that upstream, but in the meantime you can copy a current version from the FSF's site and include it, then drop that when upstream fixes theirs. Also, you should remove the second changelog entry which doesn't apply to this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 735179] Review Request: openstack-keystone - OpenStack Identity Service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735179 Mark McLoughlin changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|mar...@redhat.com |matt_dom...@dell.com Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Mark McLoughlin 2011-09-13 11:09:46 EDT --- Cool stuff, LGTM! Matt - you'll bugzilla those four last items above, right? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 736069] Review Request: apache-parent
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736069 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla 2011-09-13 11:02:58 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 735518] Review Request: html-unit-core-js - a Rhino fork for HtmlUnit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735518 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla 2011-09-13 10:53:58 EDT --- Summary and SCM request names do not match, please correct. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 598860] Review Request: httpd-itk - MPM Itk for Apache HTTP Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598860 --- Comment #7 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2011-09-13 10:51:46 EDT --- Next update http://hubbitus.info/rpm/Fedora15/httpd-itk/httpd-itk-2.2.21-1.fc15.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 732150] Review Request: btm - Bitronix Transaction Manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732150 --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla 2011-09-13 10:52:37 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 735454] Review Request: java-uuid-generator - a pure java UUID generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735454 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla 2011-09-13 10:53:19 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 736069] Review Request: apache-parent
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736069 --- Comment #2 from Andy Grimm 2011-09-13 10:42:15 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: apache-parent Short Description: Parent pom file for Apache projects Owners: arg Branches: f16 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 736069] Review Request: apache-parent
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736069 Andy Grimm changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 735518] Review Request: html-unit-core-js - a Rhino fork for HtmlUnit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735518 Andy Grimm changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Andy Grimm 2011-09-13 10:33:53 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: htmlunit-core-js Short Description: Rhino fork for htmlunit Owners: arg Branches: f15 f16 el6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 735454] Review Request: java-uuid-generator - a pure java UUID generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735454 Andy Grimm changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Andy Grimm 2011-09-13 10:32:23 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: java-uuid-generator Short Description: A pure Java UUID generator Owners: arg Branches: f15 f16 el6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 732150] Review Request: btm - Bitronix Transaction Manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732150 Andy Grimm changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Andy Grimm 2011-09-13 10:30:25 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: btm Short Description: Bitronix Transaction Manager Owners: arg Branches: f15 f16 el6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 733603] Review Request: sugar-ruler - Ruler is a simple collection of measurement tools that are displayed on the screen.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=733603 --- Comment #22 from Jon Ciesla 2011-09-13 10:29:23 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). Added f16 branch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737972] New: Review Request: spacewalk-admin - Various utility scripts and data files for RHN Satellite installations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: spacewalk-admin - Various utility scripts and data files for RHN Satellite installations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737972 Summary: Review Request: spacewalk-admin - Various utility scripts and data files for RHN Satellite installations Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: msu...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- SPEC: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/spacewalk-admin/spacewalk-admin.spec SRPM: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/spacewalk-admin/spacewalk-admin-1.5.5-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: Various utility scripts and data files for Spacewalk installations. Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3348513 rpmlint output: $ rpmlint /tmp/spacewalk-build/spacewalk-admin-1.5.5-1.fc15.src.rpm /tmp/spacewalk-build/noarch/spacewalk-admin-1.5.5-1.fc15.noarch.rpm spacewalk-admin.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary rhn-deploy-ca-cert.pl spacewalk-admin.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary rhn-generate-pem.pl spacewalk-admin.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary rhn-install-ssl-cert.pl 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737972] Review Request: spacewalk-admin - Various utility scripts and data files for RHN Satellite installations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737972 Miroslav Suchý changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||452450(F-Spacewalk) Alias||spacewalk-admin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737969] Review Request: stax2-api - Experimental API extending basic StAX implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737969 Jaromír Cápík changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||652183(FE-JAVASIG) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737969] New: Review Request: stax2-api - Experimental API extending basic StAX implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: stax2-api - Experimental API extending basic StAX implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737969 Summary: Review Request: stax2-api - Experimental API extending basic StAX implementation Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jca...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://jcapik.fedorapeople.org/files/stax2-api/stax2-api.spec SRPM URL: http://jcapik.fedorapeople.org/files/stax2-api/stax2-api-3.1.1-1.fc17.src.rpm Description: StAX2 is an experimental API that is intended to extend basic StAX specifications in a way that allows implementations to experiment with features before they end up in the actual StAX specification (if they do). As such, it is intended to be freely implementable by all StAX implementations same way as StAX, but without going through a formal JCP process. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 736768] Review Request: perl-Carp - Alternative warn and die for modules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736768 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Carp-1.22-1.fcf17 Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2011-09-13 10:18:23 --- Comment #4 from Petr Pisar 2011-09-13 10:18:23 EDT --- Thank you for the review and the repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 736051] Review Request: rubygem-archivist - A rails 3 model archiving system based on acts_as_archive
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736051
--- Comment #3 from Maros Zatko 2011-09-13 10:14:04 EDT ---
removed:
requirement of ruby and shoulda,
'echo %{SOURCE0}'
added:
%doc section
ri and rdocs are now part of package
Spec URL: http://v3.sk/~hexo/rpm/rubygem-archivist.spec
SRPM URL: http://v3.sk/~hexo/rpm/rubygem-archivist-1.0.5.1-2.fc15.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 733603] Review Request: sugar-ruler - Ruler is a simple collection of measurement tools that are displayed on the screen.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=733603
--- Comment #20 from Kalpa Welivitigoda 2011-09-13
10:02:25 EDT ---
replaced "python" with "%{__python}" in install section
Here are the new files,
Spec URL: http://callkalpa.fedorapeople.org/sugar-ruler/sugar-ruler.spec
SRPM URL:
http://callkalpa.fedorapeople.org/sugar-ruler/sugar-ruler-12-2.fc15.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 733603] Review Request: sugar-ruler - Ruler is a simple collection of measurement tools that are displayed on the screen.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=733603 Kalpa Welivitigoda changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #21 from Kalpa Welivitigoda 2011-09-13 10:03:25 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: sugar-ruler Short Description: Simple collection of measurement tools Owners: callkalpa Branches: f15 InitialCC: pbrobinson -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 442342] Review Request: pnp4nagios - Nagios performance data analysis tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442342 --- Comment #16 from Xavier Bachelot 2011-09-13 09:15:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > Can I ask an EL-6 package please? Thank you. If you're willing to adopt the package, yes. I'm not using pnp4nagios anymore and I'm not giving it the love it would deserve. The Fedora branches have been lagging behind for quite some time, and I'm not going to add one more branch, especially for long term support. Please request commit rights in the pkgdb, I'll be thankful to grant them to you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 442342] Review Request: pnp4nagios - Nagios performance data analysis tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442342 Jan ONDREJ changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ondr...@salstar.sk --- Comment #15 from Jan ONDREJ 2011-09-13 08:42:55 EDT --- Can I ask an EL-6 package please? Thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 736768] Review Request: perl-Carp - Alternative warn and die for modules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736768 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla 2011-09-13 08:30:08 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 736717] Review Request: lcmaps - Grid (X.509) and VOMS credentials to local account mapping
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736717 --- Comment #2 from Dennis van Dok 2011-09-13 08:25:22 EDT --- Hi Al, thanks for your comment. You are right about the differences in the SRPM and the spec file, this was unintended. The release tag was a leftover from an experiment. I've fixed both issues. New SRPM: http://software.nikhef.nl/dist/redhat/el5/mwsec/SRPMS/lcmaps-1.4.31-5.el5.src.rpm New SPEC: http://software.nikhef.nl/dist/redhat/el5/mwsec/SPECS/lcmaps.spec Thanks, Dennis -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 734804] Review Request: perl-IPTables-libiptc - Perl extension for iptables libiptc
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734804 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-IPTables-libiptc-0.51- ||1.fcf17 Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2011-09-13 08:19:11 --- Comment #6 from Petr Pisar 2011-09-13 08:19:11 EDT --- Thank you for the review and the repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 725168] Review Request: Xspice - X and Spice server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725168 Hans de Goede changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED CC||airl...@redhat.com, ||hdego...@redhat.com, ||sandm...@redhat.com, ||xgl-ma...@redhat.com Component|Package Review |xorg-x11-drv-qxl Resolution||RAWHIDE AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|hdego...@redhat.com Flag|fedora-review? | Last Closed||2011-09-13 08:16:05 --- Comment #7 from Hans de Goede 2011-09-13 08:16:05 EDT --- As discussed on irc, since this is building from the same upstream tarbal as xorg-x11-drv-qxl, it should just be a subpackage of that. I've just completed a build of xorg-x11-drv-qxl with a xorg-x11-server-Xspice subpackage (F-16 and F-15 to follow soon) -> closing this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 736051] Review Request: rubygem-archivist - A rails 3 model archiving system based on acts_as_archive
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736051
--- Comment #2 from Michal Fojtik 2011-09-13 08:03:50 EDT
---
Review:
Requires: ruby(abi) = %{rubyabi}
Requires: ruby
* Is this necessary?
* Is the %prep section necessary? I can't see any tests running there. In %prep
you copy all gem files with gem install in one place and in %install you move
them to another. Why not use gem install in %install section?
* Remove the 'echo %{SOURCE0}'
* Is the rubygem(shoulda) really needed as a Runtime dependency?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 736051] Review Request: rubygem-archivist - A rails 3 model archiving system based on acts_as_archive
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736051 Michal Fojtik changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mfoj...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 736768] Review Request: perl-Carp - Alternative warn and die for modules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736768 --- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar 2011-09-13 08:00:24 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: perl-Carp Short Description: Alternative warn and die for modules Owners: ppisar mmaslano psabata Branches: InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 736768] Review Request: perl-Carp - Alternative warn and die for modules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736768 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 734804] Review Request: perl-IPTables-libiptc - Perl extension for iptables libiptc
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734804 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla 2011-09-13 07:55:45 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 722843] Review Request: synergy - Share mouse and keyboard between multiple computers over the network
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=722843 --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla 2011-09-13 07:53:10 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737399] Review Request: gedit-latex - gedit plugin for editing latex documents
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737399 --- Comment #5 from Ignacio Casal Quinteiro (nacho) 2011-09-13 07:08:34 EDT --- The previous links are updated now. Build in koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3348057 rpmlint: gedit-latex.x86_64: W: summary-not-capitalized C gedit plugin for composing and compiling LaTeX documents it is gedit not Gedit. gedit-latex.x86_64: E: no-binary that's fine gedit-latex.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib not binary there. gedit-latex-debuginfo.x86_64: E: empty-debuginfo-package that's fine. gedit-latex.src: W: summary-not-capitalized C gedit plugin for composing and compiling LaTeX documents said 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 3 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 735518] Review Request: html-unit-core-js - a Rhino fork for HtmlUnit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735518 --- Comment #5 from hannes 2011-09-13 06:34:40 EDT --- Is there anything missing or any particular reason why you don't file a SCM request? Did I miss or forget something? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737399] Review Request: gedit-latex - gedit plugin for editing latex documents
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737399 Ignacio Casal Quinteiro (nacho) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NOTABUG | Keywords||Reopened --- Comment #4 from Ignacio Casal Quinteiro (nacho) 2011-09-13 06:33:10 EDT --- Reopening as we need to change the name of the package. I'll provide updated info. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737858] Review Request: eclipse-wtp-sourceediting - WTP Source Editing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737858 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||akurt...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|akurt...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Alexander Kurtakov 2011-09-13 06:26:45 EDT --- MINE :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737511] Review request: rubygem-haml-rails - Haml generators for Rails 3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737511 --- Comment #5 from Bohuslav Kabrda 2011-09-13 05:58:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > * %doc macro in -doc sub-package > - I would suggest to mark by %doc macro only documents. It means that the > test > suite and the Gemfile should not be marked as doc. > - There are also other opinions, such as that everything in -doc sub-package > is documentation and there is no need to mark anything as a documentation. > However I do not share this POV. > I definitelly agree, that marking tests and Gemfile as doc wasn't appropriate - fixed. > * Substantially different R and BR > - Requires and BuildRequires differ substantially, so I wonder what is the > reason for the difference. I guess that ActiveRecord and ActionMailer > are just optional dependencies, but I'd like to be sure. ActiveRecord and ActionMailer are really required during tests, but I managed to remove some Requires (concretely activesupport and actionpack), which are already required by railties. SPEC: http://bkabrda.fedorapeople.org/haml-rails/rubygem-haml-rails.spec SRPM: http://bkabrda.fedorapeople.org/haml-rails/rubygem-haml-rails-0.3.4-3.fc15.src.rpm Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3347929 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737858] New: Review Request: eclipse-wtp-sourceediting - WTP Source Editing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-wtp-sourceediting - WTP Source Editing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737858 Summary: Review Request: eclipse-wtp-sourceediting - WTP Source Editing Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vladimir.kostadi...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://dev.technogamma.biz/eclipse-wtp-sourceediting/eclipse-wtp-sourceediting.spec SRPM URL: http://dev.technogamma.biz/eclipse-wtp-sourceediting/eclipse-wtp-sourceediting-3.3.0-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: WTP Source editing tools provide support for editing typical "web" languages and the mixing of them. XML, XML Schema, XSL, HTML, CSS, DTD, and JSP resources, as well as an XML Perspective. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 578024] Review Request: ingres - Relational DBMS Server and Utilities
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578024 --- Comment #38 from Oliver Falk 2011-09-13 05:15:18 EDT --- status update!? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
