[Bug 730323] Review Request: telepathy-kde-accounts-kcm - KDE Configuration Module for Telepathy Instant Messaging Accounts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730323 Radek Novacek changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Radek Novacek 2011-09-15 02:56:26 EDT --- Thanks for fixing the issues, setting fedora-review+. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 738525] New: Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-H2PM - Automatically generate perl modules to wrap C header files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-H2PM - Automatically generate perl modules to wrap C header files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738525 Summary: Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-H2PM - Automatically generate perl modules to wrap C header files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: boche...@fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://bochecha.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-ExtUtils-H2PM.spec SRPM URL: http://bochecha.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-ExtUtils-H2PM-0.07-1.fc16.src.rpm Description: This module assists in generating wrappers around system functionallity, such as socket() types or ioctl() calls, where the only interesting features required are the values of some constants or layouts of structures normally only known to the C header files. Rather than writing an entire XS module just to contain some constants and pack/unpack functions, this module allows the author to generate, at module build time, a pure perl module containing constant declarations and structure utility functions. The module then requires no XS module to be loaded at run time. $ rpmlint perl-ExtUtils-H2PM* perl-ExtUtils-H2PM.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US functionallity -> functionality, functionalist, functionalism perl-ExtUtils-H2PM.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/perl-ExtUtils-H2PM-0.07/LICENSE perl-ExtUtils-H2PM.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US functionallity -> functionality, functionalist, functionalism 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. I opened an upstream bug about the incorrect FSF address: https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=70976 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 542045] Review Request: php-htmlpurifier - standards-compliant HTML filter library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542045
--- Comment #24 from David Nalley 2011-09-14 22:20:10 EDT ---
Pavel,
Thanks for the review!
SPEC: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/php-htmlpurifier-htmlpurifer.spec
SRPM:
http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/php-htmlpurifier-htmlpurifier-4.3.0-2.fc15.src.rpm
(In reply to comment #19)
> 1) Invalid spec name:
> php-htmlpurifier-htmlpurifier.src: E: invalid-spec-name
What's wrong with the spec name?
> 2) php-htmlpurifier-htmlpurifier.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l
> en_US whitelist -> white list, white-list, whistle
fixed
> 3)
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=3323223&name=php-htmlpurifier-htmlpurifier-doc-4.3.0-1.fc17.noarch.rpm
> 4) php-htmlpurifier-htmlpurifier-doc.noarch: E: htaccess-file
> /usr/share/doc/php-htmlpurifier-htmlpurifier-doc-4.3.0/benchmarks/.htaccess
>
> I think it may be ignored.
This is removed
> 5) php-htmlpurifier-htmlpurifier.noarch: W: no-documentation
> As your doc sub-package independent and does not require main package, at
> least
> LICENSE (and may be CREDITS) should be duplicated:
Fixed
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#Subpackage_Licensing
>
> Consider also require main package and move these docs to main package instead
> of sub-package:
> CREDITS, FOCUS, LICENSE, NEWS, README, TODO, VERSION, WHATSNEW
Done
> 6) Doc sub-package must go in Documentation group
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Documentation
Done
> 7) If you define macros %channel, use it in
> Requires: php-channel(htmlpurifier)
> Provides: php-pear(htmlpurifier/htmlpurifier) = %{version}
> too.
> In last also %pear_name should be.
Done
> 8) For what you define %php_libname and %pear_name with same content? Is
> %pear_name is fully enough?
%pear_name was used only once, so I adopted php_libname for that.
> 9) Requires: iconv is redundant. There no package with this name in Fedora,
> and binary provided by glibc:
> $ rpm -qf `which iconv`
> glibc-common-2.14-5.i686
fixed.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 542045] Review Request: php-htmlpurifier - standards-compliant HTML filter library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542045
--- Comment #23 from David Nalley 2011-09-14 21:47:24 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #22)
> it seems like you changed the name from php-htmlpurifier to
> php-htmlpurifier-htmlpurifier in 2011-03, which doesn't make sense afaict. the
> first name was correct, it seems like.
From: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:PHP#Naming_scheme
Packages from another channel should be named
php-ChannelAlias-PackageName-%{version}-%{release}.noarch.rpm.
This comes from the htmlpurifier channel (the channel stuff was packaged
separately as seen above)- hence php-htmlpurifier-htmlpurifier
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 676187] Review Request: csync2 - Cluster sync tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676187 Angus Salkeld changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #18 from Angus Salkeld 2011-09-14 19:19:32 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: libqb New Branches: f15 f16 Owners: asalkeld I know f15 is in https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/csync2 but it is not in git for some reason. Thanks Angus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 433228] Review Request: distcc - Distributed C/C++ compilation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433228 Andy Grover changed: What|Removed |Added CC||agro...@redhat.com --- Comment #27 from Andy Grover 2011-09-14 19:07:26 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: distcc New Branches: el5 el6 Owners: limb Hi, I'd like to see this added to EPEL please? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 472639] Review Request: Scilab - Numerical Analysis toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472639 Alex G. changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mr.nuke...@gmail.com --- Comment #51 from Alex G. 2011-09-14 19:05:03 EDT --- Just configure it with "--disable-build-help" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 736586] Review Request: ghc-vector - Efficient Arrays for Haskell
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736586 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2011-09-14 18:34:08 EDT --- ghc-vector-0.7.1-1.fc14, ghc-primitive-0.3.1-2.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 733179] Review Request: filebench - A model based file system workload generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=733179 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|filebench-1.4.9-5.fc14 |filebench-1.4.9-5.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 723123] Review Request: telepathy-qt4 - A high-level bindings for Telepathy
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=723123 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|telepathy-qt4-0.7.2-1.fc16 |telepathy-qt4-0.7.2-1.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 723123] Review Request: telepathy-qt4 - A high-level bindings for Telepathy
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=723123 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2011-09-14 18:35:32 EDT --- telepathy-qt4-0.7.2-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 733053] Review Request: perl-Unicode-CheckUTF8 - Checks if scalar is valid UTF-8
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=733053 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2011-09-14 18:36:21 EDT --- perl-Unicode-CheckUTF8-1.03-2.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 666409] Review Request: t4k_common - Library for Tux4Kids applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666409 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2011-09-14 18:39:54 EDT --- t4k_common-0.1.1-2.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728329] Review Request: perl-Test-Version - Check to see that versions in modules are sane
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728329 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2011-09-14 18:39:44 EDT --- perl-Test-Version-1.0.0-3.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 733053] Review Request: perl-Unicode-CheckUTF8 - Checks if scalar is valid UTF-8
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=733053 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2011-09-14 18:40:18 EDT --- perl-Unicode-CheckUTF8-1.03-2.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 733179] Review Request: filebench - A model based file system workload generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=733179 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System 2011-09-14 18:35:49 EDT --- filebench-1.4.9-5.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 708711] Review Request: nomnom - The graphical video download tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708711 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||nomnom-0.1.4-4.fc15 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-09-14 18:33:19 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 736582] Review Request: ghc-primitive - Wrappers for primitive operations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736582 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2011-09-14 18:34:03 EDT --- ghc-vector-0.7.1-1.fc14, ghc-primitive-0.3.1-2.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728329] Review Request: perl-Test-Version - Check to see that versions in modules are sane
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728329 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2011-09-14 18:31:58 EDT --- perl-Test-Version-1.0.0-3.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 708711] Review Request: nomnom - The graphical video download tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708711 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2011-09-14 18:33:13 EDT --- nomnom-0.1.4-4.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 733179] Review Request: filebench - A model based file system workload generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=733179 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||filebench-1.4.9-5.fc14 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-09-14 18:32:55 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 691894] Review Request: pyrit - A GPGPU-driven WPA/WPA2-PSK key cracker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691894 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||pyrit-0.4.0-4.fc15 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-09-14 18:32:41 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 733179] Review Request: filebench - A model based file system workload generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=733179 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2011-09-14 18:32:50 EDT --- filebench-1.4.9-5.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 691894] Review Request: pyrit - A GPGPU-driven WPA/WPA2-PSK key cracker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691894 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2011-09-14 18:32:33 EDT --- pyrit-0.4.0-4.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 708765] Review Request: frogr - Flickr Remote Organizer for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765 --- Comment #88 from Fedora Update System 2011-09-14 18:24:57 EDT --- frogr-0.6.1-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 708765] Review Request: frogr - Flickr Remote Organizer for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||frogr-0.6.1-1.fc15 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-09-14 18:25:08 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 738465] Review Request: rubygem-barista - A package for the barista gem
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738465 --- Comment #1 from Fotios Lindiakos 2011-09-14 17:49:19 EDT --- Apologies, but I renamed my Github repo, so these are the new links: Spec URL: https://raw.github.com/fotioslindiakos/rubygem-all/master/SPECS/rubygem-barista.spec SRPM URL: https://raw.github.com/fotioslindiakos/rubygem-all/raw/master/SRPMS/rubygem-barista-1.2.1-1.fc15.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 738465] Review Request: rubygem-barista - A package for the barista gem
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738465 Fotios Lindiakos changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 738465] New: Review Request: rubygem-barista - A package for the barista gem
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-barista - A package for the barista gem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738465 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-barista - A package for the barista gem Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fot...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: https://github.com/fotioslindiakos/rubygem-barista/raw/master/SPECS/rubygem-barista.spec SRPM URL: https://github.com/fotioslindiakos/rubygem-barista/raw/master/SRPMS/rubygem-barista-1.2.1-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: This gem allows for automated building of Coffeescripts in a rack environment. More information is available here: https://github.com/Sutto/barista. I used gem2rpm and then filled out missing license, contact, and files information. This is my first package, please be gentle. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737379] Review Request: drupal7-views - Provides a method for Drupal designers to control content presentation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737379 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla 2011-09-14 15:49:57 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 735129] Review Request: marble - Virtual globe and world atlas
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735129 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla 2011-09-14 15:49:33 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). Unretired devel as well, please take ownership. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730559] Review Request: drupal7-date - Date content type and APIs for Drupal 7
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730559 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla 2011-09-14 15:47:28 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730560] Review Request: drupal7-ctools - CTools module for Drupal 7
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730560 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla 2011-09-14 15:47:50 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737694] Review Request: drupal7-backup_migrate - Backup and migrate Drupal 7 data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737694
Paul W. Frields changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Paul W. Frields 2011-09-14 15:48:33
EDT ---
[ O K ] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted
in the review.
$ rpmlint rpmbuild/SPECS/drupal7-backup_migrate.spec
rpmbuild/SRPMS/drupal7-backup_migrate-2.2-2.fc15.src.rpm
rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/drupal7-backup_migrate-2.2-2.fc15.noarch.rpm
drupal7-backup_migrate.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gzip ->
zip, grip, g zip
drupal7-backup_migrate.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US bzip ->
zip, blip, b zip
drupal7-backup_migrate.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gzip ->
zip, grip, g zip
drupal7-backup_migrate.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US bzip ->
zip, blip, b zip
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.
These warnings may all be safely ignored.
[ O K ] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming
Guidelines.
[ O K ] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the
format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption.
[ O K ] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
[ O K ] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and
meet the Licensing Guidelines.
[ O K ] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
[ O K ] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.
[ O K ] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[ O K ] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[ O K ] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream
source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task.
If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL
Guidelines for how to deal with this.
$ md5sum
rpmbuild/SOURCES/drupal7-backup_migrate-2.2/backup_migrate-7.x-2.2.tar.gz ;
curl -s -o - http://ftp.drupal.org/files/projects/backup_migrate-7.x-2.2.tar.gz
| md5sum -
98ff6ed0c1a596b300d05f412a1819cb
rpmbuild/SOURCES/drupal7-backup_migrate-2.2/backup_migrate-7.x-2.2.tar.gz
98ff6ed0c1a596b300d05f412a1819cb -
[ O K ] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms
on at least one primary architecture.
[ N/A ] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in
bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on
that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the
corresponding ExcludeArch line.
[ O K ] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except
for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ;
inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense.
[ O K ] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using
the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.
[ N/A ] MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared
library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths,
must call ldconfig in %post and %postun.
[ O K ] MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
[ N/A ] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must
state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for
relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is
considered a blocker.
[ O K ] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does
not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which
does create that directory.
[ O K ] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec
file's %files listings. (Notable exception: license texts in specific
situations)
[ O K ] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be
set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include
a %defattr(...) line.
[ O K ] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros.
[ O K ] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
[ N/A ] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The
definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not
restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity).
[ O K ] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must
[Bug 737858] Review Request: eclipse-wtp-sourceediting - WTP Source Editing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737858 --- Comment #2 from Alexander Kurtakov 2011-09-14 15:38:30 EDT --- Seems to not be building. generateScript: [eclipse.buildScript] Some inter-plug-in dependencies have not been satisfied. [eclipse.buildScript] Bundle org.eclipse.wst.xsl.debug.ui: [eclipse.buildScript] Missing required plug-in org.eclipse.wst.sse.ui_[1.1.0,2.0.0). [eclipse.buildScript] Missing required plug-in org.eclipse.wst.xsl.launching_[1.0.0,2.0.0). [eclipse.buildScript] Missing required plug-in org.eclipse.wst.xsl.core_[1.0.0,2.0.0). [eclipse.buildScript] Missing required plug-in org.eclipse.wst.xml.ui_[1.0.0,2.0.0). [eclipse.buildScript] Bundle org.eclipse.wst.jsdt.web.core: [eclipse.buildScript] Missing required plug-in org.eclipse.wst.sse.core_[1.1.504,1.2.0). [eclipse.buildScript] Missing required plug-in org.eclipse.wst.xml.core_[1.1.500,1.2.0). [eclipse.buildScript] Missing required plug-in org.eclipse.wst.html.core_[1.1.400,1.2.0). [eclipse.buildScript] Missing required plug-in org.eclipse.wst.validation_[1.2.100,2.0.0). [eclipse.buildScript] Optional plug-in org.eclipse.wst.common.project.facet.core_[1.4.0,2.0.0) is not available. [eclipse.buildScript] Optional plug-in org.eclipse.wst.common.modulecore_[1.1.0,2.0.0) is not available. [eclipse.buildScript] Bundle org.eclipse.wst.xml.xpath.core: [eclipse.buildScript] Missing required plug-in org.apache.xalan_[2.7.1,2.8.0). [eclipse.buildScript] Missing required plug-in org.eclipse.wst.xml.xpath2.processor_[2.0.0,3.0.0). [eclipse.buildScript] Missing required plug-in org.eclipse.wst.xml.core_1.1.0. [eclipse.buildScript] Missing required plug-in org.eclipse.wst.xml.core_[1.1.0,2.0.0). [eclipse.buildScript] Missing required plug-in org.eclipse.wst.xsd.core_[1.1.50,2.0.0). [eclipse.buildScript] Missing required plug-in org.eclipse.wst.sse.core_[1.1.0,2.0.0). [eclipse.buildScript] Missing required plug-in org.eclipse.wst.xml.xpath2.processor_[2.0.0,3.0.0). [eclipse.buildScript] Bundle org.eclipse.wst.xsl.launching: [eclipse.buildScript] Missing required plug-in org.eclipse.wst.xsl.core_[1.0.0,2.0.0). [eclipse.buildScript] Bundle org.eclipse.wst.xsl.ui: [eclipse.buildScript] Missing required plug-in org.eclipse.wst.xml.core_[1.1.300,2.0.0). [eclipse.buildScript] Missing required plug-in org.eclipse.wst.sse.ui_[1.1.0,2.0.0). [eclipse.buildScript] Missing required plug-in org.apache.xalan_[2.7.1,2.8.0). [eclipse.buildScript] Missing required plug-in org.eclipse.wst.xml.ui_[1.0.400,2.0.0). [eclipse.buildScript] Missing required plug-in org.eclipse.wst.sse.core_[1.1.0,2.0.0). [eclipse.buildScript] Missing required plug-in org.eclipse.wst.xsl.core_1.0.0. [eclipse.buildScript] Missing required plug-in org.eclipse.wst.validation_[1.1.103,2.0.0). [eclipse.buildScript] Missing required plug-in org.eclipse.wst.xml.xpath.ui_[1.0.0,2.0.0). [eclipse.buildScript] Missing required plug-in org.eclipse.wst.xml.xpath.core_[1.0.0,2.0.0). [eclipse.buildScript] Bundle org.eclipse.wst.server.core: [eclipse.buildScript] Optional plug-in org.eclipse.wst.common.project.facet.core_[1.1.0,2.0.0) is not available. [eclipse.buildScript] Missing required plug-in org.eclipse.wst.common.core_1.2.0. [eclipse.buildScript] Bundle org.eclipse.wst.jsdt.web.support.jsp: [eclipse.buildScript] Missing required plug-in org.eclipse.wst.jsdt.web.ui_[1.0.200,2.0.0). [eclipse.buildScript] Missing required plug-in org.eclipse.jst.jsp.ui_[1.1.500,1.2.0). [eclipse.buildScript] Missing required plug-in org.eclipse.wst.sse.ui_[1.3.0,1.4.0). [eclipse.buildScript] Missing required plug-in org.eclipse.wst.html.ui_[1.0.500,1.1.0). [eclipse.buildScript] Missing required plug-in org.eclipse.wst.html.core_[1.1.400,1.2.0). [eclipse.buildScript] Missing required plug-in org.eclipse.jst.jsp.core_[1.2.300,1.3.0). [eclipse.buildScript] Missing required plug-in org.eclipse.wst.css.core_[1.1.400,1.2.0). [eclipse.buildScript] Missing required plug-in org.eclipse.wst.xml.core_[1.1.500,1.2.0). [eclipse.buildScript] Missing required plug-in org.eclipse.wst.sse.core_[1.1.500,1.2.0). [eclipse.buildScript] Missing required plug-in org.eclipse.wst.jsdt.web.core_[1.0.300,2.0.0). [eclipse.buildScript] Bundle org.eclipse.wst.jsdt.web.ui: [eclipse.buildScript] Missing required plug-in org.eclipse.wst.sse.ui_[1.3.0,1.4.0). [eclipse.buildScript] Missing required plug-in org.eclipse.wst.xml.ui_[1.1.100,1.2.0). [eclipse.buildScript] Missing required plug-in org.eclipse.wst.jsdt.web.core_[1.0.300,2.0.0). [eclipse.buildScript] Missing required plug-in org.eclipse.wst.css.core_[1.1.400,1.2.0). [eclipse.buildScript] Missing required plug-in org.eclipse.wst.xml.core_[1.1.500,1.2.0). [eclipse.buildScript] Missing required plug-in org.eclipse.wst.sse.core_[1.1.500,1.2.0). [eclipse.buildScript] Missing required plug-in org.eclipse.wst.common.uriresolver_[1
[Bug 730970] Review Request: jhdf5 - Java HDF5 Object Package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730970 Clément DAVID changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730560] Review Request: drupal7-ctools - CTools module for Drupal 7
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730560 Jared Smith changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Jared Smith 2011-09-14 15:27:00 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: drupal7-ctools Short Description: CTools module for Drupal 7 Owners: jsmith Branches: f15 f16 el5 el6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730325] Review Request: telepathy-kde-approver - KDE Channel Approver for Telepathy
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730325 --- Comment #2 from Rex Dieter 2011-09-14 15:28:17 EDT --- Spec URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/telepathy-kde/telepathy-kde-approver.spec SRPM URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/telepathy-kde/telepathy-kde-approver-0.1.0-2.fc15.src.rpm %changelog * Wed Sep 14 2011 Rex Dieter 0.1.0-2 - License: LGPLv2+ - fix Source0 URL - fix tabs/spaces -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737379] Review Request: drupal7-views - Provides a method for Drupal designers to control content presentation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737379 Jared Smith changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Jared Smith 2011-09-14 15:28:09 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: drupal7-views Short Description: Views module for Drupal 7 Owners: jsmith Branches: f15 f16 el5 el6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730324] Review Request: telepathy-kde-accounts-kcm-plugins - Plugins for protocol-specific UI's in the Telepathy Accounts KCM
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730324 --- Comment #2 from Rex Dieter 2011-09-14 15:25:49 EDT --- Spec URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/telepathy-kde/telepathy-kde-accounts-kcm-plugins.spec SRPM URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/telepathy-kde/telepathy-kde-accounts-kcm-plugins-0.1.0-2.fc15.src.rpm %changelog * Wed Sep 14 2011 Rex Dieter 0.1.0-2 - %doc COPYING README - fix Source URL - fix mixed spaces/tabs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730559] Review Request: drupal7-date - Date content type and APIs for Drupal 7
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730559 Jared Smith changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Jared Smith 2011-09-14 15:23:25 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: drupal7-date Short Description: Date content type and APIs for Drupal 7 Owners: jsmith Branches: f15 f16 el5 el6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730323] Review Request: telepathy-kde-accounts-kcm - KDE Configuration Module for Telepathy Instant Messaging Accounts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730323 --- Comment #2 from Rex Dieter 2011-09-14 15:22:13 EDT --- Spec URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/telepathy-kde/telepathy-kde-accounts-kcm.spec SRPM URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/telepathy-kde/telepathy-kde-accounts-kcm-0.1.0-2.fc15.src.rpm %changelog * Wed Sep 14 2011 Rex Dieter 0.1.0-2 - fix Source URL - fix mixed spaces/tabs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730970] Review Request: jhdf5 - Java HDF5 Object Package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730970 Clément DAVID changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|sylvestre.le...@scilab.org |nob...@fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #6 from Clément DAVID 2011-09-14 15:17:43 EDT --- step back from the review Everything seems fine for me (scilab build and run successfully). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 735129] Review Request: marble - Virtual globe and world atlas
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735129 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Rex Dieter 2011-09-14 15:16:02 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: marble New Branches: f16 Owners: than rdieter kkofler ltinkl jreznik rnovacek InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 735128] Review Request: libkdeedu - Libraries used by KDE Education applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735128 --- Comment #3 from Rex Dieter 2011-09-14 15:10:57 EDT --- Spec URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/kdeedu/libkdeedu.spec SRPM URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/kdeedu/libkdeedu-4.7.0-11.fc15.src.rpm %changelog * Wed Sep 14 2011 Rex Dieter 4.7.0-11 - -static subpkg for libqtmmlwidget -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 735128] Review Request: libkdeedu - Libraries used by KDE Education applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735128 --- Comment #2 from Rex Dieter 2011-09-14 14:56:58 EDT --- Re: kdeedu-libs the kdeedu noarch metapackage in kde47 includes: Obsoletes: kdeedu-libs < 4.7.0-10 Re: libqtmmlwidget.a we can either make it standalone, or simply add Provides: libkddeedu-static then any pkg that uses it will need to change to BuildRequires: libkdeedu-static accordingly too Any help to identify libqtmmlwidget.a using apps would be appreciated, I suppose splitting it out *would* help identify those... ie, what ftbfs after the split -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737379] Review Request: drupal7-views - Provides a method for Drupal designers to control content presentation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737379 Jared Smith changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730559] Review Request: drupal7-date - Date content type and APIs for Drupal 7
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730559 Jared Smith changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737379] Review Request: drupal7-views - Provides a method for Drupal designers to control content presentation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737379
Peter Borsa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Peter Borsa 2011-09-14 14:28:31 EDT
---
[ O K ] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted
in the review.
[ O K ] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming
Guidelines.
[ O K ] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the
format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption.
[ O K ] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
[ O K ] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and
meet the Licensing Guidelines.
[ O K ] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
[ O K ] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.
[ O K ] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[ O K ] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[ O K ] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream
source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task.
If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL
Guidelines for how to deal with this.
$ md5sum ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES/views-7.x-3.0-rc1.tar.gz ; curl -s -o -
http://ftp.drupal.org/files/projects/views-7.x-3.0-rc1.tar.gz | md5sum -
e158db78ae2f8cc615edb910a09384b0
/home/asrob/rpmbuild/SOURCES/views-7.x-3.0-rc1.tar.gz
e158db78ae2f8cc615edb910a09384b0 -
[ O K ] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms
on at least one primary architecture.
[ O K ] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in
bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on
that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the
corresponding ExcludeArch line.
[ O K ] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except
for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ;
inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense.
[ O K ] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using
the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.
[ O K ] MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared
library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths,
must call ldconfig in %post and %postun.
[ O K ] MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
[ O K ] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must
state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for
relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is
considered a blocker.
[ O K ] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does
not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which
does create that directory.
[ O K ] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec
file's %files listings. (Notable exception: license texts in specific
situations)
[ O K ] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be
set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include
a %defattr(...) line.
[ O K ] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros.
[ O K ] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
[ N/A ] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The
definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not
restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity).
[ O K ] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the
runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must
run properly if it is not present.
[ N/A ] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package.
[ N/A ] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package.
[ O K ] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g.
libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in
a -devel package.
[ N/A ] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the
base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} =
%{version}-%{release}
[ O K ] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be
removed in the spec if they are built.
[ O K ] MUS
[Bug 738057] Review Request: semantik - mind mapping tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738057 --- Comment #1 from Rex Dieter 2011-09-14 13:16:42 EDT --- *** Bug 731535 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 710203] Review Request: gambas3 - IDE based on a basic interpreter with object extensions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710203 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2011-09-14 12:56:48 EDT --- gambas3-2.99.3-2.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 666409] Review Request: t4k_common - Library for Tux4Kids applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666409 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 666409] Review Request: t4k_common - Library for Tux4Kids applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666409 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2011-09-14 12:51:23 EDT --- t4k_common-0.1.1-2.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/t4k_common-0.1.1-2.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 666409] Review Request: t4k_common - Library for Tux4Kids applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666409 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2011-09-14 12:51:15 EDT --- t4k_common-0.1.1-2.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/t4k_common-0.1.1-2.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 666409] Review Request: t4k_common - Library for Tux4Kids applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666409 --- Comment #15 from Jon Ciesla 2011-09-14 12:28:12 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 666409] Review Request: t4k_common - Library for Tux4Kids applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666409 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from Jon Ciesla 2011-09-14 12:23:17 EDT --- Excellent, will do, thanks! New Package SCM Request === Package Name: t4k_common Short Description: Library for Tux4Kids applications Owners: limb Branches: f16 f15 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 666409] Review Request: t4k_common - Library for Tux4Kids applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666409
Martin Gieseking changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #13 from Martin Gieseking 2011-09-14
12:16:16 EDT ---
OK, great. The package is ready now. Please add %{?_isa} to Requires: %{name} =
%{version}-%{release} as requested by the recent version of the guidelines [1]
before you check-in the package.
[1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#Requiring_Base_Package
Package APPROVED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 736069] Review Request: apache-parent
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736069 Stanislav Ochotnicky changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|652183(FE-JAVASIG) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 710203] Review Request: gambas3 - IDE based on a basic interpreter with object extensions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710203 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2011-09-14 11:36:04 EDT --- gambas3-2.99.3-2.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gambas3-2.99.3-2.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 710203] Review Request: gambas3 - IDE based on a basic interpreter with object extensions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710203 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2011-09-14 11:36:13 EDT --- gambas3-2.99.3-2.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gambas3-2.99.3-2.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 710203] Review Request: gambas3 - IDE based on a basic interpreter with object extensions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710203 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 710203] Review Request: gambas3 - IDE based on a basic interpreter with object extensions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710203 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2011-09-14 11:35:55 EDT --- gambas3-2.99.3-2.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gambas3-2.99.3-2.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 666409] Review Request: t4k_common - Library for Tux4Kids applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666409 --- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla 2011-09-14 11:29:49 EDT --- FPC exception granted, updated accordingly. SPEC: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/t4k_common/t4k_common.spec SRPM: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/t4k_common/t4k_common-0.1.1-1.fc15.src.rpm Thanks for your patience. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737379] Review Request: drupal7-views - Provides a method for Drupal designers to control content presentation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737379 Peter Borsa changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|peter.bo...@gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737379] Review Request: drupal7-views - Provides a method for Drupal designers to control content presentation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737379 Peter Borsa changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||peter.bo...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Peter Borsa 2011-09-14 10:17:28 EDT --- I'll review this today. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 738307] New: Review Request: maven-archetype - Maven project templating toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: maven-archetype - Maven project templating toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738307 Summary: Review Request: maven-archetype - Maven project templating toolkit Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: socho...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://sochotni.fedorapeople.org/packages/maven-archetype.spec SRPM URL: http://sochotni.fedorapeople.org/packages/maven-archetype-2.1-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: Archetype is a Maven project templating toolkit. An archetype is defined as an original pattern or model from which all other things of the same kind are made. The names fits as we are trying to provide a system that provides a consistent means of generating Maven projects. Archetype will help authors create Maven project templates for users, and provides users with the means to generate parameterized versions of those project templates. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 736051] Review Request: rubygem-archivist - A rails 3 model archiving system based on acts_as_archive
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736051 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2011-09-14 09:03:49 EDT --- rubygem-archivist-1.0.5.1-2.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-archivist-1.0.5.1-2.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 736051] Review Request: rubygem-archivist - A rails 3 model archiving system based on acts_as_archive
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736051 Marek Mahut changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2011-09-14 08:49:25 --- Comment #9 from Marek Mahut 2011-09-14 08:49:25 EDT --- Thank you, building it now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 738263] Review Request: felix-bundlerepository - Bundle repository service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738263 Jaromír Cápík changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||652183(FE-JAVASIG) Depends on||738034 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 738034] Review Request: woodstox-core-asl - High-performance XML processor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738034 Jaromír Cápík changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||738263 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 736051] Review Request: rubygem-archivist - A rails 3 model archiving system based on acts_as_archive
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736051 --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla 2011-09-14 08:38:58 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 738263] New: Review Request: felix-bundlerepository - Bundle repository service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: felix-bundlerepository - Bundle repository service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738263 Summary: Review Request: felix-bundlerepository - Bundle repository service Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jca...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://jcapik.fedorapeople.org/files/felix-bundlerepository/felix-bundlerepository.spec SRPM URL: http://jcapik.fedorapeople.org/files/felix-bundlerepository/felix-bundlerepository-1.6.6-1.fc17.src.rpm Description: Bundle repository service -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 736051] Review Request: rubygem-archivist - A rails 3 model archiving system based on acts_as_archive
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736051 Marek Mahut changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Marek Mahut 2011-09-14 08:32:58 EDT --- I don't think you can set up you as the owner, we can change the ownership after you get sponsored. New Package SCM Request === Package Name: rubygem-archivist Short Description: A rails 3 model archiving system based on acts_as_archive Owners: mmahut Branches: f15 f16 InitialCC: mzatko -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 736051] Review Request: rubygem-archivist - A rails 3 model archiving system based on acts_as_archive
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736051 --- Comment #6 from Maros Zatko 2011-09-14 07:52:27 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: rubygem-archivist Short Description: A rails 3 model archiving system based on acts_as_archive Owners: mzatko Branches: f15 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 736051] Review Request: rubygem-archivist - A rails 3 model archiving system based on acts_as_archive
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736051 Marek Mahut changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||mma...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mma...@redhat.com --- Comment #5 from Marek Mahut 2011-09-14 07:29:46 EDT --- Taking for sponsorship. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737580] Review Request: jena-iri - The Jena IRI library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737580 --- Comment #1 from Tomas Radej 2011-09-14 06:55:53 EDT --- Fixed source and assembly, please get the following version: Spec URL: http://tradej.fedorapeople.org/jena-iri.spec.2 SRPM URL: http://tradej.fedorapeople.org/jena-iri-0.8-2.fc15.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 736051] Review Request: rubygem-archivist - A rails 3 model archiving system based on acts_as_archive
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736051 Michal Fojtik changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Michal Fojtik 2011-09-14 07:22:53 EDT --- Looks safe. Suggestion: Move %doc to -doc subpackage :) REVIEW+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 697326] Review Request: libisoburn - Library to enable creation and expansion of ISO-9660 filesystems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697326 --- Comment #8 from Michael Schwendt 2011-09-14 06:34:23 EDT --- > There is no need to explicitly depend on a specific version at run-time, > because upstream cares about ABI compatibility and bumps soname if needed. Also for added symbols? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 454125] Review Request: gtest - Google C++ testing framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454125 --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla 2011-09-14 06:04:02 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 736717] Review Request: lcmaps - Grid (X.509) and VOMS credentials to local account mapping
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736717 --- Comment #3 from Dennis van Dok 2011-09-14 05:31:47 EDT --- For the purpose of sponsoring, here's a link to a review I've done: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697326#c5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 697326] Review Request: libisoburn - Library to enable creation and expansion of ISO-9660 filesystems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697326 --- Comment #7 from Robert Scheck 2011-09-14 05:28:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Although the subpackage xorisso implicitly depends on libisoburn, it doesn't > require the exact base package it was built with. This may not be a problem. > It doesn't include the copyright and license, and strictly speaking this is > covered by the base package, but as it is not named after the base package it > might be better to include these files separately in this package. I can include the copyright/license file(s) into the xorisso subpackage. > After installing libisoburn on a CentOS 5 box, rpmlint reports the following: > > libisoburn.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency > /usr/lib64/libisoburn.so.1.69.0 /usr/lib64/libz.so.1 > libisoburn.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency > /usr/lib64/libisoburn.so.1.69.0 /lib64/libacl.so.1 > > This suggests that upstream should review the dependencies and maybe drop the > -lz and -lacl. I will review this. > Final comment: there seems to be another newer upstream release, 1.1.4. Yes, libisoburn releases quite often. As all of the updates were just minor so far, I'm tempted to wait if somebody is doing a qualified review before I am it updating once more. (In reply to comment #6) > Unfortunately, it leads to problems regularly. Either when users install > something without running a full update first. Or when they explicitly apply > > an update (such as "yum update xorisso") without letting the package > installation tool apply *all* available updates. Sometimes the users do that > only because broken dependencies make it impossible (or very difficult) to > apply all updates. There is no need to explicitly depend on a specific version at run-time, because upstream cares about ABI compatibility and bumps soname if needed. > A dependency on /usr/bin/pkg-config is is automatic at least since several > releases of Fedora. Yes, but not at EPEL - and this package also will go into EPEL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 738162] New: Review request: rubygem-oauth-active-resource - An OAuth enabled ActiveResource wrapper
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review request: rubygem-oauth-active-resource - An OAuth enabled ActiveResource wrapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738162 Summary: Review request: rubygem-oauth-active-resource - An OAuth enabled ActiveResource wrapper Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bkab...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Depends on: 713508 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- SPEC: http://bkabrda.fedorapeople.org/oauth-active-resource/rubygem-oauth-active-resource.spec SRPM: http://bkabrda.fedorapeople.org/oauth-active-resource/rubygem-oauth-active-resource-0.4.7-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: An OAuth enabled ActiveResource wrapper. Note: To build you currently need rubygem-oauth from https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=713508. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 713508] Review Request: rubygem-oauth - OAuth Core Ruby implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=713508 Bohuslav Kabrda changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||738162 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 697326] Review Request: libisoburn - Library to enable creation and expansion of ISO-9660 filesystems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697326 --- Comment #6 from Michael Schwendt 2011-09-14 03:54:00 EDT --- > BuildRequires lists build dependencies: OK The one missing thing it searches for is "libjte". That is the library from the project "JTE - Jigdo Template Export". http://www.einval.com/~steve/software/JTE/ It is not in Fedora yet, and it is okay if this is missing. > Although the subpackage xorisso implicitly depends on libisoburn, > it doesn't require the exact base package it was built with. This > may not be a problem. Unfortunately, it leads to problems regularly. Either when users install something without running a full update first. Or when they explicitly apply an update (such as "yum update xorisso") without letting the package installation tool apply *all* available updates. Sometimes the users do that only because broken dependencies make it impossible (or very difficult) to apply all updates. Since xorisso is a subpackage of libisoburn, this is (sort of) covered by: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Requiring_Base_Package > %package devel > ... > Requires: pkgconfig A dependency on /usr/bin/pkg-config is is automatic at least since several releases of Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737511] Review request: rubygem-haml-rails - Haml generators for Rails 3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737511 --- Comment #6 from Bohuslav Kabrda 2011-09-14 03:36:57 EDT --- Additional info: - controller generator can be used to generate a controller without actionmailer and activerecord - scaffold generator can be used with other ORM (tested with datamapper) - mailer generator always generates a subclass of ActionMailer::Base, so it seems that for its proper usage, ActionMailer is required Summary: I would recommend adding Requires: rubygem(actionmailer) even though haml-rails can work with controllers and scaffolds even without it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 454125] Review Request: gtest - Google C++ testing framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454125 --- Comment #8 from Terje Røsten 2011-09-14 03:34:10 EDT --- Thanks for maintaining gtest in epel, Akira. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 738153] New: Review Request: ipset - Manage Linux IP sets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ipset - Manage Linux IP sets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738153 Summary: Review Request: ipset - Manage Linux IP sets Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: boche...@fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://bochecha.fedorapeople.org/packages/ipset.spec SRPM URL: http://bochecha.fedorapeople.org/packages/ipset-6.9.1-1.fc16.src.rpm Description: IP sets are a framework inside the Linux 2.4.x and 2.6.x kernel, which can be administered by the ipset utility. Depending on the type, currently an IP set may store IP addresses, (TCP/UDP) port numbers or IP addresses with MAC addresses in a way, which ensures lightning speed when matching an entry against a set. If you want to: - store multiple IP addresses or port numbers and match against the collection by iptables at one swoop; - dynamically update iptables rules against IP addresses or ports without performance penalty; - express complex IP address and ports based rulesets with one single iptables rule and benefit from the speed of IP sets then ipset may be the proper tool for you. $ rpmlint ipset* ipset.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US iptables -> potables, portables, inflatables ipset.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US rulesets -> rule sets, rule-sets, rules ipset.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US iptables -> potables, portables, inflatables ipset.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US rulesets -> rule sets, rule-sets, rules 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
