[Bug 738525] Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-H2PM - Automatically generate perl modules to wrap C header files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738525 --- Comment #4 from Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org 2011-09-19 03:02:33 EDT --- Spec URL: http://bochecha.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-ExtUtils-H2PM.spec SRPM URL: http://bochecha.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-ExtUtils-H2PM-0.08-2.fc16.src.rpm (In reply to comment #3) For this particular package, should I remove it completely or replace it by $RPM_OPT_FLAGS? This won't have any sense for a noarch package. Simply drop this option. Done. Is that a bug in cpanspec? It seems, and should probably be reported.. Done: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739461 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 738554] Review Request: perl-Test-HexString - Test binary strings with hex dump diagnostics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738554 Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org 2011-09-19 03:14:07 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: perl-Test-HexString Short Description: Test binary strings with hex dump diagnostics Owners: bochecha Branches: f16 el6 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 693198] Review Request: php-channel-bartlett - Adds bartlett channel to PEAR
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693198 Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com 2011-09-19 03:17:35 EDT --- Thanks for the review New Package SCM Request === Package Name: php-channel-bartlett Short Description: Adds bartlett channel to PEAR Owners: remi Branches: f15 f16 el6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737308] Review Request: gdlmm - C++ bindings for the gdl library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737308 Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com 2011-09-19 03:36:47 EDT --- Thanks for the review, Dodji! (In reply to comment #1) The only warning I'd care about are the unused-direct-shlib-dependency one. I believe this is because the gdlmm upstream tarball lacks -Wl,-as-needed linker option. This is not an error. It'll merely cause a slower-to-load library. My recommendation would be to report this upstream, but I wouldn't block this package because of that. I'm not really sure this is something that each individual GNOME module should have to handle. Perhaps the flag should come from distro-wide LDFLAGS instead. I know Mandriva has been doing this for a while: http://wiki.mandriva.com/en/Overlinking#--as-needed Some Fedora packages have amazing hacks to get -Wl,-as-needed passed to the linker, for example gtk3 is doing this by patching the libtool script with sed: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=gtk3.git;a=blob;f=gtk3.spec;h=835a21a64ce1bf2d59baeaf5e1e58ada4f50a20d;hb=HEAD#l130 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737308] Review Request: gdlmm - C++ bindings for the gdl library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737308 Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com 2011-09-19 03:39:53 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: gdlmm Short Description: C++ bindings for the gdl library Owners: kalev dodji Branches: f16 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 738589] Review Request: perl-Socket-Netlink - Interface to Linux's PF_NETLINK socket family
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738589 --- Comment #4 from Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org 2011-09-19 03:41:29 EDT --- Spec URL: http://bochecha.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Socket-Netlink.spec SRPM URL: http://bochecha.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Socket-Netlink-0.03-3.fc16.src.rpm (In reply to comment #3) MUST: - file /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/auto is not owned by any package (should probably be owned by perl-libs itself...) This file is already owned by perl-libs in Fedora 16 (as well as by a few Perl modules :-/), so there isn't anything I need to do here, is there? - issue with %optimize not defined (%optflags ?) Fixed, replaced by optflags. Note: I also opened a bug against cpanspec about this issue: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739461 Should: - for incorrect-fsf-address, please, add bug link in your spec Done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 693200] Review Request: php-bartlett-PHP-Reflect - Adds the ability to reverse-engineer PHP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693200 --- Comment #8 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com 2011-09-19 03:51:13 EDT --- Most of package install stuff directly in /usr/share/pear This channel is the only one to use a cannel sub-directory, but, as this name could change in the future (have already, from PHPCI, in previous version, to Bartlett in latest), I think it is ok to have this dir. owned by the first package to install something in it. There is no exception (like for perl) to Guidelines for PHP. (and I think perl exception have no more sense since path no more include version) Guidelines: First package must own the dir Others packages (which depends on a package which own the dir) must not own it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 738931] Review Request: perl-Socket-Netlink-Route - Interface to Linux's NETLINK_ROUTE netlink socket protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738931 --- Comment #4 from Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org 2011-09-19 03:57:28 EDT --- Spec URL: http://bochecha.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Socket-Netlink-Route.spec SRPM URL: http://bochecha.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Socket-Netlink-Route-0.03-3.fc16.src.rpm (In reply to comment #3) Should: - for incorrect-fsf-address, please, add bug link in your spec Done. - make %file more exclicite (I personally hate to wide joker) Fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 693200] Review Request: php-bartlett-PHP-Reflect - Adds the ability to reverse-engineer PHP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693200 --- Comment #9 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com 2011-09-19 04:13:12 EDT --- For JS: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Duplication_of_system_libraries = At this time JavaScript intended to be served to a web browser is specifically exempted from this but this will likely change in the future. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 725768] Review Request: rubygem-yui-compressor - JavaScript and CSS minification library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725768 Bohuslav Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||739478 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 739478] New: Review request: rubygem-jammit - Industrial Strength Asset Packaging for Rails
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review request: rubygem-jammit - Industrial Strength Asset Packaging for Rails https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739478 Summary: Review request: rubygem-jammit - Industrial Strength Asset Packaging for Rails Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bkab...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- SPEC: http://bkabrda.fedorapeople.org/jammit/rubygem-jammit.spec SRPM: http://bkabrda.fedorapeople.org/jammit/rubygem-jammit-0.6.3-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: Jammit is an industrial strength asset packaging library for Rails, providing both the CSS and JavaScript concatenation and compression that you'd expect, as well as YUI Compressor and Closure Compiler compatibility, ahead-of-time gzipping, built-in JavaScript template support, and optional Data-URI / MHTML image embedding. Note: This package is a bit tricky. Two tests fail without rubygem-closure-compiler installed, four more tests fail when testing with Rails = 3. Jammit can however be used even without closure-compiler, so I didn't list it in BR: nor R: sections. The failing tests are already reported (see links in comments in spec file). Also, please note, that you need to install rubygem-yui-compressor (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725768) and you currently need to place yuicompressor-2.4.4.jar under /usr/share/java/ manually to rebuild this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675495] Review Request: parallel - Shell tool for executing jobs in parallel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675495 --- Comment #19 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info 2011-09-19 04:36:10 EDT --- It have conflicts: Transaction Check Error: file /usr/bin/parallel from install of parallel-20110722-2.fc17.noarch conflicts with file from package moreutils-0.40-2.fc15.i686 file /usr/share/man/man1/parallel.1.gz from install of parallel-20110722-2.fc17.noarch conflicts with file from package moreutils-0.40-2.fc15.i686 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737858] Review Request: eclipse-wtp-sourceediting - WTP Source Editing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737858
--- Comment #4 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2011-09-19
04:48:07 EDT ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[!] Rpmlint output:
eclipse-wtp-sourceediting.noarch: E: description-line-too-long C WTP Source
editing tools provide support for editing typical web languages and the
mixing of them.
eclipse-wtp-sourceediting.noarch: E: description-line-too-long C XML, XML
Schema, XSL, HTML, CSS, DTD, and JSP resources, as well as an XML Perspective.
Please fix.
eclipse-wtp-sourceediting.noarch: W: dangling-symlink
/usr/share/eclipse/dropins/wtp-sourceediting/eclipse/plugins/xml-commons-apis.jar
/usr/share/java/xml-commons-apis.jar
Fine.
eclipse-wtp-sourceediting.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/doc/eclipse-wtp-sourceediting-3.3.0/about.html
Please fix.
eclipse-wtp-sourceediting.noarch: W: dangling-symlink
/usr/share/eclipse/dropins/wtp-sourceediting/eclipse/plugins/rhino.jar
/usr/share/java/rhino.jar
eclipse-wtp-sourceediting.noarch: W: dangling-symlink
/usr/share/eclipse/dropins/wtp-sourceediting/eclipse/plugins/xml-resolver.jar
/usr/share/java/xml-resolver.jar
eclipse-wtp-sourceediting.noarch: W: dangling-symlink
/usr/share/eclipse/dropins/wtp-sourceediting/eclipse/plugins/xerces-j2.jar
/usr/share/java/xerces-j2.jar
eclipse-wtp-sourceediting.noarch: W: dangling-symlink
/usr/share/eclipse/dropins/wtp-sourceediting/eclipse/plugins/xalan-j2-serializer.jar
/usr/share/java/xalan-j2-serializer.jar
Fine.
[x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines[1].
[x] Spec file name must match the base package name, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines[2].
[x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms.
[x] Buildroot definition is not present
[x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines[3,4].
[x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
License type: EPL
[-] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
[-] All independent sub-packages have license of their own
[x] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines[5].
[x] Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x] File sections do not contain %defattr(-,root,root,-) unless changed with
good reason
[!] Permissions on files are set properly.
[x] Package does NOT have a %clean section which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}
(or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). (not needed anymore)
[x] Package consistently uses macros (no %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
mixing)
[x] Package contains code, or permissable content.
[-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
application.
[x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[-] Javadoc documentation files are generated and included in -javadoc
subpackage
[-] Javadocs are placed in %{_javadocdir}/%{name} (no -%{version} symlinks)
[x] Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on jpackage-utils
[-] Javadoc subpackages have Require: jpackage-utils
[x] Package uses %global not %define
[x] If package uses tarball from VCS include comment how to re-create that
tarball (svn export URL, git clone URL, ...)
[x] If source tarball includes bundled jar/class files these need to be
removed prior to building
[x] All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
[-] Jar files are installed to %{_javadir}/%{name}.jar (see [6] for details)
[-] If package contains pom.xml files install it (including depmaps) even when
building with ant
=== Other suggestions ===
[x] If possible use upstream build method (maven/ant/javac)
[x] Avoid having BuildRequires on exact NVR unless necessary
[x] Package has BuildArch: noarch (if possible)
[x] Latest version is packaged.
Issues:
* fix line lengths
* fix about.xml permissions
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 727152] Review Request: jboss-common-core - JBoss Common Classes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=727152 --- Comment #4 from Tomas Radej tra...@redhat.com 2011-09-19 04:52:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) (In reply to comment #1) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines[3,4]. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: ASL 2.0 This part seems to be incorrect. I believe under Fedora guidelines the License field in the package spec file (currently LGPLv2+) should be LGPLv2+ and ASL 1.1. Of course that field shouldn't contain ASL 2.0, but LGPLv2+. I used a template and this slipped by my attention. Does your comment apply even with that taken into account? As far as I have read, LGPLv2+ is a valid license. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 720333] Review Request: perl-Devel-CallChecker - Custom op checking attached to subroutines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720333 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 720333] Review Request: perl-Devel-CallChecker - Custom op checking attached to subroutines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720333 --- Comment #3 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com 2011-09-19 05:16:04 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: perl-Devel-CallChecker Short Description: Custom op checking attached to subroutines Owners: ppisar mmaslano psabata Branches: f14 f15 f16 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 739129] Review Request: jabberpy - Python xmlstream and jabber IM protocol libs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739129 Milan Zazrivec mzazri...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-09-19 05:23:21 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 697326] Review Request: libisoburn - Library to enable creation and expansion of ISO-9660 filesystems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697326 --- Comment #10 from Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com 2011-09-19 05:27:27 EDT --- libburn.so.4.65.0 - libburn.so.4.67.0 (libburn 1.1.0 - 1.1.4) for example. The SONAME hasn't changed for that update. It is still 'libburn.so.4'. [ http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=2610788 ] [ http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=2705359 ] Similarly, for libisoburn it is still 'libisoburn.so.1', so a base package dep in xorisso subpkg will be needed. Comment 6. a formal review? Dunno what that is, but I've been planning to approve this whenever I find the time to review it properly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 720327] Review Request: perl-DynaLoader-Functions - Deconstructed dynamic C library loading
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720327 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-09-19 05:38:46 EDT --- perl-DynaLoader-Functions-0.000-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-DynaLoader-Functions-0.000-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 720327] Review Request: perl-DynaLoader-Functions - Deconstructed dynamic C library loading
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720327 Bug 720327 depends on bug 720323, which changed state. Bug 720323 Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Runtime - Runtime module handling https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720323 What|Old Value |New Value Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution||ERRATA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-09-19 05:38:11 EDT --- perl-DynaLoader-Functions-0.000-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-DynaLoader-Functions-0.000-1.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 717337] Review Request: URCU - Userspace RCU Implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=717337
--- Comment #8 from Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com 2011-09-19 05:42:32 EDT
---
liburcu.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/liburcu-qsbr.so.1.0.0
exit@GLIBC_2.2.5
and several more. Please find out why/when it calls exit and whether you can
get rid of this.
Looks like it's called if pthread_mutex_{lock,unlock} fails, which shouldn't
happen. Not nice, though.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737858] Review Request: eclipse-wtp-sourceediting - WTP Source Editing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737858 --- Comment #5 from Vladimir Kostadinov vladimir.kostadi...@gmail.com 2011-09-19 05:48:49 EDT --- Spec URL: http://dev.technogamma.biz/eclipse-wtp-sourceediting/eclipse-wtp-sourceediting.spec SRPM URL: http://dev.technogamma.biz/eclipse-wtp-sourceediting/eclipse-wtp-sourceediting-3.3.0-3.fc15.src.rpm - Fixed description length - Fixed doc file permissions in fetch-wtp-sourceediting.sh -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737858] Review Request: eclipse-wtp-sourceediting - WTP Source Editing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737858 Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2011-09-19 05:50:27 EDT --- Thanks, APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737308] Review Request: gdlmm - C++ bindings for the gdl library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737308 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-09-19 06:08:43 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 693198] Review Request: php-channel-bartlett - Adds bartlett channel to PEAR
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693198 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-09-19 06:05:20 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 720333] Review Request: perl-Devel-CallChecker - Custom op checking attached to subroutines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720333 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-09-19 06:07:35 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737858] Review Request: eclipse-wtp-sourceediting - WTP Source Editing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737858 Vladimir Kostadinov vladimir.kostadi...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Vladimir Kostadinov vladimir.kostadi...@gmail.com 2011-09-19 06:09:06 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: eclipse-wtp-sourceediting Short Description: WTP Source editing tools provide support for editing typical web languages and the mixing of them. Owners: vladimirk Branches: f16 InitialCC: akurtakov -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 693204] Review Request: php-bartlett-PHP-CompatInfo - Find out version and the extensions required for a piece of code to run
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693204 Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||boche...@fedoraproject.org AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|boche...@fedoraproject.org Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 738554] Review Request: perl-Test-HexString - Test binary strings with hex dump diagnostics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738554 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-09-19 06:09:32 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 242310] Review Request: moreutils - Additional unix utilities
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242310 Marc Bradshaw fed...@marcbradshaw.co.uk changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #19 from Marc Bradshaw fed...@marcbradshaw.co.uk 2011-09-19 06:09:56 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: moreutils Owners: deebs golfu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737858] Review Request: eclipse-wtp-sourceediting - WTP Source Editing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737858 --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-09-19 06:16:52 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 242310] Review Request: moreutils - Additional unix utilities
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242310 --- Comment #20 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-09-19 06:16:27 EDT --- No new branches requested. If an ownership change is needed, that is done via pkgdb at https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737308] Review Request: gdlmm - C++ bindings for the gdl library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737308 Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||gdlmm-3.1.90-1.fc16 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-09-19 06:34:49 --- Comment #5 from Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com 2011-09-19 06:34:49 EDT --- Package imported and built; closing the ticket. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 691403] Review Request: perl-IO-Stty - Change and print terminal line settings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691403 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com 2011-09-19 06:40:56 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: perl-IO-Stty New Branches: f14 Owners: mmaslano InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 720333] Review Request: perl-Devel-CallChecker - Custom op checking attached to subroutines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720333 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version||perl-Devel-CallChecker-0.00 ||3-1.fc17 --- Comment #5 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com 2011-09-19 06:50:54 EDT --- Thank you for the review and the repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 720333] Review Request: perl-Devel-CallChecker - Custom op checking attached to subroutines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720333 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-09-19 06:56:49 EDT --- perl-Devel-CallChecker-0.003-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Devel-CallChecker-0.003-1.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 720333] Review Request: perl-Devel-CallChecker - Custom op checking attached to subroutines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720333 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-09-19 07:23:22 EDT --- perl-DynaLoader-Functions-0.000-1.fc15, perl-Devel-CallChecker-0.003-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Devel-CallChecker-0.003-1.fc15,perl-DynaLoader-Functions-0.000-1.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 691403] Review Request: perl-IO-Stty - Change and print terminal line settings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691403 --- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-09-19 08:04:03 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 726351] Review Request: jboss-logging - JBoss Logging Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=726351 --- Comment #2 from Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com 2011-09-19 08:04:12 EDT --- Andy, thanks for review. Below is updated version bumped to 3.0.1. Spec URL: http://goldmann.fedorapeople.org/package_review/jboss-logging/2/jboss-logging.spec SRPM URL: http://goldmann.fedorapeople.org/package_review/jboss-logging/2/jboss-logging-3.0.1-1.fc17.src.rpm Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3360103 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737580] Review Request: jena-iri - The Jena IRI library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737580 --- Comment #5 from Tomas Radej tra...@redhat.com 2011-09-19 08:09:27 EDT --- Okay, it should finally be all right now. SPEC URL: http://tradej.fedorapeople.org/jena-iri-0.8-4/jena-iri.spec SRPM URL: http://tradej.fedorapeople.org/jena-iri-0.8-4/jena-iri-0.8-4.fc15.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 720333] Review Request: perl-Devel-CallChecker - Custom op checking attached to subroutines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720333 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-09-19 08:18:06 EDT --- perl-DynaLoader-Functions-0.000-1.fc14, perl-Devel-CallChecker-0.003-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Devel-CallChecker-0.003-1.fc14,perl-DynaLoader-Functions-0.000-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 729970] Review Request: jandex - Java Annotation Indexer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729970 Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com 2011-09-19 08:57:27 EDT --- Thank you for review! New Package SCM Request === Package Name: jandex Short Description: Java Annotation Indexer Owners:goldmann -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 729970] Review Request: jandex - Java Annotation Indexer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729970 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-09-19 09:04:40 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 658420] Review Request: zorba - General purpose XQuery processor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658420 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-09-19 09:07:01 EDT --- zorba-2.0.2-2.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/zorba-2.0.2-2.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 658420] Review Request: zorba - General purpose XQuery processor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658420 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-09-19 09:06:55 EDT --- zorba-2.0.2-2.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/zorba-2.0.2-2.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 739088] Review Request: arandr - Simple GTK+ XRandR GUI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739088 Maros Zatko mza...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dw...@infradead.org Component|Package Review |0x --- Comment #6 from Maros Zatko mza...@redhat.com 2011-09-19 09:09:10 EDT --- Hi, I've replaced variables with macros and fixed installation of doc files. Please check: Spec URL: http://v3.sk/~hexo/rpm/arandr.spec SRPM URL: http://v3.sk/~hexo/rpm/arandr-0.1.4-3.fc15.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 709051] Review Request: gossip - SLF4j Gossip Provider
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709051 --- Comment #3 from Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com 2011-09-19 09:20:11 EDT --- I fixed above issues, but cannot see 1.9 released. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3360255 Spec URL: http://goldmann.fedorapeople.org/package_review/gossip/3/gossip.spec SRPM URL: http://goldmann.fedorapeople.org/package_review/gossip/3/gossip-1.7-2.fc17.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728504] Review Request: jboss-sasl - SASL Provider for J2SE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728504 --- Comment #2 from Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com 2011-09-19 09:28:36 EDT --- Updated license, bumped version to 1.0.0.Beta2. Spec URL: http://goldmann.fedorapeople.org/package_review/jboss-sasl/2/jboss-sasl.spec SRPM URL: http://goldmann.fedorapeople.org/package_review/jboss-sasl/2/jboss-sasl-1.0.0-0.1.Beta2.fc17.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 727152] Review Request: jboss-common-core - JBoss Common Classes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=727152 --- Comment #5 from Richard Fontana rfont...@redhat.com 2011-09-19 09:40:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) Of course that field shouldn't contain ASL 2.0, but LGPLv2+. I used a template and this slipped by my attention. Does your comment apply even with that taken into account? As far as I have read, LGPLv2+ is a valid license. Yes, based on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#Multiple_Licensing_Scenarios because LGPLv2+ and ASL1.1 are distinct, and independent licenses. (Admittedly this rule is probably not strictly complied with in many Fedora packages but I see some advantages to doing so for packages coming from JBoss.) I would argue that LGPLv2+ and ASL2.0 are not distinct and independent in this Fedora sense, based on license compatibility; thus were JBossAS to rebase the source files with ASL1.1 notices on more recent (post-2004?) ASL2.0 Apache versions of these files, which in at least some cases would probably require only minimal changes, you could reasonably simplify the Fedora license description to LGPLv2+. But until that is done it should be LGPLv2+ and ASL1.1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 723875] Review Request: byteman - Java agent-based bytecode injection tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=723875 Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||akurt...@redhat.com --- Comment #5 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2011-09-19 09:45:07 EDT --- Specifying java version is only needed when the package won't work with all jvm in the repo but needs at least certain version. So if it's fine with gcj i.e 1.5 jvm it's not needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737580] Review Request: jena-iri - The Jena IRI library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737580 Roland Grunberg rgrun...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Roland Grunberg rgrun...@redhat.com 2011-09-19 09:50:47 EDT --- Thanks again. Setting as approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 727152] Review Request: jboss-common-core - JBoss Common Classes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=727152 --- Comment #6 from Tomas Radej tra...@redhat.com 2011-09-19 09:57:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) (In reply to comment #4) Of course that field shouldn't contain ASL 2.0, but LGPLv2+. I used a template and this slipped by my attention. Does your comment apply even with that taken into account? As far as I have read, LGPLv2+ is a valid license. Yes, based on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#Multiple_Licensing_Scenarios because LGPLv2+ and ASL1.1 are distinct, and independent licenses. (Admittedly this rule is probably not strictly complied with in many Fedora packages but I see some advantages to doing so for packages coming from JBoss.) I would argue that LGPLv2+ and ASL2.0 are not distinct and independent in this Fedora sense, based on license compatibility; thus were JBossAS to rebase the source files with ASL1.1 notices on more recent (post-2004?) ASL2.0 Apache versions of these files, which in at least some cases would probably require only minimal changes, you could reasonably simplify the Fedora license description to LGPLv2+. But until that is done it should be LGPLv2+ and ASL1.1. I am not sure if I made myself clear. I put the ASL license there by mistake. It should have never been there as the package is licensed solely under LGPLv2+. Was this the reason for the block? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 709051] Review Request: gossip - SLF4j Gossip Provider
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709051
Andrew Robinson arobi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review?, needinfo+ |fedora-review+, needinfo-
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Robinson arobi...@redhat.com 2011-09-19 10:31:57
EDT ---
[X] Rpmlint output:
/home/arobinso/runtime-EclipseApplication/gossip/gossip.spec: W: invalid-url
Source0: gossip-1.7.tar.xz
The value should be a valid, public HTTP, HTTPS, or FTP URL.
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
[X] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines[1].
[X] Spec file name must match the base package name, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[X] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines[2].
[X] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms.
[X] Buildroot definition is not present
[X] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines[3,4].
[X] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
License type:ASL 2.0
[X] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
[X] All independent sub-packages have license of their own
[X] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[X] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
MD5SUM this package:e5502293cc40c9b76d92800fc0599834
MD5SUM upstream package:e5502293cc40c9b76d92800fc0599834
[X] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines[5].
[X] Package must own all directories that it creates.
[X] Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[X] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[X] File sections do not contain %defattr(-,root,root,-) unless changed with
good reason
[X] Permissions on files are set properly.
[X] Package does NOT have a %clean section which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}
(or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). (not needed anymore)
[X] Package consistently uses macros (no %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
mixing)
[X] Package contains code, or permissable content.
[X] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
application.
[X] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[X] Javadoc documentation files are generated and included in -javadoc
subpackage
[X] Javadocs are placed in %{_javadocdir}/%{name} (no -%{version} symlinks)
[X] Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on jpackage-utils
[X] Javadoc subpackages have Require: jpackage-utils
[X] Package uses %global not %define
[X] If package uses tarball from VCS include comment how to re-create that
tarball (svn export URL, git clone URL, ...)
[-] If source tarball includes bundled jar/class files these need to be
removed prior to building
[X] All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
[X] Jar files are installed to %{_javadir}/%{name}.jar (see [6] for details)
[X] If package contains pom.xml files install it (including depmaps) even when
building with ant
[X] pom files has correct add_maven_depmap
=== Maven ===
[X] Use %{_mavenpomdir} macro for placing pom files instead of
%{_datadir}/maven2/poms
[-] If package uses -Dmaven.test.skip=true explain why it was needed in a
comment
[-] If package uses custom depmap -Dmaven.local.depmap.file=* explain why
it's needed in a comment
[X] Package DOES NOT use %update_maven_depmap in %post/%postun
[X] Packages DOES NOT have Requires(post) and Requires(postun) on
jpackage-utils for %update_maven_depmap macro
=== Other suggestions ===
[X] If possible use upstream build method (maven/ant/javac)
[X] Avoid having BuildRequires on exact NVR unless necessary
[X] Package has BuildArch: noarch (if possible)
[X] Latest version is packaged.
[X] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
Tested on:x86_64, i386
=== Comments ===
1. I can only find 1.7 as being the most recent release and it is certainly thr
most recent release for the URL provided.
APPROVED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 723875] Review Request: byteman - Java agent-based bytecode injection tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=723875 --- Comment #6 from Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com 2011-09-19 10:31:46 EDT --- Tomas, I fixed the issues and have one comment: maven is used upstream, but the tagged version is using ant. Probably next release will be maven-based. Spec URL: http://goldmann.fedorapeople.org/package_review/byteman/3/byteman.spec SRPM URL: http://goldmann.fedorapeople.org/package_review/byteman/3/byteman-1.5.2-2.fc17.src.rpm Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3360471 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 709051] Review Request: gossip - SLF4j Gossip Provider
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709051 Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|652183(FE-JAVASIG) | Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com 2011-09-19 10:41:36 EDT --- Thank you for review! New Package SCM Request === Package Name: gossip Short Description: SLF4j Gossip Provider Owners:goldmann -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 567086] Review Request: VXL - C++ Libraries for Computer Vision Research and Implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567086 --- Comment #31 from Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com 2011-09-19 10:55:43 EDT --- Ankur, Are you still actively pursuing this review? Richard -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 709051] Review Request: gossip - SLF4j Gossip Provider
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709051 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-09-19 11:16:38 EDT --- Unretired, please take ownership in pkgdb, and request any needed branches here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 738525] Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-H2PM - Automatically generate perl modules to wrap C header files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738525 Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com 2011-09-19 11:32:59 EDT --- All MUST fixed APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 738589] Review Request: perl-Socket-Netlink - Interface to Linux's PF_NETLINK socket family
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738589 Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com 2011-09-19 11:42:41 EDT --- All MUST fixed APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 738931] Review Request: perl-Socket-Netlink-Route - Interface to Linux's NETLINK_ROUTE netlink socket protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738931 Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com 2011-09-19 11:44:48 EDT --- Approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 735146] Review Request: kstars - Desktop Planetarium
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735146 nucleo alekc...@googlemail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||alekc...@googlemail.com --- Comment #1 from nucleo alekc...@googlemail.com 2011-09-19 11:46:13 EDT --- Should xplanet be installed with kstars or it needed only at build time? This bug depends on libkdeedu but looks like kstars not needs it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 735146] Review Request: kstars - Desktop Planetarium
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735146 --- Comment #2 from nucleo alekc...@googlemail.com 2011-09-19 11:48:58 EDT --- There are many desktop-file-validate warnings http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=SF2yQR56 Is it safe to ignore all of them? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 735146] Review Request: kstars - Desktop Planetarium
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735146 --- Comment #3 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu 2011-09-19 11:58:51 EDT --- imo, let's try to limit ourselves to review blockers (another nice-to-haves can certainly be addressed post-review). that said, re: xplanet , as I understand it, it's an optional feature that's only enabled if xplanet is present during build. so, we could add a runtime dep too, if you insist, but I don't think it's needed for normal operation. re: desktop-validate warnings. those look mostly harmless to me -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 693200] Review Request: php-bartlett-PHP-Reflect - Adds the ability to reverse-engineer PHP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693200 --- Comment #10 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com 2011-09-19 12:20:57 EDT --- - LICENSE is there ;) - .js removed - improved generated doc installation https://github.com/remicollet/remirepo/commit/1395c3ec00d974a12941e85bc03113c9822b90f3 SRPM: http://rpms.famillecollet.com/SRPMS/php-bartlett-PHP-Reflect-1.0.2-2.remi.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675495] Review Request: parallel - Shell tool for executing jobs in parallel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675495 --- Comment #20 from Golo Fuchert packa...@golotop.de 2011-09-19 12:23:26 EDT --- What happened there, why is parallel f17 checked against moreutils f15? The package moreutils was changed because of that very issue (see above) and it should be resolved for f16+. That is the reason why there wont be a gnu parallel package for f15. Is this a false positive then or does it require any action? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 727152] Review Request: jboss-common-core - JBoss Common Classes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=727152 --- Comment #7 from Richard Fontana rfont...@redhat.com 2011-09-19 12:38:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) I am not sure if I made myself clear. I put the ASL license there by mistake. It should have never been there as the package is licensed solely under LGPLv2+. Was this the reason for the block? No. (I didn't think I was blocking this one BTW, it is more something that should ideally be corrected when feasible.) The reason for the comment is that a subset of the source files in this package are (in some cases modified versions of) code taken from certain old versions of ASF projects where they were licensed under ASL 1.1, a license since superseded by the ASF. We treat ASL 1.1 as GPL-incompatible and (for purposes here) LGPL-incompatible, which means that the two licenses are distinct and independent. So, again bearing in mind Fedora's own packaging guidelines, it is more accurate to see the licensing of this package as a conjunction of LGPLv2+ and ASL1.1 than just LGPL. That is, it's really not licensed solely under LGPLv2+ unless you decide ASL 1.1 is GPL-compatible. Since currently Fedora classifies ASL 1.1 as GPL-incompatible, it follows logically that the package cannot be licensed solely under LGPLv2+. I realize from the upstream *JBoss* perspective it may be conceived as being licensed solely under LGPL, but the Fedora view is (I would argue) more precise. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737858] Review Request: eclipse-wtp-sourceediting - WTP Source Editing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737858 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-09-19 13:21:24 EDT --- eclipse-wtp-sourceediting-3.3.0-3.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/eclipse-wtp-sourceediting-3.3.0-3.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737858] Review Request: eclipse-wtp-sourceediting - WTP Source Editing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737858 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 739278] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Authen - Authentication plugin for HTTP::Server::Simple
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739278 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 739278] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Authen - Authentication plugin for HTTP::Server::Simple
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739278 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-09-19 13:37:04 EDT --- perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Authen-0.04-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Authen-0.04-1.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 739278] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Authen - Authentication plugin for HTTP::Server::Simple
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739278 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-09-19 13:37:29 EDT --- perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Authen-0.04-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Authen-0.04-1.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737574] Review Request: lis - A library for solving linear equations and eigenvalue problems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737574 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-09-19 13:40:01 EDT --- lis-1.2.53-3.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lis-1.2.53-3.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737574] Review Request: lis - A library for solving linear equations and eigenvalue problems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737574 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-09-19 13:40:27 EDT --- lis-1.2.53-3.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lis-1.2.53-3.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737574] Review Request: lis - A library for solving linear equations and eigenvalue problems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737574 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-09-19 13:40:18 EDT --- lis-1.2.53-3.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lis-1.2.53-3.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737574] Review Request: lis - A library for solving linear equations and eigenvalue problems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737574 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-09-19 13:40:10 EDT --- lis-1.2.53-3.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lis-1.2.53-3.el6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 739278] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Authen - Authentication plugin for HTTP::Server::Simple
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739278 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-09-19 13:39:35 EDT --- perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Authen-0.04-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Authen-0.04-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737574] Review Request: lis - A library for solving linear equations and eigenvalue problems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737574 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 693198] Review Request: php-channel-bartlett - Adds bartlett channel to PEAR
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693198 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-09-19 14:03:19 EDT --- php-channel-bartlett-1.3-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-channel-bartlett-1.3-1.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 693198] Review Request: php-channel-bartlett - Adds bartlett channel to PEAR
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693198 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-09-19 14:03:52 EDT --- php-channel-bartlett-1.3-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-channel-bartlett-1.3-1.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 693198] Review Request: php-channel-bartlett - Adds bartlett channel to PEAR
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693198 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 693198] Review Request: php-channel-bartlett - Adds bartlett channel to PEAR
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693198 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-09-19 14:06:15 EDT --- php-channel-bartlett-1.3-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-channel-bartlett-1.3-1.el6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 720333] Review Request: perl-Devel-CallChecker - Custom op checking attached to subroutines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720333 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-09-19 14:28:53 EDT --- perl-Devel-CallChecker-0.003-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737858] Review Request: eclipse-wtp-sourceediting - WTP Source Editing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737858 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-09-19 14:30:45 EDT --- eclipse-wtp-sourceediting-3.3.0-3.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 727323] Review Request: vios-proxy - Network proxy between a QEMU host and QEMU guests using virtioserial channels
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=727323 Ted Ross tr...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|l...@redhat.com |nsan...@redhat.com Flag|needinfo?(tr...@redhat.com) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 727323] Review Request: vios-proxy - Network proxy between a QEMU host and QEMU guests using virtioserial channels
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=727323 --- Comment #4 from Nuno Santos nsan...@redhat.com 2011-09-19 15:10:14 EDT --- Lon: I'm taking over the review from Ted, and am working with Chuck Rolke -- the original developer -- to get it through the process. Will post an updated specfile soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 733692] Review Request: python-yourls - simple python client to the YOURLS URL shortner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=733692 --- Comment #6 from Tim Flink tfl...@redhat.com 2011-09-19 15:16:15 EDT --- Is there anything else that needs to be done on my end to get the review wrapped up? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 733692] Review Request: python-yourls - simple python client to the YOURLS URL shortner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=733692 Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-09-19 15:22:22 EDT --- Wow. No, just go back in time and make me see the BZ email for your comments. Sorry for the delay. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 717337] Review Request: URCU - Userspace RCU Implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=717337 --- Comment #9 from Yannick Brosseau yannick.bross...@gmail.com 2011-09-19 16:06:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) Several of the findings in comment 2 have not been added to the spec file and have not been commented on either. Please respond to reviewers' comments even if you disagree with them. Sorry, it seems I've missed them. Will address those and your new comments with a new package soon. liburcu.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/liburcu-qsbr.so.1.0.0 exit@GLIBC_2.2.5 and several more. Please find out why/when it calls exit and whether you can get rid of this. These have been reported upstream and is being worked on. liburcu-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/userspace-rcu-0.6.3/urcu/list.h Please try to get this fixed in the upstream tarball. 0.6.4 is available, btw. These have been reported and fixed upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 733692] Review Request: python-yourls - simple python client to the YOURLS URL shortner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=733692 Tim Flink tfl...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Tim Flink tfl...@redhat.com 2011-09-19 16:24:45 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: python-yourls Short Description: Simple Python client for the YOURLS URL shortener Owners: tflink mkrizek Branches: f15 f16 el6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 716580] Review Request: httpry - A specialized packet sniffer designed for displaying and logging HTTP traffic
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716580 --- Comment #6 from Nick Bebout n...@fedoraproject.org 2011-09-19 18:45:40 EDT --- Fabian: ping? I can take this review if you are busy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 733692] Review Request: python-yourls - simple python client to the YOURLS URL shortner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=733692 --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-09-19 18:49:25 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 693198] Review Request: php-channel-bartlett - Adds bartlett channel to PEAR
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693198 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-09-19 18:58:07 EDT --- php-channel-bartlett-1.3-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 720327] Review Request: perl-DynaLoader-Functions - Deconstructed dynamic C library loading
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720327 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-09-19 18:56:22 EDT --- perl-DynaLoader-Functions-0.000-1.fc14, perl-Devel-CallChecker-0.003-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 739278] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Authen - Authentication plugin for HTTP::Server::Simple
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739278 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-09-19 18:57:29 EDT --- perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Authen-0.04-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 704239] Review Request: python-yolk - Command-line tool querying PyPI and Python packages installed on your system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=704239 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-09-19 19:02:14 EDT --- python-yolk-0.4.1-4.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 704239] Review Request: python-yolk - Command-line tool querying PyPI and Python packages installed on your system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=704239 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|python-yolk-0.4.1-4.fc15|python-yolk-0.4.1-4.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737574] Review Request: lis - A library for solving linear equations and eigenvalue problems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737574 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-09-19 19:02:35 EDT --- lis-1.2.53-3.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 711764] Review Request: osc-source_validator - osc source validator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711764 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||osc-source_validator-0.1-4. ||fc14 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-09-19 18:59:16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 711764] Review Request: osc-source_validator - osc source validator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711764 Bug 711764 depends on bug 711762, which changed state. Bug 711762 Summary: Review Request: osc - openSUSE Build Service Commander https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711762 What|Old Value |New Value Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution||ERRATA --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-09-19 18:59:08 EDT --- osc-source_validator-0.1-4.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 711762] Review Request: osc - openSUSE Build Service Commander
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711762 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-09-19 19:00:26 EDT --- osc-0.132.4-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
