[Bug 743162] Review Request: python-concurrentloghandler - Concurrent logging handler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=743162
--- Comment #4 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2011-10-12 02:28:49
EDT ---
And for consistency and safety you should use %{modname} rather than %modname
in the Patch0 line.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 743162] Review Request: python-concurrentloghandler - Concurrent logging handler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=743162 --- Comment #3 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2011-10-12 02:27:36 EDT --- You did not elaborate on the presence of the patch, could you? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 743162] Review Request: python-concurrentloghandler - Concurrent logging handler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=743162 Pierre-YvesChibon changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|pin...@pingoured.fr Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 713990] Review Request: bzr-fastimport - Bzr plugin for fast loading of data from other VCS tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=713990
--- Comment #13 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2011-10-12
01:07:37 EDT ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
[x] : MUST - Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at
least one supported architecture.
[x] : MUST - Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[x] : MUST - Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x] : MUST - Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=...
doesn't work.
[x] : MUST - Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x] : MUST - Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
/home/pierrey/tmp/reviewhelper/713990/bzr-fastimport-0.11.0.tar.gz :
MD5SUM this package : c3ba588120f346d9f72773e512c8ef34
MD5SUM upstream package : c3ba588120f346d9f72773e512c8ef34
[x] : MUST - Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[-] : MUST - %config files are marked noreplace or the reason is justified.
[-] : MUST - Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop using
desktop-file-install file if it is a GUI application.
[-] : MUST - Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[-] : MUST - Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] : MUST - ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[-] : MUST - License file installed when any subpackage combination is
installed.
[-] : MUST - The spec file handles locales properly.
[-] : MUST - No %config files under /usr.
[-] : MUST - Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] : MUST - Static libraries in -static subpackage, if present.
[x] : MUST - Rpmlint output is silent.
rpmlint bzr-fastimport-0.11.0-1.fc17.src.rpm
bzr-fastimport.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) plugin -> plug in,
plug-in, plugging
bzr-fastimport.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US plugin ->
plug in, plug-in, plugging
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
rpmlint bzr-fastimport-0.11.0-1.fc17.noarch.rpm
bzr-fastimport.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) plugin -> plug
in, plug-in, plugging
bzr-fastimport.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US plugin
-> plug in, plug-in, plugging
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
These can be safely ignored
[x] : MUST - Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and
meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[-] : MUST - %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x] : MUST - All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x] : MUST - Package contains no bundled libraries.
[x] : MUST - Changelog in prescribed format.
[x] : MUST - Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x] : MUST - Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x] : MUST - Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x] : MUST - Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x] : MUST - Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x] : MUST - Permissions on files are set properly.
[x] : MUST - Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[-] : MUST - Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[x] : MUST - If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %doc.
[x] : MUST - License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x] : MUST - Package consistently uses macros. instead of hard-coded directory
names.
[x] : MUST - Package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
[x] : MUST - Package does not generates any conflict.
[x] : MUST - Package does not contains kernel modules.
[x] : MUST - Package contains no static executables.
[x] : MUST - Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x] : MUST - Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x] : MUST - Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x] : MUST - Package installs properly.
[x] : MUST - Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
[x] : MUST - Package is not relocatable.
[x] : MUST - Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x] : MUST - Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-] : MUST - Package contains a Sy
[Bug 713990] Review Request: bzr-fastimport - Bzr plugin for fast loading of data from other VCS tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=713990 Pierre-YvesChibon changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 742556] Review Request: perl-Carp-REPL - Read-eval-print-loop on die and/or warn
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742556 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla 2011-10-11 23:56:51 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 742557] Review Request: perl-CatalystX-Profile - Profile your Catalyst application with Devel::NYTProf
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742557 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla 2011-10-11 23:57:42 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 742560] Review Request: perl-CatalystX-SimpleLogin - Provide a simple Login controller which can be reused
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742560 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla 2011-10-11 23:58:13 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 742555] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-DBIC - Store your sessions via DBIx::Class
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742555 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla 2011-10-11 23:56:26 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 742560] Review Request: perl-CatalystX-SimpleLogin - Provide a simple Login controller which can be reused
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742560 --- Comment #4 from Iain Arnell 2011-10-11 23:01:43 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: perl-CatalystX-SimpleLogin Short Description: Provide a simple Login controller which can be reused Owners: iarnell Branches: f15 f16 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 742555] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-DBIC - Store your sessions via DBIx::Class
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742555 --- Comment #3 from Iain Arnell 2011-10-11 23:00:48 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-DBIC Short Description: Store your sessions via DBIx::Class Owners: iarnell Branches: f15 f16 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 742557] Review Request: perl-CatalystX-Profile - Profile your Catalyst application with Devel::NYTProf
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742557 --- Comment #3 from Iain Arnell 2011-10-11 23:01:34 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: perl-CatalystX-Profile Short Description: Profile your Catalyst application with Devel::NYTProf Owners: iarnell Branches: f15 f16 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 742560] Review Request: perl-CatalystX-SimpleLogin - Provide a simple Login controller which can be reused
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742560 --- Comment #3 from Iain Arnell 2011-10-11 23:01:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > False positive spelling errors mostly, the one which could be tweaked is > "adition". So it is - will fix on import. Thanks again for the reviews. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 742557] Review Request: perl-CatalystX-Profile - Profile your Catalyst application with Devel::NYTProf
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742557 Iain Arnell changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 742556] Review Request: perl-Carp-REPL - Read-eval-print-loop on die and/or warn
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742556 --- Comment #3 from Iain Arnell 2011-10-11 23:01:21 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: perl-Carp-REPL Short Description: Read-eval-print-loop on die and/or warn Owners: iarnell Branches: f15 f16 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 742560] Review Request: perl-CatalystX-SimpleLogin - Provide a simple Login controller which can be reused
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742560 Iain Arnell changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 742556] Review Request: perl-Carp-REPL - Read-eval-print-loop on die and/or warn
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742556 Iain Arnell changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 742555] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-DBIC - Store your sessions via DBIx::Class
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742555 Iain Arnell changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745333] New: Review Request: drupal7-migrate - The migrate module provides a flexible framework for migrating content
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: drupal7-migrate - The migrate module provides a flexible framework for migrating content https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745333 Summary: Review Request: drupal7-migrate - The migrate module provides a flexible framework for migrating content Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sdod...@sdodson.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- SPEC : http://sdodson.fedorapeople.org/drupal7-migrate.spec SRPM : http://sdodson.fedorapeople.org/drupal7-migrate-2.2-1.fc15.src.rpm I have move example migration data into a submodule named examples. It's unclear to me if these should be included in the packaging at all. Please advise. Description : The migrate module provides a flexible framework for migrating content into Drupal from other sources (e.g., when converting a web site from another CMS to Drupal). Out-of-the-box, support for creating core Drupal objects such as nodes, users, and comments is included - it can easily be extended for migrating other kinds of content. Content is imported and rolled back using Drush commands. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 744492] Review Request: rtmidi - Library for realtime MIDI input/output
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=744492 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 743162] Review Request: python-concurrentloghandler - Concurrent logging handler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=743162 --- Comment #2 from Dan Callaghan 2011-10-11 22:30:29 EDT --- I would like to get this into EPEL6, since we'll be using it on RHEL6, but I'm not interested in RHEL5 so there is indeed a bunch of cleaning I can do. Updated spec and SRPM: http://fedorapeople.org/~dcallagh/python-concurrentloghandler/python-concurrentloghandler.spec http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/dcallagh/python-concurrentloghandler/fedora-15/SRPMS/python-concurrentloghandler-0.8.4-3.fc15.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 744492] Review Request: rtmidi - Library for realtime MIDI input/output
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=744492 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2011-10-11 22:34:06 EDT --- rtmidi-1.0.15-2.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rtmidi-1.0.15-2.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745328] New: Review Request: drupal7-menu_token - Menu Token provides tokens, that could be used in title or path
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: drupal7-menu_token - Menu Token provides tokens, that could be used in title or path https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745328 Summary: Review Request: drupal7-menu_token - Menu Token provides tokens, that could be used in title or path Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sdod...@sdodson.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- SPEC : http://sdodson.fedorapeople.org/drupal7-menu_token.spec SRPM : http://sdodson.fedorapeople.org/drupal7-menu_token-1.0-0.1.alpha3.fc15.src.rpm Description : Menu Token module provides tokens, that could be used in title or in path of menu items (links). For example, if you create menu item with path: "user/[current-user:uid]", the url will be changed "on fly" to: "user/1" (assuming you are user 1). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745323] New: Review Request: drupal7-markdown - Provides Markdown filter integration for Drupal input formats
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: drupal7-markdown - Provides Markdown filter integration for Drupal input formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745323 Summary: Review Request: drupal7-markdown - Provides Markdown filter integration for Drupal input formats Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sdod...@sdodson.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- SPEC : http://sdodson.fedorapeople.org/drupal7-markdown.spec SRPM : http://sdodson.fedorapeople.org/drupal7-markdown-1.0-1.fc15.src.rpm Description : Provides Markdown filter integration for Drupal input formats. The Markdown syntax is designed to co-exist with HTML, so you can set up input formats with both HTML and Markdown support. It is also meant to be as human-readable as possible when left as "source". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745322] New: Review Request: drupal7-locale_cookie - Keeps track of the language by means of a cookie
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: drupal7-locale_cookie - Keeps track of the language by means of a cookie https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745322 Summary: Review Request: drupal7-locale_cookie - Keeps track of the language by means of a cookie Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sdod...@sdodson.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- SPEC : http://sdodson.fedorapeople.org/drupal7-locale_cookie.spec SRPM : http://sdodson.fedorapeople.org/drupal7-locale_cookie-1.0-1.fc15.src.rpm Description : This module adds a new method for language detection to Drupal 7, it keeps track of the language by means of a cookie, so the language is preserved no matter of the user is logged in or not. It also works for recurring users. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745320] New: Review Request: drupal7-libraries - The common denominator for all Drupal components and external libraries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: drupal7-libraries - The common denominator for all Drupal components and external libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745320 Summary: Review Request: drupal7-libraries - The common denominator for all Drupal components and external libraries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sdod...@sdodson.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- SPEC : http://sdodson.fedorapeople.org/drupal7-libraries.spec SRPM : http://sdodson.fedorapeople.org/drupal7-libraries-1.0-1.fc15.src.rpm Description : Drupal 7 only has built-in support for non-external libraries via hook_library(). But it is only suitable for drupal.org projects that bundle their own library; i.e., the module author is the creator and vendor of the library. Libraries API should be used for externally developed and distributed libraries. A simple example would be a third-party jQuery plugin. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745317] New: Review Request: drupal7-jquery_update - Updates the version of jQuery to 1.5.2 and jQuery UI 1.8.11
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: drupal7-jquery_update - Updates the version of jQuery to 1.5.2 and jQuery UI 1.8.11 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745317 Summary: Review Request: drupal7-jquery_update - Updates the version of jQuery to 1.5.2 and jQuery UI 1.8.11 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sdod...@sdodson.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- SPEC : http://sdodson.fedorapeople.org/drupal7-jquery_update.spec SRPM : http://sdodson.fedorapeople.org/drupal7-jquery_update-2.2-1.fc15.src.rpm Description : Upgrades the version of jQuery in Drupal core to a newer version of jQuery. Drupal 7 to jQuery 1.5.2 and jQuery UI 1.8.11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745314] Review Request: drupal7-i18n - modules to extend Drupal core multilingual capabilities
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745314 Scott Dodson changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||745313 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745313] Review Request: drupal7-variable - Variable module provides a registry for meta-data about Drupal variables
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745313 Scott Dodson changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||745314 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 711893] Review Request: rubygem-dnsruby - Ruby DNS(SEC) implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711893 --- Comment #15 from Jon Ciesla 2011-10-11 21:19:38 EDT --- Include an SCM request when setting the fedora=cvs flag, please. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745314] New: Review Request: drupal7-i18n - modules to extend Drupal core multilingual capabilities
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: drupal7-i18n - modules to extend Drupal core multilingual capabilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745314 Summary: Review Request: drupal7-i18n - modules to extend Drupal core multilingual capabilities Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sdod...@sdodson.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- SPEC : http://sdodson.fedorapeople.org/drupal7-i18n.spec SRPM : http://sdodson.fedorapeople.org/drupal7-i18n-1.0-1.fc15.src.rpm Description : This is a collection of modules to extend Drupal core multilingual capabilities and be able to build real life multilingual sites. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745313] New: Review Request: drupal7-variable - Variable module provides a registry for meta-data about Drupal variables
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: drupal7-variable - Variable module provides a registry for meta-data about Drupal variables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745313 Summary: Review Request: drupal7-variable - Variable module provides a registry for meta-data about Drupal variables Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sdod...@sdodson.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- SPEC : http://sdodson.fedorapeople.org/drupal7-variable.spec SRPM : http://sdodson.fedorapeople.org/drupal7-variable-1.1-1.fc15.src.rpm Description : Variable module provides a registry for meta-data about Drupal variables and some extended Variable API and administration interface. So other modules can know about your module's variables and they can be translated, exported, etc. You'll get automatic variable edit forms, tokens, access control and uninstall for free. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745311] Review Request: drupal7-fivestar - The Fivestar voting module adds a clean attractive voting widget
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745311 Scott Dodson changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||745309 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745309] Review Request: drupal7-votingapi - Drupal Standardized API and schema for storing, retrieving, and tabulating votes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745309 Scott Dodson changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||745311 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745311] New: Review Request: drupal7-fivestar - The Fivestar voting module adds a clean attractive voting widget
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: drupal7-fivestar - The Fivestar voting module adds a clean attractive voting widget https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745311 Summary: Review Request: drupal7-fivestar - The Fivestar voting module adds a clean attractive voting widget Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sdod...@sdodson.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- SPEC : http://sdodson.fedorapeople.org/drupal7-fivestar.spec SRPM : http://sdodson.fedorapeople.org/drupal7-fivestar-2.0-0.1.alpha1.fc15.src.rpm Description : The Fivestar voting module adds a clean, attractive voting widget to nodes in Drupal 5, 6 and7. Developed by Lullabot and an officially supported module in Acquia Drupal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745309] New: Review Request: drupal7-votingapi - Drupal Standardized API and schema for storing, retrieving, and tabulating votes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: drupal7-votingapi - Drupal Standardized API and schema for storing, retrieving, and tabulating votes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745309 Summary: Review Request: drupal7-votingapi - Drupal Standardized API and schema for storing, retrieving, and tabulating votes Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sdod...@sdodson.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- SPEC : http://sdodson.fedorapeople.org/drupal7-votingapi.spec SRPM : http://sdodson.fedorapeople.org/drupal7-votingapi-2.4-1.fc15.src.rpm Description : VotingAPI helps developers who want to use a standardized API and schema for storing, retrieving, and tabulating votes for Drupal content. Among other things, it supports: Rating of any content (comments, nodes, users, fish, whatever) Multi-criteria voting (rate a game based on video, audio, and replayability) Automatic tabulation of results (with support for different voting styles, like 'percentage' and '+1/-1') Efficient caching of results (sorting and filtering doesn't require any recalculation) Hooks for additional vote calculations Note that this module does NOT directly expose any voting mechanisms to end users. It's a framework designed to make life easier for other developers, and to standardize voting data for consumption by other modules (like Views). For some examples of simple voting systems based on VotingAPI, check Is Useful, Fivestar, and Plus1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745308] New: Review Request: drupal7-field_permissions - A replacement for the Content Permissions module shipped with CCK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: drupal7-field_permissions - A replacement for the Content Permissions module shipped with CCK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745308 Summary: Review Request: drupal7-field_permissions - A replacement for the Content Permissions module shipped with CCK Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sdod...@sdodson.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- SPEC : http://sdodson.fedorapeople.org/drupal7-field_permissions.spec SRPM : http://sdodson.fedorapeople.org/drupal7-field_permissions-1.0-0.1.alpha1.fc15.src.rpm Description : The Field Permissions module is a drop-in replacement for the Content Permissions module shipped with CCK. It allows site administrators to set field-level permissions to edit or view CCK fields in any node, and optionally (new feature compared to Content Permissions module), edit field during node creation, and edit or view permissions for nodes owned by the current user. Permissions for each field are not created by default. Instead, administrators can enable these permissions explicitly for the fields where this feature is needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730314] Review Request: jboss-invocation - JBoss Invocation API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730314 Richard Fontana changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rfont...@redhat.com Blocks||182235(FE-Legal) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745306] New: Review Request: drupal7-eva - Eva allows the output of a View to be attached to content of entities
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: drupal7-eva - Eva allows the output of a View to be attached to content of entities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745306 Summary: Review Request: drupal7-eva - Eva allows the output of a View to be attached to content of entities Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sdod...@sdodson.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- SPEC : http://sdodson.fedorapeople.org/drupal7-eva.spec SRPM : http://sdodson.fedorapeople.org/drupal7-eva-1.1-1.fc15.src.rpm Description : "Eva" is short for "Entity Views Attachment;" it provides a Views display plugin that allows the output of a View to be attached to the content of any Drupal entity. The body of a node or comment, the profile of a user account, or the listing page for a Taxonomy term are all examples of entity content. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745305] New: Review Request: drupal7-entity - Extends the entity API to provide a unified way to deal with entities
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: drupal7-entity - Extends the entity API to provide a unified way to deal with entities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745305 Summary: Review Request: drupal7-entity - Extends the entity API to provide a unified way to deal with entities Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sdod...@sdodson.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- SPEC : http://sdodson.fedorapeople.org/drupal7-entity.spec SRPM : http://sdodson.fedorapeople.org/drupal7-entity-1.0-0.1.beta10.fc15.noarch.rpm Description: This module extends the entity API of Drupal core in order to provide a unified way to deal with entities and their properties. Additionally, it provides an entity CRUD controller, which helps simplifying the creation of new entity types. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 744948] Review Request: ubuntu-mono-icon-theme - Ubuntu Mono icon theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=744948 --- Comment #7 from Mohamed El Morabity 2011-10-11 19:45:35 EDT --- Spec URL: http://melmorabity.fedorapeople.org/packages/mono-icon-theme/mono-icon-theme.spec SRPM URL: http://melmorabity.fedorapeople.org/packages/mono-icon-theme/mono-icon-theme-0.0.37-2.fc16.src.rpm I've also removed the dependency on fedora-logos and the Ubuntu logos substitution by the Fedora ones: - depending on fedora-logos is probably too strict for those who don't/can't have fedora-logos installed (cf generic-logos) - the theme inherits from gnome-icon-themes which provides its own distributor logos; by the way, the Fedora logo isn't visible on a GNOME 3 desktop session. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 744952] Review Request: light-theme-gnome - Light Themes (Ambiance and Radiance)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=744952 --- Comment #1 from Mohamed El Morabity 2011-10-11 19:48:38 EDT --- Fix the dependency on the Mono icons, since the corresponding package was renamed (see #744948): Spec URL: http://melmorabity.fedorapeople.org/packages/light-theme-gnome/light-theme-gnome.spec SRPM URL: http://melmorabity.fedorapeople.org/packages/light-theme-gnome/light-theme-gnome-0.1.8.25-2.fc16.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 744948] Review Request: ubuntu-mono-icon-theme - Ubuntu Mono icon theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=744948 --- Comment #8 from Mohamed El Morabity 2011-10-11 19:46:49 EDT --- (I forgot to mention that the package has been renamed to "mono-icon-theme"). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 713990] Review Request: bzr-fastimport - Bzr plugin for fast loading of data from other VCS tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=713990 --- Comment #12 from Dan Callaghan 2011-10-11 19:40:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) Updated: http://fedorapeople.org/~dcallagh/bzr-fastimport/bzr-fastimport.spec http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/dcallagh/bzr-fastimport/fedora-15/SRPMS/bzr-fastimport-0.11.0-2.fc15.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745216] Review Request: lwp - C library for user-mode threading
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745216
--- Comment #4 from Michael Schwendt 2011-10-11 19:25:11
EDT ---
You could add
Source1: http://www.coda.cs.cmu.edu/pub/lwp/src/lwp-2.6.tar.gz.asc
> Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Requiring_Base_Package
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745296] New: Review Request: drupal7-context - Allows you to manage contextual conditions and reactions of your site
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: drupal7-context - Allows you to manage contextual conditions and reactions of your site https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745296 Summary: Review Request: drupal7-context - Allows you to manage contextual conditions and reactions of your site Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sdod...@sdodson.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- SPEC : http://sdodson.fedorapeople.org/drupal7-context.spec SRPM : http://sdodson.fedorapeople.org/drupal7-context-3.0-0.1.beta1.fc15.src.rpm Description: Context allows you to manage contextual conditions and reactions for different portions of your site. You can think of each context as representing a "section" of your site. For each context, you can choose the conditions that trigger this context to be active and choose different aspects of Drupal that should react to this active context. Think of conditions as a set of rules that are checked during page load to see what context is active. Any reactions that are associated with active contexts are then fired. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745295] New: Review Request: drupal7-chosen - Uses the Chosen jQuery plugin to make your elements more user-friendly
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: drupal7-chosen - Uses the Chosen jQuery plugin to make your elements more user-friendly https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745295 Summary: Review Request: drupal7-chosen - Uses the Chosen jQuery plugin to make your elements more user-friendly Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sdod...@sdodson.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- SPEC : http://sdodson.fedorapeople.org/drupal7-chosen.spec SRPM : http://sdodson.fedorapeople.org/drupal7-chosen-1.0-1.fc15.src.rpm Description : Chosen uses the Chosen jQuery plugin to make your elements more user-friendly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745293] New: review Request: drupal7-cck cck allows you to add custom fields to nodes using a web browser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: review Request: drupal7-cck cck allows you to add custom fields to nodes using a web browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745293 Summary: review Request: drupal7-cck cck allows you to add custom fields to nodes using a web browser Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sdod...@sdodson.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- SPEC : http://sdodson.fedorapeople.org/drupal7-cck.spec SRPM : http://sdodson.fedorapeople.org/drupal7-cck-2-0.1.dev.fc15.src.rpm Description : The Content Construction Kit allows you to add custom fields to nodes using a web browser. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 744944] Review Request: humanity-icon-theme - Humanity icon theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=744944 --- Comment #3 from Mohamed El Morabity 2011-10-11 19:04:50 EDT --- A few fixes: Spec URL: http://melmorabity.fedorapeople.org/packages/humanity-icon-theme/humanity-icon-theme.spec SRPM URL: http://melmorabity.fedorapeople.org/packages/humanity-icon-theme/humanity-icon-theme-0.5.3.11-2.fc16.src.rpm The package doesn't depend on fedora-logos anymore: - probably a too strict dependency for those who don't/can't have fedora-logos installed (cf generic-logos) - the theme inherits from gnome-icon-themes which provides its own distributor logos; by the way, the Fedora logo isn't visible on a GNOME 3 desktop session. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 687987] Review Request: plymouth-theme-hot-dog - Plymouth Happy Hot Dog Theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=687987 --- Comment #11 from Christoph Wickert 2011-10-11 18:55:24 EDT --- FYI: According to http://darkmattermatters.com/2011/10/11/the-origins-of-the-beefy-miracle beefy miracle was created by Kyle Hoyt. http://www.stationzero.org/kylehoyt/ David, can we continue with this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745291] New: Review Request: drupal7-active_tags - adds a taxonomy widget with a new jQuery enabled tag entry widget
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: drupal7-active_tags - adds a taxonomy widget with a new jQuery enabled tag entry widget https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745291 Summary: Review Request: drupal7-active_tags - adds a taxonomy widget with a new jQuery enabled tag entry widget Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sdod...@sdodson.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- SPEC : http://sdodson.fedorapeople.org/drupal7-active_tags.spec SRPM : http://sdodson.fedorapeople.org/drupal7-active_tags-2.0-0.1.dev.fc15.src.rpm Description : Active Tags is a pure JavaScript widget for changing how users enter taxonomy terms by piggy backing onto taxonomy modules, such as Taxonomy and/or Content Taxonomy. This keeps Active Tags simple and small. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 489803] Review Request: libserial - C++ library to access serial ports on POSIX systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489803 --- Comment #21 from Tim Niemueller 2011-10-11 18:34:07 EDT --- Poke the maintainer again... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 711893] Review Request: rubygem-dnsruby - Ruby DNS(SEC) implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711893 Paul Wouters changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 711893] Review Request: rubygem-dnsruby - Ruby DNS(SEC) implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711893 --- Comment #14 from Paul Wouters 2011-10-11 18:13:15 EDT --- I thought i had set it before, but it got eaten? I've set it again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 720857] Review Request: datalog - A Lightweight Deductive Database using Datalog
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720857 --- Comment #15 from Tim Niemueller 2011-10-11 18:08:22 EDT --- Hi John. Nice work on the package, a few minor things and we'll go for the review. Had a look at the package, here are some remarks and things that need to be fixed: - datalog IS the right name (Lua is an implementation detail, it is not a Lua module) - You need to create a -devel sub-package to package header and .so (no suffix) files (.so.0.0.0 stays in the main package). - write the full sourceforge URL (not sf.net) - remove the Packager field - Can you relax the build requirement? If there was a 5.1.5 it wouldn't build anymore, but that version would only have minor changes. If you feel that it is likely to need some work keep it as is. - define the luapkgdir at the top of the file - remove the newline between %description and the text -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 720857] Review Request: datalog - A Lightweight Deductive Database using Datalog
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720857 Tim Niemueller changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 744948] Review Request: ubuntu-mono-icon-theme - Ubuntu Mono icon theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=744948 --- Comment #6 from Mohamed El Morabity 2011-10-11 18:01:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > It is, but in those cases, it has nothing to do with the look or feel of > Google, and also, Google is not a Linux distribution. This is an area where we > need to be especially careful. Thanks for this clarification. I will submit very soon a « clean » package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 690025] Review Request: cminpack - Solver for nonlinear equations and nonlinear least squares problems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690025
Tim Niemueller changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from Tim Niemueller 2011-10-11 17:56:20 EDT
---
REVIEW:
Legend: + = PASSED, - = FAILED, 0 = Not Applicable
+ rpmlint is silent
+ The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
+ The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
+ The package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
+ The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the
Licensing Guidelines.
+ The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license (BSD).
+ The file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package, is included
in %doc.
+ The spec file is written in American English.
+ The spec file for the package is legible.
+ The sources used to build the package, match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
#sha256sum ~/Downloads/cminpack-1.1.3.tar.gz
eb319ad3eeb9e54076b2ac484058540dbd5db4a45928302a5fd1469aad5d4467
#sha256sum SOURCES/cminpack-1.1.3.tar.gz
eb319ad3eeb9e54076b2ac484058540dbd5db4a45928302a5fd1469aad5d4467
+ The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
primary architecture.
+ All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires.
0 No need to handle locales.
+ Main package calls ldconfig in %post/%postun
+ The package does NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
+ The package is not designed to be relocatable.
+ The package owns all directories that it creates.
+ The package does not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files
listings.
+ Permissions on files are set properly.
+ The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
+ The package consistently uses macros.
+ The package contains code, or permissible content.
+ No extremely large documentation files.
+ Anything, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the
application.
+ Header files are in -devel package
0 Static libraries are in -static package
+ pkg-config files are in -devel package
+ .so (no suffix) are in -devel package
+ -devel package requires base package, -static package requires -devel package
+ The package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives.
0 Not a GUI application.
+ The package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages
+ At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
+ All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8.
Excellent package, using it for months now (sorry for the really long delay),
no flaws in the spec and packaging.
APPROVED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 744948] Review Request: ubuntu-mono-icon-theme - Ubuntu Mono icon theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=744948 --- Comment #5 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2011-10-11 17:59:00 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #2) > > * It must be renamed to not use the Ubuntu or Canonical trademarks. > I was rethinking about this point. What about all the google-* packages in the > repos? Isn't Google a TM? It is, but in those cases, it has nothing to do with the look or feel of Google, and also, Google is not a Linux distribution. This is an area where we need to be especially careful. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 744948] Review Request: ubuntu-mono-icon-theme - Ubuntu Mono icon theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=744948 --- Comment #4 from Mohamed El Morabity 2011-10-11 17:29:33 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > * It must be renamed to not use the Ubuntu or Canonical trademarks. I was rethinking about this point. What about all the google-* packages in the repos? Isn't Google a TM? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 717337] Review Request: URCU - Userspace RCU Implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=717337 --- Comment #10 from Yannick Brosseau 2011-10-11 17:16:34 EDT --- Here is the updated version following your comments. Including the new release. http://www.dorsal.polymtl.ca/~ybrosseau/fedora/SPECS/liburcu.spec http://www.dorsal.polymtl.ca/~ybrosseau/fedora/SRPMS/liburcu-0.6.5-1.fc15.src.rpm The exits call are still present, but they should be fixed in the next upstream release. I've decided to put back the sed to fix the rpath as they seems less risky. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 744948] Review Request: ubuntu-mono-icon-theme - Ubuntu Mono icon theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=744948 --- Comment #3 from Mohamed El Morabity 2011-10-11 17:15:06 EDT --- Thanks Tom for your advice. I'm thinking about renaming the package simply « mono-icon-theme ». I haven't found icon themes (especially on GNOME/KDE Look) with such a name, I hope it's OK like this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 702143] Review Request: wallaby - configuration service for Condor pools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702143 --- Comment #8 from Will Benton 2011-10-11 16:39:34 EDT --- Tom, thanks again for the review. I've posted an updated package here: http://packages.getwallaby.com/wallaby-0.11.0-3.fc14.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745219] Review Request: rvm - C library for unstructured recoverable virtual memory
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745219 Kashyap Chamarthy changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Kashyap Chamarthy 2011-10-11 16:02:19 EDT --- Flipped the review flag to + -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 742996] Review Request: libpwquality - A library for password generation and password quality checking
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742996 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla 2011-10-11 15:40:06 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 744433] Review Request: libquvi - A cross-platform library for parsing flash media stream
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=744433 --- Comment #2 from Nicoleau Fabien 2011-10-11 15:24:34 EDT --- Update : Spec URL: http://rpms.nicoleau-fabien.net/SPECS/libquvi.spec SRPM URL: http://rpms.nicoleau-fabien.net/SRPMS/libquvi-0.4.0-3.fc15.src.rpm Changelog : - Fix builrequires rpmlint output : [builder@FEDORABOX rpmbuild]$ rpmlint /home/builder/rpmbuild/SRPMS/libquvi-0.4.0-3.fc15.src.rpm /home/builder/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/libquvi-0.4.0-3.fc15.x86_64.rpm /home/builder/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/libquvi-devel-0.4.0-3.fc15.x86_64.rpm /home/builder/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/libquvi-debuginfo-0.4.0-3.fc15.x86_64.rpm libquvi.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libquvi-scripts 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 739416] Review Request: php-php-gettext - Gettext emulation in PHP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739416 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|php-php-gettext-1.0.11-3.el |php-php-gettext-1.0.11-3.el |6 |5 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2011-10-11 15:27:01 EDT --- php-php-gettext-1.0.11-3.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 693761] Review Request: php-Kohana - The Swift PHP Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693761 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|php-Kohana-2.4-1.rc2.fc15 |php-Kohana-2.4-1.rc2.el6 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2011-10-11 15:26:39 EDT --- php-Kohana-2.4-1.rc2.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683127] Review Request: tpm-quote-tools - TPM-based attestation using the TPM quote operation (tools)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683127 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|tpm-quote-tools-1.0.1-1.fc1 |tpm-quote-tools-1.0.1-1.el6 |5 | --- Comment #46 from Fedora Update System 2011-10-11 15:27:20 EDT --- tpm-quote-tools-1.0.1-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 739416] Review Request: php-php-gettext - Gettext emulation in PHP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739416 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|php-php-gettext-1.0.11-3.fc |php-php-gettext-1.0.11-3.el |14 |6 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2011-10-11 15:26:15 EDT --- php-php-gettext-1.0.11-3.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 744430] Review Request: libquvi-scripts - Embedded lua scripts that libquvi uses for parsing the media details
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=744430 --- Comment #6 from Nicoleau Fabien 2011-10-11 15:22:47 EDT --- Update : Spec URL: http://rpms.nicoleau-fabien.net/SPECS/libquvi-scripts.spec SRPM URL: http://rpms.nicoleau-fabien.net/SRPMS/libquvi-scripts-0.4.0-3.fc15.src.rpm Changelog : - Remove the devel subpackage - The package is now noarch rpmlint output : [builder@FEDORABOX rpmbuild]$ rpmlint /home/builder/rpmbuild/SRPMS/libquvi-scripts-0.4.0-3.fc15.src.rpm /home/builder/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/libquvi-scripts-0.4.0-3.fc15.noarch.rpm libquvi-scripts.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) lua -> la, luau, lea libquvi-scripts.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US lua -> la, luau, lea libquvi-scripts.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/pkgconfig/libquvi-scripts.pc 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 742996] Review Request: libpwquality - A library for password generation and password quality checking
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742996 Tomas Mraz changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Tomas Mraz 2011-10-11 15:18:49 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: libpwquality Short Description: A library for password generation and password quality checking Owners: tmraz Branches: f16 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745219] Review Request: rvm - C library for unstructured recoverable virtual memory
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745219
Kashyap Chamarthy changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kcham...@redhat.com
--- Comment #1 from Kashyap Chamarthy 2011-10-11 15:03:45
EDT ---
rpmlint was very clean.
===
build@~/rpmbuild/SOURCES -> rpmlint ../SPECS/rvm.spec
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
build@~/rpmbuild/SOURCES ->
===
here is my review:
OK - %{?dist} tag is used in release
OK - The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
OK - The spec file name must match the base package %{name}
OK - The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines
OK - The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and
meet the Licensing Guidelines (license is LGPLv2)
NA - Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files must
call ldconfig in %post and %postun
OK - The package MUST successfully compile and build
koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3423707
OK - The spec file must be written in American English.
OK - The spec file for the package MUST be legible
OK - The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
build@~/rpmbuild/SOURCES -> gpg rvm-1.17.tar.gz.asc
gpg: Signature made Wed 24 Mar 2010 12:08:17 AM IST using DSA key ID 997007A2
gpg: Good signature from "Jan Harkes "
gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner.
Primary key fingerprint: 477F 78AA 863A 90A6 2366 4AA1 CE0D 7E10 9970 07A2
OK - A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's
%files listings
OK - Permissions on files must be set properly
OK - Each package must have a %clean section
OK - Each package must consistently use macros
OK - The package must contain code, or permissible content
OK - Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage -- No large
documentation
OK - If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of
the application
OK - Header files must be in a -devel package -- no devel package
NA - Static libraries must be in a -static package -- no static package
NA - Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'
OK - Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives
OK - No file conflicts with other packages and no general names.
OK - All file names in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8
OK - The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a
duplicate.
I didn't install and try the (successful)scratch build of rvm(and it's sub
pkgs) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3423708 as there are
some missing deps (lwp and lwp devel) -- the other two pkgs you needed. I see
they're submitted for 'Package Change Request'
Looks good. [I hope I didn't miss anything, I don't perform reviews as often].
This package is Approved.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 742996] Review Request: libpwquality - A library for password generation and password quality checking
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742996 Miloslav Trmač changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Miloslav Trmač 2011-10-11 14:50:22 EDT --- Thanks, accepted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 742560] Review Request: perl-CatalystX-SimpleLogin - Provide a simple Login controller which can be reused
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742560
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||mari...@freenet.de
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mari...@freenet.de
Flag||fedora-review+
Bug 742560 depends on bug 742552, which changed state.
Bug 742552 Summary: Review Request: perl-CatalystX-InjectComponent - Inject
components into your Catalyst application
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742552
What|Old Value |New Value
Resolution||ERRATA
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Bug 742560 depends on bug 742542, which changed state.
Bug 742542 Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-ActionRole-ACL - User
role-based authorization action class
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742542
What|Old Value |New Value
Resolution||ERRATA
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Bug 742560 depends on bug 742545, which changed state.
Bug 742545 Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-RelatedClassRoles - Apply roles
to a class related to yours
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742545
What|Old Value |New Value
Resolution||ERRATA
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
--- Comment #2 from Mario Blättermann 2011-10-11 14:49:27
EDT ---
$ rpmlint -i -v *perl-CatalystX-SimpleLogin.noarch: I: checking
perl-CatalystX-SimpleLogin.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US
login -> loin, logic, lo gin
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
perl-CatalystX-SimpleLogin.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US
logout -> lo gout, lo-gout, log out
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
perl-CatalystX-SimpleLogin.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US
adition -> addition, audition, edition
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
perl-CatalystX-SimpleLogin.noarch: I: checking-url
http://search.cpan.org/dist/CatalystX-SimpleLogin/ (timeout 10 seconds)
perl-CatalystX-SimpleLogin.src: I: checking
perl-CatalystX-SimpleLogin.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US login
-> loin, logic, lo gin
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
perl-CatalystX-SimpleLogin.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US logout
-> lo gout, lo-gout, log out
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
perl-CatalystX-SimpleLogin.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US adition
-> addition, audition, edition
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
perl-CatalystX-SimpleLogin.src: I: checking-url
http://search.cpan.org/dist/CatalystX-SimpleLogin/ (timeout 10 seconds)
perl-CatalystX-SimpleLogin.src: I: checking-url
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/B/BO/BOBTFISH/CatalystX-SimpleLogin-0.15.tar.gz
(timeout 10 seconds)
perl-CatalystX-SimpleLogin.spec: I: checking-url
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/B/BO/BOBTFISH/CatalystX-SimpleLogin-0.15.tar.gz
(timeout 10 seconds)
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings.
False positive spelling errors mostly, the one which could be tweaked is
"adition".
-
key:
[+] OK
[.] OK, not applicable
[X] needs work
-
[+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}.
[+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license.
GPL+ or Artistic
[+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
[.] MUST: The file containing the text of the license(s) for the package must
be included in %doc.
[+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source.
$ md5sum *
1ed6869bb214f012c8594f8096d528f4 CatalystX-SimpleLogin-0.15.tar.gz
1ed6869bb214f012c8594f8096d528f4
CatalystX-SimpleLogin-0.15.tar.gz.packaged
[+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on
at least one primary arc
[Bug 742557] Review Request: perl-CatalystX-Profile - Profile your Catalyst application with Devel::NYTProf
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742557
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||mari...@freenet.de
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mari...@freenet.de
Flag||fedora-review+
Bug 742557 depends on bug 742552, which changed state.
Bug 742552 Summary: Review Request: perl-CatalystX-InjectComponent - Inject
components into your Catalyst application
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742552
What|Old Value |New Value
Resolution||ERRATA
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
--- Comment #2 from Mario Blättermann 2011-10-11 14:32:45
EDT ---
$ rpmlint -i -v *perl-CatalystX-Profile.noarch: I: checking
perl-CatalystX-Profile.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) NYTProf ->
Profanity
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
perl-CatalystX-Profile.noarch: I: checking-url
http://search.cpan.org/dist/CatalystX-Profile/ (timeout 10 seconds)
perl-CatalystX-Profile.src: I: checking
perl-CatalystX-Profile.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) NYTProf ->
Profanity
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
perl-CatalystX-Profile.src: I: checking-url
http://search.cpan.org/dist/CatalystX-Profile/ (timeout 10 seconds)
perl-CatalystX-Profile.src: I: checking-url
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/J/JJ/JJNAPIORK/CatalystX-Profile-0.02.tar.gz
(timeout 10 seconds)
perl-CatalystX-Profile.spec: I: checking-url
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/J/JJ/JJNAPIORK/CatalystX-Profile-0.02.tar.gz
(timeout 10 seconds)
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
Some ignoreable spelling errors.
-
key:
[+] OK
[.] OK, not applicable
[X] needs work
-
[+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}.
[+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license.
GPL+ or Artistic
[+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
[+] MUST: The file containing the text of the license(s) for the package must
be included in %doc.
[+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source.
$ md5sum *
708ab56ebf8707c1668b1a48f3518c2f CatalystX-Profile-0.02.tar.gz
708ab56ebf8707c1668b1a48f3518c2f CatalystX-Profile-0.02.tar.gz.packaged
[+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on
at least one primary architecture.
- Succesful Koji build available.
[.] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, ...
[+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires.
[.] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly.
[.] MUST: If a package installs files below %{_datadir}/icons, the icon cache
must be updated.
[.] MUST: Packages storing shared library files (not just symlinks) must call
ldconfig in %post and %postun.
[.] MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
[.] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, ...
[+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates.
[+] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in %files.
[+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly.
[+] MUST: Packages must not provide RPM dependency information when that
information is not global in nature, or are otherwise handled.
[.] MUST: When filtering automatically generated RPM dependency information,
the filtering system implemented by Fedora must be used.
[+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros.
[+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
[.] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage.
[+] MUST: Files in %doc must not affect the runtime of the application.
[.] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package.
[.] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package.
[.] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g.
libfoo.so.1.1), ...
[.] MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned
dependency.
[.] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives.
[.] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop
file
[.] MUST: .desktop files must be properly installed with d
[Bug 745218] Review Request: rpc2 - C library for remote procedure calls over UDP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745218 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla 2011-10-11 14:27:45 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). Unretired, please take ownership. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745216] Review Request: lwp - C library for user-mode threading
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745216 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla 2011-10-11 14:24:57 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). Unretired, also, please take ownership in pkgdb. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 742555] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-DBIC - Store your sessions via DBIx::Class
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742555
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||mari...@freenet.de
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mari...@freenet.de
Flag||fedora-review+
Bug 742555 depends on bug 742548, which changed state.
Bug 742548 Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-Delegate
- Delegate session storage to an application model object
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742548
What|Old Value |New Value
Resolution||ERRATA
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
--- Comment #2 from Mario Blättermann 2011-10-11 14:23:54
EDT ---
$ rpmlint -i -v *perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-DBIC.noarch: I: checking
perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-DBIC.noarch: I: checking-url
http://search.cpan.org/dist/Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-DBIC/ (timeout 10
seconds)
perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-DBIC.src: I: checking
perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-DBIC.src: I: checking-url
http://search.cpan.org/dist/Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-DBIC/ (timeout 10
seconds)
perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-DBIC.src: I: checking-url
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/F/FL/FLORA/Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-DBIC-0.12.tar.gz
(timeout 10 seconds)
perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-DBIC.spec: I: checking-url
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/F/FL/FLORA/Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-DBIC-0.12.tar.gz
(timeout 10 seconds)
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
No issues.
-
key:
[+] OK
[.] OK, not applicable
[X] needs work
-
[+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}.
[+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license.
GPL+ or Artistic
[+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
[.] MUST: The file containing the text of the license(s) for the package must
be included in %doc.
[+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source.
$ md5sum *
ae13f2cbae763eef1bbad7abcd4f618d
Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-DBIC-0.12.tar.gz
ae13f2cbae763eef1bbad7abcd4f618d
Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-DBIC-0.12.tar.gz.packaged
[+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on
at least one primary architecture.
- Succesful Koji build available.
[.] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, ...
[+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires.
[.] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly.
[.] MUST: If a package installs files below %{_datadir}/icons, the icon cache
must be updated.
[.] MUST: Packages storing shared library files (not just symlinks) must call
ldconfig in %post and %postun.
[.] MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
[.] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, ...
[+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates.
[+] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in %files.
[+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly.
[+] MUST: Packages must not provide RPM dependency information when that
information is not global in nature, or are otherwise handled.
[.] MUST: When filtering automatically generated RPM dependency information,
the filtering system implemented by Fedora must be used.
[+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros.
[+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
[.] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage.
[+] MUST: Files in %doc must not affect the runtime of the application.
[.] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package.
[.] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package.
[.] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g.
libfoo.so.1.1), ...
[.] MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned
dependency.
[.] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives.
[.] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop
file
[.] MUST: .desktop files must be properly installed with desktop-file-install
in the %install section.
[+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned b
[Bug 745233] New: Review Request: python-logger - A logging replacement for Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-logger - A logging replacement for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745233 Summary: Review Request: python-logger - A logging replacement for Python Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: l...@jcomserv.net QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Logbook is a logging system for Python that replaces the standard library’s logging module. It was designed with both complex and simple applications and mind and the idea to make logging fun. What makes it fun? What about getting log messages on your phone or desktop notification system? Logbook can do that. SPEC: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/python-logbook/python-logbook.spec SRPM: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/python-logbook/python-logbook-0.3-1.fc15.src.rpm Needed for the newest pida. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745233] Review Request: python-logger - A logging replacement for Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745233 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||651853 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 742556] Review Request: perl-Carp-REPL - Read-eval-print-loop on die and/or warn
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742556
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||mari...@freenet.de
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mari...@freenet.de
Flag||fedora-review+
Bug 742556 depends on bug 742550, which changed state.
Bug 742550 Summary: Review Request: perl-Devel-StackTrace-WithLexicals -
Generate stack traces with lexical variables
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742550
What|Old Value |New Value
Resolution||ERRATA
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
--- Comment #2 from Mario Blättermann 2011-10-11 14:15:09
EDT ---
$ rpmlint -i -v *
perl-Carp-REPL.noarch: I: checking
perl-Carp-REPL.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) eval -> veal, vela, val
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
perl-Carp-REPL.noarch: I: checking-url http://search.cpan.org/dist/Carp-REPL/
(timeout 10 seconds)
perl-Carp-REPL.src: I: checking
perl-Carp-REPL.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) eval -> veal, vela, val
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
perl-Carp-REPL.src: I: checking-url http://search.cpan.org/dist/Carp-REPL/
(timeout 10 seconds)
perl-Carp-REPL.src: I: checking-url
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/S/SA/SARTAK/Carp-REPL-0.15.tar.gz (timeout 10
seconds)
perl-Carp-REPL.spec: I: checking-url
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/S/SA/SARTAK/Carp-REPL-0.15.tar.gz (timeout 10
seconds)
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
Besides some ignoreable spelling errors, no issues.
-
key:
[+] OK
[.] OK, not applicable
[X] needs work
-
[+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}.
[+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license.
GPL+ or Artistic
[+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
[.] MUST: The file containing the text of the license(s) for the package must
be included in %doc.
[+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source.
$ md5sum *
89b98f874cb3d0b4ede1363dcb3baa1e Carp-REPL-0.15.tar.gz
89b98f874cb3d0b4ede1363dcb3baa1e Carp-REPL-0.15.tar.gz.packaged
[+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on
at least one primary architecture.
- Succesful Koji build available.
[.] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, ...
[+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires.
[.] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly.
[.] MUST: If a package installs files below %{_datadir}/icons, the icon cache
must be updated.
[.] MUST: Packages storing shared library files (not just symlinks) must call
ldconfig in %post and %postun.
[.] MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
[.] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, ...
[+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates.
[+] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in %files.
[+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly.
[+] MUST: Packages must not provide RPM dependency information when that
information is not global in nature, or are otherwise handled.
[.] MUST: When filtering automatically generated RPM dependency information,
the filtering system implemented by Fedora must be used.
[+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros.
[+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
[.] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage.
[+] MUST: Files in %doc must not affect the runtime of the application.
[.] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package.
[.] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package.
[.] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g.
libfoo.so.1.1), ...
[.] MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned
dependency.
[.] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives.
[.] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop
file
[.] MUST: .desktop files must be properly installed with desktop-file-install
in the %install section.
[+] MUST: Packages must not own files or direct
[Bug 702209] Review Request: apache-commons-vfs2 - Provides a single API for accessing various different file systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702209 --- Comment #6 from Orion Poplawski 2011-10-11 14:15:51 EDT --- Whoops, forgot to rename the spec. Should be there now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 702209] Review Request: apache-commons-vfs2 - Provides a single API for accessing various different file systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702209 --- Comment #5 from Spike 2011-10-11 14:11:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/apache-commons-vfs2.spec The link to the updated specfile is dead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 744224] Review Request: perl-XML-SAX-Base - Base class SAX Drivers and Filters
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=744224
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #8 from Mario Blättermann 2011-10-11 14:06:00
EDT ---
Koji scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3423507
$ rpmlint -i -v *perl-XML-SAX-Base.src: I: checking
perl-XML-SAX-Base.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US behaviour ->
behavior
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
perl-XML-SAX-Base.src: I: checking-url
http://search.cpan.org/dist/XML-SAX-Base/ (timeout 10 seconds)
perl-XML-SAX-Base.src: I: checking-url
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/G/GR/GRANTM/XML-SAX-Base-1.08.tar.gz (timeout 10
seconds)
perl-XML-SAX-Base.noarch: I: checking
perl-XML-SAX-Base.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US behaviour ->
behavior
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
perl-XML-SAX-Base.noarch: I: checking-url
http://search.cpan.org/dist/XML-SAX-Base/ (timeout 10 seconds)
perl-XML-SAX-Base.spec: I: checking-url
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/G/GR/GRANTM/XML-SAX-Base-1.08.tar.gz (timeout 10
seconds)
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
Besides the spelling errors, no issues.
-
key:
[+] OK
[.] OK, not applicable
[X] needs work
-
[+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}.
[+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license.
GPL+ or Artistic
[+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
[.] MUST: The file containing the text of the license(s) for the package must
be included in %doc.
[+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source.
$ md5sum *
38c8c3247dfd080712596118d70dbe32 XML-SAX-Base-1.08.tar.gz
38c8c3247dfd080712596118d70dbe32 XML-SAX-Base-1.08.tar.gz.packaged
[+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on
at least one primary architecture.
- Succesful Koji build available.
[.] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, ...
[+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires.
[.] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly.
[.] MUST: If a package installs files below %{_datadir}/icons, the icon cache
must be updated.
[.] MUST: Packages storing shared library files (not just symlinks) must call
ldconfig in %post and %postun.
[.] MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
[.] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, ...
[+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates.
[+] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in %files.
[+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly.
[+] MUST: Packages must not provide RPM dependency information when that
information is not global in nature, or are otherwise handled.
[.] MUST: When filtering automatically generated RPM dependency information,
the filtering system implemented by Fedora must be used.
[+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros.
[+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
[.] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage.
[+] MUST: Files in %doc must not affect the runtime of the application.
[.] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package.
[.] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package.
[.] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g.
libfoo.so.1.1), ...
[.] MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned
dependency.
[.] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives.
[.] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop
file
[.] MUST: .desktop files must be properly installed with desktop-file-install
in the %install section.
[+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
[+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
[.] SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a
separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream...
[+] SHOULD: Timestamps of files should be preserved.
[+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
See Koji build above (which uses mock anyway)
[+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described.
I assume the packager has tested it. Don't know how
[Bug 745218] Review Request: rpc2 - C library for remote procedure calls over UDP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745218 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2011-10-11 14:07:34 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: rpc2 New Branches: f16 Owners: spot InitialCC: This package is being revived. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 702209] Review Request: apache-commons-vfs2 - Provides a single API for accessing various different file systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702209 Orion Poplawski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |apache-commons-vfs -|apache-commons-vfs2 - |Provides a single API for |Provides a single API for |accessing various different |accessing various different |file systems|file systems --- Comment #4 from Orion Poplawski 2011-10-11 14:00:02 EDT --- http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/apache-commons-vfs2.spec http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/apache-commons-vfs2-2.0-1.fc15.src.rpm * Tue Oct 11 2011 Orion Poplawski 2.0-1 - Update to 2.0 - Cleanup requires * Fri Jun 3 2011 Orion Poplawski 1.0-3 - Add license to javadoc package FYI - commons-compress is needed for the build, but I removed it from Requires. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745218] Review Request: rpc2 - C library for remote procedure calls over UDP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745218
Pierre-YvesChibon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Flag||fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2011-10-11 14:01:49
EDT ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
[x] : MUST - Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[x] : MUST - Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[x] : MUST - Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=...
doesn't work.
[x] : MUST - Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[!] : MUST - Rpmlint output is silent.
rpc2-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary rp2gen
rpc2.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/librpc2.so.5.4.5
exit@GLIBC_2.2.5
rpc2.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libse.so.5.4.5
exit@GLIBC_2.2.5
(none): E: no installed packages by name Wrote:
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.
[x] : MUST - Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
/home/pierrey/tmp/reviewhelper/745218/rpc2-2.10.tar.gz :
MD5SUM this package : 545066e67d95325840a79d163098096b
MD5SUM upstream package : 545066e67d95325840a79d163098096b
[x] : MUST - Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[-] : MUST - %config files are marked noreplace or the reason is justified.
[-] : MUST - Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop using
desktop-file-install file if it is a GUI application.
[-] : MUST - The spec file handles locales properly.
[-] : MUST - No %config files under /usr.
[x] : MUST - Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x] : MUST - ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[x] : MUST - Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x] : MUST - Package does not contains kernel modules.
[x] : MUST - Package contains no static executables.
[x] : MUST - Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
[x] : MUST - Package is not relocatable.
[x] : MUST - Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] : MUST - Static libraries in -static subpackage, if present.
[x] : MUST - Package has adequate build section.
[x] : MUST - Package contains the mandatory BuildRequires.
[x] : MUST - Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at
least one supported architecture.
[x] : MUST - Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and
meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x] : MUST - %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x] : MUST - All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x] : MUST - Package contains no bundled libraries.
[x] : MUST - Changelog in prescribed format.
[x] : MUST - Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x] : MUST - Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x] : MUST - Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x] : MUST - Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x] : MUST - Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x] : MUST - Permissions on files are set properly.
[x] : MUST - Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[-] : MUST - Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[x] : MUST - If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %doc.
[x] : MUST - License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x] : MUST - License file installed when any subpackage combination is
installed.
[x] : MUST - Package consistently uses macros. instead of hard-coded directory
names.
[x] : MUST - Package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
[x] : MUST - Package does not generates any conflict.
[x] : MUST - Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x] : MUST - Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x] : MUST - Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x] : MUST - Package installs properly.
[x] : MUST - Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x] : MUST - Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-] : MUST - Package contains a SysV-style init script if in need of one.
[x] : MUST - File names are valid UTF-8.
[x] : MUST - Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x] : SHOULD - Dist tag is present.
[x] : SHOULD - SourceX / PatchY prefixed with %{name}.
[x] : SHOULD - SourceX is a working URL.
[x] : SHOULD - Spec use %global instead of %define.
[-]
[Bug 745216] Review Request: lwp - C library for user-mode threading
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745216 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2011-10-11 13:45:48 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: lwp New Branches: f16 Owners: spot InitialCC: This package is being revived. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745216] Review Request: lwp - C library for user-mode threading
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745216 Stephen Gallagher changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Stephen Gallagher 2011-10-11 13:43:36 EDT --- RPMlint: lwp.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/liblwp.so.2.0.9 exit@GLIBC_2.2.5 lwp-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation This package looks fine to me. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745218] Review Request: rpc2 - C library for remote procedure calls over UDP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745218 Pierre-YvesChibon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pin...@pingoured.fr AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|pin...@pingoured.fr -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745216] Review Request: lwp - C library for user-mode threading
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745216 Stephen Gallagher changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sgall...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|sgall...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 695022] Review Request: pygtkhelpers - assists the building of PyGTK applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=695022 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added CC||l...@jcomserv.net --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla 2011-10-11 12:58:20 EDT --- Any update? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745219] New: Review Request: rvm - C library for unstructured recoverable virtual memory
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rvm - C library for unstructured recoverable virtual memory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745219 Summary: Review Request: rvm - C library for unstructured recoverable virtual memory Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcall...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://spot.fedorapeople.org/rvm.spec SRPM URL: http://spot.fedorapeople.org/rvm-1.17-4.fc15.src.rpm Description: The RVM persistent recoverable memory library. The RVM library is used by the Coda distributed filesystem. NOTE: This package was previously in Fedora and was retired due to FTBFS, but it builds fine these days. It depends on lwp to build, hence, no koji rawhide scratch build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745218] New: Review Request: rpc2 - C library for remote procedure calls over UDP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rpc2 - C library for remote procedure calls over UDP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745218 Summary: Review Request: rpc2 - C library for remote procedure calls over UDP Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcall...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://spot.fedorapeople.org/rpc2.spec SRPM URL: http://spot.fedorapeople.org/rpc2-2.10-3.fc15.src.rpm Description: The RPC2 library, a C library for remote procedure calls over UDP. NOTE: This package was previously in Fedora and was retired due to FTBFS, but it builds fine these days. It depends on lwp to build, hence, no koji rawhide scratch build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745218] Review Request: rpc2 - C library for remote procedure calls over UDP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745218 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||745216 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745216] Review Request: lwp - C library for user-mode threading
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745216 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||745218 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745219] Review Request: rvm - C library for unstructured recoverable virtual memory
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745219 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||745216 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745216] Review Request: lwp - C library for user-mode threading
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745216 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||745219 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745216] New: Review Request: lwp - C library for user-mode threading
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: lwp - C library for user-mode threading https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745216 Summary: Review Request: lwp - C library for user-mode threading Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcall...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://spot.fedorapeople.org/lwp.spec SRPM URL: http://spot.fedorapeople.org/lwp-2.6-3.fc15.src.rpm Koji Rawhide Scratch Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3423378 Description: The LWP user-space threads library. The LWP threads library is used by the Coda distributed file-system, RVM (a persistent VM library), and RPC2/SFTP (remote procedure call library). NOTE: This package was previously in Fedora and was retired due to FTBFS, but it builds fine these days. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
